PJ 56
CHAPTER 9

REC #2 HATONN

WED., OCTOBER 7, 1992 10:15 A.M. YEAR 6, DAY 52

WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1992
What with the International Monetary Fund now focusing on the good old U.S.A. after destroying, according to plans, the devel­oping nations, the planned riots in Germany, the now terrible plague of Typhus to add to the misery in Sarajevo, it seems al­most redundant to talk on the subject of one Henry Kissinger. On the other hand, when you realize that it is Henry "Kissinger Associates" that "advise" and set-up the situations in all those scenarios, it seems there is NO WAY to speak of him quite of­ten enough!

By the way, for you who rush out to buy Richard Secord's book to find all the dirt piled under the carpet--you won't find much more than dingy carpeting. You have to read between the lines so hard that most will miss the connections. However, it must make you see and understand how fully the actions are "within the law" as perpetrated by the ones involved. The "fine line" between truth and lie is well studied by the involved participants and the "law" is studied most carefully and anything not "legal" is made legal because it's "nice to be the King!" There IS more to Gen. Secord, however, than meets the eye so it is wise to read and wait. You have to remember, for instance, that if "one" production of "Bush" says "...and I was not in Paris"--lit­erally the mouth speaks "truth". This is where "doubles" and "replicas" do their handiest fill-in roles--it also allows easy fooling of all sensitive apparatus to measure lie against truth. It is only you-the-people who get trapped by such devices.

But, on with Kissinger and "October Revelations" as presented here and there.

Since "surgical" depopulation efforts were shown in Iraq I sup­pose we have to start there and then we will move on to POWs and the miserable show and tell at subcommittee hearings.

SUCKERING OF SADDAM
Did Saddam actually get "suckered" or is there more to the story? Well, if you deal with what led up to the "Gulf" incident and measure that which was "said" by your government and the U.N. about Kuwait (poor Kuwait--has anyone paid attention to the last few days' free elections in Kuwait?) one has to realize that still "more than meets the eye" goes on and on and on - - - .

Guess what! Henry Kissinger and his associates are shown and proven to have had a direct hand in the suckering of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein or, at the least, his seeming cooperation in the whole plan. Saddam is not too nice a human person in justice and LIGHT so it remains to be seen how "suckered" he actually WAS.

First, Kissinger et al. arranged the flow of money to allow the build up of Iraq's war machine and then maneuvered him into moving into Kuwait right on cue.

I remind you--some of the world's foremost foreign govern­ments regard Kissinger Associates as being THE U.S. "shadow government" and which served as the lead "policy counsel" to every one of the participants in the Iraq conflict.

It is KNOWN that one Alan Stoga, a vice president of Kissinger Associates, was in Iraq on many occasions for private meetings with the top leaders for months (up to a couple of years) prior to the Kuwait precipitating crisis.

I do hope you have time to get to more accurate "surgical hear­ings" regarding the events than you had success with your "surgical bombing" in the fray as are being suggested in the U.S. I would remind you, however, that the bombings had THE intended effect--measured depopulation by force as we spoke of on the yesterday. The message is far more easily seen by ones "in charge" of the "PLAN" than by you who still think the world is basically "good".

What are listed as the two things Bush Republicans seem to fear most by questioning?

1. Was last year's devastating Gulf War the outcome of a secret scheme to "set up and entice" Iraqi strongman Saddam Hussein into choosing a military solution to his dispute with Kuwait, as new evidence being presented in a federal court now suggests? Even if this question is directed--the answer will not be suffi­cient for it allows the side-stepping of the liars as to the REAL CAUSE, and;

2. Did Henry Kissinger and his swarm of weapons bearers play the key role in this whole "play"? If so, as findings indicate, why do they still have such dominant influence over U.S. for­eign policy? Do you think you will get a simple answer to THAT one?

AVOIDED ISSUES
The stir to somehow confront these "untouchable" issues has been powered by discoveries by your beloved Rep. Henry Gon­zalez, chairman of the House Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, who decided to pursue the money trail be­hind the war against Iraq, no matter where it would lead.

One of the cash conduits traced by Gonzalez led, crookedly, to the Atlanta branch office of Italy's huge government owned bank, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, known generally as BNL-­not to even mention the branch of this same bank tucked away in Chicago. Some $5 billion (known) in loans went to Iraq during the late 1980s from just the Atlanta office of BNL. Of course, the effort has been to set-up a "lone gunman" in the form of Christopher Drogoul, the BNL branch manager who signed off on most of the transactions. Now, it is too difficult for even the congress to cover up the probability that "others might have been involved". Shades of 011ie North?

Drogoul did plead guilty to having approved vast cash transac­tions and said he did so without obtaining the permission of BNL's head office in Italy--undoubtedly affixed firmly to a Kissinger Associates branch office! He probably will get to change his plea in light of lack of carry-through on his promised "protection" which didn't protect but actually "set-up" his con­viction.

Drogoul took a fall for others and could not possibly have engi­neered such a complex and widespread operation all by himself any more than could one Oliver North in his scenario. You will note, however, that in the end--it worked out swimmingly well for little "011ie" while a man like Randy Weaver rots in prison without even being allowed "bail" for a quarter-inch too short shotgun charge. Oh yes, I do forget--he now is charged with assault on a Federal Agent and some kind of "conspiracy" with Kevin Harris to bring damage to another.

You have to remember something else about the BNL-Drogoul case--it "officially" got closed after "bagging" Drogoul.

However, when the ensnared executive, Drogoul, was in federal court in Atlanta Sept. 14 for his "routine" sentencing, there was a nice new defense attorney at his side: Bobby Lee Cook, 65, one of America's top trial lawyers, who had "somehow" be­come "interested" in the affair. Where are these "interested" attorneys for Randy Weaver and Kevin Harris? Where, after all, did Mr. Spence go? The attorneys now listed as being Weaver's are NOT any of the ones named in any of the news releases--by Paul Harvey or Gritz, if you can trust any of the current information from Randy Weaver himself. Behind the scenes? Who knows but Randy--the case comes to trial very, very shortly--perhaps the shortest time before a major trial of any in the recent United States judicial history!

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CENTER: GET ON THIS CASE (WEAVER/HARRIS)--NOW! NEXT WEEK WILL BE TOO LATE. A whole bunch of "stuff" is being "stuffed".

ORCHESTRATED SCHEME
Far from having been the sole swindler behind the BNL scandal, Drogoul had been nicely set up, the victim of a scheme orches­trated at the highest levels of the U.S. government. His case was manipulated by very high-ups in order to hide the wrong­doing and blunders of Washington bureaucrats and Wall Street financiers.

During Drogoul's sentencing hearing, his second-in-command, Franz Von Wedel, who had never before been heard from, said it was an utter lie that Drogoul acted alone in a rogue operation. Von Wedel said Dorgoul acted ON THE ADVICE OF THE BANK'S CONSULTANTS, KISSINGER ASSOCIATES, whose suggestions Drogoul also discussed on a special line with the bank's chairman in Rome, with whom he spoke daily. This has cast a whole new light on the case, with the judge dismissing the government case as having been aimed at proving a rogue oper­ation only.

In reality the money trail of the huge "cover and deception" op­eration known as "Iraqgate" leads (again) right to the White House, Washington and Wall Street. But it, as usual, goes right to the rat-hole hidden linchpin between the two above; Kissinger Associates, the high-priced New York based con­sulting and dealmaking firm those nice foreign leaders re­gard as YOUR "shadow government".
PRINCIPALS
Right from the mouth of a congressional "investigator" comes the following paraphrased statement: Take a look at the princi­pal players in this setup. There is BNL, one of the world's leading banks, owned by the Italian government; there are some huge U.S. corporations, such as the Bechtel Co., the largest worldwide construction and logistics conglomerate. There are other financial interests, such as LBS Bank, an arm of the Ser­bian Communists, set up in the United States by Lawrence Ea­gleburger, now the acting secretary of state (a Kissinger associ­ate, remember) and Brent Scowcroft, the top Presidential adviser and then, there is the White House, and finally--there is Saddam Hussein, Iraq's leader.

It would be certainly obvious that these disparate power centers all followed the guidance of the SAME adviser on their colli­sion course, would it not?

Saddam Hussein granted only a single audience to U.S. Ambas­sador April Glaspie during the two years she spent in Baghdad--and that was immediately before the outbreak of the war itself. Now this comes from Michael Saba who is a corporate consul­tant who visited Iraq frequently during the same period of time in question. He preferred to deal with Kissinger and his en­voys--but it may end up being his "fatal mistake".

We shall see--for as the players in the One World Government-Ultimate World Order take off the gloves and go at it in this election farce, some interesting things may very well evolve into the light. It means, however, that to keep the lid on--some very devastating things must come down on you SHORTLY to allow for absolute control of you-the-citizens.

SO WHAT OF POWs?
Hopefully, you witnessed the outright foolish appearing denials of this "mouth" of Kissinger--at work. As profoundly good a liar as is this "poor excuse" for a human man, he simply couldn't pull it off and good old Larry King (Live?) couldn't smooth it over except to you poor people who missed the show in action at the hearings.

So, despite the outraged denials by this former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in testimony before Congress, it is obvi­ously clear he and Richard Nixon BOTH knew American ser­vicemen were deliberately being left behind during the pull­out from Southeast Asia. They both lied and continued to lie about it to all of you while continuing with business as usual with your enemy who incarcerated those beloved ones betrayed.

So what is being presented here? The same factual evidence as is coming through (now) elsewhere. Evidence is traced which proves abandonment of some minimum 350 American prisoners of war--left behind in Laos at the conclusion of U.S. combat participation in the Vietnam War in 1973--leads directly to the President's oval office and Kissinger's twinkle-toes.

It has now been uncovered in several recordings, made in the Oval Office between March 21 and April 1, 1973, document­ing that the 350 victims were knowingly abandoned to the Communists as American combat troops were being with­drawn from Southeast Asia.

Moreover, it has been learned that Adm. Thomas H. Moorer, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, sent a top-secret directive to his field commanders in Southeast Asia to halt the withdrawal of U.S. troops, as agreed upon under the Paris Peace Accords signed by U.S. and North Vietnamese negotia­tors, on January 27, 1973.

KNEW OF BETRAYAL
Moorer was aware the Communists were not upholding their end of the agreement to release all American POWs.

However, three days later, under orders from the White House, Moorer rescinded his order, and the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops continued.

Nixon then decided to override Moorer which is fully detailed and outlaid to the Senate Select Committee, in the secret White House tapes.

It was Nixon's penchant for tape recording the conversations that took place in the Oval Office, ironically, that led to the ulti­mate downfall of his administration in the Watergate scandal.

Select Committee investigators have found that on March 21, U.S. Ambassador McMurtrie Godley, the American proconsul in Vientiane, the capital of Laos, called on the chief emissary of the Communist Pathet Lao forces to immediately turn over THE 350 American POWs. His demand was ignored by the Communists.

Then, three days later, on March 24, Ambassador Godley again contacted the Pathet Lao emissary and demanded the release of all Americans, but again he was ignored.

You have to remember, chelas, THIS only accounts for some 350 men in Laos. There were another 425, at least, left in Hanoi as evacuation took place leaving no room nor time for their safe evacuation.

POW STRATEGY SESSION
On March 28, the day before the last U.S. troops were with­drawn, the subject of the POWs was discussed at the White House by President Nixon, Dr. Henry Kissinger, the Presi­dent's national security adviser, and deputy Secretary of De­fense William Clements, at which time it was decided to close the book on the captive Americans.
A high-ranking Nixon administration official said of the event that it make him "..feel a little sick. It was astonishing. Only the president could have gotten Tom Moorer to do that (reverse his decision to halt the withdrawal of U.S. troops until the POWs were returned)."

It was then determined within the Oval Office, as it turns out, that if the POWs were determined to be alive it would be neces­sary to halt the withdrawal of American troops, which would lead to renewed war; and, the United States also would be bur­dened with the task of trying to compel North Vietnam to get its Laotian allies to release them.

The Nixon administration had little means of pressuring Hanoi beyond a threat to start the war again, at the time in point. The White House seemed well aware this would never receive the support of Congress.

ADMITS LYING
Kissinger, in a September 22 appearance before the Senate Se­lect Committee, heatedly rejected assertions the Nixon Admin­istration knowingly "jettisoned" POWs in Laos, Vietnam or any­where else. Kissinger did say reports of live prisoners had crossed his desk, but that these could not be confirmed. Kissinger went on to blame an "evil" Communist government in Hanoi and a Congress that refused to assist in obtaining the re­lease of remaining U.S. servicemen held prisoner.

Kissinger's testimony represented an admission he had lied nearly 20 years ago when he and other U.S. officials publicly asserted no Americans were still being held hostage in Southeast Asia.

Kissinger then attempted to shift the guilt by accusing former Defense Secretaries Melvin Laird and James Schlesinger of spreading misinformation when they told Congress on Septem­ber 21 American POWs probably had not been returned by the Communists. Kissinger claimed the two men did not raise the POW issue in 1973, so they could not have any basis for their latest assertions.

COVER-UP BEGINS
On April 6, 1973 Godley had wired Washington: "We have to assume that all the American POWs left in Laos are dead."

He clearly knew better and is believed to have been acting upon direct orders from the President.

Shortly thereafter, Clements told his deputy, Dr. Roger Shields: "All American POWs are dead."

Shields, who also knew better and has since been interviewed by the Senate Select Committee, was appalled.

"We can't say that," he protested to Clements.

"You didn't hear me," Clements said, according to Shield's deposition, "I said they're all dead."

Then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Lawrence Eagleburger (now acting Secretary of State) had only days prior to this exchange advised his boss, Secretary of Defense Elliott Richardson, that the 350 men were still unaccounted for in Laos, and even went so far as to urge the Communists be bombed to drive home the point that the United States wanted the men back.

In turn, Richardson advised Kissinger of the remaining POWs.

Thus, the cover-up of the fate of American POWs left behind during the war has continued for nearly two decades, with the successive administrations of Presidents Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George Bush perpetuating the hideous crime of knowingly leaving American servicemen be­hind to suffer and die in enemy hands.

Now that the cover-up has been exposed for all America to see (if you looked), the last remaining act will be to account for those who may still be alive. What odds do you give of this happening, in actuality?

Well, let me remind you of some very devastingly painful points in your political structure THIS DAY.

BAD NEWS!
Bush is NOT IN CONTROL OF YOUR GOVERNMENT! Remember, the key code sheets and "hot-boxes" (football) were taken from Bush. Kissinger, through Eagleburger, Scowcroft and others, is basically running your government RIGHT NOW. Bush knows that he is "out" and "Clinton is the chosen one" to fit the needs of these "Associates" and it is hard times in the old home town tonight! There is so much with which to blackmail the Bushes that there is little fear of Bush "telling". We, of the Command, even offered the poor sucker a way off this place and out of the mess and he (one of him) refused. If he can't pull something off with Perot--it is "all she wrote", brothers.

Most of what Bush himself actually "hands-on" did, is carefully orchestrated as to be "legal" according to the "laws set up to protect the guilty"--so it's a hard bind in which your nation finds itself this day.

By the way--yesterday was the day of KOL NEDRI (Vow of all vows) which means that in the "Zionists/Jewish" tradition on the first day of Holy Days of Passover, a vow is made negating all vows taken in the upcoming year. It's a real handy device for insured lying and protection from being caught cheating and ly­ing. If you vowed to break all subsequent vows through the year and update that every year--my, my, how handy and all comes within the "rights" and "rites" of RELIGION--you know, THAT religion that was made law by PUBLIC LAW 102-14. Have a nice day!

Hatonn to clear. Salu. I suggest you go take your Crystal Life drops, your Hydrogen peroxide drops (very sparingly), eat your algae and TRY to survive long enough to find the Truth so you can change this nightmare! May the "Force be with you"! Good day. Over and out!



PJ 56
CHAPTER 10

REC #1 HATONN

THU., OCTOBER 8, 1992 8:36 A.M. YEAR 6, DAY 53

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 8, 1992

UP THE ANTE?
Can you not see it? The Feds are getting ready to railroad Randy Weaver and Kevin Harris--AND BO GRITZ! You have a situation where a trial of people and unallowed bail release is going to take place in mere weeks when it usually takes years to bring this type of case to hearing--AND, you find the trial set at the ending of October with only a week to elections--wherein Bo Gritz is a witness and a candidate. Still think you aren't manip­ulated??

You won't find CNN talking about either!

SPEAKING OF CNN
Can you not see THIS one? The CIA has lied and presented false documents to both the Congress AND the court in Atlanta. Gates (Director CIA) has promised a "look into it". CNN, on both news channels this day with such a "breaking" story, sim­ply shows one, Drogoul, being granted a "rehearing" while all this breaks in the courtroom--BUT NOT VERY MUCH IN THE MEDIA, AT LEAST NOT ON CNN. WHY?? It is so bad this day that the story covers the fact that this is a "major Italian bank", it indicates that the problem is "somewhere" in the U.S. and it states that billions of dollars were funnelled into Iraq and that Drogoul "may not turn out to be the only involved figure".

The report DID NOT GIVE THE BANK NAME (BNL), nor did it say the case is IN ATLANTA and COVERS UP COMPLETELY ANY OTHER "PARTICIPANTS" AS WELL AS NOT SAYING "WHAT" THE CIA COVERED!

Interesting point is that CNN is in Atlanta. Ted Turner got "loads" of funding for his "media networks", comes to all state dinners at the White House with little "Jane" and sits with Gor­bachev and Kissinger. NEWS BLACKOUT? Oh, I think if you can stir up some interest in "tracking" you are going to find a rat's nest to end them all! It's up to YOU!

CNN has an ongoing blackout on any mention of Bo Gritz--EVEN HIS NAME.

SYRIAN, SERBIAN--ALL THE SAME?
Also, was it a "slip" perchance? This very morning during the reporting of the news in "old" Yugoslavia, where the fighting has been between Serbians and Moslems--what slip of the lip and printed sheet caused the announcer, without note or embar­rassment or----to say "....Syrian forces..." throughout two pre­sentations of the "Headline News".

"SHIPS SHALL FALL FROM THE SKY IN THOSE DAYS"
Remember our outline of the final days before THE war AS LAND MASSES ARE CHANGED and other things such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes and winds of 150 miles per hour, would sweep the lands? We also said that the ships would sink in the oceans and the ships would fall from the sky.

It is happening daily--tit for tat (not even hidden in "response"). A cargo plane is dumped on people there and one is dumped on people here. Open up your eyes, chelas, or you will miss the clues. A little old jet liner drops its engines one day and another drops its engines the next!

A bank indiscretion is caught in political corruption one day and Gorbachev is cast out of his "Foundation" center the next! "Foundation??"--"Think-tank Foundation" it's called and YOU help support it through donations gathered by Gorbachev in the U.S.--ah, but WHO really owns that "Think-tank"? That's right: Kissinger Associates!

Since you have the same players in BCCI as in BNL AND LBS banks--you know, massive turnover of money directed by Kissinger, Scowcroft, Eagleburger and various and sundry gov­ernments (your own AND all your supposed enemies) what do you think is going to happen when you get to BANKAMER­ICA? CITIBANK? You already know the Rockefeller-Roth­schild (Committee of 300) ownership of CHASE and the FED­ERAL RESERVE. But, you say, what about the Japanese? What about them--their market is about to collapse and one after another the leaders are falling to scandals--every day. THE JAPANESE ELITE ARE MEMBERS OF THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION WHICH IS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY "THE COMMITTEE OF 300--CLUB OF ROME".

MOST DANGEROUS TIME
This period of time in America may well be the most seriously critical time for you in history as "seeming" enemies vie for the power "role". It is easy to see that things are "controlled" but how can that control be maintained? DISASTER AND FORCE!

I hope you ones will go back and read the planned scenario for getting Bush "pardoned" and the inclusion of Perot into the pic­ture, etc. I can't rerun everything but you are seeing "A" plan in the working. Don't be too concerned over who is doing what to whom--remember: the goals are THE SAME: NEW WORLD ORDER-ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT, DEPOPULATION OF THE GLOBE TO NOT MORE THAN 550 MILLION PEOPLE (PER GEORGE BUSH) AND TOTAL SUBMISSION OF ALL REMAINING PEOPLE.

CONFIRMATIONS:
UNDERGROUND/WATER INSTALLATIONS
More valid confirmations have come in that indeed, there are the underground cities and bases as we have presented--only there are apparently MORE than we presented. Well, nobody is "perfect" short of GOD.

ENVIRONMENTAL HOAX:
SHEEP HAD "PINKEYE"
Remember the big to-do about the sheep going blind in southern Patagonia--from THAT ultraviolet light slipping through the ozone hole? This was an Al Gore "victory" speech on envi­ronmental disasters and included in his infamous book on the environment??? OOPS! NOT SO! AND WORSE, EVEN "GREENPEACE" HAD TO MAKE A STATEMENT REGARDING SAME.

In the investigation into the story of this wild claim of blindness resulting from exposure in several places where the "...ozone layer has holes", it has been found that the "sheep" and "some" people were infected with "PINKEYE" (a viral infection which is airborne). Most of the story made it to a production in San Francisco (channel KGO-TV, I am told). In going to Argentina with Greenpeace the man who broke the story correction was present so this is "first party", not Hatonnese or hearsay. The alleged sheep blinded by the ozone hole is a farce and fully planned in advance. In fact the parties involved were efforting to "prove the story correct", so eyeballs were brought back for analysis at a university medical center. The verdict is that "the sheep suffered from conjunctivitis, or pink eye, a highly in­fectious inflammation of the membrane covering the inside of eyelids and front of the eyeball."

NEW ZEALAND INFORMATION
I have so many requests to present the information from New Zealand--not the least of which come FROM New Zealand, that I will plan to do so within the next few issues of the LIBERA­TOR. First, however, I must give you an outlay of how the or­ders have come down through Farmers Home Administration to "clear more farmers off the land". This is being done through FmHA debt settlement programs. This has become a nightmare in practice--a ship of no return if you have any connections with the FmHA and are more than 30 days late in making payments to that lending agency.

The best disclosure comes from ACRES, USA but relatively few of you would ever see this article so we find it imperative to of­fer it to you. You who think this organization (FmHA) only lends against farms, etc., think again. It is into "building", projects, etc. Anything that possibly relates to the "land", Agri­culture, businesses related to agriculture, housing, etc. It has been an absolute gold-mine for some industries and from those industries have flowed marvelous benefits--BUT, it is designed to take out the farmers and clear them off their own lands. So, you have one more plan identical to the RTC to get control into the hands of the Elite Banksters and inside money-changers, ALL OF THE PROPERTY OF THE CITIZENRY.

Thank you.