3/6 페이지 처음처음 1 2 3 4 5 6 마지막마지막
Results 5 to 6 of 14

제목: PJ#025, THE BITTER COMMUNION ALTARS OF HEMLOCK

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default 응답: PJ#025, THE BITTER COMMUNION ALTARS OF HEMLOCK

    PJ 25
    CHAPTER 7
    REC #3 HATONN
    MONDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1991 1:08 P.M. YEAR 4 DAY 186
    TODAY'S WATCH
    Hatonn present in the light of Holy God, in service. We shall understand frustrations and denial, chelas, for how can Man know that which has been denied his eyes and ears? Further, we shall keep the humor in all circumstance for it helps lend balance to a most unbalanced experience.

    I shall respond to the young man in Saudi Arabia at a later time for I must continue with our work at hand. In all instances you ones must look at the truth of words as they come forth; i.e. "I've skimmed through your articles. . ." How can anyone come to any valid conclusions regarding anything by skimming, things totally out of context? But the great point we must have finally made is he says, ". . .and have come to the conclusion that you are from another planet." This is the first person who has acknowledged that point so vehemently. I am honored, son, since I am the Commander of a Pleiadian vessel called the PHOENIX.

    My suggestion, however, is to allow that to cause you no discomfort for you will be given to KNOW quite soon now exactly how things ARE.

    Now, as the young man burning the Journal Expresses to warm himself at night and complaining about using up his matches and lighters--so be it. Man burned the holy books, Newton's works and even burned up the people who brought the Truth--IT CHANGED NOT ONE IOTA OF THE TRUTH. Did the burning at the stake, Bruno, who pronounced and proved the earth was not the center of the Universe, in conjunction with Capernicus, make the Truth less valid? Did the destruction of the works and men who proved the world to be round make the world less round?

    There is however, one point of troubling information in the material, the young man says he majored in Criminal Law, etc. His level of "education" however, indicates that there is even more wrong with your judicial system than even I would outline.

    I am also very relieved for you nice Americans that this young man is in Saudi Arabia "defending America and all it stands for?" What does it stand for, son? Further, do you defend a group of citizens by going thousands of miles away to re-seat a monarch with 80 wives while your own home and nation sits naked to any who should wish to attack? How is it that it has come to the point where if you object to the war in principle that you "do not support the troops"! Is it not possible to support the troops and the nation and that for which it stands and still object to a distant war and murder? If I be brainwashed in this matter, I believe that I shall resort to staying cleansed for I care not for the blood of anyone upon my soul. At least fifty children under the age of five-years died in one bombing in Baghdad of a citizen shelter which is now admitted by the allies to have been non-military. Is this what you are defending? So be it for I believe this young man might well be as misinformed as the majority of all ones on your globe.

    This young man also said that God should decide and is the only one who knows what is to happen in these ending days! Ah, would ye not, then, think it possible God is sending his emissaries to assist HIS wondrous people from the "damnation of Hell" where the young man has judged me to be placed--without trial even by his "criminal justice system". Let me remind you of some most important data: "For God so loved the world that He sent his Son unto you--and ye crucified Him" and when He ascended unto The Father He said He would go forth and prepare a place for YOU--and HE has done so! Perhaps ones should not burn the documents for in the ending the truth might have served better than the watching of a glowing ember or fragment of heat--but IT MOST CERTAINLY IS ONE SURE WAY NOT TO HAVE TO SEE TRUTH--JUST BURN IT! SO BE IT! My committed task it to get the truth to you--YOU MAY DO ANYTHING YOU WISH WITH IT! I remain grateful that you have been touched by the words to the extent of bothering to respond--much the less with five pages of written material--that indicates to me that you were touched far more deeply by the "skimming" than thine words project! Life is a most wondrous gift to be not sure WHY ye lay it down! Do ye lay it down for your Mother and lover who weeps for you? Or do you lay it down for a man who takes his "POWER" walks with the big stick each morning and treats your blood as but nothing but a number in his "acceptable losses"? Ponder it, ye readers--most carefully indeed for if this madness be stopped--it shall be ye who do of it!

    Now, as to my stupidity and not admitting ever being "wrong", I would suggest that I certainly am first to admit incorrect perceptions--i.e., I thought YOU, SIR were mature, educated and humanitarian enough to understand efforts of love and compassion--I am obviously "wrong" for ye have outgrown any need of further education or insight to possible misconceptions or historical information. I was not aware that the school-systems of this day so thoroughly covered historical and geographical subject materials so extensively that none need further input. Let me assure you, son, that it is the brilliant and educated man who will garner all possible information from whatever comes into his searching hands for he knows he cannot know it all--he does not burn it upon the sands of some desert of which he knew not the location prior to his participation in the "war to defend America".

    QUOTING CONTINUED:

    "YIDDISH"
    Before it became known as the "Yiddish" language, the mother-tongue of the Khazars added many words to its limited ancient vocabulary as necessity required. These words were acquired from the languages of its neighboring nations with whom they had political, social or economic relations. Languages of all nations add to their vocabularies in the same way. The Khazars adapted words to their requirements from the German, the Slavonic and the Baltic languages. The Khazars adopted a great number of words from the German languages. The Germans had a much more advanced civilization than their Khazar neighbors and the Khazars sent their children to German schools and universities.

    The "Yiddish" language is not a German dialect. Many people are led to believe so because "Yiddish" has borrowed so many words from the German language. If "Yiddish" is a German dialect acquired from the Germans then what language did the Khazars speak for the 1000 years they existed in eastern Europe before they acquired culture from the Germans? The Khazars must have spoken some language when they invaded eastern Europe. What was that language? When did they discard it? How did the entire Khazar population discard one language and adopt another all of a sudden? The idea is too absurd to discuss. "Yiddish" is the modern name for the ancient mother-tongue of the Khazars with added German, Slavonic and Baltic adopted and adapted numerous words.

    "Yiddish" must not be confused with "Hebrew" because they both use the same characters as their alphabets. There is not one word of "Yiddish" in ancient "Hebrew" nor is there one word of ancient "Hebrew" in "Yiddish". As I stated before, they are as totally different as Swedish and Spanish which both likewise use the same Latin characters for their alphabets. The "Yiddish" language is the cultural common denominator for all the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in or from eastern Europe. To the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in and from eastern Europe "Yiddish" serves them like the English language serves the populations of the 48 states of the United States. Their cultural common denominator throughout the 48 states is the English language, or wherever they may emigrate and resettle. The English language is the tie which binds them to each other. It is the same with the "Yiddish" language and so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world.

    "Yiddish" serves another very useful purpose for so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world. They possess in "Yiddish" what no other national, racial or religious group can claim. Approximately 90% of the world's so-called or self-styled "Jews" living in 42 different countries of the world today are either emigrants from eastern Europe, or their parents emigrated from eastern Europe. "Yiddish" is a language common to all of them as their first or second language according to where they were born. It is an "international" language to them. Regardless of what country in the world they may settle in they will always find co-religionists who also speak "Yiddish". "Yiddish" enjoys other international advantages too obvious to describe here. "Yiddish" is the modern language of a nation which has lost its existence as a nation. "Yiddish" never had a religious implication, although using Hebrew characters for its alphabet. It must not be confused with words like "Jewish". But it is very much.

    Directly north of the Khazar Kingdom at the height of its power a small Slavic state was organized in 820 A.D. on the south shore of the Gulf of Finland where it flows into the Baltic Sea. This small state was organized by a small group of Varangians from the Scandanavian peninsula on the opposite shore of the Baltic Sea. The native population of this newly formed state consisted of nomad Slavs who had made their home in this area from earliest recorded history. This infant nation was even smaller than our state of Delaware. This newly-born state however was the embryo which developed into the great Russian Empire. In less than 1000 years since 820 A.D. this synthetic nation expanded its borders by ceaseless conquests until it now includes more than 9,500,000 square miles in Europe and Asia, or more than three times the area of continental United States, and they have not stopped.

    During the 10th, 11th, 12th and 13th centuries the rapidly expanding Russian nation gradually swallowed up the Khazar kingdom, its neighbor directly to the south. The conquest of the Khazar Kingdom by the Russians supplies history with the explanation for the presence after the 13th century of the large number of so-called or self-styled "Jews" in Russia. The large number of so-called or self-styled "Jews" in Russia and in eastern Europe after the destruction of the Khazar Kingdom were thereafter no longer known as Khazars but as the "Yiddish" populations of these many countries. They so refer to themselves today.

    In the many wars with her neighbors in Europe after the 13th century Russia was required to cede to her victors large areas which were originally part of the Khazar Kingdom. In this manner Poland, Lithuania, Galicia, Hungary, Rumania, and Austria acquired from Russia territory originally a part of the Khazar Kingdom. Together with this territory these nations acquired a segment of the population of so-called or self-styled "Jews" descended from the Khazars who once occupied the territory. These frequent boundary changes by the nations in eastern Europe explains the presence today of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in all these countries who all trace their ancestry back to the converted Khazars. Their common language, their common culture, their common religion, and their common racial characteristics classify them all beyond any question of doubt with the Khazars who invaded eastern Europe in the 1st century B.C. and were converted to "Talmudism" in the 7th century.

    (Hatonn: Interruption for comment. I am asked why these people are continually referred to by Freedman, and me for that matter, as "so-called" or "self-styled"? Because, dear ones, that is how they refer to themselves--"self-styled" for they practice none of the original Judean practices but totally follow the Talmud.)

    The so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern European origin make up at least 90% of the world's total present population of so-called or self-styled "Jews". The conversion of King Bulan and the Khazar nations in the 7th century accomplished for "Talmudism", or for "Judaism" as "Talmudism" is called today, what the conversion of Constantine and the western European nations accomplished for Christianity. Christianity was a small comparatively unimportant religious belief practiced principally in the eastern Mediterranean area until the conversion to the Christian faith of the large populations of the western European pagan nations after the conversion of Constantine. "Talmudism", or "Judaism" as "Talmudism" is known today, was given its greatest stimulus in all its history with the conversion of the large pagan Khazar population in the 7th century. Without the conversion of the Khazar population it is doubtful if "Talmudism", or "Judaism" as "Talmudism" is known today, could have survived. "Talmudism", the civil and religious code of the Pharisees, most likely would have passed out of existence like the many other creeds and cults practiced by the peoples in that area before, during and after "Pharisaism" assumed its prominent position among these creeds and cults in the time of Jesus. "Talmudism", as "Pharisaism" was called later, would have disappeared with all its contemporary creeds and cults but for the conversion of the Khazars to "Talmudism" in the 7th century. At that time "Talmudism" was well on its way towards complete oblivion.

    In the year 986 A.D. the ruler of Russia, Vladimir III, became a convert to the Christian faith in order to marry a Catholic Slavonic princess of a neighboring sovereign state. The marriage was otherwise impossible. Vladimir III thereupon also made his newly-acquired Christian faith the state religion of Russia replacing the pagan worship formerly practiced in Russia since it was founded in 820 A.D. Vladimir III and his successors as the rulers of Russia attempted in vain to convert his so-called or self-styled "Jews", now Russian subjects, to Russia's Christian state religion, and to adopt the customs and culture of the numerically predominant Russian Christian population. The so-called or self-styled "Jews" in Russia refused and resisted this plan vigorously. They refused to adopt the Russian alphabet in place of the Hebrew characters used in writing their "Yiddish" language. They resisted the substitution of the Russian language for "Yiddish" as their mother-tongue. They opposed every attempt to bring about the complete assimilation of the former sovereign Khazar nation into the Russian nation. They resisted with every means at their disposal. The many forms of tension which resulted produced situations described by history as "massacres", "pogroms", "persecution", discrimination, etc.

    In Russia at that period in history it was the custom as in other Christian countries in Europe at that time to take an oath, vow or pledge of loyalty to the rulers, the nobles, the feudal landholders and others in the name of Jesus Christ. It was after that conquest of the Khazars by the Russians that the wording of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer was altered. The new altered version of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows" prayer is referred to in the Talmud as "the law of revocation in advance". The "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer was regarded as a "law". The effect of this "LAW OF REVOCATION IN ADVANCE" obtained for all who recited it each year on the eve of the Day of Atonement divine dispensation from all obligations acquired under "oaths, vows and pledges" to be made or taken in the COMING YEAR. The recital of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer on the eve of the Day of Atonement released those so-called or self-styled "Jews" from any obligation under "oaths, vows or pledges" entered into during the NEXT TWELVE MONTHS. The "oaths, vows and pledges" made or taken by so-called or self-styled "Jews" were made or taken "with tongue in cheek", for twelve months.

    (Hatonn: Now I am barraged with, "...well, what about the Christians--were they so perfect?" No indeed--they certainly were NOT and now have taken up the slop-over of the "Talmudic" teachings and are calling it "New Teachings for a Modern Society". However, my scribe can only type so fast and we can only do one thing at a time in your time and space limitations. Further, it does no good to say, "Go read the history books and save us this work," for you won't do so--you even "skim" that which we give you and pronounce judgment with practically no study what-so-ever. We have to take it according to the blueprint of God's sequence projections--therefore, NOW, at this sitting we are speaking of Khazar Talmudists--now calling themselves Zionists!)

    The altered version of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer created serious difficulties for the so-called or self-styled "Jews" when its wording became public property. It apparently did not remain a secret very long, although the Talmud states "the law of revocation in advance was not made public". The altered version of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer soon became known as the "Jews Vow" and cast serious doubt upon "oaths, vows or pledges" given to Christians (or anyone else) by so-called or self-styled "Jews". Christians soon believed that "oaths, vows or pledges" were quite worthless when given by so-called or self-styled "Jews". This was the basis for so-called "discrimination" by governments, nobles, feudal landholders, and others who required oaths of allegiance and loyalty from those who entered their service.

    An intelligent attempt was made to correct this situation by a group of German rabbis in 1844. In that year they called an international conference of rabbis in Brunswick, Germany. They attempted to have the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer completely eliminated from the Day of Atonement ceremonies, and entirely abolished from any religious service of their faith. They felt that this secular prologue to the Day of Atonement ceremonies was void of any spiritual implication and did not belong in any synagogue ritual. However the preponderant majority of the rabbis attending that conference in Brunswick came from eastern Europe. They insisted that the altered version of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer be retained exactly as it was then recited on the Day of Atonement. They demanded that it be allowed to remain as it had been recited in eastern Europe since the change by Meir ben Samuel six centuries earlier. It is today recited in exactly that form throughout the world by so-called or self-styled "Jews". Will the 150,000,000 Christians in the United States react any differently when they become more aware of its insidious implications?

    How genuine can the implications, inferences and innuendoes of the so-called "brotherhood" and "interfaith" movements be under these circumstances? These so-called movements are sweeping the nation like prairie fires. If the Talmud is the axis of the political, economic, cultural and social attitudes and activities of so-called or self-styled "Jews" participating in these two so-called movements, how genuine are the "oaths, vows or pledges" taken or given in connection with these so-called movements by so-called or self-styled "Jews"? It would be a superlative gesture of "brotherhood" or of "interfaith" if the National Conference of Christians and Jews succeeded in expunging from the Talmud all anti-Christ, anti-Christian, and anti-Christianity passages. At a cost of many millions of dollars the National Conference of Christians and Jews succeeded in expunging from the New Testament passages which so-called or self-styled "Jews" regarded as offensive to their faith. A great portion of the cost was supplied by so-called or self-styled "Jews". Christians might now supply funds to expunge from the Talmud passages offensive to the Christian faith. Otherwise the so-called "brotherhood" and "interfaith" movements are merely mockeries.

    END QUOTING FOR THIS SEGMENT

    * * * * * * * *
    We would take another rest, please. I hope you can begin to understand what a tremendous wall of humanity you face when you march off on this ground war in the Middle East and if the Islamic and Moslem world rise against you. You see, what you don't understand is that the "Christ" teachings are a way of life--not A MAN. Christ is a "state of being", not a Man's name. Whether or not the practice of "religion" of the Islams and Moslems is valid or invalid makes no difference at all--you have "modernized" your "Christianity" to suit the Satanic input by "voting in" all sorts of forbidden practices against the commandments as given forth--and naming it "modernization". The old world in the Middle East has not and they will rise up against you in the perception that YOU are the anti-christ Satan. Right or wrong will cease to have any meaning as the blood begins to flow for there will be no sitting to a table to disagree and produce documents to debate the point. Those ones in the Middle East of those stoic religions, right or wrong, KNOW THAT FOR WHICH THEY STAND--HOW MANY OF YOU KNOW ABSOLUTELY THAT FOR WHICH YOU STAND AND LAY DOWN FORFEIT THE LIVES OF YOUR CHILDREN? Tell me that for which you stand and I will show you that it is not that which is taking place in Saudi Arabia this day! Salu.


    PJ 25
    CHAPTER 8
    REC #4 HATONN
    MONDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1991 5:09 P.M. YEAR 4 DAY 186
    MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
    QUOTING CONTINUED:

    The National Conference of Christians and Jews might look into the millions of dollars being invested today by so-called or self-styled "Jews" to insure that the Talmud shall remain the axis of political, economic, cultural and social attitudes and activities of so-called or self-styled "Jews" today, and future generations. Violating the basic principle of "brotherhood" and "Interfaith" so-called or self-styled "Jews" are spending millions of dollars each year to establish and equip quarters where the teachings of the Talmud can be indoctrinated into the minds of children from the time they are able to read and write. These few news items were selected from hundreds like them which are appearing daily in newspapers clear across the nation:

    "Two new Jewish Centers, built at a cost of $300,000. will be opened to a 1000 students for daily and Sunday school activities next month, it was announced today by the Associated Talmud Torahs." (Chicago Herald-Tribune, 8/19/50.)

    "The Yeshiva School Department now provides daytime an approved English-Hebrew curriculum for grades 1 to 5 (aged 5 1/2 to 10). The afternoon Talmud Torah has opened a new beginner's class and is accepting enrollment of advanced as well as beginner students." (Jewish Voice, 9/18/53)

    "RABBI TO TALK ON TALMUD TO SHOLEM MEN. Dr. David Graubert presiding rabbi of Bet Din, and professor of rabbinical literature at the College of Jewish Studies, will present the first of his series of four lectures, ‘The World of the Talmud'. (Chicago Tribune, 10/29/53.)

    "MARYLAND GRANTS DEGREE IN TALMUD. Baltimore, (JTA). New Israel Rabbinical College has been granted here authority by the Maryland State Board of Education to issue degrees of Master of Talmudic Law and Doctor of Talmudic Law." (Jewish Voice, 1/9/53.)

    "TALMUD LESSONS ON AIR FROM JERUSALEM. Weekly radio lectures on the Talmud, in English, will be available shortly on tape recordings for local stations in the United States and Canada, it was announced today." (California Jewish Voice, 1/11/52.)

    Earlier in this letter, my dear Dr. Goldstein, you remember reading a quotation by the most eminent authority on the Talmud to the effect that "THE MODERN JEW IS A PRODUCT OF THE TALMUD. Would it surprise you to learn that many Christians also are the "PRODUCT OF THE TALMUD". The teachings of the Talmud are accepted by Christians in the highest echelons. I will only quote one on the subject of the Talmud, the former President of the United States. In 1951 President Truman was presented with his second set of the "63 books" of the Talmud. On the occasion of this acceptance the newspapers carried the following news item:

    "Mr. Truman thanked us for the books and said that he was glad to get them as ‘I have read many more of the ones presented four years ago than a lot of people think.' He said that he did read a lot and that the book he read the most is the Talmud which contains much sound reasoning and good philosophy of life."

    Former President Truman says he benefits by "much sound reasoning" and his brand of "good philosophy of life" which absorbs from the "book that he reads the most." His recent term in office reflected his study of the Talmud. No one familiar with the Talmud will deny that. But does our former President Truman know that Jesus did not feel the way he feels about the Talmud? The "much sound reasoning" and the "good philosophy of life" in the Talmud were constantly and consistently denounced by Jesus in no uncertain terms. Former President Truman should refresh his memory by reading the New Testament passages where Jesus expresses Himself on the question of the Pharisees and their Talmud. Will Mr. Truman state that in his opinion the Talmud was the "sort of book" from which Jesus "drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world" on "moral and religious subjects"?

    Before leaving the Talmud as my subject I would like to refer to the most authentic analysis of the Talmud which has ever been written. You should obtain a copy of it and read it. You will be amply rewarded for your trouble in finding a copy of it, I can doubly assure you. The name of the book is "The Talmud". It was written almost a century ago in French by Arsene Darmesteter. In 1897 it was translated into English by the celebrated Henrietta Szold and published by the Jewish Publication Society of America in Philadelphia. Henrietta Szold was an outstanding educator and Zionist and one of the most notable and admirable so-called or self-styled "Jews" of this century. Henrietta Szold's translation of Arsene Darmesteter's "The Talmud" is a classic. You will never understand the Talmud until you have read it. I will quote from it sparingly:

    "Now Judaism finds its expression in the Talmud, which is not a remote suggestion and a faint echo thereof, but in which it has become incarnate, in which it has taken form, passing from a state of the abstraction into the domain of real things. THE STUDY OF JUDAISM IS THAT OF THE TALMUD, AS THE STUDY OF THE TALMUD IS THAT OF JUDAISM. . .THEY ARE TWO INSEPARABLE THINGS, OR BETTER, THEY ARE ONE AND THE SAME. . .Accordingly, the Talmud is the completest expression of religious movement, and this code of endless prescriptions and minute ceremonials represents in its perfection the total work of the religious idea. . .The miracle was accomplished by a book, the Talmud. . .The Talmud, in turn is composed of two distinct parts, the Mishna and the Gemara; the former the text, the latter the commentary upon the text. . .By the term Mishna we designate A COLLECTION OF DECISIONS AND TRADITIONAL LAWS, EMBRACING ALL DEPARTMENTS OF LEGISLATION, CIVIL AND RELIGIOUS. . .This code, which was the work of several generations of Rabbis. . .Nothing, indeed can equal the importance of the Talmud, unless it be the ignorance that prevails concerning it. . .This explains how it happens that a single page of the Talmud contains three or four different languages, or rather specimens of one language at three or four stages of degeneracy. . .Many a Mishna of five or six lines is accompanied by fifty or sixty pages of explanation. . .is Law in all its authority; it constitutes dogma and cult; it is the fundamental element of the Talmud. . .The DAILY STUDY OF THE TALMUD, WHICH AMONG JEWS BEGAN WITH THE AGE OF TEN TO END WITH LIFE ITSELF, necessarily was a severe gymnastic for the mind, thanks to which IT ACQUIRED INCOMPARABLE SUBTLETY AND ACUMEN. . .SINCE IT ASPIRES TO ONE THING; TO ESTABLISH FOR JUDAISM A ‘CORPUS JURIS ECCLESIASTICI'."

    The above quotations were culled from a treatise intended to sugar-coat the Talmud. In painting a nice word-picture of the Talmud that author could not escape mentioning the above facts also. Coming from this source under the circumstances the facts stated above do not add glory to the Talmud.

    "The Talmud Unmasked, the Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians" was written by Rev. I. B. Pranaitis, master of Theology and Professor of the Hebrew Language at the Imperial Ecclesiastical Academy of the Roman Catholic Church in Old St. Petersburg, Russia. The Rev. Pranaitis was the greatest of the students of the Talmud. His complete command of the Hebrew language qualified him to analyze the Talmud as few men in history.

    The Rev. Pranaitis scrutinized the Talmud for passages referring to Jesus, Christians and the Christian faith. These passages were translated by him into Latin. Hebrew lends itself to translation into Latin better than it does directly into English. The translation of the passages of the Talmud referring to Jesus, Christians and Christian faith were printed in Latin by the Imperial Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg in 1893 with the Imprimatur of his Archbishop. The translation from the Latin into English was made by great Latin scholars in the United States in 1939 with funds provided by wealthy Americans for that purpose.

    In order not to leave any loose ends on the subject of the Talmud's references to Jesus, to Christians and to the Christian faith I will below summarize translation into English from the Latin texts of Rev. Pranaitis' "The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians". It would require too much space to quote these passages verbatim with their foot-notes from the Soncino Edition in English.

    First I will summarize the references by Rev. Pranaitis referring to Jesus in the Talmud in the original texts translated by him into Latin, and from Latin into English:

    Sanhedrin, 67a Jesus referred to as the son of Pandira, a soldier.
    Kallah, 1b,(18b) Illegitimate and conceived during menstruation.
    Sanhedrin, 67a. Hanged on the eve of Passover.
    Toldath Jeschu. Birth related in most shameful expressions.
    Abhodah Zarah, II. Referred to as the son of Pandira, a Roman soldier.
    Schabbath XIV. Again referred to as the son of Pandira, the Roman.
    Sanhedrin, 43a. On the eve of Passover they hanged Jesus.
    Schabbath, 104b. Called a fool and no one pays attention to fools.
    Toldoth Jeschu. Judas and Jesus engage in quarrel with filth.
    Sanhedrin, 103a. Suggested corrupts his morals and dishonors self.
    Sanhedrin, 107b. Seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel.
    Zohar III, (282). Died like a beast and buried in animal's dirt heap.
    Hilkoth Melakhim. Attempt to prove Christians err in worship of Jesus.
    Abhodah Zarah, 21a. Reference to worship of Jesus in homes unwanted.
    Orach Chaiim, 113. Avoid appearance of paying respect to Jesus.
    Iore Dea, 150,2. Do not appear to pay respect to Jesus by accident.
    Abhodah Zarah (6a)). False teaching to worship on first day of Sabbath.

    The above are a few selected from a very complicated arrangement in which many references are obscured by intricate reasoning. The following are a few summarized references to Christians and the Christian faith although not always expressed in exactly that manner. There are eleven names used in the Talmud for non-Talmud followers, by which Christians are meant. Besides Notsrim, from Jesus the Nazarene, Christians are called by all the names used in the Talmud to designate all non-"Jews": Minim, Edom, Abhoday Zarah, Akum, Obhde Elilim, Nokrim, Amme Haarets, Kuthrim, Apikorosim, and Goim. Besides supplying the names by which Christians are called in the Talmud, the passages quoted below indicate what kind of people the Talmud pictures the Christians to be, and what the Talmud says about the religious worship of the Christians.

    Hilkhoth Maakhaloth. Christians are idolators, must not associate.
    Abhodah Zarah (22a). Do not associate with gentiles they shed blood.
    Iroe Dea 153,2). Must not associate with the Christians, shed blood.
    Abhodah Zarah (15b). Suggest Christians have sex relations with animals.
    Abhodah Zarah (22a). Suspect Christians of intercourse with animals.
    Schabbath (145B). Christians unclean because they eat accordingly.
    Abhoday Zarah (22a). Christians unclean because they are not at Mount Sinai.
    Iore Dea (198 48). Clean female Jews contaminated meeting Christians.
    Kerithuth (6b p.78). Jews called men, Christians not called men.
    Makkoth (7b). Innocent of murder if intent was to kill Christian.
    Orach Chaiim (225,10). Christians and animals grouped for comparisons.
    Midrasch Talpioth (225). Christians created to minister to Jews always.
    Orach Chaiim, 57,6a). Christians to be pitied more than sick pigs.
    Zohar II (64b). Christian idolators likened to cows and asses.
    Kethuboth (110b). Psalmist compares Christians to unclean beasts.
    Sanhedrin (74b)Tos. Sexual intercourse of Christian like that of beast.
    Kethuboth (3b). The seed of Christian is valued as seed of beast.
    Kidduschim (68a). Christians like the people of an ass.
    Eben Haezar (44,8). Marriages between Christians and Jews null.
    Zohar (II,64b). Christian birth rate must be diminished materially.
    Zohar (I,28b). Christian idolators children of Eve's serpant.
    Zohar (I,131a). Idolatrous people (Christian) befoul the world.
    Emek Hammelech (23d). Non-Jews' souls come from death and death's shadow.
    Zohar (I,46b,47a). Souls of gentiles have unclean divine origins.
    Rosch Haschanach (17a). Non-Jews souls go down to hell.
    Iore Dea (337,1). Replace dead Christians like lost cow or ass.
    Iebhammoth (61a). Jews called men, but not Christians called men.
    Abhodah Zarah (14b)T. Forbidden to sell religious works to Christians.
    Abhodah Zarah (78). Christian churches are places of idolatry.
    Iore Dea (142,10). Must keep far away physically from churches.
    Iore Dea (142,15). Must not listen to church music or look at idols.
    Iore Dea (143,1). Must not rebuild homes destroyed near churches.
    Hilkoth Abh.Zar.(10b). Jews must not resell broken chalices to Christians.
    Schabbath (116a) Tos. Gospels called volumes of iniquity, heretical books.
    Schabbath (116a). Talmudists agree that books of Christians be burned.
    Abhodah Zarah (2a). Festivals of Christians called days of calamity.
    Abhodah Zarah (78c). Christian feast days despicable, vain and evil.
    Abhodah Zarah (6a). Forbidden to observe Christian Christmas Day.
    Hilkoth Akum (ch,IX). Forbidden to celebrate Easter and Christmas.
    Chullin (91b). Jews possess dignity even an angel cannot share.
    Sanhedrin, 58b. To strike Israelite like slapping face of God.
    Chagigah, 15b. A Jew considered good in spite of sins he commits.
    Gittin (62a). Jew stay away from Christian homes on holidays.
    Iore Dea (148,10). Jew must not return greeting Christian, do it first.
    Choschen Ham, (26,1). Jew must not sue before a Christian judge or laws.
    Choschen Ham, (34 19). Christian or servant cannot become witnesses.
    Iore Dea (112,1). Avoid eating with Christians, breeds familiarity.
    Abhodah Zarah (35b). Do not drink milk from a cow milked by Christian.
    Iore Dea (178,1). Never imitate customs of Christians, even hair-combs.
    Abhodah Zarah (72b). Wine touched by Christians must be thrown away.
    Iore Dea (120,1). Bought-dishes from Christians must be well washed.
    Abhodah Zarah (2a). For three days before Christians festivals, avoid all.
    Abhodah Zarah (78c). Festivals of followers of Jesus regarded as idolatry.
    Iore Dea (139,1). Avoid things used by Christians in their worship.
    Abhodah Zarah (14b). Forbidden to sell Christians articles for worship
    Iore Dea (151,1) H. Do not sell water to Christians for baptisms.
    Abhodah Zarah (2a,T). Do not trade with Christians on their feast days.
    Abhodah Zarah (I,2). Now permitted to trade with Christians on such days.
    Abhodah Zarah (2aT). Trade with Christians because they have money to pay.
    Iore Dea (148,5). If Christian is not devout may send him gifts.
    Hilkoth Akum (IX,2). Send gifts to Christians only if they are irreligious.
    Iore Dea (81,7,Ha.). Christian wet-nurses to be avoided because dangerous.
    Iore Dea (153,1 H). Christian nurse will lead children to heresy.
    Iore Dea (155,1). Avoid Christian doctors not well known to neighbors.
    Peaschim (25a). Avoid medical help from idolators, Christians meant.
    Iore Dea (156,1). Avoid Christian barbers unless escorted by Jews.
    Abhodah Zarah (26a). Avoid Christian midwives as dangerous when alone.
    Zohar (1,25b). Those who do good to Christians never rise when dead.
    Hilkoth Akum (X,6). Help needy Christians if it will promote peace.
    Iore Dea (148,12H). Hide hatred for Christians at their celebrations.
    Abhodah Zarah (20a). Never praise Christians lest it be believed true.
    Iore Dea (151,14). Not allowed to praise Christians to add to glory.
    Hilkoth Akum (V,12). Quote Scriptures to forbid mention of Christian god.
    Iore Dea (146,15). Refer to Christian religious articles with contempt.
    Iore Dea (147,5). Deride Christian religious articles without wishes.
    Hilkoth Akum (X,5). No gifts to Christians, gifts to converts.
    Iore Dea (151,11). Gifts forbidden to Christians encourages friendship.
    Iore Dea (334,43). Exile for that Jew who sells farm to Christian.
    Iore Dea (154,2). Forbidden to teach a trade to a Christian.
    Babha Bathra (54b). Christian property belongs to first person claiming.
    Choschen Ham. (183,7). Keep what Christian overpays in error.
    Choschen Ham. (126,1). Jew may keep lost property of Christian found by Jew.
    Babha Kama (113b). It is permitted to deceive Christians.
    Choschen Ham. (183,7). Jews must divide what they overcharge Christians.
    Choschen Ham. (156,5). Jews must not take Christian customers from Jews.
    Iore Dea (157,2 H). May deceive Christians that believe Christian tenets.
    Abhodah Zarah (54a). Usury may be practiced upon Christians or apostates.
    Iore Dea (159,1). Usury permitted now for any reason to Christians.
    Babha Kama (113a). Jew may lie and perjure to condemn a Christian.
    Babha Kama (113b). Name of God not profaned when lying to Christians.
    Kallah (1b,p.18). Jew may perjure himself with a clear conscience.
    Schabbouth Hag. (6d). Jew may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording.
    Zohar (I,160a). Jews must always try to deceive Christians.
    Iore Dea (158,1). Do not cure Christians unless it makes enemies.
    Orach Cahiim (330,2). Do not assist Christian's childbirth on Saturday.
    Choschen Ham. (425,5). Unless believes in Torah do not prevent his death.
    Iore Dea (158,1). Christians not enemies must not be saved either.
    Hilkoth Akum (X,1). Do not save Christians in danger of death.
    Choschen Ham. (388,15). Kill those who give Israelites' money to Christians. Sanhedrin (59a). Prying into Jews' "Law" to get death penalty.
    Hilkhoth Akum (X,2). Baptized Jews are to be put to death.
    Iore Dea (158,2)Hag. Kill renegades who turn to Christian rituals.
    Choschen Ham. (425,5). Those who do not believe in Torah are to be killed.
    Hilkhoth tesch.III,8. Christians and others deny the "Law" of the Torah.
    Zohar (I,25a). Christians are to be destroyed as idolators.
    Zohar (II,19a) Captivity of Jews ends when Christian princes die.
    Zohar (I,219b). Princes of Christians are idolators, must die.
    Obadiam. When Rome is destroyed Israel will be redeemed.
    Abhodah Zarah (26b)T. "Even the best of the Goim should be killed".
    Sepher Or Israel 177b. If Jew kills Christian commits no sin.
    Ialkut Simoni (245c). Shedding blood of impious offers sacrifice to God.
    Zohar (Ii,43a). Extermination of Christians necessary sacrifice.
    Zohar (L,38b,39a). High place in heaven for those who kill idolators.
    Hilkhoth Akum (X,1). Make no agreements and show no mercy to Christians. Hilkhoth Akum (X,1). Either turn them away from their idols or kill.
    Hilkhoth Akum (X,7). Allow no idolators to remain where Jews are strong.
    Choschen Ham. (338,16). All contribute to expense of killing traitor.
    Pesachim (49b). No need of prayers while beheading on Sabbath.
    Schabbath (118a). Prayers to save from punishment of coming Messiah.

    In the Library of Congress and the New York Public Library, unless recently removed, you can find a copy of "The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians" by the Rev. I. B. Pranaitis. A copy of the original work printed in St. Petersburg, Russia in 1892 can be made available to you by our mutual friend if you are interested in reading the above passages in the original Hebrew text with their Latin translation. I trust my summaries correctly explain the original text. I believe they do. If I am in error in any way please be so kind as to let me know. It was very difficult to reduce them to short summaries.

    The National Conference of Christians and Jews need not scrutinize the "63 books" of the Talmud to discover all the anti-Christ, anti-Christian, and anti-Christian faith passages in the books which are "THE LEGAL CODE WHICH FORMS THE BASIS OF JEWISH RELIGIOUS LAW" and which is "THE TEXTBOOK USED IN THE TRAINING OF RABBIS". They can also keep in mind that, as Rabbi Morris Kertzer also points out, as explained earlier, that "ADULTS STUDY ANCIENT WRITINGS TOO. . .IN. . .GROUP DISCUSSION OF TALMUD BEFORE EVENING PRAYER." If the National Conference of Christians and Jews are genuinely interested in "interfaith" and "brotherhood" do you not think, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that they should compel a start at once to expunge from the Talmud the anti-Christ, anti-Christian and anti-Christianity passages from the Talmud in the "brotherly" way they expunged passages from the New Testament? Will you ask them?

    Throughout the world the Oxford English Dictionary is accepted as the most authoritative and authentic source for information on the origin, definition and use of words in the English language. Authorities in all fields everywhere accept the Oxford English Dictionary as the most trustworthy fountain of enlightenment on all phases of the English language. The Oxford English Dictionary brings out clearly that "Judaist" and "Judaic" are the correct forms for the improper and incorrect misused and misleading "Jew" and "Jewish". You will agree completely with the Oxford English Dictionary if you consider the matter carefully. "Judaist" and "Judaic" are correct. "Jew" and "Jewish" are incorrect. "Jew" and Jewish do not belong in the English language if the use of correct words is of interest to the English-speaking peoples.

    The so-called or self-styled "Jews" cannot truthfully describe themselves as "Jews" because they are not in any sense "Judeans". They can correctly identify themselves by their religious belief if they so wish by identifying themselves as "Judaists". A "Judaist" is a person who professes so-called "Judaism" as his religious belief, according to the Oxford English Dictionary. The origin of "Jew" has not its roots in "Judaism", as explained. The adjective form of "Judaist" is "Judaic". "Jewish" as an adjective is just as incorrect as "Jew" is as a noun. "Jewish" has no reason to exist.

    Well-planned and well-financed publicity by so-called or self-styled "Jews" in English-speaking countries in the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries created a wide acceptance and use for "Jewish". "Jewish" is being used today in many ways that are no less fantastic and grotesque than incorrect and inaccurate. "Jewish" is used today to describe everything from "Jewish blood", whatever that may be, to "Jewish Rye bread", strange as that may sound. The many implications, inferences and innuendoes of "Jewish" today resulting from its commercial uses beggar description.

    At the 1954 annual meeting of the St. Paul Guild in the Plaza Hotel in New York City before more than 1000 Catholics, a Roman Catholic priest who was the main speaker and the guest of honor referred to "my Jewish blood". It just happens that this priest was born a so-called or self-styled "Jew" in eastern Europe and was converted to Catholicism there about 25 years ago. It seems unique that a priest who has professed Catholicism that length of time should mention "my Jewish blood" to Catholics. The radio blasts and the out-door signs blazon "Levy's Jewish Rye Bread", in the same city at the same time. Between these two extremes are countless other products and other services which advertize themselves in print, on radio and television, as "Jewish".

    This priest who talks to Catholics about "my Jewish blood" when he addresses audiences also refers to the "Jewish blood" of Mary, Holy Mother of Jesus, to the "Jewish blood" of the Apostles, and to the "Jewish blood" of the early Christians. What he means by "Jewish blood" mystifies those Catholics who hear him. They query "what is ‘Jewish blood'"? They ask what happens to "Jewish blood" when so-called or self-styled "Jews" are converted to Catholicism? And in the extreme case when a so-called or self-styled "Jew" becomes a Roman Catholic priest? How is "Jewish blood" biologically different from the blood of persons who profess other religious faiths, they ask. It is hard for me to believe that there is anything biologically different which determines characteristics typical of a specific religious belief. Are the inherent racial and national characteristics determined by religious dogma or doctrine?

    The word "Jewess" raises a similar question. If "Jewess" is the female for the male "Jew" I must admit that I have been unable to find female as well as male designations for persons professing any religious belief other than so-called "Judaism". Are there any other that you know? I have searched for the female of Catholicism, Protestanism, Hindu, Moslem, and others but without success. It seems very popular now to refer to Mary, Holy Mother of Jesus, as a "Jewess". It does seem unrealistic to identify the sex of members of any religious belief by appropriate designations. If the word "Jew" is regarded as descriptive of a race or a nation, as is often the case, it is equally unrealistic to indicate the sex of members of a race or a nation by a suffix used for that purpose. I know of no case in that respect except "Negress", and the Negro race strongly objects to the use of that designation, and strongly.

    Another word is creating more problems among Christians. I refer to "Judeo-Christian". You see it more and more day by day. Based on our present knowledge of history, and on good sense applied to theology, the term "Judeo-Christian" presents a strange combination. Does "Judeo" refer to ancient "Pharaism", or to "Talmudism", or to so-called "Judaism"? In view of what we know today, how can there be "Judeo-Christian" anything? Based upon what is now known "Judeo-Christian" is as unrealistic as it would be to say anything is "hot-cold", or "old-young", or "heavy-light", or that a person was "healthy-sick", or "poor-rich", or "dumb-smart", or "ignorant-educated", or "happy-sad". These words are antonyms, not synonyms. "Judeo-Christian" in the light of incontestable facts are also antonyms, not synonyms as so-called or self-styled "Jews" would like Christians to believe. More sand for Christian's eyes.

    An "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies" has been established by Seton Hall University. It is actually a "one-man Institute". Father John M. Oesterreicher is the "one-man Institute". the "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies" occupies a small office in a down-town office building in Newark, N.J. This "one-man Institute", according to their literature, has no faculty except Father Oesterreicher, and no students. Father Oesterreicher was born a so-called or self-styled "Jew" and became a convert to Catholicism. I have had the pleasure of hearing him talk on many occasions. Addresses by Father Oesterreicher and literature by mail are the principal activities of the "institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies". Father Oesterreicher also plans to publish books and circulate them throughout the world, in large quantities.

    Father Oesterreicher leaves no stones unturned to convince Catholics that "Judaeo-Christian" is a combination of two words that are synonyms theologically. Nothing could be further from the truth. Father Oesterreicher impresses that viewpoint upon his Catholic audiences. Father Oesterreicher talks to Catholic audiences only, so far as I am able to tell. In his addresses Father Oesterreicher impresses upon Catholics the opinion he personally holds on the question of the dependence of the Christian faith upon so-called "Judaism". His audiences depart Father Oesterreicher's addresses very much confused.

    It would make better Catholics out of Father Oesterreicher's audiences if he would "sell" Jesus and the Catholic Church rather than try to "sell" so-called "Judaism" to his audiences. Well-planned and well-financed publicity by so-called or self-styled "Jews" manages to keep Christians well informed on the subject of so-called "Judaism". If Father Oesterreicher would concentrate upon "selling" Jesus and the Christian faith to audiences of so-called or self-styled "Jews" he would be doing more towards realizing the objective of Christian effort. The activities of this "one-man Institute" are somewhat of a deep mystery. But I am certain that Monsignor McNulty will never allow the "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies" to bring discredit upon the fine record of Seton Hall as one of the foremost Catholic universities anywhere. But it will bear watching, and Monsignor McNulty will always appreciate constructive comment.

    The word "anti-Semitism" is another word which should be eliminated from the English language. "Anti-Semitism" serves only one purpose today. It is used as a "smear word". When so-called or self-styled "Jews" feel that anyone opposes any of their objectives they discredit their victim by applying the word "anti-Semitic" through all the channels they have at their command and under their control I can speak with great authority on that subject. Because so-called or self-styled "Jews" were unable to disprove my public statements in 1946 with regard to the situation in Palestine, they spent millions of dollars to "smear" me as an "anti-Semite" hoping thereby to discredit me in the eyes of the public who were very much interested in what I had to say. Until 1946 I was a "little saint" to all so-called or self-styled "Jews". When I disagreed with them publicly on the Zionist intentions in Palestine I became suddenly "anti-Semite No. 1".

    It is disgraceful to watch the Christian clergy take up the use of the word "anti-Semitism". They should know better. They know that "anti-Semitism" is a meaningless word in the sense it is used today. They know the correct word is "Judaeophobe". "Anti-Semite" was developed into the "smear-word" it is today because "Semite" is associated with Jesus in the minds of Christians. Christians are accessories in the destruction of the Christian faith by tolerating the use of the smear-word "anti-Semitic" to silence by the most intolerable forms of persecution employing that smear-word Christians who oppose and oppose the evil conspirators.

    END QUOTING FOR THIS SEGMENT

    * * * * * * * *
    Dharma, thank you for days of very diligent work and long hours at the keyboard. We can finish this subject material in the morning for you are weary and I need to be at other tasks. There is much to be monitored on your place during these critical hours. Let us pray that sanity prevails for if we have a bit more time we can bring a lot of persons into consciousness of the plight in which they have mired themselves through the vicious intent of the few who would be Kings. Of course, the would-be Kings know it also and that is one reason for the push into all-out war so that a confrontation is precipitated before it can be averted through diplomacy. Your troops are weary and frustrated while waiting and waiting in the desert sands and endless hours. This too, has been planned to wear them down and make them ready for anything just to get it over with and hopefully, home again. It must be obvious that "Peace" will have to be insured through military force--so, who wins?

    Good night and may peace go within as we move along upon this journey. Salu.

  2. #2
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default 응답: PJ#025, THE BITTER COMMUNION ALTARS OF HEMLOCK

    PJ 25
    CHAPTER 11
    REC #2 HATONN
    WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1991 8:22 A.M. YEAR 4 DAY 188
    TODAY'S WATCH
    Do not concern, Dharma, over the computer--the Father's words are remaining within the master-brain. The conscious mind is a strange element of experience--when the higher consciousness is present the manifestations of thought within the physical dimension is dulled and your computers are tampered with in order to remove all at any and every opportunity in efforts to dissuade you and other scribes from their work. NONE SHALL AGAIN SILENCE GOD! SO BE IT!

    Because I have spoken of the Zionists in the churches calling themselves "Christian", do not think that I finish with the subject of corrupted religious institutions. I do not, however, wish to withdraw or sidetrack from my subject of how the element has seeped into the very fiber of your being--as documented on your place by your people in your time of counting and experience.

    The best way to do this is to unfold unto you ones that which has been taken from the shelves and destroyed or remains only through preservation against this day of revelation. It is better if you ones can take the information and go forth and prove of the accounts to your own satisfaction wherein lies cannot prevail in the light of confrontation of Truth. If you cannot come to recognize the anti-Christ within--how can you know Truth?

    I shall postpone "TODAY'S WATCH" for I have many segments to show you regarding that which is happening in front of you and yet I have bogged my publisher with five "double" Expresses and I will not burden him further this day. He is giving you a compilation of our last several writings which might well be the most informative and valuable information you will ever experience in this life journey. I urge you readers of this information to obtain the prior publishing if you have not done so. We are taking the infiltration and corruption by the anti-Christ upon your place, one step at a time according to that which has come down in America--and thusly, the world.

    Today we will take up AMERICAN FREEDOM & ZIONIST POWER. No, you will not like the information but I urge you to continue to read of it for in these writings are the REVELATIONS being revealed.

    In utilizing this information, I honor gratefully, one Pitman Buck, Jr. for in his material he has done a splendid job and has displayed insight and writing skills of greatness. Mr. Buck claimed no affiliation with any organization and expressed his own views with great insight and wisdom and documentation of great importance.

    At the time of the writing which I shall share with you, Mr. Buck lived in Texas City, Texas, and had been employed for twenty-five years as a technician with a leading chemical firm, with a special interest in the fields of mass spectrometry and infrared spectroscopy. This is a field of utmost importance to you in this transitioning world. I shall, however, protect all further information regarding this man for in these days of peril, persons who speak out and those one's families are in grave danger at every turn--most especially when their great contributions are unveiled by God that his children might gain insight.

    Mr. Buck noted that in a speech given on March 26, 1977, before the annual Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner in Denver, Colorado, United States Senator James Abourezk stated that "..we now see a foreign country, Israel, wrapping itself in its state religion so that criticism of the state or its policies is perceived as a form of racism"--anti-Semitism. He further stated, "In this country it is much easier to criticize our own government than it is to criticize Israel!"

    The information I shall give you was written and published in your year, 1977, without reference to publisher--I honor his integrity.

    You have arrived at a time in historical passage wherein an ethnocentric, religious group which comprises less than three percent of the population has become THE leading factor in America's destiny. You have had over a decade to become deeper mired in the quicksand and have seen it not--whether or not ye perish is resting upon a tiny reed of hope. For you see, the shrouded workers have pulled the Constitution into the darkness and taken--through actions" "as if"--and compromised, then destroyed the foundation of your "BILL OF RIGHTS" AS A NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. YOU ARE NOT A NATION UNDER GOD LAW OF TRUTH, YOU ARE DIVIDED AND SERVE ONLY THE MASTER OF GREED AND SELF-ATTAINMENT, YOU ARE TOTALLY DIVISIBLE AND YOU HAVE ONLY "SHAM" LIBERTY AS THE MASTER-PUPPETEERS ALLOW YOU AND THERE IS "JUSTICE" FOR NONE AND YET LAWS GIVING UNTO THE USURPERS OF THE LAWS OF JUSTICE. YOU ARE VICTIMS OF THE HOAX.

    Dharma, we shall do as prior work and print from the document provided. I shall comment as we go if appropriate and designate such. I feel it more appropriate for readers to hear it from the mouths of earth brother so they cannot toss it aside as super-natural "gibberish and ravings from an insane mind".

    Later, we shall move right inside the secret archives of the Vatican and you will see that all of this has been a long time in the coming.

    QUOTE:


    THE NEWS, JEWS AND GENERAL BROWN
    FREE SPEECH AND DISCUSSION on the topic of this pamphlet is so inhibited that even the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff cannot freely speak his mind on a college campus (the traditional site of intellectual inquiry) without being made to apologize to the Jewish community by none other than the President himself.

    On October 10, 1974, General George S. Brown appeared before a Duke University Law School forum and in responding to a question he spoke of the strong Jewish lobby in this country whose chief interest is Israel. (In a recent article Joseph Kraft, who is Jewish, wrote of "Jews who cared chiefly about Israel..." during the 1976 presidential election.) General Brown warned the law students of the serious danger to America that unlimited support of Israel entails. For these remarks the general was called "anti-Semitic" by Zionists and pro-Zionists and was told to apologize by a president sworn to uphold the Constitution and the national defense of America.

    General Brown made the following remarks to the student forum: "We have the Israelis coming to us for equipment. We say we can't possibly get the Congress to support a program like that. They say, ‘Don't worry about the Congress. We'll take care of the Congress.' Now this is somebody from another country. But they can do it." A Commentary article (referred to below) depicts Israel's United Nations Ambassador Simcha Dinitz and an Israeli military attache inside the Pentagon demanding of Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger full United States military logistical supporting equipment during the height of the 1973 Yom Kippur War. When both Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Schlesinger demurred, Dinitz threatened to call in several unnamed United States senators to force the issue. After President Nixon received calls from a number of influential supporters of Israel (again unnamed) from both inside and outside the United States, the Commentary article states, the President then personally intervened on Israel's behalf and ordered the full logistical support of Israel, "...being keenly aware of the possible political consequences of a further delay." No doubt this power to dictate is what the general meant when he said, "But they can do it."

    Of course, the network television news managers decided to spare the American public such details concerning the Jewish lobby which would have confirmed exactly what General Brown had told the students about that lobby, namely, "It is so strong you wouldn't believe now." The network managers preferred instead to concentrate on the "technical" error made by the general when he said "They own, you know, the banks in this country, the newspapers." Had the general used the world control instead of the word own, he would have been home free.

    For an enlightening article about the matters of which General Brown spoke--the huge Israeli draw-down of United States military equipment during the Yom Kippur War, as well as the astonishing strength and operational effectiveness of the Jewish lobby--the reader is referred to the article, "Kissinger & the Yom Kippur War," in Commentary (September 1974). Commentary is published by the American Jewish Committee.

    Morris J. Amitay, a Zionist lobbyist and former staff aid to Senator Abraham Ribbicoff, told Washington Post journalist Stephen Isaacs that Jewish legislative staff members keep their Jewishness in mind when "aiding" their legislative bosses. (As reported by Leonard J. Davis, also a Zionist lobbyist, in The Cleveland Jewish News, January 24, 1975, p.20.)

    There is ample evidence that many Jewish journalists also keep their Jewishness in mind when "reporting" the news. This evidence is not just a hypothetical parallel drawn from Morris J. Amitay's comments. Jewish writers themselves confirm this bias in Jewish literature. Naomi Ben-Asher wrote: "The question of Jewish identity...is no stranger to the writer whose Jewishness is largely a biological accident....For the non-writer...Jewishness can be a negligible factor of life...This irrelevance of a man's Jewishness to his work rarely applies to the Jew who is a writer." One is hereby well-advised to keep in mind that for propagandic purposes some news may be given national coverage while other news is directed only toward the Jewish community.

    In another incident involving General Brown, the American public learned through a leak to the Israeli press--just two weeks before the 1976 United States presidential and national election date--that Ranan Lurie, a Jewish columnist, had interviewed General Brown six months earlier. In response to a question in that interview on April 12, 1976, the general had stated his honest conviction that Israel and her armed forces were "a burden" to the United States. The conveniently timed news leak of the general's remarks, duly reported by all three major American media networks, had the expected effect of embarrassing Republican candidate Ford in the American Jewish community. President Ford swiftly issued a statement that he did not agree with "the general's poor choice of words" and that he considered the matter closed. Thirty-two Jewish organizations immediately announced a special meeting to consider the situation. The next day the Jewish groups replied with one voice that, "The Jewish community does not consider the matter of General Brown to be closed."

    The news-handling of this latest Brown incident was seen by many as another example of Jewish control and manipulation of news stories in order to gain the greatest propagandic effect upon the American people for the sole benefit of Israel. Although Mr. Lurie disclaimed any conspiracy concerning the timing of the news leak, he was quick to recommend (on ABC television news) that President Ford fire General Brown for expressing his view that Israel is a burden to the United States. (Mr. Lurie lived in Israel for years and presumably holds Israeli citizenship.)

    As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Brown is in a most favorable position to know how much of a military and economic burden Israel really is to the United States. The Houston Post reported that "defense officials said that the vital United States tank reserve in Europe was cut back in 1973 to replace Israel's losses in the Yom Kippur War." That paper further reported Pentagon sources as saying "...the tanks were rushed to Israel...leaving the United States army with less than 50 percent of the tanks it believed it needed to meet any thrust by the Soviet Union's vastly greater armored forces." An authoritative Pentagon source (reported by the Middle East Perspective, October 1976) declared that the "depletion of United States arsenal for benefit of Israel during the October War left our country without a single combat-ready division anywhere." Any American president who places the survival of another nation above the national interests of his own country should be tried for treason and run out of the country.

    Every day Jewish power affects the life and pocket-book of each American citizen and taxpayer. Through the control of the national impact media of radio and television and, to a lesser degree, through the handling of national and international wire services and their dispatches, Jewish influence determines what will or will not be on national television, what the voters will know about political candidates and what tomorrow's press headlines will be. At the time of General Brown's appearance before the student forum at Duke University, Time magazine, in reporting the Brown incident in its November 25 edition, stated, "According to Washington Post Correspondent Stephen D. Isaacs' recently published book, Jews and American Politics, Jews head the corporations that own all three national television networks."

    When, on November 13, 1969, former Vice-President Spiro Agnew spoke of "a tiny enclosed fraternity of privileged men" in the television news medium who enjoy "a monopoly sanctioned and licensed by government," he incurred the wrath of a small group of men more powerful than he had imagined. If the vice-president of the United States had hopes of remaining in political life, those hopes would have been better served with an announcement to lead a "Bonds for Israel" drive.

    Not only are the private corporations of the electronic news media under Jewish control but Jews hold many of the government's most sensitive informational outlets to the public. President Ford and First Lady Betty Ford both found it useful to employ Jewish press secretaries. From the level of Department of State on down through the various executive branch agencies, whether it be Attorney General Levi's office, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the United States Information Agency, one is apt to find that the chief press spokesman or his assistant is either a Jew or works for one. If a private citizen wants to voice a complaint about the religio-ethnically biased, controlled broadcast media, he can contact the Federal Communications Commission which is charged by law with the regulation of the broadcast industry that uses the public's airwaves. A perusal of the 1976 Congressional Staff Directory indicates THAT MANY, IF NOT MOST, OF THE TOP OFFICIALS OF THE FCC ARE JEWISH!.

    In 1969 the Senate Communications Subcommittee conducted hearings on Senate Bill 2004. The bill would have granted almost automatic license renewals for stations of the broadcast media. All three network presidents were there to testify. So was Nicholas Johnson, a former FCC commissioner but not with the National Citizens Committee for Broadcasting, a group concerned about single points of view and conflicts of interest. When the hearings began, the network moguls testified enthusiastically for S.2004 which would have allowed them to forget the public's interest and concentrate totally on making money and propaganda. The networks simply do not want restraints placed upon them by the public. Nicholas Johnson, a man who is not possessed by a mean, forensic disposition, gave a fifty-page statement to the subcommittee and testified thus: "The broadcaster in America today is, without question, the single most powerful man civilization has ever permitted to roam wild. We have used a very long thread to tether a dinosaur. He finds it restricting and asks that it be removed."

    One would think that newspapers, all newspapers, would defend the right of free speech and press as a right of every American--to be exercised more particularly by those who have the official responsibility to defend the Constitution. But not The New York Times, owned by Arthur Ochs Sulzberger. On October 22, 1976, this prestigious newspaper called the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff "a general who talks too much." The writer would put several questions to the Times: what are the armed forces defending, if not the constitutional right to freedom of speech and press? During his superb thirty-five year military career, and now as America's chief military officer, General Brown has defended with his life the right of free speech and press for others, including the Times. and now the Times criticizes the general for exercising the very right he has helped to preserve for Mr. Sulzberger and his editor, A. M. Rosenthal. How unfair and ungrateful can a newspaper be?

    If the Times were to interview General Brown, would he be expected to reply to questions about Israel honestly and according to his convictions? Obviously not, since that is what the general did in the case of the Lurie interview and the Times condemned him for doing so. The Times and other media ought to refrain from asking public officials for press interviews if they do not want or expect honest answers.

    (Hatonn: It is most difficult to not interrupt at every sentence and make comment of irate objection to the thing that is pulling you down. In this very day--this very moment--you have been led into the pits of Hell in the burning desert and the lies grown bigger and bigger and mislead you into complacency. You are told that Iraqi forces are weak and worn away--the barrage of lies pouring forth would gag the maggots which feast upon the carcasses of the damned. You feast upon the lies WHILST THEY ARE TELLING YOU THAT THEY ARE TELLING YOU LIES-STRATEGY, THEY CALL IT! I AM OVERWHELMED WITH IRATE PROTEST IN YOUR BEHALF AND IN BEHALF OF THE CHILDREN YOU HAVE SENT TO BE SACRIFICED ON THE ALTAR OF EVIL.)

    In an unusually courageous editorial, The Wall Street Journal (October 20, 1976) spoke to this issue: "It looks to us as if General Brown's real sin is excessive candor, which leaves us confused, since we thought everyone agreed our leaders needed to be more candid, not less so." The Journal then concluded its editorial by obliquely suggesting to pro-Zionist backers of Governor Carter that they might be better satisfied with press interview answers given by the Carter administration officials who had been lobotomized.

    In his Lurie interview, General Brown also had a few things to say about other nations besides Israel. Concerning Britain, he said that England "is no longer a world power--all they have got are generals and admirals and bands." Unlike the Times which wrote that the general "talks too much," the Manchester Guardian Weekly (October 31, 1976) of England wrote, with obvious regard for the truth, that "The General need not apologize. He should tell us more."

    The author has concentrated on the General Brown story because in many ways it is typical of Jewish influence exercised through the control of major news organs. This manipulating, filtering and censoring of information--done daily to a lesser or larger extent--depends upon how the media perceive the factual happenings as affecting the Jewish community here and abroad. One other example will be given.

    END QUOTING FOR THIS SEGMENT

    * * * * * * * *
    Allow us a rest-break and then we will take up the subject of THE NEWS, ISRAELIS AND THE U.S.S. LIBERTY. There is no way to tell it to you often enough, for you do not wish to believe it could happen--not to you and certainly not to America or the world. Why? You have had the prophecies since the beginning of Genesis--well, friends, it isn't over until GOD WINS! I care not how many of you choose to believe otherwise and think us to be bigots and wimps! GOD IS NEITHER AND TRUTH SHALL AGAIN PREVAIL UPON YOUR PLACE JUST AS WRITTEN AND THE JOURNEY THROUGH THE LIES WILL BE UNPLEASANT INDEED. SO BE IT.

    To stand-by, please.


    PJ 25
    CHAPTER 12
    REC #1 JESUS SANANDA/HATONN
    THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1991 7:59 A.M. YEAR 4 DAY 189
    Dharma, your Brother Esu is present, chela. Let us look into the moment before we move forward for each has a journey--a purpose--and all must integrate into the other with precision lest the clock not tick properly.

    You ones must not take of your portion and DEMAND too much of another lest you not understand their confusion. It is rare that we would expect of you ones to begin, for instance, a great project at the ending of a day. I witness that you write more quantity when the whip-lash is causing pain elsewhere. We cannot stop of the writing for time and action are mandatory--however, it is not to panic the support group. Further, by the reaction of the support group comes the pressure upon your senses which effort to stop you and allow time for other forms of living "catch-up". Man has waited too long and now wishes to have it all in the 11th hour--which we effort to bring as much as possible within those moments but he, too, must turn within and LISTEN to the Truth as it unfolds.

    For instance, on this morning and you will hear it in full later--Saddam has said that he has given a REASONABLE response to Russia and further "...if it is unacceptable he intends to tell the world why the U.S. constructed and carries forth with this war." Well, chelas, it will indeed be revealing! The only hope the United States has for popular support is that the lies from your media have been strong enough to continue to hide truth and hundreds of thousands will perish in the interim, if the REAL TRUTH is pushed forth. It will also cause an intensification of effort to assassinate Saddam to silence him--oh sad is your state upon your planet. Sad indeed.

    The subject upon which Hatonn expounds is the central core of Truth which ye ones must have lest you move into the transition without facts and Truth--so it must be pulled together in a document which will outline Truth and then the brothers can glean the deeper information from the books already written. Therefore, Dharma, YOURS IS TO WRITE AND WRITE AND WRITE AS WE GIVE IT UNTO YOU. ALSO, IT IS TO DISCERN OTHER'S INPUT WHICH WOULD CAUSE DISCOUNTING OF OUR WORK IF YOU DISCERN INCORRECTLY--IT IS MOST CRITICAL THAT YOU AND THOMAS DO NOT ERR IN DECIPHERING THAT WHICH GIVES DELUSION IN THE MIDST OF ITS BEAUTY FOR THAT, INDEED, IS THE WAY OF THE MASTER-DECEIVER. THE "TOOLS" WILL NOT REALIZE THEY HAVE BEEN USED. AND YOU MUST USE ALL THE CLUES AND TOOLS GIVEN FOR YOUR GARNERING OF THE TRUTH--ALL. For example, in the document which cost you hours of time on the yesterday--you discerned with the one word title but it is necessary that you familiarize yourselves with projections, for the masses will do so and they will cling to that which allows them continuation in the defaults.

    "Jews" as a description and "title" of a Book given in the context that the man gave--as "the first and last" speaker sent by God (which makes him by obvious intent--THE giver of Truth which is the Messiah)--cannot be correct. Number one, "Jew", as you found within the week is a term only most recently applied to the ones of Judea--as in this term (title) JEWS--THE CALLED, indicates (whether or not the writer realizes it) means "ZIONIST--THE CHOSEN" which is not revealed actually until the last paragraph.

    You ones wish to cling to the mystical and find cities of crystal diamonds and colored lights and thus and so--as from prior to the beginning--and believe that God began his "creating" just for earth and earth man! Bubble bursting time again. Earth is a place for human Man to experience and there was creation before and there is almost "relative" creation beyond in a very little differing dimension. There are and have been many great and Christed teachers, I among them and some of you, among them--but not the "only one". Therefore, you must study your lessons well, chelas who write and project data--for we shall give forth no dreamy-eyed information to deceive longer, the people. YOU ARE MANIFESTED INTO PHYSICAL REALITY AND ALL ABOUT YOUR EXPERIENCE WILL BE AS SUCH--AND WONDROUS INDEED IT IS. FOR ALL YOU MUST LEARN IS THAT YOU CAN CREATE FROM THIS DENSITY IN WHICH YOU EXPERIENCE--THAT WHICH YOU NEED TO CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCE. AH, IT IS A GREAT RESPONSIBILITY YOU ONES BEAR BUT YOU ARE EQUAL TO THE TASK.

    Ones project that which they are given and unless the Holy God sources have trained them, there is no way in which they can know of Truth vs. delusion and yet man must come up out of the dream-world and into the "dream-world" of greatness and Truth of manifestation for a physical experience IS one of manifestation and creation--either for furtherance of that which you label good or evil.

    The young man in Korea in the military shall get my answer in the physical manner he can see and hear--for he already hears me, he only "desires" the physical contact--as do ye all, for that is your only perception of reality. If his ONLY purpose in this journey is to give support to, let us say, Dharma--then would not his journey be grand indeed? And, yet, as purpose is desired--it grows beyond all bindings and limits--how wondrous is the journey.

    For you who do not know, the slings and arrows are striking my scribes from every direction of the physical and the bombardment is hard and expensive. The neighbors, in their hatred, and the local Community Services District has reported a dozen things to EVERY possible police agency and daily come the police enforcers. But you ones must know; and to experience is to learn. Until you understand that you are already in a position of having no longer "community" and no longer have freedom of even that which you perceive is "property" you cannot confront and change of it. But, Dharma, your first commitment, chela, is to write for a very, very busy commander who sets aside time for this projection to meet the needs of your cycles--I can only ask that you do not lose sight of the trees for the entanglement of the forest. Precious, I care not that ones call me Jesus for it is indeed a fine label and more ones upon your place have called me that than any other--labels matter not for it is Truth and Godliness, order out of chaos, peace out of restlessness which is sought, and I hold of the key and the way. Rest easy, little one, for you can only offer unto Man that which is the gift and then, release him for he must accept and take of it or it is, indeed, no gift. So be it.

    You must further discern in that which is given in portions of which understanding can be gleaned. This is why you must access ALL, as with the writing of "JEWS" to discern whether or not the term is simply utilized for current understanding of subject matter or indeed is used as a "term in fact". You MUST be given that which can be understood by all levels of progress. This is WHY the Journals are written--so that ones can, in the conclusion of material, know the subject in point--having grown through the lessons and into knowledge. But neither can there be naught but the repetition of the lessons time after time lest ye never get to the true subject and much less into the wisdom with which to utilize the knowledge.

    I rest my hand upon your heads in blessings for in you ones, I am so well-pleased and I cherish and appreciate you without measure. We are doing of our work and the Word is pure so that man can see--if he chooses to cover his eyes and ears--so be it for that, then, is of his choosing and not of your failure.

    Commander, thank you for allowing me a brief communion for our troops are getting a bit frazzled and emotionally tattered working in the desolate bunkers of this battlefield of experience. I speak not to the ONE, but to the ALL for there is no separation but if ye make projections that your hand is my hand in service--make very, very sure it is MY hand you hold and serve for the evil brother has a million hands to tempt you and glorious stories to soothe you and great parables to lift your egos upon the imitation marble platforms which will collapse with the most tiny prick of the needle. Do not "follow me"--come in the equality and responsibility given unto you--and move beside me, in front of me but never feel unworthy and drag behind me for if ye listen, you will know the way from any position on the path. However, I caution you--if you feel YOURS IS THE ONLY WAY--ye shall be put behind for there is no leader of greatness who discounts another's values nor possibility of a "better way". Ponder it! The child in learning MUST recognize the teacher who has learned and bow to higher judgment and discernment--the student, however, will always be constantly tested by the teacher if the teacher be in any wise worthy and the teacher shall always, if he has achieved wisdom, bow at the very feet of the student for the perfection gained in the knowledge of Truth. Take my hand, when ye have "tried" me for blessed of the fold--I know the way for I come from that Greatest of all wondrous spirits only to serve--even unto the very least.

    Thank you for attending me and I shall relinquish the printing pen unto my brother, that you might continue in thine work. It is glorious work for it gives us opportunity to honor ones who passed before and left Truth and wisdom through knowledge and the possibility for your standing upon their shoulders that your journey can be in more perfection and understanding for the place is far better for them having passed this way. It is for Man in the physical to learn in measured steps of understanding--total knowledge and revelation of the whole is that which is of another dimension of experience--beware of the one who pronounces total vision while in thine dimension for he lies! Insight is one thing--claim of total knowledge is another. This is why we of the returning teachers and hosts are NOT MANIFEST IN HUMAN FORMAT upon your placement--so that you can KNOW that ones who claim such position are NOT THAT WHICH THEY CLAIM TO BE. Note further that I did NOT say that there are not returned workers and higher beings among you and some of you are the manifested proof of same--but the higher HOSTS of GOD are NOT IN THE PHYSICAL FORMAT. If there are visits to and from--then it is perception of holographic dimension--sometimes quite "physical" in perception. You ones continually ask for "proof" to your physicalness in a physical manner--which can be most easily duplicated by tricksters.

    IT IS THAT WHICH IS BEYOND THE PHYSICAL UNTO WHICH YOU MUST LOOK AND YOU WILL RECOGNIZE IT ONLY WITH THE ADVANCED "KNOWING" OF THAT CONNECTION WITHIN ON YOUR LEVEL OF ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE. Until the day when that is understood we continue with that which IS suitable in its proper sequence.

    For you who cannot "see the craft" in the heavens--you simply do not know that for which to look. On any given night when you would see the "stars" you can look into any direction and see the craft. As you connect with frequencies the brothers will give recognition--either through movement and certainly, no less, than the strobing of "colored" lights pulsed deliberately for your viewing. Massive craft are in your viewing range in these days and orbit in the same patterns as the stars--and yes, the astronomers DO KNOW and are simply forbidden to divulge the information unto you--keep attention for they ‘SLIP' with their tongues most regularly. If you see great motion of "light" from/to locations and the light be brilliant and leave no "trail", the craft is without your near atmosphere. If there is a long glowing "tail", then the craft is moving rapidly within your atmosphere thus heating the air particles which leaves the "tail". Enjoy your communion with your brothers in the cosmos for they, too, are weary of thine tending and long for their own "home" placements.

    It is honor to serve you and we give freely of selves unto your needs--but as any upon human placement--thine brothers like contact and recognition for that which they are and do. And the greatest service of all, beloved chelas, is to give grateful appreciation unto GOD for that which you give appreciation allows the Great Spirit of your Creator to see your level of understanding and growth is great when a Truth is "grown-into" to such extent that a child only asks in behalf of "another" and for the "greater good" and not for self. So be it. Do not toy greatly with the orifice called "mouth" and the "tongue" within--for God hears the energy projections of the soul within and from that projection does HE make value judgment. Adonai.

    I am Jesus Sananda, to bow to Command. Thank you.

    * * * * * * * *
    Please allow me to give appreciation unto my own "Commander-in-Chief", in whose service I come on this journey.

    There is something I am going to relay to all of you ones at this point. Stop the nonsense of Christian vs. everything or anything! You ones have long since confused the term unto its demise. ALL ONES WHO MOVE IN TRUTH UNTO LIGHTED GOD/CREATOR ARE CHRISTIANS--I CARE NOT THAT WHICH YOU LABEL SELF. THE CHRISTED PATH IS THE ONLY PATH THAT REACHES UNTO THE SOURCE FOR "CHRIST" IS A STATE OF BEING--NOT A MAN'S LABEL--NOR THAT OF A GOD OF SOME SORT--IT IS AN "ACHIEVEMENT" LEVEL OF PERFECTION. IT MATTERS NOT IF YE BE NATIVE AMERICAN, ESKIMO, HINDU, BUDDHIST, ISLAMIC--IT MATTERS NOT "WHAT" IF YE ARE HEADED FOR THE LIGHTED TRUTH IN THE HIGHER DIMENSIONAL KINGDOMS VS. THE DARK PLACES OF THE PHYSICAL RULED BY THE DARK BROTHERHOOD, YE MUST TREAD THE "CHRISTED" PATH WHICH THE NATIVE CALLS THE SACRED CIRCLE OF INFINITY--NO END AND NO BEGINNING--INFINITE AND ALWAYS IN MOTION TO OR FROM PERFECTION--ULTIMATELY ENDING IN TOTAL PERFECTION--AFTER THE LESSONS ARE LEARNED! This is most important for you who single out this one or that one to denounce or favor as a group--be sure you know of that which you speak for if you understand Truth--you will not longer speak of separation so that which you speak, labels your level of ignorance louder than you realize.

    Back to the subject of AMERICAN FREEDOM & ZIONIST POWER, by Pitman Buck as we are projecting herein regarding the incident of the American ship, U.S.S. Liberty.

    THE NEWS, ISRAELIS AND U.S.S. LIBERTY
    Dharma, before we begin this writing, get Oberli to remove the disc from the computer--it is giving false information which indicates tampering with the equipment. Just have him remove it please and then we will continue.

    QUOTE:

    ON JUNE 8, 1967, DURING the 1967 Middle East War, Israeli jet aircraft and torpedo-carrying gunboats attacked an American vessel, the U.S.S. Liberty, while it was cruising in international waters off the Sinai Peninsula. The Liberty was a highly sophisticated communications vessel operated by the United States Navy and a sister ship to the U.S.S. Pueblo which was captured by North Korea in 1968. Both ships were operated by the Navy for the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency. The Liberty was on an intelligence gathering mission when attacked by Israel as was the Pueblo when captured by the North Koreans. Thirty-four Americans died in the Israeli attack on the Liberty. One American died during the attack upon and capture of the Pueblo.

    The news media that later gave very extensive coverage to the Pueblo affair displayed no interest in seeking for the public the answer to Time magazine's question, "Why did the Israelis go out of their way to attack a neutral ship?" Apparently, no investigative reporters were assigned to the Liberty story. News media that appear all too anxious to embarrass American public officials (whether they be presidents or generals) with the Jewish community are very reluctant to uncover and report any evidence to the American public and would embarrass the Jewish State of Israel. Any time a foreign nation is responsible for the deaths of thirty-four Americans, one-hundred and sixty-four others wounded and the ultimate loss of a United States naval vessel, the American people have a right to know something about the "why's" and "wherefore's." The Liberty affair should have been given widespread publicity. In view of the serious nature of the incident, one can conclude only that a conspiracy operated at the highest levels to keep the matter closed to an inquiring public. Such a conspiracy would find the Jewish controlled news media only too willing to cooperate in this case.

    In a brief literature survey this writer found five books on the Pueblo incident listed in the 1975 edition of Subject Guide to Books in Print. In addition, the writer examined two other books on the Pueblo affair, including one by the captain of the Pueblo, Commander Lloyd M. Bucher. The other one was written by Rear Admiral Daniel V. Gallery, Ret., entitled The Pueblo Incident.

    In his literature survey on the Liberty affair, the writer was unable to find listed anywhere a single book about Israel's attack on the Liberty. Not one! Furthermore, a lengthy search has turned up only two in-depth articles in national publications about the Israeli attack on the Liberty. One was James J. Kilpatrick's "June 8, at 1400 hours" (National Review (Hatonn: which is reason enough not to believe much of it at any rate, being edited and projected by one of the most Zionistic entities on your planet.), Sept. 5, 1967, pp. 952-958). Nine years after the Liberty incident Anthony Pearson, a Canadian journalist, published the results of his investigation into the Liberty affair.

    Mr. Pearson spent several years and crossed three continents chasing down leads and information for his Liberty story. His findings indicate that a conspiracy had existed between the United States government (President Johnson, CIA and NSA) and Israel which would allow Israel to capture certain Arab lands up to predetermined boundaries. The Liberty was on station off Sinai to monitor the war's activities. Because of the initial success and advances of Israel's so-called preemptive attack on Egypt, Jordan and Syria, the Israelis decided to advance beyond the predetermined lines and take additional Arab lands not agreed upon by Johnson. Through the Liberty's intelligence surveillance and reports to the CIA (monitored by the Israelis), it was learned that Israel intended to break the agreement with her co-conspirator. Israel decided that the Liberty had to be sunk. Israeli jet planes were sent out to do the job and were later joined by motor torpedo boats. Thus, one of the most cold-bloodied acts of treachery in recent warfare was carried out against a friendly nation, the United States, without whom Israel could not exist.

    On January 20, 1969, a public naval Court of Inquiry was convened in San Diego, California to investigate North Korea's seizure of the Pueblo. It was attended by at least a dozen news journalists who, by their affiliations with many segments of both print and electronic media, assured the public of widespread coverage of evidence developed by the Court of Inquiry.

    The Court found evidence of negligence starting with the Pueblo chain of command and extending right up through higher echelons of the Navy. Among many other recommendations, the Court of Inquiry recommended that Commander Bucher and a subordinate stand trial by general court-martial. The Court's Convening Authority, Admiral John J. Hyland, rejected the Court's recommendations on court-martials because of the extenuating circumstances and Secretary of the Navy John H. Chafee concurred with the admiral's opinion. Meanwhile, thanks to the news media, Commander Bucher's name became a household word and automobiles driven all over the country bore bumper stickers reminding the public to "Remember the Pueblo."

    In contrast to the pervasive news coverage given to the North Korean capture of the Pueblo and its attendant Court of Inquiry hearings, the best public relations that tender loving care could provide accompanied news reports about Israel's attack on the .S.S. Liberty. In this endeavor the United States government had the anxious cooperation of the Jewish-controlled American news media. Accordingly, on June 11, 1967, a secret naval Court of Inquiry convened in London, England, to investigate Israel's attack on the U.S.S. Liberty. As far as this writer can ascertain, no newsman put up a squawk concerning the public's right to know more about Israel's attack on the American ship. Newsmen who went to great efforts and traveled long distances to get seats at the Pueblo hearings would rather not complain about the secret LIBERTY hearings in London.

    According to Mr. Kilpatrick's National Review article, the Court of Inquiry developed evidence "that the Israeli armed forces had ample opportunity to identify Liberty correctly," but the Court "had insufficient information before it to make a judgment on the reasons for the decision by Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats to attack." Of course, the Court did not know of the secret agreement between Israel and the United States concerning the Israeli-coveted Arab lands and the CIA and the NSA were not about to tell it. Without this knowledge the Court had no way of knowing the true purpose behind the Liberty mission; and without knowing that purpose, the Court had no way of knowing that Liberty's intelligence had discovered Israel's violation of a top secret agreement. (Three civilian communications experts manned the Liberty's "inner sanctum" which housed the electronic communications gear and not even Commander McGonagle was allowed into those quarters of the ship.) It is doubtful if the Court's Convening Authority, Admiral John S. McCain, Jr., knew why the Court hearings were ordered to be held in secret, though he may have suspected it had something to do with the government's fear of public reaction to an act of infamy. But the government need not have worried about that reaction; even if the London Court hearings had been public--the American news media would have seen to that.

    Anthony Pearson reported in his Penthouse (June 1976) article that out of secret hearings that Congress held on the Liberty affair, a leak revealed that two of the Israeli planes that had attacked the Liberty were piloted by Americans--ex-navy pilots--who had immigrated to Israel. Since the hearings were secret, this leak could be neither publicly confirmed nor disproved. Now the news media have been notorious co-operators with leak purveyors, but this leak about ex-U.S. navy pilots attacking the U.S.S. Liberty while flying for Israel was one leak that the news media definitely did not want to broadcast! And they did not, as far as this writer can determine. Again, it may be observed that for the same reason that some legislative staff employees keep their Jewishness in mind when working on Capitol Hill, it is apparent that some journalists keep their Jewishness in mind when reporting, or not reporting, the news. Biased news reporting--especially with regard to the Arab-Israeli Conflict or other areas of Jewish interests--reflects the basic philosophy of a handful of men who control the broadcast media and who ultimately influence the news judgments of their paid editors and producers.

    The State of Israel called its attack on the Liberty "a mistake" and paid a paltry total indemnity of $6.9 million to Liberty's crew casualties and family survivors, but only after an international law suit was filed against Israel in the World Court at The Hague by family members of the crew (Hatonn: And, of course, you American taxpayers put up the funds to pay the "fine"). Israeli aircraft had reconnoitered the Liberty for five hours before attacking her. If the attack were truly "a mistake," it was a mistake that took the Israelis five hours to decide to make. It was also "a mistake" for which no one in Israel ever stood trial. Zionist Israel faced the dilemma of investigating a case of jet pilots and torpedo boat commanders who obviously had not acted on their own in a decision to attack an American naval vessel. A public and thorough investigation of the facts in this case would have opened a bag of worms that even Israel could not have stomached. So nothing was done that could have led to a court-martial or trial of anyone.

    The writer has just learned (1977) that the American Palestine Committee has obtained, under the Freedom of Information Act, the Court of Inquiry documents covering the 1967 Liberty case. The United States Navy file, now mostly declassified, "...contains numerous photographs of Israeli planes and torpedo boats attacking the ship while it was plainly flying a huge 13-foot American flag (in clear weather). There is also testimony that the attackers engaged in ‘jamming' to prevent the ship's calls for help from reaching the U.S. Sixth Fleet." Since the United States State Department has not yet declassified its files on the Liberty tragedy, The American Palestine Committee has stated its intention "...to pursue the matter until we have all the answers." (Hatonn: More wishful thinking, especially in more current times--the Freedom of Information Act provides you with NOTHING. You cannot get information not wished for you to have under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. This is one of the best clues to truth or lies. If "secret" and "top-secret" files are revealed under this act, i.e. MJ-12 U.F.O. material, etc. is legible--it is false! YOU CANNOT GET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FROM THE GOVERNMENT!) For further developments on the Liberty the concerned reader should contact The American Palestine Committee and should also write his congressman urging a full and open congressional hearing on the case. (Hatonn: Case in point--how many of you in the interim 19 years have heard of any inquiry into this matter? I thought not! I can further tell you that a lot of the disclosers of information regarding Zionists' activities and cover-ups etc, are DEAD--i.e. Jack Bernstein, whom we quoted only a few days past in THE LIFE OF AN AMERICAN JEW IN RACIST MARXIST ISRAEL. And, of course, John King, Sr., and on and on goes the list. The ones remaining alive have come within our circle of protection where we can literally protect (shield) them from the pulse beams and barrage of everything from chemical to biological introduction within their systems. I remind you that you are dealing with the "big bad boy" himself and you actually have only ONE protection--God of Holy Light.)

    Incidentally, the Liberty's captain, Commander William L. McGonagle, was recommended for his country's highest award for service above and beyond the call of duty and his crew was recommended for presidential citations. Commander McGonagle received his Congressional Medal of Honor and the Liberty's crew (those that survived) received their presidential citations. (Hatonn: Does it not remind you of the passing out of "medals" to the survivors of the Panama "invasion"?)

    In contrast to all the publicity given the Pueblo case, there were no car bumper stickers traversing the country exhorting the people to "Remember the Liberty." As far as the American people at large were concerned these brave men may as well have received their country's highest honors anonymously--thanks to the American news media which tippy-toed through the whole Liberty affair knowing that keeping the American public uninformed would be in Israel's best interest.

    (Hatonn: We covered this story quite thoroughly in SKELETONS IN THE CLOSET, I believe was the title--out of some 25 Journals now, I too, get a bit forgetful of singular contents. An important point I must make again herein, however, is that the men, following the incident--were forbidden under sentence of death ‘from your government' from divulging information regarding the Liberty!)

    END OF QUOTING FOR THIS SEGMENT.

    * * * * * * * *
    I only have one more point of immediate attention to point out to you. You will all be having access to "Nostradamus" via television during the next few weeks--it aired in Southern California last evening. It is changed from a two-hour motion picture featuring Orson Welles in an hour's propaganda hosted by Charlton Heston. It is a direct updating to give you the viewers the DIRECT PERCEPTION that Saddam Hussein is the ANTI-CHRIST. This is a ploy to distract you from the fact that the State of Israel and the Zionist KHAZARS are the ANTI-CHRIST. I suggest you be most discerning in your value judgments for this is leaving you with perception which is total lie. The FACT THAT THE PROGRAM IS BEING AIRED RIGHT NOW AT THE TIME OF HOLY CELEBRATIONS OF ONE SORT AND ANOTHER--PROVES TO YOU THAT THAT WHICH WE ARE GIVING YOU IS INDEED, TRUTH! BE CAUTIOUS INDEED LEST YOU BE SUCKED EVEN MORE DEEPLY INTO THE DECEPTION. SAALOME'

    YOU WILL AGAIN BE FLOODED WITH THE ANNUAL "HOLOCAUST" BARRAGE IN ADDITION--I SUGGEST THAT YOU BEGIN TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR GETTING YOURSELF INFORMED FOR THE LIE IS GOING TO FALL FOR THE ENEMIES OF HOLY CREATOR, GOD, ARE GOING TO BE REVEALED INTO THE LIGHT OF TRUTH.

    Allow us closure of this segment for I need your presence elsewhere. Thank you for your service. God is ever in your presence--so I trust ye shall keep of it in mind in your every action, thought and deed. So be it.

    Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn, Cmdr.
    UFF-IGFC

    To clear, please.

주제글 정보

Users Browsing this Thread

이 주제글은 현재 1명이 열람중입니다. (0명의 회원과 1명의 손님)

이 주제글의 글단추(태그)

글쓰기 규칙

  • 새 글 작성이 불가능함
  • 응답글 작성이 불가능함
  • 파일 첨부가 불가능함
  • 내 글 수정이 불가능함
  •