7/8 페이지 처음처음 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 마지막마지막
Results 13 to 14 of 15

제목: PJ#054, THE FUNNEL'S NECK

  1. #13
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default 응답: PJ#054, THE FUNNEL'S NECK

    PJ 54
    CHAPTER 23
    REC #1 HATONN

    SUN., SEP. 13, 1992 8:54 A.M. YEAR 6, DAY 28

    SUNDAY. SEPTEMBER 13. 1992
    HARPER: "As moral guides, the Golden Rule and the Deca­logue are not evil and dangerous things, like a painkilling drug, to be taken in cautious moderation, if at all. Presuming them to be the basic guides of what is right and good for civilized man, one cannot overindulge in them. GOOD need not be practiced in moderation!"

    TOCQUEVILLE: "The will of man is not shattered, but soft­ened, bent and guided. Men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to be nothing bet­ter than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd."

    * * *
    Before I turn the forum over to Bashar (term meaning: teacher, professor, messenger, commander) Soltec to continue with his sharing of geophysical information as regards your homeland, I need to give input regarding last evening's radio interview. (Tape available thru THE WORD.)

    BASHERS INFECT TALK RADIO.
    The "regular" bashers were available with their discounting as fraud, lies, and other foolishness. This is so very discourteous to all listeners and conversationalists. It is most sad that your society has become so hostile to even Truth-bringers that they have no wish to continue in the sharing. Of course, however, that is the purpose of the insult--to silence the- Truth. For you who ponder the conversations, please realize that I know who are these people (yes, by name and action) and they are NOT my enemy--they are YOURS. Truth flowing at any "age" from any other "age" and sharing of information from how to make tea to how another made tea in France 200 years ago is valid. The obvious, however, is that these ones are totally involved in the stopping of information from both Tesla and Russell from coming into the hands of you people. I simply ask these ones: WHY DO I BOTHER YOU SO MUCH? WHAT IS IT ABOUT EVEN THE POSSIBILITIES OF HIGHER BROTH­ERHOOD THAT CONCERNS YOU ENOUGH TO SPEND YOUR TIME EFFORTING TO SILENCE US? COULD IT BE BECAUSE YOU ARE DISINFORMATION/MIS­INFORMATION PROJECTORS IN EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR LIFE? WHAT CAUSES YOU TO HATE SO TREACHEROUSLY? IT WOULD BE NICE IF YOU WOULD CHECK YOUR ASSOCIATION WITH GOD OF LIGHT, SIRS, BECAUSE I FIND NO FRAGMENT OF EI­THER CONSIDERATION FOR THAT BEING WHICH IS A REFLECTION WITHIN YOU AND NO DESIRE TO ALLOW ANY OTHER THE RIGHT TO HAVE SUCH RELATION­SHIP. BOTH OF YOU TOUT THE REASON OF INTEREST BEING TO "STOP THIS FRAUDULENT WOMAN"--WHY DOES THAT CONCERN YOU SO MUCH?--FOR YOUR DE­MAND IS TO HAVE PROOF OF SOMETHING OR OTHER AND THEN YOU DENY THE TRUTH--SO, IF YOU CON­SIDER YOUR FELLOW-LISTENERS TO BE SO STUPID AS TO BE UNABLE TO HEAR AND DISCERN--WHERE SIRS, DO YOU COME FROM? IF I BE FALSE--WHY DOES IT BOTHER YOU SO GREATLY? YOU FEAST ON THE LIES OF THE 'UFO COMMUNITY AND THE BLATANT NON­SENSE SURROUNDING ALL ELEMENTS OF PRIOR SCI­ENCE AS WORTHY AND FOIST ABDUCTIONS, INTERIM ARCTURIAN VISITORS AND SNATCHERS AND, YET, YOU CANNOT BEAR A HOST MESSENGER OF GOD? INDEED, I WOULD SURELY CHECK MY INTENT WERE I YOU FOR THE LISTENERS HAVE YOU QUITE COR­RECTLY PEGGED AND I, FOR ONE, LOOK GREATLY FORWARD TO OUR NEXT ENCOUNTER--IF YOU DARE! I NOTE THAT EVIL INTENT AND DARK PURPOSE DOES NOT LONG STAND IN MY PRESENCE OF LIGHTED TRUTH WITHOUT BECOMING A TOTAL FOOL. BE IT AS YOU WISH FOR I WOULD MAKE MYSELF AVAIL­ABLE. However, it cheapens the very intent of a program given forth for the people to be able to question and discern pos­sibilities. At some point you who bring disinformation and di­rect affront to Truth shall crawl back in your holes beneath the rocks and yet, even there, ye shall not escape your own in­escapable return unto self of that lie which you send forth upon brother. It is the absolute universal law of cause and effect--that which ye sow so shall ye reap.

    CONTENT OF LIBERATOR
    One asked most graciously if we could offer less on disinforma­tion and cover more information otherwise. What a "dream" it would be for myself and for the ones who do the paper. Alas, we must deal with that which hits us hourly and without respite. Evidently we are doing something "RIGHT" because even the British Intelligence and Mossad send in agents two by two and sometimes by the half dozen to stop us and destroy the WORD of GOD. We are but the messengers. Then, our obligation to you is to bring you that information which is denied you from media resources for, only in the freedom of KNOWING how it IS can you find your way into Truth about destiny and direction. For instance, if it were not for "talk" radio and the daring pa­pers in the "underground" network--YOU WOULD HAVE HAD TOTAL BLACKOUT ON THE INCIDENT IN IDAHO. Would that be bad? Yes indeed, for even if you never heard of one as Bo Gritz, for example, it is the 500 troops ordered in in full assault gear against a citizen which is important. It is the attempt to take the man and the one under assault BOTH into custody to silence his bid for President. These men know enough to bring down the scoundrels in your Government and then you could begin your move back into freedom.

    I realize that your petition was a bit different than that, it was to cease the discussion of personal assault and counter-espousal-­well, you are in the clutches of these same frauds and assault artists at the hands of that very Government mentioned above and one actually has to do with the other and cannot be sepa­rated away. In the case of dark energy presentation to cast doubts at the Truth of our presence--we MUST respond for you can now hear and see how blatant the efforts are to disallow you to know that God's messengers are present. It spoils "their" plan to terrorize you by physical acts and claims which are total fabrication and lies. You of God have no concern save brother­hood from any who come from the Cosmos--THAT IS NOT SO FOR THE EVIL PRONOUNCERS AND DOERS UPON YOUR PLACE. ONES SUCH AS THE TWO DISRUPTIVE CALLERS OF LAST EVENING ARE IN GREAT DANGER BECAUSE THEY ARE THE DECLARED ENEMY OF GOD. We, however, need DO NOTHING unto them--THEY WILL DESTROY THEMSELVES AS THE SEQUENCE UNFOLDS. GOD DESTROYS NOTHING--GOD CREATES. THIS IS PROOF FOR YOU SEEKERS THAT GOD IS LOVE, AL-LOWER, IS NOT OF WAR, FORCE OR INJUSTICE IN ANY FORM. WHEN MONSTERS ARE MANUFACTURED TO HIDE YOUR EYES FROM THE TRUTH OF GOD AND MESSENGERS-THEN YOU CAN KNOW YOUR PROOF IS AVAILABLE THROUGH THE VERY ACTS OF THE ENE­MIES OF GOD.

    What threat to your welfare can myself, my crew and/or our messenger crew be to YOU? We teach Godliness, goodness, love, honor, integrity, family unity and brotherhood--why would ones wish to "shut down this fraud"?(???). IS IT NOT, THEREFORE, OBVIOUS THAT THE DESIRE IS TO STOP THE REVELATION OF EVIL WHICH THESE VERY DENIERS THRUST UPON YOU-THE-UNSUS­PECTING? IF I BE FRAUD, FOR INSTANCE, WHAT DO I "TAKE" FROM YOU? EVEN THE PAPER IN MEN­TION IS COSTING SOME 2 TO 3 THOUSAND DOLLARS IN ARREARS EVERY EDITION. THE JOURNALS ARE NO BETTER AND DO NOT YET EVEN "BREAK EVEN". WHAT DO I (OR WE) TAKE FROM ANY? ARE YOU CURIOUS TO KNOW WHAT CAUSES THIS ASSAULT--REALLY?

    WE CAUSE THE PUBLIC TO STOP THEIR BLIND SUP­PORT OF THE VERY MEN IN POINT WHO CALLED INTO THE PROGRAM LAST EVENING. THEY ARE IN THE DISINFORMATION LIE BUSINESS REGARDING SCIENCE, TESLA, RUSSELL, AND METAPHYSICAL--ALIEN BUSINESS. THEY SELL GARBAGE AND LIES AND WE HURT THEIR BUSINESS--no more and no less. They offer total garbage and lies and SELL IT AT GREAT COST TO YOU IN EVERY WAY FROM MONEY TO DIS­INFORMATION AND WRONG ACTIONS, ALONG WITH WORTHLESS, IF NOT ACTUALLY PHYSICALLY HARMFUL, TRINKETS AND EXPENSIVE JUNK. THIS IS WHY THE ATTACK-THE POINT IS TO SHUT DOWN TRUTH. Ponder it--how many of you even know the differ­ence in a resonance frequency device and a Tesla coil which the first caller denounced as "old" stuff presented in our material? All of Tesla's "stuff" is "old"--the man is dead--but his spirit is alive and well and travels WITH ME--THAT is what "they" want to discredit, dear ones.

    Next "Bob" (I believe you will find his sir name to be Girard of Arcturus Publications who touts the Arcturians as something or other--the whole thing being totally hogwash) wishes to discount "Doris" before you ones find out how totally stupid and erro­neous is his information dished out to you searching brothers. You will find him up to his squinty eyes in such things as Matrix II and III and so on--which delves with the clandestine misin­formation thrust upon earth man by these hoodwinkers. If his name is not now "Girard" then he has simply changed it to something more acceptable after being "called" on his other misadventures upon you-the-people. He is working hand-in­glove with the disinformation bringers and the "insider" buriers of Truth at all costs. I actually have no pick with him at my level for I enjoy the encounter and know that these lessons are better given in this manner than in debate. But you end up the victims if you are not aware and most careful in discernment. If you have no basis upon which to make discernment--you will be pulled to the disinformation of the ones--offering to "save you from this terrible fraud" of "be good to your neighbor and do unto others as you would have them do unto you." My, my--how "fraudulent" can you get?

    How disreputable am I to point out that you are giving $10 Bil­lion to Israel to build Russian housing in stolen land half a world away--when Federal forces are not only NOT giving anything to those in Florida (many of them also Jewish) but are, in fact, evicting citizens from their meagre remaining property at the point of assault weapons.

    How fraudulent am I to point out that the "war" on drugs was not fought out of Homestead base but, rather, that was the biggest ingress/egress point of the drug operation covered by your own government from points south? Is it damaging or fraudulent to show you that Soviets are totally infiltrated within the fiber of your very nation--and you are now socialistically controlled through the lie of Communism which is NOT Com­munist? Which do you suppose bothers these "callers" the most--that we print "old" stuff of Tesla's or NEW STUFF ON THE DISINFORMATION CRIMINALS OF TODAY? I BELIEVE YOU ONES ARE BRIGHT, INTELLIGENT BEINGS GIFTED WITH THE ONE GREAT GIFT OF ALL--ABILITY TO­WARD WISDOM AND INTELLIGENT REASONING AND, THEREFORE, I REPEAT THE QUESTION: "WHICH DO YOU THINK THEY WISH TO STOP"?

    By the way, as you ponder what the man said about Gritz not believing in the "stuff" of Cooper, UFO's, etc. LET IT BE KNOWN RIGHT HERE AND NOW WITHOUT EQUIV­OCATION--NEITHER DO I!! BUT, WE BOTH BELIEVE UNQUESTIONABLY IN THE PRESENCE AND SOURCE OF GOD CREATOR AND IN THAT SERVICE DO WE SERVE--I CERTAINLY DO NOT OFFER SOLACE TO ONES WHO TOUT THE GARBAGE AND LIES OF UFOs AND ALIEN INSECTS, CAT PEOPLE, LIZARDS OR SER­PENTS. ONLY EVIL HAS ENEMIES FROM THE COS­MOS--AND ALL OF YOU HAD BEST THINK ABOUT IT CAREFULLY AS TO WHICH SIDE YOU MAY BE SERV­ING. I AM A MESSENGER OF GOD OF CREATION AND I HAVE NOTHING TO GAIN SAVE A TERRIBLE "HEADACHE" FROM THIS MISSION--UNLESS I CAN AS­SIST YOU IN RECLAIMING THAT WHICH IS YOURS IF YE BE OF GOD'S HOUSE. PERCHANCE THE SPOILERS DO NOT WISH DESTRUCTION OF THEIR OWN NESTS OF EVIL?(????)

    We of the JOURNAL writers do not have any relationship with either the running, business, or operations of the LIBERATOR. The Ekkers have an injunction against any participation, press­ing or suggesting for distribution of material of those JOUR­NALS in compound. I am simply a mundane figment of imagi­nation as outlaid by the adversary in Federal Court--so I can only suggest that there are still some volumes available. I noted as much in a paid advertisement from some unsuspecting dis­tributor--in the LIBERATOR. If any of you are interested in the working outlay of the universe and what IS GOD and what are YOU--I, as a non-entity still suggest you obtain that information for I am not going to repeat it herein--we are going to move on to Mr. Soltec and geophysics. Thank you for allowing me dis­cussion.

    Bless each and all who attend these brave speaker's radio shows and SHARE, SHARE AND SHARE. It is all you have at this time to stay in receiving of TRUTH and YOU MUST BE VERY DISCERNING--FOR THERE ARE FEW HOSTS WHO AL­LOW TRUTH TO BE AIRED. THE ONES WHO DO SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBLE ONES OF SAVING YOUR NATION AND YOUR CONSTITUTION, IF IT BE DONE. I SALUTE THEM AND YOU WHO SUPPORT THEM. YOU ARE DI­RECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INCIDENT IN IDAHO BEING BROUGHT TO A HALT WHILE ANY THERE RE­MAINED ALIVE FOR THE INTENT WAS TO KILL BOTH WEAVER AND GRITZ ALONG WITH THEIR FRIENDS AND PEOPLE WHO WOULD ATTEND THEM. WORSE, THE SPECIAL FORCES HAD RALLIED AND YOU WOULD HAVE TURNED AN "INCIDENT" INTO THE MOST BLOODY REVOLUTION YOUR NATION, OR THE WORLD, WOULD EVER KNOW. THINK UPON IT. GOOD DAY.


    PJ 54
    CHAPTER 24
    REC #2 SOLTEC

    SUN., SEP. 13, 1992 10:26 A.M. YEAR 6, DAY 28

    SUNDAY. SEPTEMBER 13. 1992
    SOLTEC ON GEOPHYSICS.
    (CONTINUED)
    May we please continue on our subject in point beginning today with--

    POROSITY VERSUS PERMEABILITY
    I treat my lectures exactly as I would in a classroom and there­fore I must ask that you refer to prior material so that you might retain continuity. The intent is to give you valid information and not "whiffs" of disjointed, out of sequence, metaphysical in­sight. The HIGHER consciousness and understanding comes through the understanding, first, of that which is perceived and abounds in your manifested experience. We are now in section two of "GROUNDWATER and related problems".

    How much groundwater occurs in any given place and its char­acter and movement depend largely on two variables (1) cli­mate, which controls precipitation, evaporation, and vegetation and (2) peculiarities of the soil and subsurface rock. The great bulk of ground water has simply seeped down from above, but certain rocks and rock materials have a much greater water-holding capacity or porosity than others. Loose sands and grav­els, with their irregular particles allowing a maximum pore space, may contain up to 50 percent water, as can some clays. Sandstones too, although part of their intergrain areas are filled with cement, may be highly porous. On the other hand, dense shales and igneous rocks usually exhibit a very low porosity. But an igneous rock in cooling often develops fissures, joints, or cavities from escaping gases and then, although the rock itself is dense, may be capable of containing large quantities of ground­water. I will have to give you mostly "verbal" visualizing be­cause it seems that, when we utilize diagrams or pictures avail­able to others for your use, our people end up in courtrooms for trespass. So, therefore, effort to visualize a piece of lava "rock substance". You would find that a stratum of vesicular lava is not only porous, for instance, but highly permeable. The "frothy" appearance results from escaping gases as the lava congealed through cooling.

    Next, to understand the subject of "Groundwater", you must un­derstand what is meant by and importance of--

    THE WATER TABLE
    Assuming a considerable depth of homogeneous permeable ma­terial, the groundwater table is the top of the saturated rock. In a humid region this may be quite near the surface or even coin­ciding with it after a particularly heavy rain. But normally it is at least a few feet down, overlain by a layer of loose soil where water is rapidly lost through evaporation and transpiration. This zone of soil water or vadose water is generally within the reach of plant roots and reflects immediately day-to-day or even hour-­to-hour weather fluctuations, so that characteristically it is satu­rated for only short periods of time and more often than not holds as much air as water in its pores.

    Under usual conditions a water table will roughly approximate the contours of the terrain that it underlies, higher under the hills and declining under valleys. This fact can allow you to un­derstand WHY, if the groundwater is contaminated by any substance, it will contaminate great portions of that which is resid­ing in the "water table". The seepage will be basically horizon­tal to the layer of the rock or clay "table" itself. If a pollutant or whatever is contaminating the water supply is heavy enough it will lodge onto the substance of the "table" itself and therefore, contamination remains in a proliferating state for great lengths of time if, for instance, the contaminate is a heavy metal such as mercury, lithium, etc. These contaminates would be most often (in your current daily use) from such things as toxic wastes, pesticides and fertilizers--even to excrement wastes which are resultant from the body cleansing through its organs (kidneys and hepatic systems) such poisons and toxins. Microbiologic contamination is, of course, through these same routes of passage except when intentionally introduced as is being done to your water supplies at the present time. Some con­taminants thrive for only a brief while but others remain in various states of activity or dormancy depending on envi­ronment and stability of host liquidity. Crystalline viruses, for instance, never simply "go away", they simply go inactive or "dormant" until proper "life supply" is present.

    Groundwater percolates downslope and its upper margin thus as­sumes the gradient of a surface stream; like a surface stream, it discharges into the master drainage artery in the valley. The river at the valley bottom may receive the groundwater dis­charge directly via springs as it intersects the water table, or if the river itself is slightly above the water table, the coarse sands and gravels of its bed will intercept the flow and direct it down the valley under the surface waters of the river. Swamps, rivers, or the sea, which occupy the lowest point of a given re­gion, act as regulators of the slope of that region's water table. Loss of water supply, as during an extended dry period, will cause the water table to flatten out and be found at an in­creasingly greater depth beneath the hills, but it will continue to intersect the surface in the valleys; as long as any gradient at all is maintained, groundwater will percolate downslope. This is most well demonstrated in septic systems in areas unconnected to central sewer systems.

    Wells bored below the water table will produce water, but how rapidly they will refill themselves after emptying is determined by the permeability of the rock. No matter how permeable the rock or how humid the climate, too many wells will lower the water table, and increasingly deeper bores will be required to tap groundwater. Obviously, an inventory of the groundwater resources should be undertaken before uncontrolled well boring takes place--a procedure that has seldom been followed any­where in the world until the water table has been lowered drasti­cally and disaster is imminent.

    This information will be lost on second or third generation city dwellers for, to them, water simply comes ready to use from a faucet at the sink.

    Let us consider, because it is an excellent example, the Santa Clara Valley in California, a region of irrigated orchards and, more recently, burgeoning urbanization. Here you have illus­tration of the results of continued overdraft on the ground water supplies. The increasing depths of wells through the years is easily demonstrated.

    RESERVOIRS AS RECHARGERS
    Groundwater levels can go both ways--water can be put back into the ground as well as taken out--and it is not absolutely nec­essary to stand around thirsty for 40 years waiting for the natu­ral rainfall to do the job for you. You would utilize retaining reservoirs. Climate does not have to change dramatically nor suddenly have more rainfall in the case of ability to "store" wa­ter. Neither would you have to have new and exotic water brought in from somewhere else. It becomes a matter of driving a maximum of the surface water downward into underground strata instead of letting it run back to the sea unused. The spe­cial rainfall peculiarity of the Santa Clara Valley (and much of California in fact) is that all the rain arrives in a few winter months and the long-empty stream channels, frequently grown up with brush and weeds, simply cannot handle the runoff. The result is serious flooding as well as the loss of extremely valu­able fresh water that would have been so welcome the summer before. It is very embarrassing to drown some winter after go­ing bankrupt in a farming venture the previous summer for lack of moisture, I would assume. Worse, the food supply for stor­age is cut drastically by poor management.

    You can solve a number of these problems through the utiliza­tion of a series of impound reservoirs.

    It serves as a flood control measure, saving for beneficial use winter flood water that would have, at best, been lost to the sea, or at worst, drowned people and destroyed property.

    It provides lakes for recreational use and it recharges the un­derground water system.

    What of this last condition? Why worry about it? Let's just as­sume use of the water right directly from the reservoir. Water can be diverted directly from such a reservoir, but if the bottom of the holding basin is at all porous, a certain amount of water can be added to the underground supply at the same time and a great deal more can be forced downward if it is drawn off and spread out in shallow percolating beds below the dam place­ment.

    EVAPORATION FROM RESERVOIRS
    One of the beauties of storing water underground rather than on the surface is to negate almost completely the loss through evap­oration. Unhappily, the places in the world that find themselves in need of water storage are frequently those with long hot summers and low humidity. Under these conditions the effects of evaporation can be enormous. No two reservoirs evaporate at precisely the same rate, variations depending on such things as climate, dimensions of surface exposure, percolation, and so on, but recent experiments in the northern Negev region of Is­rael indicated a loss in excess of 75 percent from evaporation alone. Obviously, any method of cutting down on such a loss rate must receive serious consideration. Some interesting work with the use of nontoxic chemical films to inhibit evaporation appears to hold real promise for both reservoirs and percolating beds, especially those that are not to be utilized for recreation. Water skiers and motor boats are not wholly compatible with an effective film. Some reservoirs in more closely guarded areas are simply covered with various coverings and now in use in widespread areas are domed covers which are most attractive as well as utilitarian.

    SEA WATER INCURSION
    In regions draining to the sea the groundwater approximation of the surface flow delivers fresh water via springs or seepages at about sea level. If well overdraft occurs upslope in the system, hydraulic pressure is diminished and salty water from the sea can invade the porous underground strata. This means that the normally fresh-water coastal-plain wells will be "salted out", often a local disaster, unless a certain minimum groundwater table can be maintained.

    Further, there is the readily observable reciprocal relationship between the level of lake, pond, swamp, and streams and ade­quate groundwater. Since much of the surface water feeds the underground strata, a lowered water table increases the with­drawal through percolation, thus lowering their level. But most of these surface water features, because of their location at val­ley bottoms or local terrain sags, also receive groundwater per­colation from upslope. So in essence, each sustains the other. Farm ponds, reservoirs, and flooded percolation beds are generally recommended by the regional planner as effective aids in stabilizing stream flow as well as lake levels.

    WATER QUALITY
    Of equal if not more important than the mere availability of wa­ter is its quality. It is hard enough to keep it potable on its own merit but with deliberate contamination it is all but im­possible to recover to a pure state of safety. If pollutants are of heavy metals and toxic waste infiltration OR crystalline life-forms, it is years, if at all, in the total recovery from contamination if known neutralizers are not introduced. In your age, the contamination is most often intentional and the counter-agents necessary for purification to drinking standards are denied public access. The point was "destruction" in the first place so "healing the cause" is not the intent un­der any circumstances as long as the enemy is in control.

    There is no use having water if you cannot use it. Not too many years ago it was a virtual article of faith that natural filtration would rejuvenate any water supply no matter how badly it had been polluted. After all, wasn't even raw sewage, the epitome of effluvial pollution, susceptible to cleansing by filtration? Thus the whole process of forcing surface waters underground to be withdrawn via springs and wells boasted the great merit of purification. But, increasingly, the variety of chemical waste products that contaminate your streams includes elements that defy the simple purge of filtration. Especially notable are in­sidious pesticides and insecticides, chemical detergents and a number of industrial wastes too lengthy to go into herein.

    There is the additional problem that groundwater, although often less polluted than surface water, is frequently "hard". This sim­ply means that in its passage through porous strata it has taken salts into solution, a part of its normal function as an agent of gradation, but one which affects its utility to humans greatly. The degree of hardness varies greatly depending on the charac­ter of underground rock and the water's temperature (heat as an industrial discharge into a stream can contribute to hard groundwater as well as destroying the immediate surface ecol­ogy). Often hard water merely means that soap lathers with dif­ficulty and moderate salt deposits build up in household plumb­ing (hot water pipes are particularly susceptible to the ac­cumulation of deposits in regions utilizing "hard" water for household consumption), but hardness can be so severe as to at­tain the saltiness of seawater and the water becomes totally unusable for either irrigation or drinking. All of this is not to imply that only groundwater can be hard, but it is much more common than in freely moving rivers as comparison.

    SOLVING THE WATER PROBLEM
    And now, of course, is that $164,000,000,000 (inflation consid­ered) question. How do you attempt to solve your dual-faceted water problem: (1) sufficient water in the right places at the right time and (2) water of an acceptable quality for general utility? There is no question that a problem exists larger than life itself, even if you were to assume a static world population--an unlikely situation for some time to come. However, even as you have decreasing populations due to intentional depopu­lation--you are left with such things as contaminated water supply (contaminated in the direct effort to depopulate). If you ignore, for the moment, the desalinization of the ocean wa­ter (for our subject is "groundwater") we are left with having to face the dilemma head-on. Simple drinking water for the world's hordes involves a huge volume in itself, compounded many times as humans agglomerate into an urban environment of flush toilets and green lawns. Agriculture dependent on the irrigation ditch is even more demanding of water on a per-acre basis than the housing tract, while heavy industry, always care­fully sited on a freshwater lake or large river, uses the most water of all.

    TRANSPORTATION
    We have already considered the principle of conserving wet-sea­son surplus moisture in reservoirs and underground holding basins for use during the dry season. But let us apply this same kind of thinking on a regional basis. Now we have to get into the concept of transporting water from surplus to deficit regions. This is old stuff. The pipe was invented to take water out of the river and into the house, or to move it clear into the next county, or to transfer it from the wet side of the mountains to the dry side as in the instance of the Rockies in Colorado under the Continental Divide to the dry side, or to impel it 300 miles out into the Australian desert to the gold mines of Kalgoorlie, or to transport it 1000 miles from northern California to the south, or from one place in Hawaii to the cane fields. Why not trans­port Columbia River water to the arid southwest, or Mackenzie River water to the Great Basin, or even the Ob or Yenesei River water to Kazakhstan (they really need it right now with all the trouble in their newly acquired "FREEDOM"). It seems that the only limit is need coupled with engineering and cost feasi­bility. But Washingtonians are not likely to react with great enthusiasm to a redirected Columbia, or Canadians to the use of Mackenzie water to irrigate the orange groves. Neither were Northern Californians and Mexicans particularly thrilled when their water went elsewhere, but standing up and saying so proved to be no deterrent to "progress". The problem comes in agreeing on a point where local regional interests and human aesthetic values become as important as the efficient use of re­source. You must utilize your resource, but perhaps when you come to the point of substituting the word "ration" for "efficient" (and then define rational to the satisfaction of one and all--not likely), you may be on the right track at least.

    RECYCLING
    All of this leads to an emphasis on more efficacious use of that wondrous commodity you now have, and the key term here is recycling. Water is never used up. If you drink it, flush it, wash in it or irrigate with it, the water is returned sooner or later somewhat changed and that is called "polluted". The trick, therefore, is to clean it up. This operation can be two- or even threefold in its benefits, at minimum. First, if you can eliminate all of the harmful side effects of pollution or contamination such as water-borne human disease, destruction of wild life, stench, and so on, it is well worth almost any cost involved. Second, the by-products might aid in cutting down that cost, as your Milwaukee city discovered years ago when its sewage treatment operations yielded a profitable commercial fertilizer. [called Milorganite] There are other such by-products available now through ozone use and other methods for reclamation of actual soil replacement from the solid wastes rendered completely neutral in content. Do you not see, however, that these methods cut out massive money acquisition projects to the Elite blood­suckers of your society? Salts from distillation and productive use of energy derived from cooling hot-water pollution are fur­ther examples. Finally, of course, there is the reason behind the original effort: clean water to be used again. If drinking recy­cled sewage water is shocking to your sensibilities, be reassured that you have been doing exactly that for all the years of life cy­cles on your place. Most towns on rivers draw their drinking water from upstream and discharge their sewage downstream. In Texas, as humorous rivals in Dallas and Fort Worth, there was a saying--Dallas, flush your toilets, Fort Worth needs the water. Rather crude, but applicable to the subject. If there were only one town per river this system might work, but there are usually great numbers of people upstream and a little filtra­tion and a dash of chlorine (deadly poison) is your only protec­tion. Actually, carefully monitored recycling, operating under an enforced master code, ensures higher quality water than most of you usually take into your systems. Now that you have de­liberate contamination by harder to cleanse substances, the problem is epidemic in proportion.

    AQUIFERS
    Thus far, we have been discussing rock with a certain homo­geneity of permeability, but this is not always the case, for many different strata may be present underlying a given region, each with its own characteristics. An important occurrence is a per­meable layer, such as sandstone, confined between impervious strata and tilted so that it intersects the surface. Water entering the exposed sandstone outcrop percolates along it as if in a pipe. But normal groundwater will be limited to the zone above this confined aquifer, for the impervious layer immediately atop the sandstone stops its downward movement and also acts as a bar­rier between free association of the water in the aquifer and the groundwater. Shallow wells plumb only the local groundwater that is subject to the vagaries of seasonal rainfall and, if the re­gion is arid, is easily exhausted. But wells tapping the deeper aquifer assure themselves of a more continuous supply, espe­cially if the intake is in a better watered area. Also, since the permeable surface outcrop is often the highest point in the aquifer, wells drilled to this lower level are usually artesian be­cause of the hydraulic pressure within the closed system. As long as the outlet is lower than the intake, water will rise in the well. Some will flow; others merely show a rise of level above that of the general water table. In either case the term "artesian" is applied (taken from the first recognized well of this type in the French province of Artois and since pushed off on you as expensive and exclusive drinking water).

    One of the largest artesian systems in the world underlies much of the interior Queensland and northern New South Wales in Australia. Here a confined and highly permeable gravel bed re­ceives water at its highest point in the humid Great Dividing Range and carries it for almost a thousand miles west beneath an arid to semiarid country where water is at a very high premium. Many hundreds of bores tap this aquifer, supplying life to what would otherwise be desolate unusable country. But inevitably, too much water has been withdrawn and most wells that at one time flowed freely at the surface now must be pumped. And too, the quality of the water seriously deteriorates with the dis­tance it moves through the aquifer so that only in the eastern half of the basin is salinity low enough for reasonable utility. Even here the water is too brackish for general irrigation and is used only for watering stock.

    In the Lake Eyre Basin, below sea level although in the heart of the continent, the lower end of the aquifer reaches the surface. The highly saline water flows out here as artesian springs, evap­orating almost as rapidly as it appears and depositing salts around each outlet. These are called mound springs, building up to a foot or two in height, and are a result of artesian water under great pressure, high salinity, and an extreme rate of evap­oration.

    Similar artesian systems are found in many other parts of the world, although none is as large as that in Australia. The Dakota sandstone, underlying the northern Great Plains, has its intake in the Rockies and is a major source of water for an extensive semiarid region. North of the Po River in Italy is a line of flowing springs, the Fontanili. Fed by melting snows in the Alps, the underground water moves down through an aquifer of coarse glacial and alluvial material. Many of the north Saharan oases exist because aquifers transport Atlas Mountain waters a long distance out into the desert to reappear as springs.

    One of your U.S. most important Aquifers is under portions of Texas and irrigates the great grain and natural growing fields of Deaf Smith County area, etc. Wouldn't you guess that this is the area contemplated for massive nuclear waste disposal--in pipes and containers sunk into and through that aquifer? How safe do you feel with the "beast" in charge of your very existence?

    If you would measure simply the total volume of water delivered per hour, perhaps the most remarkable series of springs any­where in the world also occurs in the U.S.--in the Snake River canyon of southern Idaho. Here for 10 miles upstream from the town of Hagerman literally thousands of vigorously flowing springs issue from a porous stratum exposed along the north wall of the defile. Nobody seems to be absolutely certain where this huge volume of water originates but two bits of evidence point to a likely source: (1) there are no tributaries of any kind entering the Snake from the north for a 200-mile stretch short of Hagerman; this despite the high Rockies and Continental Divide not too far off and (2) there are several streams draining south­ward from the Rockies, notably the sizable Lost Rivers, which disappear abruptly into porous lava beds.

    If this is indeed the source of the Snake River springs, then you must visualize an aquifer, probably a buried vesicular lava sheet connecting the Lost River sinks with canyon wall flows. Vesic­ular lava, when molten, is highly charged with gases and, as it cools and congeals, the tiny apertures created by the escaping gases result in an exceptionally permeable layer. The under­ground water does not percolate sedately through this kind of aquifer but flows virtually unimpeded as in a pipe.

    HOT GROUNDWATER
    The heat gradient of the earth's crust, that is, the increase of heat with increase of depth, may affect groundwater moving along a deeply buried aquifer. Theoretically, there is a depth limit to rock that can contain water, for at several miles down, the pressures exerted by overlying strata are such that rock pore space becomes inadequate to accommodate a liquid. Water may be present but it is chemically combined in the rocks. But above this limit, sufficient heat still exists to raise the temperature of moving groundwater, and when it discharges, the water is in the form of a thermal spring. This type of spring is not rare, but much more common are the hot springs, geysers and steam vents associated with regions of recently active volcanism. Here the heat of the earth's interior has been brought well up into the crust where it is easily encountered by even very shallow groundwater. Such well known tourist attractions as Yel­lowstone Park, the Rotorua district of New Zealand, and Iceland are fantastic assemblages of every conceivable type of thermal phenomenon, and each is underlain by hot volcanic rocks. To be sure, cooling magma emits hot water, steam, and other gases so that all of this activity is not wholly a result of heated groundwater, but surface waters percolating downward to con­tact the hot rocks below are without doubt an important element.

    Hot springs originating in this manner may achieve very high temperatures indeed, many reaching the boiling point. If the heat is even greater, then the water becomes steam and issues through vents in the rock as jets. The term fumarole or solfa­tara is usually applied if the pure steam is contaminated with magmatic gases and emits an odor. You will find many such outbreaks along the old volcanic mountains around Mt. Shasta and specifically notable in great numbers about Mt. Lassen. Geysers, which are merely intermittently eruptive thermal springs, are of this same origin. They require a long tube reaching from the surface to the heated rocks below. As the tube fills, the superheated water at the bottom is under too much pressure from the above to turn into steam, but when all of the water reaches the boiling point and some bubbles out at the top, pressure is released and the water at the bottom flashes into steam causing an eruption. The great volume thrown out by many geysers indicates that an underground reservoir must also be present, interconnected with the tube.

    GEOTHERMAL POWER
    Violent forces such as geysers and steam jets are not merely so much spectacular scenery but have occasionally been put to pro­ductive use. A pioneer venture in the volcanic sub-Appenines of Italy was producing practical electricity from natural steam as early as 1913, and Luther Burbank was involved in drilling shallow steam wells at The Geysers near Santa Rosa, California, in the 1920s. These are still, under new management of course, among the most efficient and largest even today. In addition, important projects are operative in New Zealand, Japan, Iceland, Mexico and Chile, and experimental work is under way and/or operative in many other nations.

    Ones who have no understanding of the forces involved remain under the delusion that somehow if you tap this resource you "ruin" or destroy the source. NO, you only utilize a renewable resource ad infinitum. To say, for instance, that if the "Prophet" settlement utilized hot springs in their location that it would destroy the Yellowstone geysers is about as absurd as you can get under any circumstance. This is the problem with ignorance, it is so infectious as to the lie perpetrated for the purpose of destroying that which would otherwise be useful and beautiful in recycling.

    Electrical power derived from the geothermal resource is not re­ally much different from that of a normal coal or oil-fired ther­mal plant in its basic scheme. Coal burned under a boiler pro­duces steam, which is directed to the turbine blades of an elec­trical generator. But in the geothermal plant, nature supplies the fuel and the boiler and there is a huge theoretical cost advantage not to mention lesser air pollution. Natural steam and hot water, however, are always, to some degree, contaminated by dis­solved salts and gases and consequently corrosion and scaling of the equipment results. For example, near Southern California's Salton Sea is an immense underground hot water reservoir but, up until now, its utilization has been impeded by equally im­mense salt content. Further, hot waste water and brine dis­charges are sometimes difficult to deal with.

    TESLA PUMP
    There is a pump/turbine system which can handle such water but you still have the problem of corrosion on other parts of the equipment. However, Tesla produced a bladeless pump which functions on the basis of a "boundary" layer and after motion is begun no water touches the blade itself. This pump can be "reversed" and becomes a turbine for production of power. This same type pump can be utilized for the pumping of every­thing from potato peels to sand-laden crude oil. The ones who have continued to work on the product, however, have been pushed out of business by the Elite industrial giants who produce other types of pumps. This same pump in proportionate sizing can even pump blood with NO damage to cells--simply by sizing the apertures (space between the discs)--because the substance never touches the blades after motion is instigated. Just another "old" Tesla device disallowed perfection for your use.

    PHOTON BELT POWER
    Don't regard geothermal power as the universal substitute for traditional power (energy) sources any more than you would re­gard wind as such--for ultimately you will only find the sun or "solar" energy to fill that need. It will come from the photon rays which are becoming ever more powerful as you enter into more gamma-ray and higher frequency "x-rays". These are simply light particles, or photons, in the invisible range and with immensely penetrating capability.

    MINERAL SOLUTIONS IN WATER
    The very fact that a large proportion of your groundwater is hard or even brackish is an indication that in all of its movement's groundwater is taking into solution and removing mineral matter from the rocks through which it passes. Even perfectly clear cold water has the ability to dissolve some minerals or to combine chemically with the rock to form new minerals. But groundwater is seldom clear, since it must pass through overly­ing material as it percolates downward to become groundwater. Decomposing vegetation on the surface and the soil below it adds elements that give the water certain solvent characteristics and then, depending on the type of rock it encounters, the water reacts chemically with those rocks. If the water is heated, it frequently becomes a much more efficient solvent and, in the process of being heated, will often pick up various new elements from magmatic gases.
    KARST: WATER-DISSOLVED FORMATIONS
    An excellent example of the sort of solution activity in which groundwater can engage is the removal of calcium carbonate by either hot or cold water with a high carbon dioxide content. Percolating through the cracks in a massive underground lime­stone stratum, such groundwater can etch out sizable cavities in a relatively short time. Given a longer time, such huge caverns as Carlsbad and Mammoth Cave result. Eventually, the terrain above these caves can be affected as the roof supports are re­moved and slumping and cave-ins manifest themselves at the surface in deep holes called sinks or dolines. Normal surface streams may disappear into such sinks only to reappear many miles away having flowed as an underground river through the cave. In Central Florida where the groundwater level is high, these sinks become lakes. Further solution within the cave will cause increased slumping until the original surface all but disap­pears and the landscape takes on a fantastic lunar aspect of sharp eroded spires. Eventually, even these become subdued through the activity of wind and rain, erosion, and weathering. Such a landscape deriving its character from the continued expansion of solution caverns beneath it, is called karst, after the region in Yugoslavia where this type of landform was first described. It would be a bit easier to picture if we have fully discussed the geomorphic cycle that karst landscapes display and I hope that at some point we can go into that as a subject. My great joy is in teaching and sharing, and it is most unfortunate to be always so limited in ability to give as all that I know would benefit you so greatly. We must, however, work with that which can be given and accepted in a sequence pertinent to happenings.

    DEPOSITION OF WATER CONTENTS
    CAVE DEPOSITS
    All "solution" is admittedly not scenic, but it is a constant pro­cess and, over the centuries, an effective one. And if there is solution and removal of materials, there must be deposition. Sometimes deposition is long delayed as when the charged water finds its way to the sea, adding its bit to the salt content there, and it remains for the sea to accomplish the deposition. Fre­quently, however, some deposition occurs along the route to the sea. Course aquifers become indurated, mineral layers build up around spring outlets, and colorful crystals develop in rock cav­ities. If a cave is open to the atmosphere, lime-rich water drip­ping from the ceiling partially evaporates and deposits hanging needles (stalactites) to be matched by counter-needles on the floor (stalagmites) where each drop evaporates further.

    PETRIFIED WOOD
    Even such elements as silicon, normally strongly resistant to solution, may be taken up by certain types of warm groundwater and redeposited. Where organic remains such as tree trunks gradually decompose, each molecule is faithfully replaced by silicon to give you petrified wood. Other minerals too, many of them valuable economically, are concentrated by this process of groundwater replacement. What causes groundwater to give up its minerals? Cooling of hot water may account for wood depo­sition; evaporation and chemical change as new elements are taken into solution, or the activity of specialized plants such as those that give color to some hot springs are responsible else­where. So groundwater constantly dissolves, transports, and deposits and thus is deserving of recognition as at least a moder­ate gradational agent along with wind, waves, ice, and running water.

    WHY IS THIS LESSON PERTINENT?
    CONTAMINATION (DELIBERATE) OF WATER
    The reason it is so timely is that the first contamination of water supplies, especially in rural areas, is going to be through the wells and groundwater systems for "tampering" is harder to dis­cover and usually there are less sophisticated persons involved. In great population areas, contamination is introduced in "substation" covered areas to hopefully prevent original recog­nition of tampering. Before you are done with this game--whole cities will be shut down because of total contamination--but with contaminates which will not be discovered until their introduc­tion is well under way and without capability of PROVING de­liberate contamination.

    Laboratories are not geared up to even reveal or isolate such contaminates as these new crystalline virus forms so water sup­plies will be pronounced "safe" when, in fact, they are not. Contamination itself will not usually be discovered or considered in most epidemics of "flu", etc., because the water tested is for the same old expected contaminates. It will be through other happenstance that things will call attention, for where you have one organism or substance present--other things are tattle-tale. Always it will be that deliberate contamination will be masked by already present disease symptoms which delay further the isolation of causative organisms or substance. This is exactly what is happening in this local Golden Hills area. You have wells and groundwater usage from areas wherein contamination was easily introduced and separation is handled at the separation lines of Tehachapi proper. That does not mean it won't creep over into the supply but some of the other water comes from other resources than does the water for Golden Hills. The con­tamination of the prison in the area, for instance, can be totally controlled and isolated--then purged to show no evidence of de­liberate tampering, causing it to be accepted that Hepatitis is passed from person to person instead of via the main water sup­ply.

    CONFIRMATION?
    As we sit to finish this writing, we already have confirmation of my projections coming forth. E.J. just now delivered an article (I believe brought in by Dr. Young) on this subject which is headed: FEAR OF FAUCETS, Do our water-treatment plants protect us against dangerous viruses in our drinking water?

    It is too lengthy to take up the subject in this writing but we will present it to you at our next sitting.

    Thank you Dharma, for your secretarial service; it is good to be working closely again for old friendships are comfortable and renewing to purpose and intent of missions. I appreciate being asked to share from time to time and look forward to more ex­tensive insight into great geophysical phenomena and evolve­ment of continents and even planets. Since I will probably not sit with you in the reprinting of the information, I shall look forward to sharing again and would bid you good-day and God­speed. I salute you ones for your ongoing and endless service. I do not use the term "tireless" for I witness that you are all to­tally "tired". We make progress, however, and in the ending--THAT shall make the day. Salu.

    Soltec to clear and relinquish frequency and to you ones who are "frequency" monitors, I do not utilize Gyeorgos Hatonn's circuit or frequency. We do, however, seem to work it out quite nicely. May peace prevail. Adonai.

  2. #14
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default 응답: PJ#054, THE FUNNEL'S NECK

    PJ 54
    CHAPTER 25
    REC #1 HATONN

    MON., SEP. 14, 1992 8:06 A.M. YEAR 6, DAY 29

    MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1992,
    KNOW WHAT YOU FACE WITH CONTAMINATED
    WATER FROM VIRUS
    You-the-people will be told that there is no virus found in the water supply which is contaminated. We speak here about the specific location of Golden Hills (Tehachapi area), Calif. It is brought home because I am HERE and you ones will "listen" to me and act. I do not yet have audience elsewhere who will act quickly enough to make impact.

    We have gone through the entire process and explanation of "Groundwater" because in THIS instance it is groundwater which is in point but the entire water supply of your nation is contaminated. To understand and realize this I ask that you read on and digest the entire written offering--NOT just personal pe­rusal and then toss aside if you think you live on the safe side of the the break-down point of the piping system. Tehachapi is in trouble also but no one has told you. Due to drought you all have terrible water for consumption and a whole nation is being contaminated with substance (viruses) which cannot be ever "cured". It may seem a small issue now but think what happens as the excretion from sick ones produces even more contamina­tion for these particular viruses are NOT KILLED by any cur­rent water treatment methods.

    I ask my ones to act TODAY to get action going--BEFORE this paper is released because you will be swamped with calls and pleas for help after it comes public.

    Be prepared to field calls.

    You may wish to have extra phones manned so prepare volun­teers. We will offer no more than backup services until com­munity response and volunteer help arrives. If it does not ar­rive, then do the best you can but do not dwell on other than immediate personnel if others refuse to carry their own respon­sibilities. "Individual" frivolous suits will only be distraction and cause NO RECLAMATION AT ALL FOR ANYONE--SO PLEASE, USE YOUR HEADS. ONES IN OUR MIDST WHO ARE HERE ONLY TO PULL US DOWN HAD BEST TAKE A GOOD HARD LOOK AT THEMSELVES AND ACTIONS FOR YOU ARE ONLY DAMAGING SELVES. I WILL NOT WALK ONE STEP OUT OF MY WAY TO HELP MY EN­EMY WHEN MY OWN ARE PERSECUTED. PONDER IT CAREFULLY!

    As you read backup information it is going to be a temptation to forget what the Constitutional Law Center (CLC) is actually doing, i.e., prosecuting a Board of Directors, etc. This revolves not so much around the water itself but rather in the KNOWING of the danger and refusing to alert the public. Keep focus or you shall be distracted into avenues of response which are not going to serve your cause. The "Board" couldn't probably help the "cause" or contamination--but that they have known and failed to act, is the charge in point. The water problems are an entirely different matter and need separate attention--immedi­ately. However, you begin where you can make impact and get publicity before you can actually CHANGE a system.

    HEPATIC DAMAGE
    Ones with hepatic damage already present are targets for death and it will never be told what was the cause of death. This as­sault is planned to serve that very need--depopulation without knowledge of cause of death. If you are an abuser of drugs cleansed through the liver, a Lupus diagnosed person with organ involvement (this will always include "liver") or a simple "alcoholic" or frequent user to the extent of even minor damage to the hepatic system--YOU ARE A TARGET.

    It IS the contaminant in the water right now which causes im­mediate reaction to the source problem in the liver of the hu­man. The REAL culprit is that which affects the liver and also causes the various forms of Hepatitis (meaning: inflammation of the liver). The pathogen works in concert with the substance al­ready present as toxins to and in the liver and causes exactly what you witness in Hepatitis, etc. The toxins are in the hepatic system and when stricken by this particular type of virus there is a major reaction, illness and, in damaged persons, full blown seizures, convulsions, heart inflammation, heart/lung inflamma­tion, heart "attack", symptoms of Hepatitis and Mononucleosis (general fatigue, malaise and liver damage symptoms of all kinds). There will be a reaction to fatty foods and an inability to break down glucose properly; this being response of the mito­chondria in inability to properly function. The seizures are the most damaging and some will have been having them under certain circumstances without realizing it. There WILL BE NO MEMORY OF THE ACTUAL SEIZURE ITSELF. This will manifest in signs of falling, loss of bladder and/or bowel con­trol, bruising from damage during falls at onset of seizure---IN AN ALCOHOL RELATED SITUATION IT WILL OCCUR MOST OFTEN FOLLOWING GASTROENTERITIS AND NO INTAKE OF SUBSTANCE.

    The response of paramedics and hospital attendants will be "withdrawal" but in actuality the symptoms will not mimic fully withdrawal or substance seizures. In fact, the patient will usu­ally be considered well and be discharged within a very short time if brought to emergency care.

    If admitted for hospitalization, the diagnosis will most likely be listed as Hepatitis (if organism can be isolated) or Lupus for this virus gives symptoms and can even mimic test results found in Lupus. This is exactly the WAY AIDS WAS INTRODUCED--BEHIND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES BUT IN THE U.S. IN THE INOCULATIONS AGAINST HEPATITIS.

    The virus introduced will, at some time shortly noted, be categorized as an AIDS causing virus. It is already on the list as revised. Check first your prison populations and then the general public--you will find Hepatitis B and C now listed as "epidemic" in some states, such as California.

    There are great interesting observations to make. Check what is happening--especially in households where there is a known al­coholic--AS THAT PERSON STOPS DRINKING. THE SYMPTOMS WILL EXACERBATE IN ALL INSTANCES. THERE ARE NOW ADDITIVES INTO WINES AND ESPE­CIALLY THE "CLEAR" ALCOHOLIC SUBSTANCES WHICH ARE INTRODUCED TO INTERACT WITH THE VIRUS IN POINT. IT IS JUST AS A HERPES (COLD SORE) WILL BREAK FORTH UNDER GIVEN CIRCUMSTANCES. THIS, JUST AS A HERPES VIRUS, IS NEVER CURED OR KILLED--IT WILL REMAIN IN THE BODY FOR THE REST OF THE LIFESPAN, READY TO BECOME ACTIVE IN GIVEN SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES, USUALLY ACCOM­PANIED BY SEVERE STRESS.

    In the situation wherein you have damage attack severe enough to affect the nervous system you have a really potentially deadly setup. The same symptoms will be going on in affected areas, in hundreds of households. If the person, for instance, is an al­cohol user you can expect the worst responses to come with no intake of substance. If you have persons with other causes and diagnoses (i.e., Lupus) you will have myocardial response in all probability with or without other symptoms but severe illness and acute (almost instant and sometimes "instant") response to simply a "drink of water" almost as in the response to rabies in­fection.

    As the liver becomes compromised the brain neuron interrup­tions result in seizures or heart attacks and usually the actual cause of symptoms is MISdiagnosed.

    "YELLOW" JAUNDICE A CLUE
    Your major CLUE in this local contamination report is the printed word regarding symptoms wherein "jaundice" is one of the symptoms along with gastrointestinal upheavals. Jaundice is ALWAYS resultant of a compromise insult to the hepatic (liver)-billiary system. If jaundice is present, as it was with per­sons immediately in point--the toxin is already at work and the person is already in toxic response in a major way. It may not be apparent but the liver is under severe attack and this is irre­versible damage. If symptoms are allowed to continue there will be total nervous system response and actual brain damage resulting in seizures and ultimate mental incapacity.

    The population is TRAINED to BLAME whatever APPEARS most obvious. That is intentional so that no one notices until AFTER the damage is done that anything is going on. The re­actions will occur first in already compromised systems and therefore diagnosis will be missed in the first complaints and, therefore, there will be no assault against the perpetrators until AFTER the disease is in full-blown epidemic proportion. Just as AIDS was intended for a certain segment to miss detection in time to stem the process, so is this next onslaught of introduced death-viruses. This will hit, first, the alcohol and drug users and those already compromised by systemic dis-ease such as hepatitis and systemic lupus.

    I DON'T KNOW HOW TO MAKE YOU SEE, CHELAS, YOU ARE UNDERGOING TOTAL AND DEADLY ATTACK AND FEW ARE ABLE TO SHAKE OFF THE SHACKLES OF BLIND IGNORANCE TO TAKE ACTION IN TIME TO STOP THIS INSANITY.

    Dharma, I ask that the items brought as confirmation be placed herein--if I cannot cause you to look at this--perhaps you will SEE SOLID EVIDENCE. I know that you ones had no access to this information prior to my introduction of the matter--but please do not waste time in pondering and lingering over possi­ble reactions of the public--GET IT OUT THERE! YOU ONES ARE BEING SLAIN AS DELIBERATELY AS IF YOU WERE ON THE BATTLEFIELD, WITH BULLETS AS AMMUNI­TION AGAINST YOU, THE TARGET. THIS IS AS SERI­OUS AS IT GETS.

    QUOTE:

    SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, "THIS WORLD" section, AUG. 23, 1992. FEAR OF FAUCETS; Do our water-treat­ment plants protect us against dangerous viruses in our drinking water?

    For years a tiny handful of scientists suspected that there was something wrong with the way cities purify drinking water. Pierre Payment, however, was not among them and, on a wa­ger, the Montreal virologist designed an experiment to prove the water skeptics WRONG. But science can turn upon small events: Payment lost the bet and demonstrated that our drinking water may not be as pure as we like to think it is.

    In dispute was the significance of a small number of viruses. Although Payment had been finding viruses in Quebec rivers and tap water for years, conventional wisdom said that those viruses were not responsible for widespread disease. In 1985, while attending a microbiology conference in Washington, D.C. the Canadian researcher decided to bet an American colleague that he could prove, once and for all, that the conventional wis­dom was right. Payment wagered that he and his colleagues at the University of Quebec's Armand Frappier Virology Research Center, who had a reputation for being tenacious virus-hunters, could demonstrate that a few stray viruses were nothing to worry about.

    "We decided to find out what happens to people who drink water from a state-of-the-art plant meeting all U.S. and Cana­dian regulations, but which draws upon disease-contaminated source water," Payment recalls.

    The experiment Payment devised went to the heart of a truth that people who drink treated water may not want to think about: Hundreds of U.S. and Canadian water plants routinely produce tap water from water that contains, at least in part, pathogens and micro-organisms from sewage. American rivers slake the thirst of, and serve as sewers for, an enormous population.

    "I used to live in Bozeman, Montana", says microbiologist Mark LeChevallier, who works for the American Water Works Service Company near St. Louis. "The water they get here on the Mississippi is the water they've flushed in Montana six months ago."

    Actually it takes the water slightly less than ONE month to make the journey from Montana sewage plants all the way down the Missouri to St. Louis. By then the river is loaded with bac­teria and discarded viruses from hundreds of upstream sewers, animal feedlots and slaughterhouses. St. Louis treats that water in drinking-water plants, uses it, treats it again in sewage plants, and puts it back in the Mississippi. Ten days later and a thou­sand miles downstream, they're drinking it in New Orleans.

    Yet those in the clean-water business, such as LeChevallier, offer a reassuring message. "We believe that our water in the United States is well treated and safe to drink. ... Today people don't really have to think when they turn on the tap."

    All Pierre Payment set out to do was prove that this common premise was true. He says he began his million-dollar experi­ment sure that "there were so few viruses in tap water that we could show water was causing no disease. What we found was the reverse."

    Payment didn't have far to look to find a dirty river. Practi­cally in his back yard was a plant that treats Des Prairies River water and pipes it to 40,000 people in one part of suburban Montreal. What made the river ideal was that Payment already knew there were viruses in it--anywhere from 5 to 10 percent of the Des Prairies flow consisted of untreated sewage. Yet no records existed that showed that Montrealers suffered an unusual amount of sewage-linked disease--the mysterious bouts of diar­rhea and 24-hour "bugs" that strike most households once a year or so. The neighborhood's tap water was locally considered of good quality and regularly met government standards similar to those that govern U.S. water.

    Payment designed perhaps the most thorough study of tap water drinkers ever conducted, putting 2,400 people in suburban Montreal under close scrutiny. To tease out useful data, he fit­ted half of the test families kitchens with extremely efficient $800 under-the-sink reverse-osmosis filters. The filters were so selective that they passed no viruses or bacteria, enabling Payment to compare the health of families drinking and cooking with purified water with a control group that took water from the tap--from the treated water of the Des Prairies River.

    Payment expected a tiny difference at best. The state-of-the-art tap water plant used chlorine, ozone and a variety of filters to kill bacteria and viruses. To produce telling statistics, he'd have to let the experiment run for 18 months. No one had stud­ied such a large group of water drinkers for that long. It was a costly and difficult gamble.

    The telltale illness Payment was looking for--gastroenteritis-­is a good indicator of tap water's overall infection potential be­cause any of dozens of different bacteria and viruses cause its symptoms: vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, cramps. Gastroenteritis is also important because researchers are linking one of its causes--the extremely hardy enteroviruses--to far more serious illnesses. (See chapter 27, "More Than Just 'Stomach Flu".) One of the implicated enteroviruses, the Coxsackie virus, is associated with a devastating form of heart-muscle deterioration. Researchers are homing in on other enteroviruses that may be linked to diabetes, meningitis and problems during pregnancy. Payment's focus, however, was on the much more common and easy-to-measure incidence of short-term gastroenteritis.

    To get the data, Payment's group decided on a tedious mix of biweekly phone checks and ongoing health questionnaires. The results of the phone calls were startling. "Almost from the first month, we started noticing the trend," says Payment. "Across every age group, sex and region, people who drank tap water without the filter were getting sick more often (than the drinkers of the filtered water)."

    The experiment was detailed in the June 1991 American Journal of Public Health. The control group of Montrealers drinking unfiltered tap water had a 30 to 35 percent greater chance of getting gastroenteritis compared with those who drink highly filtered tap water. Something in the water was making the control group sick--but the use of sophisticated filters sig­nificantly reduced the incidence of such illnesses. The filter re­duced adult gastroenteritis by two cases per 10 adults per year. Children under 5 had even greater reductions; four to eight fewer sicknesses yearly per 10 children.

    The dramatic reductions among the filtered-water drinkers would have been even greater if 5 percent hadn't contracted gastroenteritis from, oddly enough, the filters themselves (see chapter 27, "A Filter that Breeds Bacteria").

    One dismaying conclusion from the results is that this small, well-maintained plant may represent the tip of a microbiological iceberg. After all, in one small community in 1988-89, that sin­gle water plant had spread some 8,000 cases of short-term dis­ease--and, apart from a dogged virology team, no one noticed. How much more disease may remain yet to be measured is any epidemiologist's guess, since U.S. government agencies haven't yet conducted a similar study here. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), for its part, says drinking water must be so free of bacteria and viruses that no more than one con­sumer in 10,000 will be sickened per year. [H: In a place like Golden Hills there should be "o", zero--none. And, no more than one in all of Greater Tehachapi.] Payment's experiment shows that not one but 2,000 consumers are being sickened by something so preventable that certain under-sink filters can knock it out.

    It's not hard to find a reason why the effect has thus far re­mained undiscovered: The illness is relatively mild, and its nor­mal incidence per family is relatively small, about one extra case of gastroenteritis per Montreal family every 15 months. [H: Don't lose focus for this virologist is speaking of "regular" strains of viruses or bacteria--NOT what is pur­posely in water systems in the local area, for instance. You can know this because one of the "symptoms" mentioned in the paper releases, lists "jaundice" and that comes only from some type of liver involvement--not simple gastroenteritis.]

    That may not sound like much--a miserable day in bed now and again for one family member or his or her neighbor--but if Payment's results hold true in the United States, tap water may, amazingly, turn out to cause at least as much gastroenteritis as is caused by bad food. That's a remarkable rethinking of the sources of staggering amounts of American "stomach flu"--es­pecially in a decade which has seen foodborne-disease outbreaks linked to raw eggs, chicken, soft cheeses, cantaloupe and seafood.

    Payment's experiment revealed the opposite of classic "outbreak" epidemic, with many people succumbing within a short period of time. Instead, water-drinkers may have come to accept occasional gastroenteritis as "normal".

    "If you take the data we have, it isn't an epidemic. In fact, the disease maintains a sub epidemic level.... We might, as a society, now accept as normal a large chunk of gastrointestinal sicknesses which may be preventable."

    If the Montreal sub epidemic is projected across the U.S. population, the tally mounts to millions, if not tens of millions, of excess gastrointestinal bouts, with an economic cost of sev­eral billion dollars. And if scientists find that U.S. water plants are also passing on excess gastroenteritis--even though their tap water may meet recently revised EPA standards--a major re­evaluation may be in order.

    Most probably, the preventable illnesses that Payment mea­sured were caused by viruses. Payment had found viruses in Quebec municipal tap water before, roughly one human virus in each liter of raw Des Prairies River water. Were the viruses present in Montreal, but in numbers so low that they were not detectable?

    "I sat down and thought," recalls Payment. "If the plant produced water with just one virus per 1,000 liters, the number of resulting diseases would be very close to what we saw in our study. And we can't accurately measure those few viruses. Ev­ery time I detect one, there might really be 10, or 100, unde­tected.

    "And even if you only have one virus in 1,000 liters, that means that one person will be infected per 1,000 per day. That's why we've been trying to get that last virus."

    That last single virus is enough to infect an individual; its public health importance is far greater than killing say, every last bacterium. That's because it can take hundreds or thou­sands of, say, salmonella bacteria to cause infection, but even single viruses--more efficient in causing disease than bacteria--can infect a human. A few viruses, then, can cause sickness in water supplies out of all proportion to their numbers.

    "I think the potential is large for a viral cause," says Dennis Juranek, chief of epidemiology at the parasitic disease branch of Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta. "In over half of the outbreaks investigated, no [causal] agent is ever identified."

    There has been no shortage of water-related illnesses to sur­vey in the United States: From 1971 to 1985 there were 485 clusters of disease so widespread that the CDC has classified them as "outbreaks"--each averaging 7,400 cases of disease. The outbreaks happened at diverse sites, from contaminated wells to city water systems, but nearly everyone in the field agrees that those numbers represent just a fraction of 1 percent of the true number of waterborne infections.

    But to say that viruses may be the cause and that water-treat­ment methods may be to blame is not to say that proving Pay­ment's theory will be easy. "Virtually nobody has the lab capa­bility and resources to do [necessary] large-scale investigations for viruses," Juranek explains.

    Water scientists are at a loss to explain how state-of-the-art treatment plants like the one in suburban Montreal could pass on so much illness. A visit to most North American municipal plants--from which 83 percent of Americans get their water--is reassuring to a casual observer. Sparkling-clean water passes through mazes of increasingly cleaner channels; the sharp and satisfying antiseptic smell of chlorine permeates the air. Whirring pumps, white-coated technicians, authoritative banks of gauges--it's a perfect setting for a Mr. Clean commercial. As river water gets chlorinated, sedimentated, inoculated, coagu­lated, filtered and ozonated, might an occasional virus be able to get through?

    [H: Indeed, indeed. The virus now under point is one which is NOT KILLED OR TOTALLY FILTERED BY ANY KNOWN OPERATING SYSTEM TO 100%. THE VIRUS IN POINT HAS A COVERING "SHELL" WHICH IS NOT PENETRATED BY AVERAGE "SAFE" AMOUNTS OF CHLORINE (REMEMBER THAT CHLORINE IS A DEADLY POISON). THE VIRUS, LIKE THE HIV VIRUS, MOVES RIGHT THROUGH ALMOST ALL SAVE THE MOST INTACT MEMBRANE FILTERS JUST AS THE HIV PASSES EASILY THROUGH A CONDOM. MORE­OVER, THE HIV IS SECURE, ALSO, IN ANY SYSTEM OF PUBLIC WATER CLEANSING APPARATUS NOW IN USE. YOU MUST UNDERSTAND, THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY HAS NOW "CREATED" VIRUSES FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AND DEFENSES. THIS IS HOW THEY CAN TELL YOU THAT ALMOST 100% OF YOU WILL TEST HIV POSITIVE BY THE TURN OF THE CENTURY! IT IS A SURE THING--NOT JUST SPECU­LATION.]
    PJ 54
    CHAPTER 26
    REC #2 HATONN

    MON., SEP. 14, 1992 10:39 A.M. YEAR 6, DAY 29

    MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1992

    CONTINUATION: FEAR OF FAUCETS

    VIRUSES VS. BACTERIA
    Viruses do, after all, have distinct advantages over bacteria because of their tiny size and durability. If a bacterium were, say, the size of a football field, a typical virus would be only the size of a football. The ordinary sand filters that most wa­ter-treatment plants use reliably stop larger bacteria, but as many as 5 percent of the viruses pass right through. To truly reduce viral numbers, the EPA requires water companies to use a multiple-step process.

    The EPA rules tell the nation's 54,000 water suppliers they should reduce the number of viruses to no more than 1/10,000 of the source waters' original concentration. It's a curious mandate--local plants must precisely reduce the numbers of something they never actually measure. [Editor's note: Go back and read that last statement again. This is what science and engineering have deteriorated to and why I--Ed Young--have gotten out of it to hopefully do some good through this newspaper.] The EPA's 1989 Surface Water Treatment Rule exempts plants from having to test or count viruses in any way. Instead, plant operators spend $75 million yearly assiduously counting an old standby bacterium called coliform, in larger systems sometimes hourly. The problem is, coliform bacteria are next-to-useless indicators of waterborne viruses.

    The theory has long been that although fecal coliform bacte­ria usually don't cause disease, they often show up when dis­ease-causing sewage bacteria has leaked into water. So utilities dump chlorine into the input water and the coliforms vanish. By doing so, utilities meet the EPA's microbe-destroying requirement. Day in and day out, bored water technicians keep testing chlorinated water to find fecal coliform. What about viruses? From New Orleans to Newark no water company technician tests for them, so there is no record of any "problems".

    SHABBY REGULATIONS AND PHONY ARITHMETIC
    LEAVE WATER IMPURE
    To meet the letter of the law--1/10,000 the virus numbers originally in the source water--EPA rules allow water utilities to choose from a sampler of technologies which--on paper--should reduce virus numbers adequately. Filter your water, the EPA says, and they'll credit utilities with reducing viruses a 100-fold. Disinfect the water and we'll assume water viruses are reduced another 100-fold. Multiply these two reductions together and, voila, utilities can claim they've reduced viruses by 10,000 times--a mathematically-derived 99.00 percent reduction. And no technician ever need raise a test-tube to be sure the system's working.

    Of course, the dirtier the source, the more trouble treatment plants have producing uncontaminated drinking water, but right now the EPA doesn't require cities using even the filthiest river water to add extra disinfectant or filtration--in fact, no more is required of those cities' plants than from, say, mountain springs.

    "We recognize that the minimum required under the rule would probably not be adequate for systems with heavy fecal contamination," says Stig Regli, regulation manager at the EPA's Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water. "One thing that we're considering at the EPA is developing an eventual amendment to the Surface Water Treatment Rule which would require higher levels of total treatment with poor quality source water."

    The smart money says that it won't be earlier than the mid-1990s before the EPA's ponderous process of hearings, re­hearings and legal paperwork can fix the present law--if the next administration makes it a priority.

    California water supplies, on the whole, are far less polluted with human waste than many U.S. rivers. San Francisco, with its aqueduct drawing from the Sierra's Hetch Hetchy reservoir, faces negligible human waste disinfection problems. On the other hand, many cities along the Sacramento and San Joaquin River systems--like Fresno, Sacramento and Redding--dump their treated waste into waters that eventually wind up in the delta. From Contra Costa County to Southern California (via the State Water Project) a maze of local water plants depend upon theoretical estimates of the effectiveness of filtering viruses out of that delta water.

    "In the literature, people have written that water plants should reduce viruses (to 1 billionth of the original number)," notes Payment. "So you should have no viruses left. That is theoretical. In practice, the filtration plant is imperfect."

    Payment knows this firsthand because, in the jargon of re­searchers, he's done the wet work. In 1985, he found seven Quebec water-treatment plants passing about one virus per every 1,000 liters of treated drinking water. Some tap-water samples had not one, but 10 to 20 viruses.

    Jack DeMarco, superintendent of the Water Quality and Re­search Division for Cincinnati's Water Works, says that smaller systems may inevitably fail to follow rigorous technical stan­dards in caring for sand filters. "Sometimes," he says, "small systems mis-operate by improper cleaning."

    One seemingly obvious solution is simply to kill viruses by pouring in still more disinfectants like chlorine. But when chlorine is added to raw water containing organic matter, it forms tiny amounts of a familyof potentially cancer-causing by-products. Utilities and the EPA won't permit still-higher chlorine concentrations. Utilities that hope to counteract viruses in their source water must begin thinking of novel--and some­times-experimental--disinfection technologies. Cost of these new technologies varies, but in general it's just a few percent of the billions of dollars cities spend to operate waterworks.

    And it's not as if river water has been getting filthier and filthier. Mississippi water, for example, has far fewer of those indicator-bacteria, fecal coliform, than years ago, thanks largely to the 1974 Clean Water Act, which forced U.S. cities to treat their sewage before discharging it into rivers and lakes. What is new is virologists' awareness that sewage treatment plants aren't nearly as good at virus killing as once believed.

    "What I find the most difficult about sewage," says Betty Ol­son, a professor and chair of Environmental Analysis and Design at the University of California at Irvine, "is that a few studies were done back in 1974 and showed there were no viruses in [sewage plant] secondary effluent--and the EPA put the matter to rest. Now we have tests that are five times more sensitive than they had--and yet we have blinders on which don't encourage us to test for viruses today.

    Before any war against viruses can be launched, water scien­tists insist the Montreal experiment must be redone in other cities. The new experiments are necessary to resolve several criticisms of Payment's study, particularly that the Montreal source water--which contains untreated sewage--was much more contaminated than U.S. water.

    But was the Quebec River water that much dirtier than U.S. water? The numbers say NO. There were 57,000 col­iforms/liter in Montreal, but 44,000 last year in Cincinnati, and 30,000 to 50,000 just above New Orleans. Montreal's water is dirty, all right, but not much dirtier than thousands of miles of U.S. rivers. "Clearly, I think the virus and coliform in Mon­treal [rivers] are probably something you could find in Missouri and Mississippi and some of our larger waterways," agrees Joan Rose, a virologist in the University of South Florida.

    Back at the Institute of Virology in Montreal, Pierre Payment is planning the decisive experiment. He would measure ill­nesses in two matched cities, one with high numbers of viruses known to be in river water, the other with few or no viruses. If he can show that there is the same incidence of disease in both cities, then the problem is not caused by viruses. "Right now," he says ruefully, "I'm trying to get the money to do the study."

    "I think we have to validate the research that Payment has produced," says Alfred Dufour, director of the EPA's Microbi­ology Research Division in Cincinnati. "If it's repeated, with similar results, then I think we have to be concerned that there's something in our treatment process that isn't catching these pathogens, whatever they are."

    Defour's group at the EPA's Environmental Monitoring Sys­tems Laboratory in Cincinnati may be the first to reproduce Payment's experiments, if it can cobble together enough money from various agencies. It may be 1994 before an experiment is under way and the slow pace of the EPA research irritates some in the research community.

    "The EPA has tables of research on toxics, on pesticides, but right now, we have just one table on coliforms, which tells us nothing about what harmful organisms are in water and what the risk is," says Rose, who blames poor support for research from the Reagan and Bush administration. Under Reagan the EPA cited cost when it dropped out from funding half of Payment's Montreal experiment.

    "The EPA has a water-research budget for water", says Betty Olson of UC Irvine. "They put $775,000 into protozoa, viruses and bacteria--and $20 MILLION into chemicals. We may be spending millions of dollars going after mice and letting the ele­phants get through."

    Privately, scientists who study drinking water are aghast at the poverty of funds for water research--the United States still hasn't been able to fund $1 million to repeat Payment's ex­periment--and wealth of private spending for household water systems. Each year, they point out, private citizens spend $640 million for in-home water treatment--fully a third more than the EPA' entire national drinking water budget.

    Since Payment published his research--focusing late-20th­century science on 19th century water-treatment technology--a few water engineers have begun wondering how to redesign plants, a few epidemiologists have started to talk about follow-up studies, and a few Washington regulators are beginning to pay more attention to viruses. "Certainly a study like Payment's is eye-opening," sums up the EPA's Stig Regli. "There's a rev­olution going on with microbiological risk assessment right now. ... It's changing our perception of what may be in the water."

    END OF QUOTING FEAR OF FAUCETS.

    * * *
    Good luck citizens--the plan is to have the world depopulated down to not more than 550 million people by the turn of the century. That comes from the Elite LIPS of one George Bush of the New World Order. Indeed, good luck--most of you will be quite DEAD by the time the government acts--for they are the ones who have done it TO YOU.

    Please stay tuned and read the next articles relative to this subject--and by the way, do have a good day, IF you live through it.

주제글 정보

Users Browsing this Thread

이 주제글은 현재 3명이 열람중입니다. (0명의 회원과 3명의 손님)

이 주제글의 글단추(태그)

글쓰기 규칙

  • 새 글 작성이 불가능함
  • 응답글 작성이 불가능함
  • 파일 첨부가 불가능함
  • 내 글 수정이 불가능함
  •