PJ#067, THE BEAST AT WORK

[wave]

PJ 37

CHAPTER 3

REC #3 CERES 'ATONN

FRI., APRIL 2, 1993 3:02 P.M. YEAR 6, DAY 229

FRIDAY, APRIL 2, 1993

CHILDREN

"As ye do unto the least of these--have ye done it unto ME"! When ye have defiled a child--ye have defiled and assaulted the very KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. THERE IS NO GREATER SIN ONE CAN PERPETRATE AGAINST GOD--THAN TO SIN AGAINST HIS CHILDREN AND TO ABUSE A CHILD SHALL BRING THE GREATEST PUNISHMENT UPON SELF OF ALL ACTIONS THOUGHT UP BY "MAN"!
Continuation: Special Report on,

CHILD PORNOGRAPHY RING

CONTINUED QUOTING:

THE JURIES & OTHER IRREGULARITIES
JUSTICE AMERICAN STYLE

That the Douglas County and Federal Grand Juries found "no case to answer" in the Franklin Credit child abuse allegations is really not all that surprising. The list of improprieties, "coincidences", and outright lies and cover-ups could fill a book.

We have already seen how the jury foreman of the first hearing, the Douglas County Grand Jury, was not only an em­ployee of Union Pacific, and found out to be taking all confi­dential information back to that organization, but had himself been caught soliciting males for sex. We have also seen how all of Caradori's information was seized by the FBI, never to see the light of day at either trial, nor anywhere else for that matter.

The Chief Prosecutor in the Douglas County case, Sam Van Pelt, was caught out interfering with the testimony of a witness, officially known at the trial as "Jane Doe" to hide her identity. "Jane" had phoned the authorities to advise that she had no transport to the hearings. She was subsequently picked up per­sonally by Van Pelt to be driven to the court. Van Pelt made it clear during the highly irregular ride that the only testimony re­quired of her was that which might discredit Alisha Owen.

It also transpired while "Jane" was giving evidence, that one of the people alleged to have been involved was actually a good friend of one of the members of the jury. This particular woman stood up during the trial and asked "Jane" how she knew certain things to be true. "Jane" replied with certain details of her involvement with the named man, to which the juror replied:

"I don't think XX (name deleted) would have done any­thing bad.
I am friends with him, and I have known XX and his family." [C: This most certainly reminds Ekkers and attorneys of the day when Judge Randall of Kern County (the presiding judge) after Mr. Horn (S&L attorney) was caught (again) taking material of great importance OUT OF THE COURT FILE AND WAS SEEN FILCHING IT AWAY IN HIS BRIEFCASE, said when receiving "complaint" of same--"Oh, I don't believe Mr. Horn would do that...!" and ruled AGAINST THE EKKERS! Well, perhaps it isn't so bad after all if somehow three copies of the court record of Judge Brent insulting the Ekkers from his bench could "somehow ALL be missing!" and yet, impor­tant enough to call a SECRET "reconstruction of the hear­ing" (with all "that" TACKY OUTBURST FROM THE JUDGE notably MISSING) and causing Ekkers' own attorney to "play ball". My, my--how tangled the webs!]

It also transpired early in the trial that Alisha's own lawyer, Pamela Vuchetich, was actually working for and with the FBI!! Against Alisha's express wishes, Vuchetich handed over a file of crucial evidence to the FBI, and Alisha subsequently dis­missed her.

When Alisha's new attorney, Henry Rosenthal, attempted to reach Vuchetich on the "her given" contact number, he found himself connected to the FBI's Omaha Headquarters!!

FBI involvement in cover-ups relating to anything surround­ing Larry King predates all the trials and hearings, as attested to by these notes from the late Gary Caradori. Caradori had tracked down one Joanie Gregory, a Social Services employee who had been involved in an earlier investigation of the Webb family (who are covered in detail in the next section). This is what Caradori had written.

"Joanie Gregory. She is a social worker for DSS. She is re­sponsible for investigating families who are applying for foster care licenses. Her duties also include on-site checks when re­newal of a foster care license is needed.
"Approximately 2.5 years ago she was inspecting the home of Jarrett and Barbara Webb for a renewal of their license. She felt the environment was not right (specifics not available) and wrote a letter to DSS in Lincoln. She received no response. After a couple of months she wrote a letter to the Omaha Police Department regarding this same situation with the Webbs.
She was then contacted by the FBI. In the meantime she had tried to do some research on her own, but evidently some files were missing. To this writer's knowledge, a letter was not written (back) to the FBI. The FBI informed Joanie Gregory that it would probably be in her best interests if she forgot this infor­mation'".

It should be noted that at the time, Larry King was close friends with Robert Wadman, Omaha Police Chief. Wadman, in turn, was close friends with Nick O'Hara, local head of the FBI. Nick O'Hara was also good friends with and hunting part­ner of Harold Andersen, publisher of the Omaha World Herald.

O'Hara specifically spelled out the situation when he threat­ened two central figures early in the investigation with the fol­lowing remark: "If you f..k with Bob Wadman, you f..k with the FBI".

It is known that some form of investigation was at least initi­ated around the time of Joanie Gregory's efforts, by the Ne­braskan State Patrol. What became of this investigation is, however, anybody's guess. One sheet of an interview with Lisa Washington, stamped "CONFIDENTIAL", is included herein.

All three victim-witnesses maintained that FBI agents leaned heavily on them, attempting to get them to change their testi­mony. Troy Boner, who did eventually recant, subsequently called Gary Caradori's widow on the news of his death and, weeping over the phone, apologized to her for caving in to the pressure. He had, he assured Mrs. Caradori, told Gary the truth and had only recanted out of fear of what would happen to him.

In the four months following the receipt of the Caradori video tapes, FBI agents visited Alisha Owen no less than fifteen times, always to query her claims and put pressure on her. In the same period however, they made no attempt to check out even the most obvious of matters raised on the tapes, such as verifying that King had, in fact, booked certain motel and hotel rooms on certain dates. (Caradori did this independently, and had no trouble in verifying the details).

It could be argued that, morally, the Omaha FBI agents were in no position to investigate these kinds of charges at all. In August 1990 one agent, Donald Rochon, won a million and a half dollar sexual harassment case against the department. Rochon's charges were directed principally against another officer, Thomas Dillon. Rochon accused Dillon of, amongst other things, "French Kissing" other (male) agents; regularly exposing himself to other male and female agents; allowing another agent to urinate onto his face, then into a bottle from which he drank; and picking the deodorant block out of the men's urinal and placing it into his mouth. Dillon also apparently had a preoccupation with homosexual sex; kept blatant homosexual porno­graphic material openly displayed on his desk, and frequently spoke in the office about homosexual acts. The FBI denied the charges, but nonetheless agreed to the
1.5 million dollar settle­ment, and transferred Dillon to Chicago.

The Federal Grand Jury was little better than the previous one in Douglas County. This hearing was conducted by First Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Thalken. Thalken was later discovered to be a pedophile himself. This was known to Troy Boner and finding out who would be running the case was one of the main things that terrified him into recanting his original testimony.

The Grand Jury attempted to extend the line of the previous jury that 'someone' had 'coached' the witnesses. They accused the by now conveniently deceased Caradori as the logical sus­pect. Karen Ormiston, Caradori's personal assistant, who was present for the entire video-taping sessions, vehemently denied that there had been any coaching whatsoever of the witnesses, and took a lie detector test to prove she was telling the truth.

The list of irregularities, improprieties, suppression of evi­dence, witness harassment, and so on, could go on forever. Suffice to say that no reasonable person could ever accept that the two juries and their hearings had been "fair and unbiased". Is it any wonder that 93 % of Nebraskans are convinced there is a major cover-up going on?

[C: I must add here, for it is not so far mentioned, but you readers will remember that I wrote about an "International" ring hooked up via computers which was also a part of this same ring. It dealt with the capabilities of ones from Europe calling in on an "800" number and getting service children delivered anywhere chosen--in the world. In those instances a child could be waiting in the Philippines (a heavily used location), Australia (also a very heavily used location), etc. There were varying rates for virgins, etc. But the thing that actually brought the house down as to credibility was that for "just a few mere dollars more" a child could be ordered up for "snuff" purposes. (in other words for 'murder' dur­ing sex or within the scenario of sexual activities, torture, and such). Why the extra charge? You might think for commodity scarcity? No--for disposal of the body! Now, chela readers, if you find it hard to believe this--you better harken back because this was made public on both Larry King Live and one of the 60-minute type programs on your own television!]

THE ORIGINAL ALLEGATIONS
BUSH FIRST NAMED IN 1985

Stories about child sex and pornography first became public knowledge in 1989, following the collapse of the Franklin Credit Union. That is not when the allegations started, how­ever. Indeed, given the political flavor of the subsequent investigations, it would be easy to dismiss claims that George Bush had been involved. He was by then a very public figure.

Back in 1985, however, he was a relatively unknown, ob­scure, and publicly, at least, unremarkable figure. Readers will remember that, at the time of the attempted assassination of then President Reagan, there was some controversy surrounding Bush's position as "acting President", and claims that the mili­tary would not entrust him with the "code-box" used to arm the missile defense system. [C: We won't go into the involvement with the Bushlet's actual knowing of and meeting with, Hinckley--at this time--just know the pieces of the puzzle are coming together, readers, and I think you won't want to miss an episode of this soap-opera. If you are a new reader--RUN to the nearest outlet and get the prior material we have offered.]
This was not because he was considered dangerous at the time; quite the contrary it seemed. He was simply considered too "wimpish" for the task (or so it was stated). Why, in 1985, would any child bother singling out such a character to name in a child sex case? If notoriety was the motive, then there were many more suitable, prominent people available at the time.

If the first allegations about a massive child exploitation ring, centered around Larry King (Junior) and leading all the way to the White House, had been made in 1989, and had all come from the same source, some shenanigans and mischievous collu­sion could be suspected. However, the allegations arising out of the Franklin Credit collapse were not the first.

Way back in 1985, a young girl, Eulica (Lisa) Washington, was the center of an investigation by Andrea L. Carpenter of the Nebraskan Department of Social Service. The investigation was instigated because Lisa and her sister Tracey continually ran away from their foster parents, Jarrett and Barbara WEBB. Initially reluctant to disclose information for fear of being fur­ther punished, the two girls eventually recounted a remarkable story, later backed up by other children who had been fostered out to the Webb's.

These debriefings were conducted by Ms. Julie Walters, an­other welfare officer, who worked for Boys' Town at the time, and who had been called in because of the constant reference by the Webb children, and others, to that institution.

Lisa, supported by her sister, detailed a massive child sex, homosexual, and pornography industry, run in Nebraska by Larry King. She described how she was regularly taken to Washington by plane, with other youths, to attend parties hosted by King and involving many prominent people, including busi­nessmen and politicians. Lisa specifically named George Bush as being in attendance on at least two separate occasions. Remember, this was in 1985. The Webbs, and others, would adopt foster children and then "feed" them into this ring, to be abused. It was for this reason that Lisa continually ran away from them.

Secrecy was maintained by dire threats, including the threat of death, punishments including being locked up, and being regularly beaten with a thick lump of rubber known as "the railroad prop", usually while naked. These allegations, again, were supported by other children fostered out to the Webbs, and a medical report on severe welts on one of the other children's back described them as "most likely caused by some­thing similar to a thick rubber hose". Lisa also claimed that Jar­rett Webb, her foster father, regularly forced her to have sex with him.

Lisa subsequently submitted herself to four polygraph (lie detector) tests, and it was established that there was no doubt that she was telling the truth. Remarkably, however, she was never asked, during the test, to substantiate her claims about George Bush. Equally remarkably, no charges were ever laid against the Webs on any of the child sex ring allegations. Charges against Jarrett Webb relating to his personal sexual abuse of Lisa were thrown out of court on a contrived technical­ity. This was all back in 1985, and no formal action was ever taken by the authorities. Larry King certainly led a charmed (or protected) life.

This state of grace continued to as late as July 1988. At that time Carol Stitt, Executive Director of the Nebraskan Foster Care Review Board, wrote to the Attorney General specifically requesting an investigation into King, and allegations of a wide­spread child exploitation ring. Again, apparently there was never any realistic action taken by authorities.

There is no doubt that Larry King had friends in high places. He had a picture of George Bush on his office desk, was a ma­jor personality in the Nebraskan Republican Party, and had been involved in arranging functions for Bush. He claimed on more than one occasion, including in a radio interview, to be personal friends with Bush. It is interesting to note that Barbara Webb is Larry King's cousin, and Jarrett Webb was on the Board of Di­rectors of the Franklin Credit Union.

It would be impossible, in the space of a Report like this, to reproduce all the hundreds of associated documents. What fol­lows however, should be sufficient to establish the veracity of the claims made here. Included are:

Portion of the first page of Andrea Carpenter's initial report, clearly showing the date as December 18, 1985;

A copy of one page of Julie Walters original notes in her own handwriting, where she details Lisa's allegations about Bush's involvement;
Copy of one page of interview with Lisa by the Nebraska State Patrol, clearly indicating incestuous abuse;
Copies of both pages of the letter from Carol Stitt to the Ne­braskan Attorney General dated July 20, 1988, requesting a formal investigation of King, and other matters. Note that this request makes it very clear that, by that time, there was much more involved than just some "isolated allegations";
Copies of two pages of notes from an interview between Lisa Washington and Jerry Lowe, the original investigator for the Franklin Committee;
Official Omaha Police Report of interview between Officer Irl Carmean and "Jill Smith". It should be remembered that Carmean was subsequently removed from the case.

END OF QUOTING, THIS SEGMENT

PJ 67

CHAPTER 4

REC #1 CERES 'ATONN

SAT., APRIL 3, 1993 9:56 A.M. YEAR 6, DAY 230

SATURDAY, APRIL 3, 1993

Continuation: BUSH CONNECTION, CHILD MOLESTA­TION RING.

THE BOOK OF THE DEAD

(Also the dying & the jailed)

If one thing demonstrates the utter ruthlessness of those working to prevent the full story of the Nebraska Child Sex Ring from coming out, it is the trail of dead bodies and other casualties that mark the trail of the investigation so far. You will find this to be true in EVERY uncovering of clandestine and criminal activities rings. You will find the Weavers, Campbells, Gritzs, Russbachers, Casolaros, and abundant and nameless others from both sides of the discov­ery. Most "accidents" will show as murdercides, sui-termi­nus, heart arrests and accidental terminus from assorted di­agnoses. Among those dead in this particular Sex Ring ac­tivity are:
QUOTING:

CRAIG SPENCE

Spence was King's business partner in three companies, "Bodies By God", "Dream Boys", and "Man To Man", [C: Sort of make your stomach turn a bit? and, a bit of cringing may well also be in order.], whose very names suggest their line of business. Spence was the man alleged by the Washington Times on June 29, 1989, to have taken a group of homosexual prostitutes on a guided tour of the White House.

Of that tour, the Washington Times reported:
"A homosexual prostitution ring is under investigation by fed­eral and District authorities and includes among its clients key officials of the Reagan and Bush administrations, military offi­cers, congressional aides and U.S. and foreign business men with close ties to Washington's political elite".

The Times went on to suggest that some of the homosexual activities of these high ranking people had been secretly video­taped, leaving them open to blackmail. It was also reported that two of the call boys involved were suspected of being KGB op­eratives. [C: Can you see what fodder for blackmail? It is obvious that ALL of the attendees at these parties would NOT be either homosexual or child abusers--but WHO DARES TO RAT ON A HIGHER CROOK--IF YOU ARE CAUGHT AT THE SAME FUNCTION, AT THE LEAST, GIVING ALLOWANCE TO THAT WHICH IS GOING ON IF ONLY TO COVER YOUR OWN BACKSIDES!]
Spence was found dead in a Boston hotel late in 1989, the of­ficial cause "suicide". Like so many of the deaths surrounding this case, his "suicide" has many question marks.

The "investigation" into the above scandal, like the investi­gation into the Larry King/Franklin Credit Union case, quietly wound down into nothing after most of the key witnesses had turned up dead, been incarcerated, or simply disappeared.

[C: OK, Dharma Wokini, it is time to consider truth in the death of your own son in 1985--in a Bakersfield motel. He was NOT involved in ANY WAY WITH ANYTHING--and yet he was wired for voices, given instructions and finally murdercided. I'm sorry, chela, that you have to face this--but, it was that which brought you around and you ones into your work and purpose. "That", however, was NOT AN­TICIPATED--it was considered that you would lay aside all thoughts of writing or involvement further in anything more than routine existence. You have the same thing going on with Debbie and you may as well brace yourself. Ones who refuse to come within the LIGHT for protection and pursue the mentally impacted--must at some point be released IF there is to be any security for THEM at all. These adver­saries knew long before you ones so much as dreamed of purpose and journey, what would come in the years ahead and WHO was destined to carry the banner. Ones who SERVE, as well, were aware at a much higher level of ex­pression--their task. Grieve for the conscious experience--do not allow it to immobilize you. This will be true for thou­sands in this journey who cannot understand that which has impacted you and yours! Blessings be heaped upon the ones who served their missions.]

AARON OWEN

Alisha Owen's brother, Aaron, died in mysterious circum­stances on the day of Alisha's testimony to one of the Grand Ju­ries. Alisha had been warned anonymously that "bad things would happen" if she did not recant her testimony.

Aaron was arrested on a minor charge. Soon after his arrest he was found dead in his holding cell, having apparently com­mitted "suicide" by hanging himself with his bed sheets. Aaron committed suicide rather than escape: it was discovered that his cell door was unlocked and open at the time. He also left a "suicide note" which family, friends, and experts agree is not in his own handwriting.

KATHLEEN SORENSON

Kathleen Sorenson is the lady to whom the Webb girls were sent by the child care authorities after they fled the Webb household. It was to Mrs. Sorenson that the girls first made their allegations of a child sex ring run by Larry King; and it was to Mrs. Sorenson that Lisa Webb first named then Vice President George Bush.

Mrs. Sorenson was killed in a head-on car crash. The woman driver of the other car, who apparently deliberately smashed into Sorenson's vehicle, was deeply involved in a Sa­tanic Cult. Her husband had been convicted of being involved in ritual sacrifice of animals. Other testimony indicates members of an occult group drew lots for the privilege of "taking Mrs. Sorenson out". This "accident" bears a remarkably strong similarity to a smash involving a member of Australia's "freedom fight". Fortunately, Jackie Butler wasn't killed.

CHARLIE ROGERS

Charlie, an ex-lover of King's, and suspected of being pre­pared to give evidence on the case, died of a gunshot wound; again, listed as "possible suicide".

SHAWN BONER

Troy Boner's brother Shawn also died in what can only be described as mysterious circumstances. Officially, he died of a gunshot wound to the head inflicted while playing Russian Roulette. Troy Boner had previously given evidence about King's child sex parties.

CLARE HOWARD

Clare Howard was secretary to leading financier Alan Baer, named repeatedly by many of those giving evidence in the case, as a homosexual pedophile. Clare used to arrange meetings between Baer and his young male lovers. Despite being known to be in good health at the time, she simply "died in her sleep" one night.

CHRIS TUCKER

A close associate of Rogers, Tucker died when he "fell" out of an upper story hotel window.

JOE MALEK

Malek organized several of King's homosexual gala parties, and almost certainly knew about the child sex ring and other matters. He was found dead, again, from gunshot wounds; again, officially noted as a "suicide".

GARY CARADORI AND YOUNG SON A.J.

Special Investigator to the Franklin Senate Committee, Gary Caradori and his eight year old son were killed when Caradori's light aircraft crashed on July 11, 1990. Despite the fact that eye witnesses reported a bright flash of light and a loud bang prior to the plane disintegrating, and despite the fact that the wreckage was strewn over almost a kilometer, investigating authorities have ruled out an explosion and the officials have labelled the crash as "unexplained".

There are many other, lesser players who have ended up dead under mysterious circumstances. Others have simply disappeared. Still others have been incarcerated. These in­clude:

LARRY KING

King was running scared and had made it known he wanted to meet with Bush. George Bush's minder had made it clear he should stay away during the controversy. King bought a ticket to Nebraskan Governor Orr's breakfast with Bush, which would have provided an opportunity to force a meeting. A few days later King was picked up in a florist shop by Secret Service agents and quietly spirited away to a hospital in Missouri for "psychiatric observation", as he had been declared "mentally in­competent". It all happened so quickly, even King's lawyers didn't know what was going on.

King was much later declared "mentally competent", but only after he had entered into a plea bargain with the authorities that resulted in thirty seven of the forty charges relating to the Franklin Credit Union collapse dropped, and King admitting guilt to the rest. This conveniently negated the need for a trial in which the child sex allegations would have certainly surfaced, and means King will probably serve less than five years in jail.

ALISHA OWEN

Alisha, as detailed elsewhere, refused to recant her evidence to the Grand Juries, naming certain prominent people, people with connections all the way to the White House, as involved in child sex and homosexual gatherings.

Alisha was charged and convicted of perjury, possibly the only person to face such charges in a child abuse case in Ameri­can legal history. She is now serving seventeen to twenty seven years in prison. An appeal is underway, but in the meantime her hair is starting to fall out and her finger and toe nails are turning blue. There is little doubt that she is being slowly, sys­tematically poisoned.

PAUL BONACCI

Bonacci was jailed in 1989 on charges relating to soliciting minors for sex. This is despite the fact that Bonacci himself was held as a sex slave throughout his own childhood and subse­quently has serious emotional and psychiatric problems. As a result of his gross mistreatment over many years, Paul devel­oped multiple, split personalities. He has been receiving treat­ment.

On one occasion, just for a brief moment, Paul reverted to one of these personalities, and touched a youngster in the groin area on the outside of his pants. Paul quickly recovered and broke down weeping, "What have I done, what have I done"? For this "crime" and despite his own tragic circumstances, young Paul was sent to jail for three to five years. Remember, Alan Baer got a $500 good behavior bond for similar offenses.

Bonacci is due for parole, but was denied the opportunity when the Parole Board voted in November against setting him free. This was less than a month after the same Board had voted unanimously to grant Bonacci parole. There is little doubt that this turnabout was specifically to keep him in prison so that his allegations could not get a public hearing. The change of heart by the Parole Board followed an editorial in the Omaha World Herald, Nebraska's leading newspaper, which criticized the Board's earlier decision to grant Bonacci parole.

The paper claimed releasing Bonacci would be a "tragic mistake" and referred to his claims of child abuse as "delusional ramblings". One of the main characters repeatedly named by Bonacci as a pedophile in his "delusional ramblings", and named by many of the other children, is Harold Andersen. Andersen is the former publisher of the Omaha World Herald and has been named by almost all of the victim-witnesses as involved in child-sex related matters.

[C: I must interrupt at this point to ask you to refer back to the "Mind-control" writings of the past few days. DO NOT FOR ONE MINUTE THINK THAT THERE ARE THIS MANY "NATURAL" PERVERTS RUNNING AROUND! Right within your own family groups and circles of friends will come forth incredibly hard to understand activities and associations--even within the ones who work daily on God's work but get disenchanted or don't pay attention. This is why we are so hard on you ones to stay constantly in protec­tion and use your heads! There are limits beyond which our enemies cannot move--therefore you MUST STAY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAFETY. You cannot comprehend the capability of such new technology (actually it is now quite OLD) which can focus and create totally incomprehen­sible acts and/or thought patterns. You will be dealing with periodic lapses into totally robotic behavior and unthinkable activities and thought patterns from time to time and witness it, as well, in others around you. Be gentle but DO NOT ALLOW THESE THINGS TO PASS WITHOUT ATTEN­TION OR THE BOMBARDMENTS WILL INCREASE IN VOLUME AND FREQUENCY OF EVENTS. You ones are now witnessing this very impacting action and bombardment hit ones all around you as they act out IN SPITE of TRUTH. BE FOREVER ATTENTIVE AND CAUTIOUS, FOR WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO INTERFERE WITH YOUR IN­DIVIDUAL FREE WILL CHOICES.]

THE PERPETRATORS AND THEIR DEPRAVITY

Shocking as the following may be, it is necessary to under­stand the mentality of the kind of people with which we are dealing. First, here is a transcript of a telephone conversation between an Italian industrialist, Sandro Moncini, and an un­known procurer of children, while Moncini was in the U.S.A. Moncini was subsequently jailed for a year for importing pornography. The "subject" of this conversation is a ten year old Mexican girl.

The conversation was NOT introduced as evidence at his trial and Moncini was subsequently released early on good behavior.

Moncini: What can I do to this little animal?
Reply: Everything.
Moncini: Can I chain her?
Reply: Sure.
Moncini: Whip her?
Reply: Yes.
Moncini: Can I make her eat shit? Reply: I don't know.
Moncini: Can I piss in her mouth? Reply: I think so.
Moncini: Stick nails in her nipples? Reply: Yes.
Moncini: And if the little animal gets broken or hurt?
Reply: Just make the traces and body disappear.
Moncini: What will it cost me?
Reply: $5,000

Compare Moncini's callous disregard for young human life to some of the things "Jill Smith" recounted to authorities while at Richard Young Hospital.

"Jill" describes in detail the first sacrifice she had to attend, that of a white female infant. "Jill" explains how first the head was cut off, then nailed to the wall. Later the head was taken down, and the eyes cut out. "Jill" was then locked in a room alone with the body for 24 hours. During this time "Jill" could hear the men whipping and beating the other girls. "Jill" was ten at the time.
At another ritual, "Jill" describes a one year old female hav­ing her head sawn off; a four year old male hung on a wall and darts were thrown at him; and a four year old female having parts of her body cut off and ground up. "Jill" and the other girls were then forced to drink the result.

"Jill" describes how the cult members wore robes with up­side-down crosses on them, and the leader wore a long black robe and rings with skeleton heads.

SUMMARY:THE BUSH TOUR &

The Australian Connection

So what are Australians to make of all this? That there is a widespread child sex, homosexual, and pornography ring which permeates up into the highest levels of American business, ad­ministrative, and political circles, can be of little doubt to any thinking person. Some of those named are already serving jail sentences for similar crimes as those alleged by the young peo­ple around which this entire Report is centered. This is despite the fact that one young girl is serving a lengthy prison sentence for making exactly the same claims against the same people.

That there has been a gigantic cover-up involving a major perversion of the natural course of justice, and even murder also cannot be reasonably doubted. From the use of a jury foreman, himself the center of homosexual charges, to the chief prosecu­tor interfering with witnesses, to the whisking away of Larry King by the Secret Service and the subsequent plea bargaining, to the secret closure of the investigation itself, to the murder of investigator Gary Caradori and all the other mysterious "deaths", and "suicides", plus a thousand other things, the whole case reeks of continual intervention by people in the high­est of high places.

That there have been sacrificial murders, satanic cult prac­tices, and devil worship intertwined throughout this macabre story, also cannot be reasonably doubted. Too many young people, on too many separate occasions, have made too many similar allegations. That this path of perversion and satanic devil worship leads all the way to the President of the United States of America has been attested to by at least two victims, one of whom survived polygraph tests. Should we believe them?

Some of the others named by these young people, characters like Citron & Baer, have already been convicted of similar, if unrelated sex charges, giving strong conviction to the alle­gations.

If most of the allegations can be accepted as being true, why not the rest? That is, the allegation of George Bush's involve­ment--he was most certainly "around".

President Bush was due to visit Australia in the first week of December. At almost the last minute, he cancelled out, citing the need to stay at home and attend to "domestic matters". That this was a snap decision is attested to by the fact that he announced it at a hastily convened press conference at 6:40 in the morning, an unheard of practice except in times of national emergency or war.

The officially accepted line is that the defeat of Bush's for­mer Attorney General, Richard Thornburgh, in the Pennsylva­nian elections, caused much anxiety in the White House, and convinced Bush that he should stay at home and be seen to be attending more to domestic matters. That this was simply a fuss to cover up some other reason for the cancellation is attested to by the fact that Bush's tour is now back on. Should we look then, for another reason for what amounted to only a short post­ponement?

President Bush was to visit Australia in the first week of De­cember. Now he is coming on December 31, and staying to January 3. It was well known that there was going to be mas­sive demonstrations against Bush on his arrival, mostly origi­nating from the rural sector. Farmers currently being bankrupted by American subsidized export policies had every intention of making their feelings well known. It could be argued that the postponement has moved the visit to the one time in the year when it can reasonably be expected that there will be minimal turn-outs at such protests.

But surely the President of the United States is used to such protests? Surely a bunch of poorly organized, bankrupt farmers could not so scare Bush that he cancelled out his trip? And if they did, why has the visit been reinstated at all? And why is President George Bush coming here anyway?

Surely the opportunity to address our dribbling, spineless, powerless, corrupt, controlled party political hacks, laughingly referred to as our "representatives", is not good enough reason for the U.S. President, arguably the most powerful man on the planet, to travel half way around the globe in the middle of the Christmas-New Year celebrations? Especially when "domestic matters" are of as much concern as they are alleged to be?

Could it be that President George Bush HAS to be in Can­berra sometime in December? Could it be that something other than the threat of farmers' protests scared him off, at least until the fuss had died down? Something else happened around the same time as the initial announcement of Bush's visit: something that was itself surrounded in mystery; something that reached its pinnacle immediately prior to Bush's cancellation, and something which has quietly been buried by the media since.

In October the Channel Ten network began a series of ar­ticles on pedophilia here in Australia. As the story gained momentum, and more and more witnesses came forward from all around the continent, a macabre story of child sex abuse, pornography, satanic cults, devil worship, and even child sacrifice, began to emerge. A story, in fact, remark­ably similar to the one that emerged in Nebraska, and de­tailed in this Report.

As in America, there were just too many witnesses, from too many diverse locations and too many different time periods, to dismiss all the claims as simple nonsense. Experts testified that the adults, recanting stories of their childhood, were all telling stories too similar, and involving aspects and rituals normally unknown outside of occult circles, to all be making it all up. Slowly, inexorably, all roads inevitably led to Canberra, capital of Australia.

Then a retired Federal Police Officer came forward and admitted that his department had for years been TRYING to investigate just such a satanic cult, including claims of child sex, pornography, human sacrifice, and all the rest. This former police officer, along with most of the alleged victims, claimed that such an investigation was almost impossible to bring to a conclusion, as all leads eventually terminated with people "at the very highest level of business, government, and politics", just as is the case in the American allegations.

Ultimately, the Channel Ten programme Hard Copy, was able to show viewers a system of sacrificial cairns, laid out in a triangle, in the bush surrounding Canberra. The center of these cairns is the new Parliament House. There was little doubt left that Canberra is the occult capital of Australia. Within twenty four hours Bush had cancelled his trip.

There were a couple of strange aspects to the Channel Ten exposé. First and foremost, it was NEVER picked up by any other television network, radio station, or major newspaper. Australia's major papers, in fact, even refused to publish "Letters to the Editor" on the subject, despite the fact that it was creating immense interest and concern amongst the public gen­erally at the time. Second, just when the investigation seemed to be getting somewhere; just as the allegations from a multitude of witnesses seemed to be getting into a coherent picture; just as all leads started to converge on Canberra, and immediately fol­lowing the announcement of the cancellation of Bush's visit, Channel Ten simply dropped the whole matter, without explanation.

Now, without major media coverage, the whole story has withered and died away. Now that the fuss is over, and public interest has been channeled in other direction, the Bush visit is quietly back on again. It's back on again at a time when
Mr. Bush could most likely be expected to want to stay home with his family.

He is coming despite all the domestic problems in America. He is coming specifically to address the members of our Joint Houses of Parliament, presumably in the Great Hall of our new Parliament House. Could there be any connection between all these matters?

In the next Special Report from Inside News, we will be demonstrating that Canberra is, quite possibly, the occult capital of the Southern Hemisphere, if not the world. [C: INDEED!] The city, and in particular, the new Parliament House have, in fact, been specifically built as a focal point for certain psychic or spiritual forces. The layout of the new Parliament House, and other parts of Canberra, are identical to those of Wewels­burg, an ancient castle in Germany specifically rebuilt for ex­actly the same purpose by the Nazis during World War II. They too, believed they could control the planet by channeling, fo­cussing, and directing occult forces.

****[C: Editors, please locate and print information AND THE MAP showing the Illuminati/Freemason layout of the city of WASHINGTON, D.C.]****
(See end of chapter).

The number one man in known occult circles today, Michael Aquino, has described Wewelsburg as the "occult centre of the world". Canberra incorporates all the design features of Wewelsburg, with the addition of certain aspects of pyramid energy and possibly ley-line fields, similar to Glastonbury. Last, it is known that December and early January constitute one of the most important times of the year for certain occult cere­monies.

Could it conceivably be that George Bush HAS to be in Can­berra at that time to perform, or take part in, just some such ceremony--as he has done from prior to the time he was in the cult club, The Skull and Bones, in the United States? It is known to the American Authorities that this Special Report was going to be released to coincide with his original visit. It was also known that at least some of the groups planning demon­strations had expressed interest in the contents of this Re­port. This is only a small newsletter, and under normal circum­stances could only expect to achieve minimal penetration, and even less acceptance, amongst the public generally.

But what if this Special Report had been issued at a time when the whole country was abuzz with tales of child sex abuse, satanic devil worship, and child sacrifice? What if the release of this Report, Bush's visit, and the height of the Channel Ten exposé, had all coincided? How much more widely circulated would the Report have been? How much wider the public acceptance of the claims? Would this explain the reluctance of the rest of the media to jump on the story in the first place, the can­cellation and reinstatement of the Bush visit, and the killing off of the story by Channel Ten, in the meantime?

You, the reader, must decide. Under George Bush's guid­ance, under the auspices of "NEW WORLD ORDER", America continues to rush headlong towards world domination, particu­larly of Third World countries. Those it cannot force or bribe into cooperation by financial and trade means, it blockades into submission, or bombs into oblivion. Thus far, one way or an­other, Panama, Zaire, Colombia, Mexico, Argentina, Australia, the Philippines, New Zealand, and Iraq have fallen, plus countries in Europe and what was the Soviet Empire. Others are due to follow. Haiti is currently under blockade, and Libya is al­most certainly next on the bomber's hit list.

Is Bush and his New World Order the answer to the planet's problems? Is George Bush the savior of our children's futures? Or is he a homosexual child abuser, robotic and pro­grammed, deeply involved with others in satanic cults and devil worship?
YOU, THE READER, MUST DECIDE!
P.S., November 1991
END OF QUOTING

* * *

For you ones who hop onto everything as "possible" but want to add up numbers, signs and other such things. I have laid a bit of a trap for you and, now, I am going to slam the door shut. If you don't know all things about a given situation, DON'T hop in with information which can only destroy our credibility. We have one or two right at "headquarters" who get a bit carried away with bits of information stretched into questioned reason­ing BUT presented in such authoritative manner that it AP­PEARS the facts are "real" and not just possibilities.
Larry King "Live" got involved in the publicity and was actually within a "circle" within this misadventure. However, if you go forth and surmise and then "state" the probability of his being the "Senior" or otherwise involved--KNOW THAT LARRY KING (in point herein) IS AN AMERICAN NEGRO WHO WAS PUT IN PLACE UNDER THE GUISE OF HELPING MINORITY BUSINESSMEN.

I ask that you ALL be most careful so that no discrediting falls back on our presentations in the CONTACT or in our JOUR­NALS.

SATANIC TIME OF YEAR

This "Season" may represent a HOLY time for you Christians--but remember something as important as the "above". EASTER was a pagan celebration long prior to the supposed crucifixion of Esu Immanuel (Jesus). It was the high-time of the Satanic prac­titioners. Moreover, to this day, May 3rd and May 15 are THE HIGH HOLY TIMES OF THE SATANISTS--HALLOWEEN BEING ONLY THE SECOND MOST IMPORTANT TIME, SYMBOLICALLY.

I ask that you ones think greatly upon these "revelations" for if you do not come into recognition of possibilities and what is actually taking place--there is no hope of changing back into the path of Lighted goodness.

May the LIGHT shine upon you and within that you may be given into seeing. Salu.

Ceres to clear, please.

[wave]

PJ 67

CHAPTER 5

REC #2 CERES 'ATONN

SAT., APRIL 3, 1993 2:41 P.M. YEAR 6, DAY 230

SATURDAY, APRIL 3, 1993

INTERNATIONAL FOCUS POINT

I realize that my scribe is weary but I have information which must be shared and we have, at this time, no other way in which to get it "scattered" about. The fan is full of "stuff" and, then, there is also the "reminding" of things we published long ago, needing the reprinting. It is better in most instances if we sim­ply present it again.

We have piles of information sent from South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, Japan
--and, of course, Texas. The problem is deciding which you need FIRST. If you don't bring govern­ment under control you won't need housing, etc. If, however, you don't get through in wholeness--what difference does the government make? Then, in addition, we need to write a bit more on the substance of Gaiandriana as I find that many of you still wish to think of it as a "cure-all" and a "medicine-drug". Can we not just see things as they ARE without having to hype, inflate or qualify the gifts? No, I suppose not--and why?--be­cause you forget what you HAD before the changes came about, in most instances. For instance, most of you haven't the foggi­est idea of what is REALLY in your Constitution--and then, how about the NEWSTATES constitution?

Well, there is one thing of which you can be sure--the NEW Constitution is ambiguous and ALL guidelines and directives are SUBJECT TO DECISIONS AND INTERPRETATION BY THE ONES IN POWER!

We will present here an example of that very statement as is presented in The Crime Control of Act of 1993. When we receive more than three copies of a given document
--it is time to share it and most of these things, we get a half to a full dozen copies.

For instance, in this very presentation the powers that be can accuse of an undefined violent act or "attending an assembly" AND CHARGE YOU WITH TERRORISM.
Ross Regnart has compiled information to inform the public about this "Act" and I believe it wise to publish it right up front herein.

PROPERTY FORFEITURE FOR SPEECHES,
WRITINGS AND ASSEMBLY

QUOTING:

The Crime Control Act of 1993

The Crime Control Act of 1993 redefines Illegal Search and Seizure while eliminating an innocent citizen's civil redress in suits against government officials and agents. Title VII Section 2337.

Incorporated: were provisions of proposed SB 265 titled "Terrorism Death Penalty Act of 1991" and Senator Biden's SB 266 "Comprehensive Counter Terrorism Act of 1991". Both bills contained language which can charge law abiding citizens of being agents or affording support to terrorist organiza­tions.
Consider: the property forfeiture effects on organizations and individuals when Speeches, Writings, and Assemblies mentioned in SB 265 are combined with the forfeiture provisions of Biden's SB 266 NOW INCORPORATED The Crime Control Act of 1993: any individual or organization in the United States who had or should have had knowledge that an associate might commit a terrorist act can have their property seized. Written like Federal Drug Forfeiture Laws, a citizen who allowed their home or other real property to be used for an assem­bly would start out guilty having to prove they did not have knowledge of the unlawful methods of the organization or indi­viduals they allowed to use their property.

Politically active organizations and labor unions are espe­cially vulnerable to The Crime Control Act of 1993 provisions which define bodily acts as "terrorist acts". A fist fight at a demonstration or picket line would qualify. The physical act need not cause bodily harm as its provisions refer to "involving any violent act". [C: This will also come down in due time to mean anything even "spoken" about anything not approved. This will include that which you thought would NEVER come to be--especially in your nation: a national religion. Remember that Public Law a year or so ago which brought the nation (you-the-people) a national religion--THE NOA­HEDRIC! These are Jewish religious rites and writings which will eventually be required taught in EVERY church. Old time religion as practiced by you 'allowing' Christians will be OUT as first Judeo/Christian and then the Noahedric law takes over. What you thought to be a "nice" gesture to your good neighbor Jewish patrons--is now made into a Public Law and will eventually be enforced as are all Public Laws. Then, as with this "Crime Act",
it will no longer be amusing.]
S.8 The Crime Control Act of 1993 forfeiture provisions which seem aimed at public dissent are written like RICO laws taking on the added prospect of Political Property Forfeiture. Broadly written intent to commit terrorist acts is defined: "appear to be intended-(1) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (2) to influence the policy of a government by in­timidation or coercion".
It would appear provisions contained in Senator Biden's pro­posed Senate Bill 266, now included in The Crime Control Act of 1993, target any group of persons which would dare demon­strate for or against any issue. Any picket line which is alleged to have blocked public access could qualify to intimi­date or coerce a civilian population. Should violence result for any reason at a public assembly, the property forfeiture pro­visions of The Crime Control Act of 1993 may be triggered causing forfeiture of attending demonstrators' homes used for meetings and the vehicles they used for transportation to the event. Demonstrators and/or pickets who left messages on a member or organization computer BBS System could cause the forfeiture of the system and all its records. The fact the system operator had no knowledge of any planned violence will not prevent property forfeiture of organization and member assets. [C: This is EXACTLY WHY the Bulletin Board was closed which was a service offered in this area for readers' conve­nience. The system was infiltrated and very damaging information was placed in the system and sent forth without any knowledge at this end. Fortunately friends intercepted the messages and notified Rick. Do you see how easily any­one wanting to claim damaging information and inciteful in­tent--could attend our meetings and then the government cause forfeiture of everything available on the property or owned by individuals present at said meeting? Indeed we shall be most careful as to meeting content and sharing. This will hold true for ANY and ALL gatherings for any purpose as we move along here in the shut-down of America and the World by this NEW WORLD ORDER of which Mr. Biden is a KEY PLAYER.]
Conspiracy is enough under provisions of The Crime Control Act of 1993: Property Forfeiture, Arrest, Huge Fines, and Prison Sentences can result from "activities which appear to be intended toward violence". Distributing political action flyers could qualify--as in this very paper.
The Crime Control Act of 1993 provisions when first exam­ined are misleading for it gives the reader the impression it is after agents of a foreign power wishing to do American harm. The "Trojan Horse" in The Crime Control Act of 1993: anyone in the United States committing AN UNDEFINED VIOLENT ACT OR ATTENDING AN ASSEMBLY CAN BE CHARGED WITH TERRORISM.

DISCOVERY OF WITNESSES AND
EVIDENCE ELIMINATED

If a Defendant under Section 2333 of Title VII, terrorist acts and/or conspiracy, seeks to discover from the Department of Justice the evidence against him, the attorney for the Gov­ernment may object on the ground that compliance will interfere with a criminal investigation or prosecution of the incident, or a national security operation related to the incident, which is the subject of Civil Litigation. Example: Government Civil For­feiture. Expected: Defense against Government charges may be difficult where citizens have no access to knowing of the al­leged evidence against them or the right to cross-examine gov­ernment's secret witnesses.

Secret Witnesses-Secret Trials:
Protection of Jurors And Witnesses In
CAPITAL CASES

Chapter 113B Section 138 states that the list of veniremen and witnesses need not be furnished to CAPITAL OFFENSE DE­FENDANTS should the court find by a preponderance of the evidence that providing the list may jeopardize the life or safety of any person.

TITLE VII SECTION 2337

The Crime Control Act of 1993 eliminates civil suits against U.S. and Foreign Governments by persons injured resulting from Government Agents in pursuit of prevention of terrorist acts.

Title VII SECTION 711

Sentencing Guidelines Increased for Terrorist Crimes

The United States Sentencing Commission shall have the power to provide an increase in the base offense level for any felony committed in the United States that involves or is in­tended to promote international terrorism. Participation by political activists in Lawful Speeches, Writings and Public Assemblies may be used as evidence by Government to show that a political participant was aware of the unlawful meth­ods of the individual or organization they are alleged to have afforded support.

One person's violent unlawful act at an assembly may be enough for the Government to allege the assembly Appears To Be Intended Toward Violence or Activities which could Intimi­date or Coerce a Civilian Population.
Under current drug forfeiture laws: innocent citizens have been implicated by informants who will often testify to anything to mitigate their own arrest. This has resulted in innocent citizens being arrested and killed by drug agents; forfeiture of their property; and financial ruination. Under proposed provisions of The Crime Control Act of 1993 special breaks are afforded informants, even against the death penalty. Gov­ernment will have no difficulty Creating Informants to cause the incarceration of any citizen considered a threat to one's po­litical agenda.

Disproportionate zero tolerance laws have served as precedents for expanding forfeiture: Since 1984, forfeiture laws have been operating on the erroneous contention that prop­erty can possess intent to commit crime. Innocent owners can have their property seized prior to trial on mere suspicion, starting out guilty, the owner having to prove they did not have reason to know that their property was being used to facilitate a forfeitable offense. Government need only show the property owner was negligent in making their property available for ille­gal drug activity to cause its forfeiture.

The forfeiture scam: tenants arrested on real property when offered a sentencing deal by a prosecutor or immunity from fur­ther prosecution, often reply in testimony, "that had the real property owner been vigilant, he or she could have discovered drug activity taking place on their property". Government has used against real property owners in Civil Forfeiture Actions the fact that a property owner had reported to police that a ten­ant was dealing drugs at their property to show an owner hadprior knowledge of the activity. Elderly citizens afraid to face machine guns and other threats by drug dealers are especially vulnerable to having their homes and rental property seized. Elderly property owners, often in bad health, are easy prey for Police Forfeiture Squads.
The Crime Control Act of 1993 will allow government to use against its citizens, illegally seized evidence. Searches, wiretaps and seizures that result in obtaining evidence from an invalid warrant but was carried out in reasonable reliance on a war­rant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate found to be in­valid based on misleading information or reckless disregard of the truth, may in many instances over-ride Constitutional 4th Amendment protection against illegal search and seizure.
S.8 The Crime Control Act of 1993, amends the "Exclusionary Rule" to add Section 3509 Admissibility of Evidence Obtained By Search or Seizure (a) Evidence Obtained By Objectively Reasonable Search or Seizure (b) Evidence Not Excludable By Statute or Rule: sets the groundwork for Government Forfei­ture Squads to at random invade innocent owner's homes and businesses with a minimum of probable cause. Government need only assert that "a search and seizure was carried out in circumstances justifying an objectively reasonable belief that it was in conformity with the Fourth Amendment".
Informants: Now being paid by government 25% of net pro­ceeds realized from forfeited assets in drug related seizures could earn similar amounts causing forfeiture of citizens' homes they allege to have been used by an owner for discussion of at­tending assemblies which the informant believed "appeared to be intended toward violence or to intimidate or coerce a civilian population".

The Crime Control Act of 1993

Informants and law enforcement agencies addressing pre­vention of terrorist acts are to be funded by Forfeiture and Fines collected from terrorists and/or persons alleged to have afforded terrorist material support. Will Citizens Exercising Their Constitutional Right To Free Expression And Association Be Targeted By Government Agents Who Know Their Jobs Are Dependent On Property Seizures, Fines and Arrests?

Courtesy of:

The Asset Guardian
P.O. Box 513
Franklin, NJ 07416
201:827-2177

END OF QUOTING

* * *

The next question is: "Is this yet law"? What difference does it make--with the sponsors and writers of the legislation--IT WILL BE!

And what does this mean to people like ours? And how about newspapers, writings, etc.? WE GIVE THE ADVERSARY NO REASON TO SHUT US DOWN! IS THIS UNDER­STOOD BY ALL READERS? IF THE LAWS OF THE LAND BECOME SUCH THAT WE ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED TO WRITE ALL THAT WE WOULD LIKE--WE WILL CEASE AND DESIST IN THE WRITING. OUR MISSION WAS AND IS TO BRING THE WORD OF GOD, AND SEE HIS PEOPLE THROUGH. THIS IS WHAT WE SHALL DO! WE ARE NOT SENT TO INTERFERE OR BRING ANY PHYSICAL INTERJECTION, VIOLENCE, ARMS OR CONFRONTATION WITH THOSE WHO HAVE THE POWER TO KILL THE POPULACE OF THE NATIONS. YOUR PROTECTION COMES FROM KNOWING TRUTH AND HOW TO UTILIZE IT. WE HAVE NO INTENTION WHATSOEVER OF PLACING ANYONE IN JEOPARDY--WE DO NOT EVEN BEGIN SUCH CONFRONTATION AS WE ARE HAVING AT THE PRESENT WITH GEORGE GREEN--HE CHOSE THE ACTIONS AND ACTED--WE ARE NOT, HOWEVER, ID­IOTS WHO WILL STANDBY AND BE DESTROYED!
We will act, however, to the limits of the law as WITHIN THE LAW. We will utilize every legal gain and/or protection under that law of the land. When the big guns come, however, we will not confront them with any motion of violence--we need ones ALIVE--not dead right. We will be allowed to continue for quite a while, readers, because even the evil empire needs voices and a way to get this information into your hands. This information above helps "THEM" even more than it helps "YOU" in the passing. It also informs our people that there will be no follow-on of such things as the Notice to Form an Unor­ganized Militia and/or "bring your long-rifles and come gather in Waco".

We ran that material with the Gritz material because we now have other pressures on our little paper to recognize. However, we shall not again run anything so blatant for it certainly could be considered as "knowingly" writing something which "COULD" incite to violence in some manner or another.

At this time, however, it is still "assumed" that there is some shred of "freedom" of speech, print, etc., under your prior Con­stitution. However, you must note that your old foundation Constitution is NOT IN USE THIS DAY. WE ACT ONLY AND ALWAYS WITHIN THE LAWS OF GOD AND THE LAWS OF THE LAND. YOU ARE ALREADY UNDER MARTIAL LAW--WHICH BY ITS OWN DEFINITION: SETS ASIDE ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!

There are other requirements that we have also laid down if ones would participate or share in any gatherings, work struc­turing meetings, etc. That is that there will be no intent to incite any civil disobedience (we can write about it but we shall not participate) and we shall not admit anyone who bears arms among us, utilizes illegal substances and comes bearing any in or on his person or within his vehicle of transportation, and/or speaks in favor of any kind of violence. CONSIDER THAT EVERYTHING AROUND IS TAPPED, MONITORED, PHOTOGRAPHED, ETC. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS FOLLOW THE RULES AND WE'LL BE ABLE TO WORK ANOTHER DAY.

Does this disappoint some of you more active patriots in organi­zations? So be it--our mission is not, perhaps, the same as you have caused yours to be. The enemy is doing everything pos­sible to cause you to act in foolishness in order to bring you down quickly and permanently. If you live in such manner and present rules of such conduct as I have just done--it is very, very difficult for the enemy to SET YOU UP! If you bear truth--you do not have to effort to remember the tale told--for the truth will serve you nicely. Further, if you have no "groups" you can hardly be accused of having "group" dissident meetings.

Does this mean that you can't go and stand for a fellow citizen or against that which is evil? It depends on the circumstances and the presenting "laws" and the "forces" against you for pro­tection or enforcement (whichever is cited). To be present in a courtroom to make testimony by your presence is honorable--to come shooting into a courtroom is wrong under ALL circumstances.

This does not mean that these things will not happen nor does it mean that ones who read this paper won't be given into the do­ing of such acts--IT DOES MEAN: IT IS NOT SANCTIONED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER BY THE HOSTS OR THE PEOPLE WHO PRESENT THE INFORMATION. IT MEANS EACH HAS FREE WILL CHOICES IN ALL THINGS AND IT FURTHER SUGGESTS THAT WISDOM AND GOOD JUDGEMENT AND DISCERNMENT MUST BE YOUR SHIELD OF HONOR AND ACTION.

I MUST REPEAT: THIS PAPER AND THESE JOURNALS ARE NOT OF PATRIOT GROUPS, RELIGIOUS DOC­TRINE OR POLITICAL STANCE. THESE ARE RESOURCES FOR INFORMATION, GUIDANCE AND INSTRUCTIONS WITHIN THE LAWS AND WITHIN THE PATH OF LIGHTED SOURCE. WE OFFER--WE DO NOT COERCE OR FORCE ANYTHING. WE FURTHER EFFORT TO UTILIZE INFORMATION WHICH IS AL­WAYS ELSEWHERE AVAILABLE AND/OR PRE­PRINTED. WE USE, AS TIME ALLOWS--ONLY WITH DIRECT PERMISSION OR GIVE FULL CREDIT UNLESS DOING SO IS DANGEROUS TO THE ORIGINAL WRITER. THE ENEMY KNOWS WHAT IS GOING ON SO WE CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE TO TELL HIM EV­ERY MOVE IN ADVANCE. IF ONES OBJECT TO THEIR INFORMATION BEING UTILIZED FOR THE INFORMATION OF YOUR BLESSED BRETHREN CITI­ZENS--THEN TURN FROM THAT ONE FOR HIS INTENT IS WRONG AND IT INDICATES UNWORTHY IN­FORMATION AS A PROBABILITY.
EPH. 4:25: "Now that you have put away falsehood, speak truth each one of you with his neighbor". If you would but heed this urging the lies would be put away into the dung heap of darkness where they belong. Things brought forth for all to see are nourished by the lighted presence and nothing of evil can long prevail within that presence! So be it.
There are things of wisdom to be considered in this passage and it has been presented from the "Ancient" of tribes: "We only ask to survive so that we can remain who and what we are--and for that we will always thank the Creator. We ask only the chance to pass on our way of life and our love for the Creator to our children and grandchildren". How many of YOU have this as your central focus as you pass your activities through your days? I wonder - - -!

Salu and AHO!

Ceres to clear.

PJ 67

CHAPTER 6

REC #1 CERES 'ATONN

MON., APRIL 5, 1993 12:50 P.M. YEAR 6, DAY 232

MONDAY, APRIL 5, 1993

CHOOSING THE PATHWAY

As we effort to "put this paper to bed" it is all but impossible to have "cut-off" lines. Forgive the length and massive amount of input for this issue of CONTACT but please understand that we are moving into the neck of the funnel and as a few realize they are coming under some kind of "protection" there is more dar­ing revelation brought forth.

I have little to say regarding the information we are running "as is" from the Las Vegas Sun except to ask you TO READ CAREFULLY AND PAY ATTENTION, for the very LIVES of the daring writers and participants in these activities bring them to the point of the gun!

I shall only remind the players in these games of "get-it" and "getcha" that you had best always hold uppermost in mind your agreements with higher intelligence or be prepared to meet thine enemy quite severely. I also remind the adversary that MY PEOPLE AND THOSE WHO HAVE COME UNDER OUR PROTECTION--ARE UNDER OUR PROTECTION-- VIOLATIONS OF AGREEMENTS WILL NOT BE TOLER­ATED. YOU-THE-PEOPLE HAVE NO IDEA HOW MUCH WEALTH OR HOW MUCH INTRIGUE (FOR A VERY LONG TIME) IS IN POINT WITH JUST THIS ONE RESOURCE. THERE ARE OTHERS AND YET WHEN YOU ARE DEALING WITH ANY RESOURCE DESIRED BY AN­OTHER--THE CONNECTIONS MUST BE FIRM BUT PRI­VATE AND ONES WHO WORK WITH US WILL BE KEPT IN SECURITY AND ANONYMITY AS BEFITS CICUMSTANCES. ONLY IF THROUGH DIVULGING IDENTITY PROTECTS SHALL IDENTIFICATIONS BE GIVEN "FIRST" FROM THIS RESOURCE.

I ask that ALL readers pay careful attention and then go back and read and reread information as given by Russbacher, Renick, Gritz, Marchetti, etc., through our own presentations. The ONLY WAY TO ASSURE PROTECTION FROM "MURDERCIDING" IS TO GET PUBLIC ENOUGH IN­FORMATION TO CAUSE THE BASTARD ADVERSARY TO CALL OFF HIS JACKALS. DAMAGE TO MY TEAMS WILL BRING INSTANT AND RATHER UNPLEASANT RE­SULTS.
I ASK THAT COPIES OF THIS PAPER BE SENT EVERYWHERE YOU CAN THINK OF--ESPECIALLY TO OTHER PRESENTING DOCUMENTERS SUCH AS NORD DAVIS, WILLIAMS, MC-ALVANY, THE AMERICAN BUL­LETIN, NEW AMERICA VIEW, ETC. IT WILL BE THROUGH JOINT EFFORT TO PUBLICIZE THIS INFOR­MATION OF SUCH REVEALING NATURE THAT THE OF­FERING PARTIES CAN COME UNDER PROTECTION AND REMAIN RELATIVELY SAFE. SO MANY WHO ARE INCARCERATED AT THIS MOMENT ARE IN THE PROCESS OF BEING BRAIN-DAMAGED AND POISONED. THE PRICE FOR FREEDOM IS GREAT INDEED!

GYEORGOS CERES HATONN, Cmdr. IGFF-PSC Commander, Phoenix Project

* * *

You readers will find another couple of partial documents which, loathe as I am to even mention the name, are direct copies from the lawyers representing a participant in the Phoenix Institute. I have asked that the party involved be left with only initials but the signature and title be remaining in the printing. We still get daily inquiries and demand that we retract statements that George Green was both a Vice-President AND a Director of the Institute. He continues to deny both and contin­ues to contact bunches of people daily stating that he had noth­ing to do with any of several entities. George,
I think it time, Son, that you face your responsibilities and that which you DO!

You are painfully hurting so many that you continue to badger and call into your entrapment. You do not hurt me or mine--for truth will stand and through it my people will ultimately flour­ish. In the name of that which you have done worthy, I ask that you consider your actions and the consequences thereof for to continue this injustice right through the unjust courts of law--can ONLY prove that which we have presented. You continue to hurt ones who answered your call and you continue to com­pound the impact on Leon F. Know that you will confront these lies and misleadings--for it is the ultimate cycle of confrontation in ALL energy forms, human or etheric. May the Light be given passage that you may see that which you continue to perpetuate--for you are losing all credibility, in every instance, of those you most desire as allies. If you cannot bring yourself to do this in your own behalf--consider that which is being done to Desiree--mostly in her sheltered ignorance of that which is actu­ally taking place. If she be integrated in full knowledge--then the consequences shall rest as fully upon her beautiful and pre­cious shoulders--for a man cannot serve TWO MASTERS. FURTHER, TO CLAIM TO SPEAK "FOR" THE HIGHEST MASTER TEACHER OF THE UNIVERSE--AND PRACTICE THAT WHICH IS BLACK IN INTENT IS
--WITHOUT EX­CEPTION--DEADLY! SO BE IT FOR IT COMES INTO THE CHOOSING OF EACH IN HIS OWN PATHWAY BUT YOU, THROUGH YOUR OWN ACTIONS HAVE REMOVED THE PROTECTION FROM YOUR PERSONS! THE ADVER­SARY WILL PROTECT YOU ONLY FOR AS LONG AS YOU ARE USEFUL TOOLS FOR HIS DECEITFUL GAMES--AND THEN CAST YOU ASIDE AS HE DOES ALL WHO SERVE PHYSICAL GAIN AND ELITE PUPPETS AND PUPPET-MASTERS.

* * *

LOOKING FORWARD TO NEXT WRITINGS

Hold room in your brains for the next edition of CONTACT for we shall be taking up "Court and Jury Tampering in the In­justice System", the Constitution AND THE NEWSTATES CONSTITUTION (INTEGRATED WITH FEDERAL "DISTRICTS" AND THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER). You will get some confirmation along the way--the New Constitution calls for TWO vice-presidents! I suggest you count how many you actually have NOW--and she is pretty close to the head-shed, is she not? Gore actually serves sub­servient to Hillary--so it has come down, chelas, and you won't do a thing to stop it. You will, in fact, demand more police force as murder on the streets and crime to the citi­zens increases. Also, do not overlook the dastardly meaning behind this "Summit" meeting just past. Good Luck, World.
What do "WE" intend to do about these things? Not a thing save tell you and protect our own and those of God's people awaiting His reclamation. It is YOUR world and if it is to be "fixed" YOU will fix it--OR, in her own timing and sequence--she will clean herself of the vermin infesting her skin and features
--probably fertilized by the blood of the millions who shall perish in the fray.
May GOD have mercy for ye cannot know of that which you do.
(Ed. Note: Late Breaking Bulletin. This comes from CONSTI­TUTION COALITION, 25 Highland Park Village #248, Dallas, Texas 75205 (Nancy LeRosa & Eric Lighter).

After chronicling the burning of a Nashville radio station (WWCR) (presumably by the ATF, Bureau of Alchol, Tobacco and Firearms), which had just run an exposé on what really went on in Waco, the bulletin contains the following:

Just a few days ago in Ruby Creek, 15 armed ATF agents visited a female witness in that case while she was home alone. The ATF beat her mercilessly, ransacked her home looking for evidence, and then left her bloody and battered on the floor. It took 15 macho agents to do the job. This is the ATF in action. This is the New World Order operating to disarm America for mastery over our Constitutional rights.