PJ 229
CHAPTER 3
REC #1 HATONN

FRI., FEB. 20, 1998 7:49 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 188

FRI., FEB. 20, 1998
"MILITARY ACTION BUT NO WAR"
(Madeleine Albright, Secretary of State, U.S.A.)
Yesterday, at a better-planned little PUBLIC meeting the Al­bright fiasco went better with a screened GROUP present but I find this one question to be more interesting than the others, or at the least, the answer given by Ms. Albright.

The question had to do with having a war. Ms. Albright, not being all bright, responded: "Oh this is just a military action, not a war. " A "military action" but no war? This obviously MEANS that it is KNOWN the dumpees are not able to fight back against the dumpors! So you just go blow up a bunch of innocent people, wipe out citizen ability to survive--but it "ISN'T WAR"?

I SIMPLY DO NOT BELIEVE YOU CAN GET MUCH LOWER THAN THIS, AMERICA!

THE ONE SURE THING FOR THE DEMISE OF BILLY ZIPPER IS TO SEND THOSE BOMBERS! YOU HAD BET­TER WAKE UP, WORLD. EVIL IS STILL NOT A POPU­LAR ACTIVITY IF AND WHEN THE WORLD KNOWS ABOUT IT. INDISCRETION IS PART OF THE POLITICAL GAME BUT OUTRIGHT EVIL IS STILL FROWNED UPON THROUGH THE REST OF THE WORLD--AND THIS TIME, VISIBLE OR INVISIBLE--THE U.S., BRITAIN AND CANADA STAND ALONE AS THE EVIL EMPIRE!
PATRIOT GROUPS
AND BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
The first thing I want to discuss is the topic of Col. James "BO" Gritz. Just because I mention his name DOES NOT mean that somehow I involve him in anything. Those nice warm PA­TRIOT groups involve him because they assume if they get into trouble he will come to bail them out of whatever mess they have gotten into on their short-time thinking.

I don't have anything to discuss "about" Gritz other than one emphatic FACT. Bo Gritz is in no way at all a traitor to this country, a fanatic anything, or whatever ones choose to call him who wish to damage him. He took an oath to protect HIS COUNTRY under the most disciplined circumstances, and if he fails to have "thank you" graces, perhaps you could be a bit more kind and generous while you don't know anything about much of anything.

Gritz is a TRAINED Delta Force Special Forces Officer (LEADER) and he has been involved in some things beyond any of your wildest dreams and nightmares. And for anyone out of any "movement" calling themselves "patriots" who would come, say, all the way from Ohio to get "close" enough to mention a possibility of being involved with Gritz--and then play with deadly biologicals, is unthinkable and unacceptable.

What the man thinks of me or my scribe is NONE OF MY BUSINESS.

Col. Gritz lives in a remote little site in Nevada and there will be every effort to connect him to this Harris, Levitt THING.

When I speak of offering "cover" for the Colonel it is not what you seem to think that to mean. He has a reason for doing what he is doing and whether he be just an individual trying to make a positive difference or an infiltrator for the whatever--he is doing what he knows to be right.

It may well be that, like you, Bo doesn't have his Spiritual TRUTH quite straight, but he knows about the nation even if he can't quite identify the "enemy". Actually, he has even identi­fied the enemy. The best any of us can do is try to stay clear of the idiots claiming to want to save something while destroying and then breaking laws to leave themselves open for the "blame" for outrageous actions while the powers-that-be perpetrate the actual actions.

But whose side is the man on? He is on HIS SIDE. He has a family, children, and he knows what lies ahead for you all in this clamp-down, take-over-governments machine. He presses for you to be prepared for what is ahead, from defense of self to storage of some supplies. He would like to see working com­munities with some hope of survival--wouldn't we all?

I wonder why nobody mentioned George Green or others who also live in Las Vegas for connections to these false patriots and why you just nail onto Gritz? STOP IT, SILLY CHILDREN. You destroy the very things that eventually COULD SAVE YOUR BACON.

I have offered his stories as he had given them forth AND HE KNOWS THAT THEY ARE NOT TRUE--SO HE CAN CALL ME "FALSE". I SHALL CONTINUE TO SHELTER WHERE I CAN DO SO. Did he really do all those things in Asia, Cambodia, Shan, etc? He said he did and I remind you all: if a man intro­duces HIMSELF to me and calls himself Jesus Christ or any other name--I will address him from that moment on (until in­formation changes) as Mr. Christ. Of course things were and are not as presented, but what in your government or intelli­gence circles IS?

Whatever you do or don't perceive Gritz to be--he has one of the most focused and brilliant minds of your generations. If he lacks a few social and political graces as we would like to re­ceive, then let us look at our own flaws and then if we are each PERFECT, cast a stone.

Yes he was a Mason and yes he was a Mormon--there is nothing hidden about either. The Anti-Christ is very devious and hard to catch, especially as you try one religious CALL after another. Where do you find God? Well, most look in all the wrong faces and places, so let's not be judging.

I don't care whether Harris was working on live anthrax or vac­cines for same, he should not have been causing such trouble when your nation is planning to go to war and is destroying things to make it look like YOU ARE DOING IT TO YOUR­SELVES. This is NOT an act of patriotism--it is the act of warped minds and selfish "saviour" attitudes.

What will SAVE your world? TRUTH! When ALL the lies stop and when it is not acceptable to have politicians lie and then rig meetings for political gain--then you may have a place to start.

Everybody hooked in with either government or intelligence services is REQUIRED TO LIE AND BE ABLE TO DO SO WHILE PASSING LIE DETECTOR TESTS. BELIEVE IT!

And, yes, I suggest to those in the "Preparedness" group to be very, very careful for you have ENEMIES and disinformation people AMONG YOU, but you already know that, don't you?

When people MOVE OUTSIDE THE LAW to save something else--they are WRONG! Two wrongs will never make even half a "right". When you learn to live in honest integrity within the laws of land and God, you will have learned what strength and power IS.

It is a bit like the President debacle. Why go over all the possi­bilities--if he had not lied and broken laws and moral guidelines for his own purposes, he would NOT BE IN THE MESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. Has anyone heard of NOT BREAKING THE LAW AND HAVING MORAL FOUNDATIONS ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY BE AN EXAMPLE FOR YOUR GROWING CHILDREN WITHIN A FREE NATION? When your top leaders are criminals, liars, cheats and immoral people‑-you have a criminal, lying, cheating and immoral NATION. And, of all the things Bo Gritz learned, it was that you can't even run for President and beat the machinery set to FIX ELECTIONS. But you can't HAVE A SAVIOR for the United States or any other "taken" nation--the nation of citizens have to SAVE THEMSELVES.

You are going to come to find that Antichrist and World Elite are not Jews, Gentiles, Catholics, Protestants, Mormons or Na­tive Americans, Europeans, or any of these THINGS. If you break the laws of GOD (CHRIST LAWS) YOU are among the Antichrist. Antichrist has no one structure--but the dangerous ones to your world ARE THE ONES AT THE TOP LEVELS OF CONTROL--EVERY TIME.

Wouldn't it be nice to point a finger and say, "Ah there goes a Mason so he is the Antichrist." Or, "That man is in the Illumi­nati and he is the Antichrist." It is not that simple, is it? For CHRIST IS A STATE OF BEING TOWARD, EVER TOWARD, perfection in TRUTH. The Masons began as BUILDERS. Ev­ery good thing that you have or begat will be corrupted if YOU ALLOW IT--but mostly in your ignorance YOU CORRUPT IT AND THEN GET MAD AT SOMEONE ELSE AND BLAME THEM FOR YOUR PLIGHT.

I can only remind each and all of you that if you live by the bomb (tinker with them or use them), by the sword, or by the gun, you will be taken DOWN with and over them. Even the CONCEPT utilized for simple "defense" will bring you down because that is the WAY you will be caught and prosecuted, in­nocent or guilty.

Anyone can take exception with me, that is not difficult no mat­ter who I might be. The proof of my teachings are exampled all about you now.

The war between good and evil WILL BE WON THROUGH SPIRIT AND WISDOM. Where have you placed YOURS? So be it.

Issue of June 26, 1920
[QUOTING:] PART 8, GLOBAL PARASITES

JEWISH QUESTION BREAKS INTO
THE MAGAZINES
"We must force the Gentile governments to adopt measures which will promote our broadly conceived plan already approaching its triumphal goal by bringing to bear the pressure of stimulated public opinion which has in reality been organized by us with the help of the so-called 'great power' of the Press. With few exceptions, not worth considering, it has already fallen into our hands." The Seventh Protocol

Once upon a time an American faculty member of an Ameri­can university went to Russia on business. He was expert in a very important department of applied science and a keen ob­server. He entered Russia with the average American's feeling about the treatment which the government of that people ac­corded the Jew. He lived there three years, came home for a year, and went back again for a similar period, and upon his second return to America he thought it was time to give the American public accurate information about the Jewish Question in Russia. He prepared a most careful article and sent it to the editor of a magazine of the first class in the Eastern United States. The editor sent for him, spent most of two days with him, and was deeply impressed with all he learned--but he said he could not print the article. The same interest and examina­tion occurred with several other magazine editors of the first rank.

It was not because the professor could not write--these editors gladly bought anything he would write on other subjects. But it was impossible for him to get his article on the Jews accepted or printed in New York.

[H: Can you see that it is not "Jew" or Jewish? It was de­cided by the Antichrist would-be-CONTROLLERS and One­World-Kings that it WOULD BE THROUGH USE OF THIS CLANNISH ELEMENT OF "DIFFERENT" PEOPLE WHO SET THEMSELVES ASIDE OF THEIR OWN ACCORD--THAT THEY COULD MAKE THEIR SUCCESSFUL PLAY OF TAKING THE WORLD. Face it, the so-called Jewish people are the first to pay in misery, and actual genocide is their plight in every game so far played among the nations.
Didn't you notice that Netanyahu FIRST went to the Jewish people in America on his last visit to get financing beyond what you already pay Israel--and got a NASTY RECEP­TION and a sound "No"? So, what did he do next? He marched over to Jerry Falwell's "christian fundamentalists" and got everything he wanted and MORE. UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT IS WRONG--YOU CAN'T FIX IT.]

The Jewish Question, however, has at last broken into a New York magazine. Rather it is a fragment of a shell hurled from the Jewish camp at the Jewish Question to demolish, if possible, the Question and thus make good the assertion that there is no such thing.

Incidentally, it is the only kind of article on the Jewish Ques­tion that the big magazines, whose mazes of financial controllers make most interesting rummaging, would care to print.

Yet, the general public may learn much about the Question even from the type of article whose purpose is to prove that the Questions doesn't exist.

Mr. William Hard, in the Metropolitan for June, has done as well as could be expected, considering the use he was supposed to make of such material as he had at hand. And doubtless the telegraph and letter brigades, which keep watch over all printed references to the Jews, have duly congratulated the good editors of the Metropolitan for their assistance in soothing the public to further sleep.

It is to be hoped, for the sake of the Question, that Mr. Hard's effort will have a wide reading, for there is very much to be learned from it--much more than it was anybody's intention should be learned from it.

It may be learned, first, that the Jewish Question exists. Mr. Hard says it is discussed in the drawing-rooms of London and Paris. Whether the mention of drawing-rooms was a writer's device to intimate that the matter was unimportant and frivolous, or merely represented the extent of Mr. Hard's contact with the Question is not clear. He adds, however, that a document re­lating to the Question was "traveled a good bit in certain official circles in Washington". He also mentions a cable dispatch to the New York World, concerning the same Question, which that paper published. His article was probably published too early to note the review which the London Times made of the first doc­ument referred to. But he has told the reader there is a Jewish Question, and that it does not exist among the riff-raff, either, but principally in those circles where the evidence of Jewish power and control is most abundant. Moreover, the Question is being discussed. Mr. Hard tells us that much. If he does not go further and tell us that it is being discussed with great serious­ness in high places and among men of national and international importance, it is probably because of one of two things, either he does not know, or he does not consider it consonant with the purpose of the article to tell.

However, Mr. Hard has already made it clear that there is a Jewish Question, that it is being discussed, that it is being dis­cussed by people who are best situated to observe the matter they are talking about.

The reading of Mr. Hard's article makes it clear also that the Question always comes to the fore on the note of conspiracy. Of course, Mr. Hard says he does not believe in conspiracies which involve a large number of people, and it is with the ut­most ease that his avowal of unbelief is accepted, for there is nothing more ridiculous to the Gentile mind than a mass con­spiracy, because there is nothing more impossible to the Gentile himself. Mr. Hard, we take it, is of non-Jewish extraction, and he knows how impossible it would be to band Gentiles together in any considerable number for any length of time in even the noblest conspiracy. Gentiles are not built for it. Their conspir­acy, whatever it might be, would fall like a rope of sand. Gen­tiles have not the basis either in blood or interest that the Jews have to stand together. The Gentile does not naturally suspect conspiracy; he will indeed hardly bring himself to the verge of believing it without the fullest proof.

It is therefore quite easy to understand Mr. Hard's difficulty with conspiracy; the point is that to write his article at all, he is forced to recognize at almost every step that whenever the Jew­ish Question is discussed, the idea of conspiracy occupies a large part in it. As a matter of fact, it is the central idea in Mr. Hard's article, and it completely monopolizes the heading--"Great Jewish Conspiracy".

The search for basic facts in Mr. Hard's article will disclose the additional information that there are certain documents in existence which purport to contain the details of the conspiracy, or--to drop a word that is unpleasant and may be misleading and which has not been used in this series--the tendency of Jewish power to achieve complete control. That is about all that the reader learns from Mr. Hard about the documents, except that he describes one as "strange and horrible". Here is indeed a re­grettable gap in the story, for it is to discredit a certain docu­ment that Mr. Hard writes, and yet he tells next to nothing about it. Discreditable documents usually discredit themselves. But this document is not permitted to do that. The reader of the ar­ticle is left to take Mr. Hard's word for it. The serious student or critic will feel, of course, that the documents themselves would have formed a better basis for an intelligent judgment. But laying that matter aside, Mr. Hard has made public the fact that there are documents.

And then Mr. Hard does another thing, as well as he can with the materials at hand, the purpose of the article being what it was, and that is to show how little the Jews have to do with the control of affairs by showing who are the Jews that do con­trol certain selected groups of affairs. The names are all brought forward by Mr. Hard and he alone is responsible for them, our purpose in referring to them being merely to show what can be learned from him.

Mr. Hard leans heavily on Russian affairs. Sometimes it would almost seem as if the Jewish Question were conceived as the Soviet Question, which it is not, as Mr. Hard very well knows, and although the two have their plain connections, it is nothing less than well-defined propaganda to set up Bolshevist fiction and knock it down by Jewish fact for the purpose of the latter. However, what Mr. Hard offers as fact is very instruc­tive, quite apart from the conclusion which he draws from it.

Now, take his Russian line-up first. He says that in the cabi­net of Soviet Russia there is only one Jew. But he is Trotsky. There are others in the government, of course, but Mr. Hard is speaking about the cabinet now. He is not speaking about the commissars, who are the real rulers of Russia, nor about the ex­ecutive troops, who are the real strength of the Trotsky-Lenin regime. No, just the cabinet. Of course, there was only one Jew prominent in Hungary, too, but he was Bela Kun. Mr. Hard does not ask us to believe, however, that it is simply be­cause of Trotsky and Kun that all Europe believes that Bolshe­vism has a strong Jewish element. Else the stupid credibility of the Gentile would be more impossible of conception than the idea of a Jewish conspiracy is to Mr. Hard's mind. Why should it be easier to believe that Gentiles are dunces than that Jews are clever?

However, it is not too much to say that Trotsky is way up at the top, sharing the utmost summit of Bolshevism with Lenin, and Trotsky is a Jew--nobody ever denied that, not even Mr. Braunstein himself (the latter being Trotsky's St. Louis, U.S.A., name).

But then, says Mr. Hard, the Mensheviks are led by Jews, too! That is a fact worth putting down beside the others. Trot­sky at the head of the Bolsheviks; at the head of the Mensheviks during their opposition of the Bolsheviks were Lieber, Martov and Dan--"all Jews", says Mr. Hard.

There is, however, a middle party between these extremes, the Cadets, which Mr. Hard says, are or were the strongest bourgeois political party in Russia. "They now have their head­quarters in Paris. Their chairman is Vinaver--a Jew."

There are the facts as stated by Mr. Hard. He says that Jews, whose names he gives, head the three great divisions of political opinion in Russia.

And then he cries, look how the Jews are divided! How can there be conspiracy among people who thus fight themselves?

But another, looking at the same situation may say, look how the Jews control every phase of political opinion in Russia! Doesn't there seem to be some ground for the feeling that they are desirous of ruling everywhere?

The facts are there. What significance does it bring to the average mind that the three great parties of Russia are led by Jews?

But that does not exhaust the information which the matter-of-fact reader may find in Mr. Hard's article. He turns to the United States and makes several interesting statements.

"There is Otto Kahn," he says. Well, sometimes Otto Kahn is there, and sometimes he is in Paris on important international matters, and sometimes he is in London advocating certain al­liances between British and American capital which have to do in a large way with European political conditions. The most conservative men in America are really the most radical; their motives and methods go to the very roots of certain matters; and they are radicals in their own field. The men who controlled the last Republican Convention--if not the last, the most recent--are styled conservatives by those whose vision is circumscribed by certain limited economic interests; but they are the most radical of radicals, they have passed the red stage and are white with it. If it were known what is in the back of Mr. Kahn's mind, if he should display a chart of what he is doing and aiming to do, the term which would then most aptly describe him might be quite different. Anyway, we have it from Mr. Hard, "There is Mr. Kahn."

"On the other hand," says Mr. Hard, "there is Rose Pastor Stokes." He adds the name of Morris Hillquit. They are, in Mr. Hard's classification, radicals. And to offset these names he adds the names of two Gentiles, Eugene V. Debs and Bill Haywood and intimates that they are much more powerful lead­ers than the first two. Students of modern influences, of which Mr. Hard has long appeared as one, do not think so. Neither Debs nor Haywood ever generated in all their lives a fraction of the intellectual power which Mrs. Stokes and Mr. Hillquit have generated. Both Debs and Haywood live by the others. To ev­ery informed person, as to Mr. Hard in this article, come the Jewish names to mind when the social tendencies of the United States are passed under reflection.

This is most instructive indeed, that in naming the leaders of so-called conservatism and radicalism, Mr. Hard is driven to use Jewish names. On his showing the reader is entitled to say that Jews lead both divisions here in the United States.

But Mr. Hard is not through. "The man who does more than any other man--the man who does more than any regiment of other men--to keep American labor anti-radical is a Jew--Samuel Gompers." That is a fact which the reader will place in his list--American labor is led by a Jew.

Well, then, "The strongest anti-Gompers trade union in the country--The Amalgamated Clothing Workers--and very strong indeed, and very large--is led by a Jew--Sidney Hillman."

It is the Russian situation over again. Both ends of the movements, and the movement which operates within the movement, are under the leadership of Jews. This, whatever the construction put upon it, is a fact which Mr. Hard is com­pelled by the very nature of his task to acknowledge.

And the middle movement, "the Liberal Middle" as Mr. Hard calls it, which catches all between, produces in this article the names of Mr. Justice Brandeis, Judge Mack and Felix Frankfurter, gentlemen whose activities since Armistice Day would make a very interesting story.

For good measure, Mr. Hard produces two other names, "Baron Gunzberg--a Jew" who is "a faithful official" of the Rus­sian Embassy of Ambassador Bakhmetev, a representative of the modified old regime, while the Russian Information Bureau, whose literary output appears in many of our newspapers, is conducted by another Jew, so Mr. Hard calls him, whose name is familiar to newspaper readers, Mr. A.J. Sack.

It is not a complete list by any means, but it is quite impres­sive. It seems to reflect importance on the documents which Mr. Hard endeavors to minimize to a position of ridiculous unimportance. And it leads to the thought that perhaps the doc­uments are scrutinized as carefully as they are because the read­ers of them have observed not only the facts which Mr. Hard admits but other and more astonishing ones, and have discov­ered that the documents confirm and explain the observations. Other readers who have not had the privilege of learning all that the documents contain are entitled to have satisfaction given to the interest thus aroused.

The documents did not create the Jewish Question. If there were nothing but the documents, Mr. Hard would not have written nor would the Metropolitan magazine have printed the article here discussed.

What Mr. Hard has done is to bring confirmation in a most unexpected place that the Question exists and is pressing for dis­cussion. Someone felt the pressure when "The Great Jewish Conspiracy" was ordered and written.

Issue of June 26, 1920

[END OF QUOTING]

Dharma, go back up to the top of the copy and place the date of publication, when we have it. It may take a bit of time for us but I think it important that these articles are recognized as being done long ago and are not of our work but very important as historical foundation for our discussions. When you realize that these are, at this time of writing, some 78 years ago and done by one of the world's leading industrial producers, perhaps you can see how usurped the very Jewish people were and ARE.

There is something else to be noted here and that is that the Protocols WERE VERY MUCH AROUND AND VERY MUCH RECOGNIZED all the way back, at the least, to the turn of the century. Therefore, when people tell you they are fabrications, forgeries, or false information--you KNOW BET­TER.

These go hand in hand with TALMUDIC "religion" and have very little to do with any TORAH mandates or Spiritual aspect.

As you listen to the NEW LEADERS of your nation right here in the U.S.A., as the lawyers and Judges prattle and speculate--there is more and more frequent use and reference to "Talmudic law" and its acceptance in the Judicial system THAT IS. You heard it casually referred to between Marsha Clarke and Judge Ito (Japanese yet) in the Simpson case, and you hear it used al­most daily now in the "panels" of expert observers on the talk circuits regarding the President's indiscretions. This goes be­yond the mundane Admiralty or Maritime law bases of judicial take-over--this is the final hookers to have no judicial justice AT ALL. Remember that Kol Nidre--NOBODY BUT THE IGNO­RANT HAVE TO TELL THE TRUTH--BY LAW. Plausible denial AND LYING ARE TOTALLY ACCEPTABLE. Well, not to me.

The prattle goes like this: "If you are President, it's alright to dink around with a little kid, but it is not ok to lie under oath." What OATH? After all, it goes on to be prattled: "...politicians HAVE TO lie". Say what?

I don't know about YOU in particular, but I know that lying is the most acceptable thing you people do and you claim it is to keep from hurting or offending. "Little white lies" you call them. If someone asks for help you say, "I gave at the of­fice..." or "Well, I have this tax problem..." or "I wanted to go but I had..." and the big one, "Well, I had this little fling affair but I didn't want to hurt my wife/husband so...". THIS IS WHERE IT BEGINS, GOOD CITIZENS--RIGHT THERE AND WITH YOU and your own acceptance of bad behaviors, irresponsible attitudes and "me-ness" (if it feels good and I can hide it--fine, go for it). But you know something? These atti­tudes DO DAMAGE--starting with SELF.

Do you ever fudge? Do you ever find self guilty of these little things--ARE YOU JEWISH? Then why do you blame someone else? The QUESTION is truly not Jewish or Gentile--it is WRONG VS. RIGHT. And a full-blown military excursion where you go kill people half a world away--unilaterally without recourse, IS WAR.

ANTI-CHRIST IS ANYONE WHO ACTS AGAINST THE LAWS AND GUIDELINES OF CHRIST! NOW, IS THAT SIMPLE ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND?

So, have I fudged about, say, Col. Bo Gritz and the tales which were not true? No, but I knew the difference--but I only re­peated what was personally told to me by Mr. Gritz himself and in his public literature. Man has no other source upon which to base his understanding except that which he LEARNS, and if you refuse to learn truth, you are trapped within the LIE. I re­peat what was said last night by a TV Host: "Did it ever occur to anyone to not break the law in the first place?" It is sort of like "safe sex"--did anyone think of solving the problems by RESPONSIBILITY and not playing in the clandestine and dan­gerous games? Catching a disease is one of the lesser lasting damages from "unsafe sex".

If you learned that it was fine to play around, then you DID NOT LEARN THAT FROM CHRIST--THEREFORE, SINCE THERE IS ONLY "CHRIST" AND "ANTICHRIST", WHICH WAS YOUR TEACHER?

I am being hard on everyone? OH? How so? I would not have assumed that any of YOU would practice irresponsible behav­iors--if you follow the RIGHT TEACHERS. So, scribe, per­haps we won't have to work so hard later if we do our work now--we don't have to change the world, save anyone or the world, JUST TELL THE TRUTH. God promised the WORD OF TRUTH and never did HE suggest we stuff it down any­one's gullet!

Moreover, don't be offended by callers who claim their way is righteous and yours is incorrect and go on to explain how they do their good works sponsoring Boy's choirs and good candi­dates for power places. We can't afford to do the paper much the less sponsor Boy's choirs from Europe to America. Culture comes when a world is good enough to endorse and support good culture--until then it is simply a bunch of little boys singing, in this instance, Catholic songs.

And what of such as Yanni? Yanni is a Ramtha student now almost totally orchestrated by the CIA. Shocking? Can't be the truth? Oh yes indeed it is so. How do you think such inroads were made into China and India to do a "New Age" concert? His lady is a long-time intimate supporter of J.Z. and the "movement". Don't be blind just because you are titillated by some show or tell.

So, who is this 64,000-year-old E.T., Ramtha? He is now a 64,032-year-old E.T., I suppose. Do I know him? Of course, we all come to know these "barbarians" as he describes himself, "Master".

"But Yanni is Greek..." you exclaim. Yes, and so is Latsis of the Greek Mafia. Greece fell, Rome fell, Egypt fell, all the GREAT civilization FELL. IS IT NOW YOUR TURN? AND, OH YES INDEED, THIS THING YOU CALL THE "CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION" WILL FALL BECAUSE YOU HAVE LEFT OUT ONE THING: CHRIST. Adonai.
CHAPTER 4
REC #1 HATONN
SAT., FEB. 21, 1998 8:01 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 189

SAT., FEB. 21, 1998
THE SHAME AND THE BLAME
IS ON "YOU". AMERICA, U.S.A.
We actually had a high-level marketing person FROM AN­OTHER NEWSPAPER call and tell us to stop running the mate­rial we are covering.

Number one: We will run TRUTH until somebody who can stop the insanity does so.

Number two: If another paper runs something publicly that is worthy of note, we will use it if we have permission. If no permission is granted, we will not even further recommend any of you readers take that paper. NOBODY has an inside track on this world MESS, and unless they are writing pure fiction under copyright, do they have the "Wag the Dog" corner on the do­mestic mess.

Number three: For goodness sakes, readers, KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING BEFORE YOU DO IT--OR AT THE LEAST KNOW WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU ARE STOPPED FROM DOING IT.

Why have I been writing about "Jews" and Israeli matters? Be­cause of the following:

[QUOTING, SPOTLIGHT, Feb. 23, 1998:]

EDITORIAL
THINK ABOUT IT
Throughout history there have been thousands of wars. The victor may commit genocide. He may stack human skulls in pyramids, rape and enslave the women and kill the men. He can raze the cities and burn the crops.

These are things a victor MAY do. But there is one thing he absolutely HAS TO DO.

A victor always must control the subjugated nation's foreign policy and armed forces. This is certain.

IS IT NOT TRUE THAT AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY HAS BEEN TAKEN OVER AND IS RUN FOR THE BENEFIT OFA FOREIGN NATION?

Of course this is true.
Therefore, is America a conquered vassal of a foreign na­tion, even though most Americans are unaware of it?

Answer that question HONESTLY, if you are capable of honesty. THINK ABOUT IT. [END OF QUOTING]

Make sure Ms. Albright's picture is affixed; you know, that Secretary of State, U.S.A. who "didn't know she was Jewish".

(Make sure Ms. Albright's picture is affixed;
you know, that Secretary of State, U.S.A.
who "didn't know she was Jewish".)
SPOTLIGHT's same paper has a most interesting Front Page ar­ticle. Note while you read this information regarding disinfor­mation just how much totally bad information is being fed to your leaders in order for you, as a nation, to become world killers, first class! Remember the President and the scallywags are telling you that Saddam has some 80 palaces of sizes ranging from huge and palatial to even bigger than many states in the U. S.?

Well, the U.N. diplomats have now found all EIGHT of them, gone through them thoroughly, found living quarters of rather small size and grounds of small size with perhaps a pond or so. There is NOTHING in them that so much as suggests there is anything amiss--IN ANY OF THEM.

THERE IS A MOVE ON NOW TO GET U.S. CITIZENS OF DIPLOMATIC STATURE, ARAB DIPLOMATS, PERHAPS THE U.N. DELEGATES AND AMBASSADORS, AND SET­TING UP HOUSEKEEPING IN ALL OF THE PLACES TARGETED FOR BOMBS--AND SEE HOW EAGER MR. CLINTON IS TO PLAY PAC-MAN VIDEO GAMES. IS­RAEL WANTS TO HAVE ANY EXCUSE TO USE NEU­TRON BOMBS ON AN ENEMY--AND THAT IS SOON GO­ING TO BE "YOU" GOOD BUDDIES. YOU ARE TO­TALLY CONTROLLED BY THIS ISRAELI CRIMINAL EL­EMENT AND YOU WILL EITHER WAKE UP OR IT IS OVER FOR AMERICA AND THE SO-CALLED "FREE WORLD". YOU ARE RIGHT FACE-TO-FACE WITH IT, AMERICA.
[QUOTING:]

CLINTON HOODWINKED ON IRAQ
DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN BY MOSSAD
by Martin Mann
Once again a foreign intelligence service has hoodwinked an American President. This time the subject is Iraq. [H: By the way, "hoodwinked" is a good old Masonic term.]

The Clinton administration is being relentlessly driven toward another armed clash with Iraq--and a disastrous confrontation with the vast world of Islam. The motivating factor is a stream of deceptive and fabricated intelligence reports fed to the White House, congressional leaders and the U.S. mainstream media by the Israeli government and its powerful Washington lobby.

The SPOTLIGHT has learned exclusively from briefings and documents provided by high-level diplomatic sources that Presi­dent Bill Clinton's decision to order U.S. forces in the Gulf on a war footing came after he was shown top secret strategic esti­mates arguing that the regime of Iraqi strongman Saddam Hus­sein could be toppled by "crippling" air raids.

UNRELIABLE REPORTS
But Middle Eastern diplomatic sources warn that these re­ports are based on information put out by the Mossad, Israel's secret service, after its agents purportedly co-opted and de­briefed a key Iraqi defector last December. [H: "Purportedly" is THE key word here. My goodness, readers, aren't you sick unto death of the cheats, liars and Kol Nidre misfits? What does it take to wake you up and get you "mad as hell" so you don't take it anymore? You were once the shining light of the world in freedom, respect, and JOY. You were the dream of every foreign person as a place to live and BE. YOU HAVE BECOME THE EVIL EMPIRE ABOVE ALL OTHERS! YOU ARE TOTALLY RUN BY THE AN­TICHRIST!
Well, we are run by the help of honest people who support just the mere writing of the word. And here is some non-difficult intelligence reporting: Again, Dr. Young reports that we don't even have enough funds to publish this paper. Well, we dug up funds enough for this one--but how do we do the next? Every other truth-bringer is in the same posi­tion and, therefore, we each do that which we can and push as hard as we can to survive. But is survival enough? You must face your enemy NOW, World, for he has just eaten and is digesting America (all countries represented therein).]

In a detailed intelligence summary distributed both to the White House and the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Mossad identified the defector as Iraqi Lt. Col. Wafik al­Sammarrai. He was described as a former chief of Saddam Hussein's military intelligence service, who was said to have de­fected in late 1996 while on a trip to Greece.

Col. al-Sammarrai allegedly told Israeli interrogators that a number of Iraq's armed forces commanders were "fed up" with Saddam Hussein's one-man rule and opposed his "suicidal" con­frontation with the West.

According to the Mossad summary sent to Washington through back channels, the renegade Iraqi officer identified some of these disaffected generals by name.

If pounding, merciless U.S. air raids smashed the Iraqi ruler's palaces, his national communications network including Baghdad TV and radio, as well as other key installations, the generals would "see the light" and oust Saddam Hussein, Col. al-Sammarrai reportedly assured his Israeli interrogators.

WARNING NOTICE
But senior Middle Eastern diplomatic sources have provided this populist newspaper's diplomatic correspondent with access to a warning notice circulated last month by the Arab League among the leaders of its 21 member states.

The confidential memorandum points out that the Mossad's intelligence summary, attempting to justify all-out bombardment of Iraq, sounds like a fabrication.

It appears to be just another "disinformation, cover and de­ception operation of the sort Israel has launched on numerous past occasions" to mislead and manipulate U.S. strategy, the Arab League circular cautions.

[H: How many of you readers are even yet informed (by the time you get this paper) about the cute games of yesterday and the day before BY YOUR U.S. GOVERNMENT AND THE MOVIE MAKERS? THEY GOT CAUGHT WITH THE FILM OF BOMBING RUNS AND STRIKES AL­READY READY TO SHOW YOU-THE-PEOPLE, Is this Mr. Spielberg at his finest, or what? WAG THE DOG, PEOPLE; THIS IS SICKER THAN SICK. YOU PLAN TO GO BOMB A BUNCH OF PEOPLE AND YET THE NICE PRECISION STRIKES MOVIE YOU WILL BE SHOWN AS PUBLIC ONGOING "REPORTING" IS NOT ONLY READY, IT IS EDITED AND WAITING. THE EDITING CREW GOT CAUGHT AND, OF COURSE, THE REAL LIES STARTED LIKE A BLIZZARD, BUT ALL THE STORIES WERE DIFFERENT--OH WELL. AND WHAT HAPPENED ON THE MOON WITH YOU GUYS? AN­TICHRIST HAS GOTCHA, AMERICA!]

It cites several inconsistencies in the Mossad's intelligence summary, including the fact that Col. al-Sammarrai "is known to have left Iraq well before 1996; in fact, he has been described as a paid international anti-Saddam operative ever since 1993."

As for the Israeli intelligence summary's claim that aerial warfare will set the stage for military uprising in Iraq, indepen­dent observers around the world scoffed at the proposition.

Even the staid London Times--the voice of Britain's ruling Establishment, claimed by Clinton as his closest ally--dismissed the notion with a single word: "Lunacy".

OPPOSITION
The Saudi government responded to these developments with an official announcement by Prince Sultan, its defense minister and second prime minister, widely respected as the Arab world's wisest and most statesmanlike leader.

"Saudi Arabia is opposed to bombing raids or other military action against the nation and people of Iraq," Prince Sultan pro­claimed.

Egypt--known in ordinary times as Washington's best-paid and least troublesome Mideast client--went even further. Presi­dent Hosni Mubarak announced that he would convene an emer­gency Arab summit to adopt "measures to prevent any armed aggression against Iraq". [H: And, you will note: THAT HAS HAPPENED!]
[END OF QUOTING]

While we are on the topic and have permission to further spread the information, and with unlimited gratitude to SPOTLIGHT who has had to fight these Antichrists for years, let us share some more "REAL STUFF". I ask that we please give all in­formation regarding Spotlight AND Liberty Lobby. If you won't hear us, readers, LISTEN TO THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN AROUND YOUR PLACE, LEARNING THE HARD WAY.

[QUOTING:]

ANATOMY OF DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN:
IT'S IRAN-CONTRA AFFAIR ALL OVER AGAIN
by Martin Mann
Today's Mideast deception campaign has a "made in Israel" la­bel, just like the Iran-Contra scandal.

Ten years ago, National Review, the nominally conservative magazine published by talk-show host William F. Buckley, [a Jew with a British accent], provided the anatomy of a mammoth disinformation and deception operation by Israel. This was the so-called Iran-Contra affair. Now another Israeli operation against the U.S. government threatens to plunge the country into war, and Israel is using the same blueprint. [H: No! It is not against the U.S. government. Just like back then--THEY ARE THE U.S. GOVERNMENT!]

But the story of how National Review turned into a vehicle for the ministate's black propaganda mendacities is important again this year, when the Israel lobby is once again inflaming public opinion--this time against Iraq--with a similar campaign of lies and distorted "threat assessments".

Buckley and his magazine became unwitting instruments of Israel's entrapment [H: Oh Barf, Mr. Mann.] scheme because both were known for their unconditional support of President Ronald Reagan and of Zionism at the time, evidence assembled by this populist newspaper has suggested.

In the fall of 1986, the Reagan administration faced a poten­tially fatal crisis: headline stories involving some of its top offi­cials in a conspiracy to sell high-tech armaments to Iran and to funnel some of the proceeds to the Nicaraguan anti-communist fighters known as the "Contras". [H: When all this shakes out you will learn it had nothing to do with Communism and ev­erything to do with CIA-Administration DRUG RUNNING. ARMS WERE ALSO BEING FUNNELLED TO IRAQ AND SADDAM HUSSEIN ALONG WITH BOODLES OF MONEY.]

To defend themselves against charges of criminal conspiracy, Reagan's top aides decided to tell their story--an account of "what really happened"--to a friendly and trusted U.S. publica­tion.

The White House chose Buckley and his National Review, known for their unswerving loyalty to Reaganism and to the ide­als of a "Greater Israel". [H: Now, this is right on the mark.]
On Friday, November 14, 1986--the morning after Reagan gave a speech in which he told the nation of the Iran problem for the first time--the writer assigned by Buckley to the case, Neil C. Livingstone, an "anti-terrorist" expert, sat down in Washington's posh Hay-Adams hotel with Lt. Col. OLIVER NORTH for a secret briefing on the affair. [H: Don't forget this is the SAME Oliver North who went with George Bush, James Baker HI, Lloyd Bentsen, and another couple of thugs, to the hospital to get Russell Herman to sign over the "Super-Fund" Peruvian contract of such current fame. They really couldn't do much more to him, however, for they HAD ALREADY KILLED HIM; he was just waiting to die and even though they hastened his departure-time a bit, he held strong and DID NOT MEET THEIR DEMANDS. INSTEAD, HE AND V.K. DURHAM HAD PUT THAT CONTRACT TO PUBLIC RECORD FOR YOU-THE-PEO­PLE. HOW BLIND YOU ARE AND HOW CARELESS WITH THE GREAT GIFTS OF GOD AND THE SACRI­FICES OF "REAL" MEN. WAS RUSSELL SO GREAT IN HIS INTENTIONS ALL ALONG? NO, HE WAS A FULL PARTNER WITH THEM, SO CERTAINLY HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING AND DID IT FOR YOU AND YOU DIDN'T HAVE THE TIME OF DAY FOR HIM OR HIS GIFT.]

In a lead article in the January 30, 1987 issue of National Re­view, Livingstone reported on what he learned at that briefing under a splashy cover headline: "What Ollie North Told Me Before He Took the Fifth." [H: And believe me when I tell you that Billy Zipper is "just not himself" lately. He is hav­ing to go to Camp David for revamping every weekend these days. He can't even help what he is doing--he is nothing but a brain-controlled robot.]

"What follows is, I believe, the true story behind the secret diplomacy with Iran, as told to me by Ollie North," Livingstone wrote.

In essence, North told the National Review writer that the Reagan Administration, "acting in concert with Israel", had de­cided to sell missiles to Iran after it received secret intelligence reports of menacing Soviet preparations to invade and seize this oil-rich Gulf nation.

Although Livingstone's article did not specify just where these blockbuster "intelligence" reports came from, it is known today, from the confessions of Col. Robert "Bud" McFarlane, who served as national security director in the Reagan White House at the time, that the reports of a planned Soviet takeover of Iran came from three top Mossad agents.

AGENTS NAMED
McFarlane has identified them as David Kimche, then a deputy director of the Israeli secret service; Amiram Nir, the chief intelligence adviser in the Israeli prime minister's office; and Manucher Ghorbanifar, a millionaire arms dealer and Zionist deception operative.

These Mossad middlemen urgently warned the Reagan White House that legions of Soviet agents--"as many as 600 KGB op­eratives and Spetsnaz [Russian Special Forces unit]" Livingstone reported in National Review--had been infiltrated into Teheran to subvert Iran's fundamentalist Islamic government.

The undercover Bolshevik invasion of Iran was first of all de­signed to fan the flames of the Iran-Iraq war then in full swing. The Iranian high command was being lured into disastrous as­saults in well-defined Iraqi lines by Soviet disinformation, Ollie North related to Livingstone.

"Once the Iranian military were destroyed and the [Iranian] Revolutionary Guards were drawn out of Teheran, Moscow's Iranian allies will seize the government, and, as in Afghanistan, request Soviet military assistance," North told the National Re­view writer.

To comply with that request, hundreds of thousands of Soviet troops were already being massed near the Iranian border, North disclosed.

As Washington national security officials came to "recognize the seriousness of this threat" reported by Israeli intelligence, President Reagan gave the go-ahead for contacting and arming the "moderate" factions in the Iranian government, who were al­ready said to be in touch with the Mossad, North explained to Livingstone.

AFTERMATH
What followed was the tragic-comic aerial mission to Teheran by a secret team of Reagan aides, who were sent to contact the "Iranian moderates" promised by the Mossad-- only to find that they didn't exist.

In the aftermath, Reagan's national security chief, Col. Mc­Farlane, who felt duped and disgraced by the Mossad's David Kimche, attempted to kill himself.

Today it is well known that the so-called Israeli "intelligence reports" were at the heart of the Iran-Contra scandal. All of the Mossad's warnings about a Soviet plan to grab Iran were lies, cunning fabrications designed to stampede the Reagan Adminis­tration into endorsing secretive but highly lucrative Israeli arms sales to Iran.

[END OF QUOTING]

AND HERE IS A COMFORTING SOMETHING ABOUT "WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION"--FOR REAL:

[QUOTING, same paper, same page:]

U.S. TACTICAL NUKES ON STANDBY IN GULF
by Mike Blair
Military experts say nuclear weapons must be on board U.S. ships in the Persian Gulf.

U.S. aircraft carriers poised in the Middle East to launch strikes against Iraq are carrying tactical nuclear bombs and mis­siles with which to arm jet fighter-bombers.

This is the opinion of a retired Air Force intelligence officer who spoke with The SPOTLIGHT, on the guarantee of anonymity, about the potential tinder box that is about to be ig­nited in the Persian Gulf.

"Since President Clinton has signed a directive [SPOTLIGHT, Feb. 16] changing the rules to allow the use of tactical nuclear weapons to blast Iraq, it stands to reason that such weapons are already aboard aircraft carriers on station there," the retired officer explained.

"Certainly," he added, "if a decision is made to use such weapons in retaliation for Iraq's use, or apparent use, of bio­logical and chemical weapons against our troops, or Israel, our military could not be expected to have to wait until they are de­livered to the carriers from bases outside the area."

PPD-60 CONFIRMED
The retired intelligence officer was referring to a Presidential Order signed last November, Presidential Policy Directive No. 60, or PPD-60, as it is more commonly known.

The directive alters U.S. nuclear policy to allow the use of tactical nuclear weapons in the event that Saddam Hussein re­leases any chemical or biological weapons against U.S. forces or neighboring countries, (read: Israel), according to reports being specifically mentioned in the document.

It is believed that the directive would allow the use of B61 se­ries of tactical nuclear warheads, the so-called "mini-nukes" which have an explosive force of about one kiloton, which makes them about 300 to 500 times more powerful than the largest conventional non-nuclear warheads available to the U.S. military. [H: Very definitely "weapons of mass destruction" any way you cut this pie.]

The retired Air Force officer [H: He isn't named because we want him to remain "retired" and not "dead".] told The SPOTLIGHT that he believes the nuclear warheads are aboard the U.S. carriers and probably on U.S. surface-to-surface guided missile cruisers and destroyers deployed to the Gulf re­gion. [H: How does this make you feel about the security of your own sons, husbands, fathers and brothers?]

He said he doubts that they are deployed to Bahrain and Kuwait, from which U.S. Air Force planes will strike Iraq, be­cause the U.S. military would not have total control of these foreign bases.

However, bases in Bahrain are known to be a jump-off point for U.S. F-15 E fighter bombers and B-1 subsonic bombers, both of which carry laser-guided bombs including an enhanced GBU28, which can penetrate 11 feet of reinforced concrete.

Both Red China and Russia have announced very vocal oppo­sition to the planned U.S. air strikes against Iraq.

The question on the minds of many foreign policy experts is whether Russian President Boris Yeltsin was thinking specifi­cally of the U.S. use of tactical nuclear weapons when he stated that an air strike against Saddam Hussein's domain "could spark World War III.

Actually, the U.S. has pledged not to use nuclear weapons on a signer of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iraq is a sig­natory. Israel IS NOT.

That argument does not appease either the Russians or the Red Chinese, both of which are capable of launching nuclear attacks against the United States.

[END OF QUOTING]

Now for you who want me to stop writing about these topics, I will tell you now: NO. In addition to other nasties, this is a major opportunity, whether there is, or is not, war, to get an unlimited number of Israelis INTO THE UNITED STATES PERMANENTLY on the basis of their "danger" in Israel, from Iraq. By the PLANELOADS these "now-called refugees" are flooding out of Tel Aviv and INTO THE U.S. AND OTHER INTERIM PLACES WHERE THEY WILL THEN BE TRANSFERRED INTO THE U.S. WITHOUT NEED OF PASSPORTS, PERMISSION, PERMITS OR ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS.

I believe it is now appropriate to close this writing with an arti­cle from THE TORONTO STAR, Feb. 20, 1998.

[QUOTING:]

FARRAKHAN MAKES FIERY PLEA
CHALLENGES MAJOR FAITHS IN TORONTO SPEECH
Rebecca Bragg, staff reporter
Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan wrapped up a 53-na­tion tour in Toronto last night with a fiery plea for a "revolution" in ATTITUDE among all faith groups.

In a speech before about 3,000 people at the CNE Coliseum, Farrakhan, who has come under fire in the past for anti-Semitic remarks, slammed all the world's major religions for straying from the intent of their prophets.

And while no faith was singled out for special criticism, Far­rakhan took aim at people who gave lip service to their religions without making a corresponding commitment to action.

"Goodness is measured by the quality of your service to God and the quality of your service to man," the charismatic but controversial American leader thundered.

Too many Christians, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists and Hindus "refuse to attempt the uphill road" and take actions such as "freeing a slave or feeding an orphan", Farrakhan said.

Although everyone who attended the speech was subjected to a thorough body search before they were allowed in the audito­rium, there wasn't a hint of disorderly conduct all evening.

Farrakhan's Toronto supporters--women dressed in white tu­nics and hljab (headscarves), clean-cut young men in suits with trademark white shirts and bow ties--were helpful but otherwise unobtrusive.

Although the vast majority of people in the audience were Black, not all were Muslim, and the event opened first with Is­lamic prayers in Arabic, then Christian prayers in English.

CANADA AND THE U.S.
GOVERNMENTS DRAW CRITICISM ON IRAQ
While the Nation of Islam has been criticized for anti-White bigotry, its followers, mainly in the United States, have also been praised for their commitment to clean living and commu­nity involvement.

Nothing that Farrakhan, 64, said last night could have been construed as racially divisive.

But his attitude toward a possible military strike against Iraq left no room for doubt that governments of the Untied States and Canada are in the WRONG.

"My dear Prime Minister, what has Iraq done to you?" Far­rakhan asked rhetorically.

"We can't let these politicians rule when they're [crazy] as hell."

Whatever weapons Saddam Hussein now has in his army were sold to him by Western countries, he told the crowd.

"As long as Saddam was killing Muslims in Iran, the West didn't give a damn what weapons he used," Farrakhan said.

Now, with the Iraqi people having endured seven years of deprivation since the Gulf War, "Nothing but a damn group of cowards would make war on a nation that has no ability to fight back," he said.

[END OF QUOTING]

Our plea is always, "God please have mercy on us." NO, readers, THERE WILL BE NO MERCY FOR YOUR DELIBERATE ALLOWANCE OF THIS KIND OF ACTION. NONE. THE RETALIATION FROM THE ARAB AND OTHER PEO­PLES OF THE WORLD WILL FALL ON THE DOORSTEPS OF THOSE WHO ALLOWED THE ANTICHRIST OF THE JEWISH FORMAT TO RUN RAMPANT. YOU WILL BE CAUGHT BETWEEN THOSE WHO WOULD KILL YOU ON ONE SIDE AND THOSE WHO WILL WIPE OUT COUN­TRIES WHO HAVE HARBORED THESE ALIENS. IF "YOU" ARE IN THE COUNTRY OF THE BASTARDS, YOU WILL NOT BE SHOWN MUCH MERCY, MY FRIENDS. THAT PHOENIX EMBLEM ON THE JOURNALS AND THAT LOGO ON CONTACT WILL BE "YOUR" TICKET TO SAFETY--I SUGGEST YOU NOT LET THIS RESOURCE DIE BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE MANY TICKETS TO "ANYWHERE" AVAILABLE TO YOU--AND THIS IS GO­ING TO BE BETTER THAN ANY BLOOD SMEARED ACROSS YOUR DOORWAY FOR A "PASSOVER" CERE­MONY.

Now to close with a confirming notice about what I wrote yes­terday about reparations to Holocaust survivors:

[QUOTING:]

BETTER THAN GOLD
[H: Let's see, the war was in the '40s, half a century ago!]

Fifty-four years have passed and 100 BILLION Duetsch Marks of German reparations have been paid to "Holocaust sur­vivors" but the Conference of Jewish Material Claims Against Germany has just come up with 18,000 "NEW" Eastern Eu­ropean survivors WHO WILL RECEIVE AN ADDITIONAL DM50 MILLION for each of the next four years from an ever compliant Bonn government.

[END OF QUOTING]

I simply have not the time to speak on all things, so we must fo­cus on that which may allow you to LIVE A LITTLE LONGER.

Good afternoon; have a nice day. Adonai.