PJ 100
CHAPTER 1
REC #1 HATONN
MON., JUN. 27, 1994 8:53 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 315
MON., JUN. 27, 1994
REPETITION: UNTIL YOU UNDERSTAND
THE SERIOUSNESS!
As we bog down in the amount of paperwork in an effort to bring you readers what we consider to be the most important focus--timely--we are hampered by inability to be in the same office structure, do your own work (ethics by necessity) and "how do we get it all in enough ways and times to give the picture!"? Then on Mondays comes the new influx of breaking NEWS and IMPORTANT topics.
A copy of June 27th's SPOTLIGHT now sits in front of Dharma and our question is not should we offer these stories but how many can we cram into CONTACT to reach a few more citizens who won't get it otherwise. So, readers, bear with us please because some things are happening which can be "too late" in attending if the information sets on a desk for a week.
WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
MILITIA TO WASHINGTON
Thousands of you are getting information about militias forming, marches, gatherings (WITH GUNS) and such. I admire and honor the brave who will go forth and place lives on the line for freedom--HOWEVER--do not ask me to grace or bless such blatant confrontation in Washington as what is being hatched for September for freedom-fighters. "Join us in Washington (or anywhere) with guns---etc." Are your militias ready? Are YOU TRAINED AND PREPARED FOR WEAPONS MANEUVERS? WILL YOUR DEATH OR INCARCERATION HELP FREEDOM AND YOUR FAMILY? This might work if you had 25 MILLION people show up or 150 million-even if they were armed with rubber bands--but as with Devvie Kidd's "march" on Washington where over 10,000 patriots are touted--only a pittance show up. Is Linda Thompson going to lead an army of "non-federal citizens" (PONDER IT) against an independent territory of WASHINGTON, DC and hope to arrest the Congress? That is what is basically being requested and threatened against those people--in September. Is Linda prepared to be burned at the stake like Joan of Arc?? If you have a massive number of citizens and can get them trained by September, perhaps you have an interesting game going. If not, you have an interesting opportunity for the Government to come down HARD and suck in the rest of the U.N. Orders.
You claim to be "sovereign" as individual citizens! SO, YOU START AT HOME! Prepare at home, learn truth at home and train your children with TRUTH. Then you move to the town ship, then the county, then the State and it will never have to get to the Washington crowd because the ones from "home" will rise up against the criminals in Washington. Remember--the ones who REALLY RUN YOUR NATION ARE NOT THE ONES YOU THINK HAVE BETRAYED YOU--THEY ARE ONLY THE PUPPETS. The ones you want aren't even in Washington DC! I REMIND YOU READERS: AT THIS POINT IN YOUR AWAKENING CALL TO ARMS--YOU CANNOT WIN ANYTHING AGAINST THE VERY POWERS THAT HOLD YOUR ENTIRE WORLD HOSTAGE! AN ARMED INSURRECTION WILL BE ANNOUNCED AGAINST YOU-THE-PEOPLE AND YOU WILL BE BROUGHT DOWN. There is something else wrong with going about things in this manner--you will lose some of your best leadership patriots in the process! If not out rightly slain, they will be incarcerated and, in your present judicial system, don't expect them ever to get out intact.
Am I here to spoil Linda Thompson's day in the sun and glory? I hope so 'for she has been a driving force in bringing information and visually presenting what she considers PROOF of circumstances. However, you have ones such as Col. Gritz saying many of the pictures are "false" and what "appears to be flame at the end of a tank cannon is but a bit of colored wallboard!" DO YOU KNOW WHO IS CORRECT?? Well, yes, it DOES matter because you are looking for regaining Constitutional LAW in your nation--not scattered ANARCHY. You need a revolution (a turning about of direction)--not a WAR against yourselves wherein you simply lose the ground you have gained. IF YOU ARE GOING TO ACT, CITIZENS--ACT PROPERLY OR EXPECT HORRENDOUS RESULTS. I would think that to arrest a Congressman you would arrest him in the place which elected him--in Washington he is but another one of the criminal BAND. BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU DO LEST YOU DO-IN SELVES BEFORE YOU EVEN GET STARTED.
Can you not, further, hold your LEGAL weapons in security--must you take them all the way to Washington DC to have them confiscated? YOU GO MARCHING TO WASHINGTON WITH GUNS AND WAR WEAPONS AND YOU ARE GOING TO LOSE THEM! YOU HAVE EVEN TOLD THE "BIG MEAN BOY" WHERE AND WHEN TO COME FORTH AND COLLECT THEM.
SO, THE MOVE AND PLAN IS EITHER A DELIBERATE PLAN TO DO YOU IN--OR, IT IS INDEED A FOOLISH MOVE AND IF I WERE IN GOVERNMENT --OR, ONE OF THE MAJOR PLAYERS--I WOULD, FURTHER, HAVE LINDA AND HER BAND ARRESTED FOR INCITING INSURRECTION. Remember, at this time in evolvement of major things in the WORLD--you are functioning under any laws EXCEPT the Constitution and even under the CONSTITUTION--what is being planned here would be interpreted as insurrection whether it be true or false. YOU CANNOT EVEN TOUCH THE PLAYERS WHO HAVE ORCHESTRATED THIS GAME--THEY ARE THE COMMITTEE OF 17, THE MJ-12, THE BILDERBERGERS, THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, AND ULTIMATELY THE COMMITTEE OF 300. THEY ARE NOT EVEN SIMPLY U.S. CITIZENS OR OPERATIVES! YOU ARE JUST SETTING YOURSELF UP TO HELP THE TAKEOVER OF YOUR NATION! SO BE IT. I apologize to anyone who differs and honor their opinions--I am overwhelmed with inquiries about this thing--AND I WILL TELL THE TRUTH--NOT WHAT LINDA THOMPSON OR ANYONE ELSE WANTS TO HEAR!
I was blasted and threats arrived against Dharma and CONTACT because I suggested it was fine for Kidd to "march" to Washington if she wanted to do so but funds and energy would be better spent elsewhere! WASHINGTON IS A DISTRACTION!! Why don't you march on the replicas at Camp David? Why didn't you march on Helsinki, Finland the 2nd-5th of June when the Bilderbergers MET? Why don't you "march" on the G-8 (7, they still call it) next week? Why don't you MARCH on the Committee of 17? (16 they call it). Why don't you march on the Soviets (Russia they now call it)? ?YOU ARE NO LONGER GOVERNED THROUGH YOUR HEADQUARTERS IN WASHINGTON, DC AND YOU HAD BETTER REALIZE IT NOW--WHILE YOU STILL HAVE PATRIOTS AND ABILITY TO RECLAIM ANYTHING IN YOUR NATION.
IT IS URGENTLY IMPORTANT THAT YOU STUDY CAREFULLY THE ARTICLES IN THIS PAPER AND OTHERS OFFERING TRUTH. PATRIOTISM IS NOT A RASH AND FANATIC STATE OF BEING--THAT IS CALLED CHAUVINISM. "Chauvinism" is not something where the men are against the women of the world in REAL DEFINITION. If you know NOT your enemy--how can you arrest or do anything with your guns in Washington DC except get arrested yourselves? You are AGAIN about to be HAD by the aggressive goody-two-shoes and you are AGAIN acting like sheep to the pen. Do you REALLY think you will find Mr. Kissinger waiting with his hands up? How about Clinton? Will he be there with his hands up and already cuffed--awaiting your tea-party? How about Teddy Kennedy? Do you think Katherine Graham, Chairman of the Executive Committee, Washington Post (A MAJOR BILDERBERGER MEMBER) to be there with her POST reporters to give you top billing FOR FREEDOM? Think, THINK, THINK, THINK--THINK!!
HOPELESS?? PANAMA EXAMPLE
What in the world is going on? you SHOULD BE ASKING! Please take note of things, readers, such as this next "hidden" blurb on a paper back-page.
U.S. COULD KEEP CANAL
June, 1994: Under a treaty reportedly being revised with Panama, the United States may keep the Panama Canal. America [H: ?? "America" ??] is scheduled to give the canal to Panama in 1999 under a treaty negotiated by President Jimmy Carter. However, the Panamanian Defense Force--which is supposed to defend the link between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans--WAS WIPED OUT IN GEORGE BUSH'S 1989 IN-VASION. U.S. troops are still there. Under the treaty revision, U.S. forces would maintain U.S. sovereignty while defending the canal and Panama would be given entry into the NAFTA free market in exchange.
* * *
Say what? I thought you were told the Panama Invasion was to shut down drug-dealing Noriega? Entry into NAFTA?
The next is so important to you on a personal level who would go forth and tout Gaiandriana and other products as cures, wonder-miracle healing cures, etc. This is WHY we do not offer much of anything, readers, because YOUR lives and YOUR bodies ARE NOT YOUR OWN--AND CERTAINLY NO-ONE IN POWER WANTS EITHER IN A HEALTHY STATE.
HOMEOPATHIC HEALERS
HUNG JURY: June 1994--A pair of homeopathic healers who were told by the state of New Jersey they did not need medical licenses, convinced one juror they were not guilty of practicing medicine without a license, resulting in a hung jury. The state brought charges against a pair of Eastern European immigrants who allegedly prescribed minute amounts of diluted natural ingredients for a variety of ailments, which is the essence of the practice of homeopathy. Mieczyslaw Orzechowski and Barbara Kostrzewa researched the state's legal requirements and were told by a government representative they did not need a license to practice homeopathy. A STATE PROSECUTOR HAS VOWED TO RETRY THE PAIR.
* * *
And just how long do YOU think these people can continue to afford to buck the system through the bottomless money pits of the legal system, if nothing else?
GOOD OLD NAFTA
Well, you have it showing up now and especially effective AGAINST YOUR FARMERS! NAFTA has wiped out the Florida tomato growers. Tomatoes coming in from Mexico are so cheap that the U.S. farmers are wiped out in that crop. In May of 1993 a box of tomatoes sold for $20. In May 1994--$9. Ah, the blessings of NAFTA!
Now to something I consider so important as to ask them to hold the paper, if necessary, until we can type it.
The lies about "ISLAM" are getting so incredulous as to be funny if they were not so SICK. The article I am going to share with you comes from WORLD PRESS REVIEW, July 1994. A prior issue of this journal wrote a cover story, "Fear of Islam". This is a fine rebuttal and YOU MUST PAY ATTENTION BECAUSE THIS IS THE WAY IT IS--AND WORSENING AS WE WRITE.
'BRAZEN LIES' ABOUT ISLAM
This article from Cairo's government-owned Al-Ahram, written by Dr. Mustapha Mahmoud, came to the editors' attention after the May cover story, "Fear of Islam", had gone to press. Mahmoud makes a strong case that true Muslims are no threat to anyone. He also lays out a conspiracy theory that may sound bizarre to Westerners, but is widely believed in Arab countries and must be recognized as a factor in world affairs.
The storm that the West is constantly stirring up about the threat to civilization posed by Islam and the Muslims is a very strange story. Where is this threat that the Islamic countries supposedly represent?
All of these countries are afflicted with calamities; they have nothing else in common. Most of them are begging. Some are under occupation or attack, and others are threatened with starvation. These countries are Islamic in name only; their real inclinations are secular. Their fundamentalism consists of only long beards, flowing gowns, ornamented prayer beads, and embellished Korans--mostly formalities with no substance and traditions with no content. The truly religious in these societies are the minority, kneeling in the privacy of their homes and concerned only with the worship of their God. They do not confront anyone and have nothing to do with America, Germany, Italy, or Spain.
Where is that illusionary threat?
If the Western alarmists are pointing to the newborn Islam represented by terrorism and [fundamentalist parties such as] Egypt's Gamaa al-Islamiya, I would answer that this Islam is the creation of the Western nations. They spent money on it and shaped it to the specifications they wanted. It does not threaten them at all. Instead, it is a threat to us and to our Islam, since it is mistakenly regarded as a part of our religion.
On the other hand, if Islam is taken to mean a culture opposing the Western culture, I would argue that this has dwindled in our time to the point that it no longer exists except in the hearts of the genuinely pious Muslims, and there are only a handful of them. In any case, though it has differences with other cultures, this Islam has no intention of declaring war on them. Freedom of choice is a main principle of Islam. We believe in Koranic principles: "Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion" and "You have charge of your own souls. He that erreth cannot injure you if you are rightly guided."
No one would ever think of invading Europe to spread the message of Islam; there is no need, since Muslims have long since spread the word of Allah to the most distant parts of the Earth. Our position is to respect the freedom of others in choosing any religion they wish, to respond to offense with good deeds, and to answer straying with patience.
A true Muslim tries to educate people, but he does not judge them. Judgment is up to Allah alone. Nothing in the Islamic identity prescribes hegemony or intimidation of others. Allah told even his Prophet not to be intimidating, saying: "Remind them, for thou art but a rememberancer; thou are not a warder."
In contrast, secular civilization is based on the principle that you are free to do whatever you wish as long as you do not hurt others. You have only this life to live, so make the best of it. Indulge your body and satisfy your desires without any guilt. In that culture, perverts enjoy the same rights as the righteous. They have their own clubs and are free to promote their abominations. They have also closed the doors of churches and mosques so they will not be bothered by religion.
In reality, [the Western secularists] are the ones who are imposing their principles and their way of life on US through newspapers, books, films, theater, and television. Their satellites openly promote these vices and broadcast them to the bedroom of anyone with a satellite-dish antenna. It is they who declared war on us, not only through physical liquidation and massacres, but also through intellectual, ideological, and cultural invasion. They spread brazen lies that we are a danger to their culture in order to justify their own extermination campaign. Their real motive is their embedded hatred and jealousy, the desire to drag us into their own pit so that we all face the same fate [in the hereafter]. [H: Your own U.S. Billy Graham said on Larry King Live: "America is NOT a Christian nation--it is a secular nation.]
The Koran directs us to the proper conclusion: "Thou wilt find the most vehement of mankind in hostility to those who believe [are] the Jews and the idolaters." The Jews, then, are the chiefs of staff who declared and organized the war: WORLD ZIONISM HATES PEACE AS MUCH AS IT HATES DEATH. THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO REPRESENT THE ZIONISTS AT ALL LEVELS OF POLICY-MAKING IN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. THEY HAVE BEEN INFILTRATING HIGH CIRCLES THROUGH MASONIC NETWORKS FOR THE PAST 1.000 YEARS. They have people who represent their interests even in the Arab countries and the fundamentalist Islamic nations. The Koran has predicted the rise of their influence, followed by the destruction of their states.
We are at the beginning of the rise of the Jews and idolaters and everything now happening is the result of their guile. While they spread propaganda about the Islamic threat, bombs that explode here and there ARE THEIR OWN DOING. They talk through dozens of mouths. The United Nations, the U.S. Congress, and all newspapers are their mouthpieces, and their voice is magnified enormously. They own the arsenals of Israel, America, and Europe, and maybe the Russian arsenal as well. This alliance unites them all against Islam and its symbols.
But we will witness the end of this ascent in the coming five years. History and events have accelerated; although in the past empires took hundreds of years to fall, they can now topple in weeks or months. The israeli ascent is artificial, based on ignorance and false power. Its fall will be louder than the Soviet collapse, and the lesson will be much stronger. ALLAH BESTOWS POWER ON WHOMEVER HE WISHES AND REMOVES IT FROM WHOMEVER HE WISHES.
* * *
I believe this is one of the most important messages you will ever receive, readers, so do not pass it lightly off as Cairo's effort to defuse something or another.
Immanuel (the one you call Jesus) told of the happening of Mohammed who would come against those now calling themselves "Zionists and Jews", 2,000 years ago. I suggest that every READER get a copy of the journal, AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL,a Phoenix Journal, Phoenix Source Distributors, Inc. Post Office Box 27353, Las Vegas, Nevada 89126. 1-800-800-5565. Canadians call 1-805-822-9655. (Mastercard [No pun intended from any" 'Master], VISA and Discover accounts accepted.)
There are a lot of important documents about your globe--THAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT script of your Great Teacher. The TRUTH is untampered! This JOURNAL is now verified by at least three other presentations from these now translated scrolls. This was the first JOURNAL scribed by Dharma, knowingly FROM higher input.
CREATION OR CREATOR
In this journal you will find reference that "Creation is above all", even "Creator". So which came first, the Chicken or the Egg?. "CREATION--IS!" CREATOR IS FLEXIBLE AND CAN CREATE AT WILL OF THOUGHT. CREATOR WORKS WITHIN CREATION (WHICH IS). CREATOR WORKS, FURTHER, WITHIN THE LAWS WHICH ARE AND INFINITELY ARE! It is within these LAWS which allows CREATOR TO CREATE. It is, for instance, the Creation's LAW that compels Creator to respond to a CALL. You must understand that A CALL COMPELS AN ANSWER! In-deed, even if it be in the form of Host Messengers FROM GOD CREATOR--TO YOU WHO HAVE PETITIONED FOR GUIDANCE IN YOUR TIME OF NEED. Thank you, for it is our privilege to SERVE.
I want, now, to offer a bit from this book just mentioned--in this copy, page 107:
MOHAMMED PROPHESIED
[H: In cosmic presentation, (I) or (E) is a (J)--so, for in-stance, in Pleiades (where the scrolls now reside) I or Emmanuel is "(J)mmanuel]
Jrnmanuel was silent. And they hit him again on the head and he moaned in pain and started to speak, "Verily I say to you, as you beat and mock me, you too, shall be beaten and mocked. The time will come in five times one hundred years when you shall have to atone for this day. A new man will rise up in this land and whip and persecute you, and you shall have to pay with your blood.
"He will create a new cult and have people call him a prophet, and he shall persecute you throughout all times. Even though he will be a false prophet and bring you a new false doc-trine, he has great power and will have your race persecuted throughout all time to come.
"His name will be Mohammed, and his name will be, for your kind, horror, misery and death, which will be of your deserving. Verily, verily I say to you, his name will be written with blood and his hatred against your kind will be endless. But since he will be a false prophet and bring you a false doctrine, so will his cult eventually be finished, when your kind and his kind will put down the foundation for a bloody ending for this world."
These words caused such fury that they got extremely excited and beat him so brutally that Jmmanuel collapsed. When he had aroused somewhat, they pulled the purple coat from him and put his own garments back on his body and led him away to crucify him.
[H: I will also repeat pages 86 through 88:]
PROPHECIES OF THE END DAYS
As Jmmanuel walked from the temple, the disciples wanted to show him the building in which the temple was built. But he spoke to them, "Do you not see all this? Verily I say to you, not one stone here will remain upon the other without being broken. For the 'Jews' (translation) trespass against life and the truth, and they built this city on the blood of people. They plundered this land through rapaciousness and murder, and killed their friends with whom they drank wine. Thus they betrayed their own friends and murdered them, because of their greediness. Likewise it shall be done unto them."
Later as he sat on the Mount of Olives, his disciples came to him and requested, "Tell us, when will this happen and what will be the sign?" But Jmmanuel answered and said, "See to it that no one leads you astray. For many will come in my name and say, I am ‘Jmmanuel' . And they will lead great numbers of ones astray.
"People will hear about wars and war cries, they shall see and not be startled. This is what must happen, but that is not yet the end. Because people will rise against one another and one kingdom against another, and there will be times of great need and earthquakes and great floods all about the lands. This is the beginning of great calamities, and great cataclysms.
"Soon the people with the knowledge will be surrendered to grief and many will be killed. They will be hated for the sake of truth in their teaching and for their wisdom. Many kinds of cults will rise up against one another, and much blood will flow and many hearts and spirits will be broken. Many will succumb as a result of these conflicts and will betray one another, and will hate one another because they remained small in spirit.
"Because there will be lack of faith, love will become cold and deadened in many, many people. Hatred will rule over all the world and evil will reign for a long period of time. But he; who persists in the truth will 'survive'.
"This lesson will be preached throughout the entire world as testimony for all peoples, and then the end will come--when the word of truth has gone forth throughout the total of the lands.
"When the people will see the horror of destruction in Jerusalem and the lands there about, of which the prophets have already spoken, then the end will come.
"When this happens, whoever is at that time in the land of Judea, should flee to the mountains. He who is on the roof, should not come down from it to get anything from out of his house. He who is in the field should not come back in order to get his coat or any other of his possessions.
"Oh woe to the women in this place, who are pregnant and those who are suckling their babes at that time, for they shall suffer much grief and death. There will be multitudes.
"There will follow great grief as has never been before since the beginning of the world until now, and also never will be again. And, if these days were not shortened, no man would remain alive; but the days will be shortened for the sake of the spirit and wisdom, and for the sake of people who serve the truth and the Laws.
"There shall be untold gnashing and chattering of teeth and great mourning and screaming when this time comes, because of man's lack of understanding and because of his greed.
"There shall be machines made from metal for use in the air, on the waters and on land, to kill one another in great masses. They shall throw heavy projectiles out of these machines made of metal and they shall strike the cities throughout the lands. Fire will come out of these projectiles and burn the world so that hardly anything will survive and that which does survive will not long be spared.
"They will put the corner stones of life itself into the projectiles in order to kindle the deadly fires. [H: Prana, Orgone, Life, Scalar, Photon, Cosmic Life--, whatever you want to call IT. This is the ENERGY of the universe of which HE spoke that would some day be used against life itself!] And, if at that time the Celestial Sons [H: US!!] WOULD NOT APPEAR IN ORDER TO BRING IT TO A STANDSTILL, VERILY I TELL YOU, NOT ONE PERSON WOULD SURVIVE UPON THE FACE OF THE EARTH.
"Since the human race will, at that time, number AT LEAST ten times five hundred million people, two parts thereof will be destroyed and killed. When at that point someone will say to the people, behold, there is Jmmanuel, they shall not believe it, because many false Jmmanuels and false prophets will rise up and do great SIGNS AND WONDERS, so that if it were possible, also even the wise and knowing would be misled, [H: Operation Blue Beam!?!], I told you so before.
"Therefore, when they shall say: 'He is in the desert,' man shall not go out, and 'Behold, he is in a chamber,' they shall not believe.
"Since I will most certainly return at this point in time, I WILL LET THEM RECOGNIZE ME; THIS IS HOW THE LAW IS WRITTEN AND THUS SHALL IT BE. For as lightning starts with the rise and radiates until its setting, thus will be my coming AMONG THE HEAVENLY HOSTS WITH WHOM I SHALL HAVE MY RENEWED LIFE AT THAT TIME.
"Men of all times, beware, wherever the carcass is there, the vultures will gather, so beware of them. [H: This can also be referred to as: "If you are receiving the FLACK--you are on target!"]
"Soon after the grief of that time, sun and moon will no longer radiate, and the stars will fall from heaven and the powers of the heavens will become shaky. The structure of the heavens will be disturbed because of the senselessly erupted power of men who will be living in greed, power, and addiction.
"There will then appear a sign in the sky. And then all the generations on Earth will cry and will see the Celestial Sons coming in the clouds of the sky, and they are the great power and will judge harshly against senselessness. Since God is the ruler over the three human races, He, therefore, will judge them through His representatives. [H: This is NOT THE SAME as Operation Blue Beam! This sign won't be some stupid hologram.]
"Man OWES God his creation and God is the ruler over him, so that he has to follow His commandments and respect Him as the greatest King of Wisdom. [H: Note it does NOT say "worship". It DOES SAY "HE HAS TO FOLLOW HIS COMMANDMENTS" (CONDITIONS).] HE will send forth HIS GUARDIAN ANGELS with loud trumpets and will gather HIS FOLLOWERS FROM THE FOUR WINDS, FROM ONE END OF THE EARTH UNTO THE OTHER END. [H: And THAT is why there will be nice big shiny signs in the sky--for ALL to see!]
"Blessed ones, learn a parable from the fig tree: when its branch begins to have leaves and they are coming out, you know that summer is near. Likewise, the people at that time, when they see all of this they will know that it is close at hand.
"Verily, verily I say to you, this is how it will be. And this human race will not pass until all of this has come about. [H: Note that it did NOT state: "generation"--it said "THIS HUMAN RACE WILL NOT PASS UNTIL ALL OF THIS HAS COME ABOUT."] Heaven and Earth will pass, and the universe also; but my words will not pass, for they are words of truth within the LAWS OF THE CREATION. [H: "Pass" does not herein mean to PASS AWAY AND TOTALLY BE GONE. "PASS" means to move past, over, or through or allow to elapse.]
"No one knows of the day nor hour that all this will happen, nor do the Guardian Angels of God, nor I, Jmmanuel, but God alone who has the greatest wisdom, KNOWS. HE is the ruler over these human races and to HIM is due honor and praise, and BE, too, owes honor and praise unto THE CREATION which is above all. [H: SURROUNDING, ENCAPSULATING, MAKING-UP ALL!]
"So be it, if man reveres and honors God and recognizes only The Creation as the Supreme Power, [H: This IS the ENERGY SOURCE of all things and thoughts into manifestation brought through and by the THOUGHT OF CREATOR.] he thereby acts rightly in truth."
* * *
There is nothing I would wish to add to this at this time. Thank you. I salute you who labor in these vineyards of TRUTH.
CHAPTER 2
REC #2 HATONN
MON., JUN. 27, 1994 3:19 P.M. YEAR 7, DAY 315
MON., JUN. 27 1994
EXCERPTS: PART 2
THE USURPERS
by Medford Evans
About the men who rule America--an Appeal to those they rule. WESTERN ISLANDS (publisher), Belmont, Massachusetts 02178, 1968.
CHAPTER II: THE COUP D'ETAT
OF NOVEMBER 22, 1963
"Shriver ... realized that Asia, Africa, and South America would assume that 'whoever had killed President Kennedy would now be President." William Manchester, The Death of a President.
Exactly who put Lyndon Baines Johnson into the White House in 1963 is not known. The Warren Commission says it was Lee Harvey Oswald. A variety of persons, from New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison to Left-leaning lawyer and author Mark Lane, have disagreed. Whoever it was--whoever killed John F. Kennedy--evidently wanted Lyndon Johnson to become President. Was it one of those whom William Manchester calls "knee-jerk absolutists" of the American tradition, one who wanted a cowhand type in the White House? Was it, as some "Liberals" would like to imply, an oilman who felt that the depletion allowance would be safer under Lyndon Johnson? Was it--really "the lone assassin"--Lee Harvey Oswald, as the Warren Commission concluded? If so, a Communist made Lyndon Johnson President.
[H: Not to get distracted too much here, I want you to now turn your attention to a "lone" attacker of "two" people in Los Angeles' Brentwood community. This LONE killer slashed and cut and supposedly didn't even sustain a scratch in the process. Is it not quite laughable that you are expected to believe these stories? Worse--most of you DO! You are now told that at the bloodbath in L.A., a lone attacker did all this slashing and cutting--all but completely severing the neck of the female--and yet the reports found her having "curled herself into a fetal position" and the male lounging against a tree. Curled herself into a fetal position?? 'WITH HER NECK SEVERED TO HER SPINAL CORD?? ARE YOU PEOPLE NUTS OR IS IT ME? GLASSES NEARBY THE BODIES WHICH PROVED THE TRUTH ABOUT THE YOUNG MAN "HAPPENING TO RETURN GLASSES". PROVING WHAT? COULD THOSE GLASSES NOT HAVE BEEN THE VERY SET-UP--THE VERY PRE-PLANNED EXCUSE? DON'T YOU QUESTION ANYTH1NG--EXCEPT TRUTH]
This book deals with well-established matters of fact and with certain rather obvious conjectures. Naturally speculation is presented, but presented as speculation. NOT CONCLUSION. Every man is responsible for his own conclusions.
It is a matter of fact that Lyndon Johnson failed to secure the nomination for President in 1960. It is a matter of reasonable conjecture that he afterward stood little chance of ever being nominated unless he were the incumbent, and the only way to achieve incumbency was through being Vice President when an elected President died in office. It is a matter of fact that in November 1963 he had been Vice President for what Rowland Evans and Robert Novak call "three trying years." Evans and Novak quote an anonymous "White House official" who said of Johnson: "The greatest tribute to him is that he had the self-discipline and patience to accept political impotency and stay out of trouble." As it turned out, he could afford to be patient.
Since the President, in whose shadow Johnson served, was nine years younger than he, the odds were great that he would never become President unless Kennedy were killed. Indeed, there was some prospect in November 1963 that Johnson might not even continue to be Vice President, might have to exchange the relative obscurity of that office for the utter oblivion of being an ex-Vice President.
William Manchester refers to "persistent reports" that John-son "might be dumped from the ticket next year". Arthur Schlesinger Jr., writing of Kennedy's "first strategy meeting of 1964", held November 12, 1963, says, "Johnson's absence stimulated a curious story that the Kennedys intended, in the political idiom, to dump him ... as Roosevelt had dumped John Nance Garner." Schlesinger says the story was "wholly fanciful", but recognizes the "psychological cost" to Johnson, and quotes Theodore White: "Chafing in inaction when his nature yearned to act, conscious of indignities real and imagined, Johnson went through three years of slow burn." As of November 22, 1963, it was reasonable to conjecture, nothing could have brightened the outlook for Lyndon Johnson's political career-- except what actually happened.
There is no pretense in this book that certain actions do not normally imply certain intentions. Once we conclude--as so many responsible writers have shown--that the Report of the Warren Commission is inherently incredible, we can hardly suppress speculation that someone on the Commission intended a deception. This, however, remains speculation and possibly cannot be established. Most people would settle for not punishing the Warren Commission--and not believing it.
I hate to agree with (for example) Richard Rovere about anything--considering his detestable treatment of the late Senator Joseph McCarthy and his consistent service of the Left; but I do agree with the following from Rovere's Introduction to Edward Jay Epstein's Inquest:
"... the Commission's client was Lyndon B. Johnson. The day the Warren Report was issued, the American press should have begun to do what Mr. Epstein has done; it should have cast a very cool eye on the Report" (Italics added).
What is not speculation is that the death of John F. Kennedy effected a transfer of power. Every assassination of a chief of state is in effect a coup d'etat. A coup d'etat is not a revolution, it does not necessarily involve a change in ideology. It does not necessarily involve a change in the bureaucracy or professional police, except at the highest level. A coup d'etat is often accomplished by someone already near the highest level. If an assassin is too far beneath his victim in the established power structure, he cannot himself reap the fruit of his deed. The fruit will, however, be gathered. An assassin may not intend to seize power for himself; the power, nevertheless, will be seized. The assassin may not be thinking in terms of power at all. Someone, however, will be thinking in such terms!
Unlike a revolution, a coup d'etat does not involve a large number of people; indeed, its success depends on the majority's continuing to operate pretty much in their accustomed fashion. The pilot must be replaced with as little disturbance as possible to the passengers.
On reflection, most people will believe that the assassination of John F. Kennedy--so difficult to execute, so dangerous to the murderer--must have been planned, and, since the victim was President of the United States, few will doubt that the planners were politically motivated. Americans in general, however, would not believe--as Sargent Shriver said the people of Asia, Africa, and Latin America would believe--that the political motivation was anything so logical as a bid for supreme power by the next in line. In the United States only "weirdos" like that author of MacBird and the editor of the Midlothian Mirror have suggested that the Vice President was trying to "catch the nearest way" to the White House. Most Americans would no more suspect Lyndon Johnson of complicity in the assassination of John Kennedy than they would suspect Andrew Johnson of complicity in the murder of Lincoln, or Theodore Roosevelt of complicity in the killing of William McKinley.
Nevertheless, the political motivation by forces behind the scenes cannot be dismissed, and those who accomplished the deed may well have intended the consequences. Many an American has thought as much but hardly dared to dwell upon the thought, much less speak out. The thought is repellent because people fear it leads to the conclusion suggested by William Manchester with his quotation from Sargent Shriver--that the new President must have had a hand in eliminating the old one, since he (the new one) appears to have been the chief beneficiary.
Yet, it is not necessarily true that Johnson is the chief beneficiary. Ambitious as we may suppose Johnson to be, he is not necessarily his own man, not even if he sincerely believes that he is. He could be somehow more useful to others than to himself.
No, the sure gainers were the men of the center--or what passes for the center--men to the right of Arthur Schlesinger Jr., to the left of Thomas Dodd (here I refer to surface position); men to the right of Ted Sorensen, to the left of Tom Clark. Typical Texans were not gainers. Indeed, Texas was dealt a crushing blow.
The men who gained were Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara, Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, Walt Whitman Rostow and Abe Fortas--the men about whom this book is written. The list is not exhaustive, not in any special order, but it illustrates.
The Establishment--the coalition of powerful men behind the politicians--gained; and Johnson, not being identified with the Establishment, could not bring embarrassment upon it, while at the same time he could still be led to do what was expected. This is not to suggest that the Establishment contrived the assassination. But, in any case, we can accept the fact that the coup of November 22, 1963 strengthened the hand of the Establishment, which was able--whoever did the murder--to turn it to advantage.
It was--or could be considered--the Establishment's second "gain" from an assassination in the same month. On November first, exactly three weeks before the spectacular assassination in Dallas, President Diem of South Vietnam was killed in another coup d'etat. [H: How many of you remember that?] That some degree of responsibility attaches to the U.S. Establishment for the murder of Diem is much more widely recognized than in the case of Kennedy. As the late Marguerite Higgins said in her book Our Vietnam Nightmare:
In the post-coup era ... at the Department of State the Diem-must-go group was heady with a sense of accomplishment. Their ebullience spilled out at various back-ground briefings I attended. Mainly there seemed to be satisfaction that the deed was finally done, even though not quite as cleanly as everybody had hoped.
In the aftermath of each the U.S. Establishment labored to dissociate itself from the event. In the case of Diem the disavowal of any connection could be open, and needed to be open, for there had been so much of rumor emanating from Saigon to the effect that Americans were responsible for Diem's over-throw and murder that a specific protestation of innocence was in order. Arthur Schlesinger Jr., writes:
It is important to state clearly, that the coup of November 1, 1963, was entirely planned and carried out by the Vietnamese. Neither the American Embassy nor the CIA were involved in instigation or execution (A Thousand Days, p. 829). [Well, I'm like M.O.M.: "I don't really believe anything UNTIL IT IS OFFICIALLY DENIED. Here you probably have the very truth and proof that both the Americans and the CIA had everything to do with the assassination!]
The coup of November 22, 1963 could not be dealt with quite so clearly, for it was impossible to admit that anyone had even suggested that the U.S. Establishment was on that day conducting a purge of the summit. Nevertheless, what could not be admitted to have been said had still to be denied--and denied with whatever emphasis was necessary. That is one reason the Warren Commission was established.
"In his earliest hours as President," write Evans and Novak, "Johnson, assisted by Abe Fortas and other counselors, conceived his plan for a blue-ribbon commission composed of the nation's most eminent citizens to make a painstaking investigation of the tragic events of November 22 and exorcise the demons of conspiracy." William Manchester's account is a bit different, but not seriously contradictory. He involves Fortas in the decision, though somewhat ambiguously, but he gives the role of chief promoter to Nicholas deB. Katzenbach. Oddly enough, neither Manchester nor Evans and Novak mention the fact that the midweek edition of the Communist Worker, dated November 26, said in a front-page editorial:
We believe that President Johnson on the one hand and Congress on the other should act at once to appoint respective Extraordinary Investigation Commissions with full powers to conduct a searching inquiry into all the circumstances around the assassination of the President and the murder of the suspect [Oswald]. Such an investigating committee, headed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, should be composed of citizens and experts who enjoy the confidence of the nation.
Congress was laggard, but President Johnson moved promptly to do exactly what the Communist Worker had suggested. On November 29 he appointed just such a commission, headed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Of course I do not mean that he did it because the Worker recommended it. But the coincidence is striking.
On the surface, the Warren Commission Report was to backfire in the Worker's face, for it was to pin the guilt on Lee Harvey Oswald, a "silly little Communist". Still, that was better from the Worker's point of view than pinning it on a serious big Communist. Lyndon Johnson called Earl Warren over to the White House. Manchester says these are Warren's words about the visit:
I saw McGeorge Bundy first. He took me in, and the President told me how serious the situation was. He said there had been wild rumors, and that there was the international situation to think of. He said he had just talked to Dean Rusk, who was concerned, and he also mentioned the head of the Atomic Energy Commission, who had told him how many millions of people would be killed in an atomic war. He said that if the public became aroused against Castro and Khrushchev there might be war (The Death of a President, p. 630).
This leads one to believe that one of the Commission's first objectives was to clear Castro and Khrushchev. If it could clear Johnson into the bargain, that would be nice, too. But in the public mind Castro is not cleared, Khrushchev is not cleared, Johnson is not cleared. The case is wide open, and none of the networks, including the Communist network, can close it. The Warren Commission needed to make an airtight case. The failure of the Commission can be measured by the millions of dollars that were invested in trying to backstop the Commission's Report over NBC and CBS, in LIFE magazine, and through much of the communications media. And this effort, of course, also 'failed.
One senses, rightly or wrongly, that the necessity of clearing Castro, and certainly of clearing Khrushchev, has diminished since November 1963. On the other hand, the need (somebody's need) to clear Johnson is greater than ever. Where he needs acquittal is in the court of public opinion, where the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court doesn't preside. It may once have been thought that Johnson got his acquittal in 1964, but now it is plain that that was just a postponement. The case is now on the docket for 1968. Trouble is, there are so many other counts to the indictment that the verdict on this one may never be wholly clarified.
Since Macbird--the offbeat, off-Broadway parody of Macbeth which implies that Johnson killed Kennedy as Macbeth killed Duncan--it has become commonplace to admit openly that Johnson is suspect. The scandalous success of this scurrilous play, which certainly could never have been produced at all had it been written by anyone but a Leftist, illustrates the fact that in the corrupted intellectual currents of our time it is not what is said but who says it that counts.
The public, as it continues stubbornly to suspect the Warren Commission of inaccuracy and especially of incompleteness, by implication increasingly suspects Johnson of something worse.
I consider the theory of Oswald as a lone-wolf assassin to be inherently incredible, circumstantially improbable, and politically useful to the real authors of the coup d'etat. (See American Opinion magazine, September, 1967).
Thus I reject the Warren Report's "Conclusion Number Eleven": On the basis of the evidence before the Commission it concludes that Oswald acted alone. (Italics added) I agree rather with the opinion attributed by Ramparts magazine to New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison that the assassination was the work of a "powerful domestic force". And however that powerful domestic force is made up--whoever belongs to it--among the men who are the chief beneficiaries of the assassination are the men who are the subject of this book.
CHAPTER III: THE RISE OF
LYNDON JOHNSON
"...THERE IS ONLY ONE ISSUE HERE-MORALITY AND CONDUCT."
Senate Minority Leader Johnson, Dec. 2, 1954.
The Johnson Administration began with the assassination of President Kennedy. There was no other way than by the President's death in which the former Vice President could have come to power. Had John Kennedy lived, not only would he have been automatically renominated in 1964, but Lyndon Johnson might well have been, as the inelegant political term has it, "dumped" for a running mate more personable, by Kennedy standards. At noon, November 22, 1963, Lyndon B. Johnson was a politician apparently on the way down and out. Three hours later he had been sworn in as President of the United States. The decision he had made in Los Angeles in 1960 to relinquish Majority Leadership of the Senate for the comparative obscurity of the Vice Presidency had at last, fatefully, paid off.
Not only was Johnson now established in the highest office in the land, he was virtually certain of election in 1964 to a first four-year term. One year was just what he needed to reach a peak of popularity with a sufficient number of voters. No credible opposition could crystallize in that honeymoon period. He was heir to the Kennedy power and death had cleared the legacy of political liabilities. Even many disgruntled right-wingers would go with Lyndon in 1964--to prove (to themselves?) that they had not wanted Kennedy killed. A conspiracy bringing tragedy to the Autumn of 1963, in the fall by rifle fire of a young President, had given Lyndon Johnson victory from the jaws of defeat. He had snatched victory from those jaws before, in 1948, when Abe Fortas and Hugo Black teamed to put Johnson, despite the legal record, into the Senate.
The character of Lyndon Johnson is one of the determining factors of contemporary history (a reminder that we live in a dangerous age). Johnson's importance must be neither ignored nor exaggerated, but carefully assessed. The Kennedys, I think, had him wrong, seriously--one might say fatally--underestimated him. The intellectuals of the Eastern Establishment generally do not understand him at all, though an Arthur Schlesinger can perceptively attribute to Lyndon Johnson an "infinitely complex and subtle mind". And he is no intellectual. I suppose some of the gap could be due to his accent. The Johnson English falls on the eastern ear not merely as something unpleasant but as something ridiculous. That there is much about Johnson that is unpleasant may be incontestable, and is anyway a subjective matter, but to be ridiculous is an objective condition--at least to the extent of implying relative harmlessness. A domesticated animal may appear at times ridiculous--a wild animal never. And there is something feral about Johnson. He is, give him credit, a dangerous man. He is possibly more dangerous to those who regard him as ridiculous.
The career of Lyndon Johnson was built partly on the ruthless destruction of the careers of others. Four of those whose careers Johnson felt called upon to destroy were known as Conservatives and anti-Communists. They were: Coke Stevenson. Joe McCarthy. Lewis Strauss. and Barry Goldwater.
*****
This is lengthy enough for a chapter so let us close this and begin with the writings ABOUT these just-mentioned persons in Part 3.
Tags, 상세검색
PJ#100, BUTTERFLIES, MIND CONTROL-- THE RAZOR'S EDGE
