PJ#079, MARCHING TO ZOG!

[wave]

PJ 79

CHAPTER 5

REC #2 HATONN

SAT., OCT. 2, 1993 3:30 P.M. YEAR 7, DAY 047

SAT, OCTOBER 2, 1993

WHAT IS BOLSHEVISM?

I had wished to go on with our lessons in another direction but Dharma cried, "Halt, don't you dare do this to us!" Like you, I suppose, every time she THINKS she has the Bolsheviks figured out and some of the players in line-up---whoof, up in smoke. Since it is SUPPOSED to confuse you and send your senses reeling like a spinning top, I am not sure I can help you--it is the "greater" understanding through the "concept" of illusion that is intended. For instance, to call a form of government which is totally totalitarian and fascist socialism--"Communism" is a good example of the subterfuge. To call Lucifer, the evil leader into darkness, the bright "and morning star", "Prince of Light" and other "LIGHTED AND GODLY GOOD LABELS" is typical of your adversary. When you can recognize the anti-Christed god from the players in the physical game--you will recognize the LIES and, after all, is that not that to which we aspire in our growth path? YOU MUST RECOGNIZE A "THING" FOR WHAT IT IS--BY ITS ACTIONS AND CHARACTERISTIC ENERGY FORMS AND NOT ATTEND LABELS OR CUTE NAMES. Remember--a rose is a rose is a rose--calling it a lilac will not make it so!

I guess, however, that since curiosity is the better part of teaching and desire must be present to "learn"--let us catch this one while it is hot and perhaps our understanding can be then more easily extended to our current "players".

HISTORY OF BOLSHEVISM

Dharma, I believe one of the best outlays on the subject is right from the same source we have been utilizing, Behind Communism. Let us continue and see how it unfolds and if, indeed, enough historical data is present. "Bolshevik" and "Bolshevism" is the SAME THING as that foisted off on any civilization in any era efforting to take control. Therefore the "game" will be called by many names but in Russia it was obviously called Bolshevism. Since you have such a confrontation (right now unseen) with these players we shall focus on Russia.

Taking up in Behind Communism:

We must for the moment turn our attention to a group of revolutionary exiles who are important to this story because they and their disciples eventually became the rulers of Communist Russia. Head of this group, and the man who is generally recognized as Lenin's teacher, was George Plekhanov, a gentile.

Plekhanov had fled Russia in the 1880s and settled in Switzerland. There, with the aid of Vera Zasulich, Leo Deutch, and P. Axelrod--all Jews--he had formed the Marxist "Group of Emancipation of Labor", and until 1901 was recognized as the leader of the group.

Although Plekhanov was himself a gentile, those around him were, with a few exceptions, Jewish. One of the exceptions was Lenin, who first became a disciple of Plekanov, and later a competitor.

LENIN

Lenin (REAL NAME: Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) was born on the banks of the Volga in the provincial city of Simbirsk, in 1870. He was born to a station of comparative privilege, being the son of a government official whose title of "Actual State Counsellor" carried with it the privilege of hereditary nobility. Lenin's father did not himself inherit the title, but acquired it as a reward for service as a school supervisor.

By every rule "Lenin" should have become a respected member of Russian society. He was of middle class background, was university educated, and was admitted to the practice of law. That he did not do so can be ascribed in part to the fate of his older brother, Alexander, who in 1887 was executed for participating in an attempt on the life of Tsar Alexander III. This is said to have influenced Lenin to take up the career of a professional revolutionary.

In any event the year of 1895 finds young Lenin--then 25--meeting in Switzerland with the leaders of the "Group for the Emancipation of Labor". Shortly thereafter he returned to Russia in the company of young Julius Martov (Tsederbaum), a Jew who had already become prominent as an agitator in the Pale of Settlement, and who was one day to become the leader of the Menshevik faction. Their purpose was to raise funds for revolutionary activity.

In Petersburg they became involved in a series of strikes which swept the city in 1895, and in the autumn of the same year Lenin, Martov, and a number of others were convicted and sent to prison for revolutionary activity.

In February of 1897 Lenin completed his prison term and began his period of exile in Siberia. He was permitted to travel to Siberia at his own expense and he took with him his Jewish wife Krupsakaya and her Yiddish speaking mother.

It should be explained that, contrary to popular belief, political exiles--unless convicted of a criminal act--were not imprisoned in Siberia; rather they were paroled there. In exile the government provided a pension, sufficient usually to maintain an existence. To supplement this the exile sometimes sought local employment (Trotzky worked as a bookkeeper) or they got funds from friends and family. Lenin received a government allowance of 7 rubles 40 kopeks monthly, "enough to pay for room, board and laundry". (Lenin (abridgement) by Donald P. Geddes), page 26, by David Shub, New American Library, 1950 (Mentor Books).

While in Siberia, exile Lenin, Martov, and an accomplice, Patresov, formulated the idea of an "All Russian Newspaper" which would serve to combine the thought and energies of the entire revolutionary movement. The Marxists in 1900, as at all times in the future, were divided and subdivided into a great many factions. Lenin's idea was to weld these various factions into a single organization.

An interesting note: In Switzerland Axelrod eked out an existence by peddling yogurt, and Plekhanov is said to have addressed letters for an income. BUT THE FOUNDERS AND LEADERS OF COMMUNISM WERE NOT PROLETARIANS. ALMOST WITHOUT EXCEPTION THEY WERE HIGHLY EDUCATED JEWISH INTELLECTUALS, FEW OF WHOM HAD EVER PERFORMED A USEFUL DAY'S LABOR!

ISKRA

In February of 1900 Lenin was released from exile and applied for, and got, permission to go to Switzerland. In Geneva he joined the "Group for the Emancipation of Labor" and in December the Group began the publication Iskra (The Spark). The establishment of Iskra marked the beginning of Russian Marxism as an organized movement, and the beginning of Lenin's role as a party leader.

The editorial board consisted of the "oldsters", Plekhanov, Zasulich, Axelrod, and their disciples, Lenin, Potresov, and Martov. Lenin's Jewish wife, Krupsakaya, was the board's secretary. Later, in 1902, young Trotzky (Bronstein) joined the editorial board, but without voting privileges. Four of the above--Martov, Axelrod, Zasulich, and Trotzky--were Jews, while Plekhanov, Lenin, and Petresov were gentile. The editorial board thus contained four Jews and three gentiles, but since Trotzky was without vote, and since Plekhanov had retained two votes, the voting strength was exactly reversed, with the Jews having 3 votes to the gentile's four.

It is interesting to note the editorial contributions of the first 45 editions of Iskra. The largest number of articles was written by Martov, who contributed 39. Next was Lenin, who wrote 32 articles, followed by Plekhanov with 24, Petresov with 8, Zasulich with 6, and Axelrod with 4. In addition, articles were written by Parvus, Trotzky, and Rosa Luxemberg, all of whom were Jewish. It is worth recording that the only other revolutionary paper in existence at this time was Rabochee Delo (Workers Cause), organ of the "Economist" faction, of whom the Jew, Theodore Dan was the editor.

Iskra was actually printed in Munich, Germany. For a time the editorial board met in London, but in 1903 it was moved back to Geneva. From there copies of Iskra were smuggled into Russia by ship and courier. In this way Iskra built up an underground organization of professional revolutionaries, first known as "Iskrists", and later as Bolsheviks and Mensheviks.

UNIFICATION CONGRESS

In 1903 a Unification Congress convened in Brussels, Belgium. Its purpose was to unite the various Marxist groups into the Russian Social-Democratic Labor Party, which technically had been formed in 1898, but which had failed to bring unity.

Altogether, 60 voting delegates attended, four of whom were, or had been, workers. The rest were mostly Jewish intellectuals. Represented were the groups which had formed the party in 1898: The Jewish Bund, the Georgian Social Democrats, Rosa Luxemberg's Polish Social Democrats, and the Group for Emancipation of Labor, now identified as "Iskrists". The Maximalist's newspaper, Rabochee Delo was also represented by 3 delegates. These groups, their leaders, and their disciples, made the revolution of 1917. Here, Communism as we know it, was born.

In early August the Belgium Police deported a number of delegates and the Unification Congress moved en-masse to England, where it convened from August 11th to the 23rd. One very important outcome of the congress was the ideological split which divided the Iskrists into two camps: The Bolsheviks (majority faction), headed by Lenin, and the Mensheviks (minority faction), headed by Martov.

The final act of the congress was to elect Lenin, Plekhanov, and Martov to the editorial board of Iskra. This new board of three never actually functioned, due to the hostility between Martov and Lenin. After issue No. 53 Lenin resigned leaving it in the hands of Martov, Plekhanov, Axelrod, Zasulich and Petresov, the latter three being admitted to the board following Lenin's resignation.

Although Lenin's faction clung to the Bolshevik label, they did not at any time command a real majority in the party. Lenin had temporarily been able to dominate the Unification Congress when the Jewish Bund's delegation had walked out in a huff over party policy. Because Lenin had been temporarily able to martial a majority of the remaining delegates to his support, his faction had been identified as the Bolshevik, or majority, faction, and always thereafter Lenin and his followers were known as Bolsheviks. It is important to note that this Bolshevik-Menshevik split was among the Iskrists only. The two other major factions of the party--Rosa Luxemberg's Polish Social Democrats and the Jewish Bund--were neither Bolshevik nor Menshevik, although both factions usually teamed up with the Mensheviks on party policy. (In 1917, however, BOTH THE POLISH PARTY AND THE (JEWISH) BUND MERGED INTO THE BOLSHEVIK FACTION.)

REVOLUTION OF 1905

The 1905 revolution came unexpectedly. Jewish agitators, seizing upon the discontent engendered by Russia's defeat by the Japanese, and capitalizing on the "Bloody Sunday" incident--which we have already described--fanned the flames of insurrection into being what was to be a dress rehearsal of the 1917 revolution.

The revolt, coming so quickly on the heels of the Bloody Sunday incident, caught the party leadership by surprise. Lenin was in Geneva and he did not return to Petersburg until October--shortly before the Petersburg Soviet was organized. Martov, the Menshevik leader, returned at the same time. Rosa Luxemberg arrived in December, by which time the insurrection had ended. Axelrod got only as far as Finland, and Plekhanov never returned at all. The 1905 revolution was principally led by second-string leaders, virtually all of whom were identified with the Mensheviks.

Trotzky alone of the top leadership had sensed the significance of "Bloody Sunday", and at the first word of revolution he and a Jewish compatriot, Parvus, had struck out for Petersburg.

Using the pseudonym Yanovsky, he very quickly became a leading member of the Soviet and by the end of October was generally recognized as the most influential member of the Executive Committee. In addition, he edited (with Parvus) the Menshevik organ, Nachato. Later, under the pseudonym "Peter Petrovich", he edited the Russian Gazeta. On Dec. 9, as we have previously related, he was elected president of the Petersburg Soviet and, following his arrest, Parvus assumed leadership of the revolt.

Although Lenin had been in St. Petersburg throughout the life of the Petersburg Soviet, neither he nor any member of his faction played a prominent part in its activities. When the 300 members of the Soviet were finally arrested, not a single prominent Bolshevik was among them. The revolution of 1905 was strictly a Menshevik affair.

THE LONDON CONGRESS

In 1907 (May 13-June 1) a fifth Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labor party was held, this time in London. This was by all accounts the most impressive one of all, and it was the last one held before the 1917 revolution. Represented at the Congress were:
The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin--91 delegates.
The Mensheviks, led by Martov and Dan--89 delegates.
The polish Social Democrats, led by Rosa Luxemberg--44 delegates.
The Jewish Bund, led by Rafael Abramovitch and M.I. Lieber--55 delegates.
The Lettish Social Democrats, led by "Comrade Herman" (Danishevisky).

Altogether there were 312 delegates to the Congress, of whom 116 were, or had been, workers. Dominating the Congress were the great names of the party: there were the founders of the movement, Plekhanov, Axelrod, Deutch, and Zasulich--who after 1907 played roles of diminishing importance in party affairs--and their disciples, Lenin, Martov, Dan (Gurvich), and Trotzky. There were Abramovitch and Lieber (Goldman) of the Bund, and Rosa Luxemberg, the latter one day being destined to lead a revolution of her own in Germany. Present also were Zinoviev, Kamenev, and Stalin, none of whom were important in 1907, but who are listed here because one day they would be the three most powerful men in Russia. Significantly all of those named WERE JEWISH, excepting Lenin (who married into the Jewish circle), Plekhanov, and STALIN.

Perhaps one of the most important matters taken up by the London Congress was the bitterly controversial question of "expropriations". It should be explained that Lenin's Bolshevik faction had to an increasing degree resorted to outlawry to replenish its finances. Robbery, kidnapping, and theft became regular party activities. And on one occasion a loyal Bolshevik married a rich widow to secure funds for the party treasury. These activities were referred to in party circles as "expropriations". The most famous expropriation was the Tiflis bank robbery, engineered by young Josepf Stalin shortly after the London Congress.

The Mensheviks bitterly criticized these tactics, while Lenin stoutly defended them as a necessary means of raising capital. The "expropriation" question broke out again and again as a point of contention between the two factions. Actually a great deal of Lenin's strength came from this source. With money thus raised he was able to pay the traveling expenses of delegates to these various congresses, and this gave him a voting power which was probably out of proportion to his following. Lenin's opposition on the expropriation question came not only from Martov's Menshevik faction, but also from the Jewish Bund and Rosa Luxemberg's Polish Social Democrats. The Jewish Bund and Rosa Luxemberg's faction usually sided with the Mensheviks in these intra-party squabbles, and it was not until 1917, when they were actually incorporated into the Bolshevik faction, that Lenin was able to actually control the entire party.

The Tiflis Bank robbery has now become a part of the legend which surrounds Stalin, and it is perhaps worth while to give it some attention. Although the robbery was engineered by Stalin, then a minor party worker, the actual hold-up was carried out by an Armenian by the name of Petroyan, who is known in Russian history as "Kamo". Kamo's method was crude but effective: he tossed a dynamite bomb at a bank stage which was transporting 250,000 rubles in currency. In the resulting explosion some 30 people were killed and Kamo escaped with the loot, which consisted mainly of 500 ruble notes.

The Bolsheviks encountered considerable difficulty in converting these 500 ruble notes into usable form. It was decided that agents in various countries would simultaneously cash as many as possible in a single day. The operation was not a complete success. The Jewess, Olga Ravich, who was one day to marry Zinoviev, was apprehended by police authorities, as was one Meyer Wallach, whose real name was Finklestein, and who is better known as Maxim Litinov. Litinov later became Commissar of Foreign Affairs (1930-39).

THE YEAR 1908

In the autumn of 1908 the Bolsheviks began publishing the Proletariie, with Lenin, Dubrovinsky, Zinoviev, and Kamenev (the latter two Jewish) as editors. In the same year the Menshevik organ, Golos Sotsial-Demokrata began publication, edited by Plekhanov, Axelrod, Martov, Dan, and Martynov (Pikel), all of whom were Jewish with the exception of Plekhanov. In Oct. of 1908 the Vienna Pravda was launched, with Trotzky as editor.

THE TROIKA

In 1909 the Lenin-Zinoviev-Kamenev "troika" was formed. It was to endure until Lenin's death in 1924. Zinoviev and Kamenev were Lenin's inseparable companions. Later, when the Bolsheviks were in power, Trotzky would become co-equal with Lenin, and even something of a competitor, but Kamenev and Zinoviev were never Lenin's equals nor his competitors--they were his right and left hand. They would argue with him, and fight with him, and oppose him in party councils, but the "troika" was broken only when Lenin died.

JANUARY PLENUM

In January of 1910 the 19 top leaders of the Party met in what historians refer to as the January Plenum of the Central Committee. Its purpose was, as always, to promote party unity. One outcome was that Lenin was compelled to burn the remainder of the 500 ruble notes from the Tiflis expropriation, which he had been unable to cash anyway. Another outcome of the January Plenum was the recognition of the newspaper, Sotsial Demokrata, as the general party newspaper. Its editors were the Bolsheviks, Lenin and Zinoviev, and the Mensheviks, Martov and Dan. Lenin was the only gentile. Trotzky's semi-independent Vienna Pravda was declared to be an official party organ, and Kamenev was appointed to help edit it. Who could have foretold in the year 1910 that within seven short years this YIDDISH CREW WOULD BE THE LORDS AND MASTERS OF ALL RUSSIA?

[H: And how could you as little Amerikans know, even 10 years ago, that that same Yiddish crew would be lords and masters of all America??]

THE 1917 REVOLUTION

The 1917 revolution, like that of 1905, caught the top leaders of the party unprepared. Lenin and Martov were in Switzerland, and Trotzky was eking out an existence in New York's East Side.

Shortly after the March revolution the German government did a peculiar thing. It arranged to ship Lenin, Martov, Radek, and 32 members of the party across Germany to Russia. The German strategy seemed to be based on the assumption--which later proved correct--that the Communists would work to sabotage the Russian war effort, now being prosecuted by the Provisional Government. Perhaps the Lenin group had some such agreement with the Germans; no one knows. But one thing is certain: 48 hours after the Bolsheviks came to power, Trotzky began negotiations for an armistice. But that story comes later.

On April 3rd, just 23 days after the provisional government had been formed, Lenin and his party arrived in Petersburg. Within 7 months he and his faction would be the supreme dictators of all Russia.

TUNE IN TOMORROW--TO BE CONTINUED

* * *

Yes, I understand--the handwriting on the wall is taking more of an "English" language understanding, isn't it?

How do you THINK ones such as Russian-Jew Kissinger and Brzezinski (a false name you can neither spell nor pronounce correctly) came to control your government?? Nothing in politics is an accident said Mr. Roosevelt, your betrayer President. Does Yeltsin act like "one of the group"--look again!

INDIA SHAKEUP

I think I WILL, after all, comment on a couple of your current "today" items. Why is the U.S. sending $2 million and all the other nations of the world only sending $1 million to India? Well, old friends, what you see is NOT what happened. You are involved to your eyeballs in that quake--as are others--but YOU are going to pay dearly for such indiscretions as YOU just pulled off. It has a lot to do with "bases" and "cosmospheres" and particle beams and toys of mammoth destruction. You think the Russians are distracted?? The Russians are waiting to wipe you away!

NOW YOUR NAVY

What about those nasty old officers who allowed the Tailhook happening? Don't you see what is happening, you dough-dough minds? This is being used as a gimmick to get rid of your remaining worthy leaders--AND YOU CAN'T SEE IT.

WACO

It must come as a total relief to find that Waco fits right along with the POWs, October Surprise, et al,--no one in a capacity higher than a bat-boy is RESPONSIBLE for anything that went wrong there in that massacre. Officially it is now a "closed incident" while they get on with prosecuting those poor souls who got out of the place. If you can't even read ENGLISH, you dear citizens--you remain in such serious condition as to hop in a survival shelter--IF YOU HAD ONE--BUT YOU WILL NOTICE THE BOLSHEVIKS HAVE NOT ALLOWED YOU TO HAVE THEM!

May your sleep be filled with peace, for from it you may well never awaken!

Salu.

PJ 79

CHAPTER 6

REC #2 HATONN

SUN., OCT. 3, 1993 10:22 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 048

SUN., OCTOBER 3, 1993

OVERWHELM

There is so much pertinent information and ongoings that I am finally awash in too much for two hands to sort and handle. I am asking that pertinent confirmations, information and other items flowing through the CONTACT be evaluated as to possibility for running without much input from this chair. Doris has not so much as seen the last edition of the paper so is at a loss as to what was printed and "where we are" with correspondence. Thank you, Rick, for managing so beautifully and you of the Editorial staff for handling these emergency situations. I fear this will become "the habit" instead of the exception but please understand the massive importance of world events AS THEY RELATE TO YOU--IN INVISIBLE POSSIBILITIES BUT VERY INCREDIBLE CONSEQUENCES. YOU HAD BEST BE DIGGING OUT YOUR SURVIVAL INSTRUCTIONS BECAUSE NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE WEAPONS ARE BEING CONSIDERED IN AND "FROM" RUSSIA WITH LOVE, RIGHT NOW AS WE WRITE.

If this little blip in Russian history continues to get out of hand--there WILL be more. It is not going like it was "planned" and YOU may very well end up with deadly enemies you didn't anticipate.

The Russians have worked for decades to get the Bolsheviks out of Russia only to see them switch into and about the Western Powers--SPECIFICALLY IN AND OVERTAKING THE U.S. GOVERNMENT--and "they" want to blow you away, U.S.A.!

YOU have NO AGREEMENT with Russia or the Soviets. YOU-THE-PEOPLE! You-the-people are NOT longer your U.S. government and the Bolshevik-Socialist order which now rules you hook, line, and sinker--IS THE CONFRONTING DEADLY ENEMY OF THE RUSSIAN REPUBLIC--WHO CONTROLS THE MAJORITY OF THE WEAPONRY OF CONSEQUENCE IN THE RUSS. THIS IS A GOOD DAY FOR PRAYING, MY FRIENDS, AND FOR ATTENDING YOUR LESSONS.

JACK LONDON

I am in receipt of a document compiled by a reader (first hand research). I shall share the portion of a letter received and then we will share the information sent as it is absolutely pertinent to the very place we stopped writing yesterday--on Russia.

"......I happened to be browsing through my huge note file the other day and came across a summary I had made of The Iron Heel, by Jack London, published in 1908. I have been fascinated by the series you are publishing from "Dr. John Coleman", and thought you might like to see that the knowledge of the conspiracy goes back much further than his articles indicate.

London was a socialist at the time and closely associated with my great mentor, Dr. John H. Dequer, (pronounced Decker) with whom I lived and worked for six years. Dr. Dequer traveled the world with London and told me many fascinating stories of his (London's) exploits. Dequer too was a socialist (an atheist) until he "got religion" and became a Christian, in spite of his lifelong researches in metaphysics.

Dr. Dequer asked me to get a copy of London's book when I was working with him, but although I scoured the book stores in Chicago at the time I couldn't come up with one, as it had, like in Italy, been suppressed in America. [H: Like some other books I know.] Many years later I ran across a copy in a library and made the notes enclosed. The doctor told me that London had used him (Dequer) as a model for the hero of his book.

Dequer was trained by two Jewish rabbis in the Egyptian Tarot to serve the conspiracy as its secret communicator, using the symbolism of not only the Tarot but also the "funnies", Dick Tracy and Little Orphan Annie. He used the notariquon and gematria kabalistic code systems to convey secret messages to the members of the "Committee of 300" at that time on their intended moves. (He tried to teach me the technique but it was too far out for me to comprehend.) Dr. Dequer was able to make many prophecies of coming events that materialized on time. But when he decided to reveal the conspiracy, he signed his death warrant. Too long a story to go into here.

So you can see why I am fascinated with Coleman's story. It corroborates so much that I learned directly from Dequer....

This is sufficient for our needs here. I am extremely grateful for this input and I shall shield this writer from attention until it is permissioned to mention name and/or location. Readers, this is "big time" dangerous and, yet, it is but TRUTH offered as observed by actual observers. The times are "angry" at best and our intent is never to do other than present Truth that you can make choices and form opinions and "intent" with educated knowledge of that which you experience. "MY" enemy is at a much higher level of expression than any bunch of raw and rash hoodlums trotting about on your topographical lumps slinging nuclear bombs about. My mission as assigned is to give you information for insight--what you do with that "insight" is yours to ponder and decide--it is not my "business" nor do I interfere. So be it.

By the way, Sir (letter writer), the visible evidence you and thousands of others witnessed was NOT my craft--but it WAS (IS) one of my "holding shuttles". Indeed, I do still have standoff and retain craft and personnel--but as witnessed regarding your Elite and the POWs--YOU are expendable commodities. I would hasten, however, to suggest that you read elsewhere in this paper about new suppositions regarding "October Surprise" and perhaps you can see that things are coming to a rapid "boil"--I continue to suggest that steps are taken to let our people go, whoever they are and wherever they are for it will only get nastier. The Elite power brokers are intent on ONE THING--world domination and YOUR enslavement or depopulation.

COVERING TRACKS AND DECEIT

Note the spokesman network NEW accusation against Koresh in Waco--that "...he was planning to attack (with all those weapons claimed to be in his possession) the people of Waco!" AS LONG AS YOU ARE ACCEPTING THIS GARBAGE AS THE MAIN COURSE FOR DINNER--YOU ARE GOING TO CHOKE, AMERICA/WORLD.

Now, please, back to Jack London and Russia:

THE IRON HEEL

by Jack London

Copyright 1980 by Lawrence Hill & Co., Publishers, Inc.
Westport, Connecticut 06880
Reprinted by permission of the Estate of Irving Shepherd.

INTRODUCTION, p. i: The Iron Heel appeared in 1908. By 1947 Philip Foner was calling it "probably the most amazingly prophetic work of the twentieth century." To us, looking backward from the closing decades of the century, this claim does not seem extravagant. For with every passing year, The Iron Heel now seems more timely, more vital.

When Jack London wrote this novel in 1906, the Russian Revolution of 1905 was being crushed by the Czar's army, secret police, and terrorist gangs. Few people anticipated that out of this terrible defeat would emerge the triumphant Russian revolution of 1917. From our vantage point in time, we can see that these were the formative revolution and counter-revolution, an age of fierce protracted combat to determine the future of the human race. This is the apocalyptic battle imagined in The Iron Heel, which foresees the struggle between the impoverished masses who do most of the world's work and the privileged minorities who live off the profits raging without resolution for three hundred years.

Some of London's prophecies came true very quickly. In July, 1908, just five months after the publication of The Iron Heel, a national secret police agency--then known as the Bureau of Investigation--was first established in the United States. Less than twelve years later, London's prevision of the violent suppression of the worker's political organizations was carried out. On one night alone--January 2, 1920--the Department of Justice struck simultaneously in seventy cities, in raids organized by Attorney General Palmer's youthful deputy J. Edgar Hoover. Workers were dragged from their homes and beaten, printing presses were destroyed, and ten thousand activists were imprisoned. Four years later, Hoover was made head of the organization soon to be renamed the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

p. ii: Meanwhile Fascism--the form of capitalist political power envisioned in The Iron Heel and first brought into being by Benito Mussolini--was beginning its conquest of Europe. In 1922, the Fascists marched on Rome and toppled the government; within two years they were ruling Italy. In 1929, The Iron Heel was published in Italy. The translator, in a carefully guarded introduction, foresees "the battle that will burst forth, who knows when, between the plutocracy and the people." Within months, the Fascist government had banned all cheap editions of The Iron Heel and London's other revolutionary works, labeling them as part of a plot to overthrow the regime. Expensive editions were allowed to remain in print, however, for the government saw no threat in this book as long as it stayed in "the hands of the cultured classes" (as reported on the front page of the New York Times, October 10, 1929). Three years later, speaking in Milan, the very city where The Iron Heel had been published, Benito Mussolini gave this assurance: "Today, with a fully tranquil conscience, I say to you, that the twentieth century will be a century of fascism..."

London paints "the Iron Heel" of the oligarchy as though his models were the later twentieth-century fascist states of Italy, Spain, Portugal, Rumania, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Germany, with their ubiquitous secret police, unchecked militarism, and state-organized terror. And he points to the most essential fact about fascism: it is the form that the capitalist state assumes when the oligarchy feels that its economic and political power is seriously threatened by working-class revolution.

There are of course those today who think that Fascism and Nazism were defeated and expunged by the Second World War. These are the same people whom Aime Cesaire accuses (in Discourse on Colonialism) of being the "accomplices" of Nazism, because they have always "absolved it, shut their eyes to it, legitimized it" whenever it has "been applied only to non-European peoples". Thus it has been possible to define as part of the "the Free World" the regimes of General Pinochet of Chile, the Shah of Iran, Chiang Kai-shek, President Duvalier of Haiti, General Zia of Pakistan, Generals Thieu and Ky of Vietnam, President Marcos of the Philippines, General Somoza of Nicaragua, King Faisal of Egypt, General Batista of Cuba, King Hassan of Morocco, (p. iii) the royal family of Saudi Arabia, General Stroessner of Paraguay, and, to name a few others, the present governments of Argentina, Brazil, Zaire, Indonesia, South Korea, and South Africa (where leaders of the governing party have repeatedly explained that their "Christian Nationalism" is merely the same form of government known as Fascism in Italy and National Socialism in Germany).

But it is in America itself, the scene of London's Iron Heel, where his prophecies may now be most relevant. In 1961, Joseph Heller's Catch-22 saw the ostensibly defeated fascist powers actually victorious in the American military-industrial complex that emerged from World War Two, with "mobs of policemen...in control everywhere", and with the features of Mussolini merging into those of the American men in power. The events of the 1960s and the 1970s have brought The Iron Heel back home.

London foresees: the creation of attractive suburbs for relatively privileged strata of the working class while the central cities are turned into what he calls "ghettos" for the masses of unemployed and menial laborers, shoved into the darkest depths of human misery, the deliberate economic subversion of public education in order to spread illiteracy and ignorance; adequate food, health care, and housing priced above the reach of more and more people; the ubiquitous secret police infiltrating all organizations opposing the government; the establishment of a permanent mercenary army; the government conspiring in real and phony bomb plots, in the suppression of books and the destruction of printing presses, in witch hunts aimed at dissident labor leaders, professors, and authors, in destroying the reputations of some of its opponents, imprisoning many others, and murdering the few it finds too formidable; spontaneous mass rebellions of the downtrodden people of the central cities; urban guerrillas battling the government's army of mercenaries and police in the canyons of the cities. By the late 1960s, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, originating a few months after The Iron Heel, was merging into the novel's vision of the plutocracy's secret police; its agents and informers were planning and participating in the bombings and murders of civil rights workers, in the looting and burning of anti-war offices, and in the open assassination of prominent dissident leaders. It is fitting that the raid in (p. iv) which federal and state police officials riddled the sleeping bodies of Mark Clark and Fred Hampton occurred in Chicago, the city where London imagines the apocalyptic rebellion of "the People of the Abyss", who are slaughtered by the mercenaries and secret police of the plutocracy. [H: Anybody still sleeping??]

(There is quite a bit more of this fascinating introduction too long to quote, written by H. Bruce Franklin, Newark, New Jersey, April 21, 1980.)

p. 132, par. 3: Economic clashes were usually succeeded by wars.

p. 133, par. 1: The Oligarchy wanted the war with Germany. And it wanted the war for a dozen reasons. In the juggling of events such a war would cause, in the reshuffling of the international cards and the making of new treaties and alliances, the Oligarchy had much to gain. And, furthermore, the war would consume many national surpluses, reduce the armies of unemployed that menaced all countries, and give the Oligarchy a breathing space in which to perfect its plans and carry them out. Such a war would virtually put the Oligarchy in possession of the world market. Also, such a war would create a large standing army that need NEVER BE DISBANDED, while in the minds of the people would be substituted the issue, ‘AMERICA VERSUS GERMANY', IN PLACE OF ‘SOCIALISM VERSUS OLIGARCHY'.

* * *

This is all we have to share, at the moment, from Mr. London. I believe you can see that it is a most revealing and insightful volume that I suggest any and all effort to witness. It is hard, however, when the resources for such books are shut down. Remember, readers, that within this next very brief while--ALL publications are to be funnelled through Thomson Company. Already the Zionists control your media, your major news presses, theater and, of course, all major publishing concerns. A dark, dark time has been carefully prepared for you mesmerized masses.

The writer of the letter accompanying this shared excerpt also is a staunch "doer" who has petitioned Perot on a number of items--only to be ignored. HE IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS--Perot does NOT see the light nor head for it except in tiny, slow steps with business such as NAFTA, etc. As long as he still considers paying off the national debt to the banksters who stole your funds and ran up the debt--you do not have a "leader". However, this person's observation of NO-ONE to lead or hope of massive change developing is all but nil, is also quite correct! WHO DO YOU HAVE? NO, YOU DO NOT HAVE A LEADER IN BO GRITZ! YOU HAVE A COMMANDO NOT A COMMANDER IN GRITZ AS IS BEING CONSTANTLY REVEALED, IT WOULD SEEM, BY HIS ACTIONS AND STATED INTENTIONS. When you have a world more interested in Michael Jackson's glove and crotch routine vs. "Madonna's" spikey bra and vulgar routines and who will be "biggest" in Israel's "showtime" than world enslavement--YOU HAVE TROUBLES!!!

The letter writer in point also sent a copy of one of his letters to Ross Perot which states a quote from John Kennedy at Columbia University in 1963: "The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy America's freedom and before I leave office I must inform the citizens of their plight." Ten days later he was assassinated!

* * *

Let us pick up a bit more from Behind Communism before closing this segment, please. We are simply going to have to double up on our efforts to get this information out timely because there is much "planned" against you for the closing of this year and the rest of the decade is going to be a whammy. So be it.

CONTINUING: BEHIND COMMUNISM

PETERSBURG SOVIET

IT CONTROLLED THE MOB

We have already given a description of the March Revolution which overthrew the Tsar, and we have told of the establishment of the two governing bodies which came into existence on March 12th, namely the Provisional Government and the PETERSBURG Soviet.

The PETERSBURG Soviet, although it controlled the mob, was reluctant to assume the responsibility of governing--at least in the beginning. The Soviet was originally organized by second-string leaders who were quite capable of stirring up trouble, but who had little capacity for leading a revolutionary government. Furthermore, it was not clear in the early days of the revolution as to what the final outcome would be. PETERSBURG was, after all, only one city in the empire, and the attitude of the country as a whole, and of the soldiers at the front, was unknown. For this reason the Soviet preferred that the Provisional Government--which had some semblance of legitimacy--should temporarily rule.

THE PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT

The Provisional Government was not a revolutionary body. Of its 12 members, only one, Kerensky, was a "Socialist". The others were typical upper-middle class members of the Duma, with possibly mild leanings to the left. Head of the Provisional Government was Prince Lvov, whose reputation as a liberal may have qualified him for that position more than some of the others. This 12 man government had sprung into being simply because no other semblance of a government existed in PETERSBURG on March 12th--it did not in any way participate in the revolution. In the months following the overthrow of the Tsar, however, its power grew considerably, so that by July, when an abortive Bolshevik uprising occurred, the Provisional Government was able to quell the affair and arrest or force into hiding the Bolshevik leaders.

The Provisional Government undertook to continue the war against Germany. The great mass of people were, of course, patriotic Russians, and Germany was looked on as a dangerous threat to Russian "sovereignty". The Provisional Government, during its entire tenure, was primarily occupied with the prosecution of the war.

The Provisional Government took two steps, however, which were to profoundly affect the revolution. The first, and most fateful, was the decision to permit the return of all exiled political prisoners from Siberia and abroad. By doing so it sealed the fate of Russia. Here is the way one American writer, Edward Alworth Ross, has described it:

(Russian Bolshevik Revolution, page 58, by Edward Alworth Ross, Century Company, New York, 1921.) "One of the first acts of the Provisional government, however, is to bring back to Russia the political victims of the autocracy. From Siberia about eighty thousand are brought out. From Switzerland, France, Scandinavia, the United States, even from Argentina and other remote countries, come perhaps ten thousand who have been refugees from the Tsar's vengeance. In all ninety thousand at least, virtually all of them of socialist sympathies, stream into European Russia in late April, May, June, and July. Honored by a grateful people for their voluntary sacrifices and sufferings they quickly rise to a commanding influence in the local soviets and carry them irresistibly toward the political left."

These ninety thousand exiles constituted the heart of the approaching Bolshevik revolution. They were almost to the last man professional revolutionaries, and with few exceptions they were Jewish. Stalin, Sverdlov, and Zinoviev were among the exiles who returned from Siberia. Lenin, Martov, Radek, and Kamenev--as we have seen--returned from Switzerland. Trotzky returned, with hundreds of his Yiddish brethren, from New York's East Side. These were the inheritors of the revolution. Until their return the revolution had been without leadership--largely it had been conducted by second string leaders who happened to be on the spot. Now, the elite were returning. Let us take another quotation from the starry-eyed Edward Alworth Ross, who prose is almost as poor as his judgment: "The bewildered leaderless Russian masses are thrilled and captivated by these ready, self-confident men who tell them just what they must do in order to garner for themselves the fruits of the revolution. This is why refugees, obscure to us although not to Russians, who in exile had been obliged to work in our steel mills and tailor shops for a living, former residents of New York's "Eastside", who live precariously from some Russian newspapers we Americans never heard of, will rise to be the heads of soviets and, later, cabinet ministers of a government ruling a tenth of the human race. In all modern history there is no romance like it." [H: GO BACK AND RE-READ THAT, PLEASE!]

Soon these hordes of returning Jews would exercise the power of life and death over 150 million Christian Russians. Soon every factory, every government bureau, every school district, and every army unit would function under the gimlet eye of a Jewish Commissar. Soon the blood of human beings would be oozing from under the doors of Communist execution chambers as tens of thousands of Christian men and women were butchered like cattle in a slaughterhouse. Soon five million landowners would be deliberately starved to death as part of a premeditated plan. Soon a move would be under way to exterminate the gentile leader class of the entire nation by murdering every Christian factory owner, and lawyer, and government leader, and army officer, and every other person who had been, or might be, a potential leader. Soon the standing population of the slave-labor camps would exceed 15 million. Soon every church and cathedral would be gutted and every priest and preacher would become a criminal in his own community. Soon Russia would have a zombie-proletariat, docile, willing to work, easily controlled, incapable of revolt....Such was the "romance" of the Bolshevik Revolution.

When the Bolsheviks came to power, they systematically undertook to destroy every vestige of opposition. The fury of the Red Terror can be explained only as a manifestation of Jewish hatred against Christian civilization. Wherever Communists have come to power, their first act has been to execute or imprison the nation's leader class. Their second act is to install Jews in every position of power and authority. In Russia literally millions of gentiles were butchered by Jew executioners. BUT DO YOU HEAR ABOUT "THIS" HOLOCAUST? WHY??

CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS

A second important act of the Provisional Government was to create the machinery for the election of a Constituent Assembly. It was provided that delegates from all of Russia should be chosen in free elections, and these were to meet in a Constituent Assembly for the purpose of writing a constitution for Russia. It was to be, as one writer puts it..."a body encompassing the purposes of both the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention of the American Revolution." (Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and His Influence, by Lev Trotsky (translated by Charles Malamuth), Harper Bros., New York & London, 1941.

When the Constituent Assembly did meet, in January of 1918, the Bolsheviks had already been in power a month. "It met at the Tauride Palace in Petrograd and lasted less than 13 hours; from four in the afternoon of Jan. 18, to 40 minutes past four of Jan. 19, when it was dispersed by Bolshevik troops, chiefly soldiers of Lettish regiments." One of the factors which precipitated the October Revolution was the forthcoming elections for the Constituent Assembly.

TO BE CONTINUED

* * *

It is time you take note of a few things going on in Russia this day. Note that the big cheese barbarians are holding out with their massive control devices against citizens WHO ARE ALLOWED NO WEAPONS. STILL, THE OBVIOUS HAPPENED AND THE REASON YOU MUST HAVE "FOREIGN" POLICE FORCE--THE OFFICERS COULD NOT BRING THEMSELVES TO SHOOT THEIR FELLOW-CITY CITIZENRY AS THEY STORMED AND OVERWHELMED THE GUARDS. It is further noted by commentators that the "soldiers" expected to come--would bring their own weapons for that is all there are available among the "masses". Also, it is stated that the "soldiers" expected to arrive are from mercenary units out of Afghanistan, etc., "waiting for something to do!" EVEN ON YOUR NON-NEWS, MY FRIENDS, YOUR FATE IS BEING SHOWN TO YOU--AMERIKA! YOU are run entirely by these same thugs who took over Russia and now it is spread to your very doorsteps--indeed the next war will NOT be far away, it appears!

SECURITY AND SURVIVAL

This kind of ongoing upheavals causes us to turn to what systems there are to provide security. I am embarrassed to note that Dharma and E.J. were asked about a new lighter-weight substance which would provide good protection. I promised further updates--and what do we have? Well, we have unfortunate problems with the Institute which had the work ongoing but has had to hold-up until we can get rid of litigations and get on with our work. We have several products in progress--one is a very lightweight (proto-type aerated and particulated material--molded or formed), we have a substance which aerates cement by addition of additives and can be cut, formed and autoclaved--replacing the need for wood in any use (this could have added particulate blocking radiation and would also have enough "give" to be excellent as an earthquake structure). We have and are using pre-molded cement and particle slabs with a double-slab cement (thin) sandwich of honeycomb material which lightens the overall material and still has very durable strength which can allow for underground structures which will hold massive weights on its sheltering roof. The person who wrote with SASE is not being ignored--there simply is no information "packet" we can send forth. Our major thrust has been to utilize what is available and construct (from some of this very substance) placements for grain, etc. Because of personal "horrors" for John S., the domed home under construction for him has also been placed on "hold" until he can extricate himself from the home of incarceration in which he was placed by his wife. The building will be completed, however, as others wish to take over the project as soon as possible. However, John is having a hard time as he has wonderful friends but no family to assist him while his wife took total control of him and all property and will not even respond to his letters or calls. It is coming to a head-on confrontation because he is quite lucid and is ready to come out into the care and loving attendance of a home environment.

Unfortunately, friends of the adversary continue to botch his chances and, just yesterday, two of them went to visit and assured him "...he would NEVER get out"--"...he better just kiss-up to E. and be satisfied with what he has got---that those people who call themselves friends don't care about him and just want to use him." Well, ONE OF THOSE "FRIENDS" IS ME! We shall see--both about "me" and this continuation of input of adversarial nature at every opportunity! There are four (4) places where room has been set aside FOR JOHN--no strings, no nothing, except love and friendship with "Big John". Shame rests upon you who continue your pull-down of brothers for unto you shall return the pain. Go count your shekels and coins and continue your bemoaning and deceitful tell-tales and shortly the brethren who have efforted to be kind, unjudgmental and open to you shall come up from their drowse and remind you of your alignments. DID YOU THINK JOHN SO FEEBLE AS TO NOT CONFRONT EVERYONE IN SIGHT AND WITHIN REACH? WELL, THAT WHICH YOU DO ONLY SETS THE HEARTS OF THOSE WHO VISIT AND GIVE REASON TO PERSIST IN OBTAINING HIS RELEASE INTO LOVING ARMS AND A HOT THANKSGIVING DINNER AND ONGOING LIFE AT HOME. MAY YOU COME TO FORGIVE YOURSELVES FOR THE PAIN YOU DUMP AT EVERY STOP ALONG YOUR JOURNEY--WHILE YOU TOUT UNCONDITIONAL LOVE AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. IT BECOMES EVERY DAY MORE AND MORE APPARENT WHO YOU SERVE.

You continue to blame and shout out against the "Ekkers"? They have NOTHING to do with this affront. They are required to stay completely separate and apart--totally--from this encounter. You ones are going to be shown for what you are--without the cover of the deceiver's speeches. This is YOUR BROTHER you doom to a Hell of incarceration instead of allowing him to move into loving environment and ability to take up some semblance of his life remaining. Or, are you STILL trying to get that which is NOT YOURS from an Institute sitting to care and security of that which John has remaining? The sword of "return" shall surely smite thee who would use thine brethren for your worldly purpose and destroy his hope. You who come smiling into our circles and go forth and do your work upon those unsuspecting of your villainous vindictive offerings shall find you have forfeited your credibility through these types of painful encounters. No matter what YOU "thought" you did in "helping" John deal with "reality" in unconditional love--you brought the lion to front--and John is still growling--you made no friend on the yesterday in that place. How interesting, Patricia, I thought you were one of the ones in attendance to "tend" John on his release. I only ask how you could be such a part of this as to suggest he "kiss-up" to the very one who put him in there? I know your "intent" and it didn't work out that way--don't you yet realize that these kinds of efforts rarely work out the way you envision? John has to get "out" by his own merit and strength--not through puny begging and further degradation as a slave to a master controller. Can you not remember that the road to Hell is PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS? So be it--John shall be strong enough when his need is present.

Let us close this, please, so that those other things waiting can be attended. Thank you

[wave]

PJ 79

CHAPTER 7

REC #1 HATONN

MON., OCT. 4, 1993 11:06 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 049

MON, OCTOBER 4, 1993

"FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE"

Ian Flemming (James Bond) couldn't think up a story-line as good as the story being played out this day!

I am NOT going to unravel the play or the players FOR YOU! I ask that you consider ALL your lessons--even those a long way back--even to the ones in which we spoke of the agreed-upon bases in India and China FROM which you, the U.S., and U.N. could take out the Cosmosphere centers in Russia, Ukraine, etc. Well--there has been a massive earthquake and much loss of life in India where one such base would be set up and in full working (underground mostly) order from which "you" could get to Russian territory easily. But, what of China? In that area where construction and facilities were being "finished" for the SAME PURPOSE--there have been two big quakes--SINCE THE INDIA QUAKE!!!

Now--students (chelas)--go back over the most recent lessons of all--within the past days: WHO WERE (ARE) THE BOLSHEVIKS? They are speaking of "hard line Communists"? Who were (are) the very conceivers of Communism?

Let us turn to economics: Who has forgiven all defaulted debts for the Russians--and promised more funds and more grain and more, more, more. Who is YOUR enemy? Who is your GOVERNMENT'S enemy? WHO ARE YOU?

Why do you think your government Elite are getting rid of old-line Constitutionalist leaders such as your Admirals (in silly nonsense scandals?)??? WHO IS YOUR ENEMY, WE-THE-PEOPLE?

SCREEN-PLAY FOR CONSIDERATION

Suppose, as Gritz projected--that "if you didn't take back your Constitutional government with ballots--it would be bullets!" "IF" you had enough military personnel on the side of the "people" to pull it off. So, if, while some of your military strength was in place (and still not yet shipped away) you formed a revolutionary action--what would you have?

Would you not likely have a bunch of "holed-up" Congressmen and Elite Administrators, Khazarian Zionists "hard-line" (Communists) caught up IN THE CAPITAL AND WHITE HOUSE? WHO WOULD THE RUSSIANS SUPPORT?? (YELTSIN??) WHO IS FREEDOM'S ENEMY? WHO MAKES THE RULES AND LEGISLATION THAT BINDS AND ENSLAVES AND DESTROYS FREEDOM? WHO SET UP "DEMOCRATIC" PARTY AND POWER?? WHO CAN "FIX" THE BALLOT MACHINES AND "WIN" VICTORY IN ELECTIONS? BLIND ONES--WAKE UP, THE TOAST IS BURNED!

Who is causing crime in your streets in the first place? Who is going to take every vestige of your defense weapons and capability? WHO IS YOUR ENEMY?

YOU HAD BETTER GO BACK AND RE-STUDY YOUR LESSONS AND AGAIN VERY CAREFULLY STUDY, INDIVIDUALLY, THE PROTOCOLS OF PLAN 2000.

Who controls the world PRESS and MEDIA? WHO HAD THE ONLY GOOD VANTAGE POINT IN MOSCOW--MEDIA-WISE? Also, LISTEN to what the news commentators are prattling about "if" Yeltsin gains power from this move! You have never seen such tap-dancing in your lives, sleepyheads! WHO put the nuclear arsenals in protective custody? ARE YOU POSSIBLY SEEING A PLAY UNFOLD OF "TAKING BACK A GOVERNMENT?" WILL MILLIONS DIE BECAUSE OF THE EFFORTS? PROBABLY NOT--FOR "CHRISTIAN" ELEMENT IS PROBABLY NOT GOING TO HAVE A PURGE AS THE ZIONIST COMMUNISTS HAVE HAD. IS THIS GOOD? WHO KNOWS? Is Yeltsin REALLY one of the IMF biggies? No--the "biggies" didn't really even want to let him and Russia IN. But they DID and they continue to play his game, don't they? Is Yeltsin Godly goodly? Have you ever seen a politician who was Godly?? Will you just exchange "one bad coin" for another? Who knows--does it matter? The Elite plan to have it ALL. Is Yeltsin's Russia paying back interest and loans from the IMF? NO--YOU ARE!--THEIRS ALSO!

IS RUSSIA DANGEROUS TO YOU? INDEED! WHEN THE CONFRONTATION COMES "IF" YOU ARE IN THE PLACES OF THE SHEEPLE--YOU ARE GOING TO GO AS THE SHEEPLE. DOES THIS MEAN, THEN, THAT IF YOU ARE CHRISTIAN IN ACTION AND BELIEF THAT YOU WILL BE SPARED? NO, NOT IF YOU ARE IN THE PLACES OF THE SHEEPLE--GIVING EVERYONE A CONFRONTATION BAD TIME! IF YOU ARE OF THE ENEMY OF YOUR GOVERNMENT'S ENEMY--YOU ARE THE ENEMY!

Your Government Elite have made some very stupid plays lately in order to take over more power and now there is a lot of "crow" eating to be done--very judiciously so YOU don't find out what has REALLY been going on.

Survival? What are "your" chances? Depends upon who you are! Which are "my" enemies? Both and NEITHER--these are the power games of humans. "My" people shall attend the same stance as always--we sort the Truth from the lies as you can understand at some level the game. We do not take up arms "against", as in battle, for force is not of God--neither can the guy with the sling-shot WIN against the particle beam-exploded nuclear warhead! Besides, IF you await proper action the adversarial greedmongers will sort of themselves and wreck their own nests. You have just witnessed it in living color--how much, for instance, do you think YOU will have to give in "aid" to rebuild that one parliament building in Moscow? How much do you think "you" will pay in additional "aid" to repair Russia after this revolution--no matter how small? Isn't it nice to know up front--THAT YOU WILL PAY FOR IT? I CAN promise you THIS much--no matter how the smiles and agreements seem to go--Yeltsin would destroy every Khazarian Zionist alive--if he didn't see a way to GAIN IMMEASURABLY FROM THE USE OF THEM LEFT RUNNING THE WESTERN WORLD. DON'T, EITHER, THINK THE ELITE JEWISH ZIONISTS DON'T KNOW IT--YOU-THE-PEOPLE ARE BEING SOLD AS WE WRITE.

Keep your eye on the bouncing bullets--history is unfolding before you--as well as your "future" or "lack of it".

On September 14, 1993, the following article ran in The Washington Times. I think you had better pay close attention to this, readers. I also think it should be NOTED right here, before The Washington Times article, another from the Chicago Tribune, 9/19/1993 (Both very, very current!)

END OF SOVEREIGNTY

By R.C. Longworth, Tribune senior writer: NATIONS' INTERNAL AFFAIRS NOW THE WORLD'S BUSINESS.

With little thought for the consequences, the world is changing the code that has guided international relations for nearly 350 years.

The old code is based on the idea of national sovereignty--that is, that a government can do pretty much anything it likes within its own country and the outside world has no right to interfere. International law is violated only when one country attacks another.

The new code is emerging from a combination of factors--the end of the Cold War, new powers for the United Nations and a growing concern for human rights, magnified by the power of television. At its core is the belief that what goes on inside a country--including civil wars, famines and human rights violations--threatens the world's peace and justifies foreign intervention. "The time of absolute and exclusive sovereignty....has passed," UN Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali wrote in his most important policy paper, An Agenda for Peace.

The old principle was laid down by the Peace of Westphalia of 1648, which ended the religious wars of Europe. This treaty recognized the sovereignty of the principalities within the Holy Roman Empire and severely limited the empire's right to intervene in them.

Given the massacres, pogroms, persecutions, gulags and holocausts of the last 345 years, this principle clearly leaves something to be desired. But little study has been devoted to whether the alternative--the "new interventionism", in the phrase of Johns Hopkins University scholar Stephen John Stedman--will be better.

If this new interventionism is to take hold, it almost certainly will be exercised through the UN. Not surprisingly, the UN, seeing the possibility of new power, has grabbed it with both hands.

"Human rights issues push sovereignty to the edge," UN Assistant Secretary General Kofi Annan said in an interview. "When you have a cruel and painful situation, as in Somalia, the suffering of these people is so much more important than sovereignty." [H: Have you REALLY helped the people of Somalia? You now have raids in the middle of the night and they are further butchered because they struggle back against night-helicopter "gun-raids" and are punished if you crash one of your "gunships". Is this better? Or, is this a cover for what is REALLY going on in the world take over for strategic placement from which to launch an assault on all the remaining independent countries of the area? It is much like protecting the children at Waco--surely enough--you really protect dead children from further abuse!]

The Persian Gulf War and its aftermath illustrate the new thinking. [H: And what of your Elite (Bush, Sununu, etc.) team players into the area to clean up on BUSINESS DEALS?]

When the UN authorized the Gulf War, its justification was the old Westphalian idea that one state, Iraq, had violated the sovereignty of another, Kuwait, by attacking it.

The new rules appeared, probably for the first time, after the war when the UN Security Council passed Resolution 688. It authorized the UN to go into Iraq, against the Iraqi government's will, because of events--the threats to the Kurds--taking place within the country. [H: Is this not the pattern of the BIG GUNS making the rules to fit the circumstance, not letting the opponent know the rules, and then telling everyone, after the fact, what those rules MIGHT be?--not "are", just, "might be"?]

Since then, the UN has intervened with troops and relief agencies in Somalia. Because Somalia's government had collapsed, getting its permission was moot, but the UN forces did have to squelch rival warlords before they could start delivering food. [H: But remember, readers, we have spoken of how Somalia got into the mess it was in, prior to this. The Soviets were THERE--then they pulled out and YOUR (U.S.A.) ELITE moved in and wiped out the government, the economy and all stability. The Soviets moved west and you moved in, destroyed and now move back in through the UN to further wipe out the little country. Warlords? Warlords?? What are warlords? ARE YOU NOT WARLORDS? NOW YOU ARE WARLOCK WARLORDS! DEAD CHILDREN DON'T EAT MUCH EITHER!

The fact of the 1990s is that the status of sovereignty is shifting. Rev. J. Bryan Hehir of Harvard Divinity School wrote this summer, "The world will continue to be a community of soveriegn states, but political analysts and public officials alike are in search of a new understanding of the role and limits of sovereignty." [H: I always am amused that ones out of the Elite halls of learning and the Elite clubs--are so respected when they make stupid observations. I am reminded of the TWO loudest mouths speaking out, NOW, against NAFTA! Perot? A business man and MEMBER OF THE ELITE CLUBS, FRIEND TO ROCKEFELLER AND THE COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELATIONS. JESSE JACKSON, TRIPPING THROUGH CANADA SPEAKING AGAINST THE AGREEMENT--ONE OF THE FEW BLACK MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS--THE NEW WORLD ORDER CLUB PLANNERS AND DOERS!!]

During the Cold War, the Soviet Union and U.S. used ideological reasons to intervene in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Nicaragua, Grenada and elsewhere.

But none of these was endorsed by the UN. Apart from ideologues in Moscow and Washington, no one tried to justify the interventions with an appeal to some higher international law.

The new advocates of intervention say this higher law exists and will be used more and more.

In an era when TV cameras can broadcast from anywhere, the world truly has become a global village in which every person has a legitimate stake in the well-being of every other person, no matter what arbitrary frontiers divide them.

"The exclusivity and inviolability of state sovereignty are increasingly mocked by global interdependence," Brown University scholars Thomas G. Weiss and Jarat Chopra wrote in the magazine Ethics and International Affairs. "Electronic communications and media have fostered conscious and unconscious identification among all of humanity.

"Are human rights exclusively within the domestic jurisdiction of states, or are they an international concern with community jurisdiction?

"Should the prohibition on the threat or use of force against states be applicable to violence against human beings?

"Which authority is superior--state jurisdiction over individuals within its boundaries, or international jurisdiction over inalienable human rights?

To Boutros-Ghali, the answer is clear. "Underlying the rights of the individual and the right of peoples is a dimension of universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity and provides all peoples with legitimate involvement in issues affecting the world as a whole."

In other words, whenever rights are violated, the world (read: the UN) has the right to intervene.

Boutros-Ghali's predecessor, Javier Perez de Cuellar, argued "that the defense of the oppressed in the name of morality should prevail over frontiers and legal documents."

Those who grant sovereignty some merit but support intervention on humanitarian grounds argue that some sovereignty isn't worth respecting--that "certain types of governments are not acceptable and don't deserve international protection," as Jeff Drumtra, a policy analyst for the U.S. Committee on Refugees, put it.

Of the UN's 184 members, many are dictatorships with no consent from their people. Others face rebellions and barely control their capital cities, let alone their entire territory.

In such situations, what does sovereignty mean? Who is sovereign, the government or the people? If the government is oppressing its people, who has sovereignty rights? [H: It is, however, very, very important to realize that all these nations HAVE NO REAL SAY IN INTERVENTION. The SECURITY COUNCIL PERMANENT MEMBERS DECIDE THE FATE OF THE WORLD AND THOSE MEMBERS--IN LIVING PERSONAGES--ARE TOTALLY CONTROLLED BY THE COMMITTEE OF 300!]

What about majorities vs. minorities? If the Iraqi majority oppresses the Kurdish minority, do the Kurds have sovereign rights that merit protection?

During the Cold War the question did not arise at the UN because the Soviet Union, which kept hundreds of different "nations" within its border thoroughly subjected, insisted on its absolute sovereignty and treated any outside criticism as "interference in its internal affairs". Like so much lace, the debate over sovereignty is a result of the Cold War's END.

But all this is clearly getting into very deep legal water.

If sovereignty is overridden in some cases, it can be overridden in ALL cases, and that's not something the U.S. and other major nations are eager to consider. If the UN can intervene to protect Kurds in Iraq or starving children in Somalia, can it intervene to protect Catholics in Northern Ireland or poor blacks in America's ghettos? [H: Obviously that is where you are headed--directly! Only it will not be to PROTECT anything--it will be to CONTROL elements as established to allow for just such intervention.]

Obviously, this isn't going to happen. Is the new definition of sovereignty, then, only a means for the wealthy West to regain control over the Third World, a new justification for colonialism?

Maybe so, Paul Johnson, the right-wing British historian, has called for UN trusteeships over countries like Chad, Mauritania and Liberia because these states "are not yet fit to govern themselves" but exist in a state of "violence and humanitarian degradation" that is a "threat to the stability of their neighbors as well as an affront to our consciences."

But as Stedman of Johns Hopkins has pointed out, "The UN is simply incapable of playing the role that the new interventionists demand of it."

Already stretched to the limit, the UN cannot intervene in Zaire, Liberia, Rwanda, Burma, Sri Lanka and other countries where civilized life has broken down. Who then will decide where to intervene?

The answer, openly admitted by UN officials, is that the decision will be made by a CNN editor in Atlanta. The UN is in Somalia because CNN and other television outlets assaulted the world's conscience with it. The UN is not in Sudan because the government there, weak though it may be, has been able to prevent widespread TV coverage of a famine as bad as that in Somalia.

"It's easier to do humanitarian intervention because of TV," UN Undersecretary James Jonah said. "TV and its visible evidence is very powerful--but also very dangerous. OUR operations now are CNN-driven."

The danger is that the UN and its members are beginning to rewrite international law on the basis of a televised outrage, without a good answer to the key question:

Should the old sovereignty-based system, flawed as it is, be jettisoned before we know what will replace it?

END OF ARTICLE ONE.

How many of you will NOW go re-read the Protocols? Get control of the public information (media, press, control publications and give information desired by the Elite for your information) and you have "got the world enslaved". And how do you think Ted Turner of CNN thinks? Well, he REWROTE HIS OWN TEN COMMANDMENTS, READERS, AND THEY SURELY DID NOT IN ANY WAY RESEMBLE GOD'S--AND HE STATED IT RIGHT OUT FRONT! No wonder HE sits next to Kissinger at the White House STATE dinners. IF you can't see the TRAP--how are you going to keep your neck out of it?

RUSSIAN-US TROOPS PACT

Take a deep breath now and read this one: The TIMES RECORD, Brunswick ME, Sept. 9, 1993 reports that the US and Russia signed a pact for JOINT TROOP EXERCISES. "The peacekeeping exercises will involve the 3rd Infantry Division (among others) based in Frankfurt, Germany, and the 27th Motorized Rifle Division (among others) from the Volga District in Russia." "....This may not be without problems," Secretary Aspin says.

I would guess it won't be any bigger problem than the joint exercises going on in the US as we write--also TOP SECRET!

Now, for the biggie:

RUSSIAN NUCLEAR EXERCISES INCLUDE

MOCK HIT ON U.S.

REPRINT: WASHINGTON TIMES, Sept. 14, 1993.

By Bill Gertz, The Washington Times

Russia's military continues to modernize its huge nuclear force, and its elite Strategic Rocket Forces recently conducted a large exercise that INCLUDED A MOCK ATTACK AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, according to U.S. defense and strategic-weapons officials.

"In terms of military capability, Russian nuclear forces pose a very great threat to North America," said a Clinton administration official specializing in Russian nuclear forces.

The official said U.S.-Russian relations are vastly improved since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. But certain events, such as confrontation over a regional conflict, could lead to a nuclear showdown as in the past, the official said.

"They are still there," a second administration official said of the roughly 12,000 strategic nuclear weapons that remain targeted on the United States, as they were when Moscow was controlled by Communists.

The experts' view of the Russian nuclear threat contrasts sharply with statements by Defense Secretary Les Aspin and Gen. Colin Powell, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who announced the new U.S. military structure earlier this month.

Mr. Aspin and Gen. Powell said they based their blueprint for U.S. military forces in the post-Cold War period on the idea that the Soviet threat is gone and would no longer be used as a basis for military planning.

But other defense and intelligence officials said it is too soon to dismiss the threat of nuclear attack by Russia's military, which recently took control of all former Soviet strategic forces from the command structure of the nominal Commonwealth of Independent States.

The nuclear arms are spread across Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine and will be reduced under pending START agreements. Implementation has been snagged by differences between Russia and Ukraine.

Russian-U.S. military ties received a boost Wednesday when Mr. Aspin and Russian Defense Minister Pavel Grachev signed an agreement at the Pentagon calling for increased military-to-military exchanges, joint exercises and a ‘hot line' between the Pentagon and the Kremlin to be used in any future crises.

The cooperation agreement, however, contains no provisions to allow U.S. officials to take part in or observe the dismantling of Russian strategic nuclear weapons. Russian military officials oppose any U.S. role in the destruction, U.S. officials said.

These officials said the Russian nuclear exercise, along with signs of the continued construction and improvement of underground nuclear blast shelters around Moscow, are signs the Russian military still is making preparations to fight a nuclear war WITH THE UNITED STATES. "You can't dismiss that threat," one official said.

The nuclear exercise, detected by U.S. Intelligence sensors, took place earlier this year and involved all the strategic forces of the former Soviet Union--silo-based and mobile missiles, strategic bombers and nuclear submarines, according to officials familiar with intelligence about the exercises.

The nuclear forces were placed on a heightened state of alert for the exercise, which lasted several days, and caused alarm in some parts of the Pentagon among officials who thought such activities had ended along with the Cold War. [H: Anyone still snoozing?]

U.S. intelligence agencies are not certain WHO has the ability to launch nuclear weapons from the former Soviet Union, but they believe Russian President Boris Yeltsin and officials in the Russian Defense Ministry have that power.

Large numbers of U.S. nuclear forces, by contrast, have been taken off alert status in recent months and readiness exercises have been sharply curtailed, said a defense official. "We're only doing small, routine exercises. The big ones have been canceled because ‘peace has broken out'," this official said.

A total of 450 Minuteman II nuclear missiles were taken off alert status in 1991, meaning that they cannot be fired on short notice, said Air Force Lt. Col. Paula Hoffmann, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Strategic Command at Offutt Air Force Base near Omaha, Neb.

Five hundred Minuteman III and 50 MX missiles remain on alert, she said.

U.S. B-52 and B-1 nuclear bombers also were taken off alert status in 1991, and the nuclear command craft known as Looking Glass, which once flew around the clock, has been grounded on "modified alert status", Col. Hoffman said.

U.S. intelligence agencies have detected the production of new nuclear warhead material and missiles in Russia since January, officials said, adding that Moscow has announced that it has ceased producing nuclear bombers.

"They are doing what they need to do to modernize their nuclear forces," one official said.

Lawrence Gershwin, a senior CIA analyst, said in March that Moscow is expected to build three new ballistic missiles--mobile, fixed and submarine-based--by the end of the decade.

Officials said a small number of Russian nuclear missile submarines remain on alert status and a portion of the 16 U.S. nuclear missile submarines remain on alert.

Growing instability in the former Soviet Union also has given rise to new fears of an accidental missile launch.

A technological malfunction could trigger a nuclear attack, and Russian officials have begun to examine the possibility of an accidental launch, administration officials said.

SVEN KRAEMER, A FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL ARMS EXPERT, SAID RUSSIA'S NUCLEAR ARMS "CONSTITUTE A SUPERPOWER ARSENAL CAPABLE OF DESTROYING THE UNITED STATES IN A MATTER OF MINUTES."

"This is an enormous threat, given the volatilities and even civil wars in the former Soviet Union, which may well place these weapons into aggressive or erratic hands almost overnight," Mr. Kraemer said.

END OF ARTICLE

Anyone for lunch break?

Salu and GOOD LUCK!

PJ 79

CHAPTER 8

REC #2 HATONN

TUE., OCT. 5, 1993 11:58 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 050

TUE., OCTOBER 5, 1993

We are sticking right to this subject of Russian Revolution, Communism, World Order, Khazarian Zionists, etc., because of the immediate happenings in Russia and the effect upon the world. You MUST get informed or you are destined to repeat and repeat and repeat the unrecognition of the enemy among you. You have just seen in Moscow that which is being referred to as the worst bloody civil action in Moscow since the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.

CONTINUATION: BEHIND COMMUNISM,

"PETERSBURG SOVIET":

ALL RUSSIAN CONGRESS OF SOVIETS

One other event occurred which was to affect the outcome of the revolution. This was the convening of the First All-Russian Congress of Soviets in PETERSBURG on June 3rd, 1917. It should be explained that the word "soviet" means "council", or "committee". [H: That "definition" is important for almost none of YOU had any idea that in such a name as Soviet Republic of..... had that meaning--nor that the Soviet Union bore such definition.] Following the March Revolution, literally hundreds of local revolutionary Soviets were organized all over Russia by the various Marxist parties. It was decided that a congress of these soviets would meet for the purpose of unifying the forces of the revolution.

This first Congress of Soviets was dominated by the Mensheviks and Essars. (Essars = Social Revolutionary Party) The Bolsheviks had fewer than 40 delegates out of several hundred attending.

Before disbanding, the Congress of Soviets set October 20th (later changed to Nov. 7th) as the date for the convening of the next Congress. This date is extremely important because it marks the date of the Bolshevik Revolution. When the Second Congress of Soviets did convene, on the evening of November 7th, the Bolsheviks had already gained control of the PETERSBURG Soviet and had overthrown the Provisional Government a few hours earlier. The Bolsheviks were thus able to present the Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets with a "fait accompoli". This Second Congress of Soviets became the official government of Communist Russia on that same evening of November 7th, 1917.

LENIN RETURNS

But now we must turn our attention back to Lenin and his party at the time of their arrival from abroad. When Lenin arrived in PETERSBURG in April of 1917, he found the PETERSBURG Soviet dominated by the Mensheviks, with the Essars (Social Revolutionaries) second in membership, and the Bolsheviks in the minority. President of the Soviet was the Menshevik, Tcheidze, a "defensist" who strongly supported the war effort. Of the two vice-presidents, one was Skobelev, also a Menshevik, and the other was Kerensky, the only member of the 12 man Provisional Government who also belonged to the Soviet.

Although the Mensheviks controlled the PETERSBURG Soviet, they were badly divided among themselves. The main body of the Menshevik faction--the defensists--was headed by Theodore Dan Gurvich and M.I. Lieber (formerly of the Jewish Bund). The other group of Mensheviks--the internationalists--was headed by Martov.

Lenin bitterly criticized this state of affairs. He regarded the Provisional Government as an instrument of the "bourgeois" and he immediately and violently advocated its overthrow. Throughout April, May, and June the Bolsheviks preached the destruction of the Provisional Government, and among the factory workers and the military garrisons around PETERSBURG this propaganda began to take effect. Under the slogan "all power to the Soviets", the Bolsheviks had succeeded by July in recruiting to their banners large numbers of the city's more radical elements.

The returning influx of exiles also enhanced the position of the Bolsheviks. These exiles were not all originally Bolsheviks, but they were almost without exception extremists, and they had waited a long time for revolution to come; they were hungry for power. And they were inclined to favor the Bolsheviks because they were the most radical advocates of direct action. Trotzky, who had in 1905 began as a Menshevik, and who had later been a "neutral", immediately joined the Bolsheviks on his return from New York. So it was with many others.

On July 17th this anti-government agitation resulted in an unscheduled uprising by thousands of the city's inflamed worker-soldier population. In modern Russian history these are known as the "July Days". Kerensky, who by now had become the dominant figure in the Provisional Government, dealt with the insurrection with considerable firmness. The mob was fired on and in the course of the next three days several hundred people were killed.

As a result of the "July Days" uprising, the top Bolshevik leadership was either arrested or forced to flee. Lenin and Zionoviev temporarily hid out in Sestroretsk, outside of PETERSBURG. Trotzky, Kamenev, and Lunacharsky (soon to become prominent) were arrested. Stalin, at that time an editor of Pravda, was not molested.

One result of the "July Days" was the collapse of the Provisional Government under the premiership of Prince Lvov. On July 20th, Kerensky (Adler) the Jewish Napoleon, became Prime Minister of a "salvation of the revolution" government. Kerensky was quite an orator, and he applied himself to the task of whipping up enthusiasm for an offensive against the Germans. Although he met with moderate success at first, the offensive failed and Kerensky's influence declined steadily in the next three months.

SIXTH PARTY CONGRESS

In August (8-16) the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party held its Sixth Congress. This was the first one held since the London Congress of 1907, and it was the last one held before the Bolshevik Revolution, now only two months away. This Sixth Congress was completely a Bolshevik affair. The other factions merged with the Bolsheviks and ceased to exist; from this time on the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party WAS the Bolshevik Party. (Within a year the party officially changed its name to the Communist Party)

The most important act of the Sixth Congress was to elect the "October Central Committee", consisting of 26 members. This Central Committee was to rule the Bolshevik Party through the critical days of the October Revolution. Who were the principal members of the October Central Committee: Let us take the words of Lev Trotzky as they appear in his book, Stalin: "In view of the Party's semi-legality the names of persons elected by secret ballot were not announced at the Congress, with the exception of the four who had received the largest number of votes. Lenin--133 out of a possible 134, Zinoviev--132, Kamenev--131, Trotzky-131." These four, two months before the October Revolution, were the top leaders of the Bolshevik Party. Three were Jews and the fourth, Lenin, was married to a Jewess. [H: Readers, regardless of your "beliefs" or your "wishes"--these are FACTS and they are IMPORTANT FACTS.]

Trotzky's writings are extremely enlightening from a historical viewpoint. He hated Stalin and he wrote his book, Stalin, to prove that Stalin was a Johnny-come-lately, an upstart, and an usurper. He brings forth masses of evidence to show how unimportant Stalin was in Party councils during and immediately after the October Revolution. In doing so, Trotzky again and again emphasizes who the really important leaders were. Let us take another typical comment from his book on Stalin as he describes the meetings of the October Central Committee shortly before the Bolshevik Revolution:

"The 422 pages of the fourth volume, dealing with August and September, record all the happenings, occurrences, brawls, resolutions, speeches, articles in any way deserving of notice. Sverdlov, then practically unknown, was mentioned three times in that volume; Kamenev, 46 times; I, who spent August and the beginning of September in prison, 31 times, Lenin, who was in the underground, 16 times; Zinoviev, who shared Lenin's fate, 6 times. Stalin was not mentioned even once. Stalin's name is not even in the index of approximately 500 proper names." (pages 222-223)

Thus, Trotzky again cites evidence to prove that Stalin was not an important figure in the Bolshevik Party in 1917. But in doing so he names the real leaders, who as before are the Jews, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotzky, and the up and coming Sverdlov. Lenin is the only gentile.

Because the top party leaders were either in prison or in hiding as a result of the abortive July Days uprising, the Sixth Party Congress was organized by the lesser lights of the party, of whom Sverdlov was the most active. Lev Trotzky, ever anxious to discredit Stalin, gives us this description: (page 48) "The praesidium consisted of Sverdlov, Olminsky, Lomov, Yurenev, and Stalin. Even here, with the most prominent figures of Bolshevism absent, Stalin's name is listed in last place. The Congress resolved to send greetings to ‘Lenin, Trotzky, Zinoviev, Lunacharsky, Kamenev, Kollotai and all the other arrested and persecuted comrades.' These were elected to the honorary praesidium."

Here again, in the words of Trotzky, we have named the "most important figures of Bolshevism": Lenin, Trotzky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Kolontai and Lunacharsky. And we know these were the most important leaders because they were the ones Kerensky had arrested or driven underground following the July Days revolt. Of these, only Lunacharsky and Lenin were gentile; the others were Jewish. These facts show why the Jewishness of Communism is so immediately and indisputable apparent to anyone who has the slightest knowledge of Bolshevik history.

TROTZKY TO POWER

On August 17th Kamenev was released from prison, and exactly a month later Trotzky was also freed by the Kerensky regime. On Sept. 24th Trotzky was elected president of the PETERSBURG Soviet, displacing Cheidze, the Menshevik. From this moment on the Bolsheviks were in control of the PETERSBURG Soviet. On October 26th the PETERSBURG Soviet voted to transfer all military power to a Military Revolutionary Committee , headed by Trotzky. Revolution was now only days away.

MILITARY REVOLUTIONARY COMMITTEE

The Military Revolutionary Committee, under the chairmanship of Trotzky, was organized for the express purpose of preparing the revolution. Time was running out and it was a matter of striking soon or not at all. The Constituent Assembly elections were only a few weeks off, and when it convened, Russia was to have a new government. There was another reason for striking soon. The Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets was to meet on Nov. 7th. The Bolsheviks feared--and with reason--that the Kerensky government would arrest or disband the entire congress and thereby doom the revolt. For these reasons it was felt essential to overthrow the Provisional Government by or before the Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets convened on Nov. 7th.

On November 4th the Military Revolutionary Committee arranged huge mass meetings in preparation for the forthcoming revolt. On the following day the garrison of the Peter and Paul Fortress declared itself in alliance with the Bolsheviks. On the 6th Kerensky made one last attempt to forestall revolution by ordering the arrest of the Military Revolution Committee, banning all Bolshevik publications, and ordering fresh troops to replace the PETERSBURG garrison. These measures were never carried out.

REVOLUTION

On the evening of November 6th Lenin came out of hiding and joined the Military Revolutionary Committee at Smolny Institute, which served as revolutionary headquarters. At two A.M. the following morning the revolution began.

By noon the city was largely in Bolshevik hands. At three P.M. Lenin delivered a fiery speech to the PETERSBURG Soviet--his first since July. At nine P.M. Bolshevik troops began their two day siege of the Winter Palace, last stronghold of the Provisional Government.

At eleven P.M. the Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets convened, with the Bolsheviks in a clear majority. The Congress was now the official government of Russia. The Jew, Kamenev, was elected its first President. Lenin became Premier. Trotzky was made Commissar of Foreign Affairs. Before dawn it had elected a Central Executive Committee under the chairmanship of Kamenev, who thus had the distinction of being the first President of the "Soviet Republic".

Within a few days (Nov. 21) the Jew, Sverdlov, succeeded Kamenev, and thus became the second Jewish president of the Soviet Republic. A relatively minor figure in Bolshevik circles six months before the revolution, he very quickly became one of the five top men in the party. Before his early death two years later he had become the party's chief trouble-shooter and had assumed absolute control over Russia's economic life.

CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY

On November 25th, 18 days after the Bolshevik coup, free elections were held throughout Russia under machinery set up by the Provisional Government. The Bolsheviks, not yet completely organized, made no attempt to interfere with the elections, but when it became clear that the Bolsheviks would command a majority in the Constituent Assembly, they immediately laid plans to undermine its authority.

The Provisional Government had specified that the convocation of the Assembly should be in the hands of a special commission. The Bolsheviks arrested this commission, and substituted for it a "Commissary for the Constituent Assembly", headed by the Jew, Uritzky.

By this tactic the Bolsheviks were able to exert their authority over the Assembly. When the Assembly did finally convene, the Jew, Sverdlov, although not a delegate, took charge of the proceedings, and actually called the meeting to order. Ten hours later the Assembly was thrown into confusion when the Bolsheviks walked out. Shortly thereafter Bolshevik troops brutally brought the Constituent Assembly to an end by ejecting the delegates and locking the doors to the building.

This was the end of the Constituent Assembly. After having convened for only 13 hours, it disbanded, never to meet again. So ended Russia's hope for a constitution and a representative government.

In March, 1918, the Soviet Government moved its capital from PETERSBURG to Moscow. In the same month the Russian Social-Democratic Labor Party officially styled itself the Communist Party.

WAR COMMISSAR

Meanwhile the enemies of the new regime were gathering strength. Before the year was over the Soviet Government was under attack on six war fronts. Some of these anti-communist armies were organized by pro-Tsarist sympathizers; others were organized and financed by foreign governments. These "White Russian" forces constituted a dangerous threat to the new regime and in March Trotzky relinquished his post as Commissar of Foreign Affairs to become Commissar of War, a position which gave him authority over the Soviet Government's entire military resources. It was he who organized and led the Red Army to victory. Not until 1921 were the last of the anti-communist forces destroyed. [H: Now here you have introduced the White and Black Russians--having, of course, NOTHING TO DO WITH "COLOR"--BUT EVERYTHING TO DO WITH INTENT AND DIRECTION OF POWER.]

MURDER OF THE ROYAL FAMILY

Shortly after the March Revolution of 1917 the Tsar had applied for permission for himself and his family to leave the country. Nicholas II was closely related to the royal families of England and Denmark, and he felt exile there was preferable to remaining a prisoner in his own land. The Provisional Government had been inclined to grant his request, but the PETERSBURG Soviet had blocked the move and the royal family had been transferred to Ekaterinburg, in South Russia. There, in 1918 they were housed in the home of a local merchant named Ipatiev. On July 17th anti-Bolshevik troops advanced on Ekaterinburg and the local commissar, a Jew by the name of Yorovsky, ordered the family--and their house-hold servants--executed. Yorovsky personally dispatched Nicholas with a pistol shot in the head. The rest of the family was executed by a firing squad. Their bodies were then soaked in oil and burned. [H: Thus never to know that they were NOT the proper persons in the first place. In this instance covering of the identification by burning only created a worse problem of inability of identification! Where might those people and offspring be this day, 1993?? I think you may be beginning to get my point? We know that Aleksei Nicholaevich Romanoff was quite alive and very well as a direct descendant as late as right now! Those of you who pay attention to our writings will also realize that the coat of arms of the Romanoff's is the same as from the "House of Faberge" By golly, indeed there IS a lot of intrigue!]

THE RED TERROR

On August 30, 1918, the Jew, Uritzky--then head of the "Cheka"--was assassinated and Lenin was wounded. The assassins were both Jewish, and both members of the Jewish-led Social Revolutionary Party. The Bolsheviks used this as an excuse for instituting the Red Terror, which began the following day, and which in a sense has continued to the present.

Space simply does not permit us to give an adequate description of what followed. The entire membership of the Communist Party, which in 1918 numbered perhaps no more than 100,000, was turned into an instrument of murder. Its aims were two-fold; to inspire dread and horror among the Russian masses, and to exterminate the middle and upper classes i.e., the "bourgeois".

Men and women were executed or imprisoned, not because of any offense, but simply because they belonged to the "enemy class". And this definition eventually included every merchant, professional person, and landowner. Not only were these "class enemies" exterminated, but members of their families fell victim as well. The Bolsheviks cleverly adopted the practice of making hostages of the families of those who resisted the new order. David Shub in his slavishly pro-Marxist book, Lenin, gives the following description of the Red Terror in PETERSBURG: "Little time was wasted sifting evidence and classifying people rounded up in these night raids. Woe to him who did not disarm all suspicion at once. The prisoners were generally hustled to the old police station not far from the Winter Palace. Here, with or without perfunctory interrogation, they were stood up against the courtyard wall and shot. The staccato sounds of death were muffled by the roar of truck motors kept going for the purpose." This was the Red Terror in action.

The tragedy of all this cannot be measured by numbers alone; these people were the best that Russia had. They were the leader class. They were the priests, and lawyers, and merchants, and army officers, and university professors. They were the cream of Russian civilization.

The total effect was much the same as it would be in any country. With its small middle and upper class exterminated, Russia's peasant and worker population accepted Jewish Bolshevism WITHOUT PROTEST. [H: Believe me, there was never a Jewish outcry against THAT holocaust of millions of murders.] The Russian masses, deprived of its spokesmen and leaders, was simply incapable of counter-revolution. That was what the Red Terror set out to accomplish. [H: And it has happened to you in the Americas--readers. You have things as blatant as Waco and you accept without a whimper from the "masses" the murder of women, children and helpless "believers". You simply cry out--take away the guns from those who would defend themselves. Do you not see how easily you have been sucked within the jaws of the intended trap?]

THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL

A basic tenet of Marxist ideology was, and is, the promotion of world revolution. The Bolshevik leadership undertook in 1919 to further this aim by establishing the Third International, which convened in March of 1919. Its presiding officer was Lenin, and its first president was the Jew, Zinoviev, who remained its head until 1926.

The prime objective of the Third International was to establish communist parties in the various countries of the world, and to lend them aid and assistance in overthrowing their respective governments. Prospects of success were bright in the spring of 1919.

ROSA LUXEMBERG'S REVOLUTION

The first country to experience a communist revolution outside of Russia was Germany. The German government, which had abetted the Bolshevik coup in 1917 by facilitating Lenin's return to Russia via the sealed railway car, was in 1918 faced with a revolution of its own.

In many respects the German Revolution paralleled the one in Russia. As World War I reached the climatic year of 1918, and as German manpower losses mounted, the Jew-dominated German Social Democratic Party spread the seeds of defeatism among the German population much as the Bolsheviks had done in Russia. On November 3rd a mutiny broke out in the navy at Kiel, followed by rioting by the Social Democrats. On November 9th the Kaiser renounced his throne and the Social Democrats proclaimed a Socialist Republic [H: Good grief, speak about your oxymoronic statements!] Two days later, on Nov. 11th, they agreed to an Armistice with the Allies.

There now occurred an event which was to embitter the German people against the Jews for all time, and which eventually resulted in the rise of Adolph Hitler. This was the demobilization of the German armies. It should be explained that Germany did not surrender by the terms of the November 11th Armistice; the agreement was that all German armies were to withdraw to the pre-war boundaries of Germany as a preliminary to a negotiated peace. But as the German armies retreated to German soil, the Revolutionary government, fearful lest the Revolution be upset, ordered them demobilized. On November 11th Germany still possessed the mightiest military machine on earth; thirty days later it had nothing. Instead of being able to negotiate peace on the terms of Wilson's Fourteen Points, a helpless and prostrate Germany got the Versaille Treaty.

No sooner had the German armies been demobilized than the more extreme elements of the Social Democratic party, led by Rosa Luxemberg, laid plans to seize control of the revolution as the Bolsheviks had done in Russia. Aided by funds provided by the Soviet ambassador, Joffe, Rosa Luxemberg's "Spartacus Bund" in January of 1919 attempted to overthrow the revolutionary government. The revolt, following bloody street fighting, was quelled and its leaders, Rosa Luxemberg and Karl Liebknecht, were imprisoned and later executed by German army officers. Following the execution of Rosa Luxemberg, the Third International dispatched the Jew, Karl Radek, to lead the party. Later the Jewess, Ruth Fischer, assumed control of the German Communist Party, and remained at its head till 1924.

BELA KUN

Following World War I, Hungary also had a Communist Revolution. In this case the instigator was the Jew, Bela Kun (Cohen), who imposed a Communist regime on the country in the spring of 1919. Bela Kun had participated in the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and, following the Armistice, he and a group of Jewish revolutionaries, using forged passports, moved into Hungary and established the communist newspaper, Voros Ujsay (Red News). Well supplied with finances by the Soviet government, and aided by the pro-communist resident Jewish population, Kun quickly became the dictator of all Hungary.

Bela Kun proceeded to follow the pattern of the Bolshevik Revolution. Says Encyclopedia Britannica: (page 517, vol. 13--1946) "Kun's programme was to arm at once, and forcibly transfer every industry and all landed property without conservation into the hands of the ‘proletariat.' At first he collaborated with the Social Democrats, but soon shouldered them aside, nationalized all banks, all concerns with over 200 employees, all landed property over 1000 ac., every building other than workmen's dwellings. All jewelry, all private property above the minimum (e.g. two suits, 4 shirts, 2 pair of boots and 4 socks) was seized; servants abolished, bathrooms made public on Saturday nights; priests, with the insane, criminals and shopkeepers, employing paid assistants were declared incapable of the active or passive suffrage." [H: How many of you good citizen readers are feeling queazy? Do you STILL think it can't happen to you? The same "crowd" has gained control of all America!! It WILL happen to YOU!]

The result of this program was, as in Russia, economic and social chaos. The nationalization of every private bathroom in a country cannot be accomplished without profoundly affecting the social and moral tone of its society. Neither can the land, buildings, and industries of a nation be nationalized without creating havoc. As in Russia, such a program could only be enforced by resorting to the Red Terror. During Bela Kun's three month reign of terror, tens of thousands of people--were butchered.

The communizing of the country's industrial and agricultural resources produced a famine in the cities, and this, combined with the peasantry's antipathy for the Jews, resulted in Kun's eventual overthrow. In an amazingly frank report, the New International Year Book of 1919 (Dodd, Mead, Co., page 587) has summarized the situation: "One of the chief weaknesses in the new regime was antipathy to the Jews. In the country districts the feeling was widespread that the revolution had been a movement on the part of the Jews to seize the power for themselves, and the remark was frequently heard that if the Jews of Budapest died of starvation, so much the better for the rest of the country. The government of Bela Kun was composed almost exclusively of Jews who held also the administrative offices. The Communists had united at first with the Socialists who were not of the extremely radical party, but resembled somewhat the Labor parties or trade unionists groups in other countries. Bela Kun did not, however, select his personnel from among them, but turned to the Jews and constituted virtually a Jewish bureaucracy."

After three months of blood, murder, and pillage, Bela Kun was deposed and interned in a lunatic asylum. Later he was released and returned to Russia, where he assumed control of the Red Terror organization, the Cheka, in South Russia.

THE TRIUMVIRATE

Lenin died of a brain hemorrhage in January of 1924. By this time the Communists had become firmly entrenched. The civil wars were over and every vestige of organized resistance to Jewish-Bolshevism had been destroyed. On Lenin's death the party leadership fell to fighting among itself.

Lenin had, as early as May of 1922 suffered a paralytic stroke which affected his speech and motor reflexes. In December he suffered a second stroke, and his place was taken by a triumvirate composed of Zinoviev, Kamenev, and Joseph Stalin. Shortly afterwards Lenin suffered another stroke, and in 1924 he died.

TROTZKY IN DECLINE

In the early days of the new regime Trotzky had enjoyed near equality with Lenin in prestige and power. Outside of Russia, Lenin-Trotzky were regarded as a duality, and in current literature of that period their names were often hyphenated. The outside world had therefore fully expected Trotzky to assume Lenin's mantle as party leader. But after 1922 Trotsky's prestige in the Politburo had declined rapidly, as we shall see.

In the year the triumvirate began to function the Politburo was composed of Lenin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Trotzky, Bukharin, Tomsky, and Stalin. The Lenin-Zinoviev-Kamenev "troika" had, of course, been dominant so long as Lenin was active, but now Zinoviev and Kamenev, as the surviving members of the "troika", regarded themselves as Lenin's rightful successors, and they looked on Trotzky as the competitor. Into this picture Stalin insinuated himself. He allied himself with Kamenev and Zinoviev, and the three were able to turn the Politburo against Trotzky. Stalin thus became the junior member of the triumvirate. Trotzky describes the situation this way (Stalin, page 337): "Used as a counterweight against me, he was bolstered and encouraged by Zinoviev and Kamenev, and to a lesser extent by Rykov, Bukharin and Tomsky. No one thought at the time that Stalin would some day loom away above their heads. In the first triumvirate Zinoviev treated Stalin in a circumspectly patronizing manner; Kamenev with a touch of irony."

Zinoviev was considered to be the senior triumvir, and he gave the opening address at the 12th party Congress, a function heretofore reserved to Lenin. Zinoviev was not well received in this capacity, and before the Congress had adjourned, Stalin's control over the party machine gave him a dominant position in the triumvirate. This was the situation shortly after Lenin's death. [H: Is anyone uncomfortable, considering this, that ones in your government in your nation were rude, nasty, called Mr. Yeltsin a "drunk" and a "nobody"?? A-hemnnn!]

STALIN TO POWER

Stalin now moved to consolidate his position. In April of 1925 he engineered Trotzky's removal as War Commissar. In the same month he broke with Zinoviev and Kamenev, and allied himself with politburo members Bukharin, Rykov, and Tomsky.

Trotzky, Zinoviev, and Kamenev now united their forces in opposition to Stalin. But now it was too late. In February of 1926 Zinoviev was expelled from the Politburo, then from the presidency of the PETERSBURG (Leningrad) Soviet, and finally as president of the Third International. Less than a month later (October 23) Trotzky and Kamenev were also expelled from the Politburo. [H: Easy come--easy go!]

This marked the end of any effective resistance to Stalin. The next year Zinoviev, Kamenev, and Trotzky were removed from the party's Central Committee, and shortly afterwards all three were read out of the party. In 1929 Trotzky was exiled abroad. In June of 1930 Stalin became the supreme dictator of Russia.

IT IS FREQUENTLY ARGUED THAT STALIN'S RISE TO POWER MARKED THE END OF THE JEWISH PHASE OF COMMUNISM. IN SUPPORT OF THIS, IT IS POINTED OUT THAT WHILE SUCH JEWS AS TROTZKY, ZINOVIEV, KAMENEV, MARTYNOV, ZASULICH, DEUTSCH, PARVUS, AXELROD, RADEK, URITZKY, SVERDLOV, DAN, LIEBER, MARTOV, AND OTHERS WERE PROMINENT IN THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE REVOLUTION, THESE HAVE ALMOST WITHOUT EXCEPTION BEEN EXECUTED OR EXILED. THIS ON THE SURFACE IS A CONVINCING ARGUMENT. BUT IT COMPLETELY OVERLOOKS THE FACT THAT STALIN HAS BOTH A JEWISH WIFE AND A JEWISH SON-IN-LAW. BOTH STALIN AND HIS DAUGHTER, SVETLANA, HAVE MARRIED INTO THE POWERFUL JEWISH KAGANOVICH FAMILY.

TO BE CONTINUED

So, "Whose side are you on, anyway--Hatonn?" Me? God's!! Whose side are YOU on?
We'll take up with Stalin's past and maybe more of the picture will clarify a bit when we next write. Thank you.