PJ#076, SORTING THE PIECES RELATIVE CONNECTIONS VOL. IV

PJ 76

CHAPTER 11

REC #2 HATONN

SAT., AUG. 14, 1993 1:30 P.M. YEAR 6, DAY 363

SAT., AUGUST 14, 1993

SHADOW BOXING

As you walk through the shadows can you not see that if you remain within Truth and within God, you can "see" quite well for in every circumstance if you ask in intent of goodness in the receiving--you SHALL receive that which is needed. It rarely comes packaged as you pre-perceive. Then, you take the in­formation (formulae) and create (originate) an alternative cir­cumstance in which YOU have control and NOT your enemy over you. IF YOUR INTENT BE PURE--YOUR CREATION WILL BRING FORTH THE FRUITS OF YOUR LABOR IN PLENTY AND IT SHALL BE SWEET. If your intent is in worldly greed--you shall have fruit from your plantings--but it will be indeed BITTER. It may well "appear" your enemy con­tinues to "win" but you deviate not from our purpose, goal and path--it will be you who wins--not your enemy. If "his" (your enemy) had the same Godly intent--he WOULD NOT BE YOUR ENEMY TRYING TO DISCREDIT AND PULL YOU DOWN THAT HE MIGHT HAVE PERSONAL GAIN.

It is important in this journey to not simply say "I have my truth" and "You have yours" and each is valid. Valid indeed, but NOT usually Godly. The surface words may well express "Godly"--while the actions and rock throwing indicate intent otherwise. Remember, also, vineyard toilers--what "appears to be" may well NOT be the whole of the story. Hold to the intent of projects in God's purpose, done in integrity of God-worthi­ness and the adversary will fall away--but not until THE NEC­ESSARY LESSONS ARE LEARNED AND PRACTICED. Be they ever so seemingly "humble", even the most tiny "lesson" may be THE knowledge which will focus the WHOLE. Does this mean that you may not personally gain? Perish the thought--our major intent here is to PROVE to mankind that in God's garden--each can flourish both in soul growth and abundance to experience within this dimension--even with turmoil, upheaval and seemingly total devastation and evil around you. He who would pull down and damage a brother to gain in "gold" is not in movement toward God--regardless of what he believes in consciousness. The fact that restlessness and "excuses" continue to flow endlessly--proves the lack of peace and fulfillment. When, further, you GIVE to GOD for HIS work and then de­mand it back with interest--you are bordering on serious reward in troubles. You may well get what you THINK you want--but it will be as bitter in the "having" as is the Hemlock sap. You can fool almost all of the people sometime, a lot of the people all of the time--but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time--AND YOU CANNOT FOOL GOD ANY OF THE TIME! The worst circumstance, however, is when you FOOL SELF--FOR THAT INDEED MAKES YOU THE "FOOL"! THIS ALMOST ALWAYS COMES WITH INPUT FROM ANOTHER IF YOUR PATH WAS TRULY PRIORLY IN THE LIGHT OF GOODNESS. IF YOU THINK I MEAN YOU, I SUGGEST YOU LOOK CAREFULLY AT WHAT YOU DO AND WHO GIVES ADVICE AND HELPS YOU TAKE THAT INCREDIBLY STUPID ADVICE! YOU, PEOPLE, ARE THE MOST FOOLISH AND "HAD" SPECIES. TOO GREEDY TO STAY IN THE LIGHT AND WAIT UPON GOD--AND TOO FOOLISH TO KEEP FROM FOLLOWING THE PIPER WITH THE SHEKELS OF GOLD. IT IS CALLED "FOOL'S GOLD" BECAUSE YOU FINALLY GET IT AND IT HAS NO VALUE AND IT HAS LEACHED OUT EVERY FRAGMENT OF GOOD­NESS WITHIN. Usually then what happens is the "adviser" takes leave for he would not want to live with a "fool". This, further, usually happens when he has stripped you of all that you THOUGHT was of value. The adversary is indeed UNKIND, my children, and as always--you do it to yourselves.

FOOD STAMPS AND EKKERS

This is a new low, Mr. Green(berg?) and Miss Annie. Your actions are SMALL and demeaning even unto yourselves in your already "small" actions. You have started an investigation into the Ekker's eligibility for Food assistance? You idiots--they are in the process of taking early Social Security, their home was confiscated by the RTC AND SOLD to people in Arizona! What did you tell these investigators? Well, they are finding exactly what you might expect--THAT THE EKKERS WOULD ALSO BE ELIGIBLE FOR FULL ASSISTANCE WELFARE--THANKS TO YOU! I would further suppose that a few more of your letters in lying intent to damage--to other parties who hap­pen to "believe" and share in our journey--might well make you quite "liable"--especially Annie and L.F. You may just wish to express unconditional love--but what you are doing is lying about your treatment, your funds, your intent and the nasty little network you have going. If you are still an emissary of Mr. Green, Annie--it seems like a good idea to reconsider that stance.

Your letter to Mr. David P. is libelous if David was first a friend of MINE who came to work out his problems with the "system" in use of our suggestions. Assuming David is "just a friend" and was FIRST YOUR OWN CONTACT AND FRIEND, then you certainly have freedom of speech--however, it appears to me that David was efforting to sort Truth and you offered him a plateful of incorrect information and outright lies. The Institute went a long way out on a limb to make things suit­able to L.F. It matters not about the Ekkers--but you are con­tinuing to damage the reputation of the Institute and that is going to be less and less acceptable to those who utilize and work with the Institute.

I wonder with this unconditional love stance of L.F. if he would be so happy were Nora demanding her money and suggesting that it be taken out of L.F.'s share so that she would gain--to hell with his loss? Moreover, what if she got the law and de­manded Mr. F.'s share be paid to her IN GOLD COINS! You see, foolish chelas--the NOTES are backed by gold--YOU NEITHER PUT IN GOLD NOR BOUGHT GOLD. The Institute did buy gold which is held as security for your loan to the Insti­tute.

What in the world do you want? You are not only "square", you are MAKING thousands and thousands of dollars in excess of your loan. There is NO "investment". L.F. LOANED money to the Institute--which did EXACTLY what they should have done and now are repaying in full, plus! You really begin to look totally GREEDY and hardly "unconditional-love" ori­ented. Whoever is in charge of YOUR business, L., is about to do you in--credibility-wise and the last demand for MORE AND BIGGER just about got the whole transaction called off. If it be your attorney--you had better check it out. If you are allowing "others" to attend your affairs--YOU HAD REALLY BETTER CHECK IT OUT! And, in the letter you wrote to David you say I, Hatonn, sit up here and demand lawsuits? No, chelas, if I did nothing else--so be it. However, fortunate for you--I don't or I would have them slap a big one against you. I am going to match MY GOD against that one you play with. You can spell "my" GOD with a little "g" (god) and yours with a big "G" and it doesn't mean A THING. You go chase your GOLD and do your rituals--and we shall see. My first mission is to discharge the foolish ideas that you can play with the devil and call him anything you wish and dabble around in New Age and a new "Channeler" every day. If you have a new one every day, my children--you surely haven't found TRUTH in what you ARE doing--you prove that you are either steadfast in the WRONG path or you are still searching! What are you going to do with your money when you get it? Will it sit lightly and wondrously in your stomach or will your heart have a bad case of lead-poi­son? One of you may be in Truth and openly trying to "just be good"--the other is manipulative, deceitful and a liar and cheat. Which one? Does sucking a "bunch" within to "agree" with you make you RIGHT? No, just a bunch of WRONG ones.

IF your new channelers, etc., are giving you Truth--WHY ARE ALL OF YOU STILL PICKING UP OUR PAPER (WITHOUT PAYING FOR IT--AT LEAST, SOME ARE SEEN GETTING THE SHEET YOU THINK SO FALSE AND MISERABLE) and your letter indicates that you certainly don't miss a word--Or perhaps one of YOU is the new psychic "channeler"? I know your spies and your silly little clutches--who cares? If I were not what bothers you--why do you continue to hang around "my" Truth? Why would you pull me down or even wish to when we have no group and no "power", no "nothing"--why do we seem such a great THREAT to you? IF YOUR WAY BE RIGHT--I SEE NOT "MY" CREW BOTHERING YOU--THEY EFFORT TO DISASSOCIATE AT EVERY OPPOR­TUNITY BECAUSE YOU SEEM TO HATE US SO. You can go light wicka candles all over the mountains if you like--it is your business--why does what I write and "do" bother you so much? By your own words: "New channelers are popping up daily and older ones fading out." What is it that bothers YOU? So, too, George continues to call and play with you ones--so, go play with him--he must be one of YOU, he is not one of "us". He was not even kind to you when he was here--why is he such a "friend" now? You ones CHOSE--why do you not go with that which you chose and leave us be for we thrust nothing off on you. You even know, now, who is receiving reward for de­mands--perhaps you can now build temples and start your own "channel" drive or coven circle if that be what you want.

TO YOU READERS

Yes, I know you are sick of this garbage--ME TOO! I just want you to know something--THIS PAPER IS FOR INFORMA­TION. I come in the Highest Cause in service to God Creator--returning. I have come to meet this enemy head on--and he is a trickster--using every hapless person he wants, to harass and ha­rangue. If it appears I confront some poor little human beings along the way it is because the "Big Boy Deceiver" is USING THEM AND THEY ARE TOO BLIND TO SEE.

I am NOT out to gel these little tools of my enemy. I AM HERE TO HELP THOSE WHO WISH HELP--IN GOD. If your trip is in full intent of only worldly gain--do that which you will and use whatever you can to assist you. I force NOTH­ING, I do not know why ones would wish to partake of anything I represent--much less continue to battle, discredit and all other manner of nonsense. What do THEY want? I ask them to GO--they stay like glue. What is this? You ones are going to have to understand a lot of things--I COME WITH A MISSION AND WE ARE DOING THAT MISSION. I do not come here to play in your sandbox or argue a point of prophesy--I come in service to GOD and GOD'S people and most certainly if I annoy you--get thee from me. This little group in point set up their own lit­tle meditation circle and group and channel and chant--fine-­why, if yours is RIGHT, do you continue to butt into my affairs.

This is a lesson to every reader--EVERY READER. We are not some cute little dip-slip rag-sheet. If YOU don't enjoy the information or the news--so be it, don't use it. If you subscribe and are disappointed--I'm sorry--how do you feel about the L.A. Times or the Glendale Sun? I do not beat my chest and say "come here and meet God" or "I force you to come here." We write a paper and the WORD OF TRUTH. If you disagree--go your way in peace and leave us ours. I CAN TELL YOU NOW--GUARANTEED--THE GOD "I" SERVE--WINS!--with or without you! He does not pull YOU, push YOU or DRAG YOU. So, if you disagree with ME and MINE--why don't you "get lost"?

I will spend weeks and years in honest debate or lessons if you want MY TRUTH--if you simply wish to argue in favor of YOURS--go get your own paper. I continue at the very bore­dom and aggravation of readers to be kind and hope that you will see LIGHT--you few whom I adore and yet drift in your sea of silly confusion. I do not cause you to stop your confusion--I OFFER LIGHT. Take your money and your gold and go the way of the world and the Elite Puppetmasters--your choice! I AM NOT GOING WITH YOU--YOU ARE WRONG AND YOU ARE GOING TO BE "HAD"! YOU know I am TRUTH and the WAY--or you would GO YOURS! Almost all of you to whom I speak in this valley--CAME HERE FROM SOME­WHERE ELSE. WHY? JUST TO PICK ON ME AND MINE? Ekkers came here to work with Westinghouse and Mit­subishi and retire. So, if you came from somewhere else--WHY? And, if you found not what you wanted--why do you stay? OK, you like it here perhaps--then why do you continue to play in my garden?? Why? Because some of you KNOW I AM TRUTH AND HERE IS WHERE IT'S AT! YOU CAN BATTER MY SCRIBE AND E.J.--BUT YOU KNOW I AM TRUTH AND YOU THINK YOU WILL "SHOW ME"? GOOD LUCK--YOUR LUCKY CHARMS AND TRINKET RITUALS CANNOT TOUCH ME OR MINE--IF, CUTE ONES, THE MEANEST INTELLIGENCE TEAMS CAN'T ZAP ME--WHO THINK YOU TO BE?

Be careful, further, for many of those teams you thought on your SIDE are actually protecting (physically), OUR SIDE. Would it not be wonderful if we could simply be all on the SAME side? I do not denounce YOU; why is it so important to denounce me?

IS THE POPE SKIING AT ASPEN?

I even find it interesting that your New World Order politicians and even the Pope of Rome would play such silly, nifty games. Why do they need to DECEIVE? It is the time of the Aspen In­stitute PUPPETMASTER party. Why don't they just say that the Pope is here for the "Aspen" meeting and why not say Clinton is attending the "Aspen Group meeting"? No, we lie and say, golf, retreat and helicopter viewing and all sort of lies when the truth is known to those who care and the rest of you are simply deceived. This IS when they make their PLANS for things to happen and get and give instructions--so pay attention. Turn these pages quickly and go see WHAT is DOCUMENTED that THEY have planned for you nice folks. Publicity is ALL that will change the plans--uncovering the deceit is all that makes a difference. Things that have to be done in the secret, dark places need to be watched very closely indeed.

Why, for instance, are some of you so upset when I print Truth in the paper? If it be "Truth" and you be "pure" in spirit and intent--why would you not be PLEASED to have your opinions and words SHARED? CHECK WHAT YOU DO IN THE DARKNESS AND HIDE--IT WILL TELL YOU A LOT ABOUT YOURSELF!! If you conduct yourself in such a Godly way that you can present everything you do to the entire of the public--you cannot fall from lies and deceit. If there is some­thing you are ashamed of doing and do not want it public knowl­edge--I suggest you NOT DO IT.

Ones want to accuse me of being anti-Semitic and a basher of homosexuals. No, I just think some BEHAVIOR is not accept­able in PUBLIC. Your choices in the PRIVACY of your own place is your business--if it be against GOD--take it up with GOD, it is none of my business. As to anti-Semitic--my close workers are all basically from the line of Shem--Semites. How can I be "anti". Color?? You are all made in the image of God--God is LIGHT and that means ALL COLORS. I do not speak behind ones' back--I put it right in the paper for ALL--why does what YOU write and speak bother YOU to have witnessed? If, further, you do not like to be "bashed" then why do you first BASH? But I DO see--you want to "bash" and then pretend you did not or try to pretend it was not YOU who actually DID A THING. God may well turn the other cheek--in the human for­mat--that is an awfully stupid thing to do if the opposition is fir­ing poison darts. You want to throw stones but not have anyone toss them BACK. When they do--then you set up a reason to discredit them while you wash the blood off your hands.

Am I speaking "personally"? If the shoe fits--!!

FUNDAMENTALISTS AND HOMOSEXUALS

I wonder how many of you witnessed the show-and-tell on LARRY KING LIVE? It seems the books and biographies "written by" Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, along with speeches, etc., by Oliver North and many, many others were NOT. It turns out that a man, a "Reverend" person (I shall keep his privacy) WROTE THEM ALL! The audience and inter­viewers chuckled at the term used: "ghost writer". We laugh, here, for a much different reason--but so much for that.

Well, after years and years of "Christian" living and believing and living in a lie (this man had lived with a wife for 20 some odd years and now is "married" to a "man" for an additional 9 years)--HE HAS COME PUBLIC WITH HIS SEXUAL PREFERENCE. Oh boy, the hoopla, denial, insults and other tricks. He has been DROPPED like a hot potato--Robertson DID sug­gest that the man call his "800 number" and they would some­how pray and talk him out of a lifetime of homosexual prefer­ence.

Does GOD BASH HOMOSEXUALS? NO! He blesses ALL! He objects to the behavior against the laws of man and God. He blesses the man and "judges" the actions. Who would know if two men shared space and quietly went about their lives? What difference if two friends wish to communally share rent and in­surance plans? It is the exhibitionist who brings the house down. It is no better for the pornographic behavior in a hetero­sexual than a homosexual. Why should a homosexual be blessed for public irresponsible behavior and the heterosexual arrested for the same behavior? With most it is a reaction and response to confusion and DIRECTION given by outside ma­nipulators. It is the same, dear ones, as happened at Sodom and Gomorrah. EXACTLY!! IT IS NOT THE LOVING PREF­ERENCE AND RELATIONSHIP--IT IS THE ACTIONS AND BEHAVIORS! In other words--THE MANIPULATOR PUP­PETMASTERS are orchestrating the masses of YOU exactly as they want you to respond.

What do "I" think about Falwell and Robertson and thus and so? Well, this nice man has done me a favor--for these two are MA­JOR "Zionists" by their own description and work directly against the Christ and the people of God--BY DEFINITION AND ACTIONS. It is not my business to condemn, condone, or do anything for or against these ones. They live in free-choice of expression. I will not, however, CONDONE be­havior that is against the laws of God and/or Man. I allow it--for it is none of my business--it is not my business to JUDGE. It IS my business to tell you what may well be wrong with the ACTIONS. There is "natural" male and "natural" female. Do I condemn two females who wish to artificially inseminate selves and bear children? No--it seems a bit unwise for there will be great pain and difficulty ahead for the child and it is a most selfish act to put self above the welfare of another--especially a child. Does it HAVE TO hurt the child? No, but it will--because the same women are on the tele­vision constantly demanding equal respect and recognition--to what? A family who did not artificially inseminate--and mar­ried, bore children and quote, "live a normal family life". There are NO "normal family lives" left on your planet! By the way--AGAIN--"love" and "sex" are NOT THE SAME THING! Any more--they are rarely ever even a part of the same thing.

"Closet" this and "closet" that?? I thought closets were things in which to keep your apparel, etc., when not in use--not your lives! If you need hide your life in the closet--what are you do­ing that needs hidden? If you go forth, however, and demand that what you closeted be recognized by EVERYONE as RIGHT--WHAT ARE YOU HIDING? You have simply moved from the closet to the street with your guilt-trip and dumped it on someone else.

ZIONISTS. BY ANY "NAME"

Neither am I, regardless of what you may be told, a Jew any­thing. The "Jews" are the very first to be "had" at the hands of these Khazarian Zionists!! They will be the first to be trodden down and put away. They have been sucked dry in effort to keep the "would-be" Kings going in their One World Order nightmare. They have been stripped continually to pay for Is­rael and every lobby group around--through the LIES. So be it--free will to choose. If you can make a black man an Indian Chief--go for it--but don't bitch about the outcome! Dharma has Cherokee blood lineage--why don't we make her LADY CHIEF OF THE INDIAN NATION OF BIRDLAND? Come on peo­ple--what are you doing? And WHY would you do it? To sell tax-free cigarettes and have gambling halls? Is that a worthy cause in the ancient ORAL TRADMON? I doubt it--but SHOULD the nation rise up over such cause and TRY to suck in God's Command troops? Well, I will stand beside any tribe member in honest fight for rights--but for a tax-free cigarette? Nope--sorry, folks. Neither will I STOP you--it is YOUR expe­rience and if THAT be your choice of expression--it is your journey. I do find that the right of the Indian in his "nation" is valid--but the war is over that which is unacceptable to me already! Worse, it makes the honorable tribal thrust fall behind further and further. You must understand that "some" of any­thing is usually OK but it is as with the Holocaust. The LIE it­self detracts from the sacrifice of the ones who DID pay the price. ONE is too many--6 MILLION is a LIE and the giving of the ONE is lost.

One man, Christ, as the myth goes--gave his life. Well, friends, 20 (and maybe as many as 60) MILLION Christians were killed by the Bolsheviks (Communist Soviets) (often called Zionist Khazars--headed in every instance by "Jews"). Where is THAT holocaust listed?? Now "they" have stolen your Christ too--and guess what: "Judeo-Christian"--in other words the goat has con­quered the lamb! WE'LL SEE ABOUT THAT! SODOM AND GOMORRAH WILL FOREVER STAND AS EVIDENCE OF WHAT HAPPENS WHEN MAN THINKS HE RISES ABOVE GOD AND BECOMES SUBJECT TO SATAN. WILL YOU DO IT AGAIN? YES, YOU WILL. GOD WILL STILL WIN! CHRIST-GOD WILL WIN! It has nothing to do with "Jews", white people, black people, red people, purple people, purple people eaters--or green people. GOD with HIS PEOPLE--WILL WIN! Now, you can call that "Son (Sun) of God" Jesus, Esu, Standing Bear, Buffalo, Flying Eagle, Light of Day, Source, Quetzal Bird, Aton, Black-leaf,--you name it--GOD IS GOING TO WIN THE GAME!

GO WITH THE VISIBLE

OH? You can't seem to get comfort going with my ideas? I am somehow invisible to you and therefore invalid? How many of you KNOW Mr. Kissinger? How many of you KNOW Mr. Yeltsin? HOW MANY OF YOU KNOW LARRY KING? How many of you KNOW who really heads the CIA? I bring you all this knowledge--but I am not "real"? Isn't it about time you used your brains? WHERE IS INFORMATION AND TRUTH COMING FROM--MR. KISSINGER? HOW ABOUT MR. CLINTON? OH, THE POPE? NOPE!! Ponder it. When a question is asked, "Do you believe the President tells you the truth?" Everyone LAUGHS--the mere thought of it is so ridiculous it brings on fits of laughter. I HAVE NOT ONCE LIED TO YOU--NOT ONCE! I WOULD HOPE YOU WOULD PONDER THAT FACT! WHOEVER I MIGHT BE--I BRING TRUTH--EVERY TIME!

May you think on these things--and for you who feel yourself my enemy--you are NOT. You give me the lessons to present and the minute you wish to stop the fighting--SALU! You say you seek GOD? Then I suggest you start looking WHERE GOD IS. HE is right there within, alright, but HIS messengers and security troops are all around and it's your choice to go into the darkness or into the Light. I bear the LIGHT--how far are you going to get groping around trying to avoid same? I only deal with soul and LIFE. You who wish to deal with conscious physical expression and your gold stores--GOOD LUCK, but it will be taking lots MORE than "luck".

Do I sound like the preacher? Probably not, for most preachers are controlled by their congregation--not a bad reason for not having a congregation! Little Crow has a gathering (not a con­gregation) and if you want the TRUTH--go listen in Garden Grove--IT MAY SHOCK YOU! This GODLY MAN may utter the words "bullshit", even--YOU HAD BEST GET WITH THE TRUTH OF YOUR PLIGHT OR YOUR FLIGHT FEATHERS ARE NEVER GOING TO MAKE IT IN TIME FOR FLIGHT-TAKEOFF.

In spite of all that comes against you, if you walk within God's wings you shall walk in peace and beauty--may YOU ever walk in beauty! AHO!

PJ 76

CHAPTER 12

REC #1 HATONN

WED., AUG. 18, 1993 9:58 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 002

WED. AUGUST 18, 1993

THINGS TO CATCH ON THE HOT-LINE

These are items I request that ALL listeners go check out on your NEWS! Check out how you are now being set up to re­ceive the "uncovered" news and the responses to past secret lies and actions by the shadow government. I ask that these things be put on the phone line EARLY so people can check these sto­ries out for themselves from the news itself.

POWELL

Note that Colin Powell of the Joint Chiefs has been BOUGHT OFF. Not only is he "resigning" BUT, in conjunction with a couple of "Jewish 'Israel Firsters he is SELLING HIS MEM­OIRS FOR OVER 6 MILLION DOLLARS. The replacement for Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is planned, at present, to be a Polish person (which has to mean Communist-oriented and therefore is in partial service to the Russians [of necessity]). At the VERY LEAST he will be 100% in favor of full UN military control.

UN MILITARY CONTROL

How can you tell? Because also today there is an announcement that in all military actions which are under UN Security Council authorization, for the first time in HISTORY, your military troops will not be given orders through or by a U.S. Gen­eral. They will come under full and DIRECT command of a General of the United Nations force.

OTHER NOTABLES: DEMJANJUK

Your lobbyists are at full attention and alert (the Israeli Lobby). The Shadow Government and the Israeli Controlled Congress are efforting full-bore ahead to STOP an allowance of Dem­janjuk (FOUND TOTALLY INNOCENT OF ALL CHARGES AND RATIFIED YESTERDAY BY THE JUDGE'S PANEL) to return, at all, to the U.S. for ANY REASON. It is hoped that this can be overridden by Thursday--but who knows--! So, what is happening in Israel? The Israelis are petitioning for ANOTHER HEARING BY THE FIVE JUDGES (TO RETRY, ESSENTIALLY, THE WHOLE CASE).

Next, and the MOST INEXCUSABLE of all: IT IS NOW ON THE STREETS AND FROM THE PUBLIC MICRO­PHONES WHICH EXTEND ALL THE WAY AROUND THE GLOBE--"DEMJANJUK WILL BE MURDERED IF HE IS RELEASED!" People, you have really "come a long way, babies".

SDI COVER-UP--WEINBERGER

This is REAL confirmation for you who have trusted the "Space Program", NASA, etc. You who have said we have "gone too far this time" as to deceit in the Space Program: HARKEN UP.

It is announced in open media TODAY that as far back as 1984 THERE WAS DELIBERATE DECEPTION AND COVER-UP. In one instance a rigged, fixed and deceptive incident occurred (one of hundreds) where a rocket was sent up with a supposedly pin-point accuracy capability to shoot down in­coming anything. But, also YOU sent up a self-detonating satellite. So the fake launch took place, the story went that the test was incredibly accurate, the satellite blew up and there you have! Or do you? Weinberger said he approved it because, "IT WAS TO DECEIVE THE RUSSIANS INTO BELIEVING WE HAD ADVANCED CAPABILITY AND 'CAUSE THEM TO SPEND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO COUNTER'." (Yes, indeed, this is the SAME Casper the friendly ghost who was found innocent of all charges, etc., in the Iran/Contra mess.) He went even further in his statement: "It is our total intent and thrust to practice DECEPTION--that is our job!"
The fact that Congress was also deceived is interesting in­deed: They immediately voted in an additional $30 BILLION dollars for the program on the basis of that (those) deceptive and fraudulent reportings. The whole thing was a total computer mock-up.

By the way--THE RUSSIANS KNEW ABOUT IT--IN AD­VANCE!
GO NOW, AND WATCH YOUR NEWS--THE IRON IS HOT AND THEY ARE SHOWING YOU WHAT THEY CAN AND DO GET AWAY WITH. YOU ARE "IN" IT, PEOPLE!

There are other "hot-line" items such as the Gunther Russbacher reminder of second parole hearing results pending, etc. And, Randy Weaver and the Tom Brokaw show. The staff will be attentive to changes.

BAN ON GUNS

Buried in the 1800 pages of "Budget packet (plus)" is a BAN ON ALL SEMI-AUTOMATIC GUNS (NOT JUST AUTO­MATIC). ALL GUNS THAT REQUIRE A "CLIP", ETC. WILL BE ILLEGAL--EVERYWHERE IN THE U.S. THIS WILL INCLUDE HUNTING RIFLES.

Isn't this fun? You don't have to get the dirt just from "Old Commander"--and you, who have bothered to keep up and lis­ten--ARE FAR, FAR AHEAD-AND PREPARING, OR ARE PREPARED, FOR THE ECONOMIC DOWNFALL, THE LACK OF ABILITY TO SECURE YOURSELVES, ETC., ETC.(???)

Remember the "Kissinger Papers" with PLANS? Remember that within just a few brief years ALL GUNS OF ALL KINDS WILL BE BANNED! [I can tell you now that when that hap­pens, it will not be an incarceration only, offense--it will be that anyone with a gun will be SHOT--DEAD!]

CALL ME WHAT YOU WILL

You can listen to others and you can call me evil, false, a fear monger, a lie--whatever you wish. I AM OF THE HOSTS OF GOD OF LIGHT--AND I SERVE ONLY GOD AND GOD'S PEOPLE. ANY WHO WISH NOT MY INFORMATION CAN CAST IT ASIDE--however, the Reason we have written over 80 Journals in less than the past four years and offer the CONTACT is to bring the Truth in advance of the CON­FIRMATIONS so that you COULD begin to trust us. We are not aliens of some nit-wit variety as shown on your "intended to deceive" media, are not "little gray" any- things and WE ARE NOT UNIDENTIFIED OBJECTS. IT IS ONLY YOU-THE-PEOPLE WHO DO NOT KNOW EX­ACTLY WHO WE ARE AND WHY WE ARE HERE!!! SALU.

PJ 76

CHAPTER 13

REC #1 HATONN

THU., AUG. 19, 1993 1:49 P.M. YEAR 7, DAY 003

THU., AUGUST 19. 1993

HOLD THIS THOUGHT--ETERNALLY

As the days pass and it seems the tasks and burdens are out­weighing the wondrous beauty of that which is about you--LOOK AGAIN! The beauty is there--even in the darkest hour there is a beauty of sorts and a wondrous lesson in each mo­ment. As to that which is perceived as "bad"--look more care­fully than that and check your perceptions and also the TRUTH of the circumstance. Look and see if YOU might well have al­lowed or even "arranged" the happening. If it touches you at all then YOU AS WELL AS OTHERS--HAVE INFINITE IM­PACT. You may well not be able to control all actions but you CAN decide, totally--HOW YOU WILL PERCEIVE EACH AND EVERY ACTION. Walk alone? Never, for there is no way to walk alone--even if you would be the LAST of your species on the planet--you would not be "alone".

There is a destiny that makes us brothers; None goes his way alone; All that we send into the lives of others--Comes back into our own.

In remembering this one universal law at all times, you will think and respond to each action and thought as to that which you will expect BACK UNTO SELF When another sends that which is painful and hurtful to you--do not waste time with re­venge and hate--HE WILL GET HIS IN EXACT (OR MORE) MEASURE OF THE SAME--WITHOUT YOUR DOING.

How can you know if a "friendship" is false or true? Usually it takes "time" for the deceivers are everywhere to suck you into a trap and then devour you. Openly accept the joyful hand offered--but do not blather your innermost thoughts until friend­ship has proven itself--against odds which usually cause friend­ships to fail. False friendship is like a vine such as climbing ivy which decays and ruins the walls it embraces. True friendship, however, gives new life and animation to the object IT SUP­PORTS. Always you must leave something of beauty and goodness as you pass your way--for if your focus is on such--you shall not leave any negative evil behind--it cannot be both ways.

Readers, our tasks are varied--our goal ONE. Be gentle with one another for ALL are going to have to "get there" for the picture to be whole. If you live your lives with the thought in mind that when you were born, you cried and others rejoiced--Live your life in such a manner that when you die the others and world cry and you rejoice. MAKE YOUR JOURNEY WORTH THE TROUBLE!

WHAT OF GOD?

Many believe there is NO GOD! Pity those. Have compassion for those who seek but avoid, at all costs, the finding. Sympa­thize with those who are finding the light hard to abide within for they are but human--and always, keep unto your own true path toward goodness. Ah, and watch carefully self and others who pray only for self with naught save "I" and "me" in the fine petitions to God and watch more carefully HOW you pray.

To speak to God on behalf of man is like the highest service any of us can render. To sincerely ask that God's WILL be done and that, in behalf of another--is divine and ALWAYS bears fruit beyond measure. The next is to speak to MEN in the name of God in the Christed goodness. And remember that ei­ther and BOTH are possible--through HIS Grace!

Let us move directly into finishing this section of The Iron Cur­tain Over America, "Russia and the Khazars", by John Beaty. This is background that you MUST have if you are to make heads or tails from what is going on about you in your world to­day.

We were speaking of immigration shifts toward more and more non-Christian newcomers into the United States. These people had NO INTENTION to take up the ideals of your Western Christian civilization and what did YOU do about changing that? Nothing--you backed off even to the point where these have taken over your whole culture. You don't even put "Christ" first in your pledge to religious unity--you say: "Judeo-Chris­tian", etc. The two are mutually exclusive, one is anti-Christ God and the other is pro-Christ God. YOU as a nation have taken up the cloak of the anti-Christ by your voting in that which is against God and natural Creation. Then you come and blast those who wish to remain in the path chosen as goodly and go forth and demand that your children be taught "safe sex" in the first grade. THESE ARE NOT THE RIGHT LAWS OF GOD OR NATURAL CREATION. These are the conjurings of Hu­man beings to render you helpless slaves to the physical plane of which they are rulers! You MUST recognize the players in­volved.

IMMIGRANT PROBLEMS

QUOTING:

Among those who early foresaw the problems to be created by our new immigrants was General Eisenhower's immediate predecessor as President of Columbia University. (Remember Eisenhower was a Jew.) In a small but extremely valuable book, The American As He Is, President Nicholas Murray Butler in 1908 called attention to "the fact that Christianity in some one of its many forms is a dominant part of the American nature." Butler, then at the zenith of his intellectual power, expressed fear that our "capacity to subdue and assimilate the alien ele­ments brought...by immigration may soon be exhausted." [H: Please realize that often "Christian" is confused with "Christlike" and herein is where you begin to misunder­stand. What you are dealing with in this subject immedi­ately prior is the lack of "Christlike" beliefs and actions--not necessarily "Jesus-like". The U.S. was birthed one nation UNDER GOD-not "one nation under JESUS"! To some of you this is the SAME--no--it is NOT! Christ represents a Godly goodly state of being. "Jesus" by any label was a MAN physical. The important perception is that one is spiritual being, the other is physical manifestation.] He con­cluded accordingly that "The dangers which confront America will come, if at all, from within."
Statistics afford ample reasons for President Butler's fears. The new immigration was comprised preponderantly of three el­ements: the Italians, the Slays, and the Jews. The Italians and the Slays were less assimilable than immigrants from Northern and Western Europe, and tended to congregate instead of dis­tributing themselves over the whole country as the earlier Northern European immigrants had usually done.

The assimilation of Italians and Slays was helped, however, by their belonging to the same parent Indo-Germanic racial stock as the English-German-Irish majority, and above all by their being "Christian"--mostly Roman Catholics--and therefore finding numerous co-religionists not only among fully Ameri­canized second and third generation Irish Catholics but among old stock Anglo-American Catholics descending from Colonial Days. Quite a few persons of Italian and Slavic stock were or became Protestants, chiefly Baptists--among them being ex-Governor Charles Poletti of New York and ex-Governor Harold Stassen of Minnesota. The new Italian and Slavic immigrants and their children soon began to marry among the old stock. In a protracted reading of an Italian language American newspa­per, the author noted that approximately half of all recorded marriages of Italians were to persons with non-Italian names.

Thus in one way or another the new Italian and Slavic immi­grants began to merge into the general American pattern. This happened to some extent everywhere and was notable in areas where the newcomers were not congregated--as in certain urban and mining areas--but were dispersed among people of native stock. With eventual complete assimilation by no means impos­sible, there was no need of a national conference of Americans and Italians or of Americans and Slays to further the interests of those minorities.

With the new Jewish immigrants, however, the developments were strikingly different--and quite in line with the fears of President Butler. The handful of Jews, mostly Sephardic and German, already in this country (about 280,000 in 1877), were not numerous enough to contribute cultural guidance to the new­comers. These newcomers arrived in vast hordes--especially from territory under the sovereignty of Russia, the total number of legally recorded immigrants from that country between 1881 and 1920 being 3,237,079, most of them Jews. Many of those Jews are now referred to as Polish Jews because they came from that portion of Russia which had been the kingdom of Poland prior to the "partitions" of 1772-1795 and was the Republic of Poland between World War I and World War II. Accordingly, New York City's 2,500,000 or more Jews are sometimes said to be largely Polish Jews.

Thus by sheer weight of numbers, as well as by aggressive­ness, the newcomer Jews from Eastern Europe pushed into the background the more or less Westernized Jews, who had mi­grated or whose ancestors had migrated to America prior to 1880 and had become for the most part popular and successful merchants with inordinate interest in politics. In striking con­trast, the Eastern European Jew made himself a power to be reckoned with in the professions, the industries, and the political parties.

The overwhelming of the older Americanized Jews is well portrayed in The Jewish Dilemma by Elmer Berger. Of the early American Jews, Berger writes: "Most of these first 200,000 came from Germany. They integrated themselves completely." This integration was not difficult; for many persons of Jewish religion in Western Europe in the nine- teenth century not only had no racial or ethnic connection with the Khazars, but were not separatists or Jewish nation­alists. The old contentions of their ancestors with their Chris­tian neighbors in Western Europe had been largely overlooked on both sides by the beginning of the nineteenth century, and nothing stood in the way of their full integration into national life. The American kinsmen of these Westernized Jews were similar in outlook.

But after 1880 and particularly in the first two decades of the twentieth century, immigration to the United States from Eastern Europe increased rapidly. The Eastern European immigrant Jews brought with them the worn out concept of "a Jewish peo­ple". Soon these newcomers of nationalist persuasion actually exerted influence over the old and once anti-nationalist organi­zation of American Reform Judaism. In the winter of 1941-'42 the Central Conference of American Rabbis had endorsed the campaign to organize a Jewish Army. The event indicated the capitulation of the leadership of Reform Judaism to Jewish Na­tionalism. Many American-minded Jews protested, but the voices were disorganized and therefore could be safely ignored. American Jewry had succumbed to the relentless pressure of the Zionists.

With the domination of American Jewry by Judaized Khazars and those who travel with them, the position of American Jews who wished to be American became most unhappy. The small but significant group which met at Atlantic City in June, 1942, to lay the foundations for an organization of Americans whose religion is Judaism, were at once pilloried. Charges of being "traitors, "Quislings", "betrayers" were thundered from the synagogues of America and filled the columns of the Jewish press. Many were silenced or won over by the pressure and the abuse--but not all. Those brave Jews who are persecuted be­cause they are not hostile to the American way of life should not be confused with those Jews who persecute them, as Mr. Berger shows, but should on the other hand receive the sympathy of all persons who are trying to save Christian civilization in America.

Since the predominant new Jews consider themselves a supe­rior people and a separate nationality, assimilation appears now to be out of the question. America now has virtually a nation within the nation, and an aggressive culture-conscious nation at that. [H: Remember, again, this was written about 40 (forty) years ago and every statement is backed up with documenta­tion--mostly from the very works of the Jewish reference books. I am not going to take time to cite them all--but Mr. Beaty has cited them all.]

The stream of Eastern Europeans was diminished in volume during World War I, but was at flood level again in 1920. At last the Congress became sufficiently alarmed to initiate action. The House Committee on Immigration, in its report on the bill that later became the quota law of 1921, reported:

There is a limit to our power of assimilation...the pro­cesses of assimilation and amalgamation are slow and dif­ficult. With the population of the broken parts of Europe headed this way in ever-increasing numbers, why not peremptorily check the stream with this temporary mea­sure, and in the meantime try the unique and novel ex­periment of enforcing all of the immigration laws on our statutes?.... [H: The Jews today have NO TROUBLE AT ALL GETTING INTO THE U.S. AS CITIZENS--NONE WHATSOEVER--QUOTAS ARE IGNORED IN ALL INSTANCES.]

Accordingly, the 67th Congress passed the first quota law, which was approved on May 19, 1921, limiting the number of any nationality entering the United States to 3 percent of the for­eign-born of that nationality who lived here in 1910. Under this law, approximately 350,000 aliens were permitted to enter each year, mostly from Northern and Western Europe.

The worry of the Congress over unassimilable aliens contin­ued and the House Committee on Immigration and Naturaliza­tion of the Sixty-eighth Congress reported that it was necessary to the successful future of our nation to preserve the basic strain of our population and continued as follows:

Since it is the axiom of political science that a govern­ment not imposed by external force is the visible expres­sion of the ideals, standards, and social viewpoint of the people over which it rules, it is obvious that a change is the character or composition of the population must in­evitably result in the evolution of a form of government consonant with the base upon which it rests. If, therefore, the principle of individual liberty, guarded by a constitu­tional government created on this continent nearly a century and a half ago, is to endure, the basic strain of our population must be maintained and our economic standards preserved.

....the American people do not concede the right of any foreign group in the United States, or government abroad, to demand a participation in our possessions, tangible or intangible, or to dictate the character of our legislation.

The new law changed the quota basis from 1910 to 1890, re­duced the quotas from 3 to 2%, provided for the establishment of permanent quotas on the basis of national origin, and placed the burden of proof on the alien with regard to his admissibility and the legality of his residence in the United States. It was passed by the Congress on May 15, and signed by President Calvin Coolidge on May 26, 1924. The new quota system was still more favorable relatively to the British Isles and Germany and other countries of Northern and Western Europe and ex­cluded "persons who believe in or advocate the overthrow by force or violence of the government of the United States." Un­fortunately, within ten years, this salutary law was to be largely nullified by misinterpretation of its intent and by continued scandalous maladministration, a principal worry of the Congress in 1921 and continuously since.

By birth and by immigration, either clandestine or in viola­tion of the intent of the "national origins" law of 1924, the Jew­ish population of the U.S. increased rapidly. The following official Census Bureau statement is of interest: "In 1877 there were at least 277 congregations in the country and 230,000 Jews; in 1890, 533 congregations and probably 475,000 Jews; in 1906, 1700 congregations and about 1,775,000 Jews; in 1916, 1900 congregations and about 3,300,000 Jews; in 1926, 3,118 permanent congregations and 4,081,000 Jews; and in 1936, 3,728 congregations and 4,641,184 Jews residing in the cities, towns and villages in which the congregations were lo­cated." On other religions, the latest government statistics are mostly for the year 1947, but for the Jews the 1936 figure re­mains. As to the total number of Jews in the United States the government has no exact figures, any precise figures beyond a vague "over five million" being impossible because of incom­plete records and illegal immigration. The Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, however, accepts the World Almanac figure of 15,713,638 Jews of religious affiliation in the world and summarizes thus: "statistics indicate that over 50 percent of the World Jewish population is now residing in the Western Hemisphere, i.e., at least 8,000,000. Since some three-fourths of a million Jews live in other North and South American coun­tries besides the United States, the number of Jews known to be in the United States may be placed at a minimum of about 7,250,000. Jews unaffiliated with organizations whose members are counted, illegal entrants, etc., may place the total number in the neighborhood of 10,000,000. This likely figure would jus­tify the frequently heard statement that more than a half of the Jews of the world are in the United States.

Percentage-wise this is the government summary of Jewish population in the United States:

In 1937, Jews constituted less than 4 percent of the American people, but during the 7-year period following (1937-1943), net Jewish immigration to the United States ranged between 25 and 77 percent of total net immigration to this country. For the 36-year period, 1908-1943, net Jewish immigration constituted 14 percent of total. The population of the United States has increased three-fold since 1877, while the Jewish population has increased twenty-one-fold during the same period. [H: Note the dates and then think again because during and after the war there were masses of Jews brought in without question. Also, following on with Russian Jews the immigration figures grow exponentially. With such figures showing exodus of Jews from the "War Zones" of Germany, Poland, etc., and starting with less than 6 million in that part of Europe--HOW CAN YOU HAVE LOLLED OVER 6 MILLION OF THEM, EX­PORTED TO PALESTINE, ETC., AT LEAST HALF THAT NUMBER, AND HAVE SO MANY RECEIV­ING DAMAGES FROM THE "HOLOCAUST" REGULARLY--HOW COULD THE "HOLOCAUST" BE CORRECT AS PROJECTED BY THE ZIONISTS?(???) It simply does not mathematically ADD UP. I don't "knock" anybody's favorite "Holocaust" but this one DOES NOT ADD UP. Especially as compared with the numbers of Christians deaded by the Khaz­arian Jew Bolshevik Communists--SOME 20 TO 60 MILLION!]
The above government figures require elucidation. The fig­ures include only those Jews connected with an organized Jew­ish congregation and, as corollary, exclude the vast number of Jews, illegal entrants and others, who are not so connected, and hence not officially listed as Jews. The stated increase of Jews by 2100 percent since 1877 is thus far too small because non-Congregational Jews are not counted. Moreover, since the in­crease of 300 percent in the total population includes known Jews, who increased at the rate of 2100 percent, the increase in population of non-Jews is far LESS than the 300 percent in­crease of the total population.

This powerful and rapidly growing minority--closely knit and obsessed with its own objectives which are not those of Western Christian civilization--will in subsequent chapters be discussed along with other principal occupants of the stage of public af­fairs in America during the early 1950's. Details will come as a surprise to many readers, who are the unwitting victims of cen­sorship. After mentioning that the "secret ban" against pub­lishing the truth on "Zionist Nationalism", which ones such as author Douglas Reed holds "to be allied in its roots to Soviet Communism", grew in his adult lifetime "from nothing into something approaching a low of lese majeste at some absolute court of the dark past", Mr. Reed states further that "the Zionist Nationalists are powerful enough to govern governments in the great countries of the remaining West!" He concludes further that "American Presidents and British Prime Ministers, and all their colleagues", bow to Zionism as if venerating a shrine.

The subject-matter of a book can be best determined not by its preface but by its index. It is believed that an examination of the index of The Iron Curtain Over America will show a unique completeness in the listing of names and subjects bearing upon the present period of our country. In brief, The Iron Curtain Over America presents in compressed detail--along with other matters--the problems created in the United States by a powerful minority possessed of an ideology alien to our traditions and fired by an ambition which threatens to involve us in the ruin of a third world-wide war. The next chapter deals with the above­board infiltration of Judaized Khazars, and other persons of the same ideology, into the United States Democratic Party.

TO BE CONTINUED

* * *

I cannot urge you strongly enough to get background informa­tion on this subject. We must have written some fine study ma­terial by the extent to which the elements under discussion have efforted to STOP our writing. This is NOT something "way over there" or "out there somewhere" or "it won't happen to 'me'." We are talking about "Socialism-Monarchy-Dicta­torship" under the guise of COMMUNISM and it has taken AMERICA!

You can't believe me? LOOK AGAIN! The MEDIA is totally controlled. Every "Advisor" to the President is basically for­eign-born and a Zionist Jew from one nation or another. There are more KGB in your CIA than Americans and you are now under total control by the United Nations. The U.N., by char­ter, is HEADED by a Russian.

BILLARY VIEW-NAUSEA

Will fame ruin a sweet little Arkansas boy? You poor foolish misinformed and deceived people. Precious ones, Bill Clinton is totally connected to the CIA and WAS WORKING IN AND AROUND THE KGB. He was a Rhodes Scholar (Cecil Rhodes is the FATHER of the NEW WORLD ORDER!) Clinton is a puppet--but a nasty little problem to you-the-people!

This is so touchy and involved with everything coming against "us" that I am going to simply ride the truth coat-tails of the SPOTLIGHT and give honor for daring-do to Michael Collins Piper. This was first printed Nov. 23, 1992 and is now being re-run. Pay attention! What can you do? I don't see that you can do anything--YOU DID IT!

WASHINGTON INSIDERS SAY:
CLINTON IS LINKED TO THE CIA

Why did Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton help cover up the inves­tigation of George Bush's CIA-run arms-and-drugs smuggling contra supply base operating at the tiny rural airport in Mena, Arkansas? (There is a full story about that if and when we have time.)

Wouldn't that have been ideal campaign ammunition for the White House-hungry young governor? There's a lot more to the story than meets the eye.

More than a few Washington insiders are surmising that the CIA may have replaced its former director and longtime deep cover agent, Bush, with one of the agency's less senior deep cover agents. [H: You need to recall--BUSH DELIBER­ATELY BLEW HIS CANDIDACY IN THIS LAST ELEC­TION AND EVERYONE COULD PLAINLY SEE IT HAP­PENING BEFORE YOUR EYES.]

That's right. There are those who are convinced that Presi­dent-elect Clinton has been a CIA asset since his college days at the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in Wash­ington, one of the CIA's primary recruiting grounds.

Then, of course, Clinton went on to study at Oxford Univer­sity in England as a Rhodes scholar. It was at Oxford, insiders believe, that young Clinton first acted on behalf of the CIA.

At that time, the Soviet KGB was active in recruiting under­cover agents among Oxford students. It is believed that Clinton's now-infamous trip to the Soviet Union was actually on be­hest not of the communists, but instead, of the CIA.

"The time that Clinton was supposed to have gone to Moscow was the time when the CIA was very active recruiting American students and other students to go to Moscow and Helinski (E.J. This is exactly what is written--my thought is that it should be Helsinki but I don't know geography well enough to actually "guess") and get involved in peace activities in order to counter Soviet actions," said Victor Marchetti, a former CIA official.

"Without revealing any secrets as to how I come to this con­clusion, I would not be surprised to find out that Clinton was actually kind of working for the CIA." [H: As a backup to Victor Marchetti--if you read his newsletter you will find that he is in deep yogurt ALL THE TIME with the Jewish Khazarians PRETENDING to be Jews. There is such a mas­sive number of LIES and deceptions as to boggle the minds of all but the readers who KEEP UP.]

A smart young American internationalist such as Clinton would have been a ripe target for the KGB, and the CIA itself would recognize that, probably having helped smooth Clinton's way into Oxford.

DID BUSH KNOW TRUTH?

Former CIA director Bush certainly knew the truth when he was hinting that Clinton was a co-opted agent of the Soviet KGB as a consequence of Clinton's college-age journey to Red Rus­sia.

We have no way of knowing, however, whether or not Clin­ton did or did not turn and go to work for the KGB. [H: Well, you certainly KNOW that he is working WITH THE SO­VIET-COMMUNISTS NOW.]

It is well known that the CIA infiltrated both sides of the con­flict over American involvement in the Vietnam War, leading protests for and against it. Clinton, of course, spent much of his time within the anti-war protest movement, both in the United States and abroad.

After finishing his undercover work at Oxford Clinton went on to study law at Yale--another CIA recruiting ground. Three other Yalies believed to have been recruited at Yale for the CIA are Bush, William F. Buckley Jr. and James J. Angleton. It was at Yale that Clinton met his future wife Hillary Rodham.

Mrs. Clinton later went to work for the most powerful law firm in Arkansas--a firm known for its close ties to the Rocke­feller interests in her husband's home state.

(A few wags have asserted that Hillary Rodham may be a deep cover CIA asset herself. The young lady lawyer served as a staffer on the congressional inquiry into the Watergate mess, a controversy in which the CIA's fine hand was seen--or not seen--from beginning to end and from top to bottom.)

[H: How many of you STILL think, listening to the media garbage, that the nice legal advisor friend of the Ballades was a suicide? I think our staff better rerun the anonymous information WE GOT! **[See page 192]** Remember--exact time, caliber of bullet and TWO (count them) bullets to the base of the skull!!! Why do you think there is so much damage control and special remarks emphasized like "single bullet" and thus and so? Goodness, chelas, that place is like a swarming hive of hellions. It is so dank that no matter what is revealed to you WE can only touch the tip of that iceberg waiting to sink the good ship Global­-Amerika!]

METEORIC RISE.

Clinton himself was quickly promoted, after law school, into the highest ranks of the Establishment of his home state. A year out of law school he was named a professor at the University of Arkansas, although he lost a congressional race in the mean­time. Two years later he was elected Arkansas state attorney general--at the age of 30. Two years afterward he was cata­pulted into the governorship.

It will be remembered that even before Clinton was first elected governor of Arkansas in 1978 at the ripe old age of 32 he was already being promoted by the Establishment media as a "future presidential candidate" and hailed as being of "presidential timber". [H: Don't forget, either, that the Tri­lateralists and Bilderbergers (told by Kissinger) had marked him to be the President in 1992--back in 1990 AND 1991. That means, dear ones, that he was also involved with BRITISH INTELLIGENCE because this was obviously a demand of the Committee of 300 Club of Rome and the choice of Britain (at least the Crown of Britain), the Interna­tional Bankers and the International Monetary Fund. Bush is destined for bigger and better deceitful things already UNDER WAY.]

Again, this was even before Clinton was elected--even before his governing talents had been tested. Clearly, Clinton had some influential admirers in some very high places.

It will be further remembered, additionally, that the Rocke­feller family has long maintained close ties--and hefty financial interests in Arkansas. [H: Plus, little Billy is a DIRECT off­spring of the Rockefellers. Go do your homework--we have told you ALL OF THIS!]

ROCKEFELLER PROTÉGÉ

Indeed, it was none other than Winthrop Rockefeller, brother of Rockefeller family financial boss David Rockefeller, who served as the Republican governor of Arkansas in the mid-1960s. Clinton, then, essentially, was simply a Rockefeller protégé in the Democratic Party stable.

No wonder then that young Clinton, the governor of the backward state of Arkansas, was not only invited to join the Rockefeller family's Council on Foreign Relations, but also its even more influential Trilateral Commission--this over more senior and more well-established governors of larger, more politi­cally powerful states.

No wonder he was invited to the tightly closed, secret Bilder­berg meeting in 1991.

In his ultimate bid for the presidency, though, Clinton had the ultimate "inside" assistance. His chief corporate financial backers were associates of the international investment house, Goldman Sachs, a firm with close ties to the Rothschild banking dynasty and some of the world's richest families.

Other major contributors were members of the powerful New York-based law firm, Willkie Farr & Gallagher. This is the firm in which Kenneth Bialkin, a high-ranking fixture in the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith, was long en­sconced. Bialkin's ADL, of course, is an illegally unregistered foreign agent for the state of Israel and a prime mover in the Is­rael lobby in this country.

It might be noted, also, in closing, that just days before the presidential election, none other than David Rockefeller Jr., son of the family boss and heir to the throne, who signed the lead opinion page piece in the New York Times proclaiming "Why I Trust Clinton", and, incidentally, predicting a Clinton "landslide".

Obviously, with the kind of "friends" that Clinton has been assembling since his rather mysterious college days, he certainly didn't need the financial support of the American people--only their votes. That he also achieved. [H: Well, he didn't really need them and, ACTUALLY, he did not achieve them--the fixed ballot machines made sure of that.]

7/22/93 #2 HATONN

NO MIRACLES--JUST FACT!

Reference from page 190 suicide of Vince Foster
My, my, you call out for signs and miracles. In disbelief you petition for one more "show"--one more "viewing" from flick­ering star-craft lights to loss of a headache. Well I think the following will indicate a SIGN to some ones of high level trea­son. There are several (at least nine [9]) people who should be very, very interested and concerned about the following infor­mation which drifted into our hands this morning. As I under­stand the message--by the time this reaches the printer--there will be only 7 left to worry!

What is this? Well, it is a note received regarding the demise of one Vincent Foster. That nice lawyer friend of the Billaries in Washington you know, those who "lead" your nation by the ring through the nose and the harness in the hands of Reno and other ones who murder at random! I think I would be most dis­tressed and concerned as the profferers of torment, torture and bedlam murder--note that THERE IS ANOTHER SIDE. Who are they, this other side? I certainly would not want to be the one to give that information so we take what is sent, share it and hope the correct receivers get the right messages. We are in the business of journalism and printing what is brought to us or sent in truth--not in sorting out "who-dun-its".

Since there will be an obvious question as you read as to "why" "two" shots, in case it misses your sleuthing--I would guess it is to send a loud clear message about "suicide". A sui­cide victim does not exhibit "two" shots when the first one kills him dead! I doubt, however, that YOU THE PEOPLE will ever hear about the second shot in this "suicide".

QUOTING:

Re: Vincent Foster

At 4:52, July 20, 1993--at the first exit to Fort Darcy, VA, a grey Ford Econoline van stopped a 1992 Chrysler Sedan. The driver and lone passenger of the Sedan was removed from his vehicle at gunpoint. There was no fuss, as the driver assumed his plight to be a "carjacking" and possibly armed robbery.

The occupant of the Chrysler, Mr. Vincent Foster, deputy Legal Counsel and close friend to B. Clinton [H: I believe this person was a former partner in Hillary's prior law firm, as well] was taken to the rear of the car parking area. Three men, all wearing "Federal Black", told Mr. Foster to kneel on the ground--facing a park bench. At this point, Mr. Foster's head was pushed forward, a gun pushed against the base of the skull, and within seconds TWO .38 cal. rounds were fired into the skull. Foster's head was thrown forward as he died.

The men then placed the body upon the bench in a half sit­ting-half reclining position. The upper torso was bent to the right-reflecting an angle of 15% [H: perhaps "degrees"? I never like to correct or change anything not quite understood because the meaning may be exact but not to my scribe.]. The Fairfax P.D. was called with the location of the body. The men of the van left the area and returned to D.C. proper where they boarded planes for diverse destinations.

The strike was coordinated and executed by TASK FORCE 151!! It was carried out in retribution for the Wilcher, Parsons, "Piggy" [H: This one may really be a long way off proper iden­tification due to overstrikes on the message.] AND SESSIONS affair. At this time, a force of 32 men, holding a target list with 9 more names is preparing to assemble in a major East Coast City. (By the time you print this, at least two more sanctions will have been carried out.) END.

END OF QUOTING

There is no return identification on this document except 07­22-1993, 11:06. BURN THE MESSAGE, DHARMA.

LET'S REMEMBER RON BROWN

From Spotlight

BROWN ALLEGATIONS MOUNT:
CLINTON TIED TO SCANDAL

A letter of introduction to Vietnamese officials written by President-elect Clinton for an Arkansas businessman has come back to haunt him. Mike Blair

A letter written by President Bill Clinton to Vietnamese lead­ers before he took office last January becomes potentially more significant in view of allegations that Commerce Secretary Ron Brown has been secretly dealing with Vietnamese leaders to have the U.S. trade embargo against Vietnam suspended.

Brown has been accused by a respected Vietnamese-Ameri­can businessman of secretly conspiring with Hanoi to have the embargo lifted in return for many thousands of dollars deposited in foreign bank accounts and shares in the monetary gain Viet­nam derives from doing business with U.S. firms.

While he was president-elect, Clinton wrote a letter on offi­cial State of Arkansas stationery to Vietnamese leaders intro­ducing to them a fellow Arkansan interested in improving rela­tions with Hanoi.

Shortly after Clinton took office, his letter surfaced in Hanoi, and the new president was accused of quietly trying to pave the way for rapprochement with Hanoi. If true, this would have been a potential violation of the Logan Act, which restricts the conduct of the nation's foreign policy to the president. At the time, George Bush was still in office.

Now, with an FBI investigation into Brown's alleged dealings with the Vietnamese government, the letter written by Clinton to the Hanoi leaders raises a question once asked by former Sen. Howard Baker at the peak of the Watergate scandal, which ultimately brought down the presidency of Richard Nixon: "How much did the president know, and when did he know it?"

DENIES CHARGES
(This is a good rule of thumb for GUILT)

After the letter came to light, Clinton denied initiating the se­cret contact between the fellow Arkansan and the Vietnamese leaders. However, the administration has never fully explained the letter. [H: Bill couldn't remember much about his Viet­nam SERVICE or lack thereof, either!]

In any case, last December Clinton wrote a "letter of intro­duction" to top Vietnamese leaders for Clyde E. Pettit Jr. [H: You will certainly be hearing this name AGAIN!] The letter stated that Pettit was "working for the eventual normalization of relations between the United States and Vietnam."

Pettit and Clinton reportedly met during the 1960s while both worked for then-Sen. J. William Fulbright who then served as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which held a series of controversial televised hearings featuring as wit­nesses mostly those who opposed the war in Vietnam.

Pettit opposed the war, as did Clinton. As early as 1965, Pettit was traveling in Vietnam and elsewhere in Asia, filing sto­ries with an apparent anti-war slant for two Arkansas radio sta­tions.

Clinton spent the war years dodging the draft and helping to organize anti-war demonstrations abroad. At the time, he was a student in England, where he fled to avoid military service and to attend college as a Rhodes scholar.

WROTE WAR BOOK

In the mid-1970s, Pettit wrote a book, The Experts, which was about the Southeast Asian conflict. He extensively quoted Vietnamese officials involved in the war to outline history.

Pettit holds an undergraduate degree from Yale University and a law degree from the University of Arkansas.

At the time the letter surfaced in the news, White House press secretary Dee Dee Myers tried to pass it off as a "courtesy" given to Pettit as a constituent of then-Gov. Clinton.

In a telephone interview from Bangkok, Thailand, Pettit told the Reuters news agency that he had delivered the letter to un­specified Vietnamese officials in Hanoi, along with similar let­ters from ex-Sen. Fulbright and Lee Williams, also a former Fulbright staffer.

Pettit said giving the letter to Vietnamese officials was an at­tempt to improve relations between the United States and Viet­nam.

Miss Myers confirmed Clinton had sent the letter and de­scribed it as "a letter of introduction from the governor of Arkansas."

She said, "It's not an uncommon thing, but it's not intended to imply this gentleman was speaking for or representing the Clinton administration."

However, it is clear Clinton was more than just a former governor of Arkansas when he wrote the letter. He had already been elected president of the United States and would have to deal with the problem of lifting the trade embargo and the issue of Vietnam's failure to account for American POWs and MIAs still missing in Southeast Asia from the war.

The allegations of deals being worked out between Brown and Vietnam's Prime Minister Vo Van Kiet during the same time frame as the letter written by Clinton for Pettit raise legiti­mate questions as to whether the two episodes, if accurately portrayed, may have been linked. Brown at the time was Clin­ton's choice to become secretary of commerce.

"It is ample reason why both reports of alleged impropriety should be fully investigated by appropriate committees of Congress," a source close to the Brown case has said.

* * *

You ones had better stop just looking at that hand writing on the wall and start READING WHAT IT SAYS!

Enough for now, it is late and this is enough of a heavy load. Dear ones, it is not enough any longer to proclaim "I am an American" and have the world bow in honor. You have become the most hated nation on the face of the Earth--you are called "Israel, with headquarters in the U.N. and Tel Aviv!" This is the antithesis of those come in control of your wondrous nation and planet with that which you shall have to do: He who shall introduce into public affairs the principles of Christ will change the face of the world.!! Will it be done? It's up to you.

Salu.