Tags, 상세검색
PJ 51CHAPTER 1
REC #1 HATONN
THU., JUNE 18, 1992 7:44 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 307
THURSDAY. JUNE 18. 1992[Editor's note: This chapter has been printed in our prior JOURNAL (THE DIVINE PLAN, Vol. I) and is being repeated because of its important message.]
SAN LUIS OBISPO CONNECTION
The following series of informative reprints are from a well-known personage among groups who have investigated and researched for truth and who has published much information. He has published information which has jeopardized his life on many occasions which indicates that ALL OF YOU NEED THE INFORMATION. He has sent a packet of information which needs to be brought to your attention--AGAIN. His outlay is a bit different in both presentation and in some details. I honor this person and respect his research.
He has given permission that we may utilize any and all of the documents in any way we find fit and suitable. I thank him for his gracious willingness to share. I do not yet, however, have permission to call attention to this person by name so will only refer to him at this time as R.R. I, further, use the term "him" as generic reference.
I offer the reprinted information as given--without more than cursory input. I have no wish nor intent to slash and cut another's work so--as is our practice--information is given as nearly in full as possible and with NO CHANGES IN CONTENT. IF I COMMENT AS WE MOVE ALONG THEN I INDICATE AS MUCH. Therefore, I require that YOU be in the balancing of the information with that which 10 you already have and then I suggest you get your hands on "back" JOURNALS such as SPACEGATE, SKELETONS IN THE CLOSET, BLOOD AND ASHES, END OF THE MASQUERADE, THE DARK CHARADE and in addition, all of the TANGLED WEB SERIES. If you don't have the information, backup and confirmation--you aren't going to know what hit you, beloved friends.
You must understand, further that there is massive confrontation among and between factions of this "New Global Conspiracy" which only vies for top position--the GOALS are the same.
Quote:
THE SLO CONNECTIONDon't believe one word of this. Look it up yourself! If you have a brain, you can figure it out!
(Number One in Series)
Permission granted to copy any part of this book. R.R.
During the 1950's, while the United States was fighting a war in Korea, the French were fighting a war in French Indochina (Vietnam). Although the reason for the U.S. involvement in Korea was somewhat obscure, the French were very sure of their reason for being in Indochina. It was the same reason the British had spent the previous 100 years there, to control the opium production. The United States financed the French war. Why? For a piece of the action--HEROIN! In 1954, with the help of the CIA, the Vietnamese defeated the French and the Americans took over. In the 15 years following, 58,000 Americans died there. Hundreds are still imprisoned there to hide the U.S. heroin business. (A NATION BETRAYED by Col. Bo Gritz) [H: Please, readers, take note that even the Soviets now ADMIT they still have POWs from W.W.II right in Russian territory-what think ye about Korea and Vietnam as I have told you over and over again?]
The "French Connection" of heroin into the United States was as follows: From Indochina, the opium went to Marseille, France, where it was processed into heroin. From Marseille it came to America through several channels: The U.S. military; Cuba under control of Batista; the Mafia and "Resorts International"; the Bahamas (see the U.S. Senate report on Terrorism and Narcotics which tells how U.S. Ambassadors, one from San Luis Obispo, shut down an investigation of corrupt Bahamanian officials involved in drug trafficking and involved with prominent Americans in Florida).
G.H.W. BUSH: DRUG CZAR
Another channel was through the offshore oil drilling platforms in the Gulf of Mexico. The drugs were offloaded from fishing boats far out at sea. From these platforms the drugs came ashore via the normal crew and equipment boats thereby avoiding detection. This first came to light during the Kennedy assassination investigation of Louisiana District Attorney Jim Garrison. Other investigators and writers on the Kennedy assassination confirmed that the platforms were being used to smuggle drugs. These oil drilling platforms were pioneered and owned by a Houston, Texas based oil company known as Zapata Offshore Oil. The president and chief executive officer of Zapata Oil was George Herbert Walker Bush! In 1976, as Director of Central Intelligence, George Bush was head of the world's largest drug trafficking organization. (See the Christic Institute lawsuit, the Col. Bo Gritz tapes, the Mae Brussel Research Center, "THE POLITICS OF HEROIN" by Professor Alfred McCoy, "The Crimes of Patriots" by Jonathan Kwitny, H. Ross Perot, Barbara Honegger "October Surprize", Richard Brenneke, Dave Emory of "Radio Free America", Abbie Hoffman, John Judge, William Cooper and many others including Senator Kerry's U.S. Senate Subcommittee Report on Terrorism and Narcotics.)
North San Luis Obispo politicians have traditionally been elected on tickets promoting unlimited growth and unlimited real estate development. [H: San Luis Obispo is in the geographic location of Santa Barbara. One outstanding reason for of‑12 fering you readers this information is that the SAME GROUP is integrally involved in the very property in confiscation by the RTC and priorly by Santa Barbara Savings, etc., of this scribe. The dirty politics has seeped into every judicial bench and legal "group" in the State but most corrupt are the counties in which these individuals set up criminal operations. This is why I have told you that you will find this particular piece of property has ones all the way to the Presidency involved in the criminal actions---BUT, this holds true for every State and County in the Union. Don't be fooled because you live in the boonies somewhere and think yourself safe and secure--Tehachapi IS the "boonies" and yet has as corrupt politics and power brokers as any place in California. This is why much of our building and projects will need also be begun in Nevada and then in this place. We have months upon months to allow for the power line to give approval to even the least of these projects. In some instances, however, the project is similar to that which is already present on property so we hope to cut some of the "ribbons" in advance.] In San Luis Obispo, Jerry Diefenderfer and Bill Coy received large contributions from Los Angeles Realty Political Action Committees (PAC). Cattle business political action committees donated more to Coy's campaign than to any other candidate in California, including ***Deukmejian (Governor). Other north county politicians such as Carol Hallette (we shall present further information regarding her) and WILLIAM P. CLARK (very important character), who was Ronald Reagan's National Security Advisor and his Secretary of the Interior, have close ties to the cattle business and the cattle political action committees.
ZAPATA; OFFSHORE OIL, CATTLE, DRUGS
Where do these Cattle PAC's get their enormous amounts of cash to buy politicians? Take the Zapata Cattle Company for example. Yes, that's right! Zapata! The same name and the same affiliations to the previously mentioned Zapata Offshore Oil of Houston, Texas, previously (???) owned by our favorite drug "czar" and President of the United States of America, George Herbert Walker Bush!
The Zapata Cattle Company has, for many years, imported large amounts of cattle from Mexico. If you remember your high school biology, you will recall that cows have four stomachs. Hey, why not? If humans can smuggle drugs inside their bodies, why not cows? A cow must have 20 times the capacity of a human! Not only that but the tractor-trailer rigs used to transport them had secret built-in compartments. In his book, THE UNDERGROUND EMPIRE. author James Mills stated that the border customs agents received $10,000 every time they flagged through a drug truck without stopping it for inspections. [H: Besides, the trucks themselves and the shipping companies belonged directly to these same individuals--utilizing well-orchestrated corporations (in Nevada).]
Real estate development and construction is the classic way of laundering drug money.
One of the silent partners in the San Luis Obispo cattle business is RONALD REAGAN. [H: It is, further, the same group of "cattle-boys" and real-estate developers, S&L criminals, etc., which provided Reagan with "cover" for his Bel Aire estate and thus and so--(through Nevada Corporations) as a "thank you, old buddy".]
NAME: ZAPATA
Note: "Zapata" is a name for locations off Texas and Florida which fit well with the oil company but the name Zapata was chosen by the Bush cartel because it came from George Bush's old club (cult) at Yale--the "Skull and Bones" The "skull" in point is reported to be the skull of the Mexican Revolutionary, Emiliano Zapata. [H: This may well be correct--for one thing that has the native Americans totally beside themselves in anger is that the same Skull and Bones club has Chief Geronimo's skull, having been stolen by a group of club members headed by Prescott (Dad) Bush.]
Further: Three ships belonging to Zapata Oil which were used to run guns to Fidel Castro (and drugs into the U.S.) were named the "Houston", the "Zapata" and the "Barbara J". [H: Readers, we covered all this IN DETAIL in a JOURNAL. I CAN ONLY ASK THAT YOU CATCH UP YOUR LESSONS AND THAT SIMPLY REQUIRES READING AND STUDYING THE BACK JOURNALS FOR I KNOW NO OTHER RESOURCE WHEREIN YOU CAN GET IT ALL!]
COINCIDENCES, CONNECTIONS, QUESTIONS
William Clark's liaison officer, Carol Hallett, was appointed as Ambassador to the Bahamas. The purpose of this was to shut down a drug investigation of corrupt Bahamian officials and to protect their American partners in Florida. One of these Americans was the President's son, Jeb Bush. (Senate Subcommittee Report-Kerry, Christic Inst., etc....).
Jeb Bush was also the North American connection to Manuel Noriega. (THE CUTOLO AFFIDAVIT by Paul Neri, A NATION BETRAYED by Col. Bo Gritz, etc. and Steven Carr-deceased by way of murder.) The route went from Bogota and Medellin, Colombia to Allbrook Air Force Base in Panama, where the drug aircraft were met by Noriega. Another transhipment point was John Hull's ranch in Costa Rica. ("Frontline"--PBS, "West 57th Street"--CBS, Judy Woodruff, Jane Wallace, Leslie Cockburn, Mike Tolliver, Gary Betzner, George Morales, plus most of the references listed on page one. Richard Brenneke stated on "Larry King-Live"-CNN that he also flew these drug planes, but his connection was Donald Gregg, Bush's National Security Advisor.) The destination of some of these drug shipments was Homestead Air Force Base in Florida. [H: This is completely covered in a JOURNAL also.] (See reference list on pages 20 & 152.)
THE MAN WHO COULD IDENTIFY JEB BUSH AS NORIEGA'S CONNECTION WAS STEVEN CARR.
STEVEN CARR WAS MURDERED IN LOS ANGELES, ALLEGEDLY BY ONE MIKE DECKER, who worked for SICILIA-FALCONE, THE TIJUANA DRUG BOSS. Sicilia-Falcone was the largest supplier of drugs for Southern California.
(Except for maybe Air America and the U.S. Air Force.) [JOURNALS--TANGLED WEB series.] Sicilia-Falcone used the motor-cycle gangs and Roger Frye as a distributing network. Mike Decker was their chief "mechanic". [H: Do you think it simply coincidental that "Malcolm Forbes" played around with Liz and the Motorcycle gangs for the total "fun" of it?] (THE UNDERGROUND EMPIRE by James Mills) The Anzalone brothers and Jerry Schlesinger of Long Beach and Los Osos were the San Luis Obispo affiliates. The Sweet Springs bar in Los Osos was a distributing station and the Anzalone ranch in Santa Margarita was a cocaine processing factory. Several local people connected with this operation died from "accidents" or "suicides". When the Sweet Springs Tavern got "busted" for drug trafficking, the Anzalones went to "Club Fed" at Lompoc for a short vacation. Jerry Anzalone got out the hard way--on a gurney, covered with a sheet. "Diarrhea of the mouth" can often be fatal. Ronnie built a house on 3rd street in Baywood, complete with an iron spike fence, closed circuit surveillance television, and a gun in every room. Several months ago the house was destroyed by fire. (??)
Jerry Schlesinger came out of all this smelling like a rose. It pays to have friends in high places. Ask ex-supervisor Bill Coy. He always seemed to have a good relationship with the "Mayor" of Los Osos (California).
Scott Alexander was not so fortunate. Scott, who claimed to have had law enforcement experience, (Military Police, Arizona State Police) was helping a Federal Agent (DEA?) Michael Francis Aivaz gather information for the above mentioned "drug bust". Evidendy Scott did his job too well and found out too much. His body was found by the creek on the M. V. Rodriguez ranch on Hwy. 41 just outside of Morro Bay (California). He was "suicided" with a very short 12 gauge shotgun (one barrel or both?).
Mike Aivaz disappeared shordy after the big "drug bust" and Scott's death. He was in Florida, (Florida? coincidence?) New Jersey, and Fresno, California. He was allegedly "drying out" in a sanitarium. He made several quiet trips back to Los Osos where he visited Anzalone's Sweet Springs. Mike took the ultra short 12 gauge away from Scott because it was "illegal" but gave it back to him the day before Scott died. Where is Mike now???
Neal McCrea and "The Last Voyage of the 'Janet Lee' " is another interesting part of this snake pit without a bottom. The boat "Janet Lee" and its cargo of cocaine was returning from a business trip to Central America (see above paragraph 2). The boat went into Vandenberg Air Force Base and Neal left Vandenberg in a body bag. No one seems to know what happened to the cocaine. Neal's widow, Janet, became very wealthy and became Janet Schlesinger (INTERESTING!). Maybe one could ask a couple of persons named Carnahan and Brandenberg who could explain it all quite appropriately if you could FIND them.
This last paragraph is not the end of this report. This report is just the "Tip of the Iceberg". Interested parties should start their own investigation and interrogate the following local citizens. Start with bartenders, building contractors, dopers, sheriff s deputies, county officials (especially Building and Planning), country supervisors (especially ex-supervisors), judges (including ex-judges). Check and see how many local citizens went to Washington with Ronald Reagan and left Washington embarrassed, disgraced, or with "dirty hands". The following list of persons could supply plenty of information if they were so inclined: Ronnie Anzalone, Jerry Schlesinger and Janet, Ed-die Haworth, Deputy Mike Sheridan, Deputy Chuck Graves, George Jacobsen, Carnahan and Brandenberg, Mike Radon, Kathy Hodges, Al Switzer, County employees Gibson and 1Vfilne, County supervisors including past supervisors Coy and Diefenderfer, judges including ex-judge WILLIAM CLARK. Clark, as Reagan's National Security Advisor, rapidly left Washington and disappeared in obscurity in Ireland just after the Korean Air Lines 007 fiasco. There are others but this will give investigators a GOOD START. [H: You will also find that Deukmejian, Jason Brent of the Mojave Court (ex) and other Kern County "locals" also know all about these little involvements and insure that the line could not be run back up to catch the fisher. You will note that when E.J. went to Santa Barbara to check with the wondrous RTC about his property--the RTC was housed with Santa Barbara Savings (the "taken-over" mortgage company), was involved with Soloman Brothers and the "local" lawyers--contacted for information--said "you DO NOT REALLY WANT TO KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS!". Americans--WAKE UP! Also, send this material to the Constitutional Law Center--it might give them impetus to get on with those filings to the court--if nothing else, at some point "THEY" will want to shut down this "discovery". No, it will not stop the discovery but it will get attention. Yes, it IS dangerous but nothing else we have done is "safe". And if "dangerous" is that which is required--so let it be. If ones cannot walk through shadows then the sorting must be done. I am a "very big boy" and I also have "pretty good contacts" and a "lot of pull" and I CAN TAKE CARE OF YOU, CHELAS. Have I not already done so??]
THE SAN LUIS OBISPO LAW FIRM OF SINSHEIMER, SCHIEBELHUT, AND BAGGETT HAVE RECENTLY ANNOUNCED THE ADDITION TO THEIR FIRM OF WILLIAM P. CLARK.
[H: Another major law firm (about the second largest in the world) which is totally involved is Shea and Gould etc., etc., from which flowed Jason Brent at the appointment of the Governor, Deukemajian. Is it any wonder that when Brent ran for Superior Court Judge last month, he advertised that he "had all the major Republicans on his side"? Wake up little sleepyheads--the toast is burning!]
[H: I expect this document to be sent to Hornback. I want him to KNOW that his prior firm was involved, also, and that the fiasco with the "reconstruction" hearing in Mojave was leaving him wide open for a libel and malpractice suit--except that it would have gotten "him" and ours is not to "get HIM"--he has one of "our" children! Perhaps one of these days he can see the merit as well as the nice abundance of income gleaned from working with the CLC and on some of the cases worthy of his talents. Yes indeedy, there will be abundance--why do you think I have brought you resources" for gold storage and other benefit plans? No, the funding coming in is NOT drug related in any manner and besides, you will receive from distant sources which have no connection to the funds at all at any rate. What we will get for industry and projects is only a tiny tid-bit of the wealth involved. You will be most cautious and careful, however, and do business as we have taught you carefully to do for it is GOOD BUSINESS, honest and worthy. If ones in "our" group get greedy and unworthy of service--then they shall be "out" in the blink of an eye for we are in God's service ONLY and not out to do anyone IN. IF you ones of the nation wish to clean up the mess--ours is to outlay it for you--NOT FIX IT FOR YOU FOR OURS IS A DIFFERENT MISSION AND NOT TO INVOLVE OURSELVES INTO YOUR POLITICS.]
* * *
Dharma, let us close this portion. We are going to confuse you greatly, Editors, but we are going to be writing on THREE subjects (but all inter-connected) simultaneously. I must ask you to label the references accordingly. It is time I stop threatening and get on with Bush in the CIA and that will take many writings. Further, I ask that George Green contact the authors of a book being called GEORGE BUSH: THE UNAUTHORIZED BIOGRAPHY (or something similar) by Webster Griffin Tarp-ley and Anton Chaitkin. The information can be tracked down through The New Federalist who is running a series at this time. The authors will find it all but impossible to find a publisher, if I don't miss my guess, and this work needs to be published and distributed. The information is very accurate and I would appreciate the assistance to them by at least recognition and distribution--if in fact, publishing is already arranged. We will be efforting to soon begin to give you monetary assistance, George, for these projects. Thank you.
I also wish to next write on the Divine Plan for I believe we are to the end (in number of pages) for the current volume under assembly. We will refer to this volume in point as Vol. I in reference to THE DIVINE PLAN. I plan to branch off into a path which shall surprise you--for I must tell you how it IS and how it will be--even if you don't like it. It is important that you ones NOT confuse the "three days of darkness" with simply a photon entry period which may or may not even take place. YOUR OWN "RULERS" AND "THUGS" COULD STOP THAT NULL-TIME IF THEY BUT WOULD DO SO. WE CAN STOP IT IN A SPLIT SECOND IF THEY WOULD BUT ALLOW US TO DO SO--SO YOU SEE, YOU-THE-PEOPLE REMAIN THE PAWNS! I CANNOT HELP IT FOR IT IS NOT MINE TO DO. I CAN ONLY GET YOU INTO KNOWING SO THAT YOU WILL BE PREPARED IN THAT WE CAN CONTINUE RIGHT ON WITH THAT WHICH IS OUR MISSION.
Please take a short break and let us continue as the days become so overfilled now that I must ask for more writing in the days available. I shall give unto you, chela, that which you need to press on. Salu.
REFERENCE LIST
(See page 152 also)
This index was requested by Commander Hatonn in the 6/18/92 #1 writing called "San Luis Obispo Connection" starting on p.7 of this LIBERATOR. Indexed by subject from Journals November 91 through March 92. The JOURNAL number is bold and in parentheses, followed by the relevant page numbers therein.
William Casey: (39) 22, 24, 28; (42) 34, 184, 193; (44) 70
Zapata Corporations (Bush Family enterprises): (45) 58, 60-63, 83, 90; (47) 221
Blackbird (Super Secret Project): (39) 37; (40) 31; (41) 195
October Surprise (1980 Hostage Holdover for Reagan's Inauguration): (39) 37; (40) 31, 69, 107; (41) 103; (44) 25, 70; (45) 59
Jeb Bush: (46) 109
Manuel Noriega: (31) 47, 53; (42) 25, 32-48; (43) 15, 97; (44) 48-49; (46) 122
PJ 51CHAPTER 2REC #1 HATONN
MON., JUNE 22, 1992 7:19 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 311
MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1992* * *
E.J., I have to remind you of something very, very critical. As we move into these current subject matters--there will begin, again, a barrage of attempts to take out Dharma. Already this morning, the computer did not function until the third try at it. There will be assaults against the shield with "new" frequency beams and I must ask you ones to go back to "caution of extreme means". This means that care will be taken with ALL incoming persons-NO MEETINGS IN THIS DWELLING FOR THE CURRENT TIME, LOW PROFILE AND BASICALLY KEEP YOUR "BUSINESS" MEETINGS TO THE SUBJECT OF BUSINESS. YOU ONES ARE NO LONGER IN A LITTLE "GAME" OF HIDE AND SEEK AND MUCH OF THE "STUFF" FROM WHICH YOU WILL GARNER "HELP" IS SET UP TO ALLOW THE ENEMY WITHIN. IT IS FINE, FOR THEY WILL ONLY FIND THAT WE ARE NOT "ENEMIES" BUT "CARE" MUST AGAIN BECOME YOUR EVER-PRESENT THOUGHT AND A BIT OF ISOLATION WILL BE THE BETTER PART OF WISDOM, PLEASE.
* * *
Indeed, Dharma, we ARE going to write on Bush's involvement with the CIA--finally! But before we do so I must share a news item of last evening which I HOPE most of you missed.
URGENT AND CRITICAL NOTICE
Just this morning a person "claiming" to be in Pennsylvania who "identified(??)" himself to George Green, as one Paul Robert Resnick Jr., called to demand that the information being set forth be STOPPED! The specific writings in point were from the April 14, Volume 18, No. 13 issue of the LIBERATOR. Why would this be? Was it my breakdown of the "major point of teachings" of the various MAJOR religions? How about "Distractors"? Could it be my suggestion to "use" BankAmerica (for protection within the Elite vaults)? Could it be that the identification of "Hatonn" displeases him?--for MOST deny such existence as possibility. OR: Could it be the full article from Senate Report No. 93-549 (Some Dare Call It Treason)? Could it be the "CIA: INTELLIGENCE AND POLICY"? Could it be John Coleman's writing regarding the "Patriot Missiles" and the "hearings". (By the way, that was the last shared article we have printed from this resource.)
WHY would this above information disturb anyone? Could the objection be THE "LIE"? and other information, since, caused alarm?
Just understand, all of you crew-members, it is the time of separation of the "men" from the "boys". No one in the Elite groups seem to understand that my mission is to bring Truth for the unfolding and wrapping up of a planetary "cycle". My intent is not to interfere with "business as usual" for if the PEOPLE want to stop corruption--it is their responsibility--NOT MINE, to do so. This is WHY I make sure to give you information which has already not only been published but even appears in Congressional Records, etc. If ones perform in a manner which requires "hiding" from public view--then I suggest YOU ONES check into it for they all "claim" TO BE HONEST, OPEN AND ONLY SERVING YOU AND THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD IF THIS BE "TRUE", THEN IT IS SURELY "I" WHO IS IN ERROR OF PERCEPTION OF GOODLY "SERVICE" SO WHY SHOULD I CAUSE ANYONE ALARM? THIS INFORMATION IS SO OLD AND SO DREARY THAT I AM CONSTANTLY BEING THREATENED WITH LAWSUIT AFTER LAWSUIT "FOR PLA-GIARISM"! YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS, CHELAS!!
Even the projects we will build are simply for use by the humble "peasants" with inexpensive but durable and beautiful housing, foodstuffs and gardening services, along with ability to commu-nicate and make motion pictures. Why are the Elite angry with us--would you not think the subjects would be pleased for even the slightest amount of "advertising" of their "stand" on political issues and their "political platforms of action"? By all records according to "them", the LIBERATOR has "no audience" and the material is "false and stupidly incoherent". So be it--beats me!!
NEW GAME--PEROT-BASHING
The spokesperson quoted in this morning's TV mush (and we must assume it was one of the Republicans) said that several years ago (like in the 70's) Ross Perot spent "bundles" of "his own money" on investigators and investigations TRYING to find wrongdoing and illegal actions "on George Bush". "BUT HE FOUND NOTHING!" the speaker went on to say. This is the same man (Perot) who said a few weeks past that "Bush is a FINE MAN but we need change in Washington??" And--my own crew claims that Hatonn is confusing! I could write hundreds of pages on just these two points, chelas--I can only hope that your insight and perception to the "unseen" and "unheard"--by physical means--gives you as much.
ALSO "WATERGATE" AND "IRANGATE"
WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT SPACEGATE
The following excerpts are taken directly from a manuscript copy of a book "soon-to-be" published by Webster Griffin Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin. I have no input on this substance other than to say these people have done their homework. Since by their own statements the book is "unauthorized" as a biography, I would suggest they will have great difficulty in getting it published. George, please make contact with them and in exchange for utilizing portions of the volume, we will see to it that it gets published. Please require that the pricing be kept low enough for ALL to be able to receive it and I WILL MOST SURELY PUSH IT AS MANDATORY READING. The New Federalist, a LaRouche publication, has utilized it in serial form but all others have been blocked from publishing in hope to drown it before elections or "other happenings" which lock in Bush. I would surmise that The New Federalist might well be the publishers if, indeed, there is valid possibility of such. It does, however, lose its value "after the facts" such as elections and current events. Our only contribution at this time is to simply get information out as well as we can in assisting those who already DARE.
Bush, you readers must come to realize, is PERSONALLY responsible for the incarceration via Kissinger of Lyndon LaRouche and personally keeps him incarcerated by refusing to respond to the legal documents in his hands. I thought you inquiring minds would want to know this fact.
How do I feel personally about Bush? I appreciate his HELP in the matter of projects for they do and will continue to assist thousands of citizens. I do not play in your political games other than to present the facts wherever I find them in disagreement with the "party-line". I am an enemy of EVIL--not ANY "man". I will get a remnant through this tribulation and I appreciate all the help I can get. In fact, I met with the original Mr. Bush at Camp David and offered to remove him to total security IF HE WOULD REVEAL THE TRUTH TO YOU-THE-PEOPLE--HE WAS GRACIOUS AND LOVING BUT FELT HIS POWER WAS BIG ENOUGH TO SUSTAIN HIS SAFETY AND THAT OF HIS FAMLLY--HE WAS WRONG. To each his own.
A BIT OF HISTORY
I am going to start in the middle of a subject so please do not be confused by dates. I am taking up at the point in 1975 wherein George became head of the CIA. I trust you will all go back into the series on TANGLED WEBS and realize that George Bush's involvement in the CIA was PRIOR to the assassination of Kennedy (both brothers). That is not my focus herein so let us take up with his directorship.
QUOTE: (This is a very good and inclusive book as you will note this information comes after 15 preceding chapters.)
In late 1975, as a result in particular of his role in Watergate, Bush's confirmation as CIA director was not automatic. And though the debate of his confirmation was superficial, some senators, including in particular the late Frank Church of Idaho, made some observations about the dangers inherent in the Bush nomination that have turned out in retrospect to be useful.
The political scene on the home front, from which Bush had been so anxious to be absent during 1975, was the so-called "Year of Intelligence", in that it had been a year of intense scrutiny of the illegal activities and abuses of the intelligence community, including CIA domestic and covert operations. On December 22, 1974, the New York Times published the first a series of articles by Seymour M. Hersh, which relied on leaked reports of CIA activities assembled by Director James Rodney Schlesinger to expose alleged misdeeds by the agency. [H: Hmmnn--Did I not just write about a San Luis Obispo female "connection" called Neal McCrea (Janet) of the "Janet Lee" drug running boat--who "lost" her husband by terminal disappearance and later became Janet Schlesinger? This must be a good "common" American name or something because you find Schlesingers (from the same family tree) in every top group of Elite. It would seem this one is probably "Jerry" of the San Luis Obispo Connection. Indeed, I'm sure you can have confidence in such "leaked" reports. Please realize my tongue just punched through my cheek!]
It was widely recognized at the time that the Hersh articles were a self-exposure by the CIA that was designed to set the agenda for the Ford-appointed Rockefeller Commission, which was set up a few days later, on January 4. The Rockefeller Commission was supposed to examine the malfeasance of the intelligence agencies and make recommendations about how they could be reorganized and reformed. In reality, the Rockefeller Commission proposals would reflect the transition of the Structures of the 1970's toward the growing totalitarian tendencies of the 1980's.
While the Rockefeller Commission was a tightly controlled vehicle of the Eastern Anglophile Liberal Establishment, congressional investigating committees were impaneled during 1975 whose proceedings were somewhat less rigidly controlled. These included the Senate Intelligence Committee, known as the Church Committee, and the corresponding House committee, first chaired by Rep. Lucien Nedzi (who had previously chaired one of the principal Watergate-era probes) [H: Do you suppose this could ALSO be a connection with THE "Nedzi" of the San Luis Obispo Connection? It must be that this investigation was handled by a whole flock of foxes or is that a "bunch" of foxes in the "flock" of chickens?] and then (after July) by Rep. Otis Pike [H: No-o-o? Could it really be such a coincidence?]. One example was the Pike Committee's issuance of a contempt of Congress citation against Henry Kissinger [H: Is this just not too unbelievable to go on?] for his refusal to provide documentation of covert operations in November, 1975. Another was Church's role in leading the opposition to the Bush nomination. [H: We have barely begun to write and already I must ask you sincerely: Are you beginning to SEE how your nation got in the shape you are in?]
The Church Committee launched an investigation of the use of covert operations for the purpose of assassinating foreign leaders. By the nature of things, this probe was let to grapple with the problem of whether covert operations sanctioned to eliminate foreign leaders had been re-targeted against domestic political figures. The obvious case was the Kennedy assassination.
Frank Church--who, we must keep in mind, was himself an ambitious politician--was especially diligent in attacking CIA covert operations, which Bush would be anxious to defend. The CIA's covert branch, Church thought, was a "self-serving apparatus". "It's a bureaucracy which feeds on itself, and those involved are constantly sitting around thinking up schemes for intervention which will win them promotions and justify further additions to the staff. ... It self-generates interventions that otherwise never would be thought of, let alone authorized."
It will be seen that, at the beginning of Bush's tenure at the CIA, the congressional committees were on the offensive against the intelligence agencies. By the time that Bush departed Langley, the tables were turned, and it was the Congress which was the focus of scandals including "Koreagate" [H: Whoops! Didn't know about that one??]. Soon thereafter the Congress would undergo the assault of Abscam. [H: And Dharma was afraid we would run out of things to write about!]
Preparation for what was to become the "Halloween massacre" began in the Ford White House during the summer of 1975. The Ford Library in Ann Arbor, Michigan preserves a memo from Donald Rumsfeld to Ford dated July 10, 1975, which deals with an array of possible choices for CIA director. Rumsfeld had polled a number of White House and administration officials and asked them to express preferences among "outsiders to the CIA". (Gerald R. Ford Library, Richard B. Cheney Files, Box 5) [H: Richard B. Cheney "box"?]
Dick Cheney of the White House staff proposed Robert Bork, followed by Bush and Lee Iacocca. Among the officials polled by Cheney was Henry Kissinger, who suggested C. Douglas Dillon, Howard Baker, and James R. Schlesinger. Rumsfeld himself listed Bork, Dillon, Stanley Resor, Lee Iacocca and Walter Wriston, but NOT Bush. The ONLY officials putting Bush on their "possible" lists, other than Cheney, were Jack 0. Marsh, a White House counselor to Ford, and David Packard. When it came time for Rumsfeld to sum up the aggregate number of times each person was mentioned, minus one point for each time a person had been recommended against, among the names on the final list were the following: Robert Bork (rejected in 1987 for the Supreme Court), John S. Foster of PFIAB (formerly of the Department of Defense), C. Douglas Dillon, Stanley Resor, and Robert Roosa.
It will be seen that Bush was not among the leading candidates, perhaps because his networks were convinced that he was going to make another attempt for the vice-presidency and that therefore the Commerce Department or some similar post would be more suitable. The summary profile of Bush sent to Ford by Rumsfeld found that Bush had "experience in government and diplomacy" and was "generally familiar with components of the intelligence community and their missions" while having management experience. Under "Cons" Rumsfeld noted: "RNC post lends undesirable political cast."
As we have seen, the CIA post was finally offered by Ford to Edward Bennett Williams perhaps with an eye on building a bipartisan bridge toward a powerful faction of the intelligence community. But Williams did not want the job; Bush, originally slated for the Department of Commerce, was given the CIA appointment.
The announcement of Bush's nomination occasioned a storm of criticism whose themes included the inadvisability of choosing a Watergate figure for such a sensitive post so soon after that scandal had finally begun to subside. References were made to Bush's receipt of a financial largesse from Nixon's Townhouse fund and related operations. There was also the question of whether the domestic CIA apparatus would get mixed up in Bush's expected campaign for the vice-presidency. These themes were developed in editorials during the month of November 1976, while Bush was kept in Beijing by the requirements of preparing the Ford-Mao meetings of early December. To some degree. Bush was just hanging there and slowly, slowly twisting in the wind. The slow-witted Ford soon realized that he had been inept in summarily firing William Colby, since Bush would have to remain in China for some weeks [H: Remain in CHINA??] and then return to face confirmation hearings. Ford had to ask Colby to stay on in a caretaker capacity until Bush took office. The delay allowed opposition against Bush to crystallize to some degree, but his own network was also quick to spring to his defense.
Former CIA officer Tom Braden, writing in the Fort Lauderdale News, noted that the Bush appointment to the CIA looked bad, and looked bad at a time when public confidence in the CIA was so low that everything about the agency desperately needed to look good. Braden's column was entitled "George Bush, Bad Choice for CIA Job".
Rowland Evans and Robert Novak, writing in the Washington Post, commented that "the Bush nomination is regarded by some intelligence experts as another grave moral deflator. They reason that any identified politician, no matter how resolved to be politically pure, would aggravate the CIA's credibility gap. Instead of an identified politician like Bush....what is needed, they feel, is a respected non-politician, perhaps from business or the academic world."
The Washington Post came out against Bush in an editorial entitled "The Bush Appointment". Here the reasoning was that this position "should not be regarded as a political parking spot", and that public confidence in the CIA had to be restored after the recent revelations of wrongdoing.
After a long-winded argument, the conservative columnist George Will came to the conclusion that Ambassador Bush at the CIA would be "the wrong kind of guy at the wrong place at the worst possible time."
Senator Church viewed the Bush appointment in the context of a letter sent to him by Ford on October 31, 1975, demanding that the committee's report on U.S. assassination plots against foreign leaders be kept secret. In Church's opinion, these two developments were part of a pattern and amounted to a new stonewalling defense by what Church had called "the rogue elephant". Church issued a press statement in response to Ford's letter attempting to impose a blackout on the assassination report. "I am astonished that President Ford wants to suppress the committee's report on assassination and keep it concealed from the American people," said Church. Then, on November 3, Church was approached by reporters outside of his Senate hearing room and asked by Daniel Schorr about the firing of Colby and his likely replacement by Bush. Church responded with a voice that was trembling with anger. "There is no question in my mind but that concealment is the new order of the day," he said. "Hiding evil is the trademark of a totalitarian government."
[H: I want you ones to think very carefully here, about events and current happenings. I have long told you that the Elite have a major "goal" which is never lost--and yet there will be factional in-group fighting about WHO does what and to whom! You are seeing the factions begin to show clues of who is who and what is what. It would begin to appear here that Bush really is NOT a part of the in-group of San Luis Obispo but might, in fact, be in direct conflict with them--that means Nixon, Ford and certainly Reagan. I believe you will also note that Bush "promises" information regarding "Perot" right after the conventions. Is clarity seeping into the script? Yes, indeed, Kissinger plays BOTH sides to the hilt and that SHOULD BE MOST DISCONCERTING!]
The following day, November 4, Church read Leslie Gelb's column in the New York Times suggesting that Colby had been fired, among other things, "for not doing a good job containing the congressional investigations." George bush, Gelb thought, "would be able to go to Congress and ask for a grace period before pressing their investigations further." A Washington Star headline of this period summed up this argument: "CIA Needs Bush's PR Talent". Church talked with this staff that day about what he saw as an ominous pattern of events. He told reporters "First came the very determined administration effort to prevent any revelations concerning NSA, their stonewalling of public hearings. Then came the President's letter. Now comes the firing of Colby, Mr. Schlesinger and the general belief that Secretary Kissinger is behind these latest developments." For Church, "clearly a pattern has emerged now to try and disrupt this Senate Intelligence Committee investigation. As far as I'm concerned it won't be disrupted," said Church grimly.
One of Church's former aides, speech writer Loch K. John-son, describes how he worked with Church to prepare a speech scheduled for delivery on November 11, 1975, in which Church would stake out a position opposing the Bush nomination: "The nomination of George Bush to succeed Colby disturbed him as he wanted to wind up the speech by opposing the nomination... He hoped to influence Senate opinion on the nomination on the eve of Armed Services Committee hearings to confirm Bush.
"I rapidly jotted down notes as Church discussed the line he would like to take against the nomination. 'Once they used to give former national party chairmen (as Bush had been under President Nixon) postmaster generalships--the most political and least sensitive job in government,' he said. 'Now they have given this former party chairman the most sensitive and least political agency.' Church wanted me to stress how Bush 'might compromise the independence of the CIA--the agency could be politicized.'"
Some days later, Church appeared on the CBS program Face the Nation. He was asked by George Herman if his opposition to Bush would mean that anyone with political experience would be a priori unacceptable for such a post. Church replied: "I think that whoever is chosen should be one who has demon-strated a capacity for independence, who has shown that he can stand up to the many pressures." Church hinted that Bush had never stood up for principle at the cost of political office. Moreover, "a man whose background is as partisan as a past chairman of the Republican Party does serious damage to the agency and its intended purposes."
* * *
Dharma, please, we need a break. We will simply take up again where we leave off herein. Thank you.
Salu
