PJ 78
CHAPTER 9
GENERAL EISENHOWER'S DEATH CAMPS
Editor's note: In chapter 8, in a writing about the Khazarian Zionists' stranglehold on United States foreign policy and other sordid manipulations during World War II, Commander Hatonn asked that we re-run some sickening information about General Dwight Eisenhower_THE TRUTH rather than the media-spun blarney that has found its way into all the history books.
For instance, the whole idea of World War II "death camps" can never be truly appreciated without understanding Eisenhower's central role in creating some real doozies. This information is extracted from pages 139-159 of JOURNAL #40 called, THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE; THE HOLOCAUST. Vol II.
11/14/91 #1 HATONN
TODAY'S WATCH
No "Today's Watch" because we have a press deadline. I am getting a backwash of the most heinous threats regarding the so-called "Holocaust" of which I am laying forth facts. I trust the "readers" here will place the following documentation in proper sequence so that in the JOURNAL the writings regarding "false counting" will not be interrupted. Thank you.
To hurry through this document I am going to give appreciation to Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr, AUS Ret. My subject in point is a review of a publication OTHER LOSSES, by James Bacque. Most of the information in this writing comes from The Canadian Intelligence Service, Bag 78, High River, Alberta, Canada, who carries the book in point for about $28.00.
Although it is one of the most controversial books of this decade, it had to be published out of the United States. We wrote of this material a couple of years ago but I find new readers are not going back to pick up old JOURNALS because of the heavy reading load of the paper.
The following is only a review with some dates which have been verified as accurate and totally confirmed as truth. If you desire more input, then I can only ask you to get the backup in the JOURNALS and-or the book OTHER LOSSES and then follow-up on the references given where you will find some three pages of Bibliography for sources.
This deals with the Death camps of "Eisenhower" and crew. You might believe there is no connection between Eisenhower and the Jewish Khazarian Zionists; however, I hasten to remind you Eisenhower himself stated, when he chose to run for Presi-ded. and moved within the Republican Party_that "...although I am a confirmed Zionist...!" I fail to see how you can give your allegiance any more clearly. So be it.
OTHER LOSSES
Within the documentation of facts you are going to find some most heinous and painful truths unfolding about your blessed nation founded under God with a Constitution which guarantees you protection of your Constitutional freedom and rights. While you slept and were misled, things were taking place in the secret councils and at international levels of intrigue which have now brought your nation to the brink of total fall. In view of that which has gone on before your eyes in the recent Gulf non-war, undeclared, you will find it perhaps easier to realize that crimes have gone on through all the wars of this century, in fact_all wars throughout all time. We are going to deal here, however, with some final truths about World War II.
In bringing this material to the open light of day you are going to have to also realize that the Soviet Union has been tied to the U.S. in all of the massive "cover-ups". You will have to note that the Soviet relations of recent months, which has caused its leaders to admit to the murder of millions of their own people, allowed a few rays of truth to filter down and penetrate the Iron Curtain which has been erected over World War II, and which has kept vital facts from your people.
Do not be fooled by the so-called "...moving of Lenin's body" and other show-acts of changing the "leopard's spots". The Soviet Zionists in conjunction with the other Zionists now spread within the fiber of your nations have changed not one iota their intent to have a Global Government under their total and unrelenting control.
Let us look at only a few incidents released to you-the-people. I haven't the time this day to investigate every detail of why this information was allowed to come forth_but that alone is worth a full JOURNAL. Mostly it is to cause you to know that the power is massive and "you will be next if you do not follow OUR new rules!" The detention camps • are already operable right in the U.S.A. to detain you who do not like the things which are coming down upon you. I haven't said this is "easy to believe" _I simply give you facts.
This information, and if possible Bacque's book, should be seen by EVERY veteran who fought in World War H. In fact all veterans for the lies told to the public about every encounter_ARE LIES. You who fought in these horror stories KNOW THE TRUTH and it is giving you nightmares and terrors and destroying your very present existence by the hiding it within. If you would save your nation and freedom under your wondrous Constitution you must stand against the "ENEMY WITHIN" WHICH YOU RAISED YOUR HAND TO THE SQUARE AND SWORE TO DEFEND. The enemy has moved within and has gained control of your nation starting at the very Government Administration and Congress. Unless you KNOW truth you cannot know that which is WRONG .
This writing revolves around the Supreme Commander of the Allies in Europe, Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower, who was known during his days at West Point as that "terrible Swedish Jew". Surprised???
During the days before World War II, "Ike", as he was most affectionately called, was noted as quite a "ladies man, and the best damned bridge player on the Post". When anyone would mention Ike as a troop commander, it was met with hilarious, profane skepticism. Then too, you must understand that these opinions are projected by the attitudes of ones such as Gen. George Patton, who looked on Eisenhower as a "whimp", not worthy of his rank and certainly not qualified to LEAD in such high capacity. Of course, he DID NOT LEAD he was only the "front" for those who directed the war to suit the gains of the Elite.
As many of you can still remember, Ike was promoted to Supreme Commander in Europe. From Lieutenant Colonel, in early 1941, Eisenhower was promoted to full Colonel in March 1941, to Brigadier General (temporary) in Sept. In Feb. 1942, after he became a favorite of Gen. George Marshall during the Louisiana Maneuvers, he was appointed Assistant Chief of the War Plans Division. About this time, Ike became acquainted with the daughter of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and she introduced her boy friend to "pappa". Evidently F.D.R. recognized in this young officer, a man who would agree with any of his plans and who would do anything to gain promotion. This began a rapid spiral of promotions which by-passed many officers who outranked him and who were much more qualified for the posts he occupied. He became Chief of Operations Division, War Department General Staff (March, 1942), Sicily, (May 1943), Italy (September, 1943) and finally to his ultimate designation by President F.D.R. as Supreme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Force for the invasion of Europe. Now, if you don't like my information GO LOOK IT UP. TRUTH ONLY MEANS WHETHER YOU LIVE OR DIE IT IS QUITE SIMPLE, BROTHERS.
TIME OUT FOR "CHURCHILL"
Where do you think you got the fine idea of bombing homes, women and children in Iraq? You realize you missed all of the military installations, don't you? Come now, precision surgical bombing_and everything was left standing and useable? What did your planes do on those raids they showed you on CNN? You were bombing and shooting some of your own soldiers who were going to "spill the beans" when they got home, and civilian targets in Iraq!
This came from some FINE military calculations regarding Germany. Churchill asked his staff to calculate "how many homes and civilian targets destroyed would be required to take Germany? He was told "65 %". From that moment ALL at-tacks were leveled against ONLY civilian targets_Dresden was totally wiped away EXCEPT' for military installations. (Dresden is only ONE example.) When it was announced that 65% of the civilian targets had been demolished_the war ended. But not for the Germans who would fall into these terrorist's hands.
BACK TO THE WAR
It was Eisenhower's advice to F.D.R. and Churchill (the FIRST worst war criminal of all time), which caused the war to drag on for two extra years, resulting in millions of deaths on both sides, and hundreds of billions of dollars of profit for Eisenhower's racial Zionist brethren, the International bankers, who financed BOTH SIDES_AS USUAL.
If you are shocked, then I suggest you go back and read the story of Pearl Harbor wherein Roosevelt was in on the planning of the destruction at Pearl Harbor!
In early 1943, General Patton and the British Commander, Gen. Montgomery, presented a plan to Churchill and F.D.R. which called for the invasion of Europe through the "soft underbelly of Europe". This would have liberated all the eastern European countries from "Communist" control and would have ended the war in 1943.
But Eisenhower's hatred of the Germans, which was openly shown many times during those terrible days of the war, demanded that as many Germans as possible be made to suffer for their part in the war.
It might be well to state here, that as early as 1902, International "Zionism" had a plan for the destruction of what was recognized as "Christianity" in Europe.
This called for the destruction, first of Czarist Russia (note I did NOT say "Khazarian Zionist Russia") which took place in 1917 with the same people financing the war, and then for the destruction of Germany. A war chest of some $2-billion (and in those days THAT WAS A LOT OF MONEY!) WAS SET ASIDE FOR THIS PURPOSE, LONG BEFORE A MAN NAMED ADOLF HITLER EVEN CAME ON THE SCENE. When Churchill and F.D.R. listened to the advice of Stalin, instead of their two best military leaders, it gave Stalin two years to establish control over all of Eastern Europe, which is now known as the Warsaw Pact Nations.
You can see the further treason in Eisenhower's actions, when in 1945, as Patton's armored forces swept into Germany, they were held back from entering Berlin, and were even ordered to withdraw to the Western borders of Germany, until Soviet troops could enter Germany.
Any military commander "worth their salt", knows that Patton could have ended the war on the Eastern border of Germany and that country would have never been divided. Patton by this time was beginning to realize that a conspiracy existed among the top war leaders, which were keeping him from the victory his troops so deserved. It was a traumatic lesson which was to be later repeated with General Douglas MacArthur in Korea, when he was not allowed to attack enemy positions north of the Yalu River. Again, I urge you to research this for yourselves, the documentation is available and easily acquired. I suggest you do not go to the memoirs of Eisenhower, however, for your truth.
OTHER PLANS
The One Worlder groups in Washington, D.C., and London had much different plans and aided Stalin in his rape of Eastern Europe and Germany. As a matter of FACT, when we finish the other document regarding the Death Camps (so-called) of Hitler--you are going to find another blow to your senses; as you have to realize that the camps which have ever been in question as possible extermination camps were in territories which came under control of the Communists.
It was at that time the "terrible Swedish Jew" Eisenhower, whose open hatred of everything German, caused him to promote "Operation Keelhaul" at the end of the war, where thousands of anti-Communist fighters, who had surrendered to American forces, were forced, at bayonet point, back to the tender mercies of the Communists. Thousands of them were murdered outright, or disappeared into the Gulags of Russia.
Surely you remember that I have also told you that you have many missing men from Korea--IN SOVIET PRISONS--TO-DAY (ALIVE)!
Eisenhower returned to the States, made a hero by the controlled prostitute press of America, and his popularity from the populace he had betrayed was such that he became the 34th President of the United States in 1953.
I wish to also note that I have proof in information regarding your current "controlled media and press" which I will again share with you at another writing.
Eisenhower was quoted at the war's end as saying: "I hate war as only a soldier who has lived through it can, only as one who has seen it's brutality, it's futility, it's stupidity." But he did not hate it as much as he hated Germans, and he took a terrible Talmudic Zionist's revenge on over a million SURRENDERED German soldiers and civilians when the war ended. Praised by the media and the "kept" historians, this man was directly responsible for one of the most reprehensible acts in the history of so-called civilized man and warfare. One which should put him in the same class with Atilla the Hun and other total barbarians.
The peace which was inflicted on a completely defeated Germany in 1945, was called the Morgenthau Plan. It was promoted by Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, a Zionist, who later stated that most of the ideas for this plan had come directly from Eisenhower.
MORGENTHAU PLAN
Now, after tremendous research spanning over two decades, the truth about this Zionist Commander of America's forces, who became the 34th President of the United States, is known and documented and you don't have to "just believe" some non-visible space cadet with a big mouth.
In 1945, during the post-World War II period, American foreign policy was largely in the hands of a small group of very powerful Zionists based in Washington, D.C. This secret, invisible government, which has controlled America for over fifty years, was headed then by Sen. Herbert Lehman, Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter and Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau. They drew up the "blueprint" for a plan, which the enthusiastic Eisenhower carried out in Europe, which was the most monstrous policy of hate and vengeance known in the annals of civilized history.
This policy is still in operation today, fifty years later, where media pundits, twisting, exaggerating, and even manufacturing historical claims, have hounded, harassed, and had arrested 70 and 80-year old European war veterans for alleged "war crimes", which were supposed to have taken place over fifty years ago.
The following facts should be known by every American veteran and serviceman who served in World War II, especially. You are entitled to KNOW how you were lied to and inveigled into a war for the benefits of the Internationalists. Every American Legion and Veterans of Foreign War Post in this country, should have this article read to its members and groups caused to RESEARCH the facts, for you see, the same treason was carried out in Korea and then later in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Central and South America, the Gulf "Storm" and on and on. But it is you, the veterans of America, who have the first RIGHT TO KNOW the truth about the traitors who were responsible for the murder of your buddies, and the crippling of hundreds of thousands more, and who are even now laying the groundwork to get your sons and daughters involved in WORLD WAR III (NUCLEAR WAR 1).
The National Archives in Washington, D.C. contains an official document called the "Weekly Prisoner of War and Disarmed Enemy Forces Report" for the week ending Sept. 8, 1945. It shows that 1,056,482 German prisoners were then being held by the U.S. Army in the European theater, of whom 692,895 were still classified as POW's (Prisoners of War) and the other 363,587 as DEF's (Disarmed Enemy Forces).
This latter designation was illegal under international law and completely contrary to the Geneva Convention, to which both the United States and Germany were signatories. A German soldier designated DEF had no right to any food, shelter, or water_in fact, to anything. Quite often he did not receive even the basic necessities of life and died within days.
In the first week of September 1945, 13,051 of the 363,587 Germans died and were listed cryptically as "other losses". This was the equivalent of a death rate of 3.6% per week. At such a rate, all the remaining 350,536 DEF's would have been dead within 28 weeks before the end of the approaching winter.
The civilian death rate immediately outside the American camps in Germany was about 2% per year, or nearly 100 times lower, despite the greater proportion of older people. Since adequate supplies were readily available to the American troops at all times, this killing was totally deliberate.
As for the 692,895 German soldiers still falsely listed as POW's, the last of them had actually been transferred from POW to DEF status a month earlier on August 4, by order of General Eisenhower. Their death rate quickly quadrupled within weeks, from .2% to .8% per week. Assuming the latter rate for the week ending September 8, about 5,543 of the so-called POW's listed in the report as being alive and in American hands had died that week all would have died within just over two years. (The reason this death rate was lower than 3.6% weekly for the longer-term DEF's was simply that the barbaric treatment of the DEF's was cumulative, and that some of the American troops refused to go along with this barbaric treatment.)
Many of you veterans will recall the winter of 1945, when you were on occupation duty in Japan. A similar order came from your local U.S. military commander who was known for his hatred of all Japanese. It did not come from MacArthur's head-quarters in Tokyo. You were not allowed to give food of any kind to Japanese civilians, although many of them were on the verge of starvation. One officer remembers that he was commanding a detachment of 28 men, which were guarding a Japanese Quartermaster dump at the little town of Niski' yathama, about eighty miles south of Osaka. Food in this storehouse was literally spoiling, yet you were not allowed to share it with the Japanese people. For Christmas rations that year, the detachment received eight sheep carcasses and 28 turkeys, with no refrigeration for storage. Rather than see this food go to waste, the commander shared it with the starving population, and when word leaked out, he came very close to being court-martialed. It was only the intervention of a high ranking officer from MacArthur's Headquarters which saved him. I hold this man's name secure because he is STILL under constant attack.
The same thing happened over and over again in Germany, and American officers and servicemen were court-martialed, on Eisenhower's orders, for sharing their rations with the starving Germans. If you were a young man, with several small children at home, you know how these enemy children played on the minds of decent Americans who knew what their government was doing was wrong. Enemy children have never been enemies, to big-hearted Americans BROTHERS, CRY OUT FOR GOD'S SAKE AND YOUR OWN THIS IS HEINOUS AND YOU HAVE ALL BEEN MADE TO BEAR THIS HORROR ON YOUR CONSCIENCE AND MIND TO THE POINT OF MADNESS.
But Eisenhower, with his unbounded hatred for the Germans, through his order of August 4th, made it impossible for there to be such a thing as a bona fide German POW in American hands on European soil.
Instead, there were vast concentrations of men (including some women and children) starving to death in open, muddy, disease-ridden fields.
In November 1945, Eisenhower returned to Washington. A month later, a slight relaxation went into effect. Men of conscience, such as General George Patton, had no qualms about killing German soldiers in combat, but he drew a line at the deliberate policy of murder which was advocated by Eisenhower. This, of course, was the reason he met such an untimely and strange death. The truth is now coming out of old records and that "war crimes" were by no means a German monopoly, and that the "good war", as the Zionist media and historians called it in the United States, was as evil as any conflict in world history.
TRUTHFUL CONCLUSIONS
Careful calculations force the following conclusions:
Eisenhower had deplored the German's useless defense of the Reich in the last months of the war because of the waste of life. At least ten times as many Germans (undoubtedly 800,000, al-most certainly 900,000, and quite possibly a million) died in the French and American camps as were killed in all the combat on the Western front in northwest Europe from America's entry into the war in December 1941, through April 1945.
Bacque was ably assisted in his research by Col. Ernest F. Fisher, a senior historian for the U.S. Army, as well as by other highly placed members of the American military. One of them, Col. Philip S. Lauben, Chief of the German Affairs branch of SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force), stated that in late 1945, "the Vosges (northeast France) was just ONE BIG DEATH CAMP FOR GERMANS."
Now, these men started out their research searching for information on a different matter entirely only to come across entries listed simply as "OTHER LOSSES" and the conclusions are what results from following massive investigation and research into buried documents.
In spite of everything which has been written about Eisenhower which makes him out to be a hero, there seems little question that Dwight Eisenhower meets all the qualifications of a certified war criminal, even if Bacque's figures are off by a bit. (If Germany had been the winner, there is little doubt he would have been tried and found guilty of the most heinous crimes against mankind.)
Many of you veterans will get very upset with this appraisal of a man you looked on as a "bona fide" American hero. So be it. But the proof for these accusations can be found in what happened to those Germans who were fortunate enough to surrender to the British and the Canadians_some two million of them. The evidence shows that "almost all continued in fair health and many were quickly released and sent home or transferred to the French, to help in the post-war work of reconstruction. "Bacque found verification and specifically commends General Patton for behavior towards his POWs in a civilized manner. His Third Army freed vast numbers of German captives during May 1945, to the dismay, no doubt, of the Zionists who controlled Washington.
Both General Omar Bradley and J.C.H. Lee, Communications Zone (ComZ) Europe, ordered the release of prisoners within a week of the war's end. This SHAEF order was countermanded by Eisenhower on May 15, 1945.
While German soldiers from the British and Canadian zones were quickly regaining their strength and were helping rebuild Europe, Germans taken by the Americans were dying by the hundreds of thousands--emaciated figures in diarrhea-smeared clothing, huddling pitifully in water holes with perhaps a scrap of cardboard over their heads and rotten potato for supper. At times many of them were reduced to drinking urine and eating grass--if there was any.
Did all this happen because of one supremely unprincipled and influential man named Eisenhower? Or was Ike, in turn, influenced by a small circle around him or by his superiors in Washington? Historians will be probing this question for decades to come--HOWEVER, I THINK YOU WILL NOTE AS WITH OLIVER NORTH--THE MEN "ABOVE" HAD TO KNOW!
INFAMOUS "TIMES"
1944: Eisenhower told the British ambassador to Washington that the 3,500 officers of the German General staff should be "exterminated". He also favored the liquidation of perhaps 100,000 prominent Germans. Soon after, he wrote to his wife, Mamie: "God, I hate Germans! Why? Because the German is a beast!" Eisenhower said he was ashamed to bear a German name.
August 1944: The North American wheat surplus was greater than at any time in history, nearly one billion bushels. The U.S. corn surplus and potato crop also reached a new high.
March 10, 1945: A message sent from Eisenhower to the Combined Chiefs of Staff (CCS) of Britain and the U.S. recommended the creation of an entirely new class of prisoners, Disarmed Enemy Forces or DEF's. At a press conference in Paris, this same day, Ike said: "If the Germans were reasoning like normal human beings, they would realize the whole history of the United States and Great Britain is to be generous towards a defeated enemy. We observe all the laws of the Geneva Convention."
March 19, 1945: Eisenhower's special assistant, General Everett Hughes, visited the American supply depots at Naples and Marseille. In both places, he writes, there are "more stocks than we can ever use. They stretch as far as the eye can see."
Spring 1945: The International Red Cross had over 100,000 tons of food stockpiled in Switzerland. At one point, it sent two trainloads into the American Zone of Germany, but the food was sent back. The Morgenthau Plan for a "Carthaginian Peace" in Germany, to use the words of Military Governor Lucius Clay, is implemented through the directive JCS (Joint Chiefs of Staff) 1067, which specifies to Eisenhower the policy he must adopt towards every institution in Germany. The directive is largely the work of three of Henry Morgenthau's underlings in the Treasury Department Harry Dexter White, Frank Coe, and Harry Glasser. White and Glasser were both Zionists and all three were Communist "fellow travelers".
April 11, 1945: On the eve of his death, FDR told Morgenthau in Warm Springs, GA: "Henry, I am with you 100%." When Truman took over, he continued Morgenthau's "Carthaginian Policy" towards conquered Germany.
April 17, 1945: The Americans opened their enormous Rheinberg Camp, six miles in circumference, with no food or shelter whatsoever. As in the other big "Rhine meadow" camps, opened in mid-April, there were initially no latrines and no water. In some camps, the men were so crowded they could not lie down. Meanwhile, at Camp Kripp, near Remagen, the half-American Charles von Luttichau determined "that his German comrades are receiving about 5% as much food as their captors." Complaining to the camp commander, he was told: "Forget the Geneva Convention. You don't have any rights."
Late April 1945: Heinz Janssen, a survivor of the Rheinberg camp, described conditions as they were at the time. "Amputees slithered like amphibians through the mud, soaking and freezing. Naked to the skies day after day and night after night, they lay desperate in the sand of Rheinberg or sleep exhaustedly into eternity in their collapsing holes."
April 26, 1945: The Combined Chiefs of Staff sent a message to Eisenhower, urging him not to take any more prisoners after VE Day. He ignored it. The CCS approved of Ike's proposed DEF status, but only for certain types of German prisoners. The British refused to go against the Geneva Convention. The CCS orders the illegal DEF status to be kept strictly secret. By this date, Eisenhower's Quartermaster General of ASHAEF, Gen. Robert Littlejohn, has already twice reduced the rations to German prisoners, on orders. A message to Gen. George C. Marshall, signed by Ike, mandated: "No shelter" for German prisoners, despite an unusually cold and wet March and April.
May 4, 1945: The first German POW's were transferred to DEF status. Mail to and from all German prisoners was banned for more than a year.
May 8, 1945: Germany surrendered unconditionally. The U.S. State Department wasted no time dismissing Switzerland as the official Protecting Power for German prisoners, contravening the Geneva Convention. State also informed the International Red Cross that, with no Protecting Power to report to, there is no point in sending delegates to the camps. From this day forward, prisoners held by the U.S. Army had no access to any impartial observer. The British and Canadians also removed the Swiss protectors, but continued treating their POW's decently.
May, 1945: The American Red Cross reported that more than 98% of Americans captured by the Germans will be coming home safely, thanks in part to the food parcels sent to them during the war, which were promptly delivered by the Germans.
May 15, 1945: Eisenhower and Churchill talked about further reducing the rations for the German POW's. Churchill was informed that the POW's have been getting 2,000 calories per day (compared to 4,000 for American troops) and that 2,150 was regarded as an absolute minimum required for sedentary adults living under shelter. Eisenhower failed to tell Churchill that the U.S. Army was not even feeding many DEF's, and that they were feeding others, much less than 2,000 calories per day.
Mid-May 1945: The Bingen camp, near Bad Dreuznach in the Rhineland, was now holding between 200,000 and 400,000 German POW's, with no shelter, food, water, or medicine. The death rate for prisoners in these U.S. camps was now about 30% per year, according to a U.S. medical survey.
June 2, 1945: The European Theater Provost Marshal issued two reports. One, the last in a series of daily reports, logged 2,870,400 POW's on hand. The other, the first report in a weekly series, dated the same day, logged only 1,836,000. At one point in mid-June, the prisoner strength on the ration list is given as 1,421,559, despite the evidence of Gen. J.C.H. Lee and others that there were about 4 million. This bizarre bookkeeping persisted throughout 1945 in all branches of the occupying army. The apparent purpose was to obscure the death toll by means of an indecipherable mass of conflicting statistics. (One of Bacque's greatest "coups" has been to decipher them.)
Mid-June, 1945: British "Tommies" took over the huge Rheinberg Camp from the Americans, saving many thousands of German lives. The final act of the "Yanks" before the British took charge, was to bulldoze one section flat while the men were still living in their holes in the ground. Now, I ask you, who do you now think might have thought up burying 12,000 Iraqis in their trenches while ordered "to take no prisoners"? Meanwhile, a team of doctors from the U.S. Army Medical Corps completed a survey of some of the smaller Rhineland camps, holding some 80,000 POW's (not DEF's). They found a death rate 80 times higher than anything they have known in their professional careers.
July, 1945: Eisenhower becomes military governor of the U.S. Zone in Germany. He continued to turn back all relief teams from Switzerland, the U.S. and elsewhere.
July 10, 1945: A French Army unit under Gen. Rousseau, took over the Dietersheim camp (near Mainz) from the Americans. He found 32,000 men and women of all ages in a moribund (dying) state. Another French officer. Capt. Julien, was taking command 17 days later, and found a vast mire "peopled with living skeletons, male and female, huddling under scraps of wet cardboard". Horrified, Julien wrote: "This is just like the photographs of Buchenwald and Dachau." [H: Now you will find that the pictures are the ones most often shown during your "Holocaust Weeks" as representing pictures of the German camps_nope, they were dying at the hands of you lovely, caring Zionist Americans!!!]
July 20, 1945: Gen. Littlejohn received a memo stating, "These men, German POW's, are authorized a maximum of 1,150 calories for the non-workers and 1,850 for workers". (Remember, it takes 2,000 calories to keep a sedentary adult alive.)
July 26, 1945: The International Red Cross proposed restor-ing mail service to German POW's. Fearing that the reality of the death camps might come to light, the U.S. War Department rejected the idea.
August 4, 1945: Eisenhower ordered that all remaining German POW's be stripped of their rights, thus reducing them to DEF status.
August 27, 1945: In a long memorandum, Gen. Littlejohn informed Eisenhower that 1,550,000 Germans who supposedly were getting U.S. ARMY RATIONS, WERE RECEIVING NOTHING. Ike turned a deaf ear to his report and the death rate continued to climb.
August 30, 1945: Max Huber, head of the International Red Cross, wrote a stinging letter to the U.S. State Department about American interference in efforts to save starving Germans. Some months later, an evasive response, signed "Eisenhower", arrive in Washington, falsely claiming that giving Red Cross food to enemy personnel was forbidden. Thousands of train cars loaded with decaying food were sent back to Geneva and to sources in Paris and Brussels. Huber apologized for tying up the French rail system because of the food which was being returned by the Americans.
By this time, more than 2-million German men had been discharged into American custody, including thousands of priests, ministers, doctors, and professors. Not one single camp commander or guard was questioned by the Allied press corps and the controlled media of the U.S. concerning conditions in these hell holes.
It might be well to stop right here and ask this question: "Is anyone who reads this horrifying account so naive as to believe that the American people would have put up with these barbaric actions by its chief military man if they had known about it much less, turn around and make him hero President? Do you think that the politicians who were in the forefront of those who kept these facts from Americans would have lasted very long in office, if the truth had been known? Do you think that millions of Americans would show such concern for the so-called Holocaust of the Jews if they knew that it was Jewish hatred for their fellow kinsmen and were killing over a million Germans who were helplessly incarcerated? I sincerely doubt it! That's why these facts have been kept from the American people for half a century. Now these Elite believe themselves to be so POWERFUL and in CONTROL that they can override anything YOU-THE-PEOPLE can offer in resistance. We shall see!
Late Summer, 1945: Jean-Pierre Pradervand, head of the International Red Cross delegations in France, told Henry W. Dunning, an American Red Cross official, that conditions in the French camps are worse, in many instances, than anything seen in the former Nazi camps. Pradervand showed Dunning pictures of the living skeletons. Dunning explained all this to the American Red Cross in Washington, which informed key government officials. Nevertheless, the cover-up continued. Pradervand also informed Charles De Gaulle that one-third of the prisoners handed over to France by the Americans will die soon without a radical change in treatment. De Gaulle showed no interest and the prisoners continued to die.
September 27, 1945: Pradervand's pictures of German living skeletons were shown to Eisenhower in his office_with witnesses present.
September 30, 1945-October 1: The French newspaper, Le Monde, ran a story which began: "As one speaks today of Dachau, in ten years people throughout the world will speak about camps such as Saint Paul d'Egiaux." Well, not so wrong after all since so many of the pictures you are shown are actually OF THOSE CAMPS AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH GERMAN CONCENTRATION CAMPS SO YOU HAVE PROVIDED YOUR ENEMY WITH THE VERY PICTURES TO CONTINUE THE FARCE OF THE HOLOCAUST. YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN THE HUMAN IS REDUCED TO SKELETONS_THEY ALL LOOK ALIKE!
OCTOBER 11, 13, 14, 15, 20: The New York Times ran a coverup report of the death camps by star newsman Drew Middleton. Interviewed by Bacque in 1988, Middleton admitted that he never actually visited any of the 50 U.S. camps located within 40 miles of his Frankfurt desk, but was only 'driven by', as he was being debriefed by the military. (Will this not remind Col. Gritz of the so-called news coverage he had in confrontation with the very ones in Southeast Asia who COULD STOP THE DRUG TRADE?) We all end up in the same company_even old Hatonn got usurped by that very newsman from a radio network. America, you are getting to the point of no re-turn. I suggest you give careful thought to this matter.
December 1945: Eisenhower returned to the States and the U.S. Army allowed the first relief shipment to enter the American sector.
1947-1950's: Nearly all the surviving records of the Rhineland death camps were destroyed. The West German government concluded that 1.7-million German soldiers were alive at the war's end, and who were known to have been in fair health, and disappeared. The Western Allies pinned virtually all the blame on the Soviets.
1950: The first German edition of ALLIIERERTE KRIEGSVERBRECHEN is published. Never translated into English, the book gives eye-witness descriptions of the conditions which prevailed in the American camps.
1960's-1972 : The West German Foreign Office, under Will Brandt subsidized books denying the atrocities in American POW camps and the high death rate. How nice to have bought-off friends on your side, in high places.
1980: The International Committee of the Red Cross refuses to open its archives to James Bacque and other investigators into Allied atrocities. To this day, the ICRC has remained silent on the subject, despite the visits of Pradervand and other Red Cross delegates to many of the camps.
September 1989: James Bacque's book on the American death camps, OTHER LOSSES, published by Stoddard, a Canadian Publishing House (but they are not allowed to even have a dissenting opinion about questions regarding the Holocaust), was released, after being refused by more than 30 American publishers. Saturday Night, one of Canada's most respected magazines, simultaneously published a summary of this book as its lead story and within days Canada was buzzing about Gen. Eisenhower's war crimes. Why is it that you have heard almost nothing of this in the United States in spite of initial (2 days) of press mention?
As American citizens, many of you who served in the American Armed Forces during World War II, and a great many of you who are of German heritage, should demand of your leaders in Washington, D.C. that the truth about this War be made known.
I know that it tumbles in on top of myriads of other subjects being pressed by you people_so, barrage them with these topics also and DEMAND ACCOUNTING. I further know that it is terrifying to think of the consequences of your coming public. I had a pile of witness reports flow when we first wrote of these matters_all asking for confidentiality_but urging us to continue with the blessed work. Well, my scribe and speakers are about weary of bearing this big target on their chests for ALL the rest of the masses. How long can they continue to carry that burden while you precious citizens are allowed secrecy? Oh, I shall never divulge a name or location without absolute permission but if you who have SEEN and KNOW do not come forward, how will you change anything? THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF YOU WHO KNOW AND SAW AND EXPERIENCED THESE ATROCITIES IN EACH AND EVERY SO-CALLED WAR. YOU MUST NOT STOP WEEPING AT THE SHRINES OF YOUR FALLEN BUDDIES BUT YOU MUST MAKE THEIR PASSAGE WORTH SOMETHING! THE WAR IS AT HOME THIS TIME, YOU MARINES, AIR FORCE, ARMY AND NAVY! THE FRONT IS RIGHT IN YOUR DOOR-YARD AND YOU ARE ABOUT TO LOSE THE WAR, FOR YOU HAVE ALREADY LOST ALMOST ALL OF THE "BATTLES".
With accurate information of what really happened, instead of Zionist propaganda, just possibly you might be able to avert that World War III, which is now being planned by these same One Worlders.
I remind you again_the next time you are shown pictures of so-called atrocities World War 11 purporting to be Jewish victims of "racial extermination", those are actually pictures of German civilians who had died under American war criminals.
This segment needs to be closed because it grows too long but don't go away, Readers, for we are going to finish our subject of the deceit and in that we will also consider Korea and Viet Nam and who and what those wars were all about.
May you rest in peace then get up off your assets and go to work!
Hatonn to stand-by. Salu.
PJ 78
CHAPTER 10
REC #3 HATONN
FRI., SEP. 24, 1993 3:33 P.M. YEAR 7, DAY 039
FRI., SEPTEMBER 24, 1993
CONTINUED: IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA
By John Beaty
Continuation of The Unnecessary War:
Why did Churchill consent to the initiation of such a program? Why did he allow Roosevelt to give an ideologically hostile power a foothold as far West as the Elbe River, which flows into the North Sea?
Since Churchill was characteristically no weak-kneed yes-man (witness his "blood and tears" speech which rallied his people in one of their darkest hours), Roosevelt and his clique must have confronted him with terrible alternatives to secure his consent to the unnatural U.S. decisions in the last months of the war. [H: Not if he, too, was in the planning of how to later take the WORLD!] Wrote George Sokolsky in his syndicated column of March 22, 1951, "The pressure on him (Churchill) from Roosevelt, who was appeasing Stalin, must have been enormous. But why was Roosevelt so anxious to appease Stalin?" And also at Potsdam, why was Truman so ready to adopt the same vicious policy which, as a former field grade officer of the army, he must have known to be wrong?
A study of our Presidential "policies" from 1933, and especially from 1937, on down to Potsdam, leads to a horrible answer.
To one who knows something of the facts of the world and knows also the main details of the American surrender of security and principles at Tehran, Yalta, and Potsdam, and other conferences, three ghastly purposes come into clear focus:
(1) As early as 1937, our government determined upon war against Germany for no formulated purpose beyond pleasing the dominant Eastern European element and allied elements in the National Democratic party, and holding "those votes", as Roosevelt II put it.
The President's determination to get into war to gratify his vanity of having a third term of office is touched on by Jesse H. Jones, former Secretary of Commerce and head of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation [H: This is the SAME organization relabeled Resolution Trust Corporation!] in his book, Fifty Billion Dollars (The Macmillan Company, New York, 1951). In this comprehensive and carefully documented volume, which is obligatory background reading on U.S. Politics in the years 1932-1945, Mr. Jones throws much light on Roosevelt, the "Total Politician". On Roosevelt's desire for getting into World War II, these are Mr. Jones's words: "Regardless of his oft repeated statement 'I hate war' he was eager to get into the fighting since that would insure a third term." The most notorious instance of the President's Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde character was his unblushing promise, as he prepared for intervention, that there would be no war. The third-term candidate's "again and again and again" speech (Boston, October 30, 1940) is invariably quoted, but even more inclusive was his broadcast statement of October 26 that no person in a responsible position in his government had "ever suggested in any shape, manner, or form the remotest possibility of sending the boys of American mothers to fight on the battlefields of Europe." We are thus confronted by a dilemma. Was Roosevelt the scheming ruiner of his country or was he a helpless puppet pulled by strings from hands which wielded him beyond any power of his to resist?
A continuing lack of any policy beyond the corralling of minority votes blighted the entire world effort of our devoted and self-sacrificing soldiers, and frustrated the hopes of those of our lower echelon policy-makers who were trying to salvage something useful to civilization from our costly world-wide war. Our diplomatic personnel, military attaches, and other representatives abroad were confused by what they took to be rudderless drifting. In one foreign country diametrically opposed statements were issued simultaneously by heads of different U.S. missions. In Washington, the Office of War Information issued under the same date line completely conflicting instructions to two sets of its representatives in another Asiatic country. A United States military attache with the high rank of brigadier general made an impassioned plea (in the author's hearing) for a statement of our purposes in the war; but, asking the bread of positive strategic policy, he got the stone of continued confusion. Some of the confusion was due to the fact that officials from the three principal kinds of Democrats were actuated by and gave voice to different purposes; most of it, however, resulted from the actual lack of any genuine policy except to commit our troops and write off casualties .with the smoke of the President's rhetoric. Yes, we were fighting a war, not to protect our type of civilization or to repel an actual or threatened invasion, but for Communist and anti-German votes. Thus when our ailing President went to Yalta, he is said to have carried no American demands, to have presented no positive plans to counter the proposals of Stalin. In his feebleness, with Alger Hiss nearby, he yielded with scarcely a qualm to the strong and determined Communist leader. For fuller details see the carefully documented article, "America Betrayed at Yalta", by Hon. Lawrence H. Smith, U.S. Representative from Wisconsin (National Republic, July, 1951).
(2) The powerful Eastern European element dominant in the inner circles of the Democratic Party regarded with complete equanimity, perhaps even with enthusiasm, the killing of as many as possible of the world-ruling and Khazar-hated race of "Aryans"; that is, native stock Americans of English, Irish, Scotch, Welsh, German, Dutch, Scandinavian, Latin, and Slavic descent. [H: This is VERY IMPORTANT--especially when we move into the "ancient" Sumarian records and tales of "Dar", etc.] This non-Aryan power bloc therefore endorsed "Unconditional Surrender" and produced the Morgenthau Plan, both of which were certain to stiffen and prolong the German resistance at the cost of many more American lives, much more desolation in Germany, and many more German lives--also "Aryan". The plans of the prolongers of the war were sustained by those high Democratic politicians who saw nothing wrong in the spilling of blood in the interest of votes. Unfortunately, President Roosevelt became obsessed with the idea of killing Germans rather than defeating Hitler, and reportedly set himself against any support of anti-Hitler elements in Germany. Perhaps taking his cue from his Commander-in-Chief--a term Roosevelt loved--General Mark Clark told American soldiers of the Fifth Army that German "assaults" were "welcome" since "it gives you additional opportunity to kill your hated enemy in large numbers." The general drove the point home. "It is open season on the Anzio bridge-head," he continued, "and there is no limit to the number of Germans you can kill."
Such a sentiment for men about to make the supreme sacrifice of their lives has--in the author's opinion--an unnatural ring to ears attuned to the teachings of Christianity. Such a stress on "killing" or "kill" rather than on a "cause" or on "victory" is definitely at variance with the traditions of Western Christian civilization. It is also costly in the life blood of America, for "killing' is a two-edged sword. An enemy who would surrender in the face of certain defeat will fight on to the end when truculently promised a "killing"--and more Americans will die with him.
The underlying philosophy of "killing" was incidentally hostile to the second largest racial strain in America. Germans have from the beginning been second only to the English and Scotch in the make-up our population. "In 1775 the Germans constituted about 10 per cent of the white population of the colonies." The total of Dutch, Irish, French "and all others" was slightly less than the Germans, the great bulk of the population being, of course, the English-speaking people from Eng-land, Scotland, and Wales. In the first three quarters of the nineteenth century "German immigration outdistanced all other immigration" and as of 1950 "the Germans have contributed over 25 per cent of the present white population of the United States. The English element--including Scots, North Irish, and Welsh--alone exceeds them with about 33 per cent of the present white population. The Irish come third with about 15 per cent."
Thus in his desire for shedding German blood, apart from military objectives, Roosevelt set himself not against an enemy government but against the race which next to the English gave America most of its life-blood. The general merely copied his "Commander-In-Chief". Another tragic factor in any announced stress on "killing" was, of course, that the Germans whom we were to "kill" rather than merely "defeat" had exactly as much to do with Hitler's policies as our soldiers in Korea have to do with Acheson's policies.
Why did the thirty-four million Americans of German blood make no loud protest? The answer is this: in physical appearance, in culture, and in religion, Protestant or Catholic, they were so identical with the majority that their amalgamation had been almost immediate. In 1945 there was a great strain of German blood in America, but there was no significant vote-delivering body of political "German-Americans".
Meanwhile, the ships which took American soldiers to kill Germans and meet their own death in Europe brought home "refugees" in numbers running in many estimates well into seven figures. According to Assistant Secretary of State Breckenridge Long, the number of officially admitted aliens fleeing "Hitler's persecution" had reached 580,000 as early as November, 1943. Those refugees above quotas were admitted on "visitors visas". These facts were released by Congressman Sol Bloom, Democrat of New York, Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on December 10. On December 11, Congressman Emanuel Celler, Democrat of New York, complained that Mr. Long was, in all the State Department, the man "least sympathetic to refugees", and added indignantly that the United States ships had returned from overseas ports "void of passengers". Incidentally, in 1944 Mr. Long ceased to be Assistant Secretary of State.
The influx of refugees continued. So great was the number of these people that even with the closing of thousands of American homes by war casualties, the housing shortage after the war was phenomenal. For the lack of homes available to veterans, some writers blamed capital, some blamed labor, and some found other causes; but none, to the knowledge of the au-thor, counted the homes which had been preempted by "refugees", while our soldiers were fighting beyond the seas. By 1951 the situation showed no amelioration, for on August 20 Senator Pat McCarran, chairman of a Senate sub-committee on internal security, said that "possibly 5,000,000 aliens had poured into the country illegally, creating a situation 'potentially more dangerous' than an armed invasion." This statement should be pondered thoughtfully by every true American.
[H: Indeed, for here you go again from every direction. Why do I share these things? Because if you learn not from that which came before, you are destined to be "had again". It is not an accident, friends, that you are "done unto" over and over and over again as you drowse your way through this experience called "life". The adversary never has to so much as change the "play"--you ones simply march into the slaughter houses without so much as a whimper. I find it indeed interesting. I find the author's next statements most insightful.]
And there are more aliens to come. On September 7, 1951, a "five-year program for shifting 1,750,000 of Europe's 'surplus' population to new homes and opportunities in the Americas and Australia was disclosed" by David A. Morse, head of the International Labor office in the UNITED NATIONS. Needless to say, few of those 1,750,000 persons are likely to be accepted elsewhere than in the United States. Congressman Jacob K. Javits of New York's Twenty-first District, known to some as the Fourth Reich from the number of its "refugees" from Germany, also wishes still more immigrants.
(3) Our alien-dominated government fought the war for the annihilation of Germany, the historic bulwark of Christian Europe. The final phase of this strategically unsound purpose sprouted with the cocky phrase "Unconditional Surrender", already mentioned. It was "thrown out at a press conference by President Roosevelt at Casablanca on January 24, 1943.... President Roosevelt went into the press conference in which he 'ad-libbed' the historic phrase." According to General Elliott Roosevelt, the President repeated the phrase, "thoughtfully sucking a tooth", and added that "Uncle Joe might have made it up himself."
Our foul purpose of liquidating Germany flowered with the implementation of the Morgenthau Plan, an implementation which allowed "widespread looting and violence" by "displaced persons" and brought Germans to the verge of starvation, according to Prof. Harold Zink, who served as American Editor of the Handbook for Military Government in Germany in 1944 and was subsequently Consultant on U.S. Reorganization of German Government, U.S. Troop Control Council for Germany, 1944- 1945 (Who's Who in America, Vol. 25, 1948-1949, p. 2783). In his book, American Military Government in Germany, Prof. Zink writes as follows:
The Germans were forced to furnish food for the displaced persons at the rate of 2,000 calories per day when they themselves could have only 900-1100 calories.... The amount available for German use hardly equalled the food supplied by the Nazis at such notorious concentration camps as Dachau....most of the urban German population suffered severely from lack of food.
The hunger at Dachau was war-time inhumanity by people who were themselves desperately hungry because their food stocks and transportation systems had been largely destroyed by American air bombardment; but the quotation from Prof. Zink refers to peace-time inhumanity, motivated by vengeance partly in its conception and even more so in its implementation.
Why did inhumanity in Germany go on? Because "a little dove", according to President Roosevelt, "flew in the President's window and roused him against a "too 'easy' treatment of the Germans", the "little dove" being "actually Secretary Morgenthau's personal representative in the ETO"! Further testimony to the President's desire for an inhuman treatment of "German people" is found in former Secretary of State James F. Byrnes's book, Speaking Frankly. the President stated to his Secretary of State that the Germans for a long time should have only soup for breakfast, soup for lunch and soup for dinner."
The fruits of the Morgenthau Plan were not all harvested at once. The persistence of our mania for destroying the historic heart of Germany was shown vividly in 1947. With Prussia already being digested in the maw of the Soviet, the Allied Control Council in Berlin (March 1) added a gratuitous insult to an already fatal injury when it "formally abolished" Prussia, the old homeland of the Knights of the Teutonic Order. This could have had no other motive than offending Germans unnecessarily for the applause of certain elements in New York. It was also a shock to all Christians, Catholic or Protestant, who have in their hearts the elementary instincts of Christ-like mercy (St. Matthew, V.7), or know in spite of censorship the great facts of the history of Europe.
Our policy of terrifying the Germans spiritually, and ruining them economically, is understandable only to one who holds his eye in focus upon the nature of the High Command of the National Democratic Party. Vengeance and votes were the sire and dam of the foul monster of American cruelty to the Germans. In the accomplishment of our base purpose there was also a strange pagan self-immolation, for we would not let the West Germans all the way die and spent approximately a billion dollars a year to provide for our captives the subsistence they begged to be allowed to earn for themselves! Our wanton dismantling of German industrial plants in favor of the Soviet as late as 1950 and our hanging of Germans as late as 1951, more than six years after the German surrender, had no other apparent motive than the alienation of the German people. Moreover, as the years pass, there has been no abandonment of our policy of keeping in Germany a number of representatives who, whatever their personal virtues, are personae non gratae to the Germans. Our many-faceted policy of deliberately alienating a potentially friendly people violates a cardinal principle of diplomacy and strategy and weakens us immensely to the advantage of Soviet Communism. [H: Again, readers--remember this was being written EARLY IN THE 50s!]
The facts and conclusions thus far outlined fully establish the validity of Churchill's phrase "The Unnecessary War". The war was unnecessary in its origin, unnecessarily cruel in its prolongation, indefensible in the double-crossing of our ally Britain, criminal in our surrender of our own strategic security in the world, and all of this the more monstrous because it was accomplished in foul obeisance before the altar of anti-Christian power in America.
The facts and conclusions outlined in this chapter raise the inevitable question: "How were such things possible?" The answer is the subject of the next chapter.
SO, PLEASE STAY TUNED: TO BE CONTINUED.
* * *
Perhaps, editors, it is time to re-run the "why" we are using this book and who and what was against "even" those who spoke out in favor of the information--the Jewish leagues and organizations claiming the book to be anti-Semitic! (See end of chapter) It would appear that everything involving Christian and goodness is somehow anti-Semitic even to the study of mathematics and addition--i.e., a simple question: "How did you arrive at the number of deaths in the 'death camps'?"
Yes, readers, soon I am going to back off my scribe because our purpose will have been fulfilled--THE TRUTH OF HOW IT WAS, IS AND WITHOUT MASSIVE CHANGES IN MANKIND--WILL BE!! Choices are yours, we have served our mission with nearly a hundred volumes (more if all were put to print). You who still ask "why"--go do your homework. My people have gained nothing from this experience in a worldly manner except "HELL". I will continue to serve and share with those who would wish to walk with us--I make no motion whatsoever to SAVE anything or demand your attention and action to stem this blight upon your planet. I and "mine" have no intentions or desire to divert you from all the "fun" you pretend to be having upon the orb in destruction. GOD DOES NOT TURN AWAY FROM MAN--MAN TURNS AWAY FROM GOD! EVERY TIME!
Think upon these things for the time is short and we are weary of the pressures thrust against us for the telling of the facts, only to be battered, bloodied and assaulted over and over again for the favor. Denounce the Hosts of God all ye wish--for the proof of the pudding is "still" in the eating! Good day.
********
7/31/93 #1 HATONN
BOOK: IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA
ABOUT THIS BOOK--from the ADL:
QUOTE:
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE OF B'NAI B'RITH
Henry Edward Schultz
205 E. 42nd St.
New York 17, N.Y.
October 4, 1955
Lieutenant-General George E. Stratemeyer
P.O. Box 424
Winter Park, Florida
Dear General Stratemeyer:
It is never a pleasant duty to impose distressing problems upon public personalities such as yourself, and for some time it had been our hope that this letter to you might become unnecessary.
Just a year ago, the publishers of Iron Curtain Over America began distributing, as part of a sales campaign, copies of what purported to be a letter from you to John 0. Beaty, the author, endorsing this volume and recommending it to Americans in general.
At that time we withheld writing you because we felt that inevitably the facts about Mr. Beaty and his book would be brought to your attention and that you would then take appropriate action. A year has gone by and we now find that "the General Stratemeyer Letter Written to Col. Beaty" is the subject of a flyer being distributed by Gerald L.K. Smith's Christian Nationalist Crusade. Enclosed is a photostatic copy of that leaflet, which you will note acknowledges unashamedly that Iron Curtain Over America" is anti-Jewish.
This leaflet is being distributed in large quantities and thus links your name widely and publicly with the anti-Semitism of Gerald Smith and John Beaty. We take it for granted that you are familiar with Smith's long and notorious record as an anti-Jewish hatemonger. Perhaps you are not as aware of Mr. Beaty's record.
Professor Beaty is no newcomer to the field of anti-Jewish propaganda. As long ago as 1948 he was delivering anti-Semitic lectures in the Southwest. Until December 1951 his activities were confined to desultory speaking engagements whose effects appear to be irritating only in a local sense. Then he made his debut as a national anti-Semitic propagandist with the publication of Iron Curtain Over America.
We do not propose to burden you at this point with our detailed analysis of the book; [H: They rarely do!] suffice it to say that it is a compilation of anti-Jewish lies and distortions which have caused it to become a kind of primer for lunatic fringe groups throughout the nation.
Lest you feel that ours is a partisan Jewish view of this book, we would point out that Iron Curtain Over America has been denounced by the Methodist publication ZIONS Herald. Others who have condemned it are Father J.J. Mulloy of the Jesuit High School of Dallas; Dr. Orval Watts in the publication Faith and Freedom; and William Henry Chamberlain in the Chicago Tribune. (Photostatic copies of these condemnations are enclosed.)
Finally, you should know that, as a result of his activities, Professor Beaty was censured in May, 1954 by the Board of Trustees of Southern Methodist University. [H: Now we are getting there! Do you see how much POWER these bastards of truth, have?]
In view of the foregoing, it is our feeling that you may want to consider the advisability of some public action which can as-sure the American people, who hold you in such high regard, that you repudiate religious hatred, as we know you do, and the use of your name by Professor Beaty and Gerald L.K. Smith.
We would appreciate your response which we hope will relieve the concern that has been expressed to us by the many people who have seen General Smith's newest leaflet.
Sincerely yours,
Henry Edward Schultz
END QUOTING
* * *
I don't know about you readers, but Dharma is not going to rest until somebody gets that book to her. ANYBODY HATED BY THE ADL AND UNDER ATTACK IS HER FRIEND!
Perhaps a few more readings from the PROTOCOLS might fit here:
QUOTE:
16. The monarches of the Christian world, swollen with ambition and vanity, surround themselves with luxury and with numerous armies. We shall furnish them with all the money their folly demands, and so shall keep them in leash.
18. For ages past the sons of Israel, despised and perse-cuted, have been working to open up a path to power. They are hitting the mark. They control the economic life of the accursed Christians; their influence preponderates over politics and over manners.
19. At the wished for hour, fixed in advance, we shall let loose the Revolution, which by ruining all classes of Christianity will definitely enslave the Christian to US.
Thus will be accomplished the promise of God made to his people.
END QUOTING
What is hard to remember here is the connection to the sub-ject of Communism. You must hold uppermost in mind: Lenin was a Jew and so was every other member of the council in the structuring hierarchy of the Communist takeover of Russia!
* * *
QUOTE:
George E. Stratemeyer
Lt. Gen. USAF (Ret.)
P.O. Box 424
Winter Park, Florida
12 October, 1955
Mr. Henry E. Schultz
National Chairman
Anti-Defamation League
of B'nai B'rith
205 East 42nd StreetNew
York 17, N.Y.
Dear Mr. Schultz:
Your letter of 4 October, 1955 with enclosures received and I want you and your organization to know that I forcefully resent what you have said or implied.
First, I want to make it clear that I am not, nor have I ever been, anti-Jewish. I have many Jewish friends throughout this country, who are loyal honest Americans.
As for your use of the meaningless expression "anti-Semitic" it makes no sense. According to the dictionary, the word Semitic pertains to the decendants of Shem which includes As-syrians, Hebrews, Phoenicians, Arabs, Abyssinians, etc. It also pertains to the Semitic languages collectively. Therefore, how any one person or group of persons could be anti-Semitic is be-yond my understanding.
Who are you and your orgnization to tell me what I should read and what I should recommend other loyal American citi-zens to read? And, by the way, just what is the purpose of your organization?
Not until I read John Beaty's book The Iron Curtain Over America did I learn what was going on back in the United States of America while I was overseas fighting for my country.
I think every loyal citizen of our country whether he be Protestant, Jew, Catholic or Mohammedan should read The Iron Curtain Over America. I do not consider that book anti-Jewish in any sense of the word. In fact, I consider it a defense of all loyal American Jews and every Jew that loves these United States of ours should read it.
What connection exists between Mr. John Beaty and Mr. Gerald K. Smith I have no knowledge as I do not know either gentlemen. I did authorize Mr. Beaty to use my letter to him and that is no one's business but my own.
Then the United States of America reaches the point where a citizen cannot read what he desires to read and to recommend such reading to others then we will have reached the status that exists in Soviet Russia. But, THANK GOD, we are still free men in America. As I interpret your letter your organization would have the people read only what you think should be read and recommended to others. This I resent as a free American citizen.
I do not understand what you mean by your statement, "We do not propose to burden you at this point, etc." Is this a veiled threat to my free expression and thoughts? If so, this I also re-sent.
Your letter is the most outrageous communication I have ever received in my life and I intend to give it the widest possible publicity, including my many Jewish friends.
Sincerely,
George E. Stratemeyer
END QUOTING
May the "Force" be with you! Salu
Tags, 상세검색
응답: PJ#078, THE IRON TRAP AROUND AMERICA
