PJ#222, BIRTHING THE PHOENIX VOL. I

[wave]

PJ 222

CHAPTER 7

REC #2 HATONN

MON., JAN. 12, 1998 10:20 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 149

MON., JAN. 12, 1998

And that is where the Jewish Question begins. It begins in very simple terms--How does the Jew so habitually and so re­sistlessly gravitate to the highest places? What puts him there? Why is he put there? What does he do there? What does the fact of his being there mean to the world?
That is the Jewish Question in its origin. From these points it goes on to others, and whether the trend becomes pro-Jewish or anti-Semitic depends on the amount of prejudice brought to the inquiry, and whether it becomes pro-Humanity depends on the amount of insight and intelligence.

The use of the word Humanity in connection with the word Jew usually throws a side-meaning which may not be intended. In this connection it is usually understood that the humanity ought to be shown toward the Jew. There is just as great an obligation upon the Jew to show his humanity toward the whole race. The Jew has been too long accustomed to think of himself as exclusively the claimant on the humanitarianism of society; society has a large claim against him that he cease his exclu­siveness, that he cease exploiting the world, that he cease mak­ing Jewish groups the end... and all of his gains, and that he be­gin to fulfill, in a sense... his exclusiveness has never yet enabled him to fulfill the ancient prophecy that through him all the na­tions of the Earth should be blessed.
The Jew cannot go on forever filling the role of suppliant for the world's humanitarianism: he must himself show that quality to a society which seriously suspects his higher and more pow­erful groups of exploiting it with a pitiless rapacity which in its wide-flung and long drawnout distress may be described as an economic program against a rather helpless humanity. For it is true that society is as helpless before the well-organized extor­tions of certain financial groups, as huddled groups of Russian Jews were helpless against the anti-Semitic mob. And as in Rus­sia, so in America, it is the poor Jew who suffers for the delin­quencies of the itch exploiter of his race.
This series of articles is already being met by an organized barrage by mail and wire and voice, every single item of which carries the wail of persecution. One would think that a heartless and horrible attack were being made on a most pitiable and helpless people--until one looks at the letterheads of the mag­nates who write, and at the financial ratings of those who protest and at the membership of the organization whose responsible heads hysterically demand retraction. And always in the back­ground there is the threat of boycott, a threat which has practi­cally sealed up the columns of every publication in America against even the mildest discussion of the Jewish Question.
[H: Please go back and read that, from 1920, and note the comparison with the same threats of violence, acts of vio­lence and demands for retractions, etc., of 1998. We here have been the worst brunt imaginable just for mentioning the word "Jew" and we have never done anything save offer these same historical passages of WHAT WAS Truth, even to the Russian Revolution, French Revolution and the Elite Moneymakers and Bankers of the world. Would they not be proud of their accomplishments? Ah, in that one question you have the so-called "Jewish Question". They take secret pride while accomplishing their ends with utmost intent at world rule through force, coercion, threats, legal entangle­ments and even to the removal of AMENDMENTS from the Constitution to allow the Jewish Lawyers to TAKE OVER GOVERNMENT IN EVERY INSTANCE. LAWS ARE NO LONGER RECOGNIZED IN A JUDICIAL SYSTEM RUN BY THREAT AND ADVERSARIAL ACCOMPLISH­MENTS. When speaking of "these people" calling them­selves Jews, what have you? Well, re-read: "In the agendas of the aforementioned actors they all have in common a faceless, characterless, classless, genderless and raceless reality as universal goal with a Socio-Darwinistic ideal FOR ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT." You are shown individual faces but never are you willingly allowed to get at the SE­CRETS, nor allowed, if at all possible in the burying of the activities, the Protocols or the actual Plan 2000.]
The Jewish Question in America cannot be concealed forever by threats against publications, nor by the propagandist publi­cation of matter extremely and invariably favorable to everything Jewish. It is here and it cannot be twisted into something else by the adroit use of propaganda, nor can it be forever silenced by threats. The Jews of the United States can best serve them­selves and their fellow-Jews all over the world by letting drop their far too ready cry of "anti-Semitism", by adopting a franker tone than that which befits a helpless victim, and by seeing what the Jewish Question is and how it behooves every Jew who loves his people to help solve it.
There has been used in this series the term "International Jew". It is susceptible of two interpretations: one, the Jew wherever he may be; the other, the Jew who exercises interna­tional control. The real contention of the world is with the latter and his satellites, whether Jew or Gentile.
[H: One of the most important days for celebration in con­sideration of these writings by and through Henry Ford was the eventual TAKING CONTROL OF AND GAINING ALL THE ASSETS OF ALL THE FORD FOUNDATIONS AND ALTRUISTIC GROUPS SET UP AND PUT FORTH BY THIS CARING MAN, HENRY FORD--BY THE SO-CALLED JEWS. THAT TAKING OF CONTROL OF THE ASSETS OF THIS MAN WAS THE GREATEST COUP OF THE DAY. Thus could the negation of anything coming be­fore, easily be accomplished in the faces of the multitudes.]
Now, this international type of Jew, this grasper after world-control, this actual possessor and wielder of world-control is a very unfortunate connection for his race to have. The most un­fortunate thing about the international Jew, from the standpoint of the ordinary Jew, is that the international type is also a Jew.
[H: Look at how the confusion as to even how to refer to these people becomes evident.] And the significance of this is that the type does not grow anywhere else than on a Jewish stem. There is no other racial nor national type which puts forth this kind of person. It is not merely that there are a few Jews among international financial controllers; it is that these world controllers are exclusively Jews. That is the phenomenon which creates an unfortunate situation for those Jews who are not and never shall be world-controllers, who are the plain people of the Jewish race. [H: Now, they gotcha, for now the inquisitive mind can't have basis for speaking at all for "Jewish" is NOT a race, not a people, not a bloodline, not even a religion--it is a CREED. These very people will be the first to say that "we must overlook race, color and creed, join hands and--WHAT? YOU HAVE CAREFULLY BEEN TENDED AND TRAINED TO NOT EVEN RECOGNIZE WHO OR WHAT THEY ARE AND YOU FURTHER THEIR UPRISE AND YOUR DOWNFALL THROUGH IGNORANCE.] If world-control were mixed, like the control, say, of the biscuit business, then the occasional Jews we might find in those higher financialaltitudes would not constitute the problem at all; the problem would then be limited to the existence of world-control in the hands of a few men, of whatever race or lineage they might be. But since world-control is an ambition which has only been achieved by Jews, and not by any of the methods usually adopted by would-be world conquerors, it becomes inevitable that the question should center in that remarkable race.
This brings another difficulty: in discussing this group of world-controllers under the name of Jews (and they are Jews), it is not always possible to stop and distinguish the group of Jews that is meant. The candid reader can usually determine that, but the Jew who is in a state of mind to be injured is sometimes pained by reading as a charge against himself what was in­tended for the upper group. "Then why not discuss the upper group as financiers and not as Jews?" may be asked. Because they are Jews, It is not to the point to insist that in any list of rich men who have, many of them, gained their riches by serv­ing a System, we are talking about those who Control--and it is perfectly apparent that merely to be rich is not to control. The world-controlling Jew has riches, but he also has something much more powerful than that.
The international Jew, as already defined, rules not because he is rich, but because in a most marked degree he possesses the commercial and masterful genius of his race, and avails himself of a racial loyalty and solidarity the like of which exists in no other human group. In other words, transfer to-day the world-control of the international Jew to the hands of the highest commercially talented group of Gentiles, and the whole fabric of world-control would eventually fall to pieces, because the gentile lacks a certain quality, be it human or divine, be it natural or acquired, that the Jew possesses.
This of course, the modernJew denies. There is a new posi­tion taken by the modernists among the Jews which constitutes a denial that the Jew differs from any other man except in the matter or religion. "Jew" they say is not a racial designation, but a religious designation like "Episcopalian", "Catholic", Presbyterian". This is the argument used in newspaper offices in the Jews' protests against giving the Jewish designation to those of their people who are implicated in crime--"You don't give the religious classifications of other people who are ar­rested," the editor is told, "why should you do it with Jews?" The appeal to religious tolerance always wins, and is sometimes useful in diverting attention from other things.
Well, if the Jews are only religiously differentiated from the rest of the world, the phenomenon grows stranger still. For the rest of the world is interested less in the Jew's religion than in anything else that concerns him. There is really nothing in his religion to differentiate the Jew from the rest of mankind, as far as the moral content of that religion is concerned, and if there were he would have overcome that by the fact that his Jewish religion supplies the moral structure for both of the other great religions. Moreover, it is stated that there are among English-speaking nations, 2,000,000 Jews who acknowledge their race and not their religion, while 1,000,000 are classed as agnostic--are these any less Jews than the others? The world does not think so. The authoritative students of human differences do notthink so. An Irishman who grows indifferent to the Church is still an Irishman, and it would seem to be equally true that a Jew who grows indifferent to the Synagogue is still a Jew. He at least feels that he is, and so does the non-Jew.

A still more serious challenge would rise if this contention of the modernists were true, for it would necessitate the explana­tion of these world-controlling Jews by their religion. We should have to say, "They excel through their religion," and then the problem would turn on the religion whose practice should bring such power and prosperity to its devotees. But an­other fact would intervene, namely, that these world-controlling Jews are not notably religious; and still another fact would hammer for recognition, namely, the most devout believers and most obedient followers of the Jewish religion are the poorest among the Jews. If you want Jewish orthodoxy, the bracing morality of the Old Testament, you will find it, not among the successful Jews, who have Unitarianized their religion to the same extent that the Unitarians have Judaized their Christianity, but among the poor in the side streets who still sacrifice the Sat­urday business for their Sabbath keeping. Certainly their religion has not given them world-control; instead, they have made their own sacrifices to keep it inviolate against modernism.
Of course, if the Jew differs from the rest of mankind only when he is in full accord with his religion, the question becomes very simple. Any criticism of the Jew becomes sheer religious bigotry and nothing else! And that would be intolerable. But it would be the consensus of thoughtful opinion that the Jew differs less in his religion than anything else. There is more difference between the two great branches of Christianity, more conscious difference, than between any branch of Christianity and Ju­daism.
So that, the contention of certain modernists notwithstanding, the world will go on thinking of the Jew as a member of a race, a race whose persistence has defeated the utmost efforts made for its extermination, a race that has preserved itself in virility and power by the observance of those natural laws the violation of which has mongrelized so many nations, a race which has come up out of the past with the two great moral values which may be reckoned on monotheism and monogamy, a race which to-day is before us as the visible sign of an antiquity to which all our spiritual wealth harks back. Nay, the Jew will go on think­ing of himself as the member of a people, a nation, a race. And all the mixture and intermixture of thought or faith or custom cannot make it otherwise. AJew is a Jew and as long as he re­mains within his perfectly unassailable traditions, he will remain a Jew. And he will always have the right to feel that to be Jew is to belong to a superior race.

These world-controlling Jews at the top of affairs, then, are there by virtue of, among other things, certain qualities which are inherent in their Jewish natures. Every Jew has these quali­ties even if not in the supreme sense, just as every Englishman has Shakespeare's tongue but not in Shakespeare's degree. And thus it is impracticable, if not impossible, to consider the inter­national Jew without laying the foundations broadly upon Jewish character and psychology.
[H: What is most interesting to me personally is in the watching the authors and historians almost reach and find connections which would present THE answers to this ques­tion. The "British-Israel" term should be the Jewish-British for from out of that Empire has been the enabling of estab­lishment of world-control, right through the very personal guard and intelligence service, M1-6, of Her Majesty Lizzy. Queen Elizabeth, and her consort, are both from the lineage of Jew. This is in the context of BOTH DEFINITIONS or ANY definition. Unless you can understand this you can't even begin to sort the "how" it came to be that these people have gained world-control to the extent they have. They have covered the globe but their big problem now becomes the fact that such as the Chinese majority and the Moslem majority of Islam KNOW THE RIGHT DEFINITIONS AND EVEN THOUGH CONTROL IS SEEMINGLY BEING GAINED BY THESE CULPRITS, THERE IS MASSIVE CONFRONTATION TO BE HAD AS THESE NON-WILL­ING SLAVES MOVE INTO THAT SLAVERY INTENDED FOR THEM. Media CONTROL has to be tightly maintained to keep you lambs-in-the-slaughter-pens from FIND­ING OUT TRUTH.]

We may discount at once the too common libel that this greater form of Jewish success is built upon dishonesty. It is impossible to indict the Jewish people or any other people on the wholesale charge. No one knows better than the Jew how widespread is the notion that Jewish methods of business are all unscrupulous. There is no doubt a possibility of a great deal of unscrupulousness existing without actual legal dishonesty, but it is altogether possible that the reputation the Jewish people have long borne in this respect may have had other sources than ac­tual and persistent dishonesty.

We may indicate one of these possible sources. The Jew at a trade is naturally quicker than most other men. They say there are other races which are as nimble at a trade as is the Jew, but the Jew does not live much among them. In this connection one may remember the famous joke about the Jew who went to Scotland.

Now, it is human nature for the slower man to believe that the quicker man is too deft by far, and to become suspicious of his deftness. Everybody suspects the "sharper" even though his sharpness be entirely honest. The slower mind is likely to con­ceive that the man who sees so many legitimate twists and turns to a trade, may also see and use a convenient number of illegitimate twists and turns. Moreover, there is always the ready suspicion that the one who gets "the best of the bargain" gets it by trickery which is not above the board. Slow, honest, plain­spoken and straight-dealing people always have their doubts of the man who gets the better of it.

The Jews, as the records for centuries show, were a keen people in trade. They were so keen that many regarded them as crooked. And so the Jew became disliked for business reasons, not all of which were creditable to the intelligence or initiative of his enemies.

Take, for example, the persecution which Jew merchants once suffered in England. In older England the merchant class had many easy-going traditions. One tradition was that a re­spectable tradesman would never seek business but wait for it to come to him. Another tradition was that to decorate one's store window with lights or colors, or to display one's stock of goods attractively in the view of the public, was a contemptible and underhanded method of tempting a brother tradesman's cus­tomers away from him. Still another tradition was that it was strictly unethical and un-business like to handle more than one line of goods. If one sold tea, it was the best reason in the world why he should not sell teaspoons. As for advertising, the thing would have been so brazen and bold that public opinion would have put the advertiser out of business. The proper de­meanor for the merchant was to seem reluctant to part with his goods.

One may readily imagine what happened when the Jewish merchant bustled into the midst of this jungle of traditions. He simply broke them all. In those days tradition had all the force of a divinely promulgated moral law and in consequence of his initiative the Jew was regarded as a great offender. A man who would break those trade traditions would stop at nothing! The Jew was anxious to sell. If he could not sell one article to a customer, he had another on hand to offer him. The Jews' stores became bazaars, forerunner of the modern department stores, and the old English custom of one store for one line of goods was broken up. The Jew went after trade, pursued it, persuaded it. He was the originator of "a quick turnover and small profits". He originated the installment plan. The one state of affairs he could not endure was business at a standstill, and to start it moving he would do anything. He was the first advertiser--in a day when even to announce in the public prints the location of your store was to intimate to the public that you were in financial difficulties, were about to go to the wall, and were trying the last desperate expedient to which no self-re­specting merchant would stoop.
It was as easy as child's play to connect this energy with dis­honesty. The Jew was not playing the game, at least so the staid English merchant thought. As a matter of fact he was playing the game to get it all in his own hands--which he has practically done.

The Jew has shown that same ability ever since. His power of analyzing the money currents amounts to an instinct. His es­tablishment in one country represented another base from which the members of his race could operate. Whether by the natural outworking of innate gifts, or the deliberate plan of race unity and loyalty; all Jewish trading communities had relations, and as these trading communities increased in wealth, prestige and power, as they formed relations with governments and great in­terests in the countries where they operated, they simply put more power into the central community wherever it might be lo­cated, now in Spain, now in Holland, now in England. Whether by intention or not, they became more closely allied than the branches of one business could be, because the cement of racial unity, the bond of racial brotherhood, cannot in the very nature of things exist among the Gentiles as it exists among the Jews. Gentiles never think of themselves as Gentiles, and never feel that they owe anything to another Gentile as such. Thus they have been convenient agents of Jewish schemes at times and in places when it was not expedient that the Jewish controllers should be publicly known; but they have never been successful competitors of the Jew in the field of world-control.
From these separated Jewish communities went power to the central community where the master bankers and the master an­alysts of conditions lived. And back from the central commu­nity flowed information of an invaluable character and assis­tance wherever needed. It is not difficult to understand how, under such a condition, the nation that did not deal kindly with the Jews was made to suffer, and the nation that yielded to them their fullest desire was favored by them. And it is credibly stated that they have made certain nations feel the power of their displeasure.

This system, if it ever existed, exists in greater power today. It is to-day (1920), however, threatened as it has never been. Fifty years ago, international banking, which was mostly in control of the Jews as the money brokers of the world, was on top of business. It exercised the super-control of governments and finance everywhere. Then came that new thing, Industry, which expanded to a degree unguessed by the shrewdest prophets and analysts. As Industry gathered strength and power it became a powerful money magnet, drawing the wealth of the world in its train, not, however, merely for the sake of possess­ing the money, but of making it work. Production and profit on production, instead of loans and interest on loans, became the master method for a time. The war came, in which the former broker-masters of the world had undoubtedly their large part. And now the two forces, Industry and Finance, are in a struggle to see whether Finance is again to become the master, or cre­ative Industry. This is one of the elements which is bringing the Jewish Question to the bar of public opinion.
DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, issue of June 12, 1920

[END OF QUOTING]

I have chosen to leave the italics running through these docu­ments in such great numbers because at the printing of the origi­nals there was no other way to easily make BOLD, or stress points, other than italics.

I can warn you hapless people who refuse to look at this ques­tion that you are the target of mass control. The master-Plan has reached a finalization point in what were once called the Christian nations, the very government itself is being purged of all non-Jewish members. Check out the trees hopping into the pathway of problem-possible people. Note that the Bar Associ­ation has become a secret society for Jewish Lawyers and Attor­neys. The Medical Association is already one of their major se­cret societies but not quite yet purged of healers rather than drug pushers for the chemical Jewish industries and drug houses. The task is just about accomplished, however, and a close-down of all alternative possibilities is making vast strides toward ex­tinction under the LAWS. Pretty soon now you will be able to count on being arrested and prosecuted for chewing on a sun­flower seed. Every item the public touches or is allowed to touch is infected with something alien to the well-being of the individuals. Mass inoculations and vaccination programs are going to infect the rest of you via your babies. Whole national immune systems are going to be wiped out in the march for finding the most appropriate microbe to take out the unwanted populations--non-Jews of course. AND, NO, THE UNFORTUNATE TOOLS OF THE ELITE ARE NOT JEWS, EVEN IF THEY THINK THEMSELVES TO BE. THEY ARE THE HAPLESS VICTIMS OF THE JEWS IN THEIR "DO ANY­THING REQUIRED" TO ACCOMPLISH WORLD-CON­TROL MOVE ACROSS THE GLOBE. THEY ARE THE EX­PENDABLE ONES SET FORTH TO DELUDE THE MASSES AS TO THE MASTER-PLAN.

"Jesus was a gift of the Jews?" Right! He was and is a fabrica­tion replacing the Master Teacher, to suit the needs of a Plan to take control of the world for the Anti-Christ. Esu Immanuel Sananda is the expected Master Teacher and need bear no as­sumed name or "also known as". Historically it is difficult, al­though NOT IMPOSSIBLE, TO LEARN AND KNOW WITH­OUT HESITATION OR DOUBT what took place those 2000 years ago and WHY. Two millennia ago the MASTER PRO­TOCOLS WERE PUT INTO PLAY AS THE MASTER PLAN 2000. TRUTH HAS ONLY BEEN GIVEN LIP-SERVICE SINCE THAT PLACING INTO ACTION, THE PLAN.

The astute blind man can see here that all factions of the Spiri­tual Truth as presented for Man's use in his physical journey are both a LIE and totally without merit in thought, physics or mental scope. "Faith" demands are thrust off on you without any recourse by your religious institutions under Man's conjured doctrines.

What you do with TRUTH, however, is strictly up to you--my commission is to bring it forth, no more and no less. So WHO is behind all the lies and misperceptions? Well, the Anti-Christ by whatever name is King of the physical world as you have built him to be. God Creator is the Creator and thus THE cen­ter of the Spiritual world of/in TRUTH. You are manifest in human physical form so GUESS WHAT, sleepy little dreamers.

There is another big misunderstanding here, and that is that we are somehow anti-Jew AND anti-Semitic. We are neither. We ARE Semites from Shem and we do not consider the Jew to be more than a respectable opponent of God. The Jew wrote his books and has laid forth all this information regarding himself as a Man and a Race or whatever he wishes to call himself. By and large these are the most shrewd individuals on the face of the Earth for their only dominion is in physical form. You can divide and separate all sorts of Man-made doctrines and NEVER EVEN TOUCH ON THE TRUTH OF SPIRITUAL FACT. I am simply not impressed with the lies or the efforts to destroy HUman through these methods of deceit--THAT is purely for the operations of the Anti-CHRIST by whatever name you wish to label your religion. Religion and Spiritual Truth are NEVER synonymous. Neither is "Christianity" even remotely the same as "CHRIST-ness". You haven't identified the CHRIST person himself as you latch onto the Santa Satan bearing Jewish com­mercial gifts to fool you Heysoosians. Poor Immanuel, I won­der if you even care what happened to that wondrous Master Teacher? It certainly makes that Jewish Bible saying that "...and all men shall turn away from God and into the clutches of His adversary..." look prophetic. Go read Revelation and check out your vulnerable and weak position, friends. And, my Roman Catholic friends, do you know that your Catholic Roman Pope is a Jew? Oh indeed. He also sold GAS to the Nazis in the time of the so-called but false, Holocaust. Oh drat, isn't truth a handful to hold? Salu.

PJ 222

CHAPTER 8

REC #3 HATONN

MON., JAN. 12, 1998 2:40 P.M. YR. 11, DAY 149

MON., JAN. 12, 1998

We will please continue with articles from FORD'S DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, 1920-22.
[QUOTING, Part 3:]

DOES A DEFINITE JEWISH
WORLD PROGRAM EXIST?

(VIII)

In all the explanations of anti-Jewish feeling which modern Jewish spokesmen make, these three alleged causes are com­monly given--these three and no more: religious prejudice, eco­nomic jealousy, social antipathy. Whether the Jew knows it or not, every Gentile knows that on his side of the Jewish Question no religious prejudice exists. Economic jealousy may exist, at least to this extent, that his uniform success has exposed the Jew to much scrutiny. A few Jewish spokesmen seek to turn this scrutiny by denying that the Jew is pre-eminent in finance, but this is loyalty in extremity. The finances of the world are in control of Jews; their decisions and their devices are themselves our economic law. But because a people excels in finance is no sufficient reason for calling them to the bar of public judgment. If they are more intellectually able, more persistently industrious than we are, if they are endowed with faculties which have been denied us as an inferior or slower race, that is no reason for our requiring them to give an account of themselves. Economic jealousy may explain some of the anti-Jewish feeling; it cannot account for the presence of the Jewish Question except as the hidden causes of Jewish financial success may become a minor element of the larger problem. And as for social antipathy-- there are many more undesirable Gentiles in the world than there are undesirable Jews, for the simple reason that there are more Gentiles.
None of the Jewish spokesmen today mention the political cause, or if they come within suggestive distance of it, they limit and localize it. It is not a question of the patriotism of the Jew, though this too is very widely questioned in all the countries. You hear it in England, in France, in Germany, in Poland, in Russia, in Rumania,--and, with a shock, you hear it in the United States. Books have been written, reports published and scattered abroad, statistics skillfully set forth for the purpose of showing that the Jew does his part for the country in which he resides; and yet the fact remains that in spite of these most zeal­ous and highly sponsored campaigns, the opposite assertion is stronger and lives longer. The Jews who did their duty in the armies of Liberty, and did it doubtless from truehearted love and allegiance, have not been able to overcome the impression made upon officers and men and civilians by those who did not.

But that is not what is here meant as the political element in the Jewish Question. To understand why the Jew should think less of the nationalities of the world than do those who comprise them is not difficult. The Jew's history is one of wandering among them all. Considering living individuals only, there is no race of people now upon the planet who have lived in so many places, among so many peoples as have the Jewish masses. They have a clearer world-sense than any other people, because the world has been their path. And they think in world terms more than any nationally cloistered people could. The Jew can be absolved if he does not enter into national loyalties and prej­udices with the same intensity as the natives; the Jew has been for centuries a cosmopolitan. While under a flag he may be correct in the conduct required of him as a citizen or resident, inevitably he has a view of flags which can hardly be shared by the man who has known but one flag.
[H: It would be wise to stop right here and consider what has happened through the years as to the "flag" issue. In 1948 or thereabouts the State of Israel was pronounced upon the world while displacing Palestine. There was no "choice" in this matter as it simply was done by the United Nations, a new entity in its own birthing. The world's, and more specifically, the United States' "Jews" turned to "Israel First" and denounced anyone who continued to ask for the "U.S. First" in all considerations. The blue and white of the United Nations was claimed for the new Flag of Israel with a Star of David (El Roy, not King) and two blue stripes repre­senting the Euphrates River and the Tigris River. All areas between these two rivers would be relentlessly coveted for the Israeli Empire. Since that area would not be the easily acquired land of the Palestinians, a long-range Plan with de­ceit and subterfuge would have to be conjured and worked. That surely has been presented through the upheavals of Iran, Iraq and adjacent areas.]

The political element inheres in the fact that the Jews form a nation in the midst of the nations. Some of their spokesmen, particularly in America, deny that, but the genius of the Jew himself has always put these spokesmen's zeal to shame. And why this fact of nationhood should be so strenuously denied is not always clear. It may be that when Israel is brought to see that her mission in the world is not to be achieved by means of the Golden Calf, her very cosmopolitanism with regard to the world and her inescapable nationalistic integrity with regard to herself will together prove a great and serviceable factor in bringing about human unity, which the total Jewish tendency at the present time is doing much to prevent. It is not the fact that the Jews remain a nation in the midst of the nations; it is the use made of that inescapable status, which the world has found rep­rehensible. The nations have tried to reduce the Jew to unity with themselves; attempts toward the same end have been made by the Jews themselves; but destiny seems to have marked them out to continuous nationhood. Both the Jews and the world will have to accept that fact, find the good prophecy in it, and seek the channels for its fulfillment.

Theodor Herzl, one of the greatest of the Jews, was perhaps the farthest-seeing public exponent of the philosophy of Jewish existence that modern generations have known. And he was never in doubt of the existence of the Jewish nation. Indeed, he proclaimed its existence on every occasion. He said, "We are a people--One people."

He clearly saw that what he called the Jewish Question was political. In his introduction to "the Jewish State" he says, "I believe that I understand anti-Semitism, which is really a highly complex movement. I consider it from a Jewish standpoint, yet without fear or hatred. I believe that I can see what elements there are in it of vulgar sport, of common trade jealousy, of in­herited prejudice, of religious intolerance and also of pretended self-defense. I think the Jewish Question is no more a social than a religious one, notwithstanding that it sometimes takes these and other forms. It is a national question, which can only be solved by making it a political world-question to be discussed and controlled by the civilized nations of this world in council."

[H: So here you have the groundlaying for the false percep­tion of such a thing as "anti-Semitism" in full knowledge that the term Semitism does not even fit the definition of JEW. This, however, became the most effective means of confusing everyone--simply take the accepted terms and change meanings without letting anyone on the outside in on the changes.]

Not only did Herzl declare that the Jews formed a nation, but when questioned by Major Evans Gordon before the British Royal Commission on Alien Immigration in August, 1902, Dr. Herzl said: "I will give you my definition of a nation, and you can add the adjective 'Jewish'. A nation is, in my mind, an historical group of men of a recognizable cohesion held together by a common enemy. That is in my view a nation. Then if you add to that the word 'Jewish' you have what I understand to be the Jewish nation. " [H: Now is this ever convenient or what?]

Also, in relating the action of this Jewish nation to the world, Dr. Herzl wrote: "when we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party; when we rise there rises also our terrible power of the purse."

This view, which appears to be the true view in that it is the view which has been longest sustained in Jewish thought, is brought out also by Lord Eustace Percy, and re-published, ap­parently with approval, by the Canadian Jewish Chronicle. It will repay a careful reading:

"Liberalism and Nationalism, with a flourish of trumpets, threw open the doors of the ghetto and offered equal citizenship to the Jew. The Jew passed out into the Western World, saw the power and the glory of it, used it and enjoyed it, laid his hand indeed upon the nerve centers of its civilization, guided, directed and exploited it, and then--refused the offer.... More­over--and this is a remarkable thing--the Europe of nationalism and liberalism, of scientific government and democratic equality is more intolerable to him than the old oppressions and persecu­tions of despotism.... In the increasing consolidation of the western nations, it is no longer possible to reckon on complete toleration....

"Ina world of completely organized territorial sovereignties he (the Jew) has only two possible cities of refuge; he must ei­ther pull down the pillars of the whole national state system or he must create a territorial sovereignty of his own. [H: SO, THEY DID BOTH.] In this perhaps lies the explanation both of Jewish Bolshevism and of Zionism, for at this moment East­ern Jewry seems to hover uncertainly between the two.

"In Eastern Europe Bolshevism and Zionism often seem to grow side by side, just as Jewish influence molded Republican and socialist thought throughout the nineteenth century, down to the Young Turk revolution in Constantinople hardly more than a decade ago--not because the Jew cares for the positive side of radical philosophy, not because he desires to be a partaker in Gentile nationalism or Gentile democracy, but because no ex­isting Gentile system of government is ever anything but dis­tasteful to him. "

All that is true, and Jewish thinkers of the more fearless type always recognize it as true. The Jew is against the Gentile scheme of things. He is, when he gives his tendencies full sway, a Republican as against the monarchy, a Socialist as against the republic, and a Bolshevist as against Socialism.

What are the causes of this disruptive activity? First his es­sential lack of democracy. Jewish nature is autocratic. Democ­racy is all right for the rest of the world, but the Jew wherever he is found forms an aristocracy of one sort or another. Democ­racy is merely a tool of a word which Jewish agitators use to raise themselves to the ordinary level in places where they are oppressed below it; but having reached the common level they immediately make efforts for special privileges, as being entitled to them--a process of which the late Peace Conference will re­main the most startling example. The Jews today are the only people whose special and extraordinary privileges are written into the world's Treaty of Peace. But more of that at another time.

NO ONE NOW PRETENDS TO DENY, except a few spokes­men who really do not rule the thought of the Jews but are set forth for the sole benefit of influencing Gentile thought, that the socially and economically disruptive elements abroad in the world today are not only MANNED but also MONEYED by Jewish interests. For a long time this fact was held in suspense owing to the vigorous denial of the Jews and the lack of infor­mation on the part of those agencies of publicity to which the public had looked for its information. But now the facts are coming forth. Herzl's words are being proved to be true--"when we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party"--and these words were first published in English in 1896, or 24 years ago. [H: For you to­day in 1998, it is now OVER a CENTURY ago!]

Just now these tendencies are working in two directions, one for the tearing down of the Gentile states all over the world, the other for the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. The latter project has the best wishes of the whole world, but it is far from having the best wishes of the whole, or even the larger part of Jewry. The Zionist party makes a great deal of noise, but it is really an unrepresentative minority. It can scarcely be designated as more than an unusually ambitious colonization scheme. * * [NOTE: The statements indicated are those of non-Zionist Jews. The real Jewish program is that program which is executed. It was the Zionist program that was fol­lowed by the Peace Conference. It must therefore be re­garded as the official program.] It is doubtless serving, how­ever, as a very useful public screen for the carrying on of secret activities. International Jews, the controllers of the world's governmental and financial power, may meet anywhere, at any time, in war time or peace time, and by giving out that they are only considering the ways and means of opening up Palestine to the Jews, they easily escape the suspicion of being together on any other business. The Allies and the enemies of the Gentile nations at war thus met and were not molested. It was at a Zionist conference--the sixth, held in 1903--that the recent war was exactly predicted, its progress and outcome indicated, and the relation of the Jews to the Peace Treaty outlined.

That is to say, though Jewish nationalism exists, its en­shrinement in a state to be set up in Palestine is not the project that is engaging the whole Jewish nation now. The Jews will not move to Palestine just yet; it may be said that they will not move at all merely because of the Zionist movement. Quite an­other motive will be the cause of the exodus out of the Gentile nations, when the time for that exodus fully comes.

[H: Here is more proof for you of the United States and Canada: Millions of Jews have moved IN and taken over your very government, judicial system, financial system and RUN THE WORLD FROM YOUR LOCATION. This hardly qualifies you nice so-called "christians" as even re­sembling a "GENTILE" NATION. THE JEWS NOW CALL THE U.S. THE "NEW JEWISH HOMELAND". That may well be fine for the Jews but what does that do to you as a Gentile Nation of Christians-you know, that one nation un­der GOD?]

As Donald A. Cameron, late British Consul-General at Alexandria, a man fully in sympathy with Zionism and much quoted in the Jewish press, says: "The Jewish immigrants (into Palestine) will tire of taking in one another's washings at three per cent, of winning one another's money in the family, and their sons will hasten by train and steamer to win 10 per cent in Egypt.... The Jew by himself in Palestine will eat his head off; he will kick his stable to pieces." Undoubtedly the time for the exodus--at least the motive for the exodus--is not yet here.

The political aspect of the Jewish Question which is now en­gaging at least three of the great nations--France, Great Britain and the United States--has to do with matters of the present or­ganization of the Jewish nation. Must it wait until it reaches Palestine to have a State, or is it an organized State now? Does Jewry know what it is doing? Has it a "foreign policy" with re­gard to the Gentiles? Has it a department which is executing that foreign policy? Has this Jewish State, visible or invisible, if it exists, a head? Has it a Council of State? And if any of these things is so, who is aware of it?

The first impulsive answer of the Gentile mind would be, "No" to all these questions--it is a Gentile habit to answer im­pulsively. Never having been trained in secrets or invisible unity, the Gentile immediately concludes that such things cannot be, if for no other reason than that they have not crossed his path and advertised themselves.
The questions, however, answered thus, require some expla­nation of the circumstances which are visible to all men. If there is no deliberate combination of Jews in the world, then the control which they have achieved and the uniformity of the poli­cies which they follow must be the simple result, not of deliber­ate decisions, but of a similar nature in all of them working out the same way. Thus, we might say that as a love for adventure on the water drove the Britisher forth, so it made him the world's great colonist. Not that he deliberately sat down with himself and in formal manner resolved that he would become a colonizer, but the natural outworking of his genius resulted that way. But would this be a sufficient account of the British Em­pire?

Doubtless the Jews have the genius to do, wherever they go, the things in which we see them excel. But does this account forthe relations which exist between the Jews of every country, for their world councils, for their amazing foreknowledge of stupen­dous events which break with shattering surprise on the rest of the world, for the smoothness and preparedness with which they appear, at a given time in Paris, with a world program on which they all agree? [H: But of course, if you write the play, make the plans, act on the plans, and others stand in awe of your ability to keep same a secret--of course they are as­tounded and of course the play will come to pass exactly as you have written the script.]

The world has long suspected--at first only a few, then the secret departments of the governments, next the intellectuals among the people, now more and more the common people themselves--that not only are the Jews a nation distinct from all the other nations and mysteriously unable to sink their national­ity by any means they or the world may adopt to this end, but that they also constitute a state; that they are nationally con­scious, not only, but consciously united for a common defense and for a common purpose. Revert to Theodor Herzl's defini­tion of the Jewish nation, as held together by a common enemy, and then reflect that this common enemy is the Gentile world. Does this people which knows itself to be a nation remain loosely unorganized in the face of that fact? It would hardly be like Jewish astuteness in other fields. When you see how closely the Jews are united by various organizations in the United States, and when you see how with practiced hand they bring those organizations to bear as if with tried confidence in their pressure, it is at least not inconceivable that what can be done within a country,--can be done, or has been done, between all the countries where the Jews live.

At any rate, in the American Hebrew of June 25, 1920, Her­man Bernstein writes thus: "About a year ago a representative of the Department of Justice submitted to me a copy of the manuscript of ' The Jewish Peril' by Professor Nilus, and asked for my opinion of the work. He said that the manuscript was a translation of a Russian book published in 1905 which was later suppressed. The manuscript was supposed to contain "protocols" of the Wise Men of Zion and was supposed to have been read by Dr. Herzl at a secret conference of the Zionist Congress in Basel. He expressed the opinion that the work was probably that of Dr. Theodor Herzl... He said that some Ameri­can Senators who had seen the manuscript were amazed to find that so many years ago a scheme had been elaborated by the Jews which is now being carried out, and that Bolshevism had been planned years ago by Jews who sought to destroy the world."

This quotation is made merely to put on record the fact that it was a representative of the Department of Justice of the United States Government, who introduced this document to Mr. Bern­stein, and expressed a certain opinion upon it, namely, "that the work was probably that of Dr. Theodor Herzl". Also that "some American Senators" were amazed to note the comparison between what a publication of the year 1905 proposed and what the year 1920 revealed.

The incident is all the more preoccupying because it occurred by action of the representative of a government who today is very largely in the hands of, or under the influence of, Jewish interests. It is more than probable that as soon as the activity became known, the investigator was stopped. But it is equally probable that whatever orders may have been given and appar­ently obeyed, the investigation may not have stopped.

The United States Government was a little late in the matter, however. At least four other world powers had preceded it, some by many years. A copy of the Protocols was deposited in the British Museum and bears on it the stamp of that institution, "August 10, 1906". The notes themselves probably date from 1896, or the year of the utterances previously quoted from Dr. Herzl. The first Zionist Congress convened in 1897.

The document was published in England recently under aus­pices that challenged attention for it, in spite of the unfortunate title under which it appeared. Eyre and Spotiswoode are the ap­pointed printers to the British Government, and it was they who brought out the pamphlet. It was as if the Government Printing Office at Washington should issue them in this country. While there was the usual outcry by the Jewish press, the London Times in a review pronounced all the Jewish counter-attacks as "unsatisfactory".

The Times noticed what will probably be the case in this country also, that the Jewish defenders leave the text of the Protocols alone, while they lay heavy emphasis on the fact of their anonymity. When they refer to the substance of the docu­ment at all there is one form of words which recurs very often--"It is the work of a criminal or a madman. "

The Protocols, without name attached, appearing for the most part in manuscripts here and there, laboriously copied out from hand to hand, being sponsored by no authority that was willing to stand behind it, assiduously studied in the secret de­partments of the governments and passed from one to another among higher officials, have lived on and on, increasing in power and prestige by the sheer force of their contents. A mar­velous achievement for either a criminal or a madman! The only evidence it has is that which it carries within it, and that internal evidence is, as the London Times points out, the point on which attention is to be focused, and the very point from which Jewish effort has been expended to draw us away.

The interest of the Protocols at this time is their bearing on the questions: Have the Jews an organized world system? What is its policy? How is it being worked?

These questions all receive full attention in the Protocols. Whosoever was the mind that conceived them possessed a knowledge of human nature, of history and of statecraft which is dazzling in its brilliant completeness, and terrible in the objects to which it turns its powers. Neither a madman nor an inten­tional criminal, but more likely a super-mind mastered by devo­tion to a people and a faith could be the author, if indeed one mind alone conceived them. It is too terribly real for fiction, too well-sustained for speculation, too deep in its knowledge of the secret springs of life for forgery.

Jewish attacks upon it thus far make much of the fact that it came out of Russia. That is hardly true. It came by way of Russia. It was incorporated in a Russian book published about 1905 by a Professor Nilus, who attempted to interpret the Proto­cols by events then going forward in Russia. This publication and interpretation gave it a Russian tinge which has been useful to Jewish propagandists in this country and England, because these same propagandists have been very successful in estab­lishing in Anglo-Saxon mentalities a certain atmosphere of thought surrounding the idea of Russia and Russian. One of the biggest humbugs ever foisted on the world has been that foisted by Jewish propagandists, principally on the American public, with regard to the temper and genius of the truly Russian peo­ple. So, to intimate that the Protocols are Russian, is partially to discredit them.

The internal evidence makes it clear that the Protocols were not written by a Russian, nor originally in the Russian language, nor under the influence of Russian conditions. But they found their way to Russia and were first published there. They have been found by diplomatic officers in manuscript in all parts of the world. Wherever Jewish power is able to do so, it has sup­pressed them, sometimes under the supreme penalty.

Their persistence is a fact which challenges the mind. Jewish apologists may explain that persistence on the ground that the Protocols feed the anti-Semitic temper, and therefore are pre­served for that service. Certainly there was no wide nor deep anti-Semitic temper in the United States to be fed or that felt the greed for agreeable lies to keep itself alive. The progress of the Protocols in the United States can only be explained on the ground that they supply light and give meaning to certain previ­ously observed facts, and that this light and meaning is so startling as to give a certain standing and importance to these otherwise unaccredited documents. Sheer lies do not live long, their power soon dies. These Protocols are more alive than ever. They have penetrated higher places than ever before. They have compelled a more serious attitude to them than ever before.

The Protocols would not be more worthy of study if they bore, say, the name of Theodore Herzl. Their anonymity does not decrease their power any more than the omission of a painter's signature detracts from the art value of painting. In­deed, the Protocols are better without a known source. For if it were definitely known that in France or Switzerland in the year 1896, or thereabouts, a group of International Jews, assembled in conference, drew up a program of world conquest it would still have to be shown that such program was more than a mere vagary, that it was confirmed at large by efforts to fulfill it. The Protocols are a World Program--there is no doubt anywhere of that. Whose program, is stated within the articles themselves. But as for outer confirmation, which would be the more valu­able--a signature, or six signatures, or twenty signatures, or a 25-year unbroken line of effort in fulfilling that program?

The point of interest for this and other countries is not that a "criminal or a madman" conceived such a program, but that, when conceived, this program found means of getting itself ful­filled in its most important particulars. The document is com­paratively unimportant; the conditions to which it calls attention are of a very high degree of importance.

DEARBORN INDEPENDENT--Issue of July 10, 1920.

[END OF QUOTING]

I marvel at the way in which even you readers want to deny. Deny what? All of you can see the steps to this Plan 2000 ac­cording to these Protocols unfolding every day in every way. What is shocking? It is apparently what you in this democracy desire, so after all--YOU should be thrilled since you con­tributed all you ARE, and might be, into the plan's success. WHAT IS IT THAT IS SO IMPORTANT TO YOU THAT YOU WANT TO BURY YOUR SUCCESS?

Think carefully about this as you go about your daily habits and see how clearly YOU HAVE MADE SURE THAT THE PRO­TOCOLS ARE PERFECTED AND THE SHACKLES PLACED ABOUT YOU!

These grinches haven't just stolen Christmas, sleepyheads, they have stolen your very gift of understanding of a "Christmas". You are left without your very religious ICON as you pictured HIM to be. You have sold your soul to the company store, good buddies, as Tennessee Ernie Ford would sing to you. You took CHRIST out of Christmas long before you affixed a prefix of "X-mas" to shorten your work load of penning anything ref­erencing Christmas. Now you can toss out the bathwater also for you are left with an ANTI-CHRIST, and nowhere to run and no place to hide.

Do the mainline Jews object to our writing about these things and publishing factual information now in these last two years of the century? NO! They want you to NOW know how thor­oughly they have succeeded in their "take the world" plan. You who do not join the ranks and "take the sign" will simply be the fodder for the starving out, depopulation programs, incarcera­tion programs, and of course--supply fodder for the gunfire as those still rising up against this beast confront this Godlessness. Salu.

[wave]

PJ 222

CHAPTER 9

REC #2 HATONN

TUE., JAN. 13, 1998 9:29 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 150

TUE.. JAN. 13, 1998

BIRTHING THE PHOENIX

Continuation of articles from Dearborn Independent (1920-22)

[QUOTING, Part 4:]
[H: It is mandatory that in reading these writing that you keep absolute meanings of terms AND the controlled mean­ings of terms in your mind. For example, and this will be very important: GENTILE= ANYONE WHO IS NOT A JEW!]

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE
JEWISH PROTOCOLS

(X)

The documents most frequently mentioned by those who are interested in the theory of Jewish World Power rather than in the actual operation of that power in the world today, are those 24 documents known as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
The Protocols have attracted much attention in Europe, hav­ing become the center of an important storm of opinion in Eng­land only recently, but discussion of them in the United States has been limited. These are the documents concerning which the Department of Justice was making inquiries more than a year ago, and which were given publication in London by Eyre and Spottiswoode, the official printers to the British Govern­ment.

Who it was that first entitled these documents with the name of the "Elders of Zion" is not known. It would be possible without serious mutilation of the documents to remove all hint of Jewish authorship, and yet retain all the main points of the most comprehensive program for world subjugation that has ever come to public knowledge.

Yet it must be said that thus to eliminate all hint of Jewish authorship would be to bring out a number of contradictions which do not exist in the Protocols in their present form. The purpose of the plan revealed in the Protocols is to undermine all authority in order that a new authority in the form of autocracy may be set up. Such a plan could not emanate from a ruling class which already possessed authority, although it might em­anate from anarchists. But anarchists do not avow autocracy as the ultimate condition they seek. The authors might be con­ceived as a company of French Subversives with such as infa­mous Duc d'Orleans as their leader, but this would involve a contradiction between the fact that those Subversives have passed away, and the fact that the program announced in these Protocols is being steadily carried out, not only in France, but throughout Europe, and very noticeably in the United States.
In their present form which bears evidence of being their original form, there is no contradiction. The allegation of Jew­ish authorship seems essential to the consistency of the plan.

If these documents were the forgeries which Jewish apolo­gists claim them to be, the forgers would probably have taken pains to make Jewish authorship so clear that their anti-Semitic purpose could easily have been detected. But only twice is the term "Jew" used in them. After one has read much further than the average reader usually cares to go into such matters, one comes upon the plans for the establishment of the World Auto­crat, and only then it is made clear of what lineage he is to be.
But all through the documents there is left no doubt as to the people against whom the plan is aimed. It is not aimed against aristocracy as such. It is not aimed against capital as such. It is not aimed against government as such. Very definite provisions are made for the enlistment of aristocracy, capital and govern­ment for the execution of the plan. It is aimed against the peo­ple of the world who are called "Gentiles". It is the frequent mention of "Gentiles" that really decides the purpose of the doc­uments. Most of the destructive type of "liberal"plans aim at the enlistment of the people as helpers; this plan aims at the de­generation of the people in order that they may be reduced to confusion of mind and thus manipulated. Popular movements of a "liberal" kind are to be encouraged, all the disruptive philoso­phies in religion, economics, politics and domestic life are to be sown and watered, for the purpose of so disintegrating social solidarity that a definite plan, herein set forth, may be put through without notice, and the people then molded to it when the fallacy of these philosophies is shown.
The formula of speech is not, "We Jews will do this," but, "The Gentiles will be made to think and do these things." With the exception of a few instances in the closing Protocols, the only distinctive racial term used is "Gentiles".

To illustrate: The first indication of this kind comes in the first Protocol in this way:

"The great qualities of the people--honesty and frankness--are essentially vices in politics, because they dethrone more surely and more certainly than does the strongest enemy. The qualities are attributes of Gentile rule; we certainly must NOT be guided by them." [H: Still have doubts, readers?]
And again:

"On the ruins of the hereditary aristocracy of the Gentiles we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class, and over all, the aristocracy of money. We have established the basis of this new aristocracy on the basis of riches, which we control, and on the science guided by our wise men."

Again:

"We will force up wages, which however will be of no bene­fit to workers, for we at the same time will cause a rise in the prices of prime necessities, pretending that this is due to the de­cline of agriculture and of cattle raising. We will also artfully and deeply undermine the sources of production by instilling in the workmen ideas of anarchy and encourage them in the use of alcohol, at the same time taking measures to drive all the intel­lectual forces of the Gentiles from the land."

(A forger with anti-Semitic malice might have written this any time within the last five years, but these words were in print at least 14 years ago, according to British evidence, a copy having been in the British Museum since 1906, and they were circulated in Russia a number of years prior.)

The above point continues: "So that the true situation shall not be noticed by the Gentiles prematurely, we will mask it by a pretended effort to serve the working classes and promote great economic principles, for which an active propaganda will be carried on through our economic theories."
These quotations will illustrate the style of the Protocols in making reference to the parties involved. It is "we" for the writers, and "Gentiles" for those who are being written about. This is brought out very clearly in the Fourteenth Protocol:

"In this divergence between the Gentiles and ourselves in ability to think and reason is to be seen clearly the seal of our election as the chosen people, as higher human beings, in con­trast with the Gentiles who have merely instinctive and animal minds. They observe, but they do not foresee, and they invent nothing (except perhaps material things). It is clear from this that nature herself predestined us to rule and guide the world."

This, of course, has been the Jewish method of dividing hu­manity from the earliest times. The world was only Jew and Gentile; all that was not Jew was Gentile.

The use of the word Jew in the Protocols may be illustrated by the passage in the eighth section:

"For the time being, until it is safe to give responsible gov­ernment positions to our brother Jews, we shall entrust them to people whose past and whose character are such that there is an abyss between them and the people". [H: What does that say about your politicians placed into power over you-the-peo­ple? Do you see that the Jews in these instances are drawing up the whole of the anti-Christ attitudes and tactics? How can a modern Jew under any circumstances, as in a court of law, be other than terrible? The poor souls take AN OATH to break every oath, lie, cheat and steal at EVERY opportu­nity. It is a rule of the Jewish State. Those Jews, by the way, who act otherwise--are called Gentiles and Goyim and are deprived of all "Jewish" rights until they recover their ill-intentions and behaviors.]
This is the practice known as using: "Gentile fronts" which is extensively practiced in the financial world today in order to cover up the evidences of Jewish control. How much progress has been made since these words were written is indicated by the occurrence at the San Francisco convention when the name of Judge Brandeis was proposed for President? It is reasonably to be expected that the public mind will be made more and more familiar with idea of Jewish occupancy--which will be really a short step from the present degree of influence which the Jews exercise--of the highest office in the government. There is no function of the American Presidency in which the Jews have not already secretly assisted in a very important degree. Actual oc­cupancy of the office is not necessary to enhance their power, but to promote certain things which parallel very closely the plans outlined in the Protocols now before us.

Another point which the reader of the Protocols will notice is that the tone of exhortation is entirely absent from these docu­ments. They are not propaganda. They are not efforts to stim­ulate the ambitions or activities of those to whom they are ad­dressed. They are as cool as a legal paper and as matter-of-fact as a table of statistics. There is none of the "Let us rise, my brothers" stuff about them. There is no "Down with the Gen­tiles" hysteria.

These Protocols, if indeed they were made by Jews and con­fided to Jews, or if they do contain certain principles of a Jewish World Program, WERE CERTAINLY NOT INTENDED FOR THE FIREBRANDS BUT FOR THE CAREFULLY PRE­PARED AND TESTED INITIATES OF THE HIGHER GROUPS. [H: My emphasis.]
Jewish apologists have asked, "Is it conceivable that if there were such a world program on the part of the Jews, they would reduce it to writing and publish it?" But there is no evidence that these Protocols were ever uttered otherwise than in spoken words by those who put them forth. The Protocols as we have them are apparently the notes of lectures which were made by someone who heard them. Some of them are lengthy; some of them are brief. The assertion which has always been made in connection with the Protocols since they have become known is that they are the notes of lectures delivered to Jewish students presumably somewhere in France or Switzerland. The attempt to make them appear to be of Russian origin is absolutely fore­stalled by the point of view, the references to the times and cer­tain grammatical indications.

The tone certainly fits the supposition that they were origi­nally lectures given to students, for their purpose is clearly not to get a program accepted but to give information concerning a program which is represented as being already in process of fulfillment. There is no invitation to join forces or to offer opinions. Indeed it is specifically announced that neither discus­sion nor opinions are desired. ("While preaching liberalism to the Gentiles, we shall hold our own people and our own agents in unquestioning obedience." "The scheme of administration must emanate from a single brain.... Therefore, we may know the plan of action, but we must not discuss it, lest we destroy its unique character.... The inspired work of our leader therefore must not be thrown before a crowd to be torn to pieces, or even before a limited group.")

Moreover, taking the Protocols at their face value, it is evi­dent that the program outlined in these lecture notes was not a new one at the time the lectures were given. There is no evi­dence of its being of recent arrangement. There is almost the tone of a tradition, or a religion, in it all, as if it had been handed down from generation to generation through the medium of specially trusted and initiated men. There is no note of new discovery or fresh enthusiasm in it, but the certitude and calm­ness of facts long known and policies long confirmed by ex­periment.

This point of the age of the program is touched upon at least twice in the Protocols themselves. In the First Protocol this paragraph occurs:

"Already in ancient times we were the first to shout the words, 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity', among the people. These words have been repeated many times since by unconscious poll-parrots, flocking from all sides to this bait, with which they have ruined the prosperity of the world and true personal free­dom.... The presumably clever and intelligent Gentiles did not understand the symbolism of the uttered words; did not observe their contradiction in meaning; did not notice that in nature there is no equality...."

The other reference to the program's finality is found in the Thirteenth Protocol:

"Questions of policy, however, are permitted to no one ex­cept those who have originated the policy and have directed it for many centuries."
Can this be a reference to a secret Jewish Sanhedrin, self-perpetuating within a certain Jewish caste from generation to generation?
Again, it must be said that the originators and directors here referred to cannot be at present any ruling caste, for all that the program contemplates is directly opposed to the interests of such a caste. It cannot refer to any national aristocratic group, like the Junkers of Germany, for the methods which are proposed are the very ones which would render powerless such a group. It cannot refer to any but a people who have no government, who have everything to gain and nothing to lose, and who can keep themselves intact amid a crumbling world. There is only one group that answers that description.
Again, a reading of the Protocols makes it clear that the speaker himself was not seeking for honor. There is a complete absence of personal ambition throughout the document. All plans and purposes and expectations are merged in the future of Israel, which future, it would seem, can only be secured by the subtle breaking down of certain world ideas held by the Gen­tiles. The Protocols speak of what has been done, what was being done at the time these words were given, and what re­mained to be done. Nothing like them in completeness of detail, in breadth of plan and in deep grasp of the hidden springs of human action has ever been known. They are verily terrible in their mastery of the secrets of life, equally terrible in their con­sciousness of that mastery. Truly they would merit the opinion which Jews have recently cast upon them, that they were the work of an inspired madman, were it not that what is written in the Protocols in words is also written upon the life of today in deeds and tendencies.

The criticisms which these Protocols pass upon the Gentiles for their stupidity are just. It is impossible to disagree with a single item in the Protocols' description of Gentile mentality and venality. Even the most astute of the Gentile thinkers have been fooled into receiving as the motions of progress what has only been insinuated into the common human mind by the most in­sidious systems of propaganda.

It is true that here and there a thinker has arisen to say that science so-called was not science at all. It is true that here and there a thinker has arisen to say that the so-called economic laws both of conservatives and radicals were not laws at all, but arti­ficial inventions. It is true that occasionally a keen observer has asserted that the recent debauch of luxury and extravagance was not due to the natural impulses of the people at all, but was systematically stimulated, foisted upon them by design. It is true that a few have discerned that more than half of what passes for "public opinion" is mere hired applause and booing and has never impressed the public mind.

But even with these clues here and there, for the most part disregarded, there has never been enough continuity and collab­oration between those who were awake, to follow all the clues to their source. The chief explanation of the hold which the Protocols have had on many of the leading statesmen of the world for several decades is that they explain whence all these false influences come and what their purpose is. They give a clue to the modern maze. It is now time for the people to know. And whether the Protocols are judged as proving anything con­cerning the Jews or not, they constitute an education in the way the masses are turned about like sheep by influences which they do not understand. It is almost certain that once the principles of the Protocols are known widely and understood by the people, the criticism which they now rightly make of the Gentile mind will no longer hold good.
It is the purpose of future articles in this series to study these documents and to answer out of their contents all the questions that may arise concerning them.

Before that work is begun, one question should be answered--"Is there likelihood of the program of the Protocols being car­ried through to success?" The program is successful already. In many of its most important phases it is already a reality. But this need not cause alarm, for the chief weapon to be used against such a program, both in its completed and uncompleted parts is CLEAR PUBLICITY. LET THE PEOPLE KNOW. Arousing the people, alarming the people, appealing to the pas­sions of the people is the method of the plan outlined in the Protocols. THE ANTIDOTE IS MERELY ENLIGHTENING THE PEOPLE.

That is the only purpose of these articles. Enlightenment dis­pels prejudice. It is as desirable to dispel the prejudice of the Jew as of the Gentile. Jewish writers too frequently assume that the prejudice is all on one side. The Protocols themselves ought to have the widest circulation among the Jewish people, in order that they may check those things which are bringing suspicion upon their name.

DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, Issue of July 24, 1920

[END OF QUOTING]

I hope this is disturbing to you readers. I also trust that you can see that even in the early 1920s the Protocols were not only rec­ognized but, moreover, what they meant. It was stated, as above, that everything was already successful. Further it is noted that the ONLY way to STOP such movements is to en­lighten the PEOPLE. This includes ALL THE PEOPLE, those THINKING themselves to be "Jews", and any other grouping, race, creed, color, or religion. The Jews, as referred to in this, by themselves, does not by any means include those people from the area of Judea nor any bloodline pertaining to same. These self-styled, thieves of the name itself, are of the Thirteenth Tribal lineage of the Serpent People changing their labels, to protect themselves, to JEW. Do not be ashamed that you, the ignorant "people", didn't see or recognize the beast come upon you and devouring you alive, being within that group of "Jewish people" who would pay, by far, the most dearly. Remember that this SAME GROUP OF ELITE have changed Christ to use a man's name of Jesus and within that shelter of a name ("...in the name of...") totally destroy the CHRIST teachings and sup­plant them with the concepts of all breaking of God's com­mandments as being totally suitable--if circumstances present themselves appropriately.
YOU ARE, READERS, DEALING DIRECTLY WITH THE HEAD HONCHO OF ANTI-CHRIST, THE ANTI-CHRIST HIMSELF. HE WILL BEAR NO NAME THAT YOU MAY RECOGNIZE HIM, HE WILL EXCHANGE LIE FOR TRUTH AND USE YOUR OWN TERMS TO FOOL YOU. YOU CAN BE THE FOOL OR THE WISE; THAT IS UP TO YOU. ANYTHING THAT ALLOWS THE GOING AGAINST THE TRUTH AND THE GUIDELINES LAID FORTH BY THE CREATION AND THE CREATOR FOR HUMAN'S BEHAVIOR IS WRONG, A TERRIBLE ENEMY, AND SHALL BE TREATED AS SAME.

If YOU go forth and present the evil as good, you shall be counted among the followers of the Anti-Christ and shall find self within the confines of his empire. This is a physical empire which may APPEAR to be quite nice indeed. It is not and will gain you oppression, enslavement, pain, and ultimately loss of everything which is even represented as manifest human or physical.

Is this, coming from me, some kind of a threat? NO, IT IS AB­SOLUTELY THE WAY IT IS AND SHALL BE. IF YOU CHOOSE TO BRING PAIN OR DIVERSION THROUGH THE MISTREATMENT OR ASSAULT AGAINST ME OR MY PEOPLE--YOU SHALL RUE THE DAY YOU MADE AND ACTED ON THAT CHOICE. Our sole purpose in of­fering this information is to allow you enlightenment--IF YOU WANT IT. You will otherwise be left to your choices, right or wrong, and you shall ultimately be separated away from God's people, for Evil shall not dwell infinitely in the places of God. Those who are in any measure against the LAWS OF GOD and of the CREATION are servants and slaves to the Elite Anti-Christ and shall be treated as such. Irepeat so that none misun­derstand: ANYONE ASSAULTING MY PEOPLE EITHER INDIRECTLY OR DIRECTLY SHALL BE SMITTEN SEVERELY. COUNT ON IT FOR THE TIME OF DECI­SIONS AS TO COURSE IS FINISHED.

If you can't understand this above statement, so be it. When you actively take up arms, be it through litigation, outright as­sault, or propaganda--you have erred.

If you claim ignorance and lack of understanding, I suggest you GET INFORMED AND UNDERSTAND--because you will be henceforth treated as the direct enemy. Your opinions or "rathers" or ignorance are NOT MY PROBLEM, NOR MY BUSINESS.

You of the people who presume to offer "my" opinions might find it past time to stop doing so, get with the program in TRUTH, and get a LIFE. If you dislike such limitations just because some guru told you otherwise, get thee from me for no Guru of human physical shall have authority TO BREAK THE LAWS OR RULES OF GOD AND THE CREATION--period. They can treat them as any other rules for their perception, but it will not be acceptable longer--with me. Therefore, since nothing save Truth, Life, Love and Intent toward right actions and soul growth in TRUTH is longer acceptable, if ye are not with me, ye are against me, and my suggestion is to get thee from me for I do not encroach in your business, and ye shall not longer encroach in/on mine.

The commandments of God as to morality are quite clear and all souled beings are birthed KNOWING them ALL. I do not count them, for actually only ONE is sufficient. However, there are no dispensations given for breaking any of them be­cause you "thought" or "it feels good and if it feels this good it must be good". No, usually if it "feels that good" it is NOT GOOD. Getting something for nothing is an equally BAD idea.

We do not stop you from your activities so why argue the points I offer here? I am sure you will find a human or a Satanic Elite who will certainly agree with you--against me. Don't bother me with it.

We do not even limit those with whom we do business. We simply MAKE VERY SURE that what they do has NOTHING WHICH CAN FALL ONTO US OR OUR RIGHTEOUS BUSINESS.

If, further, you want a resolution to your business arrangements with George Green, through the Institute or otherwise, YOU WILL ATTEND IT. Ekkers have attended their responsibilities AND MOVED INTO GREAT DEBT TO PROTECT YOU. IT IS NOW TIME TO STEP OUT AND PROTECT YOURSELVES.

It is one thing to ask Guidance and expect help, but when the help is given directly as to both actions and circumstances, and you do not take appropriate ACTION but leave it to others, you err greatly.

Betty Tuten's attorney (I doubt she even knows of his activities) and his advisors have again tied up more severely the activities of the Institute and any dealings of or through it. MOREOVER, OTHER RESOURCES FOR MAKING UP PAYMENTS ARE EXHAUSTED FOR THOSE "GREEN" LOANS DURING THAT TIME OF OPERATION. THE INSTITUTE IS EFFEC­TIVELY CLOSED TO OPERATIONS AND NO LAW SHALL BE BREACHED.

There were to be some actions undertaken and all that was done was to bring your to the attention of Tuten. Sorry, she has no care or regard for YOU. She and her business cohorts have no conscience and no interest in your circumstances.

To you who receive interest, you have less than two weeks to get this thing under control prior to the next issue. Ekkers will not longer cover, for reserves must be maintained for the ongo­ing work in progress and litigation. That is the purpose of all private loans and shall therefore be used only for those purposes. Mr. Ekker has no choice in this matter.

All obligations will be met as quickly as can be covered. It is not determinable as to when that might be due to the ongoing major assaults against assets and persons. Every one of you damaged parties have every legal right, with counsel or without, to go against the perpetrators. This includes any perceived ad­versary--from Green, personally, to Tuten and her attorney. However, if you continue to dawdle and leave it to someone else, you are going to run out of TIME.

No, the Institute IS NOT in receivership or bankruptcy. It is prohibited from doing ANY BUSINESS because of the Tuten legal suit. Now, that original order is going to be entered as a standing order--by "default" yet.

We have kept no secrets from you and have urged at every op­portunity to take action and protect selves. We do not know what further to do. "They" are wrong, unlawful, and out of or­der. However, unless YOU act, as usual, the wrong judicial rulings will be left to apply and enforcement forthcoming.

I realize that these are NOT the things any of you want to hear, read, or face. THIS IS, HOWEVER, HOW THINGS ARE!

If you still cannot bring self to action, then I suggest you pray very HARD FOR OUR TEAM LABORING DAY AND NIGHT TO BRING FORTH SOME FUNDING. I suggest you not even mention yourself to God in that petition for HE is weary of hearing about your plight and what YOU want. Try praying for the success of a brother and surely the rewards of same shall flow back unto self.

Salu.

Thank you, secretary. I would offer time for a rest break and then perhaps we can get another bit of work done today.

So many of you writers will be working on these documents that there will be no determination as to WHO is individually re­sponsible for any part thereof. In most instances the "teacher" will not be referred to other than as we choose to use, for our comments, first person reference.

We will appreciate editorial attention to this matter. We will never again subject our secretaries, receivers, writers or what­ever classification you give to our speakers, to the vicissitudes, costs, embarrassments and negation as offered forth by Green/Binder, et al., in the outrageous fiasco of such as that case, left unnamed, came to be.

We will use NOTHING that is not now public domain or with full permission, and that which bears no copyright of any kind and/or holds no open permission for use for all or any part of publication.

Sources will always be given full credit, WHEN KNOWN, and resources will always be listed for reference. The documents under use here bear no trace of identification in any manner whatsoever as to authors, publishers or contributors. We shall individually give credit where there is resource offered, and certainly full credit and references will be given to authors if any portion of their works are utilized, with information, where available, for gaining their publications. (It may well be that this and the above paragraphs be printed prior to any use in publication, either Journal or paper.)

PJ 222

CHAPTER 10

REC #3 HATONN

TUE., JAN. 13, 1998 2:43 P.M. YR. 11, DAY 150

TUE.. JAN. 13. 1998

I hope that I don't inconvenience, unnecessarily, the staff of CONTACT by my moving around from one topic or presentation to another. I believe that example and support for any topic covered is the ONLY way to bring enough fact before the public as to be of value.

On January 10, 1995 CONTACT had an "insert" in the paper and I find one of the articles to be of great value in support of PART 4 of this ongoing series.

The excerpt used here comes from The Talmud Unmasked--The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians. It was first printed in 1892 in Russia, in Latin. It was later translated into English by Father I.B. Pranaitis in 1939. It went out of print but was republished by the Christian Defense League in 1972 [P.O. Box 449, Arabi, LA 70032].

Please take this information VERY SERIOUSLY for that which was the Torah is not used by those calling themselves Jews, but rather is utilized the TALMUD. Even here you will find that planned-on confusion filtering throughout the writings.

BIRTHING THE PHOENIX

[QUOTING, Part 5:]

THE UNITED STATES FALL FROM GRACE:
THE TALMUD

The Talmud gets its name from the word LAMUD--"taught", and means "The Teaching". By metonymy it is taken to mean the book which contains the Teaching, which teaching is called TALMUD, that is, the doctrinal book which alone fully ex­pounds and explains all the knowledge and teaching of the Jew­ish people.

As to the origin of the Talmud, the Rabbis regard Moses as its first author. They hold that, besides the written law which Moses received from God on Mount Sinai on tablets of stone, which is called Torah Shebiktab, he also received interpretations of it, or the oral law, which is called Torah Shebeal Peh. They say that this is the reason why Moses remained so long on the mountain, as God could have given him the written law in one day.

Moses is said to have transmitted this oral law to Joshua; Joshua in turn to the seventy elders; these Elders to the prophets, and the Prophets to the Great Synagogue. It is held that it was later transmitted successively to certain Rabbis until it was no longer possible to retain it orally. [H: Is it actually any wonder your entire population is totally screwed up and without ability to find TRUTH? I don't even know one per­son who can accurately repeat, with meaning or full con­cept, within 30 seconds of being told something, much the less the teachings for humanity.]

Whatever may be said about this story of the Rabbis, it is suf­ficiently known to us that before the birth of CHRIST, schools existed in Palestine in which sacred literature was taught. The commentaries of the Doctors of the law were noted down on charts and lists as an aid to memory, and these, when collected together, formed the beginnings of the Jewish Talmud.
[H: Now, see how we already start mixing "Jesus" with "christ" and confounding the facts. Remember, JESUS WAS NOT THE NAME OF THE BIRTHED CHRIST-BE-ING. THAT CHILD WAS BIRTHED AND NAMED ESU IMMANUEL (Many spellings are used and in as many lan­guages as there are languages, including Hebrew). Nothing was written or collected as to the New Testament until over 300 years LATER. Then the books were collected and as­sembled by German Jewish scholars.]

The Talmud teaches that Jesus Christ was illegitimate and was conceived during menstruation [H: Wow, is this overkill or what?]; that he was a fool, a conjurer, a seducer; that he was crucified, buried in hell and set up as an idol ever since by his followers.

The following is narrated in the Tract Kallah, 1 b (18b): "Once when the Elders were seated at the Gate, two young men passed by, one of whom had his head covered, the other with his head bare. Rabbi Eliezer remarked that the one in his bare head was illegitimate, a mamzer. Rabbi Jehoschua said that he was conceived during menstruation, ben niddah. Rabbi Akibah, however, said that he was both. Whereupon the others asked Rabbi Akibah why he dared to contradict his colleagues. He an­swered that he could prove what he said. He went therefore to the boy's mother whom he saw sitting in the market place sell­ing vegetables and said to her, 'My daughter, if you will answer truthfully what I am going to ask you, I promise that you will be saved in the next life.' She demanded that he would swear to keep his promise, and Rabbi Akibah did so--but with his lips only, for in his heart he invalidated his oath. Then he said: 'Tell me, what kind of son is this of yours?' To which she replied: 'The day I was married I was having menstruation, and because of this my husband left me. But an evil spirit came and slept with me and from this intercourse my son was born to me.' Thus it was proved that this young man was not only illegitimate but also conceived during the menstruation of his mother. And when his questioners heard this they declared: 'Great indeed was Rabbi Akibah when he corrected his elders'! And they ex­claimed: 'Blessed be the Lord God of Israel who revealed his secret to Rabbi Akibah the son of Joseph!'"

[Still quoting from The Talmud Unmasked.]
In the preceding chapter we saw what the Jews think of the Founder of the Christian religion, and how much they despise his name. This being so, it would not be expected that they would have any better opinion about those who follow Jesus the Nazarene. In fact, nothing more abominable can be imagined than what they have to say about Christians. They say that they are idolaters, the worst kind of people, much worse than the Turks, murderers, fornicators, impure animals, like dirt, un­worthy to be called men, beasts in human form, worthy of the name of beasts, cows, asses, pigs, dogs, worse than dogs; that they propagate after the manner of beasts, that they have a dia­bolic origin, that their souls come from the devil and return to the devil in hell after death; and that even the body of a dead Christian is nothing different from that of an animal.

The teaching of the Jews is that God created two natures, one good and the other evil, or one nature with two sides, one clean and the other unclean. From the unclean side, called Kellphah-­rind, or scabby crust--the souls of Christians are said to have come.

In Zohar (I, 131a) it says:

"Idolatrous people, however, since they exist, befoul the world, because their souls come out of the unclean side."

Jews are required to avoid all contact with Christians for four reasons: (1) Because they are not worthy to share in the Jewish way of life; (2) Because they are unclean; (3) Because they are idolaters; (4) Because they are murderers.

A Jew, by the fact that he belongs to the chosen people and is circumcised, possesses so great a dignity that no one, not even an angel, can share equally with him. In fact, he is considered almost the equal of God. "He who strikes an Israelite," says Rabbi Chanina, "acts as if he slaps the face of God's Divine Majesty."

A Jew is always considered good, in spite of certain sins which he may commit; nor can his sins contaminate him, any more than dirt contaminates the kernel in a nut, but only soils its shell. A Jew alone is looked upon as a man; the whole world is his and all things should serve him, especially "animals which have the form of men".

Thus it is plain that they regard all contact with Christians as contaminating, and as detracting from their dignity. They are therefore required to keep as far away as possible from all who live and act as Christians do.

From what has been shown thus far, it is clear that, accord­ing to the teachings of the Talmud, Christians are idolaters and hateful to Jews. As a consequence, every Jew who wishes to please God has a duty to observe all the precepts which were given to the Fathers of their race when they lived in the Holy Land concerning the idolatrous gentiles, both these who lived amongst them and those in nearby countries.

A Jew is therefore required, (1) To avoid Christians; (2) to do all he can to exterminate them.

Wherever it is possible a Jew should kill Christians, and do so without mercy.

A Jew is commanded to harm Christians wherever he can, both indirectly by not helping them in any way, and also directly by wrecking their plans and projects; neither must he save a Christian who is in danger of death.

In numerous places ignominious names are given by the Jews to Christian things. It will not be out of place to list a few of these names which they give to things and persons which are held holy and dear by Christians, as follows:

Jesus is ignominiously called Jeschu--whichmeans, May his name and memory be blotted out. His proper name in Hebrew is Jeschua, which means Salvation. [H: My, my, they simply couldn't get their stories straight even from the beginning. And how do you nice "Christians" feel about those nice Jewish doctors controlling your very lives?]

Mary, the mother of Jesus, is called Charia--clung, excrement (German Dreck). In Hebrew her proper name is Miriam.
Christian saints, the word for which in Hebrew is Kedoschim, are called Kededchim (cinaedos)--feminine men (Fairies). Women saints are called Kedeschoth, Whores.

Sunday is called the day of calamity.
Feast of Christmas is called Nital, denoting extermination.

Since the Goyim minister to Jews like beasts of burden, they belong to a Jew together with his life and all his faculties:

"The life of a Goi and all his physical powers belong to a Jew." (A. Rohl. Die Polem. p. 20)

It is an axiom of the Rabbis that a Jew may take anything that belongs to Christians for any reason whatsoever, even by fraud; nor can such be called robbery since it is merely taking what belongs to him.

In Abhodah Zarah (26b, Tosephoth) it says:

"Even the best of the Goyim should be killed."

A Jew who kills a Christian commits no sin, but offers an ac­ceptable sacrifice to God. In Sepher Or Israel (177b) it says:

"Take the life of the Kliphoth and kill them, and you will please God the same as one who offers incense to Him."

Jews must never cease to exterminate the Goyim; they must never leave them in peace and never submit to them. In Hilkhoth Akum (X,1) it says:

"Do not eat with idolaters, nor permit them to worship their idols; for it is written: Make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them (Deuter, ch.7,2). Either turn them away from their idols or kill them."

In this work I have quoted from only a very few of the Tal­mudic books which refer to the Christians. For the sake of brevity, and to spare you sensitive souls, I omitted many others which could have been included. These texts, however, which I have quoted from should be sufficient to demonstrate how false are the statements of the Jews when they claim that there is nothing in the Talmud which teaches hatred and enmity for Christians.

If it revolted you, Christian reader, to study the horrible blasphemies in this book, do not vent your anger on me. I did not state in the beginning that I was going to narrate something pleasant, but merely to show you what the Talmud really teaches about Christians, and I do not think I could have done so in a more suitable way.

I realize, however, that, since the truth does not please ev­eryone, there are many who will become my enemies for thus having borne witness to the truth. And I have been reminded of this, both by the laws of the Talmud itself which threatens death to "traitors", and more so, by the warnings of those who have had experience of the actions which Jews take against those who make known things which are not favorable to them.

(As predicted by his friends during that time, Rev. Pranaitis was "liquidated" by the Cheka during the Bolshevist revolution in Russia.)
[END OF QUOTING]

Confrontation with Truth is not comforting, is it? And right now when your world is on the brink of a Third World War be­cause of those people, I suggest you take a good look at what Mohammed had to say in the Koran concerning Jews:

"Whoever is a friend of a Jew, belongs to them, becomes one of them; God cannot tolerate this mean people. The Jews have wandered away from divine religion. They are usurpers. You must not relent in your work which must show up Jewish deceit. "
Now how about a little comment from MARTIN LUTHER [b. 1483]:

"But the Jews are so hardened that they listen to nothing; though overcome by testimonies they yield not an inch. It is a pernicious race, oppressing all men by their usury and rapine. If they give a prince or magistrate a thousand florin s, they ex­hort twenty thousand from the subject in payment. We must ever keep on guard against them. "
And then, in another writing, Luther states: [quoting]

They are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end and without ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hoping of their hearts is di­rected to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther... Oh how they love that book Esther, which so nicely agrees with their blood-thirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope!

The Sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revenge­ful people than they, who imagine to be the people of God, and who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. And the foremost undertaking which they expect of their Mes­siah is that he should slay and murder the whole world with the sword. As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do now, if they only could--have also tried it often and have been repeatedly struck on their snouts...

Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen; since no people under the Sun always have been, still are, and always will remain more avaricious than they, as can be noticed in their cursed usury. They also find comfort with this: "when Messiah comes, He shall take all the gold and silver in the world and distribute it among the Jews." Thus, whenever they can di­rect Scripture to their insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so. [H: Does this remind you of anyone we know?]

Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them, as in Trent, Weiszensee and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds, in secret or openly.

The person who does not know the Devil, might wonder why they are so at enmity with the Christians above all others, for which they have no reason, since we only do good to them. They live among us in our homes, under our protection, use land and highways, market and streets. Princes and government sit by, snore and have their maws open, let the Jews take from their purse and chest, steal and rob whatever they will. That is, they permit themselves and their subjects to be abused and sucked dry and reduced to beggars with their own money, through the usury of the Jews. For the Jews, as foreigners, certainly should have nothing from us, and what they have cer­tainly must be ours. They do not work, do not earn anything from us, neither do we donate or give it to them. Yet they have our money and goods and are lords in our land where they are supposed to be in exile!

If a thief steals ten gulden he must hang; if he robs people on the highway, his head is gone. But a Jew, when he steals ten tons of gold through his usury, is dearer than God himself!

Do not their Talmud and rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob (as they do with their moneylending) from a heathen is a divine service... And they are the masters of the world and we are their servants--yea, their cattle!

I maintain that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be found than in all the books of the Talmudists and rabbis and more than ever could come into the hearts of the Jews...

Should someone think I am saying too much--I am saying much too little! For I see in writings how they curse us Goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money through usury, and wherever they are able, they play us all manner of mean tricks... No heathen has done such things and none would do so except the Devil himself and those whom he possesses--as he possesses the Jews.

Burgensis, who was a very learned rabbi among them and by the grace of God became a Christian (which seldom occurs), is much moved that in their schools they so horribly curse us Christians (as Lyra also writes) and from that draws the conclu­sion that they must not be the people of God.

Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they com­plain about being captives among us! Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1400 years ago and during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted by the Jews in all the world. On top of that, we do not know to this day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem! Yes, we have and hold them captive, as I would like to keep my rheumatism, and all other diseases and misfortunes, who must wait as a poor servant, with money and property and everything I have! I wish they were in Jerusalem with the other Jews and whomsoever they would like to have with them.

Now what are we going to do with these rejected, condemned Jewish people?... Let us apply the ordinary wisdom of other na­tions like France, Spain, Bohemia, et al., who made them give an account of what they had stolen through usury, and divided it evenly; but expelled them from their country. For as heard be­fore, God's wrath is so great over them that through soft mercy they only become more wicked, through hard treatment, how­ever, only a little better. Therefore, away with them!

How much more unbearable it is that we should permit the entire Christendom and all of us to be bought with our own money, be slandered and cursed by the Jews, who on top of all that be made rich and our lords, who laugh us to scorn and are tickled by their audacity!

What a joyful affair that would be for the Devil and his an­gels, and cause them to laugh through their snouts like a sow grinning at her little pigs, but deserving real wrath before God.

Maybe mild-hearted and gentle Christians will believe that I am too rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, be­lieving that I ridicule them and treat them with much sarcasm. By my word, I am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a sa­tanic brood. I would fain do so, but they are far greater adepts at mockery than I and possess a god who is master in this art. It is the Evil One himself.

Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would maintain, and no person on Earth could alter my opinion, that the Jews as they are today are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over, who have then been dispersed in all countries, similarly to the Tartars, Gypsies and such folk. [End of Luther quote]

[END OF QUOTING]

It is almost impossible to pass by some of the things taking place even, yea, in your decade of the 1990s. I refer specifically to Public Law 102-14, March 20, 1991, 102nd Congress (United States of America). It is listed as 105 STAT. 44 PUBLIC LAW 102-14, JOINT RESOLUTION.

With that LAW, friends, the Noachide (Jewish) Laws became law and stated that these laws would henceforth be THE reli­gious structure of the United States of America. I will remind you of more of this portent and content, but not at this setting. Talmudic laws reflect the assumptions of authority on seven pre­cepts "which were commanded" to the Noachides, and seven precepts "which the Noachides accepted upon themselves".

Along with the coming into law of the Noachide Laws for the U.S. there was an attached declaration that the day, same day and date, be henceforth a proclamation as: "Education day, U.S.A. " . "The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities."

While all of you citizens continued to pay NO ATTENTION and dozed your way to prison, the bill was SIGNED INTO LAW.

I don't want to confuse you further, so when we have an op­portunity we will re-present the entirety of the writings on this issue including the entire Noachide laws.

The enemy is among you and you had best look around. Why do you think the U.S. government and ALL religious aspects are against Louis Farrakhan? BECAUSE HE SAW THROUGH AND RECOGNIZED THE ENEMY,, AND NAMED HIM.

These evil self-appointed elite fully plan to wipe out the Blacks, and the methods for the killing are terrible indeed. Only EVIL could conjure such atrocities and intentions,

We will lift not a hand against these people of evil intent for that is not the prerogative of our commission. We can and shall only present TRUTH that man may KNOW and choose.

Thank you for another long day at the keyboards. Salu.