Tags, 상세검색
응답: PJ#228, RISE OF ANTICHRIST VOL. 2
PJ 228IMPORTANTANNOUNCEMENTHatonn has asked us to run the Freedman letter to Goldstein, [Facts Are Facts, From One "Jew" To Another; Long Buried Truth Must Be Revealed] OFTEN [A letter from a Jew to a Jew covering information that is critical for all to know if we are to restore any political freedom to our dying world]. It offers good information along with excellent reference material. HE FEELS IT URGENTLY NECESSARY TO KEEP CONSTANT REMINDERS BEFORE OUR READERS, AND THE JEWS, THAT WE ARE ONLY REPRINTING INFORMATION. THIS IS OUR KEY TO SURVIVAL AS A PAPER AND AS PEOPLE.
In this letter Mr. Freedman covers many topics several of which are: Jesus Was Not A Jew--Some Of The History Of The Modern Day Jew And His Origins--Some Of The History Of The Talmud [Some Very Important Quotes From It Including Permission For Sexual Attacks Upon Babies, Etc.]--The Kol Nidre Oath. The Very Harmful Influence The Talmud and Kol Nidre Writings Have Exerted On The Entire World For Centuries--The Jews Are Not Any Part Of The "Lost Ten Tribes".
This letter takes over 100 pages in a Journal so we will only give the sources for it: Phoenix Journal #223 BIRTHING THE PHOENIX, Vol. 2 85 #233 RISE OF ANTICHRIST, Vol. 5 or CONTACT March 17, 1998, Vol. 20, #4.
Appendix Of DefinitionsExcerpt from HATONN writing 3/7/98 #1:
My goodness, only a couple of weeks into our topic and the sky is falling Hennie-Pennie. By the way, "You and all your readers are anti-Semitic," say a couple of the writers, "this is hate literature..." and "Tell us again your definitions because these writings are made to look like research".
I don't care what they look like, readers. I am using material researched in the early '20s. I don't, nor did I, make the rules of action for those calling themselves Jews.
I don't call them Jews; they named themselves that over a thousand years after Immanuel, the one you call Jesus, was long gone. They priorly called themselves
"The Serpent People", also known as Khazarian (many spellings of this word), and when a "religion" was required of them--they took up the Judean "faith" (misdefinition). They were commercially oriented and warriors, with the more blood spilled the better--and they called "that" sacrifice. They never pretended to be Semites until in the modern last century and a half when it could be used as a tool against Gentiles. There is no recognized "in-between"; there are, according to the self-styled, self-named "Jews", ONLY JEWS AND GENTILES.
You see, readers, I can't help it if you know NO HISTORY--for it is all available for your investigation.
If we deal with this confusion, also realize that CONFUSION is the number one tool of this group of nomadic peoples.
SEMITE: 1. A member of any of the peoples supposedly descended from Shem, the eldest son of Noah. (So the "Jews" of today ARE NOT SEMITES, nor are the Judeans or Hebrews.) 2. a Jew (but note this is only a MODERN classification in the Encyclopedia). 3. a member of ANY OF THE VARIOUS ANCIENT AND MODERN peoples originating in SW Asia, including the Sumerians, Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, and ARABS.
SEMITIC: 1. An important SUBfamily of AFRO-ASIATIC languages, including Akkadian, Arabic, Aramaic and Hebrew.
SEMITICS: The study of the Semitic languages, literature, etc. [H: So, perhaps this is where they get bent out of shape for, in studying the languages, history and literature, we find that the "Jew" does not fit into these categories--as Semites.]
SEMITISM: A term coined to refer to the "modern" Jew. It is a word or idiom peculiar to, derived from, or characteristic of a Semitic language. [H: But YIDDISH is a separate language MADE to fit the Talmudic people and laws.]
So, the controlled meaning set forth by the so-called Jews: A disparaging or antagonistic attitude or hostile act toward a Jewish person, Jewish organization or the religion of Judaism. [H: This, further, only refers to the "Yiddish" "Jew" and not the Middle East Judeans or Semites. Remember that Semites come from the Tribe of Shem--and these people in point DO NOT.]
COVERT INTENT: Used to disarm, intimidate and confuse Christians (GENTILES OF ALL RACES, CREEDS, COLOR) into submission to Jews at the expense and eventual destruction of Christianity.
ACTUAL MEANING: OPPOSITION TOWARD PEOPLE OF SEMITIC (SHEMITIC) ORIGIN. Most people calling themselves Jews are NOT Semitic in origin. "SEMITISM" HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH JEWS, JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS OR JUDAISM.
JEW: The word "Jew" did not appear in actual use until over 1000 years after the resurrection of "Jesus". It means someone who adheres to the religion of Judaism (modern PHARISAISM). The modern "Jew" of "Jewish Culture" has NO RACIAL SIGNIFICANCE. "Jews" are some of the most racially MIXED people on Earth due to their multi-national history, their practice of interracial marriage, as well as their contemporary international bias. Over 90% of "Jews" today are descended from the ancient Khazars--a racially NON-SEMITIC people from East Europe.
WE DID NOT MAKE THE RULES OR THE DEFINITIONS; WE ARE JUST REPRINTING SOME WORK OF A VERY FAMOUS MAN OF YOUR OWN AMERICAN HISTORY--HENRY FORD, AND OTHER ASTUTE HISTORIANS OF PRIOR DAYS.
We need one more definition:
GENTILE: The modern CONTROLLED MEANING is anyone who is not a Jew of the above classification.
TRUE MEANING: From the LATIN word "gentilis", meaning "of the same gens, clan or race". In the Bible the more modern word Gentile is a mistranslation of the actual Old Testament Hebrew word "goy", and the Greek New Testament word "ethnos"--both meaning "NATION OR PEOPLE" (ANY nation or people).
CAHILLA: The ones from the Cosmos without recognition of God Creator or the Christ concept. They never went beyond pretense to be anything else. They were from the Serpent Races and called themselves Serpent People when they were placed on this planet. They now call themselves Jews, even usurping the very heritage of some HUmans already on your planet. They serve god Lucifer-Satan and facts are facts.
YIDDISH: NOT Hebrew. Yiddish is a language created for the self-styled parties who came to call themselves Jews and to suit the needs of the TALMUD AND BE UTILIZED IN THE PROTOCOLS. It is much like using a code as in World War II when Native language was used and could not be deciphered. How much to you think, as a Russian, you might understand of Lakota Sioux? By using the Talmud and Yiddish--everyone, including the Hebrew-speaking Jews, could be fooled until it was too late to change horses.
3/24/98 #1 HATONNKeep the following definition handy for continual reference please:
ANTICHRIST: 1. a particular personage or power, variously identified or explained, who is conceived of as appearing in the world as the principal antagonist of Christ. 2. An opponent of Christ, a person or power antagonistic to Christ and/or Christ's teaching. 3. A person or power who discounts or denies or ignores the presence or teachings of Christ in God's instructions and which or who practices that which is considered to be not "christian" in attitude or function. 4. Satanists and those of any "order" who discount goodly and socially acceptable, as "christian", attitudes and set themselves up as authority to present interpretations of behaviors and teachings other than those of Christ as accepted as the Spiritual attitude of goodness.
ALSO A POWER OR PERSON WHO RECOGNIZES A, OR MULTIPLES OF, GOD, BUT NOT THE GOD OF CHRIST TEACHINGS.
ONE WHO INTERPRETS THE ACCEPTED LAWS OF GOD IN A PERSONAL OR LEGAL DEVIATION OF SAME WHICH THEN PRESENTS AS A NEGATIVE ASPECT THRUST UPON HIMSELF OR ANOTHER.
THESE LAWS OF GOD IN EACH "GOOD" OR "GODLY" RELIGION OR SPIRITUAL ACCEPTANCE ARE BASED ON FUNDAMENTAL VALUES OF GOOD MORALITY, EQUAL JUSTICE, RESPECT, REVERENCE AND FUNCTION IN THE WAY OF THE "GOLDEN RULE": "DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE OTHERS DO UNTO YOU".
"CHRIST": A Spiritual "state of being" in goodness.
"ANTICHRIST": That which is humanistically related to non-Spiritual thought and actions.
Teachers of the Christ "way" in the human physical form are classified as "christians" but the beings most prominently offered as "Christs" are NOT. They are teachers assuming the laws of God/Christ. This includes Jesus, Buddha, Mohammed, etc. Most of these laws as written in the accepted "Holy Books" are grossly tampered and misrepresent the actual instructions of God, in order to more closely fit the wishes and desires of the human individual or social "order" of any group or groups.
An organization or body of people has NO ACTUAL SPIRITUAL IDENTITY OTHER THAN "DOCTRINE". CHRISTIAN, FOR EXAMPLE, IS A STATE OF BEING OF ONLY AN INDIVIDUAL THOUGHT OR ACTION AS THOUGHT OR EXPRESSED BY AN INDIVIDUAL, INDEPENDENT PERSON.
AN ANTICHRISTIAN PERSON IS ANYONE WHO WOULD USURP OR INFLICT THROUGH PERSUASION OR FORCE HIS OPINION OR ACTION UPON THE WILL OR WISHES OF ANOTHER.
Antichrist has no selective ethnic, racial, national or color identification. Creed is the deciding factor and that is recognized in intent and/or action expressed.
Antichrist is usually defined as Atheistic, Agnostic, Unchristian, Immoral and Unlawful, a Usurper, and several other directly identifiable attributes within or expressed by an individual in a negative consideration.
Antichrist is basically that which is in opposition to the accepted teachings of Christ/God within the laws as accepted as guidelines expressed as the Ten Commandments of the Christian following of the New Testament or the Hebrew teachings of the Old Testament.
Any CHURCH or person who deviates from these accepted laws as presented and accepted as Christ principles is, by definition, Antichrist. A person may proclaim Christ as an entity, but Christ is only an individual "state of being in Spiritual awareness".
CHRISTED: One who is SPIRITUALLY in alignment and intent within God Creator and deviates not from the moral, ethical, and lawful aspects of Christ-like teachings.
This could go on and on for pages into the hundreds--but suffice it to say that you have two working "parties" in human expression: those who are Spiritually accepting of soul as relative to God, and those who deny that relationship and are basically limited to Humanistic intent and thoughts.
Bad and good, good and evil are accepted terms defining intent and actions of individuals and often erroneously applied to groups. A group is made up of individuals who usually adopt a singular or very similar ideology. In every instance a group is a gathering or clump of individuals--perhaps bearing no similarity.
JUDGMENT: Only ACTIONS of individuals can be judged. A person is simply a person from which actions take place through intent: good, bad, or otherwise. To judge another is but to judge SELF for SELF is the only basis upon which JUDGMENT can be made--utilizing the laws as set forth by man in legislative forum or as accepted societally as being goodly laws of Deity or Spiritual Acceptance. In a court of law a PERSON should not be JUDGED, but rather, the actions of that INDIVIDUAL or MULTIPLES ACTING IN ONE EXPRESSION AS A WHOLE, are the factors for JUDGMENT. INTENT to ACT, until action is verified, is not a judged offense unless that intent is EXPRESSED IN SOME MANNER. MAN WORKS ON PHYSICAL EXPRESSION ONLY AND GOD/CHRIST WORKS ONLY ON THE
MERITS OR DEMERITS OF "INTENT" IN CONNECTION WITH EXPRESSED THOUGHT OF/TO ACTION.
Now, I am asked for some examples. Fine, there are so many examples of every little illicit and unlawful action taking place in high places as to be a mass of confusion. The actions are all you have with which to consider INTENT of any individual. So, let us consider President Bill Clinton and his seemingly unique approach to sexual relationships. He goes to Church and it seems ANY church is fine with him. He clutches his "Holy Bible" in one hand and his "pretend" loving wife on his other arm. But he goes forth and breaks EVERY ONE OF THE LAWS OF GOD, even as laid forth by man as acceptable behavior.
Perhaps you need refreshing as to those Ten Commandments. I can do that but you will see that some of them are simply tossed in for the CONVENIENCE AND POWER CONTROL by MAN over others desired to be under control.
* You shall have no other gods before Me.
* You shall not misuse the name of the Lord, your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses His name.
* Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy.
* Honor your father and your mother, so that you may live long in the land the Lord your God is giving you.
* You shall not kill.
* You shall not commit adultery.
* You shall not steal.
* You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.
* You shall not covet that which is another's. You shall not covet another's spouse or any property of another.
I have chosen to briefly outline those given in Exodus of your Old Testament for those are the ones which should be identified as being Hebrew oriented. I use the term "Hebrew" for I know no people calling themselves "Jews" who adhere to these laws today.
I, further, note most Christians not adhering to these Commandments TODAY.
Please note that even in the Old Testament the commands are not ended with "EXCEPT IF, WHEN, BUT, OR...".
Now, readers, IF THESE ACTUALLY BE THE INSTRUCTIONS OF "THE LORD", WHAT HAVE WE GOING HERE TODAY? AND if these be the accepted teachings of JESUS CHRIST, what can you make of the deviations FROM THESE LAWS? And how do you equate your opinions or interpretations against, or within, any OTHER religion than your own who assembled your opinions FOR YOU?
AND NO, I DO NOT CONSIDER THESE TO BE THE LAWS OF GOD. YOU ARE BIRTHED KNOWING, WITHIN, THE LAWS OF RIGHT AND THE INTENT OF WRONG. AND THEN, IN EACH LEVEL OF LEARNING OR GROWING INTO TRUTH, YOU CAN BEGIN TO SEPARATE THAT WHICH IS "MORAL" FROM THAT WHICH IS SOCIETAL, CULTURAL OR TRADITIONAL "MORES".
All written material is MAN-MADE. THOUGHT is of God and one can proclaim that his thoughts or the written word comes from God--but language and the activity of writing is human physical action. The actual expression in writing is that which must be JUDGED, not even the writer or printer or seer can be judged--ONLY THE WORD.
Now, let us consider and use some simple deductions in REASONING and LOGIC. We are now talking about two groups of individuals forming identifiable groupings OF RELIGION AND RELIGIOUS ASPECTS: Jews and Christians. This is to keep our writings from being confusing, if at all possible, for we are not going to discuss, here, OTHER RELIGIONS.
If the TEN COMMANDMENTS are the basis upon which the Israelites AND THE Christians foundation their RELIGION, what went wrong? If, as currently acceptable in modern RELIGIOUS PRACTICE, exceptions are made of the ONLY LAWS HANDED DOWN, AS THESE RELIGIONS PRESUME, ASSUME, AND PROJECT UPON OTHERS AS TEACHINGS--WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PRACTICE OF ABIDING BY THESE LAWS WHICH MAKE YOU TO BE CONSIDERED A JUDEAN OR A CHRISTIAN?
Now, also consider this: the Hebrew Israelites did not and do not accept EMMANUEL ESU OF THE HOUSE OF JOSEPH AS THE MESSIAH. Saul of Tarsus then labeled the man, who was thought to be Christed, Jesus. This happened AFTER, long after, the absence of the actual Emmanuel Esu of the House of Joseph. So, we can call him "Jesus" if that pleases you--or you can call that individual human energy form ANYTHING YOU PLEASE. But HOW you call him is the point of the writing here.
It is then made clear that the NEW TESTAMENT was written some 300 years AFTER the moving on, whatever, of this person, even if you call him Jesus. The Gospels were compiled, as was the New Testament, into Arabic, Aramaic and some Hebrew languages, then into other languages such as Greek, etc. The final translations were into German and the German scholars chose and assembled the New Testament. Then the books were further tampered with and translated, as to please the wondrous King James, into ENGLISH. Now, there are hundreds of versions of re-translated material to suit every sect and cult that comes along.
The point here, however, is that the Israelite Hebrews believed in the Old Testament and honored a book or scrolls they called the Torah. The Christians honored the book called the New Testament. So, from these opposite and estranged ideas of one denying this Christ messiah and the other accepting this Christ messiah AS THE GOD--how do you come to a merging of these opposing ideas? Well, THE WAY YOU DO IT IS TO DENY AND ACCEPT BOTH AS ADJUSTED TO THE NEED OF THE PRESENTER AND PRACTITIONER. And, in that tradition, the Christian accepts everything good or bad in the Old Testament which supposedly was no longer valid with the birth of Jesus. But Jesus wasn't the "MAN'S" name. Then later you find that this after-named "Jesus" is the expected MESSIAH of the Illuminati and the Freemasonic cornerstone of their temple. WHOSE TEMPLE? The TALMUDISTS! They call themselves Jews--but they are NOT. They call themselves anything and everything they choose to make their humanistic practice of Luciferian behavior the LAW OF THE LAND.
In this evolvement BOTH Hebrew and Christian ideals have been totally usurped and LOST. It does not matter WHAT you call the opposing entities--the facts remain the same, don't they?
Just as a little rule of thumb on these topics as to religion, spiritual, or whatever you are doing: they are THREE DIFFERENT THINGS, OF WHICH, USUALLY, NONE ARE GODLY, BUT RATHER, STRUCTURED AND GUIDELINED BY SOME HUMAN PERSON.
HUMAN is conceived and birthed (created) knowing right from wrong as part of his very being. So what happens? Indeed, what does happen to that perfect soul and mind?
Salu, Hatonn.
[The list of definitions will be added to in future Journals as they are revealed to us.]
