6/6 페이지 처음처음 1 2 3 4 5 6
Results 11 to 12 of 12

제목: PJ#015, RAPE OF THE CONSTITUTION; DEATH OF FREEDOM, RRPP-VOL. II

  1. #11
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default

    PJ 15
    CHAPTER 19
    REC #1 HATONN

    TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 7:00 A.M. YEAR 3 DAY 293
    Hatonn is present. Do not panic--I will give interference. I hereby give notice to the surveillance teams that you will cease the beam frequency or we shall take out your circuits.

    Oberli, the impulse system has been brought within this dwelling. The electronics respond most quickly. We must remove all operations from this placement at the earliest possible time as it becomes more difficult for us to locate the apparatus in advance of "symptoms". This morning was serious indeed. You precious ones run hop-scotch hither and yon and overlook the obvious.

    Dharma, we must continue for we must get this Journal to print but I want no one save Oberli and George to know where the manuscript is sent. Is no one in this group going to take my petitions for security in seriousness?

    The sequence of activity must be to get the information to print and circulated widely lest we get stopped before we have public, enough information upon which people can build action. I am going to give you something today that I want placed within this Journal in at least three places. It is regarding action already under way regarding the 16th Amendment (Income Taxation). I will utilize it again later but this bombardment today is serious indeed and I am most irritated for it was known Oberli would be absent.

    Back to the subject, please.

    NEWSTATES.
    Do you suppose your legislators or any of your elected officials know anything about what is referred to as the "New Deal"? Do they understand anything about the "New World Order"? Not if they are not on the inside with the planners. Ask your representatives on the national, state and local level, including the school board members about the plan to restructure your U.S.A. government! Then ask elected officials on all levels if they have ever been told honestly of what this grandiose "New World Order" was going to be like, since many of them seem to have, enthusiastically, embraced this "new order" so completely.

    They have failed to oppose, and even vote in favor of, legislation and programs--some even introducing the bills for change and some have gone so far as to ridicule the honest citizens or those rare officials who have dared to strongly oppose. In many places there has been widespread persecution of those opposing the New Order--cattle killed, and feed poisoned, violent hatred campaigns, and recall threats to those officials who have stood and firmly opposed the change agents.

    Ask the officials if they have been briefed about: a World Assembly? Council of Principles? World Implementing Board? World Security System? World Economic System? World Economic Planning and Equity Council? World Monetary and Tax Policy Council? World Technology Board? World Development Office? World Forum of Long Range Planning for Human Development? World Forum for Human Development? World Commission and Court of Human Rights? World System for Ecological Balance". How current are activities? Try April 17, 1990 for a New York Times headline: "Politics of the Environment: California Will Test Waters--800,000 signatures turned in to place a voter-initiated referendum on the ballot; farmers and oth­ers are `uneasy'."

    Have the officials read the ACIR State Legislative Program (ACIR--Advisory Commission for Intergovernmental Relations--Regional Government)? The date on that is November 1975. (M-91) It is the size of a large Webster's Dictionary and weighs about 10 pounds. It includes model legislation in all areas of governance. It is called a "guide"! It was developed "by the staff with the help of the Joint Center for Environmental and Urban Problems of Florida Atlantic University and Florida International University, Dr. John M. DeGrove, Director." Other members of the Joint Center's team were Robert N. Alcock, William G. Colemand, Robert M. Rhodes, and James Tait (this, for identification in search).

    The following persons served most diligently on a panel which reviewed each proposal: Richard Carlson, Director of Research, Council of State Governments; Honorable Charles A. Docter, Maryland House of Delegates; Marcus Halbrook, Director, Arkansas Legislative Council; David Johnston, Ohio Legislative Service Commission; William J. Pierce, Executive Director, National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws; Senator Mac Davis, Judge, Wisconsin Senator; Bonnie Reese, Executive Secretary, Wisconsin Joint Legislative Council; Honorable Karl Snow, Utah State Senator; and Troy R. Westmeyer, Director, New York Legislative Commission on Expenditure Review.

    The legislation was also circulated in draft form to the following national organizations for review and comment: Council of State Governments; International City Management Association; National Association of Counties; National Conference of State Legislatures; National Governors' Conference; National League of Cities; U.S. Conference of Mayors.

    New "stuff'? Surely not -- this began long before 1935 and by 1935 the groundwork was well laid--at that time, of course, it would be a division into nine segments (for there were only 48 states in the Union).

    This plan will divide the 50 into 10 segments and rearrange all county and urban boundaries. We will reprint the map herein for I am not going to give a detailed description for it can be easily researched. I am interested in giving you cause to concern of the World Order and how far it has progressed to almost the point of no return.

    Financial assistance for this "Commission" came greatly from the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the updating and publishing this new edition of the ACIR State Legislative Program. You all know how efficiently and well-run is the HUD! My, and appreciation was given, "The Commission is grateful to all who helped to produce this volume, but the Commission alone takes responsibility for the policies expressed herein and any error or commission or omission in the draftsmanship." This from Wayne Anderson, Executive Director. I wonder how much "responsibility" they will take when it is no longer a draft?

    Look at the cover of THE PLAN (by Independent Research Associates) and you will find the following statement: "No man can understand his own fate--nor the destiny of his nation--until he understands 'The Plan'."

    There will be new labels given for these little sections and they are set up so that you don't notice the purpose--hopefully, as with all other lies, that with use and retelling it will be "assumed" legal and lawful (there is a magnificent difference). They will use: Standard Metropolitan Districts, Umbrella Multi-jurisdictional Organizations, Regional Planning Districts, Substate Districts, Super "counties" and Area-wide Planning Organizations--recognize any of them?

    They are actually administrative units of the United Nations System. They are part of the conversion to operation of America under full world (socialist) government. The implementation of these units to abolish your counties is simultaneously the process of abolishing your states. As the governing board of a district takes control (at first 51% are elected officials and 49% are unelected officials--this will reverse) there exists the directive that members of the state and federal government are also a part of the governing board. Because the reaction was so strong against it, the Department of Defense was removed as a part of the governing board at the Lake Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. This was in Carter's administration. A military government is being structured to replace the Constitutional system of government in America.

    This is not theory, The Plan has been forced upon you and has been in working operation for some years, at least since 1971. Because local government was reluctant to give up its county structure, the state accepted what combinations it could get, haphazardly, which resulted in differences in regional alignments of Comprehensive Health Program Planning, Air Resources Regions, Criminal Justice Regions, Water Quality Regions, Transit Districts, etc. It is fully opera­tional and functioning in several states--California being first. The plan melds counties together so that the above districts are ultimate management systems after all counties and cities have disappeared. This Umbrella Multi-Jurisdictional Organization with melded counties will operate with one gov­erning board over the entire area. Too large, too remote and too dictatorial, these boards will have these powers and functions: Comprehensive Planning Process over the whole area with one planning director in charge; Power of the Purse with one treasurer collecting the money from the area's residents; One Taxing Authority; Control of everything including Special Districts; Holds veto power over actions of the whole area: Holds Clearing House Power and Func­tions; Mandatory Membership Requirements (and if an area does not direct its taxes to them the area or former county gets no voting rights); ultimate direction is full APPOINTIVE management and NOT ELECTED representation; holds the RIGHT TO PERPETUAL SUCCESSION for its form of government; operated by intellectuals calling themselves welfare scientists, political and behavioral scientists. Civilian administrations and military concepts are already being integrated on a regional basis!

    THIS WILL ALL BE BROUGHT INTO FORCE AND FUNCTION THROUGH THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN ADDITION TO GUN CONTROL, RESTRUCTURING OF THE INCOME TAX LAW WHICH IS NOW NULL AND VOID AND NEVER WAS RATIFIED, ALONG WITH ALL OF YOUR OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.

    I KNOW OF NO EASY WAY TO TELL YOU THIS OTHER THAN TO SIMPLY LAY IT OUT FOR YOU. SOME IN OUR LITTLE GROUP HERE FEEL THEY CANNOT BEAR THE NEGATIVITY AND ARE ACTUALLY GOING TO BREAK UP MARRIAGES AND FAMILIES. WILL THIS CHANGE THE SITUATION? IT WILL ONLY CAUSE MORE PAIN AND GRIEF--CAN NOT YOU ONES SIMPLY TAKE ACTION TO CONFRONT AND STOP THIS DRAGON OUT TO EAT YOU ALIVE? WHAT WILL YOU "RUN TO"? WHERE WILL YOU GO TO KEEP ALL YOUR "THINGS"? THE BIG BOYS FULLY INTEND TO TAKE ALL YOUR "THINGS"! SO BE IT AND BLESSINGS UNTO YOU IN YOUR SEARCHING FOR YOU WILL NOT FIND! YOU HAVE ALLOWED DESTRUCTION TO COME UPON YOU--YOU WILL CLEAN IT UP OR IT WILL NOT BE CLEANED. YOU CAN BLAME OF GOD, SATAN OR WHOEVER; IT MATTERS NOT--YOU CAN STOP IT NOW OR YOU WILL BE SWEPT INTO THE VORTEX OF THE TORNADO. IT IS YOUR CHOICE!

    WHAT CAN YOU DO?

    THIS NEXT PORTION WILL PLEASE BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE FORWARD. THEN PLACE IT IN ITS PROPER SE­QUENCE WITHIN THE JOURNAL. THEN PLEASE PLACE IT AT THE ENDING OF THE EPILOGUE. YOU ARE IN SERIOUS CIRCUMSTANCE AND THIS IS SOMETHING IN WHICH EACH OF YOU CAN ACTIVELY BECOME INVOLVED INSTEAD OF WRINGING YOUR HANDS AND BEING SLOWLY EATEN ALIVE. THERE IS ALWAYS "HOPE" IF YOU LISTEN AND WAIT UPON GOD! HE WILL ALWAYS RESPOND WITH THE "WAY"--IT IS UP TO YOU WHAT YOU DO WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS IN YOUR FREE-WILL STATE OF BEING. I IMPLORE YOU TO TAKE CAREFUL NOTE, PUT ASIDE QUANDARY AS TO "SOURCE' OF THIS WRITING, LOOK WITH REASON AND THEN ACT!

    You can enter into action with other groups already started. Surprisingly enough there is even a group brave enough to move forward with a drive to repeal the 16th Amendment (which was never lawfully ratified anyway) and abolish the "personal" income tax. This does surprise you, does it not?

    The drive to obtain endorsements for the program has been carried out with great energy in all the state capitals. Did any of you notice or respond to the lists? Or, did you snicker and say, "What's the use?" Did you even see the name list takers? As a result the legislatures of Wyoming, Texas, Nevada, Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi, Arizona and Indiana have approved what is known as the Liberty Amendment. This is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would repeal the 16th Amendment. It was first introduced in Congress as H.R. Res. 23.

    Now, look closely at what has happened to these states by MOTHER NATURE???? No, little sleepyheads, Mother Nature has had very little to do with what has struck these areas. It is totally man-precipitated in order to cause need for federal disaster funds and get rid of any notion of withdrawing taxes!

    Thousands of petitions and hundreds of thousands of signatures have been obtained in support of "Yes on 23". And these have been and are being submitted to the members of Congress. The members are being urged to submit the Liberty Amendment to all the state legislatures. Do you get a more clearly defined picture as to the need of a Constitutional Convention to block such citizen moves? You are about to demand your freedom back and the conspirators must work faster and faster and more destructively to stop you. Will you allow of it? That is up to you the people!

    The proposed amendment has four sections:

    Sect. 1. The government of the United States shall not engage in any business, profession, commercial, financial or industrial enterprise, except as specified in the Constitution.

    Sect. 2. The Constitution of any state, or the Congress of the United States shall not be subject to the terms of any foreign or domestic agreement which would abrogate this amendment.

    Sect. 3. The activities of the United States government which violate the intent and purpose of this amendment shall within a period of three years from the date of the ratification of this amendment, be liquidated and the properties and facilities affected shall be sold.

    Sect. 4. Three years after the ratification of this amendment, the 16th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States shall stand repealed and thereafter Congress shall not levy taxes on personal income, estates and/or gifts.

    By the way, the man who worked with unabated zeal to get this done in your behalf was "taken out" in 1989. His name was Willis Stone and we honor him for his daring greatness!

    WHAT WOULD BE THE ADVANTAGES OF SUCH

    AN AMENDMENT?

    * Repeal the "personal" federal income tax.

    * Balance the budget by limiting congressional expenditures to those specified in the Constitution.

    * Stop the withholding tax and restore the right of the worker to take home a full paycheck.

    * Bring down interest rates, thereby making it possible for people, especially young couples, to enjoy the American dream of owning their homes, as earlier generations were able to do. Without this, it is impossible for a nation to prosper.

    * Stop inflation caused by government deficit spending.

    * Transfer to the states and the people the millions of acres of land, comprising more than one-third of the entire land area of the country, now held by the federal government in violation of the Constitution.

    * Stop the federal government from taxing Americans to support foreign governments. The cost of this "aid" has now reached approximately $3 trillion--more than the entire national debt.

    * Halt federal confiscation of properties and enterprises through high taxes and burdensome regulations.

    * Limit the Defense Department to the business of defending us and stop it from operating commercial enterprises in competition with those it is supposed to defend.


    • Rescue you from the politicians' Ponzi scheme, the Social Security system.



    • Cut federal spending to less than half of what it is now--immediately.



    • Stop impoverishing the taxpayers with poverty programs.



    • End federal control, interference with and harassment of private schools.


    * Eliminate the special privilege of tax exemptions for foundations.

    * Liberate farmers from federal control.

    * Restore honest money. Abolish the Federal Reserve debt-money swindle. 209

    * Stop lending tax dollars to special interests.

    * Halt the terrible waste of billions of hours' and dollars' worth of effort now wasted in filling out government forms.

    * Let the people concentrate on productive pursuits instead of playing crazy "tax loophole" games.

    * Stop government competition with private enterprise.

    * * * * * * * * * *

    More information is available from Yes on 23, USE THIS PLEASE: BOX 2386 EL CAJON, CALIF. 92021; ENCLOSE A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. THEN FIND OUT HOW TO GET LINED UP TO TAKE ACTION IN THE MOST EFFECTIVE MANNER!

    THEY WILL SEND YOU A PAMPHLET ENTITLED HOW TO GET RID OF THE INCOME TAX AND WIN 45 BATTLES AT ONCE.
    * * * * * * * * * * *
    GYEORGOS CERES HATONN

    PJ 15
    CHAPTER 20

    REC #1 HATONN

    WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 1990 9:00 A.M. YEAR 3 DAY 266
    Hatonn present in the Light of the Radiant One. We will continue with doc­umentation regarding your "new" Constitution. It, of course, is as top secret as is the Protocols just written herein. That does not mean that it is secret; it means that those who have dared publish the exposed documents are mostly quite dead!

    There are one or two publications which have been kept alive in the flow of silencing "information sources" but they are few indeed. Know that in each scenario of such seriousness there will usually be one who defy the imposters--these are the "Genius" element spoken of in the Protocols. In the mid 1800s, for instance there was one labeled William Lloyd Garrison who established the LIBERATOR in Boston. You ones will come to recognize and relate to such work and workers.

    At the time of these writings I am most cautious as to name calling for we have had threats in abundance against ones already "taken out" and the threats come forth against families and estates. Further, the searching comes back to roost and I assure you, when the source is located--it severely impacts your separate funding. I beg of you to use your thought processes for you tend to become most careless in your enjoyment of having already encoun­tered the resources. Loose tongues have cost more kingdoms than have all the armies. Although the Journals have naught to do with projects, it is too likely that your enemies will assume as much.

    Let it be known by all that the only reason we are still standing herein is that all information can be researched; we are under constant surveillance and found totally patriotic and in no wise subversive. Treason is that which has been perpetuated by those who would destroy you as a nation and as a peo­ple. We desire no wars, no pickets, no violence--we only write truth. Those who surveil our work to strike us down find that they are among the un­knowing and are just as susceptible to the corrupted system and physical death by heinous manners as are the masses. Congressmen get AIDS, con­gressmen have legal battles, congressmen will die at the holocaust without shelters---ONLY A VERY FEW OF THE TOP MANIPULATORS KNOW WHAT IS WHAT--THE REST ARE HAPLESS TOOLS FEEDING ON THE TEMPTATIONS OF GREED AND BRIBERY. THESE ONES WILL PAY MOST HEINOUSLY FOR THEY ARE THE FIRST EX­PENDED WHEN THEIR SERVICE IS NO LONGER OF WORTH. HOLD THIS TRUTH WITHIN THINE BREAST, YOU WHO WOULD DESTROY THIS RESOURCE. YOU WILL DIE JUST AS EASILY AT THE HANDS OF THE CONSPIRATORS! ALL THOSE "GAINS" OF WORLDLY STATUS AND WEALTH WILL BE OF NO AVAIL WHERE YOU WILL GO FOLLOWING THAT EXTINCTION.

    THE SECRET NEW CONSTITUTION
    This section is taken from a book called, THE SECRET NEW CONSTITU­TION. It will only summarize for we effort to keep volume to a minimum. Ones can go and investigate these things at convenience. It does us of these realms no good what-so-ever to read and digest your information for you. Do the research you feel necessary to realize the truth of our words; we shall bring you sufficient quantity to base decisions but there will always, hopefully, be the die-hard searchers for proof. It is very gracious of you who find the proof to share it with your brothers and these publishers. Thank you. RE­MEMBER PLEASE, MOST DENOUNCEMENTS OF OUR WORK STEMS DIRECTLY FROM ONES WHO HAVE NOT SO MUCH AS PE­RUSED ALL OF OUR MATERIAL BUT HAVE MADE RIDICULOUS PRONOUNCEMENTS BASED ON OUT OF CONTEXT OR CONTRA­DICTORY MATERIAL FROM THE JOURNALS --- WHICH, BY THE WAY, WOULD HAVE BEEN MOST CAREFULLY EDITED, CHOSEN AND SCATTERED FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF DENOUNCE­MENT. WELCOME BACK TO ANY AND ALL WHO HAVE NOW TAKEN THE TIME TO TRULY INVESTIGATE THE MATERIAL, WE WANT NO WARS--WE WANT COMMUNITY. COMMUNITY IS BUILT WITHIN GROUPS WHO HAVE MEMBERS WHO ARE WILLING TO SAY, "I PERHAPS ERRED". MAN MOVES AWAY FROM GOD--GOD DOES NOT EVER MOVE AWAY FROM MAN!

    I give great honor to ones who came before and their names shall be written in the books of man for credit and honor. At this time I refrain from labels in order for security. Please be patient a bit longer and none shall be omitted who have made contribution. Some work I cannot give total honor unto the writers for their work is only partial truth and conclusions are incorrect or there is deliberate misinformation. I honor truth; no more and no less.

    What you are about to read is true. It will happen unless you stop it. If you care enough, you will take action. If you as a people do nothing, it will come to be--very soon indeed.

    The people who have written your new constitution on your behalf were not elected representatives, nor your representatives in any measure. As a "tax­ exempt" foundation, they were able to do political work on what amounts to a subsidy taken from your taxes--but you were never asked if you wanted a new constitution written. Indeed, only a very tiny fraction of the people in the U.S. even know that it exists: it has been made known to practically no one except a select category of influential people whose views and interests generally co­incide with those of the people who wrote it. The American people as a whole are still in the dark about it, and this situation is deliberate. It is there­fore truly a "secret" constitution being brought into reality through slow and tedious integration and interpretation so that, in the end, you will have the "new" and the old shall be obsoleted by remoteness. It is for the ones who "interpret" the constitution to make or break the laws and render "you the people" impotent to do anything about the matter.

    The new model constitution was some ten years in the writing and drew upon well over a hundred participants. A preliminary version was published in 1970 and given exposure in very limited circles within the conspirators and changes were made, at insider requests, to further limit your freedom and hand over control unto those elitists. In 1974, an essentially final version was quietly published in a book entitled, THE EMERGING CONSTITUTION by Rex­ford G. Tugwell (Harper and Rowe), the man who directed the formulation of the new constitution. It is the 40th draft. During most of the time that their constitution was being written, the Center for Study of Democratic Institu­tions was lavishly funded to the tune of $2,500,000 annually. In other words, your freedom was purchased for about $15 million.

    After reading this summary, you may well wish to read some of the documents available. You will all do well to put aside "who" I am and "from where" I come and focus on the truth of that which we bring forth. Truth is truth is truth!

    ABSTRACT OVERVIEW
    It was hoped, by some powerful forces, to celebrate your nation's Bicentennial in 1976 by replacing the freedoms guaranteed in your present Constitution with their own dictatorship -- a cleverly disguised dictatorship. The adver­tisements of this day are cleverly arranged to cause you to go forth and pur­chase a copy of the constitution and bill of rights--which are being changed at each new printing. Soon the old and original version will only be available in archives and locked catacombs.

    It has been made to superficially resemble the government that you now have, so that you will not recognize it for what it is until too late. They are using every propaganda trick at their command to make you lower your guard--and it has worked! They are now about to put you all in a condition of economic desperation to persuade you to accept their cleverly disguised dictatorship. Note the recent rulings coming down from your Supreme Court. They have ruled that certain pictures are illegal to have within your homes and yet ob­scenity can be funded by your hard earned monies to foot the bill for "art" ex­hibits. IT IS AT YOUR DOORSTEP, THE DOOR IS OPEN AND THE THIEVES HAVE ENTERED! YOU HAVE NO LEGAL MEANS TO PROTECT YOURSELVES AND IT IS ALL BUT TOO LATE! So be it.

    Oh, you say, "And where were you while we slept and this happened to us?" Telling you as loudly as we could shout and you shot missiles at us and write of our evil presence. Will man get that which he deserves? I most certainly hope not.

    Your U.S. Constitution, according to the Preamble, is intended to provide for justice, domestic tranquility, common defense and general welfare, and to se­cure the blessings of liberty not only for yourselves but for posterity. These were the goals that shaped your Constitution. And this is the Constitution that enabled America to become a great nation of free people.

    The "Newstates (by the way, they are already set up and maps with the new designations already before the legislature) of America Constitution" has a Preamble also -- but it states NOT ONE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF YOUR TRUE CONSTITUTION. Instead of "justice and domestic tranquility", the new constitution seeks only "good order' (see the "Protocols") without defin­ing what that means. The very first words are "So that we may join in common endeavors" -- and the body of the new constitution makes it clear that this means an end to individual endeavors. Their new constitution is expressly stated to be good only for a prescribed period of 25 years. Your descendants are left to fend for themselves with ever increasing helplessness and shackles placed at each recorded change. No reference is made in the Preamble to your defense or general welfare. (No, because you will have neither.) Worst of all, the matter of liberty -- so central to your present Constitution -- is to­tally ignored in the Preamble of the new one, which seeks only "an adequate and self-repairing government". The emphasis throughout their new constitu­tion is on the government -- not on the people. "Adequate" turns out to mean too powerful to be challenged. And "self-repairing" means that the laws and governmental structures can be continually changed and shifted to permit anything your rulers wish to do. I feel as if I should ask you to go back and memorize the plan of the Zionist Protocols. EVERY SENTENCE AND CHANGE IS DIRECTLY RESULTANT FROM THAT PLAN.

    I hereby request that those Zionist Protocols and this portion of a summary of The Secret New Constitution, be published separately in and of itself. With a copy of your original Constitution as laid forth through your founding fathers.

    A little summary:

    ARTICLE I is divided into two portions defining "Rights" and "Responsibilities." It turns out that some of your present rights disappear out­right, and practically all of the remainder become conditional and fragile, able to be terminated at the whim of the government or by Presidential Order. The responsibilities, however, which are obligations of the citizen to the government, are absolute and unconditional. (Your President is already func­tioning under that carefully veiled permit and has told you so most openly and defiantly!)

    ARTICLE II defines what are called the "Newstates". The 50 states you have now become 10 in number (I ask herein that a copy of the proposed map be attached to this document.) It is no accident that your federal government for the past several years has managed its outlying activities through ten fed­eral regions. These 10 newstates will be completely subservient to the federal government and creatures of it.

    ARTICLES III-VIII define the independent branches of government and their powers and duties. Under your present Constitution, the federal gov­ernment is divided into three co-equal branches -- the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. They were carefully set up according to a system of checks and balances in order to protect your freedoms from arbitrary government. But under their new constitution, there would be not three but six branches so structured that your present system of checks and balances are totally destroyed and those branches which are now not actually part of the govern­ment, i.e., IRS, Federal Reserve, etc., would become all powerful through governmental parenthood.

    The counterparts of your present three branches would be greatly changed and would be joined, further, by a Regulatory Branch to control your everyday affairs; a Planning Branch to plan your nation's economy; and an Electoral Branch to oversee, monitor, finance, and regulate all elections throughout the country.

    ARTICLE XI provides new procedures for constitutional amendments which are totally different from and more dangerous than those which now exist.

    ARTICLE XII provides for transition from your present representative and republican form of government to the new, cleverly disguised dictator­ship.

    Every word of their new constitution has been chosen carefully and for a purpose. Its basic nature and provisions are extremely revealing.

    CITIZENS' RIGHTS
    THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS

    First, consider the matter of individual citizens' rights. One right which is under powerful attack right now and which disappears in the new constitution is the right to bear arms. Instead, "The bearing of arms or the possession of lethal weapons shall be confined to the police, members of the armed forces, and those licensed under law." Regardless of what you may think about the ins and outs of the controversial "Gun Control" issue, you should be aware of the historical fact that disarming of the populace is always a part of any totali­tarian scheme. (See Protocols)

    TRIAL BY JURY

    They already have you on this one--it already becomes the whim of the lawyers and judges as to whether or not a "general" citizen with a "case" can have a jury--and then, the one demanding a jury has to pay for it. This has already happened to this very scribe. That, along with prejudgment by a judge in that five hearings were scheduled in a case involving their home and an S&L and the defendants were not allowed so much as a speech, nor was their attorney allowed presentation of the case.

    In this instance it involved the lack of public sale of "their" home (we shall write of this case, but not at this sitting) which was not held. The sale was ad­vertised, certified notices were sent--but no one showed up to hold the sale--in the Bakersfield City Hall, yet. Witnesses to the lack of sale were the elected City Treasurer and City Clerk. Both attended three court appearances in which the case was not allowed to come before the bench for lack of proper "cover sheet" on a document. Of course the defendants had to pay expenses to the city for absence of the officials (who where outraged--and helpless). At worst, it would have cost less than $500 to reoffer the sale (this was asked and emphatically denied as was any allowance for outside court compromise)--not so, my friends, attorneys fees have now exceeded $75,000,and eight court ses­sions wherein these ones have yet to be allowed to speak. The incumbent judge is also holding threat over these one's head for he is up for re-election in June and has publicly blamed these ones for his "troubles"--but, there is still an outstanding decision resting in the hands of three judges who did tem­porarily set aside one of his judgments--yet to be heard. It is only one more step in a line of at least eight more hearings which so far exceeds the cost of the home as to be foolish except for the lessons involved. At any rate these ones have lived in packed boxes for if the decision is against them, they can be evicted and their dwelling and property seized within 24 hours. This has naught to do with taxes, or broken laws. It was simply property purchased on a land contract and the original owners were foreclosed. Because there was a second investor, Santa Barbara Savings of California would not "deal"--and suggested these ones go to the public sale which is routinely performed on foreclosures and it would allow clearing of the title -- the rest is history. Ex­cept that Santa Barbara Savings is now in the hands of the Government for failure.

    The important information asked at mandatory depositions were things like, "Do you know your children's birthdays?" and a requirement to list them. Moreso, "Did you, Mr._______ , know your ex-wife's birthday?" This at $200 plus, per hour! You have trouble, little ones--real trouble!

    In other words, that right which disappears is that of trial by jury. Instead, as defined in Article VIII on the Judicial Branch, a presiding judge may de­cide whether a trial is to be of the investigatory or adversary type. An investi­gatory trial is the type used, for example, in the Soviet Union: you are pre­sumed guilty and must prove your innocence before a panel of judges. If an adversary trial is chosen, the judge is to decide whether there is to be a jury and how many jurors there shall be. There is no provision to prevent your jury, if any, from being a jury of one, who, as easily as not, could be your bitter enemy.

    As for how you might wind up in court in the first place, the section on "Rights" provides that "Searches and seizures shall be only on judicial war­rant". Now, that sounds reassuring, until you discover that nowhere in the new constitution are there any criteria given for the issuance of a judicial war­rant. In other words, it is totally arbitrary.

    PRACTICE OF RELIGION

    The practice of religion is said to be "privileged". That is not the same as freedom of religion, legally. A right is something which cannot be revoked. A privilege, however, is something you hold only at the pleasure of the govern­ment, which can revoke it at will. For instance, at present, it is a "privilege" to voluntarily file an income tax form. Everything they do within the IRS is unlawful--it is however, not illegal. Everything the government does is "legal" even if unlawful, and you had better begin to recognize the difference or there will soon be no difference.

    PROPERTY RIGHTS

    Consider the matter of property rights. Their new constitution states "No property shall be taken without compensation". But it does not say "just" compensation. The omission of that one little word "just" -- after over 40 drafts -- cannot be accidental, my friends. It would permit the government to seize your house, give you $1.00, and say, "We gave you compensation." Frightening? Oh, I sincerely do hope so!

    DECLARED EMERGENCY

    The preoccupation with declared emergency is prominent with respect to rights. In Article VI of their new constitution, the reasons and procedures for declaration of emergency are prescribed. Among other things, it states that emergency can be declared for no better reason than "if an extra-ordinary ad­vantage be anticipated". It does not say advantage to whom, but obviously it means advantage to the government or the Presidential branch. It has already been utilized and tried out on you ones and you raved approval--how about the invasion of Panama???????

    Observe that Article I of their constitution says that freedom of expres­sion, of communication, of movement, of assembly and of petition are abridged in declared emergency. Peaceful public gatherings to discuss public issues may also be interrupted or denied. Writs of habeas corpus are also suspended in declared emergency, which means you could be locked up and held indefinitely without the preferring of any charges.

    RESPONSIBILITIES
    With respect to the so-called "Responsibilities" defined in their new consti­tution, the potential dangers tend to be more subtle: "Each citizen shall par­ticipate in the processes of democracy, assisting in the selection of officials and in the monitoring of their conduct in office." Several points even in this one sentence would merit comment, but simply consider the word "shall". This is a command--and then go back and reread the Protocols. You shall participate. Not that you have the discretion to participate. And if you do not do so, you are violating the most basic law of the land, the new constitution. Compare the constitutions of all communist-led countries, also.

    The Newstates are simply puppets of the federal government. "If govern­ments of the Newstates fail to carry out fully their constitutional duties, their officials shall be warned, and may be required by the Senate on the recom­mendation of the Watchkeeper, to forfeit revenues from the Newstates of America." You have no doubt already heard of various cases in which certain localities have been forced to forfeit their revenue sharing funds because of failure to comply with federal "guidelines", so-called.

    IT CAN HAPPEN TO YOU!!! IT CAN HAPPEN TO YOU!!!

    THE PRESIDENCY

    Consider now the counterpart of your executive branch, which in the new constitution is simply called counterpart Presidency". The President is a "strong man", able to call all the shots. He is to serve for a single term of 9 years. You may have noticed the "single term" idea popping up lately; and even the 9-year length has been suggested by some in print and speech. Their secret new constitution is the source of that idea, dear ones.

    THE VICE-PRESIDENT

    There are also two Vice-Presidents (it has already been put into play in Panama--remember--"the two vice-presidents were taken" (in the "coup") just last week, while "the President (Endara) was somewhere in America!" Then, your President pronounced it all a hoax and the incident immediately banned from all news releases of any kind on the basis (secretly) of "national security". One VP is designated for "General Affairs", first in line of Presidential succession in case of disability; the other designated for "Internal Affairs" and second in line. There are detailed provisions for Presidential and Vice-Presidential disability, with appointment playing a key role as in your present 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Note especially that Section 5 of Article V provides that "Candidates for the presidency and the vice-presiden­cies shall be natural-born citizens." The key word here is Candidates. All a foreign-person need say is, "I am doing nothing to become a candidate"; or, "I said I was not a candidate"; or, "I am not even a candidate, so therefore I can­not remove myself as a candidate for the vice-presidency"; or, "I am out to support the President's programs, how can I remove myself when I am not on it..." Under this section, therefore, a foreign-born person could well become president (and it is all carefully planned to produce exactly that result) once he is nominated by a president, in the event there is an office vacancy in one or both of the vice-presidencies, followed by succession when a president be­comes disabled for any reason. This is the very reason the Presidential Advi­sors are ever so much more powerful than any of the Cabinet members! And guess who has headed the Advisor list until just recently! Now he is indepen­dent and is even more dangerous than ever--yes, dear ones, Mr. Kissinger.

    A provision which exemplifies the power of the president is "Treaties or agreements with other nations negotiated under the President's authority shall be in effect unless objected to by a majority of the Senate with 90 days." PAY ATTENTION! URGENT! THE TRILATERALS AND BILDER­BERGERS ARE MEETING RIGHT NOW TO DECIDE WHICH TREATIES WILL BE SIGNED AT THE UPCOMING SUMMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Here is a pattern which permeates the new constitution, wherein all sorts of actions take effect unless objected to by a majority, instead of resulting from positive approval by a majority. This even applies in the matter of con­stitutional amendment, in which amendments generated by the Judicial Branch take effect unless turned down by a majority of the people. Well, the people never hear about these things already and no-one is told purposely in Congress, so 90 days pass and zilch is done. Automatically you have new con­stitutions, laws, etc., and you never even know it until you are placed under ar­rest or undergo search and seizure which you thought was illegal. "Whoops" simply doesn't cut it, friends.

    Under the Presidency, there is also to be a new official called the "Intendant", whose powers are potentially those of the commander of a na­tionwide Gestapo. The actual working, of course, sounds relatively mild to the unwary. The danger lies in what is not said and the limits that are not im­posed. He is to supervise offices for Intelligence and Investigation, as well as an Office of Emergency Organization. His role here reflects a preoccupation with emergency that crops up again and again throughout the new constitu­tion. The word "emergency" appears 13 times in the new constitution; it does not appear even once in your present Constitution. Constitutional provisions for declaration of emergency, of course, have been used time after time in re­cent years to terminate freedom in other countries, and preparation and se­cret usage is in full force in your country. Note the Banking Emergency Reg­ulations which we have already shared with you readers.

    THE INTENDANT

    The Intendant is also given the authority to charter tax-exempt founda­tions or corporations that are "determined by him to be for useful public pur­poses". There is no check whatsoever on his authority to do this. This only re­flects the unbridled authority of the President himself under the new constitu­tion, however. It does not provide for accountability of an unscrupulous President.

    Their constitution gives the President all the tools he needs to establish unchallenged authority during the transition period from our present to the new constitution, as described in Article XII. This open invitation for him to assume any and all powers he deems appropriate speaks for itself.

    Furthermore, with respect to the replacement of present governmental functions by those defined by their constitution, "The President shall deter­mine when replacement is complete." Since only the president is given this power, there is really nothing to prevent him from freezing the process part­way through, for example, after abolishing our present Congress and before appointing the new one. It is very possible that these two very short passages are the real crux of their secret new constitution. But just to round out the President's guarantees of invulnerability, their new constitution also affords a remarkable license to lie in Article IX. Of the three exceptions noted therein, "treason" is of no force and effect, since it is nowhere defined in the new constitution. Now, do you still question who are your "treasonists"?

    LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

    Given the power of the President under the new constitution, the rest of the government would really have only whatever status their President al­lowed it to have. However, the Legislative Branch would consist of a Senate and House of Representatives, as now. But there the similarities end. Sena­tors would no longer be elected at all; instead they would be hand-picked ap­pointees of the President, plus former Presidents and Vice-Presidents, and would serve for life. The House of Representatives would have 400 members, but there would be only 100 congressional districts. Each district would elect 3 representatives who would serve for 3-year terms. These would be expected to compete with one another instead of speaking with one voice; so this device would effectively undermine local representation at the national level. There would also be 100 representatives elected "at large" from the nation as a whole instead of individual districts. The "at large" members would form the backbone of what little is left to the House: they would serve for 9-year terms, and would be the ones eligible to become committee chairmen.

    JUDICIAL BRANCH.

    The Judicial Branch would be presided over by a Principal Justice, chosen by the President's hand-picked or rubber-stamp Senate. He would be a judi­cial "czar", controlling the entire judicial system of the nation with the aid of a Judicial Council and Judiciary Assembly. The Judicial Council would be the originator of all constitutional amendments and would have the duty to con­sider amending their constitution to legalize unconstitutional steps taken by the government from time to time and at random.

    REGULATORY BRANCH

    The Regulatory Branch is foreshadowed by many current developments. But the most notable feature of this Branch, aside from its grip on the nation's enterprises generally, is the blessing given to cartel arrangements called "Authorities". It states, "Member enterprises of an Authority shall be exempt from other regulation." But as for the "little guys", who do come under the government's regulation, it says, "Nonmembers shall be required to maintain the same standards as those prescribed for members". The "Standards" pre­scribed would be those agreed upon by the cartel members and nonmembers would not be allowed even to exceed those standards if they wanted to do so for competitive reasons.

    PLANNING BRANCH

    The Planning Branch is foreshadowed by the increasing clamor for "economic planning" by the present Domestic Council of the White House and by the national land-use planning legislation. It would consist of a 15- member board appointed by the President. They would prepare 6-and 12-year plans and budgets to reflect the desires of the President, who would submit the budgets to the House of Representatives for their rubber-stamp approval each year.

    ELECTORAL BRANCH

    The Electoral Branch is also on its way piecemeal, through public fi­nancing of election campaigns, quota systems, and now the newly operational Federal Election Commission, whose regulations do not apply to the present vice-presidency office...

    Under their new constitution, there is to be an electoral "Overseer" in charge of the Electoral Branch, chosen by the President's hand picked Senate, and he is to "supervise the organization of national and district parties, ar­range for the discussions among them, and provide for the nomination and election of candidates for public office." All electoral processes are to be paid for out of tax money; and no party can run candidates if it is not "recognized" by the Overseer. There are quota systems for apportionment of public funds that clearly would help drive out small parties and tend ultimately toward a one-party system. Furthermore, the Overseer is to monitor, supervise, and regulate the election process completely. All the power necessary to convert elections into a meaningless exercise is provided the Electoral Branch under their secret new constitution.

    SUMMATION

    Now sit quietly for a moment and PRAY! Ask the Divine God Creator in in Light to sit with you--and then, please, get furious, panicked, angry and get ready to ACT! I am accused of giving you no hope? I am accused of doom and gloom! IT CANNOT GET ANY GLOOMIER OR MORE DOOMED THAN THIS! HOPE? ALL YOU HAVE IS HOPE! With action ap­propriately manifested you not only have hope, you have recourse. That is, if you stop your dallying about which "channel' approves "who" and "who's Ha­tonn is who's" and "Who's Sananda might or might not be THE real Jesus Sananda". HE COMES FORTH TO SHOW YOU THE WAY AND BRING TRUTH! HOW MANY WILL HEAR--IN TIME? SO BE IT.

    I can only observe that their secret new constitution is not new at all. It is ac­tually a prescription for the oldest kind of government of all: one-man rule. It is the slippage backward into the bad old ways of the past that you have seen increasingly during your brief lifetime, brought about by increasingly ignoring your own Constitution, which is still the newest idea in government. It is all a planned and carefully laid blueprint for the ending of freedom for "you the people". You better study those Zionist Protocols and Plans most carefully, my brothers, for in many instances, it is already too late.

    You have celebrated your 200th anniversary as the rebirth of your nation---or was it the death of your free republic? Your Constitution was the product of distilling the experience of 5,000 years of civilization. Only slightly over 200 years old, it is still practically new -- especially since you have not used it much lately. If God would grant you the option of doing so at this late hour, there is truly a new start you can make with full confidence in the results---but an additional 14 years have passed since that anniversary. You had better closely look at that which has transpired in just those 14 years. You are out of time, my friends.

    The new start is to pick up your present, unique Constitution and demand that it be again utilized in every component--in every detail. Demand the ceasing of the raping of your "Justice System" and all of your freedoms. Stop the bribery and purchasing of your political representatives. If you would de­mand use of, and use yourself, your Constitution, it would be the first time in your lifetime that this has been done.

    YOU CAN CHANGE IT ALL IF YOU WANT TO. IF YOU CARE NOT ENOUGH TO GET UP AND TAKE A STAND AND DEMAND TRUTH IN GOD AND CONSTITUTION, YOU ARE DESTINED FOR THE DEATH OF FREEDOM--AND VERY SOON INDEED.

    SALU, SALU, SALU.

    MAY GOD HEAR YOUR PETITION AND GIVE UNTO YOU GUIDANCE.

    I AM HATONN TO CLEAR, PLEASE.

  2. #12
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar
    가입일
    2004-07-16
    게시글
    1,180
    힐링에너지
    100

    Default

    PJ 15
    CHAPTER 21

    A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF THE EXISTING U.S.
    CONSTITUTION AND A PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL

    By Patrick Gage June 1990

    It is very instructional to compare point-by-point the existing US Constitution with its Amendments and the "Proposed Constitutional Model" as docu­mented in the book "The Emerging Constitution" by Rexford Tugwell. Rela­tive comparisons of these documents have been made by Hatonn in previous Phoenix Journal Expresses and in this Journal.

    The purpose of this portion is to allow documentation from an interested reader, just like yourself, who has gone to the trouble of investigating these is­sues in some detail. For clarity of comparison, I would prefer to print the en­tire US Constitution with its Amendments on the left pages of this book, and the corresponding replacement from the proposed model on the right pages --­line for line -- to really see what is proposed (or rather -- what is left out!). This cannot be done in this present Journal, so a summary must suffice here. However, I do plan to create such a line-by-line comparison that should be available through America West for a nominal low cost by the end of July.

    I should point out that I am not a historian or a lawyer. I am, however, a very concerned and well educated citizen that is deeply interested in what is RE­ALLY going on here.

    REFERENCES

    Copies of the Original US Constitution with its 26 Amendments may be ob­tained for 75 cents from: THE SPOTLIGHT or the Liberty Lobby, 300 Inde­pendence Ave. S. E., Washington, D. C. 20003. Copies may also be found in reference books and local libraries - although some printed versions may be different than the actual original. The "Proposed Constitutional Model" is given on pages 595 thru 621 of "The Emerging Constitution," Rexford G. Tugwell, copyright 1974, Harper's Magazine Press, Harper & Row Publishers Inc., 10 East 53rd Street, New York, NY 10022. I was able to find the first edition (ISBN 0-06-128225-10) in a local library filed under 342.73 T915E. This book contains fourteen (14) chapters, composed of various papers, and the last chapter being entitled: "A Proposed Constitutional Model for the Newstates of America."

    WHAT IS THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL

    As stated in the book's Prefatory Note (Preface):

    "The chapters of this book were written as papers to be discussed at the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions. This was a continuing project and was contributed to not only by the Senior Fellows of the Center but by many Visiting Fellows during several years. After discussion the papers were revised and gradually assumed their present form.

    "The papers were the background for a succession of constitutional mod­els. These served to focus and to make more precise the constitutional changes believed to be necessary after nearly two hundred years. There were frequent modifications to the model, and the number of revisions grew to forty. Still more are in prospect to meet the criteria of the papers. (... and later at the end ...)

    "This is said with due respect for time and its inevitable effects. One emerging conclusion has been that coming generations ought not to be pre­cluded from making their own basic law. This offering is for now and the im­mediate -- not the far - future."

    Also, in the last part of Chapter 13, "The Emerging Situation: A Summary":

    "The year of 1787 was peculiarly a year of transition. The original compact among the states had failed to maintain a general government, and the life of the nation was in jeopardy. (...)

    "The people were to be sovereign and were to choose their representa­tives. This indicated a government whose limitations were strictly marked. The tripartite structure reflected these ideas, its branches opposed to one an­other so that none would accumulate oppressive powers.

    "Concern for protection from arbitrary authority was much stronger than the desire for governmental services. (...)

    "If the Constitution's deficiencies for these later days is accepted as sub­stantially accurate, several characteristics are conspicuous.

    "One of these is the blurring of borders on every side, of an amorphous mass, with consequent inability to say with authority what any clause means. This results from many tentative testings. All three branches have invaded the no man's land between them and have sometimes found themselves in conflict with the other branches. And all three have assumed powers re­garded as necessary to their responsibilities but not mentioned in the original charter.

    "There would seem to be a choice, now that this indeterminateness has become so prominent a characteristic, between accepting it as a satisfactory method of constitutional change or rejecting it in favor of a renewed effort, similar to that of 1787, to assign powers and responsibilities within govern­ment and the rights and duties of the citizen. (... and later at the end on page 591...)

    "Meanwhile it can do no harm to consider what a rejuvenated Constitution would he like; such an exercise may even constitute a demonstration of the distance we have come from the venerated original and how its provisions are being tortured in the constant conflict over its archaic meanings. The inten­tion of this book has been to demonstrate that such restructuring is, indeed, necessary.

    (Chapter 14 Preface, page 592

    "The arrangements argued for in this book would naturally lead to the formulation of a new model. (...)

    "No such model can ever be regarded as finished. It can only be said that it is what has seemed best at the time. Changes will still be made in the fu­ture, (...)

    'There are other changes, some in the Presidency, some in the Judiciary, but none of them is drastic. There have been complaints about both. As to the Presidency it has been concluded that its faults are mostly to be found in the Congress. (... and at the end of the Chapter 14 Preface ...)

    "It remains to say that the Center fellows are convinced that the time has come for a reassessment of our basic law. The model here is to be taken as a beginning, not an end."

    SOME GENERAL THOUGHTS

    I am sure that the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions and its Fellows were then, and still are now, trying to do their very best to restructure the Constitution in their perception to alleviate its currently perceived prob­lems and changes with the changing times. Many people support this effort. Many are dead-set against it.

    Regardless of your point of view -- REMEMBER: that what can occur as a re­sult of a convened Constitutional Convention can have little or no resem­blance of whatever draft is presented. It has happened before! I feel we were/are fortunate to have had the proper representatives and supporters present at the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

    CONTENTS COMPARISONS

    As Hatonn has described the Original US Constitution in detail, I will only summarize that it contains seven (7) Articles and twenty-six (26) Amend­ments -- the first ten Amendments being our Bill of Rights. In contrast, the Proposed Model contains twelve (12) Articles and no Amendments -- all changes being incorporated directly into the new text for each Article. Also, the order and contents of each Article of the Proposed Model are different than that of the Original Constitution, so direct comparisons are a bit difficult.

    The abbreviations "(Now)" and "(Model)" will be used to denote the original and current U.S. Constitution, and the above "Proposed Constitutional Model", respectively. The quotes will use the exact same lower- and upper­case letters as the references. This can be revealing in the intent in the read­ings. I will cover the Preamble, Bill of Rights, and some general insights of my own.

    THE PREAMBLES

    (Now) "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.'

    (Model) "So that we may join in common endeavors, welcome the future in good order, and create an adequate and self-repairing government - we, the people, do establish the Newstates of America, herein provided to be ours, and do ordain this Constitution whose supreme law shall be until the time prescribed for it shall have run."

    (Say what? -- Author's note.)

    THE DECLARED EMERGENCY

    The phrases "in declared emergency", "in emergency", "national emergency", "the emergency", "the circumstances extreme", "a limited emergency", "during emergency", "in emergencies", occur a total of at least nine times that I found during just one casual reading. Nowhere did I find what the definition or set of events was that is necessary to cause a not-emergency to become an emer­gency. This is very important, as you will see below.

    UNDER LAW

    There are also numerous references to your rights or privileges being given "under law". I counted at least seven instances of such phrases. Again, it is not clear what that law or set of laws are, and how they may be superseded by executive privilege during an "emergency".

    YOUR BILL OF RIGHTS


    • 1. FREEDOM OF RELIGION, SPEECH, PRESS, AND ASSEMBLY


    (Now) "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    (Model: Article I, Rights and Responsibilities; A. Rights; Section 1) "Freedom of expression, of communication, of movement, of assembly, or of petition shall not be abridged except in declared emergency."
    (Section 8) "The practice of religion shall be privileged; but no religion shall be imposed by some on others, and none shall have public support."

    (Model: Article I, A. Rights; Section 7) "It shall be public policy to promote
    discussion of public issues and to encourage peaceful public gatherings for this purpose. Permission to hold such gatherings shall not be denied, nor shall they be interrupted, except in declared emergency or on a showing of imminent danger to public order and on judicial warrant."

    (Model: Article I, A. Rights; Section 3) "Public communicators may decline to reveal sources of information, but shall be responsible for hurtful disclosures."


    • 2. THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS


    (Now) "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    (Model: Article I; B. Responsibilities; Section 8) "There shall be a responsi­bility to avoid violence and to keep the peace; for this reason the bearing of arms or the possession of lethal weapons shall be confined to the police, members of the armed forces, and those licensed under law."


    • 3. QUARTERING OF SOLDIERS


    (Now) "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."

    4. UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE

    (Now) "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the per­sons or things to be seized."

    (Model: Article I; A. Rights; Section 4) The privacy of individuals shall be re­spected; searches and seizures shall be made only on judicial warrant; persons shall be pursued or questioned only for the prevention of crime or the appre­hension of suspected criminals, and only according to rules established under the law."

    5. DUE PROCESS OF LAW

    (Now) "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infa­mous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual ser­vice in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

    (Model: Article I; A. Rights; Section 12) "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. No property shall be taken without compensation."

    (Model: Article I; A. Rights; Section 14) "No person shall be placed twice in jeopardy for the same offense."

    (Model: Article I; A. Rights; Section 13) "Legislatures shall define crimes and conditions requiring restraint, but confinement shall not be for punishment; and, when possible, there shall be preparation for return to freedom."

    6. SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL AND RIGHT OF COUNSEL

    (Now) "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trail, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compul­sory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."

    (Model: Article I; A. Rights; Section 15) "Writs of habeas corpus shall not be suspended except in declared emergency."

    (Model: Article I; A. Rights; Section 16) "Accused persons shall be informed of charges against them, shall have a speedy trial, shall have reasonable bail, shall be allowed to confront witnesses or to call others, and shall not be com­pelled to testify against themselves; at the time of arrest they shall be in­formed of their right to be silent and to have counsel, provided, if necessary, at public expense; and courts shall consider the contention that prosecution may be under an invalid or unjust statute."

    7. RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY

    (Now) "In suits of common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."

    8. NO CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT

    (Now) "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

    9. NOT TO DENY RIGHTS RETAINED BY THE PEOPLE

    (Now) "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

    (Model: Article I, B. Responsibilities, Section 1) "Each freedom of the citizen shall prescribe a corresponding responsibility not to diminish that of others: of speech, communication, assembly, and petition, to grant the same freedom to others; of religion, to respect that of others; of privacy, not to invade that of others; of the holding and disposal of property, the obligation to extend the same privilege to others."

    10. POWERS RESERVED TO THE PEOPLE
    (Now) "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

    (Model: Article I; A. Rights; Section 6) "All persons shall have equal protec­tion of the laws, and in all electoral procedures the vote of every eligible citi­zen shall count equally with others."

    (Model: Article I, B. Responsibilities, Section 3) "Protection of the law shall be repaid by assistance in its enforcement; this shall include respect for the procedures of justice, apprehension of lawbreakers, and testimony at trial."

    (Model: Article I, B. Responsibilities, Section 6) "Each shall pay whatever share of governmental costs is consistent with fairness to all."

    (Model: Article I, B. Responsibilities, Section 13) "All rights and responsibili­ties defined herein shall extend to such associations of citizens as may be de­fined by law."

    OF GENERAL INTEREST

    (Now) One President and one Vice-President, each having a four year term.

    (Model) One President and two Vice Presidents, each having a nine year term, and salaries for life.

    (Model: Article I; A. Rights; Section 2) "Access to information possessed by governmental agencies shall not be denied except in the interests of national security; but communications among officials necessary to decision making shall be privileged."

    (Model: Article I; A. Rights; Section 5) "There shall be no discrimination be­cause of race, creed, color, origin, or sex. The Court of Rights and Responsi­bilities may determine whether selection for various occupations has been dis­criminatory."

    (Model: Article II, The Newstates; Section 9) "Taxes on land may be at higher rates than those on its improvements."

    (Model: Article V, The Presidency; Section 3) "Responsible for the Vice-President for General Affairs there shall be Chancellors of External, Finan­cial, Legal, and Military Affairs. (...) The Chancellor of Military affairs shall act for the presidency in disposing all armed forces except militia commanded by governors; but these shall be available for national service at the Presi­dent's convenience. Except in declared emergency, the deployment of forces in far waters or in other nations without their consent shall be notified in ad­vance to a national security committee of the Senate hereinafter provided."

    (Model: Article VI, The Legislative Branch, A. The Senate, Section 8) "In time of present or prospective danger caused by cataclysm, by attack, or by in­surrection, the Senate may declare a national emergency and may authorize the President to take appropriate action. If the Senate be dispersed, and no quorum available, the President may proclaim the emergency, and may ter­minate it unless the Senate shall have acted. If the President is not available, and the circumstances extreme, the senior serving member of the presidential succession may act until a quorum assembles."

    (Model: Article VI, The Legislative Branch, A. The Senate, Section 9) The Senate may also define and declare a limited emergency in time of prospec­tive danger, or of local or regional disaster, or if an extraordinary advantage be anticipated. It shall be considered by the House of Representatives within three days and, unless disapproved, may be extended for a designated period and for a limited area before renewal. Extraordinary expenditures during emergency may be approved, without regard to usual budget procedures, by the House of Representatives with the concurrence of the President."

    (Model: Article VI, The Legislative Branch, B. The House of Representa­tives, Section 9) "It shall he the duty of the House to make the laws concern­ing taxes." And it goes on for 21 subcategories in that area alone!

    (Model: Article X, Governmental Arrangements; Section 5) "The fiscal year shall be the same as the calendar year, with new appropriations available at its beginning."

    (Model: Article XII, Transition; Section 6) "Constitutions of the Newstates shall be established as arranged by the Judicial Council and the Principle Jus­tice."

    (Now) The Constitution is modified by its current amendment and ratifica­tion procedures.

    (Model: Article XI, Amendment; Section 2) "When this Constitution shall have been in effect for twenty-five years the Overseer shall ask, by referen­dum, whether a new Constitution shall be prepared. If a majority so decide, the Council, making use of such advice as may be available, and consulting those who have made complaint, shall prepare a new draft for submission at the next election. If not disapproved by a majority it shall be in effect. If dis­approved it shall be redrafted and resubmitted with changes as may then be appropriate to the circumstances, and it shall be submitted to the voters at the following election. If not disapproved by a majority it shall be in effect. If dis­approved it shall be restudied and resubmitted."

    IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE

    This may sound like or Doom and Gloom Hatonn -- and it is not! This is the latest published version of a proposed Constitution brought to you by the best legal experts in the field per 1974, sixteen years ago! What US Corporation international agreements and treaties, Presidential international agreements and treaties, and other UN, CIA, and FBI agreements and treaties that have been made to date that may have superseded (have replaced) our current Constitutional Rights -- I know not. What would constitute a "state of emergency" to supersede all of your proposed Constitutional rights? -- I know not: but I do know that large numbers of people are very easily frightened by cloud formations and weather balloons! I remain very concerned.
    PJ 15
    EPILOGUE
    REC/T #1 SANANDA

    SATURDAY, JUNE 2, 1990 7:00 A.M. YEAR 3 DAY 290
    I Am here, Thomas, yes, I Am Sananda in the golden Radiance, come of the Father to bring his people home. Peace he unto thee this glorious day.

    Your Founding Fathers were men of integrity and great wisdom and insight. The Constitution, which was so carefully constructed for your collective benefit, held within it certain values and ways of living that today, and in recent years, are being eroded to the point of obliteration. The Founding Fathers knew what man was capable of, both good and bad, for they had experienced it...this is why the distribution of power, the balancing of responsibility.

    All men require privacy. All men (again, a generic term for hu-man) want to prosper. All men want to defend themselves in times of conflict. All men want to express their views in an unbridled manner, freely. So many of the principles your Constitution was founded on are in full jeopardy, hear me, that to live the life to come will be far, far worse than you can imagine, for to have known freedom, or your perception of freedom, and to have it then taken from thee, 'tis the greatest of pain and sorrow.

    The Founding Fathers framed your Constitution based on certain basic inherent values..."we hold these truths to be self-evident"...values that facilitate the nurturing of family. You must return to the values of God and family and community. You have steered so far off your course that you are floundering, knowing not which way to turn. Any so called leader who comes forth with a silver tongue is perceived as "knowing"...nay, nay.

    The very structure of the Constitution allows for full abundance within freedom...as God intended. Why are you so willing to cast aside that which is the greatest governing document ever written on your placement? You must not allow these freedoms to slip through your lives, for the life at the other end is filled with fear and hardship which you can not imagine...I say it is filled with fear and hardship that you CAN NOT IMAGINE!

    Oh, blessed ones of our gracious Father, return to Light which you are, the Light which I Am. You hear the phrase bantered about by your President Bush, "A thousand points of light,' nay millions...millions of beings of light searching for redirection back toward values which have been trampled and soiled...millions of beings of light who are the hope for humanity if you will but awaken in time to see that which is before your very noses. Awaken! Awaken! Do not allow the Constitutional Convention to take place for it can not be controlled...do not listen to those who tell you it can, it is A LIE. Oh dear ones, I implore thee, return to your values, return to the values that will allow for the wholeness of the family in prosperity within community once again. What stops you? Don't you care about these things? How can you not, it is thy very lives on the bargaining table and you are not being told, you are not being told!

    You have seen the three hour lines for one sausage in Russia and elsewhere. Do you think that is bad? That is nothing, you will wait three days for a bite of a sausage! Fear, I speak not of fear, I tell thee truth, do not close me out...for I and the hosts I bring are here to help you. It is not too late to change of it. You have become so lost in the daily living, sluggish, uncaring, that it seems nothing will stir you but money! Well soon your money will be all but useless and it is food and shelter that ye shall cling to, if ye can, and there is great danger therein without arms to protect your family, and without a "community" to protect one another.

    I speak here of man against man, brother against brother, lost parents, violence and rape, killing and blood-letting that are reminiscent of Genghis Khan -- lost, lost--whole hordes of starving desperate people roaming the freeways, for, of course, there will be no fuel. What will you do when the bank takes your home? Where will you go? It can't happen to you? When the money falls, collapses, is your job safe? Is it? What else can you do? Well you had better think on these things and get just mad enough to do something before it is too late, because the writing is on the wall...if ye wait much longer it shall be carved in stone, tombstones mostly...but there won't be time for the marking of graves, for survival of self will come first.

    Come back, blessed ones of God, come back unto truth, come back unto me. Return to love, return to family, return to community...brother with brother, I implore thee. Your freedom is at stake, nothing less. And I tell thee there is nothing greater on your place. Do not allow this to happen while there is yet time. Once the hourglass is turned it will be too late. Where will you be then? Where will you stand? For all must decide where they will be with God...ye will either be with God or against God, no fence-sitting allowed...for in God's kingdoms if you are on the fence you are against God. Hold it in your hearts, for time draws short indeed.

    I do not tell you these things to instill fear. I tell you these things to instill strength. For in God's name, in Light, all things are possible, ALL! Come back unto God, blessed ones of the lie, come back.

    I Am Sananda
    Jesus Immanuel of old
    I Am One with The Blessed Father

    Who might you be?

    **********
    WHAT CAN YOU DO?
    THIS NEXT PORTION WILL PLEASE BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE FORWARD. THEN PLACE IT IN ITS PROPER SE­QUENCE WITHIN THE JOURNAL. THEN PLEASE PLACE IT AT THE ENDING OF TILE EPILOGUE. YOU ARE IN SERIOUS CIRCUMSTANCE AND THIS IS SOMETHING IN WHICH EACH OF YOU CAN ACTIVELY BECOME INVOLVED INSTEAD OF WRINGING YOUR HANDS AND BEING SLOWLY EATEN ALIVE. THERE IS ALWAYS "HOPE" IF YOU LISTEN AND WAIT UPON GOD! HE WILL ALWAYS RESPOND WITH THE "WAY"--IT IS UP TO YOU WHAT YOU DO WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS IN YOUR FREE-WILL STATE OF BEING. I IMPLORE YOU TO TAKE CAREFUL NOTE, PUT ASIDE QUANDARY AS TO "SOURCE" OF THIS WRITING, LOOK WITH REASON AND THEN ACT!

    You can enter into action with other groups already started. Surprisingly enough there is even a group brave enough to move forward with a drive to repeal the 16th Amendment (which was never lawfully ratified anyway) and abolish the "personal" income tax. This does surprise you, does it not?

    The drive to obtain endorsements for the program has been carried out with great energy in all the state capitals. Did any of you notice or respond to the lists? Or, did you snicker and say, "What's the use?" Did you even see the name list takers? As a result the legislatures of Wyoming, Texas, Nevada, Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi, Arizona and Indiana have approved what is known as the Liberty Amendment. This is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would repeal the 16th Amendment. It was first introduced in Congress as H.R. Res. 23.

    Now, look closely at what has happened to these states by MOTHER NATURE???? No, little sleepyheads, Mother Nature has had very little to do with what has struck these areas. It is totally man-precipitated in order to cause need for federal disaster funds and get rid of any notion of withdrawing taxes!

    Thousands of petitions and hundreds of thousands of signatures have been obtained in support of "Yes on 23". And these have been and are being submitted to the members of Congress. The members are being urged to submit the Liberty Amendment to all the state legislatures. Do you get a more clearly defined picture as to the need of a Constitutional Convention to block such citizen moves? You are about to demand your freedom back and the conspirators must work faster and faster and more destructively to stop you. Will you allow of it? That is up to you the people!

    The proposed amendment has four sections:

    Sect. 1. The government of the United States shall not engage in any business, profession, commercial, financial or industrial enterprise, except as specified in the Constitution.

    Sect. 2. The Constitution of any state, or the Congress of the United States shall not be subject to the terms of any foreign or domestic agreement which would abrogate this amendment.

    Sect. 3. The activities of the United States government which violate the intent and purpose of this amendment shall within a period of three years from the date of the ratification of this amendment, be liquidated and the properties and facilities affected shall be sold.

    Sect. 4. Three years after the ratification of this amendment, the 16th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States shall stand repealed and thereafter Congress shall not levy taxes on personal income, estates and/or gifts.

    By the way, the man who worked with unabated zeal to get this done in your behalf was "taken out" in 1989. His name was Willis Stone and we honor him for his daring greatness!

    WHAT WOULD BE THE ADVANTAGES OF SUCH

    AN AMENDMENT?

    * Repeal the "personal" federal income tax.

    * Balance the budget by limiting congressional expenditures to those specified in the Constitution.

    * Stop the withholding tax and restore the right of the worker to take home a full paycheck.

    * Bring down interest rates, thereby making it possible for people, especially young couples, to enjoy the American dream of owning their homes, as earlier generations were able to do. Without this, it is impossible for a nation to prosper.

    * Stop inflation caused by government deficit spending.

    * Transfer to the states and the people the millions of acres of land, comprising more than one-third of the entire land area of the country, now held by the federal government in violation of the Constitution.

    * Stop the federal government from taxing Americans to support foreign governments. The cost of this "aid" has now reached approximately $3 trillion--more than the entire national debt.

    * Halt federal confiscation of properties and enterprises through high taxes and burdensome regulations.

    * Limit the Defense Department to the business of defending us and stop it 237
    from operating commercial enterprises in competition with those it is supposed to defend.

    * Rescue you from the politicians' Ponzi scheme, the Social Security system.

    * Cut federal spending to less than half of what it is now--immediately.

    * Stop impoverishing the taxpayers with poverty programs.

    * End federal control, interference with and harassment of private schools.

    * Eliminate the special privilege of tax exemptions for foundations.

    * Liberate farmers from federal control.

    * Restore honest money. Abolish the Federal Reserve debt-money swindle.

    * Stop lending tax dollars to special interests.

    * Halt the terrible waste of billions of hours' and dollars' worth of effort now wasted in filling out government forms.

    * Let the people concentrate on productive pursuits instead of playing crazy "tax loophole" games.

    * Stop government competition with private enterprise.

    * * * * * * * * *

    More information is available from Yes on 23, USE THIS PLEASE: BOX 2386 EL CAJON, CALIF. 92021; ENCLOSE A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. THEN FIND OUT HOW TO GET LINED UP TO TAKE ACTION IN THE MOST EFFECTIVE MANNER!

    THEY WILL SEND YOU A PAMPHLET ENTITLED HOW TO GET RID OF THE INCOME TAX AND WIN 45 BATTLES AT ONCE.

    * * * * * * * * * * *
    GYEORGOS CERES HATONN

주제글 정보

Users Browsing this Thread

이 주제글은 현재 1명이 열람중입니다. (0명의 회원과 1명의 손님)

유사한 글

  1. PJ#014, RAPE, RAVAGE, PILLAGE AND PLUNDER OF THE PHOENIX, VOL. I
    By wave in forum Phoenix Journals Archives
    관련글: 13
    최신 글: 2011-01-18, 02:37

이 주제글의 글단추(태그)

글쓰기 규칙

  • 새 글 작성이 불가능함
  • 응답글 작성이 불가능함
  • 파일 첨부가 불가능함
  • 내 글 수정이 불가능함
  •