PJ 222
CHAPTER 7
REC #2 HATONN
MON., JAN. 12, 1998 10:20 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 149
MON., JAN. 12, 1998
And that is where the Jewish Question begins. It begins in very simple terms--How does the Jew so habitually and so resistlessly gravitate to the highest places? What puts him there? Why is he put there? What does he do there? What does the fact of his being there mean to the world?
That is the Jewish Question in its origin. From these points it goes on to others, and whether the trend becomes pro-Jewish or anti-Semitic depends on the amount of prejudice brought to the inquiry, and whether it becomes pro-Humanity depends on the amount of insight and intelligence.
The use of the word Humanity in connection with the word Jew usually throws a side-meaning which may not be intended. In this connection it is usually understood that the humanity ought to be shown toward the Jew. There is just as great an obligation upon the Jew to show his humanity toward the whole race. The Jew has been too long accustomed to think of himself as exclusively the claimant on the humanitarianism of society; society has a large claim against him that he cease his exclusiveness, that he cease exploiting the world, that he cease making Jewish groups the end... and all of his gains, and that he begin to fulfill, in a sense... his exclusiveness has never yet enabled him to fulfill the ancient prophecy that through him all the nations of the Earth should be blessed.
The Jew cannot go on forever filling the role of suppliant for the world's humanitarianism: he must himself show that quality to a society which seriously suspects his higher and more powerful groups of exploiting it with a pitiless rapacity which in its wide-flung and long drawnout distress may be described as an economic program against a rather helpless humanity. For it is true that society is as helpless before the well-organized extortions of certain financial groups, as huddled groups of Russian Jews were helpless against the anti-Semitic mob. And as in Russia, so in America, it is the poor Jew who suffers for the delinquencies of the itch exploiter of his race.
This series of articles is already being met by an organized barrage by mail and wire and voice, every single item of which carries the wail of persecution. One would think that a heartless and horrible attack were being made on a most pitiable and helpless people--until one looks at the letterheads of the magnates who write, and at the financial ratings of those who protest and at the membership of the organization whose responsible heads hysterically demand retraction. And always in the background there is the threat of boycott, a threat which has practically sealed up the columns of every publication in America against even the mildest discussion of the Jewish Question.
[H: Please go back and read that, from 1920, and note the comparison with the same threats of violence, acts of violence and demands for retractions, etc., of 1998. We here have been the worst brunt imaginable just for mentioning the word "Jew" and we have never done anything save offer these same historical passages of WHAT WAS Truth, even to the Russian Revolution, French Revolution and the Elite Moneymakers and Bankers of the world. Would they not be proud of their accomplishments? Ah, in that one question you have the so-called "Jewish Question". They take secret pride while accomplishing their ends with utmost intent at world rule through force, coercion, threats, legal entanglements and even to the removal of AMENDMENTS from the Constitution to allow the Jewish Lawyers to TAKE OVER GOVERNMENT IN EVERY INSTANCE. LAWS ARE NO LONGER RECOGNIZED IN A JUDICIAL SYSTEM RUN BY THREAT AND ADVERSARIAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS. When speaking of "these people" calling themselves Jews, what have you? Well, re-read: "In the agendas of the aforementioned actors they all have in common a faceless, characterless, classless, genderless and raceless reality as universal goal with a Socio-Darwinistic ideal FOR ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT." You are shown individual faces but never are you willingly allowed to get at the SECRETS, nor allowed, if at all possible in the burying of the activities, the Protocols or the actual Plan 2000.]
The Jewish Question in America cannot be concealed forever by threats against publications, nor by the propagandist publication of matter extremely and invariably favorable to everything Jewish. It is here and it cannot be twisted into something else by the adroit use of propaganda, nor can it be forever silenced by threats. The Jews of the United States can best serve themselves and their fellow-Jews all over the world by letting drop their far too ready cry of "anti-Semitism", by adopting a franker tone than that which befits a helpless victim, and by seeing what the Jewish Question is and how it behooves every Jew who loves his people to help solve it.
There has been used in this series the term "International Jew". It is susceptible of two interpretations: one, the Jew wherever he may be; the other, the Jew who exercises international control. The real contention of the world is with the latter and his satellites, whether Jew or Gentile.
[H: One of the most important days for celebration in consideration of these writings by and through Henry Ford was the eventual TAKING CONTROL OF AND GAINING ALL THE ASSETS OF ALL THE FORD FOUNDATIONS AND ALTRUISTIC GROUPS SET UP AND PUT FORTH BY THIS CARING MAN, HENRY FORD--BY THE SO-CALLED JEWS. THAT TAKING OF CONTROL OF THE ASSETS OF THIS MAN WAS THE GREATEST COUP OF THE DAY. Thus could the negation of anything coming before, easily be accomplished in the faces of the multitudes.]
Now, this international type of Jew, this grasper after world-control, this actual possessor and wielder of world-control is a very unfortunate connection for his race to have. The most unfortunate thing about the international Jew, from the standpoint of the ordinary Jew, is that the international type is also a Jew.
[H: Look at how the confusion as to even how to refer to these people becomes evident.] And the significance of this is that the type does not grow anywhere else than on a Jewish stem. There is no other racial nor national type which puts forth this kind of person. It is not merely that there are a few Jews among international financial controllers; it is that these world controllers are exclusively Jews. That is the phenomenon which creates an unfortunate situation for those Jews who are not and never shall be world-controllers, who are the plain people of the Jewish race. [H: Now, they gotcha, for now the inquisitive mind can't have basis for speaking at all for "Jewish" is NOT a race, not a people, not a bloodline, not even a religion--it is a CREED. These very people will be the first to say that "we must overlook race, color and creed, join hands and--WHAT? YOU HAVE CAREFULLY BEEN TENDED AND TRAINED TO NOT EVEN RECOGNIZE WHO OR WHAT THEY ARE AND YOU FURTHER THEIR UPRISE AND YOUR DOWNFALL THROUGH IGNORANCE.] If world-control were mixed, like the control, say, of the biscuit business, then the occasional Jews we might find in those higher financialaltitudes would not constitute the problem at all; the problem would then be limited to the existence of world-control in the hands of a few men, of whatever race or lineage they might be. But since world-control is an ambition which has only been achieved by Jews, and not by any of the methods usually adopted by would-be world conquerors, it becomes inevitable that the question should center in that remarkable race.
This brings another difficulty: in discussing this group of world-controllers under the name of Jews (and they are Jews), it is not always possible to stop and distinguish the group of Jews that is meant. The candid reader can usually determine that, but the Jew who is in a state of mind to be injured is sometimes pained by reading as a charge against himself what was intended for the upper group. "Then why not discuss the upper group as financiers and not as Jews?" may be asked. Because they are Jews, It is not to the point to insist that in any list of rich men who have, many of them, gained their riches by serving a System, we are talking about those who Control--and it is perfectly apparent that merely to be rich is not to control. The world-controlling Jew has riches, but he also has something much more powerful than that.
The international Jew, as already defined, rules not because he is rich, but because in a most marked degree he possesses the commercial and masterful genius of his race, and avails himself of a racial loyalty and solidarity the like of which exists in no other human group. In other words, transfer to-day the world-control of the international Jew to the hands of the highest commercially talented group of Gentiles, and the whole fabric of world-control would eventually fall to pieces, because the gentile lacks a certain quality, be it human or divine, be it natural or acquired, that the Jew possesses.
This of course, the modernJew denies. There is a new position taken by the modernists among the Jews which constitutes a denial that the Jew differs from any other man except in the matter or religion. "Jew" they say is not a racial designation, but a religious designation like "Episcopalian", "Catholic", Presbyterian". This is the argument used in newspaper offices in the Jews' protests against giving the Jewish designation to those of their people who are implicated in crime--"You don't give the religious classifications of other people who are arrested," the editor is told, "why should you do it with Jews?" The appeal to religious tolerance always wins, and is sometimes useful in diverting attention from other things.
Well, if the Jews are only religiously differentiated from the rest of the world, the phenomenon grows stranger still. For the rest of the world is interested less in the Jew's religion than in anything else that concerns him. There is really nothing in his religion to differentiate the Jew from the rest of mankind, as far as the moral content of that religion is concerned, and if there were he would have overcome that by the fact that his Jewish religion supplies the moral structure for both of the other great religions. Moreover, it is stated that there are among English-speaking nations, 2,000,000 Jews who acknowledge their race and not their religion, while 1,000,000 are classed as agnostic--are these any less Jews than the others? The world does not think so. The authoritative students of human differences do notthink so. An Irishman who grows indifferent to the Church is still an Irishman, and it would seem to be equally true that a Jew who grows indifferent to the Synagogue is still a Jew. He at least feels that he is, and so does the non-Jew.
A still more serious challenge would rise if this contention of the modernists were true, for it would necessitate the explanation of these world-controlling Jews by their religion. We should have to say, "They excel through their religion," and then the problem would turn on the religion whose practice should bring such power and prosperity to its devotees. But another fact would intervene, namely, that these world-controlling Jews are not notably religious; and still another fact would hammer for recognition, namely, the most devout believers and most obedient followers of the Jewish religion are the poorest among the Jews. If you want Jewish orthodoxy, the bracing morality of the Old Testament, you will find it, not among the successful Jews, who have Unitarianized their religion to the same extent that the Unitarians have Judaized their Christianity, but among the poor in the side streets who still sacrifice the Saturday business for their Sabbath keeping. Certainly their religion has not given them world-control; instead, they have made their own sacrifices to keep it inviolate against modernism.
Of course, if the Jew differs from the rest of mankind only when he is in full accord with his religion, the question becomes very simple. Any criticism of the Jew becomes sheer religious bigotry and nothing else! And that would be intolerable. But it would be the consensus of thoughtful opinion that the Jew differs less in his religion than anything else. There is more difference between the two great branches of Christianity, more conscious difference, than between any branch of Christianity and Judaism.
So that, the contention of certain modernists notwithstanding, the world will go on thinking of the Jew as a member of a race, a race whose persistence has defeated the utmost efforts made for its extermination, a race that has preserved itself in virility and power by the observance of those natural laws the violation of which has mongrelized so many nations, a race which has come up out of the past with the two great moral values which may be reckoned on monotheism and monogamy, a race which to-day is before us as the visible sign of an antiquity to which all our spiritual wealth harks back. Nay, the Jew will go on thinking of himself as the member of a people, a nation, a race. And all the mixture and intermixture of thought or faith or custom cannot make it otherwise. AJew is a Jew and as long as he remains within his perfectly unassailable traditions, he will remain a Jew. And he will always have the right to feel that to be Jew is to belong to a superior race.
These world-controlling Jews at the top of affairs, then, are there by virtue of, among other things, certain qualities which are inherent in their Jewish natures. Every Jew has these qualities even if not in the supreme sense, just as every Englishman has Shakespeare's tongue but not in Shakespeare's degree. And thus it is impracticable, if not impossible, to consider the international Jew without laying the foundations broadly upon Jewish character and psychology.
[H: What is most interesting to me personally is in the watching the authors and historians almost reach and find connections which would present THE answers to this question. The "British-Israel" term should be the Jewish-British for from out of that Empire has been the enabling of establishment of world-control, right through the very personal guard and intelligence service, M1-6, of Her Majesty Lizzy. Queen Elizabeth, and her consort, are both from the lineage of Jew. This is in the context of BOTH DEFINITIONS or ANY definition. Unless you can understand this you can't even begin to sort the "how" it came to be that these people have gained world-control to the extent they have. They have covered the globe but their big problem now becomes the fact that such as the Chinese majority and the Moslem majority of Islam KNOW THE RIGHT DEFINITIONS AND EVEN THOUGH CONTROL IS SEEMINGLY BEING GAINED BY THESE CULPRITS, THERE IS MASSIVE CONFRONTATION TO BE HAD AS THESE NON-WILLING SLAVES MOVE INTO THAT SLAVERY INTENDED FOR THEM. Media CONTROL has to be tightly maintained to keep you lambs-in-the-slaughter-pens from FINDING OUT TRUTH.]
We may discount at once the too common libel that this greater form of Jewish success is built upon dishonesty. It is impossible to indict the Jewish people or any other people on the wholesale charge. No one knows better than the Jew how widespread is the notion that Jewish methods of business are all unscrupulous. There is no doubt a possibility of a great deal of unscrupulousness existing without actual legal dishonesty, but it is altogether possible that the reputation the Jewish people have long borne in this respect may have had other sources than actual and persistent dishonesty.
We may indicate one of these possible sources. The Jew at a trade is naturally quicker than most other men. They say there are other races which are as nimble at a trade as is the Jew, but the Jew does not live much among them. In this connection one may remember the famous joke about the Jew who went to Scotland.
Now, it is human nature for the slower man to believe that the quicker man is too deft by far, and to become suspicious of his deftness. Everybody suspects the "sharper" even though his sharpness be entirely honest. The slower mind is likely to conceive that the man who sees so many legitimate twists and turns to a trade, may also see and use a convenient number of illegitimate twists and turns. Moreover, there is always the ready suspicion that the one who gets "the best of the bargain" gets it by trickery which is not above the board. Slow, honest, plainspoken and straight-dealing people always have their doubts of the man who gets the better of it.
The Jews, as the records for centuries show, were a keen people in trade. They were so keen that many regarded them as crooked. And so the Jew became disliked for business reasons, not all of which were creditable to the intelligence or initiative of his enemies.
Take, for example, the persecution which Jew merchants once suffered in England. In older England the merchant class had many easy-going traditions. One tradition was that a respectable tradesman would never seek business but wait for it to come to him. Another tradition was that to decorate one's store window with lights or colors, or to display one's stock of goods attractively in the view of the public, was a contemptible and underhanded method of tempting a brother tradesman's customers away from him. Still another tradition was that it was strictly unethical and un-business like to handle more than one line of goods. If one sold tea, it was the best reason in the world why he should not sell teaspoons. As for advertising, the thing would have been so brazen and bold that public opinion would have put the advertiser out of business. The proper demeanor for the merchant was to seem reluctant to part with his goods.
One may readily imagine what happened when the Jewish merchant bustled into the midst of this jungle of traditions. He simply broke them all. In those days tradition had all the force of a divinely promulgated moral law and in consequence of his initiative the Jew was regarded as a great offender. A man who would break those trade traditions would stop at nothing! The Jew was anxious to sell. If he could not sell one article to a customer, he had another on hand to offer him. The Jews' stores became bazaars, forerunner of the modern department stores, and the old English custom of one store for one line of goods was broken up. The Jew went after trade, pursued it, persuaded it. He was the originator of "a quick turnover and small profits". He originated the installment plan. The one state of affairs he could not endure was business at a standstill, and to start it moving he would do anything. He was the first advertiser--in a day when even to announce in the public prints the location of your store was to intimate to the public that you were in financial difficulties, were about to go to the wall, and were trying the last desperate expedient to which no self-respecting merchant would stoop.
It was as easy as child's play to connect this energy with dishonesty. The Jew was not playing the game, at least so the staid English merchant thought. As a matter of fact he was playing the game to get it all in his own hands--which he has practically done.
The Jew has shown that same ability ever since. His power of analyzing the money currents amounts to an instinct. His establishment in one country represented another base from which the members of his race could operate. Whether by the natural outworking of innate gifts, or the deliberate plan of race unity and loyalty; all Jewish trading communities had relations, and as these trading communities increased in wealth, prestige and power, as they formed relations with governments and great interests in the countries where they operated, they simply put more power into the central community wherever it might be located, now in Spain, now in Holland, now in England. Whether by intention or not, they became more closely allied than the branches of one business could be, because the cement of racial unity, the bond of racial brotherhood, cannot in the very nature of things exist among the Gentiles as it exists among the Jews. Gentiles never think of themselves as Gentiles, and never feel that they owe anything to another Gentile as such. Thus they have been convenient agents of Jewish schemes at times and in places when it was not expedient that the Jewish controllers should be publicly known; but they have never been successful competitors of the Jew in the field of world-control.
From these separated Jewish communities went power to the central community where the master bankers and the master analysts of conditions lived. And back from the central community flowed information of an invaluable character and assistance wherever needed. It is not difficult to understand how, under such a condition, the nation that did not deal kindly with the Jews was made to suffer, and the nation that yielded to them their fullest desire was favored by them. And it is credibly stated that they have made certain nations feel the power of their displeasure.
This system, if it ever existed, exists in greater power today. It is to-day (1920), however, threatened as it has never been. Fifty years ago, international banking, which was mostly in control of the Jews as the money brokers of the world, was on top of business. It exercised the super-control of governments and finance everywhere. Then came that new thing, Industry, which expanded to a degree unguessed by the shrewdest prophets and analysts. As Industry gathered strength and power it became a powerful money magnet, drawing the wealth of the world in its train, not, however, merely for the sake of possessing the money, but of making it work. Production and profit on production, instead of loans and interest on loans, became the master method for a time. The war came, in which the former broker-masters of the world had undoubtedly their large part. And now the two forces, Industry and Finance, are in a struggle to see whether Finance is again to become the master, or creative Industry. This is one of the elements which is bringing the Jewish Question to the bar of public opinion.
DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, issue of June 12, 1920
[END OF QUOTING]
I have chosen to leave the italics running through these documents in such great numbers because at the printing of the originals there was no other way to easily make BOLD, or stress points, other than italics.
I can warn you hapless people who refuse to look at this question that you are the target of mass control. The master-Plan has reached a finalization point in what were once called the Christian nations, the very government itself is being purged of all non-Jewish members. Check out the trees hopping into the pathway of problem-possible people. Note that the Bar Association has become a secret society for Jewish Lawyers and Attorneys. The Medical Association is already one of their major secret societies but not quite yet purged of healers rather than drug pushers for the chemical Jewish industries and drug houses. The task is just about accomplished, however, and a close-down of all alternative possibilities is making vast strides toward extinction under the LAWS. Pretty soon now you will be able to count on being arrested and prosecuted for chewing on a sunflower seed. Every item the public touches or is allowed to touch is infected with something alien to the well-being of the individuals. Mass inoculations and vaccination programs are going to infect the rest of you via your babies. Whole national immune systems are going to be wiped out in the march for finding the most appropriate microbe to take out the unwanted populations--non-Jews of course. AND, NO, THE UNFORTUNATE TOOLS OF THE ELITE ARE NOT JEWS, EVEN IF THEY THINK THEMSELVES TO BE. THEY ARE THE HAPLESS VICTIMS OF THE JEWS IN THEIR "DO ANYTHING REQUIRED" TO ACCOMPLISH WORLD-CONTROL MOVE ACROSS THE GLOBE. THEY ARE THE EXPENDABLE ONES SET FORTH TO DELUDE THE MASSES AS TO THE MASTER-PLAN.
"Jesus was a gift of the Jews?" Right! He was and is a fabrication replacing the Master Teacher, to suit the needs of a Plan to take control of the world for the Anti-Christ. Esu Immanuel Sananda is the expected Master Teacher and need bear no assumed name or "also known as". Historically it is difficult, although NOT IMPOSSIBLE, TO LEARN AND KNOW WITHOUT HESITATION OR DOUBT what took place those 2000 years ago and WHY. Two millennia ago the MASTER PROTOCOLS WERE PUT INTO PLAY AS THE MASTER PLAN 2000. TRUTH HAS ONLY BEEN GIVEN LIP-SERVICE SINCE THAT PLACING INTO ACTION, THE PLAN.
The astute blind man can see here that all factions of the Spiritual Truth as presented for Man's use in his physical journey are both a LIE and totally without merit in thought, physics or mental scope. "Faith" demands are thrust off on you without any recourse by your religious institutions under Man's conjured doctrines.
What you do with TRUTH, however, is strictly up to you--my commission is to bring it forth, no more and no less. So WHO is behind all the lies and misperceptions? Well, the Anti-Christ by whatever name is King of the physical world as you have built him to be. God Creator is the Creator and thus THE center of the Spiritual world of/in TRUTH. You are manifest in human physical form so GUESS WHAT, sleepy little dreamers.
There is another big misunderstanding here, and that is that we are somehow anti-Jew AND anti-Semitic. We are neither. We ARE Semites from Shem and we do not consider the Jew to be more than a respectable opponent of God. The Jew wrote his books and has laid forth all this information regarding himself as a Man and a Race or whatever he wishes to call himself. By and large these are the most shrewd individuals on the face of the Earth for their only dominion is in physical form. You can divide and separate all sorts of Man-made doctrines and NEVER EVEN TOUCH ON THE TRUTH OF SPIRITUAL FACT. I am simply not impressed with the lies or the efforts to destroy HUman through these methods of deceit--THAT is purely for the operations of the Anti-CHRIST by whatever name you wish to label your religion. Religion and Spiritual Truth are NEVER synonymous. Neither is "Christianity" even remotely the same as "CHRIST-ness". You haven't identified the CHRIST person himself as you latch onto the Santa Satan bearing Jewish commercial gifts to fool you Heysoosians. Poor Immanuel, I wonder if you even care what happened to that wondrous Master Teacher? It certainly makes that Jewish Bible saying that "...and all men shall turn away from God and into the clutches of His adversary..." look prophetic. Go read Revelation and check out your vulnerable and weak position, friends. And, my Roman Catholic friends, do you know that your Catholic Roman Pope is a Jew? Oh indeed. He also sold GAS to the Nazis in the time of the so-called but false, Holocaust. Oh drat, isn't truth a handful to hold? Salu.
PJ 222
CHAPTER 8
REC #3 HATONN
MON., JAN. 12, 1998 2:40 P.M. YR. 11, DAY 149
MON., JAN. 12, 1998
We will please continue with articles from FORD'S DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, 1920-22.
[QUOTING, Part 3:]
DOES A DEFINITE JEWISH
WORLD PROGRAM EXIST?
(VIII)
In all the explanations of anti-Jewish feeling which modern Jewish spokesmen make, these three alleged causes are commonly given--these three and no more: religious prejudice, economic jealousy, social antipathy. Whether the Jew knows it or not, every Gentile knows that on his side of the Jewish Question no religious prejudice exists. Economic jealousy may exist, at least to this extent, that his uniform success has exposed the Jew to much scrutiny. A few Jewish spokesmen seek to turn this scrutiny by denying that the Jew is pre-eminent in finance, but this is loyalty in extremity. The finances of the world are in control of Jews; their decisions and their devices are themselves our economic law. But because a people excels in finance is no sufficient reason for calling them to the bar of public judgment. If they are more intellectually able, more persistently industrious than we are, if they are endowed with faculties which have been denied us as an inferior or slower race, that is no reason for our requiring them to give an account of themselves. Economic jealousy may explain some of the anti-Jewish feeling; it cannot account for the presence of the Jewish Question except as the hidden causes of Jewish financial success may become a minor element of the larger problem. And as for social antipathy-- there are many more undesirable Gentiles in the world than there are undesirable Jews, for the simple reason that there are more Gentiles.
None of the Jewish spokesmen today mention the political cause, or if they come within suggestive distance of it, they limit and localize it. It is not a question of the patriotism of the Jew, though this too is very widely questioned in all the countries. You hear it in England, in France, in Germany, in Poland, in Russia, in Rumania,--and, with a shock, you hear it in the United States. Books have been written, reports published and scattered abroad, statistics skillfully set forth for the purpose of showing that the Jew does his part for the country in which he resides; and yet the fact remains that in spite of these most zealous and highly sponsored campaigns, the opposite assertion is stronger and lives longer. The Jews who did their duty in the armies of Liberty, and did it doubtless from truehearted love and allegiance, have not been able to overcome the impression made upon officers and men and civilians by those who did not.
But that is not what is here meant as the political element in the Jewish Question. To understand why the Jew should think less of the nationalities of the world than do those who comprise them is not difficult. The Jew's history is one of wandering among them all. Considering living individuals only, there is no race of people now upon the planet who have lived in so many places, among so many peoples as have the Jewish masses. They have a clearer world-sense than any other people, because the world has been their path. And they think in world terms more than any nationally cloistered people could. The Jew can be absolved if he does not enter into national loyalties and prejudices with the same intensity as the natives; the Jew has been for centuries a cosmopolitan. While under a flag he may be correct in the conduct required of him as a citizen or resident, inevitably he has a view of flags which can hardly be shared by the man who has known but one flag.
[H: It would be wise to stop right here and consider what has happened through the years as to the "flag" issue. In 1948 or thereabouts the State of Israel was pronounced upon the world while displacing Palestine. There was no "choice" in this matter as it simply was done by the United Nations, a new entity in its own birthing. The world's, and more specifically, the United States' "Jews" turned to "Israel First" and denounced anyone who continued to ask for the "U.S. First" in all considerations. The blue and white of the United Nations was claimed for the new Flag of Israel with a Star of David (El Roy, not King) and two blue stripes representing the Euphrates River and the Tigris River. All areas between these two rivers would be relentlessly coveted for the Israeli Empire. Since that area would not be the easily acquired land of the Palestinians, a long-range Plan with deceit and subterfuge would have to be conjured and worked. That surely has been presented through the upheavals of Iran, Iraq and adjacent areas.]
The political element inheres in the fact that the Jews form a nation in the midst of the nations. Some of their spokesmen, particularly in America, deny that, but the genius of the Jew himself has always put these spokesmen's zeal to shame. And why this fact of nationhood should be so strenuously denied is not always clear. It may be that when Israel is brought to see that her mission in the world is not to be achieved by means of the Golden Calf, her very cosmopolitanism with regard to the world and her inescapable nationalistic integrity with regard to herself will together prove a great and serviceable factor in bringing about human unity, which the total Jewish tendency at the present time is doing much to prevent. It is not the fact that the Jews remain a nation in the midst of the nations; it is the use made of that inescapable status, which the world has found reprehensible. The nations have tried to reduce the Jew to unity with themselves; attempts toward the same end have been made by the Jews themselves; but destiny seems to have marked them out to continuous nationhood. Both the Jews and the world will have to accept that fact, find the good prophecy in it, and seek the channels for its fulfillment.
Theodor Herzl, one of the greatest of the Jews, was perhaps the farthest-seeing public exponent of the philosophy of Jewish existence that modern generations have known. And he was never in doubt of the existence of the Jewish nation. Indeed, he proclaimed its existence on every occasion. He said, "We are a people--One people."
He clearly saw that what he called the Jewish Question was political. In his introduction to "the Jewish State" he says, "I believe that I understand anti-Semitism, which is really a highly complex movement. I consider it from a Jewish standpoint, yet without fear or hatred. I believe that I can see what elements there are in it of vulgar sport, of common trade jealousy, of inherited prejudice, of religious intolerance and also of pretended self-defense. I think the Jewish Question is no more a social than a religious one, notwithstanding that it sometimes takes these and other forms. It is a national question, which can only be solved by making it a political world-question to be discussed and controlled by the civilized nations of this world in council."
[H: So here you have the groundlaying for the false perception of such a thing as "anti-Semitism" in full knowledge that the term Semitism does not even fit the definition of JEW. This, however, became the most effective means of confusing everyone--simply take the accepted terms and change meanings without letting anyone on the outside in on the changes.]
Not only did Herzl declare that the Jews formed a nation, but when questioned by Major Evans Gordon before the British Royal Commission on Alien Immigration in August, 1902, Dr. Herzl said: "I will give you my definition of a nation, and you can add the adjective 'Jewish'. A nation is, in my mind, an historical group of men of a recognizable cohesion held together by a common enemy. That is in my view a nation. Then if you add to that the word 'Jewish' you have what I understand to be the Jewish nation. " [H: Now is this ever convenient or what?]
Also, in relating the action of this Jewish nation to the world, Dr. Herzl wrote: "when we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party; when we rise there rises also our terrible power of the purse."
This view, which appears to be the true view in that it is the view which has been longest sustained in Jewish thought, is brought out also by Lord Eustace Percy, and re-published, apparently with approval, by the Canadian Jewish Chronicle. It will repay a careful reading:
"Liberalism and Nationalism, with a flourish of trumpets, threw open the doors of the ghetto and offered equal citizenship to the Jew. The Jew passed out into the Western World, saw the power and the glory of it, used it and enjoyed it, laid his hand indeed upon the nerve centers of its civilization, guided, directed and exploited it, and then--refused the offer.... Moreover--and this is a remarkable thing--the Europe of nationalism and liberalism, of scientific government and democratic equality is more intolerable to him than the old oppressions and persecutions of despotism.... In the increasing consolidation of the western nations, it is no longer possible to reckon on complete toleration....
"Ina world of completely organized territorial sovereignties he (the Jew) has only two possible cities of refuge; he must either pull down the pillars of the whole national state system or he must create a territorial sovereignty of his own. [H: SO, THEY DID BOTH.] In this perhaps lies the explanation both of Jewish Bolshevism and of Zionism, for at this moment Eastern Jewry seems to hover uncertainly between the two.
"In Eastern Europe Bolshevism and Zionism often seem to grow side by side, just as Jewish influence molded Republican and socialist thought throughout the nineteenth century, down to the Young Turk revolution in Constantinople hardly more than a decade ago--not because the Jew cares for the positive side of radical philosophy, not because he desires to be a partaker in Gentile nationalism or Gentile democracy, but because no existing Gentile system of government is ever anything but distasteful to him. "
All that is true, and Jewish thinkers of the more fearless type always recognize it as true. The Jew is against the Gentile scheme of things. He is, when he gives his tendencies full sway, a Republican as against the monarchy, a Socialist as against the republic, and a Bolshevist as against Socialism.
What are the causes of this disruptive activity? First his essential lack of democracy. Jewish nature is autocratic. Democracy is all right for the rest of the world, but the Jew wherever he is found forms an aristocracy of one sort or another. Democracy is merely a tool of a word which Jewish agitators use to raise themselves to the ordinary level in places where they are oppressed below it; but having reached the common level they immediately make efforts for special privileges, as being entitled to them--a process of which the late Peace Conference will remain the most startling example. The Jews today are the only people whose special and extraordinary privileges are written into the world's Treaty of Peace. But more of that at another time.
NO ONE NOW PRETENDS TO DENY, except a few spokesmen who really do not rule the thought of the Jews but are set forth for the sole benefit of influencing Gentile thought, that the socially and economically disruptive elements abroad in the world today are not only MANNED but also MONEYED by Jewish interests. For a long time this fact was held in suspense owing to the vigorous denial of the Jews and the lack of information on the part of those agencies of publicity to which the public had looked for its information. But now the facts are coming forth. Herzl's words are being proved to be true--"when we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party"--and these words were first published in English in 1896, or 24 years ago. [H: For you today in 1998, it is now OVER a CENTURY ago!]
Just now these tendencies are working in two directions, one for the tearing down of the Gentile states all over the world, the other for the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. The latter project has the best wishes of the whole world, but it is far from having the best wishes of the whole, or even the larger part of Jewry. The Zionist party makes a great deal of noise, but it is really an unrepresentative minority. It can scarcely be designated as more than an unusually ambitious colonization scheme. * * [NOTE: The statements indicated are those of non-Zionist Jews. The real Jewish program is that program which is executed. It was the Zionist program that was followed by the Peace Conference. It must therefore be regarded as the official program.] It is doubtless serving, however, as a very useful public screen for the carrying on of secret activities. International Jews, the controllers of the world's governmental and financial power, may meet anywhere, at any time, in war time or peace time, and by giving out that they are only considering the ways and means of opening up Palestine to the Jews, they easily escape the suspicion of being together on any other business. The Allies and the enemies of the Gentile nations at war thus met and were not molested. It was at a Zionist conference--the sixth, held in 1903--that the recent war was exactly predicted, its progress and outcome indicated, and the relation of the Jews to the Peace Treaty outlined.
That is to say, though Jewish nationalism exists, its enshrinement in a state to be set up in Palestine is not the project that is engaging the whole Jewish nation now. The Jews will not move to Palestine just yet; it may be said that they will not move at all merely because of the Zionist movement. Quite another motive will be the cause of the exodus out of the Gentile nations, when the time for that exodus fully comes.
[H: Here is more proof for you of the United States and Canada: Millions of Jews have moved IN and taken over your very government, judicial system, financial system and RUN THE WORLD FROM YOUR LOCATION. This hardly qualifies you nice so-called "christians" as even resembling a "GENTILE" NATION. THE JEWS NOW CALL THE U.S. THE "NEW JEWISH HOMELAND". That may well be fine for the Jews but what does that do to you as a Gentile Nation of Christians-you know, that one nation under GOD?]
As Donald A. Cameron, late British Consul-General at Alexandria, a man fully in sympathy with Zionism and much quoted in the Jewish press, says: "The Jewish immigrants (into Palestine) will tire of taking in one another's washings at three per cent, of winning one another's money in the family, and their sons will hasten by train and steamer to win 10 per cent in Egypt.... The Jew by himself in Palestine will eat his head off; he will kick his stable to pieces." Undoubtedly the time for the exodus--at least the motive for the exodus--is not yet here.
The political aspect of the Jewish Question which is now engaging at least three of the great nations--France, Great Britain and the United States--has to do with matters of the present organization of the Jewish nation. Must it wait until it reaches Palestine to have a State, or is it an organized State now? Does Jewry know what it is doing? Has it a "foreign policy" with regard to the Gentiles? Has it a department which is executing that foreign policy? Has this Jewish State, visible or invisible, if it exists, a head? Has it a Council of State? And if any of these things is so, who is aware of it?
The first impulsive answer of the Gentile mind would be, "No" to all these questions--it is a Gentile habit to answer impulsively. Never having been trained in secrets or invisible unity, the Gentile immediately concludes that such things cannot be, if for no other reason than that they have not crossed his path and advertised themselves.
The questions, however, answered thus, require some explanation of the circumstances which are visible to all men. If there is no deliberate combination of Jews in the world, then the control which they have achieved and the uniformity of the policies which they follow must be the simple result, not of deliberate decisions, but of a similar nature in all of them working out the same way. Thus, we might say that as a love for adventure on the water drove the Britisher forth, so it made him the world's great colonist. Not that he deliberately sat down with himself and in formal manner resolved that he would become a colonizer, but the natural outworking of his genius resulted that way. But would this be a sufficient account of the British Empire?
Doubtless the Jews have the genius to do, wherever they go, the things in which we see them excel. But does this account forthe relations which exist between the Jews of every country, for their world councils, for their amazing foreknowledge of stupendous events which break with shattering surprise on the rest of the world, for the smoothness and preparedness with which they appear, at a given time in Paris, with a world program on which they all agree? [H: But of course, if you write the play, make the plans, act on the plans, and others stand in awe of your ability to keep same a secret--of course they are astounded and of course the play will come to pass exactly as you have written the script.]
The world has long suspected--at first only a few, then the secret departments of the governments, next the intellectuals among the people, now more and more the common people themselves--that not only are the Jews a nation distinct from all the other nations and mysteriously unable to sink their nationality by any means they or the world may adopt to this end, but that they also constitute a state; that they are nationally conscious, not only, but consciously united for a common defense and for a common purpose. Revert to Theodor Herzl's definition of the Jewish nation, as held together by a common enemy, and then reflect that this common enemy is the Gentile world. Does this people which knows itself to be a nation remain loosely unorganized in the face of that fact? It would hardly be like Jewish astuteness in other fields. When you see how closely the Jews are united by various organizations in the United States, and when you see how with practiced hand they bring those organizations to bear as if with tried confidence in their pressure, it is at least not inconceivable that what can be done within a country,--can be done, or has been done, between all the countries where the Jews live.
At any rate, in the American Hebrew of June 25, 1920, Herman Bernstein writes thus: "About a year ago a representative of the Department of Justice submitted to me a copy of the manuscript of ' The Jewish Peril' by Professor Nilus, and asked for my opinion of the work. He said that the manuscript was a translation of a Russian book published in 1905 which was later suppressed. The manuscript was supposed to contain "protocols" of the Wise Men of Zion and was supposed to have been read by Dr. Herzl at a secret conference of the Zionist Congress in Basel. He expressed the opinion that the work was probably that of Dr. Theodor Herzl... He said that some American Senators who had seen the manuscript were amazed to find that so many years ago a scheme had been elaborated by the Jews which is now being carried out, and that Bolshevism had been planned years ago by Jews who sought to destroy the world."
This quotation is made merely to put on record the fact that it was a representative of the Department of Justice of the United States Government, who introduced this document to Mr. Bernstein, and expressed a certain opinion upon it, namely, "that the work was probably that of Dr. Theodor Herzl". Also that "some American Senators" were amazed to note the comparison between what a publication of the year 1905 proposed and what the year 1920 revealed.
The incident is all the more preoccupying because it occurred by action of the representative of a government who today is very largely in the hands of, or under the influence of, Jewish interests. It is more than probable that as soon as the activity became known, the investigator was stopped. But it is equally probable that whatever orders may have been given and apparently obeyed, the investigation may not have stopped.
The United States Government was a little late in the matter, however. At least four other world powers had preceded it, some by many years. A copy of the Protocols was deposited in the British Museum and bears on it the stamp of that institution, "August 10, 1906". The notes themselves probably date from 1896, or the year of the utterances previously quoted from Dr. Herzl. The first Zionist Congress convened in 1897.
The document was published in England recently under auspices that challenged attention for it, in spite of the unfortunate title under which it appeared. Eyre and Spotiswoode are the appointed printers to the British Government, and it was they who brought out the pamphlet. It was as if the Government Printing Office at Washington should issue them in this country. While there was the usual outcry by the Jewish press, the London Times in a review pronounced all the Jewish counter-attacks as "unsatisfactory".
The Times noticed what will probably be the case in this country also, that the Jewish defenders leave the text of the Protocols alone, while they lay heavy emphasis on the fact of their anonymity. When they refer to the substance of the document at all there is one form of words which recurs very often--"It is the work of a criminal or a madman. "
The Protocols, without name attached, appearing for the most part in manuscripts here and there, laboriously copied out from hand to hand, being sponsored by no authority that was willing to stand behind it, assiduously studied in the secret departments of the governments and passed from one to another among higher officials, have lived on and on, increasing in power and prestige by the sheer force of their contents. A marvelous achievement for either a criminal or a madman! The only evidence it has is that which it carries within it, and that internal evidence is, as the London Times points out, the point on which attention is to be focused, and the very point from which Jewish effort has been expended to draw us away.
The interest of the Protocols at this time is their bearing on the questions: Have the Jews an organized world system? What is its policy? How is it being worked?
These questions all receive full attention in the Protocols. Whosoever was the mind that conceived them possessed a knowledge of human nature, of history and of statecraft which is dazzling in its brilliant completeness, and terrible in the objects to which it turns its powers. Neither a madman nor an intentional criminal, but more likely a super-mind mastered by devotion to a people and a faith could be the author, if indeed one mind alone conceived them. It is too terribly real for fiction, too well-sustained for speculation, too deep in its knowledge of the secret springs of life for forgery.
Jewish attacks upon it thus far make much of the fact that it came out of Russia. That is hardly true. It came by way of Russia. It was incorporated in a Russian book published about 1905 by a Professor Nilus, who attempted to interpret the Protocols by events then going forward in Russia. This publication and interpretation gave it a Russian tinge which has been useful to Jewish propagandists in this country and England, because these same propagandists have been very successful in establishing in Anglo-Saxon mentalities a certain atmosphere of thought surrounding the idea of Russia and Russian. One of the biggest humbugs ever foisted on the world has been that foisted by Jewish propagandists, principally on the American public, with regard to the temper and genius of the truly Russian people. So, to intimate that the Protocols are Russian, is partially to discredit them.
The internal evidence makes it clear that the Protocols were not written by a Russian, nor originally in the Russian language, nor under the influence of Russian conditions. But they found their way to Russia and were first published there. They have been found by diplomatic officers in manuscript in all parts of the world. Wherever Jewish power is able to do so, it has suppressed them, sometimes under the supreme penalty.
Their persistence is a fact which challenges the mind. Jewish apologists may explain that persistence on the ground that the Protocols feed the anti-Semitic temper, and therefore are preserved for that service. Certainly there was no wide nor deep anti-Semitic temper in the United States to be fed or that felt the greed for agreeable lies to keep itself alive. The progress of the Protocols in the United States can only be explained on the ground that they supply light and give meaning to certain previously observed facts, and that this light and meaning is so startling as to give a certain standing and importance to these otherwise unaccredited documents. Sheer lies do not live long, their power soon dies. These Protocols are more alive than ever. They have penetrated higher places than ever before. They have compelled a more serious attitude to them than ever before.
The Protocols would not be more worthy of study if they bore, say, the name of Theodore Herzl. Their anonymity does not decrease their power any more than the omission of a painter's signature detracts from the art value of painting. Indeed, the Protocols are better without a known source. For if it were definitely known that in France or Switzerland in the year 1896, or thereabouts, a group of International Jews, assembled in conference, drew up a program of world conquest it would still have to be shown that such program was more than a mere vagary, that it was confirmed at large by efforts to fulfill it. The Protocols are a World Program--there is no doubt anywhere of that. Whose program, is stated within the articles themselves. But as for outer confirmation, which would be the more valuable--a signature, or six signatures, or twenty signatures, or a 25-year unbroken line of effort in fulfilling that program?
The point of interest for this and other countries is not that a "criminal or a madman" conceived such a program, but that, when conceived, this program found means of getting itself fulfilled in its most important particulars. The document is comparatively unimportant; the conditions to which it calls attention are of a very high degree of importance.
DEARBORN INDEPENDENT--Issue of July 10, 1920.
[END OF QUOTING]
I marvel at the way in which even you readers want to deny. Deny what? All of you can see the steps to this Plan 2000 according to these Protocols unfolding every day in every way. What is shocking? It is apparently what you in this democracy desire, so after all--YOU should be thrilled since you contributed all you ARE, and might be, into the plan's success. WHAT IS IT THAT IS SO IMPORTANT TO YOU THAT YOU WANT TO BURY YOUR SUCCESS?
Think carefully about this as you go about your daily habits and see how clearly YOU HAVE MADE SURE THAT THE PROTOCOLS ARE PERFECTED AND THE SHACKLES PLACED ABOUT YOU!
These grinches haven't just stolen Christmas, sleepyheads, they have stolen your very gift of understanding of a "Christmas". You are left without your very religious ICON as you pictured HIM to be. You have sold your soul to the company store, good buddies, as Tennessee Ernie Ford would sing to you. You took CHRIST out of Christmas long before you affixed a prefix of "X-mas" to shorten your work load of penning anything referencing Christmas. Now you can toss out the bathwater also for you are left with an ANTI-CHRIST, and nowhere to run and no place to hide.
Do the mainline Jews object to our writing about these things and publishing factual information now in these last two years of the century? NO! They want you to NOW know how thoroughly they have succeeded in their "take the world" plan. You who do not join the ranks and "take the sign" will simply be the fodder for the starving out, depopulation programs, incarceration programs, and of course--supply fodder for the gunfire as those still rising up against this beast confront this Godlessness. Salu.
