3/4 페이지 처음처음 1 2 3 4 마지막마지막
Results 5 to 6 of 8


  1. #5


    PJ 33
    WEDNESDAY, JULY 3, 1991 11:23 A.M. YEAR 4, DAY 321
    WEDNESDAY, JULY 3, 1991

    Vio present to continue with our JOURNAL. I realize that the morning had to be devoted to Hatonn’s work so we start behind in time allowance and I realize that you, Dharma, must make a trip on legal matters and to check in with Charles in the hospital, in the city. Therefore, we shall write for only about an hour and then allow you to get out of here around 1:00. In that way, we will have time to scribe a bit more this evening. Perhaps the messages on the “stamps” you are to have done, can be structured prior to going into the city for it will be well over a hundred degrees in the entire area this day and that kind of heat is debilitating and causes sluggishness, so I prefer you keep rambling to a minimum so that we can be refreshed enough for clear writing when we sit next. Thank you.


    To simplify the writing at this time, we will just deal with findings and opinions as outlayed by the scientist. This will mostly be basic “copy” work. We will only write about an hour so let us move right smartly along, please. Keep in mind that this meeting was held before 1957 so the situation is worse, compounded, and invalid in some instances. Worse, however, are the absolute lies and errors in perception in the entire presentation. Read carefully and then ponder your plight most painstakingly and it will become obvious that you are in far more serious trouble than you had any way to evaluate.

    The problems of radiation fall naturally into two main classes: (1) the effects on human beings; (2) the various ways in which radiation can reach human beings through the environment.

    The inheritance mechanism is by far the most sensitive to radiation of any biological system.

    Any radiation which reaches the reproductive cells causes mutations (changes in the material governing heredity) that are passed on to succeeding generations.

    Human gene mutations which produce observable effects are believed to be universally harmful.

    Everyone is subjected to the natural background radiation which causes an unavoidable quantity of so-called spontaneous mutations. Anything that adds radiation to this naturally occurring background rate causes further mutations, and is genetically harmful.

    There is no minimum amount of radiation which must be exceeded before mutations occur. Any amount, however small, that reaches the reproductive cells can cause a correspondingly small number of mutations. The more radiation, the more mutations.

    The harm is cumulative. The genetic damage done by radiation builds up as the radiation is received, and depends on the total accumulated gonad dose received by people from their own conception to the conception of their last child.

    So far as individuals are concerned, not all mutant genes or combinations of mutant genes are equally harmful. A few may cause very serious handicaps, many others may produce much smaller harm, or even no apparent damage.


    But from the point of view of the total and eventual damage to the entire population, every mutation causes roughly the same amount of harm. This is because mutant genes can only disappear when the inheritance line in which they are carried dies out. In cases of severe and obvious damage this may happen in the first generation; in other cases it may require hundreds of generations.

    Thus, for the general population, and in the long run, a little radiation to a lot of people is as harmful as a lot of radiation to a few, since the total number of mutant genes can be the same in the two cases.

    It is difficult to arrive at a figure showing how much genetic harm radiation can do. One measure is the amount of radiation, above the natural background, which would produce as many mutations again as occur spontaneously. It is estimated that this amounts to 30 to 80 Roentgens.

    [The Roentgen is a unit of radiation. To give an idea of its value, the average dental X-ray delivers five roentgens to the patient’s jaw, but only five thousandths of a roentgen of stray radiation to more remote parts of the body such as the gonads.]

    It is also estimated that a dose of 10 Roentgens to every person in the United States would cause something on the order of 5,000,000 mutant genes, which would then be a part of the population’s inheritance pool. This figure is subject to considerable uncertainty.

    At present the United States population is exposed to radiation from (1) the natural background, (2) medical and dental X-rays, (3) fall-out from atomic weapons testing. The 30-year dose to the gonads received by the average person from each of these sources is estimated as follows:

    1. Background--about 4.3 roentgens.
    2. X-rays and fluoroscopy--about 3 roentgens.
    3. Weapons tests--if continued at the rate of the past five years (1950-1955 with no changes in quantity) would give a probable 30-year dose of about 0.1 roentgens. This figure may be off by a factor of five, that is, the possible range is from 0.02 to 0.5 roentgens. If tests were conducted at the rate of the two most active years (1953 and 1955) the 30-year dose would be about twice as great as that just stated. (Keep in mind, Chelas, that these are figures KEPT TOTALLY UNDERSTATED BY THE ELITE CARTEL LEADER, ROCKEFELLER).

    At present test explosions (1956) of atomic weapons are the only significant source of radiation in the general environment, above the natural background.

    Meteorologists have found no evidence that atomic explosions have changed the weather or climate. Nor do they believe that continued weapon tests, at the same rate and in the same areas as in the past, would have such an effect.

    Radiation from explosions passes into the atmosphere and much of it eventually returns to the ground as “fall-out”.

    Fall-out divides into three classes: (1) close-in--material that comes down within a few hundred miles of the explosion and within 10 to 20 hours, (2) intermediate--material that descends in a few weeks after the explosion, (3) delayed--material that remains in the air for months or years.

    Close-in fall-out from test explosions affects only restricted, uninhabited regions.

    Intermediate fall-out would descend very slowly if it were pulled down only by gravity. It is mostly washed out of the air by rain and snow. It spreads over large parts of the earth, but its effect over a small area may be accentuated if there is heavy precipitation while the radioactive cloud is overhead.

    Delayed fall-out is stored for long periods in the stratosphere. Meteorologists know very little about the interchange of air between the stratosphere and lower layers, so they cannot predict exactly how long the material will stay up, nor where it is likely to descend.

    National Academy of Sciences Genetics Committee states:

    The report of the Genetics Committee of the National Academy of Science was unanimous and blunt: “Any radiation is genetically undesirable, since any radiation induces harmful mutations (changes).”

    This complex chemical compound known as a gene cannot repair itself, and to date we know of no way of repairing it.

    The injured gene will handicap some descendant, even though it may skip many generations before it does so. It may cause physical and mental handicaps to a whole line, and it will keep trying until at last it kills off the line.

    Thus, the geneticists say cold-bloodedly, from the standpoint of the human race it would be better to have a few thousand humans severely radiated than to have whole populations subjected to minor radiations.

    If, as medical evidence overwhelmingly shows, man-made radiation is not good for the health of human beings, the logical questions are: Where and how might you be exposed? What can you do to protect yourself and your family?

    You could be exposed through:
    1. Ordinary medical X-ray.
    2. Eating food, drinking water or milk or breathing air that has been contaminated by fall-out from the explosion of atomic weapons tested by the United States, England and Russia.
    3. Food or water contaminated by radioactive wastes from an atomic installation.

    Dr. W.F. Libby says: Last May 2, Dr. W.F. Libby, Commissioner, United States Atomic Energy Commission, presented to the National Academy of Sciences what is probably the most authoritative public report to date on “Radioactive Strontium Fall-out”.

    Samples of radioactive strontium, Dr. Libby said, were detected in the snow at Admiral Byrd Bay in the Antarctic; in the waters of the Danube, the Mississippi, the Seine and the Moselle Rivers; in alfalfa in the fields of Wisconsin and Iowa, and in soil in various sections of the country.

    Dr. Libby concluded his report by observing that the average content of radioactive strontium is increasing in milk supplies all over the world, and therefore more and more human beings are putting more and more radioactive strontium into their bodies.

    Since growing children concentrate calcium, they are likely to absorb more of this dangerous relative of calcium into their bones than adults. And any material incorporated into their bodies during childhood will have a longer time to act.

    An atomic laboratory worker dies from atomic rays:

    Philadelphia (AP)--Exposure to atomic radiation in a government laboratory between 8 and 10 years ago has taken the life of a Philadelphia physician, the city medical examiner said.

    Medical Examiner Joseph W. Spelman issued his finding after an inquest into the death last July 24 of Dr. Kenneth A. Koerber, 50, of Philadelphia. Dr. Koerber had worked in the Atomic Energy Commission’s Brookhaven National Laboratories, Upton, N. Y., between 1946 and 1948. He inspected laboratories to protect workers from radiation.

    “We presume,” Dr. Spelman said, “that Dr. Koerber somehow got a dose of atomic radiation which now, ten years later, caused his death. We have conclusively proved that he was subject to atomic radiation or to the inhalation or to the eating of atomic compounds. At the present time his bones contain 1,000 times the maximum safe concentration of radiation.”

    We quote now from James Poling, In Better Homes and Gardens, May, 1957. The following is far from comforting, if not totally alarming.

    “An H-bomb explosion at our Bikini test site, March 1st, 1954, blew a scientific concept, as well as an island, into smithereens. Fallout had previously been regarded as a hazard confined to the immediate vicinity of an atomic explosion. But a recording instrument at Rongelap, 100 miles to the east of Bikini, revealed that this bomb had sprayed alarming quantities of radioactive dust over that atoll. And we learned for the first time that fallout from a multi-megaton bomb was lethal over an area of several thousand square miles. Now we know that naked horror of the bomb. It poses as a potential threat to all mankind.”

    The Miami Herald prints the following:

    DETROIT ATOM PLANT CALLED DANGEROUS: “Washington--In a memo suppressed by Atomic Energy Chairman Lewis Strauss, atomic scientists have warned sternly that the “fast breeder” power reactor he approved for construction outside Detroit may “risk the health and safety of the public”.

    Last November, a similar but smaller experimental reactor at Arco, Idaho, melted down into a hot radioactive heap that couldn’t be touched for six months. Puzzled scientists still haven’t found the cause.

    Yet Strauss, ignoring the urgent advice of his own safety experts, okayed construction of the same design atomic power plant in Detroit’s populous back yard.” [Still feeling fine and that you can trust your “big boys”?]

    The eminent scientist authority upon radioactivity, Dr. Ralph Lapp, upholds our contention that the upper stratosphere will not send in its full bill for our payment until the late seventies. There is no question but what the stratosphere is accumulating death rays for destruction of earth’s oxygen at an increasing rate. The freely expressed belief that “the pull of gravity” will bring the fall-out to earth is costly to human survival. A small percentage of the higher potential goes toward Earth, but the LARGER PERCENTAGE IS OF A POTENTIAL WHICH IS LIGHTER THAN THE EARTH PRESSURES. These seek the upper levels and the stratospheres. It is possible that enough has already collected to take toll of millions of lives, or cause millions of defective births, even if we stopped the use of radioactivity now. We print Dr. Lapp’s warning in full, as issued by The Daily Oklahoman of July 5, 1956 [45 years ago day after tomorrow]--and other papers.

    Dharma, we are out of time for this writing. Let us just leave it right here and pick up right here when we next sit. This is serious, chelas, it is so much worse than you can imagine that WE know not how to best bring it to your urgent attention. I believe, however, that you probably are beginning to see what was meant by Soltec regarding the radiation from the stratosphere onto Earth within the next year or so. It is going to collect to a point where there will be widespread and massive fall-out as the accumulations build beyond saturation point.

    With all the information available back half a century and brought public while other information was deliberately kept from you--you must see that you are in urgent circumstance for the planet is all but a “hot” ball of ready-to-detonate elements. You can continue to hide or you can come out of your hole and ask God to attend WITH YOU and meet His Laws and requirements and perhaps we can set this about reversal--if you do not--you can count your days very quickly indeed.

    Germain to clear until we next sit to pen. Thank you, Dharma. I salute you and I am honored to serve with you. Salu.

    PJ 33
    THURSDAY, JULY 4, 1991 10:34 A.M. YEAR 4, DAY 322
    THURSDAY, JULY 4, 1991

    Germain present in communion of the moment. I can not express the love and caring which I hold for your great nation. It is the primary purpose of my journey upon the waves of experience at this sequence. There was such hope for the birthing of a new concept of life and government of the people, by the people and for the people--that a new nation would be birthed where Man could live in freedom and pursue livelihood protected in that freedom and seek his happiness; that he might worship as he pleases, speak out in freedom, find truth and justice within the law and courts, write in freedom, find truth and freedom in the press and live as MEN--EQUAL ONE TO ANOTHER. May you see, and find your way back. Salu.

    Let us continue the JOURNAL, for until we finish the outlay of the problems which are uppermost in your opposition to life--we cannot “fix” anything. It does not do good to place a splint on the arm if it be the leg which is broken. Your enemies are invisible--from the rays of radiation to the elusive “invisible government”. I am “honored” to be allowed to bring forth this Word--I am not joyous over the assignment. I do, however, hold knowledge which can bring great change within the boundaries of that which I speak. So, allow us to move right ahead with all possible speed. I salute you beloved brethren who receive of us for we are in great attachment and need of one another. May our work be blessed in Truth with the seal of God upon our word.


    When we had to take leave on the yesterday we were speaking of Dr. Ralph Lapp and I had just quoted an article from a press release. The last sentence needs information repeating: “Lapp said the NAS report, issued June 13, 1956, was ‘misleading’ when it indicated that the testing of nuclear weapons could be increased 25 to 30 times above the 1950-55 average without endangering the world’s health.”

    Dear ones, that testing has been increased by hundreds of times that level.

    Now, there is a second angle: “He said in an interview that the NAS limit was based only on ‘external’ radiation. He declared the safe maximum is far lower for ‘internal ingestion’ of radioactive particles carried into the human system by air, food and water.

    “The point I would emphasize,” the atomic scientist said, “is that all of us already have measurable quantities of this bomb-generated radioactive material in our system.

    “Although the quantities are not as yet dangerous in the cases where measurements have been taken, we now have enough information to determine definitely when the maximum safe level of radioactivity will be reached.”


    Lapp, who has repeatedly disclosed information about the dangers of radiation, which were later verified by the atomic energy commission, said he believes that three super-bombs probably equal to about 10 million tons of TNT each had been set off in the current Pacific test series before Tuesday.

    The Japanese central meteorological station announced evidence of a fourth super-explosion described as “possibly” an H-bomb Tuesday morning. If the total for the series is equal to 40 million tons of TNT, this would double the average annual rate for tests conducted from 1950 through 1955.

    Lapp’s warning concerned the effects of radioactive strontium, an element created when uranium atoms split. The element is chemically similar to calcium and tends to cause cancer and other ailments by concentrating in the human skeleton.


    “Making a much more conservative assumption that test rates would slowly accelerate and would double by 1970”, he said, “I concluded that by 1962 there will be enough radioactive strontium committed to the stratosphere to produce a 100 times ‘maximum permissible amount’ in every person on the planet.

    “Because of a hold-up of the invisible particles in the upper air--the particles fall to earth at a rate of about 10 percent a year--this radioactive strontium would not show up in full amount in the human body until after the late 1970’s.

    “However, by 1962 the die would have been cast irrevocably.”

    Instead of a slow acceleration, Lapp said, “The upward arc of bomb testing is proceeding out of control.” With Russia, the U.S. and Britain conducting H-bomb experiments, he declared, the total exploded by 1960 could exceed the equivalent of one billion tons of TNT.


    Lapp has been conducting a running battle against the AEC’s secret policy which prevents announcements concerning most of the tests and, even at the public detonation May 21, withheld the explosion data necessary to calculate the exact amount of radiation.

    “Education about the biological effects of nuclear radiation is an absolute prerequisite if the human race is to survive,” Lapp said, adding:

    “I think advertisement of the probable effects of war-borne radioactivity might also prove a valuable deterrent to the unlimited use of nuclear weapons.”

    Collier’s was the first prominent magazine to vividly portray the tragic dangers of radioactivity. In around 1955 it published an article about the dangers of “ATOMIC GARBAGE” by Robert De Roos, which should have awakened every human to this dreadful way of exterminating the human race. I herein print copious extracts from his article--for you hear it, apparently, better from two-legged humanoids. This article was the first one ever to have been published to that date which discloses the true facts about plutonium as being the most deadly of the killer metals. Its greater importance as a killer lies in the fact that it loses only half of its radioactivity in 23,000 years. Its primal effect upon the human body is in its direct attack upon the bone marrow where human blood corpuscles are formed. Together with strontium, these super calciums could cause more defective skeletal birth and agonizing deaths than any plague heretofore known to have hurt mankind.

    When you read these extracts have this thought in mind, that radioactivity has hardly begun as yet. This fuel is not intended for temporary use, but for permanent use. Think ahead, therefore, for a hundred years. If conditions are as they now are, after but a few experimental years, what would they be in a hundred years? We believe that there will not be one man on earth in a century or so even if so few as fifty reactors, such as Hanford and Oak Ridge, are erected. (This last portion was written in 1957!)

    It cannot be said that the danger to human life is not fully realized, for the cost of the waste storage tanks in 1956 was $278,000 each, and the Hanford plant had already purchased $27,000,000 worth of these tanks. The fallacy of this tank plan was that the tanks themselves would disintegrate in a century or so at best, or become as radioactive as their contents in some twenty years, thus fully releasing these deadly rays for many thousands of years of destruction. Many of these tanks have been thrown into the deep sea. Your present generation is already reaping the first harvests of that devastation. Your next generation will pay dearly for what you have done to them. Is that not a dreadful thought?

    The next idea for waste disposal was to lock it up in glazed bricks. Radioactive metals will destroy bricks as readily as they destroy granite and other rocky formations. It is a slow process but future generations will be the sufferers from it. There is no possible safe way of getting rid of radioactive waste beyond a few years. The deserts of the world offered the only chance, then and possibly now. By plowing very deep furrows for hundreds of miles, and as distributing all waste and free metals in very small amounts over vast (thousands of miles) areas in MANY deserts, it might be possible to save more of your atmospheric damage. Otherwise, you will have no atmosphere in time.

    So much time has elapsed since this very information came forth and you slept on, that the problem is so massive that transmutation is all but ruled out as a possibility.

    Let us reprint from the article:

    Far out in the desert wasteland of eastern Washington, at the Atomic Energy Commission’s gigantic Hanford plutonium works, radioactive elements surge in vast underground tanks--a pent-up sea of useless energy which is a constant worry to the scientists who unwillingly created it. This deadly broth of fission products is the garbage of the atomic age.

    And these highly active liquid wastes are only part of the story. Potentially dangerous atomic garbage comes in all forms: liquids, solids, gases and vapors. The ordinary defenses of man are powerless against all of them. Radioactivity is invisible and silent; it cannot be touched or tasted or smelled. And everything a radioactive element comes in contact with becomes contaminate: a wrench used in atomic installations, steel drums, a bit of waste-paper from a laboratory. Carcasses of experimental animals may contain small amounts of radioactivity; even the laundry water used to wash contaminated garments gets polluted.

    The story of radioactive wastes is just being understood by the public. For years it was cloaked in the secrecy which surrounds all dealings with the atom. But the dilemma posed by the wastes has been with us ever since the first self-sustaining atomic pile was activated under the bleachers at Stagg Field in Chicago in 1942, for when the physicists pulled the switch on the atomic age, they also created something else: the world’s first radioactive rubbish--the inevitable, lethal products of nuclear fission.

    Ten years of production, which has seen the world-shaking atom bomb pale before the even more shattering hydrogen bomb, has left the AEC with an accumulation of millions of gallons of liquid radioactive garbage and tons of contaminated solid objects. And there’s more every day.

    * * * * *

    The problem facing the AEC--and a problem which it confidently asserts is being handled with great efficiency and success--is how to keep these new materials out of the environment--out of the air we breathe, out of our drinking water and food supplies. The garbage must be kept tightly under control because unbelievably small--often invisible--amounts can contaminate large areas.

    * * * * *

    What makes the problem so serious is the fact that this radio-active garbage is building up at increasing rates--thousands of gallons every day.

    And it’s only the beginning. The atomic-energy industry, big as it is, is only an infant now, and today’s rubbish can be handled by storing it in remote sections of the country. But under the provisions of new Congressional legislation, private manufacturers will be encouraged to develop the commercial uses of fission material. So, in the not-too-distant future, disposal of wastes will become a neighborhood matter.

    Some of the best engineering brains in the country are grappling with this serious question, but unless they come up with workable solutions, constantly swelling stores of waste may hamper full development of such peacetime atomic projects as generation of electric power, heating of whole communities from central atomic “furnaces”, propulsion of ships and planes, and thousands of undreamed-of new ideas.

    * * * * *

    At Hanford, where the atomic refuse represents the greatest nonmilitary concentration of radioactive elements ever known to man, the scientists rely on CC to dispose of highly active wastes. The radiation level of the hot stuff is fantastically high: the tanks the trash is buried in contain several million times the radio-activity of the world’s entire commercial supply of radium.

    Just one element sloughed off in making plutonium--strontium 90--is over 60 times as radioactive as radium. How dangerous is that? An engineer at the General Electric Company, which operates Hanford for the AEC, figured out what would happen in the hypothetical event that you threw the element into the Columbia River--which no one would be likely to do. After covering a sheet of paper with computations, he came up with this answer: “It would take over eight hours of the full flow of the Columbia--fifty-three billion gallons--to dilute one gram of pure strontium 90 to the point where the water would be safe enough to drink according to the AEC’s permissible limits. Or, putting it another way, if you dripped three grams of the element in the Columbia every day, the water of the sixth-largest river in the U.S. would be unfit to drink.” (A gram is 1/28 of an ounce.)

    In addition to strontium 90, the chain reaction spews out about 40 other radioactive waste elements with half-lives ranging from seconds to millions of years. A half-life is the time it takes half of the atoms in a radioactive element to become disintegrated.

    Storage of the really hot stuff is very expensive. A recent contract for six 1,000,000-gallon tanks was let for $1,724,000. Hanford has $27,000,000 worth of tanks with a storage capacity of 67,000,000 gallons.

    * * * * *

    No one claims the tanks provide the solution to atomic rubbish disposal. “We are uncertain about the effects of these radioactive wastes,” comments General Electric’s Dr. Herbert M. Parker, director of the radiological sciences department at Hanford. “We are starting conservatively while trying to get answers which may modify the present program.”

    David E. Shaw, the AEC manager at Hanford, adds: “Meanwhile we keep building the tanks”--at $287,000 each.

    Meanwhile, most of the rubbish is stored. The only highly radioactive wastes being thrown away are those now sent out to sea to be dumped in very deep water beyond the continental shelf. A federally sponsored committee hopes this system may provide the ultimate solution to the waste-disposal problem. On the other hand, oceanographers, sanitary engineers, marine biologists and marine geologists are already concerned about what will happen when large amounts of radioactivity are thrown into the oceans.

    “The sea has the same topography as the land,” says Dr. Abel Wolman, of the Johns Hopkins University, a consultant to the AEC and one of the top sanitary engineers in the United States. “Big as it is, it won’t accommodate everything we want to throw into it.”

    How winds, waves and currents will affect the dispersion or concentration of radioactive materials is under very serious study. Dr. Wolman says: “One thing that makes me a little reluctant about using the ocean is the memory of the New York garbage mess--when New York dumped its trash far at sea only to have it drift back to the Jersey beaches. And what about international control of dumping at sea?”

    * * * * *

    At Oak Ridge, Tennessee, in the vast silences of the Appalachian Mountains, stand the tremendous gaseous diffusion plants where U235 is made by the Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Company, a division of Union Carbide & Carbon Corporation.

    Oak Ridge, a 60,000-acre site, also contains the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which produces most of the country’s radioactive isotopes for experimental work.


    Although its waste problem does not compare with Hanford’s in volume, Oak Ridge still pours 50,000 gallons of highly active refuse into its underground tanks every week. Another 5,000,000 gallons of less active rubbish also must be disposed of.

    Because Oak Ridge is located in a remote region, the disposal of less active wastes is but a minor worry; but getting rid of the highly radioactive rubbish is harder. Teams of scientists, headed by Dr. Z.K. Morgan, director of the health physics division of the National Laboratory, believe they have an answer for final disposal of the dangerous, long-lived refuse at Oak Ridge, if not in all other parts of the country.

    Two huge pits were bulldozed out of a hillside above White Oak Lake and large amounts of very hot wastes were poured in. The theory was that the radioactive fission products would be trapped by the fine particles of shale underlying the pits; any small amounts of hot stuff that seeped through would be diluted in the waters of the lake.

    Test wells were drilled to detect movement of the rubbish through the ground. At the end of two months, only one waste element had penetrated through to one well.

    McCalls Magazine for January of 1957, had this front cover headline for a story by P. Lorentz, “RADIOACTIVITY IS POISONING YOUR CHILDREN”. We now quote parts of his story which is indicative of the fear which is felt throughout the world of this threat to the human race. Again I ask you to harken up for this is also over 35 years ago!


    It is no secret today that a hydrogen war, no matter who starts it or who is attacked, will mean the destruction of most of the human race. One of our own high-ranking generals has stated publicly that a hydrogen attack by our forces might take the lives of three or four hundred million people--enemy or ally--“depending on the direction of the winds!”

    * * * * *

    Here is a substance you can neither see, feel, hear, taste nor smell. You may be exposed to it unwittingly; you may inhale it, or absorb it by drinking polluted water or by eating contaminated food. You may not feel any immediate ill effects, yet some materials remain radioactive for years in the body, operating as so many infinitesimal but dangerous X-ray machines.

    * * * * *

    1. No amount of man-made radiation, external or internal, is “good” for healthy, living things. Any amount of exposure does some harm, however slight.

    2. Radiation is cumulative and irreversible.

    To put it very unscientifically, you have just so much radiation tolerance, and every time you are subjected to X-rays or any other kind of man-made radiation, you have drawn against your total allowance. Some people have more tolerance than others, but, ideally, the quantity of total body radiation to which a human being is exposed during his lifetime should not be greater than that to which he is subjected from the sun, stars and planets and radiation arising from the minerals in the earth’s surface.

    3. There is no such thing as a peaceful use of atomic energy, if by “peaceful” you mean “harmless.”

    Even the by-products of a peaceful nuclear reactor could be used in one form or another for military purposes. Radiations inside atomic plants are dangerous. Air escaping from the plants can become contaminated. If water is used to shield or to cool the plant, it can become contaminated. The waste materials--the by-products of nuclear fission--are radioactive, some materials remaining highly dangerous for centuries.

    4. The more people exposed to radiation, the more damage to generations yet unborn.

    * * * * *

    For years, many groups of scientists in many parts of the world have issued appeals for a cessation of atomic explosions, on the grounds that the fall-out of radioactive materials gradually is poisoning the earth. Because of the cloud of secrecy surrounding the military facts of atomic energy and because some of these scientific groups are politically suspect, many of these appeals have been reported in the daily press as political rather than scientific discussions.

    A careful study of the official reports of our own authorities, however, should convince anyone that sooner or later the atomic powers will have to stop releasing poisonous materials in the atmosphere. If they do not stop, and stop completely, they will have achieved mutual annihilation just as surely as though they had engaged in actual, all-out hydrogen warfare.

    * * * * *

    What is more, even if all bomb tests were stopped tomorrow, it is estimated that the main part of the poisonous materials that already have been released into the upper atmosphere will not have fallen on us until 1970, and there will be a continuation of this noxious rain long after that.

    The following is quoted from the Christian Science Monitor--as written by its Science Editor, Robert C. Cowen:

    A special study group of leading American natural scientists has concluded that there is no radiation danger to human life from the present rate of atomic weapons tests. This cuts the technical ground from under the repeated demands that such tests be stopped because of the radioactive materials they release into the atmosphere.

    But, at the same time, these experts warn that the full world-wide development of peaceful uses for the atom could produce more of a radiation hazard in the form of radioactive wastes than would an all-out atomic war. In fact, this “hot” waste disposal problem is growing so quickly today that their report urges its immediate and urgent consideration at the international level to determine and set up adequate safeguards.

    This report by responsible natural scientists should help to bring more balanced thinking than has been evidenced in the past to bear on the vexing question of whether or not the human race is endangering its own future by releasing atomic radiations into its environment.

    The report was based on extensive studies by 145 natural scientists conducted under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences and financed by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. The studies were set up specifically to help resolve the world-wide controversy over radiation hazards and to provide some useful data in a field that is beset with ignorance and uncertainties.”

    The following is from the Washington Daily News, Monday, September 10, 1956, by Gene Shumate:


    (It’s Radioactive Most of the Time)

    The air over Washington has been radioactive more than 70 percent of the time since 1951, a Naval Research Laboratory Report said today.

    In 1953, it said, Washingtonians breathed pre-atomic air for only 60 days.


    “We haven’t had normal, clean air since before the atomic age--or since we started testing atomic weapons at Yucca Flats, Nev.,” Dr. Herbert Friedman of the laboratory’s Electron Optics Branch told The News.

    Dr. Friedman is one of the authors of the report.

    It said the navy has studied the air in a series of areas since 1949--Chicago, Washington, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Memphis, Puerto Rico, Panama, seven scattered Pacific isles, North Africa, and Alaska.


    Dr. Friedman said the average dosage present in the air here is only two-tenths of a Roentgen--far from being immediately dangerous--“but we’re not sure what the accumulative effect on man will be.”

    “It takes about 500 to 600 roentgens to kill a man outright”, he said.

    “There’s a lot we don’t know as yet about what effect breathing even slightly radioactive air over extended periods will have on us,” Dr. Friedman said. “We do know that certain isotopes up there are bad actors.”

    Yes, chelas, of all the cover-ups and secret actions perpetrated against mankind and life-forms of all earth beings--THIS IS IT! THIS IS THE FINAL EPITOME OF DESTRUCTION VIA THE SECRET ELITE. You have reached the point at which there is probably no return--it is time you turn your attention to the possibilities of there being a God of Love who sends His Hosts to collect you of His flock. Denying the facts herein, considering that these are conservative projections of your own species’ experts and authorities almost half century past--where are you, beloved Man of Shan? Does not everything else in your lives pale by comparison? AIDS, precious ones, is basically a simple created lifeform and acts as a deadly radioactive power plant--intended to kill!

    Part of the thrust to stop our writing is to “somehow” prevent panic among men. Panic? If you are not in a panic--you certainly DO NOT UNDERSTAND YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES!

    Why don’t we alien life-forms just drop in and “fix” things for you? Well, for one very good reason among many, we really don’t want to get nuked! We understand the problem and don’t really have any intent of committing radioactive atomic suicide. Ours will likely be in service of getting as many off your “hot rock” as will turn unto God within the next few years of your counting time. It does not generally bode well for the planet, however. If you stopped your foolish suicide mission today, you have such an incredible build-up that total reversal is highly improbable at any rate or effort expended. Ability to sustain some life-forms on the planet is possible but that, too, is getting to be a most dim probability in the long millenniums of perceived “future”. Radioactivity is already seeping into EVERY aquifer on your globe. You have no means to counter or neutralize it.

    Oh, God should fix it for you? WHY??

    The greatest and most powerful expression of fear from the use of radioactivity which had yet been made by anyone among the higher intellectuals, up to 1957, is the following world-broadcast appeal by Dr. Albert Schweitzer to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, asking that “public opinion demand an end to nuclear tests.”

    The New York Times, April 24, 1957.

    SCHWEITZER URGES WORLD OPINION TO DEMAND END OF NUCLEAR TESTS: Nobel Winner’s Pleas Broadcast in 50 Lands Says Alternative is Catastrophe for Mankind.

    OSLO, Norway, April 23--Dr. Albert Schweitzer has appealed to the world to end nuclear tests.

    The appeal of the 82-year-old missionary, surgeon, philosopher and musician, addressed to the Norwegian Nobel Prize Committee, was broadcast today in about fifty countries, including most of those in Europe. It was broadcast in Swahili from Nairobi and Japanese stations carried it.

    Dr. Schweitzer’s message was read in Norwegian by Unnar Jahn, chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, who in 1952 bestowed the Nobel Peace Prize on Dr. Schweitzer. Translations of the text were read in English, German, French and Russian on Norwegian short-wave stations.

    The impact of the warning was heightened for Norwegian listeners because the broadcast followed by fifteen minutes a report of a recent radioactive rain over Norway caused by Soviet nuclear explosions.

    The initiative for the broadcast came from Dr. Schweitzer himself. The Norwegian state radio planned to send a reporter to his hospital in Lambarene, French Equatorial Africa, where Dr. Schweitzer lives and works, to make a recording of the speech.

    Dr. Schweitzer said he was too weak to read the appeal himself. It was, therefore, decided that the message would be read in translation and Dr. Schweitzer expressed the hope that it would reach the whole world.

    Dr. Schweitzer said his aim was to awaken public opinion before it was too late. He warned that the human race was heading for a catastrophe if nuclear explosions were continued. This catastrophe must be prevented, he said.

    “There can be no question of doing anything else, if only for the reason that we cannot take the responsibility for the consequences it might have for our descendants; they are threatened by the greatest and most terrific danger,” Dr. Schweitzer said.

    He emphasized that to fail to consider the importance of radio-active elements created by man and their consequences would be a folly “for which humanity would have to pay a terrible price.” “We are committing this folly in thoughtlessness,” he said.


    Dr. Schweitzer asked why the United States, the Soviet Union and Britain did not come to agreement to stop the tests. He believed the reason was that there was no public opinion asking for it. Japan, he added, is the only exception.

    He accused “official and unofficial sources” of evading the problem when they assured that the increase in radioactivity of the air did not exceed an amount the human body could tolerate without harm.

    “Even if we are not directly affected by the radioactive material in the air we are indirectly affected through that which has fallen down, is falling down and will fall down,” he declared.

    He also stressed that not only was the health of the present population threatened by internal radiation but also that of future generations.

    “The fact is that the cells of the reproductive organs are particularly vulnerable to radiation,” he said.

    Dr. Schweitzer concluded his warning by appealing to public opinion in all nations to demand an agreement to stop the tests. “The end of further experiments with atomic bombs would be like the early sunrays of hope which suffering humanity is longing for,” he said.


    OSLO, Norway, April 23 (Reuters)--Following is the translation of excerpts from a letter issued by Dr. Albert Schweitzer through the Norwegian Nobel Committee, asking that public opinion demand an end to nuclear tests:

    Since March 1, 1954, hydrogen bombs have been tested, by the Americans at the Pacific island of Bikini in the Marshall Group and by the Russians in Siberia.

    After the explosion of a hydrogen bomb...something remained in the air, namely an incalculable number of radioactive particles emitting radioactive rays. This was also the case with the uranium bombs which were dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima and those with which subsequent tests were made. However, because these bombs had smaller size and less effect compared with the hydrogen bombs, one hardly paid any attention to this fact.

    Since radioactive rays of sufficient amount and strength have harmful effects on the human body, one started discussing if the radiation resulting from the explosions that had already taken place represented a danger which would increase with new explosions.


    In the course of the three and a half years that have passed since then, representatives of the physical and medical sciences have been studying the problem. The material collected, although far from complete, allows us to draw the conclusion that radiation resulting from the explosions which have already taken place represents a danger to the human race, a danger not to be underrated, and that further explosions of atomic bombs will increase this danger to an alarming extent.

    I raise my voice, together with those of others who have lately felt it their duty to act, in speaking and writing, as warners of the danger. My age and the sympathy that I have gained for myself through advocating the idea of reverence for life permit me to hope that my appeal may contribute to the preparing of the way for the insight so urgently needed.

    There are two kinds of atom bombs, uranium bombs and hydrogen bombs. To these two bombs has recently been added the cobalt bomb, a king of the super-atom bombs. The effect of this bomb is estimated to be many times stronger than that of hydrogen bombs having been made till now.

    The explosion of an atom bomb creates an inconceivably large number of exceedingly small particles of radioactive elements.


    Of these elements, some exist for hours, some for weeks, or months, or years, or millions of years, undergoing continuous decay. They float in the higher strata of air as clouds of radioactive dust. The heavy particles fall down first. The lighter ones will stay in the air for a longer time or come down with the rain and the snow. How long it will take before everything carried up in the air by the explosions which have taken place till now has disappeared, no one can say with any certainty. According to some estimates, this will be the case not earlier than thirty or forty years from now.

    What we can state with certainty, however, is that the radio-active clouds will constantly be carried by the winds around the globe and that some of the dust, by its own weight, or by being brought down by rain, snow, mist and dew, little by little, will fall down on the hard surface of the earth, into the rivers and into the oceans.

    Particularly dangerous are the elements combining long life with a relatively strong efficiency radiation. Among them strontium-90 takes the first place. It is present in very large amounts in the radioactive dust. Cobalt-60 must also be mentioned as particularly dangerous.


    The radioactivity in the air, increased through these elements, will not harm us from the outside, not being strong enough to penetrate the skin. But the danger which has to be stressed above all the others is the one which arises from our drinking radioactive water and our eating radioactive food as a consequence of the increased radioactivity in the air.

    Following the explosions on Bikini and Siberia rain falling over Japan has, from time to time, been so radioactive that the water from it cannot be drunk. And not only there: reports of radioactive rainfall are coming from all parts of the world where analyses have recently been made. In several places, the water has proved to be so radioactive that it was unfit for drinking.

    Wherever radioactive rainwater is found the soil is also radioactive--and in a higher degree. The soil is more radioactive, not only by the downpour, but also from radioactive dust falling on it. And with the soil the vegetation will also have become radioactive.

    The radioactive elements deposited in the soil pass into the plants where they are stored. This is of importance, for as a result of this process it may be the case that we are threatened by a considerable amount of radioactive elements.

    The radioactive elements deposited in the soil pass into the plants where they are stored. This is of importance, for as a result of this process it may be the case that we are threatened by a considerable amount of radioactive elements.

    The radioactive elements in grass, when eaten by animals whose meat is used for food, will be absorbed and stored in our bodies.

    What this storing of radioactive material implies is clearly demonstrated by the observations made when, at one occasion, the radioactivity of the Columbia in North America was analyzed. The radioactivity was caused by the atomic plants at Hanford, which produce atomic energy for industrial purposes, and which empty their waste water into the river.

    Dharma, we must break here because very shortly the computer is set to “eat” the document. It is longer than we like for a chapter at any rate because of “overload”.

    You petition me to assure you that “things are better now because there is no longer much above-ground testing”. No, I cannot tell you that for it is far worse now. You have myriads of countries all over the globe now using power plants and doing underground testing--constantly. Daily there is testing. The underworld is alive with nuclear radiation--now spread around the entire periphery of the globe. As these volcanos erupt and the fissures form and break at the fault lines and the massive heat buildup surfaces from the hot lava beneath the testing areas--deadly material will spew forth as the deadly toxic material from all volcanic activity in addition to more and more of it being radioactive.

    You have effectively allowed the murder by suicide and nuclear holocaust--an entire planet and planet life-forms. There may be no such thing as “time” nor “space” BUT THERE IS SEQUENCE OF EVENTS AND MOTION!

    So, I know, John will lead the pack in “we have to do something” and “what do we do now?” What is different today than when you were told of this heinous death plot? Why do you come to us NOW wanting instant cure for your self-inflicted diseases? Why should God do anything? What have you done to prove unto God that you deserve anything? What would you change if all were made “right”?

    What can you do to save your species? About all I see as a sure bet--is to get off the place while you still can--ah, but you can’t, can you? You have been lied to about the transportation system also, have you not? Are you still in great enamorment and captivation of those leaders who have set this plague upon you? So be it.

    God has told you exactly how it will be and what you as a people must do to change this thing come upon you--and what have you done? There are not enough yellow ribbons in the entire of the world to mourn this day, my chelas--not in all the entirety of the world. You sit squarely atop the time-bomb awaiting final detonation. OH YES, INDEED, INDEED, THERE ARE MANY ONES WHO WILL SACRIFICE AND DESTROY YOUR ENTIRE PLANET TO GAIN THEIR OWN PERCEIVED AMBITIONS--MANY!




  2. #6
    宇宙生命一家, 無次 Justice Future Society Institute wave's Avatar


    PJ 33
    THURSDAY, JULY 4, 1991 3:16 P.M. YEAR 4, DAY 322

    Germain to continue. Thank you for joining me again--I know that I push my luck for it has already been such a long day of work. But, yes, chela--there is no better gift to give unto your friends, children and grandbabies than KNOWLEDGE and LIFE. As we make it through the complications, into enlightenment--then, and only then, can we know how to insure security--even if it be to lift you off this placement and allow man to realize his own reality of choices. So many of the very children you know have come forth specifically to bear their commission; Bryan, Brian, Conan, Ryan, Eli, Shawn, Michael, Jeremy, David, Angela, Allen, Laura, Rob--ah, so many that I cannot name them each herein, and yet they must await their service until we do our work--we shall not let them down for the youth has been forsaken too long. How can a young Captain fly his craft if we cannot get past your radioactivity? Yes, it is an interesting turn of thought process, isn뭪 it? God went to prepare a place for you--and so He has! Ah, Dharma, that which you and your brethren in service unto God뭩 Word shall give unto your lineage that which is beyond measuring--for the picnic and sparkler display will be but a brief and fleeting passage--their life-streams are infinite. Will not our Lady Stacey be a beauteous Commander? These children have come to bring you home--hold them in love and honor for the gift of service they bring to a battered and ungracious people.

    I wish to allow Aton appointment to speak and remind you of His Truth before we move again into the mire of that which is so fitfully discouraging. It is in your perception and according to your perspective--how you look upon these days of glory and service. Life IS and it IS FOREVER--


    Thank you Father/Mother, may we hear the Truth in wisdom and KNOWING that we be not disheartened nor allow the travails of a physical journey of restraint and boundaries to pull us from our appointed task. We would still that you might be heard.



    Aton present, for I am never from you. I am your breath and you are my thought made manifest upon the Mother뭩 bosom. You must always seek unto the Light for him who seeks life without the Light will find death; but he who seeks the Light will find eternal life even when he walks toward death.

    He who knows not the Light shall die to find it, but he who knows the Light shall NEVER DIE.

    In Man뭩 inhaling there is life, and death trails his exhaling, yet must man breathe out to live again and deeply in that he may die.

    Know you then that I alone LIVE. I DO NOT DIE, but out of Me comes both seeming life and death.

    Life is but the inward flow of My thinking뭩 divided pulsing, and death is its outward flow.

    Know also that the divisions of My thinking are but equal halves of ONE; for I again say that I am One; and that all things which come from Me are One, divided to only appear as two.

    All things come and go from My divided thinking. I have shared with you this knowledge before but perhaps you are more prepared and in readiness for the hearing thereof. I shall repeat it until you hear and KNOW Me for you are but children who have strayed and I desire you back within my wings.

    All coming things are living things, and those which go are dead. All must pass the cycle into renewal and great gladness should be birthed in the renewal. Know that all creating things are resurrected from the dead, and dead things live again through My divided thinking arising from the seed of My thought and that which YOU ARE. Again I say that all things are bound as One through Light.

    I am forever creating My living body and destroying it in seeming death that it may live in Me to go and come again.

    The end of life in death is life뭩 new beginning stripped clean and renewed in perfection of that seed in the rebirthing of that which is borned from that seed according to its own kind. Both life and death are one in Me.

    All things are forever living and forever dying; and while they live they die; and also while they are in death they live.

    Such is My decree, My universal law, from which there is no escape for Man, or star, or grain of sand; for all things flow from Me that they may appear to Man, and return to Me, that they may disappear from his senses in the cycle of My thinking.

    I am the repetitive God. All things which flow to Me and from Me flow again both ways through Me forever in a cycle which ends not, nor has begun.

    From My right hand life flows one way and returns to me full spent as death, while full death flows the other way and returns to Me renewed as life. Around My cycle both life and death wend their seemingly opposed ways, each seeking each until the twain meet balanced at maturity, where each gives half to each.

    But when they pass that halfway point on their separate ways to Me, each then gives thought to each, and then both know, as they return to Me, that each ARE both, and both ARE One in Me.

    Death is but the seed of life.

    Death rebounds from death as life.

    From death life springs from the soil; and from life death flows even as the perfume takes leave of the rose.

    Death gives of itself to life that life may live; and likewise life gives to death that death may die.

    Life is regenerating death, and death is life degenerating.

    Light leaves your sun as death and comes to you as life; and when your death leaves you it likewise becomes new life to whom or in what, its impact quickens with your death.

    Two ways there are of breath, the inward-charging breath of life and the outward-discharging breath of death. All opposed pairs of My divided thinking pass in opposite ways along these two paths in their traversing of My cycle.

    All things which I have divided into pairs of opposites have within them both life and death, but one of these is greater than the other until they meet as equals halfway round My life-death cycle. When once they meet, and pass, they then exchange these qualities, the greater growing lesser and the lesser growing greater.

    Even though life is full when life is born, death emanates from life itself as death, and takes the opposite path toward death.

    Likewise, does life emanate from death to weaken it when death is strong, until life conquereth death to make death live as life.

    Verily I say, life cannot live without dying as it lives. Nor can death conquer life and gather aught to it but death.

    Life is My multiplying breath of compressive action; and death is My dividing, opposed breath which expands as life뭩 reaction.

    Hear Me when I again say that life and death are opposites which pass each other on My cycle going opposite ways. Life attracts life to life by its compression and death repelleth both death and life by its expansion.

    I am the interchanging point of life and death. I balance life and death; and never in their changing can either death or life outbalance death or life.

    Write that death and life are one, as the swinging pendulum is one, even though it oscillates two ways in its incessant swinging.

    He who travels East in My curved universe arrives at West as surely as he who travels West.

    Likewise, life trails the eastern road to arrive at death, while death takes the western road where life awaits to quicken death as life.

    So also does death trail the road of life to interchange with life, while life likewise trails the road of death to find itself through death.


    Naught is there in My thinking which is not My KNOWING, and naught but Life and Love are in My thinking.

    Take Man뭩 death away from him in this new day of Man. Give him eternal Life in Me by KNOWING ME IN HIM!

    Let every projection of that which is Man come into KNOWING that which I AM, that he might find solace in his knowing that I shall send unto him that which he needs to bring him again into My houses. But I repeat: He who seeks only after life without the Light will find death; but he who seeks the Light within Me will find life eternal even when he walks toward death. So be it for Man is given into his free-will that he may grow into KNOWING and I shall force him not.

    * * * * * *


    The radioactivity of the river (Columbia) water was insignificant. But the radioactivity of the river plankton was 2,000 times higher, that of the ducks eating the plankton 40,000 times higher, that of the fish 150,000 times higher. In young swallows fed on insects caught by their parents in the river, the radioactivity was 500,000 times higher and in the egg yolks of the water birds more than 1,000,000 times higher.

    From official and unofficial sources we have been assured, time and time again, that the increase in radioactivity of the air does not exceed the amount which the human body can tolerate without any harmful effects. This is just evading the problem.

    Even if not directly affected by the radioactive material in the air, we are indirectly affected through that which has fallen down, is falling down, and will fall down. We are absorbing this through radioactive drinking water and through animal and vegetable foodstuffs, to the same extent as radioactive elements are stored in the vegetation of the region in which we live. Unfortunately for us, nature hoards what is falling down from the air.

    None of the radioactivity of the air, brought into existence by the exploding of atom bombs, is so unimportant that it may not, in the long run, become a danger to us through increasing the amount of radioactivity stored in our bodies.

    What are the diseases caused by internal radiation? The same diseases that are known to be caused by external radiation.

    They are mainly serious blood diseases. If the cells in the bone marrow are damaged by radiation they will produce too few or abnormal, degenerating blood corpuscles. Both cases lead to blood diseases and, most often, to death. These were the diseases that killed the victims of X-rays and radium rays.

    It was once of these diseases that attacked the Japanese fishermen who were surprised in their vessel by radioactive ashes falling down 240 miles from Bikini after the explosion of an hydrogen bomb. With no exception, they were all saved, being strong and relatively mildly affected, through continuous blood transfusions.


    In the cases cited, the radiation came from the outside. It is unfortunately very probable that internal radiation affecting the bone marrow and lasting for years will have the same effect, particularly since the radiation goes from the bone tissue to the bone marrow.

    Not our own health only is threatened by internal radiation, but also that of our descendants. The fact is that the cells of the reproductive organs are particularly vulnerable to radiation. To the profound damage of these cells corresponds a profound damage to our descendants.

    To find out how the existing radioactive radiation has affected posterity, comparative studies have been made between the descendants of doctors who have been using X-ray apparatus for years and those of doctors who have not. Among the descendants of radiologists, a percentage of still births of 1,403 was found, while the percentage among the nonradiologists was 1,222.

    In the first group, 6.01 per cent of the children had congenital defects, while only 4.82 per cent in the second.

    It must be remembered that even the weakest of internal radiation can have harmful effects on our descendants.

    The total effect of the damage done to descendants of ancestors who have been exposed to radioactive rays will not, in accordance with the laws of genetics, be apparent in the generations coming immediately after us. The full effects will appear only 100 to 200 years later.

    We are forced to regard every increase in the existing danger through further creation of radioactive elements by atom bomb explosions as a catastrophe for the human race, a catastrophe that must be prevented under every circumstance.

    There can be no question of doing anything else, if only for the reason that we cannot take the responsibility for the consequences it might have for our descendants.

    They are threatened by the greatest and most terrible danger.

    That radioactive elements created by us are found in nature is an astounding event in the history of the earth--and of the human race. To fail to consider its importance and its consequences would be a folly for which humanity would have to pay a terrible price. When public opinion has been created in the countries concerned and among all nations, an opinion informed of the dangers involved in going on with the tests and led by the reason which this information imposes, then the statesmen may reach an agreement to stop the experiments.

    A public opinion of this kind stands in no need of plebiscites or forming of committees to express itself. It works through just being there.

    The end of further experiments with atom bombs would be like the early sun-rays of hope which suffering humanity is longing for.

    * * * * *

    New York Times, April 21st. 1957.


    An Analysis of Changed Sentiment Toward Danger of Atomic Warfare.

    PARIS, April 20--Europe is growing alarmed about nuclear bombs. The mood today has markedly changed from that of the late decade, when the United States� monopoly or predominance in nuclear power was widely regarded as assuring peace and the security of this Continent.

    Nuclear weapons are no longer considered a beneficent invention. At the very moment when the United States officially promised nuclear arms to its European allies, eighteen West German physicists joined in declaring they opposed the use of such arms by their country and would do nothing to further nuclear armament. They said current tactical nuclear weapons were as destructive as the original atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima and that their acquisition by West Germany might increase its danger.

    Europeans are becoming convinced that nuclear weapons are a menace even if there never is a nuclear war. A committee of the Atomic Scientists Association in Britain has reported that as a result of the hydrogen bombs exploded so far one person in 50,000 is likely to get cancer in the next few decades from the strontium entering his bones. This is an unproved estimate but represents a scientific judgment based on the assumption that the likelihood of cancer is proportionate to the radioactivity in the bones.

    Pending more conclusive evidence and fuller agreement among experts, many Europeans favor suspension of the bomb tests that produce radioactive 밼all-out� of greater or lesser malignancy. British statesmen find it more difficult to defend their nuclear bomb tests, which are only beginning.

    Soviet bomb tests have led to disturbing atmospheric results in Japan. After measuring the radioactive fall-out this week, Japanese scientists warned of the danger and opinion grew in favor of a ban on all nuclear tests by all nations. An official Japanese protest to Moscow brought the reply that the Soviet Union was willing to suspend the tests if the Western powers agreed.

    Thus a new effort was made, in keeping with years of Soviet propaganda, to put the blame on the West.

    Western scientists were the first to develop the atomic bomb. A Western power, the United States, was the first to use it in war. The Western alliance, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, has based its strategy on the assumption it will use nuclear weapons to meet an aggression. This decision was reasserted on Thursday by Field Marshal Viscount Montgomery, Deputy Commander in Chief of the Atlantic Forces in Europe.

    Thus the Western powers are faced with a moral and strategic dilemma that troubles the consciences of many in Europe.

    If the West foregoes use of nuclear weapons it will be hopelessly inferior on land to the Soviet Union in Europe and to Communist China in Asia. Both these powers have enormous armies that the West cannot match. The West is not even trying to match them but, as the recent British defense decision showed, is reducing armies in favor of nuclear weapons.


    But if the Western powers adhere to their policy of basing their defense on nuclear weapons in the hope of thus preventing war, they will risk playing into the hands of Soviet propaganda and causing the vast uncommitted Middle East and Far East to believe the West is responsible for a nuclear arms race.

    At the same time the Western governments probably will face growing criticism from their own peoples, who fear not only a nuclear war but even the periodic nuclear bomb tests that contaminate the atmosphere that people breathe and the plants and animals they eat.

    Western leaders have sought to limit armaments, including nuclear armaments, but have been unable to find any system of inspection to insure enforcement of any agreement. But it is urged in Europe that no such system is needed to drop bomb tests, since all such tests by the Soviet Union are immediately detected and announced in Washington.

    * * * * *

    I would like to now share with you the concern which was felt throughout the country in July, 1956 by the testimony given by Lt. General James A. Gavin before the Senate subcommittee Investigation of Air Power. Lt. General Gavin was asked by Senator James F. Duff of Pennsylvania what, in his opinion, would be the effect of hydrogen bombs dropped on Russia.

    Gavin replied that deaths would run into several hundred millions and, depending on which way the wind blew, would extend well into the Japanese, and perhaps the Philippine Island areas, or well back up into Western Europe.

    About that time it became very obvious that the U.S. was seriously thinking and planning on such a war. The Russians and other nations got busy immediately and prepared shelters for their citizens.

    That Gavin testimony brought forth this reply from Senator Mike Mansfield, of Montana: 밫he horrible conclusion given by Lt. General Gavin should make us realize that in this difficult era, with the world뭩 scientists running riot, we are faced with an uneasy peace based on the idea of mutual terror.�

    Let me give you a little picture of terror which is planned by your Elite United Nations� Global police force--the intent is to drop a nuclear bomb on an area designated as a nuclear weapons center (supposedly hidden) in Iraq. You can watch the plan build daily as they chase about the barren desert sands looking for those elusive weapons placements which originally you were told 밹ould not exist�. The proof will be in the blasting and the follow-up with �...Saddam deserved it and did this to his own people�! NO, no, no--and if the world sits still for this heinous atrocity--you deserve that which befalls you! But I tell you now--THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IS PLANNED FOR THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE. What is more painful and will not be allowed publicity world-wide (unless caught somehow in the act), the bomb and bombers will be of the doing of the U.S. and delivered by the Israelis.

    The reports we have shared with you readers are 뱋ld� for I need not speak of this day for even your non-news, controlled media have done many recent displays of toxic waste problems, etc., and we have written JOURNAL after JOURNAL pointing out the deadly escapades and plans. I felt you could look with better perspective back on 40-50 years of outlay of this deadly game at point. After reading them do you feel assured that you and your children are safe? Are you willing that it shall be tried out, knowing as you do, that the human race would be the guinea pig for the most dangerous experiment ever tried by man, AND HIS LAST ONE.

    In reading these statements you probably noticed that the small experimental plant at Arco, Idaho, blew up. It could not even be approached for six months afterwards. Accidents happen to a big plant as well as small ones--i.e, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, etc.--and many you NEVER HEAR ABOUT. The Yankee power plant will stay on line while all in charge KNOW IT IS DEADLY DEFICIENT IN ALL SAFETY AREAS.

    Does it make you feel comfortable to think that a plant like the Hanford one, or the one near New York, or Detroit, might blow? How about Chicago? Los Angeles? San Francisco? You can wipe out the entire population of New York in one blast and contaminate the entire area for thousands of years--and that is 뱎eaceful� use of nuclear power. What are you going to do with the 뱊on-peaceful� war fall-out? How many good, safe fall-out shelters do you have, America? The ignorant 밿nnocents� of the world are without any kind of shelter system--�0�, zilch, minus nothing! You are the planned expendables!

    When you think of the world concern--if you think of the world concern--and care given to protect people from the two pounds of radium, which was all the world had 60 years ago, does it make you feel comfortable to know that over 8,000 tons of much more deadly uranium salts are produced each year from a present stock pile of 600,000 tons of uranium ore? Also, do you feel that it is quite safe to continue multiplying the effects you have read about for a hundred, two hundred, three or four hundred years, which you would have to do if radioactivity is to be the next world fuel? Do you realize that the government, back in 1957, was spending $2,000,000,000 a year in atomic experiments and the amount has continued to rise astronomically--even massive sums which are hidden from you. Private industry is spending an equal amount, or more, for a dangerous and costly fuel when it could quite easily have a perfectly safe and inexpensive fuel in abundance for not more than $100,000 and a little knowledge of the true nature of electricity. Actually, the technology is perfected--it is just hidden from you.

    Before making your own decision whether or not you would vote in favor of radioactivity, read once more what Dr. Ralph Lapp said about the atom bomb tests distribution of strontium in the atmosphere. He said: 밫hat, at the present rate of H. bomb tests, if continued and probably accelerated (above or below ground), by 1962 (it is now 1991) there would be enough radioactive strontium committed to the stratosphere to produce a 100% maximum permissible amount in every person on the planet.� Do read his report with great mental concentration--or go back and reread it a couple of times--get it and read it in full several times. No other report gives much concern to what he calls 밾old up�. Again I say that your primary danger is in that stratosphere 밾old up�, and not in the 밼all out�. Dr. Lapp estimated that this 밾old up� will fall at about 10% a year. If this is true the human race could not survive, at this point, beyond another decade at the rate you are building up that level in the stratosphere. It will start falling down at great magnitudes within the next year.

    You don뭪 have to be in agreement with Dr. Lapp concerning the 10% fall to earth, for the potential of that 밾old up� is lower than the potential of a pressure ten miles up, and it is slowly expanding to still lower potential. The already too heavy 밾old up� blankets your atmosphere layer and is eating into it, irrevocably, and thus thinning your life-giving and life-protecting blue envelope--oh, and you thought it was ozone depletion? 밫hey� always give you something in the lies, do they not?

    Education about the biological effects of nuclear radiation is an absolute prerequisite if the human race is to survive. Is it already too late? Look at your diseases--look at your cancer rates. You ask us for cures to 뱎rove� who we are. We have nothing to prove to anyone--most especially Man of Earth Shan! Nothing! I do, however, suggest you start proving your intent to change, unto God, for you are at your midnight hour! We are come to bring OUR people home to safe, secure places--WHERE WILL YOU BE?

    So what of a bridge between Man and God?

    Well, the next step in the spiritual nature of man is God-Consciousness and cosmic awareness of the Light of the Divine Presence within every Man. Thousands--and then more thousands--are beginning to come into comprehension of that Inner Voice of one뭩 own Mind coming from within each. The reason for that is because the human race is still in its intellectual infancy--but it is time to awaken and grow, lest Man dies in his infancy. The Dawn of Mind-Consciousness is too recent for all Men to THINK with their Mind.

    Man-in-the-mass still senses with his body. His desires are still dominated by his senses. His concepts are still sense-based. He hurts himself with his own acts and calls it evil. He conceives a personal God with vengeful human emotions.

    All that the Master Teacher told the world about the unity of God and Man, and the location of the Mind-Kingdom within every man, has no meaning except for the very few illumined ones and the very many who now so deeply desire that illumining.

    Yes, chelas, God-Consciousness is slowly infiltrating the human race as Man knows more and more how to THINK with his Mind instead of his SENSING with his physical body. We, who know God in us, are desirous of illumining the path for you to find that Light of Inner Knowing--and when you do find it, you will then be able to say--as we have told you before--I and my Father are truly ONE--AND YOU WILL BE GIVEN INTO KNOWING ALL THINGS.

    But the bridge must be constructed. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death, precious ones. The first and last great mystery of Creation is its Creator. Second to that mystery is the eternally asked question: 밊rom where did we come to live and where do we go when we die?� This very simple question is quite easily answerable to the spiritually unfolded one who knows that which he cannot see. It has always been unanswerable to sense-dominated Man to whom the invisible universe where God dwells and rules, has no meaning, for he has no knowing beyond his sensing.

    Do you think you have heard this before? Ah so--if you only 뱓hink� you have heard it before--THEN YOU HAD BETTER HEAR IT AGAIN UNTIL YOU KNOW!

    There is a very definite bridge between God and Man. It is invisible in the vacuum of the zero stillness of God뭩 Kingdom, but it has a visible link at every point where that bridge touches the shores of the action-universe of motion. That is something which every man can understand, for he can hold the symbol of that great reality in his hand in the form of a simple seed. He has never known, however, that in the imperishable seed within that perishable acorn, which he holds in his hand, is the whole answer to where the oak trees comes from to live, and where it goes when it dies.

    Remember these words of Creator: 밙now then that I alone live. I do not die, but out of Me comes both seeming life and death.

    밚ife is but the inward flow of My thinking뭩 divided pulsing, and death is its outward flow.

    밙now thou also that the divisions of my thinking are but equal halves of One; for I again say that I am One; and that all things which come from Me are One, divided to appear as two.�

    So let us relook with a bit of renewed perception. It will be well to simplify your thinking as to what Creation really is by putting it into simple words. Creation consists of the invisible universe of Mind, which the one you called Jesus called Heaven and Man calls space, and the visible universe of motion, which Man calls matter and substance.

    There is a vast, vast difference as we have pointed out in hundreds of pages herein recently, however, in the meaning of the omnipresent 밾eaven�, which was referred to as being 뱖ithin� Man and within all things, and the meaning of 밾eaven� which Man holds up as being a place up above and apart from the earth where dead bodies and souls somehow ascend. Literature and art on your place are replete with symbolism which very vividly pictures that primitive concept. If you but enlarge your concept of the meaning of the word 밾eaven� to be that zero omnipresent vacuum, which is everywhere within and without all things, perhaps then the ages-long idea that you somehow go to 밾eaven� when you die becomes literally true. The difficult thing for Man to imagine, however, is the fact that he returns to 밾eaven� non-dimensionally, just as the dimensioned oak withdraws its huge dimensions into ultra-microscopic nothingness. That is Man뭩 difficulty. If he would but realize that his body is but the projected image of an Idea, and that Idea has no measure, it would help him greatly to understand.


    In 1957 a most important piece of information came forth and we will herein look at it in detail. An experiment at Columbia University conducted upon theories promulgated by two young Chinese physicists--Professor T.D. Lee and Professor C.N. Yang--affords an excellent example of how easily the senses can be deceived into arriving at wrong conclusions. I think it will give clarity to this whole dissertation to outline even though we have touched on it prior to this. There are still some misconceptions but the discovery was revolutionary.

    The essence of what made this discovery so revolutionary that it upset many fundamentally believed-in facts of physics lies in the conclusion that all atoms spin in the direction of their motions (meaning the direction of their axis). Now I suggest that all of you ponderers of great scientific breakthroughs--give serious attention hereto.

    What that means is that atoms or particles ejected from the north end of a 밺ecaying� atom, such as cobalt, spin in a right-handed (clockwise) direction, and those which are emitted from the south end spin in a left-handed (anti-clockwise) direction. This discovery led to the possibility that atoms acted like right and left-threaded screws, and that might eventually explain how matter is held together by some mysterious force within matter and solve the mystery of Creation.

    This cannot be 밷riefly� explained because every single premise upon which the experiment was founded is wrongly assumed to be what it is believed to be. These wrong conceptions must first be clarified. We will then explain why cobalt has given an entirely different result than carbon would give, and that sodium would have given another effect of unbalanced ejections, while sodium chloride would give a balanced effect, and tantalum would have given another effect from the one produced by cobalt. In other words, when it is shown WHY cobalt emitted a large electron from one end and a small one from the other, and it can be clearly explained WHY every single unit atom and every paired one will give different, and predictable results, it will then be easy to comprehend why the conclusions arrived at by this experiment are invalid. To begin with, the experiment itself should not have been necessary. With a true knowledge of the Nature of electricity the right results would have been predictable. To substantiate this statement we will predict other results from the same experiment with full knowledge that they will be as stated.

    I am going to give you a very 밻arthly� explanation as is already presented upon your place and as we have already discussed. Do not become bored or irritated with me, for I warn you that YOU HAVE OVERLOOKED TINY ELEMENTS IN YOUR WORK WHICH HAS DEPRIVED YOU OF SUCCESS THUS FAR. MOVE CAREFULLY WITHIN PETITION FOR UNDERSTANDING AND YOU MAY WELL BE GIFTED WITH INSIGHT BEYOND THAT WHICH YOU CAN IMAGINE.


    Step No. 1. A crystal containing cobalt nuclei was placed in a magnetic field created by current flowing through a wire coil. It was already known that the cobalt nuclei would line up in the magnetic field.

    Figure 69 indicates the wire coil, the direction of the electric current, and the position within it that the cobalt crystal is placed. The first wrongly assumed premise is that the wire coil creates a magnetic field. It creates an electric field, not a magnetic one. There are no magnetic fields in Nature. There are electric fields of curved motion, which are bounded by magnetic planes of non-motion and zero curvature. It must be borne in mind always that any expression of motion anywhere, is omnipresently repeated everywhere. The human consciousness has not quite acquired that sense of omnipresent repetition as yet but familiarity with it through TV and radar is developing it. This cobalt experiment is, therefore, not a local happening which is taking place in Columbia University and nowhere else. The electric field provides for it to happen there but the magnetic geometry of the zero universe provides for it happening universally by Nature뭩 radar system of extensions from zero points of stillness, which become mirror planes of stillness invisibly formed in space to repeat the divisions and multiplications of motion in any part of the universe to every part of it.

    The wire coil of the Columbia experiment has given no thought to the basic fact that electricity divides for the purpose of multiplying. Otherwise, the coil as made for its electric field, would be like the Fig. 70.

    I cite this fact for any experimental work done in a laboratory is valid only if it conforms with the electric current of Nature, which alone creates the universe. Any experiment, whatsoever, which DOES NOT fit within the principles of the electric current is invalid, for nothing outside of Nature can be valid.

    Step No. 2. The cylindrical coil made for the creation of an electric field does not, in any respect, conform with the electric current, which divides the stillness of cathodes into moving pairs, for the purpose of multiplying the motion of those moving pairs to create the heat and compression necessary to simulate the IDEA, which concentrated electric Mind-thinking desires to give objective expression to. The Einstein Equation properly defined this principle by the words which say that fast motion multiplies electric potential, but that principle has not been applied to the mechanics of coil making. For that reason the loops of force which cylindrical coils create, are not focussed as they would be if they followed the crystalline shape of the balanced electric current as shown in Fig. 70.

    If you will study the corner reflectors of radar, as shown in Figures 62-63, and their relation to ring projections from inert gases, and observe their spiral formation, as shown in Fig. 64, you will better comprehend the wave, which controls the construction of all matter.


    The two essentials omitted for the perfect carrying out of this experiment, up to this point, are 1--failure to conform to the working principles of the electric current, and--2--failure to conform to the omnipresence of Nature by making electrical fields to conform with the mathematics of dividing and multiplying pressures.

    Step No. 3. (I again quote from the original source of the announcement): 밫he test was based on the previously proven fact that the nucleus of the atom 멶ecays�. In the process it emits one electron and one electrino (an uncharged particle even smaller than an electron).�

    It was not necessary to prove that cobalt 밺ecays�. To decay means to disintegrate, depolarize, discharge and die. All matter does that, whether atom or man. This experiment, however, did not assist in the decay process, for it lined up the gravity shaft of cobalt with the gravity shaft of the electric field. That is a process of polarization, which divides any one electrical condition into pairs. The process of decay is an opposite effect. It ejects rings from equators, as clearly shown in Saturn--Fig. 4--and in Jupiter, Fig. 3. (See Page 40 & 41.)

    Also the statement that uncharged particles are ejected from one end is not true to Nature (good persons--some of you already picked up this little deficiency in the experiment--I jest not, I am very proud of you who are coming into recognition of KNOWING). There are no 뱔ncharged� particles in Nature. Wherever there is matter there is motion. Motion is an electric effect, which charges all matter.

    Step No. 4. According to parity, as they spun half of them should have emitted their electrons from the 뱊orth� end of the magnetic field and the other half toward the 뱒outh�. Actually far more electrons came out of the 뱒outh� end of the nuclei. By repeating the test under varying conditions, it was verified that cobalt nuclei emit electrons from one particular end. This shows that one end of the nucleus is different from the other, something never known before.

    Let us just analyze these statements a minute to see if there is right reasoning in them in accordance with the electric current. In the diagram given with the description of the experiment, large particles, labelled electrons, are being ejected from the south pole of the cobalt atom and small ones called electrinos, are being ejected from the north end. Fig. 69 is an interpretation of the diagram just mentioned, excepting that we are using only one particle. The other diagram shows three cobalt particles, oval shaped, and their respective small and large ejected particles. The names of these particles is of no import here, but the fact that one end of cobalt atoms ejects big particles, and the other ejects small particles, is most important. Also, the statement that it was never known before that one end of an atom is different from the other end is also important for it is NOT TRUE. It has been known as long as electricity has been known that each end of a polarized body is different, and all matter is polarized. Each end of a balanced atom--which means equally paired--will emit the same sized particles from each end, because polarized, or divided pairs, are male and female and belong to the red and blue sides of the spectrum. The important fact that has been OVERLOOKED IS THE FACT THAT AN UNBALANCED PARTICLE OF MATTER CANNOT EMIT EQUAL POTENTIALS FROM BOTH ENDS !

    To demonstrate this fact put a cobalt, or steel needle in the position given to the cobalt particle. You will see that both ends are different, and are not interchangeable, unless repolarized in reverse. You might better comprehend this if you lower two needles toward the center of the coil. You will find one reaching out for the north and the other reaching out for the south. Now try again with a steel or cobalt rod as long as the field. By placing it in the conical coil shown in Fig. 70, you will now see that not only are both ends different, but also the middle is different. Both ends are polarized gravity centers for high electric potential, and the middle gives no evidence of gravity, for the electric potential is zero in the middle. (In an unbalanced metal, like cobalt, the middle is a little off-center.) The reason for that is that the middle is the cathode dividing point, and the ends are anodes, which unite as one. In other words, the reason both ends are different is because one end is red--or male end--and the other is blue--or female end. Cobalt is preponderantly blue, or female. The red end of the spectrum is weak in it. Under such conditions of unbalance the polarization process could not possibly eject equal potentials.

    To better understand this take the cobalt out entirely. Only the zero of equilibrium is now there. Now turn on the current and you immediately divide that equilibrium, balanced zero into four opposite and equal pairs, all of which units are in perfect balance with their mates. The cathode is also in the exact middle instead of being off-center. That is the way Nature creates atoms. Cobalt is an unbalanced unit of a pair. It cannot be divided into equal pairs when used as a cathode.

    Now, if we place a piece of the metal cobalt between two coils like the one in Fig. 70, the middle will become the plane of highest potential and its center will 밶ttract� a needle if held toward any point of its circumference. If cobalt is thus placed in the anode position, instead of in the cathode, there will be no ejection of electrons and neutrinos from its polar ends. Instead of that, there will be ring ejections from the equatorial plane of maximum high potential, maximum heat and maximum density. We now have the decay process instead of the polarization process.

    Step No. 5. One should now be able to fully comprehend that if one attempts to divide an unbalanced element like cobalt, by polarizing it, one will obtain an unbalanced result. Carbon, for example, is a balanced dual element. It is true cube and is white, while cobalt is a distorted cube and is blue. The same experiment tried with carbon, or sodium-chloride, or potassium-bromide, would give balanced results. The ejections from both ends would be the same. If, on the contrary, sodium-iodide, or potassium-chloride is used the results would be as unbalanced as these latter pairs are unbalanced. Each of these pairs crystallize in distorted cubes while the evenly mated pairs crystallize in true cubes, like carbon.

    The familiar bar magnet, created by the electric current, will serve as a clarifying example of balance in the elements, which are all created in pairs, but are as often united as unbalanced pairs as balanced ones.

    Step No. 6. In further statements made in the description of the experiment, it is claimed that the discovery of different ends to atomic particles, and emissions of other particles from opposite ends, gives to each emitted particle 밶 spin in the direction of its motion�. As the motion of these ejected particles is claimed to be in opposite directions, the result of the discovery has 뱎roved� that motion is two-way 뱖hich means right-handed and left-handed.�

    TO EXPLAIN TO YOU HOW UTTERLY IMPOSSIBLE IT IS FOR THIS TO TAKE PLACE IN NATURE, AND AGAIN TO SHOW HOW EASILY THE SENSES CAN BE PERSUADED TO BELIEVE AS FACTS THE VERY OPPOSITE OF WHAT IS FACTUAL, WE HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE UTTER SIMPLICITY OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF OUR UNIVERSE AND LEAD UP TO A COMPREHENSION OF SUCH AN IMPOSSIBILITY. We will do this as simply and briefly as possible. In other words we will return to the electric current and compare this experiment to just one cycle of it. We, therefore, first postulate the basic fact that, in all this universe, there is only one direction to motion, but that one direction produces two opposite series of effects.

    Rain falls to the ground and rises as a vapor. That seems to be two directions. A cyclone is anti-clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere and clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere. Right-handedness and left-handedness, up and down, in and out, hot and cold, life and death, expansion and contraction, and a hundred other opposite pairs of effects are produced by one direction of motion in this pulsing universe. If we had to clarify this idea for a teenaged boy we would tell him to take a pencil and a large piece of paper, then begin drawing a closing spiral, clockwise, starting slowly from way out into space, and increasing his speed continually until he got way out into blank space again. We would tell him to keep on repeating that operation over and over again, without changing direction.

    Let us now look at this drawing, Fig. 71. Two effects have been produced in this opening-closing universe of compression-expansion--life-death--and inbreathing-outbreathing sequences. Density has been created in the direction of the center and potential has lowered in the direction of the circumferences. So, also, has heat, and speed, and high potential been created at the center and their opposites out in space. Fig. 71 is the demonstration of this fact as drawn by a child for simple understanding.

    Fig. 72 demonstrates this one direction for a two-effect principle in small scale matter. Figures 73 and 74 demonstrate the same principle in large scale matter. Nature does not have one law for atomic scale, and another for stellar scale. She has only one way of constructing matter, and that is fully covered in the electric current and the octave wave.

    Step No. 7. There is no right-handedness nor left-handedness in Nature, but its every effect causes the ILLUSION of right-handedness and left-handedness. That illusion belongs to the senses, therefore, and not to Nature. Your senses have become so fixedly accustomed to dual direction that it is difficult to explain it away, for the human understanding of omnipresent Oneness has not sufficiently unfolded as yet to make it easily comprehensible. We will endeavor to do so, however, by the use of child-primer simplicity.

    As a first step we again remind you that Nature creates everything in pairs, and that all pairs unite to form masses. The hemispheres of a sun are united pairs, for example. Try, therefore, as a first mental exercise, to image the uniting of two hemispheres of the sun, which are spinning in opposite directions. The fact that you, yourself, are right-handed and left-handed, adds to the difficulty of the subtle thing which we must explain about our universe, which has led these observers to form such conclusions. What we mean by this is that Nature is bilateral. Everything which is created is equally extended in pairs from a cathode dividing equator. The equator acts as though it were a mirror. It reflects each extended unit as two hemispheres of a sphere, which is also divided by an equator.

    Dharma, I had hoped to finish this tonight but it is so late and I have had you at this keyboard for over ten hours--I can ask no more of you today. I am in great appreciation, chela. Be at peace, for we shall get it done. When we return we shall take up with the same consideration but a second mental exercise considering your own body in light of the above. Good evening, precious ones. May the Light ever surround you in Peace and Life.


주제글 정보

Users Browsing this Thread

이 주제글은 현재 1명이 열람중입니다. (0명의 회원과 1명의 손님)

유사한 글

    By wave in forum Phoenix Journals Archives
    관련글: 7
    최신 글: 2010-01-26, 05:19
    By wave in forum Phoenix Journals Archives
    관련글: 7
    최신 글: 2010-01-26, 03:47
    By wave in forum Phoenix Journals Archives
    관련글: 12
    최신 글: 2009-11-20, 12:10
  4. 관련글: 4
    최신 글: 2009-08-30, 18:28
  5. 관련글: 9
    최신 글: 2009-08-30, 18:05

이 주제글의 글단추(태그)

글쓰기 규칙

  • 새 글 작성이 불가능함
  • 응답글 작성이 불가능함
  • 파일 첨부가 불가능함
  • 내 글 수정이 불가능함