PJ 99
CHAPTER 11
REC #4 HATONN
SUN., FEB. 17, 1991 3:40 P.M. YEAR 4 DAY 185
QUOTATION CONTINUED:

This "divine truth" which "a whole people venerate" of which "not a single letter of it is missing" and today "is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history" is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:

(Book) Sanhedrin, 55b: "A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person affliected with gonorrhea).' (emphasis in original text of Soncino Edition, Ed.)

(Book) Sanhedrin, 58b. "R. Eleazar said in R. Hanina's name; If a heathen had an unnatural connection with his wife, he incurs guilt; for it is written, and he shall cleave, which excludes unnatural intercourse (2). Raba objected: Is there anything for which a Jew is not punishable and a heathen is? (3). But Raba said thus: A heathen who violates his neighbor's wife is free from punishment. Why so?--(Scripture saith) To his wife, but not to his neighbor's; and he shall cleave, which excludes unnatural intercourse (4).

(footnotes) "(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving.

(3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew.

(4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction ‘to his wife but not to his neighbor's wife' is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse." (emphasis in original, Ed.)

(Book) Sanhedrin, 69a. "‘A man': from this I know the law only with respect to a man: whence do I know it of one aged nine years and a day who is capable of intercourse? From the verse, And ‘if a man'? (2)--He replied: Such a minor can produce semen, but cannot beget therewith; for it is like the seed of cereals less than a third grown (3)."

(footnotes) "(2) ‘And" (‘) indicates an extension of the law, and is here interpreted to include a minor aged nine years and a day.

(3) Such cereals contain seed, which if sown, however, will not grow.

(Book) Sanhedrin, 69b. "Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her,--Beth Shammai say, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declare her fit. . .All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.

(footnotes "(1) i.e., she becomes a harlot whom a priest may not marry (Lev. XXL,7.).

(2) So that if he was nine years and a day or more, Beth Hillel agree that she is invalidated from the priesthood; whilst if he was less than eight, Beth Shammai agree that she is not."

(Book) Kethuboth, 5b. "The question was asked: Is it allowed (15) to perform the first marital act on the Sabbath? (16). Is the blood (in the womb) stored up (17), or is it the result of a wound? (18).

(footnotes) "(15) Lit., ‘how is it'?
(16) When the intercourse could not take place before the Sabbath (Tosaf).

(17) And the intercourse would be allowed, since the blood flows out of its own accord, no wound having been made.

(18) Lit., or is it wounded? And the intercourse would be forbidden."

(Book) Kethuboth, 10a-10b. "Someone came before Rabban Gamaliel the son of Rabbi (and) said to him, ‘my master I have had intercourse (with my newly wedded wife) and I have not found any blood (7). She (the wife) said to him, ‘My master, I am still a virgin'. He (then) said to them: Bring me two handmaids, one (who is) a virgin and one who had intercourse with a man. They brought to him (two such handmaids), and he placed them on a cask of wine. (In the case of) the one who was no more a virgin its smell (1) went through (2), (in the case of) the virgin the smell did not go through (3). He (then) placed this one (the young wife) also (on a cask of wine), and its smell (4) did not go through. He (then) said to him: Go, be happy with thy bargain (7). But he should have examined her from the beginning (8)."

(footnotes) "(1) i.e., the smell of wine.

(2) One could smell the wine from the mouth (Rashi).

(3) One could not smell the wine from the mouth.

(4) i.e., the smell of wine.

(5) Rabban Gamaliel.

(6) To the husband.

(7) The test showed that the wife was a virgin.

(8) Why did he first have experiment with the two handmaids."

(Book) Kethuboth, 11a-11b. "Raba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7); but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as ‘as a girl who is injured by a piece of wood'".

(footnotes) "(5) Lit., ‘says'.

(6) Lit., ‘here', that is, less than three years old.

(7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years."

(Book) Kethuboth, 11a-11b. "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes here (as though she were) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."

(footnotes) "(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."

(Book) Hayorath, 4a. "We learnt: (THE LAW CONCERNING THE) MENSTRUANT OCCURS IN THE TORAH BUT IF A MAN HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A WOMAN THAT AWAITS A DAY CORRESPONDING TO A DAY HE IS EXEMPT. But why? Surely (the law concerning) a woman that awaits a day corresponding to a day is mentioned in the Scriptures: He hath made naked her fountain. But, surely it is written, (1)--They might rule that in the natural way even the first stage of contact is forbidden; and in an unnatural way, however, consummation of coition only is forbidden but the first stage of contact is permitted. If so, (the same might apply) even (to the case of) a menstruant also! (2)--The fact, however, is (that the ruling might have been permitted) (3) even in the natural way (4) alleging (that the prohibition of) the first stage (5) has reference to a menstruant woman only (6). And if you prefer I might say: The ruling may have been that a woman is not regarded as a zabah (7) except during the daytime because it is written, all the days of her issue (8)." (emphasis appears in Soncino Edition original, Ed.)

(footnotes) "(13) Lev. XV,28.

(14) Cf. supra p.17,n.10. Since she is thus Biblically considered unclean how could a court rule that one having intercourse with her is exempt?

(15) Lev.XX,18.

(1) Ibid.13. The plural "xxxx" (Hebrew characters, Ed.) implies natural, and unnatural intercourse.

(2) Why then was the case of ‘a woman who awaits a day corresponding to a day' given as an illustration when the case of a menstruant, already mentioned, would apply the same illustration.

(3) The first stage of contact.

(4) In the case of one ‘who awaits a day corresponding to a day'; only consummation of coition being forbidden in her case.

(5) Cf. Lev.XX,18.

(6) Thus permitting a forbidden act which the Sadducees do not admit.

(7) A woman who has an issue of blood not in the time of her menstruation, and is subject to certain laws of uncleaness and purification (Lev.XV,25ff).

(8) Lev.XV,26. Emphasis being laid on days."

(Book) Abodah Zarah, 36b-37a. "R. Naham b.Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it. . .From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.

(footnotes) "(2). Even though he suffered from no issue."

(Book) Sotah, 26b). "R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal?--Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissable, as it is said, Even both of these (9)--the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10). . .As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for and obscene act?" (emphasis in original text, Ed.)

(footnotes) "(4) She would not be prohibited to her husband for such an act.

(5) Farausag near Baghdad v.BB.(Sonc.Ed.)p.15,n.4. He is thus distinguished from the earlier Rabbi of that name.

(6) Deut.XXIII, 19.

(7) Money given by a man to a harlot to associate with his dog. Such an association is not legal adultery.

(8) If a man had a female slave who was a harlot and he exchanged her for an animal, it could be offered.

(9) Are an abomination unto the Lord ibid).

(10) Viz., the other two mentioned by the Rabbi.

(11) In Num.V,13. since the law applies to a man who is incapable.

(12) Lev.XVIII,22. The word for ‘lying' is in the plural and is explained as denoting also unnatural intercourse.

(13) With the other man, although there is no actual coition." (emphasis appears in original Soncino Edition, Ed.)

(Book) Yebamoth, 55b. "Raba said; For what purpose did the All-Merciful write ‘carnally' in connection with the designated bondmaid (9), a married woman (10), and a sotah (11)? This in connection with the designated bondmaid (is required) as has just been explained (12). That in connection with a married woman excludes intercourse with a relaxed membrum (13). This is a satisfactory interpretation in accordance with the view of him who maintains that if one cohabited with forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated (14); what, however, can be said, according to him who maintains (that for such an act one is) guilty?--The exclusion is rather that of intercourse with a dead woman (15). Since it might have been assumed that, as (a wife), even after her death, is described as his kin (16), one should be guilty for (intercourse with) her (as for that) with a married woman, hence we are taught (that one is exonerated).

(footnotes) (9)Lev.XIX,20.

(10) Ibid.XVIII,20.

(11) Num.V,13.

(12) Supra 55a.

(13) Since no fertilization can possibly occur.

(14) Shebu.,18a,Sanh.55a.

(15) Even though she dies as a married woman.

(16) In Lev.XXI,2. where the text enumerates the dead relatives for whom a priest may defile himself. As was explained, supra 22b, his kin refers to one's wife." (emphasis in Soncino Edition original, Ed.)

(Book) Yebamoth, 103a-103b. "When the serpent copulated with Eve (14) he infused her (15) with lust. The lust of the Israelites who stood at Mount Sinai (16) came to an end, the lust of idolators who did not stand at Mount Sinai did not come to an end."

(footnotes) "(14) In the garden of Eden, according to tradition.

(15) i.e., the human species.

(16) And experienced the purifying influence of divine Revelation."

(Book) Yebamoth, 63a. "R. Eleazar further stated: What is meant by the Scriptural text, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh (5)? This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve.

(footnotes) "(5) Gen.II,23. emphasis on This is now." (emphasis appears in original Soncino Edition, Ed.)

(Book) Yebamoth, 60b. "As R. Joshua b. Levi related: ‘There was a certain town in the Land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Ramanos who conducted an enquiry and found it in the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day (14), and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest (15)."

(footnotes) "(13) A proselyte under the age of three years and one day may be married by a priest.
(14) And was married to a priest.

(15) i.e., permitted to continue to live with her husband."

P(Book) Yebamoth, 59b. "R. Shimi b. Hiyya stated: A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest (4). Likewise it was taught: A woman who had intercourse with that which is no human being (5), though she is in consequence subject to the penalty of stoning (6), is nevertheless permitted to marry a priest (7).

(footnotes) "(4) Even a High Priest. The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidently injured hymen as a disqualification does not so regard such an intercourse either.

(5) A beast.

(6) If the offense was committed in the presence of witnesses after due warning.

(7) In the absence of witnesses and warning."

(Book) Yebamoth, 12b. "R. Bebai recited before R. Naham: Three (catagories of) women may (7) use an absorbent (8) in their marital intercourse (9), a minor, a pregnant woman and a nursing woman. The minor (10) because (otherwise) she might (11) become pregnant, and as a result (11) might die. . .And what is the age of such a minor? (14). From the age of eleven years and one day until the age of twelve years and one day. One who is under (15), or over this age (16) must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner."

(footnotes "(7) (So Rashi.R.Tam: Should use, v.Tosaf s.v .)

(8) Hackled wool or flax.

(9) To prevent conception.

(10) May use an absorbent.

(11) Lit., ‘perhaps'.

(14) Who is capable of conception but exposed thereby to the danger of death.

(15) When no conception is possible.

(16) when pregnancy involves no fatal consequences."

(Book) Yebamoth, 59b. "When R.Dimi came (8) he related; It once happened at Haitalu (9) that while a young woman was sweeping the floor (10) a village dog (11) covered her from the rear (12) and Rabbi permitted her to marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest.

(footnotes) "(8) From Palestine to Babylon.

(9) (Babylonian form for Aitulu, modern Airterun N.W. of Kadesh, v.S. Kelin, Beitrage,p.47).

(10) Lit., ‘house'.

(11) Or ‘big hunting dog' (Rashi), ‘ferocious dog' (Jast.), ‘small wild dog' (Aruk).

(12) A case of unnatural intercourse.

(Hatonn: Is any of this beginning to be a bit outlandish to any of you? Dogs? "A village ‘dog' covered her from the rear.."? Is this not the most confusing bunch of nonsense you have ever seen? Does it cross anyone's mind that you might be dealing with rules set up by ones totally unfamiliar with much of anything suitable to behavior by Earth Human? Oh yes, you have bestiality but hardly anything so allowable as "trivial" in being covered from the rear by a dog--while sweeping the floor yet? Would you believe such a tale if anyone walked up to you and told you this--today? Does anyone begin to relate anything in these outlandish displays of obscenities with what you have heard of the activities of "little gray aliens"?) To continue:

(Book) Kethuboth, 6b. "Said he to him: Not like those Babylonians who are not skilled in moving aside (7), but there are some who are skilled in moving aside (8). If so, why (give the reason of) ‘anxious'?(10)--For one who is not skilled. (Then) let them say: One who is skilled is allowed (to perform the first intercourse on Sabbath), one who is not skilled is forbidden?--Most (people) are skilled (11). Said Raba the son of R. Hanan to Abaye: If this were so, then why (have) groomsmen (12) why (have) a sheet?(13)--He (Abaye) said to him: There (the groomsmen and the sheet are necessary) perhaps he will see and destroy (the tokens of her virginity) (14).

(footnotes) "(7) i.e., having intercourse with a virgin without causing a bleeding.

Thus no blood need come out, and ‘Let his head be cut off and let him not die!' does not apply.

(9) If the bridegroom is skilled in "moving sideways'.

(10) He need not be anxious about the intercourse and should not be free from reading Shema' on account of such anxiety.

(11) Therefor the principle regarding ‘Let his head be cut off and let him not die!' does not, as a rule, apply.

(12) The groomsmen testify in case of need to the virginity of the bride. V. infra 12a. If the bridegroom will act in a manner that will cause no bleeding, the groomsmen will not be able to testify on the question of virginity.

(13) To provide evidence of the virginity of the bride. Cf.Deut.XXII,17.

(14) It may happen that he will act in the normal manner and cause bleeding but he will destroy the tokens and maintain that the bride was not a virgin; for this reason the above mentioned provisions are necessary. Where however he moved aside and made a false charge as to her virginity, the bride can plead that she is still a virgin (Rashi)."

After reading these verbatim quotations from the countless other similar quotations which you will find in the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud in the English language are you of the opinion, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that the Talmud was the "sort of book" from which Jesus "drew the teachings which enable him to revolutionize the world" on "moral and religious subjects"? You have read here verbatim quotations and official footnotes on a few of the many other subjects covered by the "63 books" of the Talmud. When you read them you must be prepared for a shock. I am surprised that the United States Post Office does not bar the Talmud from the mails. I hesitated to quote them in this letter.

(Hatonn: I also hesitated to quote them herein because the next barrage of accusations and denouncing will pile upon my people--but truth is truth and if you ones will not take time to look it up for self then hope for your journey is slim indeed. I MOST CERTAINLY DO NOT EXPECT YOU TO FIND TRUTH BY SIMPLY ASKING A NICE RABBI OR CLERGYMAN. I would like, herein, to remind you of something regarding these Zionists; Your own Jerry Falwell stood forth as leader of your "Moral Majority" and stated before the world: "I am proud to say that I am a Zionist!" Does it mean that he KNEW all these things of heinous content? No, he is simply another of the ignorant and intentionally uninformed!)

In support of the contention by the top echelon among the outstanding authorities on this phase of the present status of the Talmud, further proof of the wide influence exerted by the Talmud upon the so-called or self-styled "Jews" is supplied by Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer's article "What is a Jew" in the June 17, 1952 issue of Look Magazine. Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer's article contains a lovely picture of a smiling man seated in a chair with a large opened book upon his lap. Seated around him on the floor are about a dozen smiling men and women. They are paying close attention to the smiling man in the chair with the opened book upon his lap. He is reading to the persons on the floor. He emphasizes what he is reading by gestures with one of his hands. Beneath this photograph of the group is the following explanation:

"ADULTS STUDY ANCIENT WRITINGS, TOO. RABBI IN THIS PICTURE, SEATED IN CHAIR, LEADS GROUP DISCUSSION OF TALMUD BEFORE EVENING PRAYER." (emphasis supplied)

This picture and explanation indicate the extent the Talmud is the daily diet of so-called or self-styled "Jews" in this day and age. The Talmud is first taught to children of so-called or self-styled "Jews" as soon as they are able to read. Just as the Talmud is the "textbook by which rabbis are trained" so is the Talmud also the textbook by which the rank-and-file of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" are "trained" to think from their earliest age. In the translation of the Talmud with its texts edited, corrected and formulated by the eminent Michael Rodkinson, Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise, on page XI, it states:

"THE MODERN JEW IS THE PRODUCT OF THE TALMUD". (emphasis supplied)

To the average Christian the word "Talmud" is just another word associated by them with the form of religious worship practised in their synagogues by so-called or self-styled "Jews". Many Christians have never heard of the Talmud. Very few Christians are informed on the contents of the Talmud. Some may believe the Talmud to be an integral part of the religious worship known to them as "Judaism". It suggests a sort of bible or religious text book. It is classed as a spiritual manual. But otherwise few if any Christian has an understanding of the contents of the Talmud and what it means in the daily lives of so-called or self-styled "Jews". As an illustration, my dear Dr. Goldstein, how many Christians have any conception of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer recited in synagogues on the Day of Atonement?

(Hatonn: For you readers of AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL, allow me to point out that the original release of this information was titled TALMUD JMMANUEL. I think it is now evident as to WHY Sananda chose to relabel it. There is now a new copy of the book translated by Billy Meier--again called the TALMUD IMMANUEL. I suggest you be most careful in the reading thereof for it is printed solely for the monetary value and these ones who are reproducing the work have done everything they could do to STOP our publishing of the truth. "Talmud" is a perfectly good word but as is always the case with the great deceiver, you do not get goodness and light--but lies and deceit. Therefore, God will refrain from utilizing terms which will mislead you who are efforting to find Truth. A word placed so blatantly upon the cover indicates misuse of the intent if it is there to connote TRUTH!)

In Volume VIII of the Jewish Encyclopedia on page 539 found in the Library of Congress, the New York Public Library and libraries of all leading cities, will be found the official translation into English of the prayer known as the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer. It is the prologue of the Day of Atonement services in the synagogues. It is recited three times by the standing congregation in concert with chanting rabbis at the altar. After the recital of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer the Day of Atonement religious ceremonies follow immediately. The Day of Atonement religious observances are the highest holy days of so-called or self-styled "Jews" and are celebrated as such throughout the world. The official translation into English of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer follows:

"ALL VOWS, OBLIGATIONS, OATHS, ANATHEMAS, whether called ‘konam', ‘konas', or by any other name, WHICH WE MAY VOW, OR SWEAR, OR PLEDGE, OR WHEREBY WE MAY BE BOUND, FROM THIS DAY OF ATONEMENT UNTO THE NEXT, (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. MAY THEY BE DEEMED ABSOLVED, FORGIVEN, ANNULLED, AND VOID AND MADE OF NO EFFECT; THEY SHALL NOT BIND US NOR HAVE POWER OVER US. THE VOWS SHALL NOT BE RECKONED VOWS; THE OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBLIGATORY; NOR THE OATHS BE OATHS." (emphasis supplied).

(Hatonn: Go right back now and REALLY READ THAT PRAYER FOR YOU DID NOT PICK UP THE POINT THE FIRST TIME!)

The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the "Kol Nidre (All Vows) prayer are referred to in the Talmud in the Book of Nedarim, 23a-23b as follows:

(Book) "And he who desires that NONE OF HIS VOWS MADE DURING THE YEAR SHALL BE VALID, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, ‘EVERY VOW WHICH I MAY MAKE IN THE FUTURE SHALL BE NULL (1). (HIS VOWS ARE THEN INVALID,) PROVIDING THAT HE REMEMBERS THIS AT THE TIME OF THE VOW." (emphasis in original and supplied, Ed.)

(footnotes) "(1) This may have provided a support for the custom of reciting Kol Nidre (a formula for dispensation of vows) prior to the Evening Service of the Day of Atonement (Ran). . .Though the beginning of the year (New Year) is mentioned here, the Day of Atonement was probably chosen on account of its great solemnity. But Kol Nidre as part of the ritual IS LATER THAN THE TALMUD, and, as seen from the following statement of R. Huna b. Hinene, THE LAW OF REVOCATION IN ADVANCE WAS NOT MADE PUBLIC. (emphasis supplied and in original text,Ed.)

The greatest study of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer was made by the eminent psycho-analyst Professor Theodor Reik, the celebrated pupil of the famous Dr. Sigmund Freud. The analysis of the historic, religious and psychological background of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer by Professor Reik presents the Talmud in its true perspective. This important study is contained in Professor Reik's "The Ritual, Psyco-Analytical Studies". In the chapter on the Talmud, on page 168, Professor Reik states:

"THE TEXT WAS TO THE EFFECT THAT ALL OATHS WHICH BELIEVERS TAKE BETWEEN ONE DAY OF ATONEMENT AND THE NEXT DAY OF ATONEMENT ARE DECLARED INVALID." (emphasis supplied)

Before explaining to you how the present wording of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer was introduced into the Day of Atonement synagogue ceremonies, my dear Dr. Goldstein, I would like to quote a passage to you from the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms the fact that the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer has no spiritual value as might be believed because it is recited in synagogues on the Day of Atonement as the prologue of the religious ceremonies which follow it. The secular significance of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer is indicated forcefully by the analysis in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. In Volume VI, on page 441, it states:

"The Kol Nidre HAS NOTHING WHATEVER TO DO WITH THE ACTUAL IDEA OF THE DAY OF ATONEMENT. . .it attained to extraordinary solemnity and popularity by reason of the fact that it was THE FIRST PRAYER RECITED ON THIS HOLIEST OF DAYS."

My dear Dr. Goldstein, prepare for the shock of your life. Compelled by what you have now read here about the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer you must be shocked to learn that many Christian churches actually "pealed their bells" on the Day of Atonement in celebration of that holy day for so-called or self-styled "Jews". How stupid can the Christian clergy get? From what I have learned after a cursory inquiry I am unable to say whether it was a case of stupidity or cupidity. With what you already know, together with what you will additionally know before you finish this letter, you will be able to judge for yourself whether it was stupidity or cupidity. There is not one single fact in this entire letter which every graduate of a theological seminary did not have the opportunity to learn.

The following news item was featured in the New York World Telegram on October 7th only a few days ago. Under a prominent headline "JEWISH HOLIDAYS TO END AT SUNDOWN" the New York World Telegram gave great prominence to the following story:

"Synagogues and temples throughout the city were crowded yesterday as the 24 hour fast began. Dr. Norman Salit, head of the Synagogue Council of America, representing the three major Jewish bodies, had called on other faiths TO JOIN THE FAST...Cutting across religious lines, MANY PROTESTANT CHURCHES IN THE CITY PEALED THEIR BELLS LAST NIGHT TO SOUND THE KOL NIDRE, TRADITIONAL MELODY USED AT THE START OF YOM KIPPUR. THE GESTURE OF GOOD-WILL WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANHATTAN OFFICE OF THE PROTESTANT COUNCIL." (emphasis supplied)

That just about "tops" anything I have ever had come to my attention revealing the ignorance and indifference of the Christian clergy to the hazards today facing the Christian faith. From my personal contacts with the Manhattan Office of the Protestant Council in the recent past I hold out very little hope for any constructive contribution they can make to the common defense of the Christian faith against its dedicated enemies. In each instance they buckled under the "pressure" exerted upon them by the "contacts" for so-called or self-styled "Jews". If it was not so tragic it would be comic. It was a joke indeed but the joke was on the Christian clergy. Ye Gods! "Many" Christian churches "pealed their bells", as the Protestant Council reports the event, "TO SOUND THE KOL NIDRE, TRADITIONAL MELODY USED AT THE START OF YOM KIPPUR". Just where does betrayal of a trust and breach of faith begin?

The present wording of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer dates from the 11th century. A political reversal in eastern Europe compelled the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe to adopt the present wording of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer. That story involves the history of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe. Before relating here as briefly as possible the history of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" of eastern Europe I would like to quote here another short passage from the Jewish Encyclopedia in Volume VII, on page 540, states:

"AN IMPORTANT ALTERATION IN THE WORDING of the ‘Kol Nidre' was made by Rashi's son-in-law, Meir ben Samuel, WHO CHANGED THE ORIGINAL PHRASE ‘FROM THE LAST DAY OF ATONEMENT TO THIS ONE' to ‘FROM THIS DAY OF ATONEMENT UNTIL THE NEXT'". (emphasis supplied)

* * * * * * * *
We will herein stop quoting and for that matter, stop the writing at this point for this sitting. Thank you for the long hours of service, Dharma. I ask you to be particularly attuned to my call for you are in danger and hence is why we had to disengage your prior computer. We will simply have to work our way through the next few days of bringing forth this information for as you might well note--THE EVIL BROTHERHOOD DOES NOT WANT IT BROUGHT FORTH! When human realizes how he has been duped he shall rise up and stop this madness. Ah, and may it be "in time".

Hatonn to stand-by. I shall keep the shielding in place but I must ask that you remain within my commands lest you be damaged. The Truth is going to come forth now and it has confirmation and credentials of proof--just as you were told at onset by "The Command"--"that you would be given credentials and credibility from that which is the Silver Clouds and would be forthcoming from Earth-place." And so it shall be put to print that Man may see how sadly he has been made the dupe.

Good evening. God grants his protection of his servants. Salu.


CHAPTER 12
"TREASURYGATE" MAIL FAX
UPDATE JUNE 20-26, 1994
LEGAL BRIEFING-U.S.
COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
CASE NO. 93 518C:
Again there has been no official change in the status of the case but some very interesting information has come to me regarding the upcoming status of the case. From a very informed source I was told on 6-17-94 that the judge in the C of C has been informed to shelve the case and take no action. Further, action on the case would be taken by the court after a settlement was reached between the defendants and "TREASURYGATE". Additionally, the time frame for the court's reaction to our motion to dismiss should be shortly after 7-4-94. That means that a settlement on the case would have to be accomplished before or by 7-4-94. Now I don't want to identify this source but I have utmost confidence in him and he has never misled me or lied to me. Why would this information be true? Consider the following:

1. Mohammed told me about two months ago that the C of C judge had been told to not make a decision.

2. We are going on twelve weeks waiting on the C of C to make a decision after being shoved hard by the court to bring our show cause motion to the court within a very short time frame. It is obvious that "they" needed some time to deal with this.

3. Today the C of C clerk will tell you that no paperwork will come out of the court on the "BUCKLEY TRANSACTION" for at least a month.

4. All of my attorneys and many consulting attorneys find it legally confusing that this delay has gone on as long as it has. They all, however, understand that delays are necessary when settlements are at hand.

What in the world might have been a major cause to stop the court from making a decision at the of March 1994? Pretty simple really and in double barrel form. First, my 254 page affidavit spent a great deal of time and space affirming my contacts, conversations, presenting paperwork etc. with Mohammed and Doug Hughes (CIA). From these contacts which started in October of 1992, came the entrance of Dr. L. K. MacFarlane, former CIA, NSA and other covert posts for over 40 years. Mohammed and MacFarlane were close friends for over 20 years. Hughes tried to have me killed after I exposed him but Mohammed stopped him. When the powers in DC saw this, they began to delay. Second, came Dr. Ronald Jackson. You all know about Ronn. His help has been quite unique and well reported in both the CONTACT and in these updates. In summary, I don't blame the court for stalling. With the problems they face, I would stall too.

PRIVATE SITUATION/MOHAMMED
MR. IMPORTANT:
On 6-10-94 Mohammed flew into Amarillo, Texas. I finally got rid of him on the morning of 6-17-94. On 6-12-94 Mohammed, his associate and I flew to Salt Lake City to meet with Mr. Important. Our mission was to force the private situation open or closed by retrieving the three Japanese certificates that I had provided to Mr. Important. The meeting at the airport was caustic. Mr. Important brought an executive assistant with him. He reluctantly gave me the three certificates but was short 14 transfer sheets and would not release the Chain of Title letter provided to him by my attorney. Also he would not return the laser copies of the three Swiss certificates. I got pretty angry and really got in his face. His assistant said I was being rude. I told her that I was from Texas and she hadn't seen rude yet and also told her to butt out. Mr. Important got visibly nervous--hands shaking. I let Mohammed take over as I excused myself to go to the bathroom and settle down. Mr. Important wanted to know what happened. Mohammed told him something had happened and we would tell him after we got the balance of the paperwork back. Our plane was due to leave in less than one hour. We were already on the plane when a flight attendant ran on asking fore Mr. Buckley and gave me the package from Mr. Important. The package was still short four transfer sheets and Swiss certificate lasers. On 6-14-94 (see enclosure) we demanded the balance of the paperwork back. At that point Mr. Important became friendly again and by 6-16-94 (see enclosure) Mr. Important was back in the saddle. As of this date, he has officially confirmed each and every outstanding certificate and will have the first one resolved in about one week. After the first one is completed the balance will successfully fall like dominos. I know exactly how this will work and the relative timeframes but I am not at liberty to divulge those facts at this time. Now let's ask a few questions and make a few statements:

1. Why did Mr. Important start stalling some 2-3 weeds ago?
2. Why did he get so nervous in SLC, Utah on 6-12-94?
3. Why did Mohammed come to spend an entire week with me?
4. Why did Mr. Important tell my attorney two weeks ago that this would be resolved between 7-1-94 and 7-15-94?
5. Why did he get back on track so quickly after a very harsh confrontation with me both in person and on the phone? This is not a man who will take that kind of abuse and continue to do business with the abuser. The reason I call him Mr. Important is because he is important, internationally well known and very powerful.
6. This is the same man who ask me in early June how much I wanted ($) to release all the certificates and drop the legal action.
7. This is the same man who told me back in May that he would settle the issue on the USFRB certificates at the same time he settled the Japanese and Swiss certificates.
8. This is the same man whose associates include the former president and chairman of Credit Suisse Bank, Gen. Van Lee, and others I don't want to identify at this time.
9. This is the same man who is afraid of the ghost of Dr. L. K. MacFarlane and his living associates including Mohammed.
10. This is the man who told Mohammed in late March 1994 that he would not have gotten involved if it were not for Mohammed and Dr. MacFarlane.

So the big question at this time is not whether these certificates will be resolved but exactly when. The secondary question is Mr. Important representing the actual settlement of the legal action from an unofficial position. The answer will probably be very clear by about 7-1-94.

FLASH (6-24-94): Mohammed just called to inform me that we have been invited to New York early next week to discuss the first certificate and all subsequent certificates. Looks like they are truly getting ready. By the way, we're not going until we have an official confirmation of funds first.

CONVERSATION WITH A GOOD FRIEND:
On June 17, 1994, after I had gotten rid of Mohammed that morning I received a telephone call at home (remember very few know my home number and I want to keep it that way) from a very important source. The following is a brief list of the points of that conversation:

1. The settlement agreement(s) are made.
2. 1.4 million tons of gold will back the Treasury and not all of it is in yet.
3. Gold will go to $1200 per ounce (no timing). Heavy holders will be prone to sell and individuals will be encouraged to get into the market to drive the price up in the free market.
4. US will be economically stable when the $1200 price is reached.
5. German dollar will be in trouble by December 1994 and German debt will exceed US by that time.
6. British pound will be frozen to protect UK.
8. Chicago Board of Trade (commodities market) will be in deep trouble and could be nationalized.
9. FRB will be nationalized.
10. I won't get everything I am due contractually on the USFRB certificates but it will be substantial.
11. "They" will address everything (on the legal action, etc.) almost immediately.
12. I'm asked to be reasonable when I negotiate with "them".
13. Other certificates and "notes" will be canceled after the settlement, gold, new dollar, etc.
14. Be patient and hold on to other certificates until I'm paid.
15. "They" will try to save face.
16. When the country finds out what's happened a politician won't be worth a tinker's dam.
17. C of C judge will not make any decision until we post a motion to dismiss after the settlement. Settlement will be between the government and Buckley.

Prior to this conversation Mohammed told me that there will be two settlements: Government and Private.

Would it be preferable to the Japanese banks to pay in yen (which they can print just like the FED prints greenbacks), or would it be preferable for them to issue lines of credit? I wonder if the Japanese are holding great amounts of US dollars. The Japanese central bank along with over 10 other central banks just acquired many billions of US dollars to prevent the dollar from weakening even more. At this point "they" have enough dollars on hand to "pay"/settle without causing a market eruption. We, however may not accept the FRB dollars. Gold would be better and advisable.

POINTS OF INTEREST:
German money supply rose 46% between 1989-93. Real investment in Germany declined by 4%. The reputation of the Deutschemark as a hard currency is worrisome for investors.

A reform of the international monetary system is coming with a plan to be revealed in JULY 1994. This plan is supposed to end the drastic exchange rates fluctuations like the current strong yen/weak dollar rates. The plan would center on three currencies; Dollar, Yen, and Deutschemark.

The weak US dollar has been bolstered by the FED and more importantly the foreign official institutions (central banks). These central bands have been buying massive amounts of dollars. Political instability breeds currency turmoil and some of these institutions are tired of holding up the US welfare state and have shown that by dumping a small amount of US debt. If there is a growing trend toward dollar disfavor, then a domestic currency crisis could prevail. You know what happens here. Short interest rates move up, yield curve inverts, bond prices fall, stocks slump, U.S. Government can't sell its debt paper, interest on the budget deficit goes up greatly and the exchange reserves are blown out. What could change all of this? A new U.S. dollar eventually backed by gold, then a stable gold price of $1200. On 6/25/94 Jack Kemp, former Sec. HUD and current presidential candidate stated on the Evans & Novak show that he favored going back to the gold standard as did Malcolm S. Forbes Jr., Editor in Chief of FORBES of 6/6/94. As you know, Ronn Jackson said it first.

TOMMY L. BUCKLEY ON
RONN JACKSON AND THE CONTACT:
I didn't know anything about Ronn until a little over two months ago. Ronn's first contact to us was through my attorney and the communication has been steady since. We owe that initial contact to Charles & Mary from N.C. Ronn has done nothing but assist us. I have gone back into the CONTACT articles written by Rick Martin and tried to read everything Rick and Ronn have posted. I'll tell all of you exactly how I feel about Ronn. After settlement and at the time of distribution, I intend to have everything I can accumulate that Ronn & CONTACT have done on Ronn along with anything else Ronn can provide to me and I will provide all of this data to all of GreenLight. This deep background material is critical for all of GreenLight and for the still free (technical) citizens of this country. If you will listen to Ronn, he will set your minds free to understand what's really happened in our country and others. There is an obligation on GreenLight as a whole to continue to work after the coming settlement/resolution is complete on "TREASURYGATE". I will be closely around to make sure that GreenLight will do just that.

In fact I have a few tricks up my sleeve to insure that GreenLight will work. Apathy is not a word or attitude that I will tolerate as it relates to GreenLight and the eventual state of this union. Additionally, I will be there in virtually any capacity Ronn needs to assist him. There has been nothing written or stated by Ronn that is untrue. He desires to bring the patriot movement together under a real leader and the whole truth. As he and I have discussed, that won't be easy but it must be done. THEY must be stopped and will be stopped by women and men of courage and intelligence, not to mention the real truth. Also, there has been virtually nothing that Ronn has written or talked about that I haven't been able to confirm or knew about already. Yes, Ronn is in prison and has been for 3 1/2 years for a technical securities violation. Prison has also been the safest place for him until now. Ronn has been a rascal in the past but his head and heart are exactly in the right spot. He has been through the abyss and came out to help his fellowman. His ability to help would probably have been limited without his dark side experiences. I know, I've been in somewhat the same type of situations in the past. None of us are perfect and none of us will always be good. RONN, YOU ARE ONE HELL OF A MAN!

As far as the CONTACT is concerned. The first time I ever read it was shortly before I filed the legal action in February 1993. The CONTACT was the first newspaper to ever do a story on "TREASURYGATE" and the only paper to write exactly what I sent them. Rick Martin is a very unique person and obviously a seeker of the truth. For those of you who read the CONTACT, you already know not to allow your pre-conceived ideas placed in your head by a controlled education system and press to keep you from understanding and investigating the facts and truth. For those of you who don't read the CONTACT, subscribe: CONTACT, INC. P.O. BOX 27800 LAS VEGAS, NV 89126--1-800-800-5565.

THE RONN JACKSON LETTERS: Most of you also know that Ronn asked me about two weeks ago to cause as many letters as possible to be sent to Gov. Bob Miller of Nevada urging Ronn's early release from prison. To date we have received almost 9000 copies [as of 6/28/94 25,000] copies of those letters. We are sending a select group (about 3000) to the CONTACT to the attention of Rick Martin this week. We here at "TREASURYGATE" ask you all to keep those letters going to the governor. We wish to thank each of you in GreenLight who have caused your friends, neighbors and family (even though they weren't in GreenLight) to write these letters for Ronn.

Finally, regardless who tells us what, we must keep working, praying and doing. No mercy for the bad guys. You are a powerful force and the day you understand that along with the day you attain the understanding of the real facts and truth is the beginning of the day that we all begin the first day of the rest of our successful lives free of silly worry and full of pure freedom and faith.

One of the following events will take place soon:

1. Nothing or negative decision from the C of C
2. Official settlement of the legal action
3. Private resolution of other certificates
4. Combination of #2 and #3
We are totally prepared for one or all of the above. LOVE YOU.

Sincerely,

Tommy "TREASURYGATE" Buckley

HOT LINES: 1-806-372-4301, 1-806-356-6795 (program code 123), 1-900-388-4301