PJ 98
CHAPTER 5
REC #2 HATONN
MON., JUN. 13, 1994 1:54 P.M. YEAR 7, DAY 201
MON., JUN. 13, 1994
CONSTITUTION-FEDERALIST PAPERS
(Chapter 9)
CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE 1
SECTION 8, PARAGRAPH 1
Continuation from Chapter 8, [5/31/94 #2 Hatonn writing] Federalist Papers No. 41, Excerpts:
No. 41, Par. 21, James Madison:
....The power of regulating and calling forth the militia has been already sufficiently vindicated and explained.
The power of levying and borrowing money, being the sinew of that which is to be exerted in the national defense, is properly thrown into the same class with it. This power, also, has been examined already with such attention, and has, I trust, been clearly shown to be necessary, both in the extent and form given to it by the Constitution. I will address one additional reflection only to those who contend that the power ought to have been restrained to external taxation--by which they mean taxes on articles imported from other countries. It cannot be doubted that this will always be a valuable source of revenue; that for a considerable time it must be a principal source; that at this moment it is an essential one. But we may form very mistaken ideas on this subject if we do not call to mind in our calculations that the extent of revenue drawn from foreign commerce must vary with the variations, both in the extent and the kind of imports; and that these variations do not correspond with the progress of population, which must be the general measure of the public wants. As long as agriculture continues the sole field of labor, the importation of manufactures must increase as the consumers multiply. As soon as domestic manufactures are begun by the hands not called for by agriculture, the imported manufactures will decrease as the numbers of people increase. In a more remote stage, the imports may consist in a considerable part of raw materials, which will be wrought into articles for exportation, and will, therefore, require rather the encouragement of bounties than to be loaded with discouraging duties. A system of government meant for duration ought to contemplate these revolutions and be able to accommodate itself to them.
Some who have not denied the necessity of the power of taxation have grounded a very fierce attack against the Constitution, on the language in which it is defined. It has been urged and echoed that the power "to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States," amounts to an unlimited commission to exercise every power which may be alleged to be necessary for the common defense or general welfare. No stronger proof could be given of the distress under which these writers labor for objections, than their stooping to such a misconstruction.
Had no other enumeration or definition of the powers of the Congress been found in the Constitution than the general expressions just cited, the authors of the objection might have had some color for it; though it would have been difficult to find a reason for so awkward a form of describing an authority to legislate in all possible cases. A power to destroy the freedom of the press, the trial by jury, or even to regulate the course of descents, or the forms of conveyances, must be very singularly expressed by the terms "to raise money for the general welfare".
But what color can the objection have when a specification of the objects alluded to by these general terms immediately follows and is not even separated by a longer pause than a semicolon? If the different parts of the same instrument ought to be so expounded as to give meaning to every part which will bear it, shall one part of the same sentence be excluded altogether from a share in the meaning; and shall the more doubtful and indefinite terms be retained in their full extent, and the clear and precise expressions be denied any signification whatsoever? For what purpose could the enumeration of particular powers be inserted, if these and all others were meant to be included in the preceding general power? Nothing is more natural nor common than first to use a general phrase, and then to explain and qualify it by a recital of particulars. But the idea of an enumeration of particulars which neither explain nor qualify the general meaning, and can have no other effect than to confound and mislead, is an absurdity, which, as we are reduced to the dilemma of charging either on the authors of the objection or on the authors of the Constitution, we must take the liberty of supposing had not its origin with the latter.
The objection here is the more extraordinary, as it appears that the language used by the convention is a copy from the Articles of Confederation. The objects of the Union among the States, as described in article third, are "their common defense, security of their liberties, and mutual and general welfare". The terms of article eighth are still more identical: "All charges of war and all other expenses that shall be incurred for the common defense or general welfare and allowed by the United States in Congress shall be defrayed out of a common treasury," etc. A similar language again occurs in article ninth. Construe either of these articles by the rules which would justify the construction put on the new Constitution, and they vest in the existing Congress a power to legislate in all cases whatsoever. But what would have been thought of that assembly, if, attaching themselves to these general expressions and disregarding the specifications which ascertain and limit their import, they had exercised an unlimited power of providing for the common defense and general welfare? I appeal to the objectors themselves, whether they would in that case have employed the same reasoning in justification of Congress as they now make use of against the convention. How difficult it is for the error to escape its own condemnation. PUBLIUS.
No. 56, Par. 6, James Madison:
....Taxation will consist, in a great measure, of duties which will be involved in the regulation of commerce. So far the preceding remark is applicable to this object. As far as it may consist of internal collections, a more diffusive knowledge of the circumstances of the State may be necessary. But will not this also be possessed in sufficient degree by a very few intelligent men, diffusively elected within the State? Divide the largest State into ten or twelve districts and it will be found that there will be no peculiar local interests in either which will not be within the knowledge of the representative of the district. Besides this source of information, the laws of the State, framed by representatives from every part of it, will be almost of themselves a sufficient guide. In every State there have been made, and must continue to be made, regulations on this subject which will, in many cases, leave little more to be done by the federal legislature than to review the different laws and reduce them in one general act. A skilful individual in his closet, with all the local codes before him, might compile a law on some subjects of taxation for the whole Union, without any aid from oral information, and it may be expected that whenever internal taxes may be necessary, and particularly in cases requiring uniformity throughout the States, the more simple objects will be preferred. To be fully sensible of the facility which will be given to this branch of federal legislation by the assistance of the State codes, we need only suppose for a moment that this or any other State were divided into a number of parts, each having and exercising within itself a power of local legislation. Is it not evident that a degree of local information and preparatory labor would be found in the several volumes of their proceedings which would very much shorten the labors of the general legislature, and render a much smaller number of members sufficient for it? The federal councils will derive great advantage from another circumstance. The representatives of each State will not only bring with them a considerable knowledge of its laws, and a local knowledge of their respective districts, but will probably in all cases have been members, and may even at the very time be members, of the State legislature, where all the local information and interests of the State are assembled, and from whence they may easily be conveyed by a very few hands into the legislature of the United States.
CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE 1
SECTION 8, PARAGRAPHS 2 & 3
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
Federalist Papers, Excerpts:
No. 42, Par. 11, James Madison:
....The defect of power in the existing Confederacy to regulate the commerce between its several members is in the number of those which have been clearly pointed out by experience. To the proofs and remarks which former papers have brought into view on this subject, it may be added that without this supplemental provision, the great and essential power of regulating foreign commerce would have been incomplete and ineffectual. A very material object of this power was the relief of the States which import and export through other States from the improper contributions levied on them by the latter. Were these at liberty to regulate the trade between State and State, it must be foreseen that ways would be found out to load the articles of import and export, during the passage through their jurisdiction, with duties which would fall on the makers of the latter and the consumers of the former. We may be assured by past experience that such a practice would be introduced by future contrivances; and both by that and a common knowledge of human affairs that it would nourish unceasing animosities, and not improbably terminate in serious interruptions of the public tranquility. To those who do not view the question through the medium of passion or of interest, the desire of the commercial States to collect, in any form, an indirect revenue from their uncommercial neighbors must appear not less impolitic than it is unfair; since it would stimulate the injured party by resentment as well as interest to resort to less convenient channels for their foreign trade. But the mild voice of reason, pleading the cause of an enlarged and permanent interest, is but too often drowned, before public bodies as well as individuals, by the clamors of an impatient avidity for immediate and immoderate gain.
The necessity of a superintending authority over the reciprocal trade of confederated States has been illustrated by other examples as well as our own. In Switzerland, where the Union is so very slight, each canton is obliged to allow to merchandises a passage through its jurisdiction into other cantons, without an augmentation of the tolls. In Germany it is a law of the empire that the princes and states shall not lay tolls or customs on bridges, rivers, or passages, without the consent of the emperor and the diet; though it appears from a quotation in an antecedent paper that the practice in this, as in many other instances in that confederacy, has not followed the law, and has produced there the mischief's which have been foreseen here. Among the restraints imposed by the Union of the Netherlands on its members, one is that they shall not establish imposts disadvantageous to their neighbors without the general permission.
The regulation of commerce with the Indian tribes is very properly unfettered from two limitations in the Articles of Confederation, which render the provision obscure and contradictory. The power is there restrained to Indians, not members of any of the states, and is not to violate or infringe the legislative right of any State within its own limits. What description of Indians are to be deemed members of a State is not yet settled, and has been a question of frequent perplexity and contention in the federal councils. And how the trade with Indians, though not members of a State, yet residing within its legislative jurisdiction can be regulated by an external authority, without so far intruding on the internal rights of legislation, is absolutely incomprehensible. This is not the only case in which the Articles of Confederation have inconsiderately endeavored to accomplish impossibilities; to reconcile a partial sovereignty in the Union, with complete sovereignty in the States; to subvert a mathematical axiom by taking away a part and letting the whole remain.
No. 45, Par. 8, James Madison
....If the federal government is to have collectors of revenue, the State government will have theirs also. And as those of the former will be principally on the seacoast, and not very numerous, whilst those of the latter will be spread over the face of the country, and will be very numerous, the advantage in this view also lies on the same side. It is true that the Confederacy is to possess, and may exercise, the power of collecting internal as well as external taxes throughout the States; but it is probable that this power will not be resorted to, except for supplemental purposes of revenue; that an option will then be given to the States to supply their quotas by previous collections of their own; and that the eventual collection, under the immediate authority of the Union, will generally be made by the officers, and according to the rules, appointed by the several States. Indeed it is extremely probable that in other instances, particularly in the organization of the judicial power, the officers of the States will be clothed with the correspondent authority of the Union. Should it happen, however, that separate collectors of internal revenue should be appointed under the federal government, the influence of the whole number would not bear a comparison with that of the multitude of State officers in the opposite scale. Within every district to which a federal collector would be allotted, there would not be less than thirty or forty, or even more, officers of different descriptions, and many of them persons of character and weight whose influence would lie on the side of the State.
CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE 1
SECTION 8, PARAGRAPH 4
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
Federalist Papers, Excerpts:
No. 32, Par. 2, Alexander Hamilton:
....The third will be found in that clause which declares that Congress shall have power "to establish an Uniform Rule of naturalization throughout the United States". This must necessarily be exclusive; because if each State had power to prescribe a DISTINCT RULE, there could not be a UNIFORM RULE.
No. 42, Par. 17 & 18, James Madison:
The dissimilarity in the rules of naturalization has long been remarked as a fault in our system, and as laying a foundation for intricate and delicate questions. In the fourth article of the Confederation, it is declared "that the free inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; and the people of each State shall, in every other, enjoy all the privileges of trade and commerce," etc. There is a confusion of language here which is remarkable. Why the terms free inhabitants are used in one part of the article, free citizens in another, and people in another; or what was meant by superadding to "all privileges and immunities of free citizens," "all the privileges of trade and commerce," cannot easily be determined. It seems to be a construction scarcely avoidable, however, that those who come under the denomination of free inhabitants of a State, although not citizens of such State, are entitled, in every other State, to all the privileges of free citizens of the latter; that is, to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State; so that it may be in the power of a particular State, or rather every State is laid under a necessity not only to confer the rights of citizenship in other States upon any whom it may admit to such rights within itself, but upon any whom it may allow to become inhabitants within its jurisdiction. But were an exposition of the term "inhabitants" to be admitted which would confine the stipulated privileges to citizens alone, the difficulty is diminished only, not removed. The very improper power would still be retained by each State of naturalizing aliens in every other State. In one State, residence for a short term confirms all the rights of citizenship in another, qualifications of greater importance are required. An alien, therefore, legally incapacitated for certain rights in the latter, may, by previous residence only in the former, elude his incapacity; and thus the law of one State be preposterously rendered paramount to the law of another, within the jurisdiction of the other. We owe it to mere casualty that very serious embarrassments on this subject have been hitherto escaped. By the laws of several States, certain descriptions of aliens, who had rendered themselves obnoxious, were laid under interdicts inconsistent not only with the rights of citizenship but with the privilege of residence. What would have been the consequence if such persons, by residence or otherwise, had acquired the character of citizens under the laws of another State, and then asserted their rights as such, both to residence and citizenship, within the State proscribing them? Whatever the legal consequences might have been, other consequences would probably have resulted of too serious a nature not to be provided against. The new Constitution has accordingly, with great propriety, made provision against them, and all other proceeding from the defect of the Confederation on this head, by authorizing the general government to establish a uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States.
The power of establishing uniform laws of bankruptcy is so intimately connected with the regulation of commerce, and will prevent so many frauds where the parties or their property may lie or be removed into different States, that the expediency of it seems not likely to be drawn into question.
CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE 1
SECTION 8, PARAGRAPHS 5, 6, 7 & 8
To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;
To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;
To establish post offices and post roads;
To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;
Federalist Papers, Excerpts:
No. 42, Par. 14, James Madison:
All that need be remarked on the power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, is that by providing for this last case, the Constitution has supplied a material omission in the Articles of Confederation. The authority of the existing Congress is restrained to the regulation of coin struck by their own authority, or that of the respective States. It must be seen at once that the proposed uniformity in the value of the current coin might be destroyed by subjecting that of foreign coin to the different regulations of the different States.
The punishment of counterfeiting the public securities, as well as the current coin, is submitted of course to that authority which is to secure the value of both.
The regulation of weights and measures is transferred from the Articles of Confederation, and is founded on like considerations with the preceding power of regulating coin.
No. 43, Par. 1, 2 & 3, James Madison:
The fourth class comprises the following miscellaneous powers:
1. A power "to promote the progress of science and useful arts by securing, for a limited time, to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries."
The utility of this power will scarcely be questioned. The copyright of authors has been solemnly adjudged in Great Britain to be a right of common law. The right to useful inventions seems with equal reason to belong to the inventors. The public good fully coincides in both cases with the claims of individuals. The States cannot separately make effectual provision for either of the cases, and most of them have anticipated the decision of this point by laws passed at the instance of Congress.
***
Enough for today, dear Scribe, we can begin here at the next writing. Salu.
CHAPTER 6
REC #1 HATONN
TUE., JUN. 14, 1994 8:43 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 302
TUE., JUN. 14, 1994
CONSTITUTION-FEDERALIST PAPERS
Let us set aside the Federalist Papers as relate to the Constitution of the United States of America for this interim period of time awaiting the disc bearing the "papers". We are becoming too far behind with other pertinent and interesting information needing to get out in the paper and journals. We can pick up the load later or solicit help as with putting the Federalist Papers to disc. It remains magnificently important to integrate the two because there seems to be no way to get the public to relate the two and unless there is relationship and "explanation" there is no way to realize the full intent of the Constitution itself.
THE FREEDOM NETWORKER
C.M. has sent us some material from a publication called The Freedom Networker, 42015 Ford Road #107, Canton, MI 48187. Ph: 313-454-9977 (Mr. Ralph Barnes). Judging from the examples sent to us--it is a highly interesting journal worthy of attention. The rates are quite reasonable ($3.00 per single issue: annual subscription in the U.S.A. is $24.00, Canada and Mexico: $30.00; and other areas: $36.00.) They DO accept advertising and rates can be obtained. Are we in the business of advertising for other publications? EVERY TIME WE GET AN OPPORTUNITY AND FIND ONE WORTHY OF NOTE!
BREAKING THE BACK OF CONTACT
From upstart there has been a focused effort to break the backs of the paper, CONTACT. The PHOENIX LIBERATOR WAS destroyed as was the PHOENIX EXPRESS. Do we expect this one to "fold"? We don't know--that remains up to you as readers. However, we NEVER expect to, or longer hope to, be able to more than break-even with expenses. We long ago gave up hope of that as a goal. We have allowed no advertising through commercial parties other than our own monitored products and recommended product uses. This has been to negate any measure of "priority" for advertisers. Any book gets advertised on its MERITS and authors are supported on their TRUTH IN PRESENTATION TO THE BEST OF THEIR ABILITY. If you are able to get copies of books from this resource--it is because the author has already been paid and it is for your convenience. We effort to always have you as readers go to either the author personally or to whatever source the author asks--or from wherever we can get information regarding acquisition. Will this change? We are always open to the need for change but it will be indeed sad if the voice for the people must be closed or open to any and all advertising for immediately readers of a paper look to the type of advertising to JUDGE THE PAPER. This is unfortunate but true. And yet, readers, survival is necessary for patriots and God's people as well as Satan's bands of thugs. We simply do not have ability to have staff to monitor so the best we can do at present is to offer the articles and present all the information as to the publication from which it is obtained and hope the parties involved, from the publication itself to the friends and readers who clip and share, continue to allow and share.
Loving and overburdened hands put this paper together and totally through devoted volunteers is it shipped to you each week. Dr. Young, and editor-copy people DO NOT GO TO BED ON MONDAY NIGHTS and volunteer handlers and mailers work into each Tuesday night to get the paper off to you ASAP. You want proof through miracles? Every TUESDAY with CONTACT! The recent 88-page paper pushes the "miracle" just about into impossibility for even miracles.
I take the time for this for I have little opportunity to attend our loving crew here and less opportunity to thank the readers who faithfully and regularly share information, updates, network news-breaking "scoops", etc. Believe me, readers, YOU DO NOT WANT MAGICAL REVELATIONS--YOU WANT TRUTH OF WHAT IS! Any so-called "psychic" or "channel" will feed you tons of information and you STILL don't know what to believe if it differs one iota from another--this is even true for here. My own scribe constantly has to be given confirmation--AND THAT IS THE WAY IT SHOULD BE. I will later offer you a good example of this fact: an offering from some"one" calling itself Sanaka re: World Ascension Day--12:12. A beloved and long-time reader asks "my" comments. I have little to offer--there is some truth and much total garbage. I can only ask you to read such with great care according to the guidelines I have taught you and you will know enough. The first warning is the absolute offering of DATES and, furthermore, if you don't know about what "ascension" actually means--you have no way to sort such information. BEWARE! Especially beware of such "similar" labels as are offered in such documents and the use of other parties long respected for truth. Does this mean the information or the young man who brings information from Sanaka is invalid? No, it could mean "anything" from "misled" to "it will happen" to "some truth, some garbage".
It is simply easier to take that which is shown before you and look at that which has been hidden from you--and discern for self the possibilities. YOU have enough before you to begin your journey into TRUTH because the PROOF of these things is continually being uncovered from under the rocks where the Elite Adversaries have buried them FROM YOU.
First of all though, I am going to offer the three separate subject articles from The Freedom Networker.
[QUOTING:]
ATTORNEYS VS. LAWYERS
[H: This becomes more and more important to ALL OF YOU--EVERY DAY THAT COMES! What can be done about it? Get your Constitution back into operation and DEMAND truth in JUSTICE and CLEAN OUT THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF CORRUPTION AND SELF-MADE RULES AND REGULATIONS!]
There seems to be much confusion surrounding the terms ATTORNEY and LAWYER. A lot of people misconstrue these terms to mean the same . To determine the meaning of an "attorney" we looked to Black's Law Dictionary. Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Edition defines "attorney-law": "to turnover; to transfer to another money or goods; to assign to some particular use or service. To consent to the transfer of a rent or reversion. To agree to become tenant to one as owner or landlord of an estate previously held of another, or to agree to recognize a new owner of a property or an estate and promise payment of rent to him." [H: Emphasis is mine. Do you see anything in that definition that reflects on almost anything you find happening in the courts around your nation on a daily basis?]
"ATTORNEY-FEUDAL LAW": "to turn-over; to transfer to another money or goods; to assign to some particular use or service. Where a Lord aliened his seniority, he might with the consent of the tenant, and in some cases without, ATTORNEY or transfer the homage and service of the later to the alien or new Lord."
Attornment": "In feudal and old English law--a turning over or transfer by a Lord of the services of his tenant to the grantee of his seniority. (Lordship-Title: Seignior, Sir) the doctrine of an attornment grew out of the peculiar relations existing between the landlord and his tenant under the feudal law, and the reasons for the rule never had any existence in this country, and is inconsistent with our laws, customs, and institutions."
We need to take a very close look at these words in order to understand the rule of an "ATTORNEY" where the setting is old England and the aristocracy held the land. The lower class tilled the land as tenants. When the land changed hands from one aristocracy Lord to another aristocracy Lord, a treaty was made between the tenants and the new Lord: so that Civil War would not break out between the tenants and the new Lord. This transfer of power with treaty was called ATTORNMENT.
Attornment was the method of peacefully passing land from one aristocrat to another aristocrat without disturbing the class structure. It consisted of a peaceful method of maintaining a noble class of citizens acceptable to the common people. This does not mean that the common people liked the situation, but they suffered evils while evils were sufferable and made their "Treaties of Attornment". Therefore an English law "ATTORNMENT" was a method of guaranteeing UNEQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW for the rich and the poor. But it was one which was tolerable for the poor. It was a "peaceful" maintenance of the class structure.
An "ATTORNEY'S" role in this system was to provide the ceremony of the acquiescence or giving of the poor along with the land to the new land-Lord, and to do so in such a manner (modes operand) as to preserve and maintain the class structure, this so called peaceful transfer is "UNEQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW." It is crystal clear THAT AN ATTORNEY'S ROLE TODAY HAS NOT CHANGED. "Attorneys" practice "Attornment".
"LAWYER": "A person learned in the law. One who understands and who loves the law for its capacity to rectify the evils of society. One who professes and practices 'liberty and justice for all' and therefore the 'EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW.""Lawyers" practice "law". The U.S. Constitution provides over thirty guarantees of the "EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW". A lawyer supports those provisions of guarantee, an attorney opposes those provisions. In America, a lawyer obeys the U.S. Constitution, the supreme law of the land. An "ATTORNEY" does NOT obey the U.S. Constitution.
Furthermore, on August 31, 1990 in the case of Freed v. Martin, in a Kalamazoo County circuit court, Judge Phillip Schaefer ruled "that ALL Michigan attorneys have only "De Facto" licenses to practice law." Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition defines: "DE FACTO" as "ILLEGAL" or "illegitimate". REF: 416.
CAN YOU GET LEGITIMATE ADVICE FROM
"ILLEGITIMATE" SOURCES?
In substitute of a legitimate license from the Executive Branch of Government, "attorneys" have a BAR CARD/BAR AFFILIATION. Through this affiliation they are agents of the court and work FOR THE COURTS' INTERESTS. The courts' interests are FIRST and the client's interest is SECOND. They all are operating in a "conflict of interest"; all are without a LICENSE. One thing Judge Phillip Schaefer conveniently failed to mention is that ALL MICHIGAN JUDGES HAVE "DE FACTO" LICENSES. (Judges also have a "BAR" versus a legitimate "LICENSE".)
"MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION"
Article VI
COURTS OF RECORD, SEAL, QUALIFICATIONS
OF JUDGES
Section 19: "....Justices and judges of courts of record, must be persons who are licensed to practice law in this state."
A requirement to run for election to be a judge is that an "affidavit" must be signed under penalty of perjury. On this "affidavit" a person swears under penalty of perjury that they "have a LICENSE to practice law." ALL Michigan judges have committed perjury by signing this "affidavit". One may confirm this by questioning a judge to view his "license"; NOT HIS MEMBERSHIP CARD TO HIS LAW PERSONS FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION--Bar.
***
Please see that this is immediately gotten to the Constitutional Law Center.
The next is a short little message about all those "BLACK" helicopters which are both seen and denied. Very interesting.
[QUOTING:]
WHAT ABOUT THOSE BLACK HELICOPTERS?
Sightings of black and olive drab helicopters without markings are coming from many areas of America.
Many are reportedly moving troops from secret base to secret base. Many are cargo haulers moving military equipment and supplies to these bases from supply points.
In Michigan, these helicopters have been seen during daylight hours but their favorite flying times seem to be well after midnight.
Some of these black helicopters are the property of a de facto [H: There's that term again, "de facto" (illegal-illegitimate)] police organization called Wackenhut Security Services. When you learn that Wackenhut is run BY EX-CIA, FBI AND OTHER HIGH LEVEL INTELLIGENCE PERSONNEL AND THAT ITS PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS ARE PEOPLE LIKE THE ROTHSCHILDS AND THE ROCKEFELLERS, you know that it, too, is very much a creature of the New World Order. Already, Wackenhuts operates prisons under contract to several states. Undoubtedly, they'll be engaged to operate CONCENTRATION CAMPS too!
Military officials disclaim these helicopters as being theirs though the U.S. Air Force has now confirmed that these mysterious helicopters are classified operations not subject to revelation.
In short, these helicopters' mission here is SECRET. It seems logical to assume that they are preparing for the role of military backup for the occupation and desecration of America and Americans.
***
Not too comforting, is it? Please note that the reason for the specific mention of Michigan so often is that is where The Freedom Networker is located.
The third article is another one you should pay SPECIAL ATTENTION to. We offer these articles and call special attention because these people are located across the nation from CONTACT and yet, TRUTH is "everywhere".
[QUOTING:]
HOW A SECRET SATANIC ORDER
IS HELPING TAKE OVER AMERICA
A totalitarian tyrannical dictatorship is being imposed on America from without and from within!
Know those who are foresworn to destroy your family, your beliefs, your health, your religion and your freedoms!
Did you know there is a secret society within our country that has more than three million members whose secret goal is the conquest and enslavement of America? That most of the machinery for our total subjugation is already set in place? That these members of a Luciferic order will be worse than the Nazi SS elite troops which terrorized Germany under Hitler?
Sounds incredible? Can't happen here in America? How long have you been asleep at the helm of your ship, my dear fellow American?
Did you know that most of our courts are staffed with major and minor members OF THIS SECRET ORDER? Did you know that most sheriffs and many of their deputies belong to this diabolical cabal? Did you know that most top law enforcement officers belong to this clandestine order? Did you know that a substantial number of our legal profession belongs to this order and virtually all seriously uphold it or refuse to oppose it?
Did you know that most of our higher echelon government officials belong to this or equally satanical secret orders? (Like the unprincipled and ruthless George Bush who is a member of the demonic Skull and Bones.)
Did you know that America's and Britain's wealthy elite are either members of and/or support this unheralded secret society and a number of other secret societies as vehicles to effect our enslavement because they are presently translating their wish and blueprint for a One World Government (called the New World Order) into reality?
Why do you think they're secret? To hide their good intentions? Or hide their evil intentions?
To be sure, most of this order's membership in America are at the lower levels and not in on the conspiracy and actions to debauch America. They merely learn to blindly and unquestioningly obey orders from their superiors. The lower levels are commandedto do good deeds, yield selfless service and perform acts of philanthropy. As they rise in the ranks of the order, their service leads to dastardly plots and acts! Any high level member who betrays their oath "to follow and commit Satanical acts" in contravention of orders usually meets with mysterious death.
[H: I wish to interject a point at this juncture of the article in point. It will offer the "oath" of a 32nd degree "Mason". The above must be considered in order to understand HOW a man can go from a nice Christian-like community person into a dastardly organization. It is simply not done in abrupt stages and even, as with the Masonic Orders, it is not until you move BEYOND the 32nd degree of attainment that the REAL BIG STUFF hits the brain and it is too late for the allegiance is already implanted by the "system". You will note that higher than 32nd degrees are held only by HIGH-LEVEL POLITICIANS, JUDICIAL SYSTEM HEADS, ETC. IN OTHER WORDS, VERY IMPORTANT PERSONAGES--WHO ALSO CAN AND DO CONTROL THE MAJOR NUMBERS OF UNDERLINGS. I always appreciate that we can be offered these revelations from elsewhere so that ALL parties who are involved and might have been involved are protected and can remain in their silence. Ours is never to get MORE trouble upon unsuspecting heads--but LESS.]
This is the oath as administered to the elite arriving at an illuminized state of this secret order, that is, the 32nd degree and higher: "Brother thou has finished thy instruction as a chief of Freemasonry. Pronounce thy supreme oath. 'I swear to recognize no fatherland but that of the world. I swear to work hard everywhere and always to destroy frontiers, boundaries of all nations, of all industries, no less than of all families. I swear to dedicate my life to the triumph of progress and universal unity and I declare to profess the negation of God and the negation of the Soul.' And now Brother, that for thee, fatherland, religion and family have disappeared forever in the immensity of the work of Freemasonry, come to us and share with us the boundless authority, the infinite power that we hold over humanity. The only key to progress and happiness, the only rules of food are thy appetites and instincts."
THIS SECRET OATH IS THAT OF THE
32ND DEGREE MASONS
This is but the end product of a succession of oaths they take upon initiation in degrees that become progressively more Satanic or Luciferic. Masons are so secret that members are forbidden to write anything down--all must be committed to memory.
Women and wealth are the objects of their appetites and instincts. As they realistically control the machinery of "justice", they commit heinous crimes rather freely.
Of course the female equivalent of Freemasonry is the Order of the Eastern Star.
You can never trust a Freemason of the higher orders! Likewise, Freemasons only trust other Freemasons and are warned not to trust anyone who is not a Freemason! They are unswervingly committed to the satanic ideals of the order. Most who are nonMasons are regarded as inferior people--the scum of the earth.
- Know the Freemasons and other secret societies for what they are--evil organizations bent upon our subjugation and degradation of the bulk of the American people in mind, body and Spirit.
***
I suggest you QUESTION ANY AND EVERY "SECRET ORDER". I do not refer to simply "privacy" in relationships--I am talking about SECRET ORDERS. I do indeed mean any and EVERY RELIGIOUS ORDER who keeps its rituals and sanctuaries SECRET! WHAT IS ONLY PERFORMED IN THE DARK AND SECRET PLACES--ALWAYS HAS A REAL BIG REASON FOR DOING SO! If the organization cannot stand the light of day--ON ITS INTENT--it is hiding something from you-the-people.
Again, I do not refer to PRIVACY of personal participation or security of business operations--I AM TALKING ABOUT THE MORALISTIC, RITUALISTIC, INTENT OF ANYTHING. For instance--WHY doesn't your Government want you to know that they allowed the actual murder of POWs and KNEW IT? Because that is a "secret policy" they KNOW YOU WOULD NOT TOLERATE AS CITIZENS! This has nothing to do with anything validly security-worthy--it is a reach for power, money and World Control which covers the SECRET DEALINGS. You KNOW the difference--so debate is not worthy here regarding this message. Further, I do not tell you to "drop out" or anything else--I SIMPLY TELL YOU TO REALLY LOOK AT WHAT GOES ON (OR WENT ON AS YOU PARTICIPATED) AND ARGUMENT HAS NO VALUE AND NEITHER DOES DEBATE.
GEORGE GREEN ARGUMENT
ABOUT THE INSTITUTE
George Green continues to write to and complain to "everybody" about the Institute not opening all records to him and the public. Why? The Institute is a corporation based on valid corporate law! People participated with the guarantee of PRIVACY as should be the business relationships of EVERY BUSINESS IN THE WORLD. The INTENT, the operations, method of operations and the actual circumstances are PUBLIC TO EVERYONE AND CONTINUALLY RE-RUN PUBLICLY. IT IS BOTH UNLAWFUL AND IMMORAL TO BREAK THE "PRIVACY" AGREEMENTS OF INDIVIDUALS BY GIVING "THEIR" ENEMY THEIR PERSONAL RECORDS. There is no intent or workings to so much as bypass the IRS or any land-legislated laws. What was set up originally by Green to later "getcha" has fallen away as his dealings (and dealers) have been isolated.
So, in this area, what is "secret subterfuge"? The physically taking of $350,000 in gold coins which were sent to the Institute for use and diverting it SECRETLY to his own personal hiding place, moving it to another state (still in secrecy) and burying it in his backyard! THAT IS ILLEGAL and IMMORAL.
Now if you are a 32nd degree "Mason" or higher--you have literally taken an oath which includes "...negation of God and the negation of the Soul." You have also sworn under oath to "....destroy frontiers, boundaries of all nations, of all industries, no less than of all families." What is there to argue or debate? You didn't realize...? Ah, so be it! But, friend--be honest with self even if never ye be honest with another. It is as with the Jewish Kol Nidre. Most, by far, "attorneys" are both Jewish AND Masons. Where does this leave you-the-people? So are judges! We now have ones taking oath against all that stands representative (you thought) of YOU and in addition the Kol Nidre is the "Vow of all Vows" taken FIRST on Jewish Atonement annually. It is an oath that negates ALL OATHS and, under Talmudic law, a Jew is to lie, cheat and steal if necessary against the Goyim--which is everyone except a Jew! This also indicates that there is NO OATH OF OBLIGATION TO TRUTH IN A COURTROOM OR LEGAL BINDING FOR MORAL TRUTH IN ANY JEWISH. PRACTICING MASONIC ATTORNEY!
So, how are you further locked into being "had"? The courts will NOT ALLOW anyone but MEMBERS IN GOOD STANDING WITH THE BAR "CLUB" (not licensing board) TO COME INTO COURT AND BE COUNSEL. IT IS WORSE WITH A CORPORATION UNDER ATTACK--FOR NO ONE CAN REPRESENT THE CORPORATION OTHER THAN AN ATTORNEY!
Do you actually think GOD will sort this out for you? Prayer after prayer flows to GOD to fix it, etc. No, YOU allowed it or did it and YOU WILL FIX IT OR IT WILL REMAIN BROKEN UNTIL YOU ARE BROKEN! Ask God to show you the way, give you truth and THEN, ONLY THEN, can YOU cause the mess of broken tatters to be reconstructed upon the foundation of truth and honor. No "brothers" from space-cadet school are going to whisk you away and no angels are going to RAPTURE you away--you are going to confront that which is yours to confront--IN TRUTH--or you are going to pay dearly the price which will be exacted from you--UNTO THE NEW WORLD KINGS!
Good morning.
Tags, 상세검색
응답: PJ#098, ASCENSION OR NEVER-EVER LAND?
