PJ#018, BLOOD AND ASHES

[wave]

PJ 18

CHAPTER 21

REC #1 HATONN

TUESDAY, AUGUST 21, 1990 8:26 A.M. YEAR 4 DAY 5

FIRST MILITARY SUCCESS OF THE SPACE SHUTTLE

On March 30, 1982, one day behind schedule, you got to see a shuttle landing at the White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. White Sands is the true nerve center of the Space Shuttle Program, regardless of what is projected otherwise.

The third shuttle flight, regardless of which shuttle did what, represented another "first" and that one was not visible on television. For the first time a space shuttle had succeeded in it's secret military mission. By so doing an­other barrier was removed in the path to nuclear war.

The third shuttle mission took place nearly a year after the first flight of April, 1981. A comparison between the first and third flights is a study in ironies. In the April fiasco, publicity about the first flight was designed to give the impression that it was unnaturally perfect. Meanwhile, the secret military mission--which you did not see--was disaster. With the third flight, it was the other way around. From start to finish the publicity emanating from NASA gave the impression that the shuttle was plagued with problems. NASA wanted to be able to explain it away if disaster should strike again but, as it turned out, the military mission in space, hidden from your eyes, was a success and the loss of one more shuttle was not so detrimental to the program as a whole.

Space Shuttle No. 3 was supposed to orbit a special new Spy Satellite. It was hardened against attack from Russia's space weapons and armed with a robot-controlled laser that could shoot back. In addition, the shuttle itself was armed with lasers on this third try.

The public image of a troubled, plagued shuttle flight actually got underway several days prior to launch, thanks to the weather. Drenching rainstorms turned Edwards Air Force Base in California, used for the prior two landings, into a wet bog. The tight military schedule of the Shuttle Program required that the flight take off on schedule anyway, so for public consumption a 23-car railroad train loaded with equipment was sent from California to New Mex­ico.

Ostensibly, NASA was setting up a spur-of-the-moment landing sight at the White Sands Missile Range. This was done so that the central role of White Sands Missile Range in the Shuttle Program would not be suspected by the public and would also delete the need for substitute shuttles in the landing itself because it is publicly closed.

Space Shuttle No. 3 lifted off from Cape Canaveral only an hour behind schedule on Monday morning, March 22nd. Beginning at the moment of lift­off, NASA started laying the basis for a cover-up story should the military mis­sion fail. First you heard the pre-recorded voice of Shuttle Commander Jack Lousma saying unexplained white flakes were flying past the windshield. Later, after the shuttle was out of sight, you were told that one of the power packs called an APU was not functioning. These initial hints of possible trouble had been pre-recorded for broadcast during the launch--for a reason. There was fear that the shuttle might be destroyed by Russian space weapons before reaching orbit altitude. Had that happened, the shuttle managers wanted to be able to initiate a cover-up which would not reveal the military sit­uation; but as it turned out, the preparations paid off and, through the radical new maneuver already discussed, the shuttle did at least reach proper alti­tude.

When the Shuttle No. 3 took off, it headed into the northeast. Long-distance cameras followed it until the two solid rockets separated and fell away. Then, as the shuttle disappeared from sight, it started its long sweeping turn into the north. It was heading toward a near-polar orbit so that it would pass over Russia. This much of the flight plan was the same as in the past, but this time a critical new feature was added.

Less than 30 seconds after the shuttle disappeared from TV cameras, the cargo-bay doors were blasted completely off. This opened up a field of fire for the defensive laser at the front of the cargo-bay. Then the shuttle and its giant external tanks started rotating slowly in a space-age version of a barrel roll.

In World War II, Fighter pilots made use of the "barrel roll" to avoid bullets from enemy airplanes. Likewise, the Space shuttle used a barrel roll to pro­tect itself against probable attack from Russian Cosmospheres. By rotating like a corkscrew, the shuttle made it impossible for a Cosmosphere to ap­proach safely from any direction. The barrel roll maneuver was a very risky one, however, for the shuttle. The shuttle and tank were not designed with "aerobatics" in mind but calculations showed that it should survive a slow roll, and somehow it did.

One of the biggest questions about the barrel roll stunt was what it would do to the astronauts Lousma and Fullerton. They were required to withstand these dizzying gyrations for about six minutes. At the same time, the shuttle was still accelerating with up to three times the force of gravity; and because of the peculiar design of the shuttle and fuel tank, the gyrations were sick­ening indeed. Military space doctors knew that at best Lousma and Fullerton would be very sick for some time after reaching this low orbit. Their wild, bruising, spinning ride would end abruptly in weightlessness. That is a combi­nation guaranteed to derange the equilibrium of even the toughest astronaut. Nothing remotely like it had ever been done. Doctors were rightly worried that even if the two survived the mission and returned to earth, there could be permanent damage to their equilibrium.

When orbit was reached, they did indeed become violently ill. That is why you heard those reports about nausea striking both men. NASA wanted to pave the way for a plausible public explanation if they should not appear well when they returned to earth. At the same time, the shuttle planners knew perfectly well why they were sick. That is why NASA spokesmen acted so unconcerned when discussing the space sickness with reporters. When they called it "motion sickness", they were making a gross understatement.

Note that a simple change of words is often employed to change perception of a situation to the public. For instance, George Bush simply changed from detained to hostage in the situation in Kuwait and the whole world knew war had actually been set into motion. "Defensive" to "offensive" stance and the war is on. You are so manipulated that you, as the public, respond in perfection to each word pronounced upon you. As another example--changing per­ception of "rapid weight loss" to "toxic trauma" makes infinite difference in perception regarding Dharma's status--even if the results are actually the same.

ASTRONAUT'S IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

Lousma and Fullerton were to begin work immediately upon reaching proper orbit--sick or not. Their extensively modified crew compartment was to be depressurized already--automatically, with the two men depending upon their space suits. This plan had to be modified slightly when the barrel roll was added to the flight plan.

When the shuttle reached orbit the astronauts were in space suits, but the cabin was still pressurized. They were allowed several minutes to get from the flight deck to the Gemini-type escape capsule stored below. Once inside the escape capsule they then depressurized the cabin; then the Nose Laser Sys­tem deployed automatically to protect the shuttle against any attacks by Rus­sian space weapons. This allowed Lousma and Fullerton to recover from space sickness while inside the capsule.

For the ensuing two days or so, getting well was their main task. It was a pe­riod of total vulnerability, of depending on the untried Automatic Laser sys­tem for protection. The shuttle planners wanted to have the excuse ready later should the shuttle be attacked and destroyed. So the day after the launch you were shown TV pictures of missing tiles on the nose of the shuttle. According to those pictures at least a dozen tiles in the black area were lost.

If that had really happened, it would have been cause for extreme alarm. Later a NASA spokesman downplayed it, saying the tiles were noncritical. But there is no such thing as a noncritical black tile. The black tiles suppos­edly lost are to withstand temperatures above 1500 degrees Fahrenheit. Un­der the tile there is nothing but a piece of felt called a "strain isolation pad" which would not last five seconds in those temperatures, and under the felt is the metal skin of the shuttle. It is made of aluminum, which loses its strength above 350 degrees. If exposed to 1500-degree heat by a few missing black tiles, the shuttle could not possibly avoid very severe, crippling damage or destruction by rupturing.

The nice NASA space movies you saw on TV were a pre-recorded hoax to provide an excuse if something went wrong, but it didn't. The astronauts recovered, went to work, and deployed the new military satellite. Meanwhile NASA spokesmen waved aside the alleged tile problem as minor. It had served its purpose and was no longer needed.

Throughout the remainder of the week you heard about one problem follow­ing another. Supposedly the cargo-bay doors would not close and I guess not, since they were blown completely away, the toilet would not work, three out of four communications channels went out, one of the three crucial data dis­play screens in the cockpit failed, etc. None of these stories was true; all were devised to provide blather material and cover story for possible problems with the secret military mission, but in the end none of them was needed and so NASA spokesmen just waved them aside as unimportant.

The secret military mission was a success, so the pretended mission which was cooked up for TV was declared an overwhelming success, also.

Late Friday night, March 26th, Lousma and Fullerton finished deploying the new Superspy Satellite. It had taken longer than planned, but it was done. The shuttle was left in orbit. The astronauts re-entered their Gemini-type es­cape capsule, fired its retrorockets, and dropped out of orbit to an Indian Ocean splashdown. From there they were flown nonstop to the White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico.

The shuttle directors took advantage of a sandstorm at White Sands to delay the public landing for an extra day while the astronauts recuperated. Then the next morning they boarded one of the two remaining secret shuttles at White Sands. The shuttle took off from the north end of the immense White Sands Range, using small solid rockets. Just moments before 11:00 A.M. it made its appearance on TV. They swooped in from the north, dropped down over the mountains, and touched down in a cloud of white dust. Finally, after a respectable wait, out stepped Lousma and Fullerton all rested and re­freshed.

You need to give great honor to the entire situation because success was achieved against incredible odds, in the face of Russia's overwhelming power in space. Determination, ingenuity, and sheer boldness carried the day. But it was a black trip indeed, for its purpose was heinous. The designers of the plan were not doing all this for exploration or to prevent war--it was for the sole purpose of getting on with Nuclear War One. With the military surveil­lance necessary and critical for the planning, you moved one step closer to dooms-day.

SOME SOBERING THOUGHTS

For years your Lord Christos as held back the holocaust that threatens to engulf you. Time after time you have come to the very brink only to be pulled back and spared once again and given additional "time" and "chance" to change.

Your Lord is not willing that any should perish, most surely in the absence of God-balance and knowledge of truth, and He has shown mercy over and over again. Have you mended your ways? Have you returned unto Him? Have you revived the values that made America great? Have you efforted to return unto His laws and the Laws of The Creation? Have you basically moved away from or toward correction of your path unto God truth and actions? So be it.

Jeremiah, Chapter 5, says it very well indeed:

"We have spoken falsely of the LORD, and have said He will do nothing. No evil will come upon us, nor shall we see sword or famine.

"Behold, I am bringing upon you a nation from afar, says the LORD. It is an enduring nation, it is an ancient nation, a nation whose lan­guage you do not know."

Well, as you were sitting while the American Bolshevik SATANIC leaders in the U.S. were intending to destroy the ancient, enduring nation of Russia whose language you do not know--you could not know that you, too, were planned in the destruction. I cannot see a way to warn you more critically as you watch, now, that which goes forth in the Middle East for this is truly the location in which the final war scenario is to be staged.

Will it happen? Well, God and the Christos see all--and He alone repays that which is sent forth. But it is well worth the pondering and prayerful petition for insight that you might take positive action to change thine plight.

Allow us to leave this writing for a rest please.

Hatonn to stand-by, thank you for your service; and to you readers, for your kind attention.

PJ 18

CHAPTER 22

REC #2 HATONN

FRIDAY, AUGUST 24, 1990 2:05 P.M. YEAR 4 DAY 8

COUNTDOWN TOWARD NUCLEAR WAR ONE

As you moved through the Falklands "crisis" and into early summer of 1982, it was a time of ever increasing danger for America.

The timetable for nuclear war was still in effect. That timetable called for Nu­clear War One to erupt by mid-September 1982. The American Bolsheviks who controlled the U.S. Pentagon were not slowing down in their war prepa­rations. That was true in spite of the fact that part of their war plan had been crippled.

The covert warfare that spawned the so-called Falklands crisis had all but ru­ined the Pentagon plans for final victory in the forthcoming war, but the Bol­shevik war-planners had a suicidal streak in their thinking, and they were bent on war regardless of the consequences and you were to be sacrificial lambs, at any rate.

Headlines were growing larger about the Falklands War between Argentina and Britain. Heavy losses were reported on both sides. Argentina had lost her only cruiser, the General Belgrano, plus several minor vessels and a num­ber of aircraft. Britain had so far admitted losing five major ships--two de­stroyers, two frigates, and a container ship full of war material. Those reports reflected the scale of the fighting to some extent but they were incomplete and totally distorted. As in every war, the truth always becomes the first casu­alty.

Please keep in your mind the information and truth already presented to you prior to this chapter in that an entirely new nuclear war strategy against Rus­sia was being developed in Washington. It was being worked out by an elite military-planning group in extreme secrecy under the code name "Project Z". It was a military-planning project calling for Nuclear War One itself to begin by Septem­ber of 1982.

Project Z was continuing to move fast at the secret war-planning room in downtown Washington. The process of fleshing out the basic war plan was al­ready under way. Then the first complete draft of the total Project Z war plan was ready. The plan was essentially completed with nothing left to do but make minor refinements. The existence of the major new U.S. nuclear war plan was creeping into the news. On May 30, 1982, right at the Memorial Day celebration of remembering your war dead, an article about it appeared for the first time in the New York Times. The article was by Richard Halloran and carried the headline: "PENTAGON DRAWS UP FIRST STRATEGY FOR FIGHTING A LONG NUCLEAR WAR".

"Defense Department policymakers in a new five-year defense plan have accepted the premise that nuclear conflict with the Soviet Union could be protracted, and have drawn up their first strategy for fighting such a war."

Of course, it was to mislead the public away from any perception of immedi­ate, like within three months, all out war--begun by the U.S. with a first strike.

The article went on to mention that the plan was laid out in an unpublished document of 125 pages. It was drafted for approval by Secretary of Defense, Casper Weinberger.

The U.S. Pentagon was controlled by the Bolsheviks who formerly controlled Russia. Weinberger was the highest visible agent of the Bolsheviks in the U.S. Government at that time. Note I said, "visible".

The nuclear war plans of the Bolsheviks was moving most quickly, but the U.S. Government was a house divided. The Bolsheviks were opposed by their bitter rivals, the Rockefeller cartel. Their top "visible" operative in the federal government at the time was Secretary of State Alexander Haig. The often visible feuding between Haig and Weinberger was only a pale shadow of that deadly power struggle behind the scenes. Unlike the Bolsheviks, the Rocke­feller faction did not want nuclear war. In a word, they couldn't "afford" it. They would lose everything, and so the Rockefeller faction was working feverishly to head off the Bolshevik nuclear war plan.

The new anti-Bolshevik rulers of Russia were also against nuclear war. The anti-Bolshevik, antinuclear-war attitudes of the Rockefeller cartel and the Kremlin led to a limited coalition between them. The most spectacular result from this Rockefeller-Russian coalition was the Falklands War raging be­tween Argentina and Britain.

The Falklands was the "visible" aftermath to covert warfare which took place during April, 1982, of which we have just written. The Rockefeller cartel and the Russians joined forces to destroy certain major military installations and weapons reserves. These were key ingredients in the final phase of the Pro­ject Z war plan.

The whole operation began at South Georgia Island on April 3. With the help of Argentina a joint Rockefeller-Russian commando team was able to knock out the giant hidden naval base there. The base, built during the 1960's, was originally controlled through the U.S. Government by the Rockefeller cartel but the Bolsheviks acquired control of the bases in the late 1970's when they also seized control of the American Pentagon.

The major base was contained within a giant man-made cavern hollowed out inside a mountain near the water. With the camouflaged ship entrances sealed, the base was bombproof, but the joint Rockefeller-Russian com­mando team succeeded in attacking the base by drilling a shaft through the mountain. Then a compact Russian neutron bomb was inserted through the shaft and detonated inside the cavernous naval base. The process took sev­eral weeks. The Thatcher government which--like the U.S. Pentagon--is Bolshevik controlled (and this should give you a bad case of hives this very day in view of the mess in the Middle East), dispatched the Royal Navy.

First, it was supposed to dislodge the heavily-armed Rockefeller-Russian mili­tary force before it could destroy the naval base, then it was to move on to the Falklands for the publicly-admitted fighting.

The Royal Navy arrived several days too late to save the secret base on South Georgia Island. But by that time the panicking Thatcher government had al­ready committed some two-thirds of the Royal Navy to the South Atlantic. On top of that, at least one British ship had already been sunk by Russia in connection with the secret South Georgia operation. That left the Thatcher government with no choice but to engage Argentina in battle, otherwise it would have been impossible to explain away Britain's huge deployment to the South Atlantic, much less the heavy losses which had been sustained.

On April 30 the British blockade of the Falklands was just beginning. Later that day the entity President Reagan announced that the U.S. was actively siding with Britain (another breakout of hives, please). The announcement was a victory for the Pentagon war faction. Right away warfare around the Falklands started heating up quickly. On May 1 the British launched bombing raids against the airport at Port Stanley, and on May 2 a British submarine torpedoed Argentina's second largest ship, the cruiser General Belgrano. It sank within 24 hours, leaving a death toll of more than 300 Argentine sailors. The sinking of the Belgrano was expected to demoralize the Argentines, but instead it enraged them. The Belgrano had been sunk at a time when it was not threatening the British forces. The Argentines decided it was time to start playing their ace-in-the-hole against Britain.

Argentina had been given certain promises in return for making the secret South Georgia operation possible. One of these was the promise of covert military assistance by Russia against Britain. Specifically, it was pledged that the Russians would intervene in parallel with Argentine air and naval opera­tions in ways designed to even the odds. In this way Argentina's military lead­ers could take full credit for both their own and covert Russian attacks on the British. At the same time, the procedure was designed to keep Russia's role in the fighting quite obscure.

On May 4 the Argentine Air Force decided to put Russia's promises to the test. A pair of Fighter bombers headed out over the Atlantic to attack the Royal Navy. Acting on reconnaissance data provided by Russian Spy Satel­lites, they headed straight for the fleet. As the two low-flying Argentine jets appeared on the horizon, they were picked up by British fleet radar. At the same time, a Russian Cosmosphere hovering many miles above the fleet took final aim at one of the ships. The ship was one of Britain's newest, most mod­ern, most sophisticated ships designed specifically to shield the fleet against air attack. The ship was a Type-42 guided missile destroyer, HMS Sheffield. Long before the two Argentine jets were close enough to attack, the Cosmosphere fired its charged particle beam-weapon downward at the ship. The white-hot beam of subatomic particles blasted through the aluminum super­structure just behind the bridge near the top of the ship. In a split second the beam seared through layers of metal downward into the bowels of the ship.

The aluminum of the ship itself was instantly ablaze. The Argentine Fighter pilots witnessed the spectacular explosion and intense white flames from nearly 20 miles away. They promptly turned back toward home, having ex­pended no missiles. Bewildered survivors from the Sheffield later said there had been no warning before the blast.

I am going to tell you right now, a great portion of the current show of power is to cause a stand-off with Russia who does not wish an all out nuclear war. It is not Iraq who is being forced into a corner and Hussein knows, if attacked, he can most likely count on Russia to come to his assistance. You still cannot handle the Cosmosphere beams, but it becomes obvious that your own forces will introduce such heinous ground weaponry, such as chemicals, etc., that the whole world is held hostage--THE WHOLE WORLD! If Russia brings into play the space weapons it causes all-out and total nuclear/particle beam war. You ones are going to have to face the fact that the wondrous U.S., as you once knew it, is now headed by evil beyond your imagination--hand-in-hand as a walking shadow with England. You have pushed your innocent children into the role of the "Anti-God" for all the world to see and witness.

You do not hear from the "people" on your controlled media pictures--you only hear from the puppet or hostage leaders who are telling you exactly that which you are intended to hear. YOU ARE ONLY A BREATH AWAY FROM TOTAL ANNIHILATION AT WORST AND ALL-OUT WAR AT BEST. YOU HAVE NO SHELTER SYSTEMS, SO "AT BEST" IS QUITE ACADEMIC INDEED.

MEANWHILE IN ARGENTINA IN APRIL, 1982

Argentina's leaders were being coached by Rockefeller cartel operatives in what to say publicly about war developments. They claimed that a French-made missile called the Exocet had been used to sink the Sheffield but, to those who know the characteristics of the Exocet missile, the Sheffield disas­ter remained a total mystery.

The Exocet is a type of missile known as a sea-skimmer. It is designed to skim along just above the water, striking a ship almost at the water line. Films of the Exocet were shown on your TV and clearly demonstrated that characteris­tic. But the Sheffield was blasted close to the very top of the superstructure; in fact, that is said to be the reason for the relatively low casualty toll in the destruction of HMS Sheffield. Had the same blast been aimed low and close to the water line, the ship would have heeled over and very quickly been sunk and almost all of the crew would have been lost.

On the evening of May 4, Admiral Martin Wemyss, former director of British naval warfare, was interviewed about the Sheffield disaster on ABC Nightline. Ted Koppel began with the words:

"Admiral Wemyss, how is it that such a modern ship would not have been able to first of all detect and then destroy that Argentine air­craft?"

Admiral Wemyss answered,

"I think that's an extremely good question, and I cannot give you a straight answer. In my book, this should not have happened."

For the next two weeks talks between Argentina and Britain continued with United Nations Secretary General Perez de Cuellar attempting to mediate.

WHAT WERE THE BRITISH DOING?

Meanwhile, the Thatcher government continued to add to the British armada in the South Atlantic. Even the luxury liner, Queen Elizabeth II, was com­mandeered and turned into a troop ship. It sailed with some 3200 troops aboard on May 12.

The strategy of the Bolshevik-dominated Thatcher government was very sim­ple. They knew very well they were sending the Royal Navy into a trap, but they believed that by multiplying naval strength in the South Atlantic virtually beyond reason, they would win. They were making the British commitment so huge compared to that of Argentina that a total Argentine rout of the British would look unreasonable. It would enable the question of covert Russian aid to Argentina to he raised openly and credibly, and that could help set off the very nuclear war which they knew Russia was trying to avoid.

And what do you have going right now in Saudi-Arabia? I thought I might be reaching into your reasoning mind just a wee bit. You are setting up the ab­solute same scenario in the Saudi desert while you cook your children in suits designed to save a few from that which you, yourself plan to kill them with--chemical warfare. I am sorry, children of the lie--this is simply the way it IS.

Following that brute-force strategy, the Thatcher government continued to put every available ship into the South Atlantic fray. As of the end of May, over 100 British ships were either in the war zone or heading toward it. That was almost the entire Royal Navy! The attitude was: For every ship the Rus­sians and Argentines would sink, the Thatcher government would just send two more--anything to make sure Britain retook the Falklands because if that was not accomplished, the Thatcher government would fall and that would be a major setback to Bolshevik power in Britain. Where do you think that leaves you right now? Thatcher is stronger than ever and spends a lot of time in the good old U.S.A. in top secret meetings!

On May 19 the last ditch talks at the United Nations finally collapsed. Britain was ready at last to invade. After talks ended that evening, it was announced that the British War Cabinet would meet the following morning. Supposedly, the meeting would decide whether or not to give the go-ahead for invasion--but it was all a ruse to help create an element of surprise against Argentina and against Russia.

The first stage of an elaborate invasion strategy was already going into action. On the evening of May 19 the British invasion fleet was divided up into two groups--one group was 150 miles due east of Port Stanley, the other, 100 miles to the northeast. Shortly before midnight, Washington time, both invasion forces started heading toward shore. Russian Cosmospheres and submarines went into action working together. Both British assault groups came under fire. At least two ships critical to the assault were hit and heavily damaged. By 2:00 A.M. Washington time both assault forces aborted their moves to­ward the Port Stanley area. In response, Russian forces disengaged. The Russians believed they had thwarted the British invasion, but they were wrong.

The two large invasion groups threatening Port Stanley the night of May 19 were actually carrying out a diversionary action. British strategists knew that the Russians had the muscle available to stop any invasion. The only chance of success lay in convincing the Russians that they had stopped the invasion, and then somehow sneaking troops ashore. So the two large invasion forces of May 19 actually were staging decoy actions! Most of the British invasion troops were no longer aboard the troop carrier, Canberra, or the assault ships. Instead, they had been transferred to other ships which normally were not used for amphibious purposes.

On the morning of May 20 the elaborate British deception continued. Up un­til the previous day, British statements had been referring to an imminent all-out invasion, but on the morning of May 20 the statements changed abruptly. British Defense Ministry spokesmen suddenly started saying that the British would confine themselves to small hit-and-run raids for a while. The Bolshe­vik military planners in London wanted to further convince Russia that the invasion had been stopped the previous night. It worked.

Small groups of British ships began moving around the Falklands as if to plant small raiding parties here and there. In the early morning darkness of May 21 one of those small groups of ships moved into the north end of the Falkland Sound between the islands. Contrary to press reports, the troop ship, Can­berra, was not among them, nor was an assault ship. Those ships would have tipped off the Russians, monitoring everything from Cosmospheres far above, that a major landing was afoot. Instead, the key ship that moved into San Carlos Bay was the hospital ship, Uganda. Under cover of darkness the Uganda moved close to shore. British assault troops, crammed like sardines into the Uganda, clambered down the sides of the ship on rope ladders into motor launches. The launches ferried the troops a short distance ashore, one group after another. As soon as they were ashore, the troops had orders to spread out fast. In that way they rendered themselves unsuitable targets for any attack by the Russian Cosmospheres patrolling miles above. Particle beam-weapons are devastating against concentrated targets but very inefficient against personnel scattered over a wide area.

By dawn other ships had also disembarked troops in the same manner. NOW PAY ATTENTION--THE SAME PRINCIPLE HOLDS TRUE IN THE SAUDI DESERT--IT IS HARD TO HIT ALL THOSE SCATTERED GROUND TROOPS AND THE PROBABILITY OF THE ISRAELIS GETTING OFF SOME ROUNDS OF NUCLEAR BOMBS IS TOTALLY WITHIN CAPABILITY--AND THEN THE SHOW IS ON.

By the time daylight revealed what was really going on, it was too late. The British invasion of the Falklands was underway. Once the British got ashore with a sizable number of troops, Britain's chances of regaining control of the Islands started increasing quickly. Covert Russian help for the Argentines was much more feasible at sea and in the air than on land under those circum­stances.

You were given reports about a number of devastating air attacks by the Argentines. Up to then the British had admitted losing at least five ships plus several helicopters and Harrier Jump-jets, but slowly the British ground forces reinforced and started advancing across East Falkland Island toward Port Stanley. As of May 31, British ground forces were closing in on the main Ar­gentine garrison at Port Stanley. The operation was being portrayed in the press and news in the U.S. as a relatively easy task but I believe you now see that that was a great deviation from the truth of it.

British casualties in land battles were far greater than ever admitted, and at sea the Royal Navy took extremely heavy losses that were not even hinted, at so far as the controlled press was concerned. Many ships were badly damaged and all--I repeat--ALL of the original contingent of the Sea Harrier Jump-jets were put out of action. Both British aircraft carriers, the Hermes and the In­vincible, had been rendered incapable of launching jets. The Harriers which still were operating around the Falklands were a different type from the sharp-nosed, blue-painted Sea Harriers. They were painted in green and brown camouflage. My friends, they were U.S. Marine Corps Harriers, and they were operating from an American ship!! I'm sorry, little dreamers.

OFFICIAL STORIES VS. TRUTH

Yes, I realize that which we outlay here is in variance with official stories--but that is exactly what these Journals are about--TRUTH! And yes, Zita, pre­cious--you are the first to pronounce the fact that Henry Kissinger was the supplier of/or "Deep Throat" of Watergate fame, as he was setting up Nixon for the Big Fall!. The cycles of life and intrigue are most interesting indeed, are they not? We will cover a bit of "Watergate" in retrospect, very soon.

The things being revealed herein are at variance but this is the war you never see. Photos of British amphibious exercises taken at Ascension Island were passed off as pictures of the Falklands invasion. British Broadcasting Corpo­ration broadcasting facilities on Ascension Island were taken over weeks prior by British military. You then began to hear daily reports from Ascension Is­land that were claimed to be originating with the task force. Even more than usual, the truth had been the first casualty in the Falklands War.

BOLSHEVIK/THATCHER USE OF FALKLANDS

The Bolshevik military planners and the Thatcher government in Britain were trying every way to find some way to use the Falklands War for their own pur­poses. They were not slowing down in their fast timetable for Nuclear War One.

Within a few short weeks there would be a highly visible clue to the status of the Bolshevik nuclear war schedule. And now I refer to the upcoming FOURTH space shuttle flight. All of the space shuttle flights up to that point had been totally military in nature. The space shuttle was the Pentagon's only hope to regain a military toe-hold in space for the coming war in planning. Now a new thing came into public attention and that was that the fourth shut­tle flight would be for military purposes.

Shuttle flight number four was scheduled for June 27.

PAST REMINDERS AND A BIT OF SUMMARY

The third shuttle flight had been the first successful mission. A hardened laser-armed Superspy Satellite was orbited in March to obtain fresh recon­naissance data on Russia. It was the first updating of Russian target data since Russia destroyed America's Spy Satellites some four years prior. Target data from the new satellite was integrated into the Project Z nuclear war plan.

Shuttle four was being prepared for a different mission. Under the Project Z war plan, the coming nuclear war would begin with a surprise nuclear attack by American Stealth planes into Russia. They would attempt to knock out all of Russia's space bases--four Cosmosdromes for rockets plus Cosmosphere installations in Siberia. If all would go as planned, all of those installations would be blown up with H-bombs simultaneously. As soon as that would hap­pen, the rest of America's nuclear arsenal would be launched at Russia.

There still remained one weak point in the Bolshevik's first-strike plan against Russia. The American Bolsheviks would have to assume that the first phase of the attack plan had succeeded as of a given time. The reason was that the U.S. had no means of verifying if the initial Stealth attack had succeeded. When Russia destroyed America's Spy Satellites four years prior she also de­stroyed your high-flying Early Warning Satellites. That left the Bolshevik war planners without any way to tell if their bombs had exploded in Russia. Space Shuttle number four was intended to solve that problem.

The supersecret Department of Defense pay load would be a cryogenic infrared Sensor System. It was designed to look down at Russia from geosta­tionary orbit. It would detect the explosions of American H-bombs in Russia when they would happen. The moment that it flashed a signal confirming the explosions to the Pentagon, the rest of the American nuclear first-strike against Russia would be set in motion.

In order to do its job, the Air Force infrared Sensor System would have to be placed in geostationary orbit. That orbit is over 22 000 miles high over the equator. The shuttle itself could not go that high; it could only go to low Earth orbit, perhaps 150 miles up. To take the Air Force Sensor System the rest of the way, it had to be mounted on a rocket. The shuttle would carry the whole assembly--Sensor System, rocket and all, into low orbit. From there the rocket would take the Sensor System out to the desired location far above the equator.

Dharma, enough for this entry. When we continue, we will take up the eco­nomic attack on the U.S. Constitution. We must move smartly along now, chelas, for this becomes critical, relative information to get into public aware­ness for you are standing at the precipice of disaster and if you all continue to play the game of "disbelieve", you are destined to great holocaust. You, Dharma, shall pay no further attention to those who denounce our work--there is no longer time to even respond to such distraction; let those ones find their own confirmation for the masses of humanity stand poised for catastro­phe and the few must not prevent the masses from having the truth of that which IS upon you. So be it and Saalom God shall walk closely by thine side as we march into the valley of the shadows for God ordains that the truth shall go forth and through that truth shall man come again into freedom. Salu.

[wave]

PJ 18

CHAPTER 23

REC #1 HATONN

SATURDAY, AUGUST 25, 1990 10:34 A.M. YEAR 4 DAY 9

REGARDING EXPRESSES

Hatonn present in service unto Holy God, in the bearing forth of truth. He walks ever with us, the Hosts, and you the "bearers" upon the planet. lay the hope and instructions be gleaned from the writings and may you "act" with in­tent to regain that power which is your birthright that you may take back that which has been stolen from you by Satan's armies. Hallowed be His Name!

We are giving forth more than would be counted as regular Express material and we realize that it is shortening your perceived "time" segments. This ma­terial is so critical relative to what is happening upon your placement that you must be given more timely input than to await publishing of a Journal. These represent instructions of enlightenment, visualization of that which "truly IS" and also must move on now, into higher teachings that you can keep of your balance and inner guidance of Godself. It simply requires a doubling up of presentation.

I believe the expense involved is laid forth in segments of 13 Expresses; how­ever, I would ask that the "weekly" portion of the heading be deleted--we must not keep man from this information to simply suit income needs. I know not how to ask your public opinion--so, I shall go with God's instructions to "GIVE UNTO THE PEOPLE THE TRUTH!" SO BE IT.

Therefore, in addition to this Express which will consist of yesterday's writing on the South Atlantic/Falklands cover-up, we shall give you a truthful Water­gate unfolding in this latter half of this Express. Both should be entered into the Journal under immediate penning. In addition, the writings of Korton and Sananda of the past days must be gotten unto the people for through them can immediate spiritual guidance "life-rings" be utilized. Your ship is sinking most quickly and it is thine soul experience which brings you back into God and now that help must go forth more quickly. That Journal shall probably be named FLIGHT FEATHERS FOR THE PHOENIX.

Let us turn now to a review of Watergate so that you can begin to see the in­ter-play and participants for pandora's box was opened with the revelation of the participation of Henry Kissinger in the prior writing. You see, even those who feel themselves to be among the elite and "safely inside" are not often ac­tually thusly included. This is "how" you will prevail--all men are vulnerable to death in the human format--and believe me--only a few shall be carried into safety by the elite cartel. The remaining conspirators shall continue to be at inner battling until the final close of the scenario. At some point, those on the fringes of the corruption will see the truth of it and join with you it you but demand the truth go forth and the shield of lies be wiped away for the "lie" cannot bear the light of truth and these evil traitors shall be seen for that which they are.

TIME FLIES

It has been sixteen years, which is nearly two decades, since the resignation of Richard Nixon as President (Aug. 9). It needs to be peeked at again in re­fresher for it represents the type of lies and cover-ups which have brought you to your knees as a nation--one incident of power and coercion piled upon the evil of another.

The Watergate scandal was simply a scheme by the Rockefeller's to topple Richard Nixon and install Nelson Rockefeller in the White House. Why didn't that happen? Let us take a look inside as we unfold a few still-hidden truths.

More and more evidence emerges all the time as other scenarios unfold in your nation and within the world cartel and Zionist movement.

Despite his longtime association with the Rockefeller interests, an association born out of necessity rather than desire, on both the part of Nixon and the Rockefellers, Nixon never considered himself--nor did the Establishment con­sider him to be--a tried and true member of the power elite.

On the contrary, Nixon perceived himself, as the Establishment perceived him to be, an "outsider on the inside", a political creature through and through, who had, as a consequence of national and international political events, made it to the White House despite general Establishment disdain for the man and his policies.

Now, don't over-react to these words for Nixon was certainly no "populist", by any stretch, but following his landslide re-election victory over ultraliberal Sen. George McGovern in 1972, Nixon made moves to consolidate power and "clean house" within his administration. You see, it was the defeat of McGov­ern which gave Nixon the inroad--that type of political error was not ever to be allowed subsequently.

SECRETS

Nixon intended to overhaul the entire federal bureaucracy and bring it under the direct control of his own handpicked loyalists in the White House inner circle--trusted longtime croo, oops, colleagues who were not part of the Rockefeller sponsored elite. That reorganization attempt in the winter of 1972, which was not made public, eventually spurred into action against Nixon the great power blocs in Washington.

All of them saw danger as the hated Nixon moved more and more to control the executive branch from the White House, as he was Constitutionally man­dated to do.

What they feared was real indeed. Nixon genuinely meant to take the reins of government in hand, and if members of the Congress had been privy to a presidential conversation on September 15, 1972, they would have been even more worried. He said: "We're going to have a house-cleaning. It's time for a new team. Period! I'm going to tell the American people we didn't do it when we came in before, but now we have a mandate. And one of the man­dates is to do the cleaning up that we didn't do in 1968."

In this move, not only would Nixon tightly control all reigns of the government through eight top officers in the White House; he would plant his own "agents" in key positions in every agency of the government.

THIS THREATENED THE GLOBALIST PROFITS

Extremely threatening to the Rockefellers was the fact that Nixon and his val­ued friend, Treasury Secretary John B. Connally, the former governor of Texas and a Democrat turned Republican, were instituting international eco­nomic policy measures that threatened the globalist policies of the past that had guaranteed immense profits to the Rockefeller empire and its allied fi­nancial interests. We shall put all of this into more perspective as we move backward in the unraveling of events leading up to the planned Nuclear War One, but we shall just touch on the importance herein so that you get a picture of the conspirators and inner-warring.

For example, Nixon and Connally openly repudiated the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and slapped import fees on foreign-made goods, in­cluding even those produced by the Rockefeller family's Japanese sub­sidiaries.

Additionally, Nixon and Connally suspended the convertibility of the dollar into gold and other reserves. I just made a most wondrously important state­ment, chelas. Perhaps you should go back and reread the first sentence. This repudiation of the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund effected a devaluation of the dollar relative to other countries. The result was that U.S.-made goods became less costly to foreigners and reduced the com­petitiveness of foreign-made goods on the American market.

In short, Nixon was pursuing economic nationalism. These policies were ben­eficial to American consumers and workers and to more nationally oriented American industry but deleterious to the "transnational capitalists" operating in the Rockefeller sphere of influence.

This is why the Nixon administration so threatened the Establishment. Little wonder, then, that the Trilateral Commission--and the groundwork for the "Watergating" of Nixon--was already being set in motion at the time.

Nixon, as far as the Rockefellers were concerned, was out of control. What was worse, Nixon was grooming tough-talking John B. Connally as his succes­sor in 1976.

ROCKEFELLER'S CHIEF RIVAL

Connally, a product of freewheeling Texas oil politics, had never been a fa­vorite within the so-called Eastern Establishment ruled by the Rockefeller family, and he was viewed as Nelson Rockefeller's chief rival for the 1976 Re­publican presidential nomination.

Nixon had, in fact, planned to drop incumbent Vice President Spiro Agnew from the Republican ticket in 1972 and take on Connally as his running mate, but agitation by the Rockefellers and their allies in the media and the liberal wing of the Republican Party forced Nixon to abandon his plans. But Nixon still considered Connally his heir apparent, Agnew not withstanding.

As it so happened, however, the Establishment forced both Connally and Ag­new out of the way as part of the grand design to put Nixon's plans to rest.

Agnew resigned the vice presidency after a longtime Rockefeller crony in the U.S. attorney's office in Maryland, one George Beall, brought bribery charges against Agnew that were non-existent but none-the-less, were supported in your injustice system.

Additionally, the attorney general who promoted Beall's campaign against Agnew was Elliot Richardson, another longtime Rockefeller satellite who re­signed from the Nixon administration and ultimately became a member of the Trilateral Commission. In fact, Richardson was one of numerous Trilateral­ists named to the Carter administration in 1977, serving as ambassador to the Law of the Sea Treaty negotiations.

Connally, like Agnew, was also indicted for bribery. Connally barely won ac­quittal, but his White House ambitions were shattered, even though the evi­dence against him had been brought by an unsavory felon who was angling for a reduced sentence in an unrelated criminal case.

If you still are holding to the lie that your justice system is somehow going to help you if in trouble--forget it! Most especially if there are ones from the elite trying to "get you". Well, these ones here are going to cause them to wish they had not tampered with God's property. Of course Dharma and Oberli are exhausted with the trauma and expenses involved but some dirty laundry is going to be produced before we are finished with this particular case. Then others will be more willing to step forth in truth. Remember, dear ones, you only can receive back in proportion to that which you give forth--hold to this knowledge as things in life, unfold which seem insurmountable. Further, do not pre-judge HOW a thing should come to bear fruit for it will rarely ever be as you expect it to be.

In both instances above, the Establishment media gave full play to the charges against Agnew and Connally and helped further the perception that Nixon and his associates were engaged in widespread criminal conduct.

Nonetheless, Nixon still retained the presidency. And Nixon was, as an indi­vidual, in a position of immense power, having access to the public unrivaled perhaps by any other human being, a major roadblock in the path of the Rockefeller family's longtime goal of installing brother Nelson in the White House.

In this context, something very interesting came out during the divorce pro­ceedings of Rockefeller brother Winthrop and his then-wife, Bobo Sears Rockefeller.

According to Bobo, on the occasions that the Rockefeller brothers got to­gether, one of the frequent topics of discussion was this: How to put Nelson Rockefeller in the White House without benefit of a presidential election.

Clearly, as a result of Watergate, the Rockefeller brothers almost achieved that goal.

When Vice President Spiro Agnew was driven out of office, Nixon did an end run on the Rockefellers and the Establishment media by resisting widespread pressure to name Nelson Rockefeller as vice president. Instead, Nixon named Gerald Ford, House minority leader.

Ford was a loyal member of the Establishment, and himself a participant in the Rockefeller-controlled Bilderberg conferences. (Note that he is always included in all top-secret meetings to this current day.)

You see, this was a power play on the part of Nixon which actually repre­sented Nixon's insurance: had Nelson Rockefeller assumed the vice presi­dency, Nixon would have suffered some untimely fate, such as murder by in­tent.

By appointing Ford as vice president, Nixon gave himself a longer lease on the White House keys and the opportunity to continue to fight the efforts to de­throne him from the presidency.

However, when Nixon fell, as you now know, Ford's own life was in danger af­ter Ford appointed Nelson Rockefeller as vice president--in line to succeed him--and we shall cover that in a minute, but let us continue with this thought stream presently.

It was none other than two longtime Rockefeller intimates, SECRETARY OF STATE HENRY KISSINGER AND CIA DIRECTOR RICHARD HELMS, AND DAVID ROCKEFELLER HIMSELF, WHO URGED NIXON TO ESTABLISH THE "WHITE HOUSE PLUMBERS". NOW IS IT ANY WONDER THAT TOP CREDIBILITY COULD BE GIVEN TO "DEEP THROAT" INFORMATION? IT WAS COMING FROM THE "HORSE'S MOUTH"!

It was the Plumbers, a private White House intelligence group, who were caught breaking into Democratic Party headquarters at the Watergate Hotel in Washington, setting the enormous scandal in motion--and such a stupidly absurd incident it was--and yet the entire nation came to a halt as if this was the first corruption of politics since the nation was birthed. Oh my gracious be, how foolish you sleeple are!

BLACKMAIL

Nixon was blackmailing the CIA; the president knew about the CIA's in­volvement in the assassination of John F. Kennedy and was using this knowl­edge against the CIA for political leverage. The Plumbers were thoroughly "set-up" and it was evident they were supposed to get caught and insurance was set in place to assure the capture.

It was certainly no coincidence that it was an "ex-CIA man", E. Howard Hunt--himself often linked to the JFK murder--who led the Plumbers at the ill-fated break-in. Hunt's strange activities proved that he was never loyal to Nixon.

It was Nixon's liaison with the Secret Service, one Alexander Butterfield, a CIA spy in the White House, who first leaked the existence of the "secret" White House taping system to congressional investigators, setting the stage for Nixon's ultimate downfall.

Then-Secret Service chief, Robert H. Taylor, fired by top-ranking Nixon inti­mate, Chief of Staff Haldeman, as a result of controversy over the president's security, was later made head of the private security forces for the Rockefeller family enterprises.

NOW LET US LOOK INTO THE UNCOVERING OF DEEP

THROAT

Who was "Deep Throat"? Who was this famous unnamed source who pro­vided the Washington Post with all the inside information that helped the Tri­lateral-linked newspaper bring down Nixon?

The actual personage involved in contact in sub-parking lots was one called Bobby Ray Inman who retired as deputy director of the CIA in 1972. Inman, it so happens, is also a member of the Trilateral Commission. But he was given direct information to pass along by none other than Henry Kissinger, Chief of Staff Alexander Haig and legal adviser Leonard Garment. Funny thing--none of these nerds went to jail??!!

Charles Colson, a top Nixon adviser, made startling allegations about Nixon's fears of CIA involvement in the Watergate scandal.

The president was virtually captive of high-ranking conspirators in intelligence circles, against whom he dared not act for fear of international and domestic political repercussions.

His underlying suspicion was that the CIA planned the break-ins at Water­gate. The motive: to discredit the president's inner circle of advisers and ul­timately, himself. He was totally correct on all counts.

Most of Nixon's key lieutenants, with the notable exceptions, as just stated, of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, Chief of Staff Alexander Haig and legal adviser Leonard Garment, ultimately went to jail.

Kissinger, Haig and Garment were all, of course, members of the Rockefeller-controlled Council on Foreign Relations, Garment being one of the Presi­dent's few advisers who repeatedly, and early on, urged Nixon to simply give up the presidency.

Now, funny thing about disloyalty in the top echelons of deceit and conspiracy, it was Henry Kissinger who was instrumental in the murder of Rockefeller--all of them. But then, he too, was set up, as we have outlaid in the Journals, and they took him out also and replaced him with a "double" so powerful in the "cause of Global Control" that no one matches his power as leader of the Shadow Government under which you all are now functioning.

Haig, himself, who finally talked the embattled Nixon into surrendering the White House, was almost immediately promoted over 240 higher ranking military figures to four-star general status and then to the post of NATO commander. The general was also named to the Trilateral Commission, which he later pronounced as being too "leftist" for his tastes. Well, he just continued to grow in those next years to total entanglement in the Argentina-Falklands, etc., mess in 1982 which we won't fail to repeat to you ones in the Journal.

Upon assuming the presidency, Ford promptly pardoned Nixon, sparing him the agony of a criminal trial in which he more than likely would have been convicted--however, a lot of conspiracy evidence would have come forth which the elite cartel dared not allow. The pardon saved the Establishment from giving Nixon the opportunity, through a trial--a very public forum--to blow the whistle on the Rockefellers and the intrigue which resulted in his ouster. No different from the Noriega fiasco which was totally orchestrated to bury Noriega. Noriega, in Florida, has a good deal set up for him, for he is a well-paid-off "double" and the real Noriega is long gone to places unmention­able. I told you at the time they would never "capture" Noriega--they didn't--for it was all a staged review ready to open on Broadway. Proof? The cover-up of numbers of dead, the real involvement with the Bush personal property and no damage to the Canal. Ponder it all.

In a sense, the pardon of Nixon was the Establishment's way of both thanking Nixon for keeping quiet and, at the same time, warning Nixon to "shut up". Nixon was smart enough to play the game. He has yet to tell all he knows about Watergate, and won't. He gets to be Big Cheese in China and other negotiations as well being always on the inner circles--NOW. Further, the big honchos of the presidencies all gathered at his puny little excuse for a Library, and so on--token gifts if you will, for the silence during this time of evil treason upon your lands.

PLOT TO MURDER FORD

Yes, the intrigue ran much deeper indeed. A high-level assassination plot was hatched to kill then-President Ford and put Vice President Nelson Rocke­feller in the White House.

A man who was part of a secret organized crime-linked hit squad which car­ried out operations for the CIA and other government agencies, was ap­proached by a "Fortune 500 businessman" who tried to hire him to conduct a "hit" against Ford which was being arranged with the help of elements within the Secret Service.

The Establishment businessman, whom we will let you figure out quietly for yourselves--keeping in mind that Kissinger also had Rockefeller "taken-out"-­-made his contract contacts and pronounced, "Ford's been sanctioned. He's got to go. He won't go by himself; we've asked him. We've bloody told him to move out of the way for Nelson. But he wants to get elected."

Funny thing, Ford was, himself, part of the same cover-up that the agent herein referred to was involved with. I shall keep the identity of the person quiet for he is now a target. It IS NOT A PRETTY PICTURE OUT THERE IN POLITICS, dear ones. That cover-up was the scheme to cover up the truth about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Ford was, of course, a member of the infamous Warren Commission that con­cocted the "lone gunman" theory. Well, our silent person herein was also a part of the role and was on the government-sponsored hit squad who was dis­patched to Dallas during the time following the Kennedy assassination TO KILL ONE OF THE KEY WITNESSES WHO COULD HAVE BLOWN THE COVER-UP.

This person rejected a role in the Ford assassination conspiracy and did, in fact, effort to alert the president to the plot.

As a result the Secret Service role in the murder conspiracy was neutralized and when two subsequent efforts to kill Ford were carried out, the Secret Ser­vice conspirators, to cover their own initial complicity, backed off and refused to participate.

HERE IS ANOTHER NOTE WHICH SHALL HURT YOUR

FEELINGS

The two strange women who did try to kill Ford, Lynette Fromme and Sara Jane Moore, were both linked to bizarre groups both of which, on more than one occasion, were operating as CIA operatives and both were directly linked to American intelligence.

Miss Fromme was a member of the bloody Charles Manson cult, and Miss Moore was tied to the terroristic so-called Symbionese Liberation Army which gained fame by kidnapping heiress Patty Hearst.

Well, it all came out in the wash--Ford did live out his presidency and went on to play golf and become a big dealer in all top-secret conspiracy dealings, in­cluding those of the Trilateral Commission, etc. He was defeated by the Rockefeller family's handpicked Democratic presidential candidate, Trilateral Commission member Jimmy Carter, bless his peanut pickin' heart.

EISENHOWER HATED NIXON--TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE!

It took over two decades for the Rockefellers and their allies in the Estab­lishment to finally drive Richard Nixon out of public office and attention, but as early as 1956, Dwight D. Eisenhower tried to do the job for them.

For years it had been known that Ike wanted to get rid of Nixon, who was then his vice president, from the Republican ticket in 1956.

Eisenhower had taken Nixon on as his running mate in 1952 out of sheer po­litical expediency. Despite his "apolitical" image, Eisenhower was, in fact, the ultimate politician and totally ruthless and non-compassionate as a person. Ike save Nixon the vice presidency as part of a supremely crafted political payoff in order to win the 1952 Republican presidential nomination for himself.

Nixon--then the junior U.S. senator from California--was known to be sympa­thetic to--if not outrightly a supporter of--Eisenhower's chief rival for the GOP nod, Sen. Robert Taft of Ohio, popularly knows as "Mr. Republican". What is more to the point, Taft was said to be seriously considering Nixon as his own running mate.

Thus, the battle for control of the majority of delegates to the large and most important California delegation centered largely around winning over Nixon.

But it was Eisenhower who prevailed. He gave Nixon the vice presidency and promised then-California Gov. Earl Warren a seat on the Supreme Court, which promise, of course, was delivered upon--oh woe unto you little sheeple!

ACTIVISM IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Upon the first vacancy on the Supreme Court following his election victory, Eisenhower named Warren as chief justice. Do you now understand how frail the reeds are upon which you trust the rulings of your Constitution? This ushered in an era of judicial activism and extreme liberalism yet to be equaled by any court. This IS one of the more damaging legacies of the Eisenhower years without even mentioning the Eisenhower "death camps" at the end of World War II.

Thus, with the California delegation in his corner, Eisenhower pushed Taft out of the way and went on to win the presidency. We will get around, hope­fully, to spilling the story of the massive bribery and corruption used by Eisen­hower and his forces at that 1952 convention.

No sooner did he get into the White House than Eisenhower began plotting to get rid of Nixon.

He started hinting loudly that Nixon would be better off in a Cabinet post by the time of the 1956 election year. The influential office of secretary of de­fense was initially suggested as a placement for Nixon.

Eisenhower was asking anybody who would listen, "What do we do with Nixon?" Ike even asked his little grandson, David, this question. Funny the way events turn out--David eventually married Nixon's daughter, Julie, and became one of Nixon's most devoted defenders.

By late February of 1956 Eisenhower had already sounded out his Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, if he, Dulles (a longtime Rockefeller crony), would like to be his running mate.

At that point, though, Ike had decided to demote Nixon further. By then he had come up with the idea of putting Nixon in the far less visible post of Sec­retary of Commerce.

IKE'S "NIXON PROBLEM" MADE PUBLIC

By March Eisenhower begin talking publicly about his Nixon problem, embar­rassing the vice president in the process. So much so that Nixon wrote Ike a letter withdrawing from the 1956 Republican ticket.

However, smart politician that he was, Eisenhower didn't want it to appear that there was trouble within GOP ranks. He offered Nixon a Cabinet post, but said he would "be happy" to have Nixon as his running mate once again.

Nixon, however, was smarter than Ike thought. The vice president decided to take the matter into his own hands and went directly to the President and told him he wanted to be on the Republican ticket. Eisenhower then had his press secretary announce that he was "delighted", of course, with Nixon's decision.

Nonetheless, Eisenhower did nothing to stop efforts by others to drop Nixon from the ticket. This included a dump-Nixon campaign, headed by Harold Stassen. Stassen was a long time Rockefeller favorite, often dubbed the GOP's "boy wonder".

I simply want to point out that it took twelve years for the power elite to win--but they finally got rid of Nixon. Now what are you going to do to stop, them? You will utilize the constitutional system and bring back government into the Sovereign States. You will do it through the laws of the constitution as writ­ten. You are working from far behind but there are a lot of you if you will but bend to the task and work together. First, however, you must face the facts as to the truth of your plight. So be it.

Before I close this document I shall reprint some confirmation for you ones regarding the Japanese situation and you will see two things, that we gave you proper information regarding the supporting of your debt by the Japanese and their intent to not do so longer and the need to bring them under control through the oil supply by rupturing their economy.

I shall quote from an unlabeled source who is a very high American person in one of the major Japanese banks in America.

"Japanese banks have pulled in their horns--no more loans. Breakeven on the Neki Exchange for banks is 27,000, now at 23,000. They invest their profits (50%) in stock mkt. and can use it as collateral and loan out 22-1. They are going to need cash so I guess they won't buy our bonds. They will redeem them..."

Is the handwriting on your pages beginning to give translation? It is a critical time for your world.

Let us close this portion. Thank you for your service and for your attention. I am Hatonn.

PJ 18

CHAPTER 24

REC #2 HATONN

SATURDAY, AUGUST 25, 1990 4:18 P.M. YEAR 4 DAY 9

ECONOMIC ATTACK ON THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

At the end of May, 1982, the Falklands crisis had dominated the news. Like­wise, the growing threat of nuclear war and mounting anti-nuclear sentiment had been making headlines but, for millions of Americans, a different crisis seemed far more important on a personal level. It was a long-term crisis which had been with you for many years. The mounting crisis was that of the crumbling U.S. economy and the U.S. dollar.

In May, 1982, there had been all sorts of bad news on the economic front. On May 7 the Government announced that unemployment, as officially calcu­lated, had reached 9.4 percent, the highest level since the Great Depression and, of course, the figures are far from accurate so you had far more unem­ployed citizens than were reported to you. Just five days later there was an­other shock--Braniff Airlines abruptly terminated operations and filed for bankruptcy. It was the first time ever that a U.S. trunk airline had failed. Braniff, like more and more other businesses, was brought down by a moun­tain of debt. With interest rates remaining sky high in the midst of a deep re­cession, more and more companies simply could not survive. Production cut­backs, layoffs, and bankruptcies were continuing to spread, and more and more people were losing their jobs. The recession was especially cruel be­cause it was an inflationary recession. The major depression in this current scenario will end up being a major deflationary depression even though all things "seem" almost identical.

By the end of that May you were living in what was considered "stagflation" and you had been well warned a decade earlier, just as you have been warned for a longer period about the upcoming massive depression which, by the way, I remind you--you are now IN!

Since 1970 the combined effects of inflation and taxes had cut the purchasing power of the dollar by 55 percent. A family of four living on $10,000 in 1970 would need well over $23,000 in 1982 just to remain even, and this historically unprecedented collapse of the dollar was continuing even as people were thrown out of work.

For months the battle over the federal budget had been dragging on, day in and day out. You were told constantly that the budget was the key to bringing down the incredible interest rates that were killing the economy, and yet somehow it seemed that no one could agree about what the budget should be.

One budget proposal after another came up for consideration only to be voted down. First, there was the Reagan Administration budget which went absolutely nowhere. Then all kinds of alternative budgets started being pro­posed. There were Republican budgets, Democrat budgets, Conservative budgets, Liberal budgets, compromise budgets: and every single budget was voted down. There was more and more talk that the federal budget process had gone sour, that there was something fundamentally wrong.

On May 28 the entity President Reagan denounced the budget process while he was in Santa Barbara, California, to make a speech. He said,

"The United States Government's program for presenting a budget, or arriving at a budget, is about the most irresponsible, Mickey-Mouse ar­rangement that any governmental body has ever practiced. It's called the 'President's Budget' and yet there is nothing binding about it. It is submitted to the Congress and they don't even have to consider it."

Please note carefully how this criticism by the President was phrased. Reagan was not just delivering a standard political tongue-lashing at his political op­ponents, he was condemning the process itself, and he added,

"I think that some real solid thinking should be given now to a budget­ing process that befits the great government of a great nation."

Reagan's choice of Santa Barbara, California, for this statement was symbolic. It so happens that the so-called "solid thinking" he recommended for a new budgeting process was already done; and as the President knows very well, that thinking was done in Santa Barbara at a tax-exempt foundation called the "Center for Study of Democratic Institutions". That is where the secret new Constitution for America was written, including detailed new provisions for the budgeting process!

I might add that Dharma and Oberli's property has been "done in" by one Santa Barbara Savings of which you will find some most interesting owners if anyone ever dares unveil the whole truth--do you hear me, any daring lawyers who still consider truth and justice to have value????? Sic, sic--you ones thought we were just playing with little chippers, didn't you? God is not negli­gent when he sets forth to make a point for attention!

Now, all of you who read the Journals have access to the "new" Constitution for we have written three Journals on the subject and will write more. What you will discover if you trace through the budget, process described in the "new" Constitution is very significant indeed.

When all the legal-sounding mumbo jumbo is stripped away, the whole budget process turns out to be firmly under the thumb of one person--the President.

For example, Reagan complained in Santa Barbara that the "President's Bud­get", quote:

"...is submitted to the Congress and they don't even have to consider it."

The secret "new" Constitution would fix that very abruptly and very thor­oughly in ARTICLE VI-(b), Sec. 8 which begins, quote:

"The House shall consider promptly the annual budget."

What's more, the House is given no role in formulating the Budget. If they dare to object to anything, the Budget goes back to the Planning Board, so called, controlled totally by--you guessed it--the President!

The Reagan blast about the budget process was just the latest of an ongoing series of covert moves to pave the way for the "new" Constitution. What made this one more significant is that it was tied in with powerful economic forces which were intended to speed up the process. AND JUST WHAT DO YOU OBSERVE HAPPENING RIGHT NOW WITH YOUR BUDGET PROCESS?-?-?-?

Through months of contrived haggling, the "kept" Congress had been sensi­tizing Americans to the budget problem, and they had been doing it at a time when uncertainty over the Budget was being blamed for worsening economic woes!

Then along came the President saying that the solution was to change the whole process. And what have you today? The President comes along and begins a Middle East war on the day the budget is being cut for military and secret stealth planes and all manner of other items he desired in place. He was also in knowledge of the intent of Japan and in cahoots with all the Cartel elite--as in constant secret sessions with Thatcher, Kissinger, Ford, etc., only hours before the Economic Summit in Houston, Texas. Oh, sleeple, awaken, for your morning bacon is in the fire!

The growing Budget crisis was also tied in with another major change which the entity President Reagan had been publicly advocating. That change was the proposed "Balanced Budget Amendment" to your old worn out U.S. Con­stitution. The fact that there is a requirement to annually balance the federal budget through apportionment to the states within your original Articles has never been mentioned or hinted at in any manner, hoping none of you the people would ever notice--and hardly any of you have, surely enough.

There was a drive underway right then to call a Constitutional Convention in order to introduce a balanced budget amendment. Already most of the re­quired number of states had ratified the call for such a convention. At the time, if only three additional states ratified it, a Convention would be legally REQUIRED to be called. The excuse for calling a Constitutional Convention would be to introduce the Balanced Budget Amendment.

The problem, of course, was that once a convention would be called, there would be no way to keep it from turning into a runaway convention, re-writing the entire Constitution. In fact, as we have pounded you with unto this day, that was exactly how your present U.S. Constitution was created. The original idea was to simply "amend" the Articles of Confederation, but once the Con­vention was through, a totally new constitution emerged--aren't you lucky that God sat in?

Those who were behind the drive for a "new" Constitutional Convention wanted, and want, the same thing to happen again and if it does, they have their model for a carefully manufactured DICTATORSHIP Constitution all ready to go!

In the past there had been several other drives like that one to call a Constitu­tional Convention. Each had been built around some pet idea of one kind or another, but each time the drive fizzled out. Enough people recognized the danger of a runaway Constitutional Convention to prevent its happening. That time, though, the danger was much greater than ever before because the excuse for the proposed convention was tied directly to people's pocketbooks--and how much more so this day.

You were being told by various financial spokesmen on television that high in­terest rates were responsible for your economic woes, which was a partial truth, at best. You were also told that government deficits were responsible for keeping those disastrous interest rates high. Then you were treated to the spectacle of a government seemingly unable to decide on a budget. And, fi­nally, whenever a budget would be passed, it would contain the biggest deficits in history--well over one hundred billion dollars. Looks like pre-school tooth-fairy money now, doesn't it? And here it is, only eight years later and you talk multi-trillions in deficits.

Against that background, the promise a relief by way of the Balanced Budget Amendment could have proven to tempting to resist. If so, the drive to call a Constitutional Convention would succeed, and in the process you Americans would have sold your birthright for a mess of pottage. And where might you be eight years later? Are you going to sell it now for a nuclear war of the world?

All of this may sound quite irrelevant as in the past tense. No, if you don't know the circumstances which brought you to today's massive issues, you can­not do one confounded thing about your condition. You had spectacular po­tential for nuclear war in 1982. YOU HAVE MAGNIFICENT POTENTIAL AND PROBABILITY FOR ALL-OUT NUCLEAR WAR THIS VERY DAY IN 1990! NEVER FORGET THAT THE PLANS FAR WAR ARE THE PLANS OF MEN, NOTHING MORE. Those plans have a way of going awry in many cases; and in the case of those nuclear war plans, feverish at­tempts were underway to make them go awry. ARE YOU THAT LUCKY TODAY? RUSSIA TURNS OUT TO BE THE ONLY MAJOR POWER WHO DOES NOT. DESIRE A NUCLEAR WAR. THE U.S. AND ENG­LAND MOST CERTAINLY ARE ON DEAD AHEAD COURSE, AWAITING THE PROPER FUSE TO BE LIT.

Back in May of 1982 the Bolshevik war planners who controlled the Pentagon wanted that nuclear war at any cost but their anti-Bolshevik enemies who then ruled Russia didn't want war and were trying to prevent it. Likewise, the Rockefeller cartel in America was in a power struggle against the Bolsheviks in an attempt to stop the war plan. Dear ones, they are not around today!

If the Rockefeller interests, in that old circumstance, could succeed in re­gaining control of the U.S. Government, they planned to stop the Bolshevik war countdown. But the Rockefeller group was fighting the battle only for themselves--not for you the people for there was not a shred of care for you the people. It was they who were behind the secret new Constitution and the drive for a Constitutional Convention. If they succeeded in beating the Bol­sheviks in the U.S., they intended to indeed capitalize on the new laws. With their secret new Constitution they planned to bring all of you under their domination more completely than ever before in history. DO YOU THINK THAT INTENT HAS CHANGED OR DIMINISHED? DO YOU SEE EV­IDENCE THAT IRS RULES ARE LESSENING? OR PROBABILITY FOR WAR? OR DO YOU THINK THE EXECUTIVE ORDERS THAT CONTROL YOUR GOVERNMENT ARE NOT VALID?

COUP D'ETAT

Remember, three months prior there was a military coup d'etat in gestation in Washington. This was to be a coup by the Rockefeller cartel operatives within the Government against Bolshevik operatives. The man in charge was a four-star general, Alexander Haig, as just referred to in the prior chapter. Funny thing about people and history--they just keep cycling back into your attention once you know who to look for!

Up to then the anti-Bolshevik coup had not been accomplished, but it was gaining ground. One major gain for the Rockefeller faction occurred in April, 1982, while all eyes were on the Falklands crisis. On April 21 it was an­nounced that Admiral Bobbie Inman, Deputy Director of the CIA, "had re­signed" effective immediately. Inman was forced out by the Rockefeller fac­tion. He was replaced with lightning speed by John McMahon, a career professional with the CIA!

It was the Rockefellers who created the CIA long ago as their own private de­tective agency, and now they were working fast to re-establish the control which they had lost on the CIA over three years prior.

The infighting between the Rockefeller and Bolshevik factions in the Gov­ernment was growing more intense as the war fuse burned shorter and shorter. President Reagan and Secretary Haig were both under tight security. The summer of 1982 was to be a most dangerous summer for them and for all of you Americans, as well as for the whole of the planet.

BILLY GRAHAM GETS IN THE ACT

It is interesting to note that news was so benign that the biggest thing in your attention was a TV mini series, Marco Polo.

On the evening of May 16 millions of Americans tuned their television sets to NBC to watch the first installment of that series.

It was a most lavish portrayal of the travels and adventures of someone named Marco Polo. For the next four nights viewers were treated to a spec­tacular reenactment of Marco Polo's experiences as he supposedly traveled to China. Interspersed with those scenes of adventure and splendor were brief scenes depicting what happened to Marco Polo after he returned home to Venice. He dared to speak of places he had been and things he had seen that conflicted with the dogma of the day, and so he was tried for heresy. And so it has always been--even unto this moment. Dharma is not even "tried", she is just openly condemned and convicted without a hearing. The world has not come very far, has it, sleeple? Well, it is your necks, my friends, and he who sleeps on in this drama may very well awaken to the explosion of a nuclear bomb in your dooryard and then the Ascension shall be rapid indeed--even without meditation and practice to violet flame music and preference of desti­nation.

In 1982 you liked to think of yourselves as too enlightened to close your minds like the inquisitors of Marco Polo, but the fact is that those who challenge preconceived notions and laid-forth lies of deliberate deceit were quickly branded as heretics and worse. Dharma just writes that which the Hosts of Heaven give her as warning unto a sleeping people and she is shot at, ridiculed and her own neighbors call her witch and Satanic psychic. Funny thing--she is not in the least bit psychic and recognizes the accusation as most funny indeed. She jokes and says that if she had realized she could be bran­dished about as a Guru Psychic she might have had a stable of race horses, also, instead of SBS and the injustice system literally stealing her home. Keep your sense of humor, chelas, for it is all that will hold you in sanity from time to time--and never let go of God's hand for in His hands is thine only security!

Perfect example of this: on Sunday morning, May 16 (ironically it was the same day as the beginning of the Marco Polo series), there was an interview of evangelist Dr. Billy Graham on the ABC news program "This Week with David Brinkley".

Dr. Graham had just returned to England from participating in a five-day reli­gious conference in Moscow, Russia, of all places. He was one of more than 400 religious leaders from 80 nations who attended the conference. They were there at the invitation of the Russian Orthodox Church which sponsored the Conference.

A large fraction of those who attended were Christian leaders such as Dr. Graham, but there were also many representatives of the world's other reli­gions. They were not there to convert, to compete, or to condemn one an­other as is the usual stance among differing doctrines. Instead it was a rare opportunity for those leaders to form bridges of mutual understanding, some­thing which is sorely neglected in your world, to say the very kindest and nicest thing I can conjure.

It was a religious conference the likes of which the world had not seen for almost a century. The last time anything similar took place was well before 1900. It was held in America, in Chicago, and it was called "The Parliament of Religions".

There were many who feared that historic meeting of the minds and con­demned it. As a result, it had never been repeated in America; but herein you erred greatly for it did not destroy Christianity or turn Americans into Bud­dhists, Moslems, or Hindus. Too bad, some of that would have represented a lot of progress. This was, however, before you voted in immorality so it was harmless, at the most. What it did do was establish bonds of understanding and a bit of respect for a while where they had been sorely lacking before. It is a psychological fact that it is usually hard to hate another person if you ac­tually get to know him and look within his eyes and into his soul intent--be his intent of goodness.

This, of course, is why any government bent on war tries to dehumanize and depersonalize the enemy in all manner. You will have hostages who will be hooded or ordered not to make eye contact lest the captors weaken. DID ANY OF YOU TAKE NOTE THAT, NOT ONLY DID SADDAM HUS­SEIN KEEP EYE CONTACT WITH THE PEOPLE IN THAT ROOM THIS WEEK, BUT HE ENCOURAGED THEM TO SPEAK EYE-TO ­EYE IN OPENNESS: NOTE, HOWEVER, WHAT THE WESTERN POLITICIANS, MILITARY AND MEDIA SAID ABOUT HIS EN­COUNTER. WHO DO YOU THINK LIES TO THE WORLD? ONLY ONE CHANNEL, AT FIRST, DARED TO EVEN SHOW THE VIDEO TAPE AND ONLY ONE DARED PRESENT THE LETTER FROM HUSSEIN TO THE PRESIDENT OF EGYPT--HOW MANY OF YOU HEARD THAT LETTER? IT WAS ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL DOCUMENTS EVER TO COME INTO MY ATTENTION FOR HE PLEADED IN BEHALF OF MAN TO RETURN UNTO GOD! IT WAS TOTALLY SQUASHED IN YOUR NEWS BEFORE THE DAY WAS OVER AND ONLY SLIGHTLY REFERRED TO AGAIN ON CNN. YOU CAN EXPECT THE MAN WHO ALLOWED THIS TO REACH THE PUBLIC TO MEET WITH DISMISSAL, EXCEPT THAT HE IS A RELATIVE OF TED TURNER WHO OWNS THE NETWORK. IT WILL, HOWEVER, BE A LONG TIME BEFORE A SECOND SO SERI­OUS A SLIP SHALL MAKE IT THROUGH.

From the turn of your century onward, the U.S. Government had been con­trolled by elements who cherished war as an instrument of policy, so you saw no more Parliaments of Religion in America.

By contrast, the government of Russia underwent drastic transformation in recent years. Russia's new rulers were basically Christians--yes, that is what I said--CHRISTIANS. Once at an interview Mr. Gorbachev was asked a seri­ous question for which he had no answer and he slipped and said, "Only Jesus Christ would know the answer...".

After an agonizing struggle of six decades, those tough native Russians had fi­nally gained the upper hand over the Satanic Bolsheviks there. Over three years prior the growing power of the Kremlin Christians started producing startling changes in public. For example, for Easter, 1979, Handel's "Messiah" was performed in Russia for the first time since the Bolshevik Revolution! Several months prior to that, in January, 1979, the first legal shipment of Bibles into Russia since 1917 had taken place. The American Bible Society had asked the Russian government for permission and it had been granted.

A call went forth asking that Christians and churchmen take the initiative to reach out in a concrete way to head off nuclear catastrophe and begin new ties of trust and understanding with your Russian brothers. The response was pure apathy. This is to the everlasting shame upon America's so-called Chris­tian community. There were no Christian hands held forth across the sea unto thine brothers.

But, in 1982, a pilgrimage for peace had been made to Moscow after all. Since America's Christian leaders would not bother to take the initiative, those of Russia did so instead! They invited religious leaders the world over to make a pilgrimage for peace to Moscow, and they called their five-day as­sembly The, quote:

"Conference of Religious Workers for Saving the Sacred Gift of Life from Nuclear Catastrophe."

When Billy Graham and some other Western Christian leaders arrived in Moscow, they soon discovered that it was not as they had been led to expect. Dr. Graham discovered that there was no attempt to restrict him in his reli­gious messages. He was also allowed more freedom of movement than he could ever have expected. On the Saturday evening before the Conference began, Dr. Graham decided to pay unannounced visits to several Moscow churches. He went to three different Russian Orthodox Churches and was shocked to find that they were filled to capacity with worshippers. As he said later in a news conference, quote:

"You would never get that in Charlotte, North Carolina."

Dr. Graham made a number of statements about his experiences in Moscow which all seemed to add up to one thing: there was a lot more Christian wor­ship going on in Russia than even he expected and much greater freedom for there was no interference whatsoever.

When Billy Graham returned to the West he must have felt a little like old Marco Polo. He had journeyed to the forbidden East and discovered that it was not populated by gremlins and horrible beasts. Instead he had come away with his heart "strangely warmed" (quote). Perhaps he expected that the folks back home would welcome his unexpected good news. After all, your whole Christian faith was supposed to be built on Good News--the Gospel of your LORD JESUS CHRIST. But if that is what he expected, he was most sadly mistaken. I think perhaps Bo Gritz felt the same when he came back from the "Golden Triangle" with solid proof of U.S. Government involvement in the drug trade, in a massive level, and was told he was a "dead man" if he told the story. All of you will recall that the government set out to put him away on felony charges--now, GO LISTEN TO HIM IF HE IS EVER CLOSE ENOUGH TO YOU--AND WE PLAN TO MAKE SURE HE AND MANY OTHERS WE RECOMMEND FOR YOUR ATTENTION ARE AVAILABLE ALL OVER THE MAP. WE PLAN TO GIVE A FORUM FOR TRUTH JUST AS SOON AS WE GET ENOUGH FINANCIAL SUPPORT ROLLING TO PERMIT THE MASSIVE EXPENSES RE­QUIRED. WE DO, HOWEVER, BELIEVE THAT YOU THE PEOPLE HAVE ABOUT HAD ENOUGH OF THE LIE, AND WILL SUPPORT THOSE WHO HAVE GIVEN THEIR LIVES FOR THE TRUTH--ONE SUCH AS CAESAR CHAVEZ OF THE FARM LABORERS. YOU ARE BEING SLOWLY POISONED IN EVERY BITE YOU TAKE AND EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE AND YOU IGNORE THOSE BLESSED MARTYRS WHO COME FORTH AND GIVE THEIR VERY LIVES IN YOUR SERVICE. OH HEAR ME WELL, CHELAS--THINE DAY OF LOLLING IN THE SLEEPING IS INDEED ENDED! YOUR WORLD IS NOT AS YOU HAVE PERCEIVED IT THROUGH THE VEIL OF LIES. YOU DID IT AND ALLOWED IT--YOU WILL NOW CHANGE OF IT, YOURSELVES, OR YOU SHALL PAY MOST DEARLY. WE TELL YOU THAT WHICH YOU CAN DO AND GOD IS PURE HOPE--AND YET YOU QUIBBLE AND POKE PAINFUL ACCUSATIONS AT MY SCRIBE AND CAUSE HEINOUS TORTURE TO MY BROTHERS WHO COME WITH US OF THE HOSTS IN SERVICE UNTO YOU IN THE NAME OF AND SENT FROM--GOD.

WHEN DR. GRAHAM RETURNED

When he returned to the West, he came back not to people eager to hear more of his good news, but to hostility and condemnation! You were always told that Russia was an atheistic country and beyond redemption, and so by definition Billy Graham's words about even limited religious freedom in Rus­sia constituted heresy. He ran into a chain-saw of critics determined to cut him down for saying a good word about Russia! Just as with Dharma and my group, he was shouted at, "Communist Pig" and other such endearing terms from the "Christian" community. The public paid no attention for they could not have cared less one way or another.

These ones of my group received a call in which the person promised to kill all of them, "you M---- F---- communists, I will get you all". He started right out without identification (a sign of evil--anonymous messages to avoid all respon­sibility) and announced his intention to murder the group. Actually, we aren't even a "group" for all do their own work but now they have had formal an­nouncement from an anonymous "concerned citizen" that they are a terrible Satanic cult of some sort and the person states emphatically that he will have nothing to do with those books, much less read them. And so it goes. You have given away your right to hear and see unto the evil controllers and you fail to see of it. Mercy unto you precious sleeping children, for you have been "had" most cruelly.

With Dr. Graham it began right away with slanted reports by the statements of the major media. At one point Dr. Graham mentioned that in Russia his comments had been reported accurately in the press. By contrast, reports in the U.S. were distorted and quoted him totally out of context.

A perfect example of the treatment given Dr. Graham was that May 16 interview on ABC's example Week with David Brinkley". It was called an interview, but inquisition would be a better description. Every suggestion that Christians may be better off in Russia today than in the past was met with total hostility. Time after time after time Dr. Graham was interrupted and attacked before he could finish making a point, and many of the questions in the best tradition of heresy trials were designed to declare Graham guilty before he could even give answer.

To take just one example: at one point the ideological writer, George F. Will, mentioned an incident in which a peace protestor was subdued by Russian police. Then he asked--and this is an exact quote:

"Given that evidence that there is no, and is not about to be, any peace movement in the Soviet Union, wasn't it clear to you from the start that this propaganda festival to which you were going was used simply to encourage a unilateral peace pressure and disarmament pressure in the West?"

A question like that is the tool of a prosecutor in your injustice system, not an objective reporter. In one breath he claimed that there is no peace movement in Russia as if it were a fact, accused Dr. Graham of knowingly cooperating in Soviet propaganda, implied that all the world religious leaders who attended were stooges, and ignored the world-wide representation at the Conference saying it was all aimed at the West. Accusing questions like that were fired at Dr. Graham throughout the program. The only break in that inquisition came when Dr. Graham was removed from the discussion for a while--then every­one else sat around and ripped him up one side and down the other in his ab­sence for his "heresies".

I noted that Elizabeth C. Prophet underwent the same hazing and disgusting inquisitions on all the talk shows but most especially on Larry King Live. I WONDER HOW MANY OF YOU IN THE U.S. WOULD ENJOY HAVING A SHELTER IN YOUR YARD THIS DAY?? IF YOU WOULDN'T, YOU CER­TAINLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE CIRCUMSTANCES YOU ARE IN!!!

In spite of the grossly unfair treatment, Reverend Graham made some very telling points. He mentioned that many other American Christian leaders were also at the Moscow Conference and that still others have gone there separately, and he said there are many, quote:

"...that would hold different viewpoints than what is being expressed here today. I'm a little surprised that we don't have some of those people."

It is needless to remind you that this type of harassment is the modus operandi. Gang up and attempt total ridicule in self-authoritative tones of in­sult.

Perhaps Dr. Graham's most telling comment came fairly early in the program; perhaps it was partly responsible for the frenzied bitterness of some of the at­tacks on him later in the program. Dr. Graham said, quote:

"Now when people go to China today, for example, they are applauded for going to China. It's wonderful to go to China, but there is not as much religious freedom in China as there is in the Soviet Union."

Dr. Graham was exactly right and that statement has certainly been borne out. But the cartel elite continued to go and do business with China even when the whole world was in shock at the treatment of thousands of their own children. It certainly didn't stop Mr. Kissinger from continuing great business deals right through the incidents. Can you not see that which is before you?

The favorable image being given to Red China in 1982 was purely political and gave a chance for a "silence" payment to Nixon in the bargain. It was also military in its origins. Unfortunately, some extremely blind church-related groups are being used for these political purposes but then it has been eons since Christ was invited into any of your Christian churches. He would be thrown into everlasting prison if he dared show up in one of your church houses.

Of course what Dr. Graham did not know was the reason for the violent at­tacks he was enduring. He had run afoul of the American Bolshevik nuclear-war lobby. They wanted to use you the people to do their dirty work for them against Russia. That was what their nuclear-war plans were all about, and so at all costs they could not allow you to know that Christianity was reviving in Russia. Even more, they dared not let the American people know that the true leadership of Russia was Christian because if you all knew that you would never agree to their plans to destroy Christian Russia in a thermonuclear war.

A bit of a summary as we close this chapter. The countdown by the Bolshevik war planners who then controlled the Pentagon was still continuing. Their war plans had been damaged by the Falklands war, but they were trying to turn that conflict to their own ends.

Meanwhile, the countdown for Space Shuttle Flight number four with its se­cret military pay load was still right on schedule. If the mission would succeed, the danger of nuclear war would increase dramatically.

The Rockefeller cartel was continuing its power struggle to take back control of the Government from the Bolsheviks and Zionists who were gaining in power every day but were indeed slippery for they seemed to have no loyalties to either side when the power was up for grabs.

As part of that struggle, the preparations for a military coup d'etat led by General Alexander Haig were making progress. Likewise, the Russians were continuing to try in their own ways to prevent the war. For you who don't want to believe me, I assure you that the Russians were doing as much as they could to prevent the war--for reasons of human morality.

Well, I can only repeat a great word from your Master Teacher,

"Blessed are they who are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for their's is the kingdom of heaven."

So be it and may it be God's will that we get the truth out to you who hunger and thirst after truth for you have been sorely used. May grace and under­standing be your shield for there is much to be done if you would change of your circumstance. Each will be known for his actions and naked ye shall stand before thine creator in the final tally--hold it ever within thine con­sciousness.

Let us close this segment as the hour is indeed late and the hours of writing very long this day. Thank you, beloved scribe, for thine service and that ser­vice of mine group who labor day and night to bring forth truth unto your troubled world. Selah and the light shall shine around about you that you may finish your mission. Hatonn to clear, please.