PJ 96
CHAPTER 3
REC #1 HATONN

SUN., MAY 22, 1994 9:41 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 279

SUN., MAY 22, 1994

SOMEBODY ELSE, PLEASE
As we move along with some very exciting, but far-out, revela­tions about "how it is", our mission, your mission, their mis­sion, and nobody's mission--I am amazed that you continually miss the point.

As each thing unfolds and you realize that you ARE GIVEN HELP--I watch you back off and say, "Thank goodness, there is somebody to change these things." Worse, however, you con­jure and fiddle and do and redo, that which needs NO "re"doing in your haste to just "do something."

There is beginning to be a very large spread "notice taking" and in the sleepiness of the moment and the total misunderstanding of God, help, elders, what to do, how to do it, etc., watch as you go hither and yon tagging behind this one or that one who is willing to take the lead. Why do you blindly follow ANYONE?

I must repeat: First, you must discern WHAT IS WRONG AND WHAT NEEDS FIXING, THEN DETERMINE THE BEST WAY TO FIX IT AND LASTLY, FIX IT! So, along come ones with this way or that way--WHEN THE ORIGINAL WOULD DO FAR, FAR BETTER! The "ideas" in "newness" may well be grand but the facts are that you have never been without the "what's wrong", the how to fix it--only missing was the actual fix it as ones who broke it continue to take, break and enslave.

If I told you, Americans, that the Founding Fathers are RIGHT HERE--AGAIN, to show you the way--AGAIN! What would you say? Would you just go back to sleep and turn to your earthy self-indulgent focus and "leave it to them"--AGAIN? I don't think so, good friends. I really don't think so. Why? Be­cause they won't do it FOR YOU.

REWRITING
Why do you spend hours and days, weeks and months--and on into infinity REWRITING that which OFFERED the answers--IF MAN WOULD SIMPLY ACT ACCORDING TO THE RULES, REGULATIONS, LAWS AND GUIDELINES? YOU DO NOT NEED MORE--YOU NEED THE ONES YOU HAD FOR THEY WERE BASED ON THE NATURAL LAWS OF GOD, NATURE AND JUST FAIRNESS. The CONSTITUTION was ENOUGH. The reasons that it was enough are am­ply covered, errors of intent were offered and justness was re­turned where it was totally missing in such manner that, had you continued to USE the guidebook, you would have rectified er­rors. For instance, had you HONORED and adhered to the LAWS, there would have been NO FACES DEFACING THE BLACK HILLS OF SOUTH DAKOTA. You broke all the laws and, then, put men into high places to continue to break, misuse, abuse and grab, for their own greed, the very life-blood of your selves and your nation. No, brothers, you do not need MORE--you need to take that which WAS and USE IT.

From time to time ones efforting to structure a workable method of "recovery" will quote from this one or that one of the Founding Fathers or politicians, or great speakers--or stupid speakers--but the facts are, you OVERLOOK THE asset which will give you back your freedom. However, if you do not take up your TRUTH soon, the New Order will have ripped it from your sleeping arms and it will be GONE.

I am going to again utilize another's summary of "where you are." and then, readers, patriots and would-be "reclaimers" of your historical heritage--we are going to take up the CON­STITUTION. I find that not one of you can recite correctly, the Constitutional document--AND INTERPRET IT CORRECTLY. I watch as you ponder, toss aside, argue, critically debate, relate, compare and despair while all the interim--the points and authority ARE ALREADY LAID FORTH FOR YOU! We are going to take up that document AND the reasoning behind, around and integrated with truth, intent and abundant wisdom, that which was offered BY THE PERSONS IN POINT AT THE TIME IN POINT. THEY HAVE NEVER LEFT YOU AND NEVER WAS THE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM YOU--YOU MOVED IN AN OPPOSING DIRECTION TO THE MARCH OF SATAN'S DRUMMERS. We are going to hit hard, long and tediously, the Constitution AND the Federalist Papers. [See article on p. 46 for beginning of series] Unfortu­nately, most of you will NOT even know, at this point, of that which I speak. Well, get ready for some shock-a-roos, readers, the Founding Fathers in great Wisdom are RETURNED--WITH THE ANSWERS-- IF--YOU WILL BUT ATTEND AND ACT. At this point the Constitution is not GONE somewhere--it has simply been buried by the political New World Order. BUT SOON IT, IN FACT, WILL BE LOST TO YOU AND WHEN IT IS SO, SO SHALL YOU BE LOST TO FREEDOM.

I am not going into differences in Space Brethren or energy presence--nothing GOES anywhere, the perceptions alone change. But, NO, we of the brother tribes are NOT all from the same experience or locations as you perceive location and source. We too are growing and learning and responding as we, too, are taught and trained. You move in a spiral of energy--without time or space--only perception. However, in manifes­tation into dimensional format of human physical, you are pre­sented with the perception and DIMENSION of various "directions" of expression. "YOU" don't go anywhere and it is not time-consuming as the tick-tock of a clock to be there. However, you present sequence after sequence of experience as you ebb and flow in your pulsing universe. Pulsing? Waves? Yes, but not as you perceive it for all is a spiraling motion in perceived "action" or "motion" itself. But it is more as a "piston" which moves neither right nor left but only up and down--each stroke of this magnificent engine (motor) of mani­festation responding to YOUR thought and direction.

Do you need "leaders"? Yes, because you have forgotten that YOU ARE THE LEADER and it is your responsibility to bring your brothers (self) into freedom and honor. Will there be lead­ers? Yes, the SAME ONES WHO SERVED IN THE FIRST, INSTANCE--along with ones who will fill those roles. I sug­gest, however, that the thing you do now is to STOP, LOOK AND LISTEN--CAREFULLY. To do "something" is not al­ways better than simply doing nothing. WHY NOT DO IT RIGHT? ALL THE ARGUMENTS AND ANSWERS FOR RECOVERY OF YOUR NATION--ARE RIGHT THERE IN, ACTUALLY, THE FEDERALIST PAPERS AS REGARDS THE CONSTITUTION. AND, WE SHALL OFFER THEM FOR YOUR ATTENTION [ see p. 46 for beginning of this presentation].

But what of the Blacks? Indians? and on and on?? What about them? I am not saying much of ANYTHING was right and certainly ACTIONS were WRONG. However, THE WRONG­NESS OF THE ACTIONS WAS NOT OFFERED AS PER­MISSION IN THE BLESSED DOCUMENT. I AM GOING TO REPEAT SOMETHING TO YOU PEOPLE: THIS IS A BLESSED NATION, YOU HAVE A BLESSED FLAG AND YOU HAVE ALL BUT DESTROYED IT. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE PLACE CHOSEN FOR GOD TO TAKE HIS STAND AND SEE IF THERE BE ANY AMONG YOU WORTHY OF THE TRIP HOME WITH HIM!

Is it harder now than "then"? NO--you have more tools with which to work to reclaim TODAY than ever in the history of nations. Those errors and thefts of, say, the Native American's lands CAN BE RECTIFIED and SHALL BE RECTIFIED--but they too must step forward in TRUTH (not political revenge or greed) and join hands with brothers of whatever races--and march together in non-acceptance of that which has come upon you. Do not expect the change to come as if by a sprinkling of magic sand and stardust--for the majority of the very innocent and Godly tribes will have "joined" the adversary in an attempt to "get something" out of the insanity. There is overwhelming need for forgiveness, love and movement, as brothers in friend­ship--not just brothers in blood-line who act as brothers who quibble, grab, punch, insult and bumble in your ego aggres­sions.

MALCOLM-X
There is a mural, a picture, of Malcolm-X which has been of­fered for the public viewing. On the day-before-yesterday it was defaced by someone throwing red paint on it. I am pur­posely not telling you where it is or who did these things for it matters NOT. The Jews say it is anti-Semitic in intent and the Whites complain and thus and so... Why? Who is Malcolm-X? It doesn't matter--what does matter is that now the community is up in arms and the efforts are to try to "clean" the paint off and restore the picture before it is "set" and "worthless". Do you not see that the very defacement says more than all the pictures you can paint??? Why, the very paint used, as in blood, is drip­ping down the portrait and across the flags and symbols--and the defacement itself takes on THE VERY MEANING THAT COULD NEVER BE EXPRESSED IN A PICTURE OF A MAN. If you ones cannot come to see these relationships--you aren't ever going to achieve peace and freedom. May you come to see....

A THOUGHTFUL COMMENTARY
I am, as a summary, well done, of your situation and intents of world government, going to ask that you study the following. This is an address by a man called Charles Williams, 305 96th St., Kenosha, WI 53143. Phone: 1-414-694-7562. I am giving this information because he has great insight into the problems and wishes to "do something" and it is time, for you who are "heard" around the nation, to become integrated with directed purpose. Ronn Jackson, for instance, thinks he can come forth and everyone will rally--and, it CAN BE SO--but only if YOU DO YOUR PART! YOU ARE NOW HOLDING IN YOUR HAND THE POWER TO TURN ABOUT AND TAKE BACK YOUR NATION--AND MOVE ACROSS THE GLOBE IN FREEDOM--OR FOREVER SINK INTO OBLIVION AS A CIVILIZATION--ONCE AGAIN HAVING BEEN TAKEN AND DESTROYED BY EVIL ITSELF. SO BE IT.

I again offer appreciation and gratitude to Wisconsin Report, P.O. Box 45, Brookfield, WI 53008-0045 and the Editor, Vir­ginia Meves. (414-782-4832) Directors: Virginia Meves and John Zieroth. Address: 18310 Benington Dr., Brookfield, WI 53045.

KEYNOTE ADDRESS AT BROOKFIELD CONFERENCE
WARNS ABOUT STANDARDS AND WORLD
GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION--TOTAL CONTROL
Charles Williams is employed by a Kenosha business. He knows first hand the pressures put on competitive businesses to­day. He has a son in the public school where restructuring has turned education upside down. He is concerned about massive usurpation by government officials and calls out to fellow Americans to help with "State Action" before it is too late! He was the keynote speaker for the Wisconsin Legislative & Re­search Committee, Inc. Annual Conference on April 9, 1994 at the Embassy Suites Hotel in Brookfield, WI. Appreciation is given to Ruth Cody, Milwaukee, WI, for her labors at tran­scription of this speech.

The thrust here will be:

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ORGANIZATION
STANDARDS (ISO)
Good morning! It's good to see so many of you here today. How many country boys and country girls do we have here to­day? That's kind of a trick question. I'm a country boy too--American. This is my country. And our country is in a lot of trouble right now. Our country is in deep trouble, but we have a group here that is representative of all of America. We have many, many groups like this across the Nation--people who are waking up! They see danger on the horizon and Americans have always been good about rising to danger. The Bible says that "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge."

Well, today, we are going to try to pass some of the knowl­edge that we have gleaned from the various sources over to you, so that we will no longer be ignorant of the knowledge that may, in fact, save us from, well, for lack of a better word, the damnation that Satan is trying to pour upon us.

I have a quote here, actually several, that I would like to read to you--one from Winston Churchill. Winston Churchill wrote this in the Sunday Herald in London, on Feb. 8th, 1920: "From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx and down to Trotsky of Russia and Bella Kuhn of Hungary, Rosa Luxembourg of Germany and Emma Goldman of the USA--this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development of envious malevolents and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. They played a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the main­spring of every subversive movement during the 19th Century and now, at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the under-world of the great cities of Europe and America, yes, even America, have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads."

A history professor by the name of Arnold Toynbee said, in 1931, "We are working discretely, but with all of our might, to undermine the sovereignty of our respective nations."

Mortimer J. Adler--I used this quote in an article I recently wrote titled "Communitarianism"--it stated: "No disorder results when the state requires the individual to sacrifice or give up goods for the good of the community. On the contrary, the State is then only requiring the individual to give up individual goods that are detrimental to his own ultimate good."

A book called The Spirit of Community, which President Clinton was photographed carrying in January, was written by Amital Etzioni. This book is endorsed by Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Daniel Moynihan, Jack Kemp and Henry Cisneros. On page 265 of that book this quote appears: "There is little sense in gun registration. What we need, to significantly enhance public safety, is domestic disarmament. That exists in practically all other democracies." (We are not a democracy, folks.) "We join with those who read the Second Amendment the way it was written, as a communitarian clause calling for communities, militias, not individual gun slingers."

On page 266 of the same book, it says: "Our communitarian concern may begin with ourselves and our families, but it rises inexorably toward the long imagined community of mankind," commonly called the New World Order.

This article appeared in the Kenosha News, picked up from AP--The Associated Press--and it refers to Communitarianism and the book which I just mentioned to you. It also used some of the quotes in here, but you see what is happening--we are being socialized, communized and we are being told it is good.
Some of the statements from that article on Communitarian­ism simply indicate that America must re-align the balance be­tween the rights of individuals and the responsibilities of mem­bers of the society. Individual rights are to disappear. Commu­nitarian proponents, such as Bill Clinton, believe that sacrifice of individual rights is for the collective good. It sounds an aw­ful lot like Communism to me, folks. Or Socialism!

Here is an interesting statement from a book called The Co­ercive Utopians. This is a statement by Patricia Weis Fagan, Toward Detente With Cuba, Issues and Obstacles". It states: "For most Cubans, the progress of the revolution and the pro­motion of human rights are one and the same thing. The Cuban government operates to protect and align what are previewed as collective rights--those of the majority. When individual rights are thought to endanger collective rights, they are sacrificed." So the communitarian aspect is no different than what they al­ready have in Cuba. What do they have in Cuba? Communism!

I brought with me some updates on ISO-9000 to show you how this will interrelate with business, how it is going to inter­relate with the global economy and in education. Before I go into that, I have a little piece here from a news-letter that I re­ceived that gives you an overview of what is happening in America. It says: "Our share of world GNP has now fallen 60%, from about 50% in the early '50s to less than 20% today. We have dropped 30 [percentage points] from what we used to have. There are no steel mills in Pittsburgh, not a single one. Our steel production comes from overseas where they produce it cheaper and better. In 1960, nine of the world's ten largest banks were American. Today, not a single American bank is even in the top twenty. They are all Japanese and European." (By accident?)

"General Motors, once the largest corporation in the world, used to sell two out of every three new cars in the world. To­day they are struggling to keep a share of the market at one of four. We no longer have the refinery capacity to meet our de­mand for refined oil products. We have nowhere to refine our oil from Alaska's North Slope, so we sell it for a song to Japan. They refine it and send it back to us--sophisticated resins and plastic at 100 to 1000 times as much. We don't have a single factory capable of building VCRs, color TVs, or video cameras--not a single one! All lap-top computers come from Japan, or from other Southeast Asian countries. Many of our major ship­yards are closed down. Our Merchant Marine, once by far the mightiest fleet in the world, is almost nonexistent. Hundreds of ships are rotting in the docks. We used to build the world's great ships. Now, when we do need ships, we get them from Korea."

You know, this epitaph sounds an awful lot like pre-World War II Germany, doesn't it? Strangely enough, our politics seem very much pre-World War II Germany.

An article appeared in Kenosha News on Sunday, August 22, 1993, and stated: "Europe Sets Its Standards", and talking about the processes in Europe, trying to standardize procedures for business, for selling, for economy, for transportation and going to a single system--a "One World system."

"Wisconsin University-Parkside, Professional Development--the ISO 9000 Standards--A Practical Overview." It states: "Ian Durand has served for more than six years as a US delegate to the ISO-9000 series of quality standards. These standards pro­vide a world-wide set of quality assurance guidelines applicable to both manufacturing and services industries.

"Today corporations around the world are building sound quality systems based on the ISO standards and both the Ameri­can National Standard Institutes and the American Society of Quality Control have adapted these standards for use in the United States. The result is that for the first time a single and consistent set of international guidelines is available to evaluate a company's ability to provide goods and services. To achieve ISO certification, an increasingly necessary part to do business, both service and manufacturing companies must undergo a qual­ity audit by an accredited third-party organization."

We at Snap-On-Tools just had our audit last week. How we did, I don't know. The point is, if we don't do well, we are out of business. As our officer in charge of ISO for Snap-On said, "ISO will not give us any new business; it will simply prevent us from losing that which we already have." I think that is rather obvious. What he is really saying is: "Either we get on board or we are out of business."

ISO is the International Standards Organization. It also is in reference to the Isosceles Triangle of the Greek nature referring to equality. So when you say ISO referring to equality, you are also referring to equal standards among nations so everybody has a "level playing field". In other words, America's advan­tage is to be disadvantaged.

I have a bill here in my hand--a proposed bill that is still in committee from the Oregon Legislative Assembly of 1993--the December session--House Bill 2458, a Bill for an Act, relating to Economic Development, and it states: "Be it enacted by the people of the State of Oregon, the Legislative Assembly finds that Oregon businesses that intend to trade with the European community must be registered as conforming to the production standards described in the ISO 9000 Standards series. Busi­nesses that are not registered will not be able to continue serving foreign existing customers within the European community or sell their products or services in new European communities.

So, as you can see, even the Legislatures are pushing this ISO. Well, I had a rumor from a friend of mine, from Kenosha, who had heard that the Department of Defense was busy putting in a process of standardization for businesses doing business with the Department of Defense--contractual busi­nesses. So I called up the Department of Defense in Washing­ton and talked to a fellow by the name of Frank Doherty, who is the Division Chairman of Industrial Liaison to the Department of Defense. I asked him, "What is this about standards that the Department of Defense is setting up?" He says, "Well, we're setting up the ISO recommendations, and mandatory confirma­tion that this be set up in every industry--not only in America, but every industry in the world that does business with the De­partment of Defense must be registered into the ISO process."

Now he says: "ISO is the minimum standard. There are higher standards but we will accept no less than the ISO." I said, "Is this the ultimate of where you are heading?" He said: "No, ISO is the first step. Ultimately we will move into a pro­cess of (listen to these things and I think some of you will rec­ognize them) advanced quality concepts. We will empower people instead of design teams, and we will have continuous im­provement and there will be a team approach to everything." Sounds a little bit like Outcome Based Education, doesn't it? Or does Outcome Based Education sound a little bit like what the Department of Defense wants?

If you were to go back and study in the '60s, you'd find a process known as PPBS--Planning, Programming and Budgeting System. It's the same thing. They just brought it back home to roost.

The home base for ISO is Geneva, Switzerland. But that's a ruse. The "secret societies" are good at telling us one thing and doing something else. It is not in Geneva. That is only a front. It goes further. It is actually in--let me read to you right from this article which I received from Senator Kohl's office. I don't see it here, but I'll tell you what it says. It says, "Many people believe that the ISO Standards are home-ported and con­trolled out of Geneva, Switzerland. But in fact they have the controls from the international banking houses of London, England." But that's still not where it stops. It further went on to state "that the international banking houses got it from the Department of Defense. Washington, D.C." How about that?

So, now we see where this is all coming from. The statement from the Bureau of National Affairs, International Environment Daily, December 23, 1993--another article I received from Sen­ator Kohl's office--says: "ISO 9000, International Standards is voluntary. Don't believe it. But it will become somewhat of a requirement--that you can believe. Given the world-wide trend toward quality system registration, an expert on the issue told a European environmental regulations conference on November 18th, ISO 9000 is an international standard that describes ele­ments of an effective quality system." It was written by techni­cal committees of 176 of the International Organizations for Standards.

Another statement here, "20th Story of Level 1" printed in full format from the 1993 Businesswire Number 406. It says that "the ISO 9000 is a set of technical standards developed in the 1980s to offer a uniform way of determining whether manu­facturing and service organizations implement and document sound quality procedures. While ISO 9000 standards are rapidly becoming a requirement for success in the international market­place, many US companies are either unaware of the standards or have failed to register their compliance." There is that word--compliance. Does that sound voluntary to you? Even though the article previously said that this is all voluntary, "Experts es­timate that more than 20,000 companies from the European community are registered under ISO, while only 621 in the US have registered by the end of 1992." Well, Snap-On Tools is very close.

Another statement from 1993, from McGraw Hill Incorpo­rated, Data Communications says: "Boxes and packages shipping from networking vendors now often sport a label that is fast becoming an industry seal of approval. That is an ISO 9000 designation for buyers and the ISO 9000 tag offers official as­surance of vendor quality." But how much assurance and what kind of quality? "For those not familiar with ISO 9000's inner workings the answer to these questions may be a little surpris­ing."

And, it goes into some of the reasons: "The reality of ISO is--it does nothing for quality. It does nothing for production, except slows it down. ISO is really just a control mechanism." That is the name of the game, folks, total control! Isn't that what Revelation 13:17 and 18. referred to? (from the Chris­tian Holy Bible). It is a total control system where no man might buy or sell--just total control.

I occasionally go through various papers and here are just a few ISO ads that have been appearing in the Kenosha News, the Milwaukee Sentinel, the Wall Street Journal, and the Chicago Tribune. Some of these papers have as many as nine on one single little spot that I've cut out. So, it's here!

IT IS HERE!
PPBS--PLANNING. PROGRAMMING. BUDGETING
SYSTEM--OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION.
MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES!!!
Now, here is a nice little trick hand of fate. Has anybody here ever heard of W. Edwards Deming of the Deming Process? ISO is moving, it is like a map, and it is a road map leading to the Deming Process. This is the mechanism by which they in­tend to control. This is it, folks: the Deming Process, PPBS-- Planning, Programming, Budgeting System--Outcome Based Education, Management by Objectives, the same thing they have used in Soviet Russia and Red China for years. That is what they want to do to America. Are you going to let them (the planners) do it? I do not intend to!

Here is a news note from the Kenosha Public Library. "Total Quality Management coming to KPL (Kenosha Public Library) in 1994. In 1994 KPL will undertake a comprehen­sive effort to introduce Total Quality Management" (ISO 9000--Outcome Based Education--same thing) "into the way we do business." This means reform in how we think, and about the library as a workplace, and changes in the way we de­liver services to our customers. You'll notice, too, when you get into Outcome Based Education, and I'm sure Mrs. Herzer will get into that this afternoon, that even students and parents are referred to as customers. Everybody is now a customer because we are in business. We people are children or re­sources, so therefore we are utilized by business and are cus­tomers and resources combined.

"Implementing TQM is not a matter of making minor modifi­cations to the way we think and carry out our work. Instead, it is a matter of radical restructuring." Amen to that because they want to totally turn over America from what we were to what they want us to be--a global operation and a global fascist state.

Here is an article from The American School Board JOUR­NAL. This is what your school board members across the nation get. This article appeared in May of 1992 and is called, "The Skills for the New World Order". I bet they didn't tell you that they received any information about that or were working on it, did they?

"Skills for The New World Order: New standards and advanced technologies now require all students to master skills once demanded only by white collar and technical elites. The National School Conference Institute had (on this little page--a foldout) its 11th annual Effective Schools Confer­ence--the Total Quality School, Site-Based Management and Total Quality Management, in Phoenix, Arizona, on February 24, 1994. This was just a few weeks ago--actually a month or so ago and some of the featured speakers, for those of you in education, this should be a name for you--LARRY LAZAT, and others by the name of Madeline Hunter, David Langford and Patrick Dolan.

In TIME magazine in January, there was an article that ap­peared: Standards, Compliances and "write to US Chamber of Commerce to get more information." So I did. I received this little booklet from the US Chamber of Commerce and guess what? "TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND TOTAL QUALITY LEARNING"--the very same thing again.

The Total Quality Learning was about a 75-page book and I've got page one in my hand. It was passed out to certain ad­ministrators and pre-selected teachers in the Kenosha Unified School District. Total Quality Learning is nothing more than TQM which is a road map section to ISO 9000 and world con­trol mechanisms. In that book, there was something I found very interesting. One of the things they showed was a graph--a time line--and the time line graph shows the current school sys­tem. It shows individualism--everyone learning on an individual basis. Then it shows a time line for the future school--collec­tivism! Are they trying to tell us something?

Somehow, some of this is moving into the Education System. I'm going to steal a little bit of Mrs. Herzer's powder--hopefully I don't cover too much of it. I'm going to show you exactly where this is heading, with Business and Education as a partner­ship, First of all, recall just a few weeks ago, on April 1, 1994, when Clinton finally signed the Education Bill--Goals 2000. So it is in place--all the structure is now being put in place. One of the hard pushers for the Goals 2000 is the NEA (the National Education Association), the teacher's union. This is from the NEA Journal. It comes out once a month. A teacher friend of mine passed this on to me--asked me if I would like to read it and I said, "Sure".

On page 31 of the February issue, it says: "NEA Plays Key Role in UN Agency Founding." Which agency?--UNESCO! THEY ADMIT IT NOW, FINALLY, THAT THEY WERE KEY IN PLACING UNESCO. WHAT IS UNESCO? IT IS THE UN EDUCATION ARM, TO MAKE US BELIEVE IN WORLD GOVERNMENT, COLLECTIVISM, SURREN­DER OF SOVEREIGNTY, DISARMAMENT--THIS IS ALL THAT THIS IS FOR. We are supposed to like this.

From the desk of our school administrator in Kenosha, Wis­consin [H: Actually it is "Everywhere, USA (and world)."], Superintendent Anthony Bisciglia--it even has his name on here--this is called: "The School Administrator" and inside of that booklet, on page 13, it has a list--profiles of far-right citizen groups. Let me name some of the groups that they say are far-right and therefore dangerous fanatics: "American Family Asso­ciation; Christian Coalition; Citizens for Excellence in Educa­tion; Concerned Women of America; Eagle Forum; Focus on the Family and Traditional Values Coalition. That is what the school administrations are learning about these organizations, and that is what they apparently think about any organization, family, or citizen where great values are placed on God, family and country. This is what is called PLANNED DECEPTION.

How many of you folks scrutinize newspapers and read them real carefully? I have been doing a lot of that lately and, you know what? They tell us what they are doing. They are not a bit shameful about it. Well, I'm going to give you a whirlwind, hopefully, a whirlwind view of some newspaper clippings that will probably really astound you--they are so open about this. Did you ever hear of a fellow by the name of Walter Annen­berg? [close friend of Ronald Reagan started TV Guide]. He just gave $500 million to the education system. Well, did they tell you what he designated that money for? It has a listing in here for that: "The initial grants go to the Coalition of Essential Schools headed by Brown University's Theodore Sizer." Ann Herzer can tell you more about him this morning. Another grant goes to the "New American School Development Corpo­ration,"--a private-sector venture launched by the Bush admin­istration and headed by its former Deputy Secretary of Educa­tion, David Kern, who sponsors a variety of 'break-the-mold' schools. What that simply means is no-holds barred--anything' goes--except the law, if YOU violate the law, folks. (Ed. note: Actually in this instance many of the State laws are waived so that the new School partners may do their independent plan­ning.)

The third recipient is the Denver-based Education Commis­sion of the States--the primary resource center for governors who are pushing education reform plans. Its president, Frank Newman, who is very handily involved in the restructuring of Wisconsin's school system and has been in the forefront of an effort for results-oriented or Outcome Based schools. So you can see that Mr. Annenberg, whether he is good, bad or indif­ferent, I don't know, but he has certainly picked some very, very leftist groups. [H: Annenberg is a powerful and rich player in these games, good friends--remember, he is THE one who is always supplying HIS home as a guest house re­treat for PRESIDENTS and thus and so--never overlook him because you will also ALWAYS see his name as sponsor and donor to such as the Public Broadcasting System, etc. In­deed, a name to WATCH!]

"Westosha Board Discusses No Fail Classes." What is this? OBE classes include global issues, government instructors do not issue a failing grade but give students an incomplete, al­lowing the students an additional nine weeks, if necessary, to complete assignments. If they can't get them done in the regular school year, they can finish it up in summer school. If they have no Summer school, then they can finish it up the following year. That is what they say right here in the article. [H: Do you believe the Federalist Papers relative to the Constitution will be "must" study and homework--OR, SCHINDLER'S LIST?] {The beginning of our on going presentation for your study and homework begins on the next page.)

"Electronics firm cites skills needed." They are going to train the children for the specific regional skills of a particular region, according to what the businesses want. Now that doesn't necessarily mean they are going to train your children for the skills necessary in Milwaukee, Phoenix or Kenosha. The skills they need might be a regional business in Shanghai, or a regional business in Hong Kong. So, you notice, if you have been watching the papers, they are now making foreign language mandatory--no longer an elective. Why? You have to train them to speak the language in the area where they are go­ing to work. Remember, part of the Communist Manifesto was the redistribution of resources! Don't forget now, industry has named us, Government has named us-- and just about everybody has named us a resource (people). We are to be redistributed to locations wherever they see fit.

Listen Folks, this all sounds negative. And granted, it does seem like we have an unbeatable battle before us. But we have somebody--someone who is always greater than ourselves and that is the Lord Christ. They can't beat HIM. They tried be­fore and He rose from the dead, proving them wrong. He is coming back. In the meantime, we are to be as watchmen on the tower walls. And we are also to be out in the streets or to be out in the business communities making a stand. We are the salt of the Earth. We are not going to let them win this because we have Christ on our side.

We will win this battle. We may lose the initial battle but we, in fact, will win the war. So with that, God Bless You and keep fighting the good fight!
* * *
So, I suggest the same: That we fight the GOOD FIGHT and get on with WINNING TILE WAR! Salu.
CHAPTER 4
REC #1 HATONN

MON., MAY 23, 1994 9:18 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 280

MON., MAY 23, 1994

PATRIOTISM VS. USE OF PATRIOTISM
While you run on "empty" you are distracted by myriads of various and sundry ideas, rewritings, refoundings, Constitu­tional conventions, Amendments and other things which invari­ably cloud issues instead of clarify the foundation upon which your national LAWS were established. There are, however, the Federalist Papers offered under the identity of "Publius" and all were published in, I believe, the New York Times. There are also what are called the "Anti"-Federalist writings. Chelas, we don't have time for you to go about your continued haphazard "shopping" for a "better way". YOU DO NOT YET EVEN BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND THE WAY ALREADY LAID AS FOUNDATION FOR YOUR USE. This is NOT in any way to lessen the value and/or evidence presented by ones who would give their very lives to reclaim the freedoms you have lost and therefore work around the clock to present understandable and workable attachments or explanations to that which you were of­fered in the Constitution of the united States of America.

We did not give thought lightly to that which was established in the founding of your nation--under GOD with liberty and justice for all as a DEMAND within the LAWS. If there were errors, we diligently tried to rectify those injustices (as to the slaves and Native Americans). Remember, you were working with a di­verse group of "politicians"--just as you must rise above and be­yond this day. You have the same resources in your hands and an awakening mass of citizens to aid and abet your flow, through the fundamental law of the Constitution--IF YOU UNIFY AND EVERYONE CAN BE GIVEN A WAY IN WHICH TO HAVE CLARIFICATION--FOR YOU NO LONGER ARE ALLOWED TO TEACH THIS IN YOUR FASCIST SCHOOLS!

We have offered a document compiled by Michael Silverhawk, called The Refounding Amendment (See CONTACT May 10, 1994, Vol. 5 #9 p-50). Indeed, we have met with Michael Silverhawk and shall offer help in his continuing call to duty. There are, however, questions which arise one upon the other as readers effort to understand, clarify and define. These need attention, yes, however I shall not take time to do so. I will, though, lay forth the two major paragraphs which cause inquiry. I shall not attempt to define, in 30 seconds or less, the meaning or "should be" of such writings. Ronn Jackson petitions me this day, to do that in two instances, Paragraphs 3 and 6. No, I will offer the paragraphs as they are and now, give you explanation as to why I will not stop and take up these individual subjects which are out of sequence for that which we are doing, starting this day.

As yesterday, I repeat today, we will take the Federalist Papers AND THE CONSTITUTION AND INTEGRATE THE DIRECT COMMENTS ON INDIVIDUAL POINTS WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION.

You' do NOT need. ANOTHER CONSTITUTION: YOU NEED TO RECLAIM THE ONE YOU HAVE--IT COVERS ALL THE THINGS, ABUNDANTLY, THAT YOUR POLITI­CIANS (and Ross Perot) CLAIM NEED OF FORMING A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION. I warn continually AGAINST such a convention. I try to make you see that in the calling and holding a Constitutional Convention--ALL OF THE CONSTITUTION WILL BE ABORTED (as has actually hap­pened already in the PRACTICE). This is what happened with the formation of THE Constitution. Was "it" for the better in that instance? YES, but it will NOT be better in this instance as you will be basically changing to the Communist Mani­festo, The Protocols of Zion--under the United Nations Char­tered ONE WORLD ORDER. SO, DO NOT ALLOW SUCH A CONVENTION TO TAKE PLACE.

THE REFOUNDING "AMENDMENT"
THE REFOUNDING "AMENDMENT" is a guideline only for the REFOUNDING OF AMERICA. Where the contradictions and confusion in this document come about are in exactly that which is laid forth in wording--again, language and translation of definitions are the big "stoppers". Example? In Paragraph 3: Defining Our Citizenship: "It is essential for the survival of this nation, for the people to know exactly who they are and be able to define their citizenship." And yet, from the writing in point, one is unable to give exact definition because of the variances in the use of United States of America and "Americans". So, Michael, are we speaking of The Western Hemisphere (and should we be) or are we efforting to bring back stability FIRST into the society which CAN PULL IT OFF BECAUSE OF ITS INDEPENDENT STATUS AS A NATION?

Michael (and I refer to Michael as a generic direction in no way intending to offend or delete other writers who have worked diligently over this document) states in this Paragraph 3:

"The People of this nation are Americans. Only People who have been born of an American or who have been explicitly and legally naturalized as Americans shall be Americans. Americans who establish a domicile in one of the several States may be referred to as American Citizens or more simply as Citizens. In the constitutional republic, Americans are Citizens by virtue of their State Citizen­ship. Those Americans who have not established a domi­cile in one of the several States shall be referred to as American Nationals. American Nationals shall become Citizens upon establishing a domicile in one of the several States. No State shall restrict an American from estab­lishing a domicile in the State. The Federal Agency shall establish no special class of Americans or federal citizen­ship over which it shall have jurisdiction. Only Americans shall participate in public service."

So, the problem comes in defining "American". By this, I do not mean the definition as listed herein--for that becomes quite clear. Is it, however, correct to refer to the United States as the ONLY substantial "America" in which a citizen is referred to as "American"? No--it is not but it was always chosen to speak in that manner. The meaning of the term is VERY CLEAR, how­ever, and ones should not become hung-up on semantics because the "Initiative" in point is a working document. YOU must come to understand it in detail to stop such misunderstanding in the finalized Constitution--but let us be generous with our pick­ing before the carcass is even presented. It clearly states that "Americans are Citizens by VIRTUE OF THEIR STATE CIT­IZENSHIP...." In other words, to become sovereign as persons (citizens) you are going to have to ALSO reclaim STATE SOVEREIGNTY!

THE POINT IS TO REMEMBER THE CONSTITUTION IS A FOUNDATION FOR A REPUBLIC, NOT SOME SORT OF FASCIST-SOCIALIST DEMOCRACY!

You have the personages, the information and the DUTY to bring forth that WONDROUS DOCUMENT called the CON­STITUTION of the United States of America. You have wonder­ful input from which to draw strength--there is NO NEED TO START OVER! We will offer those arguments which present truth and wisdom in the founding of this nation with use of this document. It is time for factions, races, creeds and colors to put that aside--we are again talking about reestablishing a REPUB­LIC before you get the old one suicided into its everlasting grave. Errors can then be rectified, justice can be again estab­lished, Natives can reclaim their rightful lands and heritages and thus and so....

The next major question about the "Refounding" document re­volves around Paragraph 6: Protecting Property Rights.

Quoting:

The right of the people to have the lawful ability to own and pos­sess property is vital for a free society. When government be­comes the landlord and the dictator of property, the people are not free.

"Allodial ownership and full possession of property is, fundamental to individual liberty. The right of Americans to lawfully acquire, possess, and own property of any form shall not be restricted, abridged or denied. The Fed­eral Agency shall not lien, levy or apply in any way an as­sessment, claim or tax to the property of the American People. [H: Now readers, this is already covered in the Constitution. What you as the reading public must do is go forth and study up on that which IS already ex­plained, such as the term "allodial", etc. Then, and only then, can you move forward in understanding. We will work as quickly as possible in our attempts to clarify and "council" as well as "counsel" on these points. However, sequence of presentation in this type of "mass" media must take proper cooperation. The CONTACT is prepared to make this paper your LIB­ERATOR as from Garrison in the days of Civil War in a struggle to preserve the Union and presenting equal­ity to citizens--ALL citizens. You will also be able to obtain help from such as the NEW FEDERALIST and SPOTLIGHT as focus begins to shift around. You have US (WE/ME) AT THE ORIGINAL MANIFESTA­TION--AND WE ARE HERE IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD--NOW--TO ASSIST. SO BE IT. "THEY" DIDN'T UNDERSTAND IT THEN BUT PERHAPS YOU WILL COME TO UNDERSTAND IT NOW!] The Federal Agency will neither own nor have title to any property. All property administered by the Federal Agency shall be held in trust for the benefit of the American People. The Federal Agency shall not sell, give or transfer property directly or indirectly to foreign pow­ers or foreign individuals. The Federal Agency shall not leverage or collateralize property in any way. Upon the ratification of this amendment and whenever this nation is again refounded, all claims and title to the real property held within the several States under the jurisdiction of the. Federal Agency not explicitly authorized by this Constitu­tion shall be conveyed to that State in which it is held. All currently defined territories of the Native American Peo­ples shall be recognized as separate and sovereign nations and offered the protection of America. The People of the territories within the jurisdiction of the Federal Agency shall hold a popular election every seven years to approve or reject the jurisdiction of the Federal Agency. The ju­risdiction and power exercised within the territories by the Federal Agency shall have the same scope and limits as within the sovereign States of America."

Do you not see how ALL nations could make free decisions to come within the label of Americans? Say, Canada, chose to do so; she and each province could become recognized as a State; retaining all sovereignty but establishing citizenship individually under one protective Constitution which COULD NOT BE TAMPERED NOR USURPED BY THE FEW. Your problem as "citizens", now, is that you are convinced (trained through the lie) that that "federal legislative United States" is somehow your GOD. You set up a greedy, Satanistic, humanistic FAS­CIST Monarchy in Washington D.C. I would suggest you even relocate your national or "general" republic governing body. In other words--STOP DOING BUSINESS WITH THE BULLDOZERS IN THAT CORRUPT AND DISREPUTABLE CITY! Until you clean out the palace (White House)--don't move into the palace where the guards still protect the KING! You don't even NEED A BUILDING--a nice hillside under a lovely tree is more appropriate at WORST. Stop building TEMPLES to Satan and stop paying his henchmen! Can you do it? Certainly!

Now, what is it that I have in mind here? Well, let us "example".

We will take your Constitution as presented and integrate por­tions of the Federalist Papers to reference the points as we move along. We will be able to cover ALL, but we will also present both these documents, in full, as we move along. If you are eager--we can ask for a reprinting of the CONTACT papers which have offered the various Constitution(s) as you hold and as projected (New States Constitution), etc. Or, perhaps the ed­itorial staff will offer the "journals" in which these are reprinted. Thank you.

Let us example, now, the method of which I herein speak:

THE CONSTITUTION OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(RELATIVE TO THE FEDERALIST PAPERS). Chapter 1
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Wel­fare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this CONSTITUTION for the United States of America.

Excerpt from Federalist Paper number 84, Alexander Hamilton (Publius):

....thrown into the form of an act of parliament called the Bill of Rights. It is evident, therefore, that, according to their prim­itive signification, they have no application to constitutions, pro­fessedly founded upon the power of the people and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain ev­erything they have no need of particular reservations, "We, THE PEOPLE of the United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Here is a better recognition of popular rights than volumes of those aphorisms which make the principal figure in several of our State bills of rights and which would sound much better in a treatise of ethics than in a constitution of government.

But a minute detail of particular rights is certainly far less applicable to a Constitution like that under consideration, which is merely intended to regulate the general political interests of the nation, than to a constitution which has the regulation of ev­ery species of personal and private concerns. If, therefore, the loud clamors against the plan of the convention, on this score, are well founded, no epithets of reprobation will be too strong for the constitution of this State. But the truth is that both of them contain all which, in relation to their objects, is reasonably to be desired.

BILL OF RIGHTS
I go further and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, ARE NOT ONLY UNNECESSARY IN THE PROPOSED CONSTI­TUTION BUT WOULD EVEN BE DANGEROUS. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than was granted. For WHY declare that things shall not be done, which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, WHEN NO POWER IS GIVEN BY WHICH RESTRICTIONS MAY BE IMPOSED? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulat­ing power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men dis­posed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power. They might urge with a semblance of reason that the Constitu­tion ought not to be charged with the absurdity of providing against the abuse of an authority which was not given, and that the provision against restraining the liberty of the press afforded a clear implication that a power to prescribe proper regulations concerning it was intended to be vested in the national govern­ment. This may serve as a specimen of the numerous handles which would be given to the doctrine of constructive powers, by the indulgence of an injudicious zeal for bills of rights...." [H: Various emphases mine.]

I do not intend to comment on each "speech" for this is but a small excerpt which diminishes "meaning" from the contents of the full message and, realize, this is paper no. 84 of 85 so you have 83 such papers and speeches leading up to full under­standing of No. 84.

What is at point here is indeed wondrously comprehensive--YOU DID NOT NEED THE BILL OF RIGHTS--FOR THE INTENT IS COVERED NICELY IN THE BODY OF THE CONSTITUTION. This reminds me of the LAWS OF GOD. HE GAVE LAWS and man tampered with them to SUIT HIS OWN WHIMS. God didn't say to hold every "Sunday" open as a Holy Day. YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW WHICH DAY IS THE "SABBATH" OR....! So, it becomes apparent that WITHIN the Ten Commandments--MAN HAS MORE INPUT THAN DID GOD!

So, WHO was "Publius"? ALEXANDER HAMILTON, JAMES MADISON and JOHN JAY.

ALEXANDER HAMILTON
Alexander Hamilton was born in the West Indies in 1757, the illegitimate child of a Scottish merchant. He came to the American colonies to study at King's College (now Columbia University), and became an early and ardent supporter of the Revolutionary cause. During the Revolutionary War he was aide-de-camp to George Washington [H: An EXTREMELY IMPORTANT person!] and a member of the Continental Congress. He was a leading figure at the Constitutional Con­vention (1787) and a principal author of the Federalist Papers. As first Secretary of the Treasury he articulated a policy of protection for manufacturing interests, strong central govern­ment, and establishment of a national bank. [H: Do not con­fuse ANY of these things with WHAT YOU HAVE TO­DAY!] After leaving the Cabinet, he practiced law in New York. His personal attacks hindered the political career of the volatile Aaron Burr, who finally challenged him to a duel in 1804. Hamilton was shot, and died of his wounds.

[H: I ask you: Is it better to use the confounded gun to settle a problem AND LOSE ONE OF THE BEST PATRIOT MINDS OF THE WORLD? OR, might you not turn to the pen and the WORD and REASON?]

JOHN JAY
John Jay, (1745-1829), was a conservative lawyer who became a leading patriot. He was minister to Spain (1780-82), the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (1789-95), and he negotiated the treaty of 1795 between the U.S. and Britain. His contributions to the Federalist Papers concern foreign affairs.

JAMES MADISON
James Madison was born in 1751, the son of a Virginia planter. He worked for the Revolutionary cause as a member of the Continental Congress and the Virginia House of Delegates. The leader of deliberations of the Constitutional Convention, he fought for the adoption of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Though an ally of Hamilton on the Constitution, he was a sup­porter of Jefferson's agrarian policies. He was Jefferson's Sec­retary of State (1801-9) and his successor as President (1808-­17), but his Presidency was marred by the unpopular War of 1812. Madison died in 1836.

* * *
What you must fully understand is that no man is perfection and no man is an island unto himself. You broke away from Eng­land--ONLY TO BEGIN AT THAT MOMENT TO COME FULLY BACK UNDER THE VERY RULE OF ENGLAND FROM WHENCE YOU GAINED THAT ORIGINAL FREE­DOM.

As to the arguments of patriots regarding such things as "Amendment 13 (missing)" relative to "titles", "nobility", (referring to lawyers becoming judges), etc., I remind you--YOU DIDN'T NEED AN AMENDMENT--GO BACK TO THE CONSTITUTION AND IT IS THERE! You as a nation moved right back under the English Admiralty LAW. You allowed the very foundation upon which you builded your new legal structure to fall right back into the hands of the oppressors of the first cause.

Now, WORSE, you allow those corrupted judges, once barris­ters, to rule in any manner they choose--according to the bribes and pay-offs--for the Supreme Court of your land has fallen into a maker of laws which protect the criminals in office and on the benches--and you no longer limit their power to the INTERPRETATION OF SUSTAINING LAW OF, BY AND FOR THE PEOPLE! It has become all but impossible to find ANYTHING EXCEPT LAWYERS in the legislatures and as JUDGES--making it impossible to have unbiased and non-prejudicial regulation. These blood-suckers are in there to make sure the corruption is continued and COVERED.

I ask that CONTACT make room to run Silverhawk's "ordering information" regarding the "Refounding Amendment". [The Re-founding Society, 2303 North 44th Street, Plaza 14-2000, Phoenix, Arizona 85008, (602)-922-2803/Fax: (602)274-7247 call for ordering information.] It is going to be advantageous to have such documents established as sound working resources. As a matter of fact, since you have all those "AMENDMENTS" attached to suit the needs of the politi­cians--GO FOR SUCH AS THIS if it shortens your pain and agony. BUT DO NOT FORGET THAT, AS A NATION--IT IS THE CONSTITUTION WHICH MUST BE ATTENDED--NOT A BUNCH OF AMENDMENTS!

YOU CAN RECLAIM YOUR NATION--NOW--AMERI­CANS, IF YOU WILL BUT TAKE UP THAT RESPONSIBIL­ITY AND ACCEPT NOTHING LESS! GOD WILL WALK WITH YOU, BRETHREN, IF YOU BUT ASK!