PJ 22
CHAPTER 19
REC #2 HATONN

TUESDAY, MAY 14, 1991 3:37 P.M. YEAR 4, DAY 271

CONFIRMATION
Please see that this copy of the fax sent to George at the bookstore, this morning is included in our proceeding document. It is from the Office of Foreign Rela­tions, Washington. I purposely kept this from Dharma's attention until she had finished her morning writing, but I wish this included in the mailing to the ones named prior to this. I will keep both the time of the incident in point and give no disclosure to the party involved. If you will quietly locate the source of the original fax, George, please send a copy of this morning's writing to the sender. Thank you.

Again, I have nothing to prove, yet you ones want proof; so be it. KNOW (and this is to anyone wishing to share confirmation with our team wherever they are), YOU SHALL BE PROTECTED AND YOUR INFORMATION KEPT IN TOTAL CONFIDENCE AS TO IDENTITY AND LOCATION. I like to share confirmations when possible but, again, I have nothing to prove. This is also true for anyone who wishes incorporation or Institute information or par­ticipation. If you KNOW SOME OF THE ONES WHO ARE INVOLVED IN VARIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES--HONOR THEM AND YOURSELVES ENOUGH TO GUARD THEM. If we are asked to identify and/or are given permission to print--fine, we are happy to share but when ones are so strategi­cally at risk and ask protection, so be it and we will not play into the vicious cu­riosity of ones who would destroy a brother.

The following is typical; you will note it is regarding an area of which I spoke only this morning--which is WHY I spoke of the location this day. This is to ease my scribe a bit for information I bring is most often totally unknown to her. In fact, we often meet and information is sometimes found coming back from outside locations prior to her coming into conscious knowledge of the cir­cumstance in point. That angers me and jeopardizes our security. We have re­cently had to abandon projects under way because of loose tongues within the workers who simply do not realize that which they do. It does, however, prove a great deal to higher cause when this happens as it has in these past two weeks. It shows that some ones who claim otherwise, are still PLAYING IN THE METAPHYSICAL "NEW AGE" GARBAGE OF MYSTICAL FANTASIES AND HAVE NO IDEA OF THAT WHICH THEY ARE ABOUT.

I have no input as to another's beliefs or to that at which they wish to play. I do, however, expect ones who hold positions of trust and inclusion within our workers, take note and pay attention for the time of little games is over and if the child has not graduated--so be it--for ones may not be allowed to continue disruption and destruction of another. For instance, Mr. Cooper was badly misled and actually disinformed by ones in Sedona regarding the PHOENIX JOURNALS. This was over a year past but he responded in almost irrational manner without any knowledge whatsoever. He shouted over the airwaves, lies (oh yes, Bill: i.e., "...have plagiarized 50 pages of my work". No, the document of Mr. Cooper's, at best, was some 26 pages of rough manuscript so mathematics were erroneous, if nothing else). My scribe was not privy to the circumstances or the resource. I gave him credit for some rather reasonable research and took exception to many of his inclusions including all of his conclusions. So, in response, he claimed an entire call-in program on which George was guest and was incredibly foolish--playing right into the hands of his own enemies. He had many of his most vindictive current enemies calling in to denounce George and the JOURNALS. He spread names and addresses and total denouncement. I care not about opinion but it would seem that ones of the caliber he wishes to project as himself would have researched a bit more comprehensively prior to doing something so rash.

You see, now, ones call in to use against him that which was accusation against others by Cooper in which, in his uncontrolled behavior, he actually threatened death to his adversary. This is NEVER LOST TO THE ADVERSARY AS A TOOL TO REAP DESTRUCTION UPON THE ONE OUT OF CONTROL. Cooper also threatened my scribe through George--"....to take out these ---- re­ceivers...." I took it as an intention of probability and responded accordingly. We do not need irrational hot-heads in any operation, much less in the bringing forth of God's work--passionate participants, yes--irrational and uncontrolled behavior subject to more severe changes through any type of substances use. I can only tell you that no one can make a fool of another for the other has to agree to the being the fool. Further, ones CAN NOT DISCREDIT TRUTH --ONLY ALLOW THE PROJECTOR TO DESTROY HIS OWN CREDIBIL­ITY--AND, FURTHER, I, HATONN, HAVE NO INTENT TO DISCERN FOR ANY OF YOU WHICH IS WHICH.

Nonetheless, for you readers, here is a bit of sharing--old enough to be secure and recent enough to be current. This has nothing to do with the persons in prior point. Is it possible someone has sent me something which is a facade, sting, etc? Who cares--for I know what is at Area 51 in Nevada and I know how special services operate and so, at worst, it is certainly valid enough. At best, it gives you information which is equally valid.

The person in point is valid and the subject in point is a result of an effort to find out about craft coming and going from the area of "51" and other strange things occurring which were causing great concern and confusion to many, many citizens. Several people went forth to effort at finding out information--photographs were taken and followed up from several separate instances, finally approaching authorities and asking for information and explanation. I can as­sure you that the intent of the "authorities" was and is to put a stop to not only investigation, but also to any mention thereof.

I want you to take careful note of several things in the letter to follow: one, "elite", and, "best left to professionals", "refrain from further visits to the re­gion in question", "...focus is quite unwarranted", "panel of scientists, politi­cians and educators is very much on top of this situation", etc.

Now, why don't some of you ask again, "...why doesn't somebody bring this to the public" and "...why don't you just appear to our leaders?" and "...make your presence known and we will all know" and, and, and---YOU ARE IN THE MIDST OF THE GREATEST COVER-UP AND DECEITFUL PLAN IN ALL HISTORY--THE ULTIMATE PLAN, ACTUALLY. SO READ CARE­FULLY THE DOCUMENT IN POINT AND THEN PONDER CAREFULLY.

QUOTE:

Letterhead: WWT Inc.

U.S. Government Data Correlation Office
Office of Foreign Relations
Frances Perkins Bldg.
200 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210

[Hatonn: please NOTE, this is another one of those "non-Government" agen­cies--i.e. "Inc." This indicates a totally PRIVATE CORPORATION WORK­ING UNDER THE GUISE OF GOVERNMENT AND TOTALLY FUNDED AND POLICE-SECURED BY THE GOVERNMENT].

Date. (left out with intent.)

To: (name and address left out with intent)

Dear Mr. ( ):

According to our representatives, you have expressed an interest of late in a particular geographical region. We understand fully the concerns of ordinary citizens such as yourself, but rest assured, Mr. ( ), your focus is quite unwar­ranted under the circumstances. It may put your mind at ease to know that our elite panel of scientists, politicians and educators is very much on top of this situation. At the same time, however, it's the consensus of these top flight per­sonnel that your ongoing visits to the Southern Nevada region can serve no use­ful purpose, and may in fact subvert the common goal by disrupting the delicate matters at hand.
Therefore, we must ask you kindly to please refrain from making further visits to the region in question. Most assuredly, we are doing everything possible to support the general welfare and achieve the interests of the community-at-large. Your continued presence will only complicate matters and possibly sabotage the productive inroads made so far. In any case, Mr. ( ), we feel--and we're sure this is something with which you'd agree--that this matter is something clearly best left to professionals. With the cooperation of loyal citizens, we feel confi­dent that the United States can stay the course.

Sincerely,
Wilson F. Hines III

END QUOTING OF LETTER

I don't believe I need add anything further to the subject. May your eyes and insight be opened. Salu.

Hatonn to clear, please.







PJ 22
CHAPTER 20
REC #1 HATONN

WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 1991 8:54 A.M. YEAR 4, DAY 272

WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 1991

In the beauty of this gifted day for service, I, Hatonn, come in the service unto Creator who has given us opportunity to serve and grow. Dharma, God is OR­DER and The Creation is automatic ORDER. 'Tis Man that manufactures dis­order and chaos. Therefore, we work within the orderly priorities of need and it shall be fine. For you readers, we are receiving hundreds of pieces of mail with inquiries, confirmations and statements of "proof'. We feel indebted and humble to receive these warm, and sometimes negative, responses from you precious friends. We feel desire to share and respond to EVERY one and, yes, each topic is critical and urgent and merits entire JOURNALS devoted to the various subjects. Please be patient with us for we are filling every waking moment of your day "time" at this work and it is impossible to do all the work.

Please note that I effort to respond to inquiries which are very topical within the JOURNALS or EXPRESSES for I find no other manner in which to respond to ALL. KNOW that every word, every confirmation, every clipping is precious to us, studied carefully and accepted with appreciation.

This day I, too, am torn because I have two topics so important that I cannot choose which is more important. One being gun/search/seizure enforcement and the other the New Economics established by the Pope within the "Rerum Novarum" (translation: OF NEW THINGS) first placed into annual observance a century ago by Pope Leo XIII in 1891. This year bodes BAD NEWS for your world and shows with "proof" of the full intent toward Evil One World Govern­ment and the chosen Pope in place to pull it off--AGAINST YOU CATHOLICS!

So how does Hatonn choose a subject? I must look at all facets of the material and see WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT TO THE SAVING OF YOUR CON­STITUTION--AMERICA--FOR IT IS ALL THAT HOLDS YOU FROM THE BEAST'S SWALLOWING YOU FOR YOU ARE ALREADY NICELY CHEWED AND ALL THAT REMAINS IS THE SWALLOWING.

I must consider that which will cause you to get up and act in participation for, as truth spreads across the nations, Man WILL act for he longs agonizingly for God and brother. So I shall speak of things regarding gun control and how it has long been established to accomplish the disarming process of you-the-peo­ple.

Why do I not simply tell you where you can get the bits and pieces of the puzzle and spare all the readers all repetition and ourselves weeks of work? Because Man will not move to the libraries or books and references--you are not even finding time to read the JOURNALS. God has promised to make available information as He deems it necessary and our job is to follow through with whatever it requires to do so. What one person needs for awakening is perhaps a turnoff to another but it ALL must be shared.

It was interesting to note ones that came to the lecture at the "UFO" conference on this past weekend and swarmed about the place. Some wore purple hair, copper pyramids on their heads, crystals on their necks and fingers; some sat lotus position to receive and many listened in awe at the declarations of misin­formation regarding cattle mutilations and Reptilian beings--and yet got up and walked from the room when George spoke of genetic replications. Where are you, people? You even go to the motion picture houses and devour movies such as BLADE RUNNER with Harrison Ford and when truth washes all over you like second skin--you walk out and refuse to hear. So be it. God has time--you do NOT!

When we speak of replicas it would seem to me far easier to understand their presence than to admit that you have been so completely deceived by a handful of men.

I also find it interesting that ones refuse to listen and pronounce rejection and make astounding edicts about given works while they, in turn, KNOW NOTH­ING WHATSOEVER ABOUT THE SUBJECT IN POINT. Further, you be­lieve and act accordingly to something a man in a black robe tells you from a pulpit lit with candles and a cross hanging behind--especially if he tells you something like ones from space being evil and the JOURNALS being evil. What you will find is that great portions of the JOURNALS are written DIRECTLY BY GOD AND THE ONE YOU CALL JESUS AS WELL AS THE ONE CALLED "GRANDFATHER" OR "GREAT SPIRIT", BY THE INDIANS. HOW, PEOPLE-OF-THE-WORLD, ARE YOU GOING TO RECOGNIZE GOD WHEN HE COMES? You had better carefully ponder that point because you don't have much longer to wait for that event and at this point--in my perception--a lot of you are going to turn away and hide your face and plug your ears. IT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN THE WAY YOU ARE TOLD BY THE ELITE DECEIVERS--EVEN IF THEY BELIEVE THEMSELVES TO BE TELLING TRUTH. WOULDN'T IT BE WISE TO CONSIDER SOME ALTERNATIVE INSTRUCTIONS AND THEN MAKE DECISIONS? SO BE IT, TO EACH HIS OWN.

GUN CONTROL

You have just witnessed the House passing of the Brady Bill. Most say, "...well, for gosh sakes, who and how could it hurt to wait a week"? It is not the waiting in point--it is the registration preceding the wait and the paper-work at time of picking up the gun--keeping in mind all the while that the criminals ALREADY HAVE GUNS AND THEY CERTAINLY ARE NOT REGIS­TERED NOR WILL THEY EVER BE. BUT YOU SIGN UP AND YOU FOR­EVER HAVE A RECORD AGAINST YOU AND THE CIA-, KGB-, MOSSAD-RUN POLICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS WILL KNOW EXACTLY WHERE TO GO AND YOU WILL PRODUCE THAT WEAPON--ON DEMAND!

BILL OF RIGHTS

Let us interrupt herein to briefly discuss your Bill of Rights. Most of you don't realize it and couldn't care less, but it is the bicentennial year of those Bill of Rights of your Constitution. Walter E. Williams of "Human Events" 4/27/91, has summarized some things for your attention on "H0W BILL OF RIGHTS HAS GRADUALLY BEEN ERODED":

Passed in 1791, this year we celebrate the Bill of Rights Bicenten­nial. My question is: Shouldn't it be a requiem instead? Let's see how some of the rights of the original ten amendments have been surrepti­tiously repealed.

The 10th Amendment guarantees: "Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people".

That's pretty plain language. So you tell me how the federal gov­ernment can constitutionally mandate speed limits, control public schools and waste-disposal sites, and make hundreds of other edicts. Better yet, try to think of something you or your state can do free from federal man­dates.

The 9th Amendment provides: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others re­tained by the people".

Hamilton asked, "Why declare that things shall not be done [by the federal government] which there is no power to do"? That makes sense.

Hamilton was simply asking why should we have a measure saying that the government cannot restrict the press when it has no authoriza­tion to do so in the first place. Hamilton's concern was since it is im­possible to enumerate all liberties, such as economic liberty, politicians and judges would rule that they were not protected rights. The courts have made a mockery of the 9th Amendment.

We retain a few protections of the 5th Amendment, but they are dis­appearing. Among its protection is: A person cannot be "compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself".

Try this. Ask your Internal Revenue Service agent whether the infor­mation on your tax form can be used against you in criminal proceed­ings. Then ask whether you are constitutionally required to give that information.

[Hatonn: Try defending yourself for a traffic ticket and see if they don't demand' that you state your case--oh, you think that cannot apply here? Oh yes, brother, for the fact that you have a ticket--the only juris­diction under which you can be tried--IS "CRIMINAL" AND WILL BE TRIED UNDER ADMIRALTY LAW--NOT CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW].

Fifth Amendment provisions explain why we have the charade of "voluntary tax compliance". That way, when you appear in tax court and ask that your tax form be inadmissible as evidence under the 5th Amendment, the judge will say, "Sorry, you voluntarily gave the infor­mation".

The 5th Amendment also provides: "Nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation". Not only has the court made a mockery of that provision, it permits, as in a Hawaii case, taking of private property for private use. It denies some owners of private property the right to raze it and build another building. It denies landowners the right to chop down trees on their own land.

The 2nd Amendment guarantees "the right of the people to keep and bear arms". The 2nd Amendment is not a deer-hunting or duck-hunting amendment. It affords us some protection against wanna-be tyrants.

The people leading the attack on the 2nd Amendment are the very people who want to control greater portions of our lives and restrict our freedoms. Therefore, part of their agenda is to first disarm us. I don't know about you, but whenever you hear that the government has taken Williams' weapons, you'll know that Williams is dead.

Any bicentennial celebration of our Bill of Rights is almost a hoax. Almost, because we still have freedoms envied by most of the world; but they are under siege. The only rally I'll attend is one that has a stated agenda like "Rally for Full Restoration of Our Bill of Rights".

I suggest that if you feel this a bit snippy that you consider what Bush is saying to the Press in honor of one, Queen Elizabeth of England. Does anyone re­member that you fought a War of Independence at great, great cost to America to establish an Independent Nation? Did you hear your own elected President honor Britain as still producing your BANKING, LAW AND COMMERCE SYSTEMS? Did you not hear him drooling over the coalition for this "New World Order"? Do you not realize that Queen Elizabeth is the wealthiest woman in your WORLD? Did you not remember that Great Britain owns more property and business in America than any other nation in the world--directly? The next two owners, in order, are Canada and Australia--both British. The lady makes no bones about it--she is over in America right this minute to meet with leaders to bind this One World Government, make commitments of coali­tion and check on her property--which is indeed tremendous in quantity!

I think the best way to proceed here is to allow some information already printed but having almost no distribution and NONE in any of the Establishment media and/or press.

From: ON TARGET, Sept. 1, 1963:

"The report reproduced below was sent by one of our regional coordinators to the National Headquarters. It has been verified completely as a bold new plan for the ultimate confiscation of all privately owned guns. It would seem fantas­tic except for documented detail and photographic proof which we will present in this and subsequent issues of ON TARGET.

"This report is about the International Arms Control Symposium that was held in Ann Arbor, Michigan, from Dec. 17 through 29, 1962. One of our men attended this Symposium, and informed me that one part of it pertained to the control of private arms owned by civilians. This man states that this group has drawn up plans to confiscate all private firearms by the end of 1965. I do not know all of the details. However. I understand that this will start in the Northwest section of the United States, and five states will be blocked off by troops and no one will be permitted to travel out of these states while these private arms are being confiscated. After this area has been cleaned, another five states will be cut off from the rest of the states, and the procedure continued".

"With utmost secrecy and nearly complete news-blackout a massive new pro­gram has been launched to disarm all American civilians, including state and local police, as a first step toward control of the general population by a Commu­nist-Socialist dictatorship.

This new scheme includes such ambitious treachery--and the support of such in­fluential people--that it is always most incredible. For this reason we have spent over nine months in documenting every detail of this new threat before publishing the facts".

Now try this one by John Englund:

"Still another disarmament plan--of which many are totally unaware--involves our right to bear arms. The Institute for Arms Control and Peace held an inter­national arms control symposium in December of 1962. at the University of Michigan. One of the planned projects called for the systematic house-to-house search of the entire United States for arms of any kind. The search is to be made by the Army by blocking off five states at a time, beginning in the west­ern part of the country. All privately-owned firearms are to be seized under this plan; and the entire civilian population completely disarmed to make easier the policing of the United States by the United Nations International Police Force". Life-Line, Washington D.C., May 12, 1964, No. 33.

Questions and Answers: "Own a Gun - Go to Prison" Bulletin, 1991.

Q: Can authorities search my home without a warrant?

A: Probably YES, it depends on each particular case. If the police come to
your home based on reasonable cause /Hatonn: Which is ANYMING THEY CALL REASONABLE CAUSE]. to believe a felony is in progress, i.e illegal possession of an unregistered assault weapon, they are not required to have a warrant to stop that felony.

Q: Can the police seize any other firearms I own?

A: YES, generally. This Depends on the circumstances, arrest is for possible felony and police are generally within the law when making a felony arrest in­volving firearms if they also seize any other firearms of the defendant.

REGARDING HOUSE-TO-HOUSE SEARCHES FOR FIREARMS

FROM: AMERICAN CHALLENGE:

"President Kennedy, in his speech to the opening session of the United Nations on September 25, 1961, proposed a plan for the general and complete disarma­ment of the United States. A few days later, State Department Document 7277 was made public, setting forth a three-stage disarmament plan by which all offensive weapons and atomic missiles would be transferred to the UNITED NA­TIONS AND ALL DEFENSIVE WEAPONS AND MISSILES WOULD BE ABANDONED. This proposal was entitled: FREEDOM FROM WAR: THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMA­MENT 1N A PEACEFUL WORLD.

"As Senator John Tower of Texas pointed out, we are by no means living at present in ‘a peaceful world'. The proponents of the proposal, however, in­sisted that disarmament was the fixed purpose of Congress--else why had they passed Public Law 87-297 creating the Arms Control and Disarmament AGENCY only ONE DAY AFTER KENNEDY'S DISARMAMENT SPEECH BEFORE THE UNITED NATIONS?

"According to the enabling provisions of the Act, all American weapons can be placed by the President under the complete control of the DIRECTOR OF THE DISARMAMENT AGENCY. This accounts for the abandonment of some of our most promising defense missiles, and the planned destruction of our bomber fleet.

"WE ARE BEING DISARMED BY OUR OWN GOVERNMENT IN PROGRESSIVE STEPS: AND FEW AMERICANS REALIZE TO WHAT AN ALARMING EXTENT OUR DEFENSES HAVE BEEN REDUCED. The communications media--newspapers, magazines, radio and television--are con­trolled by the "Invisible Government", mainly by the Rockefellers and their stooges. And the military men who could and would tell us the truth have been muzzled by the Government.

"At the same time there has been a very active upsurge of the "peace at any price" movements such as the World Federalists, and particularly the World Peace Through World Law organization, plus several new ones, all with the same purpose: namely, the abolishment of the United States as a Nation.

"The following is a synthesis of an article in The Herald of Freedom, November 22, 1963:

"There is no question about it--both the United States and the U.S.S.R. have agreed already, and the United Nations has made it official, that there shall be an International Disarmament Organization and that it shall have 'unrestricted access'. So advanced is the plan for our complete disarmament, which even contemplates house to house search and confiscation of private arms of citi­zens, that suggested Zonal Maps are already produced which show United Na­tions International Disarmament Force Zonal Inspection Bases. [Hatonn: still want to quarrel over why the Russians might be working within your police de­partments this very day? Remember: the United Nations police force and mili­tary WILL BE HEADED BY A SOVIET--IT IS IN THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER!]

"In order to have a World Government as it is planned by the United Nations, it is first absolutely necessary to have disarmament. Each country which has been taken over by the Communist Conspiracy has had some form of dis­arming, principally of the private citizens through the registration--and then seizure--of their arms. Since not many private citizens were armed in the first place, this was an easy task. But in the United States, with its frontier tra­dition, its National Rifle and Gun Clubs and Sportsman's Organizations, it is a different matter. It requires a cautious approach and a well-thought-out plan.

"We can get a fairly clear understanding of the plan by analyzing the proposals of the International Arms Control Symposium held in Ann Arbor. Michi­gan, December 17 to 20. 1962. The University of Michigan seems to be out­standing in the number of egg-head intellectuals bent on seeing their country completely disarmed.

"The meetings were held in SECRECY and--although members of the press were present--with no fanfare of publicity either before or after. Officials were present from the DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (an ironic term); sev­eral liberal Senators and Congressmen: Walter Reuther: a representative from the Russian Embassy; professors from many universities; members of left-wing "peace groups" and communist-front organization: and of course several REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S. ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY; as well as several groups representing the Anti-Defamation League and American Jewish League.

"The background of the persons employed by the U.S. Arms Control and Dis­armament Agency who are negotiating for our national suicide, shows that many are members of ROCKEFELLER'S COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELA­TIONS, THE FORD FOUNDATION, ROCKEFELLER AND CARNEGIE FOUNDATION, PILGRIM SOCIETY, UNITED WORLD FEDERALISTS, AND MANY, MANY OTHER ORGANIZATIONS CITED BY THE AT­TORNEY GENERAL, THE H.C.U.I.A. OR THE SENATE INTERNAL SECURITY SUB-COMMITTEE.

"This Arms Control and Disarmament Agency works in close cooperation with the Department of State and the United Nations. The Administration is now (November, 1963) moving at a rapid pace toward United Nations control of our country. Secret letters and messages are exchanged between Washington and Communist heads of state, funds and food are supplied to support communist governments and keep them from collapsing until the world merger of the United States and U.S.S.R. can take place--for this is what World Government will be.

It is this International Arms Control Symposium which has pointed out most clearly the necessity to disarm all American civilians including state and local police as a necessary first step before imposing a communist-so­cialist dictatorship".

Thank you, readers, for this information came to me from five different sources including the original. I would, however, like to commend and thank one Bernadine Smith for staying right on top of this. If you wish to save your na­tion, get with it, America. Bernadine Smith can be reached at P.O. Box 1776, Hanford, CA 93232 or go through the Wisconsin Report, att: Meaves, 18310 Benington Drive, Brookfield, WI 53045 for a lot of Bernadine Smith's material is published therein, also. Or, get in touch with America West for further sug­gestions and directions.

How long is it now since 1960, 61-63? Three decades? How much time do you believe you have left? Every day is so precious that I cannot stress it enough.

Now let me outlay a typical syndicated article from the Washington Post, George Will, 5/3/91:

GEORGE WILL, THE WASHINGTON POST: THE SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS IS LONG OVERDUE FOR REPEAL:

Two staggering facts about today's America are the carnage that is a consequence of virtually uncontrolled private ownership of guns, and Americans' toleration of that carnage.

Class, not racial, bias explains toleration of scandals such as this: More teenage males die from gunfire than from all natural causes com­bined, and a black male teenager is 11 times more likely than a white counterpart to be killed by a bullet. If sons of the confident, assertive, articulate middle class, regardless of race, were dying in such epidemic numbers, gun control would be considered a national imperative.

But another reason Americans live with a gun policy that is demon­strably disastrous is that the subject was constitutionalized 200 years ago this year in the Second Amendment: A well regulated militia being nec­essary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

Many gun control advocates argue that the unique 13-word preamble stipulates the Amendment's purpose in a way that severely narrows constitutional protection of gun ownership. They say the Amendment obvi­ously provides no protection of individuals' gun ownership for private purposes. They say it only provides an anachronistic protection of states' rights to maintain militias.

However, Sanford Levinson of the University of Texas Law Schools says that is far from obvious. In a Yale Law Journal article, "The Embarrassing Second Amendment", he makes an argument that is dismaying to those like me, who favor both strict gun control and strict construction of the Constitution. He begins with some historical philology showing that the 18th century meaning of "militia" makes even the amendment's preamble problematic. [Hatonn: Did anybody catch this? Yale Law Review? Levinson? 18th Century definition of "militia"? That is the same time that ones with sur-names such as Levinson from the Khazarian Elite also established "JEW", Israel instead of israel, Zionist and other cute ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT TERMS UNDER THE TALMU­DIC PROTOCOLS.]

He (Levinson) notes that if the Founders wanted only to protect states' rights to maintain militias, they could have said simply, "Congress shall have no power to prohibit state militias".

The Second Amendment is second only to the First Amendment's protections of free speech, religion and assembly because, Levinson ar­gues, the Second Amendment is integral to America's anti-statist theory of republican government. That theory says that free individuals must be independent from coercion, and such independence depends in part on freedom from the menace of standing armies and government monopoly of the means of force.

In the most important Supreme Court case concerning Congress' right to regulate private gun ownership, the court, upholding the convic­tion of a man who failed to register his sawed-off shotgun, stressed the irrelevance of that weapon to a well-regulated militia. Gun control ad­vocates argue that this lends no support to a constitutional right to own­ership for private purposes.

But Levinson notes that the court's ruling, far from weakening the Second Amendment as a control on Congress, can be read as supporting extreme anti-gun control arguments defending the right to own weapons, such as assault rifles, that are relevant to modern warfare and police control.

The foremost Founder, Madison, stressed (in Federalist Paper 46) "...the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation".

The subject of gun control reveals a role reversal between liberals and conservatives that makes both sides seem tendentious. Liberals, who usually argue that constitutional rights (of criminal defendants, for example) must be respected regardless of inconvenient social consequences, say the Second Amendment right is too costly to honor. Con­servatives who frequently favor applying cost-benefit analyses to consti­tutional construction (of defendants rights, for example) advocate an ab­solutist construction of the Second Amendment.

The Bill of Rights should be modified only with extreme reluctance but America has an extreme crisis of gut fire. And impatience to deal with it can cause less than scrupulous reading of the Constitution.

WHATEVER RIGHT THE SECOND AMENDMENT PROTECTS IS NOT AS IMPORTANT AS IT WAS 200 YEARS AGO, when the de­fense and food-gathering made gun ownership almost universal. But whatever the right is, there it is.

THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION IS PERHAPS CORRECT AND CERTAINLY IS PLAUSIBLE IN ITS "STRONG" READING OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF PRIVATE GUN OWNERSHIP. THEREFORE GUN CONTROL ADVOCATES WHO WANT TO SQUARE THEIR POLICY PREFERENCES WITH THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD SQUARELY FACE THE NEED TO DE C-O-N-S-T-I-T-U-T-I-0-N-A-L-I-Z-E THE-SUBJECT BY R-E-P-E-A‑L-I-N-G THE "SECOND AMENDMENT".

I would like to further point out that the same ones (groups) as listed above have formed Educational organizations and population control groups to help solve the problem of teenage pregnancies, etc. NOW I JEST NOT, HERE IS ONE OF THE MAJOR ONES IN POINT: NATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY AND PARENTING, INC. "STERILIZE 13­YEAR-OLD BOYS AFTER DEPOSITING SPERM. Symposiums have now been held in almost all states since 1985. Perhaps you should check into this within your own state and find out what has been introduced into your own state legis­latures to implement the concepts from this symposium! Where can you get in­formation regarding this subject? Obtain the past 5 or 6 issues of the Wisconsin Report (address already given).

I can't help you, brothers, if you continue to live in your tubes of darkness and hide from Truth. I am overwhelmed by the magnitude of our task at hand, also. But the first order of action is to prevent any further tampering with the Con­stitution, allow no Constitutional Convention to change anything for they LIE TO YOU--THEY WILL REMOVE THE TOTAL CONSTITUTION AND EN­TER YOU TOTALLY UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER--HOOK, LINE AND SINKER--AND I MEAN "SUNK". We can do it if we work together and want to--can it be done? Yes. Will it be done???? It won't be if all we receive back is what one just wrote: "I refuse to read another word of the stuff you write for I don't believe you were one of the groups who first contacted Billy Meiers from Pleiades and they made me feel good while you make me feel filled with unrest--cancel my subscription and keep my name se­cret for my protection and security". But this beloved person put his address boldly on the envelope!

Well, some of the ones who first contacted Billy Meier, i.e. Asket, etc., are from DAL--not Pleiades; secondly, Semjase is in my Command and I certainly had no need to contact Billy Meier--my job is to do THIS. Foolish games are going to cost you dearly, friends, dearly indeed.

Dharma, you must have a break, please. I need you out of this location for a while this day. Thank you, chela. And for my team--THANK YOU FOR A FINE JOB ON THE WEEK-END--WE SHALL "GET THERE" YET. IN LOVE AND RESPECT,
I SALUTE YOU.

Hatonn to clear. Thank you.