2/9 페이지 처음처음 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 마지막마지막
Results 3 to 4 of 17

제목: PJ#026, COUNTERFEIT BLESSINGS THE ANTI-CHRIST

  1. #3
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default 응답: PJ#026, COUNTERFEIT BLESSINGS THE ANTI-CHRIST

    PJ 26
    CHAPTER 1
    REC #1 HATONN
    WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6, 1991 9:07 A.M. YEAR 4, DAY 202

    WHERE ARE WE?
    In the pickle pot, in a dilemma, in a mess, in confusion and muddling through the first skirmish of the "Mother of all Wars"! You are in a deflationary depression regardless of what your Earth brother broker will tell you. No? Oh I see, your "inflationary" EXPERTS say it has to be inflationary? Why? Undoubtedly the prices of some things will continue to climb for a while--but you must look to the banking/Federal Reserve wisp for your clues.

    The Fed must initially make reserves available to the banking system. The Fed does this mostly by buying government paper assets--treasury bills, notes, and bonds from the banking system and crediting their accounts accordingly. Then, in your fractional reserve system, the banks can make new loans and create new deposits for their customers up to several times their new reserves. It is, in re­ality, a legalized confidence game (scam). As long as the banks are willing to make loans, the Fed can expand deposits and currency and, hence, debt, and also the purchasing (spending) rate. The Fed has nightmares, however; what if the banks run out of "credit-worthy" borrowers and refuse to use the reserves that the Fed makes available to them to make new loans?

    The Fed is locked into this continuing credit expansion. It cannot stop. If ever bank lending slows, then the game is over and a scramble for liquidity begins. Banks and thrifts and other creditors will rush to salvage what they can from their nonperforming loan portfolios. Remember, if debts are not repaid by the borrowers, the creditors will rush to salvage what they can from their nonperforming loan portfolios.

    This is debunked by the "inflationists" by saying that the Fed can always create more and more and more money--and I have told you that they can do this, as well as telling you that there is ONLY credit--no MONEY. So far, then, the argument holds up--BUT they somehow fail to understand the essential second step in the credit expansion process, namely that the banks must use the reserves created by the Fed to make new loans. If they don't, then the Fed is merely pushing on a string--a wet one at that--and is helpless to continue the expansion. The Fed found itself in this precise mess in the 1930's. Banks had huge excess reserves but refused to use them to make loans. The banks were scared to death to make new loans. After all, you lost some 40%--some 10,000 of your 25,000 banks! This was between 1930 and the "bank closings" under Roosevelt in 1933. The banks were petrified they were so scared. The economic climate of the 1930's was highly uncertain. You still had some 9 million people out of work by 1939 and your population ratio had a much more pronounced percent­age of unemployed--that was about 17-18 percent of the work force. Therefore, it required over a decade to pull you out of the depression and required a war, in addition. World War II saved the "bacon" by allowing banks to have enough confidence to make loans related to war materiel. These, further, were secured by government spending--it is a spiral that eventually gets totally out of control.

    DEMISE OF GOLD STANDARD
    You must remember, as we discuss this situation of then vs. now, that the BIG difference was the demise of the gold standard. The main constraint on credit expansion in today's circumstance is high interest rates. You are going to see the credit expansion stretched to the outer limits of this interest constraint and, as with a rubber-band, it will reach its capacity to stretch and snap.

    Don't be misled by the prattling or the little perturbations and ups and downs as things fluctuate. Remember that all existing commercial loans and now over 50% of home mortgages have VARIABLE interest rates. As rates rise, many companies and individuals will simply not be able to meet the increases because their profits and salaries will not keep pace with the rising burden. This, in turn is referred to as a liquidity squeeze.

    Two items should be watched with the microscope and be prepared to move rapidly. One is called Total Fed Credit and the other is Total Reserves.

    Total Fed Credit is essentially the Fed's total assets on paper. These are mostly securities purchased by the Fed and are an accurate measure of Fed Credit Expansion. The total now is somewhere around $263 Billion. That is a mammoth number. The Fed is locked into creating even MORE reserves for the banking system.

    Are the banks using these reserves to make new loans? Well now, you have to turn and look at the total reserves, which are liabilities of the Fed. Total reserves are mostly deposits at the Fed that banks are required to keep against their standing loan levels. If total reserves are rising, then bank loans are expanding. There was a sharp rise in total reserves beginning back in February of 1985, for instance, just at the point where the dollar turned WEAK AND GOLD BEGAN TO RISE. Then in 1987, total reserves leveled off at around $60 Billion and have remained at about that level since. This is evidence, friends, that bank loans are NO LONGER EXPANDING, AND THE CREDIT EXPANSION PROCESS HAS PEAKED.

    IS THE FED ALL-POWERFUL?
    Pretty nearly--but as with all things--there are flaws and holes. The Fed can control its assets but not its liabilities. It can buy all the government securities it wants, to create reserves for the banks, but it can not control either the demand for currency in circulation or bank loans. People decide on how many re­serve bank notes they want to carry around, and banks themselves decide on whether or not to make new loans. So when you hear people say "the government will never permit another deflationary depression", they simply don't recognize the facts nor how important those constraints are on the power of the Fed. In short, without other intervention of some kind from the Powers that Be, the Fed would be powerless to stop a deflationary collapse once it starts the snowball course.

    Once a "run on the dollar" begins, people of the world over will scramble to get rid of dollars and return to their own currency. You know that foreigners hold hundreds of billions of dollar assets in the U.S. A drop in the stock, bond, or real estate markets would easily trigger a flight from these assets--AND IT NOW UNDER WAY!!

    PULLING OUT
    While you have been distracted by contracted manipulations in Desert
    Shield/Storm, flag waving and killing, another storm with greater "lone-term" consequence rages out of control within our own borders--unspoken of on the controlled media and the hype goes on a nauseam.

    Money funds are Pulling out of CD's and dumping bank commercial paper. Foreign investors are letting their U.S. CD's expire. Depositors with multiple accounts of $100,000 fear they will soon be limited to a total of $100,000 in insurance at best. So they are beginning to pull their money out.

    The mass withdrawals from the Bank of New England, the largest in recent memory, left the authorities so shocked that they decided to do something they had hoped would NEVER BE NEEDED AGAIN--PAY OFF ALL UNINSURED DEPOSITORS IN FULL--you see, they had some "very important" in­vestors. Further, this was supposed to inspire confidence in the banking sys­tem--but it has continued its slump anyhow and, like a landslide, it will zip downward.

    What you may not realize however, is that when they say that the recession will be over by mid-year, they may very well mean it--again, to suck you in for they can print enough new money to stall this thing until the Elite are safely into gold--(OUT OF THE NATION). Surprise: the reason the Bush son is set up in Bahrain is to receive and stash gold bought without going through the banking system and keep the dealings out of the U.S. as far as public "eye" is con­cerned. This is a rigged deal set up and orchestrated with private contracts be­tween George Bush and the "Royal" Sabahs of Kuwait.

    Now are you really surprised to learn that the agreements were drawn, orchestrated and the outcome set prior to this little fiasco in the Middle East? Sic, Sic. Even I told you over and over again. Moreover, look at the oil wells burning--isn't that just a real sight? Don't you just drool in horror at all that black smoke and pollution? They tell you "5-6 years to get those oil fires out!" That is the biggest lie thus far--they set at least half those fires and, yes, Saddam's group set the rest. However, just as they started them with napalm--they can as quickly extinguish them with one air/fuel explosion at each site--through "smart weapons". You see, it requires oxygen to allow burning. Fuel/air ex­plosives use all the oxygen and when the explosion is over so would be the fire.

    SO WHAT DO WE DO?
    Well if you are a personal friend of the Sabah's or George Bush, I would suggest you put your millions into "underground", unreported gold and get it into something of security placement in Bahrain. If you don't know them or don't have enough assets to do such--then you need to be awfully careful. If you horde gold in bullion or extensive stashes in banks it will simply be confiscated--and the foreigners know it. However, "...you scratch my back, George, and I'll set you up, friend"--says Mr. Sabah.

    I can only give you information about that which IS and that which is planned--and they plan to get all the assets; that is the plan for world domination, my brothers. There is a big brick wall at the end of every maze tunnel.

    Then you say, "I'll just get a lot of cash, then and bury it!" Good idea, except it will be worthless--that, too, is well planned.

    They may or may not pull $50's and $100's prior to exchange of currency--but it looks more and more like probably NOT. Why? Because the ones they have set up to pretend to trap are now predominantly utilizing $20's and $10's. You can be prepared within the week for Mr. Bush to again turn his attention to the major drug problem and increase in crime and murders--and make a play for the guns. All the while he will have his henchmen arranging for his assets to be turned into gold and moved out of the country--along with all those other Elite Cartel "advisors" and "buddies".

    The next few serious moves along those lines will have to be subtle indeed, for Clifford Clark's and the Arab's bank, Bank of Credit and Commerce International, is now found to be the world's major money laundering facility and is in direct working relationship, with Clark's bank, First American....etc. That will hit the public eye so maneuvers must be very, very subtle here for a while while banks are being absorbed into other banks and then into the Central Bank--where none of the Elite want their assets to be captured. This is a REAL game of charades where the "little guy" is "had".

    Let me give you a hint, if you think you can stash a little gold privately--get cir­culated coins and pay the premium--not that this is necessarily a great way to go--BUT IT IS THE WAY THE MAJOR FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD MEMBERS ARE DOING IT!! Of course, they have inside pull in the ability to cash them in LATER. The other way they are covering assets is to use gold as collateral and take money which they then put into private projects, etc, hoping the collateral will Hold Safe. And with "them" using the tool, it will last as long or longer than any other approach.

    Depending on how much you have to lose or invest--get adequate corporations set up in Nevada and get diversified and the money, gold and everything OUT of your personal name.

    You ones want the magic of perfection so you win, win and make money. Well, this way there is the possibility. Setting firmly atop your stack of money either in paper or notes will surely cost you the assets. You either move with the security of the paths the Elite take or your assets will fall to them for this plan has been laid against this day for eons.

    To get your verification just look at the banks and what they are doing; let me spell out a bit of it for you. Let us move on from Bank of New England and the Harlem Bank where they DID NOT bail it out as with the Bank of New England, and look at another situation or two for relative evaluation.

    You know now about bank holidays, etc., as in Rhode Island. The banking collapse in New Hampshire is underway and the large majority of the money-cen­ter banks, including Chase, Chemical and even Morgan Guaranty, have less than five percent (5%) in capital per dollar of assets. Another decline of 1 percentage point in this key indicator will cause them to fall below the bare bones capital levels needed to survive a more severe recession--and that is exactly the way it is planned--so that all assets of property and credit eventually end up in the ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT--ONE WORLD CUR­RENCY/BANKING CARTEL. These major banks are all working to ether to make sure this happens--it is not an accident, brothers.

    But watch the events of the great front page item, the most shocking of all to depositors and regulators alike--the crisis at Citicorp. Although Citicorp is not necessarily the weakest of the New York banks, it is certainly the largest among those which are in grave danger of total disaster. Citicorp is laying off a big bunch of employees and depositors are starting to tremble.

    Citibank is Citicorp's main subsidiary and it has significantly more capital, as a percent of assets, than Bank of New England had in its final months: some 4.8% vs. 0.8%. It is NOT enough to survive more than a very slight recession. Citicorp is already buried in spoiled, worthless real estate loans.

    Here is where you get your clue as to the intent vs. the "accidentally being caught" picture. Once it became obvious that real estate values were collapsing, you would think Citicorp would have cut back sharply, especially in the high-risk areas. Instead, in 1990, the bank lent over $12 billion to developers for commercial real estate projects--more than six times the amount loaned in 1980--and the highest for the past decade. Rotten apples somewhere in the barrel, perhaps?

    The vacancy rates zoomed upward, loan payments to Citicorp became indeed sparse. Property values dropped, sinking below the amount that the holding company, as well as other banks, lent to developers.

    However, the pain and agony does not stop there. Citicorp carries a delinquency rate on residential mortgages five times as high as the national average. They have other problems, too, as other customer loan delinquencies are also HUGE. Until recently, Citicorp management--from Wriston to Reed--thought that it could protect the bank from the ravages of big loan defaults by leaning heavily toward the consumer loan business. "Safety in numbers" was their motto, based on the assumption that large numbers of small consumers would not default. They were WRONG. Their loan defaults are mind-blowing and surging. There is no way to stop the thing--there is only knowing that it IS coming and gauge your activities accordingly.

    Look at that which you have in just this ONE bank: There is no other bank large enough to buy Citibank; the resources for a government bailout, which were abundantly available in the mid-1980's, are now gone; the economy, rather than enjoying a prolonged boom, is now plunging, and, most important, even if money could be created on the "printing presses", the resulting bulge in the federal deficits would torpedo the bond market, dragging down the government itself right along with it.

    Some think the FDIC can pull a trick off--forget it. Others believe the Treasury Department will come on the white horse. That is what happened in December when the Bank of New England went under and it was decided to cover all losses. At that time the Treasury made a $1 BILLION cash injection directly but it was simply a gamble that has proven to have failed. The extra $1 BILLION didn't stop the run. It did not prevent the failure. All it did was increase the size of the federal deficit (for you-the-people). If the Treasury tried to do the same for all large banks in trouble, the surging federal deficit would sink the bond markets.

    That leaves only one group to pay for the big losses at the banks--the depositors! No matter how shocking this may be, it is an event that is dead ahead. It is going to be a total financial shock. Brothers, check it out and if your deposits are in a sick bank that cannot be restored to financial health, you will lose: Direct access to your funds before and after a bank holiday; all or most of the interest income over the next several years and, at minimum, as much as 50% of your principal at the very best.

    Remember that Rhode Island "bank holiday" the Governor ordered? The order closed the state-charted banks and credit unions--on January 2. There were over 300,000 accounts involved. BUT, BUT, BUT--with all but 14 institutions open again for business, there are still 300,000 accounts frozen! What happened was that the original estimate was grossly understated--as with all bad news as it hits you the public--slow poison so you don't know right off that you are dead.

    Two months later--these depositors are still locked out of their money. Under the current "proposal" from the governor's office, the best they can hope for is non-interest bearing script which will mature in four years.

    What if you are one of the ones stuck in such a situation--in any state, for it is coming to ALL--with all this "funny" non-money. All you can do is do without or hope you can find someone who will take it off your hands and a good estimate of exchange value would be a HIGH of 15-20 cents per dollar.

    Hold your breath now, for you are going to be able to evaluate how bad it might be for you in similar circumstances if you do not reside in Rhode Island. The private Rhode Island insurance fund had MORE BACKING PER $100 OF INSURED DEPOSITS THAN THE FDIC! And, it is true that the FDIC has the backing of the Treasury--however, the Treasury Department itself will run out of funds because of the declining investors. The Treasury's only option will come to be to abandon the banks and abort any on-going rescue operations. There is nothing I can do for you, friends, except lay it before you and possibly urge you, again, to find out about both investments using gold as collateral and utilize corporations properly. I do not have time to go through this again and again--if you have interest in sonic measure of protection--see if you can get help through America West. I simply have no "human" means to tend each of your investments nor plan of salvation.

    WHAT ABOUT THAT MONEY EXCHANGE?
    The Fort Worth branch of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing has been printing up a storm. They printed up all the exchange currency for the Soviets and are now working around the clock on "anti-counterfeiting" notes with all this microprinting, etc. Be prepared, for when they "introduce" this mess of confusion upon you it can go in a myriad directions but you can be sure you will lose in the deal.

    It will be sudden and, just as with the Soviets, there will be LOW--HIGH-LIM­ITS. There will probably be a 10 for one ratio in exchange. You will have piles of papers to fill out and if you try to exchange too much cash beyond that which you would have from, say, three pay periods--you will forfeit a bunch. If you have big bills you will be held responsible and if "THEY" decide you might have garnered the funds illicitly--they will confiscate it. You will definitely be asked to come up with documentation of WHY you hold cash in large amounts--and yet, if you fail to exchange it, the old will be like the confederate money--WORTHLESS. IT IS ALREADY WORTHLESS FOR A BILL REP­RESENTS ONLY A CREDIT NOTE AND NOT MONEY AT ALL.

    You think it can't happen? Yugoslavia is having a 10,000 to one currency devaluation effective 1991. France will replace the 20 franc note (about $4 U.S.) with a new coin in 1992. The British Royal Mint has been minting Iraq's circulating coins for several years, including 1990.

    And watch out because the IRS has acknowledged that electronically transmitted returns are NOT PROCESSED THROUGH IRS'S NORMAL PROCESSING PIPELINE, WHICH INCLUDES GRADING AND SCORING FOR AUDIT POTENTIAL--INSTANTLY. In fact, you only have nine states where you can file electronically with returns that have "balances due" this year. All taxpayers that are due a refund, however, can file electronically, regardless of his/her state. Good luck!

    THE ORDER!
    I am going to leave this subject as such and turn to "THE ORDER". You just experienced how the "ORDER" creates war and revolution. Now it is important that you listen to me for this is important to your confirmation of fact.

    President George Bush is a high-ranking member of the Skull and Bones ("The Order"). The Cheney family (Richard Cheney, Sec. Def.) is also prominent in Skull & Bones and involved, all through and about, is Danny Quayle's family. Cheney's family were active in "The Order" even before the first Bush member, Prescott).

    As the attack on Iraq happened so did the shoe drop in the Soviet Union. The Leninists moved one step back and glasnost and perestroika were brought to an instant halt as the troops moved on the Baltic States. Gorbachev claimed "no knowledge", etc., but we all know it was not so.

    However, perhaps you missed the fact that of the ONE BILLION dollar credits granted to the Soviet Union by your Congress and the Administration (and then supposedly held up because of the nasty behavior of the Soviet troops)--"9""0"-- 90 (NINETY) PERCENT had already been drawn down!--the cargo holds were already fully loaded with your grain before the police move was made.

    Now, in the madness and distraction--after the troops began to move out and now that you had all "that help" from the Soviets with Iraq--the Soviets now get an additional credit line which YOU THINK was the original $1 billion amount. Ah, the hand is surely quicker than the eye when the eyes are wrapped in rose colored paper and the visions--shown as with a movie scenario--exactly that which they want to show you.

    You still think this was a little war? Ask the families of the over 100,000 (70,000 of which were but children) slain Iraqis in Baghdad. Ask about the additional 30,000 to 50,000 slain persons on the roads back to Iraq. Ask the fam­ilies of the over 2 million slain Iraqis who were bombed in their homes all over Iraq--civilians! It was a total bloodbath and as your own pilots giggled and strutted and told you, regarding the roadway massacre--"...it was just like shooting fish in a barrel!"

    ARMAGEDDON? WORLD WAR III?
    This was not the start of that touted great battle of battles at Armageddon--but the beginning of the set-up for same. The handwriting is there on the wall, brothers--in pure and simple English--you just don't know the definitions of the words.

    Where all of your seer-projectioneers are off, is that they still sit twiddling
    while believing that "Israel" is that new place in Palestine--when God comes for HIS PEOPLE, He is coming for His "i"sraelites. His chosen. The big ANTI‑CHRIST has moved in and occupies that little portion called Israel as self-pro­claimed by some men in the United Nations in concert with the Khazar Zionists who are so-called, self-styled "Jews"--the term "Jew", remember, only appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME IN RELATIONSHIP TO THESE NON-JUDEANS, IN THE 1700's.

    What will happen then? Oh, there will be a period of euphoria and a great "go for peace". A total pseudopeace. The world will be whooop-dee-doo and willing to submit to a new kind of world federation. BUT THIS WILL BE EXPLODED IN THE FUTURE WHEN THE COMBINED ARAB ARMIES UNITE AGAIN--AND GO FOR ISRAEL'S THROAT. Now, the leopard will show his spots and the Soviets will end up joined with the Arabs and THAT will be the big beginning of that wondrous battle called Armageddon. Check care­fully to see who signs treaty agreements guaranteeing Israel's security.

    America is referred to as Israel West already, so guess which losing side you are going to be on, America! After that dandy treaty is signed in Arab blood and the Bushes and accomplices get their assets into offshore gold, etc., there should be some 3 and 1/2 years to square around your choices and see if you can get this reversal off its dime--because you are then on the path to that great war. That next "beginning of Armageddon" war will itself (if not stopped) last another approximately 3 and 1/2 years, WITH RUSSIA ALLIED WITH THE ARAB NATIONS AGAINST ISRAEL, THE WESTERN FEDERATION AND GUESS WHO--CHINA!

    It will NOT be like your Bible Evangelists tell you, however, for the Zionists are the Anti-Christ and when GOD COMES TO GET HIS CHOSEN ONES--IT WILL NOT BE FOR THE ZIONIST "JEWS" OF A STATE OF ISRAEL--BUT RATHER FOR HIS "i"SRAELITES (HIS CHOSEN CHILDREN) AND THEY "AIN'T IN PALESTINE (ISRAEL)".

    So what are you going to do? It does NOT have to go according to "their" plan but it you do not as a nation and a world, wake up to the probabilities as laid forth. The plan is to have your world in total Rule by the Global One World Government and operable by year 2,000. You don't have much time do you? YOU CAN CHANGE IT IF YOU WANT TO! It is totally up to you. Ours is to bring Truth--assist in any way we can, those who ask and allow and move into the Godly path of Light. When God comes for HIS people, I remind you--there will be no evil brought within the places of the God places. At this point in historical evolution--YOU HAVE DELIVERED YOURSELVES INTO THE HANDS OF THE ADVERSARY OF GOD. IT WAS A MOST REGRETTABLE CHOICE INDEED. ON THE OTHER HAND, YOU WERE THE TARGET OF THE MOST CLEVER TRICKSTER OF THE UNIVERSE AND AS VICTIMS OF A CONTROLLED MIND-CONTROL SYSTEM OF VISION AND LIES--YOU KNOW NOT ELSE.

    Some say, "Well, I don't want to know because what I don't know can't hurt me...!" WRONG! IT WILL ENSLAVE YOU! FURTHER THE PRISON IS NOT GOING TO BE EITHER GENTLE NOR COMFORTABLE.

    Let us close this, please. If there is additional room on this document--please give forth information for obtaining more detailed information regarding the Kuwait/Sabah/Bush, etc., material and any other that we have to assist our brothers. Dear ones, you have reached the time where "perfection" and "cleaning-up" as they say in the economist's circles is probably not going to happen. The best we can hope for is some measure of safety and ability to hold on to some of your assets while it is turned into projects which can grow and give you return--it is a tight-rope walk at best. You are very far behind in countering the game so well planned by your adversaries. I stand ready to help for it is all I can offer--knowledge and Truth; but it IS enough! Salu.



    PJ 26
    CHAPTER 2
    REC #1 HATONN

    THURSDAY, MARCH 7, 1991 8:26 A.M. YEAR 4, DAY 203
    TODAY'S WATCH
    Instead of bantering about with the non-news this day, we are going to get down to nitty-gritty discussion regarding the Middle East War/Kuwait/Sabah-Fam­ily/Bush connection, etc. Chelas, this is hard medicine to swallow but you MUST come into acknowledgement that I am not simply feeding you "far-side" information. You can go check this out from documentation from many sources but I suggest you begin proving-up in easy-to-understand sequence.

    I am going to ask Dharma to print herein, a brief summary of the secret under­ground regarding things like the Global Regime of Interdependence--the REAL name for Bush's New World Order. Then, I suggest you get the "White Pa­pers" which will be given reference from KC&associates, 13510-A Aurora Ave. North, Seattle, WA 98133.

    This will deal with "why Bush had to have a war" and I am most grateful to one who has put it succinctly into focus. You will find nothing new from that which I have given you but I find that if you glean information as backup from Earth source--you tend to come into believing. I honor Craig B. Hulet of KC&associates for this valuable research and presentation. What I will give you is not comprehensive for it is taken from a radio interview of limited time allowance--so please, follow up. America West is getting information so that if you call them, they can either supply you with the "papers" or tell you where to obtain them--should you prefer to contact A.W. Thank you.

    Dharma, just roughly transcribe the tape, please. I will monitor and make comments, if deemed necessary, but mostly I simply want you citizens to hear it from "ground 0". I also request that our "Editors" not try too hard to turn the conversational English into perfect prose.

    TRANSCRIPTION
    Craig B. Hulet:

    This is a brief discussion of the orchestration of the entire event (Iraq/Kuwait/U.S. war) for political reasons that have been completely unknown to the American people. They were laid out long before August 2nd (1990) as a political objective.

    The objectives we were given throughout the period between August 2nd and somewhere around the first of January (1991) where COMPLETE MYTHS WITH NO BASIS WHATSOEVER--things like Saddam Hussein's military strength being a "million-man" army was a complete fabrication for he only had 475 thousand well-trained troops, 7,500 Reservists and the remainder are a "People's Army"--some as young as 11-years and as old as 80-years--so can hardly be considered as part of his military.

    In each stage of the war after August second, George Bush gave us a different political objective upon which to focus, like "defending Saudi Arabia", when the facts were that Hussein never had the industrial capacity nor the offensive capability of going any further than Kuwait, and everybody in the Pentagon and the White House knew that. However, they had to convince the American people of some reason to send the initial 200,000 troops over there and so they told us it was to defend Saudi Arabia.

    We were also told that Hussein was about to take over and control 20-50% of all of the oil in the region, which was and is an utter myth. He couldn't have controlled the oil and he couldn't even have threatened control of the oil during the month of August because the nations that were aligned against him on Au­gust 2nd, the Arab states, were Saudi Arabia, Syria, Israel, and of course, Iran on the East and Turkey on the North, so it is totally absurd to believe that one little country such as Iraq could have dictated, through military power, to the combined forces in the Middle East, including Egypt, which outnumbered him at least 10 to 1 in every single category of military capability.(Hatonn: Now take this information as absolute minimum for Craig is giving you that which was "known" and documented where he and his researchers could ferret out the information. It is understated, brothers--for Soviets (and you) had supplied Saddam with heinous weapons--but YOU had the same weapons with the excep­tion of Bull's cannons, etc. Please wait until you have read all of this before you stop and start comparisons to disprove one or the other of us. Please stop the nit-picking for you are in serious circumstances if you could remove even nine-tenths of the facts.)

    Saddam simply would not determine that he could be successful in going further than Kuwait in offensive. He did not ever intend nor feel capable of controlling the oil supply of the Middle East--that would be a totally fabricated lie served to we-the-people.

    This war was NEVER about oil--it was simply never about any of those things given to you. When George Bush told you that it was "NAKED AGGRESSION", he lied again because if it was seriously about "naked aggression" and we weren't using some selective moral indignation over Saddam Hussein's ac­tions, would we have hardly been aligned with Assad of Syria, who killed thirty thousand of his own people, annexed Northern Lebanon and installed a puppet regime which was responsible for killing a hundred and seventy thousand Lebanese? Yet, we are supposed to believe that, in this instance, naked aggres­sion so offended the U.S. administration that we would send half a million, or more, troops to stop it. That is another of the "great" myths--being a total lie. (Hatonn: You must understand the definition of "myth"--a myth is not necessar­ily "false" but Craig is using the word as representing "lie".)This is really what I see as the kind of problems that are of such a magnitude that you can safely say that the American government is so out-of-hand that THEY TELL THE TRUTH ALMOST NEVER!--TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. In one instance, where George Bush did tell the truth--nobody even understood what he really MEANT. That is when he said, "The U.N. Security Council would be used to enhance the New World Order"--that IS THE ONLY STATEMENT OF TRUTH GEORGE BUSH HAS SAID SINCE AUGUST 2ND--BUT NOBODY UNDERSTOOD HIM.

    Question from Interviewer: "One of the questions that I had is why Hussein allowed the U.S. military forces to build up to the capacity that it has--to a level where he could, apparently, no longer crush it through his military?

    Saddam Hussein had no choice, really, but to sit back and watch the build-up because Saddam's military does not have an offensive capability to make a move of that magnitude. He is a "counter-puncher" and he has powerful "defensive" capability. He defeated the country of Iran in the last four months of the war, where he could not defeat Iran offensively throughout the seven and a half years of that war. But when he suckered and brought Iran into Iraqi ter­ritory and brought their troops to him, he fought defensively, which is completely and entirely a different tactic. That is where he excels and that is where his greatest ability stands.

    The real question, rather than, "Why did Hussein allow our troops to build-up, where I don't believe he had a choice but to sit back, because at that point after August 2nd, he knew that he had been "suckered" into Kuwait. Let me explain what I mean by "suckered-in".

    Prior to August 2nd--one week prior--the American Government, the Administration and National Security Council, the CIA--the entire intelligence apparatus, had been informing President Bush and Baker that an invasion was imminent, into Kuwait. Up to seven days prior to August 2nd, the invasion was so imminent that there were serious "red alert" type memos and memoranda. Yet during that exact period of time, April Glaspie, our Ambassador to Iraq, told Saddam Hussein that we did not get involved in "Arab to Arab issues over border disputes". Now, she was attacked for having said that because it gave the green light to Hussein, to his way of thinking, to go into Kuwait. Baker chastised her publicly and said it was a "blunder". But in fact, Baker lied. Undersecretary of State John Kelly told the Senate Subcommittee EXACTLY THE SAME THING A WEEK BEFORE THE INVASION and he went even further as he said, "...we would do NOTHING to defend Kuwait because we have no defense treaty with Kuwait and this is an Arab to Arab issue." Under ques­tioning then, Margaret Tutwiller, a spokeswoman for James Baker's State De­partment, held a Press Conference and she said exactly the same thing as Un­dersecretary Kelly--"...we have no defense treaty and it is an Arab to Arab is­sue". So it was entirely corroborated that the Administration's position on Iraq taking Kuwait was a "green light" for Iraq to take Kuwait. Hussein believed he had the sanction and the approval of our Administration, or at least the auspices that gave what he believed was the right to go in and take Kuwait.

    Now then, on August 2nd George Bush screamed that he was surprised and
    shocked by this activity and called Hussein a "Hitler" and accused him of "Naked Aggression". Of course, that was totally feigned surprise and "naked
    aggression" was a total myth. BUSH KNEW HUSSEIN WAS "GOING IN".
    The question is--why would George Bush want Saddam Hussein to take Kuwait?

    Question: Wasn't Iraq already in Kuwait, working in the area around the sea?

    Well, Saddam Hussein has a perfectly legitimate claim to the Ramalian Oil fields region where the Sabah family has been slant drilling and stealing oil from him. And the Bubyian and Warbyian Islands, which is the area you ask about, is where Saddam Hussein wants a deep-water port. The fact is, that for the past two years he has already been dredging that area and the Kuwaitis have even helped finance the dredging of the area so Iraq could develop that deep-water port. Therefore, it is implied, in Kuwaiti activity, that the area was al­ready considered Iraqi territory. Those are the only two things that he asked to be remaining in his possession--and he agreed to totally pull out of Kuwait as long as those things were left to him--which were already his. Every nation in the world said they would go with that agreement and it was acceptable. The only people who found it unacceptable was President Bush and James Baker.

    Question: And why would they find it unacceptable?

    Because they have a "political agenda"--a political objective--that goes all the way back to April of 1990, and fully six months prior to that, during a study group session on the Middle East. The original political objective was much, much different than what we have been told. In April of 1990 there was a conference, an internationally led conference, at the White House--George Bush chaired it. Fitzgerald, the former Prime Minister of Ireland, authored the "white paper", the task force report, on the subject of the Middle East that came out of that April, 1990, conference. The political philosophy and the Interna­tional Community's view of the Middle East was forever changed at that point in history. They thought that, because the Soviet Union was no longer a player in the Middle East, the Western Powers--Germany, England, France, Japan, Canada and the United States (the International Community of Western Pow­ers), thought it was then time for them to move in and politically influence the Middle East in a greater degree than ever before. The first thing on the Agenda, they felt that they should control the region because of its natural re­sources and would stabilize the region by eliminating the military components of Iraq, Syria and, eventually, even Israel and Libya--eliminating them and totally disarming them militarily--unilaterally, if necessary. That they would use the United Nations Security Council as the means, if necessary, was called for in April of 1990.

    This political objective, that was stated in April of 1990, was corroborated again by a different source and that was Terik Aziz in his press conference after the Baker/Aziz meeting. Aziz stated that Bob Dole, and three or four other sena­tors, paid Hussein a visit in April of 1990 and gave him an ultimatum of a disarmament scenario where Hussein would disarm chemical, biological, con­ventional weapons and ballistic missiles. To do so he would receive credits and be allowed to be a player in the New World Order.

    NO TO NEW WORLD ORDER
    (Hatonn: Now this is on record that Hussein refused to go along with this New World Order.)
    Of course Hussein said emphatically, "No--at least NOT UNTIL ISRAEL RE‑MOVES THEIR CHEMICAL-BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS AND THEIR NUCLEAR WARHEADS FROM THE REGION." So the forced unilateral
    diplomatic approach failed and they had to resort to the United Nations Security Council as the means to disarm Iraq and the rest of the Middle East. That is, and always was, the political objective. That explains "why" it was needed for Saddam Hussein to go into Kuwait and take it forcefully, as the provocation necessary to draw the UN Security Council and the U.S. forces into attacking Saddam Hussein.

    I have been saying, for over five months in interviews throughout the country, "This isn't about Kuwait--this is about taking out Baghdad and destroying the industrial-military complex of Baghdad." Nobody believed me for five months--everybody said, "No, this is about Kuwait because Hussein invaded Kuwait." Wrong! As soon as the bombing started, where did Bush send the fliers? Straight to Baghdad!

    QUESTION: What about the resources, the phosphates and sulfates, that Iraq has? How might that play into any of this scenario?

    Well, on August 20, 1988, the London Economist reported that James Baker, in what is known as the "Baker Initiative for the Middle East", paid a visit to Hussein. This was prior to the above mentioned conference of April, 1990. He suggested to Hussein that he would receive "no further credits from the West, from Saudi Arabia or Kuwait"--they had already made that clear--"unless he was prepared" (and he needed these credits to service his debt from the Iran/Iraq War. He had borrowed a tremendous amount of money, including 26 billion dollars from Western banks--Chase, J.P. Morgan--all the six big ones) "he would receive no further credits to service that debt unless he gave up his sulfur, phosphates--his oil and other raw materials--in perpetuity--as collateral." Of course Saddam Hussein is extremely "nationalistic"--he is an Arab Socialist--and he strongly believes in Iraq as a nation-state. He said, "Absolutely no," he wouldn't even consider such a thing. He knew it was giving up his national sovereignty--his people's sovereignty and so he absolutely refused to do such a thing. (Hatonn: Please refer back to the Cartel Plans and HOW they managed to suck all the third-world nations into the banking system through this perpet­ual resource for collateral sleight-of-hand.)That was the first beginnings of the Middle East being drawn into this so-called New World Order concept, because it is an economic regime and it is about "raw materials and monetary policy". It is being demanded of ALL THIRD-WORLD AND LESSER DEVELOPED COUNTRIES THAT THEY GIVE UP THEIR NATURAL RESOURCES IN MANY DIFFERING WAYS: DEBT TO EQUITY SWAP, ETC. BUT TO PUT IT BLUNTLY, THE WEST, THE INDUSTRIALIZED POWERS, OUR MULTI-NATIONAL CORPORATIONS WHICH ARE, AT LEAST A HUNDRED OR SO OF THEM, ARE DEFENSE CONTRACTORS, AND THE "CORPORATE STATE CORPORATIONS" OF THE SOVIET UNION (POLAND, WEST GERMANY--THEY ARE STATE CORPORATIONS BUT THEY ARE STILL MULTI-NATIONAL) INCLUDING THE KUWAITI REGIME. THE KUWAITI GOVERNMENT IS SIMPLY ONE BIG MULTI­NATIONAL CORPORATIONS) OWNED BY THE ROYAL FAMILY OF SABAH. Those countries and companies that "play ball" get to play in the "Global arena". If they don't, they are targeted for elimination.

    THIS IS WHY SADDAM HUSSEIN IS BEING ELIMINATED!
    QUESTION: Now, the Sabah family has a great many holdings in the United States and so does Saudi Arabia, do they not?

    That was the key that guaranteed the International Community would line up be­hind George Bush, and it is a total lie that "he lined up the U.N. votes so quickly because of his tremendous 'ability' on the telephone". "Telephone Diplomacy" we were fed by the press. That is a complete myth (lie), they already knew what the political objective was for Iraq and Kuwait back in April of 1990 at the conference at the White House. They already knew that Iraq was being targeted to be disarmed and if Hussein didn't cooperate diplomatically, he would be dealt with forcibly through the UN Security Council. So when the or­chestration took place all the world leaders of the Western countries at the UN Security Council level all already knew exactly what was going on--it was a simple task to line up the votes and get resolutions against Hussein. The "fix" was already in place, to put it bluntly.

    The key, however, that made it all "work" and why, when Libya took Chad recently in a sponsored coup in Chad--when Syria took Lebanon and installed their regime--when the Soviets moved into the Baffles and used force, or into Afghanistan, etc., or the Vietnamese went into Cambodia--none of those countries mattered in the least. Nobody gave aid to these people and we certainly didn't send troops to stop the "Naked Aggression" against those legitimate regimes. This was due to one thing and one thing only: the guarantee that the UN and the U.S. and everybody would get in line and we would actually "have this war" to put Sabah back in his "pink palace" in Kuwait--that is the simple fact; that the Sabah family took the petro-dollars profit and invested in U.S. multi-national corporations--hundreds of billions of dollars off-shore and in our banking system with Chase, Morgan Guarantee, Morgan Brothers--$52 BILLION in T-Bills and Bonds (U.S. Gov't) and the interlock is so in­tense and so incestuous that the Sabah family has actually had a wholly owned corporation in the U.S.--still own it--Kuwait Petroleum owns Sante Fe International out of Los Angeles. They have had on the BOARD of Santa Fe International--of this Kuwaiti owned corporation--FORMER PRESIDENT GERALD FORD, who put George Bush in power as CIA Director, BRENT SCOWCROFT, who was an aide to Gerald Ford and is now the National Se­curity Advisor to President Bush, AND RODERICK HILL, CARLA HILL'S HUSBAND--she is now the Trade Representative of the Bush Administration and she was HUD Secretary under Gerald Ford. So you will note that the Sabah family has used their tremendous petro-dollars to PURCHASE POLITICAL INFLUENCE WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION AND GOING ALL THE WAY BACK TO THE NIXON AND FORD ADMINISTRATIONS. THAT IS THE KIND OF POLITICAL CLOUT THAT GUARANTEED THAT THE UN COALITION WOULD BACK THE USE OF ANY KIND OF FORCE AGAINST IIUSSEIN AFTER IIE WAS BROUGHT INTO KUWAIT TO BE­GIN WITH.

    OUESTION: Would you talk briefly about how Kuwait is so closely tied to the American companies?

    The Kuwaiti regime is unique in that it is very much like the Saudi regime, and that's why the Saudis and the Sabah family are working so closely, and always have. Being a Royal Monarchy, they do not operate the way Hussein or Qudafi, Assad or Mubarik, operate in their countries. When they sell oil on the global market--they don't "consume" their own production--they allow the East­ern Europeans to consume and they buy into things, i.e., they own a whole chain of gas stations, they own five percent of Texaco, they own a chain of gas stations in Europe but, more than that, fifty percent of everything that is taken in on those sales goes directly to the Sabah Royal family. The only one that can sign the checks--is Sabah, himself. Fifty percent of the profits goes to the Kuwait government which is also Sabah but is used, in addition, to disburse funds elsewhere and help control the population of Kuwait. The population is only about 600,000 actual citizens and the rest of the population is not made up of "citizens" and they are not allowed to "vote". The first 50% of profits, how­ever, goes directly to Sabah! Kuwait is a total feudalistic, non-militaristic despotic State--according to our own State Department. They have simply been able to wisely invest their money in the West, particularly in the U.S.--because they do have a fear of Islamic Fundamentalism and the Soviet Union.

    When you buy this much U.S. Corporate power, for instance, when you own 3, 4, and 5 percent of a Corporation such as General Electric and defense contractors and the people on the Boards of those defense contractors you have real clout. The Board members of those "defense contractors" are also Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Secretary of State, and Secretary of Defense and boy, you have bought considerable political clout and THEY KNOW IT!. It is purely and simply a protection racket, in a sense, but more than that, it makes them a key player in the new GLOBAL REGIME that George Bush keeps talking about.

    QUESTION: Do they not also own some 5% in McDonalds, Penneys, etc.?

    Oh yes, there is a long list of holdings that all of the citizens would easily recognize. The ones I focus on, such as IBM, Dow Chemical, Westinghouse, G.E., Atlantic Richfield, General Motors--those are all listed on the one hundred top (dollar amount) defense contractors in the U.S. You could say that they have purchased some stock in almost ALL of our major U.S. corporations. They never buy more than 5% of the class-A voting stock because if they did so it would force disclosure to the S.E.C. as to "who" is buying up America.

    DISCLOSURE ISSUE AND INVESTMENT HOLDINGS
    They purchase government T-bills and bonds and what they have done is purchase a "deficit"-- a "growing" deficit--of the United States. That gives them very close linkage to the banking industry and the Federal Reserve System which is basically a "private banker's" bank which loans us our medium of ex­change called the "federal reserve notes". That is a very powerful thing to pur­chase if you are looking for strong political clout and influence within the U.S. Government.

    Ben Rosenthal of New York found out all of this described and found it extremely disturbing--between 1979 and through 1983. He filed suit to stop the ownership of Santa Fe International by the Kuwaiti Government. However, after his death it fell to the wayside and no one, to this day, has dared to bring it up again because people get dead over such issues. He had also filed a House Bill which would force the disclosure of foreign nationals' holdings in U.S. multi-national corporations and in the banking industry because he felt that they would be buying political influence and could, therefore, influence more affairs of the U.S. Government by having this kind of wealth. That act did pass (The Financial Disclosure Act) in 1982, but pressure was brought to bear through Charles Percy, a senator and whose daughter married into the Rockefeller fam­ily, on President Reagan and also Vice President Bush, at the time, to veto that financial disclosure act. The threat was, at that time in 1982, as documented by Ben Rosenthal (and now you might know why Rosenthal died) was that if they were to disclose financial holdings of the Saudi regime and the Sabah family along with Kuwaiti holdings in the U.S. Banking industry--they would shift their assets to Euro-dollars, Yen, Marks, etc. This would cause an immediate banking crisis in New York which would include ALL of the Six Major Banks. The threat held strong and the Financial Disclosure Act was vetoed by Presi­dent Reagan and to this day it is illegal for the U.S. Government to tell the American people how much financial influence Sabah has in the U.S.

    There is a new kind of "disclosure act" in the Senate but it is presupposed that Bush will certainly veto it. The reason Bush is concerned is that Bush is a "global operator". Bush sits on the Boards of Texas Gulf, Eli Lilly, Purolator--and a whole host of other multi-national corporations; but most importantly, the Interstate Bank of London, Dallas and Houston--an international banking fam­ily. There is no question that Kuwait has major dollars in that bank. George Bush is a large-scale Global Player. Bush has actually taken a perceived "step down" in his political career by becoming President of the U.S. His real politi­cal career had been as a Global Globe-trotter, if you will. It has been entirely a net-work of multi-national corporations who have widespread Global interests. In fact, take Texas Gulf, it is not even a U.S. Corporation and it does not oper­ate in Texas or in the Gulf states--it is a French "holding company" and it mines phosphate and sulfur (coincidentally, Iraq's raw materials that were re­quested) and turns it into fertilizers. George Bush is definitely a big player in the Global Regime.

    This is why he continues to bring up and push the subject of the New World Order, over and over again. That really is the political objective of George Bush by being President. He doesn't care whether or not he is re-elected if this war would go bad--he has stated as much openly and publicly--even in the Los An­geles Times.

    You see, all these holdings of Bush can be covered by placing the holdings in a "Blind Trust" and when he became President he did this for the first time in his career. He never did that prior to this--not even when he was CIA Director. He refused to place any of his financial holdings in a "Blind Trust". He has, to some degree, done so now. His blind trust is somewhere around a million dollars which doesn't even represent a drop in the bucket to his assets as of the day he took office as President. All the other holdings are in multi-national, international, etc., corporations where he is covered in secrecy. He does continue to receive what is called deferred compensation from the Zapata Oil which is a completely Bush-owned oil operation for off-shore drilling, where coinci­dentally, the first oil rig set up offshore--WAS IN KUWAIT! He also sits on the board and still receives "deferred compensation" from this. Deferred com­pensation is where the check is written but it goes into the "Trust Fund" and he can't spend it until after he is no longer President.

    There are a lot of ways to get around that "Conflict of Interest", especially when you are the President. You don't have to get rid of your stock--you just temporarily cease to sit on the active Board of those corporations.

    One of the most interesting companies on which he sits, actually he is a Limited Partner, with JAMES A. BAKER, III, in a corporation called Hollywood LPG II. It is a Houston, Texas, based company. The reason that it is so interest­ing is that in George Bush's "State of the Union" address, he suggested that because of this problem with Kuwait and Iraq with crude oil, that we must start looking, as a nation, to other means and other resources--specifically liquid petroleum gas. (That is what "LPG" stands for--i.e., Hollywood LPG II, is a Liquid Petroleum Gas tanker fleet.)

    FERTILIZER?
    Bush sits on the board, and owns stock in, Eli Lilly. Eli Lilly is a MAJOR world producer of fertilizers and herbicides. The New World Order, to which "they" refer, isn't something that will enhance the opulence of Third World nations, in fact it will reduce countries like Iraq, Syria, Iran, Jordan, and Libya back to pre-1979 forms of feudalism and poverty. At the same time, you don't want to reduce a population such as those to complete poverty for they need to be fed in some manner--and that means feeding the tremendous numbers of poor in the Third World countries. Just to accomplish this gigantic task will RE­QUIRE A LOT OF FERTILIZER! George Bush is heavily invested in Texas Gulf which mines sulfur and phosphates which, without them, you cannot make fertilizer. Eli Lilly, which makes fertilizer--and of course, when you are going to constantly fertilize the ground to grow crops like soy beans, you will have problems with the soil--and you have to seek other places and that is where her­bicides--also produced by this company--come in.

    The interesting thing about this connection of Bush to Eli Lilly is that there was planned--for the Latin America Drug War--a shooting war in Latin America. That is, in part, what took place when we invaded Panama--with setting up an anti-drug force for Latin America to invade Latin American companies. (Hatonn: Yes, indeed, I have told you all this--but you to hear it again so please, just keep reading.)Bolivia and Peru were definitely targeted. Part of the scenario for invading those countries in this so-called Drug War, was to use massive amounts of herbicides on the Coca crops and it was experimented on and the major portion of the experiments just ended in March of 1989-1990. At that point the product was approved for use to destroy the hundreds of thou­sands of hectares of Coca crops in Latin America. That product is called "Spike" and it comes from a Division of Elanco--a corporation of Eli Lilly. (Hatonn: This herbicide is deadly--remember a while back when it was used on the "Hemp" (marijuana) crops in Mexico, etc., and just happened to kill a bunch of workers and users? Brothers, I remind you--the drug trade is con­trolled right out of the Bush Administration! We are not talking of New World Order--we are talking about World (Global) total domination!)

    I remind you again, that Bush is on the Board of Eli Lilly and owns stock in that company.

    NEW WORLD ORDER? NO--GLOBAL REGIME OF

    INTERDEPENDENCE
    The New World Order is a term that is considered totally passe' by all the Elite and Elite Think-Tanks--and I haven't used the word myself in over a decade in any of my analytical work or research papers, even when I was with the Institute. THE PROPER TERMINOLOGY IS: "THE GLOBAL REGIME OF INTERDEPENDENCE" but if George Bush had used THAT terminology, people would have begun to understand right off that it was "economic" New World Order. It was absolutely necessary that the American people believe that the New World Order, when mentioned, would somehow have only to do with "Peace and Security" throughout the world through the use of the United Nations--or some nebulous attachment to moral rightness. THIS IS A TOTAL LIE IN ITS MOST CONTEMPTIBLE PRESENTATION AND USURPATION OF YOUR TRUST AND FAITH. THE NEW WORLD ORDER HAS NEVER BEEN ANYTHING ABOUT PEACE AND SECURITY--IT HAS BEEN ABOUT ONE THING AND ONE THING ONLY--IT IS A GLOBAL REGIME. A REGIME WHICH ALREADY EXISTS AND WE ARE IN THE TRANSITION STAGES OF IT--OF INTERDEPENDENCE. INTERDE­PENDENCE ISN'T SOMETHING THAT COME ABOUT THROUGH EVOLUTION OF FREE-TRADE LIKE SO MANY LIGHT-WEIGHT UNI­VERSITY PROFESSORS--WHO PROJECT IT AS SOMETHING OF A UTOPIAN VISION THAT ALL THE WORLD BEGINS TRADING WITH EACH OTHER AND SOMEHOW ALL WAR WILL CEASE AND PEACE WILL JUST WASH OVER THE GLOBE. It simply is not even a PART OF THE STRATEGY.

    Inter-dependence IS A STRATEGY. It was outlined in 1961 by Vincent Rock, a defense analyst of over 20 years, for the beginnings of it. He published a book called THE STRATEGY OF INTERDEPENDENCE which was initially used by the Kennedy Administration, and McNamara in the Johnson Administration. The strategy has been adopted ever since.

    The strategy works in every field of endeavor, for instance, South Africa. We are wholly dependent on South Africa for the "platinum group" metals, chromium and commercial grade gold. It is for "strategic" war materials. This is well published and well known--that we are dependent on South Africa; therefore, the Globalist thinkers of the world future society, who are utopian, would say, "See, there is the interdependence," so we can have a lot of influence with South Africa and South Africa will work with us and we can bring about changes. The fact is that we have enough chromite, chromium and platinum-group metals, in the LARGEST DEPOSITS KNOWN ON EARTH. IN THE STILLWATER COMPLEX BETWEEN THE BORDER OF MONTANA AND THE BORDER OF WYOMING. It is a tremendously large com­plex and there is an almost unlimited supply of these strategic raw materials. Based on the analysis of 1961, however, done by Vincent Rock, the strategy of interdependence is as follows: We shut down the mills and operation of the Stillwaters facilities and since 1963 it hasn't been mined. THEY WANT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, AND THE AMERICAN CORPORATIONS WILL GO ALONG WITH THIS, BECAUSE THEY PASS THE COSTS ON TO US ANYWAY, IN THEIR PRODUCTION FACILITIES--BUT THEY WANT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO "BELIEVE" THAT WE ARE DEPENDENT UPON SOUTH AFRICA (interdependent or mutually-dependent).

    THE REAL REASON IS SO THEY CAN GET CHEAP LABOR FOR THERE ARE NO LABOR UNIONS AND THUS NO LABOR PROBLEMS AND IN FACT, EVEN IF IT COSTS MORE, THE PERCEPTION OF THE "INTERDEPENDENCE" IS A PERCEPTION AS OPPOSED TO A REALITY. THE "PERCEPTION" IS USED TO-MTNIPULATE OUR POPULATION, THE SOUTH AFRICAN POPULATION AND THE GOVERNMENTS ARE WORKING TOGETHER "KNOWING" THAT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO NEED FOR THE DEPENDENCE.

    This is EXACTLY that which is going on in the Middle East right now. They are going to create the PERCEPTION that without Kuwait's oil production and a free Kuwait under the Sabah family, there will be an insurmountable oil crisis. That is WHY we have to go to war and get this awful regime back into Gov­ernment. We have now been taught, erroneously, to believe that we are totally dependent on Kuwait for oil--a total lie.

  2. #4
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default 응답: PJ#026, COUNTERFEIT BLESSINGS THE ANTI-CHRIST

    PJ 26
    CHAPTER 3

    REC #2 HATONN

    THURSDAY, MARCH 7, 1991 3:48 P.M. YEAR 4, DAY 203

    CONTINUING ON WITH TAPED TRANSCRIPTION:

    PLAYERS (CHARACTERS
    )
    QUESTION: Who were some of the players in this Global Regime of Interdependence?

    What we are talking about comes in two layers and when you talk about the U.S. multi-national corporations you can refer to a study done through the 1976 Senate, under Lee Metcalf. He is now, too, strangely deceased and became de­ceased before the study was completed. They produced a study called Inter­locking Directorate Among Major U.S. Multi-National Corporations. It is demonstrated that there were no more than 3,500, mostly white-male Ameri­cans--Anglo-Saxon-- and they sat on boards of ALL the multi-national corporations and the major banks and foundations and a separate study, which was produced on the Federal Reserve System, showed that the same thing existed within the Federal Reserve System and ALL interlocking with the corporations, whereby one man such as William Webster (now head of the CIA and was with the FBI) sat on the Boards of as many as TWENTY MAJOR U.S. MULTI-NATIONAL CORPORATIONS, DEFENSE CONTRACTORS, BANKS--AND WHEN YOU CROSS-DIRECTORSHIP, ONE MAN SITTING ON THE BOARD OF, FOR INSTANCE, CHASE, WILL THEN ALSO SIT ON THE BOARD OF EXXON AND WILL BE SITTING NEXT TO A BOARD MEM­BER OF CHASE ALSO, WHO SITS ON THE BOARD. SAY, OF MOBIL. THAT IS HOW THEY "BEAT" THE F.T.C. RULES DEALING WITH THE "CONFLICT OF INTEREST" AND "FREE-TRADE".

    They ALL sit on each other's Boards and there are at most 3,500 or less people involved. One man, alone, may own as many as 50-80 hats and interests in corporations, foundations, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, The Council on Foreign Relations--a complete network which is extremely small when you consider what they are doing. This was considered by the deceased Lee Metcalf as a threat to our very way of life if we believe in "free-trade". He felt it would cause the kind of political influence, and he was right, that it ultimately has caused--such as in the case of George Shultz who now sits on the Board of Boe­ing--after eight years in the State Department where he was the single most influential man in the State Department. He opened up trade with Red China and now the trade is wide-open to Red China, which is a major, major victory to Shultz who, as Secretary of State, moved to increase trade with Red China to the point where Boeing Corporation now has RECORD SALES HERE IN SEATTLE AND THROUGHOUT THE U.S. NORTHWEST. OF COURSE GEORGE SHULTZ IS NOW REAPING THE REWARDS OF HIS ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE STATE DEPARTMENT--HE IS ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WITH BOEING CORPORATION.

    What about Great Britain? What about Germany? What about all those others who are now petitioned and have agreed to give the U.S. money?

    Every single one of the countries, including Japan, are represented in exactly the same scenario as just described. They are all players and they have institutionalized their ideology into groups that the far right and the far left tried to consider them some sort of Global Conspiracy--such as is the Trilateral Commission. The make-up of the Trilateral Commission, which is no more than 300 individuals at any given time, is a make-up of Europeans, West Ger­mans, British, Japanese, Canadians and Americans. The same thing holds true and that's why when they refer to the Global Regime, they aren't thinking in terms of Imperialism the way the far-left used to think the U.S. was operating--that kind-of neocolonialism--it is far beyond that. That implies a nation-State trying to reach out and control the globe and still retain its nation-State status. These men don't even consider the United States as a nation-State, they consider the nation-State as Exxon, Chase, IBM, ITT, etc. That is who they believe are now the "nation-State" and that is where they put all the cards.

    Being the President of the United States is a grand vehicle through which to ac­complish the dynamics of the "New World Order", or, "Global Regime of Interdependence". That is why I have said it is a step down for George Bush but a most important step.

    The ones who will be in charge of the New World Order or "Regime" are the same men who are in charge right now. They make up the cabinet, multi-national corporations, defense contractors, the leading bankers for they also sit on the boards of IBM, ATT, etc. They already are in charge and they have agreed to agree on that first premise. It isn't a regime such as the "Christian Fundamentalist" "thing" with a world dictator, etc., it is too well planned to ever have the appearance of such. It is a kind of feudalistic cooperation between the "princes" of the "district". Those "princes" being the C.E.O.'s and Directors--the "districts" being the interlocking or intertwined regions where the multi-national corporation crosses over all country borders.

    They no longer see nation-States. They operate in every country and they truly believe, and here I have a book called PEACE AND AFFLUENCE THROUGH MULTI-NATIONAL CORPORATIONS by Herbert Mertz, which goes so far as to say that the Regime is already in place and it is just a matter of making average layman aware of it. They go so far as to think that we should vote for our political rights no longer through Congress and nation-State Gov­ernmental apparatuses but through the multi-national political apparatus. Mertz is a Director of The World's Ecocracy.

    One thing I learned while I was with the multi-national corporations as a consultant, is that one thing totally devoid in the thinking is the welfare of the people, themselves. I have had it stated to me very clearly that "as they create the Regime and move-in and eliminate regions and first employ people and then throw them out of work and move an operation to a foreign place--however they transmit it--wherever there is disruption and the people are hurt by it, their atti­tude is simplistically stated and the words are: "When the sheep are fleeced--they bleat".

    FEUDALISM
    The Regime is clearly a feudalistic operation. I know well, some of the gentlemen who run some of those major corporations and they are, indeed, feudalistic in their thinking. I would go so far as to say that they are behavioral-social­-Darwinists with a nasty stripe of Nietzsche.

    HOW DOES EXTREME RIGHT AND LEFT AGREE?
    There are many similarities, in fact, years ago I spoke with a newspaper reporter on that very topic. There is a loose merger between the radical right and the lunatic left and that is because they have a lot of the same enemies--for in­stance, Henry Kissinger. The John Birch society did a lot of research into the multi-national corporations and they are interpreted to mean that David Rockefeller was therefore, a Communist, because he was also working with the Soviet Union. The far left always looks at it as a kind of monopoly capitol with a Marxist flavor in trying to install a kind of capitalist Regime throughout the world. Forget free-anything however, for that is the very LAST thing on the minds of these men in point.

    G.E., for instance, is a feudalist-State that has more in common with a socialist dictator such as Noreiga or the Saudi regime than they will ever have with the "free-market".

    You must think back a bit to what the Sabah's threat was and then the Saudis' threat if there was any disclosure of financial holdings in 1982. The threat was that they would go to yen or marks, or whatever it would take to cause a banking crisis. In 1982 we were under a recession and there were tremendous bank failures and the large banks were also in trouble due to the Latin American debt along with the Third World debt. That threat was very REAL and so, think about the threat today if we didn't put Sabah back into his "Pink Palace" with his 70+ wives. What would Sabah do?

    WHAT OF THE MIDDLE-EAST WAR RIGHT NOW?
    It is about making an example of Hussein and totally DESTROYING his military-industrial complex if possible by actually bombing him back into the stone age. Then they look to Assad of Syria and it is clear that the message is that "...now you will disarm--right?"

    As we move along here we find that is only the first major piece to the overall puzzle. This is a new dynamic and the reason it came about so quickly is because Soviet influence left the Middle East as a major "front". Because the Soviet Union appeared to no longer be a major influential player in that area, the Western Powers of the Global Regime could rush in and fill the void and create the dynamic which in the first instance is Iraq falling as a military power. (Hatonn: Here is where the information is now comprehensive enough to validly understand that the Soviets ARE STILL THE MAJOR MILITARY AND TECHNOLOGY-CAPABLE FORERUNNER. This is something that simply no-one has been allowed to know outside of the tiny handful of key players such as Kissinger, etc. It IS through the Soviets that the war was brought to a handy and abrupt halt with Hussein's toys intact and both sides were required to make a cease and desist peace "deal"--"or else!")

    Using Iraq as an example they could go on until Syria and Libya and the rest of the countries would disarm unilaterally or the same fate would befall them. For instance, Baker recently went to Jordan and put out the "Olive Branch of Peace" to King Hussein and said "...we want you to be a part of the New World Or­der". The press was told that that was what was offered, however, what was told to King Hussein was considerably different for there was a strong implied threat that "...when we are through with Saddam--you guys are next!" They are taking the entire Middle East back to pre-1979 when there was a Shah of Iran, no military conflict between Iran and Iraq, Libya and Syria were not a military power to be reckoned with--they want to go back to where there were non-mili­tary despots running those Middle Eastern countries with a SECRET POLICE POWERFUL ENOUGH TO KEEP THE PEOPLE, THAT ARE IN POVERTY, AT BAY AND CONTROL THEM SO THEY DON'T GET OUT OF LINE NOR CAUSE ANY RIFFLES IN THE WATERS TO ANNOY IS­RAEL. Then, too, all of the natural resources of the Middle East will simply be exported through the corporate network into those regions where they want to industrialize like Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary. It is a constant pat­tern of controlling one's resources and who gets it and who sends it to which companies and who gets the proceeds from it. How it works best, according to their thinking, is with feudalistic regimes such as the Saudi and Kuwaiti Regimes.

    Countries like Iraq and Syria that claim national identity and have a strong military defense to back it up have to be removed from power. That's because their, concern with Peace in the Middle East or protecting Israel from the Arabs--it is only a front to major extent, especially the "Peace" reasoning. Israel is an entirely different matter and is totally absorbed into the Global Elite system. It is boiled down, unfortunately, because the Exxon/Chase--the cabinet that makes up those very same Boards--can't then go to Syria and dictate economic policy. If you try to do so, they get their back up, like Hussein, and basically tell the West to "go to hell".

    There are some real flaws remaining with ones, for instance, like Libya. The problem is that the West will push the thing until they very well might pull off the Global plan but there is always the probability that these objectors will get together and get their backs up and have some kind of terrible confrontation. The Arabs know what is under planning and they are split as far as leaders--but the Arab people are united.

    The facts are that no matter how the war turns out--Hussein has won a tremendous victory in a political reference for it only has presented the obvious--that a tremendously powerful nation like the U.S. can and will simply move over and pulverize any lesser power who crosses its path in disagreement. The Arabs are totally united in two things--their total hatred of Israel and their total hatred of the United States of America.

    END OF QUOTED TRANSCRIPTION
    Thank you Dharma, we will just close this off at this point for we are out of space. However, I just want to request that you ones obtain the "White Papers" and get informed. We have spoken at length on this subject and fleshed out that which these authors have not seen and the "whole" is a massive picture, indeed. You readers get your bearings, confirm to selves the truth--and then ponder what might be done to reverse this plague upon the world.

    Remember what I told you yesterday--there will be a coalition of all Arab nations joined by the Soviet Union and then, brothers, the fur will fly and a bunch of chickens are going to get thoroughly plucked. I believe you can see why it is not as simple, either, as simply bringing "the boys" home--the Middle East is a boiling cauldron right now and will remain so--you have just made enemies un­der the surface with almost every nation in the world. So be it.

    Thank you for your service and thank you for your attention. the only portion we did not cover is nuclear capability and we have already covered that quite thoroughly so I choose not to run over on this document.

    Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn, Cmdr.
    UFF-IGFC




    PJ 26
    CHAPTER 4

    REC #1 HATONN

    FRIDAY, MARCH 8, 1991 7:59 A.M. YEAR 4, DAY 204
    Hopeless? Dharma, (sic, sic), that is exactly the response expected and worked for--to make you who are working around the clock to bring light--stop and give up, We cannot do that, chelas. God has no intentions of forfeiting the world Earth.

    You ones should be asking at this point, "What is wrong with Dharma--what is the big occasion of distress?" Just bunches and bunches of little things for, when you come into Truth, you see all that is NOT given unto you and you glean truth from the lies and then the circuits of compassion and distress over-wash the Human emotions. She is exhausted and yet, we need to write 10 times a day and still cannot cover it all. You have been in the dark so very long, beloved ones. And no, Thomas, JOY, and Dru cannot help for theirs is a dif­ferent penning task--to set the messages of the Christed presence to paper--those messages which bring again unto you the TRUE, JUST AND CORRECT direc­tions for life, balance, the laws, etc. Dru has now put to paper the command­ments almost in entirety in brief explanation, and will now put to print "the deadly ‘sins'". You have to know, ultimately, how to pull your "whole" selves out of the muck into which you have been pushed.

    What would be in the news this day that would distress? You would guess that there is only wondrous good-news with soldiers coming home and the frenzy at peak--no, look behind that which is hardly mentioned. At any rate, I must give her some time for I have made the load too great day after day after day. I will attempt to keep this to a minimum of time this morning.

    TODAY'S WATCH
    Homecoming! Rejoice and then, let us face the truth again. Welcome the children and loved ones but don't turn your eyes away in thinking the monster is gone--he has just had his feast of blood and will go, momentarily, for a rest. Don't expect those returning ones to know as much as you do, for they have been in a desert with even more restricted input of knowledge. They will, however, have heard of the numbers of suicides from your own beloved ones who became too distressed in that place. You appear to have a strong group return­ing and in many ways--you do; but in the ending they are only stronger in the fact that they are part of a "machine" from which they cannot extract them­selves.

    NEWS MEDIA PERSONNEL
    How is it that there are OVER FORTY news people "going to be released" in Baghdad? You were told of only three from one network and two, last week, from CNN! I can promise you-the-people that they will be silenced and that which comes out will be censored in its entirety--"for National Security". If you ones can ever break the press away from their shackles you will win this "secret" war against the people of the world.

    POLICE BRUTALITY
    While the world is in shock over an incident of the beating in Los Angeles by the Police Department of a black suspect being taken into custody. This is what has really pulled Dharma down, for one of her own children, now dead of "suicide", was treated to a dose of the L.A. Sheriff's Dept. He was just a sixteen year-old who had just gotten off work, on Halloween night, and on his way home was dragged from his parent's automobile--through the window, by his hair, beaten and cuffed so tightly that it took six weeks to regain full use of his right hand. When objections were entered, the "forms" (for you have to ask the County Supervisors for permission to bring charges) reached the Board of Su­pervisors--8 hours too late to be filed. How many of you know these rules?

    Dharma was employed at Children's Hospital of L.A. for some 10 years. The battered children, especially blacks from the ghetto areas, were brought in EVERY NIGHT to emergency. At one point, one child lost an eye at the Police's hands and it was simply too much for the young doctors on service. They brought charges---GUESS WHO LOST THEIR JOBS?

    Now, they will tell you that this incident--captured by a witness from his apartment balcony--on film, is isolated and "just never happens". Phooey, it hap­pens regularly and is the "rule" and not the exception to the rule. THEY ARE IN TRAINING TO BRING YOU-THE-PEOPLE INTO TOTAL POLICE CONTROL FOR THE REGIME COMING DOWN ON YOU--PLANNED AND UNDER WAY! The hospital incident above is only one of a hundred just she could give and she was nowhere near Emergency Room--and worse for the situation--it was 15 years past--how think ye it is this day??

    KUWAITIS
    Have any of you readers witnessed the hundreds of Kuwaiti citizens crossing the border and now WALKING to Kuwait City? They are angry and hungry after first being disallowed entry to their own country and totally ignored. They scream "war" (NOW THAT IT IS TOO LATE) against the Sabahs for" ...no government should treat its own people like this--like dogs and worse--we are starving and they do nothing.....!" There are hundreds upon hundreds at the border and the Kuwaitis won't let them re-enter their own country!

    DEATH TO HUSSEIN
    Now the big flash is that "...the Arab nations are putting up a big reward for removing their 'fellow Arab' Hussein from power, by death if necessary!" And, of course, that is the way it will have to be, NO! The "Arab Conspira­tors" who are in the loop of the One World Regime are trying to take him out before the people can rise up against them. America and World: KNOW that the plans are too well laid to allow survival of anyone who can fight back. You see, your world is controlled totally by those original 13 to 14 families with a few old line ball-players allowed to play for awhile, while it is convenient to utilize them and their resources. YOU HAVE NOT LIBERATED KUWAIT--YOU HAVE REINSTALLED THE DESPOT OF DESPOTS BACK INTO HIS IVORY AND PINK PALACE. YOU ARE IN GRAVE TROUBLE, WORLD--INDEED, VERY, VERY GRAVE AND YOU CONTINUE TO WHOOP AND BOW TO WONDROUS BUSH WHO LAUGHS AT YOU AND DROOLS OVER THE CARCASS OF THAT WHICH HE HAS PULLED INTO DESTRUCTION. HE IS ONE OF THE HEAD MACHINISTS AT THE TOOL SHOP. BE WARNED: FOR HE IS ONLY A ROBOTOID REPLICA-- THE BIG BOY IS STILL OUT THERE PULLING HIS STRINGS WHILE YOU WATCH AND APPLAUD THE PUPPET SHOW. BY FAR, THE WORST IS YET TO COME.

    REPETITION AND EMPHASIS
    No matter what we give unto you, you are stunned and put it aside thinking "this one" might be incorrect--so we will keep right on keeping on.

    Let us go back to an interesting old story from your "Good Book" that might be well worth looking at again this day. Let me just outlay a very impressive mes­sage from the "FOREWORD" of a booklet entitled, THE GREAT CONSPIR­ACY on the subject of WHO'S STOMPING ON CHRISTIAN CIVILIZA­TION? This is compiled by Brig. Gen. Gordon "Jack" Mohr, C.P.D.L.

    Isaiah 22:25--"There is a conspiracy of her prophets (leaders) in the midst thereof, like a roaring lion ravening the prey; they have devoured souls; they have taken the treasure and precious things; they have made her many widows in the midst thereof."

    In Psalm 2:2-4, you can read these words: "Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together against the Lord, and against His Anointed, saying, 'Let us break their band asunder, and cast away their cords from us, He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh; the Lord shall have them in derision." (Or contempt.)

    Off and on you will hear about the "Conspiratorial Theory of History." This is certainly in line with the words spoken by the Psalmist and they echo those spoken by President F.D. Roosevelt when he said: "Nothing in politics happens by accident; it was all planned somewhere, in some smoke-filled room."

    But if you mention a conspiracy today--a conspiracy to control the world and make men and women slaves--the Elite of the world, the sophisticated, the educated, laugh knowingly, tap their heads and declare you to be a "looney kook" of some kind.

    Yet many Americans know that there was a conspiracy to kill President John Kennedy. They know it was not the work of one slightly demented man. Even when the Warren Commission said one man did it, intelligent Americans said: "Why then, did you seal your findings for decades? Who are you protecting?"

    Now consider today--March 8, 1991--the ones in charge of the Book Depository from which the "so-called" assassin fired his death bullet has decreed that Oliver Stone may film a motion picture from the site--BUT NOT USE THE SIXTH FLOOR THEREOF!! Of course not, for it would be uncovered before all the world THAT IT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN THE WAY IT WAS GIVEN FORTH TO ALL OF YOU!

    When something unusual happens, which does not appear to be by accident, people have the right to ask: "Who did it? Why did they do it? Were there more than one of them? Who financed them? Who benefitted by the death of President John Kennedy? Did the man who replaced him have any debts which he paid off?" Is it not even more proper, in fact, to DEMAND these answers?

    Where are you, children? Even your Bible--which you continually tout to me in your anger at my bringing Truth--tells you beyond any shadow of a doubt that there is a long-range conspiracy against God and His people of all faiths. Herein are references from THAT BOOK that can confirm this conspiracy, three of which are in Psalm 2. In Isaiah 14, you can read about a very power­ful arch angel named LUCIFER, who tried to arrange a conspiracy in heaven, TO KICK GOD OFF HIS THRONE AND USURP THE THRONE. It went so far that he seduced 1/3rd of the angelic hosts to join with him in the conspiracy. And, if you study the Bible a bit more carefully, you will see that this great conspiracy HAS BEEN IN OPERATION SINCE THE DAY THAT GOD PLACED YOUR FOREFATHER "AU-DAUM" (Auld Dum-de­Dumb Dumb) in the beauteous "Garden of Eden".

    To identify a conspiracy, you MUST KNOW WHO is being conspired against. The Bible tells you that this great conspiracy is against God and His People. Not the people you call "Jews" today, who are the very ones your Teacher in Rev. 2:9 referred to when He spoke about: "Those who say they a Jews (JUDEANS) and are NOT; BUT ARE OF THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN." We are speaking here, about God's TRUE "israel" people, who we know are not those who call themselves "chosen people" from Palestine (Israel). I am going to take a bit of an exception to some of the material in this booklet for I refuse emphatically to give you information which will pit you against brother. For terms are used which would tend to isolate the "chosen" of God into nation­alities and lineages which can not be completely accurate. Most especially, through the evolvement of "time", I shall most certainly not allow my readers to slip into bigoted, race-isolated stance. The "REFLECTION OF GOD'S IM­AGE" bears no color nor race as such--only the energy (spirit) of God which is (LIGHT) and is all comprehensive from all "colors" and therefore could broadly be considered "white". It is factual that one's of this generation have come forth from mixtures of those who originally came from ancestry of various "colored" beings as to skin, etc. But the color of the skin had nothing to do with the ac­tions of the evil perpetrators who worked against God. As a matter of fact--those beings might well be the very ones who will now set the record to straight for YOU ARE NOT GIVEN TO KNOW THAT WHICH GOD ALLOWS TO COME FULL FLOWER. IT IS NOT MYSTIC, IT IS SIMPLY NOT YET REVEALED FROM THE "MYSTERY"

    We are going to utilize some exceptionally good information--for the most part--which came out publicly in about year 1988. It is about the Great Conspiracy. I am going to utilize this time period for it brings into focus, within your time perceptions of recognition and memory, that which was well under way. We have to make these connections again and again for few will retain much "total" recall from prior writings. Sometimes parables must be presented in several ways to meld the point and focus the point.

    ABOUT THE GREAT CONSPIRACY
    As we speak of this in a setting of the late 1980's you must, up front, realize that most information and background came from 30-50, or more, years prior to that. We have to go back, again, to the Illuminati of the Elite One Worlders. You will again see how it all connects, frankly, all the way back to the beginning of your human experience on your planet.

    These One-Worlders, known as the Illuminati, fully planned and are now ready to take over your world. You, as a world, are coming apart and you deserve to know WHY AND HOW! WHAT YOU WILL DO WITH THAT INFORMATION IS TOTALLY UP TO YOU-THE-PEOPLE. I REPEAT--MINE IS GIVE YOU THE TRUTH; I CANNOT "DO IT" FOR YOU!

    These writings herein are about a Great Conspiracy; in fact, an ages-old conspiracy to enslave ALL peoples of the world under a one-world system con­trolled by a totalitarian dictatorship. This is defined by your dictionary as: "A combination of men for an evil purpose; and agreement between two or more persons, to commit some crime in concert, particularly, a combination to com­mit treason or incite sedition or insurrection against the government of a state."

    Because this conspiracy has been a "Jewish" (Refer to the "DEFINITIONS" which I have given you prior to this writing for I MUST utilize accepted terms as presented to you for you no longer have the proper terminology suitable to make clarity. Thank you.) plot from the very beginning, the media has been very careful to poke fun at anyone who believes in what they call "The Con­spiratorial Theory of History". They will admit to many other conspiracies in the 6,000 years of "written" world history, but say they do not believe one is going on now. I am going to prove to you, little ones, beyond the shadow of any reasonable doubt, that there is and has been such a conspiracy underway to enslave you and destroy Godly civilization everywhere on your globe.

    This plot remains generally unknown to the majority of your people and when ones speak out about it, they are apt to be received with worse than scorn, contempt, and most often even hatred and abhorrent violence. There can be no doubt that we are labeled as "anti-Semites" but that is getting to be quite "passe" so check your "definitions". I cannot help it if the ones who have set this thing into operation now call themselves "Jews" and I am very sorry, indeed, for the Judeans who have allowed that to take place. The reason for this plot not being generally recognized is because the plotters have total control of the media of the land. They control the newspapers, magazines, radio, TV and the Motion Picture outlets (anything that might promote their ideas and shush yours). This is proven and "they" are quite egotistic and proud of having ac­complished this against you-the-people. It is not secret any longer--they boast about it constantly and you STILL hang on their presentations like addicts to the poison drugs.

    In recent decades, television and the movies have been in the forefront of this "brainwashing" process. These are almost totally controlled by International Jewish interests. This control has been so exaggerated and misused that it has your political and religious leaders, as well as your major educators, to the point where they believe they have the right to tell the people what they want them to hear, rather than what is truth.

    Your National leaders tout that they have received this power from their "positions in government", although your Constitution Republic was set unto be the "servant of the people, rather than its master". Today your leaders, while ostensibly in power, are controlled by shadow figures who lurk in the background, ever becoming more and more open, pulling the strings of government, no matter what political party "is in power". This is why you see little change in economics or foreign policy when there is a change of administration. But with this last change to George Bush, you have married into the big league of puppet-masters. You have not had an "American Government in Washing­ton" in three quarters of a century--and then, it wasn't worth speaking of as non-manipulated. You have been infected and pushed around la the alien fig­ures of the International Zionist Bankers, who now control our total economy and thus the country.

    The idea of those ruling Elite is to so change the thinking of you good, patriotic Americans so that you can be peacefully merged with the nations of the Third-world and Communist states.

    During the Korean War, 1950-53 (and surely you dear ones must realize that you still have military personnel in Korea and American POW's in Russia), when your armed forces came under United Nations control for the first time, you saw your boys murdered by the tens of thousands in a war your leaders never intended to win, while your national wealth went into the pockets of the International gangsters who were totally responsible for it. This was all part and parcel of the plan to weaken and divide America. You saw its horrible aftermath in Vietnam. BOTH of these "no win--no plan to win" wars were part of the world-wide conspiracy which has already destroyed much of your world. In every instance, although Americans have been brainwashed into believing your government was anti-Communist, it was your tax dollars and aid which kept this enemy of mankind alive and well and killing YOU. "Communism" is just a convenient "word"--don't get yourselves hung-up on it for it doesn't mean anything--it will now shift to something like the New World Order or some other meaningless term.

    It is vitally important for you mothers and fathers, whose loved ones died in those wars, to know the truth about this betrayal for it continues on and on and gets worse and worse all over your planet. You in America see that which IS in places like Panama, South America, Central America and the Saudi desert--but you don't get much on South Africa as it really is, nor other places like China where you get a distorted picture which, in fact, could not be buried because of its size--and Satan must always wear a bloodstained clue of the players actually involved, i.e. Bush, Scowcroft, Kissinger, etc.--never interrupting "business" with Red China and glad to have the trouble-makers out of the way at any cost--including death by tank-squashing.

    It is more important still for you to understand that, standing behind the traitors in government, there is a comparatively SMALL group of men, whose SOLE PURPOSE IN LIFE IS THE ENSLAVEMENT OF THE WORLD AND TO ENRICH THOSE WHO PROCLAIM THEMSELVES AS THE ONLY ONES CAPABLE OF RULING YOUR COMPLEX WORLD.

    In order to get a more clearly visible view of this evil plot, it is necessary to go back to a time in Europe, to its modern beginning. "Modern" is the chosen word because the underlying plot was hatched too many centuries ago to cover herein, long before the time of the Teacher called Jesus the Christed, in the dusty streets and innards of Babylon.

    I am going to tell you about the man that resurrected this ancient plot in 1776 and who was the architect of the modern conspiracy that you erroneously call "communism". Then I will bring you again to the more recent times and show you how the conspiracy remained and grew in operation. Many of you, if you are not familiar with the prior Phoenix material--or similar information--will be shocked and you will first deny and refuse belief. This is Truth and the facts are now down in your own ability to read them and garner proof if you but take the time to look for them.

    You continue to use terms which are totally without meaning other than accepted and conjured erroneously so we will need more definitions as we move along. One term which must be defined before we move on is what is meant when one is referred to as a "LIBERAL". Webster's Dictionary defines liberal as: 1. of a free heart; munificent; bountiful; generous. a liberal donor. 2. gen­erous, as a 'liberal donation'; 3. not selfish, narrow or contracted; embracing interests other than ones own; 4. embracing literature and sciences generally, as a liberal education; 5. open; candid, as 'liberal communication of thoughts'; 6. large; profuse, as a liberal discharge of matter; 7. Free; 8. not mean, low in birth or mind; 9. licentious; free to excess.

    So you can see, this commonly used word covers a very large range of thoughts from the good to the despotic. But the world conspirators seized on this word and used it as a pivot on which to build their activities. In itself, if sounds innocent and humanitarian (another mark of the beast). But you must use ex­ceeding care, for the term "liberal" is also used to describe someone or their ac­tivities, who are actually subversive in nature. Most of the agents of the world conspiracy, come from the ranks of those who consider and call themselves, "liberals".

    The satanic plot to control all of mankind was launched in the 1760's under the organized name of the ILLUMINATI. This subversive organization was organized by a Zionist named Adam Weishaupt, who had been converted to Catholi­cism, became a Jesuit priest and then became an agent for the Jewish house of Rothschild.

    It was the Rothschild wealth that financed this venture. They also planned and financed every major war and revolution beginning with the French Revolution. They worked under various "guises" and names, but it was for the same purpose and backed by the same men.

    Dharma, let us leave this writing. I ask that you get out of this location as
    quickly as conveniently possible. The others are behind, at best, and I need you
    out of here for a while, please. There is much on this subject and we will keep at it so allow us respite.

    Hatonn to stand-by, thank you.

주제글 정보

Users Browsing this Thread

이 주제글은 현재 5명이 열람중입니다. (0명의 회원과 5명의 손님)

이 주제글의 글단추(태그)

글쓰기 규칙

  • 새 글 작성이 불가능함
  • 응답글 작성이 불가능함
  • 파일 첨부가 불가능함
  • 내 글 수정이 불가능함
  •