PJ#050, THROUGH DARKNESS INTO LIGHT

[wave]

PJ 50

CHAPTER 11

REC #1 HATONN

WED., JUNE 10, 1992 7:21 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 299

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 1992

MEDITATION

As we move on to write of "messengers", let it be' remembered that always there have been the messengers sent. As far back in your books of instructions, even unto Isaiah (who was a mes­senger) there have been signs of that which would come and messengers to tell truth that man might know that which to seek for protection and journey into the "unknown".
Always too, the instructions have been to turn from your errors so that you would be worthy of acceptance into the places of the ones come to bring you into safety. See Matthew 3 and Isaiah 42:19. How can you recognize the messengers and signs, yea, even miracles, if you know not for what to look?
Most of all you must respect life--all life-for you were sent as stewards and you have forgotten.
One of the most important of Creation's Natural laws is that all life is equal. That's a fact which must be acknowledged before man can expect to find balance and growth in any enlightened community. You have to respect life--all life, not just your own. The key word is "respect". Unless you respect the earth, you destroy it. Unless you respect all life as much as your own life, you become a destroyer, a murderer. Know too, that there is great difference in "respect" and "worship". Respect gives retention of control and power unto the giver--worship gives all control and power unto the worshipped. Respon­sibility is the "key "--all must respect ALL if "self" is to flourish in wisdom among the higher brotherhood of human.

***

GENESIS' MESSENGERS

Ah, you expected me to speak of "people" who were sent as messengers? People are most unstable and forgetful, chelas-­-God nor Creation would entrust the signs and messages of un­changeable magnitude into the hands of humans. In higher wis­dom HE will always send messengers which cannot be cajoled, bribed or tampered with.

HALLEY'S COMET, ETC.

Of what am I speaking? Example: In 1986 Mankind was given (evolved in proper sequence) a once-in-a-lifetime event: the ap­pearance of a messenger from the past, a Messenger of Genesis. It was a comet which had been spoken of since Genesis. How­ever, in your latter accounting you decided to label it Halley's Comet. But I remind you--a rose by any other name is but a rose!
Halley's Comet is unique in many ways as it differs from the many comets and other small objects that roam the heavens. Among the differences is the fact that its recorded appearances have been traced to millennia past, as well as the fact that mod­em science was able, in 1986, to conduct for the first time a comprehensive, close-up examination of a comet and its core--or so it was claimed. The first fact underscores the excellence of ancient astronomy; because of the second, data was obtained that once again corroborated ancient knowledge and the tales of Genesis.
In 1720 Edmund Halley became British Astronomer Royal. He had postulated that the comet he observed in 1682 (and which came to bear his name) was a periodic one, the same that had been observed in 1531 and 1607. There was a chain of scien­tific developments which led to this--during the years 1695-1705. This involved the promulgation of the laws of gravita­tion and celestial motion by Sir Isaac Newton and Newton's consulting with Halley about his findings. By the way, it would seem worthy to again remind you that Esu (Jesus) Emmanuel was NOT born on December 25 but Isaac Newton WAS. Per­haps that would be a most worthy celebration and stop quarrels over Jesus and stars of David and candlesticks.
Until this time in point the theory regarding comets was that they crossed the heavens in straight lines, appearing at one end of the skies and disappearing in the other direction, never to be seen again. BUT, based on Newtonian laws, Halley concluded that the curve expressed by comets is elliptical, eventually bringing these celestial bodies back to where they had been ob­served before. The "three" comets of 1531, 1607, and 1682 were unusual in that they were all orbiting in the "wrong" di­rection--clockwise rather than counterclockwise; had similar de­viations from the general orbital plane of the planets around the Sun--being inclined about 17-18 degrees--and were similar in appearance. Concluding they were one and the same comet, he plotted its course and calculated its period (the length of time between its appearances) to be about seventy-six years. He then predicted that it would reappear in 1758. He did not live long enough to see his prediction come true, but he was honored by having the comet named after him.

SUN ENLIVENS COMETS

Like that of all celestial bodies, and especially because of a comet's small size, its orbit is easily perturbed by gravitational pull of the planets it passes. This is especially true of Jupiter's effect. Each time a comet nears the Sun, its frozen material comes to life; the comet develops a head and a very long tail and begins to lose some of its material as it turns to gas and vapor. This is an assumption based upon the best information which can be gleaned on your place. It is close enough to serve the pur­poses herein. All these phenomena affect the comet's orbit; therefore, although more precise measurements have somewhat narrowed the orbital range of Halley's comet from the seventy­-four to seventy-nine years that he had calculated, the period of seventy-six years is only a practical average; the actual orbit and its period must be recalculated each time the comet makes an appearance.
With the aid of equipment now available to you, an average of six or so comets are reported each year; of them, one or two are comets on return trips, while others are newly discovered. This does NOT mean they are not on return trips--only that they had not been discovered. Most of the recognized "returning" comets are short-period ones, the shortest known being that of Encke' s comet, which nears the Sun and then re­turns to a region slightly beyond the asteroid belt (I will mo­mentarily speak about that asteroid belt in relationship to what is coming down TODAY on your planet) in a period of a little more than three years. Most short-period comets average an orbital period of about seven years, which carries them to the environs of Jupiter. Typical of them is comet Giacobini-Zinner (named, like other comets, after its discoverers), which has a period of 6-1/2 years; its latest passage within Earth's view was in 1985. On the other hand there are very-long-period comets like comet Kohoutek, which was discovered in March 1973, was fully visible in December 1973 and January 1974, and then dis­appeared from view, perhaps to return in 75,000 years. By comparison, the cycle of 76 years for Halley's Comet is short enough to remain in living memories, yet long enough to retain its magic as a once-in-a-lifetime celestial event.
When Halley's comet appeared on its next-to-last passage around the Sun, in 1910, its course and aspects had been well mapped out in advance. Still, the Great Comet of 1910, as it was called, was awaited with great apprehension. There was fear that Earth or life on it would not survive the anticipated passage because Earth would be enveloped in the comet's tail of poisonous gases. There was also alarm at the prospect that, as was believed in earlier times, the appearance of the comet would be an ill omen of pestilence, wars, and death of kings. As the comet reached its greatest magnitude and brilliance in May of 1910, its tail stretching over more than half the vault of heaven, King Edward VII of Great Britain died. On the European conti­nent, a series of political upheavals culminated in the outbreak of World War I in 1914. You see, the politicians already knew how to utilize your "mystical aspects" to their own cause.
The belief, or superstition, associating Halley's Comet with wars and upheavals was fed by much that was coming to light about events that coincided with its previous appearances. The Seminole Indians' revolt against the white settlers of Florida in 1835, the Great Lisbon Earthquake of 1755, the outbreak of the Thirty Years War in 1618, the Turkish siege of Belgrade in 1456, the outbreak of the Black Death (bubonic plague) in 1347--all were accompanied or preceded by the appearance of a great comet, which was finally recognized as Halley's Comet, thus establishing its role as the messenger of God's wrath.

NOSTRADAMUS--SEPTEMBER, NOT MAY

How interesting to note that still it is efforted to attach Nos­tradamus' projections onto Hailey's Comet--when it is totally obvious that it cannot be Halley's Comet of which he spoke. If I were you I would look a bit further to that "BIG" one and be­gin to pay more attention to "September" rather than May and back it off about 9 years.

ASTEROID BOMBARDMENT EXPECTED

I wish to herein refer to the asteroid belt as already expected to affect Earth and has the politicians running nuts in total fright. THEY KNOW YOU ARE APT TO BE HIT, AND POSSIBLY DESTROYED, by things from the "asteroid belt". This is what SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) is about, chelas.
Your President Reagan gave it away in a massive slip of the lip. He suggested that you had better team up with all your enemies AGAINST INVASION FROM SPACE. The massive amounts of money spent was for a comprehensive satellite system to hook up the globe to computer monitoring systems to nail every man, woman and child into the system--FOR THE BANKERS' ELITE.
The "STAR WARS" portion was to set up a defense system, not against Soviet missiles, but to hopefully be able to blast oncom­ing asteroids before they could reach Earth.

DISBELIEF?

So what else is new? You can't seem to believe most things I tell you until you get confirmation from some author or "inside reporter" on your terra-firma. So be it--you WILL get it, I promise you that much. Why don't you read the paper and watch the news? Even though you don't get any truth, the lies are sprinkled with truth if you know that for which to watch.
NASA continues to announce in the major news media and in scientific journals (which I doubt you-the-people access) that there is a probability of large meteors or asteroids striking the Earth with calamitous results. They have even suggested some possible dates of impact.
NASA has, further, stated that "It was a good thing that Ronald Reagan had the perception and foresight to build up the Strategic Defense Initiative--"Star Wars"--because now SDI can be used to destroy these asteroids before they strike the Earth." This is partially incorrect for SDI was NEVER in­tended to be an anti-missile defense system. If anything, it was intended to be an "asteroid defense system". (This according to your own "scientists"!) The telescopes that "were not launched" but retained in White Sands, are now launched and working just fine--they are covering possible asteroid invasion. This is just another ploy to NOT tell you what the governments are doing­ all of them in conjunction via their Elite coalitions and Security Councils in secret meetings with secret agendas hidden under things such as "National Security" and "Executive Privilege".
The "Communist Threat" and the "Soviet Nuclear Attack" as have been presented for your consumption, was a pretty sick joke on the people of the world. These were fabricated to keep you working hard and paying taxes to finance the "New World Order". The Soviet "War Machine" has been financed and sub­sidized by the American taxpayer since 1917 through such organizations as "The American International Corporation" on whose board of directors sat George Herbert Walker, the grandfather of George Herbert Walker Bush. This has been known for YEARS, chelas--ask Eustace Mullins--he wrote all about it in his book THE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.
I think you must become aware that, in addition to the major underground facilities in the United States which I presented to you, there are at least 50 new ones which I am reminded to mention to you.
One of the major ones I saved to speak about at a later date (and will still reserve for a bit longer) is one well known in San Luis Obispo County, California. It is the AT&T Pacific Long Lines Facility off a road recognized as Los Osos Valley Road. I only give this as identification for ones who would recognize the lo­cation. The we-the-people would NEVER be allowed entry for this one is a major "Elite" refuge and belongs to one of the most massive factions in your Global conspiracy. Since the touting is all toward "peace" and no more threat from the Soviets--it means that there is full expectation of massive asteroid blasts. This means that there must be heavy construction at depths deeper even than for atomic bomb protection.
Stop it Dharma, I do not tell you this to ruffle your feathers, chelas--I CAN EASILY DIVERT ANYTHING FROM YOUR LOCATION SO STOP THE "FRIGHT-NIGHT" RESPONSE.
By the way, this specific installation belongs to "The Gehlen Organization" and is called "Eagles Nest". This information is right out of California Specialized Training Institute files. By the way, call a law firm by the label of Sinsheimer, Schiebelhut, and Bagett in San Luis Obispo and maybe you can make your reservation--if you live in the area--for everyone should be pre­pared! Oh, by the way No.2: Judge William P. Clark and Mrs. Clark (Von Braun), are major VIP's in charge--you know, THE Clark that was behind the bombing fiasco of flight KAL 007! Chelas, you simply MUST get with this program!

HALLEY'S COMET DIVINELY ORDAINED?

Well, it doesn't matter, the coincidence of the comet's appear­ance in conjunction with major historic events seems to grow the more you go back in time, One of the most celebrated ap­pearances of a comet, definitely Halley's, is that of 1066, during the Battle of Hastings in which the Saxons, under King Harold, were defeated by William the Conqueror, The comet was de­picted on the famous Bayeux tapestry, which is thought to have been commissioned by Queen Matilda, wife of William the Conqueror, to illustrate his victory, The inscription next to the comet's tail, isti mirant stella, means, "They are in awe of the star," and refers to the depiction of King Harold tottering on his throne.
The year 66 A.D. is considered by astronomers to be one in which Halley's Comet made an appearance; they base conclu­sions on at least two Chinese observations. That was the year in which the Jews of Judea launched their Great Revolt against Rome. The Jewish historian Josephus (Wars of the Jews, Book VI) blamed the fall of Jerusalem and the destruction of its holy Temple on the misinterpretation by the Jews of the heavenly signs and preceded the revolt: "a star resembling a sword which stood over the city, a comet that continued a whole year".
Until recently the earliest certain record of the observation of a comet was found in the Chinese Chronological Tables of Shih­-chi for the year 467 B.C., in which the pertinent entry reads, "During the tenth year of Ch'in Li-kung a broom-star was seen." Some believe a Greek inscription refers to the same comet in that year. Modern astronomers are not sure that the 467 B.C. Shih-chi entry refers to Halley's Comet; they are more confident regarding a Shih-chi entry for the year 240 B.C.
In April 1985, F.R. Stephenson, K.K.C. Yau, and H. Hunger reported that a reexamination of Babylonian astronomical tablets that had been lying in the basement of the British Museum since their discovery in Mesopotamia more than a century ago, shows that the tablets recorded the appearance of extraordinary celes­tial bodies--probably comets, they said--in the years 164 B.C. and 87 B.C. The periodicity of seventy-seven years suggested to these scholars that the unusual celestial bodies were Halley's Comet.
Surely back in the year 164 B.C. and 87 B.C. these scholars who have been preoccupied with Halley's Comet could not have realized the significance in Jewish and Near Eastern history, of such events. It was the very year in which the Jews of Judea, under the leadership of the Maccabees, revolted against Greek­-Syrian domination, recaptured Jerusalem, and purified the de­filed Temple according to their traditions. The Temple rededi­cation ceremony is celebrated to this day by Jews as the festival of Hanukkah ("Rededication").
The 164 B.C. tablet number WA-41462 in the British Museum is clearly dated to the relevant year in the reign of the Seleucid (Greek-Syrian) king Antiochus Epiphanes, the very evil King Antiochus of the books of Maccabees. The unusual celestial object, which the three scholars believe was Halley's Comet, is reported to have been seen in the Babylonian month of Kislimu, which is the Jewish month Kislev and, indeed, the one in which Hanukkah is celebrated. Now, can't history be fun? Truth is so much more fun and interesting than silly mythology and fairy­tales.

CELESTIAL SWORD

This is the description often attached to Halley's Comet. In an­other instance, the comparison by Josephus of the Comet to a celestial sword, as it is also depicted in the Bayeux tapestry, has led some scholars to suggest that the Angel of the Lord that King David saw "standing between the earth and heaven, having a sword in his hand stretched out over Jerusalem" (I Chronicles 21: 16--for you inquiring minds) might have been in reality Hal­ley's Comet, sent by the Lord to punish the king for having conducted a prohibited census. The time of this incident, circa 1000 B.C., certainly coincides with one of the years in which Halley's Comet should have appeared.
In an article published in your year 1986 by Zecharia Sitchin, he pointed out that the Hebrew name for "comet" is Kokhave shavit a "Scepter star". This has a direct bearing on the biblical tale of the seer Bilam. When the Israelites ended their wanderings in the desert after the Exodus and began the conquest of Canaan, the Moabite king summoned Bilam to curse the Israelites. But Bilam, realizing that the Israelite advance was divinely or­dained, blessed them instead. He did so, he explained (Numbers 24:17), because he was shown a celestial vision:
I see it, though not now;
I behold, though it is not near:
A star of Jacob did course,
A scepter of Israel did arise.
Mr. Sitchin has provided you with a chronology that fixed the date of the "Exodus" at 1433 B.C.; the Israelite entry into Canaan began forty years later, in 1393 B.C. Halley's Comet, at an interval of 76 or 77 years, would have appeared circa 1390 B.C. Did Bilam consider that event as a divine signal that the Israelite (as they are NOW called) advance could not and should not be stopped? If, in biblical times, the comet called Halley's was considered the Scepter Star of "Israel" (israel--God's cho­sen), it could explain why the Jewish revolts of 164 B.C. and A.D. 66 were timed to coincide with the comet's appearances. [Or, could it have been OTHER more important coinci­dences? and not, after all, the "Sword Comet"!]

TIME OF VISITORS. SHIPS AND NEPHILIM

You will be wise in the remembering as we unfold this that THIS Nibiru passage between Jupiter and Mars once every 3,600 years causes great disruptions. When this "planet of God" begins to move close to Earth, the Nephilim begin to make the journey to your planet in increasing numbers. Thus you will find craft abounding, visitors abounding and guidance as well as practical assistance to God's chosen (i)sraelites abounding.
It is significant that in spite of the crushing defeat of the Judean revolt by the Romans in A.D. 66, the Jews took up arms again some seventy years later in a heroic effort to free Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple. The leader of that revolt, Shimeon Bar Kosiha, was renamed by the religious leaders Bar Kokhba, "Son of the Star", specifically because of the above-quoted verses in Numbers 24.
I want you to use your heads now and don't go bonkers with your calendars and calculators. There are OTHER cycling planets and orbiting heavenly bodies besides Nibiru which massively impact your globe. Also, as in the case of planets outgrown their ability to wisely cope with technology--time­tables are altered according to need of attention to a species upon such planets. Also, ones from the last encounter with Nibiru/Marduk left many Nephilim ON YOUR PLACE to prepare and provide for this very day of cycle changes which would be devastating. I suggest you not go back to sleep if your addition doesn't quite add up. You do not have good records on your place and other things from Cosmic aspect can be changed in the blink of an eye.
It is obvious that the revolt the Romans put down after some three years, in A.D. 135, was also intended as was the Mac­cabean one, to achieve the rededication of the Temple by the time of the return of Halley's Comet, in A.D. 142. The real­ization that you, in 1986, have seen and experienced the return of a majestic celestial body that had great historic impact in the past, should send a shudder down some spines.
However, the 1986 Halley's Comet visit didn't see a rebuilt Jerusalem--IN JERUSALEM, did it? What could that mean? It can mean several things--one. that the temple in point would be in the "New Jerusalem" which is in the Philippines--not yet risen into view. Further, that Halley's is NOT the comet in question. This can be plainly seen in the absence of the all-out "in-spite-of" thrust at rebuilding the so-called Jewish Temple in Jerusalem prior to that time. There is a whole heck of a lot of information KEPT FROM YOU-THE-PEOPLE!
How far back does this messenger called Halley's go? Accord­ing to the Sumerian creation epics, it goes all the way back to the time of the Celestial Battle. Halley's Comet and its like are truly the Messengers of Genesis and were known as such.

OUR SOLAR SYSTEM

The Solar System, astronomers and physicists believe, was formed out of a primordial cloud of gaseous matter; like every­thing else in the universe, it was in constant motion--circling about its galaxy (the Milky Way) and rotating around its own center of gravity. Slowly the cloud spread as it cooled; slowly the center became a star (our Sun) and the planets coalesced out of the rotating disc of gaseous matter. Thenceforth, the motion of all parts of the Solar System retained the original direction of the primordial cloud, anticlockwise. The planets orbit the sun in the same direction as did the original nebula; so do their satel­lites, or moons; so should also the debris that either did not co­alesce or that resulted from the disintegration of bodies such as comets and asteroids. Everything must keep going anticlock­wise. Everything must also remain within the plane of the original disk, which is called the Ecliptic.
Nibiru/Marduk did not conform to all that. Its orbit, as previ­ously reviewed, was retrograde--in the opposite direction, clockwise. Its effect on Pluto--which according to the Sumerian texts was GA.GA and was shifted by Nibiru to its present orbit, which is not within the ecliptic but inclined 17 degrees to it-­suggests that Nibiru itself followed an inclined path. Relative to the ecliptic it arrived from the southeast, from under the eclip­tic; formed an arc above the ecliptic, then plunged back below the ecliptic in its journey back to where it had come from.
Halley's Comet shows the same characteristics, students, and except for the fact that its orbit is so much smaller than that of Nibiru (currently about 76 years compared with Nibiru's 3,600 Earth-years), an illustration of Halley's orbit could give you a good idea of Nibiru's inclined and retrograde path. In fact, Halley's Comet could be accepted as a sort of miniature Nibiru. This orbital similarity is but one of the aspects that make this Comet, and others too, messengers from the past--not only the historic past, but all the way back to the beginning (Genesis).
Hatonn to stand by.

PJ 50

CHAPTER 12

REC #3 HATONN

WED., JUNE 10, 1992 10:21 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 299

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 1992

MORE ON MESSENGERS

Halley's Comet is not alone in having an orbit markedly inclined to the ecliptic (a feature measured as an angle of Declination) and a retrograde direction. Nonperiodic comets--comets whose paths form not ellipses but parabolas or even hyperbolas and whose orbits are so vast and whose limits are so far away they cannot even be calculated--have marked declinations, and about half of them move in a retrograde direction. Of about 600 peri­odic comets (which are now given the letter "P" in front of their name) that have been classified and catalogued, about 500 have orbital periods longer than 200 years; they all have declinations more akin to that of Hailey's than to the greater declinations of the nonperiodic comets, and more than half of them course in retrograde motion. Comets with medium orbital periods (between 200 and 20 years) and short periods (under 20 years) have a mean declination of 18 degrees, and some, like Halley's, have retained the retrograde motion in spite of the immense gravitational effects of Jupiter. It is noteworthy that of recently discovered comets, the one designated P/Hartley-IRAS (1983v) has an orbital period of 21 years, and its orbit is both retrograde and inclined to the ecliptic.
Where do comets come from, and what causes their odd orbits, of which the retrograde direction is the oddest in astronomers' eyes? In the 1820's the Marquis Pierre-Simon de Laplace be­lieved that comets were made of ice and that their glowing head ("coma") and tail that formed as they neared the Sun, were both made of vaporized ice. This concept was replaced after the dis­covery of the extent and nature of the asteroid belt, and theories developed that comets were "flying sandbanks"--pieces of rock that might be the remains of a disintegrated planet. The thinking changed again in the 1950's mainly because of two hypotheses: Fred L. Whipple (then of Harvard) suggested that comets were "dirty snowballs" of ice (mainly water ice) mixed with darker specks of sand-like material; and Jan Oort, a Dutch astronomer, proposed that long-period comets come from a vast reservoir halfway between the Sun and the nearer stars. Because comets appear from all directions (traveling prograde, or anticlockwise; retrograde; and at different declinations), the reservoir of comets--billions of them--is not a belt or ring like the asteroid belt or the rings of Saturn but a sphere that surrounds the Solar System. This "Oort Cloud", as the concept came to be named, settled at a mean distance, Oort calculated, of 100,000 astro­nomical units (AU) from the Sun, one AU being the average distance (93 million miles) of the Earth from the Sun. Well, perhaps God just keeps them lined up ready to fling off in the direction of planets needing discipline?

COMETS ARE "WILD CARDS"

Because of perturbations and intercometal collisions, some of the cometary horde may have come closer, to only 50,000 AU from the Sun (which is still ten thousand times the distance of Jupiter from the Sun). Passing stars occasionally perturb these comets and send them flying toward the Sun. Some, under the gravitational influence of the planets, mainly Jupiter, become medium-or short-period comets; some, especially influenced by the mass of Jupiter, are forced into reversing their course. This, briefly, is how the Oort Cloud concept is usually stated. This however, is not correct. Comets are the one starcraft "system" that can be totally controlled without consideration of any of those planetary restrictions. Until you can come into the real­ization of this fact you cannot realize the changes destined to oc­cur in your upcoming near future.
But let us continue to look at that which is recognized in scien­tific circles. Since the 1950's the number of observed comets has increased by more than 50 percent, and computer technol­ogy has made possible the projection backward of cometary mo­tions to determine their source. This is proof enough that science is fun of "it". How could comets have "increased" by more than 50 percent? What has changed?
One team at the Harvard-Smithsonian Observatory under Brian G. Marsden has shown that of 200 observed comets with periods of 250 years or more, no more than 10 percent could have en­tered the Solar System from outer space; 90 percent have always been bound to the Sun as the focus of their orbits. This is total hogwash--"garbage in--garbage out"! But then Whipple covered the assets a bit by saying, "If we are really seeing comets com­ing from the void, we should expect them to fly by much faster than just 0.8 kilometers per second," which they do not. In other words--you don't really know a confounded thing about it--FOR SURE!

OORT QUESTIONED

Now comes the next bug-in-the-boo: During the past few years, astronomers have questioned the simple view of Oort's Cloud--­some still believe that the cloud exists, but the new results de­mand that they reconsider its size and shape. What are YOU to believe? I suggest that you start by considering "possibilities" of facts unknown to you or your scientists and check out every messenger that is allowed to pass your way.
The interesting aspect of the "reconsideration" of the Oort Cloud notion is new data suggesting that comets, by and large, have always been part of the Solar System and not just outsiders occasionally thrust into it.
What makes this Oort worthy of note? Not his solution to the problem of parabolic and hyperbolic cometal orbits and not the theory he had developed regarding other aspects of orbits. What was important was his consideration that they were "thrust out to there" and not "born" there. You know, sort of "flung off" as with a slingshot.
So maybe he warms up a bit in his suggestion that "The main process now is the inverse one, that of a slow transfer of comets from a large cloud into short-period orbits. But at the epoch at which the minor planets (asteroids) were formed ... the trend must have been the opposite, many more objects being trans­ferred from the asteroid region to the comet cloud. It appears far more probable that instead of having originated in the far­away regions, comets were born among the planets. It is natural to think in the first place of a relation with the minor planets (asteroids). There are indications that the two classes of ob­jects"--comets and asteroids--belong to the same 'species'. "It seems reasonable to assume that the comets originated together with the minor planets." Summing up his study, Oort put it this way: "The existence of the huge cloud of comets finds a natural explanation if comets (and meteorites) are considered as minor planets escaped, at an early stage of the planetary system, from the ring of asteroids."
Does this not all begin to sound like the Enuma elish....?
The principle conclusion of these suppositions is that the comets originated in a sort-of breakup event in the inner solar system. In all probability, it is speculated from your groups of wiser thinkers, that it was the same event which gave rise to the aster­oid belt and which produced most of the meteors now being vi­sualized. Why? Well, they don't say so but would it not appear that the same "other" bodies would be cycling at about the same "time"?
It was speculated that it was less certain that the same "breakup event" may have also given birth to the satellites of Mars and the outer satellites of Jupiter, and it was then estimated that the "breakup event" occurred some five million or so years ago. There didn't seem to be doubt however, that the "breakup event" took place "in the asteroid belt". Physical, chemical, and dynamic properties of the resulting celestial bodies would indi­cate that a large planet did disintegrate where the asteroid belt is today located.
But what caused such a large planet to disintegrate? The most frequently asked questions about this scenario is how can a planet just blow up? Your people simply don't have any an­swers!
Ah but the Sumerians have one: the tale of Tiamat and Nibiru/Marduk, the Celestial Battle, the breakup of half of Tia­mat, the annihilation of its moon (except for "Kingu"), and the forcing of their remains into a retrograde orbit.

EARTH, JUPITER--BANG. BANG

As to the "destroyed-planet" theory there always comes a key criticism: the whereabouts of the planet's matter; when as­tronomers estimate the total mass of the known asteroids and comets it adds up to only a fraction of the estimated mass of the broken-up planet. This is especially true if one estimate of the planet with a mass ninety times that of Earth is used in the calculations--which must be. Such criticism has only had re­sponse that the missing mass was "probably swept up by Jupiter". This called for an increase in the mass of Jupiter by as much as 130 Earth-masses as a result of the capture of asteroids, including Jupiter's several retrograde moons. To allow for the discrepancy between the mass (ninety times that of Earth) of the broken-up planet and the accretion of 130 Earth-sized masses to Jupiter then Jupiter's mass can't hold true since other studies concluded that Jupiter's mass had decreased some time in its past, and there simply is a lack of mathematical "adding up".
Rather than to first inflate the size of Jupiter and then shrink it back, a better scenario might be to shrink the estimated size of the destroyed planet. That is what the Sumerian texts have put forth. IF Earth is the remaining half of Tiamat, then Tia­mat was roughly twice the size of Earth, not ninety times. Studies of the asteroid belt reveal not only capture by Jupiter but a dispersion of the asteroids from their assumed original site at about 2.8 AU to a zone so wide that it occupies the space be­tween 1.8 AU and 4 AU. Some asteroids are found between Jupiter and Saturn; a recently discovered one (2060 Chiron) is located between Saturn and Uranus at 13.6 AU. The smashup of the destroyed planet must have been, therefore, extremely forceful--as in a catastrophic collision!

HOW TO BACK IT UP?

What do you have to scientifically back this up? Not a bunch, but some. In addition to the voids between groups of asteroids, astronomers discern gaps within the clusters of asteroids. The latest theories seem to hold that there had been asteroids in the gaps but they were ejected, all the way to outer space except for those that may have been captured on the way by the gravita­tional forces of the outer planets; also, the asteroids that used to be in the "gaps" were probably destroyed by catastrophic colli­sions--at least that takes care of having to locate them, In the absence of valid explanations for such ejections and catastrophic collisions, the only plausible theory is that offered by the Sumerian texts, WHICH DESCRIBE THE ORBIT OF NIBIRU/MARDUK AS A VAST, ELLIPTICAL PATH THAT BRINGS IT PERIODICALLY (EVERY 3,600 EARTH YEARS [BY SOME CALCULATIONS]) BACK INTO THE AS­TEROID BELT. The conclusions drawn from the ancient texts were that Nibiru/Marduk passed by Tiamat on her outer, or Jupiter, side; repeated returns to that celestial zone can account for the size of the "gap" there. It is the periodic return of Nibiru/Marduk that causes the "ejecting" and "sweeping".
By the acknowledgement of the existence of Nibiru and its peri­odic return to the Place of the Battle, the puzzle of the "missing matter" also finds a solution. It also addresses the theories that place the accretions of mass by Jupiter at a relatively recent time (millions, not billions, of years ago), Depending on where Jupiter was at the times of Nibiru's perihelion, the accretions might have occurred during various passages of Nibiru and not necessarily as a one-and-only event at the time of the catas­trophic breakup of Tiamat. Indeed, spectrographic studies of asteroids reveal that some of them "were heated within the first few hundred million years after the origin of the solar system" by heat so intense as to melt them; "iron sank to their centers, forming strong stony-iron cores, while basaltic lavas floated to their surface, producing minor planets like Vesta", This ac­cording to McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Astronomy. The pro­jected time of the catastrophe is the very time indicated in other writings, some 500 million years after the formation of the Solar System--based on the Sumerian information.

WATER: A CRUCIAL ROLE

It IS improving, however, as recent scientific advances in as­tronomy and astrophysics go beyond corroborating the Sumerian cosmogony in regard to the celestial collision as the common origin of the comets and the asteroids, the site of the collision (where the remains of the asteroid belt still orbit), or even the time of the catastrophic event, some 4 billion years ago. They also corroborate the ancient texts in the vital matter of water.
The presence of water, the mingling of waters, the separation of waters--all somehow played an important role in the tale of Tiamat, Nibiru/Marduk, and the Celestial Battle and its after­math. Part of the puzzle was already answered when we showed that the ancient notion of the asteroid belt as a divider of the waters "above" and the water "below" is corroborated by modern science. But there was more to this preoccupation with water. Tiamat was described as a "watery monster", and the Mesopotamian texts speak of the handling of her waters by Nibiru/Marduk:
Half of her he stretched as a ceiling to be Sky,
As a bar at the Place of Crossing he posted it to guard;
Not to allow her waters to escape was its command.
The concept of an asteroid belt not only as a divider between the waters of the planets above and below it but also as a "guardian" of Tiamat' s own waters is echoed in the biblical verses of Gene­sis, where the explanation is given that the "Hammered-out bracelet" was also called Shama'im, the place "where the waters were". References to the waters where the Celestial Battle and the creation of the Earth and the Shama'im took place are fre­quent in the Old Testament, indicating millennia-old familiarity with Sumerian cosmogony even at the time of the Prophets and Judean kings. An example is found in Psalm 104, which depicts the Creator as the Lord
Who has stretched out the Shama'im as a curtain,
Who in the waters for His ascents put a ceiling.
These verses are almost a word-for-word copy of the verses in Enuma elish; in both instances, the placing of the asteroid belt "where the waters were" followed the earlier acts of the splitting up of Tiamat and having the invader's "wind" thrust the half that became Earth into a new orbit. The waters of Earth would ex­plain the whereabouts of some or most of Tiamat's waters. But what about the remains of her other part and of her satellites? If the asteroids and comets are those remains, should they not also contain water?

VARIED WATERY OCCURENCE

What would have been a preposterous suggestion when these objects were deemed "chunks of debris" and "flying sandbanks" has turned out, as the result of recent discoveries, to be not so preposterous: the asteroids are celestial objects in which water--­yes, water--is a major component.
Most asteroids belong to two classes as you can recognize them. About 15 percent belong to the S type, which have reddish sur­faces made up of silicates and metallic iron. About 75 percent are the C type: they are carbonaceous (containing carbon), and it is these that have been found to contain water. The water dis­covered in such asteroids through spectrographic studies is not in liquid form; since asteroids have no "atmospheres", any wa­ter on their surface would quickly dissipate. But the presence of water molecules in the surface materials indicates that the min­erals that make up the asteroid have captured water and com­bined with it. Direct confirmation of this finding was observed in August 1982, when a small asteroid that came too close to Earth plunged into the Earth's atmosphere and disintegrated; it was seen as "a rainbow with a long tail going across the sky". A rainbow appears when sunlight falls on a collection of water drops, such as rain, fog, or spray.
When the asteroid is more like what its name originally implied, "minor planet", actual water in liquid form could well be present. Examination of the infrared spectrum of the largest and first-to-be-discovered asteroid Ceres shows an extra dip in the spectral readings that is the result of free water rather than water bound to minerals. Since free water even on Ceres will quickly evaporate, the astronomers surmise that Ceres must have a con­stant source of water welling up from its interior.
The celestial body designated 2060 Chiron, interesting in many ways, also confirms the presence of water in the remnants of the Celestial Battle. When Charles Kowal of the Hale Obser­vatories on Mount Palomar, California, (where the Photon se­cret studies are going on), discovered it in November 1977, he was not certain what it was. He simply referred to it as a plan­etoid, named it temporarily "O-K" for "Object Kowal", and opined that it might be a wayward satellite of either Saturn or Uranus. Several weeks of follow-up studies revealed an orbit much more elliptical than that of planets or planetoids, one closer to that of comets. By 1981 the object was determined to be an asteroid, perhaps one of others to be found reaching as far out as Uranus, Neptune or beyond, and was given the designa­tion 2060 Chiron. However, by 1989, further observations by astronomers at Kitt Peak National Observatory (Arizona) de­tected an extended atmosphere of carbon dioxide and dust around Chiron, suggesting that it is more comet-like. The latest observations have also established that Chiron "is essentially a dirty snowball composed of water, dust and carbon-dioxide ice."
If Chiron proves to be more a comet than an asteroid, it will only serve as further evidence that both classes of these rem­nants of the Genesis event contain water.
When a comet is far away from the Sun, it appears as a dark and invisible object. As it nears the Sun, the Sun's radiation brings the comet's nucleus to life. It develops a gaseous head (the coma) and then a tail made up of gases and dust ejected by the nucleus as it heats up--or at least this is the way it appears and is thus accepted as good data. It is the observation of these assumed emissions that has by and largely confirmed views that comets are sometimes "dirty snowballs". Spectroscopic analysis of the emissions have shown the presence of the compound wa­ter.
The presence of water in comets has been definitely established in recent years through enhanced examination of arriving comets. Comet Kohoutek (1974) was studied not only from Earth but also with rockets, from orbiting manned spacecraft (Skylab) but more especially from Soviet craft. Subsequent cometary observations have confirmed these findings to great extent. However NONE of these studies, accomplished with a variety of instruments, match the intensity with which Halley's Comet was probed in 1986. The Halley findings established un­equivocally (at least for earth-scientists' comfort) that the comet was a watery celestial body.
This 1986 comet was met by many unmanned spacecraft; So­viet, Japanese and the European Space Agency all launched craft. This seemed to give some credence to the speculation that the Star of Bethlehem in the tale of the birth of Christ was, in­deed, the comet. NO, it was NOT. However, the flowing "tail" of the Star at Bethlehem indicated celestial "manipulation" of some sort.

WHY THESE SPECULATIONS?

Intensive observations began when Halley's Comet developed its coma and tail in November 1985. Developed its tail and coma???--this is worthy of thought for would it not ALWAYS have its coma and tail? Astronomers at the Kitt Peak Observa­tory tracking the comet with telescopes reported it was certain "that the comet's dominant constituent is water ice, and that much of the tenuous 360,000-mile-wide cloud surrounding it consisted of water vapor". Other claims were that "this was the first strong evidence that water ice was prevalent," and other equally ridiculous assumptions. This does not indicate anything of the such necessarily but those telescopic observations were augmented in January 1986 by infrared observations from high ­altitude aircraft, whereupon a team made up of NASA scientists and astronomers from several American universities announced "direct confirmation that water was a major constituent of Halley's comet". It was also then when it was discovered that there would be an inescapable passage into a Photon Belt accompa­nied by "different" waves of radiation and the increased hype upon hype about the so-called ozone depletion.
By January 1986, Halley's comet had developed an immense tail and a halo of hydrogen gas that measured 12.5 million miles across--fifteen times bigger than the diameter of the Sun. How could all this prediction of "development" have been speculated? Does a comet or heavenly cosmic body "develop" things just be­cause they come within your vision allowance? Why would the loss of water be increased as it neared perihelion on March 6th? It was noted that the comet was losing 12 tons of water per sec­ond. That water loss was speculated to increase enormously--­first to 30 tons a second and then on to 70 tons a second. Boy, you were saved from dissolution of the orb itself by an assur­ance of the scientists to the press that "even at this rate Halley's Comet had enough water ice to last thousands of more orbits." Whew, for a minute I thought the "messenger" might vanish.
I guess this is enough on Halley's Comet but the point of this was to assure you that as the Sumerian texts have told you--there was water everywhere on these "Messengers of Genesis"!
I would guess that what this actually tells you is that you really don't know very much of anything about "out-there" and "what is out there". For instance, let us look briefly at the

CELESTIAL SEEING-EYES

When the Anunnaki's Mission Earth reached its full comple­ment, there were six hundred of them on Earth, while three hundred remained in orbit, servicing the shuttle craft. The Sumerian term for the latter was IGI.GI, literally "Those who observe and see."
Archaeologist have found in Mesopotamia many objects they call "eye idols", as well as shrines dedicated to these "gods". Texts refer to devices used by the Anunnaki to "scan the Earth from end to end". These texts and depictions imply the use by the Anunnaki of Earth-orbiting, celestial "seeing eyes"--satellites that "observe and see". How interesting!
Would you believe, the coincidence is that some of the Earth­-scanning, and especially fixed-position communications satellites launched in your own modem times look very much like these millennia-old depictions. So, who might be deceiving who as regards historical facts about your origins and early travels? Why has not "religion" integrated the information? I think we ALL KNOW THAT ANSWER!
Hatonn to clear.

[wave]

PJ 50

CHAPTER 13

REC #1 HATONN

SAT., JUNE 13, 1992 7:01 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 302

SAT., JUNE 13, 1992

MEDITATION

I wonder how many of you realize that the "cup" and not the "cross" was the greatest symbol of Christendom?
Do you realize it was Peter and not Paul who kept the "Master's" work and word going? The Golden Sun Disc (Aton) was the symbol of eternal God.
The CUP was the beloved symbol let by the "Teacher" as reminders to His people. The cup in point is of "clay", Mark was asked, and did so, to bring to the Teacher a cup of simple clay for his last sup with His people--to remind them of humility and that it is the "fruit" and not the things of physical (silver cups) which is in point. The clay cup discovered within the Chalice of Antioch found later was not the original used by Esu.
Mark took the cup from where it rested and returned it to his mother, to whom it belonged--as second-best table equipment, Silver was the best and Mark's mother was a wealthy widow so the act was one of intent, not accident. The intent was to use that which was of "earth" substance of which all things are created. The Cup, itself, repre­sents spiritual truth or truth of faith.
Something strange happened to that cup, however. Mark noted that in the dimly lit room where the cups were placed--this one glowed. Therefore he took it to his room and put it away for safe keeping. He kept it for some fourteen years--showing it periodically as ones would gather.
The Cup became recognized as the Chalice of Antioch but this was not so. The cup was taken to Antioch by Barn­abas and Paul (who had by now worked his way within the group of friends). The Chalice was mode of silver and "contained" a cup of clay of the same size.
Peter carried with him the cup he had used himself at the Last Gathering. This he gave to Linus, the Greek artist who fashioned the magnificent chalice that held the humble clay cup. The clay cup was replaced by the silver cup of Peter.
The point is not very big but the concept is most important for I am asked about the "Places of the Lion" and you ones seem to know very little about that which I speak. The stories are all entangled with Linus, Solomon, Rahotep, , Akhnaton and Peter--who were all considered and identified in the underground circles as "Lions" and the "Lion-throne".
The point is that in the worship of "things" you are going to be most often misled. The Chalice of Antioch, for in­stance, is authentic in that it ONCE HELD the cup in point, but it no longer holds that Cup any more than the Glastonbury Chalice holds it! Therefore, ye who would worship and do reverence at the altars of decoration and ritual are very likely worshiping a replica--an idol of some sort, if you will.
THE THINGS OF GOD ARE WITHIN THE HEART AND THE SOUL IS THE "CUP" OF GOD OF ETER­NAL LIFE TO BE REFILLED UPON PETITION. AH, INDEED, ‘TIS THE CUP AND NOT THE CROSS UNTO WHICH YOU MUST TURN THAT YOUR CUP MIGHT BE FILLED TO OVERFLOW. One day perhaps we shall find the time to write of these wondrous traditions. This day, however, we shall move on with our story already underway.

****

Today we shall speak of Shan/Gaia--The Cleaved Planet--Earth.

BY ANY OTHER LABEL--SHAN/EARTH

Why do you suppose you call your planet "Earth"? Ah so-I thought not.
In German, for instance, it is called Erde, from Erda in Old High German; Jordh in Icelandic, Jorde in Danish. Erthe in Middle English, Airtha in Gothic; and going eastward geographically and backward in time, Ereds or Aratha in Ara­maic, Erd or Ertz in Kurdish, Eretz in Hebrew and so on. The sea you now call the Arabian Sea, the body of water that leads to the Persian Gulf, was called in antiquity the Sea of Erythrea; and to this day, ordu means an encampment or settlement in Persian. Why?

FIRST SETTLEMENT

Well, a lot happened in that part of the world and the answer lies in the Sumerian texts that relate the arrival of the first group of Anunnaki/Nefilim on Earth. There were fifty of them, under the leadership of E.A ("Whose Home is Water"), a great scien­tist and the Firstborn son of the ruler of Nibiru, ANU. They splashed down in the Arabian Sea and waded ashore to the edge of the marshlands that, after the climate warmed up a bit, be­came the Persian Gulf. Persia was that which is now recognized as "Iran". At the head of the marshlands they established their first settlement on a new planet; it was called by them E.RI.DU­--"Home in the faraway". Don't you think that is a nice appro­priate name?
And so it was that in time the whole settled planet came to be called after that first settlement--Erde, Erthe, Earth, etc. To this day, when you call your planet by its name, you invoke the memory of the first settlement on Earth; unknowingly, you re­member Eridu and honor the first group of Anunnaki who es­tablished it. Is history not getting to be fun?
The Sumerian scientific or technical term for Earth's globe and its firm surface was KI. It was depicted as a somewhat flattened orb crossed by vertical lines somewhat like modern depictions of meridians. Earth does indeed bulge somewhat at its equator and therefore the Sumerian representation is more correct scientifi­cally than the usual modem way of depicting Earth as a perfect globe....
After Ea had completed the establishment of the first five of the seven original settlements of the Anunnaki, he was given the ti­tle EN.KI, "Lord of Earth". But the term KI, as a root or verb, was applied to the planet called "Earth" for a reason. It conveyed the meaning "to cut off, to sever, to hollow out". Its derivatives illustrate the concept: KI.LA meant "excavation", KI.MAH "tomb", KI.IN.DAR "crevice, fissure". In Sumerian astronomical texts the term KI was prefixed with the determinative MUL ("celestial body"). And thus when they spoke of mul.KI, they conveyed the meaning, "the celestial body that had been cleaved apart". By calling Earth KI, the Sumerians thus invoked their cosmogony--the tale of the Celestial Battle and the cleaving of Tiamat.

LANGUAGE BRANCHES

Unaware of its origin you continue to apply this descriptive epi­thet to your planet to this very time in place. The intriguing fact is that over time the Sumeariana civilization was two thousand years old by the time Babylon arose and the pronunciation of the term KI (ki) changed to gi, or sometimes ge. It was so carried into the Akkadian and its linguistic branches (Babylonian, As­syrian, Hebrew), at all times retaining its geographic or topo­graphic connotation as a "cleavage", a ravine, a deep valley. Thus the biblical term that through Greek translations of the Bible is read Gehenna stems from the Hebrew Gai-Hinnom, the crevice-like narrow ravine outside Jerusalem named after Hinnom, where divine retribution shall befall the sinners via an erupting subterranean fire on Judgment Day.
If you were taught at all in school, you were taught that the component geo in all the scientific terms applied to Earth sci­ences--geo-graphy, geo-metry, geo-ology and so on-comes from the Greek word Gaia (or Gaea), their name for the god­dess of Earth. You were not taught, however, where the Greeks picked up this term or what its real meaning might have been. The answer is, guess what--surely enough--from the SUME­RIANS--KI or GI.
Scholars all agree that the Greek notions of primordial events and the gods were directly borrowed from the Near East, I through Asia Minor at whose western edge early Greek set­tlements like Troy were located, and via the island of Crete in the Eastern Mediterranean (nearby to Atlantis). According to Greek tradition, Zeus, who was the chief honcho god of the twelve Olympians, arrived on the Greek mainland via Crete, whence he had fled after abducting the beautiful Europa, daughter of the Phoenician king of Tyre. Aphrodite arrived from the Near East via the island of Cyprus. Poseidon, whom the Romans called Neptune, came on horseback via Asia Minor, and Athena brought the olive to Greece from the lands of the Bible. There can simply be no doubt that the Greek alphabet developed from a Near Eastern one. (Dharma, please see that the illustration I shall find for you is placed herein for it will give much confidence in this story.) [See next page]
There are many books which speak of these ancient times, not the least of which was the Iliad by one called Homer. This line of historical mythology or "tradition" was handed down as re­garded the creation of celestial gods--or visitors who came to stay, etc., of Heaven and Earth--out of Chaos. These tales, dear ones, are not greatly unlike your own biblical tales of the Beginning:

Verily, at the first Chaos came to be,

and the next the wide-bosomed Gaia--

she who created all the immortal ones

who hold the peaks of snowy Olympus:

Dim Tartarus, wide-pathed in the depths,

and Eros, fairest among the divine immortals ...

From Chaos came forth Erebus and black Nyx;

And of Nyx were born Aether and Hemera.

So what do we have here?
At this point in the process of the formation of the "divine im­mortals"--the celestial gods--"Heaven" does not yet exist, just as the Mesopotamian sources recounted. Accordingly, the "Gaia" of these verses is the equivalent of Tiamat, "she who bore them all" according the Enuma elish. Hesiod lists the celestial gods who followed "Chaos" and "Gaia" in three pairs, Tartarus and Eros, Erebus and Nyx, Aether and Hemera. The parallel with the creation of the three pairs in Sumerian cosmogony, nowa­days named Venus and Mars, Saturn and Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune, should be obvious though this comparability has gone quite unnoted.
Only after the creation of the principal planets that made up the Solar System when Nibiru appeared to invade it does the tale by Hesiod (DIVINE GENEALOGY)--exactly as in Mesopotamian and Biblical texts--speak of the creation of Ouranos, "Heaven". As explained in the Book of Genesis, this Shama'im was the Hammered-Out-Bracelet--the asteroid belt. As related in the Enuma elish, this was the half of Tiamat that was smashed to pieces, while the other, intact half became Earth. All this is echoed in the ensuing verses of Hesiod's Theogony:
And Gaia then bore starry Ouranos
--equal to herself--
to envelop her on every side,
to be an everlasting abode place/or the gods.
Is it beginning to seep through why the ONE WORLD ELITE would call themselves OLYMPIANS? (Committee of 300)

TIAMAT BECOMES GAIA

Now split up equally, Gaia ceased to be Tiamat. Severed from the smashed-up half that became the Firmament, everlasting abode to the asteroids and comets, the intact half which was thrust into another orbit became Gaia, the Earth. And so did this planet, first as Tiamat and then as Earth, live up to its epi­thets: Gaia, at, Ki--the Cleaved One.
How did this Cleaved Planet look now, in the aftermath of the Celestial Battle? It was now orbiting as Gaia/Earth. On one side there were the firm lands that had formed the crust of Tia­mat; on the other side there was a hollow, an immense cleft into which the waters of the erstwhile Tiamat poured. And again Hesiod put it nicely, Gaia (now the half equivalent to Heaven) on one side "brought forth long hills, graceful haunts of the goddess-Nymphs"; and on the other side "she bare Pontus, the fruitless deep with its raging swell".

SAME PICTURE AS GENESIS

This is the same picture painted by the Book: of Genesis:
And Elohim said,
"Let the waters under the heaven
be gathered together into one place,
and let the dry land appear. "
And it was so.
And Elohim called the dry land "Earth",
and the gathered-together water He called "Seas".
By this time the nice new Gaia was beginning to take shape.
Some three thousand years separated Hesiod from the time when the Sumerian civilization had blossomed out; and it is clear his­torically that throughout those millennia ancient peoples, in­cluding the authors or compilers of the Book: of Genesis, ac­cepted the Sumerian cosmogony. Today you call it "myth", "legend" or "religious beliefs"; in those previous millennia it was "science"--"knowledge", the Sumerians asserted, bestowed by the Anunnaki. No, I did not say Pleiadians--so don't get ahead of your own story.
According to ancient knowledge, Earth was NOT an original member of your Solar System. It was a cut-off "cleaved-off" half of a planet then called Tiamat, "she who bore them all". The Celestial Battle that led to the creation of Earth occurred several hundred million years after the Solar System with its planets had been created. Earth, as a part of Tiamat, retained much of the water that Tiamat, "the water monster", was recog­nized for. As Earth evolved into an independent planet and at­tained the shape of a globe dictated by the forces of gravity, the waters were gathered into the immense cavity on the torn-off side, and dry land appeared on the other side of the planet. Please go back and refer to ancient maps depicting changes in the planet's continental arrangements. This, therefore in sum­mary, is what the ancient peoples knew. What do your modern scientists say about this?

TODAY'S OUTLAY

The theories concerning planetary formation hold that they started as balls congealing from the gaseous disk extending from the Sun. As they cooled, heavier matter--iron, in Earth's case--­sank into their centers, forming a solid inner core. A less solid, plastic, or even fluid outer core surrounded the inner one; in Earth's case, it is believed to consist of molten iron. The two cores and their motions act as a dynamo, producing the planet's magnetic field. Surrounding the solid and fluid cores is a mantle made of rocks and minerals; on Earth it is estimated to be some 1,800 miles thick. While the fluidity and heat generated at the planet's core (some 12,000 degrees Fahrenheit in the Earth's center) affect the mantle and what is on top of it, it is the up­permost 400 miles or so of the mantle (on Earth) that mostly ac­count for what you see on the surface of the planet--its cooled crust. Of course the way it was actually formed--gave no hot crust to cool.
The processes that produce, over billions of years, a spherical orb--the uniform force of gravity and the planet's rotation around its axis--should also result in an orderly layering. The solid inner core, the flexible or fluid outer core, the thick lower mantle of silicates, the upper mantle of rocks, and the upper­most crust should encompass one another in ordered layers, like the skin of an onion. This holds true for the orb called Earth--­but only up to a point; the main abnormalities concern Earth's uppermost layer, the crust.

EVEN SCIENTISTS CAN MAKE IT ADD-UP

Since the extensive "probes' of the Moon and Mars in the 1960's and 70's, geophysicists have been greatly puzzled by the paucity of the Earth's crust. The crusts of the Moon and of Mars comprise 10 percent of their masses, but the Earth's crust comprises less than one half of one percent of the Earth's landmass. In 1988 geophysicists from Caltech and the University of Illinois at Urbana, led by Don Anderson, reported to the Ameri­can Geological Society meeting in Denver, Colorado, that they had found the "missing crust". By analyzing shock waves from earthquakes, they concluded that material that belongs in the crust has sunk down and lies some 250 miles below the Earth's surface. There is enough crustal material there, these scientists estimated, to increase the thickness of the Earth's crust tenfold. Even if such nonsense were a possibility it would have given Earth a crust comprising no more than about 4 percent of its land-mass--still only about half of what seems to be the norm if you are going to consider the Moon and Mars as the "norm". Half of the Earth's crust will still be missing even if the findings of this group could prove to be correct.
This theory also leaves unanswered the question of what force caused the crustal material, which is lighter than the mantle's material, to "dive"--in the words of the report in point--hundreds of miles into the Earth's interior. The team's suggestion was that the crustal material down there consists of "huge slabs of crust" that "dived into the Earth's interior" where fissures exist in the crust. But what force had broken up the crust into such "huge slabs"?

OOPS!! OTHER ABNORMALITIES

Another abnormality of the Earth's crust is that it is not uni­form. In the parts you call "continents", its thickness varies from about 12 miles to almost 45 miles; but in the parts taken up by the oceans the crust is only 3.5 to five miles thick. While the average elevation of the continents is about 2,300 feet, the aver­age depth of the oceans is more than 12,500 feet. The com­bined result of these factors is that the much thicker continental crust reaches much farther down into the mantle, whereas the oceanic crust is just a thin layer of solidified material and sedi­ments.
There are other differences between the Earth's crust where the continents are and where the oceans are. The composition of the continental crust, consisting in large part of rocks resembling granite, is relatively light in comparison with the composition of the mantle: the average continental density is 2.7-2.8 grams per cubic centimeter, while that of the mantle is 3.3 grams per cubic centimeter. The oceanic crust is heavier and denser than the continental crust, averaging a density of 3.0 to 3.1 grams per cubic centimeter; it is thus more akin to the mantle, with its composition of basaltic and other dense rocks, than to the conti­nental crust. It is noteworthy that the "missing crust" the scien­tific team mentioned above suggested had dived into the mantle is similar in composition to the oceanic crust, not to the conti­nental crust.
This leads to one more important difference between the Earth's continental and oceanic crusts. The continental part of the crust is not only lighter and thicker, it is also much older than the oceanic part of the crust. By the end of the 1970's the consen­sus among scientists was that the greater part of today's conti­nental surface was formed some 2.8 billion years ago. Evidence of a continental crust from that time that was about as thick as today's is found in all the continents in what geologists term Archean Shield areas; but within those areas, crustal rocks were discovered that turned out to be 3.8 billion years old. In 1983, however, geologists of the Australian National University found, in western Australia, rock remains of a continental crust whose age was established to be 4.1 to 4.2 billion years old. In 1989, tests with new, sophisticated methods on rock samples collected a few years earlier in northern Canada (by researchers from Washington University in St. Louis and from the Geological Survey of Canada) determined the rocks age to be 3.96 billion years; Samuel Bowering of Washington University reported evi­dence that nearby rocks in the area were as much as 4.1 billion years old.

EARTH'S AGE: FOUR BILLION +

Scientists are still hard put to explain the gap of about 500 mil­lion years between the age of the Earth (which meteor frag­ments, such as those found at Meteor Crater in Arizona, show to be 4.6 billion years and counting) and the age of the oldest rocks thus far found; but no matter what the explanation, the fact that Earth had its continental crust at least 4 billion years ago is by now undisputed. On the other hand, no part of the oceanic crust has been found to be more than 200 million years old.
Chelas, this is a tremendous difference! No amount of foolish speculation about rising and sinking continents, forming and vanishing seas can explain these things. Someone has compared the Earth's crust to the skin of an apple (you people really like apples), where the oceans are, the "skin" is fresh--relatively speaking, born yesterday--but, where the oceans began in pri­mordial times, the "skin , and a good part of the "apple" itself, has been shorn off.
The differences between the continental and oceanic crusts must have been even greater in earlier times, because the continental crust is constantly eroded by the forces of nature, and a good deal of the eroded solids are carried into the oceanic basins, in­creasing the thickness of the oceanic crust. Furthermore, the oceanic crust is constantly enhanced by the upwelling of molten basaltic rocks and silicates that flow up from the mantle through faults in the sea floor. This process, which puts down ever-new layers of oceanic crust, has been going on for 200 million years, giving the oceanic crust its present form. What was there at the bottom of the seas before then? Was there no crust at all, just a gaping "wound" in the Earth's surface? And is the ongoing oceanic crust formation akin to the process of blood clotting, where the skin is pierced and wounded?
Is Gaia--a living planet--trying to heal her wounds?
The most obvious place on the surface of the Earth where it was so "wounded" is the Pacific Ocean. Oh my goodness, could it be?
While the average plunge in the crust's surface in its oceanic parts is about 2.5 miles, in the Pacific the crust has been gouged out to a present depth reaching at some points 7 miles. If you could remove from the Pacific's floor the crust built up there over the last 200 million years, you would arrive at depths reaching 12 miles below the water's surface and between some 20 to nearly 60 miles below the continental surface. This is quite a large cavity, chelas!! How deep was it before the crustal buildup over the past 200 million years--how large was that "wound" 500 million years ago, a billion years ago, 4 billion years ago? Suffice it to say it was considerably deeper.
What can your scientists say with some certainty? That the ex­tent of the gouging was more extensive, affecting a vastly greater part of the planet's surface. The Pacific Ocean at pre­sent occupies about a third of Earth's surface; but as far as your people can ascertain regarding the past 200 million or so years, it has been shrinking. The reason for shrinkage is that the continents flanking it--the Americas on the east, Asia and Aus­tralia on the west--are moving closer to each other, squeezing out the Pacific slowly but relentlessly, reducing its size inch by inch yearly.

PLATE TECTONICS

These are the same "plates" which I continually tell you about in regards to the changes--specifically I refer mostly to the U.S. Pacific coastal area and "Ring of Fire"--i.e., the Pacific plate will smash under the western U.S. coast and raise the land of the Mojave Desert in the northern portions along with a BIG rise in the area of this location, Tehachapi--(Tejas Shape', Tehachati).
This science and explanations dealing with this process in point have come to be known as the Theory of Plate Tectonics. Its origin lies, as in the study of the Solar System, in the discarding of notions of a uniform, stable, permanent condition of the plan­ets in favor of the recognition of catastrophism, change, and even evolution--concerning not only flora and fauna but the globes on which they evolved as "living" entities that can grow and shrink, prosper and suffer, even be born and die.

HONOR TO ALFRED WEGENER

To Alfred Wegener do you owe appreciation for this "new" sci­ence of plate tectonics. Wegener, a German meteorologist, wrote all about this theory and published it a long time ago--in 1915, DIE ENTSTEHUNG DER KONTINENTE UND OZEANE. His starting point (not a new concept) was the obvi­ous "fit" between the contours of the continents on both sides of the southern Atlantic. But before Wegener's ideas, the solution had been to postulate the disappearance, by sinking, of conti­nents or land bridges: the belief that the continents have been where they are from time immemorial, but that a midsection sank below sea level, giving the appearance of continental sepa­ration. Augmenting available data on flora and fauna with con­siderable geological "matches" between the two sides of the At­lantic, Wegener came up with the notion of Pangaea, a super­-continent, a single huge landmass into Oceans took shape. But all these bodies of water were "pieces" of the original which he would fit all the present continental masses like pieces in a jigsaw puzzle. Pan­gaea (Living Pan), which covered about one half of the globe, suggested Wegener, was surrounded by the primeval Pacific Ocean. Floating in the midst of the waters like an ice floe, the single landmass underwent a series of riftings and healings until a definite and final breakup in the Mesozoic Era, the geological period that lasted from 225 to 65 million years ago. Gradually the pieces began to drift apart. Antarctica, Australia, India, and Africa began to break away and separate. Subsequently, Africa and South America split apart as North America began to move away from Europe and India was thrust toward Asia; and so the continents continued to drift until they rearranged themselves in the pattern recognized today.
The split-up of Pangaea into several separate continents was ac­companied by the opening up and closing down of bodies of water between the separating pieces of the landmass. In time the single Panoramic ocean separated into a series of connecting oceans or enclosed seas, such as the Black, Caspian and Mediterranean, and such major bodies of water as the Atlantic and the Indian of which the Pacific Ocean still remains.

IMPORTANCE OF THESE GEOLOGIC AREAS AS

RECOGNIZED AS PLACES OF THE LION

Simple surmising will indicate that of the "original" placements of "MAN" and the "lost" continents all indicate some important locations. Further, it must be evident that, geologically and historically, the upcoming catastrophic impact and "Armageddon" are suggested to be destined for the areas of the Holy Lands. What might this mean? It might very well mean that the expected impact of returning Tiamat might very well do the most impressive work on that particular "side" of your globe. It will mess up a lot of stuff everywhere but you can ex­pect a massive removal of real estate if that returning object is allowed to connect with your planet. From the direction of travel, already plotted by your scientists--it will pass on the op­posite side of the globe on this go-about.
If your planet is "sucked out" again you will have a real jumble of confusion.
Wegener's view of the continents as "pieces of a cracked ice floe" shifting atop an impermanent surface of the Earth was mostly received with disdain, even ridicule, by the geologists and paleontologists of the time--sound familiar? It took half a century for the idea of Continental Drift to be accepted into the halls of science. Is it possible that what we are assembling herein for you--MIGHT BE THE WAY IT IS? What helped bring about the changed attitude were surveys of the ocean floors begun in the 1960's that revealed such features as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge that, it was surmised, was formed by the rise of molten rock, called "magma", from the Earth's interior. Welling up, in the case of the Atlantic through a fissure in the ocean floor that runs almost the whole ocean's length, the magma cooled and formed a ridge of basaltic rock. Herein is Soltec's (Pleiadian: Commander Soltec: Geophysics) major subject of expertise which he has previously shared with you re­garding volcanos--I honor him but feel it necessary to press on with my own outlay of information. My subject is not basically geology or geography but the Creation and Spiritual connec­tions.
As one welling up followed another, the old sides of the ridge were pushed to either side to make way for the new magma flow. A major advance in these studies of the ocean floors took place with the aid of Seasat, an oceanographic satellite launched in June of 1978 that orbited the Earth for some three months or so; its data were used to map the sea floors, giving you an en­tirely new understanding of your oceans and globe as a whole, with their ridges, rifts, seamounts, underwater volcanos, and fracture zones. The discovery that, as each upwelling of magma cooled and solidified, it retained the magnetic direction of its position at that time was followed by the determination that a se­ries of such magnetic lines, almost parallel to one another, pro­vided a time scale as well as a directional map for the ongoing expansion of the ocean's floor. This expansion of the sea floor in the Atlantic was a major factor in pushing apart Africa and South America and in the creation of the Atlantic Ocean and it continuing widening.

OTHER FORCES INVOLVED

Other forces, such as the pull of the Moon, the Earth's rotation, and even movements of the underlying mantle, also are believed to act to split up the continental crust and shift the continents about. These forces also exert their influence, naturally, in the Pacific region. The Pacific Ocean revealed even more mid-o­cean ridges, fissures, underwater volcanos, and other features like those that have worked to expand the Atlantic Ocean. Why, then, as all the evidence shows, have the landmasses flanking the Pacific not moved apart, as the continents flanking the At­lantic have done, but rather keep moving closer, slowly but surely, constantly reducing the size of the Pacific Ocean?
The explanation is found in a companion theory of continental drift, the Theory of Plate Tectonics. The continents, it has been postulated, rest upon giant movable "plates" of the Earth's crust, and so do the oceans. When the continents drift, when oceans expand, as the Atlantic or contract as the Pacific, the underlying cause is the movement of the plates on which they ride. At present scientists recognize six major plates, some of which are further subdivided: the Pacific, American, Eurasian, African, Indo-Australian, and Antarctic.
The spreading seafloor of the Atlantic Ocean is still distancing the Americas from Europe and Africa, inch by inch. The con­comitant shrinking of the Pacific Ocean is now recognized to be accommodated by the dipping, or "subduction", of the Pacific plate under the American plate. This is the primary cause of the crustal shifts and earthquakes all along the Pacific rim, as well as the rise of the major mountain chains along that rim. The collision of the Indian plate with the Eurasian one created the Himalayas and fused the Indian subcontinent to Asia. In 1985, Cornell University scientists even discovered the "geological suture" where a portion of the western African plate remained attached to the American plate when the two broke apart some fifty million years ago, "donating" Florida and southern Georgia to North America.
Almost all scientists today accept Wegener's hypothesis of an Earth initially consisting of a single landmass surrounded by an all-embracing ocean. Could this be why the wondrous green­stone granite used in the Georgia Guidestone monument might have matched the green granite of the African planet in por­tions? Further, it becomes obvious that the granite-gneiss ter­rains are remnants of ancient oceans. Well, chelas, TODAY will BE "ancient" in 3.5 billion years! Extensive rock records in virtually all the continents indicate that they were contiguous to oceans of water for more than three billion years; in some places, such as Zimbabwe in southern Africa, sedimentary rocks show that they accreted within large bodies of water some 3.5 billion years ago. Recent advances in scientific dating have ex-tended the age of the Archean belts--those that include rocks that had been deposited in primeval oceans--back to 3.8 billion years. Well, give or take a billion or so years doesn't seem too important--but it is a LONG time. .

HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN GOING ON?

Forever! But what about this continental drift? Was there a Pangaea or Pan? Yes. The breakup seemed to have begun about 600 million years ago. Actually there were two "super" continents: Laurasia to the north and Gondwanaland to the south. But your scientists simply "don't know for sure" what happened or exactly "when". So be it.
The important thing to note herein is that your modern science confirms the scientific notions that were expressed in the an­cient Sumerian texts. Is it so difficult to also accept the ancient answer in this instance: that the waters covered the face of the Earth and--on the third "day", (phase)--were "gathered into" one side of the Earth to reveal the dry land. Was the uncovered dry land made up of isolated continents or one super-continent, a Pangaea? Although it matters not as far as the corroboration of ancient knowledge is concerned, it is interesting to note that Greek notions of Earth, although they led to a belief that Earth was disklike rather than a globe, envisioned it as a landmass with a solid foundation surrounded by waters. This notion must have been drawn on earlier and more accurate knowledge, as most of Greek science did. You will find that the Old Testa­ment repeatedly referred to the "foundations" of the Earth and expressed knowledge of the earlier times regarding the shape of Earth in the following verses praising the Creator:
The Lord's in the Earth and its entirety,
the world and all that dwells therein.
For He hath founded it upon the seas
and established it upon the waters.
(Psalms 24: 1-2)
In addition to the term Eretz which means both planet "Earth" and "earth, ground", the narrative in Genesis employs the term Yabashah--literally: "the dried-out land-mass"--·when it states that the waters "were gathered together into one place" to let the Yabashah appear. But throughout the Old Testament another term, Tebel, is frequently used to denote that part of Earth that is habitable, arable, and useful to Mankind, including being a source of various ores. The term Tebel--usually translated as either "the earth" or "the world"--is mostly employed to indicate the part of Earth distinct from its watery portions; the "foundations" of this Tebel were in juxtaposition to the sea basins. This was best expressed in the Song of David (2 Samuel 22: 16 and Psalms 18: 16:
The Lord thundered from the heavens.
the Most High his sounds uttered.
He loosed his arrows, sped them far and wide;
a shaft of lightning, and disconcerted them.
The channels of the seabed were revealed,
The foundation of Tebel were laid bare.
With what is known today about the "foundations of the Earth", the word Tebel clearly conveys the concept of continents whose foundations--tectonic plates--are laid in the midst of the waters. Is it not a thrill to discover the latest geophysical theories echoed in a 3,000-year-old-psalm?
'The Genesis narrative states clearly that the waters were "gathered together" to one side of the Earth so that the dry land could emerge; this implies the existence of a cavity into which the waters could be gathered. Such a cavity (cup), somewhat over half the Earth's surface, is still there, shrunken and re­duced, in the shape of the Pacific Ocean.
Why is the crustal evidence that can be found not older than about 4 billion years, rather than the 4.6 billion years that is the presumed age of the Earth and the Solar System? The first Con­ference on the Origins of Life, held in Princeton, New Jersey, in 1967, under the sponsorship of NASA and the Smithsonian Institution, dwelt at length on that problem. The only hypothesis the learned participants could come up with was that, at the time the oldest rock specimens that have been found were formed, Earth was subjected to a "cataclysm". In the discussion of the origins of Earth's atmosphere, the consensus was that it did not result from a "continuous outgassing" through volcanic activity but was, in the words of Raymond Siever of Harvard University, the result of "a rather early and rather large out­gassing episode ... a great big belch of the gases that are now characteristic of the Earth's atmosphere and sediments." This "big belch" was also dated to the same time as the assumed catastrophe recorded by the rocks. With this kind of "knowledge" it is no wonder you are in total political and edu­cational decay.
It becomes evident that--in its specifics--the breakup of the Earth's crust, the process of plate tectonics, the differences be­tween the continental and the oceanic crusts, the emergence of a pangaea from under the waters, the primordial encircling ocean­--the findings of modem science have simply corroborated the ancient knowledge. They have also led your own scientists from all disciplines to conclude that the only explanation of the way in which Earth's landmasses, oceans, and atmosphere have evolved is to assume a cataclysm occurring about four billion years ago--about half a billion years after the initial recognized formation of Earth as part of the Solar System.

WHAT WAS THE CATACLYSM?

Mankind has possessed the Sumerian answer for some six thou­sand or more years: the Celestial Battle between Nibiru/Marduk: and Tiamat.
In that Sumerian cosmogony, the members of the Solar System were depicted as celestial gods, male and female, whose cre­ation was compared to birth, whose existence was that of living creatures. In the Enuma elish text, Tiamat in particular was de­scribed as a female, a mother who gave birth to a host of eleven satellites, her "horde", led by Kingu "whom she elevated". As Nibiru/Marduk: and his horde neared her, "in fury Tiamat cried out aloud, her legs shook to their roots ... against her attacker she repeatedly cast a spell." When the "Lord spread his net to en­mesh her" and "the Evil Wind, which followed behind, he let loose in her face, Tiamat opened her mouth to consume it;" but then other "winds" of Nibiru/Marduk: "charged her belly" and "distended her body", Indeed, "go and cut off the life of Tia­mat" was the order given by the outer planets to the invader; be accomplished that by "cutting through her insides, splitting her heart .... Having thus subdued her, he extinguished her life."

PAGANISM?

For a very long time this view of the planets, and especially of Tiamat, as living entities that could be born and could die has been dismissed as primitive paganism--but the exploration of the planetary system in recent decades has surely, in fact, revealed worlds of which the word "alive" has been repeatedly used. That Earth itself is a living planet has been forcefully put forth as the Gaia Hypothesis by James E. Lovelock in the 1970's and great honor is due this man. It has again been reinforced by him in a new work called THE AGES OF GAIA: A BIOGRAPHY OF OUR LIVING EARTH. It is a hypothesis that views the Earth and the life that has evolved upon it as a single organism; Earth is not just an inanimate globe upon which there is life; it is a coherent if complex body that is itself alive through its mass and land surface, its oceans and atmosphere, and through the flora and fauna which its sustains and which in turn sustain Earth. "The largest living creature on Earth," Lovelock wrote, "is the Earth itself." And in that, he admitted, he was revisiting the ancient "concept of Mother Earth, or as the Greeks called her long ago, Gaia."
But, in fact, he had gone back to Sumerian times and to their ancient knowledge of the planet that was cleaved apart!
We shall next consider Witness to Genesis.
Thank you.
Hatonn to clear, please.

PJ 50

CHAPTER 14

REC #1 HATONN

MON., JUNE 15, 1992 7:55 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 304

MONDAY, JUNE 15, 1992

THOUGHT FOR TODAY

If you were to sell your character today, would you get full retail price, or would it go for a bargain ­basement price? How about wholesale?
It would seem most wise in view of your response to hold yourself responsible for a higher standard than anyone else expects of you and therefore there need never be excuses.
And--always remember the great man shows his greatness by the way he treats the little man. How do you treat your brother? Your enemy? Your neighbor? Your spouse? Your child? How GREAT are you?

NECESSARY REMINDERS OF THIS WORK

I must again take time to remind all readers and "spies" who would tear us down--EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE AND WHAT WE ARE ABOUT.
We had a "spy" sent to our meeting on Saturday. Mind you, our "meetings are simply because ones at work here and others who are visitors, come to share information, facts, express care and obviously--hate.
WE ARE NOT A GROUP AS IN "CHURCH". WE ARE NOT A CULT AS IN ANYTHING. WE ARE NOT EVEN IN THE PUBLISHING OR NEWSPAPER BUSINESS--AS GEORGE'S BANK ACCOUNT CAN SO EASILY ATTEST. WE HAVE A MISSION TO BRING YOU A COMPILATION OF INTEGRATED TRUTH FROM WHATEVER RESOURCE WE FIND AVAILABLE. WE WOULD WRITE NOTHING IF IT WERE THAT YOU ONES COULD KNOW WHAT WORK AND WHOSE WORK WHEREIN YOU COULD FIND THIS INFORMATION--AND GET IT! I HAVE NEVER OFFERED OTHER--IF YOU GET INFORMATION FROM ME RIGHT OFF THE PRESS OR NOT YET HAVING HAPPENED, I SHALL ALWAYS MAKE SURE IT HAS BEEN OFFERED SOMEWHERE! WE DO NOT PLACE OUR WORKERS OR SPEAKERS IN MORE JEOPARDY THAN ALREADY ABOUNDS ABOUT THEM. IF YOU CARE NOT FOR THIS "STYLE" OF SHARING--THEN IT IS YOUR PRIVILEGE TO THROW ALL THE INFORMATION IN THE TRASH--I WOULD SUGGEST, HOWEVER, THAT YOU CHECK MOST CAREFULLY LEST YOU BE THROWING YOUR SOUL AND TRANSITION INTO THE TRASH ALONG WITH GOD WHO SENDS THIS WORD.

IN OUR MIDST

Yes, George, one did come into the meeting on Saturday--but there are always some, either already among you or sent in to disrupt and destroy you. Fear not, for I attend them with a great deal of indigestion.
There are several things which need reminding to the public. (1) We share because you ask. Our "work" is a mission in which we are sent to fulfill the promise of higher source--to give you Truth so that you can KNOW enough, in Truth, to take proper actions and not constructed doctrines of groupies, to make wise choices relative to your spiritual divinity, origin and destination. That was the final promise of the Master Teacher when he departed your place and the promise made by your Creator for soul journey is the ONLY important one item in your existence.
(2) Our physical "work" is to gather information so that you can have confirmation of facts--given in such a way that if a writer is inconclusive or draws incorrect conclusions from other­wise quite accurate presentations--you can know and go forth and get the volumes for further research. I do not simply give information at the onset for ALMOST ALL will NOT go and get the writings in point. We are efforting to grow into such a stable size as to allow support for the publisher so that works unpublishable elsewhere CAN be printed and made available AND allow distribution of all such documents which are taken off the shelves elsewhere. If your books, authors, are NOT re­moved from shelves--get serious--you are not on the Truth, in whole, path. To actually "push" your books indicates that you are really a help to the deceivers in furthering deceit.
(3) Dharma has so many other things "to do" that she would petition to stop writing this moment and never speak FOR me again. We have our relationship stable and eternal. She cer­tainly doesn't need jibes and pokes, slings and rocks--SHE GETS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING SAVE HEADACHES AND TIRED BONES FROM HER LABOR--THAT, AND THE LOVING CARE OF THE HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS WHO DO APPRECIATE OUR WORK.
Now, George, you must face the truth, son: You have enemies about you--ones who alert the insiders and troublemakers the instant the rough drafts are shown. It is now having to await publishing in some instances--but the word goes forth on the computer network, the communications network and all the intelligence branches. YOU CAN HIDE YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND AS LONG AS YOU WISH--BUT YOU WILL ALSO CONTINUE TO HAVE PROBLEMS AS ON SATUR­DAY. THE PERSON IN POINT HAD TO HAVE BEEN ALERTED IN ADVANCE AND THE SUBJECT MATTER IS THAT WHICH IS IN POINT--SO THAT I COULD PROVE THE POINT HEREIN. YOU ARE ALSO FED ERRONEOUS INFORMATION IN ORDER TO "CATCH HATONN" AND DISCREDIT THE WORK.
It will be easier to keep separation after the final full shift of the Publishing Company to Nevada along with the Distribution Company. It has never been OTHER than separated but ones who read seem to connect the two because in the beginning there was no other way to contact me than through America West. There are many books in George's library of offerings with which he is more familiar than he is with mine. Desiree' has even insisted on publishing and distributing books on "meditation and ascension" with which I take full exception. This is their company and they may do exactly that which they wish with it.
George will continue to send us mail received by them and in­tended for the paper or information of confirmation by for­warding it. However, we welcome the opportunity to cut down on their massive load by asking you to write or send directly to my attention: Commander Hatonn, Box 6194, Tehachapi, CA 93582, Fax: 805 822-0972 Tel: 805 822-0601. We will be in daily contact, if not hourly.
The work which must be done in industry and business can be begun immediately in Nevada whereas, in this small corrupt lit­tle village, we must get through incredibly difficult planning committees and town councils which are completely bought and serve their monied masters. We (you) cannot wait.

ALL TRUTH WILL STAND

As to writings, we welcome any and all lawsuits. We very carefully chose to call our writings JOURNALS, instead of books, for the sharing of information as with magazines and news publications. In addition, the paper is a compilation of in­formation of correct input to the limits of human input to select through guidance. Yes indeed, I do write most all of the paper at this time but, as we expand, we fully intend to handle it much like the "Lyke Report" in that we will offer you all manners of information from various writers and publications. We have al­ready begun by giving you bits of Dr. Coleman's work, Eustace Mullins' work and I believe that George will be handling all of Mullins' work in the near future. We are publishing a series of the "Inslaw" material from the Napa Sentinel and have much in­formation from one R.R. who writes all about the San Luis Obispo connections and other "inside" truthful versions of things such as the Kennedy assassination, etc. This work is fully as correct and dangerous as any Committee of 300 divulgence for it deals with ones in your own government and specifically the most vile group of all, coming out of San Luis Obispo area. The author sent the work unsolicited with permission to use any and/or ALL for use in informing the public.
If a man wants to hold Truth for self and deny readers the input--check out the intent and KNOW that much of the work is invalid. WE WILL NEVER USE ANY BOOK OR WRITING WITHOUT THE EVALUATION OF CONTENT. FURTHER, TO RECOMMEND A WRITING DOES NOT MEAN WE AGREE WITH ALL PORTIONS OF THE WRITINGS--ONLY THAT WHICH IS PRESENTED AND THAT WHICH IS GIVEN WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO EVALUATE FOR SELF. VERY OFTEN A BOOK MAY BE ALMOST TOTALLY CORRECT AND THE CONCLUSION IS COMPLETELY INCORRECT, OR MOST OF THE PRESENTATION IS CORRECT WHILE PARTS ARE TOTALLY INVALID AS SEEN FROM HIGHER AND COMPREHENSIVE VIEW. WE HAVEN'T THE TIME OR SPACE TO ANALYZE EVERY SENTENCE FOR YOU--THAT IS WHAT YOUR MIND IS FOR. SO BE IT.

THE CURRENT WORK

Dealing with the "Divine Plan" causes us to need begin at the beginning. I choose to begin with those writings of the Sumeri­ans of Mesopotamia--WHO WERE CORRECT. Some have erred in the translations but I find one particular book which presents the perceptions better than others, even scholars with no other interest than in translations. This person in point, re­garding "Genesis" is outstanding and his work is available. His name Zecharia Sitchin. I do not, however, agree with con­clusions in his first writings to the extent I honor his book, GENESIS REVISITED.
I specifically asked that no information regarding this material be sent to Dharma for these perturbations of rock throwing for copying are too hard to attend. But, as with all good Samaritans--the work arrives from every direction. We most certainly appreciate it and, in retrospect, I am now quite glad. A volume of this very work in point showed up from a precious friend having found it at a UFO Exposition. I discount almost ALL material found at UFO Expos. I further discount almost ALL material found at "New Age" Expos. I find very, very little Truth on your bookshelves, as a matter of fact. Does this make me a snob? Does it make me more intelligent? Does it make me greater? NO--IT MEANS I HAVE MORE TECHNOLOGY AVAILABLE AND KNOW THE STORY AND WHAT IS GO­ING ON AND YOU CAN'T. THAT MEANS, FURTHER, THAT I CAN EVALUATE MATERIAL WRITTEN FOR YOUR CONSUMPTION AND YOU HAVE TO WORRY OVER IT UNTIL YOU GARNER TRUTH. Sitchin has written other books but I shan't even name them herein for I have no interest in them. George will make them available to all readers in time, if you want them or if I choose to utilize them. I shall not be blackmailed by ones attending our "private" meetings as guests who then insist on "royalties" and/or "favors" from us under threat of lawsuit.

IMPORTANT FOR ALL YOU AUTHORS

You had better learn your laws for--even as bad as they are--you misunderstand copyrights.
YOU CANNOT COPYRIGHT TRUTH. I, further, have no interest in your "opinions" except as they are correct and I can comment (preferably favorably). If your work is good, I shall push and shove your material until our readers weary of the as­sault for I have no intent of total coverage of material--our thrust is insight and awakening and causing ones to research and glean knowledge from correct resources.
Further, you CAN COPY A VOLUME WORD FOR WORD­ AND IF YOUR CONCLUSIONS ARE NOT IDENTICAL THEN YOU HAVE NOT INFRINGED COPYRIGHTS.
IT MAY MEAN NOTHING TO YOU AT THIS MOMENT BUT THE TIME WILL COME THAT THE ONLY REASON YOUR WORK STANDS IS BECAUSE WE HAVE SHARED IT. I HAVE PILES OF DOCUMENTS FROM WORTH-WHILE WRITERS AWAITING POSSIBLE USE--SENT FROM THOSE WRITERS TO BE SHARED. EUSTANCE MULLINS IS ONE IN POINT: EARLY ON HE SAID "USE ANYTHING" FOR IT'S FOR THE INSIGHT OF THE PEOPLE, IT IS MY ONLY PURPOSE IN WRITING. WHO MIGHT YOU BE WRITING FOR AND WHY?
Now as to Mr. Sitchin's work. I am going to herein tell you that there is a petition for publication of a manuscript (which was not included with the request--only the Index) but it is so like Sitchin' s work as to be quite relevant at this writing. The author comes from Crowley, Texas and states that this is new and undiscovered work and is being presented for this "new age". It is stated that "It will blow your mind." It names the same names, places and Sumerian texts. Is this one infringing on Sitchin's work?? Truth is Truth and good research will re­veal THIS Truth. This does point out that Mr. Sitchin is NOT THE ONLY ONE WRITING ABOUT SUMERIANS AND DID TEXTS OF TRUTH. IT IS EXACTLY AS WITH THE COMMITTEE OF 300--NO ONE WAS MORE SHOCKED THAN WAS COLEMAN TO FIND I HAD TWO OTHER FULL DOCUMENTS BEARING THE SAME INFORMA­TION AND WE HAD NOT MISSED A POINT IN OUR OWN EARLIER WRITINGS. I suggest at you authors take a bit more attention to others as YOU perceive your writings to be "the only ones". Once Truth is "in the ethers", it is going to be scattered.
I find it amusing to note that Bill Cooper was going to sue me and denounced my people because I somehow supposedly "stole his material". I suggest his face may be a bit red to find that I continually hear from readers who insist that Cooper has sim­ply plagiarized all the JOURNALS since. I am grateful if it be so--but the facts are that Mr. Cooper wishes it would be oth­erwise--however, Truth is Truth is Truth and if Truth be told--it will match other Truth.

LIBERATOR WILL ENDURE

Mine is to GIVE a writer honor--not take from him in any man­ner. Always! And to Zecharia Sitchin I give great honor. I do not agree with conclusions which are presented but that has not been under discussion at this point and I won't take up the mat­ter at this juncture because my scribe is overburdened quite enough by the added load of other duties these days and doesn't know who in the world is one Zecharia Sitchin--or Bill Cooper for that matter. Bill is simply one, to her, who called she and E.I. "little pukes".
The LIBERATOR will remain exactly as is in this very location so you must watch for changes in INSTRUCTIONS regarding same. The separation will give George far more freedom in his own work by allowing separation. However, as we move along, for we are growing rapidly, our thrust will be to have far less emphasis on "space cadets" and more expression of assistance and confirmation from other writers such as Mullins, Coleman, McAlvany, Gritz, etc. They, however, are honored and re­spected men and they, too, must come into recognition of the quality of our presentation and that we are NOT kooks, bull­-shippers and/or wart hogs.
Greens must be allowed to sustain selves, investments and busi­ness interests. They have given years to his work and now must attend financial security for it was never intended that our work would be a "money-making" enterprise. Our task is to get the Word OUT there. The book business can make profits and gar­ner income from other publications as does any pub­lisher/distributor. To do this, however, I must separate the work so that ALL can continue to afford it as a bit easier than hard-back publications and keep the LIBERATOR in a price range possible for you of the masses and effort to not place my own troops into bankruptcy. We remind you--we ask that you copy, mutilate, spindle and handle in any manner appropriate for your needs--along with sharing as many papers, books and tapes as you can--even sharing costs--for ours is simply to in­form. Other work will eventually serve to tend my crew but it has been a long and barren three years. But, we have gotten out 58 JOURNALS and a daily writing (at least) and a full paper once weekly. Again I say to you. however. as you grumble about the overload of information: Dharma does 99% of all the writing, all the speaking and all the meetings as well as special tapes, meets with all my business visitors, and speaks for me at all sessions of any size--IF SHE CAN DO IT--YOU CAN FIND TIME TO RECEIVE IT. It is kept this way for this very rea­son--if one person can present it--you can receive it--if you want to badly enough!
By necessity the writings will taper off as to slower production of JOURNALS. Etc., for she will be required at all sessions of planning for the industrial complexes. Chelas, we are not doing this for the fun and games of it--you are in serious troubles and must have information and resources if you are to make it through. The masses ARE awakening and you can see it in the political arena. Unfortunately, the options are showing them­selves to be zilch. Even Perot is going to let you down terribly if you are hoping upon him for foundation. Already he wants a "draft" and to put people to work "to get more taxes". Where are you going to put them to work and for what do you desire a "draft"?

TODAY'S OBSERVATIONS

PHOTON BELT FIASCO

We must speak of the Photon Belt. It is real, alright, and the antics going on and the conspiracy of compromise, threats, at­tending wars and such, are under full ploy.

MILITARY STRIRRINGS--OMINOUS. MULTI-NATIONAL

There is expected a major effort at a U.S. first strike against the Communists in early July--this comes up regularly. At the same time, equipment and men are being massed all over your nation. Saturday came a Fax from Illinois wherein some 40 rail-cars of tanks and military vehicles along with "obvious" covered ar­tillery. This was only one train of several and all headed from N.E. to S.W.--WITH NO MARKINGS ON ANY EQUIPMENT.
Here in California, "they" are already putting forth the word to "not concern"--just some major "war games" which will include many countries, including a major portion from Japan. Japan??? They have no military according to Constitutional law set forth after W.W.II.
You had all better remember: CHINA IS THE COMMUNIST DRAGON! THEY ALSO WILL HAVE A MAJOR PART IN THE ARMAGEDDON PLAY--YOU HAD BEST PAY AT­TENTION.

NOW, FOR THE PHOTON BELT ITSELF

We have another presentation from a group of scientists back East (I guess you could call them "insiders") from a major uni­versity, who says the government and military are working around the clock on a photon storage system in hopes of making it through the null time without undue chaos. Oh yes, they ex­pect MAJOR CHAOS and RIOTS and that is why all the ar­tillery, chelas.

CAN THAT PHOTON PHENOMENON BE STOPPED?

INDEED, INDEED!! BUT WE WON'T DO IT WITHOUT A LOT IN RETURN. WE CAN STOP THE WHOLE THING IN LESS THAN 30 SECONDS FROM HAVING ANY IMPACT IN TRANSITION--AT ALL. BUT YOUR ELITE WOULD­ BE GLOBAL RULERS MOVE RIGHT ON IN FULL INTENT TO BLOW YOUR PLANET TO DUST PARTICLES. YES INDEED--EVEN THE RUSSIAN COSMOSPHERES IN OUTER REACHES COULD STOP IT IF GIVEN A FEW DAYS BUT YOUR ELITE WOULD RATHER HAVE MAJOR INCIDENTS AND WAR. WHAT WILL WE OF THE CON­FEDERATION DO? WAIT AND SEE WHAT THE ELITE DO--YOU GAVE THEM YOUR POWER AND THEY WIELD IT LIKE A SLEDGE OVER YOUR HEADS. TIT FOR TAT, THEY SAY--IF WE INTERFERE THEN THERE
WILL BE WAR AND/OR MASSIVE EARTH UPHEAVAL-­-DURING THE BAD TIMES. IF WE ALLOW THE CHAOTIC TIME OF NULL TIME, THEN YOU STILL GET THE CONFUSION AND BOMBARDMENT WHILE YOU CAN'T RESPOND.
I personally petition for more "time" so that we can get more of our work done for we aren't playing in the political arena--that is your bag, not ours. We simply need to be present to get our people and finish our mission. You have several years of confu­sion and turmoil ahead of you in any manner in which you can cut the pie.

THREE DAYS OF DARKNESS

All of you who call yourselves "religious" in any manner what­soever, should be in knowing of the expected three days of darkness--or, is it possible your "preachers" happened to miss a thing or two?
Let us look at some of the written words of prophecy. For this little summary I thank one, Albert J. Hebert, S.M.:
"If I say, 'surely the darkness shall hide me, and night shall be my light'--For You darkness itself is not dark, and night shines as the day." (Ps. 139: 11-12.)
"He who survives those three days of darkness and horror will see himself as if alone, because the earth will be covered with cadavers." (St. Gaspar del Bufalo, founder of the Fathers of the Precious Blood, - d. 1837).
Father Nectou, a Jesuit provincial who was considered a saint and a prophet (d. 1777), spoke of the height of a terrible crisis, "like a little General Judgment":
"When the moment of the last crisis has come, there will be nothing to do but to stay where God has placed us, lock ourselves indoors and pray until the wrath of Divine Jus­tice has passed."
From a woman saint, friend of prelates and of some persons who are now canonized saints, hear this:
"God will send two punishments: one will be in the form of wars, revolutions and other evils,' it shall originate on earth. The others will be sent from Heaven. There shall come over the whole earth an intense darkness lasting three days and three nights. Nothing will be visible, and the air will be laden with pestilence which will claim mainly, but not only, the enemies of religion." (Blessed Anna Maria Taigi - d. 1837).
Madaleine: "Lord, I was afraid because I thought I was going blind ... " CHRIST: "Tell them that everyone on earth is like that--in darkness." (Revelations of the "Glorious Cross", Dozule', France, Jan. 4, 1974)
"We began hearing people say, 'Why is it getting dark at this hour? What's going on?' And so, therefore, I know that this darkness that's coming is going to be happening during the daytime when people are going to be confused at the hour in which it takes place."
A refugee from Communism in Europe, an American scientist and seer, tells you:
"As I was prostrating myself in prayer a vista opened up in front of me. It looked like a colossal inferno. It was night (at least pitch dark), the ground was black, and what must have been the sky was a murkish reddish orange glow, like afire, although I did not see any tongues of flames. As I was looking, I saw the silhouette of two or three groups of angels hoisting upwards a few, three or four, dead bodies. Directly behind the angels the color of the red-orange was very intense. ONLY A FEW! Then the vision ceases. " (Jan. 20, 1986)
"The judgment will come suddenly and be of short dura­tion. Then comes the triumph of the Church and the reign of brotherly love. Happy indeed they who live to see those blessed days." (Father Bernard Maria Clausi, O.F.M. - d. 1849)
"In the end my Immaculate Heart will triumph. Russia will be convened, and there will be an era of peace." (Mary at Fatima, 1917)
The above private revelations, prophecies and visions serve as an introduction to the subject within the framework of what is called the Great Chastisement or Great Cleansing (Purification) or "Minor Judgment" at its peak; and with the promise of an era of peace beyond it.
"We possess the prophetic message as something alto­gether reliable. Keep your attention closely fixed on it, as you would on a lamp shining in a dark place until the first streaks of dawn appear and the morning star rises in your hearts." (2 Pet. 1:19)

INTRODUCTION TO THAT BOOK:

God, who is Light and who dwells in unapproachable light, said on the first day of creation, "Let there be light." And on the last days His Son Jesus will say, "I am the Morning Star, shining bright." It is then that we, together with the Holy Spirit, will cry out, "Come, Lord Jesus!" And with that Jesus will lead us into the Splendor where dwells His Father and ours to reign with Him forever (1 John 1:5. 1 Tim. 6:16. Gen. 1:3. Rev. 22:16).
All this if we but say, "Yes". For we can say "No", though with what unspeakably terrible consequences! To warn us against this most dreadful alternative, God has from time to time allowed humankind to experience what it is to be in darkness. He did this when He turned three days and nights into one long total night in the land of Egypt (Ex. 10). He did this when, for a similar length of time, He allowed Jonah to be buried in the black depths of the sea in the belly of the great fish (John 2). Above all, He did this when He caused the face of the Earth to be blanketed in utter darkness during the three dread hours when His Son hung dying on the Cross (Mat. 27:45).
In these last days, God, whose love for us is unchanging and who ever wills that we be nothing but Children of Light, appears to be warning us yet once again of the dread consequences of turning away from Him to the night of sin.
No one who reads this with an open mind and heart could doubt that this is so. Take, then, and read! Archbishop George Pearce, S.M.

***

Let him who has eyes to see--see and him who has ears to hear--­hear! Is this upcoming null-time in the Photon Belt these days of purification? Well, it certainly will seem like it to you in the experience. Chelas, it matters not if you are prepared--all will make this passage at any rate, be it sooner or later--ALL! I suggest you all stop throwing stones at bringers of Truth and get with the program! If you read something "twice" as you must to have personal knowledge of any duplication--then you must surely understand the value of the information--or do you? Why do you study such works and words? Be it for Truth or the game of "catcha" and "discountcha"? What are YOU trying to prove? Why? "You are either for Me or against Me, sayeth the Lord"!!! Amen. Seems to me that you have blundered around in total darkness for some generations now--is it not about time to walk again within the LIGHT? Ponder it.
Hatonn to clear, please.