‘THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE – THE HOLOCAUST VOL II’ – PHOENIX JOURNAL #40 - CHAPTER 12 - 13

[wave]

‘THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE – THE HOLOCAUST VOL II’ – PHOENIX JOURNAL #40 - CHAPTER 13

REC #1 HATONN
FRI., NOV. 15, 1991 8:14 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 09
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1991
TODAY’S WATCH

The most important thing of this day is probably missed by 99 & 9/10ths per cent of you-the-public.
Representative Gonzales of Texas made a speech before the House (totally empty) regarding “Special Orders”; this subject being in objection to the NEW WORLD ORDER EUROPEAN CURRENCY UNION. This is THE MOST IMPORTANT eco­nomic issue in your world and to the U.S. is without doubt the worst nightmare to ever strike if (WHEN) it comes into being. This is more important a “group” than the Committee of 7 and/or “10” and your nation cannot stand alone when this issue is brought into law. It deals with the one world currency which, in effect, will cause you to pay off all of your existing debts (trillions of dollars) in what amounts to a foreign currency—and you cannot do it.

There was one gentleman in the “audience” for the speech and he left—having obviously been there to hear the rantings of a Representative from Louisiana denouncing David Duke.
Actually, that is worthy of note herein. What is this outrage against one, David Duke? Why don’t you look at this in its proper perspective? The people are sick and tired of the crimi­nals who run your Governments. Further, just to say you are “...against quotas and hiring of inca­pable persons just because they are a specific `color’” is intelligent, not bigoted. The point is to bring all “colors” and “creeds” into balance in equality and you will never legislate that bal­ance through “laws” that require that “man” act in harmony. The young man took some fool­ish ac­tions earlier which will better serve your nation NOW—for he will dare not act in bigoted man­ners for he knows the glass is upon him. My feeling is that the criminals in your Gov­ernment and Political Parties protesteth far too loudly. They want no one in power that can uncover the lies to you-the-public. If you ones will deliberately elect a known and self-pro­fessing criminal into office then I suggest you deserve fully that which is coming down upon your nation. You cannot legislate “MORALITY”—that comes from experience and dedication within. Criminality suggests total evasion of the laws to suit a “person’s” greedy selfish ful­fillment. God does not judge, but you can expect to flow back unto you in each event—exactly in kind—that which you sow. The man with the “moral” issue at stake says he has changed and grown. The criminal laughs and says nothing about reform in any believable measure whatsoever. It is YOU who must be discerning in these instances for you know on the one hand you will simply have more and greater criminal cor­ruption. The other man may have a few good points, after all.
Why do you object? Because you have been told by the media that he associates with Nazis, KKK, etc? In the first place you can only assume such from what he tells you for you cannot be­lieve the media which is totally Zionist run. You cannot tell from the politicians who do not wish to lose their corrupted po­sitions.
So you must look at the facts.
Your First Amendment rights under the Constitution give you the right to express your opin­ion. When Duke says he is not in favor of interracial marriages and quotas but is in favor of lifting the minorities up from the poverty and into education, etc.—DOES HE NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS THAT OPINION? If you prefer “red” to “blue”, do you not have a right to that opinion? The point is, will the man stand in justice under the law? Until you ones get the important facts in view—you will continue to be manipulated by the media adversaries to “common law” and freedom.
. You must further come to know that the “activist” groups are ar­ranged to totally destroy order I know that ones must speak out—but these groups are to cause confusion and mass emotional reaction, not knowledgeable response. I am not here to tell you what to do or think—in free­dom you have a right to do and think that which is within your rights as a citizen. My com­mission is to present the Truth to you, even if it brings great discomfort to my own crew to do so. I assure you that Dharma would like to resign her post. Bullets hurt, no matter who you are. Meanness brings pain to the target—I care not who you are. Disagreement is one thing but to threaten death if you continue to speak, in a so-called “free” nation, is without acceptable reason. You all must think hard on these things for you are about to come under rule by the sword. When you can no longer speak out in your opinion regarding possibility of incorrect­ness of given issues—you are a lost people.
I remind you that the Zionists leagues have proposed legislation before your Congress to make it “illegal” to even disagree with their presentation of what happened at the so-called Holo­caust. I remind you that in France, Germany, England, Canada and the Soviet Union (and several other European nations) IT IS NOW ILLEGAL TO EVEN HAVE AND VOICE AN OPIN­ION THAT INFERS THE HOLOCAUST DID NOT OCCUR—EVEN “DIFFERING” IN NUMBERS OR OTHERWISE SPECULATION AS TO POSSIBILITIES OTHER THAN GIVEN YOU BY THE ZIONISTS. This is the most vile and evil form of moral blackmail and financial extortion. The bill is in present argument before the Australian Law Reform Commis­sion—to make denial of the orthodox version of the holocaust a “hate crime”. Who is that “hate” against? You better look again—it makes YOU the victim of “hate crime” IF YOU DIS­AGREE! Oh, you think I am bigoted and want to deny right to change laws to protect the pub­lic? The “public” is not bringing any of these suggestions, even before the United Nations (as is also under way), it is brought forth by the Jewish Leagues and announced through “Jewish” press. In Australia, for instance, in September (27), 1991 it is announced that the Secretary of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry and Sydney (Australia) director of Australia/Israel publications, has asked “...the Aus­tralian Law Reform Commission to make denial of the ortho­dox version of the holocaust a `hate crime’.” I don’t know how you can better sum it up than in their own words.
How is it that these ones proudly announce themselves “Jews” and yet if another calls them “Jew” it is unacceptable? What are you doing, World?
FACTS
We will continue to give you “facts”. For this deed, the people are continually under threat of death by the self-proclaimed Zionists. They identify their origin only leaving personal identifica­tion missing. The papers and books are publicly burned and a special packet of threats has gone from the ADL (Jewish Anti-Defamation League) to every known TV station and Radio station. IS THIS FREEDOM IN AMERICA?
YOU ALLOW YOUR GOVERN­MENT TO PAY FOR MUSEUM PRODUCTIONS OF HOMOSEXUAL SEXUAL ACTS IN PICTURES, PORNOGRAPHIC PLAYS ARE PRESENTED THROUGH GOVERNMENT FUNDING, AND OTHER PORNOGRAPHIC MATERIAL IS BLESSED—BUT WHEN SOMEONE SPEAKS OUT AND SAYS, “HEY, HERE IS EV­IDENCE THAT SOMETHING MIGHT BE A BIT WRONG WITH NUMBERS AND PRESENTATION OF A THING CALLED THE HOLOCAUST”—YOU ARE THREATENED WITH DEATH! THIS THREATENING COMES FROM THE VERY GROUP WHO GAVE FORTH THE OR­THODOX VERSION!!! MIGHT IT BE A BIT WISE FOR YOU TO ALSO QUESTION IN­TENT?
Well, today it is still “legal” to write in differing opinion and therefore, we shall write as quickly as the little fingers can move—TO BRING YOU THE COMPILED FACTS SO THAT YOU CAN JUDGE ON FACTS AND NOT EMOTION. I ONLY ASK HEARING FOR IF YOU CANNOT COME INTO BALANCE THROUGH TRUTH THERE IS NOT MUCH GOD CAN OFFER UNTO YOU. SO BE IT.
Dharma, we have hundreds of pages to present on this matter and, therefore, we must attend it while we can do so. You of the world populace have been such “people-of-the-LIES” for so long that you have ceased to “think”. It is time to “reason” lest you never be given another chance upon this wondrous place called “Earth”.
This is the task I have been sent forth to do, and so shall it be done—what you do with the Truth is of your own choosing. Amen.
BEST-SELLER IS A HOAX
Of the other variety of memoirs, those which present a picture of frail Jewry caught in the vice of Nazism, the most celebrated is undoubtedly THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK, and the truth concerning this book is only one appalling insight into the fabri­cation of the propaganda legend. It has already been proven over and over again as a hoax, but the media and Zionists con­tinue to deny the facts and continue to silence the truth-bringers. I only give that which has been pre­sented to you over and over again. Why don’t YOU know about these things? Because the contradiction is NEVER ALLOWED ON THE MEDIA OR IN THE PRESS IN ANY WAY WHICH GAINS ATTENTION. BOOKS CONTAINING THE TRUTH ARE BANISHED AND A SPECIAL FOOTBALL GAME WILL BE AIRED IN THE SLOT WHEREIN SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE GIVEN YOU SOME TRUTH.

First published in 1952, THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK be­came an immediate best-seller; since then it has been repub­lished in paper-back, going through 40 impressions, and was made into a successful Hollywood film. In royalties alone, Otto Frank, the girl’s father, has made a fortune from the sale of the book, which purports to represent the real-life tragedy of his daughter. With its direct appeal to the emotions, the book and the film have influenced literally millions of people, cer­tainly more throughout the world than any other story of its kind. And yet only seven years after its initial publication A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT CASE ESTAB­LISHED THAT THE BOOK WAS A HOAX.

It is the way in which the book is presented that is the problem. If it had been presented as a novel of “fiction” and drama—ex­cellent—for it is sensitive and emotionally captivating. But this is NOT that which happened. THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK has been sold to the public as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl from Amsterdam, which she wrote at the age of 12 while her family and four other Jews were hiding in the back room of a house during the German occupa­tion. Eventu­ally, they were arrested and detained in a concentration camp, where Anne Frank supposedly died when she was 14. When Otto Frank was liberated from the camp at the end of the war, he returned to the Amsterdam house and “found” his daugh­ter’s diary concealed in the rafters.
The truth about the Anne Frank Diary was first revealed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Fria Ord. It established that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had written the dialogue of the “diary” and was demanding payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank. A condensation of the Swedish articles appeared in the American Economic Council Letter, April 15, 1959, as follows:
“History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth, and may be­come more effective than truth.
“The Western World has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to be her per­sonally written story, Anne Frank’s Diary. Any informed lit­erary inspection of this book would have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.”
[H: This is NOT the reasoning which is valid, however, for one does not “judge” on such opin­ion but on merit of facts presented.]
“A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court con­firms this point of view, in that the well known American Jew­ish writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin’s work on the Anne Frank Diary .
“Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, promised to pay to his race kin, Meyer Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the di­alogue of Author Levin just as it was and `implanted’ it in the diary as being his daughter’s intellectual work.”
Further inquiries brought a reply on May 7th, 1962 from a firm of New York lawyers, which stated:
“I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank, and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was later set aside by trial justice. Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the man­ner required by law. The action was subsequently settled while an ap­peal from Judge Coleman’s decision was pending.
“I am afraid that the case itself is not officially reported, so far as the trial itself, or even Judge Coleman’s decision, is con­cerned. Certain procedural matters were reported in 141 New York Supplement, Second Series 170, and in 5 Second Series 181. The correct file number in the New York County Clerk’s office is 2241-1956 and the file is probably a large and full one...”
Here, then, is just one more fraud in a whole series of frauds perpetrated in support of the “Holocaust” legend and the saga of the Six Million. Of course, the court case bear­ing directly on the authenticity of the Anne Frank Diary was “not officially reported”.
A brief reference may also be made to another “diary”, pub­lished not long after that of Anne Frank and entitled: NOTES FROM THE WARSAW GHETTO: THE JOURNAL OF EM­MANUEL RINGELBLUM (New York, 1958). Ringel­blum had been a leader in the cam­paign of sabotage against the Germans in Poland, as well as the revolt of the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943, before he was eventually arrested and executed in 1944.
It is a MUST to constantly remind yourselves of the facts herein regarding the REASON the “Jews” were in that Ghetto: The “Jews” had also declared to be in a State of War against Ger­many. America had already put all Ameri­can Japanese citizens and any Japanese in the States into concentration (detention) camps. This was the same event in Germany only with Jews—who had declared war against Germany and were, in fact, having constant war encounters. The gathering up of Jews didn’t “just happen”—the Jews de­clared a state of war.
The Ringelblum journal, which speaks of the usual “rumors” allegedly circulating about the ex­termination of the Jews in Poland, appeared under exactly the same Communist auspices as the so-called Hoess memoirs. McGraw-Hill, the publishers of the American edition, admit that they were denied access to the uncensored original manuscript in Warsaw, and instead faith­fully fol­lowed the expurgated volume published by the Commu­nist Government in War­saw in 1952. All the “proofs” of the Holocaust issuing from Communist sources of this kind are worthless as his­torical documents.
Since the war, there has been an abundant growth of sensational concentration camp literature, the majority of it Jewish, each book piling horror upon horror, blending fragments of truth with the most grotesque of fantasies and impostures, relentlessly cre­ating an edifice of mythol­ogy in which any relations to historical fact has long since disappeared. We have referred to the type already—Olga Lengyel’s absurd FIVE CHIMNEYS (“24,000 corpses handled every day”). The truth is terrible enough and to lie causes all respect to leave for that horror which was actu­ally present.
You have to realize, dear ones, that this is part and parcel of the “plan” to deceive and thereby move into one world control over you-the-masses. It is directly accomplished through the tradi­tions, such as the “Kol Nidre” whereby annually on Day of Atonement—the vows are ren­dered negated until the following Day of Atonement. The Protocols “order” that the Talmud­ists (Zionists) lie, cheat, steal and do anything necessary to accom­plish the ends of World Domina­tion.
Another couple of books which represent the same type of issue are DOCTOR AT AUSCHWITZ by Miklos Nyiszli, appar­ently a mythical and invented person, THIS WAS AUSCHWITZ: THE STORY OF A MURDER CAMP by Philip Friedman, and so on ad nau­seam.
Another in this same vein is FOR THOSE I LOVED by Martin Gray (Bodley Head, 1973), which purports to be an account of his experiences at Treblinka camp in Poland. Gray spe­cialized in selling fake antiques to America before turning to concentration camp memoirs. The circumstances sur­rounding the publication of his book, however, have been unique, be­cause for the first time with works of this kind, serious doubt was cast on the authenticity of its contents. Even Jews, alarmed at the damage it might cause, de­nounced his book as fraud­ulent and questioned whether he had ever been at Treblinka at all, while B.B.C. radio pressed him as to why he had waited 28 years before writing of his experiences.
You all must realize that it is only the few who know the truth of these lies. Ones who came out of the concentration camps to find family members still living never thought fur­ther than the ones who came out and found all missing. There was no way to KNOW what transpired in an­other place—even the next room. Circumstances were terrible at best and the stories would be accepted without question—just as YOU do that your Gov­ernment is Pure and Works in your Behalf! Your senses tell you otherwise but it is easier and more comforting to believe the “orthodox” ideas. As these ones who escaped are shown pictures supposedly of Auschwitz—how can they know the pictures came from an Eisenhower prison camp of death? As you come into discern­ment, this is WHY you must at­tend facts as given and THEN, ONLY THEN, decide how it might have been other than given.
It was interesting to observe that the “Personal Opinion” column of the London Jewish Chroni­cle, March 29, 1973, although it roundly condemned Gray’s book, nevertheless made grandiose additions to the myth of the Six Million. It stated that: “Nearly a million people were murdered in Treblinka in the course of a year, 18,000 were fed into the gas chambers every day.” It is a pity indeed that so many people read and accept this kind of nonsense without so much as exer­cising their minds. If 18,000 were murdered every day, the figure of one million would be reached in a mere 56 days, not “in the course of a year”. This gigantic achievement would leave the remaining ten months of the year a total blank. 18,000 every day would in fact mean a total of 6,480,000" “in the course of a year”. Does this mean that the Six Million died in twelve months at Treblinka? What about the alleged three or four million at Auschwitz? This kind of thing simply shows that, once the preposterous compromise figure of Six Million had scored a resounding success and be­come internationally accepted, any num­ber of impossible permuta­tions can be made and no one would even think to criti­cize them. In its review of Gray’s book, the Jewish Chronicle recalls that the floors of the gas chambers sloped, whereas another survivor who helped to build them maintains that they were at a level...” column also provides a revealing insight into the fraudulent alle­gations con­cerning gas-chambers: “Gray
Occasionally, books by former concentration camp inmates ap­pear which present a totally dif­ferent picture of the conditions prevailing in them. Such is UNDER TWO DICTATORS (London, 1950) by Marguerite Buber. She was a German-Jew­ish woman who had experienced several years in the brutal and primitive conditions of a Russian prison camp before being sent to Ravensbruck, the German camp for women detainees, in Au­gust 1940. She noted that she was the only Jewish person in her contingent of deportees from Russia who was not straight away released from the Gestapo. Her book presents a striking con­trast between the camps of Soviet Russia and Germany; com­pared to the squalor, disorder and starvation of the Russian camp, she found Ravensbruck to be clean, civilized and well-administered. Regular baths (showers) and clean linen seemed a luxury after her earlier experiences, and her first meal of white bread, sausage, sweet porridge and dried fruit prompted her to inquire of another camp inmate whether August 3rd, 1940 was some sort of holiday or special occasion. She observed, too, that the barracks at Ravensbruck were remarkably spacious compared to the crowded mud hut of the Soviet camp. In the fi­nal months of 1945, she experienced the progressive decline of camp conditions, the causes of which we shall examine later.
Another account which is at total variance with popular propa­ganda is Die Gestapo Lasst Bit­ten (The Gestapo Invites You) by Charlotte Bormann, a Communist political prisoner who was also interned at Ravensbruck. Undoubtedly its most important revelation is the author’s state­ment that rumors of gas executions were deliberate and malicious inventions circulated among the prisoners by the Communists. This latter group did not accept Marguerite Buber because of her imprisonment in Soviet Russia. A further shocking reflection on the post-war trials is the fact that Charlotte Bormann was not permitted to testify at the Ras­tadt trial of Ravensbruck camp personnel in the French occupa­tion zone, the usual fate of those who denied the extermi­nation legend.
You say, “Well, these discounters can’t be believed!” Why? You believe the exaggerated and totally impossible tales of the opposition which is far more heinous to believe! I don’t ask that you “believe” one against another—JUST LOOK AT THE FACTS!!!
Let us take a bit of a rest-break before we take up the subject of the nature and condition of those war-time concentration camps. I would remind all of you that concentration camps are exactly what their name implies and in war, it means a very tacky situa­tion at best. There cer­tainly were camps in which Death should have been the first name—but precious ones, they seem to all be found inside the control of the Iron Curtain Communist Zionists. It always comes back to haunt all of you—and MUST BE FACED! And still—NONE can begin to com­pare with the hor­ror of the Eisenhower Death Camps—NONE!
Hatonn to clear. Please summon me when you are ready to proceed with the writing. Thank you.
http://fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J040.pdf
Found at:
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_d...p?q=1302361055
[Colour fonts, bolding & underlining added.].

RELATED ARTICLES:

Official German Record of Prisoners in Auschwitz Concentration Camp, May 1940 through December 1944. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...ber-1944.shtml

OFFICIAL RECORDS FROM INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS PROVE "HOLOCAUST" WAS A FRAUD. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...--Repost.shtml

Official German Record of all Prisoners in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from May of 1940 through December of 1944. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...hwi_2737.shtml

Dachau - The fraudulent stories of "extermination" and "homicidal gas chambers". See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Dachau_-_The_fraudulent_stories_of_extermination_a_3963.shtml
THE MYTHICAL HOLOCAUST. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/THE-MYTHICAL-HOLOCAUST.shtml
"The First Holocaust - Jewish Fundraising Campaigns With Holocaust Claims During and After WWI" by Don Heddesheimer. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_U...esheimer.shtml
The Holocaust™ in a nutshell. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...nutshell.shtml
"Zionism's Holocaustianity - The Big Lie". See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_US_History_108/Zionism-s-Holocaustianity---The-Big-Lie.shtml

GRUESOME HARVEST The Costly Attempt To Exterminate The People of Germany. See:http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/GRUESOME-HARVEST-The-Costly-Attempt-To-Exterminate-The-People-of-Germany.shtml

Official German Record of all Prisoners in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from May of 1940 through December of 1944. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...hwi_2737.shtml


The Incredible Jewish 'Holocaust' Facts And Opinions Raise Serious Issues See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_U...s-Issues.shtml

Lets stop with the Auschwitz lies. See:http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Lets-stop-with-the-Auschwitz-lies.shtml

WAS THERE REALLY A HOLOCAUST ? See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/NEW_RE...OLOCAUST.shtml
ZIONIST COLLABORATION WITH THE NAZIS. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...HE-NAZIS.shtml
An Introduction to the Holohoax or Holocaust Hoax: $$ Shoah Business $$. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/An-Introduction-to-the-Holohoax-or-Holocaust-Hoax-Shoah-Business.shtml
HOLOCAUST TRUTH. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...UTH_4058.shtml
The Decalogue of Inconvenient Facts about the World War II Holocaust. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...orl_2729.shtml
Over 60 Years later the Holocaust facts keep changing. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...ang_2704.shtml
What’s the Big Deal about the Holocaust? See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...ust_2684.shtml
Bergen-Belsen Camp: The suppressed story. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...ory_2632.shtml
NAZI GASSINGS NEVER HAPPENED. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...NED_2361.shtml
THE HOLOCAUST EXPLAINED. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...NED_1430.shtml

[wave]

‘THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE – THE HOLOCAUST – VOL II’ – PHOENIX JOURNAL #40 CHAPTER 12

REC #2 HATONN
THU., NOV. 14, 1991 11:06 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 090
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1991
THE WARSAW GHETTO

In terms of numbers, Polish Jewry is supposed to have suf­fered most of all from extermina­tion, not only at Auschwitz, but at an endless list of newly-discovered “death camps” such as Tre­blinka, Sobibor, Belzec, Chelmno, Maidanek and at many more obscure places which seem suddenly to have gained prominence. At the center of the alleged extermination of the Polish Jews is the dramatic uprising in April 1943 of the Warsaw Ghetto. This is often repre­sented as a revolt against being deported to gas ovens; presumably the alleged subject of Hitler and Himmler’s “secret discussions” had leaked out and gained wide publicity in Warsaw. The case of the War­saw Ghetto is an instructive in­sight into the cre­ation of the extermination leg­end itself. In­deed, its evac­uation by the Germans in 1943 is often referred to as the “extermination of the Polish Jews” although it was noth­ing of the kind, and layers of mythol­ogy have tended to sur­round it af­ter the publication of sensational novels like John Hersey’s The Wall and Leon Uris’ Exodus.

When the Germans first occupied Poland, they confined the Jews, not in detention camps but in ghettos for reasons of secu­rity. The interior administration of the ghettos was in the hands of Jewish Councils elected by themselves—remember the Jews had openly stated that they were hostile and would join the armed forces against the Germans. These ghettos were policed by in­dependent Jewish police forces. Special currency notes were introduced into the ghettos to pre­vent speculation. Whether this system was right or wrong, it was somewhat un­derstandable in time of war, and although the ghetto is perhaps an unpleasant social establishment, it is by no means barbaric unless ones within the group choose to be barbaric against their own people. And it is certainly not an organization for the de­struction of a race. But, of course, it is fre­quently said that this is what the ghettos were really for. It has been published, re­garding the War­saw Ghetto, a brazen assertion that concentra­tion camps “were a substitute for the practice of cramming the Jews into overcrowded ghettos and starving them to death.” It seems that whatever security system the Germans used, and to whatever lengths they went to preserve a semblance of commu­nity for the Jews, they can never escape the charge of “extermination”. Even to the point of requiring national LAWS that prohibit even the “discussion” of possible flaws in the Holo­caust reporting.

It has been already established that the 1931 Jewish popula­tion census for Poland placed the number of Jews at 2,732,600, and that after emigration and flight to the So­viet Union, no more than 1,100,000 were under German con­trol. These incontro­vertible facts, however, do not pre­vent Manvell and Frankl as­serting that “there had been over three million Jews in Poland when Germany began the invasion” and that in 1942 “some two million still awaited death” (ibid. p. 140). In reality, of the mil­lion or so Jews in Poland, almost half, about 400,000 were eventually concentrated in the ghetto of Warsaw, an area of about two and a-half square miles around the old medieval ghetto. The remainder had al­ready been moved to the Polish Government-Gen­eral by Septem­ber 1940. In the summer of 1942, Himmler ordered the reset­tlement of all Polish Jews in detention camps in order to obtain their labor, part of the system of general concentra­tion for labor assignment in the Govern­ment-General. Thus be­tween July and October 1942, over three-quarters of the Warsaw Ghetto inhabitants were peacefully evacuated and trans­ported, supervised by the Jewish police themselves. As you have seen, transportation to camps is al­leged to have ended in “extermination”, but there is ab­solutely no doubt from the evidence available that it involved only the effec­tive procurement of labor and the prevention of unrest. In the first place, Himmler discovered on a surprise visit to War­saw in January 1943 that 24,000 Jews registered as arma­ments workers were in fact working illegally as tailors and furriers (Manvell & Frankl, ibid. p. 140); the Ghetto was also being used as a base for subversive forays into the main area of War­saw.

After six months of peaceful evacuation, when only about 60,000 Jews remained in the residen­tial ghetto, the Germans met with an armed rebellion on 18th January 1943. Manvell and Frankl admit that “The Jews involved in planned resis­tance had for a long time been en­gaged in smuggling arms from the out­side world, and combat groups fired on and killed S.S. men and militia in charge of a column of depor­tees.” The terrorists in the Ghetto uprising were also as­sisted by the Polish Home Army and the PPR-Polska Partia Robotnicza, the Commu­nist Polish Workers Party. It was un­der these circumstances of a revolt aided by parti­sans and communists that the occupying forces, as any army would in a similar situation, moved in to suppress the terrorists, if necessary by destroying the residential area itself. It should be remembered that the whole process of evacuation would have continued peacefully had not ex­tremists among the inhabitants planned an armed rebellion which in the end was bound to fail. When S.S. Lieutenant-General Stroop entered the Ghetto with armored cars on April 19th, he immediately came under fire and lost twelve men; German and Polish casu­alties in the battle, which lasted four weeks, totalled 101 men killed and wounded. Stubborn resis­tance by the Jew­ish Combat Organiza­tion in the face of impossible odds led to an estimated 12,000 Jewish casu­alties, the majority by remain­ing in burning build­ings and dug-outs. A to­tal, however, of 56,065 inhabitants were captured and peacefully resettled in the area of the Government-General. Many Jews within the Ghetto had resented the terror imposed on them by the Combat Organi­zation, and had at­tempted to inform on their headquar­ters to the German authori­ties.

SUDDEN SURVIVORS
The circumstances surrounding the Warsaw Ghetto revolt, as well as the deportations to east­ern labor camps such as Auschwitz, has led to the most colorful tales concerning the fate of Polish Jews, the largest bloc of Jewry in Europe. The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, in figures prepared by them for the Nuremberg Trials, stated that in 1945 there were only 80,000 Jews re­maining in Poland. They also al­leged that there were no Polish-Jewish displaced per­sons left in Germany or Austria, a claim that was at some vari­ance with the number of Polish Jews arrested by the British and Americans for black market activities. However, the new Communist regime in Poland was unable to prevent a major anti-Jewish pogrom at Kielce on July 4th, 1946, and more than 150,000 Polish Jews suddenly fled into Western Germany. Their appearance was somewhat embarrassing, and their emi­gration to Palestine and the United States was carried out in record time. Subsequently, the number of Polish Jewish sur­vivors underwent consider­able revision; in the American-Jewish Year Book 1948-1949 it was placed at 390,000, quite an advance on the original 80,000. You may expect further revisions upwards in the future as things unfold.
SOME CONCENTRATION CAMP MEMOIRS
The most influential agency in the propagation of the exter­mination legend has been the paper-back book and magazine in­dustry, and it is through their sensational publications, produced for commercial gain, that the average person is made acquainted with a myth of an entirely politi­cal charac­ter and purpose. The hey-day of these hate-Germany books was in the 1950’s, when vir­ulent Germano-phobia found a ready market, but the industry continues to flourish and is expe­riencing another boom today and increases by leaps and bounds annually. The industry’s prod­ucts consist generally of so-called “memoirs”, and these fall into two basic cate­gories: those which are supposedly by former S.S. men, camp commandants and the like, and those bloodcur­dling reminis­cences allegedly by former concentration camp in­mates.
COMMUNIST ORIGINS
Here is where you had best begin to pay careful attention so that you get the “hook-up” be­cause this IS, after all, the most elabo­rate plan at One World Government ever on your planet.
Of the first kind, the most outstanding example is COMMAN­DANT OF AUSCHWITZ by Rudolf Hoess (London, 1960), which was originally published in the Polish language as Wspom­nienia by the Communist Government. Hoess, a young man who took over at Auschwitz in 1940, was first arrested by the British and detained at Flensburg, but he was soon handed over to the Polish Communist authorities who condemned him to death in 1947 and executed him almost immediately. The so-called Hoess memoirs are undoubtedly false and were produced under Communist auspices, as you shall see, though the Com­munists them­selves claim that Hoess was “ordered to write the story of his life” and a hand-written original supposedly exists, but no one has ever seen it. Hoess was subjected to incred­ible torture and brain-washing as only the Communist Psy­chopoliticians can inflict it during the period of his ar­rest, and his testimony at Nuremberg was delivered in a mindless mono­tone as he stared blankly into space. Even Re­itlinger rejects this testimony as hopelessly untrustworthy. It is indeed remarkable how much of the “evidence” regarding the Six Million stems from Commu­nist sources; this includes the ma­jor documents such as the Wisliceny statement and the Hoess “memoirs”, which are undoubt­edly the two most quoted items in extermina­tion literature, as well as all the infor­mation on the so-called “death camps” such as Auschwitz. This informa­tion comes from the Jewish His­torical Commission of Poland; the Central Commission for the Investigation of War Crimes, Warsaw; and the Russian State War Crimes Commis­sion, Moscow.

Reitlinger acknowledges that the Hoess testimony at Nurem­berg was a catalog of wild exaggera­tions, such as that Auschwitz was disposing of 16,000 people a day, which would mean a total at the end of the war of over 13 million. In­stead of exposing such estimates for the Soviet-inspired frauds they obviously are, Re­itlinger and others prefer to think that such ridiculous exaggera­tions were due to “pride’ in doing a professional job. Ironically, this is completely irreconcilable with the supposedly authentic Hoess memoirs, which make a clever attempt at plausibility by suggesting the opposite picture of distaste for the job. Hoess is sup­posed to have “confessed” to a total of 3 million people ex­terminated at Auschwitz, though at his own trial in Warsaw the prosecution reduced the number to 1,135,000. However, we have already noted that the Soviet government announced an of­ficial figure of 4 million after their “investigation” of the camp in 1945. This kind of casual juggling with mil­lions of people does not appear to worry the writers of the extermination litera­ture.

A review of the Hoess “memoirs” in all their horrid detail would be tedious. We may confine ourselves to those aspects of the extermination legend which are designed with the ob­vious pur­pose of forestalling any proof of its falsity. Such, for example, is the manner in which the alleged exter­mination of Jews is de­scribed. This was supposed to have been carried out by a “special de­tachment” of Jewish prison­ers. They took charge of the newly arrived contingents at the camp, led them into the enormous “gas-chambers” and dis­posed of the bodies after­wards. The S.S., therefore, did very little, so that most of the S.S. personnel at the camp could be left in complete ignorance of the “extermination program”. Of course, no Jew would ever be found who claimed to have been a member of this gruesome “special detachment”, so that the whole issue is left conveniently unprovable. It is worth repeating that no living, au­thentic eye-witness of these events has ever been produced.

Conclusive evidence that the Hoess memoirs are a forgery lies in an incredible slip by the Com­munist editors. Hoess is sup­posed to say that the Jehovah’s Witnesses at Auschwitz ap­proved of murdering the Jews because the Jews were the en­emies of Christ. It is well known that in Soviet Russia to­day and in all her satellite countries of eastern Europe, the Commu­nists conduct a bit­ter campaign of suppression against the Jeho­vah’s Witnesses, whom they regard as the re­ligious sect most dangerous to Communist beliefs. That this sect is deliberately and grossly defamed in the Hoess mem­oirs proves the docu­ment’s Communist origins beyond any doubt.
INCRIMINATING REMINISCENCES
Certainly the most bogus “memoirs” yet published are those of Adolf Eichmann. Before his ille­gal kidnapping by the Is­raelis in May, 1960 and the attendant blaze of international public­ity, few people had ever hear of him. He was indeed a relatively unimportant person, the head of Office A4b in De­partment IV (the Gestapo) of the Reich Security Head Office. His office su­pervised the transportation to detention camps of a particular section of enemy aliens, the Jews. A posi­tive flood of unadul­terated rubbish about Eichmann showered the world in 1960, of which we may cite as an example Homer Clarke’s EICH­MANN: THE SAVAGE TRUTH. (“The orgies often went on until six in the morning, a few hours before con­signing the next batch of victims to death,” says Clarke in his chapter “Streamlined Death, Wild Sex Orgies”, p. 124.)

Strangely enough, the alleged “memoirs” of Adolf Eichmann suddenly appeared at the time of his abduction to Israel. They were uncritically published by the American “Life” mag­azine (Nov. 28, Dec. 5, 1960), and were supposed to have been given by Eichmann to a journalist in the Argentine shortly before his capture—an amazing coincidence. Other sources, however, gave an entirely different account of their origin, claiming that they were a record based on Eichmann’s comments to an “associate” in 1955, though no one even bothered to identify this person. By an equally ex­traordinary coincidence, war crimes investigators claimed shortly af­terwards to have just “found” in the archives of the U.S. Library of Congress, more than fif­teen years after the war, the “complete file” of Eichmann’s depart­ment. So far as the “memoirs” themselves are concerned, they were made to be as horribly incriminating as possi­ble without straying too far into the realms of the purest fantasy, and depict Eichmann speak­ing with enor­mous relish about “the physical annihilation of the Jews”. Their fraudulence is also attested to by various factual errors, such as that Himmler was already in command of the Reserve Army by April of 1944, instead of af­ter the July plot against Hitler’s life, a fact which Eichmann would certainly have known. The appearance of these “memoirs” at precisely the right moment leaves no doubt that their object was to present a pre-trial propaganda picture of the archetypal “unregenerate Nazi and fiend in human shape”.

The circumstances of the Eichmann trial in Israel do not concern us here; the documents of So­viet Origin which were used in evi­dence, such as the Wisliceny statement, have been examined al­ready, and for an account of the third-degree methods used on Eichmann during his captivity to render him “co-operative” the reader is referred to the London Jewish Chronicle, Sept. 2, 1960. More relevant to the literature of the extermination leg­end are the contents of a letter which Eichmann is supposed to have written voluntarily and handed over to his captors in Buenos Aries. It need hardly be added that its Israeli authorship is transparently obvi­ous. Nothing in it stretches human credulity further than the phrase “I am submitting this declara­tion of my own free will,” but the most hollow and revealing statement of all is his alleged willingness to appear before a court in Israel, “so that a true picture may be transmitted to fu­ture genera­tions.”
Now you who are in knowledge of possibilities contained herein, please be patient and keep to the subject. It mat­ters not whether this man was an “imposter”, “synthetic”, “double” or just the “same old man”—for the intent is the same and that is to further deepen the deceit by what­ever means necessary to keep the world from finding out in time to stop the move for world control.

TREBLINKA FABRICATIONS

One of the latest reminiscences to appear in print are those of Franz Stangl, the former com­mandant of the camp of Tre­blinka in Poland who was sentenced to life imprisonment in Dec. 1970. These were published in an article by the London Daily Tele­graph Magazine, Oct. 8, 1971, and were supposed to derive from a series of interviews with Stangl in prison. He died a few days after the interviews were concluded. These alleged remi­niscences are certainly the goriest and most bizarre yet pub­lished, though one is grateful for a few admissions by the writer of the article, such as that “the evidence presented in the course of his trial did not prove Stangl him­self to have committed spe­cific acts of murder” and that the account of Stangl’s beginnings in Poland “was in part fabrication”.

A typical example of this fabrication was the description of Stangl’s first visit to Treblinka. As he drew into the railway station there, he is supposed to have seen “thousands of bodies” just strewn around next to the tracks, “hundreds, no, thousands of bodies everywhere, putre­fying, decom­posing”. And “in the station was a train full of Jews, some dead, some still alive...it looked as if it had been there for days.” The account reaches the heights of absur­dity when Stangl is alleged to have got out of his car and “stepped kneedeep into money; I didn’t know which way to turn, which way to go. I waded in papernotes, currency, precious stones, jewelry and clothes. They were everywhere, strewn all over the square.” The scene is com­pleted by “whores from Warsaw weaving drunk, dancing, singing, playing music”, who were on the other side of the barbed wire fences. To liter­ally believe this account of sinking “kneedeep” in Jewish bank-notes and precious stones amid thousands of putrefying corpses and lurching, singing pros­titutes would require the most phe­nomenal degree of gulli­bility, and in any circumstances other than the Six Million leg­end it would be dismissed as the most outra­geous non­sense.

The statement which certainly robs the Stangl memoirs of any vestige of authenticity is his al­leged reply when asked why he thought the Jews were being exterminated: “They wanted the Jews’ money,” is the answer. “That racial business was just secondary.” The series of inter­views are supposed to have ended on a highly dubious note indeed. When asked whether he thought there had been “any conceivable sense in this horror”, the former Nazi commandant supposedly replied with enthusi­asm: “Yes, I am sure there was. Perhaps the Jews were meant to have this enormous jolt to pull them to­gether; to create a peo­ple; to identify themselves with each other”. One could scarcely imagine a more perfect answer had it been invented!
Let us have a break at this point prior to taking up the so-called Diary of Anne Frank.
Thank you,
Hatonn
http://fourwinds10.com/journals/pdf/J040.pdf
Found at:
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_d...p?q=1302104009
RELATED ARTICLES:
THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE – THE HOLOCAUST VOL II’ – PHOENIX JOURNAL #40 - CHAPTER 13. See:http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/THE-TRILLION-DOLLAR-LIE-THE-HOLOCAUST-VOL-II-PHOENIX-JOURNAL-40---CHAPTER-13.shtml