PJ 50
CHAPTER 9
REC #1 HATONN
FRI., JUNE 5, 1992 7:08 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 294
FRIDAY, JUNE 5, 1992
MEDITATION
Let US look at ·patience·--that commodity of which most of you have but little. The key to everything is patience so that each emotion, each "thing" be brought about in properness, fully formed and perfected in its presentation. The key to everything is patience. You get the chicken, dear ones, by hatching the egg--not by smashing it. Smash it and not only is the chicken lost but so is the egg.
With money and funding for that which you seem to need and await--what have you? You often have a situation whereby the things are not ready for the receiving in protection and the focus often causes the very project to be lost and the monies confiscated.
You cannot go into the garden and simply demand through nag & prod--to bear blossoms. You don't go and ask a gardenia to be a rose--you must allow them to do what is natural for them, to grow and flower at their own pace. Yes indeed, you CAN do things to speed the process and if preparations are carefully done "in advance" even a gardenia will cross with a rose but in that instance you no longer have a rose nor gardenia.
Sometimes your best service is to simply stand by, be silent, be prepared, be ever expecting, be understanding--and wait. And can you not think upon beauty? Can you not think of the beauty that remains even though all seems to be misery? If you cannot look forward to beauty and positive restructuring--why bother to change the circum- stance? Will you take a moment and see what beauty might be around you at this moment? And, can you look through the fears and into that which holds no fear? Most of your fears are as tissue-paper or fine cloth in which a single courageous step would carry you clear "through" them. If you are prepared--you can find the beauty and cast aside the fear and oh, it will be a glorious day!
But neither must you continue to say, "I don't have enough time." You have EXACILY the same number of hours per day that were given to Jesus Emmanuel, Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, Mother Teresa, da Vinci, Jefferson and George Bush, Kissinger and Perot--and so, if they can accomplish what they have (good or bad), what stops you? Ponder it. Can you not do push-ups if you have no time for full work-out? Above all, learn to listen. Opportunity sometimes knocks very softly and the speaker is often only a tap on the shoulder. Listen in patience lest the important point be missed through your talking instead of hearing the teacher and the point in question be forever silenced. Lastly--God never gives-up on anyone--what right have ye to do so? Perhaps they only await your kindness and guidance. Be blessed by the effort--not the turning away! If you "include" instead of "exclude", then at some point you have none on the "outside" to pull you down. Salu.
***
PLANET'S BEGINNING
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form and void and darkness was upon the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light; and there was light.
Chelas, for generations upon generations this majestic outline of the manner in which your world was created has been at the core of Judaism as well as of Christianity and the third monotheistic religion Islam, the latter two being outgrowths of the first. In about the seventeenth century an Archbishop, James Ussher of Armagh in Ireland, calculated from these opening verses of Genesis the precise day and the moment of the world's creation, in the year 4004 B.C. Today many old editions of your "Bible" still carry Ussher's chronology printed in the margins; many still believe that Earth and the Solar System of which it is a part are indeed no older than that.
Unfortunately, this concept has had to take on science as its adversary; and science, firmly tied to the Theory of Evolution, has met the challenge and joined the battle.
BOTH SIDES ERR
It is most unfortunate that BOTH sides pay little attention to what has BEEN KNOWN FOR MORE THAN A CENTURY--THAT THE CREATION TALES OF GENESIS ARE EDITED AND ABBREVIATED VERSIONS OF MUCH MORE DETAILED MESOPOTAMIAN TEXTS, WHICH WERE IN TURN VERSIONS OF AN ORIGINAL SUMERIAN TEXT. And thus rages the battle between religion and state, Creationists and Evolutionists. But, does an argument ever produce truth? No--it simply causes entrenchment of those ideas already prevailing--right or wrong. Readers, this "separation" is not the norm among the Earth's nations and peoples nor was it the norm in antiquity, when the biblical verses were put to print.
Let us look at ancient times. The king was also the high priest, the state had a national religion and a national god, the temples were the seat of scientific knowledge, and the priests were the savants. This was so because, when civilization began, the gods who were worshipped--the focus of the act of being "religious"--were none other than the Anunnaki/Nefilim, who were the source of all manner of knowledge, alias science, on Earth.
The merging of state, religion, and science was nowhere more complete than it was in Babylon. There the original Sumerian Epic of Creation was translated and revised so that Marduk, the Babylonian national god, was assigned a celestial counterpart. By renaming Nibiru "Marduk" in the Babylonian versions of the "creation story", the Babylonians usurped for Marduk the attributes of a supreme "God of Heaven and Earth". Do you believe that such pronouncements could not be? Dear ones, this is Babylonia which is now not present but rested very near Baghdad in IRAQ. Do you not feel Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi "government" capable of restating a few things? How about your own government? Do they always speak truth to you? Do they EVER speak truth to you?
This version--the most intact one found thus far--is known as Enuma elish ("When in the heights"), taken from its opening words. It became the most hallowed religious-political-scientific document of the land; it was read as a central part of the New Year rituals, and players re-enacted the tale in passion plays to bring its import home to the masses. The clay tablets on which they were written were prized possessions of temples and royal libraries in antiquity.
The decipherment of the writing on the clay tablets discovered in the ruins of ancient Mesopotamia more than a century ago led to the realization that texts existed that related biblical creation tales millennia before the Old Testament was compiled. Especially important were texts found in the library of the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal in Nieveh (a city of biblical renown); they recorded a tale of creation that matches, in some parts word for word, the tale of Genesis. George Smith of the British Museum pieced together the broken tablets that held the creation texts and published; in 1876, The Chaldean Genesis; it conclusively established that there indeed existed an Akkadian text of the Genesis tale, written in the Old Babylonian dialect, that preceded the biblical text by at least a thousand years. Excavations between 1902 and 1914 uncovered tablets with the Assyrian version of the creation epic, in which the name of Ashur, the Assyrian national god, was substituted for that of Babylonian Marduk. Subsequent discoveries established not only the extent of the copying and translation, in antiquity, of this epic text, but also its unmistakable Sumerian origin.
RECENT EVIL EFFORT TO DESTROY ANCIENT RECORDS
Now, does it become even more obvious why there would be deliberate attempt to destroy the temples, mosques, museums and libraries in Iraq during this last so-called "war"? Israel and the Elite would-be world owners and controllers--would have NOTHING if Truth made it to open forum and the masses opened their eyes. THIS IS WHY "THEY" HAD TO COME UP WITH "DEAD SEA SCROLLS" TO PUBLICIZE--SO THAT YOU WOULD NEVER ATTEND SUCH TABLETS AS WERE ALREADY PUBLIC IN IRAQ. Always the game has been to replace Truth with lies, feed the lies while discounting the "rumors" of truth and the masses would never be the wiser. It always works--or, at least--so far it has always worked. I hope we are about to see a change in that line of unreasoning.
In 1902 a man named King (L.W.) produced a work called The Seven Tablets of Creation, which showed that the various fragments of writings add up to seven tablets; six of them relate the creation process; the seventh tablet is entirely devoted to the exaltation of "the Lord"--Marduk in the Babylonian version, Ashur in the Assyrian one--Aton in the Egyptian. The seven-tablet division is the basis of the division of the biblical story into a seven-part timetable, of which six parts involve divine handiwork and the seventh is devoted to a restful and satisfactory look back at what had been achieved.
It is true that the Book of Genesis, written in Hebrew, uses the term "yom", most commonly meaning and translated a "day", to denote each phase. But what means "day" as to duration? Twenty-four hours? But, it says in Genesis that the timetable was not of human intent but rather, with the Creator. You are further told in the Book of Psalms (90:4) that in God's eyes "a thousand years are like yesterday." Would it then be conceded that Creation might have taken six thousand years? Even with reason in front of you, you will find that most scholars and receivers of edicts handed down by orthodox doctrines--will continue to insist on a "twenty-four" hour day--even while insisting God is infinite and all-powerful and able to do anything HE chooses to do. These same ones will acknowledge that time and space perception change immediately upon entering the outer atmosphere around your globe--but nay, the holding to the lie is more important than admitting error.
BIBLE STORIES--REAL OR FANCIED?
Is the biblical tale of creation simply a religious document, its contents to be considered only a matter of faith to be believed or disbelieved? Or is it a scientific document, imparting to you essential knowledge of how things began, in the heavens and on Earth? Is it neither, both or either? This, of course, is the core of the ongoing harangue between your Creationists and Evolutionists in which you choose up sides according to your "preacher" or "priest" in your local church building and he is repeating that which is told to him and accepted in order to remain a good-little worker within the indoctrinated "faith". Facts and truth seem to have little to do with the line of argument as neither apparently, does historical proof.
I would predict that the two camps would have laid down their arms long ago were they to ever realize that what the editors and compilers of the Book of Genesis had done was no different from what the Babylonians had done: using the only scientific source of their time, those descendants of Abraham--scion of a royal-priestly family from the Sumerian capital Ur-also took the Epic of Creation, shortened and edited it to suit their controlling needs and perceptions, and made it the foundation of a national religion glorifying so-called Yahweh "who is in the Heavens and on Earth,"
Back in Babylon, Marduk was a dual deity. Physically present, resplendent in his precious garments, he was worshipped as Ilu (translated "god" but literally meaning "the Lofty One"); his struggle to gain supremacy over the other Anunnaki gods has been carefully detailed in other writings and I won't go into it herein in great detail. On the other hand, "Marduk" was a celestial deity, everlasting, and omnipresent God--Elohim--in whose grand design for the universe the path of each planet is its predetermined "destiny", and what the Anunnaki had done on Earth was likewise a predetermined mission. Thus was the handiwork of a universal God manifest in Heaven and on Earth.
The profound perceptions, which lie at the core of the biblical adoption of the creation story. Enwna elish, could be arrived at only by bringing together religion and science while retaining, in the narrative and sequence of events, the scientific basis.
But chelas, to recognize this--that Genesis represents not just religion but also science--one must recognize the role of the Anunnaki and accept that the Sumerian texts are not "myth" but factual reports. Scholars have made much progress in this respect, but they have not yet arrived at a total recognition of the factual nature of the texts and the closer they get and the more they try to present them--harder down comes the shackles and attempts to destroy the very work in point. Although both scientists and theologians are well aware of the Mesopotamian origin of Genesis, they remain stubborn in brushing off the scientific value of these ancient texts. Further, the evangelists in the world get right onto the bandwagon while calling themselves "Zionists" and loudly and blindly shout and rave and bring the terrified congregations into the lie with great frenzy and hype. Note they are the ones who started and continued the push to destroy Iraq and completely push Israel in the rebuilding of the temple, etc., in Jerusalem so that the "prophecies" might be fulfilled and the "master" come again. Can this be defined as "REASONED THINKING"?
These "great authorities" proclaim that these texts "cannot be science" because "it should be obvious by the nature of things that none of these stories can possibly be the product of human memory!"
SPACE/STARCRAFT ARE NOT NEW
Such a ridiculous statement can be challenged only by explaining that the information of how things began indeed did not come from the memory of the Assyrians or Babylonians or Sumerians but from the knowledge and science of the Anunnaki/Nefilim. This includes the Creation of Man. They too, of course, couldn't "remember" how the Solar System was created or how Nibiru/Marduk invaded the Solar System, because they themselves were not yet created on their planet--just like any other story projection such as your own perceptions of Genesis. But just as your scientists are getting a pretty good notion of how some of the things in the Solar System came about, through something they call "Big Bang", the Anunnaki/Nefilim, capable of space travel over 450,000 years ago, surely had some capacity to arrive at sensible scenarios of creation; much more so since their planet, acting as a spacecraft that sailed past all the outer planets, gave them a chance at repeated close looks that were undoubtedly more extensive than your Voyager window-peeping. I ask you again, what is a Spaceship--Starcraft?
For you Inquiring Minds, several updated studies of the Enuma elish, such as The Babylonian Genesis by Alexander Heidel of the Oriental Institute, University of Chicago, have dwelt on the parallels in theme and structure between the Mesopotamian and biblical narratives. Both indeed begin with the statement that the tale takes its reader (or listener, as in Babylon) to the primordial time when the Earth and "the heavens" did not yet exist. But whereas the Sumerian cosmogony dealt with the creation of the Solar System and only then set the stage for the appearance of the celestial Lord (Nibiru/Marduk), the biblical version skipped all that and went directly to the Celestial Battle and its aftermath.
With the immensity of space as its canvas, here is how the Mesopotamian version began to draw the primordial picture:
When in the heights Heaven had not been named
And below earth had not been called,
naught but primordial Apsu, their Begetter,
Mummu, and Tiamat, she who bore them all.
Their waters were mingled together.
No reed had yet been formed,
No marshland had appeared.
Even in the traditional King James version, readers, the biblical opening is more matter-of-fact, not an inspiration religious opus but a lesson in primordial science, informing the reader that there indeed was a time when Heaven and the Earth did not yet exist, especially in the perceptions of anyone and anything around at the time within the arena in which this particular "Play' would be transformed into seeming reality. It, further, stated that it took an act of the "Celestial Lord", his "spirit" moving upon the "waters", to bring Heaven and Earth about with a bolt of light--or something like it.
FINALLY MERGING "MYTH" WITH TRUE SCIENCE
The progress in biblical and linguistic studies since the time of King James has moved the editors of both the Catholic The New American Bible and The New English Bible of the churches in Great Britain to substitute the word "wind"--which is what the Hebrew ru'ach means--for the "Spirit of God", so that the last verse now reads "a mighty wind swept over the waters". They retain, however, the concept of "abyss" for the Hebrew word Tehom in the original Bible; but by now even theologians acknowledge that the reference is to no other entity than the Sumerian Tiamat. Oops! Proof of tampering, changing and editing? I suggest you consider same most carefully.
Let us move on with this understanding, the reference in the Mesopotamian version to the mingling "waters" of Tiamat ceases to be allegorical and calls for a factual evaluation. It goes to the question of the plentiful waters of Earth and the biblical assertion that when the Earth was formed it was completely covered by water. You will soon realize this to be correct. If water was so abundant even at the moment of Earth's creation, then only if Tiamat was also a watery planet could the half that became Earth be watery!!!
The watery nature of Tehom/Tiamat is mentioned in various biblical (yours) references. The prophet Isaiah (51: 10) recalled "the primeval days" when the might of the Lord "carved the Haughty One, made spin the watery monster, drained off the waters of the mighty Tehom." The Psalmist extolled the Lord of Beginnings who "by thy might the waters thou didst disperse, the leader of the watery monsters thou didst break up."
What was the "wind" of the Lord that "moved upon the face of the waters" of Tehom? Tiamat? Not the divine "Spirit" but the satellite of Nibiru/Marduk that, in the Mesopotamian texts, was called by that term! Those texts vividly described the flashes and lightning strokes that burst off Nibiru/Marduk as it closed in on Tiamat. Applying this knowledge to the biblical text, its correct reading emerges:
When, in the beginning,
The Lord created the Heaven and the Earth,
The Earth, not yet formed, was in the void,
and there was darkness upon Tiamat.
Then the Wind of the Lord swept upon its waters
and the Lord commanded, "Let there be lightning!"
and there was a bright light.
The continuing narrative of your Genesis does not describe the ensuing splitting up of Tiamat or the breakup of her host of satellites, described so vividly in the Mesopotamian texts. It is evident, however, from the above-quoted verses from Isaiah and Psalms, as well as from the narrative in Job (26:7-13), that the Hebrews were familiar with the skipped-over portions of the original tale. Job recalled how the celestial Lord smote "the helpers of the haughty One", and he exalted the Lord who, having come from the outer reaches of space, cleaved Tiamat (Tehom) and changed the Solar System:
The hammered canopy He stretched out
in the place of Tehom,
The Earth suspended in the void;
He penned waters in its denseness,
without any cloud bursting ....
His powers the waters did arrest,
His energy the Haughty One did cleave.
His wind the Hammered Bracelet measured out,
His hand the twisting dragon did extinguish.
The Mesopotamian texts continued from here to describe how Nibiru/Marduk formed the asteroid belt out of Tiamat's lower half:
The other half of her
He set up as a screen for the sides;
Locking them together
as watchmen he stationed them ....
He bent Tiamat's tail
to form the Great Band as a bracelet.
Genesis picks up the primordial tale here and describes the forming of the asteroid belt thus:
AND ELOHIM SAID:
LET THERE BE A FIRMAMENT IN THE MIDST OF THE WATERS
AND LET IT DIVIDE THE WATERS FROM THE WATERS.
AND ELOHIM MADE THE FIRMAMENT,
DIVIDING THE WATERS WHICH ARE UNDER THE FIRMAMENT
FROM THE WATERS WHICH ARE ABOVE THE FIRMAMENT.
AND ELOHIM CALLED THE FIRMAMENT "HEAVEN".
Realizing that the Hebrew word Shama'im is used to speak of Heaven or the heavens in general, the editors of Genesis went into some length to use two terms for "the heaven" created as a result of the destruction of Tiamat. What separated the "upper waters" from the "lower waters", the Genesis text stresses, was
the Raki' a; generally translated "Firmament", it literally means "Hammered-out Bracelet". Then Genesis goes on to explain that Elohim then called the Raki'a, the so-called Firmament, Shama'im, "the Heaven"--a name that in its first use in the Bible consists of the two words sham and ma'im, meaning literally "where the waters were". In the creation tale of Genesis, "the Heaven" was a specific celestial location, where Tiamat and her waters had been where the asteroid belt was hammered out.
That happened, according to the Mesopotamian texts, when /returned to the Place of Crossing--the second phase of the battle with Tiamat: "Day Two", if you wish, as the biblical narrative does.
Are there scholars on your placement who have this information deciphered correctly and in presentable form'? Indeed, but they are not allowed coverage and books are removed from the libraries as soon as they are placed there. I won't aid and abet our enemies by giving that information at this time and if some of you researching historians find same-PLEASE DO NOT RELAY THE INFORMATION ON TO US--YET. THIS IS THE MOST CRITICALLY OPPOSED INFORMATION WITHIN YOUR POLITICAL ELITE CIRCLES--LET US NOT ENDANGER THE VERY WRITERS WHO CAN GIVE YOU FREEDOM THROUGH TRUTH.
DETAILS OF INTEREST
The ancient tale is replete with details, each of which is amazing in and of itself. Ancient awareness of them is so incredible that its only plausible explanation, readers, is the one offered by the Sumerians themselves--namely, that those who had come to Earth from Nibiru were the source of that knowledge. Modem astronomy has already corroborated many of these details and can no longer be actually hidden; by doing so, it indirectly confirms the key assertions of the ancient cosmogony and astronomy: the Celestial Battle that resulted in the breakup of Tiamat, the creation of Earth and the asteroid belt, and the capture of Nibiru/Marduk into permanent orbit around your Sun.
Let's just look at one aspect of the ancient tale--the "host" of satellites, or "winds", that the "celestial gods" had.
You now know that Mars has two moons, Jupiter sixteen moons and several more moonlets, Saturn twenty-one or more, Uranus as many as fifteen, Neptune eight. Until Galileo discovered with his telescope the four brightest and largest satellites of Jupiter in 1610, it was unthinkable that a celestial body could have more than one such companion--evidence Earth and its solitary Moon.
But here we read in the Sumerian texts that as Nibiru/Marduk's gravity interacted with that of Uranus, the Invader "begot" three satellites ("winds") and Anu/Uranus "brought forth" four such moons. By the time Nibiru/Marduk reached Tiamat, it had a total of seven "winds" with which to attack Tiamat, and Tiamat had a "host" of eleven--among them the "leader of the host", which was about to become an independently orbiting planet, your eventual Moon.
Another element of the Sumerian tale, of great significance to the ancient astronomers, was the assertion that the debris from the lower half of Tiamat was stretched out in the space where she had once existed.
The Mesopotamian texts, and the biblical version thereof in Genesis, are emphatic and detailed about the formation of the asteroid belt--insisting that such a "bracelet" of debris exists and orbits the Sun between Mars and Jupiter. But your astronomers were not aware of that until the nineteenth century. The first realization that the space between Mars and Jupiter was not just a dark void was the discovery by Giuseppe Piazzi on January 1, 1801, of a small celestial object in the space between the two planets, an object that was named Ceres and that has the distinction of being the first known (and named) asteroid. Hmm-mnn! Three more asteroids (Pallas, Juno, and Vesta) were discovered by 1807, none after that until 1845, and hundreds since then, so that almost 2,000 are known by now. Astronomers believe that there may be as many as 50,000 asteroids at least a mile in diameter, as well as many more pieces of debris, too small to be seen from Earth, which number in the billions.
In other words, it has taken modern astronomy almost two centuries to find out what the Sumerians knew 6,000 years ago.
ASTEROID BELT DIVIDES FIRMAMENT
Even with this knowledge, the biblical statement that the "Hammered-out Bracelet", the Shama'im--alias "the Heaven", divided the "waters which are below the Firmament" from the "waters which are above the Firmament" remained a puzzle. Now, what could the "Bible" be speaking of!
You ones have known, of course, that Earth was a very watery planet, but it has been assumed that it is uniquely so. Many will undoubtedly recall science-fiction tales wherein aliens come to Earth to carry off its unique and life-giving liquid: water. So even if the ancient texts had in mind Tiamat's, and hence Earth's, waters, and if this was what was meant by the "water which is below the Firmament", what water was there to talk about regarding that which is "above the Firmament"???
You know--don't you--that the asteroid belt had, indeed, as the ancient text reported, divided the planets into two groups?
"Below" it are the Terrestrial, or inner, Planets; "above" it the gaseous, or Outer, Planets. But, except for Earth, the former had barren surfaces and the latter no surfaces at all, and the long-held conventional wisdom was that neither group had any water--excepting, of course, Earth.
As a result of the missions of unmanned spacecraft to all the other planets except Pluto, you now know better. Mercury, which was observed by the spacecraft Mariner 10, I believe, in 1974/75, is too small and too close to the Sun to have retained water, if it ever had any. There is no point in arguing the point herein for it is not the point of this JOURNAL to restructure all of your misperceptions. Size and closeness to the Sun have NOTHING to do with whether or not a planet has water. But--we shall go with what the scientist "think" they know and what is projected to you so that confusion is not the point instead of the tale unfolding.
Venus, likewise is believed to be waterless because of its relative proximity to the Sun. This one surprised the scientists for it was discovered by unmanned spacecraft, both American and Soviet, that the extremely hot surface of the planet (almost 900 degrees Fahrenheit) was caused not so much by its proximity to the Sun as by a "greenhouse" effect: the planet seems to be enshrouded by what is presumed to be a thick atmosphere of carbon dioxide and clouds that contain sulfuric acid. As a result the heat of the Sun is trapped and does not dissipate back into space during the night. (Assuming, of course, that there is actually heat from the Sun--which there is not!) Through this assumption, however, it would be recognized that an ever-rising temperature would have vaporized any water that Venus might have had. But did it ever have such water in its past? You see, as we travel along in the theories of "formation" and "what ifs", it becomes more and more clear that man hasn't ANY NOTION OF WHAT REALLY IS! It is now pretty much speculated that Venus once had a lot of water.
Interestingly enough, "the lost oceans of Venus" can be traced in its rocks--telltale signs of water flow, in fact. There was indeed water "below the Firmament"--not only on Earth but also on Venus as well.
The latest scientific discoveries have now added Mars to the list of inner planets whose waters corroborate the ancient statement. There exist "canals" on Mars and they can be seen through the telescopic lenses.
CAN YOU NOT SEE THAT WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD THROUGH THESE EONS OF TIME HAS BECOME THAT WHICH IS FALSE--AND THE TRUTH MUST AGAIN BE UNCOVERED FOR YOUR WITNESS? PLEASE DO NOT BE LONGER FOOUSH IN YOUR REFUSAL TO SEE AND HEAR FOR YOUR VERY EXISTENCE DEPENDS UPON THE WISDOM OF TRUTH IN ITS UNFOLDMENT.
Let us close this portion.
Hatonn to clear and allow pondering of this information that you I might become balanced and perceptive in awareness. Salu.
PJ 50
CHAPTER 10
REC #1 HATONN
MON., JUNE 8, 1992 7:30 A.M. YEAR 5, 297
MONDAY, JUNE 8, 1992
MEDITATION
Remember, Dharma, that the eye of prudence may never shut for a dram of discretion is worth a pound of wisdom if taken out of proper sequence. Further, if you think twice before you speak once, you will speak twice the better for it and if you want the rose you must folly respect the thorn which abides with the rose. But you must keep always in the top of your listing of actions that the prudent man does himself good, the virtuous one does it to other men. In so doing all within wisdom it will become clear that if you never exceed your rights, they will soon become unlimited. Be ever alert to the "small" things for, if you seem to be out of trouble, watch for danger. When you live well, then consider the most, your life, lest ruin take it unawares.
***
IN THE BEGINNING
(CONTINUED)
You ones must be in consideration of the investigations focused on other of your planets wherein you can see that things are not as were speculated upon as being only a short while in your past.
Let us consider findings of the Mariner 9 which confirmed and augmented the results of the Viking 1 and Viking 2 missions launched five years later; they examined Mars both from orbiters and from landers that descended to the planet's surface. They showed such features as evidence of several floodings by large quantities of water in an area designated Chryse Planitis; channels that once held and were formed by running water coming from the Vallis Marineris area; cyclical meltings of permafrost in the equatorial regions; rocks weathered and eroded by the force of water; and evidence of erstwhile lakes, ponds, and other "water basins".
Let us remember from those recordings from the probes that water vapor was found in the thin Martian atmosphere; Charles A. Barth, the principal scientist in charge of Mariner 9's ultraviolet measurements, estimated that the evaporation amounted to the equivalent of 100,000 gallons of water daily. Norman Horowitz of Caltech reasoned that "large amounts of water in some form have in past eons been introduced to the surface and into the atmosphere of Mars", because that was required in order to have so much carbon dioxide (90 percent) in the Martian atmosphere. Then in publishing results of the Viking project, it was concluded that "a long time ago giant flash floods carved the Martian landscape in a number of places; a volume of water equal to Lake Erie poured ... scouring great channels."
The final NASA report after the Viking missions (Mars: The Viking Discoveries) concluded that "Mars once had enough water to form a layer several meters deep over the whole surface of the planet".
How did they actually come to conclusions in agreement? They projected that this was possible because Mars (like Earth) wobbles slightly as it spins about its axis. This action results in significant climatic changes every 50,000 years. When the planet was warmer it may have had lakes as large as Earth's Great Lakes in North America and as much as three miles deep. "This is an almost inescapable conclusion," stated Michael H. Carr and Jack McCauley of the U.S. Geological Survey in 1985. "1985"? How many years do you think there were up to 1985? Please, chelas, be in reasoning--conclusions drawn in 1985 are like "finally" being drawn this day and still, these are only "conclusions" and not proven points of fact.
What I am trying to reach through to your reasoning mind and say, is that you can't have known very much after some cataclysmic happening occurred and caused a "dark ages" aboard your own starship. These things are only now coming into your knowledge flow. Worse, however, the information is now balanced against that which is KNOWN from other resources of controlled information and fed to you in bits and pieces of erroneous, mixed with valid, information.
When your televisions fail to function for any reason, say, in the afternoon--does the public demand retribution' and squawk and complain about loss of "news" or a scientific program on CNN? No--they complain and protest the loss of a soap opera. They may also complain about missing Oprah Winfrey on the subject of whether or not white homosexuals should be allowed to marry (through the state legal system) white homosexuals and have children. At the very most any way you can cut the subject--a legal state marriage is only a way for the state to gain fees for issuing you a worthless piece of paper--marriages are made in the heart between two people and the "commitment" is only valid if made unto each other with God as witness. Only God can help the poor TV repairman if you blot out Super Bowl.
What are you going to do through those several days with NO ELECTRICITY AND NO RADIO AND/OR TV CAPABILITY?? I suggest you ponder this most closely this very day for your scientists (the same ones listed above) expect this very scenario to occur in late July of this year. WHY DO YOU NOT GO FORTH AND DEMAND THAT "THEY" TELL YOU HOW IT WILL BE SO YOU CAN PREPARE. WHY DO YOU CONTINUE TO "TEST" HATONN AND MY PEOPLE WITH YOUR INQUIRIES? I gave you exactly what the scientists have predicted--why would you have to obtain information from ME?
I actually have ones who have written and "given me one last chance"--"If the photon belt doesn't come on time, I am through believing anything you tell us!" So, what does this make ME? Who is going to suffer from such a decision?
ME? I have a nice spacecraft with comforts you only dream of. WHO IS GOING TO SUFFER FOR LACK OF AN OPEN MIND? SO BE IT.
Yes, indeed, I have compassion for you--to the point that we continue in the face of such assault, to inform you as best we can for so many of you are patient and do everything you can to prepare and assist your neighbor--but so often your neighbor has already been rendered "brain dead"--and most family offspring and immediate relations only think you, have gone totally "bonkers". I understand your position; I simply can't interfere with man's free will choices. I can offer the information--I cannot "kidnap" anyone and jerk them into safety. In only a few very extreme circumstances am I allowed to do such--and then, if adults are involved, I have to release them after decisions are made.
EVACUATION?
What are these circumstances? When an evacuation of the planet HAS TO BE MADE to salvage soul energy forms. When annihilation is so imminent that the planetary chain reactions of the detonations set by man have no possibility of reversal--then, we have to get you off--as many as will come. Most will be more terrified of us than the situation because you won't recognize the totality of the event until too late. In those instances, ones who serve--such as my scribes, etc., with permission of "them", we are allowed to take up into safety all members of the family as requested and other ones of significant interaction. Then confrontations with those adults involved will be honored as to choices--children will be kept in security at any circumstance on that day, WHY this dispensation? So that our workers can do their work without being pulled away to attend ones of their beloved relations, etc. All hands will be needed with clarity of action and thought. This is the promise in return for service. Further, there will not be rightness of circumstance to simply blot consciousness from the workers for the service will be required in BOTH levels of understanding and physical expression.
YOUR SURVIVAL?
So, what do you do? I have told you. But moreover, you have other access to documentation and instructions. How many of you, even after my having told you so, realize your own government puts out documents every year on NUCLEAR WAR SURVIVAL SKILLS--right from the Oak Ridge National laboratory. The one sitting in front of Dharma came in 1989 when we first began to write on the subject of survival. Someone with access to the material sent a copy.
You can obtain, I guess, a copy from the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, Cave Junction, Oregon. This would be the updated and expanded 1987 edition with the Foreword by Dr. Edward Teller. For the price of an arm and one leg you can even get NUCLEAR WAR SURVIVAL SKILLS video tapes. I herein ask my people to get copies of same and then we will gather and watch together. You can also get the books at "quantity" discounts. My assumption is that this still holds true--but the point is to "kill" you, not "save" you so you will have to check it out for self.
FOR SALE: GOVERNMENT BUNKERS
This information herein should chill you out if nothing will--it proves that massive facilities of "better" quality are ready for the Elite because the government and bankers are putting "up for sale" other bunkers "touted to have been used" for bank storage, secret document storage, survival facilities and "war rooms". How do I know? Read your daily paper! Let me example:
(Associated Press), Sun., June 7, 1992: FOR SALE: 1 NEVER USED WAR BUNKER.
AMHERST. MASS.: This room has no view. But for $250,000 you can get your own 44,OOO-square-foot, climate controlled bunker, complete with glassed-in command theater.
"It's something of a white elephant, " real estate agent Esta Busl said Friday. But she has gotten a few inquiries for a former Strategic Air Command bunker, buried underneath a mountain in this college town.
"It's the only one for sale in the U.S.A. (thus far--at this time and for public consideration)," the advertisement reads, "$250,000, a wild imagination ... and it's yours."
Its latest owner, the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston used the underground command center, completed in 1956 when nearby Westover Air Force Base was SAC's northeastern head-quarters, primarily for records storage.
The two-story war room comes complete with enclosed balcony for generals and glass screens on which battle scenes could have been shown.
"It pretty much has all the comforts of home," Busl said.
***
ELITE BANKING "EXAMINED"
By the way, I can't urge you strongly enough to get copies of the transcripts or WATCH the subcommittee bearings about the BNL banking fiasco. It beats any Mel Brooks movie ever produced as the "Judicial" department pounds on "impossible" contempt citations un-issued when they "refused to even accept the suggestion that there was anything strange afoot"--AND INVOKED THROUGH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BLOCKS BY MEANS OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND NATIONAL SECURITY. The battering and incomprehensible testimony is so slap-stick that you all but miss the total insanity of the circumstances.
Why aren't Bush and Bunch worried'? Because he KNOWS all these other incredible things will come upon you before you know what has happened and he won't have to stand accountable to ANYONE! YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO REALIZE THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BLOW AWAY THREE QUARTERS OF YOUR PLANET--WHILE YOU APPLAUD AND BOW UNTO THE GENIUS OF THE PLANS. THE COMMUNISTS PLAN A FULL BLOWN ATTACK ON YOUR NATION ON THE FOURTH OF JULY, 1992 (LESS THAN A MONTH FROM THIS DAY). COMMUNIST TANKS ARE ALREADY STATIONED ALL ABOUT YOUR NATION IN ALL MAJOR CITIES NOT TARGETED FOR IMMEDIATE DESTRUCTION.
WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT! COME NOW, CHELAS. I AND MINE ARE NOT SLEEPING. WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?
BACK TO THE MUNDANE--CREATION
The outcome of the "joint" scientific studies between the Soviets and the U.S.A. NASA regarding "Mars landings" conclude that some deep Martian canyons are probably still flowing water in their depths, or at least just below the dry riverbeds. How quaint.
What had started out as a dry and barren planet has emerged, in the past decade, as a planet where water was once abundant--not just passively lying about but flowing and gushing and shaping the planet's features. Mars has joined Venus and Earth in corroborating the concept of the Sumerian texts of water "below the Firmament", on the inner planets.
ASTEROID BELT SEPARATION?
The ancient assertion that the asteroid belt separated the waters that were below the Firmament from those that were above it implies that there was water on the celestial bodies that are located farther out. We have already reviewed the later discoveries which confirm the Sumerian description of Uranus and Neptune as "watery". What about the other two celestial bodies that are orbiting between those two outer planets and the asteroid belt, Saturn and Jupiter?
Saturn itself, a gaseous giant whose volume is more than eight hundred times greater than that of Earth, as described by scientists, has not yet been penetrated down to its surface--assuming it has, somewhere below its vast atmosphere of hydrogen and helium, a solid or liquid core. But its various moons as well as its breathtaking rings are now known to be made, if not wholly then in large part, of water ice and perhaps even liquid water. This is what your astronomers and scientific computer analysts say so surely you can believe them?
They continue by telling you that originally, Earth-based observations of Saturn showed only seven rings; it is now known from space probes that there are many more, with thinner rings and thousands of ringlets filling the spaces between the seven major rings; all together they create the effect of a disk that, like a phonograph record, is "grooved" with rings and ringlets. The unmanned spacecraft Pioneer II established in 1979 that the rings and ringlets consist of icy material, believed at the time to be small pieces of ice a few inches in diameter or as small as snowflakes. But what of invisible photon rings? Who ever mentions these little perturbations? What about these little invisible particles which can destroy your entire species in a period of time with no protection? I repeat--what about those "holes" wherein already are pouring these photon waves upon you? The government lies to you--you are moving into the Photon Belt right on schedule and they are giving you hogwash about "ozone holes" and nonsense about "skin cancers".
Can man survive such a passage? Indeed, if care is taken for you will be under the influence of multiple "suns". This is why we encourage "clusters" of domes over covered by large "shade" domes so that most activities can be done without full-time exposure to these elements. Indeed, man can not only survive, but flourish in the presence of such Light if handled properly. After adjustment and a period of "mutation", plants and animals who dwell in the open will flourish incredibly well. Because of your adaptation to luxury indoor climate control, you are the ones at risk. This is, however, why the prophets will tell you that the animals will be quite well adjusted "outside" during that period of "Light" which would blind and burn your human bodies.
Outdoor dwellers will also manage very well with a minimal eye protection. This, of course, is IF the human interferers keep out of the equation. If you ignite radioactive belts, etc., you will have other problems with which to contend. Already a thrust for sunglasses which close out ultra-violet rays are marketed--why do you think this is so? Human can easily evolve protective changes if given a bit of "time" to do so--it is the suddenness which is devastating. As with any x-rays, protection of minimal amounts will be more than adequate. HOWEVER:
STERILIZATION WILL OCCUR
NEXT BUG-A-BOO: One of the major reasons why the government will not allow you to be told of the upcoming Photon Belt is because STERILIZATION OF THE SPECIES will occur through exposure to the rays for ones who are exposed without protection. This will cause a massive drop in offspring in the immediate upcoming generation of population. How better to snuff out the prospective "next generation"? There simply will only be the "select" few who will be able to have children.
This is why the Revelation prophecies state that it will be most bad for ones who are with child--the mutations will abound in the first birthing of already forming bodies and recently conceived babes. There will be massive spontaneous abortions and malformed births, most of which will not survive and in the hardships upcoming, will perish. There will be a massive annihilation of any surviving mutants.
Again, chelas, ye become angry with ME; do you think I make up these tales to give you on "scare night at the movies"? The prophecies have been before you since the beginning of your planet.
This is, however, why I suggest that as you move into the Photon Belt, you must also have facilities for protection of your "bearing" cattle, fowl, etc. Most will fare alright on their own but they, too, shall become sterile if left to exposure of great magnitude for a long period of time until adjustment can be accomplished. This would be necessary, at any rate, for the planet would be overrun by animals and the species of human would be destroyed in time.
DAMAGE TO BRAIN FUNCTION
Next bugs-in-the BOO: The rays will destroy the brain functioning if not protected. If you cannot imagine a planet filled with dying, blind--and totally insane persons--I suggest you begin to do so NOW. Just as with continued doses of radiation, the brain cells are killed off and you will surely be back to a planet of dying humanity who can function only at "cave-man" level, if that efficiently. This is as much the reason for "dark ages" as anything that happens to a planet. This is what would cyclically depopulate a planet in the natural order of things. This is why man "could" save selves but will not. Good news? Bad news? No, it just IS news. It should not be "news" for it is as old, likewise, as the beginning of the planet.
BACK TO PLANETS AND STUDIES
Taking up again with snowflakes, let us continue. What was originally described as "a carousel of bright icy particles" was revealed, however, by data to consist of chunks of ice ranging from boulder size to that of "big houses". You are seeing "a sea of sparkling ice" said JPL's scientists. The ice, at some primordial time, had been liquid water. By the way, these are the SAME scientists who tested the material left by Semjase and Pleiadians with Billy Meier and "lost" the samples.
The several larger moons of Saturn at which the three spacecraft took a look, appeared to have much more water, and not only in the form of ice. It was reported in 1979 that the group of inner moons of Saturn--Janus, Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, and Rhea--appeared to be "icy bodies ... consisting largely of ice". It was confirmed in 1980 that these inner satellites as well as the newly discovered moonlets were "spheres of ice". On Enceladus, which was examined more closely, the indications were that its smooth plains resulted from the filling in of old craters with liquid water that had oozed up to the surface and then frozen.
It was also revealed that Saturn's outer moons were ice covered. The moon Iapetus, which has puzzled astronomers because it showed dark and bright portions, was found to be "coated with water ice" in the bright areas. Voyager 2 seemed to confirm in 1981 that Iapetus was "primarily a ball of ice with some rock in its center". The data, Von R. Eshleman of Stanford University concluded, indicated that Iapetus was 55 percent water ice, 35 percent rock, and 10 percent frozen methane. Saturn's largest moon, Titan--larger than the planet Mercury--was found to have an atmosphere and a surface rich in hydrocarbons. But under them there is a mantle of frozen ice, and some sixty miles farther down, as the internal heat of this celestial body increases, there is a thick layer of water slush. Farther down, it is now believed, there probably exists a layer of bubbling hot water more than 100 miles deep. All in all, the Voyagers' data suggested that Titan is 15 percent rock and 85 percent water and ice.
Is Saturn itself a larger version of Titan, its largest moon? Well, you could wait for future missions and see what they provide--or you can turn and study the Sumerian texts and KNOW NOW. It's up to you.
JUPITER HAS WATER
Jupiter was investigated by probes called Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 AND by the two Voyagers according to your public information allowed sharing with you in some portion. The results indicated that there were no differences than found at Saturn. The giant gaseous planet was found to emit immense amounts of radiation and heat and to be engulfed by a thick atmosphere that is subject to violent storms. Yet even this impenetrable envelope was found to be constituted primarily of hydrogen, helium, methane, ammonia, water vapor, and probably droplets of water; somewhere farther down inside the thick atmosphere there is liquid water, the scientists have concluded.
As with Saturn, the moons of Jupiter proved more fascinating, revealing, and surprising than the planet itself. Of the four Galilean moons, Io, the closest to Jupiter, revealed totally unexpected volcanic activity. Although what the volcanoes spew is mostly sulfur based, the erupted material contains some water. The surface to 10 shows vast plains with troughs running through them, as if they had been carved by running water. The 'consensus is that 10 has "some internal sources of water".
Europa, like Io, appears to be a rocky body, but its somewhat lower density suggests that it may contain more internal water than Io. Its surface shows a latticework of vein-like lines that suggested to the NASA teams shallow fissures in a sea of frozen ice. A close look at Europa by Voyager 2 revealed a layer of mushy water ice under the cracked surface. At the December 1984 meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco, two scientists of NASA's Ames Research Center suggested that under Europa's ice sheet there might exist warmer oases of liquid water that could sustain living organisms. After a re-examination of Voyager 2 photographs, NASA scientists tentatively concluded that the spacecraft witnessed volcanic eruptions of water and ammonia from the moon's interior. The belief now is that Europa "has an ice covering several miles thick" overlaying an ocean of liquid water up to thirty miles deep, kept from freezing by radioactive decay and the friction of tidal forces. Eee-gads. Well, be glad Hatonn is presenting this information instead of Soltec (Senior Geophysical authority) who sits to my right elbow and is about having a hemorrhage. Never mind, chelas, you have to have the idiot blather and speculation so that you can better appreciate the TRUTH.
Ganymede, the largest of Jupiter's moons, appears to be covered with water ice mixed with rock, suggesting it has undergone moonquakes that have cracked its crust of frozen ice. It is thought to be made almost entirely of water ice, with an inner ocean of liquid water near its core. The fourth Galilean moon, Callisto--about the size of the planet Mercury--also has an ice-rich crust; under it there are mush and liquid water surrounding a small, rocky core. Estimates are that Callisto is more than 50 percent water. A ring discovered around Jupiter is also made mostly, if not wholly, of ice particles.
Modern science seems to have confirmed the ancient assertion to the fullest: there indeed have been "waters ABOVE the Firmament".
OTHER, UNSEEN PLANETS
Jupiter is the Solar System's largest planet (visible)--as large as 1,300 Earths. It contains some 90 percent of the mass of the complete planetary system of the Sun. I suggest that when you come into "visibility" you will suddenly discover you are surrounded by unseen planets and stars. These ones would have been totally obscured by photons through which your vision was incapable of witness. As the entire system "speeds up" in frequency to accommodate these new "X-rays", you will find a whole universe of wondrous new additions.
As stated a bit earlier, the Sumerians called Jupiter KI.SHAR, "Foremost of the Firm Lands", of the planetary bodies. "Foremost"??? From whose perception might that be written? Saturn, though smaller than Jupiter, occupies a much larger portion of the heavens because of its rings, whose "disk" has a diameter of 670,000 miles. The Sumerians called it AN.SHAR, "Foremost of the Heavens". "Foremost"??? From whose perception might that be written? Ah so!
Evidently these Sumerians knew what they were talking about?
LET'S LOOK AT YOUR SUN
When you can view the Sun with the unclothed eye, say, at dawn or at sunset, it appears to be a perfect disk. Even when viewed with telescopes, it has the shape of a perfect globe. Yet the Sumerians depicted it as a disk with triangular rays extending from its round surface. Why?
In 1980 astronomers of the High Altitude Observatory of the University of Colorado took pictures of the Sun with a special camera during an eclipse observed in a location in the country of India. The pictures revealed that because of magnetic influences, the Sun's corona gives it the appearance of a disk with triangular rays extending from its surface--just as the Sumerians had depicted millennia earlier.
In January of 1983 an author named ZECHARIA SITCHIN, born in Russia and raised in Palestine, an Economics/History professor, brought this "enigmatic representation" which was on a Sumerian "cylinder seal" to the attention of the editor of Scientific American, a journal that reported the astronomers' discovery. In response, the editor, Dennis Flanagan, wrote to him on January 27, 1983:
"Thank you for your letter of January 25.
"What you have to say is most interesting, and we may well be able to publish it."
"In addition to the many puzzles posed by this depiction," he had written in his letter, "foremost of which is the source of the Sumerian knowledge, is now their apparent familiarity with the true shape of the Sun's corona."
Do you suppose it is the need to acknowledge the source of Sumerian knowledge THAT IS STILL HOLDING UP PUBLICATION OF WHAT ‘SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN' HAS DEEMED "MOST INTERESTING"? What would be your best guess?
Dharma, allow us to close here at for the writing grows long. I wish to put the next couple of segments to tape this afternoon for we will get too far behind if we do not. The next segment begins to get really interesting so I would like to clear the backlog a bit if you would be able to make yourself available for that specific task. We will be taking up "The Messengers of Genesis" when we next write on the subject of the "Divine Plan".
Hatonn to clear, please. Blessings rest upon you who are willing to see and hear for upon your shoulders rests the survival of a species. Salu.
Tags, 상세검색
