PJ 54
CHAPTER 1
REC #1 HATONN
TUE., AUGUST 25, 1992 1:16 P.M. YEAR 6, DAY 9
TUESDAY AUGUST 25 1992
REQUEST
Dharma, I would request time please, to put the last three writings to tape. It (they) can be treated as a regular "meeting" session because I think it most important. Those who do not find time to read need to have the information in a form for listening while driving, flying, etc. We are now dealing with integration of major issues and consideration of possible solutions. I ask that the information be made available to all, however, for you are right up against the curtain. You must continue to realize "what is wrong" but to also consider feasible ways to handle problems, i.e., what kind of money will work, etc.
The writing at present is also MOST urgent as reminder of how you came to be in such maladjustment and unbalance in placement in the United Nations and WHY the U.S. ends up with the heavier load of tending the world. We shall probably also put this to tape and not wait for Mark to repeat the JOURNAL as published.
USURPING U.S. MILITARY, CONSTITUTION
The following comes from an outstanding issue of what is called a "Bulletin" from the Committee to Restore the Constitution. It is an extract from a recorded debate between Congressman Richard L. Ottinger, Director, U.S. Committee on the United Nations, and Archibald E. Roberts, Lt. Col. AUS, ret., Director, Committee to Restore the Constitution, at the Little Theatre, West Chester County Center, White Plains, NY, 26 Sept. 1969. The "bulletin" was published in July 1986. It has massive value for this reveals the terrible power of the United Nations Security
Council to commit U.S. Military forces to battle, anywhere in the world. The fact that this comes from over decades past should be attention getting to you who have drowsed while Rome burned.
This is so old that I am hesitant, without careful checking, to give location information but I believe the "Committee" is still quite valid and quite busy--in Colorado. We shall check into it and give you information as we find it. The documents in point were sent to us by a loyal reader who offers to share many most urgent materials. Thank you, P.K.
The reason that I believe the "Committee to Restore the Constitution" (a registered trademark) is still active is that she has sent two documents, the latest dated 1990. This shows an address of P.O. Box 986, Ft. Collins, CO 80522. As is often the case, when we have copies, it is difficult to always be able to give proper appreciation and recognition. Only the portion in point was sent so it appears that the document is incomplete. It is important enough, however, to allow understanding and you can, then, do follow-up if you are interested in the bulletins as sent from the organization. The United Nations is the one organization that has totally usurped and buried your national Constitution.
QUOTING:
JULY 1986: COMMITTEE TO RESTORE
THE CONSTITUTION
SHOULD THE UNITED STATES PARTICIPATE
AND ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNITED
NATIONS ORGANIZATION?
....Col. Roberts' testimony, rebuttal to Rep. Ottinger's opening remarks, and extended question and answer period, explain how a Federal policy of "perpetual war for perpetual peace" generated no-win wars in Korea and Vietnam. This same UN control over US military forces may in today's climate of political crisis commit a new generation of Americans to a UN no-win war in Africa.
COL. ROBERTS TESTIMONY
Congressman Ottinger, honored guest, ladies and gentlemen of the jury. I hold for the prosecution. During the next 20 minutes, the prosecution will attempt to prove the following charges against the United Nations organization:
Number 1. That the United Nations is a subversive organization.
Number 2. That vital powers of government held in trust for the American
people have been illegally transferred to the United Nations organization
in violation of the prohibitions of the Constitution.
Number 3. That the United Nations Charter was foisted upon the American
people to serve those who seek to overthrow the Constitution and to coerce
American citizens into a Socialist animal farm.
Consonant with facts presented in official documents, and we will use some of these official documents, and of public testimony by elected officials and others, I intend to use the war in Vietnam to prove these accusations and to expose the real objectives of the United Nations and those who promote its cause. During the course of my indictment of the United Nations it might be well to keep in mind the following axiom.
Wars--under whatever name--which do not reduce the political power of an officially named enemy of the American people, and which do not increase the political power of the United States, must in the end reduce the political power of the United States and thus serve the secret objectives of a concealed enemy.
JOHNSON, NIXON: EARLY TRUMPETING TOWARD
ONE WORLD GOV'T
Let us begin our introduction for the prosecution by calling on the testimony of Lyndon B. Johnson, who was then President of the United States.
Mr. Johnson told the American people on 13 July 1965 that their soldier sons were dying in South Vietnam because of our commitment to the South East Asia Treaty Organization: SEATO. During a White House news conference on this date, 13 July 1965, President Johnson stated, and I quote, "I think it is well for us to remember that three Presidents have made the pledge for this nation; that the Senate has ratified the SEATO treaty by a vote of 82-1, pledging the United States to come to the aid of any nation on their request who are parties to that treaty." Then President Johnson went on to say, "We expect to keep that commitment; our national honor is at stake."
Four years later, nearly to the day, President Richard M. Nixon, was to use the same words in describing our commitment to the SEATO treaty.
On Monday, 29 July 1969, in Bangkok, Thailand, which of course is headquarters for the SEATO organization, Mr. Nixon reiterated his pledge to the SEATO treaty in these words.
"We are determined," Nixon testified on worldwide television, "to honor our commitment to the SEATO treaty, the Southeast Asia Treaty."
Of course neither Mr. Nixon nor his predecessors have admitted that the Southeast Asia Treaty, a treaty which our sons honor in blood and agony, was framed under the provisions of Articles 52 and 53 of the United Nations Charter. As we shall see, however, SEATO is a regional arrangement, a regional arrangement formed to deal with matters relating to the maintenance of international peace and security, consistent with the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
The prosecution will prove that the no-win war in Vietnam is secretly a United Nations war and that it is being conducted to serve the purposes and principles of the United Nations. We will also reveal why this strange war has clearly failed to reduce the political power of the Communist enemy. Instead this war has increased the political power of the United Nations and thus serves the secret objectives of a concealed enemy.
The first exhibit for the prosecution is "The Story of SEATO", a booklet published by the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization. This is a copy. Anybody can get a copy of this booklet, "The Story of SEATO". On page 5 of "The Story of SEATO", we find the following declaration, and I read: "the members of SEATO have chosen a collective defense system under the authority of the Charter of the United Nations." SEATO in this statement of purpose, asserts that it is an agency, an extension, of the United Nations organization.
Now, let us join this information, that is the declaration of the SEATO people, let's take this information and join it with Exhibit number 2, for the prosecution; the SEATO treaty itself. In the back of the same book we find the SEATO treaty, The Southeast Asia Treaty, sometimes called the Manila Pact because it was signed in Manila on 8 September 1954. In these articles, and I am going to quote a part of some of them, we find the following information, "The party," says Article 1 of SEATO, "undertakes as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may become involved by peaceful means, and to refrain," and listen to this, "and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations." Well, I would say that American casualty figures in this interminable war in Vietnam is evidence that the military force used in Vietnam is applied, is applied in a manner consistent with the purposes and principles of the United Nations. [H: Would this not also account for the need for meetings including Secretary of State, Baker--in the Philippines in the recent weeks past? Remember--I said that the docks, etc., from Subic Bay are now towed to Vietnam? Watch it for the hands (and tow-boats) are much quicker than your eyes when you are distracted elsewhere.]
As a matter of fact, the United States Ambassador to Vietnam, Elsworth Bunker, made this point crystal clear in his personal testimony on Meet the Press, 19 Nov 1967. I quote a part of his testimony before the public on this television show. "It seems to me," said Bunker, "It seems to me that what we are doing in Vietnam is to make credible our commitments under the United Nations and under SEATO treaty to resist aggression. We have made a commitment." Doesn't that sound familiar?
Unfortunately Ambassador Bunker failed to identify the UN agency which is charged with conducting this Vietnam war under the United Nations. But the information to fill this important vacuum is found under Article 4 of the SEATO Treaty. Again I quote, "Measures," now when they say measures, they mean military action, "Measures, taken under this paragraph shall be immediately reported to the Security Council of the United Nations." However, let's pinpoint the UN Articles that make credible our commitment under the United Nations, because you see, ladies and gentlemen, this statement, "reporting all actions to the Security Council," this statement means that the chain of command is very specific. It could not be more specific than that. Because you see the Security Council is the war-waging arm of the United Nations.
UNITED NATIONS CHARTER; BIBLE OF
"ONE WORLDERS"
To make credible this commitment, let's quote again, as Mr. Bunker so lucidly explained on Meet the Press, let us now present Exhibit number 3 for the prosecution, the United Nations Charter.
We will find, as predicted in "The Story of SEATO", that the authority for the construction of this UN-SEATO collective defense system is revealed in Chapter 8 of the United Nations Charter. Chapter 8 is called regional arrangements, and we will find that a comparison of UN and SEATO articles also shows that the quotations that I made a moment ago from SEATO are in fact faithful duplication of the United Nations Charter, specifically of provisions 52 and 54 of the United Nations Charter, this is the Bible of the One Worlders, the Constitution for world government.
"Nothing in the present charter," says Article 52, "Nothing in the present charter precludes the existence of regional arrangements, providing that such arrangements or agencies are consistent with the purposes and principles of the United Nations."
Where have we heard that before? Why in the Charter of the SEATO Treaty.
Ladies and gentlemen, it is immediately apparent that Article 1 of SEATO exactly reproduces the authority of Article 52 of the United Nations Charter. Don't you see? In the same way Article 4 of SEATO similarly reflects the provisions of Article 54 of the United Nations Charter.
Again I quote, "The Security Council," commands Article 54, "shall at all times be kept fully informed of activities undertaken or in contemplation under regional arrangements." Undertaken or in contemplation. This means, of course, the US military operations 'undertaken or in contemplation' in Vietnam are first submitted to the UN Security Council for their approval.
Ladies and gentlemen, the evidence permits but one conclusion, just one conclusion. The strategy of 'perpetual war for perpetual peace', a strategy which sends Americans into battle with neither the promise nor the hope of victory, is the strategy of the United Nations. It is United Nations strategy, don't you see? As a matter of fact these UN war making powers, and the usurpation of governmental authority which permits it, was dramatically illustrated by James Reston in his column of 13 July 1967, which was entitled Isolations Echoes by US Move in Congo. Do you remember when we sent troops to the Congo under the United Nations?
I quote Mr. Reston, "The administration's position is that it is committed under the Charter of the United Nations, under various treaties and under the Truman Doctrine, to do whatever it can to maintain peace anywhere in the world."
You realize, of course, that the real objective of these 'no-win wars' is not international peace and security as UN supporters are led to believe. The true purpose and principle of these UN military adventures is to manipulate the United States armed forces under the United Nations Security Council. To force all of the nations of the world into line and to deliver them up to a one world government. That's what it's all about. [H: KEEP IN MIND: AUG. 1969 AND THE SUBJECT HAS HAPPENED FARTHER BACK IN OCCURRENCE.]
For proof I invite your attention to Chapter 5 of the United Nations Charter, headed the "Security Council Functions and Powers".
I quote, "In order to ensure prompt and effective action by the United Nations, its members confer upon the Security Council primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security."
Again, Article 25, "The members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council."
UN TREATY RATIFICATION UNCONSTITUTIONAL
In simple language, ladies and gentlemen, these two UN articles transfer the power of self defense given to the Congress by the sovereign states into a blanket authority to send American soldiers into battle anywhere in the world at the direction of the Security Council of the United Nations. Now, the Constitution is very specific about the powers of keeping peace and waging war. Nowhere does the Constitution authorize the transfer of these powers to an international agency. The prosecution has therefore established the fact that the Senate ratification of the United Nations Treaty on 28 July 1945 is in violation of the Constitution of the United States. Being illegal, it must be put down.
[H: If you can't repeat, verbatim, the above paragraph--with meaning--go back and read it AGAIN! Note the date of 28 July 1945. I would guess it will take some "doing" to get this job done after all these years of more and more entanglements--I suggest you get Commander Gritz elected to head this confrontation!]
Perhaps the members of this jury have wondered why the wars in Korea and Vietnam saw the outpouring of vast resources of US men and material in a land war without a formal declaration of war by the Congress of the United States. Well, Article 39 of the United Nations Charter explains why, and more importantly why the UN Security Council can at any time force this nation and the entire population of the United States into a military posture without the consent of Congress.
Again I quote from the U.N. Charter, Article 39, "The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, or breach of the peace or act of aggression. And it shall decide which measures shall be taken, in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security."
Articles 41 and 42 spell out the full authority and extent of UN military action, authorizing the use of air, sea and land forces. I'm quoting, "The use of air, sea and land forces." I'm quoting, "The use of air, sea and land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security."
Additionally, the military muscle needed to endorse these Security Council edicts is provided by usurped sovereign power as spelled out in Articles 43 and 46 of the United Nations Charter. These UN laws, Articles 43 and 46, order "the transfer of armed forces, assistance and facilities from member nations," we are a member nation, "to the UN Security Council for use as the Security Council may determine in its application of armed force anywhere in the world." Anywhere in the world.
To give legal coloration to this breach of public trust, the Congress of the United States, on 26 Sept. 1961, just eight years ago tonight, ratified Public Law 87-297, the "Arms Control and Disarmament Act". This unbelievable legislation purports to legalize the transfer of the United States Military establishment, and American citizens in uniform, to a United Nations world army. Members of the jury, fellow Americans, your sons now serving in Vietnam, are by UN Charter definition, a United Nations world army, and they take their orders from the United Nations Security Council "consistent with the principles and purposes of the United Nations."
As final proof in the case for the prosecution, I read from House Joint Resolution Number 1145, called the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution".
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution is often quoted as Congress's approval to commit Americans to the Vietnam war. This is what the resolution says. "This resolution (Section 3) shall expire when the President shall determine that the peace and security of the area is reasonably assured by international conditions created by the United Nations." Not the United States but the United Nations.
Ladies and gentlemen, I respectfully submit that the prosecutions' case against the United Nations is now legally established.
The prosecution has demonstrated that the Articles of the United Nation's Charter amend by deceit and subterfuge the Constitution of the United States, in a manner not sanctioned by Article 5 of the Constitution. The United Nations is therefore a subversive organization and it is a threat to the freedom of persons and property guaranteed to the people by the Constitution.
The prosecution has demonstrated that the authority to commit Americans to battle anywhere in the world has been surreptitiously transferred from the Congress of the United States to the Security Council of the United Nations. Therefore vital powers of government held in trust for the American people have been illegally usurped by the organization of the United Nations in violation of the Constitution.
The prosecution has demonstrated that the real but concealed objectives of the United Nations organization is to place the military power of the United States at the disposal of the United Nations Security Council, to force all of the nations into line and to deliver them up to a one world government.
The United Nations was therefore foisted upon the American people to serve those who seek to overthrow the Constitution and to coerce our citizens into a Socialist animal farm.
In this brief indictment of the United Nations, the prosecution has also revealed that, as the political power of the United States is dissipated in no-win military ventures all over the globe, the political power of the United Nations and those who serve and promote its purposes is increased.
In summation, the prosecution declares that the United States should not participate or encourage the development of the United Nations. To the contrary, the prosecution claims that it is the clear and urgent duty of all federal office holders to dismantle the United Nations organization in consonance with their oath to "defend and preserve this Constitution".
The prosecution rests.
* * *
When we again sit to write we will take up Colonel Roberts' rebuttal to representative Ottinger's opening remarks.
I would, however, leave this writing with a thought to carefully consider--presented by Col. Roberts:
Wars--under whatever name--which do not reduce the political power of an officially named 'enemy' of the American people, and which do not increase the political power of the United States, must in the end reduce the political power of the United States and thus serve the secret objectives of a concealed enemy.
Archibald E. Roberts, Lt. Col. AUS, ret., CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, E7874, 26 Sept. 1969
THINK ABOUT IT!
PJ 54
CHAPTER 2
REC #1 HATONN
WED., AUGUST 26, 1992 8:50 A.M. YEAR 6, DAY 10
WEDNESDAY AUGUST 26 1992
KNOWLEDGE
What majestic errors are made when there is refusal to receive KNOWLEDGE. There is no bliss in ignorance, only foolish failure to utilize the wondrous gifts given in response to the petitions for which responses are not noted.
TODAY'S WATCH
Since our crew has set up a note-board by phone, I shall effort to comment of things which may be worthy of note in more "timely" manner.
HURRICANE WATCH
Note that the course of the storm "Andrew" was changed to avoid the direct hit on major cities of the Gulf of Mexico area. There was a noticed and deliberate slowing of progress of movement and now the storm has been diminished in intensity. The reason was that the "Western to Eastward" storm system moved by a bit too far to the north and the "hookup" with 'Andrew" became impossible to connect into as was first planned for major impact. It matters not for there will yet be devastation from flooding as the system is slowed for the "dumping" of the water load.
What causes you to believe this is the ONLY storm which will pass that way? This one was so programmed as to be SENT directly over Homestead and it was so tracked that Bush already had FEMA at ready and in the area. It is not feasible to have great underground facilities in that area of Florida because of the water levels, so it was indeed a much bigger "lesson" than any of you citizens are allowed to see. Chelas, face it--the battle of Armageddon is engaged--you just don't yet seem to recognize the "players". May insight strike you soon lest you perish.
EARTHQUAKES
Meanwhile, the next proclaimed "date" of the California San Andreas quake has been shifted to the 29th. There is also talk of perhaps choosing to continue in the "Eastern" U.S. with quakes and tornados along the Mississippi--but the plan "of choice" as of this morning is to go ahead with Western disaster to facilitate total take-over through Executive Order and Emergency needs.
The reason for the need to act in California is to not allow for signing and putting into operation the State Budget in time to avoid the impact of bank closures, etc., as will be caused by such a "natural" disaster. It would seem to me in witnessing the fires about the Western States that your citizenry might have had enough but I suppose NOT.
POLITICS
If it is necessary to pull Quayle and replace him with a sure appointed and not elected vice-president to move into the nonelected position of President, then Baker is set and in training. Eagleburger is a total disaster in any State role but nobody objected and so it goes--by assumption. He is a full-blown Kissinger man and the NOOSE TIGHTENS.
IRAQ
The reason for the close-down of Iraq flights over Southern Iraq is NOT because of Shiites--it is to prevent Saddam to observe the movement into Iraq of inspectors, oil equipment and military invasion. You must keep your eyes open in EVERY DIRECTION because the Elite are efforting to bring the bag-strings into knotted encapsulation. The BIG works, however, are taking place in Israel. Remember that Rabin was the one who ordered the strike against your USS Liberty and also a member of the notorious and evil Stern Gang with Shamir and Sharon. The plight of the Europeans is hopeless as is South Africa. Cold war over?? Indeed! You must understand that the UN now controls, through Charter, all military actions--especially the United States'--as is my continuing outlay in the writings of present. The Soviet military is very "alive and well" and thriving on the blood of nations.
AND WHERE IS GOD IN ALL THIS?
GOD is your ONLY shield and buckler and HE seems be left out of everything abounding--not just the Democratic and Republican parties' platforms as each accuses the other. God has not been included in your governments in far over a century. I can only hope you begin to see and hear the truth of it--for THROUGH HIM IS YOUR ONLY WAY IN FREEDOM--IF IT NOT BE ALREADY TOO LATE.
* * *
I will, before closing this portion call your attention to the most heinous miscarriage of law enforcement to date--in Idaho. The point is to KILL Randy Weaver and his family. The Feds are in force and the locals are efforting to draw them away calling them "baby killers" and "murders"--to NO AVAIL. It is mandatory that the officers take out this man because HE KNOWS TOO MUCH. AS A BIT OF BACKGROUND--HE SERVED IN BO GRITZ' OWN UNIT IN THE MILITARY. Does this tell you enough? Your nation is SICK unto death--I can only petition to WAKE UP!
LETTER REGARDING "COLEMAN"
I have been interrupted in the work herein under way and presented with a request to respond, ASAP, to a letter sent in full honor by a reader who has just attended the Global Sciences Congress held in Denver. It is suitable that we first simply reprint the letter in full and then we can look at the contents.
Dear Commander Hatonn,
For about one year now, I have been faithfully following THE WORD in the Phoenix Liberator, Journals and the audio tapes. They have been truly enlightening and uplifting. For that, I thank you, Commander. Now, my wonderment and devotion is being sorely tested as a dark cloud has dimmed the light in my path.
This past weekend I attended the annual Global Sciences Congress held here in Denver. Among the luminaries invited were Bo Gritz and Dr. John Coleman. Both gentlemen had important messages for us but stunning developments were yet to unfold. Later, I found myself talking with Dr. Coleman at his display table and the subject of cosmospheres came up. I apparently had pushed a sensitive button.
Obviously piqued, the Dr. snapped, "1 know where you got that rubbish--from those Phoenix People."
He said that cosmospheres DO NOT exist and further emphasized that information printed in the Liberator is almost always 180 degrees from the truth. Dr. Coleman even expressed surprise that George Green continues to publicize the committee of 300. In fact, he was selling a "corrected" version of his book that he had published. The conversation darkened when an associate of his offered that Commander Hatonn, the Phoenix Literature and all that are a part of it, are nothing more than a cult and a scam.
The associate, with a certain measure of outrage, railed profusely against the projection of the so-called Photon Belt and its implications. He said it was terrible that people with heart pace makers had to worry that their units would cease to function. At that point, I had to leave.
It's a few days later now, and I am still confused, upset and, generally, heart-sick. Did Dr. Coleman have a falling-out with you or George Green? Could it be that he has begun to feel the heat of the controllers? Do you have some insight to this change of heart by the good doctor? Having heard him on one of the tapes with you, I was under the impression that he was "one of the flock" and on our side. Please, Commander, help me sort this out. Just what is the truth of this matter? Thank-you for everything you've done and are inspiring others to take up the torch. Salu.
R.R., Denver
(Rec: today by fax, 8/26/92.)
* * *
I ask that copies of the correspondence and transactions between Coleman and myself be sent to this person--as regards the recent visit of Gritz and, as well, the computer equipment, fax and other items Coleman refuses to return.
Also, send copies of the writings from Patterson and Mullins as was in Criminal Politics (See page 232). Mullins must be most upset at the printing of his "material" but it is now too late to change the bait in the trap. I do not wish to make further comment about that information for that is between the ones in point and not myself. Remember: "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thine neighbor!" To the writer I can only suggest that you not be so easily pulled away from truth for it truly does stand alone and shall--into infinity.
I have no intention of delving into such insults and accusations for TRUTH needs no such defense. If there be no "Cosmospheres" then the good Doctor Coleman (alias Clarke among many aka's) has been feeding YOU THE PUBLIC a full bag of lies prior to this encounter as he has certainly continually pronounced that there ARE Cosmospheres.
Other of Coleman's acquaintances have much information to dump on the public with which I heartily disagree in content. One being that somehow Dr. Coleman is a "double agent"--I think it is far more painful and deceitful than merely being a double agent.
If the Committee of 300 is now published in "corrected" form, the quality must be substantially lessened--Coleman did not have any input financially for the first publication nor has he gleaned enough funds to do another like publication. He has, however, charged almost double the price agreed upon--for his own book sales. His demands for return on the volumes have been totally outrageous but that is between him and the publisher. My crew who did the work involved in publication, and did in fact furnish a large portion of printing expenses, received not so much as a THANK YOU, or flowers, in appreciation. To each his own. Please note that THAT WHICH IS SENT FORTH IS RETURNED IN LIKE MANNER--AND THAT "RETURN" IS GETTING FASTER AND FASTER!
Falling out? At least with George Green there seems to be great blaming of George for "agreements" which never existed, but I had no relationship with him from onset, other than to help produce that which we needed to integrate information for ease of our readers to get updated input. I was unable to cause enough of you to read Mullins' work and that of others, to get fully informed and confirmations set.
We took responsibility for all things, including security, rent, utilities, computers, publication, editing, reformatting, etc., in an effort to serve John at onset of initial relationship. So far, this is the only thing received in return for the assistance. "Truth" cannot be copyrighted and therein lies the ONLY thing that has saved Coleman from the hangman's noose--I suspect. His anger with ME (and this was the end of our relationship, in fact) was that I published two documents from two different "nations" utilizing the EXACT SAME MATERIAL IN the SAME OUTLAY OF WRITING SEQUENCE, at the same time the book was in printing. TRUTH WILL ALWAYS "OUT". Mine is simply to call your attention to the information and ask you to get the material in point--I guess we will have to assume what might have been his motivation. I thank him for the book for it is a good place to gather the information you need for backup of these pages and pages of information, names and methods of these evil cartels. TRUTH itself is never touched by the bringers--even if they be in evil intent. Truth is Truth is
Truth--from whatever resource. To now deny part of the existence of the Truth therein written is but to prove the fact of it.
I note, again, regarding this author, as with others who claim we USE THEIR MATERIAL--then state that our work is 180 degrees out and "untrue". If we are using his material as claimed--is it not likewise true that HIS IS FALSE?
Chelas, just go by your "guidelines" for discernment and you will be fine. Coleman is terrified and all but rendered helpless by these latest confrontations. His "usefulness" to the adversary is in question and same is about to dump him and his in the trash bin. I have continually offered help and he refuses. I do believe you will find that he allows no confrontation with ME. At onset of "differences" I spoke clearly on the matter and he has refused any interaction, claimed some kind of agreements with Green and refuses to have communion of any sort. To each his own and he may surely go his way with my blessings. I honored the man and enjoyed his company and, in this manner transpiring at present, I see that he will destroy self as subterfuge always eventually accomplishes. The entire family set-up and presentation as well as the "work" is NOT WHAT IT APPEARS TO BE--AND I SUGGEST THAT YOU BEWARE!
Terrifying people over possible malfunction of pace-makers? Dear ones--most of those pace-makers will stop functioning--BUT, in the LIGHTED FREQUENCIES which are coming from the Photon (both in darkness and light because your perception of the rays themselves is erroneous) will allow the heart to pick up its own pacing. Most pace-makers are inserted for the benefit of the DOCTOR at point of surgical placement--not for the benefit of the patient. Surely Dr. Coleman would know as much. Obviously, the good "doctor" who is NOT, in any sense of the term, medically or degree-wise, is in a lot of pain and misery. I cannot help but have compassion on one who bites the very hands that have helped and allowed him to literally survive.
To you, the writer of this communication, I can only offer that you must look from all sides and note why there would be a response that, in fact, denies HIS OWN OUTPUT! So be it. I would add in closing, however, that the other attacks and counter attacks as going on within writers within those "inside information" printers, are most specifically ugly and totally distracting--COULD THAT NOT BE THE REASON FOR SAME? WALK GENTLY UPON THIS BEING FOR HE IS BUT A BROKEN MAN IN TOTAL AGONY--CAUGHT IN A TRAP OF HIS OWN MAKING. MAY OUR APPRECIATION FOR THE SHARING OF THAT WHICH WAS WORTHY BE NOT DIMINISHED AND MAY THE LOVE IN GIVING, BE HEALING UNTO HIM, A BROTHER, IN DESPAIR.
Thank you for writing and for you heartfelt inquiry. Our work will stand, chelas, for it is the time of the sending forth of the Hosts and so we are come, no more and no less. We do not detract from any "man's" work if it be Truth for ours is only to pen the JOURNALS that you might find the confirmation. We have no "group", much less "cult". We write "dated" Journals so that you can refer to that truth presented already on your place. Ours is not for sensationalism or "channeling" to entertain. Ours is a task to "inform" and give information wherein you can become informed in ALL subject matters--IN PREPARATION FOR THAT WHICH IS YET TO COME TO YOU. My pity is often surpassing my compassion for ones who refuse to see and hear.
By the way, not only are there Cosmospheres but they have prevented you from getting any of YOURS up there with them in any effective manner. Moreover, as to photons--WHAT DO YOU THINK THOSE HIGHER INFRARED RAYS TO BE? YOUR OWN SCIENTISTS ARE NOW CALLING THEM "PHOTONS"--AND EVEN THAT TERMINOLOGY IS BUT GENERAL CLASSIFICATION TO DISINFORM YOU AND DRAW YOU AWAY FROM THE TRUTH OF THAT WHICH IS AT HAND.
These assaults are painful to my people--but they are most well-appreciated by me for they only point up the truth of that which we present unto you. Assaults upon my people are not even worthy of comment. All knew at outset that it would be no path of rose-petals. Those who have made their wealth and reputation on lies and misinformation are not happy to have the lies shattered. Ponder it carefully. There is no income gleaned by my scribe for any of this work and the publisher is only "in the financial hole" by offering it unto you. The amount is boggling in output and expenses cannot match income in any measure. It is for the very reason of keeping costs to the reader at minimum that we can continue in the physical presentation at all. Thank you for your support.
Now, please, put this aside--AND GET OUT THERE AND HONOR THAT "OTHER" "LUMINARY", BO GRITZ. HE HOLDS IN HIS MIND THAT WHICH WILL ALLOW YOU TO TURN ABOUT AS A NATION--AND IS WILLING TO PUT HIS ACTIONS WHERE IS HIS MOUTH AT WHATEVER COST TO SELF. HE CAN ONLY DO THESE THINGS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AS PRESIDENT--THEREFORE, YOU MUST MAKE SURE HE IS GIVEN THAT OPPORTUNITY OR THE LAST OPPORTUNITY WILL BE GONE--FOREVER. SALU.
Tags, 상세검색
PJ#054, THE FUNNEL'S NECK
