3/6 페이지 처음처음 1 2 3 4 5 6 마지막마지막
Results 5 to 6 of 11

제목: PJ#104, FIRST STEPS

  1. #5
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default 응답: PJ#104, FIRST STEPS

    PJ 104
    CHAPTER 7

    REC #1 HATONN

    FRI., JUL. 29, 1994 9:03 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 347

    FRI., JUL. 29. 1994

    FOOLS AMONG US
    I am reminded of the "milk" advertisement in which the young newly married couple are in the kitchen and she says: "Did you think I wouldn't find out?" He had drunk the last of the milk.

    So, to the one who made all those phone calls on Dr. Boyles' phone credit number--did you think we wouldn't find out?? "I" don't have to tell--there are people on the other end of those phone numbers, for starters!! And, there are records kept of originating phone locations. Ah indeed, the interesting focus narrows!

    Who is the one being set up? Treasurygate's Buckley? How about Ekkers? How about Hatonn? What about Jackson? Ah indeed--how interesting that a number "would be stolen" from this particular personage--who makes all those phone calls him­self
    --usually--except that he is NOW dead and cannot be inter­rogated!

    What would have prevented THAT very person from GIVING that number to someone in this Tehachapi location--THAT num­ber to make those calls? Why? Well,
    I can think of a whole bunch of REASONS and SO CAN YOU! I would remind you, however, before you jump off into deep water, that the intent to set up CONTACT is a poor ploy for witnesses are kept alert to EVERY ONE'S ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT THIS VERY THING. This is not quite the same because of size as someone blaming SPOTLIGHT for an indiscretion in Washington D.C. Why would I compare the TWO? Because every MAJOR aerospace industry is represented here along with the FBI, ONI, CIA, MI-6, MOSSAD AND KGB. Further, you have hooked to THIS computer outlet--Edwards Air Force Base nearby, AND NORTHROP (just over the hill!), CHINA LAKE NAVAL BASE WITH AN UNDERGROUND FACILITY OF SOME 80 LEVELS WITH ATTACHED OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE, A MAJOR GOLD MINING COMPLEX OWNED BY EXXON--JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE WHO WOULD BE INTERESTED IN GOLD SHIPMENTS-AND, SHUTTING DOWN BOTH BUCKLEY AND CONTACT.

    But are THE connections within this group? YEP! Some of them! I find it interesting what is coming out in the sleuthing--George Green and his connections HEAD THE LIST. Then comes Ed Cleary, Patricia Young and Mike Blinston--through ones called Ken and Rael. Then way up at the top and looking more damaged, because of phone LOCATIONS, is Gene Dixon. Ah, the suspicion runs rampant through even Charles and Karen, Penny and Eric. Then comes Bud Clark and his lady friend, not to leave out Ann Beam and Leon Fort with all their friends and colleagues--attached to George Green--who was, by the way--in the area on the date of those phone calls. Remem­ber his "trip" to Costa Rica, which brought him to and fro through the location??? Gosh, nobody seems to have escaped the blaming, including Rick, Brent and thus and so. Oh my, what interesting circumstances! Who would want to spoil this Sherlock Holmes adventure? Surely not me. Well then, there is Wally and Jason Brent (supposedly a front for Green). How­ever, good readers, it needs to be "someone" who would be interested in information on shipments (ships at sea, the billing says), Iran, Kenya, Djibouti, Saudi Arabia, Los Angeles, Iowa (Jefferson), and Ontario (California)--
    and yep, ALL THE PHONE NUMBERS ARE LISTED RIGHT IN A ROW--20 OF THEM! Dr. Boyles (Mohammed) made two calls just prior to these 20 calls--from Atlanta--to, we assume, Buckley, or some­one or place in Amarillo, Texas.

    I do find it interesting that we have not been supplied with all of the phone billings
    --only the portion regarding the Tehachapi location and we are given no numbers
    and no information other­wise, from Mr. Buckley.

    I further find it interesting that Rick was not immediately noti­fied by Mr. Buckley about this matter. We have not even come into understanding as to where Buckley got the phone "bill" but the copy originated to here from Treasurygate's FAX. This means NOTHING, readers, any more than does Mr. Buckley's attachment of Jackson, CONTACT and others in his NEWSLETTER sent out prior to any contact with this location to check out possibilities.

    Do we believe this makes Buckley a hoax or an enemy? No--but neither do we appreciate his inferences. Is Jackson SUS­PECT? Of course, along with every member and tool of the Committee (if there is such a thing) and anyone else wanting rewards, gold, hush-intent or, or, or! Am I somehow now say­ing there is NO Committee? NO.
    I am saying that EVERY­ONE involved is suspect until shown otherwise--AND NO ONE IS ASSUMED GUILTY--REMEMBER WHAT YOU ARE STRUGGLING FOR? INNOCENCE UNTIL AND UNLESS PROVEN GUILTY-- CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IS WORTH NOTHING HERE IN THIS WORLD OF CIRCUM­STANTIAL FRAME-UPS!

    I have no pick with Mr. Buckley--we have done everything we could to assist Treasurygate because the project is valid and worthy. I appreciate the confrontation with an "infamous" Mormon about "religion" but I want to repeat here and now--
    WE ARE NO RELIGION. WE ARE HOSTS IN REPRESENTATION OF GOD OF LIGHT AND THAT "CHRIST" THAT EVERYBODY CLAIMS IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER--THE PERFECTION OF CREATION. I AM NOT "SOME" E.T. EXCEPT THAT MY LOCATION IS "OFF" SURFACE AND THERE IS NOTHING STRANGE ABOUT ME OR MY TEAM. NOTHING!

    Now, I, for my own people who are represented here, I will re­spond to a few portions of Mr. Buckley's newsletter and this is for his information.
    The Sadam Hussein gold certificate DID NOT originate with Jackson--he got it from CONTACT who got it from Grandma Fat Lady who is Singing, as nearly as the pieces of incoming mail can be checked out. Further, it was she who told Mr. Jackson about the certificate held by Jackie Kennedy--which he now claims "his people" HAVE.

    Does it look really bad for Mr. Jackson? Yes, but frankly, no worse than for Mr. Buckley--or anyone else involved. Did you think the big boys would just let you get away with getting money?? Come now, be reasonable--people are killed for 50 cents
    --and you keep talking trillions--OF DOLLARS!

    MY PURPOSE?
    Well, good friends, it is NOT to SAVE the WORLD! It is NOT to CONVERT the world to ANYTHING. It is a mission wherein I am here to bring the historical truth, have agreements for funding (from these sources) to do a moderate building pro­gram and industrial (very small) base. Our needs are minimal and agreements were made to satisfy those needs. Some of that gold you have chasing around everywhere IS OURS! YOU CAN HAVE IT TO DO ANYTHING YOU WISH, INCLUD­ING WASTE IT ON BARRIOS--THAT IS YOUR BUSINESS--MY "MISSION" IS MINE.

    There is a LOT OF SORTING to be done as to who and what will be salvaged from your place if you continue as you are and go down the tubes--nationally or planet-wise. YOU DO THE SORTING--I DO THE OBSERVING!

    WHO IS HATONN?
    I am in Command of the HOSTS (for lack of better definition) of the "good guys" sent from the Civilization of the Universe councils, the Federation, if you will. I am certainly not NEW AGE--I have told you before and I will repeat: The NEW AGE MOVEMENT "RELIGION" AND THE "RELIGION" WHICH IS BEING FOISTED OFF ON YOUR PLANET AS A ONE WORLD RELIGION--WILL DESTROY YOU!

    I represent the One LIGHT, the One Source, that One who was honored as the "sun" being, meaning LIFE SOURCE and, in Egypt at the time of reinstitution of the ONE GOD CONCEPT (Creator of Life Capability) was known and recognized as Ra or Aton. What there is that is so difficult to understand eludes me--you seem to be very willing to accept horrible little monsters, grey humanoids, lizards and serpent-people!! Or, is the GAME to discount the very promise of GOD ETERNAL--TO BRING YOU THE TRUTH IN WORD AND SEND MESSENGERS AT YOUR TIME OF EVOLVEMENT AND POSSIBLE DESTRUCTION IN SOME KIND OF PLANNED ARMAGED­DON?? Or, did you think God would come and do these things through Jim Bakker or Bill Clinton? People, I DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU BELIEVE--MY JOB IS TO BRING THIS WORD TO THIS PLACE AND YOU CAN DENY IT, ACCEPT IT, HOPE IT RIGHT, WRONG OR FOLLOW THE PIPER--THAT IS YOUR BUSINESS, YOUR SOUL AND YOUR CHOICE! DOES EVERYBODY UNDERSTAND ME? I DO NOT TREAD ON YOUR BUSINESS--AND I EXPECT THE POWERS THAT CONTROL YOU TO MEET THEIR AGREEMENTS WITH ME! WHAT THEY DO WITH THEIR OWN SOULS, IF THERE ARE ANY PRESENT, AND WHAT YOU ONES DECIDE TO DO WITH YOUR EXPERIENCE AND EXPRESSION--IS UP TO YOU. I AM GOING TO, IF YOU GET TOO ROUGH, GOOD BUDDIES, TAKE GOD'S PEOPLE OFF THE PLACE
    --AND IT IS NOT GOING TO BE A BLUE BEAM RAPTURE OR A BAPTIST RAP­TURE.

    Buckley very aptly and effectively explains his attention to "religion" and states that he is a Baptist. Well, before we get too far off-beat--Dharma was living her early life in the home of a Southern Baptist PREACHER. We have Catholics, Jews--you name it they are welcome to believe anything they wish--and do whatever they want with the information. If they wish to visit--they are welcome--IF WE HAVE A MEETING--they are wel­come. But--nobody has a RIGHT to invade--for there is no public anything--church or otherwise. If I be classified as teaching anything it is "Christ" expression of laws of Godliness, the Commandments (the real ones) which DO NOT REQUIRE SABBATH SIT-ON-YOUR-BACKSIDES AND PONDER YOUR NAVEL OR TITHING TO SOME INDOCTRINATED SECRET ORGANIZATION
    --YOUR GIFT AND SERVICE TO GOD IS BETWEEN YOU AND GOD! So, I cut down consid­erably on your list of commandments to follow--and you DON'T HAVE TO DO A CONFOUNDED THING FOR "ME"--EX­CEPT KEEP YOUR AGREEMENTS AS REGARDS PRIOR CONTRACTS.

    Am I weary of my enemy at my table (for we do treat ones who come as guests)? Yes and no. There is not even asked "donations" and usually there is gracious tea-type sharings to hopefully welcome and treat visitors with grace since curiosity is understandable in this day of E.T. authorities, channels, as­trologers and fortune cookies. Meetings are held when there is something to share or talk about--like RIGHT NOW AND 20 PHONE CALLS ON A DEAD MAN'S CREDIT CARD--FROM THE TOWN LOCATION WHERE WE WORK. There is no mysticism here, no rituals, no organization, and certainly no cult, as Mr. Green continues to advertise. That has been the most disappointing aspect of ones coming here--NO COM­MUNAL ANYTHING
    --IN FACT OFTEN TIMES THOSE WHO COME TO "BE" ARE TREATED QUITE RUDELY AS THEY COME EXPECTING SOME GROUPIE TYPE OF CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE "GOD WILL TEND YOU". NO, HERE, YOU TEND YOURSELF OR YOU DON'T GET TENDED!

    My plans, as a matter of fact, are to write less and less FOR the paper. The information you need is all around you and my job to date has been to sort it out as to priorities so that you can get a good look at what has happened to you. My major job will become, as we move along, that of showing you what comes next. If you can save your Constitutional rights in this nation--it can change the world you experience. If that fails--WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO? Do you think you will just "rapture" away to fluffy clouds? That is a most unwise con­clusion. Do you think you will just sit in lotus position and as­cend? Again, a very unwise conclusion--because I remind you--you haven't seen ANYONE do it.

    So, your response might well be: "Well, we haven't seen you either, big boy"! Oh yes, a whole big bunch of you HAVE SEEN ME AND MANY RIGHT OUT OF THE HIGH-LINEUP HAVE MET WITH ME AND MADE AGREE­MENTS, CONTRACTS, ETC., WHICH CONTINUALLY ARE BROKEN--BUT WE CAUSE THEM TO SHELVE A LOT OF THEIR MISERABLE GARBAGE AS WELL.

    Further, all you need to do to SEE US is go outside on any night--and LOOK. There we are, scattered about--showing our colors!! Neither "stars" nor planets SHOW COLORS--WE DO!

    If you have trouble believing this--so be it. The Elite not only believe it, THEY KNOW IT IS SO.

    I do not wish to take longer at this writing on this subject at this time. I would however, offer the phone numbers and locations of those calls as they appear on this document. Several of you attend the listing for accuracy as much as is possible for the printing--for the copy is extremely BAD.

    WE DO NOT HIDE AND I WANT EVERYONE TO SEE WHERE THESE PHONE CALLS ARE TO, SO THERE IS NO QUESTION ABOUT INTENDED PARTICIPATION. I AM GOING TO MEET MY ENEMIES HENCEFORTH ON "THEIR" STUPID TERMS. ANY AND ALL YOU NICE READERS ARE WELCOME TO CALL ANY OF THESE NUMBERS.

    (SEE NEXT TWO PAGES)
    TELEPHONE NUMBERS
    APPENDIX
    THE REMAINDER OF THIS JOURNAL IS A

    COLLECTION OF TIMELY NEWS AND/OR

    EDUCATIONAL ITEMS
    CHAPTER 8
    SOLTEC ON RECENT EARTHQUAKES
    8/1/94
    "I Feel The Earth Move Under My Feet"
    Toniose Soltec, here, in service unto the Holy God of Light. There are a few things I wish to discuss this evening regarding earthquake activity and some little tid-bits about what is going on overall in the Department of Earth Changes. And yes, Chelas, this department is very, very busy at the present time and continues to heat up.

    The first item in the Earthquake Department I wish to discuss is the flurry of activity which is occurring at present in a place known as Fontana, California, a small town just west of San Bernardino. The activity there has been steady and heavy, though the magnitudes of the temblors have not been what the residents would consider significant.

    The numbers, however, are the point of concern, because this recent flurry of shakers is now IN EXCESS OF TWO-HUNDRED OVER APPROXIMATELY A TWO-WEEK WINDOW. The largest reported magnitude has been something like 3.5. Not to worry, any of you little sleepyheads, but as you may or may not recall, this is precisely the type of activity which preceded the Northridge disaster in January of the present year.

    Your scientists are, as usual, asleep at the wheel, so it is left up to "you-know-who" to break the news to you ones. In fact, your scientists are reporting that this is nothing to be concerned about and that these little shakers are but a nuisance and not the precursor to the BIG ONE.

    Well, Chelas, whether or not this round is what shall bring about the BIG ONE is hardly the issue. The real issue is: can California, or anywhere else in your country, or any other country endure, with present resources, another disaster such as that which occurred earlier in the year in Northridge? I hate to tell you this, but your coffers are all but empty, and the only way they are going to get refilled is by you ones digging yet further into your pockets to bail out your Government's debacle and mismanagement of resources.

    That area of Fontana lies on a small fault line which intersects with yet other small-to-medium-size faults, which in turn intersect on one end with the Big Daddy, the San Andreas Fault, and on the other end with that pesky little newly discovered Newport-Inglewood Fault.

    [Editor's note: See pgs. 18-19 of the 2/1/94 CONTACT for more information on just how incredibly dangerous is that New­port-Inglewood Fault. It runs, in a fairly wide swath, from un­derneath Newport Beach at its southeastern-most edge, up through
    Huntington Beach and Seal Beach, traveling northwest, and then takes a more northerly cut, running underneath Ingle­wood, Culver City and Century City, and ending up about un­derneath Beverly Hills--quite an array of expensive and vastly populated towns!
    I will also tie in here, with this Newport-Inglewood Fault, a fax we received at the CONTACT office recently that goes as follows: "A friend of mine talked to someone who works for a Seismology Testing Corporation in the Los Angeles area. His current job is to drill 4 holes, 4-10 miles down, all near Holly­wood, with charges set and remote-controlled detonators. The depths of the holes and the amounts of the charges are all differ­ent. The job has to be completed by August '10th." Now, for those of you readers who are well aware that so many of our earthquakes are "non-natural", this ought to speak volumes! For more discussion on this matter, listen to what Commander Hatonn has to say on The Word tapes from the 7/31/94 meeting (call The Word at 805-822-4176 for information).

    Moreover, on today's (8/1/94) late night Los Angeles TV news, as we were going to press, it was announced (translation: they HAD TO announce because so many people called the station) that there was a 4.8 magnitude "aftershock" in the Landers-Big Bear mountainous area east of San Bernardino and Los Angeles proper. This was admitted to be one of 53,000 such "aftershocks" since the Landers-Big Bear quake of June 28, 1992. Of the 53,000, 175 have been of magnitude 4.0 or greater. Surely the writing's on the walls for those with eyes to see!]

    Also showing quite a bit of activity of late has been the Landers and Big Bear areas, again (or shall I say still) the Northridge area, plus a few other little shakers along the San Andreas Fault near Indio, Banning and Beaumont in Southern California, and in Parkfield farther to the northwest. Over near the Nevada and California border, again the area of Mammoth Lakes has been experiencing a little flurry of its own, with over three dozen small shakers.

    Now to Bolivia: I'll bet you thought I had forgotten about that one. Well, relax, I have not, and no, I did not miss it. In fact, we have been extremely busy studying and monitoring that one.

    Your scientists report that it was, I believe, an 8.2 or 8.3 at the epicenter. Well, Chelas, it is now time that you ones remember all those boring geology lessons which I crammed down your throats for months on end. The epicenter is the location at the Earth's surface, directly above the focus, which is the point at which the event actually occurred.

    Now, let logic take over, and realize that this quake was 470 MILES deep within your planet. What might you guess was the actual magnitude of this earthquake at the focus? Well, let me give you a hint: Your scales do not go that high. In fact, most of your so-called scientists of this discipline (I use the word loosely), are of the belief that the planet will never endure an earthquake greater than a 9 and that an earthquake greater than magnitude 10 is not only improbable, but impossible.

    Well, let the impossible be logged as the possible, for that 8.2 or 8.3 earthquake would have measured IN EXCESS OF 12 on your scales, which of course do not count that high! So much for your data-collecting capabilities! That which occurs at the surface point is but a shadow of what is actually occurring.

    You see, by the time your scientists get through playing games with all the numbers and adding here, subtracting there, fudging this way, fudging that way, there is no real information to be gained from what they report, other than you can almost always boost their reported numbers upward anywhere from a few decimal points to several whole numbers, depending on where, when and what sort of earthquake they are dealing with.

    What caused this great quake? And, yes, Chelas, this was a GREAT quake. Well, your scientists believe that it was caused by several tectonic plates coming into contact with other plates and by the zone of subduction which is in this area. Yet, this tectonic plate interaction is but another result of a much deeper occurrence.

    This quake's focus was located WITHIN THE MANTLE of the planet, which extends to some 4600 miles below the surface of your planet. The mantle is the portion of your planet which is mostly associated with volcanic activity.

    Now, consider the energy which was generated by this earth­quake. At the surface, which we agreed was 470 miles above the focus (point of the event), the measured magnitude was 8.2. THIS ENERGY RELEASE PRODUCED SURFACE MOVEMENT OF 514 FEET, approximately 1/10 of a mile! At the fo­cus, however, the energy potential factor would have produced movement of 615 MILES!

    [Editor's note: I'm going to jump in here again, briefly, to explain that the above motion displacements come from the di­rect calculations of earthquake magnitudes from the measured ground motion or back-and-forth shaking/displacement of the quake itself. That is, for example, a back-and-forth shake of the ground of 514 feet translates into a magnitude 8+ quake. Tech­nically, it is the log of the displacement of the surface wave in micrometers which is the earthquake magnitude number. So now you know! ] This did not occur, of course, due to the density of material between the surface and the focus, but the energy po­tential was present to have produced that amount of motion, had there been no interference present.

    This will give you some idea of the energy that is present within the depths of your little planet. Therefore, when man goes tinkering around with Nature, sometimes he bites off more than he is able to chew, let alone digest, and then you wonder why your planet is in the condition it is in now!?! Come, come let us have reasonability.

    You also have sent down, into a volcano, a little man-made probe to study the gases and such. For what? What is it that he hopes to achieve? Perhaps he is looking to see just what sort of energy potential might be present? I suggest the use of ex­treme caution in this regard, for you do not know what you are messing around with. You think you have problems now; try tapping into the life source of your planet and abusing and mis­using it, and you shall see just how alive and conscious this little spinning orb of rock really is. As the saying goes, "It is not nice to fool Mother Nature"!

    I realize that I have not addressed those powerful earthquakes which are occurring on a continual basis all along the Pacific Rim. The activity continues with no less than one or two mag­nitude 7.0 OR GREATER in any given week, and many which are 5.0 to 6.9. Everywhere from Russia, to Japan, to Indonesia, to Australia, to South America to Mexico to North America is continually moving ["Ring of Fire"].

    I shall not take up any more time at this writing, for it is late in the day and the paper is waiting, in final preparation, for this writing. I felt that it was necessary to inform you ones of what is happening at this present moment in California, and to give you yet another little science lesson and a bit of enlightenment of that earthquake in Bolivia. We still are monitoring that area, as well as other places, for you have not yet seen the last of the re­sults of that occurrence.

    Remember that all things are inter-related in the Universe and that which is true in the macrocosm is also true in the micro­cosm. Therefore, an earthquake which occurs at one point on your globe has the potential of creating yet other results at other points on your globe.

    Your tectonic plates are like a jigsaw puzzle, with all the pieces nicely fit together. Put pressure on one end, and push, and what happens? Pieces all across the puzzle will be affected, and some that are at the opposite side may just pop out of place. The same is true with your world's tectonic plates. Exert pressure at one point and there is likely to be activity at yet another point.

    The trick is to follow the energy trace and attempt to arrive at a probability factor. Try it sometime--then you will see just how difficult it is, and why even we are unable to predict with com­plete accuracy where the next earthquake will strike or the next volcano will erupt. There are only probabilities, Chelas. Only the planet and its Creator know these things.

    With that I shall leave you ones to ponder. Thank you for your attention and thank you for all your hard work. It shall pay off one day very soon. Toniose to clear. Salu.

  2. #6
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default 응답: PJ#104, FIRST STEPS

    PJ 104
    CHAPTER 9

    NEWS DESK
    BIGOTS AND JOURNALISTS
    By A.M. Rosenthal of THE NEW YORK TIMES
    From J. C. PRESS of February 7, 1994

    TIME magazine has printed a news story disclosing that fighting black anti-Semitism by asking black leaders to stand against it is a way of "enforcing racial correctness" and, "it might be ar­gued, is just another kind of bigotry".

    Yes, that is what TIME actually says. Page 37, issue predated Feb. 7.

    In its news section is a story about how an anti-Semitic speech made by a "semi-obscure" spokesman of the Nation of Islam be­fore just a "few dozen" college students is made into a big deal. It becomes pressure against "black leaders across the country", and that "rankles" with "some" blacks. It comes at a bad time for black-Jewish relations, says TIME, particularly in New York, always "fretting" about race.

    Then the "news story" discloses "how it works"--first the speech, then the columnists A.M. Rosenthal of THE NEW YORK TIMES and Richard Cohen of THE WASHINGTON POST call for black leaders to "repudiate" the speech. Then the Anti-Defamation League prints the speech in an ad.

    Then black leaders, "feeling the heat," begin the "ritual of con­demnation and racial correctness". Got it? Jews whip it up and blacks have to bow.

    Journalistically, enough said of TIME's staff writer, his assisting reporters and their assorted editors. Professionally, the article is worth noting simply as a warning to other magazines, newspa­pers and TV news programs: This is what can come out when "news stories" are allowed to cross over into editorialization by choice of words, angling and stacking. Politicization, distortion, ethical junk. So: vigilance, all!

    But the story also reflects something else: the sickeningly conde­scending attitude of so many whites, and some blacks too, to­ward black intelligence, independence, individualism and honor.

    Not a word did TIME print to indicate that it ever crossed its collectivized-journalism mind that black leaders who denounced the speech really might despise it, that maybe they stood up be­cause they liked that stance in life.

    TIME team saw them simply surrendering to pressure. Time Warner: Could it be that tells more about the story's perpetra­tors than about the black leaders?

    The speech brought black condemnation after it reached print in news stories--real ones, T.W.--the opinion columns clearly marked as such and in the ADL ad.

    But that's no plot, son. It is how journalism exposes bigotry. What would happen to America if journalism, other than TIME, decided that to point to bigotry was itself bigotry?

    And that correctness bit,--cute, but come on, team, those of us who insist on fighting bigotry are usually lifetime opponents of political correctness and its lifetime targets, as surely know TIME and staff writer.

    On Feb. 3, the real Lewis W. Farrakhan slapped custard all over TIME's face. He himself showed the importance of ex­posing bigots. After black leaders denounced his aide and his vicious anti-Semitism, Farrakhan fired the fellow and said his language was "repugnant". But he stood by the "truths" the said aide spoke.

    Since those "truths" were a foul mess of religious and racial trash, Farrakhan's weaseling moves me no more than his earlier announcement that he would play a violin piece by Mendelssohn.

    I hope that the statements against the viciousness of Farrakhan's man by the Rev. Jesse Jackson, members of the Congressional Black Caucus and the NAACP lead them to a public evaluation of the dangers of the Nation of Islam itself.

    The country needs a full African-American expose of how the Nation of Islam injects poison into the U.S. by constant spewing of separatism, hate of whites, Asians, Judaism, Catholicism--and its attacks against African-Americans who oppose it.

    Already among some Americans and in the press, there is a kind of mumblemouthed acceptance of Farrakhan and his organiza­tion. It goes: Well, maybe he is an anti-Semite, and that's not nice, but think about his good work among drug addicts and his speeches about black self-responsibility. You have to admire that, don't you?

    No, we don't, not any more than we admired Nazism's eco­nomic success or Stalin's vacations for assembly-line champi­ons. Do we still have to learn that hatred stinks, even when it perfumes its armpits?

    SPLITTING HAIRS HAS A PURPOSE
    From THE ORLANDO SENTINEL of February 18, 1994

    FREDERICKSBURG, VA - Did George Washington get a trim here?

    Nearly 200 years after his death, scientists are testing whether the genetic code of the first president survived in snippets of what may be his hair.

    Using new genetic technology, experts at the Federal Bureau of Investigation hope to conclude whether the hair is authentic. And as technology advances, they may even discover clues about Washington's health.

    "You can actually look at something and say, 'You're right, this is real,' or 'It's a sham", said Douglas Deedrick, a hair and fiber expert at the FBI's crime lab in Washington.

    The DNA tests came about after Diane Dunkley, director of the Daughters of the American Revolution Museum, began sifting through potential items for an exhibit this month that focuses on Washington's private life and surroundings.

    She asked the FBI to verify the samples. Deedrick's hair and fiber unit, eager for a high-profile test of their new technology, agreed to help.

    Using a microscope, Deedrick has examined 11 hair samples submitted by the DAR and four other museums.

    Next, the samples will be shredded and the DNA will be re­moved for comparison with samples provided by two descen­dants of Washington's sister, Betty Washington Lewis.

    In a procedure developed in the past year and used increasingly at crime scenes, the FBI will examine mitochondrial DNA, or the genetic building blocks that lie outside the cell nucleus. That type of DNA is quite hardy, surviving indefinitely in hair, bones, teeth or fingernails.

    In Washington's case, there are two seventy-generation descen­dants to supply the hair; Eleanor Funkhouser, 67, and her cousin, Eleanor Johnston, 70. "Of course, I don't look anything like George Washington or at least I hope I don't". Funkhouser said.

    RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS DELETED FROM ADS
    From ORLANDO SENTINEL of February 19, 1994

    ST. CLOUD, MN - A telephone company decision to eliminate religious symbols in yellow page ads has sparked controversy here.

    Objecting to the new policy are two religiously affiliated nursing homes that were told to remove religious symbols from their ads to ensure that the yellow pages are nondiscriminatory.

    According to Susan Poulos, media relations manager for the phone company, US West Direct, the elimination of religious symbols is part of a continuing update on advertising policies to ensure that the yellow pages "in no way, shape or form could be conceived as discriminatory" or inconsistent with federal guide­lines.

    St. Benedict's Center, a Catholic facility, had to remove a logo that contained a cross. And the center was told it could use the name "Benedict" in its ads only once and not repeat it when listing other affiliates.

    St. Benedict's also was told to substitute its traditional phrase "Spiritual care for all faiths" with the phrase "All faiths wel­come without preference".

    The logo of Good Shepherd Lutheran Home was eliminated be­cause it consists of a shepherd's cross.

    Diane Hageman, director of communications and marketing for St. Benedict's Center, charged that US West's policy amounts to a violation of constitutionally protected rights to freedom of reli­gion and expression.

    She said the phone company wants to make ads "as religion-free as possible" but, in issuing, its latest guideline, has "gone over­board".

    "Ultimately, the new standards will confuse yellow page users," said Suzanne Harley, community relations coordinator for Good Shepherd Lutheran Home.

    By not designating itself as a religion-based facility, Good Shep­herd could lose clients seeking that environment and attract oth­ers who don't want it, she predicted. The Catholic and Lutheran homes both were told their ads must include the phrases: "We comply with the Fair Housing Act" and "All Faiths Welcome Without Preference".

    The Rev. Timothy Wenzel, executive director of Catholic Char­ities of St. Cloud, said the restrictions are unnecessary because agency affiliates already follow a policy that prevents discrimi­nation.

    He argued that US West is interpreting the Housing Act's provi­sions too strictly and said he plans to write the company to ex­press his disagreement.

    In an editorial, the ST. CLOUD VISITOR, the diocesan newspa­per, cited inconsistencies that have developed in attempts to follow government anti-discrimination policies: "The same U.S. government that favors proliferation of the word 'condom' has, through the Fair Housing Act, convinced US West that re­fusal to allow proliferation of religious terminology is not to be construed as censorship or as
    a violation of freedom of religion or freedom of expression".

    ARMY OBJECTS TO STATE PANEL EVALUATING
    CHEMICAL-TESTING PROGRAM AT DUGWAY
    By Lee Siegel
    From THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE of February 18, 1994

    The Army will try to cooperate with a Utah state watchdog committee but wishes the panel would keep its nose out of tests involving nerve gas and other toxic chemicals at Dugway Prov­ing Ground.

    The Dugway Technical Review Committee previously examined only experiments in which microbes and microbial toxins were used to test detectors and gear designed to protect soldiers from biological weapons.

    But the committee adopted a statement in November saying that its mission also included evaluating how chemical testing at Dugway affects "the health and safety, risks and benefits to the citizens of Utah".

    "We object to the inclusion of chemical testing in the mission statement", Col. James King, Dugway's commander, told the panel Thursday.

    He said Dugway's chemical activities already are reviewed by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, and he hasn't yet received Army permission to provide the committee with specifics on chemical tests.

    Nevertheless, King said that if the Army approves, he will invite the panel to visit Dugway on March 30 for a tour and briefing on the chemical-testing program.

    At the suggestion of committee chairwoman Suzanne Winters, who is Gov. Mike Leavitt's science adviser, the panel voted to wait until after the briefing before discussing the scope of its job.

    Panel member and university of Utah physicist Eugene Loh told King the committee "is not here to do the Army a world of good. We're working for the state".

    When the committee last met in November, Ken Buchi, medical director of Holy Cross Hospital, complained the Army was with-holding information. Another member, Nancy Melling of the League of Women Voters, said the panel had been a rubber stamp for the Army.

    Winters and Army officials were furious when those comments were reported in
    The Salt Lake Tribune, saying the story empha­sized criticisms and ignored the
    Army's cooperation with the committee's requests.

    When Leavitt recently made his own appointments to the Dugway committee, he named six new members and retained three. Buchi and Melling were among those
    who lost their seats.

    Winters said they were replaced with members who have more expertise on toxicology. She said there was no attempt to mol­lify the Army by eliminating critics.

    Maj. Bruce Evans, an attorney and legal adviser to King, said the Army must be careful about what it reveals about the effec­tiveness of U.S. defenses against chemical and biological weapons.

    "What we're talking about is things that can cause soldiers to die", Evans said.

    Jerry Montgomery, another panelist who wasn't reappointed, attended Thursday's meeting and said he was misquoted in November when The Tribune quoted him as saying, "We're not getting enough information to provide anybody any feedback".

    Montgomery said Thursday he was commenting on what some panel members thought and didn't feel that way personally.

    Buchi, however, said during an interview this week that there were "plenty of things
    I requested that we receive that we never received [from the Army]. The same is true
    of Jerry".

    On Thursday, Winters said, "Maybe these meetings are worth­less".

    Loh disagreed, saying the panel got the Army to provide infor­mation on biological tests and to agree to design its planned Life Sciences Test Facility so that the base wouldn't be able to test the most hazardous organisms.

    DUGWAY IS ADDING DEADLY
    BACTERIA TO TESTS
    by Lee Siegel
    From THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE

    Bacteria that cause plague, anthrax and other diseases soon will be used at Dugway Proving Ground during indoor tests of a device designed to detect chemical and biological weapons on the battlefield.

    "The goal is to have a detector that can recognize the presence of biological threat agents despite the presence of other materials such as gas fumes, smoke and weapons fire", the Army said Thursday.

    Plans for earlier tests of the device--called a Chemical Biologi­cal Mass Spectrometer
    --were announced in April and again last summer.

    The latest round of experiments involves five additional species of bacteria, including several strains that cause potentially deadly diseases and other strains used in vaccine to prevent in­fection.

    "The tests will start sometime after March 17 and last roughly two months", Dugway spokeswoman Melynda Petrie said.

    The bacteria include plague microbes, anthrax, tularemia, or "rabbit fever" bacteria, and two species of brucellosis bacteria.

    The tests will be performed in protective "biosafety cabinets" at Dugway's Baker Test Facility.

    Gary Resnick, Dugway's chief scientist, said the tests are done so that the detector can build a computerized "library" of infor­mation that will allow it to identify substances in a battlefield situation.

    A TRILLION-DOLLAR POT OF GOLD
    UP FOR GRABS
    By Joseph A. Califano
    From THE ORLANDO SENTINEL of February 14, 1994

    Not since Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal in the 1930s and Lyndon Johnson's Great Society in the 1960s has Washington seen such an attempt to redistribute wealth in America as the Clinton administration's proposal to restructure health-care delivery and financing.

    Roosevelt and Johnson aimed to redistribute wealth from rich to poor. What makes the 1994 battle over health-system reform the street fight of the '90s--and a financial bonanza for members of Congress--is that President Clinton seeks to redistribute wealth among the most powerful, well-heeled interests in the nation. These interests are armed to protect their financial jugulars--and to go for the other guy's.

    Think of health-care reform as throwing a trillion-dollar pot of gold up for grabs.
    At bottom, this is not a political contest be­tween Republicans and Democrats or an ideological one between liberals and conservatives. It's a bare-fisted brawl over who gives to and gets from the rich business of health.

    For those who pay the health-care bills--federal, state and local governments, employers and patients--reform is a game of hot-potato economics. The feds want
    to toss the hot potato of costs to states and private employers. The states and large corpora­tions want to pass it back to the feds. Business, the feds and the states want to lay it on individuals. American taxpayers, per­petually on the prowl for a free lunch, want to dump costs back onto their employers and government.

    The beauty that three presidents--Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter and Clinton--saw in requiring employers to provide health bene­fits to workers is that it lays the costs onto private, state and municipal employers--and keeps it off the federal budget. Clin­ton was especially attracted to this beauty when he realized he could dress the biggest payroll tax hikes in American history in the drag of premiums for health insurance. The beast that scares state and corporate employers is a package of benefits mandated by a Congress that has no responsibility to finance them.

    Private employers have in recent years tossed the hot potato of costs to their employees by requiring them to pay a bigger share of insurance premiums and medical bills and by trimming retiree health benefits. These employers toss the hot potato to one an­other, as well as to federal and state governments. As a result of cost shifting in 1993, business with more than 100 workers paid at least $15 billion in health-care costs for employees at companies with less than 25 workers (who usually have no insurance).

    The National Association of Manufacturers, which represents more than 80 percent of the nation's manufacturers, estimates that each year its members fork over more than $12 billion, al­most 30 percent of the bill they pay, for the medical care of in­dividuals who are not on their payrolls. Seven billion dollars of that amount picks up the health-care tab for workers in other sectors of the economy, notably employees of service and retail industries, including major hotel, retail and fast-food chains. The rest supports public programs such as Medicare and Medi­caid, which no longer pay most hospitals and doctors enough to cover their costs.

    General Motors, Ford and Chrysler were first to jump into bed with the Clintons because the administration's plan, when fully in place, would be worth about $3 billion a year in savings that they can reinvest or distribute in dividends to shareholders and wages to workers. By mandating employers' coverage and dumping more costs for the poor onto the states, the Clinton plan would pretty much end cost-shifting to companies with rich plans. Having the feds pick up the health-care tab for the early retirees would be a boon to industries such as auto and steel that routinely lay off workers at age 55.

    Even before the administration released its 1,342-page bill, fed­eral employees with richer benefits at less cost than the Clinton package offers, and big unions with first-dollar coverage and no premium copayments, scrambled to get out from under it.

    When New York Gov. Mario Cuomo realized the bill would add $6 billion to his budget, he demanded more federal funds for Medicaid and whipped off a note to 200,000 state employees, warning that they would pay more for less if Clinton prevails.

    So much for those who pay the bills. What about those who have their hands in this trillion-dollar cookie jar?

    For the nation's insurers, doctors, hospitals, health worker unions, pharmaceutical companies, medical equipment manu­facturers, health-maintenance organizations, nurses, mental health providers, chiropractors, pharmacists and radiologists, re­form is a junk-yard dog fight for bigger scraps of financial meat.

    The bureaucratic behemoths of Clinton's plan are the state pur­chasing alliances that would buy most health care and monitor every physician, procedure, prescription and provider. The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employ­ees, the nation's most powerful and effective union, sees these alliances as the biggest bureaucracy since the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and a once-in-a-generation chance to shift most of the nation's insurance function into an arena in which they know how to organize workers.

    The five largest commercial insurers, including Aetna and Pru­dential, see bureaucracies just as big but they view alliances as an opportunity to expand their administrative operations if they can keep them private and away from the states, as the Cooper plan (which they favor) would.

    The nastiest street fights are likely to come among those who have the most at stake; hospitals ($409 billion), doctors ($195 billion), nursing homes and home health care ($108 billion), pharmaceutical companies ($100 billion), insurers ($62 billion), and others such as dentists, podiatrists, optometrists, physical therapists, pharmacists (more than $100 billion). They can be expected to fight in the back alleys of Capitol Hill with a rough­ness rarely seen in Washington.

    The most blood may be spilled within these groups because the Clinton plan shrewdly sets the stage for intermediane warfare. Doctors can be expected to go against doctors, with family physicians favoring a plan that would give them higher incomes and surgeons and other specialists opposing one that would cut their fees. For-profit hospitals stand to gain from competition on the basis of price and restrictions on the ability of patients to seek care outside their home areas. Teaching hospitals would lose patients and doctors because of such competition, geo­graphic restraints and government limits on the number of specialists they could have as residents each year.

    I write this not out of cynicism derived from dealing with health­care issues during the past 30 years. I write to remind the better angels in all the players--politicians, payers and providers--that we patients have a lot at stake in their scramble to protect their chips in the trillion-dollar health-care pot. At its core, health care is a ministry, not an industry. If we lose sight of this es­sential characteristic, the worthy goal of affordable, high-quality care for all will once again get trampled in the melee over money.

    Joseph A. Califano was secretary of HEW during the Carter administration. He serves on the boards of several corporations and nonprofit institutions with interests in health care.

    TAKING ON STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICIALS
    By Tom Lake (Lake is a resident of Modesto, CA)
    From the MODESTO BEE, of February 18, 1994.

    The Bee recently was replete with articles about the "illegal" filing of liens. The whole of the series began with the tragic, unthinkable attack on our Karen Mathews, Stanislaus County's clerk/recorder.

    It is apparent from the articles and what those in government are saying that such liens are considered "illegal" liens.

    In reality, by law, the only illegal lien filed is that lien filed where the lien debtor was not given a reasonable chance or op­portunity to respond to the lien creditor (lien filer) in some kind of forum, either in or outside the court system, to the charges or damages that created the lien.

    Those in government seem to think and claim the filing of liens against them is a form of harassment.

    That does not matter as the filing of a lien is permitted by law after there is a default in responsibilities or deliberate action by the lien debtor that has injured the filing party.

    The law clearly provides for the creation of liens under at least two conditions--1) by operation of law and 2) breach of contract to command specific performance as required by law.

    There is an inalienable historical right that exists for filing liens against individuals,
    to temporarily deprive them of their prop­erty.

    In a case decided by the Supreme Court, that such liens can be filed "without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England
    but also to ancient Roman times".

    This was stated in the 1968 case Sniadach vs. Family Finance Corp. case citing and quoting the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The only stipulation was that there was an opportunity granted to the lien debtor to answer for some wrong or damage done before the filing of a lien. The state Supreme Court reiterated that in Randone vs. Appellate Department in 1971.

    In this writer's case, the lien debtors were given ample opportu­nity to respond and failed to do so.

    Attempts were made to file liens against the defaulted action of the lien debtors, in which criminal charges were in fact previ­ously taken to the U.S. District Court, which the county/recorder absolutely refused to record.

    Now, there is a problem in the county recorder's office regard­ing the recording of documents. The county recorder does not have judicial capacity. She can not make
    any legal determina­tion on the legality of any document.

    The state attorney general declared the county recorder could not determine the legal sufficiency of any document, which in­cludes liens, "only to whether a document has been drafted to achieve its purpose and not to whether it might contain the par­ticular information demanded by the 'recording' sections of the Government Code".

    In his 1984 opinion, then Attorney General John Van De Kamp clearly stated there were only three reasons the county recorder could refuse to file a document: (1) The document was not in­dexable; (2) the document was not photographically repro­ducible for the microfiche machines; or (3) the party filing the document refused to pay the required filing fees.

    There were no other grounds given for her to legally refuse to record any document
    --including liens. And these were not an issue. The county recorder simply refused
    to obey the law.

    The California Government Code states that if the recorder re­fuses to record a document, the recorder personally is liable for three times damages sustained by the refusal to record such doc­uments.

    When the recorder refused to file liens as authorized by law, a $210 million suit was filed against the county counsel and the recorder.

    The papers did not report this suit as being filed according the California laws, codes, statutes and regulations governing the county recorder, or that this remedy was available in law, or that the recorder had willfully and deliberately violated the law.

    The court, in gross error, dismissed the suit.

    The dismissal violated the very laws the court was sworn to up­hold, extending the liability for and compounding damages sus­tained by the criminal actions of others.

    That action by the court now denies the injured parties a redress of grievances, and specific remedies provided for in the statutes, codes, regulations and laws of California that govern those in government.

    The question now is: Where is the illegal activity?

    COUNTY: LIENS ARE ILLEGAL

    Editor's Note: The following statement was released by the Stanislaus County Counsel's Office

    Recently, U.S. District Court Judge Robert E. Coyle ruled that a "lien document" filed against an Internal Revenue Service Agent was null and void and without legal effect.

    In Stanislaus County, Superior Court Judge David G. Vander Wall recently denied a request by Thomas Lake and others for a writ of mandate ordering Clerk/Recorder Karen Mathews to file documents entitled "Notice of Default and Claim of Lien".

    Such documents have been held by the courts to be invalid liens and are not authorized or required by law to be recorded.

    The County Counsel's Office has advised Clerk/Recorder Karen Mathews not to accept for filing any documents not authorized or required by law to be recorded.

    The courts, both state and federal have held that such "lien doc­uments" are not authorized or required by law to be recorded.

    WEST'S LEADERS WARN WASHINGTON: GIVE
    US LIBERTY -- OR ELSE

    By Christopher Smith
    DENVER, CO. - Evoking Revolutionary War analogies, Utah politicians Sunday urged fellow Western state leaders to declare their independence from Uncle Sam.

    "We have to send another shot heard round the world", Utah House of Representatives Speaker Rob Bishop, R-Brigham City, said in the keynote address of the Western States Summit held here. "Washington, D.C., is 70 square miles surrounded by re­ality. It's time reality took control".

    Sponsored by members of the Utah Legislature, the first-ever conference turned into a revival-style meeting of 200 ranchers, county commissioners, miners, legislators and recreationists from across the western United States who gave every speaker a standing ovation Sunday afternoon. The prevailing theme: Break the bonds of federal "tyranny" and reclaim states' rights to govern.

    "Let's make the 10th Amendment not the most unused amend­ment but instead the most important section of the Bill of Rights", said Bishop, referring to the portion of the Constitution that reserves for states those powers not specifically delegated to the federal government.

    Bishop, a teacher of U.S. government from Brigham City, ral­lied against federal arrogance.

    He chastised the federal government for restricting access to public lands, compared federal grazing reforms to the colonial Sugar Act tax and complained of state legislatures being forced to pay for federal programs they don't want.

    But just how the Western land "stakeholders," as they refer to themselves, will dam Uncle Sam's seemingly unending flood of regulatory edicts was drowned in the summit's opening-day rhetoric. Even Bishop acknowledged: "Venting our frustrations is easy. But to take action, it's near-insurrection".

    "Some are gentle, some are a little spicy and some are red-hot", said the New Harmony rancher who coordinated the two-day summit session. Fellow Utah House members Mel Brown, R-Midvale, Bradley Johnson, R-Aurora, and Jim Gowans, D-­Tooele, were organizing stakeholders for a videotaped message to President Clinton, extolling their complaints against Potomac rule.

    "We've become territories managed by a ruler as remote as the king of England." said Bill Howell of Price, director of the Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments. "We are witnessing a modern American tragedy".

    Facing a sea of cowboy hats, Garfield County Commissioner Louise Liston of Escalante told the audience that the culture of the rural West is being "systematically destroyed" by "nature lovers and suitcase saviors".

    "It comes down to wise use vs. no use", said the rancher's wife and retired schoolteacher. "Let's not forget the most valuable resource on our lands is the human resource".

    A sample of some of the fightback strategies being considered could be found in the back of the Stapleton Plaza Hotel Ball­room, which was adorned with flags from 17 states west of the Mississippi. There, the Bountiful-based National Federal Lands Conference was selling books with titles such as Fight Back & Win: A Rancher's Guide and Toxicity of Environmentalism.

    Videotapes instructed "positive confrontational strategies" and "how to use the power of county government to restore private-property rights".

    Several participants wore buttons supporting "Clinton-Free Zones". A White House phone list was circulated encouraging stakeholders to join a "Fire Babbitt Phone-In",
    a campaign to oust Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt.

    Today, attorneys will coach the local government officials on drafting comprehensive land-use plans that specify local customs and cultures derived from the use of federal lands. Participants also will grill U.S. Sens. Bob Bennett of Utah, Malcolm Wallop of Wyoming and Hank Brown of Colorado on Washington's on­going remodeling of the traditional West.

    And planning will continue for the "next" American Revolution. "We pride ourselves in Arizona in doing everything we can to annoy the federal government", said Arizona House Majority Whip David Schweikert, R-Scottsdale. "The war has begun, now let's just make sure we win it".

    BIG BROTHER
    Dear Freedom Loving American,

    As you know, Big-Sister and me dedicate our time making plans to fill your life with joy and happiness! They don't call us Big-Sister and Big-Brother for nothing! We are highly concerned! We want to shelter you in every way we can think of from problems which, if not solved by us, might spoil your fun. For example, if it annoys you that Congress makes laws which rob you of your earnings, you can stop worrying. I have great news! Thanks to our new disability law, you no longer have to work for a living with its constant risk of becoming a political-­prisoner--for not paying enough taxes.
    I want you to know, as usual, I have taken Big-Sister's sound advice, and made it possible for you to avoid this risk of working--by merely claiming to be a disabled alcoholic. I know it sounds too good to be true, but TRUST ME...IT'S TRUE!! Hearing my great news... I can just sense your bubbling excitement and joy, knowing that your life and future can be in my official experts' reliable hands. And you can depend on it!

    From hearing such great news, you must be vibrating with hap­piness! But, I have even better news! Because of your alleged disability, you can become a member in good standing of my huge voting-block of dependent-free-persons; created to faith­fully reelect those who have made your new "human-right" freedom-from-work possible. But, I must warn you!! After be­coming a non-responsible, non-productive freeperson, there will be a few kooks, filled with hate, alleging that your government granted entitlements to clothes, food, shelter, cars, TV etc. that were produced by, and stolen via taxes from those who still work for a living. But when such un-American misfits try to spoil your carefree life of politically-correct freedom, you can easily silence these offenders by a knee-jerk scream of : racist, cultist, white supremacist ...HATEMONGER! Or a few of the other such effective buzzwords that we've thoughtfully planted in your subconscious via "the news" (to save you from thinking
    --for your protection).

    Big-Sister suggested that I also warn you about some offensive chain letters being widely circulated. It appears from these let­ters, that in spite of our loading their promulgators with unbear­able taxes (in order to penalize such foolishness as working to support themselves and their families), they never stop writing such letters. Just for example, one of their recent letters begins with these stupid questions:

    "Have you foolishly trusted your life, liberty and property to an 'Imperial Congress' that has made tax-slaves of American workers; whose production feeds, clothes and shelters a horde of dependents existing on government handouts for re-election votes
    --enabling self-serving career-politicians to live like KINGS!? Is this buying of votes from taxes on your earning--stealing the fruits of your labor"?

    Being a patriotic, politically-correct freeperson, I am certain these hateful ranting are as offensive to you as they are to Big-Sister and myself. I want you to know, such insensitivity makes me livid with anger! And I intend to have my Attorney General do something about it...just like the cultist creeps in Waco, Texas, were ZONKED! But until the General and our militar­ily-armed storm troopers have the time, I am relying on you to do your politically-correct duty; by destroying any such hate-spreading chain letters that you may receive. This duty is: top-priority ! We must stop such chain letters from rapidly multi­plying and spreading. For if we don't destroy these letters, they will soon be read by multi-millions of voters, who perhaps, not as caring and sensitive as yourself, could, because of their overwhelming numbers, prevent our beautiful dreams for you and loved ones from becoming a reality.

    With Highest Regards, Your "Politically Correct" Servant,

    Big Brother Bill
    THE REAL CAUSE OF OUR PROBLEMS
    "The Power to Tax is The Power to Destroy"!
    (former Supreme Court Justice, John Marshall)
    ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in all of history has ruined so many lives...wrecked so many families...increased so many prices...eliminated so many opportunities to many sayings...forced so many industries into leaving our coun­try...destroyed so many wealth-creating jobs...robbed so many workers...impoverished so many millions...made so many homeless...caused so much crime...created so many AMERICAN TAX-SLAVES to support foreign wars and to enable career-politicians, foreign-rulers and global-bankers to become filthy-rich, as has: the FEDERAL INCOME TAX!

    In spite of the above truth, and that all paper-dollars are printed for the mere-cost of paper and ink by the United States Gov­ernment in any quantity it chooses, most Americans have gullibly swallowed the BIG-LIE that they must pay their "fair share" of income taxes to support "their" government. But being it's the sole-source of all paper-dollars, which today, are not backed by anything and are not redeemable, the government does not need such taxes! We are being...HAD!!!

    If this is true, which it is, then why does the government borrow "dollars" and tax us for repayment?

    It is because Congress unlawfully allows twelve private banks to buy ALL of the "dollars" printed by the U.S. Treasury Dept. for less than three cents per $100 bill! Then, they loan the "dollars" (which cost them next to nothing) into circulation and BACK to the government at full face amount plus interest!

    This "smoke and mirror" money and power-grab has created a fraudulent national debt and the resulting income-tax for repay­ment; which is gradually but methodically strangling our econ­omy! But thanks to a centrally-controlled "news" Net-work, it's a best kept political secret!

    The mentioned privately owned banks are the Federal Reserve Banks. Their name is used to deceive the American public into believing these banks are a part of the U.S.A. government, but they definitely are NOT! They operate independent of govern­ment, and exist for the unjust enrichment and power of their owners! Yet Congress allows these banks to be excluded from government audits and paying any taxes on their HUGE, UN­JUST, MIND-BOGGLING "PROFITS"!!

    Even worse, when every "dollar" is loaned into circulation as now in our country
    --no one really owns any dollars but these banks! And, "...the borrower is the slave of the lender". Which makes every American a debt-shackled, economic slave of the secretive owners of the Federal Reserve Banks!
    Because the impoverishing income-tax has destroyed so many businesses, there are now more paper-shuffling bureaucrats than all of the wealth-producing workers in the remaining American factories! (Wealth is not paper-dollars. Wealth is: necessary products that come from the earth by application of mind and muscle for the sustaining and enjoyment of life). Big govern­ment does not produce wealth. Instead, like an insatiable mon­ster, it steals and consumes wealth created by the labor of builders, farmers, and factory workers; leaving them barely enough to exist on.

    On top of this, business taxes are pyramided in the price of ev­ery American product; causing American products to cost two to three times more than they would be if their prices were not loaded with hidden taxes. This of course hurts (taxes) the poor the most, and effectively prevents them from escaping their cruel, life-draining entrapment.

    Imagine what would happen if there were no "bankster taxes" annually stealing over half of the earnings of your community. Business would BOOM! Prosperity would ZOOM! And poverty would literally VANISH!! Would you like for this to happen? IT CAN IF...a majority of voters could be made AWARE of how they are being used and robbed to vastly enrich a few banksters and their career-politicians. Then, replace their "puppet" career-politicians with LOYAL AMERICANS to issue our money free of debt and interest...the banksters' income taxes could be ENDED! But to make it HAPPEN, EACH of us without fail MUST INFORM a few others...on and on! So please do your needed part by making copies of this truth and passing it on. But whatever you do, REMAIL this sheet to someone else.

    CHAPTER 10
    THE NEWS DESK
    Rick Martin 7/28/94
    FEDERAL TRACKING
    In an article from the July 13 edition of THE ORLANDO SENTINEL,

    Quoting:
    Federal investigators have unraveled lucrative schemes to il­legally convert food stamps into cash in Maryland, the only state that uses electronic banking technology to deliver welfare bene­fits.

    The Clinton Administration, seeking to reduce welfare fraud and abuse, wants to expand the paper-free electronic benefits transfer, or EBT, to recipients nationwide by the end of the decade.

    But federal court records from four laundering cases in Maryland suggest the switch from paper food stamps to an elec­tronic card has not deterred some recipients from selling their benefits to unscrupulous retailers for cash.

    However, EBT may make it easier to catch the cheats.

    Food stamp recipients in Maryland are given an electronic card and their benefits are automatically credited to their account at the first of the month.

    To buy groceries, they present the Independence Card to an authorized retailer, who runs it through a tracking device that records the card number, date, time and amount. The recipient enters a personal identification number to complete the transac­tion.

    Federal investigators and prosecutors say the EBT system provides a complete audit trail of all transactions, allowing them to better identify trafficking patterns and food stamp recipients who sell their benefits.

    CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
    In an article from Southern California's DAILY NEWS, dated July 26 and written by David Dishneau, CHICAGO,

    Quoting:
    Paper pushers, beware. The rush to re-engineer Big Business is putting corporate bureaucrats on the firing line.

    Lawyers, accountants, data technicians and other number crunchers are the latest layoff targets as big companies reduce their management staffs to become more responsive to cus­tomers.

    The largely white-collar computer and telecommunications industries have announced at least 78,000 layoffs this year, and other industries are following.

    At Amoco Corp., which announced 4,500 mostly white-collar layoffs last week--the petroleum company's second major round of cuts since mid-1992--Chairman H. Laurance Fuller said too many people were "tossing pieces of paper back and forth and not having a whole lot of impact on the business".

    Such seemingly straight talk from a corporate chieftain is rare. Not since former IBM Chairman John F. Akers decreed in 1991 there were "too many people standing around the water cooler waiting to be told what to do" had the public heard a prominent executive decry employee deadwood and lard. IBM has since slashed nearly 50,000 jobs or nearly 16 percent of its payroll.

    Still, such sweeping statements from the boss are oversimpli­fications, say many management consultants and strategists. In their view, businesses should do less chopping and more selec­tive weeding.

    Other big layoffs announced this year came from Digital Equipment Corp., GTE Corp., Pacific Bell, Nynex and AT&T.

    SCANNERS
    In an article from the July edition of the READER'S DIGEST, written by Lars-Erik Nelson for NEWSDAY,

    Quoting:
    The technology needed to detect guns invisibly is coming, an outgrowth of research done for U.S. Navy nuclear submarines. Raytheon Company's sonar division is working on a civilian de­vice that could be used in schools, banks and convenience stores, or even by officers on the street.

    "You could build the detectors into the walls", says a source with knowledge of the project. "You could walk by people while carrying a detector in your suitcase. You could drive by in a van. It would be totally nonobtrusive. People wouldn't even know they were being scanned".

    The technological frisk is not the only high-tech crime-fighter in the works. Alliant Techsystems of Minnesota, which also does sonar work for the Navy, has a project to place microphones on city telephone poles. At the sound of a gunshot, computers would triangulate the exact location and radio it to police. No need to wait for a witness to dial 911. Police could be on the scene before perpetrators flee or before victims bleed to death.

    David Boyd of the National Institute of Justice reports promising work on a "safe gun". With miniaturized recognition technology it could be fired only by its legal owner. Over the past 20 years, about one-fifth of police officers murdered by a
    firearm were shot with their own weapons or guns taken from fellow officers.

    NEW SQUAD ON CAMPUS
    In an article from the July 27 edition of THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION, BERKELEY, CA,

    Quoting:
    The University of California here has formed a new tactical police squad to handle the kind of major emergences that have rocked Berkeley and other urban campuses in recent years.

    The creation of the High Risk Entry Team was prompted by two incidents. In 1990,
    a student was killed when a gunman held 33 people hostage in a campus-area bar.
    In 1992, a community activist armed with a machete broke into the home of Chamg
    Lin-Tien, Berkeley's chancellor, and was killed by police.

    The team is part of the university police department's Special Response Unit and has been training at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and other campus locations.

    VOODOO
    In a bizarre article from the July 10 edition of THE SUNDAY EXAMINER AND CHRONICLE, written by David Usborne, ARCADIA, Louisiana,

    Quoting:
    The three sisters were on 1-20, just east of Dallas, in the early hours when it happened. Myra Crawford, who was driving, started to act strangely, trying to veer the car into oncoming traffic and off the sides of bridges.

    Then the steering wheel squirmed into life and started to pummel her, before mutating into a monstrous demon. The ap­parition sprang from the dashboard, mounted the crazed Craw­ford and began its possession of her. It was exactly as the women had feared. The previous evening--March 17, St. Patrick's Day--they had fled from their hometown of Arcadia in northwestern Louisiana, convinced that an evil spirit was pursuing them.

    Most of what is known of their journey--including a decision, halfway, to abandon
    their terrified children with strangers--has been told by the women to lawyers, friends and the police.

    But only one thing was recorded for certain: Myra Crawford's admission, just after dawn, to a suburban Dallas hospital. Both her eyes were missing.

    Four months later, the events of that night still haunt Arcadia, a remote town with a population of 3,000, otherwise famous only as the place where Bonnie and Clyde were gunned down. The Crawford sisters--Myra, 30, who will be blind for life, Doretha, 34, and Beverly, 35--have retreated to a shuttered brick house on Evangeline Drive, a scrubby cul-de-sac on the black side of the railway tracks.

    Neighbors, slumped in the boiling summer air on their porches, hesitate to talk of the affair. Some even run away, afraid, because this is hoodoo business.

    But the secretive world of hoodoo--a rural variant of the voodoo religion practiced in Haiti and even New Orleans--may soon be laid open for all to see if, as expected, authorities in Dallas decide this week to pursue charges of criminal blinding against Doretha and Beverly.

    The accused pair's lawyer, Lela Washington, confirmed that if prosecuted her clients would plead not guilty. Crucial to the defense would be the argument that all three women were vic­tims of an evil hoodoo hex and the blinding was the work of the demon, or indeed of Satan himself.

    What set the sisters on their course originally was a visit by Beverly Crawford to a local hoodoo doctor called Benny in the hope of finding a cure for recurring headaches. She was told that she was suffering because she was under assault by demons who were trying to possess her. The revelation terrified the women, and soon afterward their father, Chester, recommended that they flee and find sanctuary with another sister in Dallas.

    But their journey was hellish from the beginning.

    When they checked into a motel in Tyler on the other side of the state line in Texas, their five children started to see things. It was then that the women ordered everyone back in the car, found a house with a cross in front of it and left the children at the door.

    As they were getting close to Dallas the possession of Myra Crawford occurred. Beverly Crawford and Doretha Crawford apparently beat the car into submission and managed also to calm their sister.

    The three then hitched a ride closer into Dallas in a truck, and were directed to a house that also served as an ad hoc church. It is in this place, the home of one Maddy Bradfield, that Myra Crawford apparently, through whatever means, lost her sight for good.

    It is a sequence that rings entirely true to David Otto, a pro­fessor of religion at Centenary College in Shreveport. He notes that in voodoo teaching, when a person becomes possessed by a spirit, he or she becomes the spirit's horse.

    "In hoodoo lore, the spirit is riding on your shoulders, and to rid the person of that spirit, you either [don't try this] cut the head off, which was not appropriate in this case, or you gouge their eyes out.

    "You won't be a good horse any more because you can't see, and so the spirit leaves.
    If you ,believed in hoodoo, eye-gouging would have been the appropriate response to possession".

    Otto is hesitant to answer the obvious question: Almost two centuries after the introduction from West Africa and Haiti of voodoo and hoodoo to the Southern United States, how widespread are these practices today? But he does venture that in rural corners such as Arcadia, reliance on hoodoo spiritual­ists, as a backup to the Christian religion and medical doctors, is likely still to be common.

    RENO'S ASYLUM
    In a column written by Lars-Erik Nelson, from the July 10 edition of THE DENVER POST,

    Quoting:
    While Coast Guard cutters were stopping boatloads of desperate Haitians on the high seas, Attorney General Janet Reno set a new basis for claiming refuge in the U.S.: homosexuality.

    In a directive to the U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals, Reno wrote that "an individual who has been identified as homosexual and persecuted by his or her government for that reason alone may be eligible for relief under the refugee laws on the basis of persecution because of membership in a social group".

    We have long granted political and religious asylum to op­pressed peoples from around the world. There is even a prece­dent for sex-oriented asylum. Under the George Bush Admin­istration, we had kind of heterosexual asylum: Chinese were granted refuge on grounds they opposed forced abortions. They only had to say they feared persecution for wanting more than one child.

    Many homosexuals can demonstrate a more credible fear of persecution than some of the refugees who have already been admitted without much question. After all, Hitler targeted ho­mosexuals along with Jews and Gypsies for extinction in the Holocaust. In a few countries--most notably Iran--homosexuals face repression and possibly death at the hands of their government.

    But still...homosexual asylum? This smacks more of special-interest lobbying than of any strategy to bring logic to Ameri­can's changeable, chaotic rules on political asylum.

    Like the since-repealed Bush policy on abortion foes, the new category for homosexuals is an invitation to massive immigra­tion fraud.

    According to OUT magazine, hundreds of homosexuals have already filed asylum claims because they face persecution in such places as Brazil, Turkey, Colombia, Hong Kong, Iran and Russia.

    Since there is already an asylum back-log of nearly 1 million people, a would-be immigrant could slip into the country by claiming homosexuality, getting a work permit and then waiting years before his or her claim is heard.

    Not least, the new rules for homosexuals also give fresh am­munition to conservatives, especially the Christian right, who have worked up so much fury over Clinton's tolerance of gays and lesbians in the military. Now they see a president who would deny political asylum to Chinese opponents of abortion but would grant it to Chinese homosexuals. What fun the fam­ily-values folks will have with that!

    GINSENG
    In an article from the July 19 edition of THE MONTREAL GAZETTE,

    Quoting:
    It's not exactly an ancient Chinese proverb, but Maurice Levesque might have something here.

    "When you grow ginseng, you go to the bank", said the mar­keting vice-president of Vancouver-based Canadian Imperial Ginseng Products. "When you grow marijuana, you go to jail".

    The ginseng root can yield up to $165,000 an acre in gross revenues--making it the world's most profitable legal agricultural crop.

    Cultivating ginseng for the Asian market has become a lucrative industry in British Columbia--about $30 million a year and growing.

    At a retail level, the industry is worth about $2.7 billion worldwide, with North American ginseng comprising 20 percent ($540 million).

    Although gaining popularity in other cultures, ginseng is used mainly by people in Asian countries or of Asian background. The Chinese have been using the root they call the elixir of life for more than five centuries.

주제글 정보

Users Browsing this Thread

이 주제글은 현재 7명이 열람중입니다. (0명의 회원과 7명의 손님)

이 주제글의 글단추(태그)

글쓰기 규칙

  • 새 글 작성이 불가능함
  • 응답글 작성이 불가능함
  • 파일 첨부가 불가능함
  • 내 글 수정이 불가능함
  •