PJ 06
CHAPTER 7
REC #3, ASHTAR
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1989 4:45 P.M. YEAR 3, DAY 025
Ashtar to resume. Dharma, you will be alright, chela. You ask why can't we just request people get books and let it go at that. No, little one-ones simply won't do it. Our promise and commitment to Source is that the word will go forth--from us--and so it shall. All contributors are of worthy note and will be given all credit; but we must give you these things for, so far, hardly anyone has paid any attention. If we present it all, and still mankind does not listen-so be it for then it will be finished. Man will come to know truth even if it is in his final midnight hour, and past the time of survival. It shall be done. You ones will do that which you can and then you can do no more. If we do of our job and man still refuses to see and act, then it is finished and you of ours, will be brought home--Selah!
FOOLISHNESS AGAINST CIVIL DEFENSE
THE WORST; SOVIETS DON'T WANT WAR
"You don't need shelters because the Soviets don't want war." Well, no, the Russian peoples certainly do not--they are told the buildup is to protect them from you. So be it. Why have they built more than 10,000 nuclear warheads and a first-strike delivery system? Why do they have an army of 195 divisions, plus an additional 20 KGB and MVD secret police divisions for a total of 215, when the good old U.S. has only 16? Why do they teach the first-strike nuclear strategy in their military manuals? Oh yes--they do! Why do they repeat in their published strategic planning that a nuclear war can be won!
Why are they deploying a new generation of mobile-launched missiles that cannot be attacked by your missiles'!
Of course they don't want war--if they can get you to surrender without a war. Well, it won't be called war if you surrender--it will be called genocide. Worse for you little Christians, is that the Soviets hate and despise the Jews worse than they can't stand you and where are most of the Jews? Not in Israel, dear ones! The communists will get rid of all of you just to get at the Jews--sorry about that! It is called slaughter. At the very least, it is called slavery. It is called the victory of proletariat forces over the capitalist imperialists.
In Afghanistan, the Soviets placed what appeared to he toys close to villages. When small children pick them up, the toys explode. These toys are sometimes called butterfly bombs, because they resemble toy butterflies. The explosions are designed to blow off the children's hands, not kill them. The children then become permanent visible testimonies to Soviet ruthlessness. Oh, you refuse to believe such a thing--read your own confounded research documents!
The threat of nuclear war is pure, unadulterated terror. They call threaten you with terror any time they please. You can't threaten them with anything, least of all the survival of your people. You refuse to believe it because you still think those kinds of things happen to "someone else". Surely not in good old U.S.A where burning a flag will become a federal offense.
NEXT ARGUMENT: SHELTERS WILL DE-STABILIZE RELATIONS
Another borrowed scenario please: Imagine that a bully is about to knock your teeth out. He has said for years that he intends to do it. He bought some brass knuckles. He is wearing them. He is standing in front of you. He pulls back his fist. You put your hands in front of your face.
"Stop!" a policeman shouts. "Put your hands at your sides!" You think the policeman is shouting at the bully. No, he is shouting at YOU. "You're just making him angry. You're going to get him all upset. Do the smart thing--give him a taxpayer-subsidized loan instead."
Ah, but you have a sneaking suspicion that if you put your hands down and keep them at your sides, he is going to knock your teeth out. You further have a sneaking suspicion that the policeman is scared to death of the bully.
Of course this is a silly, ridiculous analogy---BECAUSE IT ISN'T NEARLY THREATENING ENOUGH. The bully is also carrying a shotgun and it is aimed squarely at you and there are 20 people already laying dead in the street. The policeman is carrying a night stick and no other weapon. You aren't just trying to hide behind your hands, friends, you are trying to hide behind a wall.
Silly you. Don't you know that the wall will upset him too? Don't you know that if he even thinks you plan to build a wall for protection, he will shoot you first? So stand still. Smile. Tell him you will loan him some more money--how about a little more wheat? Go ahead, tell him you will make a deal, just like the policeman recommends.
Oh wow, it must be comforting, however, to know that once the bully pulls the trigger and blows your head off, the next victim will be that gutless policeman?
WOULD SHELTER REALLY BE AN ACT OF WAR?
Switzerland has built shelters for its people. Red China has built shelters for its people. Would you say that Red China plans to go to war with the Soviets? Well, the Soviets think so, but the Soviets can't get to the people for they have security so it remains a quiet stand-off. If the Chinese will roll over their students with tanks--what do you think they would do to you?
The U.S. has built no shelters for its people. This is an act of illusion leading to eventual annihilation or slavery.
The mere presence of shelters tells you nothing about the intentions of those who built them. The absence of shelters tells a great deal about those who refuse to build them.
THE BIG ONE--MAYBE THE SOVIETS WILL JUST LEAVE YOU ALONE
Tell that one to Afghanistan. Tell it to Poland. Go tell it to Eastern Europe. But you better tell it to someone who is totally ignorant of the history of the Soviet Union. But you sleepyheads say, "Don't tell that stuff to us, we can't believe drivel such as that". No? Well, tyrant states do not build over 10,000 nuclear warheads and overwhelming military superiority in order to leave their potential victims alone.
THE SYSTEM MIGHT NOT WORK
Let us pretend you hear the sirens. What precisely is your recommended system? You can:
1. Get on the floor of your house and await and explosion which will put up to 50 to 200 pounds, or more, of pressure on every square inch of its walls. Don't get in front of any windows, Stay away from flying doors, too--and sit tight. The children can perch on the floor under their school desks.
2. Hide in the basement--if you happen to have one. A little difficult if you live on the second or higher floor of a high-rise. The initial nuclear radiation will kill every unshielded person within three miles, but you certainly can hope for the best, Ah, but then comes fallout--oh well.
3. Right--you can write or phone your Congressman. But then Again, he may not be available. He may be in the basement under Capitol Hill wishing, that he too, had blast doors. The rest of the government high V.I.P.s will he gone to real safety. It is a heck of a time to learn how unimportant you really are!
From a strictly technical viewpoint, a shelter system could easily save the lives of 80 percent of all Americans, if you had as little as a 15 minute warning. If you had a 25 minute warning, shelters could save well over 90 percent. Even without any warning at all, it would be better than what you have available now.
Remember, in the worst possible surprise attack, the Soviets will launch all missiles simultaneously. The submarine-launched missiles will hit first, within ten or fifteen minutes. They will almost certainly be aimed at military targets and Washington, D.C. These explosions will alert surviving Americans to the war, even if the sirens are silent.
At present, hours of warning would do no good if a full-scale attack is launched against the county as a whole. The fallout will kill all that the explosions do not. The movie picture is quite accurate---bumper to bumper, stalled traffic as far as the eye can see.
No civil defense system can guarantee the survival of people who refuse to head for a shelter when they are alerted by warning sirens that an attack is imminent. It can't guarantee the survival of everyone in the downtown districts of a huge city like New York, San Francisco or Chicago on a busy weekday, but it most surely could save most of them. Almost all of your children could be easily saved. Undoubtedly it would save more than will be saved with no shelter system at all.
Shelters will work, but only if people use them and get inside when the bombs explode. Any overall system of civil defense will have some failings, just as every human plan has potential of some screw-ups. That, dear brothers, is hardly a good argument for having no plan at all.
Surely the blowing of some stupid air raid siren won't save a one.
NOW WE GET TO IT--IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE
Right--with $600 toilet seats and $1,200 dollar carpenter hammers--well, you know how those funny politicians are - - - - -! Surely the negative debaters are right. You surely cannot afford $300 per person: $200 for the shelter and $100 for food, tools, and seeds for rebuilding--it certainly would undoubtedly break your American economy---that would do it--$300 would break the economy--not the multi trillion dollar debt or the billions upon billions of defaults. Oh, but you ones must understand that you are just too poor. The government spends a trillion dollars a year on "really important things".
Keep this one in mind. The hour you hear the sirens (because even small towns still have sirens), and the newscasters tell you to take cover, think about how much money you have saved. Tell your kids how really thrifty you have been. What do you say when they ask, 밆addy, you always take care of us--Mommy, you always know what to do; what are we going to do?" Well, you just answer right out, "We are going to die, kiddies (probably a death of prolonged terrible pain and agony) but at least we saved $300 bucks apiece. Remember, kids, that paid for a good portion of last summer's vacation to Disney World--at least the tickets for a family our size. Think of Fantasyland-remember--that was our favorite place: Fantasyland. And remember those designer jeans for school, well, just don't worry about looking shabby--or think about Tomorrowland." How many of you ones will give up Tomorrowland for fear tomorrow will end up looking like Frontierland? Well, do you think your children would feel the same?
Your problem is not technical nor financial--it is spiritual. You have lost your vision and your backbone. Some of you think life isn't worth living if, during and for a while after an attack, it isn't lived in an air conditioned three bedroom home with hot and cold water and switch-on lights.
If you don't change your thinking right soon, you will not survive and it is a moot point. But think of this one: The Hebrew slaves of Moses' generation were scared to death of dying in the wilderness, so God let all of them except Caleb and Joshua die in the wilderness. God gave the slaves exactly what they feared and expected. Slaves live--and die--in fear. You are afraid of nuclear war and the difficulties of rebuilding after such a war? Then you had better learn the lesson of the Exodus generation. If you deliberately, self-consciously refuse to do that which is morally required, God turns you over to your greatest fear in life--every time. Who will join Caleb and Joshua? I know several, but only a handful, and we bless you ones beyond all bounds.
ANOTHER IDIOT TACT--IT WILL TAKE TOO LONG ANYWAY
It will take you about two years-and that is if you drag along and poke all the way. But, of course, if the program gets stalled it will take forever and forever might be sooner than you like to confront.
What might the problem be? The shelters will be identical. Oh gosh, every American gets access to the same kind of protection. Is that good or bad? Are you waiting for Ashtar to tell you? Well, screw your head back on. The shelters can be mass produced on American assembly lines and in local steel fabrication shops. The steel will be easily available: our steel factories are lying idle all over the Northwest. Surely Ashtar could not mean--jobs! You mean--income, Ashtar? Even if we never have a war? Oh, we could use them in tornado anti hurricane season, also? You mean, Ashtar, we could even have food and water after an earthquake, also?
Farmers are going broke, it seems to me! Do you think you can prod a year's supply of grain from them to set aside?--well, you could even pay for it. You can simply stockpile the wheat in storage tanks under the ground instead of in tanks on the surface--well, couldn't that be possible? You could probably help dig holes about ten feet deep somewhere near your homes?
Do you think that if you were at war you would try to build shelters? The trouble is, nobody in the U.S. wants to admit it could possibly happen--"er- er _, well there is Mr. Gorbechev and he seems like such a nice sort---". The Communists have admitted it right out front--boldly--since your 1917, but you don't believe the horse's mouth. Neither did the leaders of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Czechoslovakia, Cambodia, Afghanistan, Cuba and you count the others.
You always get a deal from the Communists, friends--only it is always from the bottom of the deck. Your "deals" have bought the Soviets the time they need. Deals have made a handful of American deal-doers rich--they have also put your neck on the guillotine. Further, "deals" indicate that you have already surrendered to the facts in principle. A most deadly message to send to your enemy, I would think.
PEOPLE WOULD BE HANDLED LIKE CORDWOOD
Friends, there arc only two kinds of cordwood after an atomic attack: stacked up cordwood (living) or blasted and irradiated cordwood (dead). This, of course, is a variation on "But people will be jammed together like sardines; without showers or deodorant or breath mints--oh perish the thought". Ok-so just perish. Bad news though--burned bodies smell really unpleasant! But, you won't have to worry about bad breath!
You literally have leaders who think you wouldn't be willing to spend two weeks in a "subway car" in order to save your lives. They tout it would be too frightening for your children to go through that experience. They said it; not Ashtar. They further think building "subway cars" for you is far too expensive. Ah yes, in that instance--less than $300 per person.
How about a little Washington D.C. scenario--ready? The elected representatives used YOUR tax money to build themselves the most expensive subway in the U.S. history--the ten-billion dollar Washington, D.C. subway system (that was ten billion 1977 purchasing-power dollars to boot!) They did not even bother to put blast doors on it or install a filtered ventilation system. An extra few millions spent then, when the city was already dug up, could save the lives today of almost everyone in that city! In fact, that $10 billion would have bought blast shelters and post-attack supplies for over 30 million Americans.
These bright, intelligent officials have brought their own families to a prime nuclear target and they have left their own families undefended--the shelters under way are for the very most elite and will remain uncluttered and un-crowded. How enthusiastic do you think these ones will be when you ask them to spend some money this year to save YOUR skin--they haven't even been efforting at saving most of their own.
Political rhetoric isn't too interesting during a nuclear attack.
MORE TIME TO STUDY THE PROBLEM
This is always the last ditch effort to stall a program forever. The fact is, everything you need to know was already known by the civil defense professionals when President Kennedy was in office. That is why he wanted to go ahead with the civil defense program. Unfortunately, he was killed before he could get the idea translated into action--well, most certainly!
In the library at your Oak Ridge National Laboratory, there are 3,000 scientific and engineering articles on the subject of civil defense. The staff members at Oak Ridge have set aside 1,000 of these as most significant. That basic information has been sorted and sitting there for three decades. The story is blatantly clear right there in research print: "AMERICANS CAN BE DEFENDED EFFECTIVELY BY SIMPLE, INEXPENSIVE SHELTERS."
It is time for you as Americans to stand up and DEMAND a fighting chance at life. If you just sit there silently, you have implicitly accepted one or more of these false premises as truth. You will have "bought the no-protection package" in whole. You have tied your future and your children's future to a lie and an illusion. You will have closed your eyes to what the Soviets have told you straightforward that they can do and will do: WIN! Your silence today will be DEAD SILENCE one of these days soon.
Dharma, enough for today. It has been much too long but every day elapsed is a day less to get your work done.
Let us draw this to a close. I honor and salute you for staying with me for I know what is in your heart. In love and infinite care for you dear ones, I stand aside.
I AM ASHTAR ADONAI
PJ 06
CHAPTER 8
REC #1, ASHTAR
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1989 7:00 A.M. YEAR 3 DAY 026
Ashtar present that we might continue. The job is most unpleasant, that you have committed to do. It is most offensive to expose wrongdoing, terror and the actual plight in which you dear ones find yourselves. You, Dharma are in one of those positions of knowledge, whereby, you could pretty much make a decision to leave or stay--we know that you know as much. Let me remind you of what Apostle Paul said when he was in a Roman prison and all he could do was 뱖rite" to the churches and the people, "For I am in a strait (tight space) between two, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ; which is far, far better: Nevertheless, to abide in the flesh is more needful for you and for service unto Him" (Philippians 1:23-24).
Dear ones, the Christ disciples and apostles were just like other men--fallible. They taught what they "understood" and if understanding was in error--they taught error. Further, as they taught; others erred and misunderstood and believe me, the old man of the darkness helped them misunderstand at every turn of the path. Be gentle about the words given down through the eons-discern, for much was tampered by even modern man--most, in fact. Ones pay their debts from these experiences--between God and himself. 'Tis not your business. It is your business to perceive and choose that which is truth and allow the false to fall aside. Annihilate the lie when you can (I said the lie--not the man bearing the lie), for it shall surely fall upon another if it remains intact.
"Heaven" is better than any place on your plane. That is simply the way it is. Else why would ones need of the experience? You are ready for the transition when your jobs are finished. This writing of information, for instance, is your primary work at this particular point in evolvement. So be it; no lecture, just response to your petition, Dharma--and that of your close brothers who must also abide the transience of work focus change.
Let us please return to our unpleasant subject. I would state this much in your behalf, Dharma. For those who are not "shocked" at this, or can just accept it without trauma, do not understand the facts of that which you are up against. Joking and teasing about it takes the sharp edge away, but it also causes lack of doing anything to correct the circumstance. You ones in the group must be even more discerning and clear in reception and perception than all others. If you example lapses in your strength and act unwisely or fall prey to a dark input--it is most detrimental. You must act clearly and morally and protect, rather than encourage, your brother to act likewise--some things are simply "not alright" behavior. If you partake, even in thy secret places, of those things which are about the destruction of your fellow-man, you have sanctioned it and untold damage can be projected upon self and others.
CONSIDER THE MORAL RESPONSE WISDOM IN RESISTANCE
The only way to avoid a nuclear war in your current time, is to convince your enemy that you can nicely survive it. The way to assure surrender is to allow your enemy to know you cannot survive, and further, let them know that you know. A NATION WITHOUT SHELTERS AGAINST SUCH AN ATTACK WILL NOT SURVIVE!
That which makes a nation (its peoples and its structures), will not survive. That which is of the natural will survive very nicely--even bringing strength unto some species of plant and animal mineral life. Heat and pressure make diamonds of carbon, remember.
Let us understand something you don't want to face--it will be the Soviets for theirs is a stated atheistic society. Of course some of the Russians are "Christian associated"--but then, there are many atheists in America, so do not be foolish in your picking of nits--lest you become a nit-wit. The Soviets have even told you exactly how they will do it and, my friends, it is working superbly at the moment, even unto perfection.
In a full-scale Soviet nuclear attack, a large percentage of the U.S. population would be dead within a month. Those whom the initial blasts didn't kill, the radiation from fallout would. The country would collapse and surrender--if there is any government official still alive (or around) to do the surrender paper work--it is a moot point.
The land would survive. The invaders would easily walk into THE LARGEST PIECE OF VALUABLE, DEVELOPED RURAL REAL ESTATE IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND. FURTHER, THE EXAMPLE AND TERROR OF WHAT HAPPENED TO THE U.S. WOULD GIVE THEM THE REST OF THE WESTERN CIVILIZATION ON A STERLING SILVER PLATTER--MEXICO, CANADA AND SOUTH AMERICA--THEY ALREADY HAVE MUCH OF YOUR CENTRAL AMERICA.
This would all happen with very little risk to the initiators--a greatly declining amount of risk daily--it can be accomplished in less than 30 minutes.
Ones can argue that the Soviets would only attack your military installations (not likely--they are focused on the largest cities). If they did, however, you might lose a few million to over 50 million people. Doesn't matter for the rest would surrender. Perhaps it might be considered the penalty for having brought this kind of death to the world, my friends.
Of course, this scenario is improbable for you would still have a surviving group of really angry people who are still pretty well armed. Therefore, the Soviets would not be so foolish for it would most certainly he more: wisdom in just having a full-scale attack, wait for the radiation to clear and walk in. They may consider the loss of a few buildings far better than facing outraged Americans and cleaning out the rebels. They, further, may not believe that certain groups speak for the remainder of the Americans with slogans like "better Red than dead". They may realize that for their long-term plans, "better dead than Red" is safer for them in their dealings with Americans, especially those Americans who are deeply religious and who see themselves as responsible before God for defending a civilization built originally on God's laws. They probably do prefer to not blow up the cities-they desire the twentieth century technology (which they do not have at present) and they will enjoy a few slaves around who know how to teach their ones to operate the technological toys. Let me just assure you, that while you have been reveling in luxury, drinking your beer and smoking your hemp leaves, their leaders have been carefully planning strategy which will pull you down.
The Soviets, further, have done exactly what your government has done to you. They have made sure the Russians, in general, have become vodka addicts and while the people are concerned with personal survival in drastic times, the proletariats have made strategic plans on a wide scale manner, to improve their lot in about 30 minutes.
Without a protection shelter system for the U.S. population, the Soviets might be able to blackmail your leaders into surrendering without ever launching an attack. You might not even know of the surrender until it is beyond undoing. Selling out your allies in South Africa, Europe, Asia, and Central America might be carried out under Soviet orders to your leaders--and made to appear as most reasonable, independent actions--in your media and press. Could be other things have fooled you??
In a substantial sense, your government's present fear that deployment of civil defense and deployment of strategic defense must be delayed, so that you will not anger or worry the Soviets, is itself a kind of implicit surrender. That policy, if continued, could easily lead eventually to your actual surrender, or nuclear annihilation.
YOU ARE FINANCING YOUR OWN SURRENDER AND MURDER IT IS YOUR MONEY, FRIENDS!
This policy must be reversed, friends---SOON! The years slip right on by and you grow more helpless while the Soviets grow relatively stronger, oh foolish ones. What wisdom is there in the money and technology that you provide to the Soviets at present? Could it already be a form of surrender in "sheep's cloth"? Perhaps like lambs to the slaughter? You send wheat to Russia while you have starving and homeless people in your own streets! Oh, you think you don't give them money? Dear hearts, I am embarrassed for you. The U.S. government encourages U.S. banks (grey men perhaps?--see SPIRAL TO ECONOMIC DISASTER, please) to give the Soviets and their satellites long-term loans at interest rates far below those at which they loan money to Americans. Woops, didn't you know that, little sleepy ones? Oh, well, let me catch you up a little bit.
Over $80 billion was loaned to them just in your 1970s (so much more now), at interest rates far more favorable than American businesses could receive, with over $20 billion of that money going to economically hopeless --let us say, Poland (and it seems Ashtar recalls just a very few weeks ago, Mr. Bush promised them another $1.3 billion or so). A branch of YOUR government, the Export-Import Bank, was established to use taxpayers money to guarantee the repayment of such cheap loans, just in case the Soviets default. Your money would be used to payoff the lending banks. (Oh, NOW you are going to give Ashtar some attention cause we are again talking about YOUR money, and not just your little old kids and self survival.)
Your own professor, Richard Pipes of Harvard, gives you a little explanation worth repeating:
"The debt of the Soviet Union to Western assistance is not widely known, because neither of the parties involved wishes to advertise it--the Soviet Union wants to avoid the embarrassment of conceding that it is more or less permanently dependent on the 'capitalist camp', while Western firms are coy about doing business with a power that most Westerners view as hostile and spend great sums to arm themselves against. (To this day, the U.S. Department of Commerce will not release lists of industrial corporations granted export licenses to the Soviet Union, although such business is perfectly legitimate.)"
It is legal, yes, perfectly legal.
OH ASHTAR; DIRTY BOUNDER--THIS IS BELOW THE BELT
There is even a nearly secret, not-for-profit corporation that makes it easier for big, big U.S. firms to do business in the Soviet Union. ITS MEMBERSHIP LIST IS A SECRET. THE GOVERNMENT WON'T RELEASE THE NAMES, AND THE ORGANIZATION CERTAINLY WILL NOT (PLEASE REFER TO SPACE-GATE AND SPIRAL TO ECONOMIC DISASTER AS QUICKLY AS YOU CAN--IF YOU "REALLY WANT TO KNOW"). Their hundreds of corporate members insist on secrecy! Well, they sort of call it the US-USSR Trade and Economic Council-but its real name is a secret! They even publish a regular journal-with a very small circulation. YOU can't subscribe to it, but the members of the "Council" can--now what Council do you suppose that might be? How about an address? 805 Third Avenue, New York, New York, 10022. The Soviets write most of the articles, and the Americans run most of the ads (nothing changes very much does it?). Oh well, the American corporations deduct the cost of the ads from their taxable income at the end of the year. You can always make up that shortfall in tax revenues!
***THE SOVIETS ARE YOUR MORTAL ENEMIES***
The above tactics have worked for all the other countries in the world, for your "grey men's" plan at world control---IT WILL NOT WORK FOR THE SOVIETS. YOU WILL NOT BANKRUPT THE SOVIETS NO MATTER WHAT--THEY WILL SIMPLY KEEP WHAT THEY HAVE AND BLOW YOU OFF THE MAP! IN LESS THAN 30 MINUTES!
You have a $300 billion annual defense budget which supposedly is spent to protect you from those "mortal enemies". But, it doesn't work that way--that money is diverted and you feed, send technology and make it a sure deal for them to be able to walk all over you. MIGHT THERE BE SOME HANKY PANKY IN THE HIGHER ECHELONS OF YOUR GOVERNMENT? THIS WRITING WILL PROBABLY BE CONSIDERED "TREASON". FRIENDS, WHERE IS THE TREASON? WHO ARE THE TRAITORS WHO HAVE BETRAYED YOU? YOU SIT LIKE LAMBS AT THE SLAUGHTER TABLE; DEFENSELESS!
Most Americans have never been allowed to know THAT U.S. TAX MONEY--IN 1966--PAID FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADS THAT LED FROM THE SOVIET UNION INTO AFGHANISTAN, RIGHT INTO THE CAPITAL OF KABUL. THE SOVIETS EVEN HELPED BUILD THEM! DO YOU WONDER WHY? WHEN THOSE TANKS ROLLED ACROSS AFGHANISTAN, THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SIGNS IN RUSSIAN ALONG THE HIGHWAYS: "U.S. HIGHWAY TAX DOLLARS AT WORK". THE SOVIET TANKS AND TRUCKS THEMSELVES WERE MADE, IN PART, WITH FACILITIES THAT WERE BUILT BY AMERICAN CORPORATIONS AND FINANCED BY AMERICAN BANKS.
HOW ABOUT ANOTHER OUCHIE!
MOST AMERICANS HAVE NEVER BEEN TOLD THAT A U.S. COMPANY, THE BRYANT CHUCKING GRINDER COMPANY OF SPRINGFIELD, VERMONT, IN 1972 SOLD THE SOVIET UNION THE BALL BEARING MACHINES THAT MADE POSSIBLE THE GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF MIRV'ED WARHEAD MISSILES. (MIRV stands for "multiple independently targeted re-entry vehicle": many warheads per missile, each precisely accurate.) Oh humm, how boring you are, Ashtar.
The Soviets had tried from 1961 to 1972 to buy those machines (Centalign-B grinders), but they were prohibited from buying them by the U.S. government. The Soviets, therefore at that time, couldn뭪 make any MIRV뭙d missiles. Then, in 1972, the Nixon administration came through. The administration suddenly authorized the sale: The Bryant Company presumably (surely they didn't go begging), made millions and millions of dollars. WELL, IT HAS COST YOU NICE TAXPAYERS HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS. It will cost you everything if they use those MIRV'ed missiles before you get your shelters built!
Maybe you better start, and continue, to ask yourselves: "WHY DON'T WE HAVE SHELTERS?" THE ANSWER: "YOU DON'T NEED THEM", IS SOMEWHAT LUDICROUS, IS IT NOT?
Without a defense protection system, you, and your leaders, are psychological prisoners. They know that the Soviets can kill almost all of you. To resist any evil, you have to be alive. It is very difficult to imagine how a successful resistance effort could be sustained if your enemy has the technical power to kill you at any time. How does one resist totalitarian evil in such a world'!
PROVIDE BOMB SHELTERS FOR ALL 235 MILLION AMERICANS, AND THEN YOU CAN BEGIN TO DISCUSS WHAT YOU MIGHT DO NEXT. AND WAKE UP, IN THE NAME OF GOD, WHOM YOU CLAIM TO LOVE-- WAKE UP!
Haven't you wondered at all, how Mr. Gorbachev comes along and suddenly the entire Soviet attitude is peaches and cream? YOU ARE BEING SET UP, DEAR DREAMERS--- YOU ARE ALREADY TIED TO THE EXECUTION POST--THEY JUST DON'T HAVE EVERYTHING THEY WANT FROM YOU YET AND THEY PREFER WORLD OPINION BE ON THEIR SIDE FOR "LOOK HOW HARD WE TRIED". BETTER GET WITH THE WORK, LITTLE YANKEE DOODLE DANDIES OR YOU WILL HAVE LOST YOUR BROADWAY STAGE--FOREVER! HARD TO BELIEVE THAT A SIMPLE, UNDERGROUND SHELTER SYSTEM COULD SAVE YOUR WORLD ISN'T IT? I CERTAINLY HOPE YOU HAVE BEEN LISTENING-- YOU WHO NEVER SEEM TO KNOW "WHAT CAN I DO"? YOU HAD BETTER DO SOMETHING POSTHASTE!
Take a break, Dharma, but not too long as I think we may he opening some eyelids. Ashtar to stand-by. SALU
Tags, 상세검색
응답: SURVIVAL IS ONLY TEN FEET FROM HELL
