PJ 19
CHAPTER 3

REC. #2 HATONN

FRIDAY, AUGUST 31, 1990 5:15 P.M. YEAR 4 DAY 15

LOOKING BACK
Just to remind you, let us recall the plans for a minute. This was for the late 70's. The first step was to be a supposedly surprise agreement between Israel and Egypt at Camp David. The Camp David hoax went off without a hitch and the following spring the Egyptian-Israeli treaty was signed in Washington. It was called a "peace" treaty but its real purpose was to set the stage for war!

The so-called Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty was just a new, more elaborate version of the Sinai Accord of some six years prior. The Sinai Accord was held together by American technicians in the Sinai. Likewise, the Egyptian-Israeli treaty was leading toward a primarily American military force in the Sinai Peninsula due to start in April of 1982.

At that time the purpose was to provide a pretext to drag the United States directly into a Middle East war. From there the conflict was to spread into all-out war. In order to carry out the limited nuclear attack on Saudi Arabia, world opinion must have been prepared in advance as much as possible. The idea of actually using nuclear weapons must have been made less unthinkable to you and Israel must be provided some excuse for calling Saudi Arabia a deadly threat. In both of those areas, rapid progress was made. Again, not at all unlike what is being staged on August 31, 1990--LOOK AT THE SIMI­LARITIES.

To make an atomic raid more thinkable when it would take place, Israel had been using the old technique of "gradualism". For years Israeli war planes had been striking into Lebanon. For a while there were feeble protests from Washington, for public consumption, that Israel might be misusing her American weapons. Israel replied that she was attacking a vital threat, the PLO, and kept right on with the strikes. After a while the novelty wore off and most of you just began to accept it. AGAIN, NOT UNLIKE WHAT IS GOING ON TODAY, TO THE POINT THAT YOU CLAMOR AND BEAT YOUR BREASTS FOR WAR EVEN AT THE RISK OF EVERY FOREIGNER AND CITIZEN OF IRAQ AND KUWAIT WHO YOU CLAIM TO BE THERE TO FREE!

Next, the Israelis raised the threshold of psychological pain a notch higher. In clear and direct violation of agreements with the Pentagon, Israeli aircraft started dropping cluster bombs on Lebanon. Lebanese villagers--men, women, and children--were maimed, dismembered, and killed. When you first heard about it, it sounded inexcusable to many, but after a while you for­got about your outrage and went on to other things of importance like the World Series, the prior baseball strike and Super Bowl.

Once again the U.S. Government was careful to do nothing! You had learned to accept something a little worse than before in warfare. Step by step, the Israeli violations of international law and of agreements with the U.S. had become bolder and bolder. Each time the U.S. Government gave lip service to law, morality, and a momentary concern of the American public, but each time Israel was given the green light again with hardly a pause of interruption of actions.

For instance, in June, 1981, the Israeli Air Force shot down two Syrian helicopters over Lebanon using American-made aircraft. The result was a new crisis over Syrian anti-aircraft missiles. With that crisis unresolved, Israel then destroyed the nuclear reactor in Iraq, and all the while the United States Government continued to let Israel have its own way because Israel is doing exactly what the Bolshevik military planners in the U.S. have planned.

ACCEPTANCE
Having accepted Israel's destruction of a nuclear reactor, it was only a short step beyond to accept the use of battlefield nuclear weapons.

That still left the matter of setting up Saudi Arabia as a credible threat to Israel. The U.S. was taking care of that problem while pretending to do the Saudis a favor. Early in 1982 Saudi Arabia was to began taking delivery of a fleet of F-15 Fighters, equivalent in many ways to those of Israel. On top of that, the sale of five AWACS radar surveillance planes to Saudi Arabia was being considered. The secret purpose of those arms deals with Saudi Arabia was the exact opposite of what was claimed. The U.S. claimed that it wanted to improve Saudi Arabia's national security, presumably against Russia; but the real purpose was to give Israel the excuse it needed for a pre-emptive at­tack on Saudi Arabia. AND IF YOU CANNOT RECOGNIZE THIS AS A TOTAL WORD FOR WORD PROJECTION FOR YOUR SALES AND GIFTS OF UPDATED ARMS TO SAUDI-ARABIA AND THE OTHER MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES--I SUGGEST YOU STOP READING AND GO FORTH AND TURN TO YOUR NEWS BROADCASTS FOR THIS IS EXACTLY THAT WHICH THEY ARE TELLING YOU AND ASKING THE WORLD TO HELP PAY FOR IT BY "PASSING THE HAT".

The model for Israel's attack against Saudi Arabia was the attack in June against Iraq. Israel claimed that the Iraqi reactor was going to be used some day against Israel. On that basis, Israel described its pre-emptive surprise attack on Iraq as a defensive action. It was even said that Israel had saved lives by carrying out the surgical attack before the facility was completed.

This was a perfect set-up for later saying the same thing when the time would
come for Israel to attack the Saudi oil fields. The Israelis would act more and
more frightened that a Saudi Arabia armed with modern F-15's would someday use them against Israel. As proof, they would quote, out of context, past Saudi intent for a Muslim Jihad to gain control of Jerusalem and, to justify the pre-emptive nature of the raid, the Israelis would insist that they were forced to strike before or shortly after the delivery of the AWACS radar planes. As in the case of the Iraqi nuclear plant, Israel would characterize the Saudi raid as having been designed to spare as many lives as possible. The raid would not strike at heavy population centers but at the oil fields. In that way the Is­raelis would say that they had eliminated the financial basis of the alleged threat to Israel.

It was a wonderfully laid ploy because even the Saudis themselves could not believe it when they were informed of the plan--oh yes, of course, everyone was informed of the plan--makes it look grim for the potential of awakening the masses today, doesn't it?

How quickly times change. People no longer scoff at the idea that nuclear war is approaching, even suggesting use of nuclear weapons to get the price of that gas back down for the picnic crowd. Funny thing, in June 1981, just after the Israeli raid into Iraq, the New York Daily News carried an article about "Israel's oil weapon". It began:

"Israel had an oil weapon too, one just as powerful as the threat of an embargo by Saudi Arabia or any other Arab state. Israel can bomb the wells."

Further on, an aide to Israeli Prime Minister Begin was quoted as saying:

"The Saudis can cut off oil to the West, and so can we."

When Israel would decide to bomb the Saudi wells, it would do so in the same way as it bombed the Iraqi nuclear plant. Israel would use its newest and best American jet fighter bombers against Saudi Arabia, just as it did against Iraq. The raid would be launched with absolutely no advance warning, just as was done against Iraq; and just as happened to Iraq, the Israelis would make maximum use of deception in the raid itself.

Now, today, guess why you import over half of the oil used in the U.S.A.? Could it be that in the event there are no Middle Eastern oil fields producing--you and the Zionists are sitting atop plenty of fuel to keep your world global domination right on track--without competition from nations or people with the ability to use their machinery or remain mobile? I hoped you would see a flicker of light go on in the brain!

The Israeli Air Force had been carrying out mock air raids on northwestern Saudi Arabia for over two years. Every so often Israeli F-15 fighter bombers would swoop in unexpectedly across the Saudi border from the Gulf of Aqaba. As often as not, they would carry out a simulated attack on the Saudi Air Base at Tabuk. The frustrated Saudis were falling into a trap by reacting exactly as expected. They were crying out for their own F-15's so that Israel would be unable to continue those brazen over-flights. What the Saudis had so far refused to accept is that that was all a ruse, a deceptive trick.

Well, it was planned that one day in 1982 Israel would launch the real raid. At first it would look like just another of those mock bullying attacks on the Saudi Air Base but, when the Israeli jets would pass over the Base, they would not turn back as in the past. Instead, they would thunder overhead in a straight line toward the Persian Gulf. Disappearing into the undefended interior of Saudi Arabia, they would disperse to elude further detection.

As in the case of the Iraq raid, the American-manned AWACS plane would conveniently fail to locate those Israeli attackers in time, and/or give false information as to direction, craft type, etc. Within a couple of hours, nuclear fireballs would cap off the Saudi oil wells. The world would be in a state of total shock; the industrial heart of Europe and Japan would be crippled--but this would only be the beginning.

NOW HEAR THIS. THIS WILL MOST LIKELY TAKE PLACE RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHTMARE OF A PLANNED ISRAELI/BOLSHEVIK CHEMICAL ATTACK AGAINST YOUR OWN MILITARY. WHILE IN THE MIDST OF THE TOTAL CONFUSION AND RAMPANT DEATH AND HORROR, AN ATTACK ON THOSE FIELDS WOULD GO BY WITH WIDE-OPEN ACCEPTANCE OF IT HAVING BEEN DONE BY SADDAM HUSSEIN. OH THE POTENTIAL COMING DOWN ON THIS WORLD IS DASTARDLY INDEED. PRAY THAT RUSSIA HOLDS STRONG AND HUSSEIN BIDES HIS TIME FOR IT IS INCREDIBLY IN THE BALANCE--FOR THE SURVIVAL OF THE WORLD.

Go now, and when we return we will talk of the lies regarding the safety of your military machine to survive chemical war--you will have hundreds and hundreds of thousands killed--and the Pentagon KNOWS IT!


PJ 19
CHAPTER 4
REC #3 HATONN

FRIDAY, AUGUST 31, 1990 7:38 P.M. YEAR 4 DAY 15
DISAPPOINTMENT
I feel your pain and disappointment as you are presented with truth which cannot he refuted. It is the plan that you get no news of truth and, when you do, it is buried in the back pages in small print. How many of you realize that the oil companies whose employees are being held in Iraq have stopped all salaries, benefits, health coverage, etc., for those people? Now, you tell me who is the evil one? Those are not Iraq's oil companies--they are the elitist cartel's oil companies--you know, like British Petroleum and Shell and Tex­aco, etc. Does this give you great national pride?

Do you further realize that your country is truly considering going in and sacrificing the "hostages"--your husbands and fathers--to "get the mad-man Hus­sein"? Worse, how do you feel to realize the American public stands in favor of such action? God weeps for you for you deliberately continue in your igno­rance and deceit. Let me now show you that which shall be reaped as reward for your childrens' willing service unto your nation.

VULNERABLE TO POISON GAS
The administration of President George Bush has ignored two above top-se­cret Pentagon reports concerning the vulnerability of U.S. forces to chemical weapons in committing tens of thousands of American troops to Saudi Arabia to face whatever is set up for them to face. Obviously, chemical weaponry is one of the plans, albeit not Iraq's plan, but your own and that of Israel.

I might suggest, however, that the Iraqis are fully aware of this information and HAVE THE REPORTS AND DOCUMENTATION IN THEIR HANDS. It is, again, only you innocent sleeple who are victims of the lies.

The American public has the obligation to KNOW THE FACTS OF THESE HORRENDOUS AND DELIBERATELY ORCHESTRATED EVENTS. LET US JUST TAKE THE SCENARIO, FOR BREVITY'S SAKE, THAT THE IRAQIS WOULD INVADE AND USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS. IT WILL NOT HAPPEN THAT WAY BUT CHEMICAL WEAPONS REC­OGNIZE NO CREEDS, COLORS, CAUSES OR WHO LAUNCHES THEM!

BUSH KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT THE DANGERS ARE
The Bush administration has foreknowledge that the results of this military situation can and probably will be catastrophic--described by ones who know and cannot change the action as "a foolhardy 'Charge of the Light Brigade.'"

AMERICAN AFFRONT
It is an affront to the American people, who must send their sons, husbands and fathers; daughters, sisters and mothers to Saudi Arabia for such a potentially disastrous encounter and, as the case will be, sitting ducks for your own ally to devastate.

ARE THE SOVIETS INNOCENT?
Of course not. The Soviets were eager, for the purposes of nurturing world public opinion, to join the U.S. and other nations of the world in condemning the ridiculous "invasion" of tiny Kuwait. They are not so eager, however, to send any troops to stand beside America's young patriots in battle as neither are any of the other so-called United Nations.

Then there is Israel, always eager to extend its Zionist domain, which has the U.S. set up to eliminate Iraq, its mortal enemy, and to remove the world's attention from its brutalization of the Palestinian people. No one is going to no­tice Israeli troops killing frustrated and homeless rock-throwing Palestinian children and the shameful and illegal establishment of Israeli settlements by displacing Palestinian families from the disputed West Bank. The world won t even notice that it wasn't the Iraqis who nuclear bombed the Arab oil fields for they would be too busy watching thousands of your own children dying an agonizing death on the battlefields from "friendly" chemical "errors".

GAMES
The first report concerns the results of a series of computer war games commissioned by the U.S. Air Force some four years ago to determine if Ameri­can troops could survive a chemical warfare attack anywhere around the world. I recently pointed out that this very scenario, as set up in Saudi Arabia over the Iraq situation, was set up a decade ago and the same war "games" were orchestrated and laid forth.

The second was conducted by the U.S. Army just two months ago at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

Both reports found that the U.S. would encounter "horrifying" casualties if Hussein or anyone attacks with poison gas.

At Fort Leavenworth, top U.S. Army officers gathered to hear the results of a simulated encounter in the Middle East between the powerful nation of "Shattland" (code name for Iraq), which had hypothetically attacked into the vital oil fields of "Audialand" (Saudi Arabia).

It was instantly apparent that the U.S. forces would not halt Iraq without destroying the world s largest oil fields, which would create havoc for the econ­omy of the world for years.

According to Elizabeth Sigmund (I give names because you will want to confirm this story, no doubt), a British chemical weapons expert, the "really ap­palling thing for American forces on the ground is the fact of being forced into anti-chemical warfare gear which will he totally intolerable in the desert, and only fractionally effective (if at all) under any circumstances."

The Iraqis are prepared to deliver poison mustard and nerve gases by drop­ping canisters of the deadly substances from Iraqi aircraft or by Soviet-built Scud medium-range guided missiles. The Scuds are capable of delivering a payload of 1,000 pounds of a chemical agent up to 400 miles from their launch site.

Gen. Colin Powell, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who reportedly reviewed the results of the Fort Leavenworth exercise, said of the chemical weapons that, "It is a threat that we are concerned with." Does Colin Powell really know the plans? Come now, little babes! He went on to claim that the Iraqis have now in place numerous Scud launchers along the Kuwaiti-Saudi Arabian border, many of which have been equipped with poison gas war­heads. And what would YOU do if you were Iraq awaiting being blown off the map?

Powell said U.S. troops being sent to the Middle East are being equipped with gear to protect them from the deadly gases, of which Iraq reportedly has hundreds of thousands of tons in its arsenals. And how many tons do you think the U.S., England, Germany and Israel have? Ask anyone who has served at the special storage depots.

WHAT DO CHEMICAL WARFARE EXPERTS SAY?
They call that wondrous U.S. protection gear, "1950's horse blankets".

TEMPERATURE FACTOR
The protective gear was designed in the 1950's to protect U.S. soldiers from chemical weapons used by Soviet and other Eastern-bloc troops in Europe.

Due to the high temperatures in the desert, often 120 degrees-plus, the bulky gear, which will add at least 10 degrees to the temperature the soldier must deal with, will make it impossible for him to withstand an Iraqi gas attack for more than some 15 minutes.

"The Iraqis certainly have some of the best chemical warfare capabilities in the world," according to Dr. Billy Richardson, a deputy assistant to Secretary of Defense, Richard Cheney. "They have had a lot of practice with it; they are very capable."

Richardson said the casualties would be "horrifying" if the Iraqis use the chemicals against the American forces, or if there should be widespread accidental unleashing on the part of the American military or other United mili­tary defensive operations." What would that tell you about the "possibility" that "everyone" is loaded with chemical weapons as well as microbiological weapons? The Americans were the first and most deadly users of such weapons as far back as World War I and referred to them then and since as "Higher Forms of Killing".

The Iraqis "reportedly" have large stockpiles of mustard gas and the nerve gases Tabun and Sarin, which were initially developed by German scientists during the World War II. However, it is not known for sure what they have or if they possess Soman, the principal nerve gas in the chemical warfare inventory of the Soviet Union, which supplied most of the modern weaponry that transformed Iraq into the most powerful Arab nation in the Middle East. Of course, the rest of the world and especially the U.S. and Israel wouldn't know anything about those elements, would they?

ANTIDOTES ARE USELESS
If Soman is utilized (which is fully planned for total effectiveness), the situa­tion is bleak indeed.

Although Tabun and Sarin are deadly, Soman presents a particularly critical problem for U.S. forces.

Along with their cumbersome body covering that includes rubber boots, rub­ber hood and mask, U.S. soldiers are provided with the drug atropine, with which they would inject themselves if faced with a nerve gas attack.

However, atropine is useless in counteracting Soman. Peter Galbraith, a se­nior staff member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who went to Iraq to interview Kurdish survivors of poison gas attacks, said that somebody is going to get desperate very quickly and chemical weapons are bound to come into use if this confrontation goes further.

TWO-YEAR STUDY
For two years, from 1984 through September, 1986, the U.S. Air Force commissioned 40 leading chemical warfare experts, including academicians from Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, defense specialists, ac­tive and retired military officers and Pentagon scientists, to conduct a series of simulated chemical attacks in a number of global trouble spots to determine how well American forces would perform on the chemical warfare battlefield--(you see, I knew that some of you Americans might just happen to know something or other about chemical weapons).

Dr. Evan Koslow, one of the members of what was called "the Red Team", said the group found that in "an intemperate climate like the Persian Gulf, THE SURVIVABILITY OF U.S. AIR BASES 'IS NIL'. HEAT STRESS REDUCES OUR FORCES TO A HELPLESS GLOB".

SOME OF THE TRUTHS OF IT ALL
There is total probability of confrontation with utilization of chemical warheads from missiles utilizing at least mustard and nerve gases.

U.S. forces would not be able to intercept the missiles.

Casualties among American forces would rapidly mount as they would be forced to utilize the heavy protective gear. Heat stress would quickly make it impossible for the men to work and they would collapse, either from heat exhaustion or from the deadly gas fumes. The casualties would then mount astronomically.

The air bases would shut down, pilots no longer being able to operate the aircraft.

There would then likely he another follow-on attack, either with chemical or conventional weapons. The Americans would be unable to defend them­selves.

According to the Red Team report "virtually ALL of our soldiers would die and the U.S. would lose."

A spokesman at the Virginia-based defense firm, Jaycor, which was granted the Pentagon contract to establish the Red Team, said his firm "would not comment on the team's work because it was of a highly CLASSIFIED na­ture"! And so, my friends, what might you have been doing on the day the world ended? Ponder it most carefully for if you feel no fear or panic at this information--FROM YOUR OWN PEOPLE--THEN YOU ARE INDEED BEYOND IGNORANT, HAVING GROWN INTO THE DIMENSION OF TOTAL STUPIDITY!!!

WHITE HOUSE CONTINGENCY PLANNING FOR PERSIAN GULF

I am simply going to ask Dharma to reprint herein a portion of a public statement which was leaked to only one or two publications but you need to familiarize yourself with the contents. I shall protect the resource.

"SHOOTING IMMINENT"
"Part of the contingency planning on the Persian Gulf crisis by the White House and the Pentagon calls for 'military reprisals' against Iraq in the period between August 27 and September 1.

"It appears that if such an operation were actually mounted, it would be preceded by 'provocations', similar to the threats against American civilian and military personnel used to justify the U.S. move against Panamanian dictator Gen. Manuel Noriega in December, 1989.

"President George Bush has been advised by Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak that he doubted he could hold the Arab League's anti-Iraq coalition together beyond the end of September if a military stalemate developed.

"But there is an equally important domestic reason for military action against Iraq not later than September 1, if Bush is truly seriously considering it.

"The House of Representatives resumes its sessions at noon on September 5, and the Senate reconvenes at 10 A.M. on September 10. Any hostilities would have to be completed before those dates.

"In this connection, the experience of the White House and the Pen­tagon in the invasion of Panama is paramount. Then, too, the Congress was out of session and Noriega surrendered to the United States by January 3, before Congress returned. With this success in Panama, Congressional criticism was eliminated.

"NUKES TO BE USED

"The U.S. contingency plan under study calls for attack with a mix of artillery shells and bombs, including the first-ever use of NEUTRON WARHEADS, nuclear weapons which kill personnel but do not de­stroy military equipment.

"Under this strategy, Kuwaiti oil wells and ports will remain intact, and Kuwait can immediately resume oil exports and bring down the price of oil on the world markets. (Hatonn: of course the Kuwaitis would be dead also but that must be simply incidental.)

"An important secret element includes bombing the headquarters where Saddam is located in the hope that be would be killed. Bush is determined that the failure to kill Col. Muammar el-Kadaffi during the 1986 U.S. raid on Libya would not be repeated in the case of Saddam.

"Assuming his plans are undertaken, and they succeed, Bush would effectively blunt criticism within the United Nations of the U.S. eco­nomic sanctions against Iraq and would be seen, instead, as a bold, vic­torious leader.

"Finally, Bush could expect that a victory over Iraq with minimum loss of American lives would prompt the American people to elect enough Republicans (and more Zionists) to the Senate to give him control of that legislative body."

Ah yes, aren't Congressional recesses and Executive Orders wondrous things for a dictator's use'? So much for you ones who blindly say, "God is in his heaven and all is right with the world," and, "I'll just find myself and practice Ascension". When you *et up here I hope you look up old Hatonn because I want to be among the first to tell your brethren how it works! Of course, if you ascend through a nuclear blast--it doesn't count as a truly "controlled" and "learned" method of Ascension. Further, if you are a survivor who didn't learn your Ascension lessons and are stuck with burying all those millions of dead bodies who didn't "ascend" either--don't complain to your upstairs brothers about not being forewarned!

God rest ye merry gentlemen, let nothing you dismay--
just dance and dance and sing thine songs
for the beast has you at bay!
Curse this scribe and curse this truth
and denounce the call of God-‑
for in the ending dance, my friend,
'twill be ye atop the sod!

(You might well find that you did not ascend properly and there is no one left to put you 'neath that sod.)

Walk within the shelter of my wings, chelas, and I shall care for you--you're not heavy to carry for you are my brother! Good night and sweet dreams! Will you fly with the great and powerful whirlwind unto the heavens or will you simply reap the ravages of the whirlwind? It is indeed your choice! AHO!