PJ 48
CHAPTER 1

REC #2 HATONN

SAT., MARCH 21, 1992 8:57 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 218

SATURDAY, MARCH 21, 1992

TODAY'S WATCH
There are so many "thing-watchers" today that we can hardly even touch them all.

BUSH ARROGANCE

You are looking at an arrogant stand-off between the forces of a Khazarian Zionist controlled Congress and a "Skull and Bones" President. As usual--you-the-people are the pawns. I believe you witnessed the show and tell of a President running for of­fice--the only problem being that you don't know for which of­fice he is REALLY running. You are, however, seeing dirty politics in full blossom and I hope you are alert so as to read "between those lines" and don't be hoodwinked by the show.

ROSS PEROT

Yes, if you all get behind this man--IF HE TEAMS UP WITH GRITZ--YOU CAN TURN THIS NATION AROUND!! You would be able to pull in all of Brown's votes, Nader's backing and pick up a lot of disappointed Buchanan backers. Surely you would get the final backing of the Independent candidates as well.

T.H.R.O.

The above stands for: Throw the Hypocritical Rascals Out. This is the political movement which Ross projects and it seems quite beneficial in perception--if you will actually do it. Gritz will "can" the whole bunch of "appointed" goons but you ones are going to have to clean up the House and Senate.

I am amused at Bush's reference to the "House" Banking prob­lems and their lack of ability to "run one little bank". I suggest that something stinks about a very, very large Bank utilized by ones such as Bush, Clinton, Clifford, Saddam and on and on and on--called BCCI. He must be feeling very smug and brave for some reason, to bring up the dirty laundry in the skeletons' closet--YOU HAD BEST CHECK INTO THOSE REASONS!

At present, no candidate without a bank behind him can afford to run for office. You now have "representative form of gov­ernment"--i.e.: He who contributes most gets the represen­tation.

WATCH IRAQ AND SADDAM

Sudden change and giving up of weapons? Oh, chelas, take care for that can only mean that there is coalition now, between Jordan, Syria, Libya, etc., so that no longer will Iraq's frag­ments be needed. If you don't get those vipers out of office soon--there will be no nation remaining.

KHAZARS, ETC.
If you think you are weary of hearing about Khazars and other species, please forgive me but I, too, am weary of the distrac­tion. It helps to know your enemy, however, especially when it is THE ENEMY who intends to destroy your world.

I am not going into long words about the issue even though it remains at the top of the denial list of information given. Mainly that argument revolves around the connection with the Committee of 300 and the Jewish connection and, and, and.

I would share with you a reference of fact sent to my attention for YOUR confirmation about what we bring to your table of information. This came with xeroxed copies of reference material right out of a London Library. The information came from one M.D.W. of Millikin University in Decatur, II.

To: Commander Hatonn, Dharma, Anyone.
Date: 3-17-92
From: M.D.W.
Subject: Khazars - Genealogy of British Royal Family

One of my hobbies is royal genealogy. While going through this book on ancestral lines of Prince William of Wales, I came across an interesting bloodline. (See Chart 22, etc.) Through the me­dieval kings of Hungary, the current Prince of Wales is related to Marot, Khagan (Khan) of the Khazars.

My interest in royal genealogy began after reading Holy Blood, Holy Grail by Michael Baigent. I be­lieve their thesis is that Jesus survived the crucifix­ion, married Mary Magdalene, and had children by her. Also that the bloodline survived and continued through the Merovingian Kings of France down to our present day. Can you verify the truth of this hy­pothesis?

Yes, I can--but not at this writing for it is far too lengthy and will be misunderstood if not laid forth in proper sequence of events. I will suggest that all of you refer back to AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL and you will find that he most certainly did not "die" on the cross and, taking some ones with him, went eventually into Tibet after traveling through In­dia.

We of the record keepers find it difficult to equate your inquiries to that which is represented to us as "countries" for boundaries and labels change and to identify "France" without qualification would be a most foolish error on my part. Also, it is not appro­priate that I simply won't answer yes or no regarding relation­ships with Mary Magdalene for there is NO way that in this brief reference I can adequately follow that sequence. I will most surely eagerly look forward to unfolding this story for your witness as we move out, (if we ever can), of the trap of dis­agreeable current events and necessary information to get you "that far".

SOVIET BASES--IN THE U.S.?

You can call this entity anything you want--but the fact is it is still very much the "Soviets". It is only factions which are di­vided and the Elite of both sides have never lost goal intent. One intends to rule the world and has infiltrated within your very nation of the U.S. and into many, many other countries under the banner of various "ideals"; and the Russian element who can be referred to as the non-atheistic Russians who intend to get rid of the Jewish Khazar Zionists at any cost. Either way, it becomes such a tangled web of intrigue that I don't wonder that you can't keep up with the changing terminology.

I suggest that you never mind the terminology but pay attention to facts as sequence unfolds them. I have told you that the CIA/KGB/Mossad are all basically one element now under di­rect control of their master-parent: the Committee of 300. I have told you that the KGB has more operatives in the CIA than do Americans. I have also told you that you have members of the KGB within your various cosmopolitan police academies training the forces that will enforce the New World Order Con­trol. I have given you locations of underground installations of large size and also missile bases with targeted missiles in place. I have yet to point out the 500 major points of impact as targeted by the Soviets. I have told you of the Soviet and Communist buildup of military equipment in Mexico at your Southern Bor­der along with the players involved from Vietnam (as in "Cong"), the Korean Communists and how all are infiltrating into your "States" and setting up points of base operations. I am appreciative when I can give you confirmation from people "in the field" which I can share with you although I'm not sure I totally share his humor regarding the inhabitants of the city in point.

From Ohio comes confirmation of a base--you will note that I didn't mark Ohio as having your own facilities as in other locations. That is because the ones set forth are no longer in the control of the U.S. For instance, as reported from Ohio (and in several other bases formerly U.S. military) the "Russians have come". The message is that a major U.S. military base is now completely in control of, and secretly used by, the Soviets--AT COLUMBUS, OHIO. The letter-writer's comment was that "perhaps Columbus deserves it!".

WHERE ARE GOD AND HOSTS?

You keep badgering me as to why we don't show up and "fix" things and why didn't we show up at such and such a time be­cause there was promise of change as with the Kennedy Presi­dency. We do not play in those short-sighted games and be­sides, chelas, I think you forget to look at all sides of the holo­gram. What makes you think I am not present and that perhaps I have CONTROL OF SOME OF THE INSTALLATIONS? Do not your UFOlogists continue to tell you about all those "aliens" running around with your government in "HOSTAGE"? If we represent enemies to the governments and adversary--does that mean that we are YOUR enemy? It might be well worth pondering possibilities. You had best be checking to define whose side YOU ARE ON. Truth will stand on the final deci­sion day--words will gain nothing. Any time you have ones who can merge with and pass through solid substance--YOU HAVE PROBLEMS IF THEY ARE NOT ON YOUR SIDE! Will an "alien" hurt you? NO--but the Men of human format will cer­tainly try and make you believe they will.

I can give you a clue or two--why do you think the Elite Con­spirators have such massive and luxurious facilities in places like Australia, etc., and are prepared to "forfeit" the Northern Hemisphere--COULD THEY REALLY KNOW SOMETHING THEY AREN'T TELLING YOU?

Wouldn't it be nice if you lovely humanoids would just get your own mess into control and reclaim your nation from your trea­sonist enemies? I heartily suggest you work at it and consider the potentially beneficial thrust of an open mind toward these possibilities of the Host's contribution and participation. God is not in the habit of playing silly games ON HIS PEOPLE. Those "tricks" are only of the adversary. Why do you think the church speakers and religious false teachers try to sell you lovely people on the lie that aliens and anything coming from space is of Satan and a "lie"? Where in the name of all reason do you think the Christos (by any name) and the messengers have come from since the onset of all "time keeping"? You had best get your reasoning caps upon your heads, open your minds and get out of Fantasy La-La Land and into the vision of Truth. I am a lot closer to you than you might think.

SECRET FACILITY UNDERGROUND AT PRISON

You are told so little about everything and anything and you grasp the false illusion like a lifebelt. In this very area of Cali­fornia there is a large prison facility called a cute name like "Correctional Facility", while most of the criminals are left out­side running your government and big business. Nonetheless, Dharma said one day to a few people talking about the under­ground facilities that "...well, but what about that big facility under the prison!" There was silence and all turned to look at her as if to ask "...what about it?" She was stunned because she knew all about it--having even been there--and was quite sure I had spoken of it in meeting as well as in writing. No, I had not, because we have ones who are employed at the prison and I need to keep protection about them.

Not only do they have a massive facility which interlocks with the Northrop and other facilities but the inmates in various cat­egories of "lock-up" worked on the project and some have tat­tled quite openly about it. It simply is NOT that which will run in your local paper when they won't even run a simple letter­to-the-Editor regarding "No" on War.

I do not wish to take more time on this now, but will get back to it as we have opportunity. I mention these things because they must be integrated into the concept of the ever outstretched cov­erage of the CIA and other "intelligence" groups.

Let us return to the subject of the CIA structure and spend an hour or so, before our meeting, on the subject in point.

HATONN MEETING TAPES AVAILABLE

By the way, for you readers and listeners, it has gotten com-pletely beyond Dharma's ability to write such volumes of docu-ments as to cover all material and miscellaneous matters inappropriate to a JOURNAL in preparation. So, if you will look in the BOOKLIST AND ORDERING INFORMATION section there will be information on how to obtain audio tapes of these meetings we have--unless totally geared to local business matters. I will endeavor to respond to questions which flow into this focus and it will, in addition, give us opportunity to ex-change more comfort with conversational communications. If at first you are uncomfortable with a bit of female voice tone I be-lieve it will not even be noted as we move along in the taping. The expense for same will be kept as minimal as possible to break even and you will be given other instructions as to source of ordering for we need to relieve America West of some of the load and give separation as to this type of communication for they face enough impact from the publications. Thank you for your attention and patience while we get set up with equipment to run that many copies for circulation.

I would like as many as who would be interested to obtain the tapes from our last large meeting for I believe it was one of the more important as to information. That meeting was on the 14th of March and was some five hours in length so there will be probably some 4 tapes ($10 per set). Information can still be gotten immediately through America West--our intent is remove additional burden for soon the publications will be handled through Nevada and other resources for security and more effi-cient business operations. We will effort to set the audio tapes into some kind of format so that the cost can be utilized as a "donation" for your convenience. So be it, let us move on with our subject in point.

THE CIA STRUCTURE

HONORS TO "I AM ANONYMOUS" WHO WROTE OF THIS SUBJECT IN 1974 AND WE ARE GOING TO FILL IN THE DELETIONS MADE BY THE CIA AFTER PRESENT-ING THE EVIDENCE.

THE CLANDESTINE MENTALITY

The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious. encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but with-out understanding. Justice Brandeis, 1928.

The nation must to a degree take it on faith that we too are honorable men devoted to her service. CIA Director Helms, 1971. [H: And if you believe that one--I have some bridges to sell you!]

WILLIAM COLBY

The man who masterminded and oversaw the CIA's clandestine operations in Indochina during much of the 1960s was William Colby. He is a trim, well-groomed Princeton and Columbia Law School graduate who, if he were taller, might be mistaken for a third Bundy brother. He started in the intelligence business during World War II with the Office of Strategic Services. His field assignments included parachuting into German-occupied France and Norway to work with the anti-Nazi underground movements, during which he showed a remarkable talent for clandestine work. After the war he joined the newly formed CIA and rose rapidly through its ranks, becoming an ex-pert on the Far East. From 1959 until 1962 he served as the CIA's chief of station in Saigon. In 1962 he was named head of the Far East Division of the Clandestine Services.

In this position Colby presided over the CIA's rapidly expanding programs in Southeast Asia. Under his leadership (but always with White House approval) the agency's "secret" war in Laos was launched, and more than 30,000 Meo and other tribal warriors were organized into the CIA's own Armee Clandestine. Colby's officers and agents directed--and on occasion par­ticipated in--the battles against the Pathet Lao, in bombing oper­ations by the CIA's proprietary company, Air America, and in commando-type raids into China and North Vietnam, well be­fore Congress had passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.

Colby seemed to keep the secret operation always under tight control. His colleagues in the CIA marveled at his ability to run all the agency's activities in Laos with no more than forty or fifty career CIA officers in the field. There were, to be sure, several thousand other Americans supporting the CIA effort, but these were soldiers of fortune or pilots under contract to the agency, not career men. From the CIA's point of view, the war in Laos was cheap (costing the agency only $20 to $30 million a year) and well managed. The full cost of the war was actually closer to a half-billion dollars a year, but most of this was funded by other agencies--the Defense Department and AID. The number of Americans involved was small enough that a rel­atively high degree of secrecy could be maintained. In contrast to the tens of thousands of Laotians who died in the war, few Americans were killed, and those who were casualties were not CIA career officers but rather mercenaries, contract officers, and personnel of the agency's air proprietaries. The agency considered Laos to be a very successful operation. And Colby received much of the credit for keeping things under control.

The agency's clandestine activities in Vietnam were not so well organized, concealed, or successful as its Laotian opera­tion. In the mid-1960's the CIA was swept along with the rest of the U.S. government into launching huge programs designed to support the war effort. The agency would have preferred to run relatively small, highly secret operations (or to have had complete control of covert action), but the stiffer and stiffer de­mands of the Johnson Administration made this impossible. Thus, if the President wanted a larger contribution from the CIA, the CIA would contribute. In 1965 Colby, still stationed in Washington, oversaw the founding in Vietnam of the agency's Counter Terror (CT) program. In 1966 the agency be­came wary of adverse publicity surrounding the use of the word "terror" and changed the name of the CT teams to the Provincial Reconnaissance Units (PRUs). Wayne Cooper, a former For­eign Service officer who spent almost eighteen months as an ad­visor to South Vietnamese internal-security programs, described the operation: "It was a unilateral American program, never recognized by the South Vietnamese government. CIA repre­sentatives recruited, organized, supplied, and directly paid CT teams, whose function was to use Viet Cong techniques of ter­ror-assassination, abuses, kidnappings and intimidation--against the Viet Cong leadership". Colby also supervised the estab­lishment of a network of Provincial Interrogation Centers. One of these centers was constructed, with agency funds, in each of South Vietnam's forty-four provinces. An agency operator or contract employee directed each center's operation, much of which consisted of torture tactics against suspected Vietcong, such torture usually carried out by Vietnamese nationals.

THE PHOENIX TERRORIST PROGRAM!!

In 1967 Colby's office devised another program, eventually called Phoenix, to coordinate an attack against the Vietcong in­frastructure among all Vietnamese and American police, in­telligence, and military units. Again CIA money was the cata­lyst. According to Colby's own testimony in 1971 before a congressional committee, 20,587 suspected Vietcong were killed under Phoenix in its first two and a half years. Even Colby has admitted that serious abuses were committed under Phoenix. Former intelligence officers have come before congressional committees and elsewhere to describe repeated examples of tor­ture and other particularly repugnant practices used by Phoenix operatives. However, according to David Wise, writing in the New York Times Magazine on July 1, 1973, "Not one of Colby's friends or neighbors, or even his critics on the Hill, would, in their wildest imagination, conceive of Bill Colby attaching elec­tric wires to a man's genitals and personally turning on the crank. 'Not Bill Colby. . . He's a Princeton man. '" Figures provided by the South Vietnamese government credit Phoenix with 40,994 VC kills. [H: Whose side do you suppose God might have been on? You always "claim" HIM, do you not, because of your "humanitarian" approach to burying men in trenches and other cute tricks?]

Also in 1967, President Johnson sent Robert Komer, a for­mer agency employee who had joined the White House staff, to Vietnam to head up all the civilian and military pacification pro­grams. In November of that year, while Komer was in Wash­ington for consultation, the President asked him if there was anything he needed to carry out his assignment. Komer re­sponded that he certainly could use the services of Bill Colby as his deputy. The President replied that Komer could draft any­body he chose. A year later Colby succeeded Komer as head of the pacification program, with the rank of ambassador. The longtime clandestine officer had ostensibly resigned from the CIA to become a State Department employee.

* * *

Dharma, we must leave this now lest we be late for our agreed appointment. Promptness is always mandatory in our service for ones must always find us dependable and worthy of our "word" in ALL things.

I will move to stand-by and allow you to close down the equip­ment. Thank you.
PJ 48
CHAPTER 2

REC #1 HATONN

WED., MARCH 25, 1992 8:15 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 222

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25 1992
Dharma, since there is so much to write regarding other than the JOURNAL in writing, I shall simply ask that you continue with the subject for we need to sort priorities with other material and, yet, I must place this CIA information at the top for all activities of military nature (which is all activities) around your globe are now under direction of the CIA in connection with and at the di­rection of a Central Intelligence as set up by the Global Gov­ernment.

Dear ones, I suggest you be a bit terrified right now--this is not amusing games in the information shipped back to you from an alleged "space shuttle"--they are showing you prepared pictures of electron particle beams and covering their actions with cute pictures of vapor trails, etc. These are issued as "blackmail" to us of the Command. Things are indeed serious on the Interna­tional front as is exposed by what is happening in Libya (if nothing else). The Libyans are pawns of the enforcers--let me remind you for YOU ALREADY HAVE BEEN TOLD THIS--BY ME.

The British Intelligence set up the frame-up of the Libyan ter­rorists in connection with the Scotland air crash. The two men in point are NOT guilty of anything to do with the crash. This is a totally set-up situation to force a nation to capitulate under force of total isolation and embargo via the One World Govern­ment orchestrated under the shield of the U.S.A. (shame on you, America). This particular little plot was conjured by one Henry Kissinger. Therefore, I need to give you a bit more on Henry Kissinger as he related to this CIA head, George Bush. It is a break from the JOURNAL in point, it would seem; it is not because all the power was gained through the use of the CIA.

This portion will go back to the Kissinger clone ambassador to the United Nations (Bush) in the early seventies and we will un­fold Bush's inter-relationship at that general time of sequence

KISSINGER AND UNITED NATIONS

We will take up the story of this relationship in the very early 1970's where, at that time in his career, George Bush entered into a phase of close association with both Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger. As you will see, Bush was a member of the Nixon cabinet from the spring of 1971 until the day that Nixon resigned. You will also note Bush on a number of important oc­casions literally acting as Nixon's speaking conduit, especially in international crisis situations. During these years in point, Nixon was Bush's patron, providing him with appointments and urging him to look forward to bigger things in the future. On certain occasions, however, Bush was upstaged by others in his quest for Nixon's favor. You will note, today, that Nixon is right back in the gang of influencers--i.e., note association and meetings with Buchanan. Dear ones, the Buchanan you get is not what WAS. This ended up a "planted deal" as the Buchanan who was going to try for President was reprogrammed quite early on as an impact was shown and, to bring the robotoid un­der control, the press was given release that there would be meetings with Bush to tell Bush to resign, etc. That was only a front to cause you to believe there would be a meeting--which there was--and everything in Buchanan was reprogrammed to move right into line and steady leaning toward full support of the Republican Party. Clinton is also chosen BY THE SAME GROUP to be groomed in like manner so that control will never be in jeopardy of the Conspirators.

WAR NOW VERY CLOSE

You are so near nuclear war that all are acting under total blackmail by the Intelligence enforcer-groups. Note that today the only power plant (nuclear) to give power to Iraq (who is mostly dead with no life support systems) was destroyed by this group of United Nations "inspectors" from the United States. You have reached the most pathetic and pitiful stage of your planet and this pit will now deepen on a daily basis. Worse--the "news" is pre-prepared and it is ordered THAT YOU GET ONLY THE "AUTHORIZED" EDITIONS. I assure you right NOW--YOU SHALL REAP THE REWARDS OF THIS HOR­RENDOUS ACTIVITY--AND IT SHALL BE VERY, VERY SOON.

Besides Nixon, there was Kissinger, far and away the most powerful figure in the entire Washington regime, even then, who became Bush's boss when the latter became the U.S. Am­bassador to the United Nations in New York City. Later, on the campaign trail in 1980, Bush would offer to make Kissinger Secretary of State in his administration.

Bush was now listing a net worth of over $1.3 million, but the fact is that he was actually unemployed in readiness to assume the next "official" post, to take the next step of what, in the ca­reer of a Roman Senator, was called the cursus honorum, the patrician career, for this is what he felt the world owed him. Here is just a tiny, tiny portion of Bush's portfolio:

In 1970, Bush's presented portfolio included over 30 companies in which he had an interest of more than the required-for-public­announcement of over $4,000. He had 10,000 shares of Ameri­can General Insurance Co., 5,500 shares of American Standard, 200 shares of AT&T, 832 shares of CBS, and 581 shares of In­dustries Exchange Fund. He also held stock in the Kroger Company, Simplex Wire and Cable Co. (25,000 shares), IBM, and Allied Chemical. In addition, he had created a trust fund for his children with "pre-placement" positions arranged and guaranteed for future use.

Nixon had promised Bush an attractive and prestigious political plum in the executive branch, and it was now time for Nixon to deliver. Bush's problem was that in late 1970 Nixon was more interested in what another Texan could contribute to his administration. That other Texan was John Connally, who had played the role of Bush's nemesis in the elections just concluded, by virtue of the encouragement and decisive support which Connally had given to the Bentsen candidacy. Nixon was now fascinated by the prospect of including the right-wing Democrat Connally in his cabinet in order to provide himself with a patina of bipartisanship, while emphasizing the dissension among the Democrats, strengthening Nixon's chances of successfully executing his Southern Strategy a second time during the 1972 elections.

Now, more than ever before, political figures are groomed and practiced in selected denouncements and rhetoric to fool you-the-people. Ones come out in seeming opposition to actions of Bush and the party in power--but they are only placing the stage-set for manipulation of your emotional reactions which will guide you right into the trap set for you in the first place. The same type of biliously insipid games are being played out between you and Israel at the moment.

The word among Nixon's inner circle of that period was "The Boss is in love," and the object of his affections was Big Jawn. Nixon claimed that he was not happy with the stature of his cur-rent cabinet, telling his domestic policy advisor John Ehrlichman in the fall of 1970 that "Every cabinet should have at least one potential President in it. Mine doesn't." Nixon had tried to recruit leading Democrats before, asking Senator Henry Jackson to be Secretary of Defense and offering the post of United Nations Ambassador to Hubert Humphrey.

Within hours after the polls had closed in the Texas Senate race, Bush received a call from Charles Bartlett, a Washington columnist who was part of the Prescott Bush network. Bartlett tipped Bush to the fact that Treasury Secretary David Kennedy was leaving, and urged him to make a grab for the job. Bush called Nixon and put in his request. After that, he waited by the telephone. But it soon became clear that Nixon was about to recruit John Connally, and with him, perhaps, the important Texas electoral votes in 1972. Secretary of the Treasury! One of the three or four top posts in the cabinet! And that before Bush had been given anything for all of his tireless slogging through the 1970 campaign! But the job was about to go to Connally. Over two decades, one can almost hear Bush's whining complaint for "kinder and gentler" treatment.

This move, of course, was not unprepared. During the fall of 1970, when Connally was campaigning for Bentsen against Bush, Connally had been invited to participate in the Ash Com-mission, a study group on government re-organization chaired by one Roy Ash. This White House access was dangerously undermining George Bush and the Texas GOP was complaining loudly. A White House staff member named Peter Flannigan was also a close friend of Bush and he generated a memo to White House Chief of Staff H. R. Haldeman with the notation: "Connally is an implacable enemy of the Republican Party in Texas and, therefore, attractive as he may be to the President, we should avoid using him again." Nixon found Connally an attractive political property and had soon appointed him to the main White House panel for intelligence evaluations. On November 30, when Connally's appointment to the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board was announced, the senior Senator from Texas, John Tower, and George Bush were instantly in touch with the White House to express their extreme distress over the appointment. Please let me believe you ones are seeing connections with the Kennedy assassination and that which is following as outlaid herein and the players involved. This can be confirmed by a writing by James Reston, Jr., THE LONE STAR: THE LIFE OF JOHN CONNALLY, which gives you a lot of good historical data.

TOWER'S MISSING BOOK

Tower was indignant because he had been promised by Ehrlichman some time before that Connally was not going to receive an important post. Bush's personal plight was even more poignant: he was out of work, and he wanted a job. As a defeated senatorial candidate, he hoped and fully expected to get a major job in the administration. Yet the administration seemed to be paying more attention to the very Democrat who had put him on the job market. "What gives?" Bush was justified in asking, I'm sure. Do you also begin to see why Tower, scorned, would later write on these topics of interest--and be killed in an air-crash as his book was to be released-- -- -- what ever happened to that book?

The appointment of Connally to replace David Kennedy as Sec­retary of the Treasury was concluded during the first week of December 1970. By the way, why do you think Connally had such pull at that time? Ah so--now you are beginning to get the idea of this monster--he knew what happened and what went wrong in Dallas when Kennedy was slain and, now, you also know why he screamed, "My God, they are going to KILL US ALL!" The appointment could not be announced without caus­ing an upheaval among the Texas Republicans until something had been done for lame duck George B. On December 7, Nixon retainer H. R. Haldeman was writing memos to himself in the White House. The first was: "Connally set." Then came: "Have to do something for Bush right away." Could Bush be­come the director of NASA? How about the Small Business Administration? Or the Republican National Committee? Or then again, he might like to be White House congressional liai­son, or perhaps Undersecretary of Commerce. Since no job immediately came to mind, Bush was assured that he would come to the White House as a top presidential adviser on something or other, until another fitting job would open up.

BUSH GIVEN U.N, AMBASSADORSHIP UNDER
KISSINGER CONTROL

Bush was called to the White House on December 9, 1970 to meet with Nixon and talk about a post as assistant to the Presi­dent "with a wide range of unspecified general responsibilities", according to a White House memo initialed by H. R. Haldeman. Bush accepted such a post at one point in his haggling with the Nixon White House. But Bush also sought the United Nations job, arguing that there was a dearth of Nixon advocacy in New York City and the general New York area and that he could fill that need in the New York social circles he would be moving in as Ambassador. Nixon's U.N. Ambassador had been Charles Yost, a Democrat who was leaving. But the White House had already offered that job to Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who had accepted. See what "tangled webs" are woven when evil placements are politically chosen? Note that these AP­POINTMENTS of politicians are the ones who run your na­tion--not those nice Congressmen who you place in Congress--those dupes are in turn controlled by the Political Action Committees in service to the British Zionist Israelis. You-the-people have NO say in your government whatsoever!!!

Political calls were made and other promises made and Moyni­han decided that suddenly he did not want the U.N. Ambassador post after all, and with a sigh of relief publicly projected, the White House offered it to Bush. Bush's appointment was announced on December 11, Connally's on December 14. In of­fering the post to Bush, Haldeman had been brutally frank, telling him that the job, although of cabinet rank, would have no power attached to it. Bush, stressed Haldeman, would be taking orders directly from Kissinger. Even Bush later claimed to have replied: "...even if somebody who took the job didn't under­stand that, Henry Kissinger would give him a twenty-four hour crash course on the subject."

Nixon told his cabinet and the Republican congressional leader­ship on December 14, 1970, what had been in the works for some time: that Connally was coming not only as a Democrat but as Secretary of the Treasury for the next two full years. Even more humiliating for Bush was the fact that your hero had been on the receiving end of Connally's assistance. As Nixon told the cabinet: "Connally said he wouldn't take it until George Bush got whatever he was 'entitled to' ." Connally was sure why Bush wanted the appointment to the U.N. but was certainly going to help see to it that he received it. It was this blackmail tactic by Connally that finally prompted Nixon to take care of poor little George. Nixon told Tower that he realized it was hard for him (Tower) but necessary and further told him that he really needed him back in 1972. Tower responded that "I'm a pragmatic man. John Connally is philosophically attuned to you. He is articulate and persuasive. I for one will defend him against those in our own party who will not like him."

Nixon considered Connally to be a possible successor in the presidency--or at least decided to handle him as such until some other means of getting rid of him could be established. Con­nally's approach to the international monetary crisis then un­folding was that "all foreigners are out to screw us and it's our job to screw them first," as he told C. Fred Bergsten of Kissinger's National Security Council staff. Nixon's bum­bling management of the international monetary crisis was one of the reasons why he was Watergated, and Big Jawn was cer­tainly seen by the financiers as a big part of the problem. Bush was humiliated in this episode, but that is nothing compared to what later happened to both Connally and Nixon. Connally would be indicted while Bush was in Beijing, and later he would face the further humiliation of personal bankruptcy. It seems everyone was to overlook the power of Bush and Kissinger. Bush maintained a smoldering, visceral dislike of Connally and it lasted well into the 1980's. As you all must have noticed during the Gulf War--Bush is no wimp but, rather, a vindic­tive killer who gets what he wants at whatever the cost to ev­eryone else. He is a true goal-oriented servant of Skull and Bones unto the Evil Empire conspiracy. And, you are ready to keep him in office or give him bigger and higher power with Kissinger come election time--if you make it that far.

BUSH SENATE CONFIRMATION

Bush appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for his pro forma and perfunctory confirmation hearings on February 8, 1971. It was a free ride. Many of the Senators had known Prescott Bush, and several were still Prescott's friends. Acting like friends of the family, they gave Bush friendly advice with a tone that was congratulatory and warm, and avoided any tough questions. Stuart Symington warned Bush that he would have to deal with the "duality of authority" between his nominal boss, Secretary of State William Rogers, and his real boss, NSC chief Kissinger. There was only passing reference to Bush's service of the oil cartel during his time in the House, and Bush vehemently denied that he had ever tried to "placate" the "oil interests". Claiborne Pell said that Bush would enhance the luster of the U.N. post. Indeed, as a shining star of the morn­ing.

On policy matters Bush said that it would "make sense" for the U.N. Security Council to conduct a debate on the wars in Laos and Cambodia, which was something that the United States had been attempting to procure for some time. Bush thought that such a debate could be used as a forum to expose the aggressive activities of the North Vietnamese. No Senator asked Bush about China, but Bush told journalists waiting in the hall that the question of China was now under intensive study. The Wash­ington Post was apparently "impressed by Bush's lithe and youthful good looks". Bush was easily confirmed without oppo­sition.

At Bush's swearing-in later in February, Nixon, probably anx­ious to calm Bush down after the strains of the Connally affair, had recalled that President William McKinley had lost an elec­tion in Ohio, but nevertheless gone on to become President. "But I'm not suggesting what office you should seek and at what time," said Nixon. The day before, Senator Adlai Stevenson III of Illinois had told the press that Bush was "totally unqualified" and that his appointment had been "an insult" to the United Na­tions. Bush presented his credentials on March 1.

Then Bush, "handsome and trim" at 47, moved into a suite at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in Manhattan and settled into his usual hyperkinetic, thyroid-driven lifestyle. The Washington Post marveled continually at his "whirlwind schedule" just as they still do, which seemed more suitable for a "political aspi­rant than one usually associated with a diplomat". He rose ev­ery morning at 7:00 A.M., and then mounted his exercycle for a twelve-minute workout while taking in a television news pro­gram that also lasted exactly twelve minutes. He ate a small breakfast and left the Waldorf at 8:00, to be driven to the U.S. mission to the U.N. at Turtle Bay where he generally arrived at 8:10. Then he would get the overnight cable traffic from his secretary, Mrs. Aleene Smith, and then went into a conference with his executive assistant, Tom Lais. Later there would be meetings with his two deputies, Ambassadors Christopher Phillips and W. Tapley Bennett of the State Department. Pete Roussel was also still with him as publicity man. No wonder you good taxpayers can't afford to pay your bills with such wondrous numbers on your payrolls.

For Bush, a 16-hour day was more the rule than the exception. You see, he was goal oriented and never lost sight of that goal-- you-the-people start way behind this character out of Hell. His days were packed with one appointment after another, luncheon engagements, receptions, formal dinners--at least one reception and one dinner per day. Sometimes there were three receptions per day--quite an opportunity for networking with like-minded Freemasons from all over the world. Bush also traveled to Washington for cabinet meetings, and still did speaking engagements around the country, especially for Republican candidates. "I try to get to bed by 11:30 if possible," said Bush in 1971, "but often my calendar is so filled that I fall behind in my work and have to take it home with me." Bush bragged that he was still a "pretty tough" doubles player in tennis, good enough to team up with the pros. But he claimed to love baseball most. He joked about questions on his ping pong skills, since these were the months of ping-pong diplomacy, when the invitation for a U.S. ping-pong team to visit Beijing became a part of the preparation for Kissinger's "China card".

Mainly, Bush came on as an ultra-orthodox Nixon loyalist. Was he a liberal conservative? asked a reporter. "People in Texas used to ask me that in the campaigns," replied Bush. "Some even called me a right-wing reactionary. I like to think of my-self as a pragmatist, but I have learned to defy being labeled.... What I can say is that I am a strong supporter of the President. If you can tell me what he is, I can tell you what I am." Barbara liked the Waldorf suite and was a very enthusiastic hostess.

Soon after taking up his U.N. posting, Bush received a phone call from Assistant Secretary of State for Middle Eastern Affairs, Joseph Sisco, one of Kissinger's principal henchmen. Sisco had been angered by some comments Bush had made about the Middle East situation in a press conference after presenting his credentials. Despite the fact that Bush, as a cabinet officer, ranked several levels above Sisco, Sisco was in effect the voice of Kissinger. Sisco told Bush that it was Sisco who spoke for the United States government on the Middle East, and that he would do both the on-the-record talking and the leaking about that area. Bush knuckled under, for these were the realities of the Kissinger years.

* * *

Dharma, let us take a break please for the interruptions are get-ting too hard to overcome. Thank you.

Hatonn to stand-by.