PJ#042, UNHOLY ALLIANCE

[wave]

PJ 42

CHAPTER 11

REC #1 HATONN

WED., JANUARY 8, 1992 9:48 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 145

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 8 1992

TODAY'S WATCH

As we sit to pen today, I am flooded with so many subjects of pressing importance that I am stymied by the mass of subjects, each seemingly as important as any other. Let us ask God's presence within us as we read and each will be guided to that which impacts himself most--then, by sharing, perhaps we can find Truth and Light.

I have been reminded that the next issue of the LIBERATOR will be sent to thousands of alternative medicine persons and physicians. They already know the problems in their own limitation of life prac­tice so it would seem superfluous to recreate "the wheel" with them.

Suffice it to say that it is by much higher forms of killing by murder within the projection of the so-called medical sciences and govern­ment sciences and military sciences that ones are and shall become sickened unto death. Therefore it always returns to the political in­sanity which must be recognized, revealed and then dismantled, if there is ever to be good health upon your orb.

There are writers who have had insight into these matters and I can only ask that you seek into these sources of information for we need not repeat and repeat that which is already documented, confirmed and literally present in your ability to garner the information. The problem is that most of you are barely blinking of your blinded eyes and are at great disadvantage. I do not wish you to consider "Hatonn" in any manner at this point other than you would any writer of "truth" in any aspect of your physical plane. I have cre­dentials which give me "expert status" from far higher universities than a Yale or Harvard in any comparison--however, my task is to give you what you MUST have and then ask that you confirm and act. I have written on Biological and Chemical warfare and the sub­stances utilized. Please go back and read those JOURNALS, as well as the revealing of the source, invention and cause, as well as why the need, for AIDS. I cannot take time to cover it again when it is so readily available and already confirmed in almost all details.

I wish for you, before we go further, to understand--again--your plight of the day. Lies, misinformation, disinformation and a totally controlled media which presents all of these things unto you, delib­erately and with full knowledge, for it is a part of the Plan.

CONFIRMATION

It has come full cycle since the days of the Congressional Human Rights hearings in Washington, with fixed Zionist panelists and a Public Relations Corporation in charge of the "show" regarding Iraqi atrocities in Kuwait. Now, what do you have breaking in the news yesterday and today? THE ANNOUNCEMENT THAT IT ALL WAS A HOAX TO EMOTIONALLY SET YOU INTO A HEINOUS WAR! Great speakers announced that babies had been ripped from their incubators in great numbers and the incubators taken while the babies were tossed to the floor and perished. The patients on dialysis were stripped of their tubes and the equipment taken--chelas, I told you then and I repeat, watch how and what is said and by whom. Why would the people testifying be comfortably in America? Why would they have to read from written script? Anything so heinous is designed to stay vividly in the mind in every detail and requires no pre-written scripting. So, now you find that the little lady who did the best job of acting was not only lying, the things DID NOT HAPPEN and she is in fact of the Royal Sabah family in ruling Kuwait--whose father is Ambassador to the U.S. from Kuwait--he, by the way, sat two chairs from her during the testimony. I shouted "lies, lies, lies" at the time--but you wanted to believe that you were sending your sons and husbands, mothers and sisters off to a valid cause. Worse, you sent them off so that they could be trained as murderers without hesitation. Your world is sick unto dying and it is YOUR death which is planned.

POLITICAL PRESSURES OF UNLAWFUL INSANITY

Look at your very political campaigns. It matters not WHO might be a candidate for office--your Constitution says all who wish to run for office may do so--under circumstances of citizenship and age as laid forth. Do you not witness the major efforts to now keep the parties, not only limited to the two FIXED parties--but now keep certain candidates who rebel against the Establishment Government corruption and atrocities OFF THE BALLOTS.

Do you not also see that the incredible and deadly possibilities of nu­clear war are now unleashed by the ending of your so-called "Cold War"? I have just finished telling you the truth of the coalition and activities of your enemy in your own nation. As for medical input--I have had to tell you that disease, health and total annihilation now lie in the hands of button-pushers through beam systems beyond your ability to calculate in power and devastation. It is almost blasphe­mous to even speak of anything further back than New Year's Day, 1992. The gods of Evil can now control all forms of killing by se­lected "dialing".

I am constantly asked and prodded: "Give us a cancer cure and a cure for AIDS--and THEN we will believe you." and "How can God allow people, especially little children, to die and suffer with awful diseases, starvation and cancer if He is truly God?" BECAUSE YOU AS A PEOPLE HAVE DELETED GOD OF TRUTH FROM YOUR PROGRAM--REMEMBER, EVEN AMERICA IS NOW IN HER POST-CHRISTIANITY ERA. But moreover, the American Medical Association is only an arm of the Club of Rome (Committee of 300) and a Zionist Elite organization to insure that things such as Cancer--not only occur but continue to kill in ever increasing num­bers. After all, chelas, THE SAME ONES WHO OWN THE DRUG HOUSES TOUTING CURE, AND KEEP THE NATURAL HEALING METHODS AWAY FROM YOU, ARE THE SAME ONES WHO RUN "MEDICINE"--THEY SEE TO IT THAT YOU HAVE CANCER AND YOU ARE RUN BY AND CLAMOR AFTER THE EVIL BARONS--GOD HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR "CANCERS". "My" curing them wouldn't do a thing for you except make you even more doubtful about GOD! If I overrode all heinous methods of infection and put a blanket of healing upon your world, the cure would be claimed by the drug houses and a new disease would be upon you before sunset. You must cure the prob­lem or you will never cure any of the disease. Can you even imag­ine the size of the profits from Cancer? AIDS is only a form of ra­diation cancer. The diseases are created on Earth, controlled on Earth and the cure is prevented on Earth.

THE PROFITS OF CANCER

I, again, to save time and give authority unto a writer of decades of truth bringing--will copy from a book called MURDER BY INJEC­TION, by one Eustace Mullins. I also would like to, if time and space permit, refer to Robert S. Mendelsohn's CONFESSIONS OF A MEDICAL HERETIC. There are others but these were the most daring and Dr. Mendelsohn, as well as ones such as Linus Pauling, are to be honored into infinity for that which they have EFFORTED to tell you and so few listen--for their works are widespread and in every bookstore. It is harder to find Mullins' work for he is like myself--banned!

I shall again speak of Dr. John Coleman's work, briefly, and more later. I have asked that you even pre-order his "in progress" work. The first volume of some 300 pages is in brief editing and will im­mediately go to press--directly and unpolished. Even to you who read and are shocked at that which I bring to your attention and by other writers, such as Mullins--you are in for toe-curling, hair-rais­ing shock. I honor this brother but I also am commissioned to take care of him and keep him physically alive--that is no easy task and it will be obvious "why". He has been around the block several thou­sand times and has been writing on these subjects for decades--ONLY TO HAVE OTHERS TAKE UP THE INFORMATION AND SPURT IT OUT AS IF THEY HAD GOD'S KNOWLEDGE AND INPUT--(BY THE WAY--WHILE DISCOUNTING OUR PRESENCE AND THAT OF GOD).

John was the first to write of the Club of Rome from experience and research which literally cost him his life. It was not intended that his work be lost to mankind and I shall cover that aspect at another time, also.

He is the only one who writes of the Committee of 300, though it is the same as the Club of Rome and ofttimes referred to also as the Olympian Club, etc. He will trace the steps from the very top and through the ranks. If he doesn't cover the whole of the CIA connec­tion, then I shall immediately do so to accompany these volumes of his presentation. It is very hard to get this material into print and life becomes hard to maintain as the very bastard satans such as Henry Kissinger have contracts on your head. Well, the lives of my people, and ones like Coleman, are hardly dull and boring. The very fact that these books with this information make it to print and into your hands--IS THE PROMISE AND CONFIRMA­TION OF GOD'S PRESENCE--THAT YOU MAY HAVE OPPORTUNITY TO FIND TRUTH BURIED BENEATH THE LIES OF "THE PLAN".

George Green got a threatening letter just yesterday from one who says "...this is your LAST chance, George--to back LaRouche for President or you are lost forever and I shall tell your secret!" The secret? Somehow the man has conjured that the "Phoenix" repre­sents the coming up out of the ashes of the destruction of darkness (true) and that Hatonn and brood must be the returned Satan of those destroyed dark places. The reasoning eludes me but each to his own. He seems to have much fact but "reasoning" is totally absent. He even defines the one God of Light--Aton, correctly--in Egypt--and then blows it by forgetting that the Phoenix is a universal symbol of a rebirthing God of Creation from the rubble of Evil destruction through the hands of his tools--MAN.

People such as this must, however, wait in line, for my people are constantly threatened and promised demise by far more sophisticated operatives in the CIA, Mossad, KGB, ADL and World Zionists. In other words--knock it off, your totally heinous disservice to LaRouche should be enough to shut your mouth. If you wish to press a man for President--you don't threaten his could-be support­ers.

What do ' I' think of LaRouche? It is not my business to think any­thing of L. LaRouche. He tried to open your eyes at great cost to himself. What I DO THINK is that his case is certainly one for the Constitutional Law Center for it is openly stated in publications and by the dirty deed doers themselves that he was "framed" and "railroaded" on false charges via a "fixed" judge. If Constitutional Law is violated it makes no matter whether the victim be saint or total sinner. If you ones cannot see as much--you are on a hopeless track to downfall.

Back to the PROFITS OF CANCER

Thank you, Eustace, and I can only support this work and hope that ones will avail themselves of your outlay of truth. I also wish to ac­knowledge information on one Dan Roman from a friend in France. You ones have insightful and sharing people--please avail yourselves of the input. Let me just speak of Dan Roman a moment. He is from Romania and tells of the struggle of the Romanians against Bolshevik occupation at the expense of years of horrendous incarceration, etc. Let me just recite a brief partial paragraph or two from the volume of work:

"....For example the Minister for Internal Affairs was a for­mer printer and one of 400 members of the communist party named Burach Tescovich. After he became Minister, he changed his name to Georgescu [you better pay attention be­cause that is simply spelled and pronounced differently in En­glish], a truly Romanian name. He was the number two man in the "Romanian" government after Ana Pauker........
"....Because he couldn't find trusted Romanian people to cover the leadership and the management of all his de­partments, he brought from the USSR, Poland and the two former Romanian provinces, 200 THOUSAND extra Zionists, changing their names to Romanian ones. Some of them couldn't speak a word of Romanian, others spoke with strange accents. Nevertheless, they were given ranks of gen­erals, colonels and other superior officer ranks, and named leaders of Secretariat, Militia, prisons and forced labor camps. Interestingly enough, Burach Tescovich 'Georgescu' brought these anti-Christians to Romania with a decree signed only by himself in spite of the fact that Romania had a Parliament and a King! His powerful au­thority was unlimited."

Ah yes, there are daring fighters in all parts of your world--South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, China, Palestine and yes, there is even the element of God's people who struggle hardest of all--in Is­rael against the corruptors and violators of humanity.

So what does this have to do with Cancer? If you can't see from whence springs the physical blight of the planet--how can you under­stand the physical blight of the individual?

Now to quote Eustace Mullins:

In 400 B.C., Hippocrates assigned the name of Cancer or "crab" to a disease encountered during his time, because of its crab-like spread through the body. Its Greek name was "karkinos". In 164 A.D., the physician Galen in Rome used the name of "tumour" to describe this disease, from the Greek "tymbos" meaning a sepulchral mound, and the Latin tumore, "to swell". The disease could not have been very prevalent; it is not mentioned in the Bible, nor is it included in the ancient medical book of China, The Yellow Em­peror's Classic of Internal Medicine. Unknown in most traditional societies, it spread with the rise of the Industrial Revolution. In the 1830's, cancer was responsible for two per cent of deaths around Paris; cancer caused four per cent of deaths in the United States in 1900.

With the rise of cancer came "modern" methods of coping with it. A leading critic of the medical establishment, Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, comments that "Modern cancer surgery someday will be regarded with the same kind of horror that we now regard the use of leeches in George Washington's time." The surgery of which he spoke is the widely accepted and imposed method of cancer treat­ment now in vogue throughout the United States. It is called the "cut, slash and burn" technique. This method of cancer treatment actually represents the highwater mark of the German allopathic school of medicine in the United States. It relies almost exclusively on surgery, bleeding and heavy use of drugs, with the exotic addition of radium treatment. The Temple of the modern method of cancer treatment in the United States is the Memorial Sloan Kettering Can­cer Institute in New York. Its high priests are the surgeons and re­searchers at this center.

Originally known as Memorial Hospital, this cancer estab­lishment was presided over during its early years by two physicians who were stereotypes of the Hollywood caricatures of "the mad doctor". If Hollywood planned to make a movie about this hospital, they would be stymied by the fact that only the late Bela Lugosi would be appropriate to play not one, but each of these two doctors. The first of these "mad" doctors was Dr. J. Marion Sims. Son of a South Carolina sheriff and tavern owner, Sims (1813-1883) was a nineteenth century "women's doctor". For years he dabbled in "experimental surgery" by performing experiments on slave women in the South. According to his biographer, these operations were "little short of murderous". When plantation owners refused to al­low him to conduct further experiments on their slaves, he was forced to purchase a seventeen year old slave girl for $500. Within a few months he had performed some thirty operations on this unfor­tunate, a girl named Anarcha. Because there was no anesthesia at the time, he had to ask friends to hold Anarcha down while he per­formed his surgery. After one or two such experiences, they usually refused to have anything further to do with him. He continued to experiment on Anarcha for four years and, in 1853, he decided to move to New York. Whether his little negro hospital in South Car­olina was surrounded by screaming villagers one night as they bran­dished torches, as in an old Frankenstein movie, is not known. However, his decision to move seems to have come rather suddenly. Dr. Sims bought a house on Madison Avenue, where he found a supporter in the heiress of the Phelps empire, Mrs. Melissa Phelps Dodge. This family has continued to be prominent supporters of the present cancer center. With her financial assistance, Sims founded Women's Hospital, a 30 bed, all charity hospital which opened on May 1, 1855.

Like a later quack, "Doc" Simmons, Sims advertised himself as a women's specialist, particularly in "vesico-vaginal fistula", an ab­normal passage between the bladder and the vagina. It is now known that this condition has always been "iatrogenic", that is, caused by the ministrations of doctors. In the 1870's, Sims began to specialize in the treatment of cancer. Rumors began to circulate in New York of barbarous operations being performed at Women's Hospital. The "mad doctor" was at it again. The trustees of the in­stitution reported that "the lives of all the patients were being threat­ened by mysterious experiments." Dr. Sims was fired from Women's Hospital. However, because of his powerful financial supporters, he was soon reinstated. [H: re-read the Protocols--the man was DOING HIS JOB!] He was then contacted by members of the Astor family, whose fortune was founded on old John Jacob Astor's ties with the East India Company, the British Secret Intelli­gence Service, and the international opium trade. [H: Chelas, is any of this beginning to sound familiar in other aspects of inter­esting operations?] One of the Astors had recently died of cancer, and the family wished to establish a cancer hospital in New York. They first approached the trustees of Women's Hospital with an of­fer of a donation of $150,000 (a very large amount at that time) if they would turn it into a cancer hospital. Smarting from his recent firing, Sims double-crossed the trustees by private negotiations with the Astors. He persuaded them to back him in a new hospital, which he called the New York Cancer Hospital. It opened in 1884. Dr. Sims later went to Paris, where he attended the Empress Eugenie. He was later awarded the Order of Leopold from the King of the Belgians. Apparently he had lost none of his chutzpah. He returned to New York, where he died shortly before the opening of his new hospital.

In the 1890's, after receiving gifts from other benefactors, the hospital was renamed Memorial Hospital. In the mid-twentieth century, the names of Sloan and Kettering were added. Despite these names, this cancer center has for many years been a major ap­pendage of the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly. During the 1930's, a block of land on the fashionable Upper East Side was donated by the Rockefellers to build its new building. Rockefeller henchmen have dominated the board ever since the building was opened. In 1913, a group of doctors and laymen met in May at the Harvard Club in New York City to establish a national cancer organization. Not unnaturally, it was named the American Society for the Control of Cancer. Note that it was not called a society for the "cure" of cancer, or the "prevention" of cancer, nor have these ever been pri­mary goals of this organization. 1913, of course, was a very signifi­cant year in American history. During that fateful year President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act, which was set up to provide funding for the forthcoming World War; a national progressive income tax, taken directly from Marx's Communist mani­festo of 1848, [H: And fully in line with the Zionist Protocols which states: "Gold always has been and always will be the irre­sistible power. handled by expert hands it will always be the most useful lever for those who possess it, and the object of envy for those who do not. With gold we can buy the most rebellious consciences, can fix the rate of all values, the current price of all products, can subsidize all State loans and thereafter hold the states at our mercy. Already the principal banks, the exchanges of the entire world, the credits of all the governments are in our hands".] was imposed upon the American people; and legislatures had their Constitutional duty of appointing Senators removed, they being henceforth elected by popular demand; they all now had to compete for the popular vote. It was in this heady era of socialist planning that the cancer society originated. Naturally enough, it was funded by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. His attorneys, Debevoise and Plimpton, remained dominant in the administration of the new soci­ety throughout the 1920's. Its funding came from the Laura Spel­man Rockefeller Foundation, and from J.P. Morgan.

From its inception, the American Cancer Society has followed the pattern set up by the American Society for the Control of Cancer . ACS also had a board of trustees, a House of Delegates, and in the 1950's, it also established a Committee on Quackery. This Com­mittee later changed its name to the Committee on Unproven Meth­ods of Cancer Management (note that it was called "management", not "cure"), but the society still used the term "quackery" freely in referring to any methods not sanctioned by its trustees, or deviating from the "cut, slash and burn" method of cancer treatment.

In 1909, the railroad magnate, E. H. Harriman (whose fortune, like that of the Rockefellers, had been funded entirely with Roth­schild money funnelled to him by Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb Co.) died of cancer. His family then formed the Harriman Research In­stitute. In 1917, the scion of the family, W. Averell Harriman, abruptly decided to go into politics, or rather, to manage our politi­cal parties from behind the scenes. The Institute was suddenly shut down. Its financial backing was then transferred to Memorial Hos­pital. The principal backer of the hospital at that time was James Douglas, (1837-1918). He was chairman of the Phelps Dodge Corporation, whose heiress in 1853, Melissa Phelps Dodge, had been the initial backer of what eventually became Memorial Hospi­tal. She had married a dry goods merchant named William Dodge, who used the Phelps fortune to become a giant in copper production.

The Dictionary of National Biography describes James Douglas as "the dean of mining and metallurgical properties". He owned the richest copper mine in the world, the Copper Queen Lode. Born in Canada, he was the son of Dr. James Douglas, a surgeon who be­came head of the Quebec Lunatic Asylum. His son joined the Phelps-Dodge Company in 1910, later becoming its chairman. Be­cause he had discovered extensive pitchblende deposits on his West­ern mining properties, he became fascinated with radium. In collab­oration with the Bureau of Mines, a government agency which he, for all practical purposes, controlled, he founded the National Ra­dium Institute. His personal physician was a Dr. James Ewing (1866-1943). Douglas offered to give Memorial Hospital $100,000, but there were several conditions. One was that the hospital must hire Dr. Ewing as its chief pathologist; the second was that the hos­pital must commit itself to treating nothing but cancer, and that it would routinely use radium in its cancer treatments. The hospital accepted these conditions.

With Douglas' money behind him, Ewing soon became head of the entire hospital. Douglas was so convinced of the benefits of ra­dium therapy that he used it frequently on his daughter, who was then dying of cancer; on his wife; and on himself, exposing his fam­ily to radium therapy for the most trivial ailments. Because of Dou­glas' prominence, the New York limes gave a great deal of publicity to the new radium treatment for cancer. The journalist headlined his story with a page one headline, "Radium Cure Free for All". The claim was made that "not one cent's worth of radium will be for sale". Douglas was greatly annoyed by this statement, and on Octo­ber 24, 1913, he had the Times run a correction. He was quoted as follows: "All this story about humanity and philanthropy is foolish. I want it understood that I shall do what I like with the radium that belongs to me." This was a rare glimpse of the true nature of the "philanthropist". His rivals in this field, Rockefeller and Carnegie, always gave away their money with no string attached. With this as­surance, they were able to stealthily establish their secret power over the nation. Douglas had revealed the true nature of our "philanthropists".

The original press releases from Memorial Hospital had in fact intimated that the radium treatments would be free. They apparently believed that the great philanthropist James Douglas would donate his supply. The Memorial Hospital Rules and Regulations were immediately changed to stipulate that "an extra charge would be made for Radium Emanations used in the treatment of patients." In 1924, the Radium Department at Memorial Hospital gave $18,000 radium treatments to patients, for which it charged $70,000, its largest single source of income for that year.

Meanwhile, James Douglas, who had boasted that he would do what he liked with his radium, continued to give himself frequent treatments. A few weeks after the New York Times story in 1913, he died of aplastic anemia. Medical authorities now believe that he was but one of a number of personalities associated with the early devel­opment of radium who died from its effects, the most famous being Marie Curie, wife of its discoverer, and her daughter, Irene Joliot­ Curie. By 1922, more than one hundred radiologists had died from X-ray induced cancer.

Douglas' protege, Dr. Ewing, remained at Memorial Hospital several more years. He developed a number of ailments, the most annoying being tic doloreau, which made it embarrassing for him to meet or talk with anyone. He withdrew from the hospital, becoming a recluse on Long Island, where he finally died of cancer of the bladder in 1943.

Douglas' son and heir, Lewis Douglas, inherited one of the largest American fortunes of that time. He married Peggy Zinsser, daughter of a partner of J.P. Morgan Co. Peggy's two sisters also married well; one married John J. McCloy, who became the chief lawyer for the Rockefeller interests; the other married Konrad Ade­nauer, who became Chancellor of postwar Germany. Lewis Dou­glas became chairman of Mutual Life of New York, a Morgan con­trolled company. Early in World War II, he became a protege of W. Averell Harriman in the Lend Lease Administration. Douglas was then named chairman of the War Shipping Board, one of the famous "dollar a year" men of the Roosevelt administration. Later in the war, he succeeded Harriman as U.S. Ambassador to England. After Hitler's fall, Douglas was slated to become High Commis­sioner of Germany, but he stepped aside to allow his brother-in-law, John J. McCloy, to take this post. The two Americans were pleas­antly surprised when their brother-in-law, Konrad Adenauer, was named Chancellor. The family interests of the J.P. Morgan firm were firmly in control. In fact, Adenauer's earlier political activities in wartime Germany had centered around a small group of J. P. Morgan cohorts in Germany. They were ready to take over when Hitler died.

In the 1930's, two giants of the automotive industry were per­suaded to become contributors to Memorial Hospital. Alfred P. Sloan had been president of General Motors. He owned a 235 foot yacht which was valued at one and a quarter million dollars in 1940. Charles Kettering was an authentic inventive genius, responsible for much to today's auto ignition, lights, starters and other electrical systems. FORTUNE estimated in 1960 that Sloan was worth 200-­400 million dollars, while Kettering was worth some 100 to 200 million.

Alfred Sloan's credentials as a philanthropist were somewhat marred by his record at General Motors. He had steadfastly op­posed the installation of safety glass in Chevrolet cars. During the 1920's, the lack of safety glass meant that a relatively minor auto ac­cident, if it caused the breaking of the windshield or the windows of a car, could result in hideous disfigurement or death of the occu­pants. Shards of flying glass would rip through the interior, slicing the passengers as it tore by. [H: Anyone care to take a guess as to what shards of glass will do to occupants of the "Crystal Cathedral" of Dr. Schuller's when the "Big One" on the San Andreas fault comes? How about a massive bombing raid? The picture is quite mind-boggling, is it not?] For a relatively minor amount, the ordinary glass used in automobiles during that period could be re­placed with safety glass. Today, safety glass is required on all cars. Sloan made a public statement on this issue on August 13, 1929. "The advent of safety glass will result in both ourselves and our company absorbing a very considerable portion of the extra cost out of our profits. I feel that General Motors should not ADOPT SAFETY GLASS FOR ITS CARS AND RAISE ITS PRICES EVEN A PART OF WHAT THAT EXTRA COST SHOULD BE." On August 15, 1932, Sloan again reiterated his opposition to the in­stallation of safety glass in General Motors' automobiles. "It is not my responsibility to sell safety glass," he complained. "I would very much rather spend the same amount of money on improving our car in other ways because I think, from the standpoint of selfish busi­ness, it would be a very much better investment."

The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation is doing well; in 1975 it had $252 million, which grew to $370 million by 1985. It and the Charles F. Kettering Foundation ($75 million) continue to be the chief benefactors of the Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. A liberal editor, Norman Cousins, heads the Kettering Foundation. The Al­fred P. Sloan Foundation is headed by R. Manning Brown, Jr. Di­rectors include Henry H. Jowler, former Secretary of the Treasury, now a partner of Goldman Sachs Co., New York investment bankers--also director is Lloyd C. Elam, president of the nation's only black medical school, Meharry College in Nashville, Ten­nessee; Elam is also a director of the giant Merck medical firm; Kraft, South Central Bell Telephone, and the Nashville Bank; Franklin A. Long represents the necessary Rockefeller connection as a director of Exxon; he is also a director of United Technologies, Presidential Science Advisory Commission, professor of chemistry at Cornell since 1936, a Guggenheim fellow, he has received the Al­bert Einstein Peace Prize--he is a member of the American Pugwash Steering Committee, set up by the notoriously pro-communist fi­nancier Cyrus Eaton who was a Rockefeller protege--Pugwash is said to be directed by the KGB; Herbert E. Longenecker, president of Tulane University; he serves on the selection committee for Ful-bright students, a very powerful position--his list of awards and hon­ors in Who's Who goes on for several paragraphs; Cathleen Morawetz, who is a director of National Cash Register, also a Guggenheim fellow; she is married to Herbert Morawetz, a chemist from Prague; Thomas Aquinas Murphy, president of General Mo­tors for many years, also director of Pepsico, and the National De­troit Corporation; Ellmore E. Patterson, who had been with J. P. Morgan Company since 1935, he also serves as treasurer of Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and is director of Bethlehem Steel, Engel­hard Hanovia, and Morgan Stanley; Laurance S. Rockefeller, who is director of Reader's Digest, National Geographic Society, and the Caneel Bay Plantation; Charles J. Scanlon, director of the GM Acceptance Corporation, Arab-American Bank of New York, and trustee of Roosevelt Hospital, New York; and Harold T. Shapiro, president of the University of Michigan, director of Dow Chemical Corporation, and Ford Motor Co., Burroughs, Kellogg, and the Bank of Canada--Shapiro has been on the advisory panel of the Cen­tral Intelligence Agency since 1984; he also is an advisor to the U.S. Treasury Department.

The governing board of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer In­stitute, called the Board of Managers, reads like a financial statement of the various Rockefeller holdings. Its principal director for many years was the late Lewis Lichtenstein Strauss, partner of Kuhn, Loeb Co., the Rothschild bankers in the United States. Strauss listed him­self in Who's Who as "financial advisor to the Messrs. Rockefeller". He was also a director of Studebaker, Polaroid, NBC, RCA, and held government posts as Secretary of Commerce and as head of the Atomic Energy Commission. For many years he funnelled Rocke­feller funds into the notorious Communist front, the Institute of Pa­cific Relations. Strauss was also president of the Institute for Ad­vanced Study, a Rockefeller think tank at Princeton, and financial di­rector of the American Jewish Committee, for which he raised the funds to publish the propaganda organ, Commentary magazine.

Another prominent director of Sloan Kettering was Dorothy Peabody Davison, a leading New York socialite for some fifty years. She had married F. Trubee Davison, son of Henry Pomeroy Davi­son, a Rockefeller relative who had been the right-hand man for J. P. Morgan. Davison was one of the group of five leading bankers who met with Senator Nelson Aldrich (his daughter married John D. Rockefeller, Jr.) at Jekyll Island in a secret conference to draft the Federal Reserve Act in November of 1910. The Dictionary of Na­tional Biography notes that Davison "soon won recognition from J. P. Morgan, frequently consulting with him, particularly during the monetary crisis of 1907 . . . In association with Senator Aldrich, Paul M. Warburg, Frank A. Vanderlip and A. Piatt Andrew, he took part in drawing up the Jekyll Island report that led to the crys­tallization of sentiment resulting in the creation of the Federal Reserve System." As head of the Red Cross War Council during the First World War, Davison raised $370,000,000, of which a con­siderable number of millions were diverted to Russia to salvage the floundering Bolshevik government. His son and namesake, Henry P. Davison, married Anne Stillman, daughter of James Stillman, head of the National City Bank which handled the enormous cash flow accruing to the Standard Oil Company. H.P. also became a partner of J.P. Morgan Co.; his brother, F. Trubee Davison, mar­ried Dorothy Peabody, the nation's leading philanthropic family. The Peabodies may be said to have invented the concept of founda­tion philanthropy, the first major foundation being the Peabody Edu­cation Fund, set up in 1865 by George Peabody, founder of the J. P. Morgan banking firm; it later became the Rockefeller Foundation. Dorothy Peabody's father was the renowned Endicott Peabody, founder of the Establishment training school, Groton, where Franklin D. Roosevelt and many other front men were educated. Dorothy Peabody was on the national board of the American Cancer Society for many years, as well as director of Sloan Kettering. She was also a noted big game hunter, making many forays to India and Africa, and winning many trophies for her prize animals. Her hus­band was Secretary of War for air from 1926-1932, and was presi­dent of the American Museum of Natural History for many years; this was Theodore Roosevelt's favorite charity. Her son, Endicott Peabody Davison, became secretary to the J. P. Morgan Co., and then general manager of the London branch of the firm; he has been president of U.S. Trust since 1979, director of the defense firms, Scovill Corporation and Todd Shipyards, also the Discount Corpo­ration. He is a trustee of the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Markle Foundation, which makes key grants in the communications media. Eisenhower's Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, was also related to the Rockefellers through the Pomeroy family.

[H: Now isn't this a lot more informative and honest than all the begatting and more begatting in that book which fills many pages of nonsense? I guarantee that if you "stay tuned" we will discover that these same people I name in the above material will find their names on the "translations of the Bible" foundation for Biblical authenticity AND on the lists of participants in the founding of the Protocols and all socialist/fascist manifestos. In almost all instances in the "begatting order of Biblical transcrip­tions", the names represent absolutely NO-ONE! Can you actu­ally believe you will get any translated proof of contents of the Dead Sea Scrolls? These very people who control your world control the Scrolls in point. You are going to come into "reason", dear ones, or you aren't going to make it.]

******

Dharma, this is getting too unwieldy in length. Allow us to break this chapter at this point and we will simply pick up at this place when we sit again. I would like to move right on, please. Thank you.

Hatonn to stand-by.

WHAT'S IN A BRAND NAME CIGARETTE?

A. N. OTHER 12/31/91
All Rights Reserved

The United States Government and the tobacco industry are playing a dangerous game with your health when it comes to warnings about cigarette smoking. If you are a smoker, you have quite literally been deceived into believing that the tar in nicotine is the main ingredient that makes smoking a habit-forming health hazard: "The Surgeon General Has Determined That Smoking Is Hazardous To Your Health." That warning label is deemed sufficient to protect you from the dangers of smoking.

As a smoker you have been led to believe that addiction to nicotine and danger from the tar it produces is your only problem. If this is what you believe then read on. Your life may depend on it. Cigarettes are not just tobacco rolled up in fancy thin papers with brand names stenciled on them. Indeed the secret of addiction to to­bacco-smoking may lie in the paper itself. A doctor friend of mine who has done a lot of research on smoking told me, when I began this investigation, that he was once invited to visit a cigarette paper‑making factory in the course of his research work. Before being shown around the plant, he had to don a coverall made of a paper-like substance, which covered him from head to foot.
He was shown various stages of manufacture including a sealed room which his guide said was a paper impregnation plant. My doctor friend was informed that in this building the paper was impregnated with a substance to ensure even, slow-burning without the taste of burning paper. Later, when he got home (he kept the coverall as a souvenir), he had the fine dust on it analyzed and when the lab results came back, lo and behold the dust contained traces of opium.

The doctor is thus under the firm impression that paper used for cigarette manufacture is first impregnated with OPIUM. It is the opium that causes addiction to smoking. Even in small quantities, opium is extremely addictive. In his opinion, based upon research on nicotine, he found that it is not nicotine alone that makes a to­bacco addict, but rather, it is the opium used to impregnate the paper plus the nicotine that is the root cause of addiction to smoking.

My doctor friend is a smoker himself, and in order to prove his point, he changed to rolling his own cigarettes. Kits to roll cigarettes can be bought in smokers' speciality shops, and consist of a supply of thin paper apparently no different from the usual cigarette paper, tobacco, plus a device that rolls the paper around the tobacco.

After trying several brands of loose tobacco and rolling his own cigarettes for three weeks, his craving was not relieved. Rather, it became worse. Finally, after three weeks of home-rolled cigarettes, he went back to his favorite brand of manufactured cigarette. "The relief was instant, the satisfaction gratifying," he told me. As a result of his experiment, the doctor is more than ever convinced that addiction to smoking does not come from tobacco alone, but from the PAPER used by cigarette companies, no matter what brand of tobacco is used.

Do you believe this is far-fetched? Well, if you do, that is exactly what the government and the tobacco industry want you to believe. You might wish to reconsider the matter after you take into account the following information. If you have any lingering doubts there­after, then I urge you to write to the Department of Health and Hu­man Services and ask them about it.

You might not get a response from the government, but you will be certain to attract the attention of Stanley Temko, a lawyer at Cov­ington and Burling, legal guardians of the tobacco industry. If that causes concern, then you might try Senator Jesse Helms, so filled with rectitude when it comes to Manuel Noriega (accused, but far from proven guilty, of being a cocaine smuggler). Helms represents North Carolina, the premier tobacco-growing state in the nation.

On second thought, Senator Helms might not be inclined to enlighten you, so you might then try the Office on Smoking and Health, a government watchdog agency which is supposed to have our health and welfare at heart. Dr. Ronald Davis, who resigned from the agency earlier this year, is on record as stating: "I think the con­sumers have a right to know what is in tobacco products, but I'm not allowed under law to release this information to the public."

The Office on Smoking and Health and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are the keepers of the keys to the top-se­cret lists of what ingredients go into making your favorite brand of cigarette, the additives that give tobacco its "flavor", keep it soft, and give it that special aroma. If you thought "taste" was just an ad­vertising gimmick, you would be wrong. "Taste" is very important to tobacco addicts, which is why cigarette manufacturers go to such lengths to create it.

Before doing any writing or phoning your Senator, the tobacco com­panies or HHS, you might want to reflect upon the wisdom of arousing the watchdog. "Let sleeping dogs lie" may be preferred to "kicking a sleeping dog". You see, the list of ingredients that go into cigarettes is TOP SECRET. Yes, that is right, TOP SECRET. Government doesn't like people nosing around top secret documents, and the tobacco industry is paranoid about secrecy. They might de­cide to take a note of your name for future reference.

The tobacco industry does not want smokers to know that, apart from tobacco, he or she is inhaling acetone, methyl salicylate, turpentine, glycyrrhizic acid, caramel, shellac, catechol, ace­tyldehyde, amino acids. What are the effects of these substances on the body when heated, i.e., at that magic moment when you first light up and deeply inhale?

Take caramel, added to give flavor--which smokers believe comes from their favorite tobacco mix. When the burning end of a cigarette heats the caramel--or any other of the many types of sugar used in the manufacture of cigarettes--it produces catechol which, when combined with some of the other additives, strengthen their carcinogenic properties.

This is called synergistic reaction. In tests on laboratory rats using a number of vitamins, scientists Ken Anderson, R. T. Bartus, C. E. Girgea, Kaufman and several others found that by combining vita­mins with other substances, a synergistic reaction was observed. What this means, for instance, is that rats on choline didn't show that much improvement, but when combined with piracetum, the re­sulting improvement was dramatic. Reverse synergistic effects hap­pen when caramel is burned with other additives in cigarettes, thus strengthening their carcinogenic properties.

Do you like licorice? Most kids do, but smokers would not be amused if you told them they were smoking it in the additive licorice root--glycyrrhizic acid--used to flavor and keep tobacco moist, which the American Health Foundation says gives off polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons when burned, and that means smokers are inhaling a known cancer-causing substance along with their aroma-filled to­bacco smoke.

How about amino acids? Now, most everybody knows that amino acids are what DNA is all about, and don't health food stores sell amino acids, so what is so bad about it? The trick is not to heat amino acids, nor combine them with other substances that might give a synergistic effect. Once heated, amino acids give off suspected carcinogens, says the American Health Institute.

You can't smoke without applying heat, I mean, where there is to­bacco there has got to be heat, and where there is heat there has to be smoke, and where there is tobacco-smoke there are carcinogens. So now you know, cigarettes consist of a good deal more than just blended tobacco rolled in paper, even though the outside package of your favorite brand doesn't list any additives.

Your Virginia Slims, Marlboros, Winstons, Camels, Kools or any other brand you favor contain, in varying degrees, a number of chemicals, plant extracts and other substances which tests in France proved can amount to as much as 8 percent of the content of what you enjoy so much when you inhale that smoke. Do not be deceived by the printed information on that attractive packaging, "Ingredients: Selected Fine Tobaccos".

Like Mrs. Nancy Reagan's non-solution to the drug addiction problem washing like a tidal wave over this nation, "just say no," or applying a PARTIAL warning label to a package of cigarettes, isn't going to solve the problem. In any case every smoker thinks smok­ing-induced cancer is strictly for the other fellow.

The warning label cigarette packages carry is meaningless and will remain so until the SECRET ADDITIVES in the tobacco are printed on the label alongside what they are capable of doing to your health. It is time that the FDA enforced its own rules but, given the huge amounts of money spread around Washington by powerful tobacco industry lobbyists, this is still a long way off.

Since the FDA requires strict labeling of ingredients used in ALL foodstuffs, why then is the tobacco industry exempted from these re­quirements? Not that tobacco is a foodstuff. But if it is compulsory to properly label household detergents and to tell the public what is inside a bottle of apple jelly jam, or peanut butter or ketchup, why conceal the deadly poison that is added to an already dangerous sub­stance called nicotine? How about cigarette paper? Is it im­pregnated with opium or not? Why aren't consumers told what, if anything, goes into the making of the paper?

Here is something you ought to know about nicotine. It causes flushing, a sense of warmth, heart palpitations, nausea (especially in first-time smokers), dyspepsia, muscle cramps, blurred vision, a lowered blood pressure when rising from a sitting position and is suspected of causing deformities in unborn babies if the mothers smoke during pregnancy.

In the 1960's, when the truth about tar in nicotine was brought out and stories about lung cancer caused by tobacco swept the land, the tobacco industry went into a state of panic which resulted in the pro­duction of "low in tar" brands to offset dramatic losses in sales. These so-called "light" brands were to help assuage the guilty feeling among those who could not bring themselves to kick the smoking habit, even knowing what they were doing to their bodies.

"Light" cigarettes consisted of lighter blends of tobacco, plus filters which were so dense that smokers could no longer get the all-im­portant "taste" of their cigarettes. "Safe" cigarettes became "tasteless" cigarettes. The tobacco industry's solution to tasteless cigarettes was to use more and more additives of the kinds already enumerated so that "taste" and "flavor" were restored.

But unbeknown to the fans of "light" cigarettes, the cigarette they believed was lighter and safer was now more deadly than the regular type, because of the heavy dosage of secret ingredients it took to re­store what smokers wanted most, taste and flavor.

Do our government agencies know about this? Yes, they do. So why don't those agencies responsible for protecting our national health do something about the menace? They did, or thought they had done something with passage of a 1984 law which called upon manufacturers of cigarettes to list "health risks associated with smoking cigarettes containing any substances commonly added to commercially manufactured cigarettes".

That was in 1984; yet in spite of urgent appeals to the cigarette in­dustry to come clean, by 1991 they have still not done so. In 1984 a Surgeon-General's report said that data about additives was impossi­ble to obtain, "because cigarette companies are not required by law to reveal what additives they use in each and every brand of cigarettes they manufacture." What the Surgeon-General wanted was a meaningful list of additives that could be related to amounts contained in each cigarette.

Succumbing somewhat to public pressure arising from these disclo­sures, Congress reluctantly passed a law later that year (1984) which mandated that cigarette manufacturers provide HHS each year with a list of additives used in cigarette manufacturing. However, the to­bacco industry was successful in subverting that law. Congress sold out to the tobacco industry--it is called "reaching a compromise".

Instead of each and every cigarette manufacturer being compelled to give a complete listing of specific additives and amounts going into each and every brand of cigarette produced, the industry--not each manufacturer--was allowed to get away with a general listing of ad­ditives which was and still is totally lacking in detail. These annual lists have been described by anti-smoking groups as "page after page of meaningless, useless names". But according to Covington and Burling, the tobacco industry is "complying with the law".

Then the tobacco industry scored an even greater triumph over we, the people. It got a provision entered into law which said that the lists of additives were not to be published or made available to the public or research scientists. To this day it is a crime to provide in­formation contained in the TOP SECRET lists. The "state secrets" of the tobacco industry remain sacrosanct. Dutifully each year the tobacco industry gives HHS its secret list and, each year, H.H.S. du­tifully locks the list in its safe, away from prying eyes.

If you believe the cigarette industry lists of deadly additives are pub­lic property, in short a government document, try getting it under the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA). You will come up blank no matter how hard you try. The FDA insists on Twinkies being prop­erly labeled, but has nothing to say when it comes to cancer-causing agents in cigarettes and why they should be excluded from cigarette packaging warning labeling.

But even if you achieved the seemingly impossible and obtained a copy of the lists, it wouldn't mean very much in its unrelated state. All you would see would be a long list of chemicals with difficult to pronounce names, not grouped or related to any brand of cigarette. If you are dogged enough to stick with it, you would be able to un­ravel the jumble of chemical names, but how would you relate that information to INDIVIDUAL brand names of cigarettes? Only the cigarette manufacturers could do it, but they are not about to oblige us in any way shape or form. Cigarette manufacturers say it is their right to protect their "recipes"--they call them trade secrets--over the rights of consumers to know what goes into their favorite cigarettes. This rule does not apply to cereals, canned foods, etc. Apparently the FDA agrees with the tobacco industry for, thus far, the FDA continues to look the other way. Is it a case of special privileges? I think so, otherwise what else should we call it?

Remember this the next time you pass one of those billboards along the highway where some tough-looking rancher sits on his horse smoking a Marlboro as his fiercely keen eyes scan the wide blue skies above him. It would be better for him, and for us, if he were to drop his gaze for a moment and take in the cancer wards filled with pain-wracked or so-doped-out-by-morphine patients, to whom life has become meaningless as it nears its end. Cigarettes are in­deed the most dangerous product sold in America.

Better yet, why don't anti-smoking groups go out and erect such "cancer ward" billboards--preferably as close as possible to the blue-sky blue-smoke Marlboro billboards? Come to think of it, a lot of people would find it a sobering experience the next time they pass that hitherto attractive outdoor scene.

PJ 42

CHAPTER 12

REC #2 HATONN

WED., JANUARY 8, 1992 1:21 P.M. YEAR 5, DAY 145

WEDNESDAY. JANUARY 8. 1992

CONTINUATION

We will continue in the discussion of the Board of Managers of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

The present board of Managers of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center include Edward J. Beattie, a Markle scholar at George Washington University, and staff member of Rockefeller Hospital since 1978, fellow of the American Cancer Society, and chief medical officer of Memorial since 1965; Peter 0. Crisp, who is manager of investments for the Rockefeller Family Associates; Harold Fisher, chairman of Exxon Corp., the flag-bearer of the Rockefeller fortune; Clifton C. Garvin, Jr., president of Exxon Cor­poration, director of Citicorp, Citibank (the former National City Bank), Pepsico, J.C. Penney, TRW, Equitable Life, Corning Glass, and the drug firm Johnson and Johnson; Louis V. Gerstner, Jr., president of the giant Squibb drug firm, director of American Ex­press, Caterpillar and Melville Corp.; he is a member of the visiting committee at Harvard University; Ellmore C. Patterson, with J.P. Morgan since 1935, married Anne Hyde Choate, of New York's leading legal family; Patterson is treasurer of Memorial Sloan Ket­tering; he is also a trustee of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which was formerly headed by Alger Hiss; Patterson's brother-in-law, Arthur H. Choate, Jr. was a partner of J.P. Morgan Co. for some years; he then joined Clark Dodge and Co.; Robert V. Roosa, partner of the investment bankers Brown Brothers Harriman, a Rhodes Scholar who was the mastermind of the Federal Reserve System for many years, training Paul Volcker and then nominating him to be chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors in Washington; Roosa also helped David Rockefeller set up the Trilat­eral Commission, of which he remains a director; Benno C. Schmidt, managing partner of the investment bankers J. H. Whitney Co. for many years, which has large holdings in Schlumberger, Freeport Minerals, and CBS; Schmidt was general counsel of the War Production Board during World War II, and managed the Of­fice of Foreign Liquidation in 1945 and 1946, which disposed of billions of dollars worth of material at giveaway prices; Schmidt was on the President's Cancer Panel from 1971-80; he is a director of General Motors Cancer Research Foundation, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and the Whitney Museum; he received the Cleveland Award for distinguished service in the crusade for cancer control from the American Cancer Society in 1972 (these groups are always awarding each other honors and prizes, no one else need ap­ply); Schmidt also received the Bristol Myers award for distin­guished service in cancer research in 1979; his son, Benno Schmidt, Jr., married the boss' daughter, Helen Cushing Whitney, and is now president of Yale University; he had served as law clerk to Chief Justice Warren at the Supreme Court and later held the office of le­gal counsel to the Department of Justice.

Other members of the Board of Managers are H. Virgil Sherrill, president of the investment firm Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, which is now Prudential Bache; Frank Seitz, director of Organon and the Ogden Corp., both of which are chemical firms; he has been chair­man of the key political group, the Institute for Strategic Studies since 1975; Seitz is on the board of the National Cancer Advisory Board and the Rockefeller Foundation; he also serves on the Belgian American Educational Foundation which was set up by Herbert Hoover after World War I to conceal his profits from his Belgian charitable work; Seitz also serves on the board of the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation which had assets of $105 million in 1985, and from which it spent only $7.5 million in its charitable work; William S. Sneath, president of the giant chemical firm Union Car­bide Corp., which has had several accidents in its chemical factories in recent years; he is also a director of Metropolitan Life, controlled by the Morgan interests, Rockwell International, and the giant ad­vertising firm, JWT Group; Lewis Thomas, whose exploits take up a full column in Who's Who; he is investment counselor for the Rocke­feller Institute, dean of the medical school at Yale, professor of medicine at Cornell since 1973; Thomas is a director of the drug firm Squibb, president emeritus of Memorial Sloan Kettering, di­rector of the Rand Institute, Rockefeller University, John Simon Guggenheim Foundation, Menninger Foundation, Lounsbery Foun­dation, the Sidney Farber Cancer Institute, and the Aaron Diamond Foundation; J.S. Wickerham who is vice president of the Morgan bank, Morgan Guaranty Trust; Harper Woodward, who is with the Rockefeller Family Associates, longtime associate of Laurance Rockefeller.

This is only the Board of Managers of Memorial Sloan Kettering, the nation's preeminent cancer center. Each person on the Board of Managers shows many direct or indirect links with the Rockefeller interests. The Center's Board of Overseers includes Mrs. Elmer Bobst, widow of the prominent drug manufacturer and reorganizer of the American Cancer Society; Dr. James B. Fisk, chairman of Bell Telephone Laboratories, director of American Cynanamid, Corning, Equitable Life, John Simon Guggenheim Foundation, Chase Manhattan Bank (the Rockefeller Bank), board of overseers at Harvard, and director of the Cabot corporation; Richard M. Furlaud, chairman of the giant drug firm, Squibb, director and gen­eral counsel of Olin Corporation, the huge munitions manufacturer, and director of American Express; Dr. Emanuel Rubin Piore, born in Wilno, Russia, headed the Special Weapons Group at the U.S. Navy 1942-46, head of the Navy Electronics Bureau 1948, director of research at IBM since 1956, professor at Rockefeller University, consultant to MIT and Harvard, director of Paul Revere Investors, director of Sloan Kettering since 1976; he received the Kaplan Award from Hebrew University; his wife Nora Kahn is a long­standing health analyst with the New York City Health Department since 1957, director of the Commonwealth Fund, Blue Cross Senior Fellow, United Hospital Fund, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (for the drug firm Johnson and Johnson), Pew Memorial Trust, Vera Foundation, Urban League, grantee from U.S. Public Health Ser­vice; James D. Robinson III, chairman of American Express, which has now incorporated both Kuhn, Loeb Co. and Lehman Brothers investment banking houses into Shearson Lehman Hutton; he was formerly with Morgan Guaranty Trust and is now director of Bristol Myers, the drug firm, Coca Cola, Firemans Fund Insurance, chair­man of Memorial Sloan Kettering, and Rockefeller University; James S. Rockefeller, director of Cranston Print Works; Laurance Rockefeller, who is director of Reader's Digest with 18 million cir­culation and National Geographic with 10 million circulation--meaning that he influences 28 million middle class American homes each month--Dr. Ralph Moss, former public relations director of Memorial Sloan Kettering, noted that Reader's Digest is often a barometer of orthodox thinking on the cancer problem. The Rocke­fellers remain the most prominent contributors to Memorial Sloan Kettering; William Rockefeller is also an overseer--he is a partner of Shearson Sterling, lawyers for the Rockefeller interests; he is also a director of Cranston Print Works and Oneida Ltd.; T.F. Walkowicz, who serves with the Rockefeller Family Associates is chairman of National Aviation and Technology Corporation, and a director of CCI, Itek and Mitre Corporation, Safetrans Systems and Quotron Systems; Arthur B. Treman, Jr., managing director of Dillon Read investment bankers for many years.

Not only do the boards of Memorial Sloan Kettering have direct ties to the Rockefellers; they are also closely linked with defense in­dustries, the CIA, and chemical and drug firms. It is no accident that they serve on the board of an institution whose recommendations on cancer treatment mean literally billions in profits to those who are in the right position to take advantage of them. And you thought this was a charitable organization! The fact is the Memorial Sloan Ket­tering and the American Cancer Society are the principal organiza­tional functionaries, with the American Medical Association, of the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly. In 1944, the American Society for the Control of Cancer changed its name to American Cancer Soci­ety; it was then placed in the hands of two of the most notorious patent medicine hucksters in the United States, Albert Lasker and Elmer Bobst.

Albert Lasker, born in Freiburg, Germany (1880-1952) has been called "the father of modern advertising". He focused on easily re­membered slogans and constant repetition to drill his messages into the heads of the American people. Like other successful hucksters memorialized in these pages, he began his career as a journalist. He was brought to this country by his parents, who settled in Galveston, Texas. His father, Morris Lasker, became a representative for Rothschild banking interests, and soon became the president of five banks in Texas. He lived in a luxurious mansion in Galveston, was a prominent grain and cotton dealer and, because of extensive inter­ests in West Texas, he became known as "the godfather of the Panhandle". He died in 1916, leaving his son Albert as his execu­tor. Needing cash to expand his advertising business, Albert Lasker hurriedly sold the lands at a bargain price which, in 1916, was not very much. His business acumen failed him here, because more than one billion dollars of oil was later discovered on those lands.

At the age of sixteen, Albert Lasker became a reporter on the Galveston News; he soon moved on to a better paying position in Dallas, on the Dallas Morning News, the largest newspaper in Texas. He soon found that the real money in the newspaper business was not in journalism, but in advertising, which brought in most of the revenue. Lasker went to Chicago, where he talked his way into a position with Lord and Thomas, the city's largest agency. He was only nineteen years old. Because he had agreed that his salary de­pended on how much business he could bring into the firm, he be­came a fanatical hustler. At the age of twenty-five, he had saved enough money, together with his family's money, to buy twenty-five per cent of the agency. He went on to participate in some. of the most memorable advertising campaigns in the history of the business. He built a three and a half million dollar estate in the exclu­sive suburb of Lake Forest, Mill Road Farm, a 480 acre spread with twenty-seven buildings, and a million dollar golf course which Bob Jones described as one of the three best golf courses in the United States. At the age of 42, he had arrived. The estate employed fifty workers, who kept six miles of hedges clipped each week. The French chateau in the center of all this luxury was more magnificent than anything built by his crusty neighbors, who viewed him with ill-disguised dislike. For years, he was the only Jewish resident, and he delighted in bruiting it about that he intended to leave the estate in his will as a Jewish Community Center.

Lasker was always very active in major Jewish organizations, serving on the American Jewish Committee and the powerful Anti-Defamation League. His sister Florine founded the National Council of Jewish Women and the Civil Liberties Committee in New York; another sister, Etta Rosensohn, was a passionate Zionist who headed the Hadassah Organization.

During the First World War, Lasker had been persuaded by his friend Bernard Baruch to join Woodrow Wilson's cabinet as an as­sistant secretary; this was to be his only government post. Despite the fact that he had built Lord and Thomas into a giant advertising agency, he felt that Chicago was too small for him; he soon moved his headquarters to New York. When he joined the agency, it had only $900,000 a year income, of which a third came from one prod­uct, Cascarets, a laxative. After he moved to New York, he realized that he was in a position to launch national campaigns to sell prod­ucts whose stocks would then greatly increase in value. He cannily invested large sums in products which had not yet gained wide pub­lic acceptance, his most notable triumph being his promotion of Ko­tex, and it was seldom advertised. Lasker bought a million dollars worth of International Cellulose, its manufacturer, and then launched a tremendous campaign in newspapers and magazines. He made many millions in profits on this one operation. Not only did he charge the firm for his advertising campaign, but he also reaped millions from the stock operation. He repeated this formula with other products, amassing a fortune of fifty million dollars. He later boasted that "No one has taken as much money out of advertising as I have."

Lasker was behind many of the nation's most successful radio shows. He auditioned Bob Hope, and launched him on a sixty year career. It was Lasker who made Amos and Andy the most popular radio show in the United States. He hired them for Pepsodent because he said that the half of the American population who listened to the show each evening would be envisioning the white teeth flashing "in those dusky countenances". The sponsor of the show was Pepsodent tooth-paste. Although the program is not denigrated as offensive to American blacks, if Lasker were still alive, he would push it as the nation's most successful television show.

Lasker owned the Chicago Cubs, and was a heavy gambler. He was known to bet as much as $40,000 on a single golf match. [H: But let poor old Pete Rose, an outstanding ball player, bet even a little bit and he is barred from the Hall of Fame forever--after actually performing beyond expectations which place ones in that Hall of Fame. (sic, sic)] He also was a hard driving taskmaster. In the depression year of 1931, he had a personal profit of one million dollars. This did not dissuade him from cutting back the expenses of his business. He took advantage of the widespread unemployment and the depression to fire fifty people from the staff of Lord and Thomas; those who remained had their salaries cut by fifty per cent.

One of Lasker's most successful promotions was his campaign to popularize drinking orange juice for Sunkist company. He is best remembered, however, for his association with American Tobacco's George Washington Hill. When Lasker came onto the scene, Perci­val Hill was still the firm's president. The son of a prominent Philadelphia banker, he had built up a successful carpet business, which he sold, investing the proceeds in a tobacco company, Black­well Tobacco; he then sold this firm to the tobacco king, James Duke. Duke reorganized the firm in 1911 and asked Hill to become president, his son, George Washington Hill, became vice president. Lasker got the account after World War I, when tobacco manufac­turers were very conservative in their advertising expenditures. They rarely spent large sums promoting a single brand, preferring to advertise their entire line. Lasker persuaded the Hills to concentrate their advertising, and to increase their budget. They did so and sales skyrocketed. In a single year, Lasker increased their advertising budget from one million to twenty-five million dollars. He managed to maintain good relations with the arrogant and domineering George Washington Hill, whose crudeness was memorialized by Sidney Greenstreet in the film "The Hucksters". Greenstreet portrayed Hill as a loathsome slob who made his point by spitting a great gob on the table in front of his directors.

Lasker created the catchy slogan for Lucky Strikes, "It's Toasted". When World War II began, he tried to foist a supposedly patriotic slogan on the American public, "Lucky Strike Green Has Gone to War". The campaign was a flop. It was a flimsy pretext that the green color used in the package had been requisitioned for the war effort.

Lasker's greatest achievement was his national campaign to per­suade women to smoke in public. He could be said to be the father of women's lung cancer. At that time, few women were bold enough to be seen smoking in public. Ably assisted by his minions in Hollywood, Lasker saw to it that in many scenes of movies, leading women would be seen smoking cigarettes in public. His greatest success was through Bette Davis, who delivered her lines in almost every scene through a thick cloud of smoke. Smoking in public now became common, creating a vast new market for cigarettes, which, of course, was Lasker's only goal. Some twenty years later, many of these women were dying from emphysema or lung cancer.

Lasker's furious pace took its toll. He had three nervous break­downs, but his greatest shock came when his wife died in 1936. He met an actress the following year, Doris Kenyon, and impulsively married her. The marriage lasted only a few months. She went back to Hollywood, divorced him, and married the brother-in-law of pianist Arthur Rubinstein, which proved to be a successful marriage. In 1939, while lunching with Wild Bill Donovan at the "21 Club" who was soon to become head of the wartime OSS, later the CIA, he was introduced to an attractive divorcee, an art dealer named Mary Woodard. The daughter of a Wisconsin banker, she had started a dress company, Hollywood Patterns, designing inexpensive dresses for working girls, and then had gone into the art business. A few days later, while he was lunching with publisher Richard Simon, he met her a second time, and decided to marry her. He was just starting to build an art collection and knew very little about painting. He later claimed he had married her to save a million dollars in sales commissions, which he probably did. She tried to get him to relax, and soon had him going to a psychoanalyst. He was lunching with Richard Simon again when he jumped up and said, "I'm late for my psychoanalyst." Simon seemed puzzled, and Lasker explained, "I'm doing it to get rid of all the hate the advertising business has put into me." It is likely that he had put more hate in the advertising busi­ness than it had put into him. Despite the fact that practically all of his close friends were prominent Jews, such as Bernard Baruch, [H: Please remember that it was Bernard Baruch who showed up with Eisenhower at a pre-scheduled meeting with my Space Command and we had to change locations, etc. Do you still wonder why we have a difficult time in interaction with you lovely people of Earth? It was Baruch and the Catholic Priest, also present--who prevented Eisenhower from mentioning the meeting to the public--they didn't "want to panic the Christian community".] Anna Rosenberg, David Sarnoff, the New York pub­licist Ben Sonnenberg, and Lewis Strauss of Kuhn, Loeb Company, he rarely hired Jews in his advertising firm. When he was re­proached for this, he merely smiled, and said, "Look, I went into this firm and took it over. Do you think I want somebody to do that to me?"

Among his proteges were very successful advertising men such as Emerson Foote, William Benton and Fairfax Cone, all of whom were gentiles. Lasker liked to call them his little "goyim". He joked about how he could make them jump when he barked.

In 1942, Lasker, having made a large fortune, decided to close down Lord and Thomas. His proteges went on to found the firm of Foote, Cone and Belding; William Edward, a lawyer, had married Carla, the daughter of Bernard Gimbel of the department store for­tune. At the wedding, Lasker dourly cited an old Jewish proverb, "You can't make an omelet from two spoiled eggs." He was proven right; they got a divorce. His daughter, Mary, married the Chicago steel tycoon, Leigh Block, of Inland Steel. They amassed a multi­million dollar art collection. She also became a vice president of Foote, Cone and Belding. Block's brother, Joseph, became presi­dent of the Jewish Federation.

Lasker had grown bored with wearing white shirts; he started the vogue of wearing blue shirts in New York, which became the hall­mark of the advertising profession. He never learned to drive a car and had no mechanical skills. After moving to New York, he be­grudged the enormous upkeep of his Lake Forest estate; in 1939 he donated it to the University of Chicago. The trustees promptly sold it off for building lots; the million dollar mansion went for $110,000.

Lasker's importance to this narrative is the fact that he and his cohort, a patent medicine huckster named Elmer Bobst, took the American Cancer Society, a moribund group in the early 1940's, and within months built it into a powerful national force. They used all their techniques for promotion, fund-raising and business organi­zation to make this group the most powerful force in the new billion dollar world of cancer treatment, an achievement for which the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly was extremely grateful. They sum­marily dumped a cumbersome organization known as the Women's Army, which was very decentralized, and placed all the power of the American Cancer Society in New York. All of its meetings are held there. They also used their business connections to bring in a new board of trustees from the biggest names in banking and industry, charging $100,000 each for the privilege of serving on the board.

After launching the American Cancer Society as a viable or­ganization, Lasker himself became ill with cancer. He was operated on for intestinal cancer in 1950, not knowing that cutting into a can­cer immediately spreads it throughout the body. He died in 1952 at the Harkness Rockefeller pavilion. Before his death, he had set up the Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation, which was to make Mary Lasker the most powerful woman in American medicine. [H: It is also because of this desire that the cancer was deliberately intro­duced to other varying parts of Lasker's anatomy while under the "slash, cut, burn and mutilate" knife of the surgeons. Who, by the way, also did very well later for their sincere and success­ful efforts. It is almost a reminder of how well the government can get rid of problems as with Casey and his "sudden and abrupt" brain tumor which killed him almost instantly. How could anyone fake cancer of the brain? That story in itself is al­most worthy of telling right here but I have much to cover and that can come along with the CIA.]

Mary Lasker soon controlled a vast empire of grants, foun­dations, Washington lobbyists and other organizations. Her most able lieutenant in achieving this power was the Rockefeller em­ployee, Anna Rosenberg, who has worked closely with her for years.

Elmer Bobst, who was Lasker's partner in putting the American Cancer Society over the top, was also a tycoon. Unlike Lasker, Bobst had come from a poor family, but he also had the born huck­ster's mentality, taken from that native American entrepreneur, P.T. Barnum, who said, "There's a sucker born every minute." Bobst joined the drug firm of Hoffman LaRoche in 1911, where his talents as a salesman got him the presidency of the firm. He was also a shrewd businessman; just after World War I, knowing that com­modity prices were bound to fall, he was shocked to find that the firm had accumulated huge inventories in the New Jersey ware­house. He quickly closed a deal with Eastman Kodak to buy five tons of bromides, a key ingredient not only of analgesics but also of photographic supplies. He offered the bromides at sixty cents a pound, ten cents below the market price. Within a few weeks, the market price had fallen to sixteen cents a pound.

Bobst's great achievement at Hoffman LaRoche was his ad­vertising campaign for vitamins. It was so successful that he won the nickname of "The Vitamin King". He made millions of dollars in the stock market, and he decided to leave lloffman LaRoche for greener pastures. In 1944, he called in Cravath, Swaine and Moore, the lawyers for Kuhn, Loeb Company, to negotiate his terms; they got him a very favorable settlement of $150,000 the first year and $60,000 a year until his seventy-fifth birthday. Having made his fortune in peddling vitamins, he now moved on to the higher-priced pills, becoming head of Warner-Lambert. This firm's biggest prod­uct was Listerine. Gerald Lambert, no mean huckster himself, had built Lambert Pharmacal into a giant empire, principally through his relentless warnings about the perils of "bad breath". His father had invented a mouthwash, for which he appropriated the most famous name in medicine, Baron Joseph Lister, the inventor of antiseptics and asepsis in hospitals. A prominent surgeon, Baron Lister had op­erated on Queen Victoria herself, the only time she submitted to the knife. Gerald Lambert made his name a household word with full-page advertisements for Listerine. Banner headlines warned that "Even your best friend won't tell you." Lambert coined a new word for this plague, halitosis, from the Latin for bad breath. At the height of the 1920's stock market boom, Gerald Lambert sold his firm to the Warner Corporation for $25 million, the equivalent of $500 million in 1980 dollars. The deal was closed in 1928; within a year, the value of the firm had dropped to $5 million.

The resulting Warner-Lambert Corporation had showed little growth during the 1930's. Bobst was hired primarily for his mar­keting skills, but he soon proved that he was an empire builder, buying more than fifty additional companies. In an astute move, he named Albert Driscoll president of the firm. Driscoll had just served seven years as Governor of New Jersey. As directors, Bobst brought in the shrewdest brains on Wall Street, Sidney Weinberg of Goldman Sachs, and Frederick Eberstadt, of Eberstadt and Com­pany. As director of public relations, he brought in Anna Rosen­berg, who had long been director of labor relations for the Rocke­fellers at their primary holding Rockefeller Center. This meant that Bobst had now established a key Rockefeller connection, as Anna Rosenberg continued to have a close association with her former employers.

Because he was the only one who was aware of his ambitious plans, Bobst had bought heavily into Warner-Lambert stock before he began his great expansion. As a result, the stock increased- many times in value. He was now the largest stock holder, worth many times millions. FORTUNE described his "seigniorial life style, his vast estates in New Jersey, his 87 foot yacht at Spring Lake, and his suite at the Waldorf". In fact, Bobst owned five yachts in succes­sion, each one larger than the last, and all named Alisa, the last be­ing called Alisa V. He also married a second time, marrying the Lebanese delegate to the United Nations. He was chairman of the War Bond drive in New Jersey during World War II, and became a large contributor to political campaigns. He thus became a very in­fluential behind the scenes figure in the Republican Party, so much so that he chose his own man for the presidency.

Eisenhower's Secretary of the Treasury, George Humphrey, of the Rothschild bank, National City Bank of Cleveland, had been slated to speak at a fund-raising rally in New Jersey of which Bobst was chairman. He became ill, and Vice President Richard Nixon was sent in his place. This began a close relationship between Bobst and Nixon, which was almost a father-son relationship. Nixon was dazzled by Bobst's millionaire life style, and he saw to it that the Bobsts were frequently invited to the White House dinners. In 1957, Nixon was able to introduce Bobst to the Queen of England at a White House gathering.

After Nixon's ill-advised, if justified, attack on the press after his campaign in California, it seemed that his political career was over. However, Bobst was not about to give up on such a potential ally. Nixon later fondly recalled the best advice Bobst ever gave him. Bobst had drawn him aside, during what was a period of great de­pression for Nixon, and earnestly told him, "Dick, it's time you learned the facts of life. You see, there are really only two kinds of people in the world, the eaters and the eaten. You just have to make up your mind which group you're going to be in."

At a time when Nixon had little or no prospects, Bobst went to his attorney, Matt Herold, the senior partner of the Wall Street firm of Mudge, Rose and Stern. Warner Lambert was their biggest client and when Bobst "suggested" to Herold that he bring in Nixon from California as a partner of the firm, Herold was only too happy to oblige. With this springboard, Nixon was able to launch his success­ful campaign for the Presidency.

The move turned out to be a wise investment all around. After Nixon won the election, the Republican Governors of the states of New Jersey, Nebraska, Kentucky, and West Virginia turned over all of their tax-free bond business to Mudge Rose, giving the firm an additional million dollars a year of income. In January of 1971, Mudge Rose appeared before the Justice Department on the matter of the merger of Warner-Lambert and Parke-Davis, a decision which meant millions of dollars to Bobst. Attorney General John Mitchell, also a protege of Bobst, disqualified himself; his deputy Attorney General, Richard Kleindienst, then let the merger go through. These were the only deals which became a matter of public knowledge; no doubt there were many more. In a brilliant tax move, Mitchell ad­vised Bobst to donate $11,000,000 to New York University for the Bobst Library.

In 1973, Bobst had his autobiography published by David McKay Company in New York. An obvious "puff" job, it was a glowing account of Bobst's accomplishments, unmarred by any unfavorable comments. When Bobst died in 1978, no obituary appeared in the New York Times. This was an amazing circumstance concerning one of New York's most prominent tycoons. The Times routinely memorialized even the minor executives of New York firms. Strangely enough, a public statement about Bobst did appear in the Times, a memorial eulogy by his longtime friend, Laurance Rocke­feller, the chairman of Sloan Kettering. Rockefeller said, "His ef­forts in the fight against cancer earned the sincere gratitude of cancer patients and researchers as well as the general public." Perhaps Bobst's real memorial is the label of Listerine, which still carries the message, "For Bad Breath, insect bites, infectious dandruff; 26.9% alcohol."

********

Dharma, this seems a good place for another chapter break. I also wish to ask that you of the public watch something which is occur­ring right under your noses. Watch the manner in which Oliver North is being set up and getting his big pay-off for taking the fall in the Iran-Contra affair. He is being groomed for President of the U.S., or other major office, by his little conspiracy-mates. He is on (the same program reruns) Larry King Live frequently and referred to more frequently as a wondrously fine and beyond reproach up­standing citizen and officer. He was without a doubt the most sniveling treasonist of your day and age. He represents the common criminal drug pusher and cover-up artist. He will now be placed as a "regular" on the "Capital Gang" and other regular deceiver pro­grams. If you pay attention, America, you can see it happen and ex­actly HOW it happens.

Let us have respite, please. Thank you. By the way, most of these wondrous liquid medications and miracle drugs are at least 26.9% alcohol! Beats beer and wine and is ever so much more socially acceptable!

[wave]

PJ 42

CHAPTER 15

REC #3 HATONN

THU., JANUARY 9, 1992 4:32 P.M. YEAR 5, DAY 146

THURSDAY, JANUARY 9, 1992

CONTINUATION: PROFITS FROM CANCER

As we move on with this gross dissertation on "Cancer", I ask that you at America West please make sure our old hard-ball denouncer and debunker in Florida (who has a talk-radio show in which he asked me to guest and then twice was so insulting as to embarrass his own listeners and claimed to be head of "World Headquarters for Information" or something as silly--I believe Jack Cole was his name, if not please Edit to correctness) GETS A COPY OF THIS WHOLE PAPER. He said: "If you are real, Hatonn, then why don't you cure cancer and then we could believe you!" Do you ones actually still sit with the opinion that that would be true? Do you think anyone or thing will be allowed to give YOU the cure for anything? This bunch also accused us of anti-Semitism--well, these are the guilty parties, what do YOU say? If you wish to label these bastard killers "Semites", I guess you must know that I am anti-Semitic. They are most certainly self-proclaimed Zionists and brothers, ZIONISM IS RACISM! Further, the attempt is to wipe out all other races--AND THESE ARE NOT JUDEANS! It is time that EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU CONFRONT THESE FACTS! "Jews" will be just as dead as fast, or faster, than any other group of people on the face of the earth--"Jews", if that is what you wish to label selves (although you are NOT), had better take note that you are the primary target because you ARE THE ENEMY OF THE ELITE ZIONISTS!

In 1978, the American Cancer Society had $140 million income of which less than 30% was spent on cancer research, with 56% going to cover administrative costs. The Society had $200 million in investments. Before the Bobst-Lasker takeover in 1944, its income had never gone past $600,000 a year; the following year, it raised $5 million. In 1982, Allan Sonnenshein published a warning, "Watchout; the American Cancer Society May Be Hazardous to Your Health!" In 1955, in a power move, ACS took over all re­search from the National Research Council, executing a brilliant coup by creating a new Science Advisory Council to represent American hospitals and universities. Dr. Samuel Epstein, in his book, THE POLITICS OF CANCER, noted that "apart from being uninvolved in cancer prevention, other than, to a limited extent, to­bacco, senior (ACS) officials have developed for the society a repu­tation of being indifferent, if not actively hostile, to regulatory needs for the prevention of exposure to carcinogenic chemicals in the gen­eral environment and in the workplace." Epstein reported that the ACS opposed regulation of such potential carcinogens as Red Dye #2, TRIS, and DES. ACS refused to support the Clean Water Act, and blamed victims for cancer. EPA had reported that indoor pol­lutants cause six thousand cancer deaths a year and that 38 million Americans drink water with unsafe levels of lead and other toxic matter, [H: Just today it is making headlines that thousands of babies have been given lead in their formulas producing lead poi­soning and retardation--due to using tap water to mix baby for­mulas. Does this strike you as being particularly horrendous that you are lied to about your very life-resources?] including chlorine by-products. DES, diethylstilbestrol, was widely used from the 1940's to the early 1970's as a synthetic female hormone which was routinely prescribed by doctors to prevent miscarriage; it was not tested for possible side effects, nor did anyone know what they were. Finally, a student at the University of Chicago Medical Cen­ter showed that not only was it ineffective in preventing miscarriage, but it might have side effects. This finding failed to halt its use. In 1972, its longterm effects began to appear, cancer of the breast, with vaginal cancer in daughters of those patients treated with DES, as well as other genital malformations and abnormalities. It was also linked to liver damage.

Lee Edson, in THE CANCER RIPOFF notes that 74 private companies near the National Institute of Health in Bethesda were charging the government 144% overhead plus 9% profit to perform virus research. Nixon had placed his protege, Dr. Frank Rauscher, in charge of NCI; he was a virologist who began to promote chemotherapy as the answer to cancer. Dr. Rauscher claimed that the NCI chemotherapy program "has provided effective treatment for cancer patients all over this country, and the world". This claim was promptly challenged by Dean Burk, head of the cyclochemical section of the NCI, pointing out that "virtually all of the chemothera­peutic agents now approved by the FDA for use or testing in human cancer patients are highly toxic to markedly immuno-suppressive and highly carcinogenic in rats and mice, themselves producing cancers in a wide variety of body organs." Despite this criticism, Rauscher was then named head of the President's National Cancer Adyisory Board.

The side effects of chemotherapy have been graphically described by many of its victims, the terrible nausea, loss of hair, sudden weight loss and many other adverse factors. A book by M. Morra, CHOICES; REALISTIC ALTERNATIVES IN CANCER TREAT­MENT, Avon, 1980, reports favorably on all of the Establishment's "cut, slash and burn techniques". Morra mentions diet only in its relation to nausea from chemotherapy; he soberly advises that you "let someone else do the cooking so that the smell of the food won't nauseate you." Morra gave no advice on how to serve food without smell.

Since Memorial Sloan Kettering's first benefactor, James Ewing, dosed himself to death with radium in 1913, it has remained the treatment of choice at this Cancer Center. The New York Times noted July 4, 1979 that 70% of all cancer patients at Memorial re­ceive radiation treatments, at a charge of $500,000 a year. It now performs 11,000 surgical procedures and 65,000 radium treatments a year. In 1980, Memorial bought all new equipment for its radium treatment, an expenditure of $4.5 million. However, radium treat­ment continues to be a horrifying treatment in its effects.

In 1937, Dr. Percy Furnivall, a prominent surgeon at London Hospital, diagnosed his own tumor as cancer. On February 26, 1938, he published in the British Medical Journal an impassioned plea as a result of his experience, "Tragedies from radium treatment are of frequent occurrence, and the publicity given to radium treat­ment of cancer is a disgrace to the Minister of Health and the vested interests which charge fantastic prices for this body-destroying sub­stance. I do not wish my worst enemy the prolonged hell I have been through with radium neutitis and myalgic over six months.... This account of my own case is a plea for a very careful considera­tion of all the factors before deciding which is the most suitable form of treatment." He died shortly thereafter, yet his plea had no effect on the continued use of radium treatments for cancer.

The late Senator Hubert Humphrey, who died of cancer, is often cited as an advertisement for radium treatment. Jane Brody in her New York limes book, YOU CAN FIGHT CANCER AND WIN, coauthored with American Cancer Society vice-president Holleb in 1977, cites Hubert Humphrey as "a famous beneficiary of modern radiotherapy". She glosses over the fact that "this famous benefi­ciary" was totally disillusioned with radium therapy before his death. In 1973 he was found to have cancer of the bladder; he was treated by X ray, and in 1976, his physician, Dr. Dabney Jarman, tri­umphantly reported that "As far as we are concerned, the Senator is cured." (New York Times, October 6, 1976). Humphrey continued to wither away, undergoing more chemotherapy, until he flatly re­fused to go back to Memorial Cancer Center for more treatment. Quoted in the Daily News, January 14, 1978, he called chemother­apy "bottled death".

The Washington Post in February 1988 ran a story "Cancer Treatment Toxic". "We are spared very little as we see healthy looking people turned before our eyes into shaking, shivering, nau­seated bundles of misery . . . The successes, although few, have been dramatic."

One factor which has been consistently ignored in the devel­opment of cancer is the role of unusual stress. We all face daily stresses in our lives, with which we cope as best we can. However, unusual and prolonged stress places a greater strain on our system than we may be able to cope with. This is particularly true today, when sinister hidden forces poison all our communications with their shadowy propaganda, while assuring us that they stand only for "compassion and caring". A writer named Morley Roberts ad­vanced a startling theory of cancer in 1926. An English scientist, Roberts belonged to no known school of thought, and because of his independence, his works have been largely ignored. His theory of Organic Materialism advances the following points:

"Malignancy and Evolution: Malignancy is the diversion of en­ergy from high differentiation into the proliferation of low-grade ep­ithelia which can endure irritation but only differentiate with diffi­culty." Epithelioma, a common form of cancer, is the multiplication of cells of the simplest type in the body, which, like those of the outer skin, the epidermis, are comparably short-lived and unable to differentiate. An organism afflicted with cancer is unable to dif­ferentiate to meet the conditions of its existence, because its energy has been diverted into multiplying low-grade cells. Cancer is the proliferation of low grade cell colonies in the organism. They mi­grate through the body seeking a place for themselves, although they have no function. Wherever they gather, they rob the higher grade cells of nourishment, where they are gathered into cell colonies as the organs of the body. These organs are choked off and starve, eventually causing the death of the organism. The modern State is a malignant organism dedicated to the proliferation of lower grade units at the expense of higher, more differentiated types. The more productive organisms are heavily taxed to support large numbers of non-productive and poorly differentiated growths. The steadily in­creasing strain on the productive members of the State causes their premature death, just as the proliferation of the lower grade cells in the cancerous organism kills the higher differentiated cells. Roberts posits the question, "May we go further and even say that the com­mon tendency to malignancy is the result of sociology refinements which ask for a higher role for epithelia?"

Morley Roberts posited a theory of the development of the or­ganism, in which other cells began to gather around the excretory cell colonies of primitive organisms, and subsequently these cell colonies began to give off secretions which were poisonous to the organism. In self-defense, the organism threw up fortifications, or other cell colonies, around the vicious presence, which, in time, be­came part of the organism, and whose secretions became useful to it. Roberts calls this a theory of the development of the organs of the body.

The role of nutrition in cancer has yet to be seriously researched by the billion dollar boondoggles of the National Cancer Institute. Yet in 1887, an Albany, New York physician, Ephraim Cutter, M.D. wrote a book called DIET IN CANCER, in which he stated, "Cancer is a disease of nutrition."

Hippocrates coined the word diaitia, meaning "a way of life" which is what a diet is. In the classical world, "meat" meant the daily fare, and referred to oats, barley, rye, wheat, fruit and nuts. The confusion as to the meaning of the word meat occurs in transla­tions of the Bible. In Genesis, it is stated, "Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat." Hippocrates' advice to physicians was that they should first find out what food is given to a patient, and who gives it.

The ongoing controversy over laetrile revolves around the fact that it is a substance called a nitriloside. In 1952, Dr. Ernest A. Krebs, Jr., a biochemist, discovered that cancer is caused by a defi­ciency of nitrilosides, which occur naturally in over twelve hundred foods and plants. Animals usually instinctively seek out grasses and other plants which contain nitrilosides, yet when humans do the same thing they are attacked by federal agents. Some researchers believe that the adverse effects of carcinogens, radiation and sunburn on humans is caused by the fact that they are suffering from poor nutrition. These nutrition experts argue that coal tar does not cause cancer and that the sun does not cause skin cancer. Rather, these conditions arise from the sun's effect upon the skin of a person who is consuming too many sugars, fats and dairy products. The sun's rays create an acidic condition which causes these substances to rise to the surface of the skin, causing an irritation which can then be­come a catalyst. It is noted that people in tropical countries, who are exposed to strong sunlight, rarely get skin cancer because they eat little meat and fats. It was also discovered after the atomic bombing of Japanese civilians that those who were still eating their traditional diet of brown rice, sea salt and miso vegetables, were little damaged by the same amount of atomic radiation which killed those who were eating a more modern diet of fats and meats.

Some experts note that they can detect cancer by the peculiar smell of a person in its early stages, the smell of decomposition. Others note that cancer can be detected by a greenish cast to the skin. The epidemic of prostate cancer among American men seems to be the result of a diet of rich foods, with frequent ingestion of eggs, meat and dairy products, and baked goods made with refined flour. A suggested remedy is a diet of fruit and rice, the same diet which is recommended to lower blood pressure and which has been featured at Duke University for many years. Beef is said to be par­ticularly dangerous for prostate and colon cancer. Nutritionists be­lieve that cancer represents a reverse evolutionary process, in which cells decompose or change back to a more primordial vegetable type of life. This corresponds in some ways with the theories of Morley Roberts.

It is notable that only four percent of the nation's medical schools offer a course in nutrition. This reflects the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly's obsession with drugs and its commitment to the allo­pathic school of medicine, as opposed to homeophathic or holistic medicine.

Nobel Prize winner James Watson declared at a cancer sym­posium at MIT that "the American public has been sold a nasty bill of goods about cancer . . . a soporific orgy", as reported in the New York Times March 9, 1975. In January of 1975, Dr. Charles C. Edwards, a researcher, wrote to the Secretary of HEW that the war on cancer was politically motivated and was based on spending money. The prominent French oncologist, Dr. Lucien Israel, said, "Radium is an unproven method in many cases . . . indeed, there have been no conclusive trials" on radiation therapy. Israel terms it "a palliative for relief of pain, etc., temporary in nature". He also points out that "The medical community has been thrown into confu­sion by recent studies which have shown that metastases may be more frequent in cases that have received radiation." In short, the radiation increases the spread of cancer. It has long been known that cutting into a tumor causes it to spread throughout the body. The exploratory operation to see if you have cancer usually guarantees that it will be fatal.

Nevertheless, the American Cancer Society continues to back all of the losing methods of treating cancer. For twenty years, it has patently repeated its famous Cancer's Seven Warning Signals, which ignore chemicals in the environment and discounts FDA warnings about coal tar and hair dyes. In 1976, the ACS released a press communication, "Urgent Message; Mammography; Benefits and Risks". Dr. John Bailar of the Harvard School of Public Health, and editor of the prestigious NCI Cancer Journal, was horrified. He wrote a letter to the acting director of the NCI, Dr. Guy Newell, "I have just become aware of a problem that has the seeds of a major disaster.... The Urgent Message itself is plain hogwash, the state­ment is seriously faulty, and hence represents a grave danger to that bulk of women who should avoid mammography." Nevertheless, the ACS flyer went to every hospital in New York, and to 15,000 physicians. Despite the known risks of exposing women to repeated X rays, the ACS still emphasizes annual mammographies as one of its most vaunted techniques for "controlling" cancer. Jane Brody's book, YOU CAN FIGHT CANCER AND WIN, recommends this and many other ACS goals.

[H: I ask you to pause right here and harken back to the news YESTERDAY. There is potential severe threat to some women undergoing mammograms. This was headline news and still, again, they discounted the numbers of at risk patients to be so slight as to not be worthy of serious note. If you don't see the confirmations flowing all about you, then how are we to ever reach the masses of civilization? If you are so asleep that you allow your own murder without speaking out--then how can God, through his Hosts, do your job FOR you? You see, I CAN give you the cure for cancer--pure and simple, does it make you believe me? I thought not! You want magic with no responsibility and, moreover, without changing any of your unGodly behaviors for you want to continue with the "if it feels good--go for it". Chelas, it is those irresponsible actions of the physical being now trained in false expectations which has brought you to this stage and you will not heal anything without changing the status of your mental-set. You, for instance, cannot stamp out venereal diseases or stop promiscuity by passing out condoms or teaching "safe sex" in grade schools or kindergarten. Until, further, the adults take responsibility, how in the world do you expect the children to do other than worse than the example? So be it.]

The American Cancer Society also stands firmly behind radical mastectomy, the total removal of the breast in cases of women's breast cancer [H: and then restructuring with silicone implants, etc. Which came first, the poison chicken or the infected egg?]. This technique is frowned upon as unusually brutal and ineffective; it has long been abandoned in most European countries, including England, France and the Scandinavian countries and neighboring Canada. In 1975, when Rose Kuttner published her definitive work, BREAST CANCER which was critical of radical mastectomy, the ACS refused to list or recommend it.

It was Elmer Bobst's goal to make the National Cancer Institute "autonomous", much as the Federal Reserve System is "autonomous". He was able to achieve this goal because of his long­standing personal connection with President Richard Nixon. As the mastermind of the American Cancer Society, he really intended it to become "autonomous" from Washington influence, while making it completely subservient to the American Cancer Society from New York. Rep. David Obey, Democrat, Wisconsin, noted that "The American Cancer Society wants to keep the National Cancer Institute strong in bank-roll and weak in staff so that it can direct its spending without too much interference." A very astute observation. One of its directors, Mary Lasker, who, thirty-six years after Albert Lasker's death, is still described by Washington observers as the most powerful woman in American medicine. The National Institute of Health bought the Visitation Convent in Bethesda from the Catholic Church for $4.4 million; it now houses the Mary Lasker Center. Through her access to funding, the ACS maintains fulltime lobbyists in Washington, headed by Col. Luke Quinn, and aided by Mike Gorman. The Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, with Washington lobbyist Lloyd Cutler, also works with Mary Lasker.

Whatever else may be said of the American Cancer Society, there can be no doubt that it remains well insulated against reality. A leading Washington reporter, Daniel S. Greenberg, wrote in the Columbia Journalism Review in 1975 that cancer rates for most types of cancer had been static since the 1950's; some rates actually declined, probably because the use of toxic chemotherapy increased the death rate. One researcher told Greenberg there had been little improvement since 1945. Dr. Frank Rauscher challenged Greenberg at the 1975 ACS Science Writers Seminar, claiming that these fig­ures were out of date; however, when the new figures were released, they upheld Greenberg's findings. This rings hollowly against the annual promises of "breakthroughs" when the two and a half million "volunteers" swarm across America shaking their tin cans and beg­ging for the rich. They have been making these same promises and raising the same amounts of money, or more, for almost fifty years. Laurance Rockefeller noted in Reader's Digest, February 1957 an exultant comment, "There is, for the first time, a scent of ultimate victory in the air," as he described "progress against cancer". Sloan Kettering director C.P. Dusty Rhodes was quoted in the Denver Post, October 3, 1953, "I am convinced that in the next decade, or maybe more, we will have a chemical as effective against cancer as sulfanilolomides and penicillin are against bacterial infection." Well, maybe more. In 1956, Dr. Wendell F. Stanley, a Nobel Prize Winner, reported in an address to the annual AMA convention, "viruses are the prime cause of most types of cancer". Nothing more has been heard on this subject in thirty years.

One physician, Dr. Cecil Pitard, was informed that he had termi­nal cancer and that he had only a few weeks to live. The Knoxville, Tennessee physician was diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic as having lymphoma. Lumphatic cancer results because the body is no longer able to detoxify or cleanse itself. Tonsillectomies often initiate a deterioration of the lymphatic system, resulting in lymph gland in­flammation, and eventually, lymphatic cancer. With nothing to lose, Dr. Pitard experimented on himself with the anti-flu bacterial anti­gen, staphage lysate and sodium butyrate, a fatty acid food found in milk and butter. He soon found that he had been completely cured. Nevertheless, the Cancer Establishment ignored his report, and be­came even more vociferous in its campaign against "unproven reme­dies". In most cases like Dr. Pitard's the cancer profiteers sneer that it probably was misdiagnosed and he never had cancer, or that he had a "spontaneous remission", which is their most oft repeated response. It would seem that they would show some interest in how to obtain a "spontaneous remission" because they have now been talking about it for half a century, yet we have heard nothing from the $70 million a year research program at Sloan Kettering about spontaneous remission.

After Dr. Ralph Moss had been fired from Sloan Kettering for revealing the positive results of laetrile experiments, he made public the fact that the Institute was sitting on many other results of suc­cessful treatment of cancer, including more than one thousand posi­tive cases of response to the Coley treatment since 1906. Moss re­ported that Dr. James Ewing, "Coley's nemesis and arch rival, turned Memorial Hospital into a medical branch of the radium trust." Dr. William E. Koch, professor of physiology at Detroit Medical College and the University of Michigan, presaged freeradical pathology treatment with the development of Glyoxylide, which stimulated the body to oxidate toxins. Although his treatment was never scientifically refuted, Koch, who began oxidation studies in 1915 and used this treatment since 1918, was persecuted for sixteen years by the Medical Monopoly. He was finally driven out of the country, and died in Brazil in 1967. The FDA had started to harass him in 1920; the Wayne County Medical Society formed a "Cancer Committee" of doctors in 1923 who condemned Koch's treatment. His stimulation of cell oxidation treatment is by carefully planned diet which cleansed the system, yet this proven treatment is still de­nounced today by the cancer profiteers as "quackery". Koch tried to continue his work in Mexico and Brazil, but the FDA refused to abandon their pursuit. He was prosecuted in 1942 and 1946; the FDA finally obtained a permanent injunction against the Koch treat­ment in 1950. Several physicians who had successfully treated can­cer with the Koch treatment were expelled from the medical society. It was still allowable to kill a patient but it was unforgivable to cure him.

Another independent physician, Dr. Max Gerson, discovered that a vegetarian diet, with raw fruits and vegetables, and no salt, cured migraine and lupus. He continued his studies until he found that detoxification of the body could cure cancer. In 1958, he published his findings in his book, A CANCER THERAPY, emphasizing a low fat diet, no salt and a minimum of protein. In 1964, he was in­vited to testify before a Senate Subcommittee, which produced a 227 page report, document number 89471. The copies of this report were never distributed by the Senate; it received no coverage in medical journals, and Dr. Gerson never received one cent from any charitable organization such as the American Cancer Society to ei­ther prove or disprove his findings, even though these groups claimed they were "researching" a cure of cancer.

Another famous case was that of Harry Hoxsey, who used a herbal treatment, based upon Indian remedies, for cancer for thirty-five years. In a well-publicized court battle, Hoxsey won a libel suit against Morris Fishbein; the good doctor was forced to admit under cross-examination that he, the most famous doctor in the United States, had never practiced medicine one day in his life.

Dr. Robert E. Lincoln discovered the bacteriophage method of conquering cancer, in which viruses parasitically attach and destroy specific bacteria. He received national attention when he cured the son of Senator Charles Tobey with this method. Tobey was as­tounded to learn that Dr. Lincoln has been expelled from the Massachusetts Medical Society because he was curing people of cancer. He conducted a Congressional investigation, in which his special counsel from the Department of Justice, Benedict Fitzgerald, wrote, April 28, 1953, "The alleged machinations of Dr. J. J. Moore (for the past ten years the treasurer of American Medical Association) could involve the AMA and others in a conspiracy of alarming proportions....behind and over all this is the weirdest conglomera­tion of corrupt motives, intrigues, selfishness, jealousy, obstruction and conspiracy I have ever seen. My investigation to date should convince this Committee that a conspiracy does exist to stop the free flow and use of drugs in interstate commerce which allegedly (have) solid therapeutic value. Public and private funds have been thrown around like confetti at a country fair to close up and destroy clinics, hospitals and science research laboratories which do not conform to the viewpoint of medical associations. How long will the American people take this?"

Thirty-five years, they are still taking it. The outcome of the Tobey hearings is instructive. Senator Tobey died suddenly of a heart attack, as happens in Washington when a politician treads on dan­gerous ground. He was succeeded on the Committee by Senator John Bricker of Ohio. Bricker, for many years, was considered to be a dedicated conservative by millions of Americans. In reality, he was the lawyer for a number of large drug manufacturers and bankers, the ultimate establishment figure. He promptly fired Spe­cial Counsel Benedict Fitzgerald; the Hearings were then closed down.

Dr. Robert Lincoln was bold enough to sue the Massachusetts Medical Society for libel; he also died before the case could come to trial.

Dr. Andrew C. Ivy, vice president of the University of Illinois, began to use a preparation which he called Krebiozen. He suc­ceeded in curing cancer with it; the AMA promptly published a re­port on Krebiozen which ruled that it was "of no benefit". A 289 day trial resulted, in which Dr. Ivy was cleared of all counts against him. Dr. Peter de Marco, a graduate of Hahnemann Medical School, successfully treated over 800 patients with PVY, procaine polyvinyl pyrrlidone; his license to practice medicine in New Jersey was revoked.

A favorite recommendation of the American Cancer Society is the "Pap" test for cancer, despite its many drawbacks. Insight maga­zine, January 11, 1988, criticized many diagnostic laboratories for doing sloppy work, quoting the Wall Street Journal of November 1987 that "Pap smears have a false negative rate of from 20-40%; a false negative means death by cancer." Stung by this exposure of a method which the ACS had frenetically promoted for many years, Dr. Harmon J. Eyre, president of the American Cancer Society, called a joint press conference of the ACS, the AMA, and the NCI, to renew their joint recommendation that all women from 20 to 60 have an annual Pap smear. At this press conference reported by AP, January 20, 1988, Eyre was quoted, "A main reason for calling the press conference was an attempt to counter confusion about the value of the Pap test in light of recent publicity about the percentage of false negative results from some labs." Although he went on record with unqualified endorsements of the Pap tests, Eyre offered no an­swer to the problem of false negative reports or the terrible threat which it posed to many women.

Some women's groups are becoming alerted to the fact that the Medical Monopoly is needlessly condemning many women to death. The Washington Post noted, February 16, 1988, a report of a Women's Health Trial, in which 300 women demanded low fat tests in which fat in the diet would be reduced from 40% to 20%, the purpose being to diminish breast cancer. They asked for funding from the NCI, but the Board of Scientific counselors of NCI refused to advance any funding for the project. The women's spokesman pointed out that "NCI is committed to breast cancer control rather than prevention."

What would the most powerful woman in American medicine have said about this? Mary Lasker has been content to play the part of the gracious Lady Bountiful with the money her husband earned as the nation's most famous huckster. At the American Cancer So­ciety's Science Writers Seminars, which are held each year in some exotic hotel during the harsh winter months, Science noted May 18, 1973, that these spring seminars, held annually since 1949, always are held in warm climates, free junkets for science editors at big cir­culation newspapers and magazines. Science pointed out that these seminars, which cost ACS about $25,000, generate about 300 favor­able news stories and result in ACS raising about $85 million in ex­tra donations. This is probably one of the best investments around. In 1957, novelist Han Suyin, wearing an exquisite fur coat, delivered an enthusiastic report to the Science writers about how much good the chemical manufacturers have done for the health of our citizens. In all fairness to Han, Love Canal had not been discovered in 1957. The seminar met recently (1973) at the fabulous Rio Rico Inn near Tucson, Arizona. Not only are all expenses paid for the complaisant writers, but an extra treat, a Happy Hour at the bar at the end of each "work day", makes certain that the journalists float in to dinner in a very jovial mood. The Happy Hour is paid for by the gracious Mary Lasker. Saturday Review noted April 10, 1965, the ACS had an unusually effective public relations department. The secret of public relations is to obtain free space in major publications, instead of buying advertising. The Lasker connection also ensures that ma­jor New York agencies such as McCann Erickson, prepare adver­tising campaigns for ACS at no charge.

It is ironic that Albert Lasker, the co-creator of the American Cancer Society as we know it, and its subsidiary creature, the Na­tional Cancer Institute, should have built much of his fortune on his promotion of cigarette smoking. After his death from cancer, the American Cancer Society reluctantly came to the conclusion that "smoking is bad for your health". The mounting death toll from lung cancer forced the cigarette companies to consider alternatives; one of these was filters. On January 1, 1954, Kent cigarettes re­leased an ad to 80 newspapers that AMA tests had proved the Kent filters were the most efficient in removing cigarette tar. Because this "proof" was on a par with most other AMA claims, the AMA was compelled to protest to Lorillard, the manufacturer. Time mag­azine commented, April 12, 1954, "The usually soporific AMA barred advertisements for Kent cigarettes."

When the Surgeon General released his 1964 report on the harm­ful effects of cigarette smoking, it panicked the industry, even though it had long been heralded by previous studies. In June, 1954, Dr. Daniel Horn and Edward Cuyler Hammond presented a report to the AMA convention, linking smoking and lung cancer. Horn and Hammond headed the statistical department at the ACS. American Tobacco, one of Lasker's principal holdings, dropped five points in one day after this presentation. Hammond was a well known epi­demiologist who had served as a consultant to NIH, the U.S. Navy, USAF and the Brookhaven Lab. He was a vice president of ACS and director of its research. Although he had conducted extensive research on the effects of smoking, he steadfastly refused to share this material with other organizations. In 1971, he received an in­vitation to join a panel of scientists to discuss smoking; he refused, stating that it had been the policy of ACS since 1952 not to share data with other researchers. Current Biography reported in 1957 that Hammond smoked four packs of cigarettes a day; his wife smoked three packs a day. They both died of lung cancer.

Despite the ACS revelations, the tobacco interests, which were closely linked to the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly, fought a deter­mined rear guard action against the lung cancer campaign. One of Washington's best connected lobbyists, Patricia Firestone Chatham, widow of Representative R. T. Chatham, the chairman of Chatham Mills textile firm, stalled the placement of the warning on cigarette packages, "Smoking May Be Dangerous To Your Health", for five years, from 1964 to 1969. She lives in a two million dollar mansion in Georgetown, the former James Forrestal home.

The furor over lung cancer and smoking ignores a pertinent fact, that primitive tribes have been smoking tobacco for thousands of years, with no disagreeable after effects. In Virginia, Indians were smoking tobacco when Captain John Smith landed at Jamestown. Dr. Richard Passey, a researcher at London's Chester Beattie Re­search Institute, conducted twenty years of research on the tobacco problem. He found no significant link between the traditionally air dried tobacco and lung cancer. However, the American and English tobacco industries, which are dominated by the Rothschilds, use sugar in their tobacco, for a sweetened, sugar dried effect. England uses 17% sugar, the United States 10%. England has the highest lung cancer rate in the world. Dr. Passey concluded that the addi­tion of sugar to tobacco creates a carcinogenic substance in the nico­tine tar; in air dried tobacco, this carcinogen is not activated. He found no resulting lung cancer in the Soviet Union, China or Tai­wan, all of which produce air-dried tobacco. [H: I suggest you all read and reread Dr. Coleman's factual writing regarding cigarettes and remember that opium is utilized in the process and infiltrated into the paper and filters--thus addicting any smoker to the product.]

Esquire magazine featured a lengthy article on the work of the Janker Clinic in Bonn, Germany, finding that this clinic has treated 76,000 cancer cases since 1936, with full or partial remission in 70% of their patients. The Esquire reporter was astounded to learn that "the National Cancer Institute refuses to use Janker Clinic isophosphamide, A. Mulsin, Wobe enzymes and other successful Janker techniques because they refused to use sufficient dosage. The American Cancer Society is even more rigid. It prides itself on keeping the Janker techniques out of the United States." The Es­quire reporter went on to complain that "The American Cancer So­ciety has become a major part of the problem. It eschews sponsor­ship of chemical and research innovation and instead goes in for propaganda (cigarettes are harmful, the Seven Danger Signals, celebrity radio and TV spots) and it virtually condemns and suppresses unorthodox methods which, incidentally, it does not even trouble itself to investigate thoroughly."

The reporter did not know that the American Cancer Society has a vested interest in the established forms of cancer treatment; for in­stance, it holds a fifty per cent ownership of the patent rights of 5 FU, (5 flourouracil), one of the toxic drugs now in vogue as an "acceptable" medication for cancer. 5 FU and a later development 5-4-FU, are produced by Hoffman LaRoche Laboratories.

The Knight Ridder News Service reported in 1978 that the ACS refused to take a position on suspected pesticides which caused can­cer. The ACS board and its allied organization, Sloan Kettering, have many members who are heads of the largest chemical firms in the United States. The war against pollution will win no adherents there. ACS was asked to take a position on other dangerous sub­stances, such as Red Dye #2, the fire-retardant TRIS, used in chil­dren's clothing (it has since been banned), and forms of synthetic estrogen. Yet ACS again refused to state its position on these sub­stances. To counter its baneful influence, the Committee for Free­dom of Choice in Medicine planned to file an action in 1984 before the Permanent Committee on Human Rights at the United Nations, charging that the American medical establishment was in violation of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the Interna­tional Human Rights Agreement of 1966. Its prepared statement noted that "Americans have been needlessly slaughtered and crimi­nalized because a host of useful products, medicine and metabolic nutritional approaches in medicine have been crushed by vested in­terests." The Committee termed the present situation "a Medigate".

The failure to reduce the death rate from cancer is a grim in­dictment of the insurmountable obstacles which the ACS has placed in the path of a viable approach to this problem. John Bailar of the Harvard School of Public Health, addressing the American Associa­tion for the Advancement of Science in 1986-7, pointed out that "The government's fifteen year old national cancer program has not lowered the death rate for major forms of cancer and should there­fore be considered a failure. It has not produced the results it was supposed to produce." Bailar was well qualified to make this obser­vation; he had been editor of the Journal for NCI for twenty-five years. He was supported by a fellow member of the faculty of the School of Public Health, Dr. John Cairns, who reported that, "In the past twenty years, cancer has increased; there have been no signifi­cant gains against cancer since the 1950's."

Dr. Hardin James addressed the ACS Panel in 1969. A professor of medical physics at the University of California at Berkely, he stated that his studies had proven conclusively that untreated cancer victims actually live up to four times longer than treated individuals. "For a typical type of cancer, people who refused treatment live an average of twelve and a half years. Those who accepted surgery and other kinds of treatment lived an average of only three years. I at­tribute this to the traumatic effect of surgery on the body's natural defense mechanism. The body has a natural type of defense against every type of cancer."

In February, 1988, the National Cancer Institute released its definitive report, summarizing the "war against cancer". It reported that over the past thirty-five years, both the overall incidence and death rates from cancer have increased, despite "advances in detec­tion and treatment". Washington Post, February 9, 1988. The problem may be that, just as in other wars we have engaged in the twentieth century, too many of those "on our side" are actually working for the enemy.

********

Perhaps this might well remind you to look at the "War on Drugs" which is also handled by the very ones dealing the drugs and selling and providing the guns. If the enemy is "within" you are in bad trouble--America, you are in BAD TROUBLE. This subject has only dealt with the "CANCER" problem so don't think it is sweet­ness and light when you don't have "cancer"--it gets worse when you consider AIDS and "OTHER HIGHER FORMS OF KILLING!"

Dharma, thank you, chela, for an incredibly long day of work but it's a fun job and somebody gets to do it--or something like that, the saying goes.

Walk in beauty and in the Light and all shall be revealed and in the knowing can Man find freedom for he falls not for the evil de­ceiver's plans. God keep you in his Glory. Good day. Hatonn to clear, please.

PJ 42

CHAPTER 16

REC #1 HATONN

FRI., JANUARY 10, 1992 10:12 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 147

FRIDAY. JANUARY 10. 1992

Perhaps, since we have spent some heavy, heavy days of writing on the "Cut, Slash, Burn (and Poisoning)" method of medical treatment--most especially cancer treatment--I shall sit with you and take stock of subjects to be attended. I shan't give them all in detail or I might just lose my scribe for we are finishing our 49th book, this week, and she is weary.

I need, first of all, to thank Nora. I have no way of actually showing and giving my appreciation for the research efforts she is making in the JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA. It is difficult and "draining" work--although I note a distinct relief and rising level of Truth in her being as she finds I speak only Truth. Dharma has not time to read that which is being offered for I plan it that way. Please, Nora, if you feel slighted in response, it is because I ask that she not study the work you are doing--yet.

The hardest one group which you have to defend against are the ones who 'THINK' themselves 'JEWS'. As history is being outlayed in THEIR OWN BOOK you will find Truth and it is as I give it unto you. At the appropriate time, Nora, we shall present the information in abbreviated format as according to your excellent notations in ref­erence to those things which we have given so that confirmation can be presented to our brethren who are worse deceived than are you of the other religious beliefs.

Please note that as with the coinage of "terms" such as "Jews", which deceives the multitudes--so, too, does "born-again Christian". This latter term is applied only in the very recent days as a bigger fact of deceit. What the NEW term "born-again" means is NOT what was written as to be reborn in Christ/God. This new term in­dicates a belief in the physical assumption of believing on the person of one, Jesus, "who shed blood, died, and absolved you of all responsibility of sins by that sacrifice." No! It is and will always be exactly as that very person told you--you will stand responsible for that which you do even unto the end and through the recognition and assuming of that responsibility and coming into knowing with full intent of changing into the laws of God and Creation, shall ye be washed clean and accepted within the places of God. It has naught to do with forgiveness--for God does not "judge". You are either in the intent of Godness or you are short of Godness--forgiveness indi­cates a need for "another" to choose your path--nay, nay--you will choose for self and judge of self's actions and no blood of another will change an iota of it. The new presentations are to make you be­lieve what "they" want you to believe and deceive you unto the very ending of the cycle so that you are forfeit.

You fail to recognize the punch-line of "salvation". Indeed, you may come into intent of Godliness and you may fall short of per­fection--but the acceptance of the contract is based on the intent to stop breaking the laws of God and Creation as given unto you--not a bunch of rules and voted-in "OK's". Moreover, when you go forth after proclaiming to man and God that you accept His directions and are "birthed anew", you are in worse trouble when you deliberately break the original laws as given of God. You cannot have selective hearing and seeing so that it is as you WANT it to be without re­sponsibility or course change. It is fine if you choose that path but you will not be acceptable in the higher places of God and it gets very "iffy" as to whether or not you will get off the planet under any circumstances. If you continue in the lies, you will, at best, be taken into placement to continue your learning and not into the presence and co-creation places of God. Pronouncing a ritual chant simply does not cut it. You see, I come with the transportation to the place prepared for you--according to your stature in God's school of learning. Nothing is based on Man's physical anything--except as your actions project intent.

You ones in overwhelming mass denounce and reject the very ones and things sent for your security. Who taught you those things of rejection? Could it be that the Men who would control you have led you through the primroses? Think about it a minute--You have no PROOF that there ever was such a one as Jesus of Nazareth. Does it mean that a Christed being did not exist? No, it only means that you still place your very transition and infinite experi­ence into the limitations of the Man who chose to do the writing. That is the same as believing that one, Doris, is laying the in­structions for security and lift-off for you. She can write any­thing and after a while some of you would accept it simply be­cause she writes it. That is why we of the higher and farther projection do the authoring for no MAN is given into the remem­bering even though there well might have been the experience.

MOREOVER--WE ASK, YEA--INSIST, THAT YOU READ ALL WITH FULL REASON, LOGIC AND TRUTH AS BAL­ANCED AGAINST THE GIVEN LAWS OF GOD AND CRE­ATION--AND NOT THE OPINION OF "ANOTHER". GOD WILL NOT COERCE AND NEITHER WILL ANY OF THE HOSTS--OURS IS TO BRING THE TRUTH FROM THE LIES SO THAT YOU CAN HAVE YOUR PROOF FOR THE PUR­POSE OF CHOOSING WISELY. YOUR CHOICES, HOW­EVER, WILL BE HONORED AND IF YOU CHOOSE TO CONTINUE IN THE GREED AND WANTON PRACTICES OF THE HUMAN FORMAT--SO SHALL YOU BE LEFT TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF THAT CHOICE. EVIL SHALL NOT BE BROUGHT INTO THE REALMS OF GODNESS. EVIL IS THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE AND IS NOT OF GOD. IT GOES BEYOND ANY ONE PER­SON OR BEING--IT SIMPLY IS HOW IT IS. THERE IS A SAYING THAT IS MOST VALID--"LIVE BY THE SWORD AND DIE BY THE SWORD" but more: "LIVE BY THE FLESH AND YE SHALL DIE IN THE FLESH." Then all those "things" which seemed so wondrous to have in the flesh cannot even be "touched" in the Spirit and all those things which "felt" so good "so do it" will be equally as removed from your expression. It seems the better part of wisdom to think on these things.

It is not the "death on the cross" which has meaning for that was a physical death by ALL of your touters--it is the LIFE of the being which had value--not the death of physical housing. HIS SACRI­FICE WAS NOT YOUR SACRIFICE--YOU WERE THE VERY ONES WHO MURDERED HIM AND NOW MAKE YOUR RULES TO SUIT YOUR CRIME. He, this sacrificed lamb, may well forgive you and you may "claim" it if you have made your­selves worthy--but through no other route can you receive same. YOU HAVE MISSED THE DIFFERENCE IN THE TERMS "JESUS", "IMMANUEL", "EMMANUEL", "ESU", AND CHRIST. "CHRIST" WAS NOT A PART OF HIS NAME--IT WAS HIS "STATE OF BEING". And, a "Christ" does not go about voting-in pleasing laws to suit mankind.

Does this mean, then, that ones who praise God and honor "Jesus" are discounted in my journey? Of course not. However, they will likely deny the presence of the Host and also the Master returned for they are seeking the wrong personage. They will withdraw and never take the opportunity of the lifeboat while awaiting the won­drous rapture. To rapture as projected means absolute and total death of the physical being--it does not mean Ascension. It means that, literally, you have to "disperse" the physical being to maintain a density capable of being within a cloud. Without intent of moving on into security--the being cannot endure the trauma and the physical will perish.

Why is there trouble in merging the expressions? Because one is fed by the Lie and the other by the Truth and the projecting speakers KNOW WITHIN, the errors. There is no need for defense as to be­lief, for if the intent is Godly, what is there to defend? If all of your time is spent defending physical manifestation and actions, you have missed the entire point of the transition. YOU are Spirit, your body expression is physical and the body, at best, can last, say, a century or less. YOU endure for eons of expressions and experience to again reach ONENESS with God.

Think a moment: If gold be a physical expression of a precious metal and in the same breath you claim heaven is a place with streets paved with gold--you are obviously saying that you are GOING TO A PHYSICAL PLACEMENT! THAT CANNOT BE OF GOD FOR GOD IS OF SPIRIT. Therefore, does it not make some logi­cal sense that you have interim needs? Further, if one you say is unlimited and infinite--would you not expect that ONE to prepare most carefully and in perfection for your transition? Yes, you DO have to choose for you can't have it both ways unless you choose the way unto God. If you truly choose the way of God you auto­matically claim your placement and the ticket is the intent of acting without evil in purposeful intent. The journey will most certainly be one of "Rapture" for your goal is final oneness with God and there­fore the "interim" journey will be one of glory. But, if a cloud be your rapture then you have no way to release yourself from your bindings.

LIVE BY THE RULES

If you are in trouble and you knock on your neighbor's door and ask shelter--does not your neighbor have a right to ask you to abide by the rules within his shelter?

Well, brothers, YOU are going to be coming into OUR shelter and transportation system. We welcome you aboard--but, you will not be in setting of our rules. Our laws and rules are sufficient for God and therefore, you either leave your rules behind or remain behind with them. We are not interested in your opinions. "Except by me will you enter into the Kingdom of God"--ah so, I happen to travel with the very Christ who told you that. And therefore, I can promise you that except by Him shall ye enter in. We are the ser­vants of Holy God come to reclaim that which is His and if ye be His, YOU. If you choose to abide with His adversary, so be it to your choices. And remember, after the third chance of discernment in wisdom--you shall be left to the physical absence of God--called Hell. Would it not be far easier and nicer to simply change your op­eration into the balanced and harmonious laws of God? Look most carefully at your perceptions. Do you not see how evil works? Joy, pleasure, happiness, etc., is experienced in the soul (emotion). That of physicalness is experienced in the "senses" of the physical manifestation. The experience of a moment may well be registered in the soul as expression but the fulfillment of the experience unto soul is always balanced against the laws as given. This is why one can experience the same as another and one will wilt in guilt and the other experience joy. Each must have his own perception and there­fore is the reason for LAWS. I speak not of laws of the land--for those are physical and written by the "rulers" to contain and control you-the-blind.

You who SAY you claim CHRIST--what are you really saying? You cannot claim "Christ" without claiming His Truth! In coming into that Truth you are ALLOWED. You are allowed the privilege of errors and growth but if you claim forgiveness while still per­fecting the error--you are in gross trouble on "judgment day" for you will "judge" self and you will find yourself far short of that goal you know to be correct in actions.

We shall not be in the leaving of anyone but this will be a physical transition and it is up to you whether or not you can physically pull it off. Moreover, if you wish to come with us, you will be brought aboard unto the 11 1/2th hour. But the facts are that you are being told and trained to deny our coming--and we will be called and claimed to be of the evil empire. The facts are simply that most of you who think you claim "God" shall deny the Truth of the rescue (salvation). So be it. You can kill my scribe, deny me, kill all ones attached to the Phoenix material and burn every JOURNAL--will that change anything? No.

USE OF GOD'S SYMBOLS

If you do not research your own journey it is most sad. However, that is why we bring you the WORD--because you have been put to sleep by your own enemy of infinite life. The very symbols of God have been taken and adorn the evil mansions and power seats. The Eagle will be used to adorn the gates and coats of arms of physical tyrants. Remember, Satan himself utilizes the TRUTH to project his LIES. Why? SO YOU WILL BELIEVE HIM AS HE DECEIVES YOU! GOD HAS NO NEED TO DECEIVE YOU FOR HE WILL LEAVE YOU TO YOUR GIFT OF CHOICES AS WAS PROMISED FOR THE PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE. REMEM­BER, THE BATTLE WHICH YOU AWAIT--IS BETWEEN EVIL AND GOODNESS AND IT IS FOR THE FREEDOM OR IMPRIS­ONMENT OF YOUR SOUL. If you remain locked into the physi­cal consciousness--you will, by choice and default--continue in the ignorance which is separation from God. Salvation and destiny in infinity in God presence is NOT a bloodbath and spillage 2000 years ago--it is intent of Godness with desire to live within the Godly laws--NOW.

IF THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THIS AS YOU READ IT--THEN YOU HAD BEST LOOK AGAIN AT WHERE YOU HAVE LEARNED YOUR SO-CALLED TRUTH. IF YOU ARE TOLD BY "MAN" TO CAST THIS TRUTH AWAY--THEN YOU HAD BEST LOOK EVEN CLOSER FOR "MAN" IS NOT IN CHARGE OF THIS TRANSITION, ESPECIALLY MAN OF EARTH-SHAN. I CAN'T TELL YOU OFTEN ENOUGH OR STRONGLY ENOUGH--I AM YOUR WAY OFF THAT ORBIT­ING ORB, AND, IF YOU ABIDE NOT WITHIN THE LAWS AS GIVEN DOWN IN THE CHRISTED TRUTH--YOU SHALL GET A VERY BIG HOT-FOOT FOR WE FORCE NOR COERCE NO-ONE. BY THE WAY--WE DON'T TOUCH EVEN A HAIR OF YOUR HEAD WITHOUT BEING ASKED! PONDER IT!

OTHER SUBJECTS

Only through knowing the problem can you make solutions. So, only through knowing what is wrong and who did it (your enemy), can you change anything lest you run in circles and cure nothing. Therefore, it is my task to continue to inform you of facts and Truth and then guide you to others on your place who present that Truth. MY MISSION IS FIRST TO BRING TRUTH, THEN BRING INTO SAFETY A REMNANT AND THEN TO REMOVE GOD'S CHILDREN FROM THE DANGEROUS PLACES OF EARTH--IN THAT ORDER. THE FIRST TWO ARE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME FOR, IN TRUTH, WE SHALL FIND AND HAVE THE REMNANT.

I will give example of intent of these ones who would control you in the name of Jesus. In this community, my scribe has been literally slain (but it is very hard to keep God's child dead). Guess who did the slaying? Guess who continued the threats when the first trials appeared to have failed? Denouncement, rejection and open threats of horror such as: "The Christian community will be coming to visit you and you will not be allowed to remain in this town," and "Every time any of you turn the key in your ignition you will be terrified for your cars will be bombed," and, "By the ending of July, George Green will be assassinated." George is a publisher who publishes many things so would this be considered even "fair"? More than that--IS ANY OF THE ABOVE OF GOD AND/OR CHRIST BEHAVIOR? WELL, THEY PROJECT THE SAME THING THEY DO ON T.B.N.--RAPTURE, SALVATION, BORN-AGAIN, ETC. How much do you contribute to ensure your "salvation"? Just a point to ponder and WHO sets himself up as your leader and instructor and from WHERE does he claim the truth of his speeches? Oops!

I urge ones to go and sit with all AND ANY, in the Church build­ings, and listen, listen, and listen. I ask them to study all of the books called Holy. I only remind you that war, killing, and the other ten commandments broken, are not of God in Truth. God does NOT NEED TO SEND YOU TO WAR! SO, IF GOD IS NOT SENDING YOU TO WAR--WHO MIGHT BE? AND, WHO JUST MIGHT BE THE IGNORANT AND MISLED TOOLS OF THAT BIG BAD BOY? Does it not sound a bit fishy to dump your evil trip on a person of perfection some 2000 years old? Isn't that some sort of mad cop-out from responsibility for your own chosen actions? So be it. You go by your rules and I shall go by mine and see who ends up in the halls of God. I have the transportation system and you have no way off the place.

Some of you are "learning" Ascension? To where? What will you do when you get there? How many people have you seen ascend? How many have you seen get even a quarter inch off the ground?

SPACESHIP LIFTOFF ACCORDING TO "NEW AGE"

Some of you actually have the first part right--space commands will lift you off--but the next part is the hard part--WHERE WILL YOU GO? You will NOT go into the places of God's pure balance. So, it would indicate that you will go to places of interim learning to con­tinue with your growth. Is this possible?--oh indeed. But, you aren't going to like those places any better than the one you are leaving because each is placed according to his KNOWING. Gray does not make black or white.

Since, however, I, Hatonn, command the fleet which brings God/Christ (Sananda), I do know how and who will be aboard which craft and destination. Claiming without intent of Truth to be in ser­vice to God of Light (by whatever name) means nothing--you shall be judged by your actions and not by your speeches.

You ones miss the point entirely in most instances. You effort to ac­cept EVERYTHING AND EVERY BEHAVIOR because you do not wish to be a bigot and labeled as such. You claim to be "allowing". I said "God" allows--I didn't say "you" can allow for what you allow in practice, is committed within your soul intent. You can allow, for instance, if you choose without ACTING IN BIGOTRY OR CON­SENT OF BELIEF. For instance, if you have taught your child properly, you can have the schools give him 200 boxes of condoms and he will put them aside and ACT in responsibility according to his KNOWING of proper behavior. If you have failed to teach the proper responsible actions--then it is your burden and you cannot dump it off on the perfection of Christ. If you don't know any bet­ter, so be it. IF YOU, HOWEVER, REFUSE TO LEARN BET­TER, then the piper will be paid. In this instance the sins of the fa­thers (and mothers) shall be rested upon the sons (and daughters) for all time to come.

It is the time of separation and choices. There will be some three migrations--will you be included? It is up to you and YOU DON'T KNOW HOW MANY OF SAME ARE ALREADY PAST! YOUR ANSWER IS NONE OF MY BUSINESS--MY MISSION IS MY BUSINESS AND I SERVE ONLY GOD OF DIVINE LIGHT-­SOURCE/CREATION. BY THE WAY, HATONN HAS A LOT OF PULL WITH THAT PARTICULAR PROJECTION SO IT MIGHT BE HANDY TO READ A BIT ABOUT ME.

YES, indeed, there are other scribes and speakers for ME. But most have fallen by the way and into the trap of "New Age" confusion. They were told how it would be and all the quarreling in the physical form will not change the journey one iota. Calling me evil will not make it so and if you balance that which I bring against that which they teach--I believe you will have your proper answer! You may never bring yourself to "admit" it--but you will have your TRUTH. If you break the laws of God and Creation--then you are not in full service unto God and your "opinions" will not change anything.

SAFE PLACEMENT

Be careful when you continue to ask, "Where is a safe place for me?" Look carefully at WHY you want a "safe place"! Dharma, for instance, doesn't even want a safe place for she knows that her work is only just begun. It is perceived that if your place "is not safe" that you transition and get out of your responsibility. So, look at WHY you want safety! If it is to save your "assets" (either one) your reason is unsound and you will likely not be "safe" anywhere! If you think yourself to escape the transition of the planet and conse­quences of the actions upon the planet--no place is any safer than another--all will experience the trauma for it is the cycle of chaos and trauma.

What, next, is your definition of "safe"? You cannot simply ask for a "safe place" without making clear "safe from what"? If you are within the shield of God, you are safe ANYWHERE--if not, you are safe NOWHERE.

Do not limit God. If you are within God, you are safe EV­ERYWHERE AND ALL-WHERE. Further, we have capability of bringing you aboard from ANYWHERE you happen to be. If you are within the shielding of God you go about your work and all will take proper sequence. If, however, you're only half-shielded, then I suggest you might have a bit of problem no matter where you are.

THE ADVERSARY PLANS TO HAVE ALL OF YOU AND ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY AND THEN, YOUR SOUL AS WELL. WILL YOU SELL YOUR SOUL? WILL YOU GIVE IT AWAY? WHAT WILL YOU CHARGE? SAFETY? A CRUST OF BREAD? SLAVERY? KNOW THAT ONCE YOU SUCCUMB--HE GETS IT ALL ANYWAY! SATAN AND HIS EVIL THRONG ARE LOCKED INTO THE PHYSICAL--HE CANNOT GET YOU OFF THE PLACE AND INTO SAFETY ANYWHERE. ONLY GOD CAN LIFT YOU OUT OF THE TRAP. I DO NOT COME FORTH TO TELL YOU THAT WHICH YOU PREFER TO HEAR--I AM COME TO TELL YOU HOW IT IS AND GIVE OPPORTUNITY TO CONSIDER CHANGE WHILE THERE IS YET "TIME" TO ACCORD THAT CHANGE. IT IS UP TO YOU.

CAN'T I DO SOMETHING? DO I HAVE THE "POWER" TO DO THINGS? YES INDEED--BUT I SHALL NOT INTERFERE--IT IS YOUR JOURNEY AND IF I TAKE YOUR JOURNEY FROM YOU--I HAVE ONLY DEPRIVED YOU OF YOUR JOURNEY AND MADE MORE SLOPPY, MY OWN. I WILL NOT DO IT FOR YOU, HOWEVER, WHEN YOU PETITION IN THE SERVICE UNTO GOD--I HAVE PERMISSION TO SHOW YOU THE WAY AND MAKE KNOWN "HOW".

There is more which must be unfolded to uncover the adversary, from more on medical murder to judicial murder and annihilation of freedom to the workings and infection of the CIA and One World Government.

Then we can turn our attention wholly unto the glory of that which will come to you who see Truth. Until that day when you open your eyes and "see", your ears and "hear", the Truth of your destiny in glory cannot be witnessed nor perceived. The lessons must be con­fronted in your manifestation and your manifestation is in the physi­cal projection. When you can separate the two, then we can begin the "how to" get into the swing of perfection beyond the bindings of physical limitation. Do we have time? You don't have anything else! Only perception--and that is of time and space--both an illu­sion. You will separate the reality of existence from that illusion just referenced or you will remain binded to the illusion in helpless­ness. You must KNOW THINE ENEMY, KNOW THE TRUTH--AND YE CAN BE SET FREE. IF YOU REFUSE TO HEAR THAT WHICH IS SENT FOR YOUR NEEDS--YOU CANNOT REMOVE SELF FROM THE TRAP. I OFFER MY HAND IN LIGHT AND TRUTH--LOVE AND FRIENDSHIP. WHETHER OR NOT YOU RECEIVE OF IT IS YOUR CHOICE. SO BE IT FOR THAT IS THE WAY OF GOD. REACH OUT AND DARE TO LIVE! DEATH IS SUCH A BORING ADVENTURE! SALU.

May the Light of Truth shine around you so that you can be touched and claim of your heritage and birthright. You have not lost of it--the deceiver has only hidden it from your sight and told you that only through his way can you have that which you desire. Which do you struggle for--fulfillment of desire of flesh or soul? Peace or pleasure? Power over Men or "God Power"? A roll in the hay or an energy fulfillment beyond your imaginings? Limitation or infinite freedom? These choices are but yours to make and they are as indi­vidual as your fingerprints or soulprint. YOU are YOU and not any other can do of choosing for you.

Good day. By whatever name ye shall call me--I come to show the way and bring you home--you who will come with me. I do not travel the roads of hell, I fly and soar in the places of glory--and you are caught in-between the two. Salu.