Tags, 상세검색
응답: PJ#020, THE MOSSAD CONNECTION
PJ 20CHAPTER 23
REC #1 HATONN
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1990 8:57 A.M. YEAR 4 DAY 62Hatonn present within the Light and in total service unto the Holy God of Divine Creation and unto you, my Earth brethren of all nations. Saalome' and Salu.
TODAY'S WATCH
Be most observant as the World Series returns to the San Francisco Bay area! The earthquake was one year ago today and anniversaries are wondrous days to make points unto the unsuspecting!
MOST IMPORTANT NOTICEI have great bombardment flying back at my scribe and discounting of "Hatonn" regarding the subject of Zionists and Zionism and the "anti-Semite" hogwash again thrust at us. We hate no one and, further, one has nothing to do with the other. The "Protocols" are a Zionist blueprint for gaining total control of your world. It is time you ones of the dream see the truth of the nightmare. Ones believing themselves to simply be farsighted leaders of the nations have fallen into the trap and know not more than you, the reader. I WOULD CERTAINLY SUGGEST THAT YOU THE PEOPLE MAKE SURE YOUR LEADERS ARE APPRISED OF THE INFORNIATION-- JEW AND GENTILE, ATHEIST AND AGNOSTIC, BUDDHIST OR MOSLEM--ISLAMIC OR SATANIST (THE LATTER BECAUSE IT MAKES SURE "THEY" KNOW THAT "YOU" KNOW AND WILL NOT TOLERATE THE EVIL). SO BE IT AND MAY GOD TOUCH OF YOUR HEARTS THAT YOU MAY SEE AND HEAR THIS TRUTH.
I AM HEREIN STRESSING THIS POINT WHICH HAS BEEN MISSED BY MANY ONES READING THE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR EXPRESS AND/OR JOURNAL CHAPTER: THE ZIONIST PROTOCOLS WERE PRODUCED FROM THE MEETINGS OF THE ZIONIST MEN OF WISDOM. THEY WERE BROUGHT FORTH FROM THE RECORDINGS OF NILUS AND APPEARED IN WRITTEN FORMAT AROUND 1884. THEY WERE PUBLISHED IN 1920 BY SMALL, MAYNARD AND CO, USING THE SOURCE HEREIN.
"ZIONIST" HAS NAUGHT TO DO WITH "JUDAISM", JEWISM NOR RELIGIONS. ZIONISM IS A POLITICAL REFERENCE!
The word "protocol" was used to signify a flyleaf pasted at the top of an official document, bearing either the opening formula or a summary of the contents for convenient reference. ..., the word came to mean also the minutes of the proceedings. In this instance "the protocols" mean "the draft of the plan of action" of the Jewish leaders. There have been many such drafts in Jewish history since the dispersion, but few of them have come into general circulation. In all, the principles and morality are as old as the tribe. By way of illustration, we give an instance which occurred in the 15th century.
In 1492, Chemor, chief Rabbi of Spain, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice when a Spanish Law threatened expulsion. This was the reply:
"Beloved brethren in Moses, we have received your letter in which you tell us of the anxieties and misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear it as yourselves.
"The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following:
1. As for what you say that the King of Spain obliges you to become Christian: do since you cannot do otherwise.
2. As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your property: make your sons merchants that they may despoil, litle by little, the Christians of theirs.
3. As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: make your sons doctors and apothecaries that they may take away Christians' lives.
4. As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues: make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their churches.
5. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them.
6. Do not swerve from this order that we give you because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.
SIGNED: PRINCE OF THE JEWS OF CONSTANTINOPLE.
The protocols given to the world by Nilus are only the "latest" Earth-known edition of the Jewish leaders' programme. Earlier editions have been carefully secreted and guarded.
REMEMBER: THESE WERE PRODUCED AROUND THE YEAR 1884.
* * * * *CONTINUATION OF PRIOR SUBJECTHertzl's "dream" of setting up a Zionist homeland in Palestine was the subject under review, and we shall continue from where we stopped writing on the day before yesterday.
Arab preponderance among the inhabitants did not dampen the enthusiasm of the Zionists. Only some "justification" was needed to rationalize or excuse the incursion by the Jews of the Diaspora (those scattered throughout the world) into the territory of another people.
Then as now, many people were appalled at this nervy design of "ingathering" the Jews into Palestine at the cost of dislodging the Arab natives, who for centuries had farmed the land and brought Palestine some measure of stability. However, then as now, people were silenced in their rational objections to such an unjust proceeding by trumped-up charges of "anti-Semitism".
It was one named Jacob de Haas, an intimate of the late Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, who wrote that "Zionists purposely used the word 'JEW' SYNONYMOUSLY WITH ‘ZIONIST' to give political Zionism (the) protection from criticism enjoyed by religious Judaism". Writing in his "Decadence of Judaism in Our Time", Moshe Menuhin says that Zionism has served to "stultify, brainwash and inoculate the amorphous body of world Jewry with the virus of secular, rampant Jewish political nationalism; Jewish education under the pretense of spiritual and religious immunity or liberty has been instituted everywhere".
BALFOUR DECLARATIONThe origin of modern Israel has nothing to do with any religious miracle, but is instead the product of international politics of the most sordid and treacherous kind. To see what happened, begin with 1915, when imperialist Germany was threatening England's interests in the Mideast.
At that time, in order to gain the support of the Arabs against the Germans, the British promised the Arabs sovereignty over Palestine, provided that the Arabs would revolt against the Turks who then held the area. (Turkey, allied with Germany, was an enemy of England in World War I).
The Arabs, believing the promises of the British to liberate them from the Turks, obligingly revolted and, after an exceedingly bloody and hard-fought campaign, helped Gen. Edmund Allenby capture Palestine in 1917.
The first of a long and tragic series of betrayals now began; the British welshed on their pledges to the Arabs. Instead of turning over the administration of Palestine to the Arabs, they decided to keep it for themselves.
The reason was that England had secretly double-crossed the Arabs, even while the latter were fighting and dying with Gen. Allenby in the campaign against the Turks. To see what happened, we must return to the war in Europe, which was then raging.
By the fall of 1916, the war was bogged down on the western front. The Germans, fighting on two fronts, were heavily occupied with Russia, and it was not until their decisive victory at Tannenberg that the Kaiser was able to begin to give more attention to fighting against the British and French.
England had tried everything possible to induce America to enter the war on her side but America's historic policy of non-intervention was too strong to permit the US. to be a catspaw for the ambition of international interests. Woodrow Wilson was reelected in 1916 on the slogan, "He kept us out of the war".
Within a few weeks a secret deal was concluded and immediately the powerful Zionists of America launched a propaganda campaign to bring the hapless Americans into a war for ends they did not remotely comprehend. At the same time, Wilson's key advisers, Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis and "Col." E. Mandel House, went to work on the President.
BALFOUR DECLARATION PAYS OFFIt did not take long, only five or six months, for the powerful international Zionist conspiracy to bring America into the war. The slogan selected by the war criminals was, "Make the world safe for democracy".
Wilson, pressed by the Zionists, who foresaw fruition of their dreams in the British promises, was caught on his own dagger of campaign promises. Perhaps not unlike Mr. Bush who genuinely felt he could arrange "not to raise taxes". Be a bit kind to these leaders who thought they could see a way and became totally mired within the quicksand trap. Persuaded by Justice Brandeis and the cabal, Wilson sought anxiously to find a way out of his campaign declarations of neutrality.
The Zionist-influenced press renewed headline protests relating to the, by then, two-year-old sinking of a British ship, the "Lusitania". The newspapers created a war scare response in the American public and, when President Wilson went before Congress and told of the sinking of another British ship on which American lives were lost, the Congress and American public frenziedly cried out for revenge and war.
Five months after his election on the "peace" platform, a Zionist-controlled Wilson had America at war.
In this particular, it is interesting to read the following sidelight on Wilson's call for war: (From THE MAKERS OF WAR, by the Right Hon. Francis Neilson, M.P.) "Wilson, desperate to find a pretext to enter the war, found it at last in a story of the 'sinking' of the 'Sussex' in mid-channel. Someone (???) had invented the yarn that American lives had been lost". With this excuse he went to Congress for a declaration of war. "Afterward the Navy found that the ‘Sussex' had not been sunk, and no American lives were lost". What think ye that ye might ultimately find has transpired in IRAQ?
BRANDEIS REPRESENTS ZIONIST CABAL
Authors Jacob de Flaas and Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in their book, THE GREAT BETRAYAL, reveal that Louis Dembitz Brandeis, leader of the Zionists of America, played a major role in writing and polishing the Balfour Declaration. Early in 1917, Balfour came to Washington and met Brandeis. Actually, the final draft had been sent to Brandeis even before Balfour's secretaries had shown it to their foreign secretary-employer.
Since Brandeis had a close relationship with President Wilson, his dual political interest--with Zionism and with the Balfour Declaration--was carefully concealed from the public, especially since Wilson had named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1916. Balfour and Prime Minister Lloyd-George both said that by the declaration they always "meant" AN EVENTUAL ZIONIST STATE, and that intent is well documented.
The Balfour Declaration--legal foundation for the present state of Israel--was formally, if quietly, issued on November 2, 1917. The declaration is in the form of a letter from Lord Arthur, then English foreign secretary, to Lionel Walter Rothschild.
The declaration makes two pledges:
1. "His Majesty's Government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a Jewish national home, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate this objective".
2. "A promise is made to the Arabs that 'Nothing shall be done to the Arabs which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine"'.
Looking back, C. L. Sulzberger, writing in the New York Times of November 3, 1970, wrote: "Conflict was clearly inevitable from the start, because it was patently absurd to support the benevolent idea of one people a national home in an area where another people was living, and at the same time not to prejudice the latter's rights".
VERSAILLES TREATY AND AFTERWARDThe war finally ended, but not until 116,708 (known) American men had died and 204,002 (known) of your men were wounded. Wilson surrounded by special-interest counselors including Zionists, hastened to break all tradition and steamed across the Atlantic to sit at the Peace Table with the old seasoned diplomats of Europe.
The eyes of all the world centered on the picturesque Palace of Versailles with its beautiful fountains and gardens. However, the Paris Peace Conference, which met at Versailles, was to produce as the fruits of its deliberations a treaty, the terms of which, according to Gen. Douglas MacArthur, "were more like a treaty of perpetual war than of perpetual peace".
Later, British Prime Minister David Lloyd-George had this to say of the conference: "The international bankers dictated the reparations settlement...They issued the orders with the imperiousness of absolute monarchs who knew there was no appeal from their decisions".
The Arabs came to the conference with no great political pressure-group working for them. There were no great blocks of Arab votes nor rich American Arab bankers or newspaper magnates in the U.S. or England. Many today are unaware that the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles were so manifestly unfair--e.g., Allied occupation of the German Rhineland--that the U.S. Senate refused to ratify the document. Later, these provisions for Allied occupation of the German Rhineland served as a German rallying point for Hitler's rise to power, and World War II.
The conference created the ill-fated and misbegotten League of Nations. Wilson made fatal mistake in dropping his humanitarian "Fourteen Points" Proposal and accepting in its place the League of Nations plan which led to his being personally repudiated by large segments of the American electorate. And the League, as you know, was never ratified by the U.S. Senate.
While American proposals were being voted down by the wily diplomats of Europe, at the same time, behind the scenes, the international bankers backing Zionism pressured Britain to take a further step in preparing the way for a "national home" for the Zionists. The Paris Conference, under these secret pressures (mainly American Zionists), created a new political invention called a "mandate" whereby Britain would govern Palestine. How do you feel about those foxes in the hen-pen? Are you beginning to get a picture of who the Zionists REALLY are? Do you see that it is, and will be, the JEWS who are destroyed in the fracas?
This was satisfactory to the Zionists since they had been assured by the English that they would receive preferential treatment over the Arabs, as the English were still beholden to the Zionists for euchering the United States into the war. It is interesting to note that the Balfour Declaration was incorporated formally into the British mandate.
POPULATION EXPLOSIONA direct result of the British Mandate was an explosion of the Jewish population in Palestine between 1922 and 1940 from some 83,790 (counted) Jews in 1922 to 463,535 (counted) in 1940. This floodtide of Jewish immigrants irritated the native Arabs, and minor skirmishes began to occur. As a result of these small battles between immigrant Jews and native Arabs, the British government set up a special commission to study the situation.
WHITE PAPERIn 1939, the British published the so-called white paper. Resulting from a commission studying the strains and tensions in Palestine, the white paper recalled first how the Balfour Declaration contained the two inconsistent provisions we have cited before, namely the establishment of a Jewish state and the protection of Arab civil rights.
The paper then recommended that Palestine be partitioned into two separate states--one for the Jews, and one for the Arabs. The partitioning proposals looked like a diplomatic "out" for the British from their inconsistent earlier stand.
The white paper further called for the immigration of 10,000 Jews a year into Palestine for the next five years, unless the Arabs and Jews were willing for it to continue beyond that point.
ZIONISM'S DARKEST HOURThe Zionists, despite the fact that they were attempting to colonize a country not their own, were indignant over the white paper and their anger was expressed in the words of David ben Gurion: "The Jews will fight rather than submit to Arab rule...It is the darkest hour of Jewish history".
The Zionists then demanded that the British abandon their mandated authority over Palestinian immigration and turn over the movement of Jews into the territory to the World Zionist Organization. The British payoff for Zionist help in propelling the U.S. into World War I had ended England's usefulness to Zionism. The Jews now wanted the British mandate authority abrogated. Can you begin to see how these factions appear to repel one another but actually simply rearrange the troops for the best offensive?
In the U.S., a meeting was held at the Biltmore Hotel in New York City, at which American Zionists formally rejected the white paper and called for unlimited Jewish immigration into Palestine and the conversion of that country into a Jewish commonwealth. Pressures were put on members of Congress from districts and cities with large Jewish voting blocs and resolutions were introduced in both Houses of Congress urging fulfillment of the Balfour Declaration promises.
The Arabs protested the Palestine partition resolution (No. 181) that was
adopted by the United Nations on November 29, 1947. The British had
grown weary of being the final arbiter between the Arabs and Zionists. Arabs boycotted the UN "Hearings on Partition", claiming that the Arabs' sole right to Palestine was inviolable, based on four premises:
* The natural right of the people to remain in possession of the land of its birthright should be valid;
* Palestinian Arabs had lived in majority numbers in Palestine for over 1,300 years;
* At the time of the partition announced by the UN, the Arabs were the rightful owners of most of the homes and fields, which partition gave to the Zionists Jews;
* In addition to these valid claims, the Arabs charged that partition by the UN would be illegal, improper and unnecessary.
TERRORISMAlthough World War II was exploding, the Zionists found time to conduct their so-called "War of Liberation" to get the British authorities out of Palestine. In 1946, the notorious Stern Gang blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, which was the official headquarters for the British mandate authority, and killed or injured hundreds. The Zionist underground waged a full-scale guerrilla war of harassment to drive the British out; and the situation became so intolerable that Britain attempted to return its mandate authority to the UN.
However, May 14, 1948 the British pulled out of Palestine, and the Zionist Jews, without permission of the UN, announced they had taken over a major portion of Palestine and had proclaimed it a Jewish state called "ISRAEL". Now, I remind you ones who are reading this--this is FACT and there are ones living in healthy form within your very families WHO WILL REMEMBER THIS AS FACT!
The Jews based their claims on their statements that Palestine was "the birthplace of the Jewish people" although the Old Testament definitely states that Abraham, progenitor of the Jews, WAS BORN IN THE FARAWAY KINGDOM OF UR, AND DID NOT REACH PALESTINE UNTIL HE WAS OVER 75 YEARS OF AGE!!!!
PRESSURE ON HARRY TRUMANInterestingly enough, I believe, the intensive pressure that the Zionists generated in your country to gain support for the carving up of Palestine is described by former President Harry S. Truman in a piece that appeared in the January, 1956 issue of LIFE magazine: (read his lips!)
"I do not think 1 ever had as much pressure and propaganda aimed at the White House as I had in this instance. The persistence of a few of the extreme Zionist leaders--actuated by political motives and engaging in political threats--disturbed me and annoyed me. Individuals and groups asked me, usually in rather quarrelsome and emotional ways, to stop the Arabs, to keep the British from supporting the Arabs, to furnish American soldiers to do this and to do that and the other".
In spite of the above statement, the actual historical fact remains that Truman had entered into a secret agreement with the Zionist leaders and just exactly 11 minutes after the Zionist declaration of Palestinian partition and independence on May 14, the President recognized "a Jewish state now exists". The President's formal recognition of this coup d'etat came while the General Assembly of the UN was in session, bitterly considering the UN proposal for trusteeship of all Palestine.
IS IT JUST POSSIBLE THAT SADDAM HUSSEIN OF IRAQ HAS SOMEWHAT BETTER MEMORY REGARDING WHAT THE "LIPS SAID" IN THE PAST THAN YOU ONES?????
Insiders knew that Truman had acted on the urgent pressure of David K. Niles and Judge Sam Rosenman without even informing the U.S. delegation at the UN or his own State Department of his intentions. Thus, the President disregarded international law and sold out the best interests of the U.S.
Hastily assembling top State Department officials and the American ambassadors to Mideast countries, the President declared: "I am sorry, gentlemen, but I have to answer to hundreds of thousands who are anxious for the success of Zionism. I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents".
With this bold note of cynical political opportunism, Truman carved out an unenviable position in the archives of those who have sold out America to the international bankers of Zionism. Today, as we retain in all the Arab world only the fragile friendship of Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, we can see in retrospect how President Truman for votes, alienated the friendship and goodwill of over 100 million Arabs and of more than 500 million Moslems.
Here you see, once again, the American policy of non-intervention and neutrality advocated by Presidents Washington, Jefferson, Madison, etc„ rejected by politicians who have been bluffed, bamboozled and swindled or outrightly "BLACKMAILED (AS NOW)", by the internationalists spawned by the Zionist Octopus.
BLOOD COSTForgotten by your politicians is the blood cost of the bastard state (illegitimate in its claims and pretensions). Shortly after the partition, the Jews in the diaspora came pouring into Palestine and the Arab-Israeli conflict became a bloody battle. In the midst of the war, Zionist terrorists descended upon the Arab village of Deir Yassin and slaughtered 250 men, women and children. Nearly a million Arabs had to flee their ancestral homes and land in Palestine and seek sanctuary in neighboring Arab states.
The late Norman Thomas, perennial presidential candidate of the Socialist Party, remarked: An Arab, without too much exaggeration, can complain that the Jews are practicing Hitlerism in reverse. Arabs have been made second-class citizens".
American citizens who showed any sympathy or understanding of the plight of the Palestinian Arabs immediately were deemed heretics and were harassed by the Zionist-dominated American political community.
One of the more tragic sidelights of the new Israeli history is the assassination of Count Folke Bernadotte of Sweden by the Jewish guerrilla Stern Gang. The count had declared: "The liability of the provisional government of Israel to restore private property to the Arab owners and to indemnify those owners for property destroyed wantonly (by the Zionists) is clear". For this fair and objective judgment and his defense of the rights of the dispossessed Arabs, Bernadotte won the hatred of the Zionists and was cold-bloodedly killed.
Most Americans are unaware that Hitler's hostility toward the Jews originated in the Zionist leaders having pushed the U.S. into World War I on the side of the Allies. This is acknowledged by Samuel Landman, secretary of the World Zionist Organization from 1917 to 1922 in London, who writes in his GREAT BRITAIN, THE JEWS, AND PALESTINE:
"The fact that it was Jewish help that brought the U.S.A. into the war on the side of the Allies had rankled ever since in German--especially Nazi--minds, and has contributed in no small measure to the prominence which anti-Semitism occupies in the Nazi program".
Thus, as the leader of a once-defeated nation, Hitler hated the Jews as the source of the German defeat in World War I. The German General Staff generals were just as anti-Semitic as their leader. So the seeds sown by the Zionists in 1917 came to fruition in the New Germany. Now, perhaps you can better understand why all the statements originating from Israeli and Zionist sources--ALWAYS REPRESENT SADDAM AS HITLER! IT IS AN EXPLOSIVE AND KNEE-JERKING MEMORY-CONNECTING DATA KEY!
After all, in a conference of world Jewry in 1933, an historic "declaration of holy war on Germany" had been publicized and even broadcast over your own CBS by Samuel Untermyer, president of the World Jewish Economic Federation. Are your memories, indeed, so short?
To a Gold Star Mother, it was small consolation to read in the The American Hebrew that "Whenever an American...fell at Bataan or Corregidor...the real reason why that boy went to his death was because Hitler's anti-Semitic movement succeeded in Germany".
Even after the invasion in 1939 of Poland and the invasion of France in 1940, the mood of the average American was that of neutrality. Without approving of the German expansion, most Americans recognized that this was an intramural conflict (the type George Washington had warned against meddling with), and felt the conflict was no threat to the tranquility of America.
THE WARTIME JOURNALS OF CHARLES LINDBERGH sets the mainstream American tone with respect to America's possible entry into the European war. On April 25, 1941, Lindbergh writes:
"What rotten luck it is to find myself opposing my country's entrance into a war I don't believe in, when I would so much rather be fighting for my country in a war that I do believe in. Here I am stumping the country with pacifists and considering resigning as a colonel in the Army Air Corp when there is no philosophy I disagree with more than that of the pacifist, and nothing I would rather be doing than flying in the Air Corp".
Again, in May of 1941, Lindbergh remarked:
"The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to it but the administration seems to have the bit in its teeth and be hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country arc behind the war, and they control a huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures. There are also the 'intellectuals' and the Anglophiles, and the British agents (who are allowed free rein), the international interests and many others".
Lindbergh felt that the Jews were among the major influences pushing the country toward war but was appalled by the fear, which many people in the nation demonstrated, of refusing to discuss the Jewish push toward war in public for fear of retaliation.
Later the Colonel, as well as the late Secretary of Defense, James Forrestal, were to feel the tremendous pressures the Jews exerted on their professional careers; and the death of Forrestal was to become a major hushed-up mystery.
The "America First" organization, dedicated to the traditional American policy of non-intervention, was pilloried and its members stamped as "traitors" by the Zionist-controlled press. Fearful Americans allowed this nation to be "sucked into battle" and those who singled out the Jews for their part in getting us into the war were scorned and ridiculed.
The hatred of those opposing the war created by the biased newspapers led to the infamous 1944 "sedition" trials, in which men were indicted and imprisoned because of their opposition to this war. Walter Wincheli, the notorious bedroom gossiper, used his column to excoriate the patriotic opposition to the surrender of American neutrality, and used his powerful influence with President Roosevelt to further the aims of his Jewish compatriots.
During both the Truman and Roosevelt administrations, this baleful Zionist influence and pressure continued to have an evil and deforming impact on your foreign policy as it related to the Arab world.
AMERICAN SUPPORT OF ZIONISM
So far, we have demonstrated how the U.S. has been used by the Zionists to provide political power for the artificially created state of Israel. Historical documentation proves conclusively that Zionist leaders promised English politicians that the U.S. would be pushed into World War I by the international bankers in order for the Zionists to secure the promise of any English government to assist the Zionist in establishing a "homeland" regardless of the rights of the Arabs.
Secondly, the facts prove that World War II was created out of the seeds of hate sown at the Peace Conference at Versailles. Further, that undue pressure was put on President Truman to recognize Israel.
It is self-evident that all of these facts disclose how far the American government has strayed from your traditional foreign policy of neutrality and non-intervention in the affairs of other nations.
While many students of Zionism are aware of the above facts, at the same time most Americans are unaware of the vast financial resources diverted from your nation to the uses of political Zionism.
Since 1948, and up to fiscal year 1982, the total economic and military aid given by the U.S. government to the unlawful Zionist, bankrupt regime in occupied Palestine amounted to $30.9 BILLION. The World Zionist Organization issued a statement declaring that "world Jewry and its friends" contributed over $2 BILLION in private gifts and contributions to Israel in just one year.
This means the Zionists are now pouring more than a billion dollars a year into the treasury of Israel out of the U.S. money market, and note well: these siphoned funds are TAX-EXEMPT and TAX-DEDUCTIBLE. Since 91 percent of all American taxpayers are non-Jewish, the financial drain by the Zionists adds to the tax burden of the more than 200 million U.S. citizens who are not Jewish. So be it! This does not include the outrageous amounts directly funneled in cash through governmental routing.
B'NAI B'RITH TAX FRAUDThe financial dealings of Zionism were long shrouded by mystery and uncertainty. This mystery was partly maintained because the Zionist apparatus in your country is a maze of corporations and agencies, the complexity of the network being such as to totally confuse and tax even the keenest minds--AND YOU TAKE NOTE!!!
However, in 1971, for the first time, much of this veil of mystery was torn asunder, thanks largely to the lawsuit of a former high official of B'nai B'rith. In February, the Jewish-owned Washington Post carried a long article telling of the lawsuit filed by Saul E. Joftes. Earlier, the Washington Observer (Dec. 15, 1969) had given the first public exposure to Joftes' charges against the Zionist organization.
It was established that Joftes charges that B'nai B'rith, a charitable, religious, tax-exempt American membership organization, was using its funds raised in the U.S. to pursue international political activities contrary to the B'nai B'rith constitution and in violation of the federal Foreign Agents Registration Act, as well as your American tax laws.
Joftes pointed out that the Foreign Agents Registration Act is "intended to require public disclosure by persons engaged in propaganda activities...for or on behalf of foreign governments". The law seeks to discriminate between what is American political activity and what is sponsored by aliens or governments abroad.
Joftes, by this lawsuit, established the fact that he is an honest, responsible American citizen and that he represents a type of Jew whose loyalty is to the U.S. rather than to the artificial state of Israel. The suit blew the whistle on the unlawful Zionist money-raising schemes in your country and provided solid information as to the inner workings of the world Zionist financial complex.
A SHADOW GOVERNMENTThe channeling of these vast sums of tax-deductible contributions, as the result of the energies and misrepresentations of the United Jewish Appeal and the network of interlocking groups, all stem from a covenant made in Israel between the Jewish Agency and the government of Israel. The Jewish Agency's functions were described as: immigration, agricultural settlement, land acquisition, private investments and financing.
In Israel the Jewish Agency, by assuming so many chores of the state, operates and is recognized as a quasi-governmental body. In fact, it is the best-financed shadow government in the world. Today, the Jewish Agency's good works--illegally supported by tax-exempt U.S. citizens' donations--embrace many functions of the Israeli government.
A revealing fact relative to the wealth of the Jewish Agency is the disclosure that the Jewish Agency is one of the largest Landowners in Israel.
Here in the U.S. the United Jewish Appeal (UJA) is a subsidiary also of the World Jewish Agency. So close is the relationship of the United Israel Appeal (UTA) and UJA that the two fund-raising agencies are both situated in the same building at 515 Park Avenue, New York City. It has been publicly admitted that the UIA receives between 60 and 70 percent of all Jewish Agency funds that are collected in the U.S., while Jewish charities in America receive less than 30 percent of all the millions collected in the name of charity. All of this money, in the main, has been provided by tax-free contributions in American dollars.
In 1963, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee investigated the Jewish Agency and uncovered a "conduit" operation run by an organization named "the American Zionist Council". Over an eight-year period, the investigation disclosed this "council" received more than $5 million from the Jewish Agency to create a favorable opinion toward Israel in this country. The "council" was revealed, thereby, as an unregistered foreign agent operation, and the "conduit council" was shut down.
However, the expensive propaganda continues and today even giant bill-boards are rented to spread this false appeal, so alien to traditional American policy.
Despite the heavy penalty extracted politically from the shrill cries of "anti-Semitism" that automatically result from even the most restrained discussion or criticism of Israel, two brave congressmen and a senator--all of whom own "liberal" voting records--have dared to raise the issue.
"The Israeli lobby the most powerful lobby in America today", said Rep. Paul McCloskey (R-Calif.) in July, 1981, "more so than the Mormon Church, the right-to-life people, the Moral Majority or the National Rifle Association. It has completely unbalanced our foreign policy".
Rep. Paul Findley (R-Ill.), in August, 1981, criticized Israel's policy of "bombing residential areas with U.S.-supplied equipment, building illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank and maintaining military rule over a million Palestinians".
Sen Charles Mathias Jr. (R-Md.) wrote a scholarly assessment of the situation earlier in 1981 which was widely published. In it, he also criticized the overwhelming strength of the Israeli lobby.
Perhaps the last word on the subject should come from the lips of that extremist of the left, former Sen. William Fulbright, who, nevertheless, recognized the true colors of the UJA and declared: "As everyone knows, the UJA campaign is tax deductible and adds to the foreign exchange of Israel for the purchase of anything, including arms". When will Americans wake up to this blatant tax fraud and demand that the Internal Revenue Service do something useful, like revoke the tax-exempt privileges of the United Jewish Appeal and of B'nai B'rith?
MILITANT ZIONISTSAny serious study of Zionism's impact on your foreign policy must make mention of two militant Jewish groups, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Jewish Defense League (JDL).
The ADL, an arm of the 125-year-old B'nai B'rith (an international Jewish secret fraternity) is in the business of upholding the honor (?) of Israel by vilifying and issuing lying statements against all who oppose political Zionism. It is probably the most proficient spying and rumor-generating organization in the U.S. and outplays the Soviet Empire's espionage establishment.
As Liberty Lobby members know, the ADL will put spies into groups opposing it, will hire men to steal from an organization's files, and will send out in its newsletters slanderous material against all whom they consider "anti-Semitic".
One of the best examples of the ADL's dangerous and destructive work is the story of the late Dorothy Thompson. A Jewess of wit and ability, her columns appeared in hundreds of newspapers. Yet, when she saw that "Zionism...was turning into a reactionary, aggressive, chauvinistic movement of the same character as other European nationalisms which site had been fighting", she left the Zionists and devoted her abilities to assisting the Palestinian Arab refugees.
Immediately, the ADL launched a campaign of vilification and innuendo. Pressure was put on newspapers that carried her column by Zionist advertisers, and her career was damaged immeasurably.
Countless cases can be given where the ADL has intimidated or even black-mailed people in order to eliminate all opposition to the political Zionist program for America. We can expect to see more of this as the battle for traditional American culture heightens.
Another Jewish militant group has been making headlines, the so-called Jewish Defense League (JDL). It has an established policy of using violence and personal harassment against all who oppose Zionism.
Dharma, allow us a break for lunch, please. When you return we shall finish the subject in point although it will run beyond the limits of an Express in quantity. It is most important that we meet this responsibility of getting this information into the public's hands. I want it herein recognized by ones who are receiving these signals through surveillance equipment that this scribe has not the slightest knowledge of this information prior to this writing and this material has been made public in dozens of documents. She stands firmly in our protection as scribe, within the Federation Command and attempts on her physical well-being shall be accepted as confrontation qualifying in equality to "declared" WAR! These ones attending our Journals are none other than conduits of information and shall be accepted and treated as same.
We know all planted "spies" and agents and stand as shields against actions detrimental unto our workers. Ours is not to subvert nor cause riots or civil disobedience--ours is to present truth unto the public in our capacity as Hosts in preparation of cosmic presence. So be it for this is formal warning.
Hatonn to stand-by, ever present that you might know of my commitment unto your safety, chelas. God blesses our work in these troubled times of transition and chaos and your efforts do not go un-noted. Selah!
Salu and Saalome'
PJ 20CHAPTER 24
REC #1 HATONN
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 18, 1990 6:00 A.M. YEAR 4 DAY 63Hatonn to continue, in the Light of Truth, in service unto Divine God and unto Man.
TODAY'S WATCH
As we sit to print this day, we will begin by finishing the topic of yesterday. I only wish to point out that which Mr. Baker has said unto Congress that you might confirm that which I have said unto you. There is NO intention of allowing Congress to decide whether or not to move into war with Iraq; Mr. Baker has said to Congress that Congressional ones may be consulted but declaration of war would not be placed in the councils of the Congress!
I further wish to speak unto my own, so called, group. I remind you that I am aware of that which is done and counsels sought. I welcome any who wish to participate in truth--I ask that ones in the efforting of bringing discredit unto truth are observed and noted.
Oherli, you must demand the correcting of those things which have been perpetrated against you and this property. The games being played by ones claiming to "help" is dastardly and unacceptable. Ones now act to cover indiscretions and this only makes the situation worsen. If there must now be a settlement to prevent your having to move from the premises, I expect responsible ones to make such arrangements. To be "done in" by thine enemies is painful enough--to be "done in" by thine brother is indeed painful! There should be future funding sufficient from these writings to allow potential collateral for settlement. If this property is lost because of these new legal shenanigans, responsible parties shall be confronted. So be it.
Let us return to the writing, please. Get prepared for some shocking input for ours is to bring truth. Truth can set you free but it does nothing without "action". We only present truth--you as "people" shall do with it that which you will.
SOVIET-ZIONIST COMBINE
I would continue just briefly with reference to yesterday's subject for the computer began to give problems and I had a thought or two to finish.
You must realize that violence brings counterviolence. A resort to violence by any group will end in violence to the same group by superior numbers making up a majority. This is proven historically. Therefore, "minority" groups should take exquisite care as to that which they project for it will always be the ones within who will pay the dearest price.
Ones in your Capitol, Washington, are well aware that the ADL and kindred groups are feverishly intimidating members of Congress so that the legislature will not speak out against a Mideast bloodbath. Secret agents of the World Zionist Conspiracy are seeking to corrupt and force Pentagon officials to permit the illegal shipment of arms and material to Israel. Once again, Zionists seek to evade your historic American objective, "to avoid entangling alliances". Can you not see, America, that the conspiracy encompasses the globe and the clamps are coming down against "citizen participation" in the government of "you the people"? Mine is but to point it out!
In light of the headlines in your controlled and prostituted press, the above may seem like a fantasy of your imagination. Yet if you examine the facts behind the false facade of the Zionist-controlled press, we will see how logical such a combine is and how the true knowledge of present events proves the correctness of the assumption.
Let us first remember that Soviet Russia was the first country officially to recognize Israel. Prime Minister David ben Gurion expressed his gratitude to Russia in Israel's 1952 official "Year-book".
"Israel does not forget the stand taken by the Soviet Union in the Assembly of the United Nations on the historic 29th day of November, 1947, nor does it forget the like stand of the United States of America. It remembers as vividly the aid received from Czechoslovakia during the War of Independence, and the attitude of Poland towards Jewish immigration to Israel, manifestations which without doubt bespoke sincere sympathy with Israel's enterprise".
After the Six-Day War of 1967, the Arabs were rather handily overrun by the superior forces of the Israeli army. Unthinking observers of the world scene felt that the Russians had "backed the wrong horse"; and the communists were shrewd enough to let them keep on believing it.
Actually, the Russians never believed for a microsecond that the Arabs would win the war; they were far more interested in forcing the Arabs to rely on the communists for arms and back-up protection. After all, the historic fact remains that ever since the days of Peter the Great, the Russians have been looking for a warm-water port on the Mediterranean. Most of the Russian ports on the Baltic Sea are frozen for many months each year and the Black Sea ports are land-locked (though Russia seems to pass freely now through the Turkish Bosporus and Dardanelles).
That the USSR's chief interest in the Egyptian crisis was to open the way for its expanding naval fleet is proven by the fact reported in U.S. News and World Report, that the USSR insured an Arab defeat by sending 250 Soviet tanks from Syria into Jordan during the hostilities. Of these, only 170 actually even got close to the battle, and the rest "developed mechanical problems" which left them "officially" inoperable.
Gen. John Glubb, who is surpassed by no other Englishman or American in his intimate knowledge of the Mideast, tells you in his book, THE MIDDLE EAST CRISIS, that the Soviets engineered the crisis in order to embroil the U.S. with the Arab world, by causing the U.S. to declare unequivocally its support for Israel, right or wrong. The Arabs then would be thrown upon the mercies of the USSR and thus, the Red Russians would get a toehold in the Arab world.
The rash decision of your State Department not to aid in constructing the high Aswan dam on the Nile River, after which the USSR undertook it, illustrates how quickly the USSR built up Arab goodwill at the expense of the U.S.
The modern Arab world extends nearly 4,000 miles, from Morocco to the Persian Gulf, and most importantly, it controls the corridor through which traffic passes from the Far East, Australia, India and East Africa to Europe.
Israel now occupies only an area of about 7,000 square miles, roughly the size of Wales. Presently, Israel has no canal to the Indian Ocean, nor does it possess oil fields comparable to those under the control or ownership of the Arab nations.
Since oil is the precious "molten gold" of the 1980's, the U.S. and Britain may indeed have backed the wrong horse in sponsoring Israel.
In addition, the Islamic territory is more vast than Arab lands alone, since it stretches from Mauritania, on the Atlantic coast of Africa, all the way across southern Soviet territory to Mongolia or Indonesia. Checking on the globe, you see that these Islamic territories plus the Arab world, when combined with the Soviet Empire, all but encircle Western Europe. This gives credence to the horrifying thought that some geopoliticians have that such a combination of Arabs, Moslems and communists could place Western Europe under the Soviet yoke.
QUIXOTIC SUPPORT FROM AMERICAThe Zionist propaganda mills in the country are telling the American public that the U.S. must stand foursquare behind Israel, since Israel is a fine example of democracy in action.
Actually this attribution of "democracy" is both quixotic and untrue.
In 1952, the Israeli parliament passed the Nationality Act, which served to codify existing discriminations and made the Arabs second-class citizens. Under the provisions of the act, all Jews in Israel automatically become citizens of the state, but not one of Palestine's Arabs (240,000, or more, of them) who remained in the country can gain citizenship without first proving his residence in Palestine before May 14, 1948. At the same time, many of the Arabs who remained in their ancestral homes were uprooted from their villages along the borders on the basis of "security" and were paid nominal sums for their properties.
On top of the forced sale of their property, the Arabs were placed under strict military rule. Reports disclosed that by the end of 1960, more than 250,000 acres of Arab land were appropriated by the state of Israel. All of this took place, of course, in a nation that the Zionist-kept press of America declares to be "a shining example of democratic action".
The myth that Israel is democratic in form is assiduously promoted by the international Zionist propaganda machine. But the truth is otherwise. Israel does not even have a constitution, and virtually all of the political parties are extremely left-wing by American standards. In "The Israeli Government", an article in the winter, 1970 issue of The American Mercury, author James de-Witt says:
"As might be expected, the communal nature of Israeli society has produced an ideologically homogeneous political climate in Israel. There are many avowed Marxist, radical socialist and laborite parties, which constitute the governing coalition in Israel. In addition, Israel has two open communist parties, each of which has elected representatives sitting in the Knesset, or Israeli parliament. In fact, Israel is the only state in the Middle East having legal communist parties".
DeWitt quotes Shlomo Avineri, chairman of the department of political science at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, who wrote in Commentary magazine:
"Therefore, probably more Marxists are in Israel than in the whole of the Arab world.. .In most Arab countries, communist parties are out-lawed and individual communists rot in jail, while Israel is blessed with two communist parties".
Haviv Schieber, a Polish-born Jew, settled in Palestine in 1932 and left in 1958. His anti-communism found little support among Israeli politicians. Says Schieber:
"Many years of observation have convinced me that Israel is the most thoroughly communized state outside the Soviet Union, and that its government has been formally committed to a 100 percent ideological, political, diplomatic and military agreement with Moscow since 1949".
Even in religion, the Arabs are antagonistic to the communists. Most Arabs are strongly religious and despise an unbeliever. In Israel, while 90 percent of the Jews attend the synagogue on Yom Kippur, most of the people do not have any formal religious affiliation whatsoever.
Further, secularism is making inroads; according to Christianity Today, "...perhaps 80 percent of Israel's population is actually 'secular' rather than orthodoxly religious in orientation. While there are about 220 kibbutzim (communal living centers (communism)) in Israel, only 14 are avowedly religious in character".
This indicates, dear ones, the mistake of many so-called "Christians" who have thought that the new state of Israel fulfills Bible prophecy; rather, it demonstrates that materialistic Israel deserves the severest judgment of all from God, perhaps. It begins to fulfill the prophecies but not in the manner the "Christians" expect and through this route of experience shall bring down the house of dominos.
MILITARY ALLIANCEIn Washington today, Capitol Hill reeks with saturation of Zionist lobbyists. You hear congressmen and U.S. senators mouthing statements written for them by Jewish propagandists. Zionists of great wealth, international banking firms and blackmailing organizations, such as the ADL, all apply pressure on American leaders. It is certain that these schemers want the President and the State Department to agree to a military alliance with the state of Israel that will compel American military action in case of the development of a conflict in the Middle East which threatens the military and political ambitions of the illicit state of Israel.
The very same forces which took you into World Wars I and II are now seeking to involve you afresh in their Mideast plight. Once again, you need to listen to George Washington and the other leaders of your nation, who said: "No foreign alliances"!
LOSS OF INFLUENCESSuch a conflict will end all American influence in the Mideast, in Africa and perhaps even in an encircled Western Europe. The conclusion of any such conflict will inevitably leave Soviet Russia and Zionism the only real winners even as was true World Wars I and II.
America's folly is seen when you realize that the Mediterranean is now practically a Soviet lake. Funny thing, the Mediterranean, even after the so-called freeing of the Soviet Bloc, is becoming a Soviet Lake while the Persian Gulf is a British Lake.
The Red Sea is Soviet-controlled also, as is the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean. U.S. troops can reach Israel only by airlift from Germany, and once sent, it takes no flight of prophecy to foretell that they will probably never be withdrawn without massive losses.
Should full-scale war break out--which is obviously planned and moving smartly along--America will immediately be plunged into wartime conditions with total civilian controls impossible to conceive of in any measure of "peacetime". If missiles start to fly, martial law would be declared and overnight America would be subjected to a Zionist-communist dictatorship. Is this the result desired by the ill-informed and cowardly who refuse to face up to the Zionist menace? Qf course!
TROOPS OVERSEASHow many of "those" pro-Zionists in your country argued that you "shall never send American boys into the Mideast"? TO THEM AND ALL OF YOU, I RECOMMEND READING PUBLIC LAW 85-7, PROMULGATED ON MARCH 9, 1957 BY THE 85TH CONGRESS. SECTION 11 READS AS FOLLOWS:
"The President is authorized to undertake, in the Mideast, military assistance programs with any nations or group of nations of that area deserving . . . To this end, if the President determines the necessity thereof, the United States is prepared to use armed forces to assist any such nation or group of such nations requesting assistance against armed aggression from any country controlled by internal communism".
INNOCENT AMERICAN AGGRESSION?
Well, you the people are somewhat innocent in that you actually believe that which is told unto you. That, dear ones, is where the "innocence" stops.
U.S. involvement in both world wars, the Korean conflict, Vietnam and Cambodia and Laos--all began by "innocently" supplying arms and equipment; but in each case, things mushroomed into full-scale U.S. participation, with thousands of American boys spilling their blood on foreign soil because your leaders forgot the American dictum: "No involvement with foreign nations"!
American children have been shipped overseas before this. As related above, a law already exists that can send those thousands more to die for a land stolen from many of its rightful owners and now being governed by the occupiers while tax-free American dollars support this remittance state of pretenders. Do you still believe that you are protecting the "rights" of Americans and to "free" anyone through humanitarian efforts? LOOK AGAIN!
"USS LIBERTY" INCIDENTI have already outlaid this story so I will only briefly refresh memories. In a prior "Mideast conflict" there was a most "mysterious attack" by the Israeli Air Force and torpedo boats on the "USS LIBERTY" during the Six-day War. It happened June 8, 1967. This ignominious and unprovoked attack on your vessel in international waters, lest you forget, took 34 American lives and
wounded over 75.
The Israelis weak alibi was that they misread the "Liberty's" markings for those of an Arab vessel, despite the fact that it was a clear day and the American flag was in full view and the ship newly painted with all markings clearly and freshly showing. The "official records" are carefully preserved by your government but they are "above top secret" in the interest of "national security". It is most unlikely that they will ever be "declassified" and made public. The Zionists will see to that since their mischievous cause would be damaged should the American public ever realize the extent of Zionist guilt in these deliberate incidents.
NEUTRALITYDo you realize that there is only ONE lobbying group in Washington espousing neutrality in the Middle East? That is Liberty Lobby! How many of you even know of it?
This lobbying group is ever mindful of your historic American "policy" of noninvolvement and absolute neutrality as practiced by the early leaders of your Republic. This group believes any other policy will lead you inevitably into war--and surely enough, look where you are today! Every lesson of your past diplomatic history tells the same story: foreign involvements mean American bloodbaths and tremendous financial drains on your national economy.
Interestingly enough, no major professional poll-taking organization has yet taken the pulse of the American people on "intervention in the Middle East" by the U.S. BEFORE THE FACT, and if they have been, the results are quickly buried. A small poll taken by the Municipal Research Institute a couple of years ago against American Middle East intervention, showed that some 86 percent of those polled were totally against intervention in any way--funny that you the public never heard about that one.
WHERE IS YOUR LOYALTY?Jews in the United States are confronted today with a vital question: "Where is your loyalty, and where do you claim citizenship"? One young Jewish American citizen in high school said, ''I owe no loyalty to the United States". How is it that you can be birthed and a citizen of a wondrous nation and owe no loyalty? What kind of teaching is this?
To young men like him, you need to remind most firmly that a Motherland is not color or creed, it represents the ideals of the citizens who make up the, society of the country. You have the right to choose the country to which you want to give your loyalty, but, if it isn't the United States, or wherever one might be dwelling, then go unto the country of your choice and don't expect to enjoy all of the privileges and benefits while your love is toward another nation. It is as with a marriage with partners prostituting in adulterous activities--the action is unacceptable and against the Laws of God and Creation. You cannot be loyal unto that which you hate. If that which is good is leached away and slain, the very foundation of a nation shall fall.
Some will say: "I love both the U.S., where I was born, and also Israel, whose cultural and political objectives reflect my own desires". The answer, of course, is that you know not the underlying cultural and political intentions and you cannot serve two masters who stand for opposite principles.
The ones to be loved and nurtured are the myriads of Jews whose voices have been muffled and buried and reject POLITICAL ZIONISM. Do not err in denouncing "Jews" for that is truly of the bigot for there are only a tiny, tiny handful of Jews who are Zionists.
ANTI-SEMITES?Does not desiring a World War Holocaust make you anti-Semitic? Only Zionist groups equate any expressed opposition to Zionist aims, either by Arabs or Americans, with bigotry against the Jews. Even non-Zionist Jews are attacked as "anti-Semitic". Example, Dr. David Reisman of Harvard University wrote in the Jewish Newsletter: "The Zionists can muster not only the threat of the Jewish vote and the no less important Jewish financial and Organizational skill, but also the blackmail of attacking anyone who opposes their political aims for Israel, as anti-Semitic". Dear ones, you are on a dead-ahead course to disaster!
As a reminder to you of the United States it is appropriate herein to reprint the Farewell Address of George Washington, given before your Congress in 1796--now recognized as an all-time classic in content:
So likewise a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducements or justifications.
It leads also to concessions, to the favorite nation, of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions, by unnecessary parting with what ought to have been retained, and be exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld; and it gives to ambitious, corrupted or deluded citizens who devote themselves to the favorite nation, facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity: gilding with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for the public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption or infatuation.
As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils.
Against the insidious, wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it.
Excessive partiality for one foreign nation, and excessive dislike for another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other.
Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interest.
The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as ittle political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith: (But) here let us stop.
Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very remote, relation. Hence, she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves, by artificial ties, in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collusions of her friendships or enmities.
In offering to you, my countrymen, these counsels of an old and affectionate friend, I dare not hope that they will make the strong and lasting impression I could wish; that they will control the usual current of the passions or prevent our nation from running the course which has hitherto marked the destiny of nations.
But if I may even flatter myself that they may be productive of some partial benefit, some occasional good; that they may now and then recur to moderate the fury of party spirit, to warn against the mischiefs of foreign intrigue, to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism, this hope will be a full recompense for the solicitude for your welfare by which they have been dictated.
George Washington
Can you not regain your intent of "AMERICA FIRST" so that you can again move into the wondrous position of "GOD FIRST"? You can reverse this draining of your life substance if you but choose to regain that which is your national birthright--REGAIN YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS CITIZENS OF THE WONDROUS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA--ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE--WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE TO ALL!
We are sent forth to remind you of the way. Which path ye shall take is in thine hands! So be it. I salute you of God that your way may be lighted.
Salu and Saalome', I Am Hatonn
