PJ 30
CHAPTER 9
REC #2 HATONN
SUNDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1990 9:06 A.M. YEAR 4 DAY 108
Chapter II provides for participation in UNIDO. Membership is open to all States members of the United Nations or a specialized agency. Article 6 provides for withdrawal from membership, not possible now without withdrawing from the United Nations, subject to providing a reasonable period of notice. The right of withdrawing from UNIDO alone may provide useful leverage, although actual withdrawal would entail a difficult decision.
Chapter III establishes the organs of UNIDO. Article 8 specifies a General Conference composed of all members which will act upon the reports of the Board and the Director-General and determine the guiding principles and policies of the organization. Article 9 provides for the Board to be composed of 53 members elected by the Conference, with the following distribution of seats: 33 members elected from the G-77 (developing countries), 15 members elected from Group B (industralized democracies) and 5 members elected from Group D (the Soviet bloc). Article 10 establishes a Programme and Budget Committee to consist of 27 members elected by the Conference with the following distribution: 15 from the G-77, 9 from Group B, and 3 from Group D.
Chapter IV delineates the process for approval of the program of work and the regular budget (i.e., the budget expenditures to be met from assessed contributions) and the operational budget (i.e., budget expenditures to be met from voluntary contributions). Article 14 stipulates that the Director-General shall prepare and submit a draft work program, regular budget and operational budget to the Board through the Committee. The Committee will consider the Director-General뭩 proposals and make recommendations to the Board by a two-thirds majority vote of those present and voting. The Board will examine the Director General뭩 proposals and the recommendation of the Committee and adopt the program of work, regular budget and operational budget, for submission to the Conference, by a two-thirds majority of those present and voting. The Conference will approve the submission of the Board by a two-thirds majority vote of those present and voting. The Conference may make no decision or amendment involving expenditures unless the Committee and the Board have had an opportunity to act as indicated above. By commanding more than a third of the votes in the Board and the Committee, the major donor States (i.e., Groups B and I), which share a common desire to keep United Nations agency budgets to a reasonable level, will be able to block work programs and budgets of which they disapprove, if they act together.
Article 15 provides that the scale of assessments for members shall be established by the Conference by a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting, upon a recommendation of the Board adopted by a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting. The Board뭩 recommendation is to be based on a draft prepared by the Committee. The Constitution thereby provides a mechanism for the major donors as a group to veto a scale of assessments which they disapprove. Article 15 also stipulates that the scale of assessments shall be based to the extent possible on the scale most recently employed by the United Nations and no member shall be assessed more than 25 percent of the regular budget.
Chapter VI covers legal matters. Article 23 provides for amendments, with special, stringent provisions for amendments to financial articles. Financial amendments must be approved by two-thirds majorities of the Board and Conference respectively and must be ratified by three-fourths of the Members States. This provision protects the blocking more than a third of the votes which major donors command in the Committee and the Board.
**(H: Remember what I told you--on the UN level, countries of the world are called UN뭩 뱒tates�.)**
Article 25 stipulates that the Constitution shall enter into force when at least eighty States that deposited instruments of ratification notify the Secretary General of the United Nations that they have agreed, after consultations among themsleves, that the Constitution shall enter into force. However, for States that had deposited instruments of ratification but did not participate in such notification, the Constitution shall come into force on such later date as they choose.
The practical effect of the entry into force provisions is that the Constitution will not enter into force without the agreement and participation of major donors, including the United States. Once the Senate has given its advice and consent to ratification, this provision will afford the United States a strong position to ensure that the basic concerns of the United States, such as budgetary restraint, are taken into account. ***(H: Oh sure! And who else is going to be sick besides ME?)***
Article 27 states that no reservations may be made to the Constitution.
A major problem in the constitutional negotiations was to balance the desire of major contributing countries for control over the regular budget with the insistence by developing countries that funding for technical assistance activities continue to be available on an assured basis. Under current arrangements, a portion of UNIDO뭩 activities in the field of technical assistance is financed by assessments from the regular budget of the United Nations. Under Annex II of the Constitution, 6% of the regular budget of UNIDO will be set aside for technical assistance activities which have heretofore been financed by assessed contributions to the United Nations budget. The six percent figure sets a constitutional ceiling on the portion of the new organization뭩 regular budget which can be devoted to technical assistance. All other technical assistance activities must be financed by voluntary contributions. Since the United States together with the other major contributing countries will have more than a third of the votes in the Board, which must approve the regular budget by a two-thirds majority vote, we will have substantial influence on the overall figure with regard to which the 6% techincal assistance figure will be calculated and, therefore, over the absolute amount of technical assistance expenditures from the regular budget.
The combined effect of the 6 percent ceiling, the major donors having more than a blocking third of the votes, and the withdrawal provisions will provide the United States with much greater capacity than presently exists to ensure that regular budget funds for technical assistance are used for programs which we believe should qualify for such funding. In this connection, the United States representative to the Constitutional Conference placed on the record our view that technical assistance financed by assessments, 뱈ust fill gaps which would be difficult for the UNDP, with its country specific focus, or other voluntary funds to fill. Specifically, such technical assistance would deal with emergency situations and financial activities that primarily benefit the entire international community, not a single country.�
There has been growing recognition in UNIDO of the need to achieve a true consensus on development questions if UNIDO is to cope effectively with development problems. At the same time, there has been growing recognition within the United States of the need for the United Nations to be more responsive to our basic programmatic and budgetary concerns, especially in light of the large United States assessed contributions. The Constitution of UNIDO is a product of both of these movements. It gives an already existing institution a new mechanism of decision-making which provides special recognition of the essential role of major contributors, including the United States. In this way, it is truly a precedent setting document for the United Nations system which deserves our earnest and rapid support.
The other agencies most concerned, the Department of Labor, the Agency for International Development, and the Department of Commerce, have no objection to ratification of the Constitution. I hope that you will ask the Senate to consider the Constitution and give its advice and consent to ratification as soon as possible.
Respectfully submitted,
William Clark.
Let us herein repeat the
PREAMBLE
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION
The States parties to this Constitution,
In conformity with the Charter of the United Nations,
Bearing in mind the broad objectives in the resolutions adopted by the sixth special session of the General Assembly of the United Nations on the establishment of a New International Economic Order, in the UNIDO Second General Conference뭩 Lima Declaration and Plan of Action for Industrial Development and Co-operation, and in the resolution of the seventh special session of the General Assembly of the United nations on Development and International Economic Cooperation,
Declaring that:
It is necessary to establish a just and equitable economic and social order to be achieved through the elimination of inequalities, the establishment of rational and equitable international economic relations, implementation of dynamic social and economic changes and the encourgaement of necessary structural changes in the development of the world economy.
***(H: Regional Government is a component of the structural changes.)***
Industrialization is a dynamic instrument of growth essential to rapid economic and social development, in particular of developing countries, to the improvement of the living standards and the quality of life of the peoples in all countries, and to the introduction of an equitable economic and social order.
It is the sovereign right of all countries to achieve their industrialization, and any process of such industrialization must conform to the broad objectives of self-sustaining and integrated socio-economic development, and should include the appropriate changes which would ensure the just and effective participation of all peoples in the industrialization of their countries.
As international co-operation for development is the shared goal and common obligation of all countries it is essential to promote industrialization through all possible concerted measures including the development, transfer and adaptation of technology on global, regional and national, as well as on sectoral levels.
All countries, irrespective of their social and economic systems, are determined to promote the common welfare of their peoples by individual and collective actions aimed at expanding international economic co-operation on the basis of sovereign equality, strengthening of the economic independence of the developing countries, securing their equitable share in total world industrial production and contributing to international peace and security and the prosperity of all nations, in conformity with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.
Mindful of these guidelines,
Desiring to establish, within the terms of Chapter IX of the Charter of the United Nations, a specialized agency to be known as the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) (hereinafter referred to as the 밢rganization�), which shall play the central role in and be responsible for reviewing and promoting the co-ordination of all activities of the United Nations system in the field of industrial development, in conformity with the responsiblities of the Economic and Social Council under the Charter of the United Nations and with the applicable relationship agreements,
Hereby agree to the present Constitution.
***(H: By any label, this means 뱒haring the wealth.
I see no alternative other than to pursue this subject in this manner. Regional Government is a component of the structural changes. Futher, you may not know it but in 1945 the U.N. Charter was proclaimed law of the land!
Oh, no belief herein?)***
CHAPTER I.--OBJECTIVES AND FUNCTIONS
ARTICLE 1
OBJECTIVES
The primary objective of the Organization shall be the promotion and accleration of industrial development in the developing countries with a view to assisting in the establishment of a new internationl economic order. The Organization shall also promote industrial development and cooperation on global, regional and national, as well as on sectoral levels. And so it goes - - - -.
NEW WORLD ORDER
Treaty #97-19 IS A CONSTITUTION. This constitution is only one of many constitutions that the United Nations has 밿n force� upon the United States, causing your once free people to be merged with the communist nations of the world. This is the basis upon which President George Bush and the U.S. State Department hinge their authority for converting the United States system of government from a Constitutional Republic into a segment of the international socialist world government: THE NEW WORLD ORDER!
When asked about 밅onstitutionality of that which he is doing�, Mr. Bush smiled to the press and all the world and said, 밒 know all of my rights within the Constitution; I also know what Presidents before me have done and �..� This speech was given only two days ago just after ringing the death knell of your 밚iberty Bell�!
The treaty discussed herein is in force, right now, world-wide, having been enacted on behalf of the American People, who not only DO NOT KNOW that this treaty exists, much less the serious changes that it makes in your lives as the treaty helps overthrow the United States Constitution. Consent of the governed has never been granted to permit such destructive treaties and changes nor will it be easy and probable that you can change of it.
Some two centuries ago your forefathers engineered the best form of government that could ever be created by man as it conforms to the natural law, places limits on the power that man can exercise over his fellow man, and safeguards your natural rights, which come as an endowment from the Creator. By the way, this also includes the right of the people to keep and bear arms--which is also being removed from you.
The P.P.B.S. (Program, Planning, and Budgeting System) which plays an active part in this scenario, is an accounting system but NOT an ordinary accounting system. It is a computerized command and control system, based upon predetermined goals and objectives. It is in operation in the United States in order to socialize the American people and their government in all the economic, social and political aspects of human endeavor. Government funding is granted only when recipients comply to given management performance.
RECOURSES? Yes, fortunately there are--I wonder if you will take action? There is a principle in international law by which treaties can be nullified: Rebus Sic Stantibus. If you fail to stand against these intrusion to your sovereignty, your independence, your right to keep and bear arms, then you, as individuals, as a state, and as a nation, are ruined!
IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT!
Along with the other information, take this to your State Representatives. It is probable that he is not versed in INTERNATIONAL LAW and will not know how to proceed to nullify these disastrous treaties which are the reason why your guns, etc., are being taken away from you, as well as giving of your armed forces into a communist United Nations under a permanent arrangement.
Tell him/her that there is ample reason to void the disarmament law, and the INF treaty which has already been signed. You can stop the additional and worse treaties which the state department and the president have already worked out for you, by knowing how to proceed.
Your Representative will find the PREMIER PRINCIPLE of International Law in Black뭩 Law Dictionary. The page number, definition and documentation are reproduced below. IT IS THE HIGHEST REASON IN RANK FOR VOIDING A TREATY. THE PRINCIPLE IS CALLED:
REBUS SIC STANTIBUS
IT MEANS THAT 밫HE SITUATION HAS CHANGED�. THIS SET OF PAPERS HAS BEEN GIVEN TO DOCUMENT WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING TO THE UNITED STATES AND TO GIVE YOU PRINCIPLES IN LAW WHICH WILL ASSIST YOU TO PROCEEED TO ARREST THE EVIL!
Blacks Law Dictionary: REBUS SIC STANTIBUS: On Page 1432 it gives the definition as follows: At this point of affairs; in these circumstances. A name given to tacit conditions. Said to attach to all treaties, that they should cease to be obligatory, so soon as the state of facts and conditions upon which they were founded has substantially changed.
Documentation:
Taylor International Law, Section 394; 1 Oppenheim International Law, Section 550; Gotius, Chapter XVI, Section XXV.
What your Representative needs to know is that there is more to the treaties than what meets the eye....more than the states and citizens are aware. The people have been lied to about the 뱎eace� program. They were not told that it meant giving away their armed forces and their own personal firearms. The true nature of the treaties was denied them. They were not told that the National Security and the security of the 50 states would be endangered. They were not told that they were being restructured for world government under a communist set of operating documents. Now that they know the truth the situation has changed! This knowledge is grounds for nullification of the treaties. It is the Duty of the States to see that the Constitution is enforced as well as the Bill of Rights. It takes ONLY ONE STATE TO FORCE THE SUPREME COURT TO RULE ON THE ISSUE. IF THE RULING COMES DOWN UNFAVORABLE, THE ONLY RECOURSE IS TO REPEAL. TO REPEAL TAKES THRITY-EIGHT (38) STATES TO OVERRIDE THE SUPREME COURT. IF THE ATTEMPT IS NOT MADE, YOUR GOVERNMENT IS IRRETRIEVABLY GONE! WHEN THE SECOND AMENDMENT GOES, ALL OF THE AMENDMENTS WILL GO BECAUSE IT IS THE KEYSTONE AMENDMENT. THIS INCLUDES THE RIGHT TO OWN LAND AND TO VOTE FOR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES. ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES WILL FIND THEMSELVES IN CONFLICT WITH THE MILITARY GOVERNMENT THAT WILL SUPERSEDE THEM! THE USE OF DUAL-SPEAK, (ALSO CALLED DUAL-USE) SOPHISTRY AND LEGER DEMAIN STRATEGIES WERE APPLIED TO FOOL THE PEOPLE INTO INACTION. THE PEOPLE ARE THE ULTIMATE POWER. THE EVIL BEING DONE IS WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED. YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT WAS WRITTEN IN PERPETUITY AND WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS DOING IS AGAINST THE LAW. THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER WAS SLAPPED ONTO YOUR COUNTRY AS A 밫REATY�, ALSO! SINCE IT IS CAUSING ALL THE DAMAGE, IT SHOULD BE GOTTEN RID OF, ALSO, BY REBUS SIC STANTIBUS!!!
Chela, you need a break and this is probably mind-shattering enough to cause need for digestion assistants. The clock is running out for you precious children of the lie--the ones in charge of your nations know exactly that which they do. IF YOU DO NOT ACT TO COUNTER THIS THING, YOU WILL SIMPLY BE ABSORBED AND THE GAME FINISHED! SO BE IT. MAY GOD WALK WITH YOU FOR YOU LOST YOUR WAY. SALU.
Hatonn to clear and move to stand-by. Saalome�
PJ 30
CHAPTER 10
REC #1 HATONN
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1990 6:40 A.M. YEAR 4 DAY 110
TODAY뭆 WATCH
In the Light of the Love of the Universe, I come to commune. In service unto you little Doubting Thomases. Hatonn present.
December 3rd came and went and nothing happened??!!? Where were you?
From where I sat, I saw five space missiles sent up. I saw you effort once again, in America, to launch a spy/sensor satellite system--which by the way, was again prevented from its appointed task. I saw Japan place a 뱂ournalist� aboard a Russian spacecraft to monitor independently that which you ones planned to do--if you managed to do it. I watched the 밪iberian Express� move into cities and areas of the Midwest and bring 밨ECORD� BREAKING snow and ice to Chicago--밬nseasonable�, they said and further pronounced that if this continues, it will be a long hard winter with 밼uel� shortage for heating. I saw Miami erupt in riots because of your injustice system. I watched Gen. Powell go to Great Britain. I saw two massive planes collide in Detroit while witnesses said 뱒omething� flew past the wing prior to the accident. I saw a deep earthquake in Mt. Fuji which vented ash all the way to the surface--some fifty miles from the cauldron. I witnessed tides higher than recorded prior. I watched Israel pronounce intent for war over the upcoming Iraq/U.S. meetings. I watched President Bush give away Billions of Dollars from you nice U.S. taxpayers to Brazil in free-trade and aid. I watch Argentina erupt in response to Bush뭩 visit there this day--where he will give a rotten government more billions of your dollars. I watched as Saddam Hussein agreed to release 3,000 Russian nationals by Thursday--IF RUSSIA DOES THIS OR THUS. What about the other 6,000 Russian military instructors and advisers?
I watched Saddam Hussein send a bill (statement) to England for costs incurred for housing 밐ostages� in the nice hotel in Baghdad ALSO WATCHED AS ENGLAND AGREED, WITHOUT COMMENT, TO PAY IT.
NEXT I WATCHED WHAT IS THE MOST HEINOUS DISRESPECTFUL DECEIVING OF A NATION THAT I HAVE YET WITNESSED. YOUR WONDROUS PRESIDENT WHO WOULD BE KING OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER HAS NOW CALLED UP SO MANY RESERVES THAT IF HE CALLS MORE HE WILL NEED TO CALL A NATIONAL EMERGENCY! THAT IS WHAT THE WHOLE THING IS ABOUT, CHELAS!!!!
Once Mr. Bush can call a National Emergency--all Emergency Regulations can be put into service, from closing your banks to removing all of your Bill of Rights--remember those writings of weeks ago? Funny thing--Mr. Greenspan of the Federal Reserve did exactly that which I told you last week--he has lowered the reserve required by Banks!
How much more do you want regarding yesterday and things that didn뭪 happen? Do you count your blessings or do you moan and groan that disaster did not strike poor New Madrid--well, dear hearts, the week isn뭪 finished, is it? I suggest you pay closer attention to California--you did have a quake in California yesterday worthy of media mention. So be it, I am not going to do all your homework for you but since you can뭪 see into the cosmos or even the limited distance to your own spacecraft whose equipment 밺oesn뭪 work� I would suggest you should be objecting to the multi-billion dollar toys that don뭪 ever work!
Oh, by the way--what about the sur-tax 밠r. Read My Lips� is going to place on all you nice taxpayers to go with that nickle a gallon gas tax? Oh, its the one that is going to pay for this Middle East war! You know, the one like the one used in Vietnam!
Now, I am going to shatter a lot of balloons. You see, Satan has to wear a clue, no matter how faint or subtle--you have to be alert. I am going to write something herein from your own Newsweek magazine from Dec. 3, 1990!
Quote:
EXCLUSIVE: WHERE ARE THE TROOPS?
It뭩 the case of the 몀issing� military presence. Since Operation Desert Shield began, the Pentagon has given regular updates on Iraq뭩 military buildup in Kuwait. In late August it reported that some 150,000 troops and up to 1,500 tanks were in Kuwait. In mid-September it said there were 265,000 Iraqi troops and 2,200 tanks in Kuwait and southern Iraq.
Now, Newsweek has been told, some American experts are puzzled by a set of five Soviet satellite pictures of eastern Kuwait and southern Iraq that show little or no Iraqi military presence. ABC News bought the photos, shot in mid-September, from the Soviet commercial satellite agency Soyuz-Karta. But the network finds them so bewildering it won뭪 air them.
To analyze the photos, ABC called on two experts: George Washington University professor Peter Zimmerman (a nice Zionist surname), a member of the U.S. Arms Control Agency in the Reagan Administration, and a former Defense Intelligence Agency photo analyst. When the pair looked at the shots, they were astounded, 밯e turned to each other and we both said, 멦here뭩 nothing there�,� Zimmerman recalls. They found no trace of an Iraqi military presence anywhere in Kuwait. In fact, all they could see, in crystal-clear detail, was the U.S. buildup in Saudi Arabia.
When questioned, a Pentagon spokesman said the military 뱒ticks by its numbers�.
There is no definitive explanation for the mystery. An ABC spokesperson speculated that perhaps poor photo resolution was the problem or that the Iraqi buildup had been expertly camouflaged.AND HOW WAS YOUR WEEK?
Do you ones have a clear-cut picture of how large (in population) is Iraq? Well, it has some 17 million people--THAT, DEAR ONES, IS ABOUT THE SIZE (A BIT LESS POPULATED) THAN GREATER LOS ANGELES!
This is a continual question from you who have listened to suggestions. 밯hat creative steps can a company take to prepare for these uncertain times of possible war and economic disaster?�
I shall simply ask Dharma to reprint Lewis Laughlin뭩 response to the same question.
A TALE OF 2 COMPANIES:
In the not too distant past, times were much like they are now. You probably remember a time in the 1970뭩 when times were tumultuous and recession or even depression seemed almost imminent. During these times there were two companies that are representative of many during that time.
One company did what it could to prepare, It cut spending and used all of the conventional methods but that뭩 about where the preparation ended. The company had some assets that were valuable. Unfortunately, that company doesn뭪 have those assets today--in fact, the owners of that company don뭪 have the company today.
You see, when times got tough, the company뭩 creditors moved in and took the assets away. The company fell victim to economic hard times.
Then there was the other company. In addition to the conventional steps that the first company took, this company took some creative action. This particular company also had certain valuable assets and it still has them today. Here뭩 what they did...
The company got heavily in debt to another company꿬t borrowed heavily and used all of it뭩 assets as collateral for the debt. A strange way to prepare for possible hard times you say--yes it was. The catch is that the owners of that company also owned the creditor--the company that was in debt and the company that it was in debt to were controlled by the same people.
So, even if creditors wanted to move in on the assets of the company, they could not. Not without paying off the secured creditor first...and the secured creditor was controlled by the same people.
This company was recession proofed--depression proofed--judgment proofed. The company was prepared!
The strategy that the prepared company implemented came to be known as the 밯arbucks/Red Inc. strategy�.
END QUOTE.
You can do it too and in times like these, NOW would be none too soon.
A WORD TO THE WISE!!! NOW IS THE TIME! IT IS ALSO THE TIME TO PUT YOUR EXTRA INVESTMENT MONEY TO WORK. YOU CAN COVER YOUR 밅ONTRIBUTIONS� IN TWO WAYS--I.E. AS WITH THE PHOENIX INSTITUTE AND THE 밅ONTRIBUTION� WILL BE COVERED BY THE COLLATERAL OF PURE GOLD! THE GOVERNMENT IS READY TO PULL THE NOOSE CLOSED. IS EVERYTHING GUARANTEED AND PERFECTION? DO YOU LIVE ON THE MOON? NO, YOU LIVE ON EARTH WHICH IS GETTING READY TO GO OUT OF BUSINESS AND THERE WILL BE NO PERFECTION AND GUARANTEES. I SUGGEST YOU GET IN TOUCH WITH THE PUBLISHER AND FIND OUT WHAT YOU CAN DO, AND OBERLI WILL ASSIST YOU--I CANNOT GIVE YOU MORE. BUT, THE TIME FOR DILLY/DALLY IS FINISHED FOR ALL PRACTICAL PURPOSES UNLESS YOU ONES GET UP OFF YOUR ASSETS (INTENDED ANY WAY YOU WISH TO ACCEPT IT) AND CHANGE THINGS. SO BE IT.
How many of you realize that a war still rages in Burma? In fact, how many of you know that Burma is not Burma? It is Myanmar (Burma뭩 official name since mid-1989--now that would confuse you 뱇istening� public, would it not?) At this point this war is the longest-running insurgency in the world. Well, people are maimed and die in that war and mostly it is over drugs and utilizes the most modern weapons, compliments of the U.S. and the Communists. There are already over 250,000 well-armed troops--I suggest you keep at least one eye open and on this little Myanmar.
Now, let us look at what the press is attributing to little Israel. Well, they fear things will get a lot worse before they get worse. The picture being thrust upon you unsuspecting world spectators is one of economic and social strains. WHY? Nothing should have changed in Israel as they have 밺eliberately kept a low profile in the Gulf crisis�. They claim to now worry that Saddam will be given a face-saving way to escape a knockout blow and emerge as an even more dangerous Arab hero. New U.S. arms sales to Saudi Arabia and President Bush뭩 meeting with Syria뭩 Hafez Assad add to Israeli disquiet, even more so given the overall chill in U.S.-Israeli relations. (This action is taken in EVERY similar circumstance to fool you the people.) 밫he meeting between Bush and Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir on December 11 should allay some concerns...�, it is suggested!
Now, I shall ask Dharma to reprint a section from U.S. News and World Report:
�....At home, Arab-Israeli enmity is deepening in the wake of the Temple Mount killings and a surge in Palestinian guerrilla attacks along the border. A clampdown on West Bank-Gaza workers entering Israel has, in effect, re-established the 밎reen Line� separating Israel from occupied Arab land, creating a fresh pool of unemployed and volatile Palestinians. The massive influx of Soviet immigrants threatens to overwhelm Israel뭩 economy. As many as 1 million are expected in the next three to four years, the equivalent of the U.S. absorbing 55 million. Yet so far only 10,000 of 45,000 planned housing units have been started, and even with the latest 5 percent tax hike the country will have to borrow as much as $30 BILLION abroad. Shamir will ask Bush for an additional $4 BILLION in aid to help cover resettlement costs.
밯ell�, you ask, 밒sn뭪 peaceful coexistence within secure borders with Arab neighbors the historic aim of Israel?� No, no and no. The Middle East has been in constant and unHoly turmoil since the instant of founding of Israel. This is directly attributable to Israeli policy.
The basis of Israel뭩 foreign policy is the attainment of the XX dream of Eretz Yisrael--Greater Israel--which encompasses most of the present Arab states--and that, dear ones, is a LOT OF TERRITORY. MOST COINCIDENTALLY, THIS TERRITORY ALSO INCLUDES THE GREATEST CONCENTRATION OF MINERAL WEALTH IN THE WORLD, THE OIL FIELDS OF SAUDI ARABIA.
By the way, how many of you REALLY realize what has happened in Saudi Arabia? You believe that the U.S. has sent hundreds of thousands of your troops to keep Iraq from invading Saudi Arabia? YOU--YOU, THE U.S. of A. simply invaded Saudi Arabia instead!! Not only did you invade Saudi Arabia but you have occupied the territory!! SO BE IT!
Israel feels its expansionist dream can best be realized by creating total chaos in the Middle East, much as the Serbian nationalists under the domination of the Austro-Hungarian Empire felt that they could achieve nationhood only in the wake of a total breakdown of the European political landscape. Thus, the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand and the resultant tragedy known as World War I, as we just covered day before yesterday.
Israel cannot, however, yet do it alone and doesn뭪 need to do so. Although mightily equipped for war, thanks to the beneficence of its patron the U.S.--that cannot hope to stand up to the superpower challenge. Thus, Israel has turned to a most unlikely ally--THE SOVIET UNION! Ah, the plot thickens, does it not?
Israel and the Soviet Union will be the ultimate winners of any U.S. war with Iraq in the Middle East. While it has all but slid by unnoticed during the continuing crisis in the Middle East, as planned, there has been a renewal of friendly relations between Israel and the Soviet Union and considerable diplomatic travel back and forth between Moscow and Jerusalem--and darn it all, you nice U.S. taxpayers pay all the travel expenses FOR BOTH SIDES.
The content of top-secret Israeli-Soviet talks has been confined to a small circle of insiders with the two governments and the 밼riends of a Greater Israel� in Washington. But they undoubtedly concern how the Israelis and Soviets will divide the spoils of war between Iraq and the U.S. and the latter뭩 hodge-podge collection of small, ill-trained and ill-equipped 뱈ultinational� allies.
The American public, at least, is becoming a bit confused as to WHY the U.S. would risk the deaths of tens of thousands of its young soldiers in a war with Iraq. The administration has not even defined a reason for confronting Iraq, but has instead offered various conflicting justifications that have left the public even more confused.
The people, however, are becoming a bit aware that the international oil companies and bankers are already greedily lining their pockets with war profiteering--at your own expense.
What they don뭪 know is that the two major malefactors in an American war with Iraq--Israel and the Soviet Union--already have plans in place for seizing the oil-rich Middle East for themselves. Now, isn뭪 this just wondrous and puzzling intrigue?
Israel, in cooperation with the Soviet Union, is positioning itself to seize the great Saudi Arabian oil fields in the aftermath of a bloody confrontation which the Israelis are prepared to ignite themselves, if necessary. The sparking of war by Israel would not require any tremendous effort, just as it takes little skill as an arsonist to touch off a blaze in a room filled with gas-soaked rags.
Let there be no mistake, chelas, the Israelis are not friends of the U.S. and have no qualms about killing young American servicemen. THERE IS NO HONOR AMONG SATAN뭆 SERVANTS, LITTLE SLEEPYHEADS!
The Israelis have blatantly displayed their treachery on two glaring occasions in recent history.
During the Six-Day War of 1967, Israeli air and naval forces knowingly attacked the American reconnaissance ship, the USS Liberty--remember the story? Thirty-four American sailors were sent to their graves and more than a hundred others were injured and maimed after being bombed, machine-gunned, torpedoed and napalmed. Israeli gunners even shot up their life rafts--please don뭪 be forgetting this.
The Mossad purposely did not inform the U.S. intelligence officials that terrorists planned to bomb the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon, in October, 1983. As a result, 241 young American Marines were blown up.
So, you see--America still needs a first strike nuclear holocaust against the Soviets in order to head up this 밡ew World Order� without opposition or struggle, for top-level control.
The Mossad has a most active spy operation, known as 밇l�, in place in America to steal U.S. secrets and plans--you know, like launching sensor spy satellites and shuttle programs, etc. and to start a war is indeed very easy. Let us just consider, what if---. What if a group of Palestinian terrorists (or pretend ones)--say, Israelis dressed as Palestinian terrorists, or a whole group posing as Palestinian terrorists, crosses into Israel from Jordan and perpetrates some terrorist act in Israel. (Oh yes, this is exactly what the Mossad is best at.) The Israelis react by invading Jordan to attack the terrorist camps. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein moves to aid Jordan, and the United States reacts by moving against Iraq from Saudi Arabia.
While U.S. forces are pinned down by Iraqi defenses along the Saudi-Kuwaiti border, Israeli armored forces plunge through Jordan and deep into Saudi Arabia from the west, pushing ultimately to the sea.
Meanwhile, U.S. forces are held back and severely mauled by Iraqi defenses, including their use of chemical and biological warfare weapons.
America뭩 current Arab allies on the front lines would quickly pull out of the fight, considering Israel뭩 attack in Saudi Arabia a far worse danger than Iraq.
Meanwhile, again, U.S. forces are being horribly shredded by Iraqi forces, who are even now still being supplied and trained by the Soviets (remember those advisers mentioned above?) and making matters worse, America뭩 supposed Arab allies, such as Egypt and Syria, defect from the 뱈ultinational force� due to the Israeli intrusion--it appears that now the Soviets have several options or windows of opportunity.
As weak as the Soviet Union is internally, its army is still numerically superior to the remaining Western forces in Europe (we will also talk of the vulnerability of Europe presently). It no longer needs to fear the forces of NATO, with most of the best U.S. troops and armor having been sent to Saudi Arabia from Europe. The Soviets have non-aggression pacts and various peace pacts signed with European NATO countries--particularly Germany and France.
The Soviets would be free to move against Iran and its rich oil fields, which they have long coveted. Or they could treacherously attack Iraq from the rear, seizing Iraqi and possibly even the disputed Kuwaiti oil fields.
Now how could this scenario end? It ends with Israel and the Soviet Union sharing the great Middle East oil fields. The American Army is effectively destroyed--WHICH, BEING IN SAUDI ARABIA--HAS LEFT THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TOTALLY OPEN AND VULNERABLE (COULD YOUR PRESIDENT HAVE ACTUALLY KNOWN THIS?), AND THE SOVIETS WIN THEIR ULTIMATE VICTORY IN THEIR DECADES-LONG STRUGGLE WITH THE U.S., WITHOUT FIRING THAT PROVERBIAL 밪HOT� IN ANGER AT U.S. FORCES.
Israel, in turn, realizes the ZIONIST dream of Eretz Yisrael, with a hammerlock on the Western World뭩 major producing oil reserves. The Soviets, already the world뭩 largest oil producer, realize even greater fortunes and monopolistic power from Middle East oil and achieve their long-sought desire to be linked by land to the Persian Gulf.
And what of the U.S.? Its military is wrecked in the Middle East, its economy in a shambles, and its major source of badly needed foreign oil cut off, is no longer a major world power.
Congress, completely dominated by the Israeli lobby, will not raise so much as a whimper in protest. The President, his political power cut off at the knees as a result of the U.S. defeat, will be in no position to challenge the resulting status quo (exactly according to plans for the 밼eet of clay�). The media pundits, such as W. Safire, A. Rosenthal and W. Buckley, will congratulate Israel on its 뱒tunning victory�.
Dear ones--THIS SCENARIO IS ON THE DRAWING BOARD, SET UP AND READY FOR ACTION AND YOU ONES WON뭈 EVEN KNOW WHAT HIT YOU BECAUSE IT IS PREFERABLE, FOR SEVERAL REASONS, NOT TO BRING THE WAR INTO THE U.S. IN A TERRIBLY DESTRUCTIVE MANNER SO THAT THE U.S. CAN BE USED LATER.
Worse, the above as outlined is coordinated with an intended terrorist campaign in the country, which will have a mortal effect on the U.S. dollar, spelling the end of America뭩 leading role in the world뭩 financial community, and economic and civil chaos in your country.
And guess what as an added little humorous dividend? You American taxpayers will be forced to pay foreign aid to rebuild the devastated nation of Iraq!
WHAT OF POOR BAGHDAD SUFFERING?
Let us look into that little misconception also.
One of the most visited cities on Earth at this time is Baghdad, the capital of Iraq. It is teeming with foreigners. All hotel rooms are occupied, and all of the flights in and out of the international airport are full. Hence, one of the reasons for 밷illing� England for her 밾ostages� in the hotel--this is occupying rooms which could otherwise be rented.
In fact, there are now more foreigners in Baghdad than ever before in HISTORY! There are many news people from the international media, although one would not know it from the paucity of coverage of the Iraqi side in this country.
Visiting foreign dignitaries arrive daily to meet with the Iraqi officials to try to arrange the release of their nationals. Also, relatives of those being held are coming in droves to attempt personal diplomacy on behalf of their loved ones. Nations represented by visitors just in recent days include China, New Zealand, Japan and all the Western European nations.
But, the greatest number of foreigners in Baghdad are businessmen making profitable deals to beat the un-imposed sanctions. If Baghdad were to be bombed by your forces today, there would be a holocaust not only of Iraqi citizens but of foreigners from all over the world, as well. LOOK AT THAT WHICH IS NOT SO OBVIOUS, CHELAS.
DHARMA--CLOSE THIS NOW!
Tags, 상세검색
응답: 플레이아데스 컨넥션 - 피닉스호의 귀환, PLEIADES CONNECTION--RETURN OF THE PHOENIX. " Dedication & Introduction
