PJ 49
CHAPTER 1

REC #2 HATONN

THU., APRIL 9, 1992 9:15 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 237

THURSDAY, APRIL 9, 1992

RESPONSE TO "WHO ARE YOU?"

Who am I? What difference does it make if I bring you TRUTH? If I sort lies from Truth and uncover the secrets set to destroy you as nations and people--what difference does it make? If I were the Tooth Fairy and I bring Truth which allows you to see beyond the shroud of lies, does it matter? I will never give you ANYTHING which cannot be borne up in Truth by confirmation if you but look and find. Further, as a "journalist" and "record keeper" I know my resources and sources and I shall not divulge them for the benefit of their be­ing set upon. I suggest that none of you confuse me with any­thing "mystical" or "out there somewhere"; I am neither. I am very "real", very "near" and there are many, many who come with me.

TRUTH OF "RULES"

You are a follower of, say, Zoroastrianism and therefore you cannot "believe" in my reality? Then I concern over your un­derstanding of Zoroaster. The same goes for Judaism, Brahmanism and thus and so. Christian? Oh, I see--but do you? Who and what is a Christ? Jesus? No, this being in point was born Esu Emmanuel and later called Jesus by one Saul of Tarsus aka Paul--in Greece after the passing on of Jesus. CHRIST is a state of being attained by most of the speakers of the Christ way of Truth unto and within the teachings of the Laws of God and the unchanging Laws of the Creation. We are simply come forth as the forerunner to that return unto your place of the Greater Teacher as you have awaited lo, these many eons.

What of the Laws? Let us consider the "similarities" of the dif­ferent Masters for it is interesting for you, perhaps, to discover the many versions of that most basic natural Law of all rational human conduct, that Law referred to in the Western world as the "Golden Rule".

Major religions of the world teach this "rule" so let us look at it closely as to its various presentations.

Christianity: All things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do you even so to them: for His is the Law and the prophets.

Judaism: What is hateful to you, do not to your fellowmen. This is the entire Law; all the rest is commentary. See, no "eye for eye" or "tooth for tooth" written for and by MAN. Simply put: What is hateful to you, do not to your fellow­men.

Brahmanism: This is the sum of duty: Do naught unto other which would cause you pain if done to you.

Buddhism: Hurt not others in ways you would find hurtful.

Confucianism: Surely it is the maxim of loving-kindness: Do
not unto others that you would not have them do unto you.

Taoism: Regard your neighbor's gain as your own gain, and your neighbor's loss as your own loss.

Zoroastrianism: That nature alone is good which refrains from doing unto another whatsoever is not good for itself.

Islam: No one of you is a believer until he desires for his brother that which he desires for himself.

Considering the fact that this Law has been known and understood by some for thousands of years, in the name of common sense why is this natural Law not being taught as such in every school and every grade, in every cult, church and temple--in ev­ery country of the world?

Why did I not include the aboriginal belief in the above listings? Because I listed "religions" of the world in major categories. The aboriginal presentation of the ancient wisdomkeepers had no "religion"--they WERE BROUGHT FORTH IN TRUTH BEFORE THE "RELIGIONS" WERE SET FORTH BY MAN. Ponder it for it may mean a great deal in your journey into Truth.

You are coming upon the season of Easter time. Check closely and HONESTLY as to exactly WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU! Is that perception of physical or spiritual? Check closely for if you said the crucifixion and blood spillage of Jesus--you have just separated a physical being from a Christ being for one is of physical and the other only of SPIRITUAL.

If any thought came before "Spiritual infinite LIFE" then you had best get on with your studies. Blood is simply a physical substance which flows through physical body and has no spir­itual existence at all. What else do you place between YOU and GOD? It is time to consider it most carefully.

BACK TO THE ILLUSION OF "IMPORTANT"

With the turmoil and collapse of the Japanese market and Banks just as I laid forth for you--I hope I have some new listeners at hand. In that hope fulfilled, I want to share some repetition but clarifications of that which I have been giving unto you.

You have only a couple of "shelters" left in your nation if you abide in the U.S. for the curtain of Executive Order through Emergency Regulations is going to be laid on you soon. Never mind elections for the Elite will not allow anything to stand in their way--especially nothing like democracy for and by the people. You must be learning to read the signs and clues in­stantly and you are a long way behind. I just encountered total lack of full understanding in my own crew.

I have told ones here to please watch news morning and evening and lo and behold, some of my own workers have recently un­plugged the television sets so they wouldn't be upset by the vio­lence and lies. I am continually annoyed and exasperated that my own immediate students and workers fail to hear my warn­ings and lessons. You do not "win" something by "withdrawing" and you do not "fight" something with bigger guns and get killed. You take responsibility and make changes in the midst of the rules and regulations given for your re­strictions--go where they have set their shelters, those who would bind you. The point is not to get "dead" but to have a "remnant" survive to have a Constitutional foundation upon which to build when the Elite Conspirators devour themselves and enslave the multitudes and eliminate some 6 billion people. You do not stay alive by bringing great notice unto selves and brothers and you do not do it by ASSUMING you are not on the beast's listings. YOU ARE ON THE LIST AND HAVE BEEN SINCE BIRTH.

The Master Guide told you to live within the Laws of God and The Creation AND within the laws of the land. If the laws of the land do not break the Commandments of God or the Laws of Creation, then work within the laws of the land. Everything you need do can be done within the limits of legality. Remember that everything the government or military does to you is "legal" because they have the big gun--even if it be "unlawful" as to the Constitution. Taking up arms and "fighting" as in war will only get you killed by the thugs with the bigger guns. You MUST win through changing the minds of men. You can only do this through the realization of the TRUTH and uncovering of the LIES as thrust upon you. YOU MUST KNOW YOUR EN­EMY AND HOW HE WORKS AND HOW YOU HAVE COME TO BE IN THIS PLIGHT OF HELPLESSNESS. IN KNOWING IS THE POWER TO RECLAIM AND REDEEM--ONLY THROUGH KNOWING TRUTH CAN YOU FIND FREEDOM AGAIN UPON YOUR PLACE IN HUMAN EX­PERIENCE.

IF YOU "MUST" BANK. USE B OF A

Why? Because, even through "illegal" methods according to your Constitution, the power has been shifted to allow illegal proceedings to take place. Bank of America is a direct organization in the U.S. to service the Committee of 300. Then why, if it is corrupt, would I recommend you use it? Because all banks are corrupt and all the rest are destined to come under the control of Bank of America. The banks of the nations will come into only FIVE. Bank of America is due to survive while the Elite glean all the assets and wealth of the people and na­tions. Stay small and unpretentious and they will leave you alone and cooperate with you nicely because they will already hold your assets without stealing them from you. There is a "silent" agreement which means "highest top secret by order of the Committee of 300 One World Order" that as banks and S & L's fail, B of A will be allowed to publicly take over the good assets of these failures in toto and leave the bad notes and debts to you-the-people.

Let me give you the background of the recent "rebuilding" of the Bank of America and its mighty financial role under the planned direction of one Richard Rosenberg and you will see a bit of the formation of the octopus in action.

One year ago, Bank America Corp. Chairman Richard M. Rosenberg picked up his telephone to place a call that would change California banking.

Following reports early last year that merger talks failed be­tween two of his rivals, Security Pacific Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co., Rosenberg called Security Pacific Chief Executive Robert H. Smith to suggest combining with BankAmerica. The result, announced last August, is banking's biggest marriage ever. Now don't go off half informed or misled as to the roles of these named individuals--the plan is at the top of the Elite ladder. I simply present it as presented in your news releases, i.e., this particular rendition is by the Los Angeles Times, Feb. 16, 1992. The completion of the Plan is finished now and the beast is already in the slaying and capture phase feeding frenzy.

It is time you hear what these Elite tell you, however, so we shall present it to you.

Since taking over the parent (BankAmerica) of Bank of America in 1990, Rosenberg, 61, has launched on an unprecedented buying binge. Once the nation's quintessential international bank, BankAmerica's main push the past few years has been to expand its operations in the West through what Rosenberg and other BankAmerica executives believe are unprecedented acqui­sition opportunities stemming from the financial problems of the thrift and banking industries.

Rosenberg is also outspoken in his belief that there are too many banks in the United States and that reducing their numbers through mergers will help restore the industry's health. The merger binge isn't without pain for a lot of workers--some ex­perts estimate as many as 100,000 banking jobs will be lost in 1992, more than 10,000 in the BankAmerica-Security Pacific merger alone.

A former Wells Fargo executive, Rosenberg is considered one of the country's leading marketing experts (one of his ideas be­came the scenic checks that banks issue). He earned the right to succeed BankAmerica chief A.W. (Tom) Clausen through his role in banking industry's biggest turnaround ever. [H: Don't get carried away, readers, this is a bunch of you-know ­what.]

I shall just quote the next few paragraphs and you try not to get sick to your tummies at the incredible song and dance.

In the mid-1980's, BankAmerica nearly failed, dragged down by bad foreign loans and other problems. Rosenberg and a group of other former Wells Fargo executives working under Clausen not only stemmed the losses, but turned the bank into one of the nation's healthiest institutions, poised to be one of the country's most aggressive acquirers in the 1990's. Early last year, BankAmerica came within a shade of buying the failed Bank of New England from federal regulators, a move that would have given it branches on both coasts and brought BankAmerica a step closer to becoming a nationwide bank.

From his 40th-floor office, Rosenberg can look out at the sweeping 180-degree view, from the Golden Gate bridge to the left and the East Bay hills on the right. Unlike the serious statesman-like Clausen, Rosenberg is an affable executive whose comments are often marked with self-depreciating humor. During a recent speech in Los Angeles on banking, Rosenberg expressed shock that 750 people had showed up "because this is about the least exciting subject I can think of".

* * *

Least exciting? This is the very thing that is stealing the entire wealth and all monetary assets, taxes and all of value in a mate­rial way--from you-the-people. Only 750 showed up? Where are the other 6 billion who are going to lose every shred of per­sonal property? It is because of this very projection that the banking industry has been left to flourish in the hands of total criminals bleeding you-the-citizens.

I don't want to speak on BankAmerica longer at this point for I only wanted to point out the nuances in play. First--note a slight variation in Bank of America into BankAmerica. Note this and act accordingly. You will, however, see that the name will ul­timately merge but for now, it remains openly different to de­lude you. The most safety for deposits and day to day banking will be found under the shelter of the serpent's venom. The in­tent is to pull you in through deceit and not force which will alert you sleeping rabbits intended for dinner. Stay alert and move as the need arises. Keep those investments out of the in­dustry and keep your banking to minimum for there is no FDIC insurance to cover anything--the system is bankrupt. Be wise and you will be fine--act in greed and you will be devoured for they wait coiled and ready to eat you.

Now, what else can you do? You can incorporate (small, tiny corporations without your name attached) in Nevada. We are going to start presenting "how-tos" in the LIBERATOR of general nature. Ours is to help you protect your small estates. If you are a big business and only interested in greed and gain--I suggest that our people can incorporate you but that is all the intermediary responsibility we wish to share. God provides in­structions for ALL, but we do not intend to aid and abet total greed.

This method of protection may not be long-lived or, it may go on as long as there is business availability. I would guess, how­ever, if there is a massive change in rules with disclosure of ownership of corporations in Nevada, then there will be a grandfather arrangement which will cover already established corporations. NEVADA IS THE ONLY STATE IN THE UNION WITH THE LEGAL COVER TO DO THIS, CHELAS, REGARDLESS OF WHAT LAWYERS AND AC­COUNTANTS WILL TELL YOU OTHERWISE.

THINK: If you incorporate in Nevada and learn to use this new "sovereign Nevada helper" you have no further need for ac­countants or lawyers. Do you actually think that either is going to advise you to sever their Mercedes payments? How about "trust salesmen" who will cease to get your money for simply tying up your funds and STILL the government can claim them. When Emergency Regulations and Executive Orders come down you will turn over those trusts--instantly. A Nevada corporation is a child (sovereign and separate) of Nevada. Old corporations never even die--they just get a new President. The "family" corporation set up in Nevada, for instance, does not ever go into probate just because the owner or current President (you) dies or retires--it just moves right on in business in the hands of your appointed directors (kids, donations--whatever) and its bank ac­counts stay useable and no probate. Indeed, lawyers hate the idea for they don't get any of YOUR ASSETS, neither does the government get any TAXES ripped out of your blood.

I have asked E.J. and Cort to write regularly in the LIBERATOR so that you can have access to assistance and always you can call for further education as to management, set-up, etc. Chelas, I can do no more than point the way--I CANNOT DO IT FOR YOU. So far, the Nevada Corporation (within the U.S.) is the only protective state of sovereignty which has not been violated. It must however, be run in such manner as per­fection of records is done. If handled properly the corporate veil cannot be pierced nor will it be. If your intent is to do it properly then it is exceptional in value--if your intent is to evade laws and taxes then you shall eventually get caught in your own trap and our people want NO PART OF IT. So be it. If you have interest and have not acted, the way to contact these ones who can help will be listed herein.

These workers are working as rapidly as possible to set up a way to provide more and better coverage and assistance through Nevada at on-site location while still servicing you out-of-state persons through out-of-state management assistance. We only "offer" a way, we certainly do not require that you follow it.

BANKING, AMERICAN-STYLE

I am going to utilize information compiled and briefed down in AntiShyster, March, 1992. I do this because I know that the majority of you readers do not have even an idea what I am talking about and yet you need input from Earthside hard-copy. I have given you all of this, yes--but you MUST know it and you are in overload of information. Please allow me to serve to my best ability as "teacher" for simply hearing a thing once--does not bring KNOWING.

You will note, as before, I honor one Henry B. Gonzalez who is a representative from Texas. He has been a representative since 1960 and has spent most of that time on the House Committee for Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs and is now Chairman.

Rep. Gonzalez recently delivered a speech to the House of Rep­resentatives that included some extraordinary comments on your banking system. Given his credentials, it's impossible to dis­miss his comments as uninformed or misguided. I will note, however, as I have before, that when this great man spoke to enter his speech into the Record, the House was empty save one or two clerks. THIS is why you are in serious and irreversible trouble. I am going to write this but recognize the guidelines and outline of the writer before me. It is past time to thrust forward with all the power and pressure possible--the Truth in any manner possible and as quickly as is humanly possible.

Although some people swear the world is assaulted, perhaps even ruled, by a conspiracy of bankers, it matters not if you do not consider this a viable theory--for in the uncovering of facts that theory will be proved or put down--consider what IS. You will note that many of Rep. Gonzalez' remarks underscore the enormous, unseen influence bankers have on your lives and point to the probability of some type of a conspiracy if nothing more and must be considered most carefully re­gardless of what you now believe.

We would be here reading all day and night if we do not simply take excerpts and juxtapositions from the "Congressional Record--House February 3, 1992". We will effort to bring all pertinent factual information and leave you to read the document in entirety for full input. Journalistically, we must conserve time and space herein in order to present more topics for con­sideration--for you "cannot live by bread alone" lest you be poi­soned by the unsuspecting dish slipped onto thine table.

For a complete, accurate text of the speech, call Rep. Gonzalez' office at 202-225-3236 in Washington, DC, or 512-229-6195 in San Antonio. Ask for a copy of his February 3rd, 1992 speech regarding the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro. Yes, readers, I have written much on the subject but you must hear it again for--pause a moment and see if you can repeat what it was I told you about it. I thought not. Let us continue.

After a year and a half's investigation into the transfer of American weapons programs to the Iraqis, Rep. Gonzalez wrote to Secretary of State, James Baker III (Nov. 13th, 1991):

"The Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs is conducting an investigation of Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL) which provided Iraq with over $4 billion in loans during the latter half of the 1980's. The Committee respectfully asks for your cooperation with this investigation to discover...how BNL loans were used to provide Iraq with the technology and know-how necessary to produce weapons of mass destruction.

"The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the U.N. Special Commission have both informed the Committee that they have compiled a list of companies, including numerous U.S. firms, that may have supplied Iraq with technology and know-how necessary to develop conventional and non-conven­tional weapons. Both have stated that they are not authorized to provide the Committee with the names of the companies.

"While the IAEA and the U.N. commission did state that the 'lists' are available to U.N. member countries, they informed the Committee that the United States Mission to the U.N. has not formally requested copies of the lists.

"Why has the State Department failed to formally request a copy of the IAEA and U.N. special Commission lists of the U.S. companies that may have provided Iraq with the tech­nology to develop weapons of mass destruction?"

The letter closed, asking Secretary Baker to "please request the IAEA and the U.N. Special Commission lists and forward a copy of them to the Banking Committee."

But The State Department "Stonewalled" ...the Secretary of State has not responded--has not made the request to the U.N. agencies and has not explained why there has been no action on the part of the administration. [H: This is all into the record, friends, so I suggest you get off your "buts" and go check it out.]

In fact, even "the Justice Department under Attorney General Thornburgh stonewalled us and I put the letter in the Congres­sional 'Record' some time ago in which he defied the committee to continue any kind of hearings" and said, "You should not have any hearings, and we are shocked and disappointed that you insisted on having hearings."

So on January 31, 1991, Rep. Gonzalez wrote to President Bush, saying:

"The Banking Committee has evidence that U.S. firms were in­volved in ... Iraqi missile programs ... and in the production of modified Scud missiles. These are the same Scud missiles used during the Gulf War to attack both American troops stationed in Saudi Arabia and civilians living in Israel."

The letter noted the curious willingness of the Departments of Commerce and State to approve export licenses necessary to ship American technology to Iraq and also Secretary Baker's re­fusal to cooperate in the Banking Committee's investigation. Rep. Gonzalez closed by requesting the President "instruct the appropriate agencies to be forth-coming in assisting the Com­mittee with its investigation."

Receiving no reply from the President (surprise, surprise--since many of those companies were his), Rep. Gonzalez delivered his speech to the House of Representatives on February 3, 1992. Excerpts are as follows:

(At this point Dharma's computer stopped recording her typing and several pages later "locked up", causing the loss of hours of work. She re-typed the work in the following chapter.


PJ 49
CHAPTER 2

REC #3 HATONN

THU., APRIL 9, 1992 2:21 P.M. YEAR 5, DAY 237

PERSONAL: Dharma, I know you are unnerved and upset over the loss of the writing of this morning. It happened before I re­alized the invasion and now there is nothing to do but repeat the work for I believe you realize the importance of the information. We must both be alert and pay attention and not allow assump­tion that the document is being saved automatically. I want this in this current LIBERATOR and today is the cut-off time so, please, we simply have to do it again. I also want it noted that a tape or two will be available by the week's end covering the subject of Semites, Gog, Magog, who is who in Judaism vs. Zionism, etc. I want it listed so that we do not bog down Da­lene with the tapes and yet I DO ASK that it be announced in this issue of the paper--along with the tapes from Sunday evening's meeting at "Spiritwind". So, for you, E.J. and the meeting notifiers--we will be having the Spiritwind program at the general purpose area of the Community church at 6:00 p.m. Sunday evening. Please come prepared with some questions as I hope to keep the issues to spiritual discussion as much as possi­ble. All out of town people are encouraged to attend please and we will effort to keep the hour within reason for return journeys home. A community will only welcome us to the extent we welcome them within our experience so that they might see that we come from God and have no separation in that wondrous connection. We simply hold no "Manmade" doctrines. Truth becomes OBVIOUS as the political system becomes chaos in this time nearing reformation or translation. When ones realize we are but brothers in Truth and no threat or other than our proclamation of Hosts--so shall they be gathered in and we can expect no more if we are not willing to first trust them. So be it. I would appreciate there being so many present that the room cannot hold all.

Now let us take up this writing exactly where the computer de­stroyed the document, at "Excerpts are as follow":

"The Iraq Sanctions Act contained a provision requiring you to conduct a study and report on the sale, export, and third party transfer or development of nuclear, biological, chemical, and ballistic missile technology to or with Iraq. Pursuant to that Act, the President issued a report to Congress in the Fall of 1991 concluding that U.S. firms did not contribute directly to Iraq's conventional and nonconventional weapons capabilities. The report to Congress is clearly inaccurate. In fact, nu­merous U.S. companies provided critical support to Iraqi weapons programs, including missiles."

Further, "The report submitted to the Congress is classed as secret. .. . But if something is so good, why do you keep it secret? If the report shows a diligent job by those in power, why, you want to publish it; you do not want to hold it secret."

In fact, "There is little information in the report that is not al­ready published and in the public realm as always. ... I read the foreign press, and I have read articles about things that were in great detail outlined that we were told were sensitive, secret, here. ... The American people, with all the secrecy, are the ONLY ONES THAT DO NOT KNOW. Everybody outside of the U.S.A. long ago has known."

"To date, the American people know little about how Iraq operated in this country to attain its illicit goals. ... But some of the essential facts of the transfer of American materials and technology to Iraq's military buildup are these:

"Iraq developed a carefully controlled system to build chemi­cal and nuclear weapons, and missiles capable of delivering those weapons;

"Iraq used a clandestine procurement network which con­trolled American companies that supplied important support to the weapons program;

"The U.S. Commerce Department, with the acquiescence of other agencies, readily licensed the export of militarily useful goods to Iraq, even though it clearly knew... what their real pur­pose was... because not only the CIA but the military intelligence and the Defense Department advised them that these had poten­tial military use;

"The President submitted an inaccurate report to the Congress concerning these matters; and,

"The State Department has thus far refused to obtain relevant information from the United Nations on the Iraqi weapons pro­gram....

"What about the CIA? We thought this was our vaunted in­telligence gathering agency for which we appropriate untold and still publicly undetermined billions of dollars. [H: Please note that this is still a portion of the CIA "Tangled Webs" but I cannot wait for the appropriate spot in the JOURNAL in progress for I must finish the explanation regarding Cuba and Castro and the book is growing too lengthy. You must have this information NOW.] Here is the pathetic thing: the CIA knew all about this. But whatever it brought forth was ei­ther ignored or canceled by the State Department or the De­partment of Commerce and by other individuals...of commer­cial and financial backgrounds, including highly placed indi­viduals in the administration today, very high, specifically the National Security Advisor, and the present Deputy Secretary of State. He was even on a Yugoslavian bank board."

THE BOTTOM LINE

"At the bottom of almost every event in human history... is fi­nances."

"For example, the day the hostages held in Iran were re­leased (1/20/81), they were released AFTER A FEDERAL RESERVE official in New York pressed a button and re­leased several billion dollars from London to the folks in Iran. ... The cause and effect there is obvious.

"Our folks in the United States have never gotten a full and complete report of all those financial dilemmas that led to the taking of the hostages. It involved about 10 billion dollar's worth of banking investments from the United States.

"It is sad to think that we now have somewhere around $800 billion in this country in foreign money, and nobody really knows how to keep track of it. Not all of the $800 billion is le­gitimate, but just a chunk of it is highly leverageable. It can be leveraged in a matter of minutes electronically to such things as drug money laundering.

"I have been saying for over 20 years that the kind of crime, particularly drugs and all that goes with it, would not be possi­ble in our country unless there was a tie-in between the criminal element, political (officials), and the financial or business sec­tor.

"Today over 25 percent of our total financial or banking as­sets are owned by foreign entities. The difficulty is to try to convey even to our regulators how different it is when any of these international banks headquartered in the United States charter agencies in several of the other States. What is not re­alized is that every one of those foreign banks are State-owned.

"One of those banks is the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL). [H: To you readers: yes, I have spoken at length about this banking operation and its connection and owner­ship jointly by the Mafia and the Elite Bankers Cartel. I MUST write of it again, however, for you ones don't seem to fully understand the Plan. This is not the BCCI but you will find the same high officials (such as Bush and Saddam Hus­sein) utilizing the same bank and the very same accounts in BOTH. In BCCI, for instance, resided over $250 million dollars split personally between Saddam and George Bush.] BNL is owned by the Italian Government; BNL provided over $4 BILLION in what appears to be illicit loans to the Gov­ernment of Iraq ... about half was used to finance Iraq's war ef­forts to build a self-sufficient military industry.

"The government of Iraq, operating with BNL financing and using a secret procurement network, was able to obtain assis­tance through the Export-Import Bank. This network obtained $2.15 billion in loans from BNL alone for militarily useful products. ... In addition, BNL financed $2 billion worth of agricultural goods through the Commodity Credit Cor­poration Program. Taxpayers are going to have to pick up that tab, and it amounts to somewhere around $2 billion, and that does not include over $200 million from the Export-Import Bank guarantees.

"Today we are in imminent danger of the dollar being re­placed as the international reserve currency. This means that, for the first time in our history, the U.S.A. is about to lose the great privilege of being able to pay its debts in our own cur­rency. It means that this huge, monstrous debt we have piled up on the governmental level, on the corporate level (which is as great as the governmental level), and the private level, will have to be paid back in somebody else's currency. Forget about eco­nomic freedom, forget about our vaunted standard of living. Yes, we are beginning to worry now. We are beginning to see the intractability of the so-called recession which I said over a year ago would be intractable.

"Few people recognize the gravity, the extent, the depth, the spread of the complicated problem that faces us just in the finan­cial world.

GRIM TRUTH: U.S, IS BANKRUPT

"The unique American deposit insurance system ... the need for reform there is long overdue ... the congressional intent has long ago been corrupted. You cannot have $3 trillion of insured funds in the commercial banking system and have an insolvent insurance fund without saying that it would be quite difficult to tell the people the truth.

"In these difficult times, I do not know how much political mileage there is in being constantly having to do what seems to be absolutely necessary--to provide the necessary funds to ensure the at least temporary actuarial soundness of the banking and insurance fund.

"We are now facing . . . huge ... deeply rooted problems that affect the continuing solvency of our country, our system of Government, our economic and financial independence. It is under great threat, and it pains me to be a person who has raised his voice every one of these 30 years to a silent chamber, but it is on the record." [H: Remember that I said at onset of the writing that the speech was given to an empty House. Also do not lose top note that this is the Chairman of the House Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs Committee. There is no man higher in your Congress to know these things than is this particular Representative of you-the-people. I will note, further, that Dharma turned to C-SPAN and watched and wept as the last of the "audience" slipped out of the chamber while this lone Patriot continued to speak to that empty room as if nothing of value or note was being considered. I have little hope for your survival, little ones--indeed, little hope.]

"Today we are on the edge of a precipice. What troubles my mind and my soul more than anything else since 1979 is the fact that the United States has an almost debauched currency--the value of our dollar [Federal Reserve Notes, actually] has de­clined 60 percent in 6 years. How can we continue that?

"When Congressmen ask me what is the single thing that I feel is most direly needed in this country, I answer with one word, 'solvency', 'solvency' . We are bankrupt.

"The whole course since World War II could have been charted on a graph. It was obvious from the statistics that show that, as late as 1956, our country was producing over 80 percent of the world's goods. Today it is not even 16 percent.

"That was foreseeable. Certainly we should know that the day would come when there would be a recuperation and resurgence of Europe and Japan. As Shakespeare so aptly said, when a nation becomes arrogant in its folly it becomes a laughing stock.

"What do you think for so many years folks outside the U.S.A. called us? Do you think they called us Uncle Sam? They did the same thing they did after World War I. We are Uncle Sap; we are patsy."

* * *

You can breathe again now for I see some of you turning pur­ple. In March this beloved Patriot, in an effort to awaken you, made at least three more speeches which provide even more evidence of incompetence and corruption in your government and banking system so that you can confirm that which I have given to you. We'll back them up with hard-copy when we can do so without scrubbing new information.

OK, are you all set to go on now? If you think that one was good (or bad) wait until you chew up this next one. Let me quote one Editor's comments on the upcoming information:

This information will come at you like machine gun bul­lets. In fact, without Rep. Gonzalez' remarks to validate the foreign influence in our nation's banking mess, I wouldn't run the following essay because, by itself, it's almost impossible to believe. So if you haven't read the previous article, don't even bother trying to read this one. However, if you've already read Rep. Gonzalez' remarks, go ahead and try this one, too. It is challenging reading.

This Editor in point has reorganized the original work in order to effort at clarification of the original author's intent. The Ed­itor admits his guessing may be incorrect so we will look at it closely and see if it can go as is. It MUST be shared and it came anonymously and therefore was impossible to clear the content's intent with the author first hand.

Because conspiracy theories run the whole spectrum from incredible in false projection to the other extreme of blaming segments and groups such as Jews, Blacks, Japanese, and even space aliens, for the intended overthrow of the government, we shall look at facts herein.

I find it rather fun because I have already printed this informa­tion for you as it comes directly from information and is based directly on an extraordinary, 607-page document--Senate Report No. 93-549. I suggest you effort to get a copy for yourself for it will convince you of the Truth of that which we write and have priorly written. I will be utilizing some 70-odd references so that you can go check it all out. I do not intend to spoon-feed you more than that for I must cover the situation in South Africa and the incredible dangerous activities in Red China. Further­more, my scribe must be in court in trial for most of at least the next two weeks--Happy Easter! I can only remind you precious lambs that in the ending--GOD WINS--and you were never promised a "rose garden filled with thornless thatch". The Elite are bringing the noose about your necks as was projected unto you within all prophecies and you must attend your actions well if you are to be among the remnant. God shall sustain in the best way for your overall good if you will but do your portion.

Please remember as we go along that this is an essay type of document and therefore is the reason for all the references.

SOME DARE CALL IT TREASON
RE; SENATE REPORT NO, 93-549

(For reference No.'s see end of chapter.)

Now that you have retrieved your breath and calmed your soul (but not gone back to sleep, please,) let us continue:

The United States went "bankrupt" in 1933 and was declared so by President Roosevelt by Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260,1 under the "Trading With The Enemy Act" of the Sixty-Fifth Congress.2

The several states of the Union then pledged the faith and credit thereof to the aid of the National Government, and formed numerous socialist committees, such as the "Council of State Governments"3 and "Social Security Administration" to purportedly deal with the economic "emergency".

These organizations operated under the "Declaration of IN­TERdependence" (emph. added) of January 22, 1937, published in the 1937 edition of The Book of the States. This book openly declared that the people engaged in such activities as Farm­ing/Husbandry Industry had been reduced to mere feudal "Tenants" on their land.4 This was compounded by such activi­ties as price fixing of wheat and grains (7 U.S.C.A. 1332), quota regulations (7 U.S.C.A. 1371), and livestock production controls (7 U.S.C.A. 1903), which have held agriculture prices consistently below the costs of production, interest on loans, and inflation of paper "Bills of Credit". These acts have left the food producers in a state of peonage and involuntary servitude, and constitute the taking of private property for the benefit and use of the public, without just compensation.

During the Second World War the "League of Nations" was reinstituted under the pretense of the "United Nations" and the "Bretton Woods Agreement" .5 The United States came out of World War II as a corporate body politic (a fiction) and in such bad economic condition that in 1950 it declared Bankruptcy [again] and "Reorganization". That "Reorganization" is de­scribed in Title 5 of the United States Codes Annotated (U.S.C.A.). The "explanation" at the beginning of 5 U.S.C.A. notes that the "Secretary of Treasury" was appointed as "Receiver" in the Bankruptcy.6

CONGRESS SHALL HAVE THE POWER

Congress alone was given the Power and Authority to coin money and to regulate and maintain the true and inherent "value" of the Coin by the ordained U.S. Constitution,7 and is likewise obligated to maintain said gold and silver Coin and for­eign Coin according to the "equal weights and measure" clause.8 Nevertheless, the government ignored the Constitution and the warnings in the Federalist Papers,9 and passed the "Coinage Act of 1965" which completely debased the Constitutional Coin (gold and silver, i.e., the true "Dollar").10

At the signing of the Coinage Act, Lyndon B. Johnson stated in his Press release that:
"When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the first fundamental change in our coinage in 173 years. The Coinage Act of 1965 supersedes the Act of 1792. And that Act had the title: An Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating the Coinage of the United States...."

"Now I will sign this bill to make the first change in our coinage system since the 18th Century. To those members of Congress, who are here on this historic occasion, I want to as­sure you that in making this change from the 18th Century we have no idea of returning to it."

Note that NO constitutional Amendment was obtained to change, amend, abridge, or abolish the Constitutional mandates concerning the coinage of money. However, due to the internal and external diversions surrounding the Viet Nam War, the usurpation and breach went basically unchallenged and unno­ticed by the general public, who were thereby reduced to "a wealthy man's cannon fodder or cheap source of slave labor". 11

Those exercising the Offices of the several States, knew "De Facto Transitions" like the "Coinage Act of 1965" were unlaw­ful and unconstitutional, but nevertheless sanctioned, im­plemented, and enforced the complete debauchment of the money and the consequent "governmental, social, industrial economic change" in the "De Jure" States and in the United States of America.12,13

Congress then passed the "Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966", which placed the entire taxing and monetary system (the "Essential Engine" of our government)14 under the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.)' 15 The U.C.C. was promulgated by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in collusion with the American Law Institute for the "banking and business interests" .16

Over the years, the United States engaged in numerous con­flicts (Korea, Viet Nam) under the direction of the United Na­tions 17 and agreed to foot the bill for these U.N. conflicts. However, the Federal government was unable to honor its obli­gations and rehypothecated debt credit, and therefore openly and publicly dishonored and disavowed its "Notes" and "obligations" ,18 (i.e., "Federal Reserve Notes") through Section 2 of Public Law 90-269, 82 Stat.50 (1968), which reads:

"The first sentence of Section 15 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 391) is amended by striking 'and the funds provided in this Act for the redemption of Federal Reserve notes' ."

NIXON DECLARES EMERGENCY

Things grew worse and on March 28, 1970, President Nixon issued Proclamation No. 3972, declaring an "Emergency" be­cause the Postal Employees struck against the de facto govern­ment for higher pay, due to inflation of the paper "Bills of Credit" .19 (Nixon also placed the U.S. Postal Department under control of the Department of Defense)20

The system faltered for a decade, but the bench mark date of the collapse is August 15, 1971. On this day, President Nixon reversed U.S. international monetary policy by officially declaring the non-convertibility of the U.S. dollar (Federal Re­serve Note) into gold.21

On September 21, 1973, Congress passed Public Law 93­110, amending the Bretton Woods "Par Value Modification Act" (82 Stat. 116, 31 U.S.C.A. 449), and reiterated the "Emergency" in 12 United States Code annotated 95a.22

On January 19, 1976, Rep. Marjorie S. Holt noted for the record, a second "Declaration of INTERdependence" and clearly identified the United Nations as a "Communist" organi­zation that was seeking both production and monetary control over the United States through International Organizations that promoted the "One World Order" .23 [H: Is everybody still with me or do you continue to think this is just Satanic hogwash? Your very survival and existence depends on your coming into KNOWING of this Truth so I suggest you not take it lightly in your jesting and game-playing and yellow-ribbon wagging--YOU ARE IN DEEP TROUBLE!]

EVERY JUDGE FOR HIMSELF

On February 11, 1976, forty-four Federal Judges filed the Complaint/Petition, Atkins et al. vs. U.S. in the U.S. Court of Claims, Docket No. 41-76. This suit noted our socio-economic decline and complained that:

"As a result of inflation, the compensation of federal judges has been substantially diminished each year since 1969, causing direct and continuing monetary harm to plaintiffs .... the real value of the dollar decreased by approximately 34.5 percent from March 15, 1969 to October 1, 1975 .... As a result, plain­tiffs have suffered an unconstitutional deprivation of earnings." In their prayer for relief, they claimed "damages for the Con­stitutional violations enumerated above, measured as the diminution of their earnings for the entire period since March 9, 1969."

These federal judges held and enjoyed Offices of Public Trust, Honor and Profit and obviously knew of the emergency financial problem of the nation. However, they sought protec­tion for themselves only. They intentionally ignored the mone­tary damage and injury to the People and Children of this Na­tion, and classified them as "a club that has many other mem­bers" who "have no remedy".

Worse, knowing that "heinous" acts had been committed, these "honorable" federal judges stated that they would not apply the Law nor any substantive remedy "until all of us (judges) are dead".

This promise violates Cohen vs. Virginia (1821), which de­clared that the Courts, "have no more right to decline the exer­cise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be Treason to the Con­stitution. "24

Despite their Oath to uphold, defend, and preserve the sovereignty of the Nation and the several Republican States of the Union, those Federal judges breached their Duty to protect the People/Citizens and their Posterity from fraud, imposition, avarice, and stealthy encroachment.25

The destruction of our financial system continued with Public Law 94-564 which states: "Moving to a floating exchange rate for international commerce means private enterprise and not central governments bear the risk of currency fluctuations."26

EMERGENCY!!...??

The government's contrived "Emergency" created numerous abuses, usurpations, and abridgments of delegated Powers and Authority. As stated in Senate Report 93-549:

"These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President ex­traordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompass­ing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional process. "

"Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of pro­duction; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens."40

In Federal and State Tribunals, we sometimes hear statements that Constitutional arguments are "immaterial", or "frivolous". These statements are based on the concealment, furtherance, and compounding of the Frauds and "Emergency" created and sustained by the "Expatriated"43 ALIENS of the United Nations and its various associated organizations."44

Recognizing the "Supremacy Clause" and "Separation of Powers", Senate Report No. 93-549 concedes that abridgment of our Constitutional rights and freedoms has occurred: "A ma­jority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and gov­ernmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency..." 41

Acts committed under fraud, force, and seizures are many times done under "Letter of Marque and Reprisal" (i.e., "recapture").37 However, according to 16 American Jurispru­dence42 no "emergency" justifies a violation of any Constitu­tional provision. [IMPORTANT!!]

Honor is earned by honesty and integrity, not under false and fraudulent pretenses. Such principles as "Fraud and Justice never dwell together"38 and "A right of action cannot arise out of fraud,"39 are borne out in U.S. vs Throckmorton, 98 US 61, pg 65, which reads, "Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments."

INTERNATIONAL CONTROL

Congress held numerous debates concerning the International Financial Institutions and their operations. For example, Rep. Ron Paul (former Chairman of the House Banking Committee), made repeated references to the true practices of "International" financial institutions, including the conversion of 27,000,000 in gold [H27 million what? Dollars? Ounces?) Do you see a bit of subterfuge herein?], contributed by the United States as part of its "quota obligations" [H: From here on in you will find this very type of implicitness registered over and over and over again so that "they" interpret the laws ANY WAY THEY PLEASE AND YOU ARE STUCK WITH IT AS THERE WILL BE NO DEFENSE FOR ONLY THEY CAN INTERPRET THE LAWS NOW COME FORTH.], which the Governor-Secretary of Treasury of the International Mone­tary Fund (IMF) sold under some very questionable terms and concessions 27

On October 28, 1977, the passage of Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227, declared most banking institutions, including State banks, to be under direction and control of the corporate "Governor" of the International Monetary Fund.28 This Act further declared that:
"(2) Section 10(a) of the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 (31 U.S.C. 822a(b) is amended by striking out the phrase 'stabilizing the exchange value of the dollar' ..."

"(c) The joint resolution entitled 'Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States', approved June 5, 1933 (31 U.S.C. 463) SHALL NOT APPLY TO OBLIGATIONS ISSUED ON OR AFTER THE DATE OF ENACTMENT OF THIS SECTION" (Emph. added.)

Thus, the United States as "Corporator"29 and "State"30 had declared "Insolvency" .31 A permanent state of "Emergency" was instituted within the Union through the contrivances, fraud and avarice of the International Financial Institutions, Organiza­tions, Corporations, and Associations, including their "fiscal and depository agent", the Federal Reserve.32 This led to "Emergency" legislation like the "Public Debt Limit-Balanced Budget And Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985".33

By becoming a "corporator", the government lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen.34 It can exer­cise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter.35 The real party in interest is not the de jure United States of America, but "The Bank" and "the Fund".36 [H: This, of course, refers to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund which we refer to as the IMF and where, says Bush, will come all the guaranteed loans (by you-the-­people) to the Soviets, etc. Everyone can get some of that money except you-the-people and you just continue to pay and pay on the debt of interest created from those delightful "humanitarian" notes. Do you see how simple it is to come up with money if you are among the Elite and can use a little blackmail?]

FOREIGN AGENTS?

The Internal Revenue Service entered into a "service agree­ment" with the U.S. Treasury Department45 and the Agency For International Development (AID).46 AID is an International paramilitary operation45 [H: I just wrote all about that within the past few days so I won't extend that here.] which is responsible for such activities as "Assumption of full or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area" .48 [H: I suggest you get the current writing regarding the CIA because this is ALL ENTANGLED.]

The 1985 Edition of the Department of Army Field Manual FM 41-10 describes the International "Civil Affairs" operations. At page 3-6, it is admitted that the AID is under direction of the International Development Cooperation Agency, and at page 3-8 that the operation is "paramilitary". According to the Senate Report No. 93-549 (pg 186), the International Organization's intents and purposes are to promote, implement, and enforce a "dictatorship over finance in the United States". (Emph. added.)

The intents, purposes, and activities of the International Or­ganization include complete control of "Public Finance", i.e., the "control, supervision, and audit of indigenous fiscal re­sources; budget practices, taxation, expenditures of public funds, currency issues, and banking agencies and affiliates" .50 This complies with "Silent Weapons For Quiet War"51 which discloses a declaration of war upon the American people, mon­etary control by the Internationalists through information so­licited and collected by the Internal Revenue Service,52 and identifies who is operating and enforcing the seditious Interna­tional program.53

Treasury Delegation Order No. 92 states that the IRS is trained under direction of the U.N.'s Division of "Human Re­sources" and the Commissioner (International), trained by the obscure "Office of Personnel Management". However, Execu­tive Order No. 10422 states that the "Office of Personnel Man­agement" is under the direction of the Secretary General of the United Nations.70

IRS: FOREIGN AGENT?

The IRS is also an agency of the International Criminal Po­lice Organization, and solicits and collects information for 150 Foreign Powers.71 Further, the "Memorandum & Agreement" between the Secretary of the Treasury/Corporate Governor of "The [International Monetary] Fund" and "The [World] Bank" and the Office of the U.S. Attorney General indicates that the Attorney General and his associates are also soliciting and col­lecting information for Foreign Principals.72

Note that an Attorney or Representative is required to file a "Foreign Agents Registration Statement" if he represents the interests of a Foreign Principal or Power.54 Documentary evi­dence suggests that IRS Agents are "Agents of a Foreign Princi­pal" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Reg­istration Act of 1938". They are directed and controlled by the corporate "Governor" of "The [International Monetary] Fund" (aka "Secretary of Treasury"),55 and the corporate "Governor" of "The [World] Bank"56. Further, they act as "information-service employees",57 who "solicit, collect, disburse or dispense contributions (Tax: a pecuniary contribution, Blacks Law Dictionary, 5th Edition), loans, money, or other things of value for or in interest of such foreign principal 58, and they entered into agreements with a Foreign Principal (the "Agency for In­ternational Development") pursuant to Treasury Delegation Or­der NO. 91.59

Congress has also acted as foreign agents in that it has appro­priated, transferred, and converted vast sums to Foreign Pow­ers61, and has entered into numerous Foreign Taxing Treaties (conventions)61 and other Agreements, which are solicited and collected pursuant to 26 Internal Revenue Code 1603(k)(4). Massive appropriations of rehypothecated debt credit were also made for the general welfare and common defense of other Foreign Powers, including Communist countries and satellites, and to support the International control of natural and human re­sources.62 (A "Resource" is a claim of "property" and when related to people constitutes "slavery".) Such restrictions as "For the general welfare and common defense of the United States"63 are ignored, and thereby contribute to the insolvent nature of the continual "emergency", with socio-economic repercussions laid upon present and future generations.

In theory, military force cannot be legally imposed in civil af­fairs without authority to act. That authority can be missing for several reasons, such as the absence of a Foreign Agents Regis­tration Statement," or Article 2, Section 7 of the United Nations Charter which prohibits the U.N. from "intervening in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state..." However, Korea, Viet Nam, Kuwait, etc., are ample evidence of the United Nations' willingness to violate its own rules and invade foreign nations. Such is the "Rule of Law" as practiced by the United Nations; such is Communist terrorism, despotism, and tyranny. All were and are outlawed here by our ordained and established Constitution (1787).

NEWSTATES OF AMERICA

Ok, here we go again--so pay attention as it is run past you once more! I can only salute this Patriot who daringly got this infor­mation to me. I can do no more than print it--but know that I understand AND I HAVE IT AND NO ONE IN MY SERVICE KNOWS SO YOU ARE SECURE and blessings be unto you until Truth can find safety for its servants.

On January 17, 1980, the President and Senate confirmed another "Constitution", namely, the "Constitution Of The United Nations Industrial Development Organization" found at Senate Treaty Document No. 97-19, 97th Congress, 1st Session. A perusal of this Foreign Constitution exposes the Internation­alist's intents. The Preamble, Article 1 ("Objectives"), and Ar­ticle 2 ("functions"), clearly show their intent to direct, control finance and subsidize all "natural and human resources" and "agro-related as well as basic industries", through "dynamic social and economic changes...... with a view to assisting in the establishment of a new international economic order." In the Preamble, an unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable oli­garchy of expatriates and aliens, fraudulently claim that they intend to establish "rational and equitable international economic relations". However, this is pure misrepresentation, deceit, and fraud since they also openly declared that they no longer "stabilize the value of the dollar" nor "assure the value of the coin and currency of the United States" .73

According to THE EMERGING CONSTITUTION by Rex­ford G. Tugwell, the Constitution For The Newstates Of Amer­ica was accomplished under the auspices of the Rockefeller tax-exempt foundation called the "Center for the Study of Demo­cratic Institutions" .74 [H: Ah, they do like to use labels which delude you into believing they are "saviors" come to bring you home safely! The Evil Adversary King of Deceit also comes calling himself the Prince of Light and the Bright Morning Star. BEWARE!]

Don't be fooled by labels like "Democratic". The people and Citizens of this Nation were forewarned that "Democracies have ever been the spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property, and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. "75

In any case, this alien "newstates constitution" has little to do with "democracy"--it is merely the foundation for a despotic, tyrannical oligarchy. For example, in Article I ("rights and Re­sponsibilities") of the "newstates constitution", Sections 1 and 15 evidence the authors' knowledge of the "emergency". The Rights of expression, communication, movement, assembly, pe­tition, and Habeas Corpus ARE ALL ELIMINATED DURING A "DECLARED EMERGENCY". [H: Ready? For they are aimed and firing--NOW!]

The "newstates constitution" openly declares among other seditious acts that "Until each indicated change in the govern­ment shall have been completed the provisions of the existing Constitution and the organs of government shall be in effect,"76 and, "All operations of the national government shall cease as they are replaced by those authorized under this Constitution. "77

The "newstates constitution" includes no mention of trial by jury, "Just" compensation, or the right to being informed of the "Nature & Cause of this Accusation". In sum, this "newstates constitution" is but a reiteration of the Communist Doctrines, intents and purposes, and clearly establishes a Police Power State, under direction and control of a self-appointed oligarchy.

ENEMIES, FOREIGN and DOMESTIC

It appears that the "Treasonous" and "Seditious" elements of our government are brewing up a storm of untold magnitude. As support, consider President Bush's public address of Sept. 11, 199165 where he admitted "Interdependence".66 Other authorities have admitted (along with him) "One World Or­der",67 affiliation and collusion with the Soviet Union Oli­garchy,68 and direction by the United Nations.69

It is now necessary to ask which "Constitution" our govern­ment is operating under. There is evidence of the fact that the taxing and monetary system--the "essential engine" of our gov­ernment as established by the U.S. Constitution (1787) and un­der the "Bill of Rights" (1791)--HAS BEEN OVERTHROWN! It is apparent that the present operation of our de facto gov­ernment is under Foreign/Alien Constitutions, Laws, Rules, and Regulations.

Our patience and tolerance for those who pervert the neces­sary and basic foundations of our society have been misguided and detrimental to our nation. While we have watched pa­tiently, they have fundamentally changed the form and substance of our Republican form of Government and exhibited a willful and wanton disregard for the Rights, Safety, and Property of others. While we have merely watched, they have evinced a despotic design to reduce my people to slavery, peonage, and involuntary servitude, under a fraudulent, tyrannical, seditious foreign oligarchy, with intent and purpose to institute, erect, and form a "Dictatorship" over the Citizens and our Posterity.

While we stood by, they have destroyed the Livelihood and Lives of thousands; aided and abetted our enemies; declared War on us and our Posterity; destroyed untold families; afflicted widows and orphans; turned Sodomites loose amongst our young; implemented foreign laws, rules, regulations, and proce­dures within the body of the country; incited insurrections, rebellion, sedition, and anarchy within the de jure society; ille­gally entered our Land; taken false Oaths; entered into Seditious Foreign Constitutions, Agreements, Pactions, Confederations, and Alliances; arbitrarily dismissed and held mock trials for those who trespassed upon our Lives, Liberties, Properties, and Families; endangered our Peace, Safety, Welfare, and Dignity; and under the pretense of an "emergency" (which they them­selves created), promoted, furthered, and brought forth swarms of bureaucrats, foreign agents, double agents, frauds, cheats, and swindlers to eat out the substance of the good and produc­tive people of our society. The damage, injury and cost have been higher than mere money can repay. They have done what they were commanded by law NOT to do. The time for just correction is NOW! [H: OR NEVER!!]

A PRESENTMENT OF TREASON AND SEDITION

Fortunately, in our Land it is necessary to seek, obtain, and present EVIDENCE to sustain a conviction and/or judgment. Unfortunately, the covert procedures used to implement and en­force these Foreign Constitutions, Laws, Procedures, Rules, Regulations, etc., have not, to my knowledge, been collected and assimilated, nor presented as evidence to establish seditious collusion.
Information on the de facto Federal and International char­tered "institutions", their Officers, Employees, Servants, Agents, and Representatives, must be gathered, verified, and turned over to a Court of Law for prosecution, trial, and judg­ment according to Law. (See: Pope Mfg. Co. vs Gormully, 144 U.S. 414, PG 419; ALSO, 22 u.s.c.a. 286G.) [H: And good luck--for the courts no longer recognize Constitutional Law and, depending on the presiding judge, you are apt to sim­ply be denied any type of hearing on the matter and if so, it will NOT BE ACCORDING TO CONSTITUTIONAL RULES OF JUSTICE.]

Sincere consideration of a "Presentment" of Treason and Sedi­tion to a Grand Jury under the Constitution for the United States of America (1787), Amendment V, is in order. [H: In order, indeed, but allowable?, I doubt it! They have passed every other dastardly deed upon you including all-out war under no declaration of war and you only bowed and waved your yellow ribbons and desecrated the very symbol of freedom in your FLAG of holy meaning. You actually passed United Nations flags out to your school children and thereby de­nounced your own nation under God and handed it in total unto the Foreign Aliens. Aliens from Space your problem? Oh, I do suggest you look again!] Numerous High Crimes and Misdemeanors have been committed under the Constitution For the United States of America, and Laws made in Pursuance thereof, and under the Constitution for the State of ALL STATES, and the Laws made in Pursuance thereof, and against the Peace and Dignity of the People, including but not limited to C.R.S. 18-11-203 (which defines and prescribes punishment for "Seditious Associations" and is also applicable to the other constitutions, and the intents and professed purposes of their Organizations, Corporations, and Associations).

I could go on but the story is long! I hope this information and research is of assistance to you. Much remains to be un­covered and disclosed, as it is necessary and imperative to se­cure the Lives, Liberties, Property, Peace, and Dignity of the People and our Posterity. Good hunting, and the Good Lord be with you in all your endeavors.
GOD BLESS!


REFERENCES

1 Senate Report 93-549, pgs 187, 594]
2 65th Congress, Sess. I Chs. 105, 106, Oct. 6, 1917; as codified at 12 United States Codes Annotated 95a.
3 Note: The Council of State Governments has been absorbed into other organizations such as the "National Conference of Commissioner on Uniform State Laws", headquartered at 676 N. St. Clair St, Ste 1700, Chicago, Ill., 60611. The members of this Conference are also members of the bar, and have lobbied for, passed, adjudicated, and order the implementation and execution of their purported statutory provision, to "help implement international treaties of the United States or where world uniformity would be desirable." See 1990/91 Reference Book, National Council of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, pg. 2) This is apparently what Robert Bork meant when he wrote "we care governed not by law and elected representatives by an unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committee of lawyers applying no will but their own." (The Tempting of America, Robert Bork, pg. 130)
4 Book Of The States, 1937, pg. 155]
5 60 Stat. 1401
6 Reorganization Plan No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903, Public Law 94­564, legislative History, pg. 5967
7 U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clauses 5 & 6, and Article I, Section 10, Clause 1,
8 See also: Bible, Deuteronomy, Ch. 25, verses 13-16; Public Law 97-289, 96 Stat. 1211
9 "Madison's Notes", Constitutional Convention, Aug 16, 1787, Federalist Papers No. 44
10 18 U.S.C.A. 331 & 332, U.S. vs. Marigold, 50 U.S. 560, 13 L.Ed. 257]
11 Silent Weapons for Quite Wars", TMSW7905.1,pgs 6-9, 12- 13, & 56
12 Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg 5936, 5945; 31 U.S.C.A. 314; 31 U.S.C.A. 321; 31 U.S.C.A 5112; C.R.S. 11-61-101; and C.R.S. 18-11-203]
13 See also, Federalist Papers No. 44; Craig vs. Missouri, 4 Peters 903
14 Federalist Papers No. 31
15 Public Law 89-719, Legislative History, pg 3722
16 Handbook of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, (1966) Ed. pgs. 152-153
17 22 U.S.C.A. 287d.
18 12 U.S.C.A. 411
19 Senate Report No. 93-549, pg. 596
20 Dept. of Army Field Manual, FM 41-10 (1969 ed.)
21 See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg 5937; Senate Report No. 93-549, Foreword, pg III; Proclamation No. 4074, pg 597; 31 U.S.C.A 314; and 12 U.S.C.A. 5112]
22 See: 22 U.S.C.A. 286f; (Section 8 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act of 1945, 22 included "reports on foreign currency transactions," (Executive Order No. 10033); and also declared in Section 2(b) that: "No provision of any law in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, and no rule, regulation, or order under authority of any such law, may be construed to prohibit any person from purchasing, holding, selling, or otherwise dealing with gold.")
23 8 U.S.C.A. 1101 (40); and 50 U.S.C.A. 781 & 783]
24 Cohen vs. Virginia, 6 Wheat 264, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821); see also, U.S. vs. Will, 449 Us 200, 66 L.Ed. 2d 392, at pg. 406.
25 Atkins et al. vs. U.S., 556 F. 2d 1028, pg. 1072, 1074; The Tempting of America, Robert Bork, pgs 155-159; 5 U.S.C.A. 5305 & 5335; and Senate Report No. 93-549, pgs 69-71
26 Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5944
27 Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg 5945-5946; The Ron Paul Money Book, (1991), by Ron Paul, Plantation Publishing, 837 W. Plantation, Clute, Texas 77531)
28 See Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5942; United States Government Manual 1990/91 ed., pgs. 480-481
29 22 U.S.C.A 286e, et seq.
30 C C.R.S. 24-60-1301(h)
31 See: 26 I.R.C. 165 (g)(1); U.C.C. 1-201(23); C.R.S. 39-22­103.5, Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188, 75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W.2d 911
32 22 U.S.C.A. 286d
33 Public Law 99-177.
34 See: 22 U.S.C.A. 286e
35 The Bank of the United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia,
6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244; U.S. vs. Burr, U.S.C.A. 286, et seq.
36 22 U.S.C.A. 286, et seq
37 31 U.S.C.A. 5323
38 Wingate's Maxims 680]
39 Broom's Maxims 297, 729; Cowper's Reports 343; 5 Scott's New Reports 558; 10 Mass. 276; 38 Fed. 800]
40 Senate Report 93-549, Foreward, pg III
41 Senate Report 93-549, Introduction, pg 1.
42 16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd Ed., Sections 71-72,
43 The controlling statutes on "expatriation" include: 8 U.S.C.A. 1481, 22 U.S.C.A. 611, 612, & 613; and 50 U.S.C.A. 781.
44 "Letters", Insight Magazine, 2/18/91, pg 7, Lowel L. Flanders, President, U.N. Staff Union, New York.
45 Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg 5967,
Reorganization Plan No. 26
46 Treasury Delegation Order No. 91
47 Department of The Army Field Manual, (1969) FM 41-10, pgs 1-4, Sect. 1-7(b) & 1-6, Sect. 1-10(7)(c)(1); and 22 U.S.C.A. 284
48 FM 41-10 pg 1-7, Sect. 110(7)(c)(4); and, Agreement Be­tween the United Nation and the United States of America Regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, Sect. 7(d) & (8); 22 U.S.C.A. 287 (1979 ed.) pg 241
49 Congressional Record - Senate, Mr. Thurmond, December 13, 1967)
50 FM 41-10, pgs 2-30 through 2-31, Sect 251. Public Finance
51 "Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars" Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1, pg 3 & 7
52 TM-SW7905.1, pg 48; 22 U.S.C.A. 286f; Executive Order No. 10033; and 26 U.S.C.A 6103(k)(4).
53 TM--SW7905.1, pg 52
54 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(1)(iv), 612, & 613; Rabinowitz vs. Kennedy, 376 U.S. 605, 11 L. Ed. 2d 940; 18 U.S.C.A. 219
& 951
55 See Public Law 94-564, supra pg 5942; U.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs 480-481; 26 U.S.C.A 7701(a)(11); and Treasury Delegation Order No. 150-10
56 22 U.S.C.A. 286 & 286a
57 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(ii)
58 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(iii)
59 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(2)
60 22 U.S.C.A 263a
61 22 U.S.C.A 285g; 22 U.S.C.A. 287j
62 Public Law 101-167, 103 Stat. 1195
63 U.S. Constitution, Art I, Sect 8, Clause 1
64 22 U.S.C.A. 612; 18 U.S.C.A. 219 & 951. Department of the Army Pamphlet 27100-70, Military Law Review, Vol 70
65 Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents
66 Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg 5950
67 Extension of Remarks, Jan 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt, 8 U.S.C.A. 1101(40)
68 50 U.S.C.A. 781
69 22 U.S.C.A. 611
70 22 U.S.C.A, 287, (1979 Ed.) at page 248
71 22 U.S.C.A. 263a
72 The United States Government Manual 1990/91, pg 385; The Ron Paul Money Book, supra, pgs 250-251
73 Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227, at pg 1229
74 Located at Liberty Lobby, 300 Independence Ave SE, Washington DC 20003
75 Federalist Papers No. 10; The Law, by Fredrick Bastiat
76 Constitution For The Newstates Of America, Article XII, Sect 3
77 Constitution For The Newstates Of America, Article XII, Sect. 4.