6/7 페이지 처음처음 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 마지막마지막
Results 11 to 12 of 14

제목: PJ#020, THE MOSSAD CONNECTION

  1. #11
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default 응답: PJ#020, THE MOSSAD CONNECTION

    PJ 20
    CHAPTER 19

    REC #3 HATONN

    SUNDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1990 3:20 P.M. YEAR 4 DAY 59

    AND NOW TODAY
    Let us finish this Express and Journal Chapter with current circumstance. There is great misunderstanding regarding Jews, Zionists, U.S. Nationalism and anti-Semitism, or, any other anti-anything.

    DEFINITION: ZIONISM
    Zionism is a secular political movement dedicated to the establishment of a Jewish state. It seeks to transform religious hopes and the yearning for individual freedom into a nationalistic political program. Not until the first Zionist Congress in 1897 did Theodor Heal call for a "legally secured Jewish home in Palestine". Zionism uses the mask of religion to hide its blatant nationalism, racism and atheistic philosophy. (Doesn't sound like Father Joseph's or Mother Mary's Jewish children to me)!

    MEDDLING
    Meddling can easily trigger NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST! And YOU, AMER­ICA--ARE MEDDLING BEYOND YOUR DEPTH TO CONTROL.

    Actually, since the U.S. abandoned her traditional nationalism and intervened in a European war and turned it into World War I, hundreds of thousands of young American service people have died in needless foreign wars.

    It is imperative that the U.S. return to the old Monroe Doctrine in which you tolerated no European or Asian domination of any nation--IN YOUR HEMI­SPHERE. It is equally imperative that you observe ALL OF THE MON­ROE DOCTRINE, in which you pledged not to intervene in quarrels outside the Western Hemisphere.

    Unless your leaders are forced to return to sanity, the world will be goaded into a devastating World War III. The greatest, most effective means the internationalists use to promote U.S. intervention in the volatile Middle East is the charge of "anti-Semitism" to those who oppose using American tax dol­lars to support Israeli aggression and oppression. You have developments un­folding this very day which prove the point.

    Israel, on the yesterday, said they would not fight a UN force moving into Jerusalem to investigate Monday's fray. Now, today, they refuse any coopera­tion and denounce any such move and will effort at preventing any such group from entering. What does that tell you, America? Does it not say loudly and clearly that there is evil afoot? If you have nothing to hide from the world then why all this objection to finding truth. Surely if the Palestinians were the culprits, they would quickly be denounced as usual! No, the group will find foundation stones for the "new temple" and exclusion of the Palestinian wor­shippers from their Holy places--through intensified force!

    Some of the "natural" incidents you are undergoing in America is to bring the Bush administration under control in an all-out effort to bring the Israelis un­der control--for if this is not done within mere days, that massive war will be underway!

    RELIGIOUS AND HISTORICAL MYTHS

    Americans today are confused by various religious and historical myths that surround the question of the formation and destiny of the so-called "republic" of Israel. Uninformed so-called "Christians" believe that Zionism is a "religious" movement, instead of a political one.

    The gravest confusion exists in the realm of the political, however. The phi­losophy of internationalism, which has been assiduously inculcated into the minds of two generations of Americans by a veritable army of well-financed brainwashers who aim to bring about a world of perpetual peace through perpetual war, has unfortunately been absorbed even by millions of Ameri­cans who consider themselves patriots--this certainly includes Jewish persons. perhaps to an even greater extent than others.

    Most Americans seem subconsciously to believe that ANY FIGHT ANY­WHERE in the world between two groups justifies your nation's immediate intervention, the appropriation of millions or billions of dollars and the raising of an army to bring "peace" to the afflicted area.

    Only a very tiny few Americans ever stop to think that there are at least three sides to any quarrel of foreigners--there is one side to each of the antagonists and also the American side. And contrary to the naive and childish interna­tionalist idea that wars are fought between the "good" and the "evil'', as Spinoza once said, they are fought between two "right" sides.

    The question that America should answer when viewing the differences of others is not "Which side is right?" and "Which side should America take?" but "What are the interests of America?"!

    As simple and as self-evident as this is, the thought is totally alien to most Americans--and particularly to your political leaders.

    I will briefly herein touch on a few points which shall be enlarged upon in a future presentation allowing more space for publication.

    Could you, for a minute, forget everything except being "American"? If you are of another country--pretend for this moment that you are American. Consider the Mideast problem from an unabashedly America-First stand­point, as peculiar and unpopular as such a position may be with the false pa­triots and the corrupt who deliberately strive to use the power of the Ameri­can people for alien ends and their Own personal profit.

    The question you must attempt to answer is not, "Are the Jews or the Arabs (in this instance, Iraq) right"? but rather, "What is to America's best interest"? Now you must also realize that oil, to the citizen of the U.S., is not short of supply nor should there be outrageous prices for you have abundant supplies of oil both stored and unproduced domestically.

    Readers will note that the above means what it says, as the writer herein does not mistake the interests of say, Standard Oil, for the national interest of America, and consider that anyone who would contemplate war for the pur­pose of protecting the profits of a few stateless international financiers and stockholders is unworthy of serious refutation.

    Although the judgments in this instance appear to be harsher against Israel and international Zionism than against the Iraqis, the reader is respectfully re­minded that if he wishes to know the pro-Israel viewpoint, all he has to do is to turn on his television set, buy a newspaper or contact his nearest politician.

    The state of Israel is purely the product of the political machinations of one political group--the Zionists--made up largely of atheistic self-proclaimed and false Jews. You find the Zionists trying to involve the U.S. of America in their feud with the Arabs at every time--which involvement is over land which has been stolen by the Zionists.

    Let us contrast the "traditional" basis of American foreign policy in rejecting "entangling alliances with foreign powers" and the political, economic and military disasters that have always resulted when this historic principle of non­intervention (neutrality) has been forgotten or ignored. You are going to re­ally have to reach back a long way for this one.

    If America is to avoid being swept into the maelstrom of a nuclear confronta­tion in the Middle East and a resulting world war that would destroy all the fruits of Western culture and civilization, you must stand firm for a policy of neutrality and non-involvement in the Middle East and demand a return of your soldiers, equipment and all fragments thereof--HOME TO AMERICA!

    Historians have already pointed out quite sufficiently that American intervention in the affairs of Europe in 1917 only created new problems for America. That, dear ones who don't remember, was the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Within only a couple of decades, the fruits of the Versailles Treaty were harvested: World War II. By secret planning of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and England's Prime Minister Winston S. Churchill, the U.S. experienced its greatest military disaster at Pearl Harbor, which led to your involvement once again in the ancient quarrels of other nations.

    Yet, in spite of the sacrifice of thousands of American youth and the expendi­ture of billions of the taxpayers' money, no lasting accomplishment came out of the two world wars, as I am sure any of you can take note.

    Thousands of American soldiers, almost forgotten, still patrol the uneasy bor­der between South and North Korea. An uneasy truce, constantly being vio­lated, reflects the failure to secure convincing victory either on the military or diplomatic fronts. Again, the violation of your policy of neutrality led to the needless death of countless American youths. Some of these soldiers still are POW's and, beloved chelas, a great number of them are in SOVIET PRIS­ONS IN RUSSIA AT THIS VERY TIME. Your intervention in Asian affairs has led to the upsetting of the subtle balance of power in Asia and has given the Soviet Empire the excuse for formation of the strongest military force in world history to protect its Asian empire from American encroachment.

    Now you had better take a closer look at that which is taking place through China at the present time, for it is far more important than you can imagine. CHINA IS BEGINNING A VAST EXPLORATION OF THE ANTARC­TIC!! NOW JUST WHY DO YOU SUPPOSE THEY WOULD BE DOING SUCH A THING?

    Your retreat from Vietnam, after the expenditure of more than 50,000 lives and hundreds of billions of dollars, constituted the first military defeat for the U.S. Although your troops were finally out, the war-torn peninsula remained aflame with intense conflict. Your intervention in Vietnam was a crime, not only to all Vietnamese but to yourselves, and the significance of your shameful defeat is not even vaguely understood by Americans. You have left your­selves open to be actually invaded by these Viet-Cong right into and up through your southern border with Mexico. Further, your government is in­deed over its head into the Opium trade from out of the Asian Golden Trian­gle.

    Your misadventure in Vietnam is categorical in its proof of the total irrespon­sibility and stupidity of the internationalist policy of "perpetual war for per­petual peace", which you have followed since the days of poor foolish puppet Woodrow Wilson.

    It is clearly established, by all these lessons of the past and present, that American involvement in the affairs of foreign nations is a costly and useless exercise in meddling.

    Americans must examine carefully the unending propaganda of the Zionists, in the press, on the air and especially on the floor of Congress. Able expo­nents of Zionist schemes to entangle you in the quarrels and feuds of the Mideast forget their roles as "doves of peace" in the Vietnam conflict, and raise their shrill "war-hawk" cries for intervention in the Arab-Israeli conflict.

    With Zionists in control of the American press, radio, and TV, the flood of advocates for American intervention are selling the American public a false religious-political sentimentality that, "Israel is God's chosen nation--you must save it"! Oh, perish the thought!

    If your people and leaders ignore the lessons of the past and involve you in the angers and hates of the Mideast, then will come the most horrible nuclear holocaust and the death of the world you have known and presumably loved.

    HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
    Your examination of American diplomatic history must begin at least as far back as Washington's Farewell Address of 1796, wherein he admonished your young country to guard against foreign entanglements. "It is our true policy", declared George Washington, "to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world--so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it".

    This policy of avoiding entanglements and maintaining neutrality in the Washington presidential tradition was solidified in Thomas Jefferson's first inaugural address, in which the new president supported the non-interventionist policy of Washington. Jefferson counseled his fellow citizens to enjoy ''peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, and entangling alliances with NONE".

    Washington's great rule found further expression in the Monroe Doctrine, enunciated by President James Monroe in 1823. All Americans know that the chief executive here declared that the Western Hemisphere was the specific interest of the U.S. and that the nations of Europe and Asia were to keep out of the Western Hemisphere in terms of military adventure or conquest. You Further guaranteed the safety and preservation of these nations within your Western Hemisphere's geographical area--you most certainly did not promise to invade them as with Panama.

    What many forget over and over, is that Monroe added another guarantee, namely: "As long as the other nations of the world respect our area of influence in the Western Hemisphere, we acknowledge that we have no MORAL right to interfere with the extensions of power by other nations in the other areas of the world". Thus, President Monroe sharply delineated his understanding of the moral basis for Washington's neutrality policy. It may come as a surprise to many misinformed Americans to learn that the Monroe Doctrine is a two-way street.

    As log as your leaders were firm in supporting this doctrine, other nations respected it and observed its restrictions. In 1866, the Monroe Doctrine was invoked to oppose the intervention of France in Mexico, which had as its object the establishment of the Archduke Maximilian as Mexico's emperor. Again, in the late 1860's, President Ulysses Grant broadened the doctrine to forbid the transfer of European territory in the New World from one European power to another.

    In 1905, Teddy Roosevelt added what was to become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. President Roosevelt expounded the principle that "chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence resulting in the general loosening of the ties of civilized society on the part of a country in the Western Hemisphere, might require the U.S. to exercise an international police power".

    Roosevelt's forceful declaration was generated by the situation in Latin America and the Caribbean area, where the navies of the British and German empires were setting up blockades of the Venezuelan coast.

    The Pan American Conference of 1940 reasserted that no country in the New World could be transferred from one power to another, and the U.S. was authorized to act unilaterally in an emergency to enforce this principle.

    One more example of this application of the Monroe Doctrine occurred in 1962, when President John F. Kennedy instituted a naval blockade around Cuba and announced a "naval quarantine of the island". After secret negotiations and an agreement, not yet made public, between the president and the leaders of the Kremlin, the missiles were "officially removed" from Cuba.

    Your last foray in the New World under the Monroe Doctrine was in 1965, when U.S. Marines were sent into the Dominican Republic to quell a communist-inspired revolution.

    After reading this profile of Washington's and Jefferson's advice to stay clear of involvement with foreign nations outside the Western Hemisphere, it is valid to pause and ask how you slipped up and permitted yourselves to become involved in two world wars and several "local wars"--set forth by 'Executive Order and never declared valid by your Congress.

    Again, a review of history is requisite to a full comprehension of both of these twin disasters and the conspiratorial webs that ensnared your government. Though Americans claim to detest war, you have lost hundreds of thousands of your fighting men in both world wars in the effort to "make the world 'SAFE FOR DEMOCRACY'".

    The critical question must arise: "Why did America permit itself to be baited into these terrible wars"? Most Americans remain woefully uninformed as to the whys and wherefores of the maneuvering that surreptitiously nudged the United States of America into those holocausts.

    PLANNED SECRET PATH TO WORLD WAR I
    In 1916 the political parties of the U.S. sensed the mood of the electorate as calling for neutrality. The majority of citizens felt the quarrels of Europe were their own family affairs over there. Woodrow Wilson, hypocritically, was running as the candidate who "kept us out of war". The Republican platform also called for a "strict and honest neutrality in the European war". The Democratic platform condemned the efforts of every organization "that has for its object the advancement of the interest of a foreign power".

    Then, on January 22, 1917, President Wilson told the Congress: "We do not desire any hostile conflict with the Imperial German government; we are the sincere friends of the German people and earnestly desire to remain at peace with the government that speaks for them".

    While the American people were thus lulled into the belief that both political parties were "peace parties", already, hidden events were pushing Wilson to­ward a warlike position.

    MENTIONING THE UNMENTIONABLE

    As one traces American steps of intervention toward both World Wars, histo­rians find it essential to examine the part which Zionism has played in getting Americans to fight European wars and then expose the real political objec­tives of the Zionists.

    When one attempts to point out the part played by Zionists in getting you into war, the cry is immediately made that, You are anti-Semitic". This, many times, frightens the unsuspecting historian and closes his inquiry into this important aspect of political life--which is exactly that which it is created to perfect.

    Oddly enough, one can successfully speak of German history without being branded anti-German; one can discuss the Irish, the Poles or Italians, without fear of reprisal. But let one discuss the origins of the present Arab-Israeli conflicts and--unless the Jews are cast in nothing but the most glowing terms--the "anti-Semitic" charge springs forward like some reflex, calculated to in­timidate and gag any concessions on behalf of the Arabs.

    Yet, you cannot trace American intervention in World War I and your aban­donment of Gen. Washington's injunction "to avoid permanent alliances" without examining Zionism and its role in pushing the U.S. into war. So, without apology, we must trace the steps by which Zionists have pushed "gentile" nations into bitter conflict with or "gentile" nations, in order for the Zionsist nation to rise triumphant out of the discord and ruins of the goyim nations.

    ZIONISM IS NOT JUDAISM!
    Zionism is an unknown quantity to most people; but one fact must be made unmistakably clear, and that is that Zionism IS NOT JUDAISM, NOR IS IT JEWRY. ZIONISM IS AN INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURAL SCHEME TO ESTABLISH A JEWISH HOMELAND IN WHAT WAS FORMERLY KNOWN AS PALESTINE AND IS NOW ISRAEL!
    Zionism was founded not by Abraham or Moses, but by Theodor Herzl, a Hungarian journalist, in 1897. Herzl was Jewish, but there are many non-Jewish Zionists and many Jewish non-Zionists.

    There was only one small and inconvenient difficulty with Herzl's dream of selling up this Zionist homeland in Palestine: 93 percent of its inhabitants were Arabs, and this had been historically true for 19 centuries. It is true that more than 3,000 years ago the area was INVADED AND CONQUERED BY BANDS OF HEBREWS AND A "MIXED MULTITUDE" OF OTH­ERS, but the blood relationship between these Biblical peoples and modern Jews, after more than a hundred generations, is most faint indeed--and that is to say the very least.

    Dharma, allow us to close this portion lest the Express gain the length of a Journal in one issue. We shall finish this dissertation in the following Express. This is the most important fact about your modern day circumstances; more important than is any other. Until next time, I ask blessings upon you all and may God he thine shield. Saalome' Hatonn to clear.








    PJ 20
    CHAPTER 20

    REC #2 HATONN

    SUNDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1990 8:20 A.M. YEAR 4 DAY 59

    TODAY'S WATCH
    All I wish to say regarding today's watch is to pay close attention to that which is happening in widespread outlay. Note incredible bloodshed in Egypt, Palestine and elsewhere in far distant places, one from the other. This is typi­cal "distraction" while your government goes about its planned deceptions.

    Pay close attention to the water supplies in Jordan and that entire region
    around the Euphrates, Tigris and Jordan Rivers. Oil may be the point at issue this day, but it shall be the water which causes the massive wars as the wells dry and the rivers are choked off by the up-river dams utilized for the elite gains.

    Please note the floods "of the century" from what were basically very small tropical type storms in your own Southeast. This massive deluge is not nature at work, it is manipulation of those small storms through sophisticated guid­ance systems. The conspiracy is beyond your imagination and those you con­sider to be "your own" defenders will do you in to gain their advantage. So be it.

    Finally, Dharma:

    VILLAINS OF THE S&L CRISIS
    First we will give a general breakdown of the situation for many were totally asleep as the S&L situation began to unfold. The cover-up has been massive as has been the unprecedented deception and thievery from you the people. The banks shall be worse as they fall prey to the elite trap and the economy shall collapse. The mouthings over the budget in Washington are simply that­--"mouthings". Perhaps more insight to just one facet of the major scams, the S&L's can give you insight as to that which you are up against. For if you have evil corruption in one MAJOR area of life--there will be corruption and evil in all other areas with the same participants. It is like this day as Israel says, "We will investigate the uprising of Monday last! We will not block the UN inves­tigators but neither will we answer to them". If the fox is eating the chickens within the hen house, you will not save the chickens until you rid yourselves of the foxes! The fox may well blame the "skunk" or "coon" for the chicken deaths but you must look beyond to the foxes you locked within the hen house for a chicken thief will always be a chicken thief--even if it glues feathers to it­self and calls itself a chicken!

    We will just take the S&L situation from about the mid-1970's because you need current data. The fact that the groundwork was laid a century ago is evident but distracting. We will speak of that which has unfolded in your at­tention span.

    The official Washington cover-up has moved along in desperation trying to hide the true dimensions of the savings and loan debacle for well over a decade. Aided and abetted by the thrift industry and its hired hands--accoun­tants, appraisers, attorneys--key figures in both parties have so relentlessly re­fused to face reality that American taxpayers will have to pay a cleanup bill that will easily exceed $500 billion within the next couple of years. This is in­clusive of ONLY the S&L's. There has been total collusion among the judi­ciary circles, investment operations and the old/new Resolution Trust Corpo­ration set forth to "save" you. The entire scenario is orchestrated to gain all property into the hands of the elite and movement is steadily in that consum­mation of actions. The manipulations of dishonesty and cover-up, just re­garding the property of Dharma and Oberli, moves from the grass roots S&L of Santa Barbara Savings, and attached corporations, all the way up and through participation by two U.S. presidents. It does require brave souls, in­deed, to go against such odds. First they effort at the lawyer level to strip a citizen of assets beyond which the case cannot be fought for no lawyer will take on such a case except until the funds are exhausted and most judges will dismiss a case unrepresented by a "brother" lawyer. THERE IS NO JUS­TICE REMAINING IN THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM. Even a just Judge can hardly stand against the laws enacted in the legislatures by lawyers to protect lawyers and not people.

    The cost so far, just to these ones, is well in excess of $100,000 and the case it­self has not even begun--there has yet to be allowed hearing. There is proof that there was no sale and yet that fact (which the case is all about) is never allowed mention in the courtrooms. It is truly come to be a sad time in Camelot!

    The S&L cover-up continues in more desperation today, with the federal agency in charge of the S&L bailout running out of cash and neither Congress nor the White House is willing to provide more funds, at least not on the sur­face. But that, too, is planned chaos to require the RTC to dump more and more business and private property--which will be scooped up by the elite wealthy and you are not supposed to be the wiser for the sleight of hand.

    The problem WILL NOT GO AWAY. The over-dramatic jailing of Charles Keating, accused of criminal fraud for looting a large California thrift, thrust the scandal back onto the front pages. Neil Bush, the President's son, faced public hearings on his role in the failed Silverado (Colorado) S&L that will eventually bleed far over a billion dollars from you the people. We will take up this matter in depth in just a few paragraphs.

    Let me outline what takes place in a "seized" S&L. I can use Santa Barbara Savings as an example for we deal with them every day and have witnessed first hand the operations. I realize that I could write a full Journal on each topic but we have neither the time nor the personnel to handle all the labor involved. We will simply work diligently to get the information to you in the most advantageous manner, as quickly as humanly possible.

    OTHER "PAY ATTENTIONS"
    Note that there was a "reminder" earth tremor in the San Francisco area within these 24 hours. I urge some of my beloved ones who think to transfer to that area to ponder that decision most carefully. The Hayward fault line is pegged for slippage in a massive way in the relatively near future when a ma­jor point can be made.

    Pay attention to the Atlantis shuttle; it is not even kept secret that it will bear a major military pay-load and I suggest that you watch carefully the "natural" happenings of "mother nature". Whether or not you wish to believe or face facts, you are being manipulated by some very sophisticated "genetic robotoids" and they are without compassion or truth--YOU ARE THE EX­PENDABLES!

    BACK TO S&L'S
    As we speak, federal regulators have filed a $200 million suit against Bush and other officers of Silverado. How much money do you think will be gleaned by lawyers, etc., from such a suit and do you actually think that there will be $200 million paid in fines? There was an "invasion" of Panama last December to save Bush property in Panama of some $300 million. I think you might see my point?

    A few brigands and swindlers have gotten most of the publicity and blame; they could not have flourished without an amazing run of intentional cover-ups and mistakes by people who knew better: Congressmen and cabinet offi­cers, regulators, lobbyists and journalists who failed to allow the clues to sur­face. This is based on a drive of total greed and self-interest. The net result of the cover-up was to cripple the nation's financial immune system. "All kinds of safeguards were built into the system to make sure this didn't hap­pen", said William Seidman, who is overseeing the bailout. "And all of them didn't work". NO! All kinds of safeguards were built into the system for the crooks, and all of them DID WORK--for long enough! The security system has not failed--you have marched right on to the next phase of the dastardly scheme. They haven't finished the blood-letting by any form or means.

    As with Santa Barbara Savings (SBS) as an example, the S&L got into "trouble" intentionally and was required to do business "differently". They, for a while, could only accept deposits and would have to cease making loans and what-not until their asset base was increased to a given level. But as business seemed to lag under the watchful eye of the regulators, the officers and own­ers gave themselves overnight bonuses of multi-thousands of dollars. Within 24 hours the Resolution Trust Corporation moved in and a Mr. Berry took control of the S&L. The word was publicly given forth that the officers had "retired". That does not mean that the officers do not still run the S&L. Fur­thermore, Mr. Berry made great publicity and then moved into the main SBS offices into a lovely office suite--expense free. All other employees, especially their legal department, remained the same. Now the facts are that nothing has changed--the operation can continue to do business as usual under the "supervision" of the RTC.

    Now a fun game starts for those who have claims or suits against SBS, such as the Ekkers. There is a little known "form" which must list all claims against a given S&L, entered and registered with the special branch of the RTC group in charge of this "supervision" within a specified "short" period of days or THE CLAIM IS FOREVER BARRED FROM BEING ENTERED! That means, dear ones, that with very little manipulation and "in-the-mail accidents of non-­delivery of forms and instructions" a person with a pending court case finally gets hearing scheduled only to find out he has not entered the claim form and the case never opens!!!!

    I would like to say at this point that SBS and their attorneys, as well as Mr. Berry, do not like Hatonn very much for I seem to botch their schemes at ev­ery turn. And still, we may not win the round--WE WILL WIN THE WAR! Believe me, by the time we are finished it would have been so much wiser of SBS to give the property and unlimited damages to these people for Hatonn sticks like super-glue to tissue paper. The lawyer in charge of SBS's case is a fine Zionist right from Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills, a friend of the Reagans' benefactors, to be explicit. He doesn't know HOW we catch every last ma­neuver he pulls.

    This lovely man, by the name of Steven Horn, even got continuances of 90 days in order to lapse the time of filing the "unknown" claim with the RTC! I sent Oberli, Dharma and Audrey to the office just before the lapse "to settle the matter with Mr. Berry". They were literally thrown out of the office by the lawyer, Mr. Berg, who had been involved in the deception and fraud from on­set of the case some three years past. What interesting things you find if you hear our nudges and follow through. This gave us opportunity to up the amount of damages and allowed Oberli to write some most insightful letters to Mr. Berry with copies to Mr. Seidman (mentioned above).

    Well, for politicians, dear ones, a reckoning could come on election day! Some thrift officers, like Keating, face criminal and civil charges which might place them in Club Fed minimum security Country Club for a very brief period of time while they continue manipulation in absentia. But most of the critical figures will remain unaccountable to the voters or to the courts. Judgment, for them, will be rendered only by history, and their own consciences--both of which are rarely noted.

    FLAWS
    The thrift industry was created in the 1930's for the worthy purpose of enabling millions of Americans to buy homes on reasonable terms. But it contained a basic flaw: depositors could withdraw their money at any time, but thrifts themselves were committed to 20 or 30-year mortgages at low interest rates. This "maturity mismatch" would not have been tolerated by the financial markets, except for one thing: federal deposit insurance guaranteed the whole system against loss (and remember what I told you about that insurance? The law establishing such a thing was never ratified into law it does not exist in reality).

    Franklin D. Roosevelt warned at his first press conference as President that insurance would "put a premium on unsound banking" and cause "a probable loss" He knew his colleagues better than you might suspect! Now comes the misconception, however, for the story goes on that, "Roosevelt signed it ultimately into law in any event". Ah, but it was never ratified and, therefore, became no law at all!

    The system seemed to function well, for a while, under what was called the 3- 6-3 formula: depositors collected 3 percent interest on their accounts, the funds were lent to homeowners at 6 percent, and the thrift bosses headed to the golf course at 3 p.m. This system provided tidy profits for S&L owners and helped house the middle class for decades because interest rates stayed stable for a while. But in the late 1960's, the Vietnam War ignited an outburst of inflation, and in the early 1970's, the great surge in oil prices fueled it further. As interest rates rose, S&L depositors looked for better investments. This outflow of funds set off alarm bells, but Congress ignored the underlying problem. Banking experts argued that S&L's should be allowed to introduce adjustable-rate mortgages that could adapt to changing conditions. But populists on Capitol Hill, led by Senator William Proxmire, D-Wisconsin and later chairman of the Banking Committee, stopped the idea cold in 1974. In the populist's view, long-term, low-rate mortgages were an American birthright; they just never figured out how to pay the tab. The cover-up had begun in real intent!

    DELUSION REGARDING DEREGULATION
    Through the late '70's, the deposits hemorrhaged out of S&L's into money-market accounts set up by banks and brokerage houses offering higher interest rates than thrifts were allowed to charge. In March, 1980, the entity Jimmy Carter signed legislation designed to ease the problem by lifting interest-rate ceilings for S&L's. Thrifts then found themselves paying as much as 18 percent to attract depositors, but since the measure did nothing to allow them to diversify their investments, they remained saddled with huge portfolios containing 6 percent mortgages. Given this gap, capital reserves of the thrift industry plunged from $31 billion to $4 billion in two years. The 1980 bill left the industry essentially bankrupt--but the elite Global 2000 Plan was set and under way in fine form!

    The 1980 bill had other problems. It permitted federal officials to lower the capital levels thrifts were required to keep on hand. The idea was to give troubled institutions time to recover; the result was to rebaptize unhealthy institutions as healthy ones. In October, 1980, Jay Janis, head of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (I like to give credit where due!), which then supervised the industry, lowered capital requirements from 5 percent of assets to 4 percent. Two years later Janis's successor, Richard Pratt, lopped off another point--the net effect allowed thrifts to increase their exposure by 65 percent.

    WATCH THIS MANEUVER!
    Another damaging provision of the law raised the amount of federal deposit insurance from $40,000 per account to $100,000. While some experts protested, lawmakers said the aim was to enhance the security of the system. The result though, was to encourage some thrift operators to take risky gambles with those deposits. The change was done mainly under the prodding of Senator Alan Cranston a California Democrat, and Fernand St Germain, the Democratic chairman of the House Banking Committee, two of the largest recipients of S&L campaign donations! THESE DONATIONS CAME FROM ONES LIKE LINCOLN SAVINGS AND SANTA BARBARA SAVINGS, ETC., THROUGH OWNERS OF THE S&L'S SUCH AS THE LAW FIRM OF SHEA AND GOULD WITH WHOM THE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE IN MOJAVE, CALIFORNIA, AND THE SEATED JUDGE WHO DID IN DHARMA AND OBERLI, WAS A MEMBER OF THE FIRM. THEY ALSO GAVE GREAT DONATIONS TO THE CAMPAIGN OF DUKEMAJIAN, GOVERNOR! WHAT A TANGLED WEB IS BROKEN WHEN THE TRUTH IS FINALLY SPOKEN!
    A "Common Cause" report says Cranston and St Germain received $144,000 each in the 1980's from S&L interests. That is only what showed on the surface--by accidental happenstance and poor record keeping. Acting with the U.S. League of Savings Institutions, they faced little opposition. S&L's were a potent force because they combined a sentimental, "little guy" image with a large bankroll that pumped $11.67 million into campaigns in the 1980's. The league's power was so great that it virtually controlled the bank board and its regional offices--compromising any oversight.

    Lifting the insurance ceiling exposed taxpayers to tremendous new liabilities. When thrifts started paying handsome new rates, backed by taxpayer guarantees, Wall Street brokers were attracted by the lucrative, no-lose investments. They began packaging huge sums in $100,000 chunks and sending them around the country in search of the highest rate. One of the biggest packagers of brokered accounts was Merrill Lynch, the Wall Street firm run by Donald Regan until he became Ronald Reagan's Treasury Secretary--OOUCH! This led to dizzying growth by some thrifts and a frantic effort by others to keep pace by offering ever higher yields and taking greater investment risks to cover those costs.

    Less than a year after the 1980 bill was signed, Reagan took office, bringing with him a deep devotion to the principle of "deregulation". So did Vice President George Bush, and why, of course, one of the reasons he was Vice President, who oversaw the administration's deregulation campaign, and Regan. Their policies encouraged subordinates like Richard Pratt, the head of the bank board, to lift the remaining shackles from the industry. Some of the deregulation was essential to allow thrifts to meet changing conditions in the finance industry, but other rules coaxed the cover-up along. During his two-year tenure, Pratt implemented a series of accounting changes which could well have been called "creative accounting" that allowed thrifts to mask their growing insolvency and to further erode the integrity of the system. Regan argued, of course, that his aim was not to obscure the problem but to give the industry time to recover its footing. "We saw a sick industry, and we wanted to help it out rather than see it sink into oblivion", he said. He now concedes that his policies led to disaster for the people. He also smiles and gets acco­lades from his elite colleagues for performing a superb and masterful operat­ion to glean the wealth of the nation and the property of the citizens into the barns of the Cartel Elite! A little egg on the face matters not if you end up with the entire egg factory and all the hens as well.

    ALL SYSTEMS "GO"
    By 1982, with the thrift industry on the rocks, Congress passed another bill "to correct" the ills created two years earlier. The legislation, named for its two chief sponsors, St Germain (oops!) and Jake Garn, a Utah Republican, adopted a solution widely supported by the "experts": Let S&L's expand be­yond the home-building business, and permit them to invest in more high-risk, high-return ventures. It made sense in theory, but in practice, Garn-St Ger­main became a critical step on the road to total and final ruin--they get acco­lades also! Texas Democrat Jim Wright, who supported the bill as House majority leader, now calls it a "grotesque error" and now says of the scandal: "I'm ashamed. I wish I had seen it coming and organized to stop it from hap­pening. But I didn't". Oh sad sobs of shame--he pushed it through in full knowledge and participation and you the people know it!

    The bill cracked open another glaring flaw in the S&L system, the division be­tween state and federally chartered institutions. An archaic distinction, it meant that thrift owners could choose to operate under the loosest available set of restrictions. Texas and Florida had already lifted investment limits by the time Garn-St Germain was in the works, but the biggest battleground was California, where legislators, eager for campaign cash from the thrift industry, wanted to keep as many institutions as possible under state control. On the last day of the 1982 legislative session in Sakramento, just weeks before Congress acted, California adopted a law sponsored by Republican Assem­blyman Pat Nolan eliminating all limits on thrift investments. Now what does Garn spout off and concede? That it was a major mistake not to force states to adhere to the federal regulations if depositors were going to get federal in­surance on their accounts. The largely unpolished state-chartered thrifts have accounted for about two-thirds of the industry's losses.

    The stage was now set for anarchy and absolute fraud. Thrifts could lend money at any rate and invest in a wide range of speculative ventures, all with taxpayer-backed insurance. Brokered deposits flowed in from Wall Street while rules on capital standards and accounting procedures slackened. In their deregulatory zeal, federal officials dropped another critical safety net: they killed rules that had required thrifts to be owned y many shareholders, all living close to the institution. (This was a mouthful for you investigating the SBS v. Ekker case). In sum, one imprudent investor or, worse, a bandit or a law firm could capture an institution and operate with complete impunity!

    Oh, you ask, what does Jason Brent, Judge, have to do with anything? For Municipal Court Judges are "elected". Not so, Jason Brent was APPOINTED to the bench following "retirement from the bench" of his predecessor. HE WAS APPOINTED BY GOVERNOR DUKEMAJLAN AFTER RECEIVING MORE THAN $50,000 (KNOWN) CONTRIBUTIONS FROM SBS OWNERS, THE LAW FIRM OF SHEA AND GOULD! (Jason Brent was a former partner in the firm of Shea & Gould). I thought you might begin to see the flicker of light at the end of the spider web! Further, an abundance of loans had been given forth on property in the area and now the "capture the property" time is at hand! Dharma and Oberli "just happened" to get caught in the fraud per­petration.

    DO YOU READERS SEE THE IMPORTANCE OF NOT ALLOWING THIS CASE TO BE WON BY THE CARTEL? I ASK PRAYER AND PARTICIPATION OF YOU READERS FOR THESE ONES FOR THEY RUN THE GAUNTLET EVERY HOUR OF THEIR LIVES TO BRING THIS TRUTH UNTO YOU THE PEOPLE. THEY HAVE BEEN ATTACKED AND IMPACTED FROM EVERY POSSIBLE DIRECTION AS THEY SIMPLY EFFORT TO DO THIS WORK. IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT YOU ONES WIN THIS BATTLE LEST YE BE FOREVER TRAMPLED AND IMPRISONED BY THE POWER-ELITE.

    Scores of investors like Charles Keating moved in swiftly, turning the thrift in­dustry into a huge casino where only taxpayers could lose. The most un­scrupulous operators traded worthless land parcels back and forth, each time raising the value on their books and creating nothing of value. Many S&L kingpins lived like royalty, buying opulent homes, yachts and political influ­ence. Cronies and insiders obtained huge loans with almost no collateral or totally worthless collateral. In "cash for trash" schemes, some borrowers used the funds to buy real estate owned by an S&L at inflated prices. And many of those who weren't deliberately pillaging their S&L's were simply lousy busi­ness operatives, investing in everything from bull-sperm banks (from bulls al­ready deceased, in fact), to shopping centers in the desert. Others invested in highly speculative commercial real estate. Still others bought junk bonds that plunged in value immediately.

    Officials at the U.S. League of Savings Institutions, which supported the rules changes, now rue them. "We didn't see the buccaneers coming. We thought we were dealing with the traditional people we had always dealt with", admits Noel Fahey. They were! Donald Regan, too, now says he has learned that there is an "avaricious, greedy, criminal element" in all industries--takes one to know one! If he, "--had known then what I know now, I would not have fa­vored so much deregulation". Weep, dear ones, at the lies for it is YOU against whom they are perpetrated--WITH NO CONSEQUENCES OF AC‑--------

    page199 and 200 missing



  2. #12
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default 응답: PJ#020, THE MOSSAD CONNECTION

    PJ 20
    (Title missing)
    CHAPTER 21
    bailout. A $10.8 billion compromise was signed by President Reagan in November, more than a year after the bill was introduced and only two-thirds of its original size.

    Many other lawmakers went to bat for thrifts endangered by Ed Gray's born-again regulatory zeal. The Senate Ethics Committee is now investigating charges that the so-called Keating Five--Democrats Alan Cranston, Don Riegle, Dennis DeConcini and John Glenn, plus Republican John McCain--improperly interceded to block action against Charles Keating. Of course the lump of corrupt "takers" is far, far greater than five and thusly, they will even­tually tattle on one another. Less well known, for instance, is Democrat Frank Annunzio of Illinois, chairman of the House subcommittee that monitors the thrift industry. Craig Simmons, a senior auditor for the GAO, says he "caught unmitigated hell" from Annunzio and St Germain in March, 1986, when he delivered an alarming assessment of the industry's health. The Chicago congressman is now engaged in a tough re-election battle, hampered largely by revelations that his two sons-in-law both worked for the thrift industry.

    Since Texas was the focal point of the scandal, many Texas lawmakers got drawn into the issue. Then, of course, it became evident that California law­makers were over their heads into the mess, by the dozens. Over the objec­tions of many "experts", two Republicans, Representative Steve Bartlett and Senator Phil Gramm, authored a key provision in the 1987 bill that allowed banks to operate with much lower capital than normal and thus conceal their true weakness. Critics regard the provision as a major factor in the cover-up, but Gramm says he was acting at Gray's request. Another lawmaker who helped the S&L industry was the late Claude Pepper, the Florida Democrat who headed the Rules Committee. Pepper, a recipient of $21,000 in PAC contributions from S&L's during the 1980's, bottled up a 1988 bill expanding the bailout fund started the previous year. Republican Representative Jim Leach of Iowa, the measure's author, says: "Pepper wasn't going to let any­thing against S&L interests out of the committee".

    The cover-up impulse accelerated with the approach of the 1988 election. In January, 1988, shortly after he became head of the bank board, M. Danny Wall met with GAO auditors who were painting an increasingly gloomy pic­ture of the industry. The mood grew testy as Wall rejected the GAO's analy­sis and accused the auditors of being "a bunch of morticians". Charles Bow­sher, the GAO's comptroller general, became "red in the face", according to several witnesses, shook his finger at Wall and left the room.

    Wall now contends that he could not discover the depth of the scandal be­cause the thrifts themselves were guilty of a "premeditated and intended ef­fort to cover up the problem". In several letters to the GAO through 1987 and 1988, William B. O'Connell, president of the thrifts' lobbying organiza­tion, accused the auditors of trying "to alarm the public and undermine confi­dence in the financial system" by publishing their reports. Another group of professionals didn't acknowledge how serious the problem was. For instance, Alan Greenspan, now chairman of the Federal Reserve, but then a private consultant, wrote a letter to the Home Loan Bank Board in San Francisco in 1985 extolling Lincoln Savings as a "vibrant and healthy" institution that "presents no foreseeable risk" to the insurance system. Lincoln collapsed a few years later and could eventually cost the system over $2.5 billion. Federal regulators have filed more than two dozen suits against accountants, charging complicity in the cover-up. In California, 29 of 31 insolvent S&L's showed "clean" audits by these so-called honest accountants.

    The cover-up reached its high point in the final weeks of the 1988 campaign. Michael Dukakis was told to avoid the issue by Democrats worried about the role of Wright and others in fighting reform legislation. And the Bush cam­paign, run by James Baker, who had been White House chief-of-staff and Treasury Secretary as the crisis grew, was determined to keep it off the agenda. Baker had been a key figure in trying to limit the scope of bailout legislation in 1986 and 1987, even as the crisis was growing. In the campaign endgame, he and other GOP officials were instrumental in making sure bailout legislation wasn't discussed until after Bush was elected. This is the same man who has sold you out to Assad in Syria.

    Without bailout funds to close down insolvent thrifts, Wall began soon after the election to try to save struggling institutions. He negotiated dozens of deals with investors, who got lucrative subsidies and tax incentives to buy 179 S&L's. Officials have now revealed that the probable cost of those deals, alone, had shot from $38 billion to a staggering $71 billion--prompting critics to charge the "government had been taken to the cleaners". No, just you the people.

    Early in 1989, President Bush ended some of the cover-up by proposing that taxpayers be required to finance the S&L bailout and that a federal agency--the Resolution Trust Corporation--be created to manage it. But it took an­other nine months to enact such measures--on top of the full campaign-year delay--and even the final bill contained deceptive provisions. Of the $50 bil­lion provided, $30 billion was financed by bonds, only $20 billion by the Trea­sury. The result: $3 billion in added interest costs, but a lower short-term im­pact on the budget deficit. The bill does cut back some of the worst regula­tory excesses of the Reagan years by beefing up capital requirements and re­stricting lending practices. But attempts to enact new and stiffer accounting rules have been thwarted in Congress. Think of it this way, however, look at the numbers of new rip-off jobs created at your expense and see how the RTC expedites the capture of the property of you the people and puts it into the hands of the wealthy elite.

    The cover-up continues. The Bush White House is trying to oust Seidman, whose term has another year to run. And the RTC is running out of money fast. It has had to cancel a well-publicized sale of $300 million in seized assets because few buyers could be found. Much of official Washington is still ducking the truth and running to hide from that which sticks to themselves, somehow hoping that the problem will go away in all the other distractions dumped on you the people.

    QUESTIONS FOR THE CANDIDATES

    Here are a few questions voters might ask lawmakers to gauge what their po­sition was as the S&L scandal grew:

    * 1980: Did you think it was wise to raise deposit insurance from $40,000 to $100,000?

    * 1982: Did you have any reservations about the Garn-St Germain bill that removed many restrictions on where thrifts could invest taxpayer-insured funds?

    * 1986: Did you believe bank regulators like Ed Gray and Paul Volcker and lawmakers like Senator Jake Garn when they said the thrift system was head­ing for collapse? If so, why didn't you act on bailout legislation? (No bill was passed because of delays orchestrated by Representatives Jim Wright and Fernand St Germain and Senator William Proxmire.) And, (sic, sic) you thought Proxmire was the Golden God on the White Horse uncovering all those nitty over-expenditures!

    * 1987: Did you believe lobbyists for the thrift industry who argued that bailout plans should allow S&L's liberal leeway to recover? How did you vote on the Jim Leach amendment to limit direct investments by thrifts?

    * 1988: Was there a reasonable alternative to the do-nothing policy of both parties during the presidential campaign? (Auditors said the problem grew by over $50 billion that year).

    Dharma, I would ask you to please reprint herein the article, "Jail the Real S&L Crooks! Here's a List for Starters." (GEORGE: TAKE CAREFUL NOTE OF THESE PEOPLE).

    A foretaste of the political explosion building up in the United States over the wrecking job done on the economy and banking system came bubbling to the surface in Seattle, Wash. on July 25.

    The scene was the Scottish Rite Temple, 1155 Broadway Ave. S.E.. The occasion, a public meeting of the "Not-With-My-Bucket Brigade", a group of irate taxpayers and others who oppose the federal bailout of the savings and loans (S&L's). The organizers were Mike Siegel from the Seattle NBC affiliate KING-AM radio, and John Hinterberger, staff columnist for the Seattle Times. The two had organized the meeting over the previous month, through their columns and talk-shows. Siegel, a New York lawyer turned talk show host, is the presi­dent of the National Association of Talk Show hosts. The meeting, filmed by the local NBC television affiliate, and by ABC stations from Los Angeles and New York, was featured on national network news July 26. Siegel aims to turn the Seattle meeting into the model for a national movement.

    The purpose? "I don't care what anybody says. Throw all the bastards out--every incumbent". "Enough is enough...what we need is to get those criminals and find out where their money is".

    The target'? The S&L bankers ripping us off for $2,500 each, forever, and the Congressmen and Senators who helped them do it. "I don't want to see these people go to the federal country club jails. I want them out in the sun and the rain with wood-handled picks, breaking rocks"!

    This scene is going to be repeated across the country this summer, and into the fall, and not because some newspaper columnist or talk show host encourages it. It's going to happen anyway. Why? Because peo­ple have had it. There's a depression going on, and it is getting worse. They've been lied to. They've been ripped off. Savings have been wiped out. Families have been destroyed. Pensions have been wiped out. They're two late-rent or mortgage payments away from being thrown onto the streets to join the ranks of the homeless. People are angry. They're frightened. They want to get even. Someone's going to pay. The sink-hole of corruption now coming to light around the S&L fiasco has been the last straw. The country's going to hell and this sleaze is getting bailed out?

    A VISIT TO SKADDEN ARPS
    Well, wise up, or you are going to get taken for a sucker again.
    Do you want to know who grabbed your savings, who stripped you of your pension, who is going to put you on the street? Then go down to the New York City lawfirm Skadden, Arps, Slate Meagher and Flom 919 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022; telephone number (212) 371-6000. Ask for Joe Flom, if you can find him.

    Any list that doesn't start with Flom's lawfirm isn't what it says it is. (Hatonn: I would also include the firm of Shea and Gould, if I were you!) Since 1977-78 it been THE law firm Skadden, Arps which introduced most of the changes in legal practice, whether through Congress, the courts, or somewhere else, which bankrupted the country, bankrupted the banking system, bankrupted the S&L's, and sad­dled everyone with $21 trillion in combined accumulated debt and speculation.

    If you want to talk about jailing sleaze, you should start with Skadden, Arps. Go after the looters and the asset-strippers on their client list--among them James Goldsmith; the fallen Drexel, Burnham and Michael Milken; Goldman, Sachs & Co.; Morgan Stanley; Rothschild, Inc. And the mobsters, the representatives of what used to be called organized crime, the Boeskys, the Riklises, the Steinhergs, the Pickenses, the Icahns, the Lorenzos, the Belzbergs, the Lindners. The thugs who did their dirty work and were called arbitragers, takeover artists, greenmailers, asset-strippers--anything but mobsters and thugs.

    You don't want to go after these criminals? Then don't start talking about throwing people in jail. This is the crowd that looted the country for the account of their masters in the City of London.

    REMEMBER CARTER & VOLCKER?
    You want to talk about corruption in the S&L's? Then you want to talk about Paul Volcker the thug whom Jimmy Carter appointed Federal Reserve chief. Remember him? Twelve years ago, he was the one who put interest rates through the roof. I le's the one who bankrupted the S&L's by 1981. And then what? Did you ever hear of the New York investment house Salomon Brothers? They are the ones who invented something called mortgage-backed securities. Congress in 1981 passed a law which ordered S&L's to sell their mortgages outstanding, and to write off losses incurred in the sales against taxes paid before 1978. Salomon Brothers, thanks to Henry Kissinger's business partner, William Simon, a former Treasury Secretary and Salomon bond trader, was the only investment house in the country with the set-up to handle the sales. They borrowed cheap outside the country, to finance the mortgages through changes in government agencies like Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac. They got the government to put its faith and credit behind the international market they had created to loot the S&L's Volcker bankrupted. Mortgages traded as securities became the basis for the off-balance sheet liabilities which helped finish off the banking system as a whole. Jim Wright, the front-man for S&L sleaze, got thrown out of congress. Who took his place as Speaker of the House? Tom Foley, the Congressman from Salomon Brothers.

    What is Salomon Brothers? It is owned, in part, by the commodity trading arm of the Oppenheimer gold, diamond, and raw materials syndicate through the Oppenheimer subsidiary Phibro. It is the same crowd which works through Skadden, Arps.

    ALONG CAME BUSH
    You want to clean this up? Then you've got to get rid of what the Japanese call "American flea market economics". That is what it is. This is the crowd which has looted the United States in the name of deregulation and flea-market economics. Jimmy Carter again; he started the deregulation of the banking system, of transportation and utilities. Then under Reagan who was it? It was George Bush and Donald Regan, chairman and vice-chairman of the Presidential Commission on Regulatory Relief. They set the rules under which the country was driven into bankruptcy after 1982. You want to talk about corruption? Take a look at what used to be the First Republic Bank of Dallas and how it was taken over by North Carolina National Bank. Take a look at Texas Commerce Bancshares and how it was taken over by Chemical Bank from New York. Take a look at the buyout of RJR-Nabisco, the $25 billion "deal of the century", and which shareholders pocketed the cash. Then go visit Skadden, Arps.

    And you will find lots and lots more that you never thought about. So be it.

    Dharma, it has been far too long a day at this keyboard, allow us to close. Thank you for this day of service. I am sorry to work so many hours hut the work must be going forth and the time is short. There is simply no way to get it all into your hands so we will pick and choose and give you what appears most appropriate and in priority for your attention and action. YOU can make a big impact, dear ones, in November at election polls!!! Saalome'


    PJ 20
    CHAPTER 22

    REC #1 HATONN

    MONDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1990 7:50 A.M. YEAR 4 DAY 60

    TODAY'S WATCH
    Hatonn present to walk with you through the valley of shadows that you can find your way. I come in service unto you, my brothers, and in humble and to­tal service unto God. So be it.

    God has sent you help--will you hear our call? On the "watch" today I shall remind you of some most evident and pertinent facts:

    ** The economy is being held in some manner of hype until after the November elections.

    ** The price of gold is only down while Russia is selling a large amount of the metal to raise needed funds. IT IS NOW TIME TO BUY! THE PRICE IS FURTHER BEING BROUGHT DOWN TO ENABLE THE ELITE TO TRANSFER THEIR FUNDS FROM INVESTMENTS IN MARKET STOCKS AND INTO GOLD. THAT IS YOUR PROOF THAT THE IN­TENT IS TO TAKE IT "THROUGH THE ROOF".

    YOU MUST UNDERSTAND, HOWEVER, THAT WE CAN ONLY WORK WITH PROBABILITIES AGAINST THAT WHICH IS ALREADY LAID FORTH IN THE "ESTABLISHMENT ELITE'S" PLANS. IT IS A TIME OF CHAOTIC CHANGES AS ONE PLAN IS BOTCHED AND AN ALTERNATIVE PUT IN PLACE.

    IF YOU GET THOSE INCUMBENT CRIMINALS OUT OF THEIR CE­MENTED PLACES IN CONGRESS AND YOUR STATE HOUSES YOU HAVE A GOOD CHANCE TO CHANGE CIRCUMSTANCES. THIS, OF COURSE, IS BECAUSE THE NEW RULERS WILL NOT BE AS BRAVE AS THE ENTRENCHED CROOKS. IF THE PUBLIC SPEAKS LOUDLY ENOUGH THE VOICES SHALL BE HEARD AND YOU CAN REGAIN CONTROL FOR THOSE REMAINING IN POWER WILL TAKE NOTE. IT IS UP TO YOU TO ACT FOR THE WORST FINAN­CIAL IMPACT IS YET TO HIT YOU IN THE PROBLEMS OF THE BANKS, INSURANCE COMPANIES AND PENSION/RETIREMENT SYSTEMS!!

    BEWARE: PLANS ARE TO GIVE YOU SOME INCREDIBLE "EMERGENCY" DISASTERS PRIOR TO THAT NOVEMBER ELECTION DATE, TO BRING THE PUBLIC TO YOUR KNEES IN PRAYERFUL BEGGING TO THE ELITE FOR FUNDS TO REGAIN STABILITY. THEY ARE TRULY CONSIDERING A MASSIVE QUAKE ON THE HAYWARD AND SAN ANDREAS FAULTS TO KEEP CALIFORNIANS FROM THE POLLS.YOU THINK THEY WOULD NOT DO SUCH A THING? THINK AGAIN! NOT ONLY WOULD THEY DO IT--IF YOU DON'T REVEAL THEIR PLANS PUBLICLY, THEY WILL DO IT! YOU ARE BEING MANIPULATED IN ORDER TO KEEP THE SUPPORT CRIMINALS IN OFFICE THROUGH THIS COMING ELECTION.

    I HEREIN REPEAT SOMETHING: THE MONEY STOLEN IS HIDDEN BY THE ONES WHO THIEVED IT. AS A NATION YOU MUST RISE UP AND DEMAND THE CROOKS WHO TOOK IT TO RETURN IT AND YOUR DEBT AND DEFICITS WILL BE PAID IN FULL AS THEY HAVE MANUFACTURED ENOUGH MONEY TO MATCH ANY MISSING FUNDS. YOU WILL FIND IT ALL IN THE CONTROL OF THE ELITE--REMOVED INTO THE HANDS OF THE FOREIGN "MASTERS"--TRY LONDON AND THE SWISS BANKS AS WELL AS TUCKED NICELY INTO INVESTMENTS AND THE WORLD BANK. BEGIN WITH THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND CONGRESS AND YOU WILL BRING STABILITY AGAIN UNTO YOUR NATION--YOU START BY GETTING RID OF INCUMBENTS WHO HAVE BEEN IN OFFICE FOR MORE THAN ONE TERM--I.E.: THE PICKLES, CRANSTONS, ETC...

    PLEASE TAKE NOTE
    Members of Congress themselves continue to collect fat pension checks, EVEN IF THEY ARE CONVICTED CRIMINALS! Until you change that, dear ones, you will have criminals in the seats of government! There is NO reason to cease to criminalize for you forgive and pay them for your misery. Think most carefully about this thing which is consuming your very existence.

    As millions of workers fear, rightfully so as we will outline shortly, for the health of their pension plans--targeted by corporate raiders as cash cows and abetted by a Congress content to do nothing as the catastrophe unfolds.

    If a member of Congress is convicted of a felony (even one connected to his official duties) he or she can still pick up a hefty taxpayer-financed pension when reaching retirement age--which the majority of "old" Congressmen have done.

    The payments, based upon the number of years the law-breakers have served in Congress, and regularly adjusted to reflect cost of living increases, provide the shamed solons with a generous subsidy. Further, as the crimes were being committed there are always "arrangements" on the side to be provided with luxurious living facilities (as with Reagan) and influential jobs within the "industries" they supported during their tenure in the government. James Wright, for instance, lives in a wealthy manner and makes well over $600,000 annually. I suppose that might be worth a little "humble-pie eating"!

    Funny thing about the laws, and this should point out how bad the situation has become: under current law TREASON is the ONLY offense for which members of Congress can be denied their pensions. THAT SHOULD INCLUDE THE WHOLE OF CONGRESS! Even those ones you think (and themselves believe) are serving well, have removed your existence into the hands of a national Congress when the right of law is within your Sovereign STATES! So, therefore, ALL COMMIT TREASON WHETHER BY IG­NORANCE OR TOTAL INTENT! STUDY YOUR CONSTITUTION!!!

    We shall give a bit of credit to one efforting representative, John Porter (R-Ill.) who is seeking to put an end to this scandal. I suggest you take note for it has not even been considered prior to the election wherein a lot of old long­standing Congressmen might well be put to pasture this fall. Mr. Porter has a bill which would prevent lawmakers from receiving their federal pensions if they are convicted of a felony.

    The bill, H.R. 4292, would refund members' own contributions to their own pension funds but would return any government contributions to the U.S. treasury. A very mild measure indeed.

    You still believe this does not happen? Well, here are a few smatterings of ones who are basically not recognized for the real culprits don't get put on the list publicly for a very long period of time. Real crime allows a trip to Club Fed and good cover-up on a continuing basis--if one is dangerous to the Es­tablishment, that one gains a lethal brain tumor, assassination, suicide and/or worse--but the pension goes on to the widows and orphans for services ren­dered in the line of duty.

    Ex-Rep. Cornelius Gallagher (D-N.J.), income tax evasion--still receives $52,986 annually. I suppose that makes Red Foxx and Willie Nelson feel "real" good.

    Ex-Rep. Charles Diggs (D-Mich.), misappropriated government funds and took kickbacks from his own staff--$49,668 a year.

    Ex-Sen. Harrison Williams (D-N.J.), convicted of accepting a bribe of sizable amount--$48,720.

    Ex-Rep. John Murphy (D-N.Y.), convicted of accepting more than $50,000 in one bribe--$48,504.

    Ex-Rep. Richard Hanna (D-Calif.), convicted of accepting a bribe--$36,420.

    Now, dear ones, these are convictions on only ONE count. This does not re­quire return of any funds stolen and by the time there is court procedure, the money taken is well tucked away in unfindable locations and corporations. If there is a conviction on ONE COUNT, you can be sure that there are multi­ple counts unmentioned.

    Remember also, that there are additional ex-lawmakers found guilty of felonies who have not yet reached retirement age but who will begin receiving taxpayer-financed pensions. These public servants come from the four direc­tions of the wind as to geographic location!

    I believe you can see why no one wishes to take a stand AGAINST the blight--ALL BUT A TINY FEW ARE GUILTY OF A FELONY OFFENSE.

    This, further, is WHY a budget waited for finalizing until "after the fact"--to get it passed without attention to individuals, so many are guilty of treason against you the people!

    SCANDAL TO DWARF S&L CRISIS

    We will speak of things herein that follow as night follows day and the prob­lems of the banking industry, as recognized separate from the S&L's. I shall speak of the looting of the PENSION/RETIREMENT FUNDS! I shall, how­ever, use data which you can check and confirm from April, 1990, because a careful effort is being made to hide all current figures until after elections in November. This problem will dwarf the S&L crisis.

    The administration officials are constantly meeting behind closed doors to plan emergency measures against the day when "the public finally realizes its retirement money is being stolen" in larger amounts than through the S&L's.

    White House Chief-of-Staff John Sununu (he gets his share of attention these days) has been alerted and is totally frantic by memoranda warning that the nation's pension funds, worth some $1.6 TRILLION in aggregate, have been "looted by fraud and abuse that will dwarf the savings-and-loan scandal when it comes to light", as Labor Department Inspector General Raymond Maria put it in a report finding its way to the public in early April, 1990.

    Under the "take the money and run" ethics of the Reagan era, regulators and auditors are "blocked and thwarted" when they attempt to protect pension plans from plunder by "unscrupulous promoters and speculators". This ac­cording to the inspector general, whose office polices some 870,000 private re­tirement programs nationwide, in a follow-up memo. And if you believe these ones have efforted to stop the plunder--please contact me for a cheap deal on the Golden Gate Bridge, right after the earthquake!

    The "stampede of corporate greed" that makes a "a practice of stripping cash from employee old-age funds" was denounced by more than one senator at a recent series of hearings into attempts by the new owners of the Coleman Corp. and other firms to skim tens of millions of dollars from the so-called surplus of their pension plans. Remember, herein we are only giving ex­amples which can be checked out on your placement so as to not confuse in­formation from "radio" signals, or telephone communications.

    FORMER FBI AGENT
    While Maria, a former FBI agent, did not specify the "unscrupulous promoters and speculators" he cited in his reports, administration sources and congressional investigators speaking privately made it clear that his indictment was aimed at the junk bond financiers and market manipulators who have taken over some of the best-known old-line U.S. corporations.

    Explained Dr. Aldo Milinkovich, a former treasury auditor who is now a Wall Street financial services analyst: "Ten years ago, the Bulova Watch Co., Revlon Cosmetics, the McCrory Corp., National Forge, Pacific Lumber Co., Standard Gravure, to name just a tiny few well-known firms, all had generously endowed, dependable retirement plans for their employees.

    "But during the Reagan years, all these pension funds were gutted and closed. What the employees got instead are so-called annuities serviced by private providers".

    Apart from the disadvantage that annuities generally pay fewer and smaller benefits than employer-owned retirement plans, they are hazardous. If the insurance company that has contracted to provide them runs into financial trouble, the payments stop and, insurance companies are sometimes established in order to go defunct to obviate payments. There is no federal insurance or state compensation to aid elderly workers who are suddenly left without an income in their shadow years.

    "That is what will happen to aging employees in every one of those long-familiar work-places, from Bulova to Revlon to Nabisco, etc., if the firm that services their annuities, Executive Life Insurance Co., for instance, sails into rough waters--where it already sits atop the sand-bar. This is not just speculation; Executive Life is a subsidiary of First Executive Corp., a CALIFORNIA FINANCIAL SERVICES OUTFIT KNOWN AS A MAJOR JUNK BOND PLAYER"!

    On April 10 First Executive announced that it had lost nearly $1 billion in 1989 on total revenues of $1.9 billion--a dizzying drop, due mostly to the collapse of the junk bond market. "This is a big insurance outfit, and it isn't busted yet, but it may be headed that way", says Michael Dennison, a Wall Street securities dealer who follows insurance stocks. "If it goes belly up, nearly 70,000 workers for whom it services annuities will be left stranded". I further suggest to you who like a challenge--check into the involvement of a law firm called Shea and Gould. I further suggest that some of you check into the level of knowledge of all the rip-off scams with judicial involvement from a firm called Bunker, Byrum & Kimball in Bakersfield, California, if you want to have a bad case of hives. Dharma and Oberli have been set-up and ripped-off by the thieves from onset of their case regarding their property! Somehow, this little law-firm in this All-American village can afford an entire top floor of the most luxurious building in the city. You do not glean that kind of income from standing forth in behalf of the "wronged public". So be it. Ones affiliated with those leeches should look within and see what God might have done for thee and reconsider actions and locations! Is security through deceit and plunder worth thine very souls? Again, so be it. The breath of God given in truth for service can as easily be removed! This is for those who would deliberately turn from truth and God's service as well as away from the true intent of the Constitutional Justice System. There will be no peace within for those who sell of their souls unto the devil!

    There are a number of other major annuity providers--national insurance firms such as Cigna, Prudential, Aetna and Equitable--who have loaded down their portfolios with junk bonds in these recent years so beware as the dominos begin to fall!

    ALERT: FEDERAL AUTHORITIES, WHO MAINTAIN A MINIMAL SAFETY NET FOR SOME 40 MILLION WORKERS IN THE NATION'S PENSION PLAN SYSTEM UNDER THE PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORP., WILL ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY RETIREE WHOSE OLD-AGE PLAN HAS BEEN EXCHANGED FOR THE SORT OF ANNUITY SERVICES PROVIDED BY FIRST EXECUTIVE AND OTHER INSURANCE FIRMS.
    OTHER WAYS TO ROB YOU
    Skimming off the "surplus" from a pension fund and trading in the rest for a cheaper annuity program is by no means the only way speculators and fast buck financiers chisel uncounted millions from the hard-earned old-age reserves of the nation's workers.

    When FBI agents and bank examiners seized the giant CenTrust Savings Bank in Miami in March, 1990, they found that its chairman, David Paul, another leading junk bond financier, had exchanged the stocks and bonds in the employee retirement account with CenTrust shares--securities which are now, with CenTrust insolvent, just about worthless. Paul is only a typical pension fund pirate which should give you worse hives.

    Paul spent tens of millions of company dollars on personal luxuries that were nothing short of grandiose: teams of famous European chefs were flown to Miami for his dinner parties, million-dollar artworks for his mansion, a $10 million yacht (studded with gold nails in the master deck suite)--all this extravagance while CenTrust Bank was washing down the drain.

    Now thousands of ordinary Americans who work for CenTrust and its subsidiaries will not just find themselves jobless, the elderly and exhausted among them who are eligible for a modest retirement will face a gutted pension fund and declining years of poverty.

    Horror show: like so many Reagan-era money magnates, Paul WAS NOT EVEN A BUSINESSMAN OR A FINANCIER; he was a parasite who preyed on the nation's resources. Bush and his aides know this and they expect a storm of outrage and protest when the public finds out about the pension fund scandal. Therefore, all means possible are being employed to keep it from public knowledge until the "dictatorship" is more firmly in place and fall elections are over! IT IS UP TO YOU THE PUBLIC!

    WHO WAS SLEEPING?
    A greater mystery of mysteries is why Americans have not yet risen up in righ­teous wrath over the collapse of the nation's S&L's--you just go along while name-calling continues in Congress and nothing is done except charge the taxpayer more and more and more. Who has fallen asleep at the wheel while the pension funds of the hard-working, tax-paying citizens were being looted by thieves in three-piece suits? Where were the people when the Banks were being destroyed? Oh, you want to blame God's Hosts for allowing you to sleep on and on and on? WE TRIED, BROTHERS, WE CERTAINLY TRIED AND YOU SHOT AT OUR SCRIBES AND DENOUNCED THE TRUTH AS "THE GREATEST FRAUD AGAINST MANKIND"! AH YES, WE HAVE TRIED UNCEASINGLY! WHERE HAVE YOU THE PUBLIC BEEN IN YOUR DAZE OF SLEEP-WALKING? ATTENDING THE WORLD SERIES AND SUPER-BOWL, PERHAPS? SO BE IT.

    The reason, dear hearts, is that you still do not understand the absolute ENORMITY of the damage done, and will not react personally until your own taxes are hiked to pay for the cleanup--which will now be endless!

    People will, however, definitely react with unbounded anger when their pen­sion checks bounce because some corporate crook has cleaned out the ac­count--never to be seen again. That is exactly what is happening to the na­tion's pension funds. The specter of imminent collapse of the nation's retire­ment funds is scaring the politicians greatly and, as you will hopefully note from the above, they are already deep at work in distractions, war planning and instigation and instituting other plans for "DAMAGE CONTROL" against public outrage.

    They should be making, instead, plans to restore the health of the pension funds themselves and for calling to account the thieves who have brought this collapse; billions of dollars have simply disappeared, the perpetrators are go­ing unpunished, and the public is getting the proverbial "shaft". So what else is new, Hatonn? Oh yes, dear hearts, there are measures which could set it to right--if you insist on it being done.

    Who's responsible? Start at the top. The President may CLAIM that he inherited the problem from his predecessor, but he has been in office for two years now and, so far, no action. Congress has been aware of the problem since its inception and has been content to let it fester and churn. Again, no action. And the corporate pirates who have actually taken the money are still free and enjoying the fruits of their immoral and illegal enterprises, having scattered the funds most carefully against recovery into the nations of the world and hidden corporations. When will you the people learn to play the game? Why are you always the loser? Why must God's work always be for­feited? We give you instructions and you act as if we have handed you the poison cup--WILL NO ONE ACT IN BEHALF OF GOD???

    All of these people involved should be held liable for violation of the public trust--starting with those in your governmental houses who have made "unlawful" but "legal" laws to facilitate the crimes. Can you not step forward in your own goodness and require that these criminals be held liable for viola­tion of the public trust?

    One modest proposal for action: loot the congressional retirement fund, one of the most generous on Earth--and--recall those already being distributed to ability and extent and STOP further payments! Even congressional felons are kept comfortably by you taxpayers, as shown clearly above. When Congress gets into the casting about for funds to restore the pensions of retired workers, demand that the extremely generous pensions members of Congress re­ceive be diverted to making up the shortfall in the average worker's retire­ment. VOTE OUT ALL THOSE WHO VOTED FOR THE MOST RE­CENT PAY HIKE--CLEAN HOUSE--AND SENATE TOO!
    GET THEM BEFORE THEY GET YOU
    I suggest you go for it in a big way while you are at it. Refuse to further sup­port the plunder, genocide and mass stupidity.

    DC) YOU EVER GET ANGRY? PUBLIC CITIZENS, DO YOU EVERY GET RIGHTEOUSLY ANGRY? Do you ever want to lash out at gross in­justice, at political corruption and the violations of your our rights as given forth in your Constitution? Or do you just drift while expecting "someone else" to pro­tect your rights--maybe perhaps your government? I think you begin to see that it will never be so!

    If you do, you must be in an endless dither trying to figure out just which bat­tle to take on today. Listening to a newscast or reading the daily paper gives you the feeling that you are being maneuvered into a series of new battles to be fought at the time and place the ENEMY SELECTS.

    You are told with authority that "you can't win them all". The fact is, you have hardly won any, up to now! Despite this, there is a sure way to protect your­selves against all present and potential invasions to your liberties, and to re­gain the ground already lost.

    This should come as no surprise. You wouldn't have these battles on your hands now if you had followed the rule established by your Founding Fathers and kept the Constitution in full force and effect. Thomas Jefferson told you there was but one way to do it, "bind down those we are obliged to trust with power by the chains of the Constitution".

    It was the best possible advice for staying out of the clutches of tyrants in the first place--and is the only possible way you can get out of the present dilemma.

    Once you released the politicians and bureaucrats from their "constitutional chains" they began extending their power over you as swiftly and totally as possible, and in a multitude of different ways.

    If you fight them the hard way--one fruitless battle at a time--you will be drawn into every kind of a battle your enemy wants to fight--just like the at­torneys who never end a case in order to continue the dole, and on the terms the enemy imposes. The skillful multiplications of these minor conquests was designed to exhaust the people and leave you little time, energy or resources for the main job of restoring freedom.

    Tom, the LIBERTY AMENDMENT which has been designed to fight all the multitude of apparently different battles at once--and WIN by restoring the Constitution to full force and effect. Once the amendment is applied, a multi­tude of diversified battles will be won.

    Look carefully over the following list of battles that would be won by the ap­plication of the LIBERTY AMENDMENT. The list is by no means complete, but if one or more of these may be passing through your now-thinking minds, body and soul, then get together for the main event and win them all at once, and WIN BACK YOUR BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY, BECAUSE THE LIB­ERTY AMENDMENT WILL:

    Balance the federal budget by reducing federal spending to a level which you can afford, by limiting federal spending to only those purposes speci­fied in the Constitution.
    Stop the "withholding" tax, and restore the right of the worker to take home a full paycheck.
    Stop IRS audits of your personal income and affairs.
    Bring down interest rates, thereby again making it possible for people, es­pecially young people, to enjoy the AMERICAN DREAM of being able to own their homes, as earlier generations were able to do.
    Stop inflation caused by government deficit spending.
    Restore to city and county officials the right to run local affairs without federal interference and dictation.
    Get rid of the federal Department of Energy's unconstitutional manipulation of and interference with energy production.
    Transfer to the states and the people the millions of acres of land, comprising one-third of the total land area of the country, which are now held by federal government agencies in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
    Enable people to support charities of their own choice instead of supporting expensive federal bureaucracies.

    Stop the U.S. government from taxing Americans to finance communism and to support foreign governments with "foreign aid". Due to deficit spending, foreign aid has in effect been financed with borrowed money. The cost of the aid and the consequent compounding of the interest on the national debt has now reached approximately $3 TRILLION--more than the national debt!

    Terminate the princely privilege of rent free, tax exempt, subsidized political enterprises.

    Stop the political foul-up of your economy , where high taxes and stacks of regulations, plus foreign aid to your competitors, cause the destruction of domestic industries.

    Stop the federal government from being the number one arms and munitions merchant to the world.

    Restore obedience to the Constitution, and put you back on the road of greatness through liberty.

    Halt federal confiscation of properties and enterprises through high taxes and burdensome regulations.

    Limit the defense department to the business of defending you, and stop it from operating commercial enterprises in competition with those it is sup­posed to defend.

    Bring your troops and equipment home from the Middle East.
    Stop the meddling in disputes that are none of American's business.
    Stop providing military enforcement of special interests for the wealthy
    elite establishment cartels such as with oil and other banking rip-offs.

    Get the power business back to economic management.
    Permanently arrest the threat of socialized medicine and bring costs of same into affordable limits.

    Rescue you from the politicians' "Ponzi-scheme" "social security" trap.
    Cut federal spending to less than half of what it is now and then bring it totally under control through the Constitutional procedures,
    PUT AN END TO THE IRS BEING USED TO HARASS AND INTIMIDATE CITIZENS WHO SPEAK UP FOR THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.
    Demonstrate the Power and benefits of liberty to the captive peoples of the world and give forth example of that which to pattern governments.
    Stop impoverishing the taxpayers with poverty programs.
    Halt the unconstitutional federal control and takeover of public schools: restore schools to local control.

    Terminate federal controls, interference, and harassment, of private schools.
    Eliminate the special privilege of tax exemption for foundations.
    Curtail federal government controls over human food and health products.
    Restore your independence from foreign entanglements.
    Prevent surrendering the U.S. to "world government".
    Stop the corruption of "urban renewal".
    Eliminate the use of federal "mental health" programs, as political weapons.
    Restore to the states the right to set speed limits on the highways.
    Liberate farmers from federal controls.
    Halt the federal harassments of mining industries which is hindering domestic production and causing needless and dangerous dependence on foreign sources.

    Restore honest money. Abolish the Federal Reserve debt-money swindle. Resume gold and silver coinage.
    Stop lending tax dollars to special interests.
    Halt the terrible waste of billions of hours and billions of dollars worth of effort now wasted in filling out unnecessary federal government forms.
    Stop the federal government from funding programs which incite racial tensions and strife.
    Restore to elected state and local governments the powers which have been usurped by unelected "regional government" bureaucracies.
    Let the people concentrate on productive pursuits instead of spending time, energy, and money playing crazy "tax loophole" games.
    Limit federal courts to judicial affairs; stop unconstitutional "judicial legislation".
    Stop government competition with private enterprise.
    Put an end to the federal takeover of local police forces by means of federal grants, controls and "guidelines".
    Stop the IRS from interfering with religious affairs.
    Stop the "one world order" now under way through the usurpation of the
    government by the United Nations which is run by the Establishment Elite.
    AND--OH, YES. DON'T FORGET--IT WILL REPEAL THE FEDERAL PERSONAL INCOME TAX! THIS TAX IS ILLEGAL AND EN­FORCED BY A PRIVATE POLICE FORCE.

    IT WILL RETURN THE GOVERNMENT INTO THE HANDS OF YOU THE PEOPLE. IT WILL REESTABLISH STATE SOVEREIGNTY AND POLITICIANS WILL BE DIRECTLY AND LOCALLY ANSWERABLE TO YOU THE PEOPLE.

    There are so many more advantages that I have not the time to list here. Since so many problems would be solved by this ONE ACT--and since so many peoples' special areas of interest are covered by it--why shouldn't you apply yourselves to the one great task of passing the LIBERTY AMENDMENT?

    The amendment is drawn and ready for support and action--why do you not utilize it to regain control of all that which has been ripped from you?

    There is no need to fight on all the separate fronts when you can unite and approach freedom from the positive standpoint. The LIBERTY AMENDMENT would automatically eliminate many threats you now fear, rectify wrongs that have occurred, and promote a climate of freedom and security for all of you.

    There are nine of your wondrous states who have endorsed the LIBERTY AMENDMENT: WYOMING, TEXAS, NEVADA, LOUISIANA, GEOR­GIA, SOUTH CAROLINA, MISSISSIPPI, ARIZONA AND INDIANA.

    I SUGGEST THAT THE MAJORITY OF YOU THE PEOPLE HAVE NEVER BEEN ALLOWED TO SO MUCH AS "HEAR" ABOUT SUCH A THING. SO BE IT, FOR YOU WHO LAG WILL BE "HAD" IN THE FINAL TALLY AND BRING YOUR BRETHREN DOWN WITH YOU!

    For further information I suggest you contact America West Publishers--phone and address given, and/or contact "YES ON 23, Box 2386, El Cajon, CA 92021. PHONE: (619) 579-8500. You will be able to establish personalization of all records and petition forms to suit individual state requirements.

    TEXT OF LIBERTY AMENDMENT
    Sec. 1. The Government of the United States shall not engage in any business, professional, commercial, financial or industrial enterprise except as specified in the Constitution.

    Sec. 2. The Constitution or laws of any State, or the laws of the United States, shall not be subject to the terms of any foreign or domestic agreement which would abrogate this amendment.

    Sec. 3. The activities of the United States Government which violate the intent and purposes of this amendment shall within a period of three years from the date of the ratification of this amendment, be liquidated and the properties and facilities affected shall be sold.

    Sec. 4. Three years after the ratification of this amendment the sixteenth article of amendments to the Constitution of the United States shall stand repealed and thereafter Congress shall not levy taxes on personal incomes, estates, and/or gifts.

    BY THE WAY--IF YOU CONTACT YOUR FEDERAL CONGRESSMEN YOU WILL PROBABLY BE TOLD THAT "THE LIBERTY AMENDMENT IS DEAD" OR YOU WILL GET TOTAL LACK OF INFORMATION. THIS HAS HAPPENED IN ALMOST EVERY INSTANCE AS OUR WORKERS HAVE CONTACTED SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES. I SUGGEST YOU GO WITH YOUR FELLOW CITIZENS AND BYPASS THE FEDERAL CONGRESS FOR YOU CAN SEE THAT YOU WILL PUT THE CRIMINALS OUT OF BUSINESS!! TAKE POSITIVE ACTION AND YOU CAN TURN YOUR PREDICAMENT INTO THE GLORY OF A NATIONAL REBIRTING! I PETITION YOU MAKE THE EFFORT! VOTE VERY CAREFULLY IN THE UPCOMING ELECTION AND TAKE CONTROL, PNCE AGAIN, OF YOUR NATION THROUGH YOUR CONSTITUTION! YOU CAN DO IT IF YOU WANT TO!

    Allow us to close as the writing has been indeed long. Thank you for your service, Dharma, and you of the group who work endlessly in behalf of your brothers. I salute you in humble honor and appreciation.

    I move to stand-by. Hatonn to clear.

주제글 정보

Users Browsing this Thread

이 주제글은 현재 2명이 열람중입니다. (0명의 회원과 2명의 손님)

유사한 글

  1. PJ#033, PLEIADES CONNECTION - MURDER BY ATOMIC SUICIDE
    By wave in forum Phoenix Journals Archives
    관련글: 7
    최신 글: 2013-02-07, 09:54
  2. PJ#037, PLEIADES CONNECTION - SCIENCE OF THE COSMOS
    By wave in forum Phoenix Journals Archives
    관련글: 7
    최신 글: 2010-01-26, 05:19
  3. PJ#036, PLEIADES CONNECTION - HUMAN, THE SCIENCE OF MAN.
    By wave in forum Phoenix Journals Archives
    관련글: 7
    최신 글: 2010-01-26, 03:47
  4. PJ#030, PLEIADES CONNECTION - RETURN OF THE PHOENIX.
    By wave in forum Phoenix Journals Archives
    관련글: 12
    최신 글: 2009-11-20, 12:10
  5. 관련글: 9
    최신 글: 2009-08-30, 18:05

이 주제글의 글단추(태그)

글쓰기 규칙

  • 새 글 작성이 불가능함
  • 응답글 작성이 불가능함
  • 파일 첨부가 불가능함
  • 내 글 수정이 불가능함
  •