PJ 52
CHAPTER 11

REC #1 HATONN

SUN., JULY 26, 1992 8:12 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 345

SUNDAY. JULY 26. 1992

NOTHING HAPPENING?
If you think nothing is happening then I concern for your world more than can be imagined. Just on a local level the laser pulse beams are so debilitating that my crew finds it difficult to func­tion. The constant bombardment makes it very tempting to simply "give up" and await whatever shall be coming. Oh, would that it could be so simple. You are being toyed with in a most heinous manner and my heart goes out unto you. My team notes that the silent hours are so busy that their physical mechanical houses will hardly function upon arising.

Many of you are going within and finding your day to day con­clusions of actions. I can offer no more than that as a teacher for in the remainder of journey it shall be moment to moment, day to day. Rejoice in the gift of even one more hour, one more day--and, if allowed just a few more years in which to grow--you can change this old world, friends. That is, if you want to do so. Most are marching now to the new piper's song and drumbeat to zombie-land.

CAMP DAVID?
Your President is off for a "get-away" at Camp David? This is what the CNN speaker said this morning! Can't the writers re­member from one minute to the next, their stories? Remember--he went to Camp David with his high level staff, Powell, Ch­eney, Quayle, etc., to decide when to bomb Iraq? Is that so unimportant that it is called a "get-away"? What ever happened to "doing business" in the Capital and White House of your government? Besides, all the while they were "making plans and contingency operations"--how is it that Powell was also off making speeches which were also shown on the same news-cast? These were political, so guess what is most important? What do YOU know? How do you know that you know? Do you have any idea at all of what is going on beyond that which you are shown on TV or in the press? I thought not.

Just remember, friends, Bush declared the first Iraq war from his usual office: the golf course. World affairs and death of a nation in between golf ball holes and on golf carts. Does this strike you as less deadly than one, Adolf Hitler, who at least de­clared his intent "to the people" on "working" ritual--not from vacation-land. Do you realize that ALL of Bush's major decla­rations of intended death dealing doom bombs--have come from his GET-AWAYS and always from a place of "game-playing"? Can it be that he is always at "play" or is it just imagining coin­cidence? Could it be that the "one" shown to you "isn't" the entity in point of making those horrendous decisions against you and your nation? You had better take a better look at all those Elite puppets.

BAKER IN PHILIPPINES
Where is your Secretary of State while the world dangles be­tween disaster and catastrophe? Ah, indeed, he is in the Philip­pines! Why? Would you find it strange that Imelda Marcos has gone to do banking in Hong Kong (right now!)? She has to have SPECIAL permits to go anywhere so how could this be--and only four days, yet. (??) Could there be some kind of Pay-Off being setup for this so-called little "Indonesian Conference"? Why is Pinatubo blowing again? Let me tell you again, students of life progress--the Philippines are the most important point of remaining heritage in your world. It is so important that Dharma sits and stares at 33 hours of taped language course and four texts on the language of Tagalog--the native language of the Philippines. It is too much; I agree that it is too much at this time, but we must have it available when I need it. This does not mean, please, that any of you Filipinos who speak Tagalog may begin pounding her with your language to get to me--YOU GET TO ME DIRECTLY AND IT ONLY BURIES HER IN TOTAL BEWILDERMENT. YOU MUST, ALSO, YOU PRESENTERS--RECEIVE FROM ME DIRECTLY. Usually, silence is the best approach to almost all things--for in the si­lence you can HEAR!

In the silence she is also becoming attuned to Lakota when Grandfather calls. What links do you ones have to your past heritage? Go into the silence and perhaps you will hear and know. There are no accidents--why would Little Crow be a Lakota? Why not a Mayan? Well, WHO says he wasn't--isn't? How can you LEARN these things if you remain locked into the moment of concern about that which is contradiction? If you learn the clues and guidelines--you can KNOW without asking another, even a higher brother, for the answers. I like to often repeat Little Crow's speaking: "It will all be exactly as it will be".

GO READ YOUR LESSONS
Instead of reading a "few" of the volumes and papers and then barraging me with questions--even about ones such as Billy Meier, etc. Why do you not avail yourselves of ALL the infor­mation and you will KNOW the answers? I have no interest in dawdling over one speaker or another--the world is made of over 6-1/2 BILLION people--each needing, needing, needing - - -. Does MY opinion of, say, the BOOK OF ENOCH or OAH­SPE actually mean so much to you? If you have read my pro­jections and used the never-changing guidelines--YOU WILL KNOW THE VALUE AND/OR THE ERRORS. The great Wisdom keepers are knowing that there are many ways to pre­sent "truth" and most often the best way to discern Truth is through the blackest lie. How can YOU gain in this wisdom if you attend the details of "man's" blatherings without giving guidelines to the reception and sorting into valid, possibly valid and erroneous or false? To get my opinion on those things is exactly that--my opinion. Some of you want my opinions so that you can confirm your own or, somehow prove ME WRONG. I am in no contest for anything and I am here to prove nothing--I have a mission and I am doing it to the best of my capability (which is quite adequate). Truth is a strange commodity-it stands alone and seems always to be attacked in the most heinous manners when it would be obvious that were it NOT Truth--no one would pay a second glance at the circumstance.

EXAMPLE?

QUOTING: Wednesday, July 8, 1992, The Honolulu Adver­tiser: Historian says the Holocaust never occurred, JEWS ACCUSE GOEBBELS' DIARY TRANSLATOR OF BEING BIASED.
Associated Press: LONDON--Revisionist historian David Irv­ing's key role in getting Joseph Goebbels' diaries published has sparked protest by Jews, and provoked debate over the accuracy of translations by a man who claims there was no Holocaust (as presented).

The Sunday Times (London), which paid Irving for tran­scribing previously unpublished extracts from the diaries as well as a "finder's fee" for delivering them to the paper, has been attacked for dealing with the controversial historian.

The state archives in Moscow, where the diaries were dis­covered, has also become embroiled in the controversy because of its dealings with Irving. The cash-strapped archives, which allowed him to work for free, now says it should be paid.

Sunday Times Editor Andrew Neil said the controversy over Irving has obscured the potential impact of the previously un­published segments of the diaries, which Oxford historian Nor­man Stone says fill "the largest outstanding gap in the documentation of the Third Reich".

Since the rival Independent newspaper revealed details of the publishing deal last week, Irving's house has been picketed by Jewish Groups and the Anti-Nazi League [off-spring of British Intelligence]. The protesters say Irving's views make him unsuitable to translate the diaries of Hitler's propa­ganda chief. [H: What would make his "suitable"? Would changing the truth to lies make him more suitable, per­haps?]
Irving said yesterday that windows have been smashed at British bookstores selling his works. He also said members of underground Jewish organizations, disguised as telephone engi­neers, raided his apartment and smashed down the door with a sledgehammer.

Irving, who has written many books about World War II and is preparing a biography of Goebbels, denied accusations that he was an "apologist for Hitler". But he stood by his contention that there was no Holocaust as presented. In an article he wrote in Tuesday's Guardian, he predicted that "one year from now the Holocaust will be discredited".

Times Editor Neil said it would have been more convenient if an uncontroversial historian had offered the newspaper new ex­tracts from the diaries, but Irving came up with "a world scoop" and he wasn't about to turn it down.

Neil said Irving was one of the few people who could deci­pher Goebbels' spidery handwriting and shorthand. Irving said it had taken him two years to learn how to read it.

Actress Miriam Karlin, a member of the Anti-Nazi League, who protested outside Irving's house on Saturday, said he was totally unsuitable for translating accurately because of his denial of the Holocaust as it happened, in which her mother's family died. [H: Does this make HER possibly a better translator?]
Irving countered: "My opponents say, 'There you are, he's going to give it a right-wing slant'. But you can't do that be­cause you'd leave yourself open to immediate detection".

Neil said The Sunday Times has done extensive checks against already published sections of Goebbels' diaries and is convinced the new extracts are not fakes. In 1983, the news­paper bought purported Hitler diaries, which turned out to be forgeries.

"It's not a mistake the paper could afford to make twice," Neil said. End of quoting.

AND WHAT OF JESSE JACKSON?
He was just in Brussels speaking to the World Jewish Congress meeting. (Jesse Jackson? (??)) He says, "Zionism is a libera­tion movement", and called for Jews and Blacks to re-create their "old coalition". Old coalition? Seems to me it was only a brief period of time ago that the Jews were blasting Jesse Jack­son as an Anti-Semite for referring to New York City as "Hymietown" during his 1984 campaign and embracing Pales­tine Liberation Organization Chairman Yasser Arafat. Isn't it amazing that you can simply lie a bit more and swing votes in your favor? Well, chelas, if it depends on my telling you what you want to hear--forget it--for, from me, you shall have Truth whether or not it wears well in the voting stands.

NO NULL-TIME YESTERDAY?
Oh? Tell that to the ones who were caught for over four hours in total blackout and no way to get the information to anyone--not even CNN. Then, when the word DID get out--all media was forbidden to even reference it. THE MEDIA WAS WARNED THAT IT WAS PART OF A TOP-SECRET OP­ERATION AND INVOLVED NATIONAL SECURITY AND THERE WAS AN IMMEDIATE GAG ORDER ON ALL DE­TAILS. ANYONE A BIT SCARED YET?

THE BIG ONE?
Be patient, little rushers, California reeled and rocked for the past two days and is still shaking this minute. Be patient and when you least expect it--smile, you're on Candid Earthquake. The Elite have a LOT riding on the events of these days and George Bush has problems brewing on top of his problems.

INDICTMENTS
So, NOW, we are going to consider indicting Reagan and top aides for being involved in Iran-gate? What of Bush? He was the biggest part of all and his name isn't even getting honorable mention today.

What WILL you do about Bush--and all those Presidents who have covered-up and allowed to die, all those sons and husbands of you-the-people? Let me share with you, an article brought to my attention within the Spotlight. Thank you for sharing for it says it more believably than can I in reaching through the physi­cal walls of "prove it to me".

QUOTE:

The Spotlight, July 27, 1992 (mailed 7/17/92): POW EXCLUSIVES CONFIRMED (front page), Presidential Du­plicity Proven:

The final chapter can now be written on the story of the fate of American prisoners of war and missing in action left behind at the end of American participation in the Vietnam War nearly 20 years ago--in 1973. [H: No there won't be any "new" things herein--but you need it ALL. The article is by one Mike Blair whom I respect but find his information of­ten lacks the "whole truth"--as in the assassination of John Kennedy, he somehow "missed" the main murderers. So be it.]

Exclusive to the Spotlight; by Mike Blair.

The Senate Select Committee on POW and MIA Affairs, a temporary committee set up and funded to determine the fate of America's Vietnam War missing, will soon be able to write its final report to Congress and the American people as to the fate of some 2,300 missing Americans still unaccounted for from the war in Southeast Asia.

It will not be a pretty report, and it will shock and disgust the American people, for it concludes a story of infamy, deceit and betrayal, so great as to never have been surpassed in U.S. his­tory.

The report will detail how the administrations of five succes­sive American presidents--Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George Bush--could have resolved the live POW-MIA issue but instead tried to bury it forever in one of official Washington's numerous memory holes. There is still time to bring redemption, to resolve the issues. That he will is doubtful. [H: I note that the biggest picture in the article is of HENRY KISSINGER! I wonder how they are going to blame all of this on the "Little Gray Aliens 'holding your administration hostage'"?]
......Yes, indeed, American prisoners of war were left behind, alive in Southeast Asia. STOP QUOTING.

[H: I can't continue this barrage of words--as right-on as they might be, because it is obvious that if 370-plus troops were left on the tarmac when the rest flew home to safety--there WERE men left in Southeast Asia!

Of course there were men left there and are still there. This writer, however, wants you to believe the men were "for sale", etc., No, it all now has to do with international drug trade and higher causes.
I believe that there is a much more important notation in small size that would explain a lot more if you could get the truth on the man, in point, Richard Armitage! I believe you would be able to get confirmation from one Col. James Gritz regarding my statement.]

Quote:

SECRET AGENDA? Richard Armitage, the U.S. State Department manipulator who engineered the downfall of Ferdinand Marcos, is touring Australia, speaking on regional security , sponsored by the Heritage Foundation AND Institute of Public Affairs. However, his main thrust was against non-candidate Ross Perot, who he denounced to the Australian press as a "fascist unfit to control the CIA, FBI and IRS". Armitage added that Australia should have grave fears concerning Perot. Now they don't have to worry. End of quoting. (Also from Spotlight, same day but from press releases elsewhere).


Secret agenda? That must be THE most understated one-liner of the year!

WAKE UP, WORLD
I have written about the Heritage Foundation AND THE Insti­tute of Public Affairs. Is it too much to ask that you ones read the information I bring you before you continue to ask and ask and ask questions which have been answered so many times that other readers withdraw in boredom? If you cannot "afford" the books I know not what to do other than DEMAND that they be carried in your local libraries. I again remind you, we write for almost 7 BILLION people and I cannot attend individuals who inquire on personal subjects. Ask those questions of God and LISTEN for the response. Often, however, it will be, "Go get and read the information I am sending unto you! What is most important in your journey? Think carefully in an­swering ME".
Armitage was the most involved of all your State Depart­ment personnel in drug dealings in the Golden Triangle--get Gritz's information, tapes--whatever you can get hands on. He also was in Lebanon (about drugs and "deals" at the on­set of the Iraq "Gulf War"). Why would that possibly be?? Watch this one man and you'll get a LOT OF ANSWERS!

HOW DO YOU GET INFORMATION?
You can read that which we bring and it will "get you through" but if you only are driven to proof and more, more and more than I have time to outlay--you are pretty much on your own. My people can supply you with listings of books of truth as far as insight into physical workings are concerned but the most im­portant, of course, are as this one in hand, REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN ON THE POSSIBILITY AND DESIRABILITY OF PEACE. This book was printed in 1967 (sorry, to you who demanded I use "new" material). It was WITH­DRAWN from the libraries and public access (just as is planned with the PLEIADES CONNECTION series and the TANGLED WEBS series--under way right now) before the third printing could be completed.

Well, you ask, "Couldn't YOU give us that information like you do other things? You are already in trouble and seem to keep it flowing--why don't you give it to us"?
I guess I shall consider that as a request for I got much inquiry when I mentioned it prior to now. It is certainly appropriate and timely information RIGHT NOW:

The first paragraph of the "Introduction" reads: "The report which follows summarizes the results of a two-and-a-half-year study of the broad problems to be anticipated in the event of a general transformation of American society to a condition lack­ing its most critical current characteristics: its capability and readiness to make war when doing so is judged necessary or de­sirable by its political leadership..... "

I realize you don't want to hear about "old" stuff, i.e., George Bush and "Watergate", but how can you relate to NOW if you have no understanding of that which went prior to NOW?

I had left off in the story a million years ago, it seems, with in­formation regarding "Chairman George Bush in Watergate". I believe I had only done one writing on the matter when I changed to include Ray Renick's more critical and crucial in­formation--especially if you are a West Coast area dweller try­ing to save assets and property. He outlays the San Luis Obispo Connection and it has all but cost him his life. Support this man, please.

As to property, it was noted on the "news" yester evening that Home Fed "properties" were being auctioned "with no minimum bid" and that purchasers could get houses, etc. for as little as ONE DOLLAR. Funny thing is that Home Fed had a trust deed on this "EKKER" property and yet, consideration of a non-minimum bid, even WITH NO AUCTIONEER PRESENT, made the court laugh and throw out the case in point. Whew--I simply do not see how you can keep up, it flows so quickly and so dankly.

At any rate, I shall ask that another short notice from Renick be inserted here and then we will do a bit of continuation of the Watergate involvement of your beloved Commander-in-Chief.

QUOTE:

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS--May 19, 1992
Public Comment--Transcript

My name is Ray Renick. I live at 1625 Nipomo Avenue, Los Osos.

I'm sure you've seen my report which is a synopsis of half my lifetime of research into government drug trafficking and murder and assassination. There are hundreds of copies of this report, not only in this building, but in this county, and in Washington at several congressional investigations which are going on right now.

Perhaps you've heard some of the radio broadcasts I did on KVEC TALK RADIO, where I covered the same information. I call this report "The S L O Connection" because it connects San Luis Obispo officials with the crimes of drug trafficking, murder and assassination and includes the assassination of Presi­dent John Kennedy which I described on my January 28 broad­cast with Dave Congleton on KVEC and where I identified, on January 14, one of the San Luis Obispo officials as Judge William P. Clark.

I am in the process of initiating a lawsuit which will mandate an investigation of this information and these charges. This lawsuit will augment an existing lawsuit filed in Ventura County by Gary Wean which calls for an investigation of new evidence in the murder of Senator Robert Kennedy and names several prominent Californians.

This is an appeal for additional information. Information about drug trafficking of high government officials, as well as information about murder and assassination--especially about the Kennedys. [H: We wrote in detail about the death and BS given you regarding Robert Kennedy's death--I hope that you will obtain the JOURNAL in point and get current for these people now bringing more and more truth are in need of backup and it can only come from ones who already KNOW! Stop asking, "What can 'I' do," and start doing it! GET INFORMED AND, FRANKLY, THE JOURNALS AND THE LIBERATOR ARE THE BEST RESOURCE ON YOUR PLANET AT THIS TIME FOR IT WILL GIVE GUIDELINES AS TO WHERE TO GO AND GET MORE. This paper in point is called PHOENIX LIBERATOR for a very, very good reason: it is patterned after and by the ones who presented the LIBERATOR at Boston--William Lloyd Garrison, A.D. 1805-1879. You ones have some daring his­torians in your past--do not let them down now that you can change a world by your simple participation.]
Also information about the Gehlen Organization, the Zapata Cattle Company, Eagles Nest, and the murders of Scott Alexan­der and Steven Carr.

I live at 1625 Nipomo Avenue in Los Osos. I do not have a telephone but I will appreciate any information I can get. Thank you. (ZIP: 93402)

KCBX FM 90 9:55 AM

END OF QUOTING.

* * *
Now to Bush:

We take up exactly where we left off in prior writing and at the topic of "Moves for Impeachment". Please remember that we write dated JOURNALS and if you read with that real­ization, the grammar as applied to literature (novels) will not be so lacking in your perception. WE intend to simply bring information from wherever we garner it and in the most simplistic format possible. We do not ever expect the "Nobel Peace Prize" so let us deal simply with "what IS". So, now, we continue with QUOTING:
[H: I am reminded to "remind you" that the book, IM­MACULATE DECEPTION will be ready for distribution around mid-August and it is so worthy of your attention. I continue, however, with that which we have and since it dif­fers only in semantics, we shall utilize it. Yes, I do have the manuscript of the above volume--but I wish to utilize it else­where. Thank you.]
(Moves for Impeachment): Later, on Nixon's last Monday, Bush joined White House Counsel J. Fred Buzhardt and Dean Burch on a visit to Congressman Rhodes, and showed him the transcript of the smoking gun tape. "This means that there's just no chance in the world that I won't vote to impeach him". Bush must have heaved a sigh of relief, since this is what he had wanted Rhodes to tell Nixon to get him to quit. "Rhodes later let it be known that he was offended that Bush had been briefed before he was", but of course, Bush was a top official of the Nixon White House.

But Nixon still refused to quit, raising the prospect of a trial before the Senate that could be damaging to many besides Nixon. The next day, Tuesday, August 6, 1974, saw the last meeting of the Nixon cabinet, with Chairman George in atten­dance. Nixon's opening statement was, "I would like to discuss the most important issue confronting this nation, and confronting us internationally too--inflation". Nixon then argued adamantly for some minutes that he had examined the course of events over the recent past and that he had "not found an impeachable of­fense, and therefore resignation is not an acceptable course". Vice President Ford predicted that there would be certain im­peachment by the House, but that the outcome in the Senate could not be predicted. Ford then said he was an interested party on the resignation issue and would make no further com­ment.

Nixon then wanted to talk about the budget again, and about an upcoming summit conference on the economy. Attorney General Saxbe interrupted him.
"Mr. President, I don't think we ought to have a summit conference. We ought to make sure you have the ability to govern". Nixon quietly assured Saxbe that he had the ability to govern. Then Chairman George piped up, in support of Saxbe. The President's ability to govern was impaired, said George. Watergate had to be brought to an end expeditiously, Bush argued. From his vantage point at Nixon's right elbow, Kissinger could see that Bush was advancing to­ward the conclusion that Nixon had to resign. "It was cruel. And it was necessary", thought Kissinger. "More than enough had been said", was the Secretary of State's impression. Kissinger was seeking to avoid backing Nixon into a corner where he would become more stubborn and more resistant to the idea of resignation, making that dreaded Senate trial more likely. And this was the likely consequence of Bush's line of argument.

"Mr. President, can't we just wait a week or two and see what happens"? asked Saxbe. Bush started to support Saxbe again, but now Nixon was getting more angry. Nixon glared at Bush and Saxbe, the open advocates of his resignation. "No," he snapped. "This is too important to wait".

KISSINGER PREVAILS
Now the senior cabinet officer decided he had to take the floor to avoid a total confrontation but would leave Nixon be­sieged but still holding the Oval Office. Kissinger's guttural ac­cents were heard in the cabinet room: "We are not here to offer excuses for what we cannot do. We are here to do the nation's business. This is a very difficult time for our country. Our duty is to show confidence. It is essential that we show it is not safe for any country to take a run at us. For the sake of foreign pol­icy we must act with assurance and total unity. If we can do that, we can vindicate the structure of peace". The main pur­pose of this pompous tirade had been to bring the meeting to a rapid end, and it worked. "There was a moment of embarrassed silence around the table", recalls Nixon, and after a few more remarks on the economy, the meeting broke up.

Kissinger stayed behind with Nixon to urge him to resign, which Nixon now said he felt compelled to do. [H: Note that Mr. Kissinger usually "gets his way" for he is, after all, a "diplomat of diplomats", so it's said of him.] Bush sought out Al Haig to ponder how Nixon might be forced out. "What are we going to do?" asked Bush. Haig told Bush to calm down, explaining: "We get him up to the mountaintop, then he comes down again, then we get him up again". Kissinger walked back to his office in the West Wing and met Gen. Brent Scowcroft [H: The "Mormon" representative.], the NSC di­rector. Kissinger told Scowcroft that "there was precious little support" for the President. Kissinger, no mean hypocrite in his own right, thought that Saxbe had been "weak-livered". Bush and Saxbe had both been petty and insensitive, Kissinger thought. He compared Bush and Saxbe and the rest to a seventeenth-century royal court with the courtiers scurrying about, concerned with themselves rather than with their country. [God forbid!]
During this cabinet meeting, Bush was already carrying a letter to Nixon that would soon become the unkindest cut of all for Chairman George's wretched patron. This letter was de­livered to Nixon on August 7. It read as follows:

BUSH LETTER TO NIXON
Dear Mr. President,
It is my considered judgment that you should now resign. I expect in your lonely embattled position this would seem to you as an act of disloyalty from one you have supported and helped in so many ways. My own view is that I would now ill serve a President whose massive accomplishments I will always respect and whose family I love, if I did not now give you my judgment. Until this moment resignation has been no answer at all, but given the impact of the latest development, and it will be a last­ing one, I now firmly feel resignation is best for the country, best for this President. I believe this view is held by most Republican leaders across the country. This letter is much more difficult because of the gratitude I will always have for you. If you do leave office history will properly record your achievements with a lasting respect".
The next day, August 8, 1974, Nixon delivered his resigna­tion to Henry Kissinger. Kissinger could now look forward to exercising the powers of the presidency at least until January 1977, and perhaps well beyond. [H: He has always and con­tinues to exercise those powers.]

For a final evaluation of Bush in Watergate, we may refer to a sketch of his role during those times provided by Bush's friend, Maurice Stans, the finance director of the CREEP (Committee to Re-elect the President). This is how Stans sizes up Bush as a Watergate player: "George Bush, former member of Congress and former Ambassador to the United Nations. Bush, who proved he was one of the bravest men in Washington in agreeing to head the Republican National Committee during the 1973-74 phase of Watergate, kept the party organization to­gether and its morale high, despite massive difficulties of press criticism and growing public disaffection with the administra­tion. Totally without information as to what had gone on in Watergate behind the scenes, he was unable to respond knowl­edgeably to questions and because of that unjustly became the personal target of continuing sarcasm and cynicism from the media".

But there are many indications that Bush was in reality some­one who, while taking part in the fray, actually helped to steer Watergate toward the strategic outcome desired by the dominant financier faction, the one associated with Brown Brothers Har­riman and with London. As with so much in the life of this per­sonage, much of Bush's real role in Watergate remains to be un­earthed. To borrow a phrase from James McCord's defense of his boss, Richard Helms, we must see to it that "every tree in the forest will fall".
END OF QUOTING.

I am now asked to reprint one more thing and this comes from the Spotlight also via a couple of people who ask that we further the information per request of that publication. It is excellent so we are pleased to be of service.

BUSH LIES TO AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT
IRAQGATE HANKY-PANKY

President George Bush, appearing July 1 for nearly 90 min­utes on the CBS-TV program This Morning, lied to the Ameri­can people when he denied receiving a warning from a State Department legal officer that taxpayer-guaranteed agricultural loans to Iraq were being diverted to military use.

The president thus linked himself directly to an illegal cover-up of his administration's involvement in the burgeoning scandal involving the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro and its use as a con­duit to provide U.S.-backed loan guarantees to Iraq prior to last year's Persian Gulf conflict.

From 1983 right up to just weeks before the August, 1990 Iraqi invasion and annexation of neighboring Kuwait, some $5.5 million in U.S. government-guaranteed loans were funnelled to Iraq, most of it through the Atlanta office of the Italian state-owned bank, more commonly known as the Bank Lavoro. [H: This is only the tiny most tip of the iceberg and I am almost unwilling to let this go because it doesn't fully represent the magnitude in any manner. This is only one tiny conduit--with multiples of millions hidden through BCCI and simple "other" avenues of flow.]

CLEARLY LIED
Bush clearly lied to the American people in attempting to an­swer earlier testimony before the Judiciary Committee by Frank Lemay, the State Department's legislative management officer.

"You can talk about what one State Department employee (said)," Bush stammered in answering a question about the case, "and if we had known it, it wouldn't have happened". He thus went on the record as saying he had received no such warning.

Lemay told the committee that early on he had warned there was evidence the guaranteed loans to Iraq were being diverted to build up Iraq's military arsenal instead of for the agricultural purposes for which they were supposedly intended. He testified under oath that the circulation of his warnings was severely re­stricted but that they had been delivered to Secretary of State James Baker a full month prior to the administration's autho­rization of an additional $1 billion in loan guarantees in the fall of 1989.

The State Department is refusing to say whether Baker did in fact receive such a warning. Lemay's superior at the time, Un­der Secretary of State Richard T. McCormack, who is now in private business, declines to discuss his dealings with Baker concerning the case.

However, McCormack clearly made a liar of Bush when he admitted that
"Mr. Lemay's representations to the committee were entirely accurate".

GUT POLITICS
President Bush complained on the CBS program that suggestions he or other top officials knew of the diversion were "pure, gut American politics".

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jack Brooks (D-Texas), has asked U.S. Attorney General William Barr to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the Bank Lavoro af­fair and to prosecute any officials of the Bush administration in­volved in criminal activity connected with the banking scam.

The Judiciary Committee had been asked to investigate the Bank Lavoro case, and to request the appointment of a special prose­cutor, by the House Banking Committee, chaired by Rep. Henry Gonzalez (D-Texas), which has been trying to get to the bottom of the bank fraud since before the Persian Gulf conflict. [H: Indeed--even to the suggestion of Bush impeachment, if you recall. I would note that just to effort at getting a "special" prosecutor was a show and a half on the C-SPAN channel. I hope you ones stay attuned to those two C-SPAN channels because they are the "entertainment" center of your TV.]
Documents obtained by Gonzalez indicate both Baker and Bush's national security adviser, Brent Scowcroft [oops], a con­sultant for Bank Lavoro before joining the Bush administration, urged the Agriculture Department to grant the additional
$1 bil­lion in farm credits to Iraq through the Atlanta branch of the bank after the misuse of funds had become known.

Actually, documents reveal that Iraq's use of the American assistance to build its military force was discussed on October 13, 1989 at a meeting at the Agriculture Department. Those attending the meeting included lawyers and other officials of the department's Commodity Credit Corp. (CCC), which granted the taxpayer guarantees for the loans.

The minutes of the meeting state: "Although additional re­search needs to be done, it appears more and more likely that CCC-guaranteed funds and/or commodities may have been di­verted from Iraq to third parties in exchange for military hard­ware".

In fact, Gonalez has determined American grain, paid for by the guaranteed loans, was shipped out of the port of Houston and ultimately found its way to the then-Soviet Union and other so-called Eastern bloc nations, where it was bartered for military hardware sent to Iraq.

According to Gonzalez, the CIA knew all about the grain-for­-weapons operation. He said the intelligence warning flag "was either ignored or canceled by the State Department level or the Department of Commerce level and by other individuals who had some of the commercial and financial backgrounds, includ­ing highly placed individuals in the administration today, very high, specifically the national security adviser (Scowcroft) and the present deputy secretary of state (Lawrence Eagleburger)".

Iraq actually received $480 million of the $1 billion in guar­anteed loans requested by Baker. It has since defaulted on them and some $1.3 billion in previously guaranteed loans dating back to 1983. Most of the money, nearly $2 billion, has since been quietly paid with U.S. taxpayer funds.

NUMEROUS VIOLATIONS
Alleged criminal activities in the case concern the adminis­tration's involvement in purposely delaying the prosecution of officials of Bank Lavoro until after the Persian Gulf conflict, the alteration of some 68 Commerce Department documents to cover up the diversion of funds for military purposes, the mak­ing of false and misleading statements to Congress, numerous conflicts of interest and the failure of both the CCC and the Export-Import Bank to diligently pursue the circumstances of the loan guarantees.

Thus far, all requests by the Judiciary Committee for the ap­pointment of special prosecutors have led to their appointments.
END OF QUOTING.

Please feel free to copy this information, spindle, mutilate, use in bird-cages or whatever might spread the word, chelas. The fate of the planet actually rests in your hands--not mine. I only bring the word. Salu.

Allow us to close, Dharma, we are late for our meeting. Thank you for your service and attention.

I salute you who will take a stand AND CHOOSE FREEDOM.

Hatonn to clear, please.



PJ 52
CHAPTER 12

REC #1 HATONN

MON., JULY 27, 1992 10:10 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 346

MONDAY, JULY 27, 1992

ATTENTION!
The following Cease and Desist "order" (??) was forwarded to me this morning and therefore I shall share it with you immedi­ately. If it doesn't bear the most remarkable "fingerprints" of duly self-authorized adversaries (among us), then I have never seen such obvious evidence. (Editors: Please scan this in, so that you have full benefit of the original document. You will NEVER get better confirmation of several facts:
1) Persons be­hind this take us very seriously indeed. 2) They would have found exactly what they were looking for or they would never have DENIED it. (If, in fact, they monitored ANY­THING!) 3) Six months of special monitoring just to discount a "fictitious" space commander is most amusing and be­speaks the idiocy of the government system--WHY DID THEY PUT IN THE MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR "ALIEN" SPACE SEARCH PROGRAM IN THE WINTER PAST? Could this mean the elaborate network and tower transceiver stations and grid system IS NOT for monitoring "ET" communications but is, in fact, used for OTHER MORE MAGNIFICENT PURPOSES? (???) 4) "Final test monitoring today (2100Z26JUL)..."? Why didn't they sim­ply monitor the CIA and Edwards Field systems? Why would one "intelligence" service waste so much time, personnel and money when others are monitoring already? Further, does the one who instigated this meandering non­sense not realize that he represented the need for concern--originally? 5) Are we supposed to be impressed with a Col. Bill Straton, Hawaii 992441232852?. Please, print the text as received and then I shall respond.

********


RESPONSE: July 27, 1992

TO: Z234Z26 4824 9924451232852 N0000000 (no?)OR (no-no?) N04220 N04220 87833774598376464676734873587873187756449877136976 491964987538745483 83875

FROM: Cmdr. (Geo) G.C. Hatonn
57838454783578946919469194679631778944-
6577813787845378437843767646

RE: SIGNALS TEHACHAPI, CALIF. OPS
4824 INTELLIGENCE SIGNAL MONITORING

1, EXACTLY SIX MONTHS AGO, ENDING 2100Z26JUL, SPACECRAFT COMMANDER, CEASED FORTHWITH TRANSMITTING ON SAID FREQUENCY, AND CHANGED TO 1694.333 (IN YOUR WEATHER SATELLITE BAND). I APPRECIATE YOUR RECOGNITION OF OUR ORIGINAL BROADCASTING FREQUENCY--OUR READERS NEED THAT CONFIRMATION. AS TO "CLAIMS", WE ALSO CEASED "CLAIMING" THE ORIGINAL FREQUENCY AT THAT TIME, (THIS CAN BE VERIFIED MOST QUICKLY BY "RICK" AT RADIO "KOA", DENVER, COLORADO,
(TEL: 303:893-8500), WHEREIN IN A RECENTLY BROADCAST INTERVIEW THERE WAS GREAT ATTEN­TION CALLED TO THE FREQUENCY IN POINT. NONETHELESS, ANY GOOD RADIO OPERATOR WOULD SURELY HAVE BEEN RESOURCEFUL ENOUGH TO MONITOR SUCH A MINUTE SHORT BAND CHANGE, THEREFORE, I AM CONFIDENT YOU DID FIND THE TRANSMISSION AS YOU SO INTERESTINGLY CONFIRM IN YOUR "CEASE ORDER".

2) ONLY "STATIC" WAS RECORDED!? THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONFIRMATION, SIR. WHAT WAS IT THAT YOU EXPECTED TO HEAR? DID YOU EXPECT AN OP­ERATIVE WITH A DELIGHTFULLY SHAM BRITISH ACCENT WORKING FOR THE QUEEN OF GREAT BRITAIN? THERE WAS A MORE SIMPLE WAY OF FINDING OUT THAT A PULSE ONLY PRESENTS A STEADY SHRILL TONE OR "STATIC". MOREOVER, I DO NOT BROAD­CAST EXCEPT AT VARIOUS AND SUNDRY TIMES WHEN WORK IS IN PROGRESS. IF YOU CANNOT DE­CODE THE TRANSMISSION, THEN I MUST FURTHER SUGGEST THAT YOU COORDINATE WITH THE CIA THROUGH EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE AND/OR READ THE LIBERATOR. WE DO NOT, AS WITH YOUR GOV­ERNMENTS, KEEP "SECRETS", FOR OUR MISSION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR ELITE POLITICIANS, GOVERNMENTS OR INTERNATIONAL SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES OF ANY KIND. FURTHER, WE FIND YOUR "NEW WORLD ORDER" AN INTERESTING BUT RATHER PRIMITIVELY DELIBERATE MOVE TO DESTRUCTION OF FREEDOM FOR THE POPULACE WHILE THE ELITE GAIN TOTAL CONTROL THROUGH ONE WORLD GOV­ERNMENT AND FORCE. WE DO NOT INTERFERE NOR INTERVENE IN ANY ACTION, ALTHOUGH, IT IS TEMPTING TO DO SO FROM TIME TO TIME. WE COME AS THE "HOSTS" OF GOD IN PREPARATION FOR SE­CURING "OUR" PEOPLE--GOD LEAVES NOTHING TO "CHANCE"--NOT EVEN FOOLISH AND INCREDIBLY STUPID NONSENSE SUCH AS THIS PARTICULAR "CEASE" ORDER--ALTHOUGH WE ARE IN GREAT APPRECIATION FOR THE EFFORTS PUT FORTH IN OUR BEHALF TO GIVE FURTHER CREDIBILITY TO OUR PRESENCE.

WHY DO YOU THINK WE HAVE SET THINGS UP AS WE HAVE IN THIS PAST SEVERAL MONTHS WITH CONTACTS AS YOU ARE NOW WITNESSING? TO PULL YOU OUT OF YOUR WOOLY HOLES, OLD BUDDIES, AND I WELCOME YOU INTO THE "LIGHT". MY PEOPLE ARE ONLY INVOLVED IN PRESENTING THE "WORD" AS WE TRANSMIT IT AND YOU HAVE JUST CONFIRMED THE TRUTH OF IT--WHY WOULD YOU WISH US TO CEASE AND DESIST? I MOST CERTAINLY HOPE THAT THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED TO ALL "BASES" AND CENTRAL VORTEX RECEIVERS--IF NOT, PERHAPS THIS MES­SAGE WILL NOTIFY THE REMAINDER OF THE IN­TERESTED PARTIES OF THE WONDROUS CONFIR­MATION "FOR" US FOR I, PERSONALLY, WAS HAV­ING A BIT OF DIFFICULTY GETTING BELIEVABILITY TO THE MASSES--YOU HAVE JUST DONE THAT JOB FOR ME. I AM IN GREAT APPRECIATION. IF WE CAN BE OF ASSISTANCE TO YOU, PLEASE NOTIFY US FOR WE CAN BE REACHED AT THE SAME FREQUENCIES IN POINT HEREIN--AND--WE SPEAK ENGLISH (EVEN "THE QUEEN'S ENGLISH") SO DON'T BE HESITANT TO USE THAT LANGUAGE IN THE COURSE OF TRANSMIS­SIONS. I SALUTE YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST AND CONCERN ABOUT THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD THAT THEY NOT BE MISLED BY LEADERS WHO WOULD POSSIBLY SHADE THE TRUTH FROM THE MASSES--IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCE. I AM DOUBLY HONORED THAT YOU WOULD USE INCREDIBLY EXPENSIVE TIME AND APPARATUS TO CHECK THIS OUT FOR "YOU-THE­PEOPLE" AND THEN, BOTHER TO INFORM US OF POS­SIBLE DISCREPANCIES IN INFORMATION OUTLAY. MAY GOD BE WITH YOU, SIR, AND REWARD YOUR SERVICE WITH THAT WHICH YOU HAVE SO WILL­INGLY AND SINCERELY GIVEN TO US. WE ALL UNDERSTAND THE "CYCLE" LAW--THAT WHICH IS GIVEN FORTH IS RETURNED--IN KIND. THEREFORE, I SHALL CONTINUE TO MONITOR YOUR TRANSMISSION AND ACTIONS AND KEEP THE PUBLIC INFORMED. SALU.

3. YES, INDEED, I THINK THAT A 6 MONTH TRIAL AT DECODING TRANSMISSIONS IS ADEQUATE FOR OUR PURPOSES--I TRUST THEY HAVE BEEN ADEQUATE FOR YOURS. IF NOT, I'M SURE THE TAXPAYERS WOULD MOST CERTAINLY GIVE A FEW MILLION DOLLARS MORE TO RECONSIDER THE LENGTH OF STUDY-TIME FOR FUNDS ARE SURELY MORE VALU­ABLE IN THIS KIND OF "STUDY" THAN IN FOOD RE­LIEF OR UNEMPLOYMENT RESOURCES. AFTER ALL, THIS NEW WORLD ORDER MUST NOT SUFFER AT THE EXPENSE OF MERE "PEOPLE".

4. I WONDER IF YOU TRIED, JUST IN PASSING, 169443 KHz? JUST WONDERED! I SURELY DO WANT YOU TO FIND WHATEVER IT IS YOU ARE RESEARCHING. CRAFT COME INTO VISIBILITY AT A HARMONIC RESONANCE OF 169443 SO PERHAPS THERE IS WHEREIN LIES YOUR CONFUSION. PLEASE NOTIFY ME IF THERE IS MORE I CAN DO FOR YOU IN REGARDS TO THIS OFFICIAL MATTER.

5. I SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY GEORGE GREEN OF THIS DEMAND AND RESPONSE SO THAT HE NO LONGER MISINFORMS ANY OF THE PUBLIC WHO MIGHT RECEIVE ANY OF OUR "JOINT" INFORMATION.
I HEREIN ALSO RELIEVE HIM OF ANY RESPONSIBILITY IN THE MATTER FOR I ASSUME FULL RESPONSI­BILITY FOR ALL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THIS COM­MAND. I, FURTHER, WILL REQUIRE THAT THIS INFORMATION BE IMMEDIATELY AND PUBLICLY DIS­CLOSED BY AUDIBLE STATEMENT AT EACH AND EV­ERY SUBSEQUENT MEETING IN WHICH OUR WORK IS MENTIONED FOR I BELIEVE THIS IS THE PROPER PROCEDURE IN HANDLING SUCH "ORDERS" ACCORD­ING TO PRIOR "ORDERS" [REF: AMERICA WEST AIR­LINES AND OTHER PUBLISHING INFORMATION REGARDING "BANNED" AND "CONFISCATED" PUBLICATIONS]. I HAVE A WARPED (NO PUN INTENDED) "THRUST SYSTEM" BUT IT APPEARS TO ME THESE AS­SAULTS UPON OUR WORK "GIVES" CREDIBILITY RATHER THAN "DISTRACTS" FROM SAME. AS PUB­LISHER IN POINT, HOWEVER, I SHALL ALSO REQUEST THAT GEORGE GREEN SEE TO IT THAT THIS INFORMATION IS GIVEN FORTH WHEN ANY PUBLICATION OF AMERICA WEST BY ONE JOHN COLEMAN IS REF­ERENCED, FOR I WAS INVOLVED WITH THOSE PUBLI­CATIONS AND WISH NO MISLEADING INFORMATION TO REFLECT ON SAID PARTY OR ON COMMAND, AS WELL AS THE PUBLISHER IN POINT. I TRUST THIS MEETS WITH YOUR APPROVAL FOR WE DO NOT WISH TO CAUSE PROBLEMS FOR THE INTELLIGENCE SERVICES WHO ARE SO WILLINGLY SERVING YOUR NA­TIONS IN THIS TIME OF TOTAL CONFOUNDMENT. I CONTINUALLY EFFORT TO BRING ATTENTION TO YOUR SERVICE.

AGAIN I DO THANK YOU FOR CONFIRMING OUR PRIOR HUMBLE OFFERINGS TO A PUBLIC SO OFTEN MISLED BY ONES OF YOUR ORGANIZATIONS--TT IS WONDROUS INDEED, TO SEE THAT YOUR WORK HAS COME TO THE LEVEL OF SERVING THE PEOPLE FOR IT IS SO OFTEN UNRECOGNIZED. COL. OLIVER NORTH HAS POINTED OUT THIS FLAW IN THE SYSTEM SO OF­TEN--THAT YOU OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY WORK WITHOUT RECOGNITION AND THEREFORE, PUBLIC APPRECIATION AND HONOR. RECOGNIZING HOW PAINFUL IT WAS FOR THE TROOPS OF VIETNAM TO HAVE BEEN SO OVERLOOKED IN THEIR SERVICE TO THEIR NATION AND THE TOTAL SACRIFICE OF THE LIVES OF TROOPS LEFT AS POWs AND MIAs AF­TER ALL RECENT WARS--I DO WISH TO DO MY PART IN MAKING YOUR EFFORTS PUBLICLY NOTED. MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU!

I ASK, IN ADDITION, THAT GEORGE GREEN ATTEND COPIES OF THESE DOCUMENTS TO ALL SURVEIL­LANCE HEADQUARTERS WHICH CAN BE LOCATED WITHOUT BREAKING SECRECY AND/OR NATIONAL SECURITY
--I ASSUME THAT MR. GATES SHOULD BE FIRST IN OFFICIAL STATUS VIA "PRECISION MAIL". PERHAPS A COPY SHOULD BE ALSO DIRECTED TO MR. STICKNEY AT FEMA SINCE THE IMMEDIATE EXERCISES WITHIN THE NATIONAL UNITED STATES ARE UNDER FULL AND TOTAL CONTROL OF FEMA AND EXECUTIVE ORDER REGULATIONS.

GOOD DAY, AND WITH BEST REGARDS TO YOU, ALSO, SIR, I SALUTE YOUR GRACIOUS AND WILLING WORK BEYOND THE CALL OF DUTY (EVEN IF IT COULD BE CONSTRUED AS A BIT EXPENSIVE TO THE TAXPAYERS OF THE NATION AS A WHOLE).

SIGNING OFF TO CLEAR:
57838454783578946919467963177894465778137878453784376 7646

MESSAGE ENDS
MESSAGE ENDS
232254783267458323267878
565789

46738954773858
57838454783578946919467963177894465778137878453784376 7646

Editors Note: "Ray Renick shared the meeting of 7/26/92 with Commander Hatonn which also contained good discussions on Earth Quakes and the Photon Belt. An excellent set of tapes (3) to share with newcomers".