PJ#006, SURVIVAL IS ONLY TEN FEET FROM HELL

[wave]

PJ 06

CHAPTER 7

REC #3, ASHTAR

SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1989 4:45 P.M. YEAR 3, DAY 025

Ashtar to resume. Dharma, you will be alright, chela. You ask why can't we just request people get books and let it go at that. No, little one-ones simply won't do it. Our promise and commitment to Source is that the word will go forth--from us--and so it shall. All contributors are of worthy note and will be given all credit; but we must give you these things for, so far, hardly anyone has paid any attention. If we present it all, and still mankind does not listen-­so be it for then it will be finished. Man will come to know truth even if it is in his final midnight hour, and past the time of survival. It shall be done. You ones will do that which you can and then you can do no more. If we do of our job and man still refuses to see and act, then it is finished and you of ours, will be brought home--Selah!

FOOLISHNESS AGAINST CIVIL DEFENSE

What will be the arguments that opponents will thrust at you? It appears to us beyond belief (except that we watch from up here and are continually shocked), that people would have objections to a system of protective shelters that could give you a way to reduce threats against you. But, then, we still watch you laugh at $600 for a $4.00 toilet seat. Let me assure you that the Red Chinese understand that a nation cannot keep its national independence free of charge. So do the Swiss and so do the Soviets. But opponents of civil defense have successfully foiled any attempt to use tax money to protect Americans from nuclear attack. You spend those tax dollars on every hair brained idea that passes to blind you to facts. You are even being made free world countries of addicts to keep you from noticing what has happened. Oh, it will be all over for the rest of the free world; all will fall. Other free world nations are even worse off defense wise than are you---it is just that you are the primary target, dear friends, and when you fall the dominos all fall.

THE WORST; SOVIETS DON'T WANT WAR

"You don't need shelters because the Soviets don't want war." Well, no, the Russian peoples certainly do not--they are told the buildup is to protect them from you. So be it. Why have they built more than 10,000 nuclear warheads and a first-strike delivery system? Why do they have an army of 195 divisions, plus an additional 20 KGB and MVD secret police divisions for a total of 215, when the good old U.S. has only 16? Why do they teach the first-strike nuclear strategy in their military manuals? Oh yes--they do! Why do they repeat in their published strategic planning that a nuclear war can be won!
Why are they deploying a new generation of mobile-launched missiles that cannot be attacked by your missiles'!

Of course they don't want war--if they can get you to surrender without a war. Well, it won't be called war if you surrender--it will be called genocide. Worse for you little Christians, is that the Soviets hate and despise the Jews worse than they can't stand you and where are most of the Jews? Not in Israel, dear ones! The communists will get rid of all of you just to get at the Jews--sorry about that! It is called slaughter. At the very least, it is called slavery. It is called the victory of proletariat forces over the capitalist imperialists.

In Afghanistan, the Soviets placed what appeared to he toys close to villages. When small children pick them up, the toys explode. These toys are sometimes called butterfly bombs, because they resemble toy butterflies. The explosions are designed to blow off the children's hands, not kill them. The children then become permanent visible testimonies to Soviet ruthlessness. Oh, you refuse to believe such a thing--read your own confounded research documents!

The threat of nuclear war is pure, unadulterated terror. They call threaten you with terror any time they please. You can't threaten them with anything, least of all the survival of your people. You refuse to believe it because you still think those kinds of things happen to "someone else". Surely not in good old U.S.A where burning a flag will become a federal offense.

NEXT ARGUMENT: SHELTERS WILL DE-STABILIZE RELATIONS

Another borrowed scenario please: Imagine that a bully is about to knock your teeth out. He has said for years that he intends to do it. He bought some brass knuckles. He is wearing them. He is standing in front of you. He pulls back his fist. You put your hands in front of your face.

"Stop!" a policeman shouts. "Put your hands at your sides!" You think the policeman is shouting at the bully. No, he is shouting at YOU. "You're just making him angry. You're going to get him all upset. Do the smart thing--­give him a taxpayer-subsidized loan instead."

Ah, but you have a sneaking suspicion that if you put your hands down and keep them at your sides, he is going to knock your teeth out. You further have a sneaking suspicion that the policeman is scared to death of the bully.

Of course this is a silly, ridiculous analogy---BECAUSE IT ISN'T NEARLY THREATENING ENOUGH. The bully is also carrying a shotgun and it is aimed squarely at you and there are 20 people already laying dead in the street. The policeman is carrying a night stick and no other weapon. You aren't just trying to hide behind your hands, friends, you are trying to hide behind a wall.

Silly you. Don't you know that the wall will upset him too? Don't you know that if he even thinks you plan to build a wall for protection, he will shoot you first? So stand still. Smile. Tell him you will loan him some more money--­how about a little more wheat? Go ahead, tell him you will make a deal, just like the policeman recommends.

Oh wow, it must be comforting, however, to know that once the bully pulls the trigger and blows your head off, the next victim will be that gutless policeman?

WOULD SHELTER REALLY BE AN ACT OF WAR?

Switzerland has built shelters for its people. Red China has built shelters for its people. Would you say that Red China plans to go to war with the Soviets? Well, the Soviets think so, but the Soviets can't get to the people for they have security so it remains a quiet stand-off. If the Chinese will roll over their students with tanks--what do you think they would do to you?

The U.S. has built no shelters for its people. This is an act of illusion leading to eventual annihilation or slavery.

The mere presence of shelters tells you nothing about the intentions of those who built them. The absence of shelters tells a great deal about those who refuse to build them.

THE BIG ONE--MAYBE THE SOVIETS WILL JUST LEAVE YOU ALONE

Tell that one to Afghanistan. Tell it to Poland. Go tell it to Eastern Europe. But you better tell it to someone who is totally ignorant of the history of the Soviet Union. But you sleepyheads say, "Don't tell that stuff to us, we can't believe drivel such as that". No? Well, tyrant states do not build over 10,000 nuclear warheads and overwhelming military superiority in order to leave their potential victims alone.

THE SYSTEM MIGHT NOT WORK

Let us pretend you hear the sirens. What precisely is your recommended system? You can:

1. Get on the floor of your house and await and explosion which will put up to 50 to 200 pounds, or more, of pressure on every square inch of its walls. Don't get in front of any windows, Stay away from flying doors, too--and sit tight. The children can perch on the floor under their school desks.

2. Hide in the basement--if you happen to have one. A little difficult if you live on the second or higher floor of a high-rise. The initial nuclear radiation will kill every unshielded person within three miles, but you certainly can hope for the best, Ah, but then comes fallout--oh well.

3. Right--you can write or phone your Congressman. But then Again, he may not be available. He may be in the basement under Capitol Hill wishing, that he too, had blast doors. The rest of the government high V.I.P.s will he gone to real safety. It is a heck of a time to learn how unimportant you really are!

MORE FACTS

From a strictly technical viewpoint, a shelter system could easily save the lives of 80 percent of all Americans, if you had as little as a 15 minute warning. If you had a 25 minute warning, shelters could save well over 90 percent. Even without any warning at all, it would be better than what you have available now.

Remember, in the worst possible surprise attack, the Soviets will launch all missiles simultaneously. The submarine-launched missiles will hit first, within ten or fifteen minutes. They will almost certainly be aimed at military targets and Washington, D.C. These explosions will alert surviving Americans to the war, even if the sirens are silent.

At present, hours of warning would do no good if a full-scale attack is launched against the county as a whole. The fallout will kill all that the explosions do not. The movie picture is quite accurate---bumper to bumper, stalled traffic as far as the eye can see.

No civil defense system can guarantee the survival of people who refuse to head for a shelter when they are alerted by warning sirens that an attack is imminent. It can't guarantee the survival of everyone in the downtown districts of a huge city like New York, San Francisco or Chicago on a busy weekday, but it most surely could save most of them. Almost all of your chil­dren could be easily saved. Undoubtedly it would save more than will be saved with no shelter system at all.

Shelters will work, but only if people use them and get inside when the bombs explode. Any overall system of civil defense will have some failings, just as every human plan has potential of some screw-ups. That, dear brothers, is hardly a good argument for having no plan at all.

Surely the blowing of some stupid air raid siren won't save a one.

NOW WE GET TO IT--IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE

Right--with $600 toilet seats and $1,200 dollar carpenter hammers--well, you know how those funny politicians are - - - - -! Surely the negative debaters are right. You surely cannot afford $300 per person: $200 for the shelter and $100 for food, tools, and seeds for rebuilding--it certainly would undoubtedly break your American economy---that would do it--$300 would break the economy--not the multi trillion dollar debt or the billions upon billions of defaults. Oh, but you ones must understand that you are just too poor. The government spends a trillion dollars a year on "really important things".

Keep this one in mind. The hour you hear the sirens (because even small towns still have sirens), and the newscasters tell you to take cover, think about how much money you have saved. Tell your kids how really thrifty you have been. What do you say when they ask, 밆addy, you always take care of us--­Mommy, you always know what to do; what are we going to do?" Well, you just answer right out, "We are going to die, kiddies (probably a death of prolonged terrible pain and agony) but at least we saved $300 bucks apiece. Remember, kids, that paid for a good portion of last summer's vacation to Disney World--at least the tickets for a family our size. Think of Fantasyland­-remember--that was our favorite place: Fantasyland. And remember those designer jeans for school, well, just don't worry about looking shabby--or think about Tomorrowland." How many of you ones will give up Tomorrowland for fear tomorrow will end up looking like Frontierland? Well, do you think your children would feel the same?

Your problem is not technical nor financial--it is spiritual. You have lost your vision and your backbone. Some of you think life isn't worth living if, during and for a while after an attack, it isn't lived in an air conditioned three bedroom home with hot and cold water and switch-on lights.

If you don't change your thinking right soon, you will not survive and it is a moot point. But think of this one: The Hebrew slaves of Moses' generation were scared to death of dying in the wilderness, so God let all of them except Caleb and Joshua die in the wilderness. God gave the slaves exactly what they feared and expected. Slaves live--and die--in fear. You are afraid of nuclear war and the difficulties of rebuilding after such a war? Then you had better learn the lesson of the Exodus generation. If you deliberately, self-consciously refuse to do that which is morally required, God turns you over to your greatest fear in life--every time. Who will join Caleb and Joshua? I know several, but only a handful, and we bless you ones beyond all bounds.

ANOTHER IDIOT TACT--IT WILL TAKE TOO LONG ANYWAY

It will take you about two years-and that is if you drag along and poke all the way. But, of course, if the program gets stalled it will take forever and forever might be sooner than you like to confront.

What might the problem be? The shelters will be identical. Oh gosh, every American gets access to the same kind of protection. Is that good or bad? Are you waiting for Ashtar to tell you? Well, screw your head back on. The shelters can be mass produced on American assembly lines and in local steel fabrication shops. The steel will be easily available: our steel factories are lying idle all over the Northwest. Surely Ashtar could not mean--jobs! You mean--income, Ashtar? Even if we never have a war? Oh, we could use them in tornado anti hurricane season, also? You mean, Ashtar, we could even have food and water after an earthquake, also?

Farmers are going broke, it seems to me! Do you think you can prod a year's supply of grain from them to set aside?--well, you could even pay for it. You can simply stockpile the wheat in storage tanks under the ground instead of in tanks on the surface--well, couldn't that be possible? You could probably help dig holes about ten feet deep somewhere near your homes?

Do you think that if you were at war you would try to build shelters? The trouble is, nobody in the U.S. wants to admit it could possibly happen--"er- er _, well there is Mr. Gorbechev and he seems like such a nice sort---". The Communists have admitted it right out front--boldly--since your 1917, but you don't believe the horse's mouth. Neither did the leaders of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Czechoslovakia, Cambodia, Afghanistan, Cuba and you count the others.

You always get a deal from the Communists, friends--only it is always from the bottom of the deck. Your "deals" have bought the Soviets the time they need. Deals have made a handful of American deal-doers rich--they have also put your neck on the guillotine. Further, "deals" indicate that you have already surrendered to the facts in principle. A most deadly message to send to your enemy, I would think.

PEOPLE WOULD BE HANDLED LIKE CORDWOOD

Friends, there arc only two kinds of cordwood after an atomic attack: stacked ­up cordwood (living) or blasted and irradiated cordwood (dead). This, of course, is a variation on "But people will be jammed together like sardines; without showers or deodorant or breath mints--oh perish the thought". Ok-so just perish. Bad news though--burned bodies smell really unpleasant! But, you won't have to worry about bad breath!

You literally have leaders who think you wouldn't be willing to spend two weeks in a "subway car" in order to save your lives. They tout it would be too frightening for your children to go through that experience. They said it; not Ashtar. They further think building "subway cars" for you is far too expensive. Ah yes, in that instance--less than $300 per person.

How about a little Washington D.C. scenario--ready? The elected representatives used YOUR tax money to build themselves the most expensive subway in the U.S. history--the ten-billion dollar Washington, D.C. subway system (that was ten billion 1977 purchasing-power dollars to boot!) They did not even bother to put blast doors on it or install a filtered ventilation system. An extra few millions spent then, when the city was already dug up, could save the lives today of almost everyone in that city! In fact, that $10 billion would have bought blast shelters and post-attack supplies for over 30 million Americans.

These bright, intelligent officials have brought their own families to a prime nuclear target and they have left their own families undefended--the shelters under way are for the very most elite and will remain uncluttered and un-crowded. How enthusiastic do you think these ones will be when you ask them to spend some money this year to save YOUR skin--they haven't even been efforting at saving most of their own.

Political rhetoric isn't too interesting during a nuclear attack.

MORE TIME TO STUDY THE PROBLEM

This is always the last ditch effort to stall a program forever. The fact is, everything you need to know was already known by the civil defense professionals when President Kennedy was in office. That is why he wanted to go ahead with the civil defense program. Unfortunately, he was killed before he could get the idea translated into action--well, most certainly!

In the library at your Oak Ridge National Laboratory, there are 3,000 scientific and engineering articles on the subject of civil defense. The staff members at Oak Ridge have set aside 1,000 of these as most significant. That basic information has been sorted and sitting there for three decades. The story is blatantly clear right there in research print: "AMERICANS CAN BE DEFENDED EFFECTIVELY BY SIMPLE, INEXPENSIVE SHELTERS."

A LITTLE SUMMARY

It is time for you as Americans to stand up and DEMAND a fighting chance at life. If you just sit there silently, you have implicitly accepted one or more of these false premises as truth. You will have "bought the no-protection package" in whole. You have tied your future and your children's future to a lie and an illusion. You will have closed your eyes to what the Soviets have told you straightforward that they can do and will do: WIN! Your silence today will be DEAD SILENCE one of these days soon.

Dharma, enough for today. It has been much too long but every day elapsed is a day less to get your work done.

Let us draw this to a close. I honor and salute you for staying with me for I know what is in your heart. In love and infinite care for you dear ones, I stand aside.

I AM ASHTAR ADONAI

PJ 06

CHAPTER 8

REC #1, ASHTAR

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1989 7:00 A.M. YEAR 3 DAY 026

RESIST

Ashtar present that we might continue. The job is most unpleasant, that you have committed to do. It is most offensive to expose wrongdoing, terror and the actual plight in which you dear ones find yourselves. You, Dharma are in one of those positions of knowledge, whereby, you could pretty much make a decision to leave or stay--we know that you know as much. Let me remind you of what Apostle Paul said when he was in a Roman prison and all he could do was 뱖rite" to the churches and the people, "For I am in a strait (tight space) between two, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ; which is far, far better: Nevertheless, to abide in the flesh is more needful for you and for service unto Him" (Philippians 1:23-24).

Dear ones, the Christ disciples and apostles were just like other men--fallible. They taught what they "understood" and if understanding was in error--they taught error. Further, as they taught; others erred and misunderstood and believe me, the old man of the darkness helped them misunderstand at every turn of the path. Be gentle about the words given down through the eons-­discern, for much was tampered by even modern man--most, in fact. Ones pay their debts from these experiences--between God and himself. 'Tis not your business. It is your business to perceive and choose that which is truth and allow the false to fall aside. Annihilate the lie when you can (I said the lie--not the man bearing the lie), for it shall surely fall upon another if it remains intact.

"Heaven" is better than any place on your plane. That is simply the way it is. Else why would ones need of the experience? You are ready for the transition when your jobs are finished. This writing of information, for instance, is your primary work at this particular point in evolvement. So be it; no lecture, just response to your petition, Dharma--and that of your close brothers who must also abide the transience of work focus change.

Let us please return to our unpleasant subject. I would state this much in your behalf, Dharma. For those who are not "shocked" at this, or can just accept it without trauma, do not understand the facts of that which you are up against. Joking and teasing about it takes the sharp edge away, but it also causes lack of doing anything to correct the circumstance. You ones in the group must be even more discerning and clear in reception and perception than all others. If you example lapses in your strength and act unwisely or fall prey to a dark input--it is most detrimental. You must act clearly and morally and protect, rather than encourage, your brother to act likewise--some things are simply "not alright" behavior. If you partake, even in thy secret places, of those things which are about the destruction of your fellow-man, you have sanctioned it and untold damage can be projected upon self and others.

CONSIDER THE MORAL RESPONSE WISDOM IN RESISTANCE

The only way to avoid a nuclear war in your current time, is to convince your enemy that you can nicely survive it. The way to assure surrender is to allow your enemy to know you cannot survive, and further, let them know that you know. A NATION WITHOUT SHELTERS AGAINST SUCH AN ATTACK WILL NOT SURVIVE!

That which makes a nation (its peoples and its structures), will not survive. That which is of the natural will survive very nicely--even bringing strength unto some species of plant and animal mineral life. Heat and pressure make diamonds of carbon, remember.

Let us understand something you don't want to face--it will be the Soviets for theirs is a stated atheistic society. Of course some of the Russians are "Christian associated"--but then, there are many atheists in America, so do not be foolish in your picking of nits--lest you become a nit-wit. The Soviets have even told you exactly how they will do it and, my friends, it is working superbly at the moment, even unto perfection.

In a full-scale Soviet nuclear attack, a large percentage of the U.S. population would be dead within a month. Those whom the initial blasts didn't kill, the radiation from fallout would. The country would collapse and surrender--if there is any government official still alive (or around) to do the surrender pa­per work--it is a moot point.

The land would survive. The invaders would easily walk into THE LARGEST PIECE OF VALUABLE, DEVELOPED RURAL REAL ESTATE IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND. FURTHER, THE EXAMPLE AND TERROR OF WHAT HAPPENED TO THE U.S. WOULD GIVE THEM THE REST OF THE WESTERN CIVILIZATION ON A STERLING SILVER PLATTER--MEXICO, CANADA AND SOUTH AMERICA--THEY ALREADY HAVE MUCH OF YOUR CENTRAL AMERICA.

This would all happen with very little risk to the initiators--a greatly declining amount of risk daily--it can be accomplished in less than 30 minutes.

Ones can argue that the Soviets would only attack your military installations (not likely--they are focused on the largest cities). If they did, however, you might lose a few million to over 50 million people. Doesn't matter for the rest would surrender. Perhaps it might be considered the penalty for having brought this kind of death to the world, my friends.

Of course, this scenario is improbable for you would still have a surviving group of really angry people who are still pretty well armed. Therefore, the Soviets would not be so foolish for it would most certainly he more: wisdom in just having a full-scale attack, wait for the radiation to clear and walk in. They may consider the loss of a few buildings far better than facing outraged Americans and cleaning out the rebels. They, further, may not believe that certain groups speak for the remainder of the Americans with slogans like "better Red than dead". They may realize that for their long-term plans, "better dead than Red" is safer for them in their dealings with Americans, especially those Americans who are deeply religious and who see themselves as responsible before God for defending a civilization built originally on God's laws. They probably do prefer to not blow up the cities-they desire the twentieth century technology (which they do not have at present) and they will enjoy a few slaves around who know how to teach their ones to operate the technological toys. Let me just assure you, that while you have been reveling in luxury, drinking your beer and smoking your hemp leaves, their leaders have been carefully planning strategy which will pull you down.

The Soviets, further, have done exactly what your government has done to you. They have made sure the Russians, in general, have become vodka addicts and while the people are concerned with personal survival in drastic times, the proletariats have made strategic plans on a wide scale manner, to improve their lot in about 30 minutes.

THE STICK-EM-UP

Without a protection shelter system for the U.S. population, the Soviets might be able to blackmail your leaders into surrendering without ever launching an attack. You might not even know of the surrender until it is beyond undoing. Selling out your allies in South Africa, Europe, Asia, and Central America might be carried out under Soviet orders to your leaders--and made to appear as most reasonable, independent actions--in your media and press. Could be other things have fooled you??

In a substantial sense, your government's present fear that deployment of civil defense and deployment of strategic defense must be delayed, so that you will not anger or worry the Soviets, is itself a kind of implicit surrender. That policy, if continued, could easily lead eventually to your actual surrender, or nuclear annihilation.

YOU ARE FINANCING YOUR OWN SURRENDER AND MURDER IT IS YOUR MONEY, FRIENDS!

This policy must be reversed, friends---SOON! The years slip right on by and you grow more helpless while the Soviets grow relatively stronger, oh foolish ones. What wisdom is there in the money and technology that you provide to the Soviets at present? Could it already be a form of surrender in "sheep's cloth"? Perhaps like lambs to the slaughter? You send wheat to Russia while you have starving and homeless people in your own streets! Oh, you think you don't give them money? Dear hearts, I am embarrassed for you. The U.S. government encourages U.S. banks (grey men perhaps?--see SPIRAL TO ECONOMIC DISASTER, please) to give the Soviets and their satellites long­-term loans at interest rates far below those at which they loan money to Americans. Woops, didn't you know that, little sleepy ones? Oh, well, let me catch you up a little bit.

Over $80 billion was loaned to them just in your 1970s (so much more now), at interest rates far more favorable than American businesses could receive, with over $20 billion of that money going to economically hopeless --let us say, Poland (and it seems Ashtar recalls just a very few weeks ago, Mr. Bush promised them another $1.3 billion or so). A branch of YOUR government, the Export-Import Bank, was established to use taxpayers money to guarantee the repayment of such cheap loans, just in case the Soviets default. Your money would be used to payoff the lending banks. (Oh, NOW you are going to give Ashtar some attention cause we are again talking about YOUR money, and not just your little old kids and self survival.)

Your own professor, Richard Pipes of Harvard, gives you a little explanation worth repeating:

"The debt of the Soviet Union to Western assistance is not widely known, because neither of the parties involved wishes to advertise it--the Soviet Union wants to avoid the embarrassment of conceding that it is more or less permanently dependent on the 'capitalist camp', while Western firms are coy about doing business with a power that most Westerners view as hostile and spend great sums to arm themselves against. (To this day, the U.S. Department of Commerce will not release lists of industrial corporations granted export licenses to the Soviet Union, although such business is perfectly legitimate.)"

It is legal, yes, perfectly legal.

OH ASHTAR; DIRTY BOUNDER--THIS IS BELOW THE BELT

There is even a nearly secret, not-for-profit corporation that makes it easier for big, big U.S. firms to do business in the Soviet Union. ITS MEMBERSHIP LIST IS A SECRET. THE GOVERNMENT WON'T RELEASE THE NAMES, AND THE ORGANIZATION CERTAINLY WILL NOT (PLEASE REFER TO SPACE-GATE AND SPIRAL TO ECONOMIC DISASTER AS QUICKLY AS YOU CAN--IF YOU "REALLY WANT TO KNOW"). Their hundreds of corporate members insist on secrecy! Well, they sort of call it the US-USSR Trade and Economic Council-but its real name is a secret! They even publish a regular journal-­with a very small circulation. YOU can't subscribe to it, but the members of the "Council" can--now what Council do you suppose that might be? How about an address? 805 Third Avenue, New York, New York, 10022. The Soviets write most of the articles, and the Americans run most of the ads (nothing changes very much does it?). Oh well, the American corporations deduct the cost of the ads from their taxable income at the end of the year. You can always make up that shortfall in tax revenues!

***THE SOVIETS ARE YOUR MORTAL ENEMIES***

The above tactics have worked for all the other countries in the world, for your "grey men's" plan at world control---IT WILL NOT WORK FOR THE SOVIETS. YOU WILL NOT BANKRUPT THE SOVIETS NO MATTER WHAT--THEY WILL SIMPLY KEEP WHAT THEY HAVE AND BLOW YOU OFF THE MAP! IN LESS THAN 30 MINUTES!

You have a $300 billion annual defense budget which supposedly is spent to protect you from those "mortal enemies". But, it doesn't work that way--­that money is diverted and you feed, send technology and make it a sure deal for them to be able to walk all over you. MIGHT THERE BE SOME HANKY PANKY IN THE HIGHER ECHELONS OF YOUR GOVERNMENT? THIS WRITING WILL PROBABLY BE CONSIDERED "TREASON". FRIENDS, WHERE IS THE TREASON? WHO ARE THE TRAITORS WHO HAVE BETRAYED YOU? YOU SIT LIKE LAMBS AT THE SLAUGHTER TABLE; DEFENSELESS!

YOU ARE NOT TOLD

Most Americans have never been allowed to know THAT U.S. TAX MONEY--IN 1966--PAID FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADS THAT LED FROM THE SOVIET UNION INTO AFGHANISTAN, RIGHT INTO THE CAPITAL OF KABUL. THE SOVIETS EVEN HELPED BUILD THEM! DO YOU WONDER WHY? WHEN THOSE TANKS ROLLED ACROSS AFGHANISTAN, THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SIGNS IN RUSSIAN ALONG THE HIGHWAYS: "U.S. HIGHWAY TAX DOLLARS AT WORK". THE SOVIET TANKS AND TRUCKS THEMSELVES WERE MADE, IN PART, WITH FACILITIES THAT WERE BUILT BY AMERICAN CORPORATIONS AND FINANCED BY AMERICAN BANKS.

HOW ABOUT ANOTHER OUCHIE!

MOST AMERICANS HAVE NEVER BEEN TOLD THAT A U.S. COMPANY, THE BRYANT CHUCKING GRINDER COMPANY OF SPRINGFIELD, VERMONT, IN 1972 SOLD THE SOVIET UNION THE BALL BEARING MACHINES THAT MADE POSSIBLE THE GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF MIRV'ED WARHEAD MISSILES. (MIRV stands for "multiple independently targeted re-entry vehicle": many warheads per missile, each precisely accurate.) Oh humm, how boring you are, Ashtar.

The Soviets had tried from 1961 to 1972 to buy those machines (Centalign-B grinders), but they were prohibited from buying them by the U.S. government. The Soviets, therefore at that time, couldn뭪 make any MIRV뭙d missiles. Then, in 1972, the Nixon administration came through. The administration suddenly authorized the sale: The Bryant Company presumably (surely they didn't go begging), made millions and millions of dollars. WELL, IT HAS COST YOU NICE TAXPAYERS HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS. It will cost you everything if they use those MIRV'ed missiles before you get your shelters built!

Maybe you better start, and continue, to ask yourselves: "WHY DON'T WE HAVE SHELTERS?" THE ANSWER: "YOU DON'T NEED THEM", IS SOMEWHAT LUDICROUS, IS IT NOT?

ALREADY PRISONERS

Without a defense protection system, you, and your leaders, are psychological prisoners. They know that the Soviets can kill almost all of you. To resist any evil, you have to be alive. It is very difficult to imagine how a successful resistance effort could be sustained if your enemy has the technical power to kill you at any time. How does one resist totalitarian evil in such a world'!

PROVIDE BOMB SHELTERS FOR ALL 235 MILLION AMERICANS, AND THEN YOU CAN BEGIN TO DISCUSS WHAT YOU MIGHT DO NEXT. AND WAKE UP, IN THE NAME OF GOD, WHOM YOU CLAIM TO LOVE-- WAKE UP!

GORBACHEV GETS IT DONE!

Haven't you wondered at all, how Mr. Gorbachev comes along and suddenly the entire Soviet attitude is peaches and cream? YOU ARE BEING SET UP, DEAR DREAMERS--- YOU ARE ALREADY TIED TO THE EXECUTION POST--THEY JUST DON'T HAVE EVERYTHING THEY WANT FROM YOU YET AND THEY PREFER WORLD OPINION BE ON THEIR SIDE FOR "LOOK HOW HARD WE TRIED". BETTER GET WITH THE WORK, LITTLE YANKEE DOODLE DANDIES OR YOU WILL HAVE LOST YOUR BROADWAY STAGE--FOREVER! HARD TO BELIEVE THAT A SIMPLE, UNDERGROUND SHELTER SYSTEM COULD SAVE YOUR WORLD ISN'T IT? I CERTAINLY HOPE YOU HAVE BEEN LISTENING-- YOU WHO NEVER SEEM TO KNOW "WHAT CAN I DO"? YOU HAD BETTER DO SOMETHING POST­HASTE!

Take a break, Dharma, but not too long as I think we may he opening some eyelids. Ashtar to stand-by. SALU

[wave]

PJ 06

CHAPTER 15

REC#4ASHTAR

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 4:30 P.M.YEAR 3, DAY 027

Ashtar returned and ready to continue.

START NOW-EXPAND

Get started. If your representatives in Congress see the light and decide that you deserve more space per occupant, they can vote to build additional shelters. That way, you don't mess up production schedules. You just get more of the same. In short, "Buy two; they're small".

The entire system could be completed in less than two years by means of existing industrial facilities, and with existing and currently underutilized industrial capabilities in steel and concrete production, metal-forming, and earthmoving. The currently idle American assembly line facilities can be used to produce the habitability items, such as radiation meters, hammock beds and chairs, water storage containers, ventilation equipment and blast valves. Then if you expand into a better system these shelters can be converted into massive underground storage facilities as an adjunct to your underground city.

PROTECT THE HOMELESS

As the original facilities become replaced and the need for storage is diminished, you will still have safe, weather protected places to house and tend your homeless. There could be areas selected for kitchens, sleeping, etc. and a program organized for self-tending in exchange for labor and other selected duties. Get your addicted population cleaned up and you will have a whole new working class of contributors.

But what if Congress only spends $100 per person? You cannot go to one square foot per person. Alternative approaches include: 1) shelter for the women and children but not the men; 2) shelters for the "important people" and not the rest of you; 3) shelters without survival equipment: you can't stay inside long, and everybody brings a box lunch. Well, if you get started the communities will find a way. In the cities, if ones will not participate, then you have another type of problem.

The bottom line is that you must start building modular shelters for the children--now.Surely you can agree that you have no moral right to leave them unprotected. Then you build for your soldiers, then for your homes and businesses. If you like the results, you just keep on building and by then you will have found better and more efficient building materials and procedures.

With compressed earth domes you only have to dig half as deep and have equal protection. But, get started. Get started and allow it to grow. A journey is begun by that first step--perhaps this book is the first step for many of you--blessings be upon you for such a decision. Maybe you will even build so many that there will be comfortably low occupancies. Maybe you will even then tie them together with tunnels. Maybe your children, your grandchildren, and your civilization will have a future after all. Perhaps you can be the foundation civilization for a whole new world in transition. So be it.

LOCATIONS OF SHELTERS

You must be certain that the shelters will be located so that most of them cannot be destroyed even by the worst possible deliberate attack on the shelters themselves. This is the best way to ensure that such an attack will never take place. You must place the shelters according to Soviet capability, not according to your perceptions of their intentions.

The United States (not including Alaska) contains approximately 3 million square miles. Nuclear explosions of 500 to 1000 kilotons (1 megaton) at optimum height can destroy most buildings over a 50 to 100 square mile area. Therefore, with an attack by 10,000 explosions, the Soviets could destroy the buildings in an area of about 1 million square miles. Excluding, therefore, buildings in desert, forest, and very rural areas, they have the capability of destroying most of the buildings in the U.S.-----BUT DEAR FRIENDS, THEY WILL NOT DO THAT--FOR THAT WOULD LEAVE THEM WITH NO DEFENSE OR RETALIATION ABILITY AGAINST CHINA. THAT IS ONE REASON THEY HAVE LEFT YOU ALIVE. IT IS STILL A GREAT RISK, FOR THEY KNOW THE CHINESE CAN PROTECT THEMSELVES AND ARE JUST WAITING UNTIL THE SOVIETS ARE WEAKENED IN GREAT MEASURE. OH, IT IS JUST A BIG MERRY-GO-AROUND OF INTRIGUE, IS IT NOT?

As their nuclear arsenal grows, and as the number of their "delivery vehicles" grows, they will be able to knock down even more of your buildings.

TARGETS WILL BE URBAN AREAS AND MILITARY INSTALLATIONS

In practice, of course, they would concentrate explosions in urban areas and around military installations, and keep weapons in reserve for threatening other countries into submission. Such threats will be very effective in a world in which the U.S. no longer exists. Even so, it is unlikely that any city or large town will be free from a direct attack. Clearly you cannot defend your buildings. Only an anti-missile defense system can do that--a deployed strategic defense, not a research and development program.

There are, however, domed structures with the majority of the "floors" underground that, will survive an almost direct explosion for the shock wave and wind force will be deflected from the domed shape. We will speak of those things at a later time--let us just get started at present; we can help you plan and dream and build for the assured future for which you are saving yourselves.

An air-burst attack on your buildings will not harm your people if they are in properly designed, 200 psi sure-safe blast shelters, The blast shelters could only be harmed by a ground-burst attack. Besides being much less effective at destroying buildings, a ground-burst attack would also not be effective in de짯stroying very many of your shelters.

WHAT OF NEUTRON BOMBS AND PARTICLE BEAMS?

I would insert in this portion for you who are already asking: What about neutron bombs that preserve buildings and just kill life? What about particle beams that back feed and chain react into oblivion? THE COSMIC COUNCIL MAY ALLOW A GREAT DEAL OF INTERFERENCE FROM WE, THE BROTHERHOOD OF THE FEDERATION; FOR WITH THOSE WEAPONS YOU WOULD MOST PROBABLY ANNIHILATE YOUR PLANET AND THAT WILL NOT BE ALLOWED IF AT ALL PREVENTABLE. WE WILL INTERCEDE. WE HAVE ALREADY BEEN CALLED INTO ACTION BY BOTH THE UNITED STATES, THE SOVIET UNION AND SEVERAL TIMES BY CHINA TO STOP CHAIN REACTIONS FROM YOUR PARTICLE BEAM SYSTEMS. ONCE AT CHERNOBLE, ONCE JUST BEFORE A MAJOR SUMMIT IN EUROPE, ONCE AT THE LIVERMORE LABORATORIES NEAR SAN FRANCISCO. OH, WE ARE MUCH MORE ACCEPTED THAN YOU MIGHT EVER BELIEVE TO HEAR TELL OF IT. LET US JUST DEAL HERE WITH LITTLE OLD NUCLEAR BOMBS AND SHELTERS THEREFOR.

LITTLE OLD "REGULAR" NUCLEAR BOMBS

A ground surface burst, 500 to 1000-kiloton explosion produces a crater about 0.03 square miles in area. You read it correctly: three one-hundredths of a square mile. This can vary, of course, in accordance with soil type and other factors. In addition, soil and rock ejected from the crater covers an additional 0.1 square miles to a significant depth--a depth that, in the absence of a tunnel system, might fatally trap the occupants of an underground blast shelter. In addition, there is severe ground-transmitted shock and pressure in the immediate vicinity of a nuclear explosion. For these reasons, it is impractical to build civilian blast shelters that can resist ground bursts within their own 0.6 square mile location. Six tenths of a mile is not much area.

The shelters described herein would be sure-safe outside of a 0.6 square mile area around a ground burst explosion of a one-megaton nuclear weapon. They would be surely destroyed within a 0.3 square mile area. In between, they would be partially destroyed.

DIRTY LITTLE EARTHQUAKE SIDE EFFECTS

You will find the Soviets have another dirty little scheme--they have targeted some of the most stressed areas of your fault line systems for directed ground-짯burst missiles. These would trigger your Earth fault line and the devastation of such a power supported quake would be tremendously more destructive than that which you are expecting from Mother Nature

WHAT IF THE SHELTERS ARE GROUND-BURST TARGETED?

What if the Soviets, knowing that you are going to be tucked safely in your little shelters, simply targeted the shelters with ground bursts? For 230 million people, you will need 1.5 million shelters, as compared with 10,000 Soviet weapons. Clearly they cannot kill many of you unless you put the shelters too close together.

Half the people of the United States live at a density of 1,500 people per square mile or less. They would need less than one shelter per 0.1 square miles. The low densities of people in rural locations would require a few more minutes on average to reach shelter, or else placement of extra shelters with fewer people per shelter. In the worst case, therefore, the Soviets could only endanger six shelters per explosion and could only surely destroy less than three with one bomb.

An additional 30 percent of your people live at densities of more than 1,500 but less than 6,000 per square mile. For them the risk would be a minimum of 3 shelters per explosion and a maximum of 24.

When these facts and also the circumstances of those people living at even higher densities are taken into consideration, the estimate is a maximum of less than 10 percent of your blast shelters could be destroyed by an all-out ground-burst attack on the shelters themselves with the entire Soviet nuclear weapons inventory--pretty good odds by any count.

Dharma, enough for now as I would rather start fresh later as I note you are getting muscle cramps. You are doing well, chela, and we will proceed as rapidly as possible but it cannot all be done by one in one day. So be it and my blessings upon you and my beloved assistants for I realize I am piling great workloads on already burdened backs. I salute you for your contributions in such love and willingness. The gift will perhaps be the saving of a nation and its peoples. That would be a reward of great abundance in itself.

I AM THAT I AM, IN THE SERVICE OF GOD AND IMMANUEL SANANDA, I AM ASHTAR SIGNING OFF, CLEARING CIRCUIT��╈��.OUT.

PJ 06

CHAPTER 16

REC# 2ASHTAR

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 19899:00 A.M.YEAR 3, DAY 028

Ashtar come to share and witness, Dharma. Your heart is heavy with things of life: You knew that your path would not be one of ease and further, you knew it would be filled with danger. You ones must come into your senses for in your innocence you blunder. In your carelessness you can blunder and cause great pain and damage to your brothers and unto our most fragile cred짯ibility base. You ones must be pure and responsible beyond all others for ye are the light; you cannot light of a path with smudged candle globes. Ye ones are the fish within the fishbowl of fishbowls. Dark ones always appear in innocence -- why would Satan call himself the "Prince of Light?" If you are given to feel uncomfortable about any situation--know that there is something WRONG with it. Those negative prodding��셲 are sent forth from us at your request--heed them!

Let us continue in our work to get you some survival shelters, but I want you ones to use your heads and see the ultimate damage done if our work is discredited in any measure. Further, I prefer that you ones make it long enough to be able to physically need the shelters. Through carelessness you can be "taken out". Through irresponsible behavior or deliberate actions of negative intent; we will remove you from the projects--we are not dealing with afternoon tea and crumpets; we are about the transition of a world and a survival of a civilization. Consider this a most severe warning from your Commander, please.

SHELTER LOCATIONS

Some of this material I would now utilize from the good doctors' book, but my agreement is that if I utilize some of a chapter, I utilize all. My purpose for not doing so is to cause ones to be caused to get their book and to get the references and back-up materials to make the plan function; you will need go to their sources or you will not be able to utilize my information properly. My purpose is not to use a human's information but to cause you to wake up, get busy and get information of substance, from ones who know what they are doing on an Earth plane. I would simply hit you soundly upon thy heads with the book if I were so allowed. Get the information---these are the ones we recommend you utilize of their knowledge and research. GET THEIR BOOK, GET THEM TO HEAD UP YOUR PROGRAM IF YOU CAN 짯 AND GET MOVING. ASHTAR AND BROTHERS HAVE NO INTEREST IN YOUR PUBLISHING BOOK BUSINESS, NOR YOUR RESOURCES, NOR ALMOST ANYTHING ELSE YOU HAVE; WE ARE EFFORTING AT KEEPING YOU ALIVE AND INTO WISDOM AND KNOWLEDGE, YOU ONES OF THE FATHER'S FLOCKS. THE WORLD AS YOU KNOW IT WILL COME TO A SCREECHING HALT JUST AS PROCLAIMED BY THE PROPHETS--IT IS UNDER WAY RIGHT THIS MOMENT; THEREFORE WHAT YOU ONES DO IS MOST HIGHLY IMPORTANT. YOU WILL HAVE NUCLEAR WAR, THE ONLY QUESTION AT ALL IN POINT, IS 'WHEN'. YOU NEED THE SHELTER SYSTEM ALL THE REMAINDER OF THE WAY THROUGH THE TRANSITION SO, AT WORST, THE SHELTERS WILL NOT BE USELESS.

Drs. Robinson and North make some excellent population comparisons and excellent observations which I will utilize, this in no way relieves you of the responsibility of obtaining their comprehensive information.

Air-burst is the detonation of choice in any enemy attack. Air-burst attack will take out your buildings and above ground installation to put you out of operation. Ground-burst explosions are much less effective for blast damage than are air-burst weapons. The buildings near the explosion are destroyed, but the land surface area covered by destructive blast forces is much less. Therefore, if you had large numbers of small blast shelters distributed at your non-evacuated population density, the casualty rate would be so low as to render an attack on the shelters impractical and ineffective.

Let me add comments at this point. Up to this point there has been no need for consideration of any but major air-burst systems because that would easily wipe out your human population above ground. If they could utilize weaponry that would wipe out life and preserve utility buildings, etc., that would, of course, be the weapon of choice. That is not going to be allowed so the next strategy is do second best. At your status of helplessness you are most vulnerable above ground so air-burst bombs are most preferable, even if buildings and technical installations must be rebuilt. As things move along it may change. You see, an occupying group must consider the occupation populace. Ground-burst weapons leave more useable buildings, but you have a tremendous fallout problem and then you could move into a semi-nuclear winter with tremendous clouds of radioactive material--circling the globe, which could bring the fallout right back on one's home base. You see, this makes the point--there is risk involved and that buys you more time.

CURRENT "HANGING-ROPE" SALES

I further hope my crew noted the news of yesterday, where the Soviet leaders are asking the U.S. to get behind their freedom movement and support them with more money and supplies, as well as additional trade. If your spines I further hope my crew noted the news of yesterday, where the Soviet leaders are asking the U.S. to get behind their freedom movement and support them didn't have chills--twenty days in isolation for you! What is so terrible, is the citizen taxpayer will push for that very thing--��쐓end the rope---send the rope��� and the scaffolding and the trap door. Let us have peace and friendship at any cost--that cost is your annihilation, dear old U.S. citizens.

SHELTERS NEED TO BE NEAR USUAL LOCATIONS OF POPULATION

You must have your blast shelters near your usual locations so that you can have instant protection. You will not need to evacuate. But blast shelters are a bit more costly than simple fallout shelters. Why not evacuate into the countryside and build fallout shelters?

The Soviet civil defense systems relied in part upon evacuation during the years that their blast shelter system was under construction. Of course, they had the advantage of warning, since it is their military doctrines that call for a surprise first-strike. Yours do not.

Now that Soviets have completed a formidable blast shelter system, they no longer depend upon evacuation. Unfortunately, and most stupidly, some of your planners still propose evacuation schemes that assume long warning times. They assume that you will see the Soviet evacuation and then have time to act. Evacuation is no longer required by the Soviets, so there will be no early spy warning of preparatory evacuation of the Soviets. This was an obvious development, since their military strategy of a surprise first-strike could hardly include the obvious warning of evacuation in their own camp.

In the face of the Soviet threat, the Chinese built an evacuation system--30 feet underground. The Chinese plans do not depend on warning and evacuation time. They know their enemy. In addition to their early knowledge, the Soviets have the following advantages: we have fewer attack weapons; most of those weapons will be destroyed by the Soviet's first strike; those that you manage to launch will encounter their formidable strategic missile defense systems; and, finally, if any do get through, they will not do much damage to a country that has protected most of Its industry and has blast sheltered its population.

Shelter density is illustrated by reference to maps labeled 1 and 2 In FIGHTING CHANCE, which are outline maps of Washington, D.C. and its Surrounding counties: Montgomery and Prince George's (Maryland) and Fairfax (Virginia); and maps of Los Angeles and Orange Counties in California. (Ashtar: this should make you ones in Los Angeles tingle with delight--it indicates a potential deadly target area, beloved friends and relatives in Southern California coastal areas.)

WASHINGTON D.C. AREA AND LOS ANGELES/ORANGE COUNTY

In 1980, Washington, D.C., Montgomery County, Fairfax County, and Prince George's County had populations of 638,400,579,100,596,900, and 665,100 respectively, for a total of 2,479,500, or about 1% of the US population. The corresponding surface areas are 63, 495, 393, and 487 square miles respectively.Therefore, the average population densities in these four regions are 10,100, 1,700, 1,500, and 1,400 persons per square mile.

Because most people within the three counties are concentrated in about one half of the areas, the actual density is about 3000 persons per square mile, with densities approaching twice that, or 6000 per square mile, in a few localities. In Washington, D.C. itself, the additional increase in density involves a little higher risk per shelter.

In order to kill everyone in the shelters, an area of about 700 square miles would need to be attacked with about 2000 ground-burst explosions, on one city, Washington, D.C. and its suburbs, in order to kill 1 % of your people. Those 2000 weapons represent 20 percent of the available Soviet arsenal. On the other hand, only 10 to 15 explosions in the air would destroy the buildings in this entire area, and would also kill nearly all of the people who were not inside shelters (which would be all at this present writing).

Los Angeles County and Orange County had, in 1980, populations of 7,477.400 and 1,932900 (remember: nine years ago), and areas of 4,070 and 798 square miles respectively. The corresponding densities are 1,800 and 2,400 persons per square mile. Those people are, for the most part, concentrated in one-half of Los Angeles County and two-thirds of Orange County, so that the effective density is about 4000 persons per square mile in a 2,500 square mile region that contains 4% of the US population.

Would the Soviets deliver 60 percent of their entire nuclear arsenal on these two counties alone, just to kill all of these people in their shelters? Or would they prefer to use only about one percent of their weapons on these two counties, in order to destroy most of the buildings and kill those people who are not in shelters? We think the answer is obvious. The shelters will survive.

These examples are applicable to most of the U.S.Most of you live in areas like these, or in areas where the population density is lower, and which would be therefore even more safe from Soviet attack if you had blast shelters available.

There is one notable exception: New York City--Manhattan Island, Brooklyn, Bronx, and Queens--contains 6,700,000 people living at densities of 64,900, 31,900, and 27,800, and 17,500 persons per square mile respectively. The area is only 242 square miles. These people could be killed by 500 Soviet nuclear weapons even if they were in the proposed shelters. As improbable as this may seem to us, it is unwise to trust so many lives to the rationality of an evil and irrational opponent. The obvious solution is to build better, deeper shelters and perhaps even tunnels in New York and its suburbs. There are very few equally heavy population densities in the United States, so they do not markedly change the overall program, even if special provisions must be made for them. (Could be why Mr. Nostrodamus saw the rockets firing into New York, however? Pause for thought--by the way, one of the Italian volcano��셲 is in eruption today--has anyone noted? Further, do any of you place significance upon it?)

HIGH POPULATION AREAS MOST VULNERABLE

High population centers are also the most vulnerable to the possibility of a single nuclear explosion (and it would probably be a ground-burst) by terrorists. Potential immediate civilian casualties from such an explosion could be hundreds of thousands, with over a million killed by fallout. However, with shelters and with just 15 minutes warning (perhaps from a ransom demand), the immediate casualties could be reduced to a few thou짯sand. Fallout casualties, even with no warning from the terrorists, would be completely eliminated. People would enter the shelters when they heard the explosion or were alerted by the authorities.

The high-quality blast protection of properly designed shelters limits the killing radius of nuclear weapons to such a great extent that it would be impossible for the Soviets, even with their huge first-strike genocidal weapons inventory, to kill more than 10 percent of the American people if they were in those shelters, and the shelters were installed at your current living density. This fact is not compromised by the very high shelter occupancy rates which you recommend herein, in order to bring the overall cost within currently realistic boundaries. After a minimum number of shelters are installed, guaranteeing that your children can survive, and your soldiers and you, your짯selves, can survive, you can always install more shelters to lower the occupancy and increase your comfort.

***I WILL GUARANTEE THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT WILL END UP PLEDGING MORE IN SUBSIDIES AND BUSINESS LOANS (NOT EVEN CONSIDERING BUSINESS EXCHANGE) TO RUSSIA AND COMMUNIST COUNTRIES THAN DOUBLE THE COST OF A SURVIVAL SYSTEM.--IN YOUR VERY NEAR FUTURE. Ashtar. You, dear ones, are the dead men in the game.***

SHELTER DESIGN

Immediately after the first atomic bombs were exploded over Japan in 1945, scientists in the US, including many who had helped build the bombs, began work on defense against nuclear weapons and particularly civilian defense. As soon as sufficient weapons were available, various tests of shelters were conducted with nuclear weapons. These direct tests and experiments came to an end with the test-ban treaties, treaties which have proved far more valuable to Soviet tyranny than to freedom. Since that time, occasional experiments have been carried out with chemical explosives that provide scaled-down models of some nuclear weapons effects. The largest of those tests conducted in 1985 and scheduled again for mid-1987 utilized 4 kilotons of explosives which simulated the blast wave of an 8-kiloton ground-burst nuclear weapon. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki explosions were air bursts of 12 and 22 kilotons, respectively.

Since protection by buried shelters proved relatively simple, most research since the 1950's has been directed at the problem of reducing cost through engineering innovations. There was an especially large amount of this research carried out in the early 1960's at President Kennedy's order. He ordered this work preparatory to building a national shelter system. This system, which was abandoned after his death, is needed far more urgently today than it was in 1961, when Kennedy concluded that it should be built. If the American people remain unsheltered and therefore perish, Kennedy's murder in Dallas will prove to be an historical event which led step by step to the destruction of the free world.

REGARDING JOHN KENNEDY'S ASSASSINATION

MY PEOPLE ALREADY KNOW THAT WHICH I AM ABOUT TO SAY짯--I ASK THAT ALL OF THE REST OF YOU REFER TO SPACE- GATE. THE VEIL REMOVED. I TELL YOU, AND IT IS WELL KNOWN IN THE CIRCLES OF GOVERNMENT; MR. KENNEDY WAS KILLED BY HIS SECRET SERVICE GUARD WHO DROVE THE DEATH VEHICLE. THIS VERY PROJECT OF PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE WAS A MAJOR REASON FOR THE MURDER. YOU, AS CITIZENS, HAVE NO COMPREHENSION OF THE PLIGHT YOU ARE NOW WITHIN. YOU HAD BEST BE ASKING GOD FOR ALL THE INSIGHT YOU CAN RECEIVE--IT MOST SURELY IS TIME TO BARGAIN WITH GOD, DEAR BROTHERS. IT IS ALSO TIME MY OWN ONES WORK HARDER AND MORE CAREFULLY IN THE PROTECTIONS OF OUR BELOVED SCRIBES AND RECEIVERS. THIS IS BEYOND INTERNATIONAL INTRIGUE; YOU ARE BOUND INTO INTERGALACTIC, INTRACOSMIC INTRIGUE OF A PLANET AND CIVILIZATION IN TRANSITION--HOW CAN I MAKE YOU HEAR ME? PLEASE, I PETITION YOU, HOW CAN I MAKE YOU HEAR ME? YES, JOHN KENNEDY WAS A MEMBER OF ALL THE SECRET ORGANIZATIONS WHICH ARE EXPOSED, BUT HE SAW WHAT WAS COMING DOWN AND THE GAME CEASED TO BE A GAME FOR HIM; WHEN IT DID--HE WAS MURDERED--THEY PLAY REALLY NASTY AND DEADLY GAMES!

OAK RIDGE INFORMATION

There are several thousand research reports and primary scientific articles which are relevant to blast shelter protection from nuclear weapons. In February 1986, the Emergency Technology Library at Oak Ridge National Laboratory contained a subsection of about 1,000 of those articles. Those 1,000 articles formed most of the primary research material from which was selected a single standardized shelter design for these documents. This design is quite similar to a standardized design which is under development by the scientists at Oak Ridge and to designs which have been repeatedly proposed by engineers and scientists over the past 30 years.

EARTH ARCHING PHENOMENON

When a steel tank, much like a large fuel tank or a large road culvert with sealed ends, is buried under sufficient granular soil and subjected to the high pressures of a nuclear explosion, the sides of the tank yield slightly, and the earth compresses to form a protective arch over the tank. The tank must be strong and flexible. In this way, the strength of re-enforced concrete can be duplicated by a low-cost, lightweight structure. Since the soil also provides and inexpensive massive radiation shield, this is an ideal solution to low-cost blast and radiation protection. Better even, would be compressed "shan짯-stone" underground arched shelters, but we will continue to utilize the standard scheme outlined in the good doctors' book, and save fragmentation distracters.

In order for earth arching to protect the tank from the blast, the tank must not be buried below the water table. There are several means of avoiding this problem in locations where the water table cannot be avoided. One Simple method is to install the tank as usual, and surround it with reinforced concrete to provide the extra strength required.

The shelter discussed herein is a tank made of 1/4 inch thick steel. The tank is 11 and one half feet in diameter and 40 feet long. It is small enough to be transported by truck to the desired location. 75 percent of the tank is designated for living space and 25 percent for storage and common apparatus and facilities.

There is a cost summary at the end of this chapter, based on such a tank structure, as well as a space per occupant summary. The tanks need to be buried with about 10 feet of soil over the top. Tank shelters of this size can be entirely manufactured and equipped in existing metal-fabricating shops and delivered on trucks in complete, functional condition to the installation sites.

An earth moving machine, usually either a large backhoe or a medium size dragline, digs the hole and lowers the shelter into it. The entryways are then either bolted or welded on, and the dirt is replaced. In some cases, where the dirt is poorly suited to earth arching, road gravel would be used as back fill instead of the original soil.

Entry to the shelter is from each end through tubular entries designed with two right-angle turns that will decrease reflected radiation entry. There is an illustration at the end of this chapter. One entry is vertical with a ladder. The other is angled with a slide for rapid entry. This entry works like the tubular fire escapes that were popular in multiple story public schools in the past, or like and airline escape slide. The two entries give safety in case one should be plugged with rubble, and the slide entry allows for very rapid entrance in case of emergency or handicapped persons. We will enlarge upon entry systems to help you with entry covers which will withstand rubble bombardment-you need a sure survival, not both doorways in blockage which is very likely in such a small area. You must have a long entry tunnel into at least one of the entrances.

These entries also serve as ventilation shafts through smaller tubes that join them and connect with the ground surface. The ventilation shafts have blast valves that close automatically when hit by a bomb blast wave. The entries themselves have steel blast doors which are locked mechanically after the people have entered. These parts of the shelter are designed for maximum simplicity as is most of the other shelter equipment. It is important to understand that nuclear explosions are hard on shelters. If some part won't work after it is banged around, bent out of shape, and generally mistreated, then you don't want it on your shelter.

Nuclear explosion blast is an especially impressive phenomenon, Imagine a force that can actually compress the surface of the ground by as much as a foot. The blast doors are flush with the ground to avoid reflected pressure and flying objects. They are backed by large concrete collars which transfer the blast load to the ground rather than to the shelter where it could crush or bend the steel shell.

Once inside the shelter, air for breathing, water for drinking, and a mechanism for cooling to remove metabolic heat (especially in a crowded shelter or a warm climate) are the most immediate needs.

VENTILATION AND COOLING

Air can be supplied from outside air with special precautions to avoid contamination with fallout, chemical, or biological warfare agents. Each shelter is therefore equipped with two air passages, dust filters (in the entryways where the accumulation of some fallout radiation will not harm shelter occupants), and specialized filters to remove dangerous chemical and biological agents. These filters are delicate, so blast valves are installed to protect the filters.

As a backup to this system, and also for use during periods of very high external danger, such as during the attack itself, each shelter contains stored oxygen and carbon dioxide-removal chemicals sufficient to supply the occupants for two days-more if in higher risk areas. This means that the shelter can be closed completely if necessary. Test equipment for monitoring oxygen, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, temperature, and absolute pressure levels is also provided. Additional days of air supply can be provided at a cost of about $12 per person per day.

The best supply of safe water is from a well. This is the source which was utilized in most German bunkers. A well is also required under Soviet shelters. With a well, water is plentiful for personal hygiene as well as simple drinking requirements. Manual pumping must be available and is relatively easily accomplished.

As a backup in case the well is lost to ground motion or contamination, each shelter must store the drinking water required for life for all of the occupants for a period of two weeks. Excellent modular containers have been developed for this purpose. These have the advantage that they can be stacked in the entryways during long term occupancy in order to further reduce radiation levels.

Cooling is extremely important. Depending upon climate and time of year, these shelters could be occupied by 20 or so people whose metabolic heat can be removed by the walls and earth surrounding the shelter. If the shelter were not cooled, however, at the design occupancy of 150 persons, the occupants would eventually die from thermal effects and would be very uncomfortable within a short time.

The shelter, therefore, has two entirely redundant cooling systems. This reduces risk to those inside. First, there is air cooling. Outside air is pumped through the filters and the shelter in much greater amounts than are needed for breathing. The air carries away metabolic heat. The air pumps are redun짯dant, so that in the case of failure of the electricity, manual air pumps can be used.

After the attack, there would be no electricity other than battery power for lights, radios, and meters. Power could be supplied by an emergency generator. An emergency generator, however, is not included in this austere design. Bicycle-type air pumps where the wheels are actually fans have been developed for shelters. The shelter occupants would take turns peddling the pumps.

Second, there is water cooling. Shelter occupants would also take turns on the floor-mounted manual water pumps. The shelter well system is connected to copper cooling coils that cool the shelter with well water. Coating with well water permits operation of the shelter in a completely closed configuration, and it also backs up the air cooling system.

With air, water, and cooling provided, and the survival of the occupants assured, the shelter then provides human comfort items.

Let us have a break please, Dharma. You continue to be distressed over attacks upon us as your sibors. Do not anguish over it; it is simply that ones cannot come into full belief of us with whom you write. Somehow it is too much to accept the highest universal energies, but you most surely do not need tend of it, little one. All men have the right unto their own choices, however, he who cannot come into belief and carry a magnificent impact upon the human masses will of necessity be overpassed.The world must come into truth and I am quite sure God and Sananda can do without instructions on behavior. The listings in the document already sent forth have done most of their work, so most of the questionable ones can be removed. Many were placed in the protected list to simply preserve their lives from their own kind and to call their hand. They would not wish to be listed on our protection list, not being of us. It was a necessary ploy and has most certainly served its purpose, starting with Mr. Cooper.It is very dangerous to be on our list if you are actually of the dark side-the dark brothers will wipe you away and will not wait for the asking and the answers. So be it. Let us have a brief respite.

Ashtar to stand-by. Salu