PJ 225
CHAPTER 7
STELLAR EXAMPLE OF THE
KHAZARIAN-ZIONIST KIND OF GUY
Editor's note: The following information, some of which is reprinted from early 1995 issues of CONTACT, puts a spotlight on just one of the Khazarian-Zionist tribe members who has crossed our local paths on too many occasions. Commander Hatonn refers to this material in the 3rd column of page 55 and 2nd column of page 56.

The following article is reprinted from the Front Page of the January 17, 1995 issue of CONTACT.

High-IQ Group's Star Spokesman?
Ex-judge Jason Brent's
Shocking "Concern" For Humanity
1/11/95 #2 HATONN
JASON BRENT'S MENSA
You are being set up again in a different direction and you had better look again at the articles in the paper regarding Jason Brent, Esq. and the Mensa bunch. They MEAN IT! The only thing they find wrong with Hitler, according to Brent (not his name--he was born something like Berkowitz), was that Hitler blew it for the "Master Race". This man (Brent) CLAIMS to be a Jewish leader with over 150 of his people killed in the Holocaust. Boy has he stuck his foot firmly into his mouth this time.

[QUOTING, 1/10/95 Los Angeles Times:]

NEWSLETTER ARTICLES STIR FUROR
IN HIGH-IQ GROUP
* Opinion: Writers in Mensa publication
spark outrage by advocating killing the old,
infirm and homeless. Board backs the editor and
the authors' right to express their views.
by NORA ZAMICHOW
Times Staff Writer
In what sort of publication would you expect to read:

"Those people who are so mentally defective that they cannot live in society should, as soon as they are identified as defective, be humanely dispatched."

Or that Adolf Hitler's greatest offense was not the killing of 6 million Jews in the Holocaust but "the fact that his actions prevent a rational discussion of the creation of the master race."

These articles recently ran in the monthly newsletter of the Los Angeles chapter of the high IQ society, Mensa. The publication circulates to a readership that claims IQ in the top 2% of the public.

In defending her decision to publish the article--which appeared to propose extermination of the homeless, the mentally retarded, the old and the infirm--newsletter editor and Mensa member Nikki Frey was unapologetic and surprised that anybody would be offended.

"I would not print anything I thought was truly harmful or offensive," she said. "I didn't think it was harmful; I don't think it's even that offensive--nobody wants to have a deformed child.

"I personally wouldn't hurt a fly. Well, maybe a fly. I am the most sensitive person."

Not everybody thinks so. The articles in the November edition of the Mensa newsletter caused considerable outrage among the chapter's 2,000 members. Some wrote irate letters, others called to complain. And several attended a board meeting to protest.

"We have these Nazi ideas being published in the publication that goes everywhere," said Mensa member Betty Schneider. "This is fascism carried to the nth degree. I don't want to be identified with an organization that condones this type of thing."

Alan Stillson, puzzle editor of the newsletter, wrote a letter threatening to quit unless an apology was printed.

"As a Mensa member who enjoys the organization and most of the members and as a stepfather of a Down's Syndrome child who loves him and is incensed at the thought of advocacy of his extermination, I insist on an immediate written apology and a retraction of the policy of printing hate articles," Stillson wrote in his letter, printed in the December newsletter.

In the previous issue, one of the writers, Jason G. Brent, a Tehachapi lawyer, wrote that "society must face the concept that we kill off the old, weak, the stupid and the inefficient." He concluded that the true travesty wrought by Hitler was that he forever spoiled the concept of a master race.

The other writer, Jon Evans, put forth equally shocking views.

"It is not clear to me just exactly why anyone would expend time and effort and money on the homeless. What good are they? The vast majority are too stupid, too lazy, too crazy, or too anti-social to earn a living," Evans wrote. "Granted, there are a few people who have fallen beneath the blows of circumstances and are unable to afford any place to live, but they are few and far between. The rest of the homeless should be humanely done away with, like abandoned kittens."

Nor did Evans show much mercy for the infirm.

"A piece of meat in the shape of a man but without a mind is not a human being, whether the body be deathly ill, damaged by accident, mentally blank because of brain deficiency, or criminally insane."

Brent said he was merely writing about a crucial reality--the urgent need for population control--that much of the world has ignored. "I'm not a fascist," he said. "I just have a problem that we better face."

Evans was unavailable for comment.

This is the second time in little more than a year that the Los Angeles chapter of Mensa, which admits only those with IQs above 132, has been caught in an embarrassing spotlight. In late 1993, Mensa board members were rattled by a string of anonymous letters, including death threats that appeared linked to a personal feud.

Newsletter editor Frey, who works as a legal secretary, and some Mensa board members are quick to point out that the monthly newsletter, called LAMENT, endorses no official point of view. A disclaimer beneath the masthead reads: "Opinions expressed in Lament are those of the individual contributors."

"Besides," said Frey, "Nobody actually reads the newsletter." (Well, they do in St. Louis; the newsletter's circulation was wide enough to attract the attention of a newspaper columnist in that city, who recently wrote an enraged piece.)

Frey also felt the criticism was overblown because it was merely about words. "I don't know what people are so excited about; it's not like Evens or Brent have any influence over any law," she said.

Nor was it as if Frey had great respect for the opinions of the writers. Evans had published dozens of similar articles in the newsletter before she took over almost two years ago, she said.

"Evans used to have these articles month after month, ‘Kill this group, kill that group,'" Frey said.

Bruce Kent, publications officer and board member with the national parent organization, American Mensa Ltd., said the group has guidelines for the newsletters that are issued by almost 150 chapters. Those guidelines call for material to be in "good taste" and suggest that editors "avoid publishing material that reflects negatively on Mensa."

"We officially deplore hate material," Kent said.

Did Evans' and Brent's pieces violate the guidelines? Apparently not.

"I hadn't seen them as hate articles," said the chairman of the Greater Los Angeles Area Mensa chapter, a woman who goes only by the name of Gowen. While one board member dissented, seven agreed with Gowen during their Dec. 3 meeting. Members rallied around Frey, giving her a unanimous vote of confidence and telling others that the flap over the articles was a waste of the best and brightest's brain energy.

Gowen said the newsletter and its articles were appropriate for its high-IQ readership.

"It depends on whom the publication is for," she said. "If you are writing for just anyone, you write it one way. But if you write it to get people to think, you write it a different way."

Author Brent, who wrote about population control, said, "I don't want to be portrayed as some weirdo person, though nobody else agrees with me.

"We cannot continue to have population explosion. Growth has to stop. We better face that we have to kill people. There are not unlimited amount of resources."

The way to trim the population, according to Brent, is to force people to purchase the right to reproduce. In his world view, children would not be allowed to inherit wealth, so everyone would start on a level playing field when it came to buying their reproductive rights.

Many Mensa members say they don't begrudge anyone the right to express an opinion. But they said the official newsletter was not the correct spot to air views advocating exterminations.

"While I agree with free press, I also believe there's a certain responsibility," said member Martin Elkort. "This indicates to me that having a high IQ does not necessarily translate to common sense or wisdom."

[And then, from the 1/11/95 issue of The Bakersfield Californian:]

MENSAN MADE A DUMB MOVE,
HIGH-IQ SET SAYS
by Tamara Koehler
It is the last thing you'd expect to hear from a Jewish man who says he lost 190 relatives in the Holocaust.

"Hitler's greatest crime was not that he killed millions of Jews, but that his actions prevent discussion about population control and a master race," says Tehachapi attorney and former East Kern Municipal Court Judge Jason G. Brent.

Well, OK, it's a free country where people can say what they think. But when Brent put his thoughts to paper in the November newsletter of Mensa, the high-IQ society, it touched off a furor of criticism that he knows he hasn't heard the last of.

Hate material, dangerous talk, get rid of the bum. That was the reaction of many members of the elite group that boasts IQs in the top 2 percent nationwide. Others wrote letters threatening to quit the organization unless Brent wrote an apology.

"As a stepfather of a Down syndrome child who loves him and is incensed at the thought of advocacy of his extermination, I insist on an immediate written apology and retraction of the policy of printing hate articles," wrote Alan Stillson of Lancaster.

But reactions among Brent's fellow Mensa members in Bakersfield are more tolerant, in part because they know him as a lawyer who takes in poor clients and has served on the county's Human Relations Commission.

They say Brent's article was at worst "politically incorrect" and at best an honest expression of well-thought-out ideas.

"First of all, this is an in-house publication; it's not pitched and promoted on the newsstands," said Peggy Noland, an attorney in Kern and proctor of the local Mensa chapter. "I encourage the forum and the opportunity where people can express a position that may be a little unpopular in the mainstream."

Don Silvius, a retired Bakersfield City School District supervisor and Mensa member, said the newsletter often is filled with non-mainstream types of opinion pieces.

"Political correctness is not one of the strong suits of this group of minds," Silvius said. "One of the things that makes Mensa interesting is that any topic is up for discussion."

The article in question is called "Like It Or Not," a one-page discussion on the need for enforced birth control and euthanasia to bring the world's population under control. It appeared in Lament, the monthly newsletter of the Southern California chapters of Mensa, which includes about 2,000 members in Kern and points south.

At the center of the article is a picture of Pope John Paul II, a man Brent says is "one of the two greatest criminals who ever lived." (The other, Brent says, is Hitler.)

The greatest crime anyone can commit in this age of exploding population growth is to have more than two children, Brent argues.

Grim facts are woven through Brent's arguments. Every 30 years, the world's population doubles. At present, there are more than 5.6 billion people on the globe, with roughly two-thirds living in Asia.

Brent argues that society eventually will play God and decide who is to live and who should die. On the debit side are "the old, the weak, the stupid and those unable to survive in a highly technological society."

Brent admits his words inspire strong reactions. But that's what he wants.

Despite his strong rhetoric, Brent is a man of contrasts--a Democrat turned Republican, a man who says the poor are bound to be on society's to-do-in list yet takes on many of his clients for little or no payment.

Brent was appointed to the East Kern Municipal Court judgeship by Gov. George Deukmejian in 1988 and served in the Mojave, Tehachapi and Boron branches until 1990.

Information is available by calling Noland at (805) 589-4691.

[END OF QUOTING]

This is the same man who ruled against Ekkers while working with the S&L and Governor of California. He and Steven Horn, his friendly cohort (still), both were given information from George Green AND THE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY to prevent getting the "property" case settled. I warned you local friends, in the beginning, that it was going all the way to the White House--and so it has gone even further. Brent is a part of the Zionist One Worlders who fully plan to HAVE EVERYTHING OF PROPERTY--AND KILL OFF THE ELDERLY, INFIRM AND COMPROMISED--THAT MEANS EVEN THE HOMELESS!! AND, WORSE, IT HAS HIT THE PAPERS!! Well, perhaps it is "better". It is hard to continue to blame E.J. and Doris for ALL HIS PROBLEMS today, is it not?

I do suggest that this information from Mensa with cover-letter be gotten to all the legal counsel in EVERY case--it will reflect right back into Green's lap. Remember that everything is hooked to everything else--that is, the attorney, Jason Brent, that George sent Leon and Eleanor to, to "getcha". With morals such as described in the paper and a history of removal of documents and tapes from case files and personal threats with many witnesses, while representing a case HE STARTED with the lot owner and then the subsequent arrest fiasco--is good background to consider for ammunition now. The fact they are making amends FOR HIM by saying that he handles some cases free--is pure B.S. Jason Brent committed a crime by trying to force Ekkers to pay his legal fees in a case he brought through the county in which the taxpayers paid for his client's legal encounter. This is where it is, readers, you have to hit it at home or you can't change a nation when these are the types of men you have on the benches of your courts across this nation. I am tired of the criminals winning! I also hope you ones who now KNOW THE ASSOCIATED PRESS PERSONNEL WILL ACT WISELY AND SWIFTLY. [See Rick Martin's letter to the Associated Press in the following article.] Thank you.

The following article is reprinted from page 43 of the January 24, 1995 issue of CONTACT.

JASON BRENT--THE SEQUEL
Editor's note: In our spare time (ha!) here at CONTACT, we've perfected a Time Machine that has allowed us to go forward and bring back for your "enjoyment" the Letters To The Editor which are printed in this Wednesday's (1/25/95) edition of THE TEHACHAPI NEWS. After Brent took center stage as last week's Front Page story, Commander Hatonn has continued to refer to the absurdity of this man and his viewpoint throughout writings in this week's CONTACT. Thus we thought you might care to read some of the heated, indignant local reactions to the ideas of this "rebel without a cause". If you didn't already have it figured out before now, you ought to now have a pretty good idea of the typical "brilliance" of the shining stars of most so-called high-IQ societies. I have reluctantly had to be around such proclaimed "brilliance" for all of my professional life and, believe me, it takes some getting used to--if that's ever really possible while holding onto one's common sense! --E. Y.

READER SHOCKED BY BRENT ARTICLE
I am shocked and alarmed that Mojave's former judge, a licensed attorney-at-law, would make such Nazi statements as Jason Brent has in his recent article appearing in the newsletter of an alleged high-IQ organization called Mensa.

Mr. Brent, a practicing attorney in Tehachapi, wrote some of the following remarks in his article--which, by the way, has been picked up by the major press across the country. His remarks include:

"...society must face the concept that we kill off the old, weak, the stupid and the inefficient," concluding that the true travesty wrought by Hitler was that he forever spoiled the concept of a master race, and "I'm not a fascist, I just have a problem that we better face," (I'll say he has a problem--big time) and "I don't want to be portrayed as some weirdo person, though nobody else agrees with me--we cannot continue to have population explosion. Growth has to stop. We better face that we have to kill people. There are not unlimited amounts of resources."

From a man who is practicing law in our humble community, and touted as a leader of the community, formerly evidenced by a bill-board upon entering town and one in Mojave--is this the kind of stupid and prejudicial commentary that we want to reflect on our community? In Brent's pious condescending tone, he goes on to add, "The way to trim the population, is to force people to purchase the right to reproduce."

With such inappropriate commentary, Brent should be called to answer for his actions before the State Bar Association.

Even in a free society this kind of outrageous arrogance is rare--particularly when stemming from an alleged group of "smart folk".

Amazing disgrace.

Rick Martin

HOPES GOD MORE FORGIVING THAN BRENT
In reference to that article on Jason Brent's idea of eliminating the elderly, weak, stupid and inefficient [it] is better known as Genocide. Does Mr. Brent want to walk these people into ovens as did Hitler!

I would like Mr. Brent to know that the people of this nation will not put up with this kind of thinking.

And if any organization that Mr. Brent belongs to would advocate this kind of thinking, [they] should be watched and monitored closely.

I suggest that Mr. Brent get some psychological help.

I would also like to add that I will defend Mr. Brent's right to his opinion.

The world should be protected from people like Mr. Brent and his way of thinking.

I hope that my God is more forgiving of the elderly, weak, stupid and inefficient people of this world than is Jason Brent.

Sandra L. Wills

APPALLED AT ATTORNEY'S WRITINGS
In reference to Mr. Brent's statement to Mensa. I would be appalled to have a member of my organization write or say anything like this.

I, being one of the old, weak, stupid and inefficient (veterans) that fought for this country so that Mr. Brent can have his opinion. I must say Hitler would have been proud.

Why have a debate? What political office is Mr. Brent trying to run for. I think Mr. Brent should read the plaque on the Statue of Liberty.

David F. Terry
Old, weak, stupid taxpayer

BRENT ARTICLE UPSETS WRITER
I'm writing regarding the comments that Jason Brent (ex-municipal court judge of Mojave who has a law office in Golden Hills) made to his Mensa group.

How can anyone in this community support a person who advocates the killing of our old, maimed, ignorant and sick.

Some of you who are his clients I'm sure fit one of the categories now. How does that make you feel??? Does he have his or your best interest at heart or does he even have a heart???

Talk about Nazi Germany!! This man(??), whose recent desire was to get voted onto the Superior Court bench in Bakersfield, is right here among us and advocating that many in this community should be murdered.

He proudly claims to be a Jew, and they criticized Hitler for the Holocaust. His ideas seem to be aligning with the Hitler philosophy of creating a master race. "If you talk like a duck and act like a duck..."

Dr. Al Overholt

BRENT SOLUTION TO
OVERPOPULATION A ‘DISGRACE'
Tehachapi attorney, Jason G. Brent, was quoted on January 10, 1995 in the Los Angeles Times from an article he wrote for Mensa. Mensa is a group of people who think they have high IQs--over 132.

Mr. Brent, referring to the overpopulation in the world says in the article, "society must face the concept that we kill off the old, weak, the stupid and the inefficient. We cannot continue to have population explosion. Growth has to stop. We better face that we have to kill people. There are not unlimited resources." Further, Mr. Brent says the true travesty wrought by Hitler was that he forever spoiled the concept of a master races.

Rush Limbaugh was so incensed by Mr. Brent's article that he quoted from it on his national radio and television shows, pointing out the absurdity of it and arrogance of Mr. Brent or anyone touting such a barbaric view.

In the May 31, 1990 edition of the Tehachapi Ad-vantage, Kern County Judge John Quinlen publicly listed $50,000 worth of political contributions made by Jason Brent's L.A. law firm in 1987 and 1988. Mr. Brent was appointed shortly afterward to his Kern County Judgeship. What a coincidence. In 1989, Judge Brent was officially criticized in the Kern County Auditor's report for a poor record in disposing of cases. After seeing the facts in print, the voters turned Brent's bid for election down in 1990.

There is a problem with overpopulation in this world but I think that Jason Brent's solution is a disgrace to humanity. You certainly have a right to your opinion but you also represent the public as an attorney and people have the right to know what kind of a person you are. The ironic thing is that Mr. Brent has stated publicly many times that he is Jewish. In my opinion, he is living proof that a supposed high IQ doesn't translate to any degree of moral integrity or wisdom.

Brent Moorhead

The following article is reprinted from the page 13
of the February 7, 1995 issue of CONTACT.
Keep Writing Those Letters!
JASON BRENT STILL STIRRING UP TROUBLE!
Editor's note: We have to share with you some of the latest feedback from the news media about "brilliant" ex-Judge Jason Brent--you know, the Mensa high-IQ group's star(?) spokesman who wants to "humanely dispatch" any of us old, poor or stupid taxpayers--and who has had a personal vendetta against the Ekkers for many years now. See the Front Page story of the 1/17/95 issue of CONTACT for the basics on this matter, and also see p.43 of the 1/24/95 issue of CONTACT for follow-up reactions. Last week's CONTACT, pgs. 55-56, provided some of the early background on how this paragon of "justice" has railroaded and otherwise persecuted the Ekkers.

And don't forget to register YOUR indignations about the shenanigans of this "judge"--and keep those letters pouring onto the desks of the others, listed below, who either need constant reminding of your watchful concern or who just need your words of support.

FROM NEWSPAPER READERS
ACROSS THE COUNTRY
THE DENVER POST (1/22/95):

Evolution has graced homo sapiens with the capacity for high intelligence, and the capacity for compassion and moral reasoning. Based on the disgraceful pronouncements from the Los Angeles chapter of Mensa, I would much rather cast my lot with Mensa's designated misfits than with a group whose putative high intelligence is distressingly devoid of any trace of essential humanity.

Joseph D. McInerney
Colorado Springs, CO

THE BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN (1/21/95):

This letter is written in response to the article by Jason Brent, which dealt with his views on population control and euthanasia. My first comment is in regard to the reaction of people who became outraged at the thought of those two subjects. But isn't this how our ideas and our ideals begin to change. We start with a radical concept introduced by someone, then it is fostered along by others.

New words or phrases are used by these people to tone down or soothe us until we are desensitized to what is actually going on. At this point, we may begin to believe what is being said just might be right. This, in turn, erodes the moral fiber of ourselves and our society.

This has already happened in our society. Forty years ago, the concept of abortion would have brought about the same reactions that are happening today regarding the statements by Brent. Now we have phrases such as, "It's a woman's choice," "Medical procedure," or using the word "fetus" when referring to the baby.

All of these have contributed to the devaluing of our morals, and many of us are not even aware of it. Take some time and ask yourself what is actually going on. Are we believing that something is right based upon the criteria that I have mentioned? If so, let's work to change what has been done.

Ronnie McLean
Bakersfield, CA

THE BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN (1/21/95):

The gift of a superior IQ carries with it the duty to use that ability to assist those with limitations imposed by physical or mental incapacity and the inevitable effects of growing old.

A good example of this is Dr. Steven Hawking, the world renowned astrophysicist whose intellect searches for answers that may benefit all life forms without arbitrary standards or distinctions, while at the same time his remaining bodily functions are held hostage by a most debilitating illness.

Brent's concern about the effects of the geometric increase in population growth is nothing more than a restatement of the earlier discarded views of the economist Robert Malthus.

Instead of looking at the glass as half empty, I challenge Brent, together with all thinking people regardless of their age or infirmities, to view the glass as half full and provide the leadership that is needed to ensure that the family of man will act responsibly and to guarantee that the atrocities committed by any self-appointed superior being will never happen again.

Philip Rudnick, Attorney
Bakersfield, CA

THE BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN (1/29/95):

I am not a member of Mensa, but I am sometimes interested in the discussion of radical ideas. With this in mind, I present the following:

Is it better for society to put a disabled man out on the streets without food or clothing, expose him to abuse by those who would take advantage of his vulnerability, ignore his medical needs and allow him to suffer untold misery for years until he dies of starvation, exposure and disease, or would it be better to extinguish the man's life quickly in a humane manner?

Most readers would probably respond that neither of these options is acceptable in a civilized society. Many were shocked recently when Jason Brent suggested that societies might benefit if they considered the second solution for citizens suffering from serious, persistent mental illness.

For me, the first idea is just as immoral, and yet we have allowed it to become a reality. One-third of our homeless population sufferes from serious mental illness, which is, in most cases, treatable. However, our legislators have passed laws that prevent the medical intervention these people must have to improve their quality of life.

Unless the laws are changed, our citizens who have been struck down by incurable, no-fault diseases at the beginning of their adult lives are doomed to suffer rejection and abuse until they die.

Elizabeth Davis
Tehachapi, CA

SEE NEXT PAGE

CHAPTER 8
JASON G. BRENT
FORMER MUNICIPAL JUDGE
SHARK? YOU BET!
by Rick Martin 1/30/98
In the letter you are about to read from Tehachapi Attorney, and former Judge, Jason Brent to George Green, dated April 19, 1995, you will see the clear, calculated and premeditated PLAN for the destruction of not only two individuals, namely, Doris and E.J. Ekker, but also of the Phoenix Institute For Research & Education, Ltd. The Anti-Christ finger prints are all over this letter.

It is, of course, difficult to read such a document in and by itself without the prerequisite background to understand the events leading up to and beyond the letter in point. So, with that in mind, let's reflect back for a moment to see if the pieces of the puzzle (or the knots of the tangled web) cannot be sorted out.

Mr. Brent's first encounter with the Ekkers was while he sat as a Municipal Court Judge in Mojave, California. The year was 1988. I was present in the courtroom when he openly accused, from the bench, the Ekkers of being deadbeats and flakes, a statement he predictably has denied ever having made. Mr. Brent was aided and abetted by old-time associate and crony, Beverly Hills Attorney Steven Horn. At that time, Horn, representing Santa Barbara Savings & Loan, and later the RTC, was attempting to separate the Ekkers from ownership of their retirement home. This was an effort that ultimately proved successful.

When publisher George Green moved with his wife Desireé Green to Tehachapi to assist in publishing the Journals, and began a newsletter at that time referred to as the Phoenix Journal Express in mid-1990, there was no reason to suspect that another agenda might be afoot. It was only much later that evil would show its hand. It goes without saying that to outlay the entire chronology of events would take several entire issues of CONTACT, and the historical sequence has been published as we've gone along here.

It became obvious early on that Jason Brent had it in for the Ekkers. He didn't really make it any secret. He went so far as to actually blame the Ekkers for his Municipal Judgeship defeat--but in actuality, he defeated himself, with the help of his wife making a fool of herself in public at a local property-owners association meeting. This all took place way back in 1990.

Of course it isn't possible to make commentary on the sequence without first introducing the cast of "characters", and you can take the term characters any way you like. There was Ed DeMar, who turned the Ekkers in, from everything to the Food Stamps investigative unit to the Postal Authorities to the Securities and Exchange Commission to the FBI. Nothing was found with which to incriminate the Ekkers in any way, but DeMar did manage, in association with George Green, to make things very uncomfortable for the Ekkers, for a time.

Then we have Ann Beam, a self-confessed member of an Arizona witches' coven who moved in on Leon Fort like he was a dead carcass by the side of the road. Ann sang her siren's song to Leon, and poor Leon took the bait. Leon was already going down for the count when he took up with George Green, Luke Perry (pathetic scavenger digging for a way into his mother's secure retirement funds while simultaneously feeding the Associated Press disinformation about the Ekkers and the Institute), Ed Cleary (former Catholic priest of 30 years), and of course, Nevada Attorney George Abbott.

Then we have Rod Ence, who stole outright from the Phoenix Institute and did everything humanly possible to bury the Institute's experimental farm into debt with sabotaged farming methods that were destined for failure. Rod's close relationship with Ed Cleary, Leon Fort, and Betty Tuten further fanned the flames of the Anti-Christ.

When George Green and his wife left California for Nevada with over $350,000 in Institute gold, they initiated an even more aggressive campaign to bring down the Ekkers and the Institute, too. Green even went so far as to sue not only Doris and E.J. Ekker, but the Phoenix Institute, Gyergos Ceres Hatonn and Esu "Jesus" Immanuel Sananda, to name just a few of the Defendants. This information was published in the May 11, 1993 edition of CONTACT. Shortly afterwards the Associated Press in Nevada was running absurdly incorrect stories that Doris Ekker claims she is Jesus Christ. Again, the Anti-Christ's fingerprints were showing up around every corner.

In a deposition of Jason Brent conducted on June 19, 1996, Brent was asked several questions, among them:

Do you know a person named George Green? To which he responded, "I spoke with him on the phone."

When did you speak with him on the phone?

"Last--about two days ago."

Do you have--have you ever represented Mr. Green?

"Nope."

Have you ever rendered any legal advice to Mr. Green?

"No."

Then, several pages into the deposition later, Mr. Brent responds to the question: And you have assisted the enemies of the Ekkers in the past, haven't you? Mr. Horn, predictably, objected to that question.

Jason Brent then responded: "I am not assisting anyone. Mr. Green consulted me about legal matters. [Didn't he just say that he has never rendered any legal advice to Mr. Green?] I am not going to tell you more than that." Well, when reading the letter below, is it any wonder?

At one point in the deposition, Brent responded:

"I have an utter dislike for the Ekkers, but I am telling the truth and I am not in any way attempting to shade [good word] or adjust my testimony. I violently dislike them. That I will not deny. I am not in any way shading or making my testimony gray [another good word] in any way, shape or form. So, yes, I dislike them."

Wow.

Not only does Jason Brent violently dislike the Ekkers, he outlined a clear PLAN TO DESTROY THEIR REPUTATIONS AND THEIR WORK, OUTLINED IN THE LETTER BELOW (IN HIS OWN WORDS).

This plan was followed not only by George Green, but also by Betty Tuten, who has done everything in her power to bring down the Institute. Tuten, along with Ann Beam and Leon Fort, contacted the tabloid television program EXTRA, and they managed a slam-job on CONTACT, the Institute, and the Ekkers, attempting to, in some not-so-obscure way, link them to the bizarre and insane mass suicide(?) of the Heaven's Gate CULT.

Betty Tuten's efforts, combined with Jason Brent, George Green, George Abbott, David Horton, Steven Horn, Leon Fort, and Rod Ence continue to this very day. The Anti-Christ will destroy itself with the scorpion's sting!

And now, sit back and read this diabolical presentation put forth in typical protocol fashion by a true deceiver, Jason Brent, Mensa member who advocates death to the old and infirm--no need to make up stories on this fellow, he tells on himself.
LAW OFFICE OF
JASON G. BRENT

21030 Mission Street · Tehachapi, CA 93361
(805) 823-1103 · FAX (805) 823-1104
(800) 649-1103



April 19, 1995


Mr. George Green
Box 3300
Bozeman, MT 59772


Dear George:

This letter is intended to confirm our telephone conversation of Friday, April 14 relating to the Ekker problem.

I would recommend that each person defrauded by the Ekkers write a detailed letter to Ed Jagels, Kern County District Attorney, Don Lungren, Attorney General of the State of California, the Fraud Department of the U.S. Post Office, and the Fraud Department of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. setting forth a detailed account of how they were defrauded and requesting criminal prosecution of the Ekkers. I would also recommend that each person send a similar letter to the District Attorney of the county in which he/she resides as well as the Attorney General of the state in which he/she resides. In addition, I would recommend that each person defrauded send a similar letter to the Attorney General of the State of Nevada as the Ekkers do a substantial amount of business in Nevada. Lastly I would recommend that each person who was defrauded contact any local government official they know and ask that government official to apply pressure to the District Attorney or Attorney General. For example, if Mr. Jones was defrauded and he is friends with an Assemblyman where he lives he should contact the Assemblyman and ask the Assemblyman to set up an appointment with the District Attorney of his county and with the Attorney General of his state. Hopefully, all of this pressure will get some action on the criminal front against the Ekkers.

If I am retained as the attorney, I would assist in preparing the above letters and contacting the appropriate prosecuting officials.

Both of us know what the Ekkers are and, therefore, no further
Mr. George Green
April 19, 1995
Page 2



description of their honesty, integrity, etc. is needed. If I am retained as the attorney for the persons defrauded, I would want a substantial warchest. The Ekkers will fight every inch of the way and will attempt to hide their assets and, therefore, going after the Ekkers will be a full time job. To put it slightly differently, I would have to give up my entire practice and only proceed against the Ekkers. Not only would I have to proceed against them in the courts, I would also have to proceed against them on the public relations front. That would require providing evidence to the editors of all appropriate newspapers so that they and their shills cannot use the newspapers to attack the victims, appropriate law enforcement agencies, and every one else concerned in their fraud.

You have indicated to me that you were contacted by people that were defrauded in the approximate amount of $2 million/$2.5 million. I believe it only fair for each person to put up 10% of the amount he/she was defrauded so that my warchest would be $200-250,000 for legal fees and costs. I would not proceed until and unless that money was deposited in my Attorney's Trust Account so that I could be assured of receiving payment for the services I render and for the substantial costs I will incur. I will incur substantial filing fees and, in all probability, incur substantial private investigators costs.

I think the above summarizes our conversation. As I advised you, if the people cannot put up a warchest equal to 10% of the amount they have been defrauded, I am not interested in proceeding against the Ekkers. If the people haven't got the courage to put up 10% of the amount they were defrauded to hopefully recover the amount they were defrauded, then they do not deserve competent legal counsel.

If I can provide additional information to you or anyone, please contact me.

Sincerely yours,

JASON G. BRENT

JGB/mm

JASON G. BRENT
ATTORNEY AT LAW