PJ#091, FOOTSTEPS INTO TRUTH UNCOVERING LIES AND FRAUD ABOUT GOD AND MAN

[wave]

PJ 91

CHAPTER 11

REC #4 HATONN

MON., APR. 4, 1994 3:50 P.M. YEAR 7, DAY 231

MON.. APR. 4. 1994

DEFRAUDING AMERICA, Part 16
by Rodney Stich

START OF ANOTHER CONGRESSIONAL COVERUP

Appearing on the Lany King Live television show within a few days of the holocaust, Senator Dennis DeConcini stated he would head a Senate investigative committee investigating the Waco affair. DeConcini repeated the statements of the Justice Department and President Clinton placing the blame for the deaths on Koresh. This dogmatic statement indicated his pre-judgment of the matter and his determination to protect government personnel who caused the deaths to occur. His statement blaming one of the victims came after there was overwhelming evidence showing Justice Department agents to be lying.

THE "INVESTIGATORS"

Never at a loss to find people willing to assist Justice Department mischief, a team of "investigators" came upon the scene several days later and defended the onslaught, stating the occupants themselves decided to set the building and themselves on fire. The wife of the team's leader, Paul Gray, worked for the same people who started it all, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Gray taught at the ATF's academy and had been selected by the ATF to conduct the "investigation". Gray stated that "this fire was intentionally set by persons inside the compound."

SUBSEQUENT REPORT

In response to pressure from groups of concerned citizens, Treasury Secretary Lloyd Bentsen called for an independent review to determine what really happened. In September 1993 the Treasury Department released its report, defending the use of the para-military force on the residence occupied mostly by women and children. The report admitted that there was a pattern of deception by senior officials in the aftermath of the bungled operation. Simultaneously, Department of Justice officials released a report clearing Attorney General Janet Reno and other federal officials (who had given approval to the attack), blaming the tragedy on field personnel. [H: Please don't be forgetting, readers, that both Bentsen and Reno work for a foreign government. Neither are paid by the U.S. They are paid from the International Monetary Fund. How do you like those apples?]

GUN OWNERS BEWARE

Millions of gun owners who legally purchased guns that were legal at the time of purchase can end up in prison and financially destroyed, solely at the whim of a bureaucrat from the ATF and Justice Department. One gun owner, W.J. Chip Stewart, from Springdale, Arkansas, was charged with a federal offense by the ATF, the same people responsible for the Weaver family and Branch Davidian massacres (and others). ATF and Justice Department attorneys caused him to be sentenced to federal prison for twenty-seven months. As a result of his imprisonment, Stewart lost his business, his wife who didn't wish to be inconvenienced, his credit worthiness, and his money.

What did the bureaucrats in the ATF and Justice Department consider to be a crime? Stewart had legally purchased two semi-automatic handguns, that were legal to own at that time: a small 22 caliber and a 45 caliber semi-automatic pistol from Holmes Firearms Company, similar to those owned by millions of people in the United States.

ATF bureaucrats decided, after many of these guns were sold, that the widely-sold semi-automatic guns could be converted by a gunsmith to become an automatic weapon, and were therefore illegal.

Shortly after ATF agents notified Stewart that the guns that he had legally purchased were now unlawful, he turned the guns over to the ATF. They had gotten his name from the gun manufacturer's registration records. Eight months after ATF notified Stewart that his two pistols were put onto the banned list, and after Stewart voluntarily turned the guns over to them, Justice Department prosecutors obtained a grand jury indictment against him. Stewart, who owned an auto wrecking business and was a relatively permanent member of the community, could have been served peacefully with the warrant for his arrest. Instead, sixteen heavily armed ATF and FBI agents and local sheriff s department personnel converged upon his home, breaking down the door. Fortunately for Stewart, he wasn't home. Otherwise, he could have met the deadly fate of Scott, the Weavers, the Branch Davidians, or the many others who were killed by the "brave" men of ATF and FBI.

With this type of mindset almost anyone can be financially destroyed and put in prison, either because of violating some obscure statute, or by being falsely charged.

WIDESPREAD INVOLVEMENT OF
FEDERAL JUDGES

The direct and indirect involvement of federal judges in almost every one of the criminal enterprises shown in these pages has already been described. In Chapter 11 courts they were directly involved in the theft of billions of dollars a year. In other pages the mechanism for paying off certain federal judges is described. My impression is that they are as sleazy a group as the attorney group they represent.

Federal judges were repeatedly put on notice through my federal court filings of the criminal activities described within these pages that a group of CIA insiders were ready to testify. (The judges included, for instance, Ninth Circuit Judges including Marilyn Patel, Samuel Conti, Milton Schwartz, Edward Garcia, Raul Ramirez, and each of the Justices of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; District of Columbia judges and justices, including Stanley Sporkin, Green, Silberman; Second Circuit judges and Justices at New York City; Fifth Circuit judges at Chicago.) They blocked the reporting of federal crimes, which made them guilty of federal crimes. I repeatedly appealed and petitioned the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene, as they had a duty to do.

SUPREME COURT'S COMPLICITY

None of these criminal enterprises could have continued without the criminal cover-up by each of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. In the 1970s I brought the corruption to the attention of the Supreme Court Justices as it related to the air safety and criminal violations associated with a series of air disasters and the felony cover-up by Justice Department attorneys and federal judges. In the 1980s I brought to their attention the pattern of hard-core civil rights violations that were part of the California scheme to silence me and the destruction of federal remedies by a gang of federal judges.

As a matter of law, under Supreme Court procedures as specifically provided by Rules of Court of the Supreme Court, a person has the right to petition an individual Justice for relief. Also, under federal crime-reporting statutes, the law clearly provides that a citizen must report federal crimes to any federal judge. Implied in the law, a federal judge must receive the evidence. Every time that I exercised these rights and responsibilities the Supreme Court Justices blocked me.

Only once did a Justice of the Supreme Court make any type of response, and this was highly unusual. In response to my petition addressed to Justice Byron White, which he refused to grant, he stated in an October 28, 1991, letter.

As a single Justice I can be of no help to you. I am returning your petition.

White and the other Supreme Court Justices aided and abetted the persecution of whistleblowers and informants who threatened to expose the criminal activities in which they were involved. The charges of organized crimes involving major U.S. agencies that I brought to their attention left no discretion for any federal official to deny me a hearing, especially when the crimes included judges over whom the Justices of the Supreme Court had supervisory responsibilities.

SUPREME COURT'S SOILED RECORD

President Lyndon Johnson relied upon voter fraud to get into the U.S. Senate, as related in the 1964 publication of A Texan Looks At Johnson and Means of Ascent by Robert Caro, published by Knopf. When Johnson discovered that Texas Governor Coke Stevenson had received 112 votes more than he did, Johnson arranged for a "recanvass", of the records. Lo and be-hold, an additional 202 suspicious votes appeared, nicely arranged in alphanumerical order, in a district he controlled. When the matter was taken to the federal district court, the court issued an injunction barring Johnson from claiming victory, and setting a hearing to address the voter fraud.

To circumvent the unfavorable evidence being presented in the U.S. District Court in Texas, Johnson's attorney, Abe Fortas (who was later appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court), filed a petition with Justice Hugo Black of the U.S. Supreme Court to block the federal district court in Texas from taking any action. Black ruled in Johnson's favor, without allowing the evidence of voter fraud to be presented. Johnson later rewarded Fortas as he appointed Fortas to the U.S. Supreme Court. But as the saying goes that "a leopard doesn't change its spots," Fortas' conduct on the Supreme Court was sufficiently outrageous that he was later forced to resign rather than face impeachment.

An editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle (June 30, 1991) titled, "The Pernicious Court", stated the "judiciary is riding roughshod over rights and precedent as it enacts its legislative agenda into law." The editorial stated that "the Supreme Court rode roughshod over traditional constitutional rights, ignoring settled precedents and overturning others that got in its way." If no constitutional outrage was examined other than what federal judges have done to me in retaliation for exercising federal crime reporting requirements and exercising federal defenses, it would be prima facie evidence of a criminal mindset in the fed­eral judiciary.

UNCONSTITUTIONAL SEIZURE LAWS,
APPROVED BY SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

The Supreme Court Justices in June 1989 upheld the right of state and federal agents to confiscate the assets of a person pos­sessing drugs, or who committed a crime, even though charges may not have been filed (and maybe never would be), and there had never been a trial. This seizure of assets usually deprived the person of funds needed to hire legal counsel to defend against the charges. The Court's fuzzy argument is that the Sixth Amendment right to appointment of legal counsel will in­sure proper legal representation. The Supreme Court Justices knew that court-appointed attorneys are usually a farce.

Even if the party is never accused, or he is found innocent, the person is usually unable to obtain his or her seized property. The Pittsburgh Press described the seizure laws as a "License to Loot--Victims lose even if charges aren't filed." These and other articles depict how police in the United States can take a person's assets, including their homes and money to pay for le­gal defenses, even without being charged with a crime. The police need simply charge the person with an offense, which can easily be fabricated. Supreme Court Justices have rendered de­cisions making police officers and prosecutors usually immune from liability. It is a stacked deck against the people of the United States, and they don't even recognize it.

To get the property back, if it hasn't already been disposed of, the person has to sue the government, and this takes money for legal fees, which the person usually doesn't have.

Simply because small quantities of drugs were found, large ships, airplanes, and buildings have been seized and forfeited, without any regard to the financial relationship between the amount of drugs and the value of the seized property. The per­son who put the drugs on the seized property may not even be its owner, while the actual owner may be totally unaware and unable to control the presence of drugs.

Property seizure laws permit taking a person's assets on the mere suspicion that the person violated the law. Justice De­partment officials either violate the law themselves, or protect those government officials who do. Made more preposterous by the CIA and other government agencies involvement in smug­gling drugs into the United States in the interest of funding covert CIA activities (many of which terminate in wholesale deaths of Americans such as in the Vietnam conflict), which makes a mockery of the so-called drug wars. [H: How can this "fly"? Because of executive order for one thing. If a "war" is "declared" by a president (on anything or anyone) it au­tomatically invokes "Executive Order" and anything goes....] In December 1993, after much public outrage, five of the nine Supreme Court Justices held that there must first be a hearing before property may be seized. Reno's Justice Department replied, "We will continue to use the forfeiture laws vigor­ously." With the heavy concentration of former Justice Department attorneys on the federal bench, forfeiture will probably continue as before, as targeted citizens must prove a negative, that they did not violate any laws.

SELF-IMMUNITY AGAINST JUDICIALLY-INFLICTED
CIVIL RIGHTS AND CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS

The arrogance of federal judges and justices is reflected by a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Justices of the Supreme Court held that a citizen cannot sue a judge for harms inflicted by the judge, regardless of whether the judge acted in error, maliciously, or in excess of authority. In one instance the Supreme Court Justices ruled that a judge who ordered a young woman sterilized was immune from damages. The U.S. Supreme Court Justices have held in such cases as Stump v. Sparkman (435 US 349 [1978]) that the American public has no protection against the renegade judges, over whom the Supreme Court Justices have supervisory responsibilities, who inflict great harms upon a particular targeted person.

This isn't what civil rights statutes read; it is self-made law by judges that violate the statutes and constitutional protections. These self-protective case law decisions conflict with the pub­lic's right to seek damages from anyone who knowingly inflicts harms through known and deliberate violations of protected rights. [H: This SHOULD include even ones such as poor John Schroepfer against ones seeking to take his freedom and his property. So far, however, the people in the "hospital" simply bring in the law to KEEP IBM ISO­LATED--EVEN ALLUDING TO THE STEP-SON AS THE CONSERVATOR--AN OUTRIGHT MISCARRIAGE OF LAW.]

The greatest threat to our constitutional protections is with the present group of judges and Justice Department attorneys, who are openly destroying the protections under our form of gov­ernment. The media and every major check and balance have kept the lid on these outrageous acts, as they have done with ev­ery major scandal described within these pages. The im­plications of this are enormous. The losses of civil rights are all around us but the majority of Americans, kept ignorant of these matters by the mass media, haven't the faintest idea what is ac­tually going on and being done to them.

In 1993 the California Supreme Court held that a citizen could be arrested and held in jail for several days solely on the basis that he or she was not carrying identification. A swimmer walking to the beach could end up in jail, in chains, enduring body-cavity searchers, and risking rape, solely because he or she did not have identification suitable to the stopping officer. [H: Do you now begin to see how happily you will all line up for your inserted chips and tattoos so that you are never "caught" in such a compromising circumstance as not having your identification card?]

THE CRIMES OF CONGRESS

The public has a short memory. Scandal after scandal by members of Congress has surfaced, and rarely has a member of Congress been criminally prosecuted. Simultaneously, thou­sands of American citizens are charged and put in prison for committing some minor offense, or imprisoned or trumped-up charges. Even in the Savings and Loan scandal, the nation's worst financial debacle that will adversely affect Americans for decades, not a single member of Congress, including those who openly solicited money to block regulators' actions, has been sent to prison.

Member of Congress limited their investigation of the Keat­ing-Five to "ethics" violations, which is comparable to limiting the charges against the Murder Incorporated assassins to ethics violations. Even here, Congress couldn't hold that those who aided and abetted the greatest financial debacle had violated any ethics.

People in the CIA, for instance, have reported to members of Congress for years about the CIA and DEA drug trafficking, during closed-door hearings, by letters, and by petitions as I have sent. In every instance these members of Congress have kept the lid on the scandals, and are co-conspirators.

CREATING A CRIMINAL MINDSET THAT
ESTABLISHES GOVERNMENT AND NON-

GOVERNMENT RESPECT FOR

LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS

The conduct of Justice Department attorneys and officials, of federal judges, of the CIA, sets a pattern of lawlessness for the country to follow. The people in the ghettos know about this criminality, while the average middle-class American is unin­formed. We cannot halt or reverse the escalating lawlessness in the population while the lawlessness exists. And the system in place is so corrupt that it cannot and will not correct itself.

END OF PART 16.

PJ 91

CHAPTER 12

REC #2 HATONN

TUE., APR. 5, 1994 10:31 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 232

TUE., APR. 5, 1994

A LOOK BACK..,.

As we attend other duties this morning and "life" itself seems only a myriad of frustrating tasks which seem difficult to culminate in positive ways--let us look into this time of chaos and see that which came before. Only briefly will we linger on the subject--for that which is gone before is only worthy of the lessons harvested and progression learned.

Your scientists today tell you they have "found" another galaxy in your heavens. They say they had missed it while assuming the "stars" to be part of your own. Pray, how do they miss a galaxy?? So be it.

What I would mention here is something to which you can relate a bit more "closely" than that of either your relationship with original "Pan" or "Lemuria" (a much more "akin" civilization). We will speak of Atlantis for it was so much like what your "technical" projections have brought you to this day. We still refer to some of those old places as Poseid. What could have happened that would awash a wondrous civilization such as was Poseid? The same that is nearing your own qualifications.

You have progressed (a very bad term) to the point of breeding out of your generations the goodness of soul "christness" (small letter please, it is simply a "term"). You have technically copied that which has come into your places without any capability to control that power which you now are ready to unleash without capacitors or transformers--energy so great in its recycling as to change the orbit and polarity of your own globe.

Face it, you have reached the level of natural decadence which shall decide your direction and fate as a planet of continents. Some will perish, some may remain aloft to offer a "start" again if man will amend his ways. Just as with Atlantis, the nation came to a greater glory of mechanics, of science, and of physical condition than had been experienced prior to that civilization.

But then, guess what happened? As sequence unfolded the scholars found that those things which had always been possible only through mechanical contrivance, were more easily accomplished by purely psychic means; they learned it was possible to divest themselves of the flesh, and in astral body go wherever they wanted and could appear, instant as an electric current, at any distance. So good so far? Furthermore, if only goodness would have been THE projection--even better. They learned that they could perform material actions when they had thus projected themselves and indeed, yes, I recognize the quality of which I speak! Then, as is the usual evolution of man in dense perspective, next would come the cruder methods of physical expression to be suffered to lapse into the semi-forgetfulness of experience. And guess what--the masses began to rely on others, most especially the priesthood of the day--as they became Earthbound--to direct all things.

Thus it came that only the "few" exalted minds could reach out into that deeper side of nature and the "many" would remain in the lesser places. Inevitably then came corruption of power; the few were masters and the many had no recourse because the master of physics is invulnerable to the laws of physicality when wielded by men less than he.
Then, indeed, was the day come when ripeness was on the land and on the people. The ripe fig cannot keep perfection, but at the heart begins to decay which spreads from center to cortex, and lo, the end! At the core is the "education" of the people. Whenever Earth's nations cease to educate the coming generation, decay begins for the people. The "few" will have attained such exalted knowledge of natural forces that the many cannot over take them--as happened in Atlantis. Then, discontented with the comparative non-education the many had, they allowed all the "marvels" to diminish and weaken.

As you read back in those Hebrew scriptures upon which originally ALL of you based your historical recollections, you fail to realize that the accounts of doom often projected were in fact the same forces "out of control".

Ah, Poseid arose to the heights which the wildest dreams of science have not predicted for the modern world--for you came first to the destructive mechanisms of war and death. She arose, flourished and decayed, in the fullness of cyclic times. Let us consider that perhaps America is Poseid come again--with all the promise of a chosen creation, reincarnated, and shall see its scientific people repeat, but on a higher plane, the attainments of Atlantis. How can this be? Will it be before or after a time of total apparent destruction? I am not a fortune-teller, good people--which do you believe it to be? I will give you insight, however, in that you can be expecting the remnants of Lemuria to rise again, bearing some of her ancient gifts unto human to SEE what it is ye shall do with a final act from God as to reclamation of civilization.

Will this mean ALL persons will have flight into glory and fun and games? No, for the evil shall rise against itself and the clash shall be to the point of total devastation and Mother shall cleanse herself. Man will destroy man to the extent that it shall be but remnants of civilization which shall be ultimately preserved.

In its beauty and harmony shall the Americas rise in consciousness at some point of sequence wherein man shall move back into his relationship with God--by whatever label you call your Source/Spirit. But the "debts owing" humankind are great. The "original" American (and you better look at that term carefully) bore the enfleshment of those souls which in those olden days made that land proud and strong within the Great Spirit in harmony and balance of life force. However, it is upon the face of that nation that man shall "make it" or "break it" for she is the bastion of hope--now dimming in her radiance. Strength and power of "might" has reached a point of urgent importance as to possible restoration.

Are there enough of the Goodly Company to accomplish that which seems impossible? Yes--IT ONLY ACTUALLY TAKES ONE!

You reached a time of near greatness--but you have followed the evil path--taking from the perfection and moving into destruction of your resources and yourselves. You have allowed that which is "physical" expression to bind you to inability to move beyond the physical shackles.

Ones of spiritual expression are come again to show you the way from your darkness but few there will be who see and hear. However, it will be sufficient unto that which IS and shall forever BE.

The point of this little discussion is to assure you that you have gone about as far down that incorrect pathway as you can go-- AND MAKE IT. It is time you turn again into your eternal quest and realization that you can release from the wheel of misperception. Ye are LIGHT and only within light can you "see". Only those things created in the spiritual are eternal-- those which are manufactured in the physical are but passing fancies of the imaginings of thought manifest. You have become trapped in your own thought manifestations and they mostly be evil in intent. Such intentions direct you into the wrong direction of growth.

In those wondrous places of what you call the Pacific whereupon the ancient crystal cities shall find again glory of the radiant sun of your orbiting cycles--shall also come "the way" for therein dwell the ancient dwellers of the many planets--and other dimensions--WHO HAVE NEVER FORGOTTEN THEIR TRUTH OR THEIR WAY! They are the guardians of your journey as it takes you down the roads of unfoldment within the physical evolution into regaining of essence expression. They shall come again up out of the depths or from the core of your placement--or they shall join the Hosts as we share this time of expression evolving again into that which can lead you home. Will you welcome them/us or will you effort to kill them/us? It is your own demise which shall come from your evil actions--for these ones are without physical death! We shall see....!

[wave]

PJ 91

CHAPTER 13

REC #3 HATONN

TUE. APR. 5, 1994 1:57 P.M. YEAR 7, DAY 232

TUE., APR. 5, 1994

EVERYBODY'S TRYING

I appreciate the observations made by one of the staff this morning regarding the journals. However, we are not yet ready to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Until the legal garbage is finished we will have to handle the journals as we have been up to now. We have neither time nor resources to change.

Old editions of magazines remain available--most especially ones such as OR, National Geographic and others with topical subject material. I am not in favor under any circumstances, at present, to disallow readers from getting back issues which have been tied up in George Green's warehouse for two years. As it is, the value is totally reduced to less than printing costs at best--but to fail to reprint much demanded information is not accept­able for I shall not bring it forth--again. If that is a necessity--then we shall simply reprint them at regular intervals. I have no wish to print books as suggested, such as Reader's Digest who review one to three books in their reviews. Our magazines are already "reviews".

Thank you for your suggestions. Perhaps there is, further, a misunderstanding. I have not asked for input on the handling of my writings. I am most lenient about most things except those things for which my mission is aimed and around which my mis­sion revolves. If ones are too busy to pick up old editions for readers then we are doing something very wrong! I realize that everyone wants to tune up efficiency--but until we have some businesses which at least break-even, that luxury is not ours. Neither is our job "just to break even" nor to "make money off God's WORD". Let us not be tossing out the babe with the bath, please.

Perhaps the handling of the printings falls too intently on too few shoulders? I don't want our work to be a burden but I do feel that it is necessary that we not forfeit information for con­venience. There are so many subjects covered in back issues and so many new readers seeking that information that I find no easy "solution". We "title" the volumes for reference and per­haps if we can get these first editions indexed, we would be at advantage for finding past information. I repeat--I will NOT be offering the information again as such. It would behoove all--including and especially, ones who live and work here--to go back and start at the beginning and STUDY THOSE RE­LEASES!

Legally these editions are worthless past dating segments--but information wise--they are priceless as reference and in­formation gathering. I would hope they fit at least into the category of scientific or medically presented material for reference purposes. I don't know how else readers will know what research material to obtain.

I would hope that you would see that you need to intensify the "advertising" of contents of the original editions--not cast them out--for how can our readers know what they have missed if someone doesn't tell them and the CONTACT is the ONLY place they are offered to any great extent.

I do not wish to belabor the point but I do ask for MORE input of featuring older editions of the journals EVERY paper. Per­haps if you have not enough income for needs, there is some­thing being handled ineffectively for I cannot believe the mate­rial is not worth the offering. There is not team enough to allow for the lengthy effort of summarizing contents. But perhaps it is a very good idea if the one offering the suggestion would review at least one extra per week and give us a summary for the paper--that is what I have asked for since inception of the work. Per­haps a brief index might be offered as well.

Now, please, back to "Camelot".

I realize the difficulty and tedium with which you have to work, Dharma, to continue to write the material from Ronn Jackson as presented. I also realize that it is time consuming to have con­versations repeated, etc., but as we move into the document, es­pecially, you cannot have the impact of the author if you sum­marize instead of offer his presentation as he has seen fit to offer it.

In this instance you are dealing with a "typical" secret service sanction server. This means "kill" (sanction), my good typist, and unless you can grasp that "job" you cannot understand the magnitude of the story unfolding. I would rather take additional weeks to tell the story than to change it as we present it--at the least, in the beginning. I know you are tired of the long, long days, chela--but we must go on for these people we attend--are in serious danger. Ronn Jackson is in hospitalization within the prison system as we write this day--and that is SERIOUS!! It is better we be weary than our newly awakened brothers be deaded. Thank you for trying a little longer and we will see how it unfolds. Especially as concerns Ronn's work, remem­ber, there is no published book for the readers to get--this is it! Remember, chela, this was written for documentary (movie) and the conversation included sets the scenes for what took place in relationships and sequence.

THE DEATH OF CAMELOT, Part 3
By Ronn Jackson

QUOTING:

I went to the restroom and picked up a couple of towels. I started wiping the coffee off of the desk and the reporter took the second one, apologizing, as she wiped. I told her that it wasn't necessary but she continued to do so. I had a grin on my face and when I looked up she was looking at me. I got the im­pression she didn't like it. All I said was, "I'm just amused at your spitting all over the place."

"I didn't spit all over the place," she came back, in a very sharp and pointed tone.

I didn't want to run through what I had accomplished this day and, also, I didn't want her to think she was going to have the upper hand. "Look, maybe I should have said what I said differently. I've been trying to figure out just how to word it since I made the deal with the President. Could you tell me how I should tell someone that I have taken the lives of many people?"
"You are serious, aren't you?"
"Very"
"How many lives?"

I knew the question would come but I wasn't prepared for it. Well, I thought, I asked for this and I may as well get it over. "In twenty some odd years, I've had one hundred three sanctions."
"You mean you have killed a hundred and three people?"
"I said that I've completed one hundred and three sanctions. There is a difference between assassinations and murder. I did it on the express orders of others and on several occasions more than one person was involved."
"You mean that you've killed more than a hundred and three people."

It was my turn to get hot and I mean I hit the boiling point-- right now. I grabbed the lip around the desk and said, "Lady, you are here because I requested you, because I thought I might have owed you something, because someone was going to get it and I thought you might appreciate it, after you've heard the entire story. I didn't ask you to pass judgement, just listen and ask questions and if you are going to be so thin skinned, hit the door. I will get someone who isn't so judgmental--maybe a man."

My speech was over and I relaxed and leaned back in the chair. I usually don't get this emotional but there was difference this time. My ass was on the line. I was breathing hard.

* * *

I was driving south out of New York City on highway nine. Because of where I was, it was easier to get to New Jersey this way and it was my intent to drive on into Washington, D.C. I was so sick of airplanes, I could scream. The food was terrible and there had been rough weather coming across the Atlantic. I had to take a cab to my destination from Kennedy because the line at the rental agencies were twenty deep. I had to wait three hours to make my delivery and the businessman had a smart mouth. Hell, maybe it was me! I then took a cab to get this thing I was driving and had to wait an hour for it. NO sooner than I had signed the papers one of the tires went flat. I told the attendant that if O.J. Simpson were to walk on the lot I would break his jaw. He reminded me that O.J. worked for "number one" and this was "number two". I agreed with him.

I hit every red light on that cow pasture highway and was about to the boiling point. When the light turned I pulled through the intersection and turned into a shopping center. I knew I need to cool down. While sitting in the car I had noticed a neon sign in the shape of a martini glass and I though that I "might as well". There were alternatives to being miserable in a compact rental car. I walked to the establishment and upon entering I stopped just inside the door. The place was loud and I waited for my eyes to adjust to the poorly lit place. There was a fight of some kind going on in front of the bar so I waited a minute as I wasn't interested in being included.

The bigger one of the two ended up on his back and the crowd went back to their drinking. I walked toward the bar making my way through the tables and the semi-conscious man was in my path. I started to step over him and heard the unmistakable sound of a switchblade. I jumped and felt something on my pants. When I looked down I saw that he had missed me but I now had a gash in my trousers. I looked down at the prone figure and he was just laying there with a sneer on his face, holding the knife in plain view. I thought, "another want-to-be bad-ass," and my survival instincts kicked in. Before I realized what I was doing I moved around to his head, grabbed the hand holding the knife and bent it back which forced him to drop it. I pulled him to his feet and brought his arm down across my knee. I reached down and picked up the knife. Taking hold of it at both ends, I stepped over and broke it on his head. He stood looking at me so I grabbed him by his hair and threw a right to his forehead. He wasn't looking at anybody, now.

Whatever he had in his hair caused my fingers to stick to­gether. My other hand was throbbing and I thought I might have broken a knuckle or even two. I turned to the bartender and told him to pour me a scotch and water, that I was going to the restroom and wash my hands and when I came out I wanted plenty of space at the bar. The more I thought about the guy on the floor the madder I became. I looked around the bar and noted there wasn't a word being spoken.

That gunk that the man had in his hair was something else to get off. There was Boraxo in the dispenser and I had to do my hands twice to get the stuff off. I went back out to the bar and found that most of the patrons had left and two guys were help­ing that Jerk out. No one was at the bar and my drink was set­ting alone. I picked it up and took a good long swallow. The bartender noted that the guy I had punched out was "trouble". I finished my drink and wanted to tell him that the man was sim­ply lucky to be breathing. I threw a five on the bar and left.

It helped to have relieved a little steam and I felt things would be a bit better. The first stop-light was green and I was in Jer­sey in thirty minutes.

My first stop was a warehouse that was owned by "BCCI". Of all things, this place was supposed to contain the substance and base for talcum powder. My employers weren't interested in the material itself but it was what was contained in the bags. I had heard of coffee grounds throwing off scents in drug cases--but in thinking about it I supposed talcum powder would also work.

I walked across the docks and came to an open door. The place was about the size of a small gymnasium and was full of large bags stacked on pallets. I looked over the large room and the walls were of concrete, the roof was metal over steel bar joist. My employer must think I'm Clark Kent, I thought.

There was man on a fork-lift at the rear of the room starting to put the pallets two high. Must have a shipment coming in, I thought as I walked over to him. I told him that I was from Johnson & Johnson and we had a shipment that was late. He said the shipment was going to be even later as he closed in a few minutes and nothing was moving out until the following Monday. Suddenly I know what my problem was, the people in this area were so diplomatic and had such a way with words. I wondered how he was going to like the unemployment lines. Coming in I had noticed a plumbing riser and as I walked to­wards the exit I noticed a fairly new retro-fit system that had been installed. It was just outside the door and when I came to it I didn't see anyone around so I gave it a hard turn--breaking the seal that New Jersey's finest had put on. I opened the door all the way and I could hear the results from within as I stepped into the door. It looked like a monsoon had hit and a guy was running towards me at which point, when he arrived, I nailed him cold. I almost doubled over. I had forgotten about my knuckles. If they weren't broken before, they were now.

I drove over to the Jersey Turnpike and headed south. I set the cruise control as the state troopers had a reputation of being quick with the tickets. This freeway was no different than any other in the United States in that if you drove the speed limit ev­eryone passed you. If you speeded up, it was you that got the ticket, so I left the cruise engaged.

My second stop was in a small town where a gentleman had just closed his account at BCCI. Med-seven figures wasn't all that much but my employers were a little upset with his business methods with them. It had something to do with the treasury certificates and his inability to produce the agreed amount and numbers. I hadn't been given all the details....

* * *

I stopped in a fast food restaurant and found myself laughing at the situation that had just taken place. I knew that the water would play havoc on those burlap bags. I also knew that the contents of the bags would be protected and I also knew there was an alarm tied into the sprinkler system. I ordered a cup of ice with my food and while I ate I put my sore hand on ice. I could still move my fingers so maybe I had been lucky. I couldn't remember why I had complained about airline food as this was no better. Somehow nothing seemed to suit me today.

My objective this time lived on the outskirts of the town. It was thought that he was getting ready to make a move and there was little other information about that subject. He was a family man and the information I had on them was that the family was in South Carolina on vacation. He was thought to be joining them in a few days. He had a girl friend and not much was known about her. When I found his home I pulled into his driveway. There was a "Rolls" sitting in front of the garage with the top down. The house was a two-story colonial type and cost big bucks. I checked my weapon and made sure the silencer was right, put a round in the chamber and walked to the door. I knocked and there was no answer. The door was unlocked and I went in. I heard no movement, no sounds. I checked the downstairs areas and no one was around. I went upstairs and it was also empty. I found his office and there was a briefcase on the desk. I opened it and there was the money and the missing treasury notes. There were several pieces of unopened mail and as I looked them over I walked over to the window to see the back of the property. There was a pool with two people there who appeared to be sleeping. I put the mail into the briefcase and took it downstairs. I walked to the rear of the house and found the rear entrance. I put the briefcase on a hall table and quietly let myself out onto the patio that separated the house from the pool. I took out my nine millimeter and stood for a few seconds. Neither one moved so I walked over to the reclining figures and they were asleep. I completed my assigned task, making very little noise, and went back into the house. I started to open the briefcase and looked over the letters and decided to leave as I could do that later. I still had one more stop to make...

Back on the turnpike I turned on the radio. I found a news station and a major drug bust had been made. An industrial accident had led the authorities to the site...our good old boys in blue.

I took the bypass around D.C. and drove to Dulles. I turned the rental car in and rented a truck. I was more comfortable in one and considered that I might have some hauling to do a bit later. I then drove to McLean and checked in at the Holiday Inn. The last part of my job was in our nation's capitol.

In the room I locked the door and put on the safety chain. I closed the drapes and I really didn't expect any problems here because if the vice-president can bring his girl-friend here, there shouldn't be any problem for me.

Back in the briefcase there were several letters and three were from banks. I read one particular one. The letter was granting the gentleman a several million dollar line of credit and it was signed by Clark Clifford. I thought for a minute and then remembered the name. He had been in politics for many administrations and now he owned a bank. Politics must have been good. I then remembered that I had a file on him--in fact the records were in the "Hoover's files" that Casey had given me. Well, I had a little more for Mr. Clifford's file....

This guy I just sanctioned was really connected. There was another bank from the south, BNL, and they had given him another line of credit. He had a tax return check and an offer on a building that he had a commercial lease on. The nicest part of this situation was the case--that was mine! I didn't bother to count it but I was sure that it was the proceeds of his closing his account at the New York Bank.

The last part of my assignment lived in Baltimore. He was a long-time civil-servant and this was around the time that the whistle-blowing was becoming fashionable. Even though he was justified in what he was doing, one of his targets was connected to someone else and you know how the domino effect is. I put plastic explosive in the wheel-well of his car. I had only a short wait and when he was headed home I followed him. I waited until he went through the toll plaza and got onto the road on which he lived and detonated the explosive.

Author's note: I put all of the letters in Clifford's file. I had heard his name over the years but, like so many people, I just didn't pay any attention. When I placed them in the file I examined Hoover's papers on him. He was just as dirty as the others; fifty years in government service? As I sit here and write this I wonder if anyone is clean. (ID:060220)

END OF PART 3

* * *

This is enough for today. I watch you wondering why we should care very much about the health of Mr. Jackson as life certainly was of no value to him except as it paid him to dispose of it. Ours is not to judge--just to type...! Salu.

APPENDIX

THE REMAINDER OF THIS JOURNAL IS A

COLLECTION OF TIMELY NEWS AND/OR

EDUCATIONAL ITEMS

PJ 91

CHAPTER 14

OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION

The following report on Outcome Based Education was received anonymously in the CONTACT office. No author or publisher was shown in the material received. We reprint it as it is. If someone can provide us with the author's name, we shall be happy to give credit.
Confirmations on much of the information in the article can be found in Dr. John Coleman's Book, Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Committee of 300, 2533 N. Carson St., Carson City, Nevada, 89706, as well as Antony C. Sutton's book, America's Secret Establishment. An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones.

John Dewey was a prominent member of Skull and Bones. Mr. Sutton's book can be obtained from Liberty House Press, 2027 Iris, Billings, Montana, 59102. The Freemasonry/Secret Soci­ety "connections" of ADL/B'nai B'rith have been researched in the book, Occult Theocracy, by Edith Starr Miller, pg. 73, 465, first published 1933, by The Christian Book Club of America. I quote a paragraph from Ms. Miller's article on the Independent Order of B 'nal B'rith: "There is but little doubt now that the B'nai B'rith" seems to be the supreme body, shaping and di­recting, for the attainment of its own ends, the policies whatever they may be, of all Freemasonry beginning with the Grand Lodge of England, the Grand Orient and Scottish Rites, and ending in the O.T.O. , which is Illuminism under another name. "

THE EVIL SOCIAL ENGINEERS BEHIND
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION

The parent or teacher alarmed about Outcome-Based-Education (OBE) today runs into an immediate jungle of acronyms, and in­stitutions, many of which appear obscure or locally based. The reality is quite different: all of these programs are nationally coordinated and come from a nexus of evil, which reaches from the United Nations to the National Education Association.

Officially, the push for OBE began in the early 1980s, and was fostered by the Department of Education, the Carnegie Corpo­ration, the Business Roundtable, the Department of Labor, and now a national agency called America 2000, which set up a national coordinating body. There are innumerable other corpora­tions, like Xerox and RJR Nabisco also involved.

The on-the-ground enforcer of Outcome Based Education and other brainwashing programs now claiming the nation's children as their victims, is the National Education Association. But the NEA itself is the product of a much higher level of social engi­neers whose self-appointed task has been the destruction of the American democratic republic. Today, these people exist as an invisible army of brainwashers, of psychological warfare ex­perts, psychiatrists, psychologists, psychoanalysts, and social workers who have for more than half a century fought a battle for the control of the minds of the American people. The "mother" institution of this network is the London-based Tavis­tock Institute of Human Relations.

THE TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE

Since its creation in 1921, Tavistock has served as the psycho­logical warfare arm of the British monarchy, and has benefited from the patronage of that monarchy and other allied oligarchi­cal networks. It has always enjoyed a close working relation­ship with the highest circles of Freemasonry: Its current chair­man of the board of directors is the Duke of Kent, the top Scot­tish Rite Freemason.

Tavistock, on behalf of its oligarchical masters, seeks to destroy Western Judeo-Christian civilization. At the center of its decades' long fight is the battle to wipe from the minds of men a view of man as born in the image of his Creator, in the unique sense that each individual is endowed with the potential for cre­ative reason. If that power of reason can be destroyed, then men can be reduced to easily controllable beasts.

The man who shaped Tavistock and who developed the brain-washing techniques that are referred to as the "Tavistock Method" was Brig. Gen. John Rawlings Rees, who became the director of the then Tavistock Clinic in 1932. It was Rees who first proposed in various published locations to deliberately induce controlled forms of neurotic behavior and even psychosis, for the purpose of mass psychological control of society. Rees displayed an open hatred for minorities, placing them in what he called the "psychopathological tenth" of the population or the "dullard". Writes Rees, "Aldous Huxley in his book Brave New World was planning to produce a section of subnormal men who do the dull jobs of society; we really don't need to produce more of them, for there are far too many already."

Rees proposed to create an army of "psychological shock troops"--psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers and the like--who would become the controllers of a society "where it is possible for people of every social group to have treatment when they need it, even if they do not wish it, without it being necessary to invoke law."

Under Rees's encouragement, teams of Tavistock personnel developed methods to bring about this vision of a fascist world order, including the use of mass media to create what was dubbed a psychologically controlled environment. Carrying on the work of Sigmund Freud and his followers, the Tavistockians paid particular attention to work on the destruction of the family and on child psychology. The point of attack was focusing on "infantile sexuality" and its effect on the development of the personality, and seeking to produce an adult population whose intellectual and emotional development was that of neurotic children.

The Second World War provided Tavistock with a means to test its mass brainwashing techniques under the sanction of Anglo-American intelligence, not only on "enemy" populations, but on both the American and British soldiers and the public. These "tests" tended to corroborate the evil theories of Rees and his followers that both small and large groups of people, under conditions of induced and controlled stress, could be made to become more infantile, and would give up even held beliefs under "peer" pressure to conform to perceived popular opinion. These "outcomes" could be steered by a Tavistock-trained controller or group leader, or as it is now called in our schools a "facilitator."

Throughout this period, Rees remained committed to his project of creating his invisible army of psychological shock troops. That was first done by recruiting directly to Tavistock itself. Then, those "recruits" started fanning out to other institutions, including major hospitals and universities in the United States. In addition, new institutional centers from Tavistock operations were established at such places as the Wharton School of Finance and Business Administration at the University of Pennsylvania, the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan, the Stanford Research Institute's Center for Advanced Behavioral Sciences, the Sloan School at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, among others. In 1947, Tavistock, with the help of funding from its royal patrons, was converted from a clinic to an "institute" to be more capable of directing its now far-flung operations. These new centers, in turn, recruited more individuals to the "Tavistock method" and from them it was possible to launch a larger operation to take over control of major government, labor, educational, and corporate institutions from within.

NATIONAL TRAINING LABORATORIES

One of the key institutions established for this purpose in the United States was the National Training Laboratories (NTL). Founded in 1947 by members of the Tavistock network in the United States and located originally on an estate in Bethel, Maine, NTL had as its explicit purpose the brainwashing of leaders of the government, educational institutions, and corporate bureaucracies in the Tavistock method, and then using these "leaders": to either themselves run Tavistock group sessions in their organizations or to hire other similarly trained group leaders to do the job.

The "nuts and bolts" of the NTL operation revolves around the particular form of Tavistock degenerate psychology known as "group dynamics," developed by German Tavistock operative Kurt Lewin, who emigrated to the United States in the 1930s and whose students founded NTL. In a Lewinite brainwashing group, a number of individuals from varying backgrounds and personalities, are manipulated by a "group leader" to form a "consensus" of opinion, achieving a new "group identity". The key to the process is the creation of a controlled environment, in which stress is introduced (sometimes called dissonance) to crack an individual's belief structure. Using the peer pressure of other group members, the individual is "cracked," and a new personality emerges with new values. The degrading experience causes the person to deny that any change has taken place. In that way, an individual is brainwashed without the victim know­ing what has taken place.

This method is the same, with some minor modification, used in all so-called "sensitivity groups" or "T-groups," or in the more extreme rock-drug-sex counterculture form, "touchy-feely groups," such as the kind popularized from the 1960 onward by the Esalen Institute, which was set up with the help of NTL.

From the mid-1950s onward, NTL put the majority of the na­tion's corporate leaderships through such brainwashing pro­grams, while running similar programs for the State Depart­ment, the Navy, the Department of Education, and other sec­tions of the federal bureaucracy. There is not a firm estimate of the number of Americans who have been put through this pro­cess in last 40 years at either NTL, or as it is now known the NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences, which is based in Rosslyn, Virginia, or its West Coast base of operations, the Western Training Laboratories in Group Development, or in various satellite institutions. The most reliable estimate is in the several millions.

One of the groups that went through the NTL mill in the 1950s was the leadership of the National Education Association, the largest organization of teachers in the United States. Thus, the NEA's outlook has been "shaped" by Tavistock, through the NTL. In 1964, the NTL Institute drafted the programs for the training of the nation's primary and secondary school teachers, and has a hand as well in developing the content of educational "reforms," including OBE.

THE CARNEGIE CORPORATION

The role of the Carnegie Corporation (in an earlier incarnation, the Carnegie Institute) in both dominating and subverting U.S. public education shows how private corporate funds are im­planting a one-world New Age agenda in our schools.

Through its virtual monopoly over the Department of Education and its predecessor since at least the 1950s, Carnegie--together with a handful of other elite foundations such as the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Aspen Institute, the Brookings Institute, and so forth has succeeded in dominating all debate on education curriculum, testing and teacher training in the United States.

An insight as to why Carnegie decided to get into the "education" business can be gleaned from its sponsorship back in 1918 of the Eugenics Record Office in Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island, which had been set up with a grant from the Har­riman fortune as the active center of all organized eugenics re­search, propaganda and political activity in the U.S.A. The Eu­genics Record Office, later known as the Carnegie Institute's Department of Genetics, continued to promote immigration re­striction quotas and compulsory sterilization of human beings with "inferior blood" until it was finally shut down on the eve of World War II.

The eugenicists became unpopular in this country after Ameri­cans witnessed firsthand the consequences of a state eugenics policy under Nazi Germany. But they by no means disap­peared. Instead, they took their pseudoscience into the realm of behavioral psychology, where mad doctors like Kurt Lewin and Hilda Taba were trying to create a new species of man through psychotropic manipulation of the human mind. Kurt Lewin's National Training Laboratories, in collaboration with the Na­tional Education Association, went on to spawn many of the New Age monstrosities being foisted on our children today in the name of education.

Hilda Taba, an Estonian psychologist who emigrated to the U.S.A. in the 1930s where she conducted her infamous "reward and punishment" experiments at child guidance clinics and psychological research institutes in California throughout the 1940s-50s, became the mentor of psychologist Ralph Tyler. Tyler went on to become the founder and director of the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences in Stanford, California, from which position he was invited to join a high-level education task force under President Kennedy, and later under President Johnson, to craft the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965. The ESEA pumped federal funds into education "innovations", and spawned a series of education "laboratories" which came up with hundreds of psycho-behavioral instructional programs. Those programs in turn, were written and "validated" for dissemination to the schools by educational consultants like Ralph Tyler.

In 1966, Tyler chaired the Exploratory Committee on Assessing the Progress of Education (ESCAPE) under the sponsorship of U.S. Commissioner of Education Francis Kerpel, (son of a Carnegie Corporation president). Financed not by the federal government but by Carnegie Corporation and by the Ford Foundation's Fund for the Advancement of Education, Tyler, together with then Carnegie Corporation President John Gardner, formulated the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP), which was formally implemented in 1969.

NAEP's prototype was Pennsylvania state's Educational Quality Assessment (EQA) test, written by Ralph Tyler in 1964 through a contract with a Princeton, New Jersey firm called Educational Testing Service (ETS). The EQA, as of 1989, when it was temporarily pulled in the face of parent opposition, contained 385 "attitudinal" assessment questions, and only 30 academic ones! The ETS, it turned out, was a wholly owned subsidiary of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; the ETS and CFAT boards of directors were virtually interchangeable. Tyler was later to become a president of CFAT himself.

ETS had also created and owned the college boards--the Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SATs)--and the National Teachers' Examination'. ETS not only writes most of the country's education assessment tests, on both the state and federal level, but scores and maintains data banks of all test results, down to the micro (individual) record level.

In 1976, President Carter created the Department of Education. Ernest Boyer, an ardent advocate of "globalist education," became the U.S. Commissioner of Education and, by 1983, an-other CFAT president.

In 1980, the Department of Education's National Institute of Education (NIE) issued a working paper which declared that "along with the work toward a centralized computer bank and the funding arrangement to make it all happen...achievement data are not the primary focus of the studies, which also collect data on educational attainment, student characteristics and attitudes, parent attitudes, and school programs."

The NIE and Carnegie have a virtual "Revolving door" between them, sharing projects and, sometimes, personnel. In 1988, CFAT/ETS's three computer banks of test result data were integrated into one large super-computer, the Elementary and Secondary Integrated Data System (ESIDS), which was brought on line by the U.S. government to meet precisely those guidelines of the NIE.

NEA: PURVEYORS OF A BRAVE NEW WORLD

The institution probably most responsible for the destruction of American education in this century is the National Education Association, or NEA. Although founded in 1857 first as an organization of state teachers' colleges to effect public policy on education and later as a teachers' membership organization, by around the turn of the century it had become the leading purveyor formed of the issues at stake so that much that now is un-thinkable may at least become thinkable.

In 1969, Dewey's student, Arthur Wellesley Foshay, who had held the post of director of UNESCO's Institute for Educational Study, wrote the NEA's "Curriculum for the 70s." It predicted that educators would assume responsibility for children when they reach the age of two; that enforced or mandatory foster homes would be created for children whose own homes were said to have a bad influence; that children would be given drugs on an experimental basis; that teachers would become "learning clinicians"; and that the schools would take on the function of providing "individualized psychosocial ' treatment' for the stu­dent."

The man who drafted the NEA's "Curriculum", is Dewey's stu­dent Arthur Wellesley Foshay, who had also held the post of di­rector of UNESCO's Institute of Educational Study. Part of Foshay's proposed new curriculum included the teaching of "self-awareness and self-development." Writes Foshay, future schools would give "full attention to the curriculum of social ex­perimentation": and would "be run by the students."

The document concludes, "education and schools, as they exist today, will change drastically during the 1970s, and will be modified almost beyond recognition by the end of the century."

In 1973, the NEA's Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development published a book titled Education for Peace: Fo­cus on Mankind. One essay, called "Ethical Concerns for the Future," lays bare the underlying philosophy behind the NEA's curriculum. The essay applauds the fact that "traditional beliefs are being questioned, including the notions that: a) scientific progress is automatically good, b) what is medically beneficial for one man is necessarily good for society, and c) scientists know how to improve humanity."

Shortly thereafter, NEA official Sally R. Williams, who also served on the board of directors of the Sex Information and Ed­ucation Council of the U.S.(SIECUS), which introduced sex ed­ucation into the schools, testified to Congress on the need to use drugs as "useful tools" in "stabilizing the brains of children with learning disorders."

ENTER THE MIND CONTROLLERS

In 1962, the NEA formally took over the National Training Labs (NTL). NTL was directed for years by psychologist Abraham Maslow, creator of "humanistic psychology" and of the term "self-actualization," a concept later used by behavioral psychologist Carl Rogers (1964 Humanist of the Year) to found so-called sensitivity training. Carl Rogers is the intellectual godfather of most of the psychotherapy programs used in public school "guidance counseling" around the country.

In January of 1968, Carl Rogers addressed a symposium spon­sored by the NTL-linked Esalen Institute in California, at which he predicted that, by the year 2000, "The teacher or professor will have largely disappeared. His place will be taken by a fa­cilitator of learning...focusing his major attention on the prime period for learning--from infancy to six or eight. [The stu­dent's] unhappiness with parents or with other children--all these will be an open part of his curriculum, as worthy of exploration as history or mathematics."

The NEA is also the "enforcer" against those who will not con­form to its agenda. In 1971, the NEA's Commission on Profes­sional Rights and Responsibilities proposed "to gather informa­tion about the various individuals and groups who criticize or oppose education, and make resumes of their activities."

That same year, in the NEA's "Schools for the 70s and Beyond: A Call to Action," we find that "teachers who conform to the traditional institutional mode are out of place. They might find fulfillment as tap-dance instructors or guards in maximum-secu­rity prisons or proprietors of reducing salons, or agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation--but they damage teaching, children and themselves by staying in the classroom."

THE ROLE OF THE ADL

A review of the enforcers of OBE would not be complete without identifying the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (ADL). The ADL is a freemasonic entity, which was set up to protect "Jewish" gangsters like Meyer Lansky, and to wage war against Judeo-Christian values. This is lawful, since many of the leading ADL/B'nai B'rith spokesmen, of which Sigmund Freud was a representative, served as transmission belts for Communist Party ideology.

The ADL has not only supported the infamous 1947 Supreme Court decision proclaiming the "wall of separation" between church and state, but has brought innumerable other legal actions to drive prayer, and even the Bible and the Ten Commandments, out of schoolrooms. Over 30 percent of the ADL's amicus curiae briefs have been written on this topic.

In 1992 The ADL published a guidebook on "Religion in the Public Schools: Guidelines for a Growing Changing Phenomenon," to serve as a handbook for challenging any religious expression in the public schools. As simple observation shows, the ADL has shown no such concern about pagan religious expression in the schools.

The ADL sees itself in a virtual "holy war" against the "religious right," as it fights for "tolerance" of homosexuality, abortion, and other New Age degradations. Through its infiltration of law enforcement agencies and other government agencies, unfortunately, the ADL may well be in your school already--although you don't know it.

* "preparing for change and evaluating its implications for learning";
* "adapting to change as needed";
* "analyzing conflicts to discover methods of cooperative resolution";
* "using the environment responsibly";
* "expressing insights, feelings, and perceptions through a variety of creative processes, performances or products";
* "functioning effectively within multicultural environments";
* "respecting individual differences, points of view, and the works of others"; and so on.

The underlying concept to these "outcomes" is the belief that many children attending public school cannot be taught academic subjects. One of the top psychological gurus cited extensively in the Ohio Board of Education Vision 21 OBE draft plan is Howard Gardner of Harvard University, who created the racist theory of "multiple intelligences." According to Gardner, most African-American, ethnic Catholic, and eastern European heritage children are genetically unable to learn reading, math, and science, but are genetically gifted at other "intelligences" enabling them to be "singers," "dancers, athletes" (kinesthetic intelligence). No matter which intelligence they are, all children, says Gardner, must develop their "interpersonal" and "intrapersonal intelligence."

Assessment of "learning outcomes", or behaviors and attitudes, requires evaluations that go beyond objective tests: personal interviews, group evaluations, and anecdotal records are all used to maintain electronic "portfolios" on each individual child, a record which follows the child through graduation and beyond. Your child is already being politically "tracked."

What is the difference between such "portfolios" and the files of any Gestapo or secret police? The "portfolios" are psychological profiles which are regularly evaluated and fine-tuned through the administration of state assessment tests like the Bettendorf Survey.

One parent in Pennsylvania who objected to test questions her daughter was required to answer and wanted to pull her child from the program was told it was federally mandated and that there was therefore no "opting out"!

MENTAL TORTURE INSTEAD OF LEARNING

It is frightening enough that a profile of the attitudes, beliefs, and behavior of one's child from pre-school through adulthood can constitute a life-time "report card" that is permanently accessible by the federal government. But already, any child now subject to an OBE curriculum is already in the same position of a captured prisoner-of-war who is forced to undergo brain­washing.

OBE's stated objective is to shape and control attitudes, beliefs, and behavior through state-mandated curricula written by be­havioral psychologists! In psychological warfare terms, that is called brainwashing.

According to OBE, one's child can be repeatedly "remediated" by "facilitators" (teaching is no longer an approved activity un­der OBE, as the onus for learning is now on the child!).

Remediation means that the child who refuses to demonstrate "mastery" of an OBE learning outcome--that is, to conform to the state-mandated goal--can be trapped indefinitely in a remedi­ation loop, despite his/her progress on any other learning goal.

No child can be failed in any subject, since failure is considered damaging to one's "self-esteem." Instead, the child is given an "incomplete" or "not yet" status.

OBE has been accused of "dumbing down" education, forcing the quicker kids to spin their wheels. A Minnesota high-school freshman with a 3.9 average complains that, with OBE, she has to "sit through three or four days of reteaching and reteaching. The content is very basic. We'll go over the same thing day af­ter day....I've become so much lazier this year."

Children who master the OBE goal must either wait for the rest of the class to catch up, or become a "peer tutor" for the others. An elementary school teacher in a Pittsburgh OBE program re­ports, One of the things were trying to stress is that they (the children) don't ask me for help. They ask their neighbor. We believe there can be a lot learned from their peers." This is called "cooperative learning" in OBE language, but are we sending our children to school to be "facilitators"?

Computers also aid in the "remediation" effort. The computer program used to "remediate" your recalcitrant child will be individualized--tailor made not only to his personal performance data and "learning style," but also on his personal medical, psychological and cultural profiles, information on the family (including income, educational levels achieved, etc.), and non-school activities.

"The computers we have here are not the type where the kids program the computer; they are the type where the computer programs the kids," admitted one employee of the Cleveland board of education on the OBE program.

Teachers are also victims of OBE. According to new laws be­ing passed in Washington state as part of OBE, those who do not demonstrate "accountability"--i.e., whose children are not ade­quately mastering the OBE goals--are themselves "remediated" by so-called "mentor teachers" placed alongside them in their classrooms. If they resist such "accountability" procedures, their contracts are subject to immediate termination.

Teacher certification procedures are simultaneous undergoing major changes, to weed out those who want to teach from those willing to enforce "politically correct" guidelines being hatched by the psychological gestapo. OBE teachers admit that since their jobs depend upon showing a high outcome mastery rate among their students, their tendency is to lower standards and expectations, also thereby reducing the amount of reteaching and retesting they are otherwise burdened with.

It may not be long before teachers are replaced completely--per­haps in the name of "cost-cutting"? As OBE guru Howard Gardner wrote in his book Frames of Mind: "Still, it is worth noting that among the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of the schools are the personal qualities of the principal and the teachers. Despite the promises of a microcomputer alongside (or, in place of) every desk, these individuals cannot be replaced (at least not yet)" [emphasis added].

Don't be lulled into believing that OBE is an overlay upon stan­dard education. It is a revolution against everything America stands for. Why else would it be necessary, in the view of the OBE implementers in Washington, for instance, to repeal all the standard laws on the books concerning education, in order to implant OBE?

As reported by Jed Brown, who is fighting OBE in Washington, 218 laws are now up for repeal in Washington concerning education:

"There is a law on the books that requires all of our students in this state to be taught the U.S. and Washington state constitutions....There is a law that requires the teaching of morality and patriotism in the schools. Let me read it. ' it shall be the duty of all teachers to endeavor to impress on the minds of their pupils the principles of morality, truth, justice, temperance, humanity, patriotism. To teach them to avoid idleness, profanity, and falsehood. To instruct them in the principles of free government and to train them up to the true comprehension of the rights, duty, and dignity of American citizenship. That law is on a list that is targeted for repeal. We were told that these were just the laws that they needed to repeal so that Outcome Based Education would work in this state."

The OBE brainwashers also want to repeal the law that establishes the school year, the law that establishes the length of the school day, and the law that establishes on which days school shall not be taught. Those days are currently listed as: Sunday, Martin Luther King Day, 4th of July, Veterans Day, Christmas, New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day. In Puget Sound, there is a proposal that such "traditional, religious holidays will be replaced with seasonal activities or common underlying concepts and values."

ADL'S WORLD OF DIFFERENCE

Anti-OBE activists be warned: If you find yourselves accused of anti-Semitism, or homophobia, or religious extremism, you should immediately suspect the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith as the source of such smears!

The ADL is not a Jewish organization, nor is it a civil rights' organization. It is a Freemasonic entity which, since its inception, has waged war against Judeo-Christian values through such activities as: promoting the international drug trade, honoring Playboy's Hugh Hefner with one of its First Amendment awards, supporting homosexual and abortion "rights" and using the courts to drive religion out of all phases of public life.

The ADL has now turned its sights on the public school system, where it has become deeply involved in promoting OBE-type programs, as well as such OBE offshoots as the obscene Rain-bow Curriculum, which aims to turn children into perverts by pushing homosexuality and sexual promiscuity.

The ADL is carrying out this filth largely through a program it launched in 1985, called "A World of Difference," which it is selling to school systems, preschools, youth groups, church organizations, police departments and corporations across the country, as a "prejudice reduction" program.

The ADL boasts that A World of Difference has thus far trained more than 100,000 elementary and secondary school teachers, "impacting more than 10 million public, private and parochial school students."

ADL: AMERICAN DISSOLUTION LEAGUE

Funded by convicted felon Michael Milken of Junk-bond infamy, "A World of Difference" is a thinly veiled effort to foster vicious racism and divisiveness, under the rubric of multiculturalism.

The vast array of teaching materials which the ADL has produced through its A World of Difference Institute deliberately seeks to emphasize racial and other differences, rather than the idea of a "melting pot" which enabled the United States to assimilate vast waves of immigrants in the past, "Teachers should affirm rather than deny differences, " A World of Difference instruction manual proclaims.

The program's teaching materials, in effect, deny the concept of universal man, a concept derived from die Judeo-Christian belief that all men are created in the image of God, and promote in its place the antithetical view that it is the differences which exist among people that are more important than that which binds them together.

Like all such "multicultural" programs, "A World of Difference" is a prescription for the rapid dissolution of American society.

The methodology employed by "A World of Difference" is a prescription for the rapid dissolution of American society.

The methodology employed by "A World of Difference" bears a striking resemblance to the behavior modification program known as OBE. That is hardly surprising, given that key ADL officials have been deeply involved in developing and promoting OBE in various parts of the U.S.

(In fact, parts of the ADL curriculum were developed by Gordon Allport, a social psychologist trained at Britain's Tavistock Institute, a leading center for the development of various social profiling and brainwashing methods, who later teamed up with the National Training Laboratory, an affiliate of the National Education Association.)

One of the program's basic tenets is that "all of us harbor some biases and prejudices against others." Based on that highly questionable premise, the ADL program encourages teachers to involve their students in all sorts of New Age-style activities, such as "role-playing, video vignettes, and action planning."

Teachers and parents who have been lured into participating in the program are subjected to training sessions in which an ADL "facilitator," employing social engineering techniques such as small-group dynamics, to convince participants that they are inveterate racists if they refuse to bow to multiculturalism.

These efforts are designed to subtly channel participants into thinking of themselves as part of competing sub-groups. In the Minneapolis program, for instance, students are presented with a graph (a series of inter-connected circles), called the "Personal Identity Molecule," and are instructed to write in the circles "the five groups with which you identify."

Through "A World of Difference," the ADL is not only trying to push its own "multicultural" political agenda. It is also attempting to infiltrate the country's school system for the purpose of carrying out spy operations against people it deems to be political enemies: i.e., parents, religious leaders, community activists, students--anyone who opposes the particularly vicious child abuse program known as OBE.

Illegal spying is nothing new to the ADL: it is already under investigation for running a decades-long surveillance and intelligence-gathering operation targeting over 1000 organizations and individuals.

It is a supreme irony that the ADL should be pawning itself off as experts in "tolerance."

Item: The ADL has devoted over 30% of its legal efforts to write amicus curiae briefs on behalf of Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black's infamous 1947 decision proclaiming the existence of an unbridgeable wall of separation between church and state. The ADL has brought legal actions to drive prayer out of the school, shut down Christmas pageants, and even prohibit the posting of the Ten Commandments. According to the November/December 1992 issue of the ADL newsletter On the Frontline promoting "The wall of separation between church and state guaranteed in the Constitution's First Amendment establishment clause has long been an ADL concern. The League believes that any organized religious practice of instruction should take place in the home or place of worship rather than in the public school or other government institution."

Item: The ADL has filed numerous amicus briefs to support abortion rights, and spokesmen have even gone so far as to maintain that abortion opponents are anti-Semites because they are attempting to impose their religious views. This despite the fact many Jews believe abortion to be prohibited by Jewish moral law.

Item: At a conference in Montreal in 1991, the ADL identified "black intellectuals" as main enemies of the Jewish community.

Item: The ADL's 80th anniversary National Commission Meet­ing this June featured an address by Skip Poreous, president of the Institute for First Amendment Studies, in which he called for a virtual "holy war" against the "Religious Right."

Item: The ADL published a guidebook on "Religion in the Pub­lic Schools: Guidelines for a Growing and Changing Phe­nomenon," last year to serve as a hand-book for challenging any religious expression in the public schools--long a target of ADL activity.

Commenting on the book's purpose, Ruth L. Lansner, chairman of the ADL National Legal Affairs Committee, said: "Compliance with the separation of church and state must be most vigorously enforced in the nation's public schools."

TEACHING HOMOSEXUALITY:

THE RAINBOW CURRICULUM

The scene is a ninth-grade classroom in New York City. A young 17-year old woman is writing on the blackboard. She is the "guest teacher" of the day, sent into the schools by the non­profit Hetrick-Martin Institute, which seeks to aid young homo­sexuals. This is her ninth peer-training class. She asks every­one in the class to say what words come to their minds when they think of homosexuality. Ninth-graders volunteer such words as "AIDS," "dyke," "homo," "weird," "disgusting." "These aren't nice words, are they?" says the "guest teacher." And such words would not be used to describe African-Ameri­cans or Latinos, she says. Therefore, we should not use derogatory terms for homosexuality.

Is this an attempt to break down "prejudice" or is your child being sexually assaulted in the classroom, and actively recruited by sex perverts?

Here are the instructions for the Grade 1 teacher in the Rainbow Curriculum:

"Teachers of first graders have an opportunity to give children a healthy sense of identity at an early age. Classes should include references to lesbians/gay people in all curricular areas."

Under the Rainbow Curriculum and similar mandatory classes on homosexuality, the very idea of the family is being erased from the minds of our children. The textbooks for the Rainbow Curriculum are Heather has two Mommies, and Daddy's Room­mate which idealize lesbian and homosexual couples' "parenting" of children.

This filth is now being shoved down the throats of young chil­dren, pushed through school boards by the National Educational Association and the Anti-Defamation League.

RAINBOW PERVERSITY SPARKED
FIGHT IN NEW YORK

The Rainbow Curriculum resulted in the forced ouster of New York Schools Chancellor Joseph Fernandez in early 1993, but the curriculum is still taught in many city schools. In May 4, 1993 school board elections, a record high voter turnout of 450,000 gave victory to more than 60 candidates who cam­paigned on a "pro-family-issues" platform, including returning to the board people who had been kicked out by the perverse Fernandez. A week after the elections, Carol Gressner of Queens, who had cast the swing vote to oust Fernandez, was elected president of the Board of Education.

Opposition to the Rainbow Curriculum's child molestation was led by a coalition of Protestants, Jews, and Roman Catholics, including the New York Catholic Archdiocese. The coalition distributed 500,000 copies of a voters' guide which reviewed the candidates' positions on Rainbow. On the other side were the American Federation of Teachers, The New York Times, the National Education Association, the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. A spokesman for the tax-exempt ADL said the ADL supports Rainbow as "Multiculturalism."

THE LUCIS TRUST:
SATANISTS BEHIND OBE

Organized Satanism had its hand in the creation of Outcome Based Education, through the United Nations-sponsored Lucis Trust, a.k.a. Lucifer Trust. A special U.N. Design Team for OBE, one of eleven design teams in the country, was active in formulating the program, run through the University of Peace, whose Chancellor Robert Muller, a former deputy secretary of the U.N. was a prominent member of the Lucis Trust. Muller boasts that his 1986 "World Curriculum" is the basis for OBE. The Lucis Trust, which likes to think of itself as a "spiritual United Nations," is headquartered in Washington, D.C. at a so-called "Temple of Understanding," and has been granted an of­ficial "meditating" room at the United Nations itself. Prominent Lucis Trusters have included former Defense Secretary and World Bank President Robert Strange McNamara.

The conceptual basis for Lucis Trust interest in education is a book published by its founder Alice Bailey in 1954, Education in the New Age. Ms. Bailey was a member of the Theosophy Society, where the leadership succeeded from Okhrana agent Mme. Blavatsky to British SIS agent Annie Besant. Self-avowed witch Bailey, foreshadowing Marilyn Ferguson's Aquarian Conspiracy, indicates that her education curriculum is designed to usher in the Aquarian Age:

"The Piscean Age dealt with the details of the endeavor to mea­sure up to a sensed ideal. The conquests of science, the con­quests of nations, and the conquests of territory are all indicative of the Piscean method, with its idealism, its militancy, and its separativeness in all fields--religious, political, and economic. But the age of synthesis, of inclusiveness, and of understanding is upon us, and the new education of the Aquarian Age must be­gin very gently to penetrate the human aura."

This emphatically means the eradication of morality as a param­eter for human behavior or thought, as Bailey later writes in the same volume:

"It is the older generation who foster in a child an early and most unnecessary sense of guilt, of sinfulness, and of wrongdo­ing. So much emphasis is laid upon petty little things that are not really wrong but are annoying to the parent or teacher, that a true sense of wrong (which is the recognition of failure to pre­serve right relations with the group) gets overlaid and is not rec­ognized for what it is. The many small and petty sins, imposed upon children by the constant reiteration of no. by the use of the word naughty, and based largely on parental failure to under­stand and occupy the child, are of no real moment. If these as­pects of the child's life are rightly handled, then the truly wrong things, the infringements upon the rights of others, the en­croachments of individual desire upon group requirements and conditions, and the hurting or damaging of others in order to achieve personal gain, will emerge in right perspective and at the right time."

In short, the only discipline children require is discipline that forces them to bow to peer pressure. OBE and its accompany­ing sex and hypnosis curricula-Rainbow and the Pumsy guidance program--have made satanist Alice Bailey the schoolmarm of America.

THEY'RE OUT TO TAKE YOUR
CHILD AWAY

Your young son does not return home from school on Friday afternoon. In a panic, you call the police, who initiate a man­hunt, which continues throughout the weekend. On Monday morning, when police contact the boy's school, they are in­formed by a guidance counselor that the child protection author­ities removed the boy from school on Friday, and placed him in foster custody. The authorities refuse to discuss the matter with the detective investigating the case, citing confidentiality laws.

Sound like fiction? It's not. This actually happened to New York City resident Carol Rockhead, in May 1993.

What happened to constitutional protection? Due process? The opportunity for the parents to argue their side of the story? The state's child welfare agency rules only require that, when a child is put in custody, the parent be notified by certified mail, return receipt requested.

It's not limited to New York City. In Kentucky and Missouri, pilot projects have begun to assign social workers from birth to families accused of being "at risk" for child abuse or other problems. There are 12 criteria in Kentucky for judging whether a parent is "at risk" for being a child abuser, including: Does the parent smoke? Is the parent overweight? Does the child have too many or too few toys? Did the child have low birth weight? On the basis of criteria such as these the social worker is empowered to remove the child from the home.

Forty states now have a "home visitation" program known as "Parents as Teachers" (PAT). A state-designated "parent educator" comes to your home a minimum of eight times a year to monitor whether or not you are a "good" parent.

According to Bettina Dobbs, R.N., former consultant to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the program "will result in state control of the children and reduce parent to the status of breeders and supervised custodians. The child is given a personal computer code number by which he can be tracked the rest of his life. There are 12 computer code definitions which label the child "at risk." Since the expectation is that every child will be found "mentally ill", there is no code for "normal."

The aim, of course, is to eventually eliminate parental influence altogether. That is why the National Education Association in recent years has dedicated itself to strenuously promoting the concept of in loco parentis--the school replace the parent. They have floated--and are already experimenting with--numerous proposals (modeled, by the way, on Mao Tse Tung's Cultural Revolution precepts) for turning schools into all-day child-rearing center, including pre-school and post-graduate services ranging from daycare and pregnancy counseling to sex-education and drug rehabilitation.