PJ#104, FIRST STEPS

[wave]

PJ 104

CHAPTER 11

THE NEWS DESK

Ed Cleary 7/30/94

GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS IS TO CONTROL

GOLD PRICE ON SAT., JULY 30, 1994
N.Y. COMEX: $383.00/oz.

DO YOU TRULY WANT TO UNDERSTAND?

Relative to an article titled "A Theoretical Conversation Be­tween an Individual and the NWO (New World Order)" in a re­cent Leading Edge, I present these pertinent considerations.

There are so many and such varied laws in this country that it is impossible to obey all of them.

Logically and intelligently one would think that laws are enacted to preserve order or to restore it. It is most difficult to think that the opposite is true, that laws are passed to create disorder and chaos.

THE MORE LAWS THE MORE CRIMINALS

In the "conversation" referred to above, it went like this: The New World Order fellow says, "You broke one of our laws. Well, what do you think they're for? We want them broken. We're after power and we mean it. There is no way to rule in­nocent men. The only power government has is in the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one has to make more of them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? Just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted, and you create a nation of lawbreakers--THEN YOU CASH IN ON THE GUILT. Now, that's the system and the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with. Government is in the business of defense, police and courts, so the government's 'customers' are military aggressors, criminals and civil litigants. If there were no foreign military threat, no crime and new civil lawsuits, the government would have no 'customers' and would shrink in size and authority. In the defense/police/court business the government is a monopoly. Nobody else is allowed to compete--the only way for a monopoly to increase is to increase the customer base by creating new laws to apply to new people--laws which are all but impossible for the public to obey, thus technically creating a nation of criminals".

IT'S THE SYSTEM

The usual citizen goes about muttering and mumbling that he does not know what it is all about, what is happening, what went wrong and how it is to be corrected. It is quite impossible to understand the true answer to any of these questions if you think all of this legislation is for your benefit.

NOW HEAR THIS. It ain't the way you think it is. The system (government, finance, religion, education, information, welfare and medicine) is designed to harm you while at the same time causing you to think you are being helped (actual brain­wash and mind-control).

If you want to understand how we got to where we are, then read CONTACT regularly. Follow the trail of the Khazar-Zion­ist-Bolshevik anti-God and anti-Civilization groupings. Watch the powerful war and money and drug crowd move parallel with them for the most part.

If you want to understand what they have in store for you for the next six years read CONTACT regularly. Be alert to all in­formation coming from the CFR, the Trilats, the Bilderbergers and all the other Elite organizations and publications. Make not the mistake of not accepting the statements at full face value. They do what they say.

HOW "GUILTY" ARE YOU?

A key word in the quoted paragraph is "guilt". The NWO person picks it out cleanly and explains how it is being used on a day to day basis:
"Guilt produces passivity, and makes man programmed for defeat. The importance of this for totalitarianism cannot be overemphasized. If a whole society can be made to feel guilty, it will be unable to withstand an enslaving state. It is ripe for conquest. This has long been recognized as the most successful method of rendering men passive and pliable, incapable of resistance to state domination and control. As guilt produces impotence, it also leads people to call for more controls from the state. The passive population is not only malleable, yielding and submissive--it positively welcomes state intervention. The guilty, perceiving themselves unable to solve life's problems (which have been created by the state), will welcome being "saved" by the state. There is no way to disarm any man except through guilt.
If a man has ever stolen a dime, you can impose on him the punishment intended for a bank robber and he will take it. If we teach a man that it's evil to look at spring flowers and he believes us and then he does it, we'll be able to do what­ever we please with him. He won't fight. But save us from the man who lives up to his own standards and the man of clean conscience. He's the man who'll beat us".

If anyone of you wish truly to understand the questions pre­sented priorly then give concentrated attention to the statements of your enemies and accept them at full value. Example: The Protocols of Zion. Check 'em out and you will understand the who and what and how of the present state of the world. Argue with me about the red herring of forgery and you will never un­derstand anything. Other samples: the holocaust, "anti­semitism", democracy, socialism and on into infinity.

A sovereign, knowing individual can never be enslaved within any lie.

"POSTSCRIPT"

During November of 1993 (and since), the United States Congress has been passing a series of Crime Laws--essentially passing the Omnibus Crime Control Act in pieces instead of as a single piece of legislation. On November 4, 1993, it was an­nounced that the government has allotted $22.3 billion dollars over the next five years, in which $3 billion is for regional pris­ons and $1 billion for boot (concentration) camps".

You are smarter than you were before you started reading this item.

Right under our national noses today a massive $30 + billion crime bill is soon to become law. These are the major provi­sions:

QUOTING:

*Authorize 100,000 more law officers on the beat. Intended
for community policing with officers getting to know the neighborhoods they patrol.

*Create about five dozen new death penalty categories. Re­stores some that existed before the U.S. Supreme Court over­turned capital punishment in 1972, creates new ones such as carjacking slayings, drive-by shooting murders and drug-traf­fickers who deal large amounts of drugs even if they are not di­rectly connected to any specific death.

*Toss third-time violent and drug felons in prison for life, if the third conviction is in federal court. Would allow the early release of some prisoners over 70 if they have served at least 30 years.

*Provide $10.5 billion for prisons, including $8.7 billion in a state prison building grant program and $1.8 billion to reimburse states that incarcerate criminal illegal aliens.

*Ban 19 named types of assault-style firearms and dozens of others that are deemed by the government to meet the charac­teristics of such firearms. It would limit magazine capacity to 10 rounds.

*Provide $7.4 billion for crime-prevention programs. Includes $1.8 billion for the Violence Against Women Act and $1.8 billion for Local Partnership Act grants.

END OF QUOTING
You are programmed to accept this and believe that this law is to stop or prevent crime. Not me! A hundred-thousand more cops mean more arrests and more criminals and more judges and courts and more prisons. The federal government is the biggest criminal in the crime business and not one cent is allo­cated to catch the largest fish in the pond.

And if you imagine that the health care criminals are interested in your health, it is time to have you placed in the closest looney bin.

CHAPTER 12

FBI Director Freeh Notified:
Respond Or Evade: Pre-Meditated Murder,
High Treason Cited

Citizens For A Constitutional Washington
Inspired by the Statute of July 4, 1776:
The Declaration of Independence

"We the People" Committee
John R. Prukop, Executive Director
11910-C Meridian East, #142
Puyallup, Washington, Postal Zone: 98373/TDC
Phone: (206) 840-8071 -‑
FAX: (206) 840-8074

CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
July 26, 1994

REGISTERED MAIL
R 476 513 462

Mr. Louis Freeh, Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States of America
10th & Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, D.C. 20535

cc: Mr. Thomas Kuker, Spec. Agent in Charge
Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States of America
915 2nd Avenue, Room #710
Seattle, WA 98174

Re: (1) Request for the production of documents.
(2) Constitutional Authority of FBI Office in the Soviet Union.
(3) Confirmation of MJTF Police/UN Operatives in America.
(4) The Holocaust at Waco, Texas.
(5) The Murders of Vicki and Samuel Weaver at Ruby Ridge, Idaho



Dear FBI Director Freeh,

Taking the numbered order of the above referenced items, first, pursuant to the United States Code, Title 5, Section(s) 3331, 3332, 3333, and 7311, please provided certified copies of the following documents: (1) Your "Oath of Office" [5 USCS 3331]; (2) Your "Officer affidavit; no consideration paid for ap­pointment" [5 USCS 3332]; (3) "Employee affidavit; loyalty and striking against the Government" [5 USCS 3333]; (4) Proof by affidavit of Item (3) that you are in compliance with 5 USCS 7311 et seq., to wit: "An individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the gov­ernment of the District of Columbia if he--(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; (2) is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the over­throw of our constitutional form of government..." (5) Your Registration Statement and Supplements thereto [22 USCS 611­612]; and, (6) A certified copy of your "Loyalty and Security Check", by the Office of Personnel Management [22 USCS 272b].

Secondly, in an Associated Press wire story of July 5, 1994 that appeared in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and The News Tribune, (see attached copy) which is headlined as: "Freeh opens FBI office in Moscow...", you are quoted as saying, "Our two nations have more in common than ever before", commenting in a speech at the Soviet Union's interior Ministry's police academy. You add, "Most especially, we share a belief in the importance of democratic ideals, human rights and the rule of law". Based on this article, please answer the following questions, Director Freeh:
(1.) Just WHERE in the Constitu­tion for the United States of America, do you find ANY AU­THORITY to conduct official business of the United States of America, inside the KGB infested and very much Communist, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics??? (2.) Just WHO was it, that made the budget appropriation for this disgusting little twist of a power hungry and corrupt government gone mad? And, since when do our nations have "more in common than ever be­fore"? (3.) How can a Communist inspired and led Marxist government have anything to do with Life, Liberty and the Pur­suit of Happiness, as we know it, in these United States of America, when the Constitutions of both countries are so dia­metrically opposed to one another there can be NO COM­MONALITY?

Certainly it must be no secret to you that the "United States" as a corporate body politic (artificial), declared Bankruptcy and "Reorganization" in 1950. The Reorganization is located in Ti­tle 5 of the United States Codes Annotated. The "Explanation" at the beginning of 5 USCS is most informative reading. The "Secretary of Treasury" was appointed as the "Receiver" in Bankruptcy. (See: Reorganization Plan No. 26, 5 USCS 903, Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967) The "United States" went down the road and periodically filed for further Reorganization. Things and situations worsened, having done what they were commanded NOT to do, (See: Madison's Notes, Constitutional Convention, August 16, 1787, Federalist Papers No. 44) and in 1965 passed the "Coinage Act of 1965" completely debasing the Constitutional Coin (gold & silver, i.e. "Dollar"). (See: 18 USCS 331 & 332, U.S. vs. Marigold, 50 U.S. 560, 13 L.Ed. 257) At the signing of the so-called "Coinage Act on July 23, 1965", Lyndon B. Johnson stated in his Press Release that:

"When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the first fundamental change in our coinage in 173 years. The Coinage Act of 1965 supersedes the Act of 1792. And that Act had the title: An Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating the Coinage of the United States...".

"Now I will sign this bill to make the first change in our coinage system since the 18th Century. To these members of Congress, who are here on this historic occasion,
I want to as­sure you that in making this change from the 18th Century, we have no idea of returning to it". (emphasis added).

It is important to take cognizance, Director Freeh, of the fact that NO Constitutional Amendment was EVER obtained to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE, amend, abridge or abolish the Constitutional mandates, provisions or prohibitions. However, due to internal and external "diversions" surrounding the Viet Nam U.N. Police Action etc., THE USURPATION and BREACH went basically unchallenged and unnoticed by the general public at large, who became "a wealthy man's CAN­NON FODDER OR CHEAP SOURCE OF SLAVE LABOR." (See: Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars,
TM-SW7905.1, pas. 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 & 56) Congress was clearly delegated the Power and Authority to regulate and maintain the true and inherent "value" of the Coin within the scope and purview of Article I, Section 8, Clauses 5 & 6 and Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, of the Ordained Constitution (1787).

Director Freeh, the foregoing is a CRIME of such immense proportion, that those exercising the Offices of the several States, in equal measure, knew such "De Facto Transitions" were UNLAWFUL and UNAUTHORIZED, but nevertheless sanctioned, implemented and enforced the COMPLETE DEBAUCHMENT and the resulting "governmental, social, indus­trial and economic change" in the "De Jure" States and in the United States of America (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5936, 5945, 31 USCS 314, 31 USCS 321, and 31 USCS 5112) and were and are now under the delusion that they can do both directly and indirectly, what they were absolutely prohibited from doing. Therefore, Director Freeh, having now the knowledge of this CRIME having been perpetrated against the People, and as against the Peace and Dignity of the Laws of the United States of America, WHEN CAN WE EXPECT YOU TO EXERCISE YOUR AUTHORIZED INVESTIGATIVE POWERS TO BRING THE PARTIES OF INTEREST BE­FORE THE BAR OF JUSTICE FOR CRIMINAL PROSECU­TION BY THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT? Or will this
mean ratting on a few of your "friends"? Just WHERE does your loyalty lie?

Your quotes in the article [noted above] of July 5, 1994, wherein you speak of
lofty "democratic ideals, human rights and the rule of law" suggest what U.S. Representative Marjorie S. Holt noted for the Congressional Record on January 19, 1976, of a second "Declaration of INTERdependence" which clearly identified the United Nations as a "Communist" organization, and that they were seeking both production and monetary control over the several States of the Union and the People, through international Organizations promoting the "One World Order". Is it no wonder then, that those within the Executive Branch of the United States Government have seen fit to abro­gate and annul each and every allegiance to the Ordained and Established Constitution for the United States of America? Where is YOUR AUTHORITY and ALLEGIANCE? Is it to the Soviet Red Flag with the Yellow Arm and Sickle?

With regard to both the Waco and Weaver "CRIMES" by the United States Government, among other reasons for lack of AUTHORITY to act, such as a Foreign Agents Registration Statement, 22 USCS 612 and 18 USCS 219 & 951, Military authority cannot be imposed into civil affairs. (See: Depart­ment of The Army Pamphlet 27100-70, Military Law Review, Vol. 70) The United Nations Charter, Article 2, Section 7, further prohibits the U.N. from "intervening in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state..." Korea, Viet Nam, Ethiopia, Angola, Kuwait, etc., etc., are evi­dence enough of the "BAD FAITH" of the United Nations and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations, to which the "United States" is a subscribing member, not to mention the in­terconnecting INTERPOL agreements and the crimes that were committed during the seizure of two day care centers in the State of Minnesota by Agents of the internal Revenue Service (who are also agents of INTERPOL--See: 22 USCS 263a) and hold­ing the children as collateral/hostages for payment/ransom of their fraudulent, dishonored, rehypothecated debt credit, worthless securities (See: 26 USCS 165g). Such is the "Rule of Law" "as envisioned by the Founders of the United Nations. Such is Communist idiotism despotism and tyranny. ALL WERE AND ARE OUTLAWED HERE... IN THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

After witnessing the terrorism and deliberate, premeditated MURDERS of Vicki Weaver, Samuel Weaver, and the 90 or more Branch Davidians at their Church Home by components of the De Facto UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, it is clear to us there currently exists INTERdependence, (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5950) affiliation and collusion with the Soviet Union Oligarchy (See:
8 USCS 1101(40) and 50 USCS 781), direction by the United Nations (See: 22 USCS 611), etc.
It is interesting to note that Treasury Delegation Order No. 92 states that the IRS, for example, is trained under the direction of the Division of "Human Resources" (U.N.) and the Commis­sioner (INTERNATIONAL), by the "Office of Personnel Management. In the 1979 Edition of 22 USCS 287, The United Na­tions, at pg. 248, you will find Executive Order No. 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under direction of the Secretary General of the United Nations. Also, the IRS is a member in a 150 nation pact called the "International Crimi­nal Police Organization" [Interpol] (See: 22 USCS 263a). The "Memorandum & Agreement" between the Secretary of Treasury/Corporate Governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank" and the Office of the U.S. Attorney General, is indicative that the Attorney General and his/her associates are soliciting and collecting information for FOREIGN PRINCIPALS, i.e., "The Fund" and "The Bank" (International Monetary Fund and The World Bank).

It is also interesting to note that under the "Justice System Improvement" Act under Public Law 100-690, purportedly to deal with the so-called "War on Drugs", under the provisions of "FBI TRAINING OF STATE AND LOCAL CRIMINAL JUS­TICE PERSONNEL" (See: 42 USCS 3701 et seq. and espe­cially 3771) the duties under which the FBI conducts training is under the general authority of the Attorney General. And, as we now know, the Attorney General is the Permanent Repre­sentative to INTERPOL and according to Article 30 of the IN­TERPOL Constitution, the Attorney General must EXPA­TRIATE citizenship of the U.S.A. That, Director Freeh, makes Janet "Butch" Reno an Agent of a Foreign Principal un­der the jurisdiction of the United Nations. Does this not make the Attorney General's Office directed, controlled, financed and subsidized by "The Fund" and "The Bank"? Where is the AUTHORITY for this under the Constitution for the United States Of America, in which all Laws must be made in PUR­SUANCE thereto?

On January 17, 1980, the President and Senate confirmed another "Constitution", namely, the "Constitution Of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization", found at Senate Treaty Document No. 97-19, 97th Congress, 1st Session. A perusal of this Foreign Constitution should more than qualify the
INTERNATIONALIST intents. The "Preamble", Article 1, "Objectives" and Article 2, "Functions" clearly evidences their intent to direct, control, finance and subsidize all "natural and human resources" and "agro-related as well as basic industries", through "dynamic social and economic changes", "with a view to assisting in the establishment of a new international economic order". The high flown rhetoric is obviously of "Communist" origin and intents. An unelected, unrepresentative, unac­countable oligarchy of expatriates and aliens, who fraudu­lently claim in the Preamble that they intend to establish "rational and equitable international economic relations", yet openly declared that they no longer "stabilize the value of the dollar" nor "assure the value of the coin and currency of the United States" is purely MISREPRESENTATION, DECEIT and FRAUD.

In view of the Associated Press wire story of July 5, 1994, depicting your trip to the U.S.S.R. and Moscow to set up an FBI office, it is now necessary to ask WHICH Constitution "THE GOVERNMENT", i.e., the F.B.I. and other so-called "Government Agencies" are operating under? The Constitution For the Newstates Of The United States, which was located at Liberty Lobby, 300 Independence Ave., SE, Washington, D.C. 20003, was the subject matter of the book entitled, The Emerg­ing Constitution, by Rexford G. Tugwell, which was accom­plished under the auspices of the Rockefeller tax-exempt foun­dation called the "Center For The Study of Democratic Institu­tions". The People and Citizens of this Nation were forewarned against formation of "Democracies". "Democracies have ever been the spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found INCOMPATIBLE with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." (See: Federalist Papers No. 10; also see:
The Law, Fredick Bastiat, Code Of Professional Responsibility. Preamble) This Alien Constitution, however, has nothing to do with democracy in reality. It is the basis of, and for, a despotic, tyrannical oligarchy.


Article I, "Rights and Responsibilities", Section 1 and 15, evidence their knowledge of the "emergency." The rights of expression, communication, movement, assembly, petition and Habeas Corpus are all ELIMINATED from being exercised under and in a "declared emergency". The Constitution for the Newstates of America, openly declares, among other seditious things and delusions that: "Until each indicated change in the government shall have been completed, the provisions of the existing Constitution and the organs of government shall be in effect" (See: Article XII, Section 3), "All operations of the na­tional government shall cease as they are replaced by those authorized under this Constitution". (See: Article XII, Section 4) No trial by jury is mentioned, "JUST" compensation has been removed, along with being informed of the "Nature & Cause of the Accusation", etc., etc., and every one will of course participate in the "democracy". This "Newstates" Con­stitution is but a reiteration of the Communist Doctrines, intents and purposes, and clearly establishes a "Police Power State", under direction and control of a self-appointed oligarchy.

Apparently the present operation of the "De Facto" govern­ment is under Foreign/Alien Constitutions, Laws, Rules and Regulations. The overthrow of the "essential engine" declared in and by the Ordained and Established Constitution for the United States of America (1787) is obvious. The covert proce­dure used to implement and enforce these Foreign Constitutions, Laws, Procedures, Rules, and Regulations, has not, to our knowledge, been collected and assimilated nor presented as evi­dence to a Grand Jury to establish seditious collusion and con­spiracy...but will soon be.

Referencing Item #3, "Confirmation of MJTF Police/UN Operatives in America", Title 42 USCS 3751, describes a "Drug Control and System Improvement Grant Program", wherein at subsection (b)(2) it is stated: "The Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance is authorized to make grants to States ... Such grants shall provide additional personnel, equipment, training, technical assistance...including multiju­risdictional task force programs that integrate Federal, State, and local drug law enforcement agencies and prosecutors for the purpose of enhancing interagency coordination, Intelli­gence, and facilitating multijurisdictional investigations". Be­cause of troubling and persistent rumors regarding the stationing of foreign (UN) troops on American soil and/or assigned for training duty at American bases, plus our concern regarding how such assignment, if true, might square with the enumerated powers delegated to the Federal Government by the American Constitution, and also due to the recent flurry of confirmed photo-recon pictures of
UN and Soviet military equipment traversing the railway system throughout the United States, in addition to the current proposed Clinton Crime Bill wherein former Royal Hong Kong police are to be hired into the Federal police service, and given the fact that FBI Training of State, County and units of local government are under the auspices of the Attorney General and his/her interconnecting agreements with INTERPOL, please advise as to the several questions enu­merated below and also point out the inaccuracies, if any, which may exist in our interpretation of the various statutes referenced herein and the inaccuracies, if any, which may exist in the at­tached news report from the Spotlight, dated October 12, 1992, at which time President George Bush declared in his speech be­fore the United Nations on September 21, 1992, wherein he re­portedly offered to make available to the UN certain military bases, including Fort Dix (New Jersey) and perhaps others. In what manner would the United Nations play a role in the "multijurisdictional task force" (MJTF) on the so-called "War on Drugs" and also relating to the purported Citizen-held firearms confiscation planned in Stage 1 or Stage 2 of State De­partment Publication 7277 (See: Public Law 87-297), as the United Nations is simultaneously brought to full global power?

OUR QUESTIQNS:

1. Are there any UN troops on duty in America today?
2. If so, where are they, and what is their duty?
3. If not, how soon will they begin arriving, and at what bases?
4. If UN troops will be stationed in America at a future date, what will be the nature of their duty assignments, and what controls will the Justice Department and/or Secretary of Defense or the Chiefs of Staff have over them and their mission?
5. Have any UN troops been on duty in America during the past year, participating in any Justice Department MJTF program, including drug interdiction or control?
6. If so, where, when, and what was the nature of their involvement and/or duty?
7. What is the relationship between such UN troops, if any, and the various provisions of the Federal Emergency Management Act/Agency (FEMA)?
8. What is the relationship between such UN troops, if any, and the various provisions of the interconnecting "Memorandum of Understanding" and/or "Agreement" and/or "relationship" of the FBI, INTERPOL and the Jus­tice Department, i.e., U.S. Attorney General.
9. When MJTF personnel, including FBI, SWAT, U.S. Marshal, and United Nations and/or U.S. military personnel are involved in any given operation, WHO's in charge?
10. Were there MJTF and/or UN operatives involved in the FBI assault at Ruby Creek near Naples, Idaho in which Vicki Weaver and Samuel Weaver were murdered?
11. Were there MJTF and/or UN operatives involved in the FBI/BATF assault at Waco, Texas in which 90 or more Branch Davidian Church members were murdered?

If no reply is received by August 05, 1994, my advisory board has instructed me to regard the non-reply and/or a waf­fling answer to these direct questions as confirmation of the news report here attached (Spotlight, October 12, 1992, Page 6) and substantiation for the basis of the persistent rumors regard­ing the presence of UN troops on American soil, and to proceed on the justifiable premise that UN troops are now assigned or scheduled by agreement with the UN for immediate duty in the United States, that their mission is to assist the Justice Depart­ment and various other known and unknown components of the MJTF in maintaining "internal security" actions to "control" the American populace in the event of a national emergency (FEMA) requiring imposition of "martial law" in America, in part by corralling "dissidents" and incarcerating them in "facilities" erected for "martial law" purposes and/or including the confiscation of Citizen-owned firearms.

Referencing Item #4, "The Holocaust at Waco, Texas", sensationalism is not necessary to present the incredulous statement by your FBI Special Agent and press liaison Bob Ricks that, "They're killing themselves", especially in light of the new evidence coming forth from the Mt. Carmel Center that suggests the FBI and the Justice Department have not been totally candid with the American people. In fact, it is scurrilous indeed that the FBI and the Justice Department have continually contrived, manufactured and fabricated the "truth" to fit their own devious design and ulterior motives as to the real facts of what happened at Waco. Just how is it, Director Freeh, that you have not lifted one-finger to INVESTIGATE the circumstances surrounding the deliberate ARSON-CS/CYANIDE GAS MURDER DEATHS of the Branch Davidian Church members, some 90 men, women and children, who perished at the hands of components of the United States Government and the State of Texas, and who at the same time violated numerous Federal and State Laws? Just WHO are you paying a favor to for your position of Public Trust, Honor or Profit? Are you protecting former FBI Direc­tor Sessions or the skullduggery of former BATF Director Stephen Higgins? Are you protecting the Socialist and Marxist dictator, Mr. Bubba Clinton? Or are you protecting the rather queer appearing-lesbian-infested-immoral-perverted-alternative­lifestyle-homosexual Janet "Butch" Reno? Quite frankly, all of you should be doing 80-years for Treason, Sedition and Murder, or under the original laws of the United States of America for Treason, hang from the end of a rope until dead as a dodo bird.

The American people are beginning to discover the truth about the hideous lies and cover-up at Waco. And despite the continuous bombardment of the "official party line" from FBI Special Agent Bob Ricks as the only "Establishment" media representative, we are just now beginning to see the real truth of the United States Government atrocities emerge out of the ashes at Waco, because of the dedication of one independent and non-establishment television station in Ponca City, Oklahoma. David Hall, Owner and Station Manager of KPOC cared enough to independently "investigate" the real reasons behind WHY WACO? During the July 4th celebration of Independence Day, the KPOC Television team from Oklahoma, together with a Certified Police Officer, a Certified Fireman, and a Certified Chemist, were seeking JUSTICE in Waco, that the Justice De­partment has tried to cover-up and white-wash. From their fact finding efforts and the evidence retrieved from soil samples and other data from autopsies of the Branch Davidians, it can now be proved conclusively that the 86 plus men, women and chil­dren who died at Waco, were MURDERED at the hands of the United States Government.

As Mr. Hall has pointed out, CS Gas is used as a "Riot Con­trol Agent", but its use is confined to outdoor use only because of the volatile nature of the gas. Additionally, when CS Gas burns, it burns at 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit and creates CYANIDE during the burn-off. All of the Waco victims had ethanol and cyanide in their bloodstream, but none was found in their stomachs. This would indicate that the victims of Waco suffered a horrible, paralyzing and agonizing death, because they would have been unable to move once the CS Gas was in­serted into the closed building and they continued breathing the air. Even the U.S. Government's own SWAT Training Manuals and the training seminars conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Pris­ons, prohibits the use of CS Gas as a "Riot Control Agent" in an indoor, closed environment, because of the high probability of combustion and fire. It cannot be used inside cell blocks, only outside in the prison yard. Why then, would it be allowed to be used at the Mt. Carmel site? The answer is clear: because the United States Government never intended for there to be any survivors at Waco. Just like at My Lai, Viet Nam, the order was given by some bureauRAT sitting in Washington, D.C. to, "Waste them".

It was also well known by those Agents of the United States Government surrounding the Mt. Carmel Church Home on that fateful date of April 19, 1993, that if they had sprayed water on the fire, a cloud of steam-hydrogen-cyanide would have been produced, and they themselves would have suffered the same consequences as that of the Davidians inside the burning Church buildings: DEATH! We now know the reason why the fire trucks were held back and no attempts were ever made at putting out the fire. This means that the actions of the Agents of the United States Government and all those associated with the incident at Waco, Texas on April 19, 1993 are guilty of PRE­MEDITATED MURDER. Therefore, the use of CS Gas was not utilized as a "Riot Control Agent", but as weapon of mass destruction. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms' own internal manuals, state very clearly for all to read that the CS Gas is not to be used in any closed environment. The United States Government and every other Law Enforcement Authority participating at Waco, knew, ahead of time, what was going to happen. They knew the Davidians were using open kerosene lanterns inside the building. They knew that CS Gas, in an enclosed environment would explode into fire. It was PREMEDITATED MURDER! And to hear FBI Special Agent Bob Ricks tell the American people: "They're killing them­selves" is one of the most incredulous and dastardly lies the American people have ever witnessed, save for the perfidy of the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.

The KPOC Television investigation will soon be released to the American people in a special, nationally televised video documentary, The Waco Incident. But before that occurs, we would urge your Office to immediately cause a Special Independent Grand Jury to be convened, to investigate the perpetrators of the PREMEDITATED MURDERS of the 86 or more Branch Davidians who died at the hands of the United States Government and the State of Texas. We demand your voluntary compliance. If you think for one minute the American people are going to just idly stand by while the Federal Bureau of Investigation destroys evidence at the scene of a crime, while promoting an "objective lesson" to those who would oppose the government's unlawful authority, you and the rest of your cronies had better pack your bags and move to Moscow, U.S.S.R. permanently, because we intend to use every means possible to hunt down each and every one of the perpetrators of the Holocaust last year in Waco, Texas and bring them to the Bar of Justice. You and your ilk will not [further] abuse our national pride, morality and common sense.

Finally, referencing Item #5, "The Murders of Vicki and Samuel Weaver at Ruby Ridge, Idaho", WHY hasn't the Jus­tice Department released their official report on the govern­ment's handling of the North Idaho standoff? Idaho U.S. Sena­tor Larry Craig has recently "asked" Janet Reno for a THIRD TIME to release the report. The delay of this report reads like a bureaucratic put-off to the people of Idaho and only adds to the anger, fear, and distrust of the federal government that many Americans feel over this incident.

Could it be, that the stalling tactics and delay by the Justice Department in releasing the report, possibly be related to the wrongful death, destruction of property and wrongful injury lawsuit that attorneys representing Randy Weaver will bring against the federal government, before the two-year anniversary of the shootout this August? Could it be, that if Janet Reno waits just long enough, that he/she will then be able to say, "We can't possibly release the report now, because we're in litiga­tion"? Obviously, if that occurred, the report would never be released.

As you know, Director Freeh, Randy Weaver and Kevin Harris were ACQUITI'ED of ALL murder, conspiracy and weapons charges from the standoff, in which U.S. Marshal William Degan was killed. Evidence now suggests that perhaps Degan was killed by his own men. Furthermore, it is well known across America that the August 21, 1992 shootout oc­curred when federal government para-military individuals sur­reptitiously entered upon Randy Weaver's private property...to plan their "hit" on the Weavers. There can be no excuse for this abhorrent behavior of what is supposed to be our govern­ment, whose mission it is to "insure domestic Tranquility, pro­mote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty...".
There is little doubt, upon reviewing the events of Ruby Ridge and Waco, with additional irrefutable evidence now coming to the forefront, that the United States Government is guilty of far more serious crimes than any individual throughout most of our national history. Your crimes compete only with those factions of history considered repulsive by most (Attila the Hun, Adolf Hitler, etc.). The United States Government is, unmistakably, the most criminal element in our society.

This is your wake-up call, Director Freeh, that the American people have had enough of the Bull ****. Get your act to­gether, conform to the Law of this Land, obey your Constitu­tional Oath, or pack your bags and depart from us quickly.

Constitutionally yours,

/s/ John R. Prukop
Executive Director

cc: Christine Gregoire, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Washington
General Media Distribution.

"Once you Know the Truth, the Law will set you Free"!

[wave]

PJ 104

CHAPTER 13

RONN JACKSON ANSWERS MORE
OUESTIONS FROM READERS

BULLETIN #15
by Ronn Jackson

1. "T" from Union Mills, Indiana asks: "Could you speak more about our past or present contracts/agreements/associations with higher extraterrestrial life"? By the time you receive this letter in CONTACT, you will have read Bulletin #12. In Bulletin #17, I go into depth on most of what you asked. Thank you for writing, and please don't be hesitant to identify yourself and use a return address.

2. "Howard & Catherine" from Riverside, California ask: "Do you know who 'Larry Nichols' is and what part did he play in the Clinton situation"? I had to make several phone calls to get this information and I consider my sources very reliable. Mr. Nichols accused President Clinton of several violations of the law including "drug money laundering". Mr. Nichols was the director of the "Arkansas Development Finance Authority", un­der our current president, while he was Governor of Arkansas. The only charges that he has been able to substantiate are: "Some of Clinton's friends paid off over two-hundred-thousand dollars in personal loans that 'Bill Clinton' signed for while making a little over $35,000 a year, as Governor". If they had not paid off the loans, Bill Clinton would have had to pay every penny he earned over a period of 10 years. Who is this fraud trying to kid?

3. "Mary G." from Portland, Oregon asks: "Mr. Jackson, since you are in prison, what is your opinion of the death penalty"? My being in prison has nothing directly to do with the death penalty. That decision must be made by the people and in compliance with the Constitution. My personal opinion is, no person has the right to take another's life, however if I were to be asked, I would support the death penalty for the following crimes: Murder (not in self defense), any crime against children of a sexual nature by an adult, rape, treason, and the making of a law or presidential directive that does not comply with the Constitution. The answer to the second part of your question pertaining to abortion, is: An abortion is a personal decision to be made by the female person involved and is none of your or my business.

4. "Dean" from Salt Lake City, Utah asks: "Have you read 'Shakespeare' and if so, what is your favorite work"? Yes, and I like, A Mid-Summer's Night Dream. I've seen several ver­sions also and pick-up something new each time I see it. I have two favorite Broadway shows. The first is or was, Happy Time. It was shown on Broadway in the early seventies and starred "Robert Goulet". My second favorite is, A Chorus Line.

5. "Jerry" from Los Angeles, California asks: "Did 'Michael Jackson' really get married"? Who cares!!

6. "H.C. & Wanda" from Dallas, Texas ask: "Do you or have you ever taken drugs"?
I will soon be 56 years old and have never taken any drugs other than those related to surgery. The second part of your question referring to "recreational users", is a contradiction unto itself. People who use the term are only fooling themselves.

7. "Louise" from Colorado Springs, Colorado asks: "Can you recommend any gold stocks"? The stocks that I know and be­lieve in are: "Battle Mountain Gold", "Cambior" and "Royal Oak Mines". A good indication of what to buy is to watch
"Sir James Goldsmith" from England. He recently purchased gold futures. He alone, by his buying habits, controls much of the global gold market.

8. "Dale" from Milwaukee, Wisconsin asks: "What is the phone company doing with the '500' area code"? The phone company is offering a service. The Government has already re­quested access to those subscribers. 1984?

9. "Ed" from Atlanta, Georgia asks: "Can you tell me anything about the organization, 'MENSA' "? It is an organization of people with "IQs" of over 145. I was at one of their meetings and all I saw were people trying to impress others with their knowledge. The Government told me mine is 217. I don't pay that much attention to those things. Common sense is more important.

10. "Charles H." from Honolulu, Hawaii asks: "Do you have an orographic background"? I like the mountains and I have climbed a few and skied down a few. You need to be a little more specific. If you are referring to L-610-04, yes, that was me. From your letter, I can deduct you were a part of Naval Intelligence.

/s/Ronn Jackson

* * * *

BULLETIN #16

I have received thousands of requests asking why The Death Of Camelot is not being run at this time. In the paper's prudent wisdom, much in the series exposes names and events that most of you are familiar with. Because of the nature of the offenses and those individuals involved, you, the readers will understand.

It seems to me, I get an occasional letter with a subject con­tained in that letter and Commander Hatonn invariably will touch upon that very subject. Case in point, the July 19, 1994 issue of CONTACT had a small mention of "Nostradamus" on p. 44.
I am not an expert on the ancient prophet, and have no in­tention of being so, but I would like to make some very definite statements regarding prophecies. Let's start with one nearer to us in time. Many people are traveling to "Egypt" this December for the Ascension of 144,000 people on 12/12/94. What I would like to say is that the only thing that is going up is "the bank account of the tour originators". What 12/12/94 means is, December 12, 1994. Nothing more. The originator of this "Prophecy" is an obese female living in Phoenix, Arizona, who is claiming to be 265 years old. When I spoke to a couple of "elders", their response pertaining to the lady in question was: a 35-year-old "con-artist" who fleeces Senior Citizens out of large sums of money.

To those who did not send their return address on letters to me, you have lost your deposit. Look at this as a learning experi­ence; you could have lost more.

The next prophecy is one of my own. "1997" completes a two hundred-year cycle that most people are not aware of. Most of what I say can be verified in most history books.

Religion runs in 200-year cycles. Currently and in the past one hundred-ninety-seven years, people have held in their hands a crutch, called the Bible. Many unscrupulous people have used this book against people by twisting what is said in it to their own self-serving needs. They use, and twist and contort simple statements around and attempt to use a literal translation, in­stilling fear into people and stating certain actions will bring abomination unto those who do not believe their interpretations. These individuals are nothing more than good speakers (at times) and are able to hold people's attention. What will happen in 1997 upon completion of the cycle is: bigotry, "anti-semitism", hatred, and small mindedness will continue, and death by virtue of religious beliefs and/or convictions will con­tinue to be the largest single reason people die on this globe. Yes, more people in history, up to and including now, have died because of religious reasons. I challenge anyone to dispute these words.

I continue to be asked, what is my opinion of the Bible, I must pre-empt my answer with the following statement: In a former life I was "Josephus", of the "Essenes". Two other men and myself participated in some of the events described in the Bible during that time; however, those events as depicted in that pub­lication in no way resemble what I know to be fact. My conclu­sion is, due to innumerable translations by innumerable person­alities, some with self-serving reasons, the Bible is similar to our country. It is not what it appears. and is represented to be. Further, as a scientist (in a sense), there are too many unexplained discrepancies. I believe in and know of a Supreme Be­ing and know, in my present existence, that I will meet Him.

We, as Americans, have always risen to the occasion, no matter what the reason may be. Just in the past few short years this country has had fires burning millions of acres, floods making thousands homeless, and earthquakes causing billions of dollars in damage. Now we know that one of the first things that hap­pens in a disaster is, that the politicians flock to the disaster like flies to "cow dung". The second thing that happens is, an emergency is declared, with the politician standing between the camera of the mainstream media and one of the most shocking scenes. The third step is, the politician, based on figures usually by someone on his staff, commits to huge sums of money that the Government does not have. The fourth step is, the politician brings in the bloated bureaucracy known as the Federal Emer­gency Management Agency, FEMA for short.

Now we, as Americans, as I stated earlier, are always eager to help, but none of us stop and think about where the money will come from. The money comes from "bonds" printed up by the Government and then the private enterprise central bank goes into action and prints up a like amount of "FRNs" (Federal Re­serve Notes) to cover the amount authorized by the action of our politicians.

I will concede that the people who are hurt by these disasters need and appreciate the money given to them by Government but, let us examine what the Government actually did. First, the catastrophe that happened is used by the politician to show what he has done with our money and to propagate his ruse. Next, the bloated bureaucracy drags their feet, using as an excuse the paperwork, to prolong the suffering of those involved, putting those people in a frame of mind that anything is better than nothing and actually not giving one single thought about the source of the funds. After the printing of the "FRNs", that money is placed into circulation so that when the bonds that the Government printed up are sold, an equal amount of "FRNs" are now in circulation. By the time the paperwork is completed on any particular disaster, another one occurs and the cycle continues all over again.

What the Government accomplished in the disaster, people will say, helped those unfortunate victims of the disaster, but they are forgetting about the funds that were used to pay for the dis­aster. Where will they come from? Now, since you and I were not involved directly, we don't give those funds another thought. We elected those people to do a job and it is their responsibility. You say, "It ain't no skin offen our butts". You're wrong! It is coming right out of our pockets as those bonds will come due in thirty or forty years and they have to be redeemed [paid off]. Oh well, we will let our grandchildren pay for them. Now, you are getting the picture. What the Government has done is in­dentured your grandchildren. The definition of slavery is: "A person wholly subject to another". In this case, Government. You and I are now slaves to FEMA. It is non-positive law (laws that do not comply to the Constitution), and until you awaken and discover what the Government has done to you, and what they do to you every day, you deserve to be in bondage.

1. "Adam H." from Springfield, Illinois asks: "Why is Com­mander Hatonn speaking of the following past Government offi­cials: 'Clark Clifford', 'Walt Rostow', 'Robert McNamara', 'Abe Fortas', and others"? The current series, THE USURPERS, mentions these people and more. All are included in The Death of Camelot, Book #1. Commander Hatonn knows what he is doing and I received his request. "Walt Rostow" is A-1 of the Committee [of 16/17 ] and much more. That infor­mation is included in Book II of The Death of Camelot, The Darien Conspirators. Mr. Rostow also has an entire chapter of Book IV. Dean Rusk is also included but he is not a part of the Committee. Mr. Rusk receives more credit than he deserves, although as a statesman he excelled, so we are told. Mr. Ros­tow may be the most dangerous man on this Earth; however, in our conversation of last week, he was very civil.

2. "John F". of Vista, California asks: "Can you give an edu­cated guess on where the next earthquake will occur in California"? There is an unusual amount of stress on the San Andreas Fault, west of Fresno on Highway #165.

3. "Beverly & Leo" of Minneapolis, Minnesota ask: In your career, did you work with any law enforcement agencies"? No, as most were restricted by the court system in one means or an­other. When you play in the league I was in, you make your own rules as required.

4. "George & Marie" from Emporia, Kansas ask: "Did your work ever bring you to Kansas"? I delivered and picked up "items" on occasions but nothing of a nature that you are refer­ring to.

5. "Mike" from Baltimore, Maryland asks: "Mr. Jackson, sev­eral years ago, I was employed by a firm that did computer en­gineering for the Federal Government. The man who owned the company had your name. Is there any connection"? Yes. Hi, Mike!

6. "D.H." from New York City, New York asks: "Several years ago, I was told a story by a man who had been in a plane crash. The story was about his stay in the hospital after the plane crash. Are you by any chance that man"? Yes, Ms. Hall. I saw your "soap" yesterday (Fri. 7-21-94).

7. "Albert & Eva" from Cumberland Gap, Tennessee ask: "From your statement about the 'Bear'. Were you in a former life from Tennessee"? If you were asking about the saying, I heard it from my Grandfather. No, I was not Davy Crockett. I don't object to telling you a few of my former lives. Starting backwards, I was a soldier killed in the First World War. Prior, I was an Indian killed in the Southwest. I then lived in England as a bookkeeper, and before that, I was "William Pitt" the elder, to name a few.

8. "I. M. Y." from Coamo, Puerto Rico asks: "My wife and I lived in Santa Barbara County in California. My son attended 'E. P. Regette' high school. Did you have children attend that school"? Yes, we were neighbors about 18 years ago.

9. "H. G." from Spokane, Washington asks: "The people of Washington state voted in 'Term Limits'. Rep. Foley is fighting the people's mandate in court. Care to comment"? Representa­tive Foley is speaking for the Government in his law-suit. The Government has only contempt for their Constituency and are openly showing it. My opinion of Foley's actions means little. You are a part of Washington. What are you going to do about it? I realize it is improper to answer a question with a question, however, the people of this country are going to have to get off their "Complacent Duffs" or accept slavery. Representative Thomas Foley is a traitor to the Constitution.

10. "Art & Peg" from Ocala, Florida ask: "Several years ago, there was a movie that said, the United States did not land on the moon. What are we to believe"? NASA is a Government bureau that spends (not in our interest) billions & billions of dollars. It is a program that spends your and my money and is primarily devoted to employing people. However, we did go to the moon. The movie was for entertainment.

11. "Craig" from Billings, Montana asks: "How is your lawsuit progressing"? The pre-trial is scheduled on 9-13-94. The Gov­ernment is in violation of the court rules as they have failed to respond to the pre-trial order.

12. "E.L." from Connersville, Indiana asks: "I think I have seen, in the writings of CONTACT, that you are from Indiana. Can you tell where, if this is true"? Just about 30 miles north of where you live; I'm from New Castle.

13. "Martin T." from Des Moines, Iowa asks: "I've seen mentioned in your story, 'David Belin', an attorney from my city. How is he involved"? Mr. Belin was the
co-counsel, along with Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, for the Warren Commission.

14. "A.L." from Ft. Worth, Texas asks: "What kind of car do you drive"? I buy only American products. My preference for years has been a "4 X 4". Currently I own a
3/4 ton Suburban by General Motors.

15. "Sandra" from Niles, Michigan asks: "Do you know anything about the disappearance of 'Jimmy Hoffa' "? That infor­mation is included in Book #1 of The Death of Camelot. The speculation by the main-stream media is that he was killed by organized crime; that is incorrect. He was killed by two law en­forcement officers, one from East St. Louis, Illinois and the other from Chicago, Illinois. Further details will be forthcom­ing; however, Mr. Hoffa is buried not far from Chicago. De­tails have been given in the series [of Camelot books ].

/s/Ronn Jackson

* * * *

BULLETIN #17

1. "A.C." from Dayton, Ohio asks: "Mr. Jackson, having lived my entire life in this area, there are stories about the military fa­cilities in this area. Can you elaborate on any of them"? There is nothing out of the ordinary about the bases, i.e., Wright-Patterson and others. However, outside of Wright-Patterson, there is a security clearinghouse that the Government denies as being important. The reason they deny that anything is going on is reason enough to question them. Never believe anything that the Government says or does until it is denied.

2. "Paul" from Sun City, California asks: "Do you have any idea what will happen with Social Security"? The Government, as they normally do, promised more than they can provide. So­cial programs are nothing more than the "fancy" of idealistic fraudulent politicians. Their only hope of pushing through these types of legislation is dealing with the gullibility of people who want something for nothing. You need to make a very impor­tant decision. Do you want freedom or slavery? Your Gov­ernment has now placed you in that position.

3. "R.G." from Norman, Oklahoma asks: "Can you explain the prime number"? It is
a number not divisible by any smaller number [other than one ]. There has been controversy as to the existence of such a number [that is, calculating what might possibly be the LARGEST prime number to date]. Since the num­ber would be impossible to be worked out manually, only a computer could do all of the necessary computations. Then, there is the problem of the computer having the correct information or software, therefore requiring a person with a mathe­matical background to write the computer code. Several people have tried, and I am told, have been successful by using "Super Computers" to solve the problem of whether or not there is a [largest discovered] prime number. I have solved that problem, using the language FORTRAN, on an XMP-48 Cray Super Computer. The number is 20,148 digits long and required a lit­tle over two hours to calculate.

4. "A.F." from Chapel Hill, North Carolina asks: "I've noticed that none of the federal elected officials live in Washington, D.C. What is the reason for that"? When the federal elected officials are on Washington, D.C. property, physically, they are exempt from the Constitution. In other words, since our na­tion's capitol was originated by the Constitution, any decision or law made by them cannot be used against them for any uncon­stitutional act. In effect, our devious elected federal officials can commit treason and get by with it. If you look at all "non-positive" law (those laws not in accord with the Constitution), those who voted for non-positive law are guilty of "treason" against the Constitution. Each and every one of those politicians would say: "The people want it"; and if those people who are elected would say, "this law is unconstitutional" before voting against it, those laws would not be in effect today.

5. "Doris" from Jackson, Oregon asks: "Sometimes I feel a strong presence here. Have you been to central Oregon"? Yes, I own property around Blue Rivers or Sisters, Oregon. No, I have never felt any presence in that area, but I wasn't looking for one on my trips there.

6. "A. & C.-F." from San Diego, California ask: "Can you tell what information you have regarding the closure of the military bases in our country"? There are many rumors regarding what those bases will be used for. There is one very large facility in Alaska, that is being transferred to the park service. Two facilities in the San Francisco Bay Area are, it is said by the cities involved, being turned over to the cities for their use. One on the East Coast has been taken over by that particular state and a shopping center is being built at this very time. I believe what you are asking is, are these bases going to be used for dissidents of this country who do not believe in their country and Govern­ment. I would say that possibility does exist. However, there is a line, which, if the Government does go over, the citizens of this country would not tolerate. This is one.

7. "Alel" from Springfield, Missouri asks: "Can you give your opinion of the EPA "? While an agency of that nature is needed, it should be run by the states and people, not the Gov­ernment. That Agency will be one of the first to go.

8. "Chris" from Orem, Utah asks: "What can I do as an individual to help my country"? Two things. First, become in­formed and learn. Second, reread the Constitution and pay close attention to the 10th Amendment and then contact the "Committee of 50 States" at 4808 Quailbrook Cr., Salt Lake City, Utah 84118. This is a fine organization and I believe their methods are the correct ones.

9. "E." from Goleta, California asks: "There is a fairly new re­search center near my home. When I speak to my neighbors, no one knows much about it. Do you know what is being done at that facility"? Yes, but there is nothing of a clandestine nature. While the work there is classified, it is in support of programs going on at Vandenberg AFB which is 60-70 miles north of your location.

10. "Ester" from Morristown, New Jersey asks: "Why do you make so many bad remarks about the Treasury Department"? Because they are true and because that agency is not owned by this Government any longer. It is owned by the United Nations. Our Government passed a bill 22 years ago giving it away.

/s/ Ronn Jackson

* * * *

BULLETIN #18

1. "Leo" from Rock Springs, Wyoming asks: "Would you give your opinion of Rush Limbaugh"? Mr. Limbaugh fills a need, however his remarks are geared toward the entertainment part of journalism. There is a fine line that he refuses to cross over.
I would ask why he has never addressed the deaths of people connected with the President of the United States. In my opinion, Mr. Limbaugh is as irresponsible as
is Tom Brokaw of NBC News who is on the Council On foreign Relations board.

2. "Mary" from Altadena, California asks: "All that's on TV is O.J. Simpson this and O.J. Simpson that. What do you think"? First, the prosecution is out to make a name for themselves. Secondly, Mr. Simpson will be ultimately judged as "a black man with money" not a citizen who may or may not have committed a crime. My opinion is: he killed his ex-wife and her friend in a fit of passion. He is responsible for his acts and should be accountable.

3. "M" & "G" from Durango, Colorado ask: "My husband and I have all of our retirement in the stock market. I've told my husband we should reduce our holdings and put our money in other investments. What are your suggestions"? I know the market, by comparison to the great crash, is going to devastate many more people now than it did in the '20s and '30s". Get your money out now! Put your money into "mortgages". People always need a place to live.

4. "Alan K." from Palo Alto, California asks: "Can you give me any information on Biotech Companies"? In my opinion and as you can see, Biotech Companies are "start-ups" from drug companies, usually "funded" and then "bought out" by other drug companies. Not only does the government tell you "who" and "what" to think, so does the drug industry. When, as stated by the drug companies, the next generation of drugs come along I should welcome it; however, I have to take their word for everything. What you are seeing is nothing more than, "marketeering". The worlds greatest "marketeer" got along with the very same methods for many years and then it came back and bit them. Their name is IBM.

5. "Robert & Alice" from Ashby, Massachusetts ask: "Can you tell us what the next step is for the One World Order"? There are too many unknowns at this time, such as priority of World Currencies and wages of the working class on a global basis. However, when Europe puts together an agreement similar to the one we have, the only thing that is remaining is to disarm this country. Then, you will see a type of genocide. The Government will not be the victor!

6. "Ed" from Atascadero, California asks: "Your numbers on the 'comet' hitting Jupiter are different from what is being reported to us. Who is correct"? I am, although the numbers I used are from someone who had a "ringside seat". The largest "fragment" was over 11 miles wide. The impact was larger in diameter than the Earth. Had the angle of impact been more direct, (and speed been higher) the spot of impact would have covered the entire surface of Jupiter!

7. "P.L." from Henderson, Nevada asks: "Do you think we should take military action in Haiti"? Yes, but only if the persons sent there are members of the Executive and Legislative branches of the United States Government.

8. "Jason & Cary" from Kansas City, Missouri ask: "Thank you for your quick response. Our real problem is IRS. Our attorney received a copy of your case. He also has Mr. Carter's case, (a copy of). We have lost our home and both of us have lost our jobs due to attachments on our salaries. What can we do to help you"? Please keep the faith and I will help you. We have identified who you are. Many changes are coming soon.

9. "H.B." from New Paris, Ohio asks: "Commander Hatonn has said that our Treasury is owned by the United Nations. How can this be"? Our Government has sold us out in many ways. Our country is going to be returned to us.

10. "Glenn" from Arlington, Virginia asks: "How can you change our Government?
It is too entrenched". From your letter, you are a part of the Government and don't like them. As long as you support the Government in any way, you are a part of the problem. The Government is now 2.8 million people and is growing every day. We all have to do our part. There are decisions that responsibility dictates.

/s/ Ronn Jackson

CHAPTER 14

"Looks like THE FOXES have been turned loose in THE HEN HOUSE"!

GRANDMA WRITES ABOUT "BIG TIME FRAUD"

Lets talk about: EXTORTION, RACKETEERING, ORGANIZED CRIME, MIS-APPROPRIATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS IN TRUST, USING MONEYS FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN MONEYS PLACED "IN TRUST".

CONTACT, Inc. News
Dateline: July 26, 1994

Dear Rick and Readers,
We keep hearing about "the new system of backing our (the people's) treasury with gold and silver".

THE INDEPENDENT TREASURY ACT of August 8. 1846 (U.S. Statutes at Large. Vol. IX. P. 69ff ).
This being the independent treasury system and methods of keeping public moneys.

"An act to provide for the better Organization of the Trea­sury, and for the Collection, Safe-Keeping, Transfer, and Dis­bursement of public Revenue".

Be it enacted... That the rooms prepared and provided in the new treasury building at the seat of government for the use of the treasurer of the United States, his assistants, and clerks, and occupied by them, and also the fireproof vaults and safes erected in said rooms for the keeping of the public moneys in the pos­session and under the immediate control of said treasurer, and such other apartments as are provided for in this act as places of deposit of the public money, are hereby constituted and declared to be the treasury of the United States. And all moneys paid into the same shall be subject to the draft of the treasurer, drawn agreeably to appropriations made by law.

Sec. 6, That the treasurer of the United States, the treasurer of the mint of the United States, the treasurers, and those acting as such, of the various branch mints. all collectors of the cus­toms, acting also as collectors, all assistant treasurers, all re­ceivers of public moneys at the several land offices, all post­masters, and all public officers of whatsoever character, be, and they are hereby, required to keep safely, without loaning, using, depositing in banks, or exchanging for other funds than as al­lowed by this act, all the public money collected by them, or otherwise at any time placed in their possession and custody, till the same is ordered, by the proper department or officer of the government to be transferred or paid out; and when such orders for transfer or payment are received, faithfully and promptly to make the same as directed, and to do and perform all other du­ties as fiscal agents of the government which may be imposed by this or any other acts of Congress, or by any regulation of the treasury department made in CONFORMITY to LAW; and also to do and perform all acts and duties REQUIRED BY LAW or for making any other disbursements which either of the heads of these departments may be REQUIRED BY LAW (this is where you use ARTICLE VI. of the Constitution of the United States of America) to make, and which are of a character to be made by the depositories hereby constituted, consistently with the other official duties imposed upon them...

SEC. 9, That all collectors and receivers of public money, of every character and description, within the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, shall, as frequently as they may be directed by the SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, or the POSTMASTER GENERAL (a corporation no longer associated with the federal Government, same as is the Federal Reserve Board) so to do, pay over to the treasury of the United States, at the treasury, all public moneys collected by them, or in their hands...

SEC. 18, That on January 1. 1847, and thereafter, all duties, taxes, sales of public lands, debts, and sums of money accruing or becoming due to the United States, and also all sums due for the postages or otherwise, to the general post-office department, shall be paid in GOLD and SILVER COIN ONLY, OR IN TREASURY NOTES ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES.

SEC, 19, That on April 1, 1847, and thereafter, every offi­cer or agent engaged in making disbursements on account of the United States, of the general post-office, shall make all payments in GOLD and SILVER COIN, or in TREASURY NOTES, if the creditor agree to RECEIVE said notes in payment.

Isn't it interesting that 3 (three) people, when Congress is OUT OF SESSION can pass an illegal act, which by law is re­quired to be passed by 2/3rds of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate, and this is called the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT?! Operated by a FOREIGN OWNED, FOREIGN HELD "CORPORATION" ...who keeps THE PUBLIC MONEYS AS BY LAW, MANDATED TO BE HELD IN TRUST FOR THE PEOPLE...in banks in FOREIGN COUNTRIES (example is a CREDIT LYONNAISE tally sheet affixed hereto) where BIL­LIONS OF AMERICAN DOLLARS are OUTSIDE THE NA­TION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND BEYOND THE "CONTROL OF THE TRUSTORS [the People] "?!

When the American TRUSTORS need money, the TRUSTEES raise the TAXES, and there is NO MONEY AVAILABLE...???

/s/GRANDMA

YEP, LOOKS LIKE "THE MICE ARE GUARDING THE CHEESE, AND THE FOXES ARE GUARDING THE HEN HOUSE"...No one is running the RAIL ROAD, AND THE RAILS ARE BEING SOLD OFF ILLEGALLY OUTSIDE THE NATION... "WHO IS DOING WHAT TO WHOM"????? Its called TREASON.