PJ#045, THE MOTHER OF ALL WEBS, WHO GOTCHA!, VOL. III

PJ 45

CHAPTER 3

REC #1 HATONN

WED., FEB. 19, 1992 9:14 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 186

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1992

TODAY'S WATCH

ISRAEL/LEBANON

Please do not take the immediate situation lightly wherein Israel is deliberately taking out leaders of the opposition along with women and children. This war is INTENDED TO ESCALATE into widespread encounter along with hap-penings in the U.S. Government election campaigns. If it continues to look bad for the controller in the U.S. it will be-come "nuclear". HOWEVER, IF YOU ARE TO RECLAIM YOUR GOVERNMENT AND SALVAGE YOUR PLANET-- YOU MUST PRESS AHEAD AGAINST THIS MASSIVE CONSPIRACY.

NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARIES

You have a chance if you latch onto it like glue. It is shown that "the people" are desiring change with the support of Buchanan and YOU CAN SWEEP THE NATION IF YOU PAY AT-TENTION RIGHT NOW TO THAT WHICH IS SET IN MO-TION. As a matter of fact, chelas--even Jerry Brown of Cali-fornia has the right idea for turning things around.

So what of Gritz? Do I abandon Gritz? NO, NO AND NO. LOOK AT YOUR OPPORTUNITIES HEREIN! The POINT of this maneuver is to get more than one dedicated worker into the slots--not just one to stand alone against a fixed and bribed Congress. Each candidate, including Gritz, will have some flaws in intent and areas yet to be uncovered for them in the revealing of the lies and criminals in office NOW. I remind you--to not be distracted--Bush plans on a secure position, beyond Criminal indictment on past actions, in the United Nations. He knows he will fall if elected to the Presidency. He shouts he will no longer be "kinder and gentler to Buchanan but will show him who is who!" I believe his words to be. This is such a psychological victory for Buchanan in the political arena beyond your hopes. HOWEVER--IT ALSO SPEEDS UP THE NEC-ESSARY EMERGENCIES, WARS, ETC., WITH WHICH TO MAINTAIN POWER. IT HAS TO COME, CHILDREN, SO DO NOT BE INTIMIDATED FOR YOU KNOW YOUR FREEDOM AND PROSPERITY ARE LOST IF YOU CHANGE NOT.

I am petitioned again and again this day as to "Well, what do we do now?" Note that no Independent candidate was even mentioned in all the ravings of the press, etc. If anyone can WIN the election other than through "fluke" it is Buchanan. More-over, he knows the running of politics and our beloved friend "Bo" is NOT A POLITICIAN. BUT--CAN ANYONE OUT THERE SEE THE WONDROUS MERIT IN A TEAM SUCH AS BUCHANAN/GRITZ?? No, I have not spoken about this with Commander Gritz. But if his intent is where his mouth is-- HE HAS VOWED TO SERVE WHERE HE CAN AND ANY WAY HE CAN MAKE THE MOST IMPACT. How many of you realize that the Vice Presidency rather automatically takes over the "SPACE PROGRAM"? Can you not see how strong your government can be if you would have a coalition of these outstanding idealists and practical functional leaders in office--ALL! RIGHT IN THE TOP ADMINISTRATION SLOTS!! Ones like Perot, and Brown, and other patriots could then be brought in to strengthen the fiber of the leadership and THEN YOU CAN TURN YOUR NATION ABOUT.

Will it be in time to save the masses of people destined under the iron fist from depopulation and poverty? No, for the Conspirators PLAN is already speeded up in order to insure their destruction against millions of "victims". But--they would be required to back off from America to a great extent or have total destruction--along with themselves also. If you do not do it NOW--you will NEVER BE ABLE TO GET IT DONE IN THE NEXT GENERATIONS IMMEDIATELY TO COME--FOR THE PLAN IS IN OPERATION ALREADY--YOU JUST DIDN'T NOTICE.

So, what would "I" do? I abhor your politics and shudder at the very inquiry, but you are stuck with this system until such time as you can reclaim your rightful place under the protection of your Constitution and clean up your Judicial system and sweep the vermin from the nests of incestuous treason. I would push a massive support network for the frontrunner who runs on a mas­sive cleaning of the system. At this juncture it is Buchanan. His flaws and misunderstandings can be rectified for his intent is proper in spite of the massive assault against him. Then, I would begin two campaigns--get Gritz KNOWN everywhere about the place--support him to the point of allowing him to be THE BEST KNOWN WARRIOR IN THE MILITARY ARENA SO THAT THE DIRT CAN BE CLEANED FROM THE CAR­PETS OF THE INTELLIGENCE SERVICES AND MILI­TARY CONSPIRACIES. IN THE SAME PUSH I WOULD DEMAND A MEETING OF THESE TWO FINE MEN AND PERHAPS OTHERS--BUT MAKE A SINGULAR THRUST SO AS NOT TO DISTORT PURPOSE. DEMAND THAT A "TEAM" BE ELECTED AND NOT SOME POLITICAL BROTHER IN "DEBT" FOR SERVICE. AMERICA, YOU CAN DO IT IF YOU WANT TO--THE PATH HAS BEEN SHOWN--BUT YOU MUST WALK IT.

If you voters remain divided and set in cement--you will only allow the election of the very enemy himself--again. You see, the conspirators of the U.N. NEED PUPPETS IN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT TO PULL OFF THE REMAINDER OF THE FULL PLAN.

Look what a fine opportunity to place a person such as Perot into a slot of REAL OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE IN A POSI­TION WHICH IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE PRESIDENCY--INTO THE POSITION OF REVAMPING YOUR INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS.

WHAT OF IACOCCA? SPARE ME, CHELAS. You herein have a man who raises such horrendous claims against Japan and goes forth and shouts "Buy American" and then places his full revival on an automobile which is totally built in Canada. Well, he can smile, and does so, and says with a grin, "...well, you know, I could do that because Canada is part of the Ameri­cas." Are you not filled to overflow with this LIE!? THE FULL THRUST IS TO TURN BROTHER AGAINST BROTHER--AMERICAN OF ANY LINEAGE AGAINST THE JAPANESE AMERICAN--a rerun of World War II. Can you not see what is being done to you as a nation?

Forget where Truth comes from at this point--just, for goodness sakes, see and hear the Truth and the rest will take care of itself. Ultimately you will come again under God as a nation or you shall move into the destruction of the nation. This, I can promise you!

You must, further, take the steps in the sequence presented unto you--as they come. Without a change in government, all the other plans at hand fall to the wayside. If the Constitution is overridden and set aside for any reason, the government auto­matically becomes puppet-master without ability to return to Constitutional foundation. In that event, there can be no service through the Law Center, the industrial growth, agriculture through advanced methods and thus and so. You will be totally stuck in that which is thrust upon you--WHILE YOUR CITI­ZENS ARE EXTERMINATED THROUGH DISEASE AND FAMINE.

It is time to set aside all political bigotry along party lines and get in line for ONE THING--getting someone who at least claims to be on your team. If you do this and set it properly--HE WILL HAVE TO SERVE YOU PROPERLY FOR YOU CAN AGAIN TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR DESTINY. Nei­ther must you ask only ONE MAN to do it all--for in this system of spider webs--he cannot. You also need a team that, quite frankly, if one is pulled down, you have another to fill the va­cancy. Many of the most wondrous of leaders have no notion about God and that which awaits you as the prophecies of God are fulfilled.

JOSHUA AND HATONN

I was asked, just this day, if I were by any chance the tall being who came and walked and worked with Joshua. Indeed. I was presented with a "sword" according to your books--It was not a sword, it was the staff of life! I will further give you a bit of humor for your daily meditation--I told him to pull down the wall of Jericho through harmonic vibrations and one of the tru­isms which has remained is THAT THEY FELL IN A HEAP. You are going to find it most difficult to deny me for very much longer, chelas--for indeed, I have been around for a very long time in your counting! So be it.

A BIT ON BANKING

How many of you are aware that TODAY there is absolute chaos and horror in Citibank? They have to come up with about a BILLION AND A HALF DOLLARS WITHIN THESE IMMEDIATE FEW DAYS OR, OR - - -! THEY DO NOT HAVE IT!!! ANY OF YOU WITH MONEY IN CITIBANK­-I SUGGEST YOU GET IT OUT--LAST WEEK!

ADL--OWNS "STERLING NATIONAL BANK"

Remember--the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a recognized tool of Zionism, is a "British Intelligence Operation". It is also integrated within the organized crime cohorts of National Crime Syndicate boss Meyer Lansky. This is WELL DOCUMENTED as are its ties to the international drug cartel. The ADL is still widely thought to be a legitimate civil rights organization "combatting anti-Semitism" group. That is pure fraud and you had best know it.

You must realize that one of the oldest and strongest ties be­tween the ADL and the National Crime Syndicate centers around one of the mob's favorite New York City banks, the Sterling National Bank. The biggy is in New York City (center for Zionism)--Sterling National. It was founded in 1929 by one of Meyer Lansky's closest syndicate associates, Frank Erickson. Erickson was one of Lansky's chief money handlers. After the November 1926 murder of Arnold Rothstein, the predecessor to Lansky as the "brains" of the Jewish mob, Lansky personally ar­ranged for Erickson to take over the management of the syndi­cate's nationwide bookmaking operations. Erickson was Lansky's money handler in several major business ventures, in­cluding Lansky's hidden ownership of racetracks in Florida and casinos in Nevada, according to Lansky biographer Hank Mes­sick.

Sterling National Bank was also the syndicate's "factor" bank in the New York City garment center--doling out high-interest short-term loans to enable the thousands of small clothing man­ufacturers to purchase raw materials. The loans were collater­alized by the garment companies' Accounts Receivable. It as a quasi-legal form of loan sharking--enforced with Syndicate mus­cle. Erickson's relationship to Meyer Lansky gave Sterling Na­tional virtually unchallenged control over the garment center.

To shorten this story, just KNOW that Sterling National Bank is the ADL's bank! ADL financial records on file with the Inter­nal Revenue Service, up through 1976, show that Sterling Na­tional Bank and Standard Financial Corporation were the only outside institutions in which the ADL made any investments (with an exception when they invested $5,000 in the American Bank and Trust Company, headed by ADL National Commis­sioner and one-time B'nai B'rith international president Philip Klutznick). They never allowed such a slip to occur again.

Worse, there is no major effort to keep the ties to the Crime Syndicate hidden. The point is, you see, confuse the issues which in turn hide the operations. They launder massive amounts of drug money for the ADL. Even inside looting was and is prevalent and public legal accusations come and go of looting and "laundering" ADL money.

One such case revolves around Marvin Tallerman who could outdo Keating, Boesky and Milken all lumped together. In one operation he simply converted $880,000 of his company's assets into a letter of credit which was issued to a dummy company in New Jersey which HE OWNED. This was then funnelled off into accounts off-shore in Panama and Switzerland. Tallerman did this over and over and finally defaulted on some known loans and was able to make off with all the hidden funds in cash. He nicely and loyally named buddies as co-conspirators. ISN'T IT TIME FOR A HOUSECLEANING, AMERICA? WORLD?

AMERICA WEST BOOK CATALOGS

I have requested that America West, in making their catalogs available unto you readers, do me a favor. I asked that no other material, other than that which I offer and approve, be listed in the catalog of Phoenix publications carried by America West. I herein now ask that John Coleman's book be featured in both catalogs--NUMBER ONE IN THE PHOENIX LISTINGS. IT IS THAT IMPORTANT FROM A STANDPOINT OF UN­DERSTANDING YOUR ENEMY IN THE CATEGORY OF WORLD DOMINATION. WE WILL CONTINUE WITH THE UNCOVERING OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY IN YOUR NATION CALLED THE CIA--BUT I CONSIDER, FROM EARTH FUNCTIONING STANDPOINT, COLE­MAN'S BOOK TO BE THE MOST IMPORTANT "HUMAN" INPUT YOU WILL EVER HAVE. YOU MUST KNOW YOUR ENEMY BY WHATEVER NAME HE MAY BE CUR­RENTLY CALLING HIMSELF. IT IS NOT THE ONLY BOOK--IT IS ONLY THE "FIRST". LET US GET PAST THIS UNCOVERING AND RECOGNIZE THE ENEMY AND THEN WE CAN GET ON WITH THE WONDROUS EXPE­RIENCES AWAITING YOU AS YOU INTEGRATE WITH THE COSMOS AND YOUR COSMIC BRETHREN! KNOW THAT WITH GOD--ALL IS NOT ONLY POSSIBLE BUT MUST COME TO PASS!

Dharma, several days ago we had almost finished an article regarding the KGB. We had such a wondrous time seeing through the glass clearly that which is most clouded. I am sorry to have had the interruption but we have had several of the most over­filled days imaginable since we began the writing. We have to walk and work one day at a time for we, too, are bound by our physical counterparts.

I have had several group and semi-private meetings lately--I would ask you who gather in groups to discuss and share mate­rial and opinions about the areas of our readership--ask about getting such tapes. We will have a phone speaker "gathering" on Saturday of this week. I have pages of questions--all reflec­tive of all of you. We do not have "professional" shows and tells--we get right to business and hopefully I can respond and "caution" in those sessions.

I must write the JOURNALS in a sequence most fitting but I know your eagerness to see and hear regarding that which is covered in the JOURNALS but you don't get to fully under­stand. I am not allowing ones off their responsibility of home­work with the books--I cannot cause informed readers who work at this every moment available--to be bogged by personal and intentional delays of our work. No one has to believe a word of my presentation if they so choose. I, further, don't wish to comment or discern about other sources, speakers, energies or such--if you utilize the facts and guidelines--it is so much better to discern for self for--no matter what I respond to you--you will form your own opinion at any rate. Many channels have simply fallen away and/or have totally different focus than do we in this area and project center. You also must understand that there is great reason that ones' very intent in solving healing problems and creating "frequency" machines and finding free energy sup­ply are not going to be fulfilled. This is because these things have been created and placed on your globe and taken by the Elite controllers. There is no need to reinvent a wheel only to have it stolen and smashed. Impatience is the curse of humans seeking to serve. If you have "karma" to pay, most of you will find it in learning PATIENCE and WAITING UPON THE LORD. A babe must first turn over and see possibilities, then "lizard" his way to hands and knees, then crawl a bit, then faster--then stand and hold to that which is stable--then finally and haltingly--step forth--usually to fall many times. Then, in wondrous growth come the steps sure and stable in the walk, then the jog, then the run--and finally, chelas--YE SHALL FLY! SO BE IT.

At any rate, if any of you "groups" would wish to meet with the tapes, ask and let us see how we can best serve to meet those needs. I do not consider this group who gathers in a room with Dharma--my only crew--you ones out there are not THAT lucky!! Neither do you need the confusion of dozens of speakers from which to effort to decide "Truth". However, I have purposely kept you a bit unincluded so that you WOULD CON-TINUE TO GAIN INFORMATION FROM ALL SOURCES--it is only in the comparison can the discernment come, in fact. Truth will stand alone and you will be able to find the total contradictions and the "right" input will be innately known unto you. We fear no comparison. If the one who presents in-formation gives you secret "orders", secret anything, hierarchical "royalty" and ALLOWS ANY ACTIONS IN HOLY SANCTIONING WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAWS OF GOD IN TOTAL--THEY ARE FALSE! GOD ALLOWS ERRORS-- HE DOES NOT REMOVE THE LAWS! THE GUIDELINES ARE SIMPLE, FEW AND SUCCINCT--IF ONES PRESENT OTHERWISE--THEY ARE FALSE. MAY YOUR INSIGHT ALWAYS BE BLEST WITHOUT LIMITS THAT YOU CAN FIND YOUR WAY FOR ALL WE ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF, ARE WAYSHOWERS--YOU MUST WALK THE PATH.

So, Dharma, let us pick up the article right where we left off, with no more attention to it--it only needs completion so that the "thought" might find completion. Thank you.

SPY VS. SPY; DEFECTOR DESCRIBES
HIS LIFE INSIDE THE SOVIET KGB

Wall Street Journal: Wed. , Feb. 12, 1992

Continued:

'NORMAL' WORK

Instead, the focus was on secondary sources. He would recruit a local employee of a U.S. Embassy, for example, and ex-tract telephone directories or State Department publications that were combed for information. He also cultivated agents the KGB dubbed "special unofficial contacts"--officials of a foreign government who weren't paid but were befriended and persuaded to pass on information about their own contacts with the U. S .

If cash was needed to buy information, it was readily avail-able. He (Mikhail) says he never paid more than a few thou-sand dollars, but even amid the recent Soviet economic crisis he heard a senior KGB official tell field officers that "If you need money for a worthy target, we will find it."

Though he felt no fervor for Communism, Mikhail prospered because he found the work intellectually stimulating. "It was daily, routine work of gathering intelligence, which was all right with me," says Mikhail. "It was something every country needed. It was normal."

Besides ferreting out information about the U.S., another prime KGB goal was simply to disrupt U.S. foreign policy. In doing that, "I tried to use more or less acceptable methods," Mikhail says. In one case, he attempted to disrupt the work of a U.S. diplomat by sending him concocted threatening letters in the name of a sinister national liberation movement.

Mikhail's overseas jobs were alternated with stints at Moscow headquarters, and he rose to a management-level position in the KGB. But by 1990, Mikhail says, unsettling trends inside the KGB made him decide to get out. While Mr. Gorbachev was publicly working with the U.S. and talking of glas­nost and peristroika, a series of directives from KGB headquar­ters to the field sent opposing signals.

New restrictions were placed on agents' contacts with U.S. officials. One cable told spies to set up espionage efforts against the West because "hostile" forces were using the changed inter­national climate to "undermine the socialist nature of the U.S.S.R. " , Mikhail recalls.

ZERO DECREASE IN SPIES

At his last overseas post, Mikhail was ordered for the first time to carry out an operation against an American using meth­ods that "could be harmful to his physical well-being." He ar­gued with his superior and watered down the instructions, then carried out the job. [H: Come come now--if you can believe this incredible lying, then I am truly disappointed and "throw in the towel". These men thrive on "take-downs" and "take-outs" and murder intrigue. Surely by now you can SEE the article for what it is--a massive display staged by the CIA and planted for your consumption. The KGB NICE?? Oh my--so was Atilla the Hun!] But he had decided to jump. He got in touch with an American friend and carefully planned a covert escape in 1990. He came under the CIA's wing, and the agency now is trying to help him establish a new life in the U.S.

Despite a housecleaning at the top, Mikhail says, the KGB spy bureaucracy lives on and has simply moved inside the Rus­sian government. He estimates that "90% to 95% of middle management are still in the positions they had before the coup." A senior U.S. official, in fact, says he has seen "zero" decrease in the number of Russian intelligence agents working in the U.S.

For now, U.S. analysts doubt that the remnants of the KGB pose an immediate threat to Russia's democratic and economic reforms. The KGB foreign intelligence division isn't much of a political force right now. Meanwhile, the KGB's internal secu­rity apparatus has been broken up and Boris Yeltsin's efforts to rebuild a big Russian internal security service so far have been slowed by the parliament.

Oleg Kalugin, a former KGB general who bolted from the agency, says the spy service is struggling these days simply to pay its spies, and was late in meeting its November and Decem­ber payroll. Yet he worries that the remaining intelligence ap­paratus is "perhaps the most reactionary organization" in Russia.

Mikhail is more blunt: "The old guard will be regrouping," he warns.

END OF QUOTING

INDEED! THEY NEVER "UN-GROUPED". THEY SIM­PLY HAVE FOUND APPROPRIATE REASON TO "GIVE THE PUBLIC" FOR TOTALLY INFILTRATING YOUR NA­TION AND REPLACING THE CIA.

I believe, since this has grown so lengthy for a segment, that we might have a rest and then take up anew with the CIA and IMA's accounting. We must move on through this information for I have full outlay of George Bush to lay on you. It is so massive a job to get it all into your hands but we shall do the best we can. It becomes a real "toss-up" as to which is more important as to sequence. But I really want you informed about this George Bush and his lineage before election time. We shall simply do the best we can and ask you to bear with us.

Hatonn to stand-by until you are ready to continue, Dharma.

PJ 45

CHAPTER 4

REC #2 HATONN

WED., FEB. 19, 1992 12:20 P.M. YEAR 5, DAY 186

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1992

Let us just move directly and rapidly into the subject which seems to be dragging on to great length. I trust you readers can sort and mentally arrange the material. There is simply too much of urgent matter to forsake the daily comments into your attention. This is the reason for structuring the material into JOURNALS, not unlike a "Captain's Log", with date and time so that you can relate to the information timely. I remind you that our thrust is in no wise literary excellence but rather a gath­ering of urgently necessary information into your hands for use and action.

Continuation of:

CIA AND THE INTELLIGENCE
COMMUNITY "IMA" 1974

MACHINE DOMINATED INFORMATION AGENCY

Contrary to the National Security Act of 1947, the CIA today (1974) does not in fact perform the function of "coordinating the intelligence activities of the several governmental departments and agencies". For a time during the early 1950's the DCI did manage some degree of control over the other agencies but in the years that followed came the technological explosion in in­telligence and with it the tremendous expansion of the commu­nity. The spying trade was transformed--everywhere but at the CIA--from a fairly small, agent-oriented profession to a ma­chine-dominated information-gathering enterprise of almost boundless proportions. Technical collection, once a relatively minor activity in which gentlemen did read other gentlemen's mail, blossomed into a wide range of activities including COMINT (communications intelligence), SIGINT (signal intel­ligence), PHOTINT (photographic intelligence), ELINT (electronic intelligence), and RADINT (radar intelligence). Data was obtained by highly sophisticated equipment on planes, ships, submarines, orbiting and stationary space satellites, radio and electronic intercept stations, and radars--some the size of three football fields strung together. The sensors, or devices, used for collection consisted of high-resolution and wide-angle cameras, infrared cameras, receivers for intercepting microwave transmissions and telemetry signals, side-looking and over-the-­horizon radars, and other even more exotic contrivances. [H: Please pause a moment and consider what has been accom­plished in the last two decades since the writing of this book. It becomes beyond the incredible! However, it can give you confirmation and a better balance of understanding to know what WAS at given intervals in your recent past so that you can grasp the growth and magnitude of the technology now operable and capable for use against you by the Elite Con­spirators. It also allows you to realize that information was brought forth for your informing but has been squelched and hidden and intentionally not allowed circulation into your attention. This also becomes obvious why the attack against the ALLOWANCE OF PUBLIC OPINION AGAINST AN ORTHODOX PROJECTION BY WAY OF LAWS. lit is a long way beyond "serious", dear ones--it is critical and the bindings under-way.]

TECHNOCRATS AND MANAGERS

The proliferation of technical collection has also had a sig­nificant influence on the personnel makeup of the intelligence community. The mountains of information received gave rise to a variety of highly specialized data processors; cryptanalysis, traffic analysts, photographic interpreters, and telemetry, radar, and signal analysts, who convert the incomprehensible bleeps and squawks intercepted by their machines into forms usable by the substantive intelligence analysts. And it has created a new class of technocrats and managers who conceive, develop, and supervise the operation of systems so secret that only a few thousand (sometimes only a couple of hundred) have high enough security clearances to see the finished intelligence prod­uct. [H: Does it not now become more reasonable that we have ones such as Dharma as translators and "decoders"? Also I hope it makes it more clearly reasonable to you read­ers WHY we restrict the outlay of this type of information to the very, very minimum numbers of receivers. This is not to "put-down" other speakers--but the very purpose of focus is to stop the confusion as to material being presented. I re­mind you--the "Master" you await is NOT on your planet in human form at this time so STOP SPECULATION AS TO "WHO" HE MIGHT BE!!! If ones proclaim in presence in human physical format--they are misinformed and are mis­informing YOU! KNOW THAT GOD HAS REASONS FOR THAT WHICH HE DOES AND IT IS TO COUNTER THE CONFUSION SET FORTH BY THE KING OF DECEIT AND CONFUSION. I am continually solicited to speak on such ones as "Lord Maitreya" and others. No--you discern according to that which I give you--read all information as presented to the limit of time capabilities and you will have your answer for self. I would point out regarding that spe­cific inquiry--Benjamin Creme has not been correct so far and the mark of a true prophet is "100% correct EVERY TIME" . Cheating does not help and if ones tell you specifi­cally a time and place of happening--realize that one is "guessing" because all things are subject to possibilities of change according to actions within manifestations.

You also ask about Krishnamurti and this becomes even more easily recognized as a problem--IF YOU GO READ ABOUT KRISHNAMURTI AND HOW AND WHO SET HIM UP AS A "MASTER OF SOME SORT". YOU WILL FIND KRISHNAMURTI CAME RIGHT OUT OF THE MASONIC ORDER OF THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY! SO BE IT.]

TECHNICAL INFORMATION VALUABLE

The information collected by the technical systems constitutes the most valuable data available to U.S. intelligence. Without it, there would be no continuing reliable way for government to determine with confidence the status of foreign--especially So­viet and Chinese--strategic military capabilities. Without it, also, there would have been no agreement with the Soviet Union in 1972 for the limitations of strategic armaments, since that pact was absolutely dependent on each side being confident that it could monitor new military developments--even possible cheating--on the other side through its own satellites and other surveillance equipment.

U-2 SPY PLANES

The first advanced overhead-reconnaissance systems--the U-2 spy planes and the early satellites in the late 1950's and early 1960's--provided valuable information about the Soviet Union, but their successes only whetted the appetites of U.S. military planners, who had so long been starved for good intelligence on America's main adversary. Once they got a taste of the fruits of technical collection, they demanded more specific and more fre­quent reporting on the status of the Soviet armed forces. And the technicians, with nearly unlimited funds at their disposal, obliged them, partly because the technicians themselves had a natural desire to expand the state of their art.

A complementary circle of military intelligence requirements and technical collection methods evolved. Collection responded to requirements and, in turn, generated still further demands for information, which resulted in the development of yet bigger and better collection systems. If some particular type of data could somehow be collected, invariably one or another part of the Pentagon would certify that it was needed, and a new tech­nical system for gathering it would be developed. The prevail­ing ethic became collection for collection's sake.

McCONE vs. McNAMARA

In the infant years of the technological explosion, Allen Dulles paid scant attention to technical collection's potential as an intelligence tool. He was far more interested in clandestine operations and the overthrowing of foreign governments. After the Bay of Pigs debacle in 1961 cut short Dulles' career as DCI, his successor, John McCone, soon grasped the importance of the new information-gathering systems. He tried to reassert the CIA's leadership position in this area, and as part of his effort he created the Directorate for Science and Technology and recruited a brilliant young scientist, Albert "Bud" Wheelon, to head the component. But try as he might, the tenacious, hard-driving McCone could not cope with the Pentagon juggernaut, then under the direction of Robert McNamara, who energetically supported the military services in their efforts to gain maximum control of all technical collection. McCone was forced to conclude that the battle with the Defense Department was lost and tine trend toward Pentagon domination was irreversible. This was one of the reasons that McCone resigned in 1965 (another being, in McCone's view, President Johnson's lack of appreciation for strategic intelligence such as the National Intelligence Estimates).

McCone was followed by Admiral William Raborn, whose ineffective tour as DCI was mercifully ended after only fourteen months, to the relief of all members of the intelligence community.

CIA OVERSHADOWED

Richard Helms took over the CIA in the spring of 1966. Like Dulles, he was much more interested in the cloak-and-dagger field, where he had spent his entire career, than in the machines that had revolutionized the intelligence trade. Although he was Director of Central Intelligence, not just the head of CIA, Helms rarely challenged the Pentagon on matters regarding technical collection--or, for that matter, intelligence analysis--until, belatedly, his last years as DCI. As a result, during his directorship the CIA was completely overshadowed by the other agencies in all intelligence activities other than covert operations, and even here the military made deep inroads.

Richard Helms clearly understood the bureaucratic facts of life. He knew all too well that he did not have Cabinet status and thus was not the equal of the Secretary of Defense, the man ultimately responsible for the military intelligence budget.

Helms simply did not have the power to tell the Pentagon that the overall needs of U.S. intelligence (which were, of course, his responsibility as DCI) demanded that the military cut back on a particular spying program and spend the money elsewhere. Since managing the intelligence community did not interest him very much anyway, only on a few occasions did he make the effort to exercise some measure of influence over the other agencies outside the CIA.

TOO MUCH INTELLIGENCE

In 1967 Helms was urged by his staff to authorize an official review of intelligence collection by community members, with special emphasis on the many technical collection systems. However, Helms was reluctant to venture far into this highly complex, military-controlled field, and decided only to authorize a study of the CIA's "in-house" needs. He named an experienced senior agency officer, Hugh Cunningham, to head the small group picked to make the study. Cunningham, a former Rhodes scholar [H: Clue!! This absolutely identifies him as a conspirator within the command of the Committee of 300.] had previously served in top positions with the Clandestine Ser-vices and on the Board of National Estimates. With his broad experience, he seemed to agency insiders to be an ideal choice to carry out the review. After several months of intense investigation, he and his small group concluded--this was the first sentence of their report--"The United States intelligence community collects too much information." They found that there was a large amount of duplication in the collection effort, with two or more agencies often spending great amounts of money to amass essentially the same data, and that much of the information collected was useless for anything other than low-level intelligence analysis. The study noted that the glut of raw data was clogging the intelligence system and making it difficult for the analysts to separate out what was really important and to produce thoughtful material for the policy-makers. The study also observed that the overabundance of collection resulted in an excess of finished intelligence reports, many of which were of little use in the formulation of national policy; there simply were too many reports on too many subjects for the high-level policy-makers .to cope with.

HELMS SUPPRESSES CUNNINGHAM CIA STUDY

The Cunningham study caused such consternation in the CIA that Helms refused to disseminate it to the other intelligence agencies. Several of his deputies complained bitterly about the study's critical view of their own directorates and the way it seemed to diminish the importance of their work. Since the study was even harsher in dealing with the military's intelligence programs, Helms was further unwilling to risk the Pentagon's wrath by circulating it within the intelligence community. He decided to keep the controversial report within the CIA.

Always the master bureaucrat, Helms resorted to the time-honored technique of forming another special study group to re­view the work of the first group. He organized a new commit­tee, the Senior Executive Group, to consider in general terms the CIA's managerial problems. The SEG's first job was to look over the Cunningham study but its members were hardly fitted to the task. They were the chiefs of the agency's four di­rectorates, each of which had been heavily criticized in the original study; the Executive Director (the CIA's number-three man), a plodding, unimaginative former support officer; and--as chairman--the Deputy DCI, Admiral Rufus Taylor, a career naval officer. After several prolonged meetings, the SEG de­cided, not surprisingly, that the study on collection was of only marginal value and therefore not to be acted on in any signifi­cant way. A short time later Cunningham was transferred to the Office of Training, one of the CIA's administrative Siberias. The SEG never met again.

THE MANNED ORBITING LABORATORY

Although Richard Helms showed little talent for manage­ment--and even less interest in it--during his years as DCI he did make some efforts to restrict the, expansion of the intelligence community. One such try was successful. It occurred in the late 1960's when Helms refused to give his approval for further development work on the Air Force's extremely expensive manned orbiting laboratory (MOL), which was then being pro­moted as being, among other things, an intelligence-collection system. Without Helms' endorsement, the Air Force was un­able to convince the White House of the need for the project, and it was subsequently dropped by the Johnson Administration. (Some Air Force officials viewed Helms' lack of support as re­taliation for the Air Force's "capture" in 1967 of the SR-71 re­connaissance plane, which the CIA had originally developed and would have preferred to keep under its direct control, but this criticism was probably unfair. Helms simply seemed to be go­ing along with the strong pressure in the Johnson Administration to cut costs because of the Vietnam War, and saw the MOL as a particularly vulnerable--and technically dubious--program in a period of tight budgets.)

PENTAGON MORE POWERFUL THAN CIA

Helms was always a realist about power within the govern­ment and he recognized that, except in a rare case like that of the MOL, he simply did not have the clout to prevent the introduction of most new technical collection systems. He also un­derstood that the full force of the Pentagon was behind these projects--as redundant or superfluous as they often were--and that if he concentrated his efforts on trying to eliminate or even reduce unproductive and outdated systems, he was making ene­mies who could undercut his own pet clandestine projects over­seas. But even the few efforts he did bring against these obvi­ously wasteful systems failed (save that against the MOL), demonstrating vividly that the true power over budgets in the in­telligence community lies with the Pentagon, not the Director of Central Intelligence.

THE EATON STUDY

In 1967, for example, Helms asked Frederick Eaton, a prominent and conservative New York lawyer, to conduct a re­view of the National Security Agency. For some time the NSA's cost-effectiveness as a contributor to the national intelli­gence effort had been highly suspect within the community, especially in view of the code-breaking agency's constantly growing budget, which had then risen over the billion-dollar mark. Eaton was provided with a staff composed of officials from several intelligence offices, including the CIA, the State Department, and the Pentagon, and this staff accumulated sub­stantial evidence that much of the NSA's intelligence collection was of little or marginal use to the various intelligence con­sumers in the community. But Eaton, after extensive consulta­tion with Pentagon officials, surprised his own staff by recom­mending no reductions and concluding that all of the NSA's programs were worthwhile. The staff of intelligence profes­sionals rebelled, and Eaton had to write the conclusions of the review himself.

The lesson of the Eaton study was clear within the intelli­gence community. The NSA was widely recognized as the community member most in need of reform, and the profession­als who had studied the matter recommended substantial change in its programs. Yet Helms' effort to improve the supersecret agency's performance through the Eaton study accomplished nothing, and if the Director of Central Intelligence could not, as the professionals said, "get a handle on" the NSA, then it was highly unlikely that he could ever influence the expanding pro­grams of the other Pentagon intelligence agencies.

NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE RESOURCE BOARD

In 1968 Helms created another select inter-agency group at the insistence of his staff: the National Intelligence Resources Board (the forerunner of the Intelligence Resources Advisory Committee). Intended to bring about economies in the commu­nity by cutting certain marginal programs, the NIRB had more bureaucratic power than any of its predecessors because it was chaired by the Deputy Director of the CIA and had as members the directors of the Defense Intelligence Agency and the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research. It immedi­ately decided to take a new look at the NSA's programs and it singled out a particular communications-intercept program, costing millions of dollars a year, as particularly wasteful. The NIRB had found that nearly all intelligence analysts within the community who had access to the results of the NSA program believed the data to be of little or no use. These findings were related to Paul Nitze, then Deputy Secretary of Defense, with the recommendations that the program be phased out. (The final decision on continuing the NSA program, of course, had to be made in the Pentagon, since the NSA is a military intelligence agency.) Nitze did nothing with the recommendation for several months. Then, as he was leaving office in January 1969, he sent a letter to Helms thanking the DCI for his advice but in­forming him that approval had been given by Pentagon decision-makers to continue the dubious project. And despite the NIRB's overwhelming arguments against the project, Nitze did not even bother to list any reasons why the Pentagon chose not to concur with the decision of the Director of Central Intelligence.

HELMS HELPLESS AS DCI

In the wake of such defeats, Helms gave up on making at­tempts at managing the intelligence community. At one point, months later, he observed to his staff that while he, as DCI, was theoretically responsible for 100 percent of the nation's intelli­gence activities, he in fact controlled less than 15 percent of the community's assets--and most of the other 85 percent belonged to the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Under such circumstances, Helms concluded, it was unrealistic for any DCI to think that he could have a significant influence on U.S. intelligence-resource decisions or the shaping of the intelligence community. [H: Does it now seem a bit more clearly visible how and why General Powell and Cheney are so powerful? Moreover, they only have to turn to the President (Bush) who actually runs the whole shooting match to conclude whatever plans they wish to embark upon in action. This should scare the living daylights out of you-the-people!]

MELVIN LAIRD

But when the Nixon administration took over in 1969, some very powerful people, including Defense Secretary Melvin Laird and the President himself, became concerned about the seemingly uncontrolled expansion of the Pentagon's intelligence pro­grams. Laird said in his 1970 Defense budget statement:

Intelligence is both critical and costly. Yet we have found intelligence activities with management overlapping or nonexistent. Deficiencies have pro­voked criticism that became known even outside the intelligence community. These criticisms can be summarized in five principal points:

1. Our intelligence product was being evaluated poorly. (Some intelligence was not being evalu­ated at all and, as a result, a new concept, "the linear drawer foot", entered the English lan­guage. Translated from Pentagonese, this refers to the amount of paper needed to fill a file drawer one foot in length. A 1969 House Armed Ser­vices Committee report noted that the Southeast Asia office of the DIA alone had 517 linear drawer feet of unanalyzed raw intelligence locked in its vaults.)
2. Various intelligence-gathering activities over­lapped and there was no mechanism to eliminate the overlap.
3. There was no coordinated long-range program for resource management and programming.
4. Significant gaps in intelligence-gathering went unnoticed.
5. The intelligence community failed to maintain frank and unrestricted channels of internal com­munication.

THE PENTAGON: AN AMORPHOUS LUMP

That same year President Nixon appointed a "blue-ribbon" panel chaired by Gilbert W. Fitzhugh, chairman of the board of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, to conduct a review of the Defense Department's entire operations and organization. Fitzhugh declared at a July 1970 press conference that his in­vestigation showed that the Pentagon was "an impossible organi­zation to administer in its present form, just an amorphous lump". Then turning to military spying, he stated, "I believe that the Pentagon suffers from too much intelligence. They can't use what they get because there is too much collected. It would almost be better that they didn't have it because it's diffi­cult to find out what's important." The Fitzhugh panel recom­mended a series of economies in Pentagon espionage and also urged that a new post of Assistant Secretary of Defense for In­telligence be created. Under this proposal, the various military intelligence agencies, which previously had been scattered all over the Defense Department's organizational chart, were to be put under the authority of the new Assistant Secretary, who in turn would report to Secretary Laird.

THE HOUSE GETS IN THE ACT

By 1971, before the Fitzhugh recommendations were put into effect, the House Committee on Appropriations had become aware that military intelligence was in need of a shake-up. The committee released a little-noticed but blistering report which stated that "the intelligence operations of the Department of De­fense have grown beyond the actual needs of the Department and are now receiving an inordinate share of the fiscal resources of the Department." The congressional report continued, "Redundancy is the watch word of many intelligence opera­tions.... Coordination is less effective than it should be. Far more material is collected than is essential. Material is collected which cannot be evaluated...and is therefore wasted. New in­telligence means have become available...without offsetting re­ductions in old procedures." With these faults so obvious even to the highly conservative and military-oriented congressional committee, strong reform measures would have seemed to be in order. But little was done by the Congress to bring the intelli­gence community under control. The fear on Capitol Hill of vi­olating the sacred mystique of "national security" prevented any effective corrective action.

SECRET STUDY

Finally, in November 1971, after a secret review of the intelligence community carried out by the Office of Management and Budget's James Schlesinger, who would a year later be named Director of the CIA, the Nixon Administration announced "a number of management steps to improve the efficiency and effectiveness" of U.S. intelligence. The President reportedly had been grumbling for some time about the poor information furnished him by the intelligence community...Most recently he had been disturbed by the community's blunder in assuring that American prisoners were being held at the Son Tay Camp in North Vietnam which, during a dramatic rescue mission by U.S. commandos in 1970, was found to be empty. Nixon was also angered by the failure of intelligence to warn about the ferocity of the North Vietnamese response to the South Vietnamese invasion of Laos in early 1971. (In both these instances the faulty intelligence seems to have come from the Pentagon, although there are good reasons to believe that in the Son Tay case the President's political desire to make a show of support for the prisoners outweighed the strong possibility that no prisoners would be found there.) The President, as the nation's primary consumer of intelligence, felt that he had a right to expect better information.

INTELLIGENCE: A PRIVATE PRESIDENTIAL
PRESERVE

Whether a President takes great personal interest in intelligence, as Lyndon Johnson did, or, as in Nixon's case, delegates most of the responsibility to an aide (HENRY KISSINGER), the intelligence field remains very much a private presidential preserve. Congress has almost completely abdicated any control it might exercise. Thus, when President Nixon chose to revamp the intelligence structure in 1971, he did not even bother to consult in advance those few Congressmen who supposedly oversee the intelligence community.

The ostensible objective of the 1971 reorganization was to improve management of the intelligence community by giving the DCI "an enhanced leadership role...in planning, reviewing, coordinating, and evaluating all intelligence programs and activities, and in the production of national intelligence." Under the Nixon plan, the DCI's powers over the rest of the community for the first time included the right to review the budgets of the other members--an unprecedented step in the tribal federation of intelligence and one absolutely necessary to the exercise of any meaningful degree of control.

LET'S SHARE A BIT MORE OF KISSINGER

But with this very same plan to enhance the DCI's "leadership role", the President was also placing control over all U.S. intelligence squarely in the National Security Council staff, still headed today (1974) by HENRY KISSINGER , even after he also has become Secretary of State. Kissinger was put in charge of a new NSC Intelligence Committee which included as members the DCI, the Attorney General, the Under Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. [H: What a tangled web is woven when the creeping vines entwine and become all-inclusive.] This intelligence Committee was to "give direction and guidance on national intelligence needs and provide for a continuing evaluation of intelligence products from the viewpoint of the intelligence user." At the same time the President established another new body, called the Net Assessment Group, under Kissinger's control, to analyze U.S. military capabilities in comparison with those of the Soviets and Chinese as estimated by intelligence studies. Already chairman of the 40 Committee, [H: By the way the "40 Committee" idea and label is a direct offshoot of the "300 Committee"--just in case you have missed it so far.] which passes on all high-risk CIA cover operations, and the Verification Panel, which is responsible for monitoring the intelligence related to the S.A.L.T. negotiations and agreements, Kissinger, with his control now asserted over virtually all the NSC's key committees, had clearly emerged as the most powerful man in U.S. intelligence--as well as in American foreign policy.

Yet with Kissinger almost totally occupied with other mat­ters, the President clearly intended under his November 1971 reorganization that CIA Director Helms take over and improve the actual management of the intelligence community--under Kissinger's general supervision, to be sure. Partly because of the nearly impervious tribalism of the community and partly be­cause of Helms' pronounced lack of interest in management and technical matters, the shake-up had little effect on the well-en­trenched ways of the community. Much to the amazement of his staff, Helms did virtually nothing to carry out the wishes of the President as contained in the restructuring order.

Shortly after the 1972 election, Helms was fired by the Presi­dent as Director of Central Intelligence. According to his own testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations committee, he wanted to stay on the job but that was not the wish of the White House. The President's dissatisfaction with Helms' manage­ment of the intelligence community was certainly a factor in his ouster, as perhaps were Helms' social connections with liberal Congressmen and journalists (some of whom were on the White House "enemies" list).

SCHLESINGER RULES ONLY FOUR MONTHS

From his earlier work at the Office of Management and Bud­get and the Rand Corporation, James Schlesinger appeared knowledgeable about the problems facing the community and moved quickly, once he arrived at the CIA to replace Helms, to set up the bureaucratic structures necessary to exercise control over the other intelligence agencies. He created a new Deputy Director for Community Relations and strengthened the Intelli­gence Resources Advisory Committee, but his four-month tenure was too short to bring about any large-scale reform. And nothing in the record of his successor, William Colby--a clan­destine operator for thirty years--indicates that he has either the management skills or the inclination to bring the spiraling growth of the intelligence community under control.

THE CIA IS SIMPLY A COVERT
ACTION MACHINE

Clearly, the CIA is not the hub, nor is its Director the head, of the vast U.S. intelligence community. The sometimes glam­orous, incorrigibly clandestine agency is merely a part of a much larger interdepartmental federation dominated by the Pentagon. And although the Director of Central Intelligence is nominally designated by each President in turn as the govern­ment's chief intelligence advisor, he is in fact overshadowed in the realities of Washington's politics by both the Secretary of Defense and the President's own Assistant for National Security Affairs, as well as by several lesser figures, such as the Chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Nevertheless, agency directors and the CIA itself have managed to survive, and at times even flourish in the secret bureaucratic jungle because of the one highly specialized contribution to the national intelligence effort. The CIA's primary task is not to coordinate the efforts of U.S. intelligence or even to produce finished national intelligence for the policy-makers. Its job is, for better or worse, to conduct the government's covert foreign policy.

* * *

Dharma, I wish to speak just briefly about our "jumping" around so much within a given subject--seemingly getting com­pletely sidetracked. We must integrate important factors as we move along and as the public is focused on particular instances or happenings. For instance, with the "JFK" motion picture so popularized, I must remind you that "I" told you that both NIXON AND BUSH were completely involved. I further told you that the Watergate "break-in" was to retrieve very damaging photos of these two which would prove collusion in the as­sassination.

I think it would be appropriate to insert a writing regarding Bush at the time of the Bay of Pigs and the Kennedy assassination. Although it is out of sequence a bit for the immediate timing of the writing at point--it is highly important and totally in point. You see it was claimed that George Bush was not active in the CIA at the time of the assassination--forget it! His name even turns up in the personal address book of one of the most impor­tant personages of the time: De Mohrenschildt--who was Lee Harvey Oswald's CIA control officer!!!

So on this note, allow us some rest and hopefully, the readers will be able to digest some of this information.

Hatonn to clear, please.

PJ 45

CHAPTER 5

REC #1 HATONN

THU, FEBRUARY 20, 1992 9:06 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 187

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1992

TODAY'S WATCH

ISRAEL/LEBANON

You will note the war is escalating. I can do no more than warn you. Israel is deliberately starting a world war and it is all in the aftermath of leadership (yours) meetings in the area. ALL military personnel are at stand-by alert.

CITIBANK

For you who wish further confirmation in the banking industry-- keep your eyes to the papers, please, because there is no way to keep the inside crimes from coming forth within the next few days.

This is all entangled with Bache and officers from Bache are in the midst of giving depositions. Your government has been conducting a "sting" operation with Citibank as the point. It has culminated now and the president and several, perhaps 10 or so, corporate officers WILL BE INDICTED. Is this new criminal­ity? No--it is only now coming to focus in order to pull all the banks into one sweeping entity. WHAT IS REALLY IRRITAT­ING TO ME IS THAT THESE PERSONS HAVE BEEN PLAYING GAMES WITH FUNDING FOR SOME OF OUR PROJECTS AND YET ONES IN CHARGE ARE DISIN­CLINED TO LISTEN TO ME. I HAVE GIVEN, OVER AND OVER AGAIN, THE DANGERS AND SPECIFICALLY IN THE PAST HAVE GIVEN SUCCINCT AND DIRECT IN­FORMATION WHICH HAS CEASED BECAUSE SPOUSES AND OTHERS ARE OF FUNDAMENTAL "CHRISTIAN" BELIEF AND SEND MY INFORMATION BACK TO SOURCE. YOU WILL LEARN AND RECEIVE GOD'S HELP WHEN YOU UNDERSTAND YOUR CIRCUM­STANCES AND THAT IF YOU ARE A PART OF GOD'S IMMEDIATE PLANS--YOU WILL FIND EITHER SUCCESS OR NOT, ACCORDING TO THE INTENT OF INPUT. SO BE IT--MAY THE WISE COME TO HEAR AND SEE. YOU ARE IN THE CLOSING DAYS AND THE WORLD IS FILLED WITH LIARS AND CHEATS--MOST FROM THE VERY PULPITS OF CHURCHES TO KEEP YOU IMPRIS­ONED. I SPENT DAYS WRITING ABOUT CHASE BANK, BCCI, CITIBANK AND OTHERS INVOLVED. THE PLAY IS AMONG THE "BIG BOYS" TO MAKE A "KILLING" BE­FORE THE GONG SOUNDS--YOU CITIZENS HAVE BEEN "HAD" EVERY IMAGINABLE WAY MAN CAN THINK UP. I REFUSE TO ALLOW ANY SUCH ATTITUDE TO COME FROM ANYTHING WITH WHICH I MIGHT BE­COME ENTANGLED. PONDER THESE THINGS BE­CAUSE UNTIL INTENT IS "FOR" GOD'S SERVICE IN TRUTH--GOD DOES NOT SERVE YOU. AS LONG AS YOU SERVE IN A MISPLACED VERSION OF SO-CALLED "GOD'S PLAN" AND EVEN ONE IOTA OF THE DOC­TRINE DEVIATES FROM THE LAWS OF GOD--YOU WILL NOT BE ATTENDED IN FULLNESS. I SUGGEST ALL GET THEIR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT, SUCCINCT AND REFOCUSED.

SECURITIES

I am continually badgered regarding this or that investment. Remember something, chelas, I do not deal in your money. I can analyze possible safety measures but even with those in point of my explanation--I tell you the window of opportunity may well be very, very limited. I am sorry if you miss op­portunity for shelter but I will do no more about it.

I do not like what I see happening within the ranks of the Common Law Service Center. I DO NOT SANCTION NOR RECOMMEND TRUSTS OF ANY KIND. I believe there can be a temporary use for them in some instances. Moreover, I DO NOT RECOMMEND FOUNDATIONS IN ANY FORM UNDER ALMOST ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. YOU ARE SPEAKING OF "TAX FREE" COVERAGES AND IT IS SIMPLY GOING TO BECOME A TOTALLY BAD SIT­UATION. I RECOMMEND, AS I HAVE SAID BEFORE A COUPLE OF THOUSAND TIMES--FOR THIS PERIOD OF TIME I BELIEVE YOUR BEST AND MOST SECURE ROUTE IS THROUGH INCORPORATION IN THE STATE OF NEVADA--AND DON'T SHOW ANY PROFIT. THAT MEANS CAREFUL MANAGEMENT AND I AM NOT GOING TO SPEAK OF IT HEREIN AND HAVE THE INFORMATION MISREPRESENTED AND/OR MISPER­CEIVED. I HAVE NO INTEREST IN YOUR "TAXES". I can grant you that if you already have funds in such entities and cannot remove it other than to a like entity--it may remotely be feasible to do so. When the Planners who have pulled off gain­ing of the world go to work--you are not going to cover many assets by tax deductions--you would be far wiser to put your as­sets to work and build income making industry. You have come to a place historically wherein simply hoarding money is of ab­solutely no merit. I am not, herein, going to go over it again for I weary of the repetition. I further remind all of you--YOU will decide for it is but mine to offer the information. We cannot see how long OUR METHOD will be valid for it becomes difficult to have institutions which will serve in the capacity required for we require substantially lasting Elite owned banks so that collat­eral will not simply be confiscated along with safe-deposit gold. CAN THEY DO IT? When the big man has the big gun, he can do anything he chooses!

I will help you to GROW AND FLOURISH--I will not help you to hoard your physical assets while your brother is brought to death and destruction. If you wish to utilize our shelter--we welcome you. If you but wish to take our people's time and re­sources for your own personal gain--I am sorry--our purpose is to ready a place for God to come aboard--not attend individual banking accounts during the downfall of nations.

SAFETY

By the way--I am now refusing to answer questions regarding places of "safety"! Safety from what? Safety for what purpose? No place is SAFE and EVERY place is SAFE. What do you wish to do--serve or survive? I don't need any "survivors" who simply plan to continue a physically projected path when the waters recede. If you want fables and fairy tales of Ascension-- go elsewhere to your fortune tellers for if you are attuned to God--YOU WILL AUTOMATICALLY BE EXACTLY WHERE YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE--LISTENING INTENTLY FOR INSTRUCTIONS!

I am going to remark--again--on the merit of "learning Ascension"--HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE YOU SEEN ASCEND?? DON'T GIVE ME "JESUS"--FOR YOU DIDN'T SEE IT AND HE DID NOT ASCEND IN THE MANNER GIVEN UNTO YOU BY THE SOOTHSAYERS. I am given a wonderful question, in full and loving intent, for this next Saturday's meeting which goes something like this: "What happens before, during and following Ascension?" Better you ones recognize what happens to you in the physical--ON YOUR PLANE--during the time you HOPE TO ASCEND. My intent is not to make light of inquiries but I always use examples and if my input contradicts another "channel's" version of a "thing"--I bow to your choices. WHICH, however, SOUNDS REASONABLE, LOGICAL AND POSSIBLE within the laws of natural physics and according to God's Laws? More important to attend God's Laws for if you do not offer willingness to serve God's Laws and those of balanced Creation--you aren't going to "ascend" at ANY RATE short of total annihilation of your planet by means destructive to soul essence and then, it will be for safe passage only--to a suitable place to match the level of your individual growth. YOU take care of your lessons--GOD WILL TAKE CARE OF YOUR ASCENSION!

CIA AND BUSH'S EARLY INVOLVEMENT

Dharma, George needs a personal meeting with me and then you need to be elsewhere. Therefore, allow us to write on the CIA for a while and I ask that we slide out of format and pick up a segment of the story of George Bush around the time of the Bay of Pigs. Thank you.

We are having a miserable problem with security for the researchers and compilers of this information--some of which is invalid hearsay so I ask to allow for anonymity in the present until we decide how best to go about the publishing of the information with security for the people involved as well as the publisher. Our work has been discounted by the ones in point-- most because they have been exposed to none of it. It is leaking out because no one will publish and I will await "value change" before I ask even one more thing of George Green at America West. WE SHALL WAIT AND SEE.

GEORGE BUSH INVOLVEMENTS IN INFAMY

Bush publicly claims to have not been involved with the CIA at the time of the happenings we shall discuss. We shall see just what he was doing and if this be so.

From Donald Freed, Death in Washington (Westport, Conn., 1980): "JM/WAVE...proliferated across Florida in preparation for the Bay of Pigs invasion. A subculture of fronts, proprietaries, suppliers, transfer agents, conduits, dummy corporations, blind drops, detective agencies, law firms, electronic firms, shopping centers, airlines, radio stations, the mob and the church and the banks: a false and secret nervous system twitching to stimuli supplied by the cortex in Clandestine Services in Langley. After defeat on the beach in Cuba, JM/WAVE became a continuing and extended Miami Station, CIA's largest in the continental United States. A large sign in front of the .... building complex reads: 'U.S. GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS PROHIBIT DISCUSSION OF THIS ORGANIZATION OR FACILITY'." [H: Gosh, sounds like the forbidden subject of whether or not records meet the lies projected by the Zionists regarding the Holocaust--it becomes illegal to speculate!!!]

Chelas, there is positive proof that George Bush's activities during the late 1950's and early 1960's were incomplete in very important reports of his actions--if not missing entirely from documentation made available except to above "top secret" archives and "national security" cover-ups.

Starting at about the time of the Bay of Pigs invasion in the spring of 1961 came the first slips that Bush, in addition to working for Zapata Offshore (basically in drug running), was also a participant in other cover operations of the U.S. intelli­gence community.

These participations would fit right in with the pledges made right in the old Skull and Bones Society of Dad, Prescott Bush, as well as within the Brown Brothers Harriman networks. Dur­ing the twentieth century, the Skull and Bones/Harriman circles have always maintained a sizeable and often decisive presence inside the intelligence organizations of the State Department, the Treasury Department, the Office of Naval Intelligence, the Of­fice of Strategic Services, and the Central Intelligence Agency.

George Bush was most certainly associated with the CIA prior to 1963. Bush started working for the agency in 1960-61, using his oil business as a cover for clandestine activities. By the time of the Kennedy assassination, there is official FBI documentation regarding "Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency". Despite official disclaimers, chelas, this IS THE SAME MAN THAT IS NOW PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. AND DWELLS IN YOUR WHITE HOUSE.

This great mystery of George Bush as a covert operator is proven on four points right on physical evidence--so forget, please, space cadets. Each one represents great political and es­pionage scandals of postwar American history:

1. The abortive Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, launched on April 16-17, 1961, prepared with the assistance of the CIA's "Miami Station" (also known under the code name JM/WAVE). After the failure of the amphibious landings of Brigade 2506, Miami Station, under the leadership of Theodore Shackley, became the focus for Operation Mongoose, a series of covert operations di­rected against Castro, Cuba, and other targets.

2. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas on November 22, 1963, and the cover-up of those responsible for the crime.

3. The Watergate scandal, beginning with an April 1971 visit to Miami, Florida by E. Howard Hunt on the tenth anniversary of the Bay of Pigs invasion to recruit operatives for the White House Special Investigations Unit (the Plumbers, and later Wa­tergate burglars) from among Cuban-American Bay of Pigs vet­erans. I told you long ago--Hunt shot the President that day from behind the fence. Same old E. Howard Hunt!

4. The Iran-Contra Affair, which became a public scandal dur­ing October-November 1986, several of whose central figures, such as Felix Rodriguez, were also veterans of the Bay of Pigs--AND INVOLVED IN THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION!

George's role in both Watergate and the October Surprise/Iran-­Contra complex has already been handled in detail--but, we shall cover it again in proper sequence as we move along so per­spective can be more accurately given to continuity of involve­ment. It is more important herein to realize that some thirty years of covert operations, in many respects, form a single con­tinuous whole. The entire new Cuban cadre now simply emerged from the Bay of Pigs. The names, Howard Hunt, Bernard Barker, Rolando Martinez, Felix Rodriguez and Euge­nio Martinez would, in the next quarter century, pop up, often decisively, over and over again in the most dangerous American foreign policy crises. They didn't bother to cover it too care­fully--simply expecting the American Public to be totally oblivi­ous to the whole scenario and no one would notice. Over and over again the same names popped up in conjunction with dan­gerous American foreign policy crises. There were Cubans flying missions for the CIA in the Congo and even for the Por­tuguese in Africa; Cubans were the burglars of Watergate; Cubans played key roles in Nicaragua, in Irangate, in the American move into the Persian Gulf. Felix Rodriguez says that he was infiltrated into Cuba with the other members of the "Grey Team" in conjunction with the Bay of Pigs landings; this is the same man you will note directing the Contra supply effort in Central America during the 1980's, working under the direct supervision of Don Gregg and George Bush. Theodore Shackley, the JM/WAVE station chief, later shows up in Bush's 1979­80 presidential campaign.

Such covert operations have drawn upon the same pool of per­sonnel. They are to a significant extent the handiwork of the same crowd. It is therefore revealing to project forward and backward in time the individuals and groups of individuals who appear as the cast of characters in one scandal, and compare them with the cast of characters for the other scandals, including the secondary ones that have not been enumerated right here.

E. Howard Hunt, for example, shows up as a confirmed part of the overthrow of the Guatemalan government of Jacopo Arbenz in 1954, as an important part of the chain of command in the Bay of Pigs, as a person repeatedly accused of having been in Dallas on the day Kennedy was shot--and was and did--and as one of the central figures of Watergate.

George Bush is demonstrably one of the most important protag­onists of the Watergate scandal, and was the overall director of Iran-Contra. Since he appears, especially in Iran-Contra, in close proximity to Bay of Pigs holdovers, it is surely legitimate to wonder when his association with those Bay of Pigs Cubans might have started.

1959 was the year that Bush started operating out of the Zapata Offshore headquarters in Houston; it was also the year that Fidel Castro seized power in Cuba. Officially, as we have noted, George was now a businessman whose work took him at times to Louisiana, where Zapata had offshore drilling operations. George was a frequent visitor to New Orleans. Because of his family's estate on Jupiter Island, he visited, frequently, the Hobe Sound area. And then, never overlook those most valued Zapata Offshore drilling operations in the Florida strait. This allowed for all sorts of contraband to come ashore directly with­out inspection--through and via Zapata operations.

The Jupiter Island connection and father Prescott's Brown Brothers Harriman/Skull and Bones networks are the KEY. Jupiter Island meant Averell Harriman, Robert Lovett, C. Dou­glas Dillon and other Anglophile financiers who had directed the U.S. intelligence community long before there had been a CIA at all. And, in the backyard of the Jupiter Island OLYMPIANS (see definition in other writings of Committee 300) and under their direction, a powerful covert operations base was now being assembled in which George Bush would have been present at the creation simply as a matter of "birthright".

OPERATION ZAPATA

Let us talk about Zapata for a bit. During 1959-60, Allen Dulles and the Eisenhower Administration began to assemble in south Florida the infrastructure for covert action against Cuba. This was the JM/WAVE capability, later formally constituted as the CIA Miami station. JM/WAVE was an operational center for the Eisenhower regime's project of staging an invasion of Cuba using a secret army of anti-Castro Cuban exiles (yes, even "good-old Ike"--why do you think the Elite made him king?) or­ganized, armed, trained, transported, and directed by the CIA. The Cubans, called Brigade 2506, were trained in secret camps in Guatemala, and they had air support from B-26 bombers based in Nicaragua. This invasion was crushed by Castro's de­fending forces in less than three days. Funny thing about those Castro forces--they could only have been endowed with master­ful Soviet leadership, don't you think?

Before going along with the plan so eagerly touted by Allen Dulles, Kennedy had established the precondition that under no circumstances whatsoever would there be direct intervention by U.S. military forces against Cuba. On the one hand, Dulles had assured Kennedy that the news of the invasion would trigger an insurrection which would sweep Castro and his regime away. On the other, Kennedy had to be concerned about provoking a global thermonuclear confrontation with the U.S.S.R. in the eventuality that Nikita Khrushchev decided to respond to a U.S. Cuban gambit by, for example, cutting off U.S. access to Berlin. Ah yes, what "tangled webs".

Hints of the covert presence of George Bush were scattered here and there, and all around, the Bay of Pigs invasion. The code name for the Bay of Pigs was actually "Operation Pluto" but old E. Howard H. couldn't bear losing ego seniority and denies that this was the code name used by JM/WAVE personnel; Hunt writes: "So perhaps the Pentagon referred to the Brigade invasion as Pluto. CIA did not." But Hunt doesn't tell you what the CIA code name actually was--it was "Operation Pluto" among some other equally "cute" phraseology. I never can get over your need for trite, cutesy and totally debasing idiot code-names and "initials" labels.

You will also note that in the "exposing" done by Hunt, he also does not tell you what was in the Watergate era White House SAFE. Well--he might actually have "sold out" due to the incredibly disloyal person in point--had everything not been totally buried by FBI Director Patrick Gray. Hunt is an interesting study in one who would seem to be totally evil and yet never more than a henchman--so beware of this type of entity for you can't tell who or what with which you might be dealing.

The CIA code name was most often utilized as "Operation Zapata", not "Jupiter". The plan was so referred to by ones such as Richard Bissell of the CIA, one of the plan's prime promoters, in briefings to President Kennedy in the Cabinet Room on March 29, 1961. I ask that as these names pop up you relate them to the material being written in our outlay of the CIA material, please. It all must be integrated and you may never get the deleted material from other resource. I make reference to other resources simply so that you can rest assured that the information IS AVAILABLE and not simply mysterious thought forms of one, Dharma. Actually, it's more for HER input than for yours for she sits on the "hot seat" ALL the time. I wonder how many of YOU perceive yourselves to be so brave? So be it.

Does Operation Zapata have anything to do with Zapata Off-shore? Well, in that Zapata Oil was set up as a "fit-in", it is hard to tell which came first the chicken or the egg. After all, Zapata had been a very public figure in his own right, and the subject of a motion picture acted by Marlon Brando. The landing beach, the Playa Giron, utilized in this operation is located south of the city of Cienfuegos on the Zapata Peninsula, on the south coast of Cuba.

THE BARBARA

Then there is the question of the Brigade 2506 landing fleet, which was composed of five older freighters bought or chartered from the Garcia Steamship Lines, bearing the names of Houston, Rio Escondido, Cariber, Atlantic and Lake Charles. Oops--in addition to these vessels just named, which were outfitted as transport ships, there were two somewhat better armed fire support ships, the Blagar AND THE BARBARA. George also named his infamous death-trap (for his comrades trapped inside when he abandoned them) plane--the Barbara!

The Barbara was originally an LCI (Landing Craft Infantry) of earlier vintage. Attention is attracted at once to the Barbara and the Houston, in the first case because you must have noted the above habit of George's naming his combat vessels "Barbara" after, of course, his wife Barbara. In the second case, Bush was at this time a resident and Republican activist of Houston, Texas. Further, these vessels were seen and documented at offshore drilling rigs for undisclosed reasons.

After the defeat of the Bay of Pigs invasion, there was great animosity against Kennedy among the survivors of Brigade 2506, some of whom eventually made their way back to Miami after being released from Castro's prisoner-of-war camps. There was also great animosity against Kennedy on the part of the JM/WAVE (CIA) personnel.

During the early 1950's, E. Howard Hunt had been the CIA station chief in Mexico City--(No-o-o!?!)--YES INDEEDY! A quite embittered David Atlee Phillips (JM/WAVE veteran) tattles--and that can be found in his account called THE NIGHT WATCH. E. Howard Hunt had been the immediate superior of a young CIA recruit named William F. Buckley, the Yale graduate and Skull and Bones member who later founded the National Review. I'm sorry, chelas, I didn't write the story--I just report it! Hunt spoke his opinion very clearly about the Bay of Pigs: "No event since the communization of China in 1949 has had such a profound effect on the United States and its allies as the defeat of the U.S.-trained Cuban invasion brigade at the Bay of Pigs in April 1961.

"Out of the humiliation grew the Berlin Wall, the missile crisis, guerrilla warfare throughout Latin America and Africa, and our Dominican Republic intervention. Castro's beachhead triumph opened a bottomless Pandora's box of difficulties that affected not only the United States, but most of its allies in the Free World.

"These bloody and subversive events would not have taken place had Castro been toppled. Instead of standing firm, our govern­ment pyramided crucially wrong decisions and allowed Brigade 2506 to be destroyed. The Kennedy Administration yielded Castro all the excuse he needed to gain a tighter grip on the is­land of Jose Marti, then moved shamefacedly into the shadows and hoped the Cuban issue would simply melt away."

I think it becomes quite clear WHY there would be great media push and political pressure to hide documentation and denounce investigations by ones such as Oliver Stone and discredit the motion picture in any way possible--because truth is so thick and deep as to hang bunches of participants--mostly all in high gov­ernment places.

I want you to think a minute about media--say "cable media" and CNN. What is a major note of interest? The continual ad­vertising of such things as "National Geographic" and "National Review". Chelas, if you pay not attention--there is less than lit­tle hope for your saving your nation--much less the "free" world.

Dharma, when we write again I need to speak briefly of the Kennedy-McArthur connection. You the ones of the public are so grossly uninformed and misinformed that we simply have to take the time and effort to speak of these things. Thank you for your attention and, Dharma, thank you for your service Walk in peace this day. Salu.

Hatonn to stand-by.

PJ 45

CHAPTER 6

REC #1 HATONN

FRI., FEBRUARY 21, 1992 7:40 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 188

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1992

TODAY'S WATCH

ISRAEL/LEBANON

Unlike the Eveready commercial where the rabbit will eventu­ally run down--the war continues to rev-up. Keep your eye open to other things going on and this will fit into its proper placement. Remember what I told you about WATER in a writing some couple of months past. This is a major reason for such encounters as well as forced building--to claim water. The aquifers which feed Israel are under the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Israel plans to have all the land above these re­sources one way or another. So be it.

OTHER MATTERS

I move rapidly from one subject pattern to another which causes great difficulty at times and for that I make hardy apologies. I am, however, continually interested in how "shoe fitting" takes place. Ones think that God sees not--No, it is man and often Space Command who sees not. God SEES ALL.

We have had several ones come through our places of sharing and through the businesses which spring forth in service to assist through this time of hard times and blistering competition. There are ones located in our proximity of service in this area who actually do not serve THIS cause or are still seeking direc­tion in their own pathway. Does it mean their service is not worthy? No--it means only that ones within the employment al­ready set up, mostly due to lack of funding--cannot function within their requirements.

It is quite natural that ones feel displaced and abused at times--forgetting that at this time ALL comes from money attended by the one or two who assume total responsibility while the re­ceivers seem to think there is limitless supply. The limitless supply comes when the receivers have also shared in unlimited measure--and you simply are not yet "there".

As I ponder this situation a few weeks past I ran past several in­stances without subject change other than paragraph separation for I wish neither to embarrass nor handle personal business within these documents. One subject did not necessarily lead into the next.

I suggest that you ones might consider why you put shoes upon your feet which may or may not fit!

I said that one had turned in the Common Law Service Center for "selling software". I also said that it was from ones who de­sired work within the "group" for service and remuneration. I failed to state that the initials of "those" guilty parties are K.H. and T.A.C. May this serve as a lesson for all of us in making judgments. Let us also remember to always project in such manner that we are above even the slightest suspicion as comes from prior actions in point.

I repeat the question to the ones who seek "something" and find it not visible--what do you want from us? YOU must find that which you can do and wherein you can offer talents--it is NOT for these ones to MAKE A PLACE. The projects are yet un­funded and the supply of personal funds has long since run out. Remember--this is not a center for study nor group experience. This is a place of work for bringing forth the WORD and laying a foundation for experience to see a remnant through and offer possibilities of regrouping. We are most wondrously happy to share all that we have--but when the "what we have" is ex­hausted--what more can you expect from the ones who have given? They give unto the cause of the WORD at this time and all else must follow in proper sequence.

I am humbly grateful to you ones who share this burden for we could not function at all were it not for your participation. Please remember that we write for over six billion people and the miserable picking and rock-throwing becomes unacceptable.

OUR WORK

I am disappointed as my own workers within this very place of­fer totally off-the-wall explanations on subjects of "faith" and our "work" unto callers. Can we not keep silence or--at the least--give opinions to callers? You express opinions as being Hatonn's and they are NOT. I sit with tape in hand from a beautiful person who expresses longing desire to pull these ones from the grip of Satan and Hatonn. Good--I express not annoy­ance at the caller or tape-maker but at my own people who then pronounce "total confusion" now that the tape has been sent. From the first expression on the tape it was blatantly clear from where came the resource of information--with total ignorance of more than a couple of papers somehow causing the attack. If ones read our work--they will find no contradiction nor confu­sion. Confusion in our material comes FROM NOT KNOW­ING WHAT IT IS YOU ARE PRESENTING--AND SPEAK­ING AS IF YOU KNOW.

CHANNELS

I welcome your inquiries and most certainly appreciate your sharing of information gleaned from another. But, chelas, please use your intelligent discernment. Just as ones ask ME about such things as Ramtha, Lazarus, and different "Channels"--I do not have right to speak on those subjects for I am not informed as to that which is their business. If their work fits within the LAWS OF GOD AND THE CREATION--what pick can you have? If not--they are uninformed or misled.

Example: I have been sent a portion of a newsletter from one who receives from some energy called "This Awareness". "This Awareness"??? Does this energy not have a name or identification? Why do you not demand identification? This is like using the term "unified" as a proper label. "Awareness" is not a "name" nor an identification.

I take no exception to the attention given by this one in response to many inquiries regarding the Phoenix material--in fact, I am most happy to have the ability to interact. Ones ask for re­sponse when they have only seen one or two documents--at most--and then turn to "Awareness" and ask judgment (yes, I said "judgment"). The person and "Awareness" have seen no more of the information or papers than has the inquirer but we get two full pages of detailed credit and discredit all mixed in the same pot.

For readers of the Phoenix material who have followed along and read their homework--there is no confusion nor failure to measure intent. With over 12,000 pages of writing I think all of you can find something of value in the pile of material. If you know the rules of discernment according to laws we keep re­peating and repeating unto you--you have no problem with "belief".

I get credit for telling Truth and then smacked because it is written "somewhere". Do you not read? I have stated over and over and over again--I GIVE WHAT IS ALREADY ON YOUR PLACE AS PERTAINS TO. ACTIONS OF THE ELITE--SO THAT YOU CAN GET CONFIRMATION. Do you badger a Journalist for reporting the news? The point is to integrate the "news" so that the sleeping masses can finally see and hear it!!! Wherein the subject is God and soul journey--YOU WILL GET TRUTH AND NO FLOWERS TO DISTRACT YOU FROM THE GRAVE INTO WHICH THE WORLD IS READY TO ROLL.

As with the taped message which does all in the name of "Jesus" (ALL), and then says Truth: "...who was named by the Apostle Paul....", etc. Indeed? Wherein is your 'CHRIST'? "Christ" is the point and not a man named by another man. You have now focused on a PHYSICAL BEING and left out the one com­ponent part of value--CHRIST, which is a state of being in en­ergy form--called spiritual.

Now, as with "Awareness", the speaker goes along very well as he quotes from a letter of inquirer: "Word from knowledgeable sources has stated that this information is only copied from al­ready existing materials and the government is actually behind this, adding mistruths to a percentage of the information in order to confuse and mislead those who have a high amount of aware­ness concerning covered-up issues. ("This Awareness" sug­gested the last paragraph be reread.) "Word from knowledge­able sources has stated that this information is only copied from already existing materials, and the government is actually be­hind this, adding mistruths to a percentage of the information in order to confuse and mislead those who have a high amount of awareness concerning covered-up issues."

This goes on for some two pages so allow me to spare the space and time, please. Number one: if there is already "awareness of events", how can more clarification possibly cause CONFU­SION? Next, even "Awareness" indicates the Truth of the pro­jections of the MATERIAL--THEN GOES RIGHT ON TO STATE: "DON'T TAKE THE INFORMATION SERI­OUSLY......!!!"

I am denounced--actually my scribe is denounced--and named, Doris Ekker. Well, I shall be happy to share a bit further for the ones sending the information to this place removed all evi­dence of source of "Awareness" identity by sending only perti­nent Phoenix reference. This is proper and fine, I just wish to make a point for clarity. I would suggest that I see that these are ones, Avaton and Vikki. I make no comment on their capa­bility for it is not my business to share their journey or purpose. However, if you do not take the material SERIOUSLY then you are going to have a very, very rough go of it.

I repeat several things herein--I HAVE NO CONNECTION TO ANY KNOWN "RELIGION"--I SERVE ONLY GOD AND GOD'S PEOPLE AS YOU MOVE TOWARD TRANSITION. THERE IS GROSS MISPERCEPTION AS TO MY CONNEC­TION WITH THE HIGHER ENERGY FORMS WHO HAVE BROUGHT THEIR OWN MISSION OF INFORMATION. THIS MISINFORMATION AND MISUNDERSTANDING CONCERNS EVEN MY RELATIONSHIP WITH ONE, ASHTAR COMMAND. I HAVE SPOKEN AND COR­RECTED SO MANY TIMES THAT I REFUSE TO DO SO AGAIN HEREIN FOR OUR TIME AND SPACE IS MORE VALUABLE THAN ALL THE GOLD ON YOUR PLACE­MENT. THE RELIGIONS AND DOCTRINES OF RELIGION AND THE NEW AGE MOVEMENT WILL BE THE DEATH OF YOUR SOUL JOURNEY IN TRUTH AS YOU ARE HEADED.

I note that even in the taping of denouncement and "help for a lost soul", the names and places are totally incorrect--how can you say the "Bible" has no errors when the spokesmen speak al­most no valid facts as to dates or players??

MY ONLY INTENT AS FAR AS WORLD HISTORY AND HAPPENINGS IS TO CONFIRM AND VALIDIFY FACTS, FOR YOUR ENEMY IS CONTINUALLY CHANGING HIS­TORY TO SUIT HIS OWN NEEDS FOR YOUR ENSLAVEMENT. YOU ARE TAUGHT INCORRECTLY AND TO BLATANTLY DISREGARD THE LAWS OF GOD AND THE CREATION--IT IS FINE IF YOU DO SO--IT WILL, HOW­EVER, NOT GET YOU ABOARD SECURE PASSAGE OFF YOUR PRISON. I WOULD ASK THESE TAPERS AND CHANNELS AND "AWARENESS" JUST HOW IT IS THEY CAN JUDGE THIS WORK?? I, FOR ONE, DEMAND TO KNOW IN BEHALF OF YOU ONES WHO BELIEVE THEIR OUTPUT--TRUE OR FALSE. IF THE ANSWER IS FROM A PURELY PHYSICAL ASPECT--BE CAUTIOUS FOR YOUR SOUL WILL RESIDE IN THE SPIRITUAL--DETACHED FROM PHYSICAL. JUST AS MY WORDS ARE CHANGED IN THE RETELLING--SO HAS BEEN THE BOOKS GIVEN FOR YOUR GUIDANCE--DELIBERATELY AND DEADLY! FEEL FREE TO CONTINUE IN YOUR PRAYING FOR IN­SIGHT FOR THESE "POOR CHILDREN CAUGHT IN HATONN'S TRAP OF EVIL" AS PRONOUNCED UPON MY ONES, BUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE MUST INCLUDE: "CHARITY MUST BEGIN AT HOME"! WE SHALL CON­TINUE TO PRAY FOR YOUR CLARITY OF INSIGHT AND GO RIGHT ON WITH OUR PROJECTIONS OF DESTINY AS UNTOUCHED BY PHYSICAL, HUMAN HANDS AND TAMPERINGS. WE MAKE NO CLAIM NOR FORCE UPON ANY WHO WISH TO TRAVEL A DIFFERENT JOURNEY--I JUST SUGGEST YOU BE SURE WHERE YOUR PATH LEADS- - - -AND THEN, PERHAPS, YOU WILL REJOICE IN THE TID-BITS OF PROOF AND CONFIRMATION WE SORT OUT OF THE BILLIONS OF PAGES OF NONSENSE, TO PRESENT TO YOUR ATTENTION. HOW MIGHT IT BE THAT THIS SCRIBE HAS ONLY CHO-SEN THOSE TOPICS WHICH PROVE TO BE TRUTH EVEN TO THOSE YOU PETITION? WOULD YOU BE CAPABLE OF SUCH SELECTIVITY--WITHOUT ERROR OF CHOICE? WOULD YOU NOT, PERHAPS, CHOOSE EVEN ONE IN-CORRECT PRESENTATION? DHARMA IS A 60 YEAR-OLD HUMAN WHO HAS NEVER BEEN INTERESTED IN ANY OF THIS MATERIAL--THAT IS ONE OF THE REA-SONS SHE SERVES IN THIS CAPACITY--SO SHE DOES NOT TAINT THE WORK BY HER OPINIONS--FOR SHE BORE NO PARTICULAR OPINIONS REGARDING THE SUBJECTS AT POINT. I ASK THAT YOU READERS PONDER THIS INPUT FOR I AM ADVANCING BEYOND THIS TYPE OF DISSERTATION--THE INFORMATION IS FOR YOUR USE AND GLEANING--I AM NOT COME TO DEBATE NOR ARGUE POINTS OF PHYSICAL DOMIN-ION. ULTIMATELY, THERE IS NOTHING OF VALUE IN ANY RATIO WHATEVER--EXCEPT SOUL AND I, FOR ONE, NEED TO GET ON WITH THAT ASPECT FAR MORE FULLY. HOWEVER, IF YOU ARE MIRED IN THE BLINDNESS OF THE LIES AND THE PHYSICAL--YOU CANNOT RISE HIGH ENOUGH TO PERCEIVE THE SPIRITUAL TRUTH. THE INTENT OF PULLING YOU DOWN-- BEGAN IN THE SPIRITUAL LIES!! MOREOVER, THIS IS WHY BOOKS AND SPEECH ARE BANNED FROM THESE RESOURCES--FOR IT IS THE ONLY WAY TO KEEP TRUTH FROM YOU!

AS TO SPIRITUAL TRUTH--I SUGGEST YOU STOP ASK-ING FOR ANOTHER'S OPINION REGARDING YOUR SOUL JOURNEY. YOU WILL MAKE IT SOLELY ALONE WITH GOD. AVATON'S OPINION OF MY WORK IS WORTHLESS TO YOU. IF THESE ONES BE GOOD TEACHERS THEN YOU WILL BE ABLE TO DISCERN FOR SELF ACCORDING TO THE RULES AND GUIDELINES OF TRUTH--WHAT DOES THE WORD MEAN TO YOU?!?! THAT IS THE ONLY MEASURE OF IMPORTANCE--YOUR PERCEPTION! WE ONLY GIVE YOU THE FACTS OF "HOW TT IS" AND YOU WILL DO THE DISCERNING AND JUDGING FOR I JUDGE NOT AND NEITHER WILL GOD. YOU WILL JUDGE ALONG WITH THAT GOD WITHIN--MY MISSION IS TO ALLOW YOU TRUTH WITH WHICH TO HAVE DISCLOSED KNOWLEDGE BY WHICH TO FORM YOUR JUDGMENTS AND DIRECTION--EXACTLY ACCORDING TO THE PROMISE OF GOD--FOR YOUR JOURNEY THROUGH THE VEIL OF PHYSICAL MANIFESTATION--OUT OF THE PITS AND INTO LIGHT! NO MORE AND NO LESS--THE REST IS STRICTLY UP TO YOU.

Let us move on with our work. Following disclosures of the lies as impact you THIS DAY--we shall take time to move into these other areas of discernment, but, frankly, I wish to have my audience with me so that the multitudes HEAR WHAT I SAY AND RECOGNIZE WHO I AM AND I HAVE JUDGED THAT THIS IS THE PROPER SEQUENCE TO ARRIVE AT THAT PRESENTATION--AFTER YOU ONES HAVE ABIL-ITY TO DISCERN THAT I DO BRING TRUTH WHICH CAN BE CONFIRMED AND BELIEVED. THE LESSONS OF ENERGY AND SOUL ARE TOO IMPORTANT TO FRAGMENT AND QUARREL OVER IN YOUR LITTLE CIRCLES SET FORTH TO DISTRACT YOU AND KEEP YOU MISINFORMED. NOTE THAT ALL THE WORDS ARE USUALLY USED BY THE ADVERSARY, UPON YOU PRECIOUS LISTENERS--AND THEN HE LOCKS YOU SE-CURELY INTO THE PHYSICAL NON-REALITY WHILE CAUSING YOU TO SEPARATE YOURSELF FROM IN-SIGHT TO SEE BEYOND THAT VEIL INTO REALITY. SO BE IT--FOR TO EACH WILL BE HIS OWN!

We were into the subject of your President's activities within the CIA as being presented herein. I give total and full credit to able writers and daring patriots for their work in point. Some are not understanding of the dangers and I honor them to the point of total protection of their physical beings--would it not be better if you cared as much for your brother's welfare? God al­ways returns honor and reward to those who give in truthful purpose unto that which is goodly and within the laws of good­ness. This, by the way, fits the rules laid forth in your Consti­tution of the United States of America and your Bill of Rights. You must now begin at reclaiming that foundation lest you lose freedom to recover. I shall reveal all resources at the proper time for secure deliverance with ability to bring forth Truth unto you-the-people in freedom and safety. Your taunts of "plagiarism" are unworthy of Truth--YOU CANNOT PLAGIARIZE TRUTH! If YOU accuse of "plagiarism" and the subject be "Truth", you show your own ignorance and total lack of knowledge as to even the legality in the laws. We print JOURNALS and NEWSPAPERS--I suggest you ones check out the differences in perception and definition of both and/or ei­ther. By the same set of honorable rules I PROTECT RE­SOURCES FROM YOU ONES WHO WOULD PULL THEM DOWN BY YOUR ACCUSATIONS, DENIALS AND DI­RECT ASSAULT. LET IT BE CLEARLY KNOWN AS TO THIS FACT--HEREIN--NOW. If I choose to editorialize--I SHALL DO SO. I LAY A BANQUET FOR YOUR INTAKE--YOU MAY REFUSE ANY OR ALL. I AM NOT YOUR EN­EMY--YOU ARE YOUR ENEMY!

CIA AND BUSH BOYS

I ask that we simply begin right here with the subject I outlaid yesterday:

KENNEDY AND MAC ARTHUR

How is it that facts are distorted and lies fill the void? Let us use the following as an example. Right out of a note in the Spotlight regarding author and contributor, Mark Lane, you will find the following interesting turn of events. Now, please, as you read the quotation I ask that you keep in mind what I have told you: The ADL is a fabrication and a branch of BRITISH INTELLIGENCE--not "Jewish" anything. The operations in the U.S. are called "... B'nai B'rith". This "ADL" is in inte­gration with the Mafia Crime Syndicate and owns Sterling Bank, home officed in New York. From this springs the Jewish De­fense League (JDL), Jewish Defense Organization (JDO), World Zionist Organization (WZO) and other Lobby groups.

Note herein that Mark Lane wrote a book regarding the Kennedy assassination recently. Parts of that were integrated into Oliver Stone's "JFK". Mark's book, PLAUSIBLE DE­NIAL, is about the assassination and has nothing to do with Jews, Zionists nor does he speak of these elements in his inter­views. Thus, the next becomes a bit perplexing if you don't un­derstand the way these organizations work to get attention and sympathy for themselves. I think I need not make further com­ment for the little notice speaks for itself.

FALSE ACCUSATIONS

"COVERT ACTION?--Spotlight, Feb. 24, 1992: Author-attorney Mark Lane, author of the phenomenally best-selling PLAUSIBLE DENIAL, has been the target of harassment by the violence-prone Jewish Defense Organization (JDO), an offshoot of the Jewish Defense League. After his appearance on a New York City television interview program, the JDO demanded "equal time" and threatened to picket the home and office of the host. According to Lane: "Equal time for what? I never men­tioned the JDO or Israel in my book, which is about the JFK as­sassination. I know their spiritual leader, the late Meir Kahane, was an informant for the FBI, and I now wonder if when I say the CIA killed JFK, the JDO is entitled to equal time because they are now representing the CIA."

We will take this one step forward, please. This "Racism" and "Anti-Semitism" is totally out of control and you will end up as Canada--blindly giving up your freedom of expression and press by playing into the lying frenzy of the accusers. Here is another one assaulting an author, James B. Stewart, who wrote a book DEN OF THIEVES about the junk bond swindler, Michael Milken. What happened? Let's quote: "Did Michael Milken get of easy in court? That was the opinion of lawyer Alan Der­showitz, who announced, 'I smell a rat in this case. '

"But a few months later, when the jailed junk bond swindler hired Dershowitz to argue his appeal, the aggressive attorney changed his tune. When DEN OF THIEVES was published, re­vealing a documented account of Milken's 'historic' crimes, Dershowitz attempted to discredit it by calling author James B. Stewart an "anti-Semite" and his book "an anti-Semitic screed".

So what is this about? It is about your freedom to bring Truth forth in any form whatsoever. In the book, in the Index, the word Israel is not listed--but that is used as an expression to "prove intent" of anti-Semitism!?! Also missing in the index is the Simon Wiesenthal Center or the Simon Wiesenthal Founda­tion. Yet these "Nazi-hunting" agencies have received more fi­nancial support from Milken and his inner circle, such as Marc Rich, than from any other source. In turn they represented the junk bond czar's major social forum--the one place where Milken regularly attended social and public functions. I would suggest that the missing words from the index indicate the pro-Israel slant instead of the orthodox definition of "anti-Semitism".

SWINDLERS BIG CONTRIBUTORS

It is totally proven that the financial support Milken and his co­horts gave Israel was very significant. Apart from the Simon Wiesenthal group, other leading pro-Israel organizations have extended their top honors to these swindlers.

Ivan Boesky, one of the junk bond czar's principal confederates, raised "hundreds of millions of dollars" for Israel as two-term chairman of the United Jewish Appeal's Israel bond drive and was named Man of the Year in 1985 for "untiring" efforts. Milken was similarly honored for what are described as "huge" handouts he contributed during "emergencies" such as the in­vasion of Lebanon by Israeli forces.

I am going to leave this at this point but when you speak of "confusion"--is it Hatonn who offers confusion?? You sleepyheads better get your eyes open before they are "put-out" for the remainder of your life journey on your placement. Did you nice investors who were placing your money into what you thought was good investment--KNOW THAT YOUR MONEY WAS FUNNELLED FOR WAR IN ISRAEL? I THOUGHT NOT!

You must come to see and recognize the connections for the en­tire Elite circle of controllers are never sleeping and they are out to "GETCHA!" You are already in the "Web"; all that is left is the "kill" and "supper".

Even if this seems to be unconnected to Bush, Kennedy, MacArthur and thus and so--No--you must come to realize that all is connected to all and clues have been abundant all the way to this moment in setting of the stage for the things that have come to destroy you. You must come to see and KNOW.

HUNT/KENNEDY/MAC ARTHUR

Hunt was typical of the opinion that the debacle (Cuban inva­sion) had been Kennedy's fault, and not the responsibility of men like Allen Dulles and Richard Bissell, who had designed it and recommended it. After the embarrassing failure of the inva­sion, which never evoked the hoped-for spontaneous anti-Castro insurrection, Kennedy fired Allen Dulles, his Harrimanite deputy Bissell, and CIA deputy Director Charles Cabell (whose brother was the mayor of Dallas at the time Kennedy was shot). [H: Remember, he is the one responsible for changing the route of the motorcade that infamous day!]

During the days after the Bay of Pigs debacle, Kennedy was deeply suspicious of the intelligence community and of proposals for military escalation in general, including in places like South Vietnam. Kennedy sought to procure an outside, expert opinion on military matters. For this he turned to the former Comman­der in Chief of the Southwest Pacific Theatre during World War II, General Douglas MacArthur. Kennedy met with MacArthur in which the veteran general warned the young President that there were elements inside the U.S. government who em­phatically did not share his patriotic motives, and who were seeking to destroy his administration from within. MacArthur warned that the forces bent on destroying Kennedy were centered in the Wall Street financial community and its various tentacles in the intelligence community.

MAC ATHUR'S AWARENESS VALUED

It is a matter of public record that Kennedy met with MacArthur in the latter part of April 1961, after the Bay of Pigs. Accord­ing to Kennedy aide Theodore Sorenson, MacArthur told Kennedy, "The chickens are coming home to roost, and you happen to have just moved into the chicken house." At the same meeting, according to Sorenson, MacArthur "warned Kennedy against the commitment of American foot soldiers on the Asian mainland, and the President never forgot this advice." This point is very grudgingly confirmed by Arthur M. Schlesinger, a Kennedy aide who had a vested interest in vilifying MacArthur and who wrote that "MacArthur expressed his old view that anyone wanting to commit American ground forces to the mainland of Asia should have his head examined." Mac Arthur restated this advice during a second meeting with Kennedy when the General returned from his last trip to the Far East in July 1961.

Kennedy valued MacArthur's professional military opinion highly, and used it to keep at arms length those advisers who were arguing for escalation in Laos, Vietnam, and elsewhere. He repeatedly invited those who proposed to send land forces to Asia to convince MacArthur that this was a good idea. If they could convince MacArthur, then he, Kennedy, might also go along.

At this time, the group proposing escalation in Vietnam (as well as preparing the assassination of President Diem) had a heavy Brown Brothers Harriman/Skull and Bones overtone: The hawks of 1961-63 were Harriman, McGeorge Bundy, William Bundy, Henry Cabot Lodge and some key London oligarchs and theo­reticians of counterinsurgency wars. And of course, George Bush during these years was calling for escalation in Vietnam and challenging Kennedy to "muster the courage" to try a sec­ond invasion of Cuba.

CONTAMINATING MIAMI AREA

In the meantime, the JM/WAVE-Miami station complex was growing rapidly to become the largest of Langley's many satel­lites. During the years after the failure of the Bay of Pigs, this complex had as many as 3,000 Cuban agents and subagents, with a small army of case officers to direct and look after each one. According to one account, there were at least 55 dummy corporations to provide employment, cover, and commercial disguise for all these operatives. There were detective bureaus, gun stores, real estate brokerages, boat repair shops, and party boats for fishing and other entertainments. There was the clan­destine Radio Swan, later renamed Radio Americas. There were fleets of specially modified boats based at Homestead Ma­rina and at other marinas throughout the Florida Keys. Agents were assigned to the University of Miami and other educational institutions.

The raison d'etre of the massive capability commanded by Theodore Shackley was now Operation Mongoose, a program for sabotage raids and assassinations to be conducted on Cuban territory, with a special effort to eliminate Fidel Castro personally. In order to run these operations from U.S. territory, fla­grant and extensive violation of federal and state laws was the order of the day. Documents regarding the income tax returns were faked. FAA regulations were violated by planes taking off for Cuba or for forward bases in the Bahamas and elsewhere. Explosives moved across highways that were full of civilian traffic. The Munitions Act, the Neutrality Act, the customs and immigrations laws were routinely flaunted.

Above all, the drug laws were massively violated as the gallant anti-communist fighters filled their planes and boats with illegal narcotics to be smuggled back into the United States when they returned from their missions. By 1963, the drug-running activi­ties of the covert operatives were beginning to attract attention. JM/WAVE, in sum, accelerated the slide of south Florida towards the status of drug and murder capital of the United States it achieved during the 1980's.

THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION

It cannot be the task herein to begin to treat the reasons for which certain leading elements of the Anglo-American financial oligarchy, acting with certain kinds of support from continental European aristocratic and neofacist networks, ordered the murder of John F. Kennedy. The British and the Harrimanites wanted escalation in Vietnam; by the time of his assassination Kennedy was committed to a pullout of U.S. forces. Kennedy was also interested in seeking a more stable path of war avoidance with the Soviets, using the U.S. military superiority demonstrated during the Cuban missile crisis to convince Moscow to accept a policy of world peace through economic development. Kennedy was interested in the possibilities of anti-missile strategic defense to put an end to that nightmare of Mutually Assured Destruction which appealed to HENRY KISSINGER, a disgruntled former employee of the Kennedy Administration whom the President had denounced as a madman.

JFK'S PLANS FOR GOOD

Kennedy was also considering moves to limit or perhaps abolish the usurpation of authority over the national currency of the Wall Street and London interests controlling the Federal Reserve System. He fully planned to assert presidential control, as distinct from Wall Street control, over the intelligence community. My, what a big order--little realizing that your nation had al-ready been taken over by these very organizations in point. Kennedy fully planned to oust J. Edgar Hoover from his purported life tenure at the FBI, subjecting that agency to presidential control for the first time in bunches of years. Hoover had become a "mentally sick" individual. Kennedy was further committed to a vigorous expansion of the space program, the cultural impact of which was beginning to alarm the finance oligarches.

Above all, Kennedy was acting like a man who thought he was "President of the United States", violating the collegiality of oligarchical trusteeship of that office that had been in force since the days before Roosevelt. Kennedy furthermore had two younger brothers who might succeed him, putting a strong presidency beyond the control of the Eastern Anglophile Liberal Establishment for some decades to come. This would, in turn, strengthen the Constitutional functioning of the system and break down the Judicial machine as structured by the non-justice bilkers of Law.

George Bush joined in the Harrimanite opposition to Kennedy on ALL of these points.

After Kennedy was killed in Dallas on November 22, 1963, it was known that E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis had both been present--together--in Dallas on the day of the shooting, although the truth of these particular allegations were buried and the proof efforted at thwarting. Both Hunt and Sturgis were active veterans of the Bay of Pigs operation and would later appear center stage in Watergate.

BUSH PROVABLY INVOLVED

I think it is important for you to know that both Nixon and Bush were involved in the assassination. Bush, as a matter of fact and record, made a phone call to the FBI, identifying himself as George H.W. Bush only brief hours following the shooting. He reported that a "right-wing Young Republican had been talking of killing the president". Remember that Bush's name is George Herbert Walker Bush and at that time he was an oilman living in Houston (he still has a hotel room so he can claim residency and avoid state taxes and vote in Texas). He was active in the growing Republican Party in Texas as well. The party was split in those days by a bitter struggle for control between moderates such as Bush claimed to be and extreme conservatives.

BLAME IT ON THE PARROT

The facts then fell apart when the Bush press office at first de­nied any such call--even though proof was in hand. Then the authenticity was challenged along with the authenticity of the FBI records of the call. Then, of course, as with all memories in trouble--Bush said that he "...didn't recall the phone call!" Stranger yet, the records were buried in the archives of "top se­cret--national security". By the way--more to the story as you might guess. The story was to be planted and given publicity and Bush was to "advise", telephonically, the Houston FBI of­fice that a right-wing member of the Texas Young Republicans "had been talking of killing the president when he comes to Houston." POOR CHILD CATCHING THE BLAME? MILTON PARROTT. Parrott would forever bear the stigma of being "fingered" by the now President of the United States as an assassin. The FBI picked up Parrott and questioned him ad nauseam. The only thing ever brought forth as "cause" was that Parrott had been somehow noted checking out the "John Birch Society" .

POLICE DESTROY OWN RECORDS

It was noted that both Hunt and Sturgis were among a group of six to eight derelicts who were found in boxcars sitting on the railroad tracks behind the grassy knoll near Dealey Plaza, and who were actually rounded up and taken in for questioning by the Dallas police on the day of the assassination. I note further--the records were destroyed by the police. Somehow the fin­gerprints, interrogations and all related material were "LOST" on all parties involved--including the other fourteen "derelicts".

I can assure you, however, the evidence was still good enough to have the Commission on CIA Activities Within the United States (the Rockefeller Commission) to attempt to refute them in its 1975 report. Yes, I said "Rockefeller" Commission.

SO WHAT OF GEORGE?

I would think you can see the cover when you see what is writ­ten in George Bush's OFFICIAL biography: He was during 1963 a well-to-do businessman residing in Houston, the busy president of Zapata Offshore and the chairman of the Harris County Republican Organization, supporting Barry Goldwater as the GOP's 1964 presidential candidate, while at the same time actively preparing his own 1964 bid for the U.S. Senate.

But--during that time some strange bedfellows are noted. Bush shared some common acquaintances with LEE HAR­VEY OSWALD.

This is getting most lengthy so allow us to close this segment. When we pen again we will take up the De Mohrenschildt con­nection which will speak to the Oswald connection more clearly. Thank you for your attention.

Hatonn to clear.