PJ 28
CHAPTER 13
REC #3 HATONN

SATURDAY, APRIL 6, 1991 2:33 P.M. YEAR 4, DAY 233

THE CORRECTIVE CULTURE

Despite massive efforts to destroy it, there is still a record (severely mutilated and tattered) that at the time of the first recorded history, one people had recog­nized what was happening within the human species and had done something about it. Realizing that the condition had gone too far to simply re-educate those who had been selectively bred for lack of perception, the perceptive peo­ple segregated themselves from the others.

These people, the Northern Europeans, who defended their segregation by maintaining a no-man's land around themselves, established a culture that was diametrically opposed to the long-standing primitive one.

A highly significant point is that these perceptive people recognized that a culture cannot be fought with mere words; they recognized that a culture must be opposed by a culture. Ah ha, now we begin to begin to see a flicker of what happened a very long time ago to get you to where you are NOW and by whom you were manipulated.

Nature's God does not speak the crude language of humans. However humans can speak the language of Nature's God. Culture is a statement made in that language. Culture deals selectively in birth and death. When unscrupulous ma­nipulators created their human culture of humans, they chose to oppose the di­rection set by Nature's God in the language of Nature. The corrective culture was a deliberate, clear, positive, unequivocal, explicit opposition to the primitive anti-Nature culture. The two cultures are eternally incompatible.

The corrective human culture of humans was based upon agreements between a group of perceptive individuals that would curtail the manipulative breeding in of the unperceptive and would breed out manipulators. It seemed good enough at that point.

The new culture of the segregated northern Europeans dealt with both factors that make an effective culture--birth and death. The basic ideas and actions of the corrective culture were two very simple ones.

Giving birth was an individual decision. A perceptive woman could be ex­pected to choose her sexual mate with perception and give birth to perceptive children. Therefore, opposing the breeding methods of mass manipulators--of manipulators who arrogated to themselves the role of "authorizing" sexual rela­tions and forbidding sexual relations they had not "authorized"--the Northern Europeans agreed that a woman's choice of a man by whom she would bear children would be exclusively hers--as an individual. The agreement was that no man could have sexual relations with her by force or coercion, and she need defer to no individual or group approval when choosing her children's father. The perceptive people reasoned that no one should have any word-invented "authority" over the intangible portion of Nature and Nature's God within an individual, because an individual's value judgments are made by the God within. The social agreement, that would not allow interference with the highly important value judgment of each individual woman regarding who should be the father of her children, effectively meant that the people looked upon each woman as a goddess.

Dealing with death was also an individual decision.Curtailing the use of manipulated masses against individuals was the cultural action that fell to men. Unscrupulous demagogs were bred out by making formal, socially approved one-to-one "fair fight" combat the prerogative of every individual. There was full social approval of formal individual combat and full social rejection of all groups that tried to impose "group will" on individuals. There was concerted group action against individuals only within the limited range to which each in­dividual had agreed. Outside that austerely limited range every individual could demand one-to-one single combat and full social approval would uphold the demand.

This culture, speaking Nature's language of birth and death, effectively reversed the primitive culture that had bred for unperceptive zombi-like humans, and bred for the unscrupulous demagogs who manipulated zombis with words (oops, where are you now?) The new culture, that consciously and effectively again proclaimed all individuals equally sovereign, as Nature had always done before the primitive culture, actually accelerated the direction of Nature's selection.

At the beginning of recorded history, the new culture had already bred the seg­regated Northern Europeans into a people significantly distinct from those around them. They cherished that difference. Any manipulated mass, that tried to breach their protective no-man's land and re-absorb them, was recognized as a potential mass organism. The evolving group entity was called a "dragon". The feats of great heroes who became dragon-slayers were memorialized in story and song. But here you can see where the term "dragon" and "dragon beast" came into importance.

THE CHOICE

Let us refer to these two opposing human cultures of humans by the descriptive terms: The culture of manipulated masses and the culture of individual sovereignty.

Backing away from both for a look no more long-ranged than "What kind of people do I want to associate with"? the choice focuses on the individuals who are products of the two cultures: 1) The culture of manipulated masses breeds for lack of perception and/or deliberate falsity, coupled with a strong instinctual affinity for the kind of deception that makes a clever manipulator, and 2) The culture of individual sovereignty breeds in perception and integrity, and breeds out manipulators.

Ultimately the two man-made cultures will be measured by Nature's three billion year old criteria--which it would be reasonable to call "the morality of Nature and Nature's God (Great Spirit of Light, Holy God and The Creation).

When manipulated masses take on irreversible dominance over individuals the masses become the only organisms that continue to have effective will. These masses function as asexual organisms; individuals function as their component cells; evolution is thereby turned back six hundred million years or more. Na­ture's selective survival is transferred from the component individuals to the new mass organisms. ETERNAL MASS WARFARE BETWEEN THE NEW ORGANISMS IS THE INEVITABLE RESULT.

When individuals remain sovereign, Nature's focus remains on individuals. Nature's selective survival continues to apply to human individuals and there is no regression. The field is open for further development. Looking at the long range direction manifest by Nature, the human species remains in the forefront of all organic evolution as it was prior to the first primitive human culture. So­cial approval of individual sovereignty is social approval of nature's morality.

Looking at Nature's criteria, the choice becomes: Shall the human accept Nature's long range direction or oppose it? And herein is an opportunity to pause and consider the response to this question as you see it in perspective of our writings and the unfoldment of "secrets" kept from you.

THE FIELD FOR CULTURAL CONFLICT

Leaving generalized descriptions and turning to the actual conflict between the advocates of these two cultures, we recognize that the mass manipulators now have control of most governments, of the media and of the school systems. They overwhelm everyone with their confusing version of history. However, enough mutilated historical fragments still exist so that the significant story can be somewhat pieced together--even without my scanners.

The significant battle between the people of the two cultures has taken place, and continues to take place, in Europe, in the Mediterranean area, and in the Western hemisphere--where there has been total infiltration and integration within the organisms.

The people of the Orient have been affected by the dominant culture of manip­ulated masses as it now exists in the Western World, but they have never been involved in the conflict between the two cultures as have other people, although it is coming into manifestation currently. Speaking of the Oriental people in general, they are not even aware that it now exists or ever did exist although the seepage is showing up more and more. Certainly they can see little evidence that any culture now exists in the West other than the culture of manipulated masses.

There is the same non-awareness of the cultural conflict by the people of Russia although some astute people are sticking their heads up and beginning to smell the coffee burning. Russia is an area of biologically mixed people that stands between the East and West. The area has been heavily impacted by the Khaz­arian shroud of word twisters and as a government, the USSR conspicuously implements the culture of manipulated masses. The precise form of the current Russian culture came from the same source, and constitutes the same virulent danger to the human species as that which forms one side of the current battle in the West. This especially virulent form came to the Russian people in two waves, the first beginning about the tenth century and the second early in the twentieth century. There had never been a substantial culture of individual sovereignty in the area, so neither wave met any effective native resistance.

Both the Orientals and the Russians continue to feel the impulse toward individ­ual sovereignty within them, but they have no consicious memories of individ­ual sovereignty--as a culture. Since the Western Americans have experienced individual sovereignty it is hard to have realization that you no longer have it. This is because the word manipulators have pulled some heinous tricks on you and you live under a shroud of "their" deception and illusion.

The battle between the advocates of the two cultures has existed exclusively in the Western World. It was in the Western World that the culture of individual soyereignty came into being. It is here that some conscious advocates of it now remain. It is in the Western World that a decisive battle between the advocates of the two cultures is now being fought.

The Western World still has a high percentage of people bred for individual sovereignty. However, it is on those who remain conscious advocates of the culture that bred them that now rests the only visible hope that the whole human species will not go the way of the regressive insects. And, unfortunate as it is for the only visible hope, many who were bred for individual sovereignty have now been so confused by words that they fail to see that the conflict is between the advocates of the two cultures. When they say that they will "just wait to see what will happen" before they decide to act, they fail to recognize that they are not "just leaving things to Nature". Human cultures have been in­jected into natural selection. The conflict is taking place by human will. They are leaving everything to their human enemies. A veil of human words now clouds the perception of many bred for perception.

CLOUDS OBSCURING THE FIELD OF CONFLICT

A confused subject called "human progress" serves to obscure the significant conflict between the advocates of the two cultures. It detracts attention from human beings by focusing on manufactured gadgets. Also its spokesmen falsify human history. They use manufactured gadgets as the measure of civilization and teach American school children that two thousand years ago the Northern Europeans were "barbarians".

On the contrary, archeological excavations indicate that Europe was the area where the world's earliest finely manufactured articles were developed. You can only imagine at the exact historical reasons causing the Northern Europeans to abandon man-made things and return to natural things as their criteria of value and we will not hang up on that point herein for it is a distraction for the focus point. The verbal history, or "mythology", that would tell the story on your placement has been systematically destroyed or totally twisted. You only know that about 60 B.C., when Julius Caesar was writing about the Northern Europeans, the described culture of individual sovereignty had existed among them for untold centuries. The cultural core that selectively bred for individual sovereignty was effectively protected by the no-man's land that Caesar was try­ing to penetrate. It allowed only one-way passage. The Northern Europeans could go out but they allowed no one to come in. They were protecting their segregated culture. They recognized that, as individuals consciously upholding the sovereignty of individuals, they were fighting potential mass organisms that they called "dragons". However, the people outside viewed the conflict as merely the usual mass warfare, which is an essential part of their culture.

The earliest records you will be able to find regarding the conflict between two peoples who recognized opposing cultures as the basis of the conflict was that which showed up between the early Babylonians and the people occupying the Iranian plateau. Only a "color" of their conflict remains in recorded history, and you cannot be sure whether or not the division between the peoples existed because individual sovereignty people were spreading from a Northern Eu­ropean cultural core, or whether Iran versus Babylonia was the original area of division. To more fully comprehend this circumstance we must look more deeply into the Khazars by whatever name they called themselves, and we will do so as we get a bit more foundation herein with which to work.

To get a clear view of the two cultures you have to look for a discernible divi­sion between peoples advocating the opposing cultures. Otherwise you look at cultural garbage. The two diametrically opposed cultures cannot be mixed among one people. There are only two directions that a human culture of hu­mans can go--with Nature's overall direction or against it.

It appears ricidulous to make the obvious statement that nothing can at the same time go in two opposing directions. Such a statement now becomes necessary with regard to cultures because there are many who call the present enforced mixings of peoples trying to go in opposing direction, "the richness achieved by mixing cultures". That sort of misuse of words prepares for manipulation by promoting confusion--and who is the master of confusion? Fragments of civilization, that have been broken by mixing peoples from opposing cultures, may have facets that dazzle, like fragments of broken glass in a kaleidoscope. But when a culture is viewed as a culture, it is an injection of human will into natural selection. Natural selection deals only in birth and death. Cultures cre­ated by human will are dealing in birth and death. The flesh and blood people that human will has selected for survival the "richness (or pollution) achieved" by injecting cultures into natural selection. Conscious mass manipu­lators willfully promote the confusion that obscures perception of this. We seek to penetrate the obscuring cloud.

We know of areas where, in historical times, there have been mixings of people bred for individual sovereignty and those bred for mass manipulation. However the resultant conflict arising from the opposing cultural directions has not been perceptively analyzed in widely promoted histories. Spengler, who may well be the most competent of widely known historians, even applies the term "culture" to the mixings. Honor ones who passed Earth's way and projected some in­telligent reasoning and understanding into historical data.

Facts indicate that people bred for individual sovereignty moved into India where they were greatly outnumbered by those long bred by the primitive cul­ture. They were overwhelmed by sheer numbers. They could not establish their own culture. They could not act. They talked. This began before recorded history. They are still talking. The conflict between cultures cannot be settled by words.

Another mixing of peoples bred by the opposing cultures came when those from the cultural core of individual sovereignty moved in on the opposingly bred people of Greece. An attempted division between the peoples continued for several centuries by arbitrarily dividing them into "citizens" and "slaves". Ob­viously that attempted division, when the people were thoroughly mixed in daily contact, could not work. It did not. The attempts to create a "scientific state", where the two cultural thought patterns could be "rationally" combined, ended in the destruction of what is called the "golden age of Greece". Rashly building an empire that would teach "the science of government" to the people around the Mediterranean, who had been bred for mass manipulation, the Greeks cre­ated a tangible civilization, born of mixed cultures that was like a fruit ripe for picking. Some of the more stalwart and dominant energies (teachers) of the Greek era have continued in many forms to bring understanding, wisdom and insight into the mechanism--some of you continue in frustration and repeated at­tempts to awaken the masses at this very day in time.

The Romans, who had fully accepted the culture of mass manipulation, and who had sufficient military power to take over a people confused by a mixture of two opposing cultures, took over the Greek people and the Greek empire. Most historians shed copious tears over this fact but show little perception of what was actually happening.

Histories, that are written by those "educated" for the culture of manipulated masses, present mass warfare (an activity of no living things but humans and regressive insects) as a natural phenomenon. Their histories are nothing but studies of mass manipulators and the battle leaders acting under the "authority" of mass manipulators. Their histories imply that no culture other than the cul­ture of manipulated masses ever existed or ever could exist. Accepting this primitive culture as "human nature", they remove the word "culture" from its application to the human species. They twist the WORD to mean "development or improvement by ' education' , or refinement resulting from such develop­ment". They ignore the conflicting directions set by human cultures.

Human cultures, a specialized use of human will, are no more visible than the wind but, like the wind, their effects are visible. Most of your historians de­scribe only the effects; they fail to point out or even perceive the opposing cul­tures during the time that the Greek and Roman Empires dominated the Mediterranean area. Careful examination of this time and place, that identifies the beginning of the current cultural conflict, is vitally important to the fate of the whole human species--a fate that will be determined by which of the two cultures eventually dominates. Mostly these two diabolically opposed cultures are either missed or totally ignored. Those of you in the third perspective can see how it is but are basically at a loss as how to proceed to bring about massive change.

These two cultural directions might well be like the meeting of two winds--as words opposing directions meet to form a devastating storm. Well, then came along one--again--as a Christed being (the one you called Jesus at the given sequence of time progression) and he became significantly placed in the "eys of the storm". IT IS HOWEVER, THE WHOLE (ENTIRE) STORM WHICH VITALLY CONCERNS YOU AS A HUMAN SPECIES.

PJ 28
CHAPTER 14
REC #4 HATONN

SATURDAY, APRIL 6, 1991 5:45 P.M. YEAR 4, DAY 233

ACTUAL CONFLICT

From known history, the significant fragments must be sifted out and put into a meaningful order, if we are to make sense of what is now happening to the hu­man species. The cultural storm system cannot be viewed as a whole without giving attention to "the eye of the storm". I make no comment regarding ratio­nale or differences in spiritual aspects regarding this particular "being" but do give undivided attention to the circumstance and that which ensued. You have had historians who acknowledge and summarize the most common attitudes to­ward "the eye of the storm" in your current area of mixed cultures.

In one way it was stated that "Whether for good or ill, whether fact or fiction, the story of Jesus has had an effect--perhaps an enormous effect--in determin­ing human destiny. In the United States there are two conspicuous views of the story. One is held by those who believe that Jesus was a "supernatural" being, that all people in the world have "sinned", and that Jesus was crucified as a sac­rifice for their "sins". The other is held by those who look upon the first group as a bunch of "born-again boobs", and wish the whole story had never gotten started. Well, I'm sure that Emmanuel of "Jesus" fame wishes his presence had not been taken and made into deceit and delusion of a whole civilization--for whether or not you believe--the mere mythology becomes a focus.

From time to time, obscure and perceptive writers--and even a few who are not so obscure, have presented a third viewpoint. They have taken the view that the stay of Jesus IS significant and it is most significant when told absolutely straight.

The next statement will be news to most of you--Thomas Jefferson presented one "straight" version in his comments bound with the American Christian Bible. One historian in point is Erik Holden who carried on the work of sifting out significant fragments as started by John Harland. Holden contrasts the sig­nificance of the straight story with that of the one accepted by many institutional religions.

The extracts from the Bible that were put together by Jefferson left out the writings of Paul (I hope herein you will refer back to AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL to find out the FACTS regarding Paul. As a matter of fact, we greatly honor Paul in this current time for he is making every effort to rectify his misinformation) and the totally reversed twist to the story that was adopted by the Council of Nice in 325 A.D. The so-called Jefferson Bible has been generally suppressed as is all truth; the editions that were previously available were couched in comments that came close to being apologies to Khazars (Jews) and to so-called Judaeo-Christians for what Jefferson left out. Holden looks at the story very much as Jefferson did. Inasmuch as Jefferson was the author of the Declaration of Independence and was also a man who rejected in­stitutional Christianity, while asserting that he was a real Christian, Holden has chosen a highly significant starting point.

The American Christian Bible is of vital significance for the American people at the present time. The current conflict between the culture of individual sovereignty and, for that matter, individual national sovereignty, and the culture of manipulated masses is the same that has been going on for two thousand years. The imposition into Northern Europe of what the Catholic church called Christianity was the original focal point of the conflict.

The segregated Northern Europeans, who were so careful to preserve their no-man's land, were not conquered by the armed force of any manipulated masses from outside. Their enemies slyly injected the culture of manipulated masses into Northern Europe, and then used manipulated masses of Northern Europeans to force the culture which destroyed their own culture, and millions of people bred by that culture, on other Northern Europeans.

Incredible as it seems, two thousand years later the same tactics are still just as effective. The two greatest wars the world has ever known were between peo­ple bred by the culture of individual sovereignty fighting others of the same breeding. What manipulators call "the richness achieved by mixing cultures" is a synthesized drug; that drug destroys all perception; it renders people respon­sive to suggestions for insane action.

HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT FACTS

The culture slyly injected into Northern Europe centuries ago remains the focal point of the current conflict. Many, who think it was religion that was injected, may tend to dismiss that statement by saying "religion no longer carries signifi­cant weight in practical matters". But to them we must say: Hear us out. We are not talking about what some falsely categorize as religion. We are talking about culture.

The mass manipulative culture of the medieval Catholic Church was imple­mented by wholesale slaughter, torture racks, and public burnings, as one facet of cultural action. The other was church "authorized" marriage, church chris­tenings, and church schools for the children of those allowed to leave progeny. The path of that foreign culture of mass manipulation, as it selectively killed some people and encouraged the breeding of others, marked the sharp line of conflict with the culture that had bred the Northern Europeans.

Theretofore the foreign culture, in its usual dragon form, had been recognized and successfully opposed. Now it was not recognized because individuals merely carried its seeds. To get across the no-man's land these individual saboteurs had to have a passport. Harland describes the passport, which gave passage to the foreign culture's advocates, as being like a two-sided coin. The teachings of Jesus were on one side; the teachings of the Nomadic Khazar (so-called Jewish) Nation were on the other. The priests who gained passage were the ones skilled in deftly flipping the coin from side to side to make it fit the oc­casion.

Currently the same trick is performed--all day every day, in the U.S.--by those who have unconstitutional control of radio and television stations. In current use the two-sided coin is the hyphenated word: Judaeo-Christianity.

We need to most carefully examine the two-sided passport that has played such havoc with the culture of individual sovereignty.

Before Jesus, the Nomadic Khazar Nation was only a minor nuisance to the Roman Empire. The Nomadic Khazar Nation became a factor of worldwide significance only because it was the weather front for one culture when the two opposing cultures met with Jesus, "the eye of the storm". The whole storm system falls within our subject.

INVENTING GOD
Benefiting by a view that now stretches over two thousand years, you can rec­ognize that the opposing cultural winds did not meet at the focal point where Je­sus was born among the Judeans "just by accident". Although the Khazars were only a minor nuisance to the Roman Empire, they were the world's most pro­nounced weather front for the culture of manipulated masses. The Khazarian people exemplified the products of the manipulated mass culture more clearly than any people on earth. Also they advocated the culture, itself, more con­spicuously than any people on earth. They had rationally and deliberately formalized the significant direction of the primitive culture by inventing a "god" who opposed Nature.

Most current Khazars (now labeling themselves as so-called Jews) no longer be­lieve any such "god" exists but, nonetheless, their well-known objective of "victory over nature" and their anti-Nature "morality", which they either claim was decreed by the "god" they invented or follows logically from their atheistic communism, remains the focal point of the tradition that coordinates their ac­tions. According to the spokesmen for their "god" they are a people chosen by their "god" for the role of the world's manipulators. They are repulsed by any need for contact with Nature. Their spokesmen tell them that their "god" promises them that they need have no contact with Nature, that they can live off the milk and honey produced by other peoples. Their culture has bred them for such complete lack of respect for, and perception of, Nature that they remain totally blind to the fact that their objective of "victory over nature" would accomplish precisely what the regressive insects have "accomplished". It would push regression of the entire human species to the point of no return.When the cultural storm system developed, the core of the culture diametrically opposing the one the Khazars had formalized was isolated in Northern Europe. The Greeks, although biological products of that culture, had compromised it while trying to rule over peoples bred for mass manipulation. However, they had thirteen cities designed as samples of Greek civilization located around the area where Jesus was born. Although diluted and confused, some color, or breath of wind, suggesting the existence of an alternative to the culture of manipulated masses had permeated the area.

A much keener perception than that usually found among the so-called Jews (Khazarians) was needed to sense the color, or feel the faint breeze, and to visu­alize what would happen if the culture indicated by the faint breeze came in full force. The culture had been weakened by the Greeks' compromises but, from the same direction as the breath of wind that hinted at an alternative culture's existence, could be sensed the movement that was the whole of Nature. The faint cultural breath told that the culture both supported Nature and was backed by nature. The suggestion, however faint, that such a widely different culture did exist would be enormously significant to anyone with perception who was caught in a squeeze play between the advocates of two cultures fighting for dominance--when both the cultures were just different forms of mass manipu­lation.

The Romans had power over the Khazars. The Khazars bent to Roman rule in the open and fought it in secret. Born among the Judeans, Jesus was under the usual Judean pressure to side with the Khazarians against the Romans, but he recognized that they both moved in the same cultural direction and therefore, HE WAS OPPOSED TO BOTH!

What mass manipulators have interpreted as the "non-violence" teachings of Je­sus was something utterly different. Jesus advocated and practiced a policy of not taking sides between two systems that both had the same direction of mass manipulation--this held true much later with the group of Essenes who asked for his sanction and participation within their specific group--at which point he rapidly took total and complete leave of them while at the same time announcing to his people that they would CLAIM HIM TO BE ONE OF THEM. You must further understand that at that time the term or label "Jesus" was not attached to the entity at all. He was called Emmanuel, Esu etc. not Jesus. Paul later con­jured and labeled the master teacher by that handle after traveling in Greece. If you know nothing of history and fact--how can you even know that which you worship?--for it is often false.

COMMANDMENT NUMBER ONE

This is the very reason God gives you a first commandment of "have no other Gods before ME". He is the very essence of life itself which lives and remains within each from the beginning of experience unto the ending and beyond into infinity--by whatever name you choose. If you WORSHIP none other, then there aren't apt to be errors in judgment by the WORD MANIPULATORS.

Esu advocated giving no active physical help, which necessarily meant giving no active physical opposition, to either side. When talking about the cultures, Esu concerned himself primarily with that of the Judeans because the Kazar/Judeans had formalized the culture of manipulated masses and stated its Nature-opposing "morality" in WORDS. The formalized verbal statement of the culture was something that Esu could oppose in human words. He did so for about three years.

The Khazars had the clearest statement of a culture that took action against Nature; they had actually said that the imaginary "god" they invented had cre­ated the world and then "repented" his own creation. To one who had felt the faint breeze of an opposing cultural wind, and could recognize that the total flow of Nature moved in the direction of that breeze, it was clear that the direc­tion advocated by "the law and the prophets", who proclaimed an anti-Nature "god", would lead all advocates of that culture to inevitable damnation.

The primitive Nature-opposing culture had not only been formalized, it had also been stated in great detail by the intricate laws of the Khazars, by their verbose prophets, and by the numerous examples of action in their proudly preserved history of clever treachery. Esu chose the contrast of speaking against it in the simplest possible words.

SOVEREIGNTY ACCORDING TO ESU

He talked of Nature and of the God who clothed the lilies of the fields and val­ued the smallest sparrow. He denounced the law and the prophets and, ignoring the imaginary Khazar "god" who was presented as being external to his cre­ations, Esu talked of a different God who was within and Father to His cre­ations. The message of Esu was that perceptive people would realize they were of the Father. He said, "I am in the Father and the Father is in me". He told people they could go against the law and that was not important, they could go against what they called "god" and that was not important, but if they did not heed the Holy Spirit that was WITHIN them, they would be eternally damned.

In simple, bare, inexact human words, there has never been a clearer statement of individual sovereignty. But Esu was placed at the weather front of masses looking for a messiah--looking for a leader of manipulated masses, a new spokesman for the imaginary "god" they had invented. They thought only of fighting the Roman culture of manipulated masses with their own, even more extreme, culture of manipulated masses. Human words were inadequate for something as important as Esu wanted to say.

When He had said all that could be said by using inexact human words, He had to accept the bitter cup that words alone do not establish a culture. With coura­geous resignation He faced the fact that, even though the people around Him would not accept a culture opposite to the one that was leading them to damna­tion, He could still make a full statement to the whole world regarding that which came from the Holy Spirit, or Father, within Him in the language of the REAL GOD--in the language of Nature's God.

He told his disciples that His time was approaching but that their time was yet to come. He planned to precipitate a battle in which they could take sides. He said to them, "Sell your coat and buy a sword."

Then in the language of Nature and Nature's God, He spoke. As one who had violated no specific law of the mass manipulators--but as one who had de­nounced their total culture--He openly confronted the mass manipulators with full knowledge of what would happen. Having publicly proclaimed the sovereignty of an individual, He placed himself so that as an individual He con­spicuously stood against the most clearly defined culture of manipulated masses that existed anywhere in the world, a culture that will tolerate no one who re­jects the law and the prophets, a culture that will tolerate no one who obeys only the Holy Spirit within.

Esu deliberately walked into a situation where He foresaw that his crucifixion would clearly show the mortal opposition which exists--unreconcilably--between the two cultures. In the language of Nature and Nature's God, His crucifixion proclaimed to all the world that the opposition between the two cultures is mor­tal and eternal, that compromise cannot be made, that one of the diametrically opposing directions must be chosen.

And herein I might state that this Journal could well be labeled Vol II of THE PLEIADES CONNECTION for these are the teachings of truth without manip­ulation of either culture. These ARE the teachings of the brotherhood from afar--and furthermore it must, by now, make sense why it is so important for the manipulators to silence the Truth-Bringers. Especially at this time is this in­formation highly dangerous to the manipulators for you are foundationed upon the basis of individual sovereignty as a nation of individual people. The manipulators have not yet accomplished all necessary constraints to enslave you but are well on their way to so-doing. You as individuals with ability to func­tion as sovereign people are all but finished and the coming into being of the One World Order with central government by those who manipulate is all but written into history as accomplished. Ah but remember--it is never too late if Man awakens even unto the eleventh hour. He does, however, have to basically understand his circumstance.

Crude, inexact human words do not pass the boundaries of different peoples and are seldom fully understood. In the universal language of Nature and Nature's God, Esu made the most significant and most eloquent statement ever made to the whole human species.

The Khazars tried to ignore that statement. When they discovered that they could not simply ignore it, they tried to kill off everyone who tried to point out the significance of it. The Romans saw its significance and gave the Khazarian gangs license to exterminate Christians--no more and no less.

Then one of the Khazarian butchers, Saul of Tarsus, came up with the idea of twisting the story backwards and actually making it support the Khazarian cul­ture of mass manipulation (sorry Paul, but know son, ye bring that which is needed this day to the table that we might bring these things unto the masses of current human experience. Hold steady for all manners of opposition in all forms of manifestations are sent and continue to bind you but you shall be given to prevail and bring other fragments into peace as well as you bend not to the rigors and vicissitudes of human bombardment. Each now takes active roles in setting to straight the historical errors of experience and some will fail--again; but ones of Godly intent shall surely succed).

The imaginary primitive "god" which the Khazars had invented purportedly de­manded bloody sacrifices of the first born and finest before he would forgive their "sins". Everyone had heard Esu say, "I am in the Father, and the Father in me". Many had said that Esu was claiming to be a god. Saul conceived the idea that people could be made to accept Esu as the son of the imaginary "god" the Khazars had invented, and accept his crucifixion as a sacrifice that the imaginary god's law demanded for the salvation of all who had not obeyed that law.

A ROSE---?

Now I hope you ones have noted that I continue to utilize the word Khazar--but that is not actually the label appropriate. At the time of Esu the Khazars (by that label) were still in the confines of Europe. Therefore you must now look to that which "KHAZAR" means--"gaz" or "to wander", in other words, "nomads", and the first factual references which you will find to this group as "Khazars" came in a Syrian chronicle by "Zacharia Rhector", dating from the middle of the sixth century. So what can I possibly mean? I mean that this "culture" of people were already present and functioned as the anti-Christ even before the presence of the one you accepted or touted as "Christ". So what were they called? Well, some called them Canaanites--descendents of Cain the cursed. But this interrupts my chain of thought which I wish to project, please--without distraction to another topic. You ones must realize that this group also is represented in your church lessons as Pharisees. We shall come back to this discussion at another time--just explicitly know that when I refer to Khazars, I speak of those who are now self-styled, so-called "Jews".

The mob had demanded that the body of Esu be crucified. Saul conceived the idea of crucifying the spirit. Nietzsche, describing Paul's action in The Anti-Christ, wrote: "Once more the priestly instinct of the Jew perpetuated the same old master crime against history--he simply struck out the yesterday and day be­fore yesterday of Christianity and invented his own history of Christian begin­nings. What indeed, has not this evangelist (Paul, Saul of Tarsus) sacrificed to hatred! Above all the Savior, he nailed him (back) on his own cross". In spirit, Esu continues to hang there. Such conspicuous persons as Billy Graham and Jerry Falwell (who said, "I am proud to say I am a Zionist"! [KHAZAR /ELITIST]) encourage today's manipulated masses to drive more nails.

Despite the fact that the "converted" Paul set up a chain of churches in Greece to promote the version of "Jesus" he had invented, many Greeks recognized and valued the clear and superb eloquence of the statement Esu had made. They saw it as far exceeding that made by Socrates; it was greater in both dramatic impact and clarity of meaning. Among the Greeks, people began making new commitments to the individual sovereignty that had bred them. The seed of their own culture had been resown.

Inevitably there was conflict between the two stories. Arguments, attempts to derogate the opposition and attempts to reconcile the unreconcilable, gave rise to an enormous amount of verbal garbage. A hundred years after the crucifix­ion of Esu "Jesus" there were already over a hundred sects that called them­selves Christian.

Verbal garbage is a preparation of the ground for dogma. Acceptance of dogma is acceptance of the culture of mass manipulation. The Roman Emperor Con­stantine recognized the potential of mass manipulation in the garbage of con­flicting ideas about "Jesus". (I would interrupt herein to ask my historian, Nora--how am I doing? I, Hatonn, am greatly indebted to ones who pay atten­tion so that I don't err greatly in sequence of events. I find your history tedious and mostly unpleasant but I do effort at being accurate).

In 314 A.D. the Emperor convened a council of the various "Christian" sects to study their teachings. At a subsequent council in 325 A.D. he selected the fol­lowers of certain doctrines for official approval--with the understanding that they would either absorb or destroy the others.

THE PASSWORD

Basically it was the false, totally reversed twist given the story of Jesus by the anti-Christ butcher that was made "official Christianity" by an Emperor wanting docile, dogma-controlled subjects. However, the most eloquent statement ever made regarding the mortal opposition between the two human cultures of hu­mans was not easily crushed. The significant and eloquent statement Esu had made in the language of Nature and Nature's God persisted.

Knowing how that statement had appealed to the Greeks, the priests of "official Christianity" used it as a passport of entrance to the guarded areas of individual sovereignty in Northern Europe. To the Northern Europeans, that dramatic statement, upholding their own culture and condemning the culture they con­demned, made by some heroic individual in a foreign land was doubly accept­able. Its eloquence was coupled with individual heroism, and individual hero­ism had their respect no matter where seen.

The straight story served as a passport for the Roman priests whose purported message was the teachings of the hero, who weaponless had defied the dragon (or serpent as Esu had called the underhanded Khazarian nation) so as to show the whole world the serpent-dragon's mortal opposition to the bare existence of a sovereign individual. Having gained passage, the priests gradually replaced the Christianity based on the straight story of Esu (Jesus) with the confusing garbage of Paul's anti-Christ "Christianity". Into this, bit by bit, was injected the Khazarian formalized dogma for promoting the primitive culture of mass manipulation.

The manipulated killing--by their own kind--of millions upon millions of the people who had been deliberately bred by, and for, the culture of individual sovereignty began when something called "JUDAEO-CHRISTIANITY was made the "coin of the realm".

The manipulated battle, between the confused people, soon developed so many facets that it was virtually impossible to distinguish friend from foe.

The same battle is still going on throughout the Western World at this moment. The trigger that precipitates the destruction of those bred for individual sovereignty by others of the same breeding is still the same two-sided coin. The mass manipulators keep the confusion and destruction going as actively as their fullest efforts can promote it.

Martin Luther challenged the head manipulators in Rome over the confusing garbage being passed out for forced feeding. While observing the widespread attempt to vomit up the incompatible foreign stuff that had been cunningly pushed upon the Northern Europeans, Luther became intensely disturbed that it was not only the formalized primitive dogma of the so-called, self-styled Jews that caused the problem; the flip-side of the Christian coin was also serving as a passport for the Khazarians (so-called Jews) themselves.

While enviously admiring the clever new forms of deception practiced by the Catholic Church, the so-called Jews were intensely aware that it was their own system of mass manipulation that the Church was using to bring down those of the opposing culture. They felt jealously possessive of the anti-Nature "god" they had created in their own image; they wanted to move in and take over the power the Catholic Church had acquired over the proud, competent, Nature-lov­ing Northern Europeans by making them bow their heads before the Khazarian "god". The Khazarian so-called Jews were like jackals moving in to feast on a lion's kill. Luther's violent words against their methods and against the very existence of the so-called Jews as a people are fully understandable.

Now what happens? It depends upon how many individualists desiring sovereignty of person and nation there are left. The manipulators have and continue to join forces and gang up on you--fortunately for you, they can't re­linquish desire to be head manipulator and this gains you some time for action and changes.

Dharma, I apologize for such a very long day but this is such incredibly impor­tant information. Thank you, chela, for I know that you are weary. Have a good rest and we shall continue on the morrow. Good night, friends, and keep heart for we ARE MAKING GREAT PROGRESS--AS LONG AS MAN CAN REGAIN HIS "REASON" HE CAN PREVAIL AGAINST ALL ODDS. IT LS ONLY THAT INDIVIDUAL MAN HAS LOST HIS WAY. SO BE IT.

Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn to clear.
Cmdr. UFF-IGFC