PJ#087, IN GOD'S NAME AWAKEN!

[wave]

PJ 87

CHAPTER 11

REC #2 HATONN

FRI., FEB. 25, 1994 2:29 P.M. YEAR 7, DAY 193

FRI., FEB. 25, 1994

SHARK CARTILAGE/CARBRAGAIA

We are going to interrupt our ongoing subject to take up this one, please. It is time you readers and people efforting to "treat" yourselves for cancer and other debilitating diseases QUIT KILLING OFF YOUR OTHER LIFE-FORMS FOR YOUR OWN UNNECESSARY USES.

I am incensed that so many forms from your seas are being slain to fill (insufficiently) a need which could be filled without damage or the taking of a single life-form.

So what is so important about cartilage? It is the original structure of life formation
--bearing all DNA and able to cellularly mold the very structure of a body--IN PERFECTION ACCORDING TO THE DNA OF T'HAT BODY. It also has the capacity to incorporate DNA and shift it to where it is needed for perfection and/or to bear a perfecting exchange with other cells.

We have written on the subject prior to this but it is now important that you UNDERSTAND some things about this subject so that the insane killing can STOP and you can also have product far surpassing that of the "dead" animal you slay.

WHAT IS CARTILAGE?

You break your bones, tear your ligaments, strain your muscles. What do you do to your cartilage? What--where, in fact--is cartilage?

You're probably most familiar with cartilage as the "tough stuff" that you don't want in your meat but, when eating, you most likely refer to it as "gristle". Cartilage is apparent in the human body, too, but you call it by other names, such as "Adam's apple", ears, etc.

Cartilage is found not only in the larynx but also between the segments of the spine and at the ends of long bones, where it acts as a shock absorber and a bearing surface to reduce the friction between moving parts. It is a tough, elastic, and translucent material that comes in three varieties.

Fibrocartilage, the first variety, is found between the backbones. It is the strongest of the three types. The second, hyaline cartilage, is gristly elastic tissue that thinly covers the moving ends of bones, connects the ribs to the breastbone, and supports the nose, windpipe, and part of the voice box. This type of cartilage is likely to harden in elderly people. Yellow cartilage, the third variety, is the most elastic. It is found in the external ear, Eustachian tube, and throat.

One of the most interesting things about cartilage, however, is not its form but its importance to the body, an importance that is first apparent in the embryo.

EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT

In an early fetus, there are no bones; it is cartilage that provides the framework on which the major bones of the body--excluding the skull--take form. Eventually, fetal cartilage becomes impregnated with calcium salts so that hard, or "stony", bones become apparent.

The bones of children are relatively pliable because they contain more cartilage
--which is found at the tops of bones in zones called growth plates--and have less calcium salts than do the bones of adults. (A theory has been postulated that newborn children are resistant to many diseases because of the large amount of cartilage present in their bodies during the early fetal and developmental stages). Elderly people have much less soft tissue such as cartilage and a higher proportion of calcium salts, so their bones are more brittle.

A process similar to the one in which fetal cartilage develops into bone takes place throughout life whenever bones are bro­ken. It is believed that, when a bone breaks,
a substance within the bone signals cells from the circulatory system to clean out the breakage site and summon undifferentiated cells to populate the site and multiply. These undifferentiated cells become chondrocytes (relatives of the chondriana, Gaiandriana...), or cartilage cells, which produce an intertwining of cartilaginous fibers that fills the break and joins the bone fragments together. Finally, the cartilage is calcified and becomes new living bone.

Amazingly, cartilage is a tissue that performs its functions with­out nerves, blood vessels, or a lymphatic system. Nutrients are, therefore, not transported to cartilage via the blood or lymphatic fluid. It is the flow of water, the chief constituent of cartilage, that is responsible for nutrient transport, which is brought on by the compressions and relaxations arising from body movements. This is why extended periods of inactivity are deleterious to joint cartilage.

As a result of inactivity, the calcium salts in cartilage's inter­cellular material can turn from a water-containing gel into a stonelike material. The calcification cannot be reversed or re­paired as can torn ligaments or broken bones. Calcification is ultimately the death of cartilage.

WHY SHARKS IN THE FIRST PLACE?

Because sharks have THE MOST cartilage and also an incredi­bly effective immune system. Sharks are largely free of any or all infections. Antibodies contained in the blood successfully combat bacterial and viral infections as well as protect against an array of chemicals that easily kill most mammals.

In human beings, there are millions of possible antibodies, known as immunoglobulins (and the immune system is normally dormant), which become active only in response to antigens. Sharks, however, have a peculiar immunoglobulin, a large amount of which is always CIRCULATING AND READY TO ATTACK. Thus, if you are able to do the same for a "body" with proper immune system "fighters" on duty at all times --whoopee!

The shark's powerful immune system produces antibodies against more than just bacteria, viruses, and chemicals, how­ever. It also seems to help protect against cancer (there is actu­ally only ONE cancer), whether the shark is bred and main­tained in clean open water or in carcinogen-laden enclosed wa­ters. So--there has to be something which presents this mar­velous miracle.

Sharks have been harvested for many products from hide, fins, oil, teeth to meat. Sharkskin, for instance, surpasses the quality of cowhide for durable leather. But this is not the subject in point.

Sharks are known for their absence of any kind of cancer growths. They are one of the few living creatures of which this can be said.

So why? Well, tumors cannot grow without a network of blood vessels to nourish them and to remove waste products, therefore inhibiting the development of blood vessels could be a potential cancer therapy.

Taking this further--it becomes obvious that if you can introduce into the body of the human, say, cartilage which can adapt to or cast out selective tissue cells--you can program a body to NEVER HAVE CANCER. In addition you can further program it to not allow the takeover by viruses, bacteria, etc.

I don't believe I need to go into the scientific mechanisms here--we want to simply explain a BETTER way to get this "cartilage" in a far more effective form and into YOUR body.

CARBRAGAIA

The membrane which we utilize in the culturing of Gaia-Kar­gosok derivative is FAR SUPERIOR TO ANY KIND OF CARTILAGE--ANYWHERE. It is NOT a medicine or drug--but rather, a totally natural life-form which can be grown and harvested, programmed and totally focused--by an individual person. It changes itself to the very DNA structure of the indi­vidual intaking the substance.

Why would CarbraGaia be any better than any other type of cartilage? Because is not "simply" grown--it is nurtured in an amnionic fluid of Gaiandriana thus producing the most effective angiogenesis inhibitor known to man. Angiogenesis is the for­mation of new blood vessels, originally relating to the placenta during pregnancy. This word comes from Greek angio, mean­ing "blood", and genesis, meaning "formation of". Today it simply refers to the formation of new blood vessels during an individual's development or growth, or to the replacement of injured vessels in existing tissue.

So--any time you have a body undergoing unusual angiogenesis you will find cancerous tissue formation in all probability. Remember--"cancer" is NORMAL. It is the inability of the body to handle those cancer mutatations (cells) which is the problem. So if angiogenesis can be stopped, tumor growth could be stopped. With CarbraGaia you can stop it. Plus you can have those nice antigens circulating at all times as well.

AMAZING STORIES

With the above in mind, consider some of the results achieved by ones taking shark cartilage. But further, consider the results in ones who have returned to whole health from the chondrianas or gaiandrianas. IF YOU COMBINE THE TWO--YOU HAVE A WONDROUS POTENTIAL.

It is through the use of Gaiandriana and CarbraGaia that we are able to develop selective products. We are able to GROW the bonding drias for the various "Sorbs" from caffeine to starch.

The potential is without limits--EXCEPT that the drug houses have a corner on medicines and drugs--and we want no part of either.

HOW MUCH?

Very little, actually--especially if you are already taking Gaian­driana and Gaialyte--
for you have already set your own programming. What you are doing by adding more CarbraGaia (natural cartilage) is that you are adding the same substance as in shark cartilage, only better--and also programmed and ready to take up your individual DNA structure.

The problem with the NEWLY developed viruses and bacterias is that they are crossed physically with all sorts of DNA changes which then mutate AGAIN when an individual ingests them. If you do not have a balanced programmed counter to that invasion (invader) you are soon not going to have a chance of outliving the untreatable diseases. We TREAT nothing--the products of­fered only allow you to assist your own immune system.


We don't make claims because there are no claims to make. Each individual will respond equally individually.

The products will NOT act like a big dose of wonder drugs (when they do work) but the body will rally its own defenses and healing crisis will be achieved and, if balanced, will nor­malize itself, having cast off the invasion of infectors.

Dear ones, you are going to have to have this kind of ability for your children and for yourselves--but I mention the children because there WILL BE MANDATORY IMMUNIZATIONS--this is the only method I know of to offset that kind of invasion and insult to the system. Before it is over you will ALL be subject to such random acts of mandatory injections for one conjured reason or another lied to you--so it's up to you. God sends His miracles but it is up to you as to whether or not you use them.

So, how much do you need? Shake the bottle and take a teaspoon three times a day in anything you choose. The ground membrane-cartilage will have the flavor of Kargosok tea to most extent. However the bath (liquid) in which it is contained
--is STRAIGHT GAIANDRIANA, which in turn is working dili­gently at full "programming".

This can be simply swallowed or mixed in any drink--you won't even realize it is in Gaialyte or fruit juice. Take the full amount once a day if you prefer. After a while, see how you are--per­haps only a teaspoon a day will keep the devil away.

DO WE NOW HAVE ENOUGH?

I don't know. We can check it out, however. I ask that a lot be used in almost all the other Gaia products so there may be a bit of a shortage from time to time, especially with the "Trim" pro­gram coming out because we want the ingredients to instantly move within the cells and start moving out the excess fat cells. However, I believe that there should be by this time quite a lot of matured membrane-cartilage ready to emulsify. The growers can certainly up the number of nursery incubators if necessary to meet a pretty good load of demand.

GAIALYTE

I have been petitioned by so many to allow for changing of the Gaialyte "drink" in order to cut down on the sugar intake. There are two things you can do--change it any way you wish and/or get extra tea (I'm asking the people who attend it to make it available. It is NOT THE SAME AS THE OTHER MEM­BRANE TEAS YOU MAY BE GROWING--BUT, IF YOU HAVE SOME, USE IT). Also, I believe that it is being worked on to cut in half the "sugar" fruit base.

I do want you users to know, however, that there is Sucrose-sorb in the product as well as caffeine-sorb. This does not negate calories per se but does neutralize the radicals. The "tea" sugar is totally converted and is converted IN GAIAN­DRIANA which automatically intakes and bonds the sucrose particles.

I hope I haven't simply bogged your thinking even more abun­dantly than priorly. However, I am petitioned for "information" constantly. I feel there is so much more I can tell you about how and why these things work--but as Dr. Young will attest, I get totally carried away and the scientific translations are, at best, stupefying. NEVER will I get into formulas for the mira­cle comes in the total conversion of everything so that eventually in a container, for instance, that smelly Gaiandriana will become PURE energized water programmed to become instantly one with a body DNA and will perfect to the cell of equal DNA and cast out every particle of alien matter within and to that cell structure. To this add the antiangiogenic CarbraGaia and you have wiped out the allowance of formation of mutation structure because no blood supply can be created to nurture the tumor. Moreover--tumors already present--lose their ability to continue a blood supply. You can actually see a Kapose's sarcoma lesion begin to DIE. This is a wondrous experience for anyone with advanced AIDS!

Again, do we make "claims"? Nope--here it is--use it if you wish, discard it if you prefer or ignore it if you want. Soon, however, you are going to be a civilization without immune systems--and that means that you will be WITHOUT CIVILIZATION! Moreover, you cannot build that balanced immune system and
have fighting warriors overnight. It's up to YOU.

ARE THE "SORBS" BLOCKERS?

Yes indeed. For instance, let us consider the "starch" bond. Starch particles, if you will, are "bound"--instantly bonded to a drio cell. It works on the same general principle as sweetening something, say a cup of coffee. The whole cup of liquid becomes sweet, not just the sweetener dumped in.

Once bonded and when the bonded ‘stuff' moves within the body it then moves instantly within the cells of the body without change of "frequency" of the cell life pulse. But, the neat trick is that it will sit there waiting and only allow exactly the needed amount of additional starch to "stay" in the cells after ingestion. Excess amounts do not convert to EXCESS fat--but rather, are discarded in the elimination systems. This, however, is WHY you must intake sufficient fluids to wash these rascals OUT.

Can you get "fat" in spite of the "sorbs"? Of course--be totally without reason and you can create every monster you can perceive. But, why would you want to do so? The IDEAL is to GET INTO BALANCE IN ALL WAYS--AND STAY THAT WAY! GET A LIFE FOR YOURSELF AND YOU WON'T HAVE TO WORK SO HARD AT KILLING YOURSELF!!!

You may well think this is a rotten life and you are ready to move on? Think again because if you don't clean it up HERE-- you ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THE NEXT ONE! The magic is NOT in the transition but in the growth attained at the time of that transition!

Do you want to do these things that you might live a long time? NO--SO THAT YOU CAN LIVE INFINITELY!

SECTION 2

THE REMAINDER OF THIS JOURNAL IS A

COLLECTION OF TIMELY NEWS AND/OR

EDUCATIONAL ITEMS

PJ 87

CHAPTER 12

A WHITEWASH ERODES UNDER WACO'S PALL

CHRIS SHEEHAN/CS GAS AND A DAMNING VIDEO

From WISCONSIN REPORT of January 20, 1994
Reprint: Sarasota, FL HERALD-TRIBUNE 1/3/94

The shadow of a dark chapter in American history still looms over the Clinton presidency, eight months after President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno approved a tank and chemical gas assault on the Mount Carmel religious center that resulted in the fiery deaths of 86 members of the Branch Davidian sect, including at least 17 children.

The Treasury and Justice departments predictably have admitted only to minor mistakes and blamed the tragedy on the sect's leader, David Koresh, who is no longer around to defend himself, but mounting evidence indicates not only that a whitewash is in effect, but that it is crumbling.

'The Waco case remains under scrutiny by independent investigators and recently the government's credibility took another blow, this time from a Harvard professor whose report assailed the FBI for ignoring the advice of its own negotiators and behavioral experts in launching the final, fatal attack. Alan Stone, a professor of law and psychiatry, also drew attention to the potency of the CS chemical gas pumped into the complex for several hours, and suggested that Reno was unaware of its "potential harmful consequences for infants and children".

The use of CS gas at Waco heretofore has been one of the most misunderstood aspects of the entire debacle. CS has been routinely described in the mainstream press as a "tear-gas" and a "minor irritant", when it is in fact the type of war gas ordinarily associated with the likes of Saddam Hussein. CS gas (0-chlorobenzalmalononitrile) has been outlawed for war by the Geneva Convention and the Chemical Weapons Convention because of its devastating, and sometimes lethal, effects. It was originally designed to be used outdoors for riot control--not in an enclosed structure--and its use at Waco likely turned the final hours of the Davidian children, who did not have gas masks, into a "living hell", according to Benjamin Garrett, director of the Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute of Alexandria, VA. It also explains why Amnesty International has launched an investigation of the government's handling of the Waco affair.

A recent video by Indianapolis attorney Linda Thompson, called Waco: The Big Lie, includes a clip from a military training film that shows recruits stumbling from a room after being administered a brief dose of CS gas. They're gasping for air, their eyes are snapped shut, their noses are running uncontrollably, they're coughing wildly and their stomachs are heaving. The U.S. Army's own policy forbids the use of CS gas in "barricade" situations, as at Waco, because it can explode when it becomes concentrated: "It must be remembered that burning-type grenades should not be used if there is a danger that a fire may be started: (U.S. Army Training Circular 19-3 Control of Civil Disturbance, 1968).

Reno: Incompetent or misinformed?

Yet, by the end of the Waco siege, said Stone's report, the FBI believed it had only "three options: gas, gas and gas". He called the decision to employ CS "a misguided and punishing law enforcement strategy".

But Harvard professors apparently have their limits. For despite his criticism of the brutal chemical gas used at Waco, Stone concluded that the Branch Davidians set the fatal fire and killed themselves. Remarkably, he fails to address Linda Thompson's
video, released in June, which shows a tank backing out of the building (just before the fire broke out) with flames clearly rippling out of a nozzle at the end of its boom. In her tape, Thompson slows down the film speed and the viewer is left with the chilling realization that the government's "suicide" story is a cruel, cynical hoax.

Responding to FBI allegations that she doctored the video, Thompson had the flame-thrower footage analyzed by several independent experts, including a former FBI agent and it was found to be unaltered. "The original (footage) was analog (tape) and you can't edit analog, you can't put flame on it", Thompson said. She also pointed out that the Big Lie video has been shown on about 75 television stations across the country (including the 1,000-watt Channel 24 in Sarasota) and in most cases, due to the content, was analyzed by stations for authenticity prior to its airing.

Also unaddressed by Stone are recent revelations concerning Koresh's religious manuscript on the Seven Seals of the Book of Revelation. On April 14, five days before the fire, the FBI and Koresh agreed on a plan whereby the Davidians would surren­der if Koresh was allowed to write his manuscript. The agree­ment was negotiated by two religious scholars, J. Phillip Arnold and James Tabor of the Reunion Institute in Houston. After the fire, FBI officials dismissed the manuscript as a stalling tactic by Koresh.

The existence of the manuscript itself, as well as internal evi­dence within the text, confirm that David was keeping his promise to produce an interpretive document... (and) "supports the view that David actually intended to lead his group out peacefully", Arnold and Tabor wrote in their analysis of The Decoded Message of the Seven Seals of the Book of Revelation.

For reasons that have not been properly explained, Koresh was not allowed to live up to his agreement with the FBI. After the fire, Reno said she acted after receiving reports that Koresh was abusing children inside the complex, but she later backed off that statement, and the Justice Department report acknowledged, "There was no evidence indicating Koresh engaged in any physical or sexual abuse of children during the standoff". The report also said Reno approved the tank and gas assault after receiving a detailed report from the FBI on the plan, but "did not read the prepared statement carefully nor did she read the sup­porting documentation provided along with the statement".

This suggests Reno is either hopelessly incompetent and should be prosecuted for criminal negligence, or that the decision had already been made for her, and her approval was only a formal­ity. If this is so, then who made the call?

Jack Anderson, in his Watch on Washington radio report the day after the fire, reported it was Clinton himself who pushed the red button, but "chose, for political reasons, to let the FBI take the heat".

I would like to know more about those anonymous FBI officials who sold Reno and Clinton on the plan to end the siege - a plan that has now been thoroughly exposed. What are their names? What other "cult experts" were involved?

There will be plenty of other questions to be answered in the months ahead. Congressman John Conyers, D-Mich., is quietly conducting a major investigation of the Branch Davidian mas­sacre. And many lawsuits have been filed.

Until Clinton truly addresses the many questions of Waco and produces the kind of thorough and honest investigation he promised back on April 20, he will have no choice but to stick with trade issues, gay rights, health care and the like.

Chris Sheehan, an independent writer, lives in Warm Mineral Springs, FL.

[wave]

PJ 87

CHAPTER 13

POLICE SUICIDE: HIDDEN EPIDEMIC
ACROSS THE COUNTRY?

From THE ORLANDO SENTINEL, Sunday, January 30, 1994 by Jules Loh, Associated Press.

NEW YORK--The man didn't show up for work so Cindy Goss phoned his home. NO answer. She jumped in her car and rushed to his house. He was there, a bottle and a glass at his side.

"Trust me," she said to him. "You must trust me now".

Her heart pounding, she slid her finger between the trigger and the trigger guard and eased the muzzle of the gun from his mouth.

Cindy Goss is one of America's more successful battlers against what one forensic psychologist calls a hidden epidemic: police suicides.

It is hidden because suicides tend to be hushed up, in part out of reluctance by police authorities to admit they may be work-re­lated. And, although "epidemic" may not be quite apt--there is nothing contagious about suicide--there does appear to police psychologists to be an undeniable increase lately across the country.

In America about 16 of every 100,000 adults commit suicide annually. At least that is the figure generally accepted among psychologists studying the problem seriously: 0.16 suicides per 1,000 adults.

In Florida, the Jacksonville force of 1,200, tiny by comparison, four suicides in the past two years is 10 times the general rate.

"I don't see any tie directly to the job", said Jacksonville's di­rector, W.C. Brown, i.e., neither did New York Police Com­missioner Raymond Kelly. All eight suicides on this force, he said, stemmed from "domestic problems", not police work.

While there are no government statistics on the suicide rate of police officers, the Occupational Safety and Health Administra­tion does, however, report that cops have a life span eight to 11 years shorter than the average. Specialists who study police suicide say the rate on a national scale is at least double that of the general population and possibly higher.

You could not convince Cindy Goss that the reason has nothing to do with the emotionally draining work. Cops, incidentally, refer to their work as "The Job", as if no other fit the definition.

Goss is a certified counselor for drug and alcohol abuse. She went to work with the employee assistance program for New York's Erie County and met with success in every county office except one. "In the sheriff's department", she said, "nothing seemed to work". She set about discovering why.

What she discovered about The Job, others in the field have discovered as well. To oversimplify, the progression from idealis­tic police academy graduate to depressed cop with his gun in his mouth goes like this:

Graduate frequently exposed to blood, gore and danger. Does not unburden these horrors on spouse. Spouse wouldn't under­stand. A few drinks with the guys after work helps to unwind. Fellow cops understand. Can't trust civilians. Can't admit troubles even to fellow cops: would be considered a wimp. Can't trust fellow cops. Drinking increases. Spouse takes off. Gun is handy.

The gun Cindy Goss removed from that officer's mouth was only one of five similar rescues she has made in as many years. All five men are back at work.

There's no telling, of course, how many lives the program she devised five years ago might have saved. But the decrease in absenteeism, sick leave, turnover, tardiness and other measures of departmental performance are so marked that the program has become mandatory in every police agency in Erie and some other New York counties and has leaped the border into Canada. No agency to adopt it has recorded a suicide since. More obvious, say colleagues, are the hundreds of careers, even marriages, saved long before the progression reaches the gun-in-­mouth stage.

"Cops are well screened before they sign on", says Harley Stock. "Most have a mentality more like a social worker than a soldier. Over time and in increments they don't recognize their personality gets chipped away and changes".

Stock, among other specialties, is a screener. He knows the progression well, both from textbooks and experience.

He has earned a handful of degrees including a doctorate in po­lice psychology, a narrow but expanding specialty. He's a certi­fied SWAT-team member and hostage negotiator. He worked with two dozen police agencies in Michigan and was police psy­chologist in Broward County. He now has his own treatment center, "Interphase 911" in Boca Raton, FL exclusively for po­lice officers and entirely confidential.

"Typically", he says, "the cop who commits suicide is a male, white, 35, working patrol, abusing alcohol, separated or seeking a divorce, experiencing a recent loss or disappointment. Typi­cally, a domestic dispute is involved.

"Cops are controlling individuals. When a cop loses control in his own home he can't handle it. For 24 to 36 hours he is acutely suicidal. He barricades himself in his house and makes all kinds of threats. If he can get beyond that point he gets him­self back together very quickly. You don't see that in the gen­eral population.

"Also", says Stock, "about 90 percent of the time the cop is drinking heavily when he shoots himself". (That was the case in all five of the men Cindy Goss took the guns from).

"Here's a statistic with lots of supporting data to back it up", Stock continued. "About 10 percent of the general population who drink become alcoholics. Among cops the figure is 23 per­cent. Cops also abuse drugs.

"And here's another solid statistic: The suicide rate among alcoholics in the general population is 270 (as opposed to 16) per 100,000".

Among cops, after-shift drinking bouts are so endemic to The Job that they have a universal euphemism for it: choir practice. If the pitfalls of choir practice aren't obvious , Stock explains:

"Alcohol at first releases tension but if you drink enough it be­comes a depressant. So if you have an underlying depression it makes it worse. The suicide rate among people suffering from depression is 230 per 100,000.

"What you have, then, is a psychologically panicking cop full of alcohol, depressed, with access to a weapon. Bad combination. Bad combination".

In a recent study of 20 suicides in one large Midwest police department, 13 of the victims were alcohol abusers.

Joseph Wambaugh, the writer, has long studied the progression from idealism to despair. Wambaugh was a Los Angeles cop for 17 years. His books, fiction and nonfiction, are as much about how police do their jobs as what The Job does to them.

"Cops of course see the worst of people but they expect that when they sign on", he says.

"What they don't expect--and nothing can prepare them for it--is to see ordinary people at their worst. This works on their sense of belief, I would say, and they tend to become prematurely cynical.

"Even people who come from war can rationalize it by telling themselves that that was war and in war people become savage barbarians. But this is not war and people are normal and good. And here he is in the middle of the night in a normal person's home seeing normal people at their absolute worst. He begins believing that all people are barbarians and savages.

"I've had young cops confess to me in a patrol car at night that when they go to the grocery store they wonder who the grocer is ripping off, whether he will try to cheat them. When they go to church they wonder what the preacher does when nobody's around. That's pretty cynical.

"An old saying among cops is that everybody is garbage except my partner and me and I'm not sure about him. When he begins to include himself the erosion of self-esteem is complete, the cynicism is complete".

Wambaugh, Stock, Goss and others all seem to recognize these same steps toward depression and use the same phrases to de­scribe other traits of the The Job.

The John Wayne syndrome, for example: This is the cultivated swagger of authority
--and its corollary, the macho refusal to admit a weakness or ask for help. "Eventually" says Wambaugh, "the badge becomes almost heavier than he can carry".

PJ 87

CHAPTER 14

AMERICAN STATE SENATOR JACK METCALF
WANTS TO RESTORE TO THE U.S. CONGRESS
ITS POWER TO CREATE MONEY

NOV./DEC. 1992

by Alain Pilote

The political history of the United States, especially that of the first 100 years
(1776-1876) can be summed up in the battle be­tween international bankers and the legitimately elected govern­ment of the nation for the control and issuance of money. The bankers seemed to have got the last word in this battle when, in 1913, the United States Congress voted the Federal Reserve Act that took the power to create money away from the Congress it­self and gave this power to the Federal Reserve (commonly called the "Fed", the central bank of the United States).

But now there is a Washington state senator, Mr. Jack Metcalf, who rises up and launches a campaign against the Federal Re­serve, to restore to Congress its power to issue money, a power that is clearly stated in the U.S. Constitution.

And what is most surprising is that the news has been reported on the front page of the mouthpiece of financial circles and great defender of the bankers. The Wall Street Journal, of July 16, 1987, under the title, "Fed Up with the Fed, a State Legislator Moves to Abolish It". Here are excerpts from this article of The Wall Street Journal:

"For seven years, Mr. Jack Metcalf, a Republican state sen­ator in Washington, has waged a one-man guerilla war to abolish the central bank. And, much to the consternation of Fed officials, he has scored some remarkable successes". (Note of "Michael": to the consternation of the bankers and the Wall Street Journal too!)

"Last year, for instance, Sen. Metcalf single-handedly persuaded the reputable National Conference of State Legislators to endorse unanimously a resolution urging states to challenge the constitutionality of the central bank. And this year, after four failed efforts, he won approval in the Washington legislature for a referendum on whether this state should file such a challenge in the U.S. Supreme Court". (A success that is all the more remarkable since the majority of the Washington state senators are Democrats, while Sen. Metcalf is a Republican).

"Sen. Metcalf's argument is that the nation's money system is controlled by a handful of multinational banks and rigged to work against the average American. He believes that the Supreme Court will decide that Congress unconstitutionally delegated its money-making power to the central bank".


The senator is traveling about the state, and has won the support of many grass-roots groups for his referendum (which will be held in November 1987). He has undertaken a real campaign to educate the population on the workings of the banking system, and he speaks to be clearly understood. For instance, addressing a group of union leaders gathered in Seattle, he tells the story of the "Federal Reserve Saloon":

"Four cowboys put up their belongings as collateral to borrow a deck of cards. The hitch is that each of the four must bring back 14 cards at the end of the evening--a mathematical impossibility (there are only 52 cards in all, that is to say, 13 to each).
In the end, one player ends up with only 10 cards and loses his belongings... That is the problem with the Fed. It creates money to make loans but doesn't create the money to pay the interest".

The Wall Street Journal ends its article by trying to discredit Senator Metcalf with all kinds of falsities and insinuations, and would like the people to vote against his referendum. It is nothing to be surprised at from the bankers, for when they feel that things are getting hot for them and their power is in jeopardy, they are ready to use the most unfair and treacherous tricks and stratagems so their monopoly of money creation may not be questioned. They used the same tactics against C.H. Douglas and Louis Even, but when the truth is unveiled and their swindling system unfolded, the bankers cannot stop the truth, in spite of all their millions and the efforts of their faithful servant bootlickers to keep the population in ignorance of their swindle.

CALL ON THE PEOPLE

Senator Metcalf is aware that the financiers can corrupt and bribe some elected representatives, but they cannot bribe the whole population, that is why he calls on the people by means of a referendum, in order that the issue "Who must create money" be made public as widely as possible. "This is the most important issue of any legislature in any state of the union this year", Metcalf says.

Metcalf maintains that it is absurd for the government to pay interest to the banking system for the use of its own money, which the government could issue itself without debt. And he also maintains that Congress, when it delegated, in 1913, the power to create money to the Federal Reserve, had not the Constitutional authorization to delegate that power. Metcalf says:

"Our most basic document, the U.S. Constitution, states in Article 1, Section 8:
"The Congress shall have the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof ". Nowhere is there the slightest hint of authorization to delegate that power even to another governmental institution--much less to a private banking system. That is absolutely outside the most broad interpretation possible".

Moreover, it was the American President Andrew Jackson who said: "If Congress has a right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use by themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations".

WHO MUST CREATE NEW MONEY?
SOCIETY

Who must create new money? The Social Creditors have known it for a long time; it is society, or more precisely, the government acting on behalf of society. New money belongs to society, and not to the bankers, for this money is based on the production of society: the banker has produced abso­lutely nothing in the country, he only brings figures. With­out the production of all the citizens of the country, the fig­ures of the banker are worthless. But the banker acts as if this new money was his, lends it out and charges interest on it as well. It is a double robbery.

The result is that the more a country develops, the more the production increases, the deeper in debt the country goes. The richer the country is, the deeper in debt it is! It is a contradiction, but it shows precisely that it is the system of the bankers that is upside down. Under such a crazy sys­tem, those who built the country, the population, owe it to those who did absolutely nothing, the bankers, those who did not even turn one shovel full of dirt. The bankers only wrote figures to allow the population of the country to make use of their own productive capacity and their own wealth.

Justice and common sense require that the government itself issue its own money, without interest, and without going through a National Credit Office (or another institution, which could well be the Bank of Canada for the Canadians, or the Federal Reserve for the Americans,, but this time be­ing really at the service of the population, and not serving the interest of private bankers), would set up an exact ac­counting, where getting in debt would be impossible: the new money would be issued at the same rate as production, and withdrawn from circulation at the same rate as consumption. Thus there would be a constant balance between money and products, and money would have a stable value.

This is, among other things, what is proposed by Social Credit, which, besides that by its dividend to each citizen and its famous technique of the compensated price, would ensure the necessities of life to each citizen and prevent any inflation. Money would be at last put at the service of the individual. Such a reform will take place only through the education of the people and the apostolate.

Alain Pilote

*****

METCALF EXPLAINS THE FEDERAL RESERVE
BEFORE THE WASHINGTON STATE SENATE

Report excerpted from the American publication "The National Educator." Address: The National Educator, P.O. Box 333, 1110 South Pomona Ave. , Fullerton, California, 92632, U.S.A.
Sen. McCaslin: Senator Metcalf, reading your resolution, are you really telling us that the Federal Reserve Banking System is a private banking system?

Sen. Metcalf: Like most Americans, I believed the Federal Re­serve was a part of the federal government. It is not! It is a federally chartered private banking corporation, which has by law--not by the Constitution, but by law--been given the power to control and issue the "money" used in the U.S.

Sen. Guess: How does the Federal Reserve create money?

Sen. Metcalf: This is an accurate summary of what happens. The federal government is going into debt about a billion dollars a week. Where does that money come from? The government prints a billion dollars' worth of interest-bearing U.S. govern­ment bonds, takes them to the Federal Reserve; the Federal Re­serve accepts them and places $1 billion in a checking account. The government then writes checks to a total of
$1 billion.

The crucial question is: "Where was the $1 billion just before they touched the computer and put it in the checking account"? The answer: "It didn't exist". We, the people, allow a private banking system to create money at will--out of absolutely nothing--to call it a loan to our government and then charge us inter­est on it forever.

In reply to a question of another senator, Mr. Metcalf goes on:

I would urge you to remember the quote from Thomas Jefferson that I placed on your desks in the last session: "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a money aristoc­racy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the government, to whom it properly belongs".

Jefferson emphasized repeatedly that no private bank, whether chartered by the federal or a state government, should ever be permitted to issue currency or control credit; for, once entrusted with such power, they become superior to the nation itself.

Sen. Vognild: Do you contend that we, the people, are paying interest to a private banking system for the use of our own government money?

Sen. Metcalf: Yes, and you bring up the most crucial point. I mentioned the creation of a "checkbook money" by the Federal Reserve. As these checks from the $1 billion of newly created money go out all over America, they become our money in circulation.

Why are we paying interest to a private banking system for use of our own money?
By what logic does any private group col­lect a tax from the people for the use of our own money? And remember, the Federal Reserve System, which receives the in­terest, is allowed to set the rate of interest they receive.

Sen. Lysen: The Federal Reserve Act delegates to the Federal Reserve the power to create money. Are you contending the Congress does not have the Constitutional authorization to dele­gate that power?

Sen. Metcalf: Now we are down to the crux of the matter. We are all aware that power granted to a body may or may not be delegated to another body, agency or institution. Our most basic document, the U.S. Constitution, states in Article 1, Section 8:

"The Congress shall have the power to coin money and regulate
the value thereof".

Nowhere is there the slightest hint of authorization to delegate that power even to another governmental institution--much less to a private banking system. That is absolutely outside the most broad interpretation possible.