PJ 50
CHAPTER 13
REC #1 HATONN
SAT., JUNE 13, 1992 7:01 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 302
SAT., JUNE 13, 1992
MEDITATION
I wonder how many of you realize that the "cup" and not the "cross" was the greatest symbol of Christendom?
Do you realize it was Peter and not Paul who kept the "Master's" work and word going? The Golden Sun Disc (Aton) was the symbol of eternal God.
The CUP was the beloved symbol let by the "Teacher" as reminders to His people. The cup in point is of "clay", Mark was asked, and did so, to bring to the Teacher a cup of simple clay for his last sup with His people--to remind them of humility and that it is the "fruit" and not the things of physical (silver cups) which is in point. The clay cup discovered within the Chalice of Antioch found later was not the original used by Esu.
Mark took the cup from where it rested and returned it to his mother, to whom it belonged--as second-best table equipment, Silver was the best and Mark's mother was a wealthy widow so the act was one of intent, not accident. The intent was to use that which was of "earth" substance of which all things are created. The Cup, itself, represents spiritual truth or truth of faith.
Something strange happened to that cup, however. Mark noted that in the dimly lit room where the cups were placed--this one glowed. Therefore he took it to his room and put it away for safe keeping. He kept it for some fourteen years--showing it periodically as ones would gather.
The Cup became recognized as the Chalice of Antioch but this was not so. The cup was taken to Antioch by Barnabas and Paul (who had by now worked his way within the group of friends). The Chalice was mode of silver and "contained" a cup of clay of the same size.
Peter carried with him the cup he had used himself at the Last Gathering. This he gave to Linus, the Greek artist who fashioned the magnificent chalice that held the humble clay cup. The clay cup was replaced by the silver cup of Peter.
The point is not very big but the concept is most important for I am asked about the "Places of the Lion" and you ones seem to know very little about that which I speak. The stories are all entangled with Linus, Solomon, Rahotep, , Akhnaton and Peter--who were all considered and identified in the underground circles as "Lions" and the "Lion-throne".
The point is that in the worship of "things" you are going to be most often misled. The Chalice of Antioch, for instance, is authentic in that it ONCE HELD the cup in point, but it no longer holds that Cup any more than the Glastonbury Chalice holds it! Therefore, ye who would worship and do reverence at the altars of decoration and ritual are very likely worshiping a replica--an idol of some sort, if you will.
THE THINGS OF GOD ARE WITHIN THE HEART AND THE SOUL IS THE "CUP" OF GOD OF ETERNAL LIFE TO BE REFILLED UPON PETITION. AH, INDEED, ‘TIS THE CUP AND NOT THE CROSS UNTO WHICH YOU MUST TURN THAT YOUR CUP MIGHT BE FILLED TO OVERFLOW. One day perhaps we shall find the time to write of these wondrous traditions. This day, however, we shall move on with our story already underway.
****
Today we shall speak of Shan/Gaia--The Cleaved Planet--Earth.
BY ANY OTHER LABEL--SHAN/EARTH
Why do you suppose you call your planet "Earth"? Ah so-I thought not.
In German, for instance, it is called Erde, from Erda in Old High German; Jordh in Icelandic, Jorde in Danish. Erthe in Middle English, Airtha in Gothic; and going eastward geographically and backward in time, Ereds or Aratha in Aramaic, Erd or Ertz in Kurdish, Eretz in Hebrew and so on. The sea you now call the Arabian Sea, the body of water that leads to the Persian Gulf, was called in antiquity the Sea of Erythrea; and to this day, ordu means an encampment or settlement in Persian. Why?
FIRST SETTLEMENT
Well, a lot happened in that part of the world and the answer lies in the Sumerian texts that relate the arrival of the first group of Anunnaki/Nefilim on Earth. There were fifty of them, under the leadership of E.A ("Whose Home is Water"), a great scientist and the Firstborn son of the ruler of Nibiru, ANU. They splashed down in the Arabian Sea and waded ashore to the edge of the marshlands that, after the climate warmed up a bit, became the Persian Gulf. Persia was that which is now recognized as "Iran". At the head of the marshlands they established their first settlement on a new planet; it was called by them E.RI.DU--"Home in the faraway". Don't you think that is a nice appropriate name?
And so it was that in time the whole settled planet came to be called after that first settlement--Erde, Erthe, Earth, etc. To this day, when you call your planet by its name, you invoke the memory of the first settlement on Earth; unknowingly, you remember Eridu and honor the first group of Anunnaki who established it. Is history not getting to be fun?
The Sumerian scientific or technical term for Earth's globe and its firm surface was KI. It was depicted as a somewhat flattened orb crossed by vertical lines somewhat like modern depictions of meridians. Earth does indeed bulge somewhat at its equator and therefore the Sumerian representation is more correct scientifically than the usual modem way of depicting Earth as a perfect globe....
After Ea had completed the establishment of the first five of the seven original settlements of the Anunnaki, he was given the title EN.KI, "Lord of Earth". But the term KI, as a root or verb, was applied to the planet called "Earth" for a reason. It conveyed the meaning "to cut off, to sever, to hollow out". Its derivatives illustrate the concept: KI.LA meant "excavation", KI.MAH "tomb", KI.IN.DAR "crevice, fissure". In Sumerian astronomical texts the term KI was prefixed with the determinative MUL ("celestial body"). And thus when they spoke of mul.KI, they conveyed the meaning, "the celestial body that had been cleaved apart". By calling Earth KI, the Sumerians thus invoked their cosmogony--the tale of the Celestial Battle and the cleaving of Tiamat.
LANGUAGE BRANCHES
Unaware of its origin you continue to apply this descriptive epithet to your planet to this very time in place. The intriguing fact is that over time the Sumeariana civilization was two thousand years old by the time Babylon arose and the pronunciation of the term KI (ki) changed to gi, or sometimes ge. It was so carried into the Akkadian and its linguistic branches (Babylonian, Assyrian, Hebrew), at all times retaining its geographic or topographic connotation as a "cleavage", a ravine, a deep valley. Thus the biblical term that through Greek translations of the Bible is read Gehenna stems from the Hebrew Gai-Hinnom, the crevice-like narrow ravine outside Jerusalem named after Hinnom, where divine retribution shall befall the sinners via an erupting subterranean fire on Judgment Day.
If you were taught at all in school, you were taught that the component geo in all the scientific terms applied to Earth sciences--geo-graphy, geo-metry, geo-ology and so on-comes from the Greek word Gaia (or Gaea), their name for the goddess of Earth. You were not taught, however, where the Greeks picked up this term or what its real meaning might have been. The answer is, guess what--surely enough--from the SUMERIANS--KI or GI.
Scholars all agree that the Greek notions of primordial events and the gods were directly borrowed from the Near East, I through Asia Minor at whose western edge early Greek settlements like Troy were located, and via the island of Crete in the Eastern Mediterranean (nearby to Atlantis). According to Greek tradition, Zeus, who was the chief honcho god of the twelve Olympians, arrived on the Greek mainland via Crete, whence he had fled after abducting the beautiful Europa, daughter of the Phoenician king of Tyre. Aphrodite arrived from the Near East via the island of Cyprus. Poseidon, whom the Romans called Neptune, came on horseback via Asia Minor, and Athena brought the olive to Greece from the lands of the Bible. There can simply be no doubt that the Greek alphabet developed from a Near Eastern one. (Dharma, please see that the illustration I shall find for you is placed herein for it will give much confidence in this story.) [See next page]
There are many books which speak of these ancient times, not the least of which was the Iliad by one called Homer. This line of historical mythology or "tradition" was handed down as regarded the creation of celestial gods--or visitors who came to stay, etc., of Heaven and Earth--out of Chaos. These tales, dear ones, are not greatly unlike your own biblical tales of the Beginning:
Verily, at the first Chaos came to be,
and the next the wide-bosomed Gaia--
she who created all the immortal ones
who hold the peaks of snowy Olympus:
Dim Tartarus, wide-pathed in the depths,
and Eros, fairest among the divine immortals ...
From Chaos came forth Erebus and black Nyx;
And of Nyx were born Aether and Hemera.
So what do we have here?
At this point in the process of the formation of the "divine immortals"--the celestial gods--"Heaven" does not yet exist, just as the Mesopotamian sources recounted. Accordingly, the "Gaia" of these verses is the equivalent of Tiamat, "she who bore them all" according the Enuma elish. Hesiod lists the celestial gods who followed "Chaos" and "Gaia" in three pairs, Tartarus and Eros, Erebus and Nyx, Aether and Hemera. The parallel with the creation of the three pairs in Sumerian cosmogony, nowadays named Venus and Mars, Saturn and Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune, should be obvious though this comparability has gone quite unnoted.
Only after the creation of the principal planets that made up the Solar System when Nibiru appeared to invade it does the tale by Hesiod (DIVINE GENEALOGY)--exactly as in Mesopotamian and Biblical texts--speak of the creation of Ouranos, "Heaven". As explained in the Book of Genesis, this Shama'im was the Hammered-Out-Bracelet--the asteroid belt. As related in the Enuma elish, this was the half of Tiamat that was smashed to pieces, while the other, intact half became Earth. All this is echoed in the ensuing verses of Hesiod's Theogony:
And Gaia then bore starry Ouranos
--equal to herself--
to envelop her on every side,
to be an everlasting abode place/or the gods.
Is it beginning to seep through why the ONE WORLD ELITE would call themselves OLYMPIANS? (Committee of 300)
TIAMAT BECOMES GAIA
Now split up equally, Gaia ceased to be Tiamat. Severed from the smashed-up half that became the Firmament, everlasting abode to the asteroids and comets, the intact half which was thrust into another orbit became Gaia, the Earth. And so did this planet, first as Tiamat and then as Earth, live up to its epithets: Gaia, at, Ki--the Cleaved One.
How did this Cleaved Planet look now, in the aftermath of the Celestial Battle? It was now orbiting as Gaia/Earth. On one side there were the firm lands that had formed the crust of Tiamat; on the other side there was a hollow, an immense cleft into which the waters of the erstwhile Tiamat poured. And again Hesiod put it nicely, Gaia (now the half equivalent to Heaven) on one side "brought forth long hills, graceful haunts of the goddess-Nymphs"; and on the other side "she bare Pontus, the fruitless deep with its raging swell".
SAME PICTURE AS GENESIS
This is the same picture painted by the Book: of Genesis:
And Elohim said,
"Let the waters under the heaven
be gathered together into one place,
and let the dry land appear. "
And it was so.
And Elohim called the dry land "Earth",
and the gathered-together water He called "Seas".
By this time the nice new Gaia was beginning to take shape.
Some three thousand years separated Hesiod from the time when the Sumerian civilization had blossomed out; and it is clear historically that throughout those millennia ancient peoples, including the authors or compilers of the Book: of Genesis, accepted the Sumerian cosmogony. Today you call it "myth", "legend" or "religious beliefs"; in those previous millennia it was "science"--"knowledge", the Sumerians asserted, bestowed by the Anunnaki. No, I did not say Pleiadians--so don't get ahead of your own story.
According to ancient knowledge, Earth was NOT an original member of your Solar System. It was a cut-off "cleaved-off" half of a planet then called Tiamat, "she who bore them all". The Celestial Battle that led to the creation of Earth occurred several hundred million years after the Solar System with its planets had been created. Earth, as a part of Tiamat, retained much of the water that Tiamat, "the water monster", was recognized for. As Earth evolved into an independent planet and attained the shape of a globe dictated by the forces of gravity, the waters were gathered into the immense cavity on the torn-off side, and dry land appeared on the other side of the planet. Please go back and refer to ancient maps depicting changes in the planet's continental arrangements. This, therefore in summary, is what the ancient peoples knew. What do your modern scientists say about this?
TODAY'S OUTLAY
The theories concerning planetary formation hold that they started as balls congealing from the gaseous disk extending from the Sun. As they cooled, heavier matter--iron, in Earth's case--sank into their centers, forming a solid inner core. A less solid, plastic, or even fluid outer core surrounded the inner one; in Earth's case, it is believed to consist of molten iron. The two cores and their motions act as a dynamo, producing the planet's magnetic field. Surrounding the solid and fluid cores is a mantle made of rocks and minerals; on Earth it is estimated to be some 1,800 miles thick. While the fluidity and heat generated at the planet's core (some 12,000 degrees Fahrenheit in the Earth's center) affect the mantle and what is on top of it, it is the uppermost 400 miles or so of the mantle (on Earth) that mostly account for what you see on the surface of the planet--its cooled crust. Of course the way it was actually formed--gave no hot crust to cool.
The processes that produce, over billions of years, a spherical orb--the uniform force of gravity and the planet's rotation around its axis--should also result in an orderly layering. The solid inner core, the flexible or fluid outer core, the thick lower mantle of silicates, the upper mantle of rocks, and the uppermost crust should encompass one another in ordered layers, like the skin of an onion. This holds true for the orb called Earth--but only up to a point; the main abnormalities concern Earth's uppermost layer, the crust.
EVEN SCIENTISTS CAN MAKE IT ADD-UP
Since the extensive "probes' of the Moon and Mars in the 1960's and 70's, geophysicists have been greatly puzzled by the paucity of the Earth's crust. The crusts of the Moon and of Mars comprise 10 percent of their masses, but the Earth's crust comprises less than one half of one percent of the Earth's landmass. In 1988 geophysicists from Caltech and the University of Illinois at Urbana, led by Don Anderson, reported to the American Geological Society meeting in Denver, Colorado, that they had found the "missing crust". By analyzing shock waves from earthquakes, they concluded that material that belongs in the crust has sunk down and lies some 250 miles below the Earth's surface. There is enough crustal material there, these scientists estimated, to increase the thickness of the Earth's crust tenfold. Even if such nonsense were a possibility it would have given Earth a crust comprising no more than about 4 percent of its land-mass--still only about half of what seems to be the norm if you are going to consider the Moon and Mars as the "norm". Half of the Earth's crust will still be missing even if the findings of this group could prove to be correct.
This theory also leaves unanswered the question of what force caused the crustal material, which is lighter than the mantle's material, to "dive"--in the words of the report in point--hundreds of miles into the Earth's interior. The team's suggestion was that the crustal material down there consists of "huge slabs of crust" that "dived into the Earth's interior" where fissures exist in the crust. But what force had broken up the crust into such "huge slabs"?
OOPS!! OTHER ABNORMALITIES
Another abnormality of the Earth's crust is that it is not uniform. In the parts you call "continents", its thickness varies from about 12 miles to almost 45 miles; but in the parts taken up by the oceans the crust is only 3.5 to five miles thick. While the average elevation of the continents is about 2,300 feet, the average depth of the oceans is more than 12,500 feet. The combined result of these factors is that the much thicker continental crust reaches much farther down into the mantle, whereas the oceanic crust is just a thin layer of solidified material and sediments.
There are other differences between the Earth's crust where the continents are and where the oceans are. The composition of the continental crust, consisting in large part of rocks resembling granite, is relatively light in comparison with the composition of the mantle: the average continental density is 2.7-2.8 grams per cubic centimeter, while that of the mantle is 3.3 grams per cubic centimeter. The oceanic crust is heavier and denser than the continental crust, averaging a density of 3.0 to 3.1 grams per cubic centimeter; it is thus more akin to the mantle, with its composition of basaltic and other dense rocks, than to the continental crust. It is noteworthy that the "missing crust" the scientific team mentioned above suggested had dived into the mantle is similar in composition to the oceanic crust, not to the continental crust.
This leads to one more important difference between the Earth's continental and oceanic crusts. The continental part of the crust is not only lighter and thicker, it is also much older than the oceanic part of the crust. By the end of the 1970's the consensus among scientists was that the greater part of today's continental surface was formed some 2.8 billion years ago. Evidence of a continental crust from that time that was about as thick as today's is found in all the continents in what geologists term Archean Shield areas; but within those areas, crustal rocks were discovered that turned out to be 3.8 billion years old. In 1983, however, geologists of the Australian National University found, in western Australia, rock remains of a continental crust whose age was established to be 4.1 to 4.2 billion years old. In 1989, tests with new, sophisticated methods on rock samples collected a few years earlier in northern Canada (by researchers from Washington University in St. Louis and from the Geological Survey of Canada) determined the rocks age to be 3.96 billion years; Samuel Bowering of Washington University reported evidence that nearby rocks in the area were as much as 4.1 billion years old.
EARTH'S AGE: FOUR BILLION +
Scientists are still hard put to explain the gap of about 500 million years between the age of the Earth (which meteor fragments, such as those found at Meteor Crater in Arizona, show to be 4.6 billion years and counting) and the age of the oldest rocks thus far found; but no matter what the explanation, the fact that Earth had its continental crust at least 4 billion years ago is by now undisputed. On the other hand, no part of the oceanic crust has been found to be more than 200 million years old.
Chelas, this is a tremendous difference! No amount of foolish speculation about rising and sinking continents, forming and vanishing seas can explain these things. Someone has compared the Earth's crust to the skin of an apple (you people really like apples), where the oceans are, the "skin" is fresh--relatively speaking, born yesterday--but, where the oceans began in primordial times, the "skin , and a good part of the "apple" itself, has been shorn off.
The differences between the continental and oceanic crusts must have been even greater in earlier times, because the continental crust is constantly eroded by the forces of nature, and a good deal of the eroded solids are carried into the oceanic basins, increasing the thickness of the oceanic crust. Furthermore, the oceanic crust is constantly enhanced by the upwelling of molten basaltic rocks and silicates that flow up from the mantle through faults in the sea floor. This process, which puts down ever-new layers of oceanic crust, has been going on for 200 million years, giving the oceanic crust its present form. What was there at the bottom of the seas before then? Was there no crust at all, just a gaping "wound" in the Earth's surface? And is the ongoing oceanic crust formation akin to the process of blood clotting, where the skin is pierced and wounded?
Is Gaia--a living planet--trying to heal her wounds?
The most obvious place on the surface of the Earth where it was so "wounded" is the Pacific Ocean. Oh my goodness, could it be?
While the average plunge in the crust's surface in its oceanic parts is about 2.5 miles, in the Pacific the crust has been gouged out to a present depth reaching at some points 7 miles. If you could remove from the Pacific's floor the crust built up there over the last 200 million years, you would arrive at depths reaching 12 miles below the water's surface and between some 20 to nearly 60 miles below the continental surface. This is quite a large cavity, chelas!! How deep was it before the crustal buildup over the past 200 million years--how large was that "wound" 500 million years ago, a billion years ago, 4 billion years ago? Suffice it to say it was considerably deeper.
What can your scientists say with some certainty? That the extent of the gouging was more extensive, affecting a vastly greater part of the planet's surface. The Pacific Ocean at present occupies about a third of Earth's surface; but as far as your people can ascertain regarding the past 200 million or so years, it has been shrinking. The reason for shrinkage is that the continents flanking it--the Americas on the east, Asia and Australia on the west--are moving closer to each other, squeezing out the Pacific slowly but relentlessly, reducing its size inch by inch yearly.
PLATE TECTONICS
These are the same "plates" which I continually tell you about in regards to the changes--specifically I refer mostly to the U.S. Pacific coastal area and "Ring of Fire"--i.e., the Pacific plate will smash under the western U.S. coast and raise the land of the Mojave Desert in the northern portions along with a BIG rise in the area of this location, Tehachapi--(Tejas Shape', Tehachati).
This science and explanations dealing with this process in point have come to be known as the Theory of Plate Tectonics. Its origin lies, as in the study of the Solar System, in the discarding of notions of a uniform, stable, permanent condition of the planets in favor of the recognition of catastrophism, change, and even evolution--concerning not only flora and fauna but the globes on which they evolved as "living" entities that can grow and shrink, prosper and suffer, even be born and die.
HONOR TO ALFRED WEGENER
To Alfred Wegener do you owe appreciation for this "new" science of plate tectonics. Wegener, a German meteorologist, wrote all about this theory and published it a long time ago--in 1915, DIE ENTSTEHUNG DER KONTINENTE UND OZEANE. His starting point (not a new concept) was the obvious "fit" between the contours of the continents on both sides of the southern Atlantic. But before Wegener's ideas, the solution had been to postulate the disappearance, by sinking, of continents or land bridges: the belief that the continents have been where they are from time immemorial, but that a midsection sank below sea level, giving the appearance of continental separation. Augmenting available data on flora and fauna with considerable geological "matches" between the two sides of the Atlantic, Wegener came up with the notion of Pangaea, a super-continent, a single huge landmass into Oceans took shape. But all these bodies of water were "pieces" of the original which he would fit all the present continental masses like pieces in a jigsaw puzzle. Pangaea (Living Pan), which covered about one half of the globe, suggested Wegener, was surrounded by the primeval Pacific Ocean. Floating in the midst of the waters like an ice floe, the single landmass underwent a series of riftings and healings until a definite and final breakup in the Mesozoic Era, the geological period that lasted from 225 to 65 million years ago. Gradually the pieces began to drift apart. Antarctica, Australia, India, and Africa began to break away and separate. Subsequently, Africa and South America split apart as North America began to move away from Europe and India was thrust toward Asia; and so the continents continued to drift until they rearranged themselves in the pattern recognized today.
The split-up of Pangaea into several separate continents was accompanied by the opening up and closing down of bodies of water between the separating pieces of the landmass. In time the single Panoramic ocean separated into a series of connecting oceans or enclosed seas, such as the Black, Caspian and Mediterranean, and such major bodies of water as the Atlantic and the Indian of which the Pacific Ocean still remains.
IMPORTANCE OF THESE GEOLOGIC AREAS AS
RECOGNIZED AS PLACES OF THE LION
Simple surmising will indicate that of the "original" placements of "MAN" and the "lost" continents all indicate some important locations. Further, it must be evident that, geologically and historically, the upcoming catastrophic impact and "Armageddon" are suggested to be destined for the areas of the Holy Lands. What might this mean? It might very well mean that the expected impact of returning Tiamat might very well do the most impressive work on that particular "side" of your globe. It will mess up a lot of stuff everywhere but you can expect a massive removal of real estate if that returning object is allowed to connect with your planet. From the direction of travel, already plotted by your scientists--it will pass on the opposite side of the globe on this go-about.
If your planet is "sucked out" again you will have a real jumble of confusion.
Wegener's view of the continents as "pieces of a cracked ice floe" shifting atop an impermanent surface of the Earth was mostly received with disdain, even ridicule, by the geologists and paleontologists of the time--sound familiar? It took half a century for the idea of Continental Drift to be accepted into the halls of science. Is it possible that what we are assembling herein for you--MIGHT BE THE WAY IT IS? What helped bring about the changed attitude were surveys of the ocean floors begun in the 1960's that revealed such features as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge that, it was surmised, was formed by the rise of molten rock, called "magma", from the Earth's interior. Welling up, in the case of the Atlantic through a fissure in the ocean floor that runs almost the whole ocean's length, the magma cooled and formed a ridge of basaltic rock. Herein is Soltec's (Pleiadian: Commander Soltec: Geophysics) major subject of expertise which he has previously shared with you regarding volcanos--I honor him but feel it necessary to press on with my own outlay of information. My subject is not basically geology or geography but the Creation and Spiritual connections.
As one welling up followed another, the old sides of the ridge were pushed to either side to make way for the new magma flow. A major advance in these studies of the ocean floors took place with the aid of Seasat, an oceanographic satellite launched in June of 1978 that orbited the Earth for some three months or so; its data were used to map the sea floors, giving you an entirely new understanding of your oceans and globe as a whole, with their ridges, rifts, seamounts, underwater volcanos, and fracture zones. The discovery that, as each upwelling of magma cooled and solidified, it retained the magnetic direction of its position at that time was followed by the determination that a series of such magnetic lines, almost parallel to one another, provided a time scale as well as a directional map for the ongoing expansion of the ocean's floor. This expansion of the sea floor in the Atlantic was a major factor in pushing apart Africa and South America and in the creation of the Atlantic Ocean and it continuing widening.
OTHER FORCES INVOLVED
Other forces, such as the pull of the Moon, the Earth's rotation, and even movements of the underlying mantle, also are believed to act to split up the continental crust and shift the continents about. These forces also exert their influence, naturally, in the Pacific region. The Pacific Ocean revealed even more mid-ocean ridges, fissures, underwater volcanos, and other features like those that have worked to expand the Atlantic Ocean. Why, then, as all the evidence shows, have the landmasses flanking the Pacific not moved apart, as the continents flanking the Atlantic have done, but rather keep moving closer, slowly but surely, constantly reducing the size of the Pacific Ocean?
The explanation is found in a companion theory of continental drift, the Theory of Plate Tectonics. The continents, it has been postulated, rest upon giant movable "plates" of the Earth's crust, and so do the oceans. When the continents drift, when oceans expand, as the Atlantic or contract as the Pacific, the underlying cause is the movement of the plates on which they ride. At present scientists recognize six major plates, some of which are further subdivided: the Pacific, American, Eurasian, African, Indo-Australian, and Antarctic.
The spreading seafloor of the Atlantic Ocean is still distancing the Americas from Europe and Africa, inch by inch. The concomitant shrinking of the Pacific Ocean is now recognized to be accommodated by the dipping, or "subduction", of the Pacific plate under the American plate. This is the primary cause of the crustal shifts and earthquakes all along the Pacific rim, as well as the rise of the major mountain chains along that rim. The collision of the Indian plate with the Eurasian one created the Himalayas and fused the Indian subcontinent to Asia. In 1985, Cornell University scientists even discovered the "geological suture" where a portion of the western African plate remained attached to the American plate when the two broke apart some fifty million years ago, "donating" Florida and southern Georgia to North America.
Almost all scientists today accept Wegener's hypothesis of an Earth initially consisting of a single landmass surrounded by an all-embracing ocean. Could this be why the wondrous greenstone granite used in the Georgia Guidestone monument might have matched the green granite of the African planet in portions? Further, it becomes obvious that the granite-gneiss terrains are remnants of ancient oceans. Well, chelas, TODAY will BE "ancient" in 3.5 billion years! Extensive rock records in virtually all the continents indicate that they were contiguous to oceans of water for more than three billion years; in some places, such as Zimbabwe in southern Africa, sedimentary rocks show that they accreted within large bodies of water some 3.5 billion years ago. Recent advances in scientific dating have ex-tended the age of the Archean belts--those that include rocks that had been deposited in primeval oceans--back to 3.8 billion years. Well, give or take a billion or so years doesn't seem too important--but it is a LONG time. .
HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN GOING ON?
Forever! But what about this continental drift? Was there a Pangaea or Pan? Yes. The breakup seemed to have begun about 600 million years ago. Actually there were two "super" continents: Laurasia to the north and Gondwanaland to the south. But your scientists simply "don't know for sure" what happened or exactly "when". So be it.
The important thing to note herein is that your modern science confirms the scientific notions that were expressed in the ancient Sumerian texts. Is it so difficult to also accept the ancient answer in this instance: that the waters covered the face of the Earth and--on the third "day", (phase)--were "gathered into" one side of the Earth to reveal the dry land. Was the uncovered dry land made up of isolated continents or one super-continent, a Pangaea? Although it matters not as far as the corroboration of ancient knowledge is concerned, it is interesting to note that Greek notions of Earth, although they led to a belief that Earth was disklike rather than a globe, envisioned it as a landmass with a solid foundation surrounded by waters. This notion must have been drawn on earlier and more accurate knowledge, as most of Greek science did. You will find that the Old Testament repeatedly referred to the "foundations" of the Earth and expressed knowledge of the earlier times regarding the shape of Earth in the following verses praising the Creator:
The Lord's in the Earth and its entirety,
the world and all that dwells therein.
For He hath founded it upon the seas
and established it upon the waters.
(Psalms 24: 1-2)
In addition to the term Eretz which means both planet "Earth" and "earth, ground", the narrative in Genesis employs the term Yabashah--literally: "the dried-out land-mass"--·when it states that the waters "were gathered together into one place" to let the Yabashah appear. But throughout the Old Testament another term, Tebel, is frequently used to denote that part of Earth that is habitable, arable, and useful to Mankind, including being a source of various ores. The term Tebel--usually translated as either "the earth" or "the world"--is mostly employed to indicate the part of Earth distinct from its watery portions; the "foundations" of this Tebel were in juxtaposition to the sea basins. This was best expressed in the Song of David (2 Samuel 22: 16 and Psalms 18: 16:):
The Lord thundered from the heavens.
the Most High his sounds uttered.
He loosed his arrows, sped them far and wide;
a shaft of lightning, and disconcerted them.
The channels of the seabed were revealed,
The foundation of Tebel were laid bare.
With what is known today about the "foundations of the Earth", the word Tebel clearly conveys the concept of continents whose foundations--tectonic plates--are laid in the midst of the waters. Is it not a thrill to discover the latest geophysical theories echoed in a 3,000-year-old-psalm?
'The Genesis narrative states clearly that the waters were "gathered together" to one side of the Earth so that the dry land could emerge; this implies the existence of a cavity into which the waters could be gathered. Such a cavity (cup), somewhat over half the Earth's surface, is still there, shrunken and reduced, in the shape of the Pacific Ocean.
Why is the crustal evidence that can be found not older than about 4 billion years, rather than the 4.6 billion years that is the presumed age of the Earth and the Solar System? The first Conference on the Origins of Life, held in Princeton, New Jersey, in 1967, under the sponsorship of NASA and the Smithsonian Institution, dwelt at length on that problem. The only hypothesis the learned participants could come up with was that, at the time the oldest rock specimens that have been found were formed, Earth was subjected to a "cataclysm". In the discussion of the origins of Earth's atmosphere, the consensus was that it did not result from a "continuous outgassing" through volcanic activity but was, in the words of Raymond Siever of Harvard University, the result of "a rather early and rather large outgassing episode ... a great big belch of the gases that are now characteristic of the Earth's atmosphere and sediments." This "big belch" was also dated to the same time as the assumed catastrophe recorded by the rocks. With this kind of "knowledge" it is no wonder you are in total political and educational decay.
It becomes evident that--in its specifics--the breakup of the Earth's crust, the process of plate tectonics, the differences between the continental and the oceanic crusts, the emergence of a pangaea from under the waters, the primordial encircling ocean--the findings of modem science have simply corroborated the ancient knowledge. They have also led your own scientists from all disciplines to conclude that the only explanation of the way in which Earth's landmasses, oceans, and atmosphere have evolved is to assume a cataclysm occurring about four billion years ago--about half a billion years after the initial recognized formation of Earth as part of the Solar System.
WHAT WAS THE CATACLYSM?
Mankind has possessed the Sumerian answer for some six thousand or more years: the Celestial Battle between Nibiru/Marduk: and Tiamat.
In that Sumerian cosmogony, the members of the Solar System were depicted as celestial gods, male and female, whose creation was compared to birth, whose existence was that of living creatures. In the Enuma elish text, Tiamat in particular was described as a female, a mother who gave birth to a host of eleven satellites, her "horde", led by Kingu "whom she elevated". As Nibiru/Marduk: and his horde neared her, "in fury Tiamat cried out aloud, her legs shook to their roots ... against her attacker she repeatedly cast a spell." When the "Lord spread his net to enmesh her" and "the Evil Wind, which followed behind, he let loose in her face, Tiamat opened her mouth to consume it;" but then other "winds" of Nibiru/Marduk: "charged her belly" and "distended her body", Indeed, "go and cut off the life of Tiamat" was the order given by the outer planets to the invader; be accomplished that by "cutting through her insides, splitting her heart .... Having thus subdued her, he extinguished her life."
PAGANISM?
For a very long time this view of the planets, and especially of Tiamat, as living entities that could be born and could die has been dismissed as primitive paganism--but the exploration of the planetary system in recent decades has surely, in fact, revealed worlds of which the word "alive" has been repeatedly used. That Earth itself is a living planet has been forcefully put forth as the Gaia Hypothesis by James E. Lovelock in the 1970's and great honor is due this man. It has again been reinforced by him in a new work called THE AGES OF GAIA: A BIOGRAPHY OF OUR LIVING EARTH. It is a hypothesis that views the Earth and the life that has evolved upon it as a single organism; Earth is not just an inanimate globe upon which there is life; it is a coherent if complex body that is itself alive through its mass and land surface, its oceans and atmosphere, and through the flora and fauna which its sustains and which in turn sustain Earth. "The largest living creature on Earth," Lovelock wrote, "is the Earth itself." And in that, he admitted, he was revisiting the ancient "concept of Mother Earth, or as the Greeks called her long ago, Gaia."
But, in fact, he had gone back to Sumerian times and to their ancient knowledge of the planet that was cleaved apart!
We shall next consider Witness to Genesis.
Thank you.
Hatonn to clear, please.
PJ 50
CHAPTER 14
REC #1 HATONN
MON., JUNE 15, 1992 7:55 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 304
MONDAY, JUNE 15, 1992
THOUGHT FOR TODAY
If you were to sell your character today, would you get full retail price, or would it go for a bargain basement price? How about wholesale?
It would seem most wise in view of your response to hold yourself responsible for a higher standard than anyone else expects of you and therefore there need never be excuses.
And--always remember the great man shows his greatness by the way he treats the little man. How do you treat your brother? Your enemy? Your neighbor? Your spouse? Your child? How GREAT are you?
NECESSARY REMINDERS OF THIS WORK
I must again take time to remind all readers and "spies" who would tear us down--EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE AND WHAT WE ARE ABOUT.
We had a "spy" sent to our meeting on Saturday. Mind you, our "meetings are simply because ones at work here and others who are visitors, come to share information, facts, express care and obviously--hate.
WE ARE NOT A GROUP AS IN "CHURCH". WE ARE NOT A CULT AS IN ANYTHING. WE ARE NOT EVEN IN THE PUBLISHING OR NEWSPAPER BUSINESS--AS GEORGE'S BANK ACCOUNT CAN SO EASILY ATTEST. WE HAVE A MISSION TO BRING YOU A COMPILATION OF INTEGRATED TRUTH FROM WHATEVER RESOURCE WE FIND AVAILABLE. WE WOULD WRITE NOTHING IF IT WERE THAT YOU ONES COULD KNOW WHAT WORK AND WHOSE WORK WHEREIN YOU COULD FIND THIS INFORMATION--AND GET IT! I HAVE NEVER OFFERED OTHER--IF YOU GET INFORMATION FROM ME RIGHT OFF THE PRESS OR NOT YET HAVING HAPPENED, I SHALL ALWAYS MAKE SURE IT HAS BEEN OFFERED SOMEWHERE! WE DO NOT PLACE OUR WORKERS OR SPEAKERS IN MORE JEOPARDY THAN ALREADY ABOUNDS ABOUT THEM. IF YOU CARE NOT FOR THIS "STYLE" OF SHARING--THEN IT IS YOUR PRIVILEGE TO THROW ALL THE INFORMATION IN THE TRASH--I WOULD SUGGEST, HOWEVER, THAT YOU CHECK MOST CAREFULLY LEST YOU BE THROWING YOUR SOUL AND TRANSITION INTO THE TRASH ALONG WITH GOD WHO SENDS THIS WORD.
IN OUR MIDST
Yes, George, one did come into the meeting on Saturday--but there are always some, either already among you or sent in to disrupt and destroy you. Fear not, for I attend them with a great deal of indigestion.
There are several things which need reminding to the public. (1) We share because you ask. Our "work" is a mission in which we are sent to fulfill the promise of higher source--to give you Truth so that you can KNOW enough, in Truth, to take proper actions and not constructed doctrines of groupies, to make wise choices relative to your spiritual divinity, origin and destination. That was the final promise of the Master Teacher when he departed your place and the promise made by your Creator for soul journey is the ONLY important one item in your existence.
(2) Our physical "work" is to gather information so that you can have confirmation of facts--given in such a way that if a writer is inconclusive or draws incorrect conclusions from otherwise quite accurate presentations--you can know and go forth and get the volumes for further research. I do not simply give information at the onset for ALMOST ALL will NOT go and get the writings in point. We are efforting to grow into such a stable size as to allow support for the publisher so that works unpublishable elsewhere CAN be printed and made available AND allow distribution of all such documents which are taken off the shelves elsewhere. If your books, authors, are NOT removed from shelves--get serious--you are not on the Truth, in whole, path. To actually "push" your books indicates that you are really a help to the deceivers in furthering deceit.
(3) Dharma has so many other things "to do" that she would petition to stop writing this moment and never speak FOR me again. We have our relationship stable and eternal. She certainly doesn't need jibes and pokes, slings and rocks--SHE GETS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING SAVE HEADACHES AND TIRED BONES FROM HER LABOR--THAT, AND THE LOVING CARE OF THE HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS WHO DO APPRECIATE OUR WORK.
Now, George, you must face the truth, son: You have enemies about you--ones who alert the insiders and troublemakers the instant the rough drafts are shown. It is now having to await publishing in some instances--but the word goes forth on the computer network, the communications network and all the intelligence branches. YOU CAN HIDE YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND AS LONG AS YOU WISH--BUT YOU WILL ALSO CONTINUE TO HAVE PROBLEMS AS ON SATURDAY. THE PERSON IN POINT HAD TO HAVE BEEN ALERTED IN ADVANCE AND THE SUBJECT MATTER IS THAT WHICH IS IN POINT--SO THAT I COULD PROVE THE POINT HEREIN. YOU ARE ALSO FED ERRONEOUS INFORMATION IN ORDER TO "CATCH HATONN" AND DISCREDIT THE WORK.
It will be easier to keep separation after the final full shift of the Publishing Company to Nevada along with the Distribution Company. It has never been OTHER than separated but ones who read seem to connect the two because in the beginning there was no other way to contact me than through America West. There are many books in George's library of offerings with which he is more familiar than he is with mine. Desiree' has even insisted on publishing and distributing books on "meditation and ascension" with which I take full exception. This is their company and they may do exactly that which they wish with it.
George will continue to send us mail received by them and intended for the paper or information of confirmation by forwarding it. However, we welcome the opportunity to cut down on their massive load by asking you to write or send directly to my attention: Commander Hatonn, Box 6194, Tehachapi, CA 93582, Fax: 805 822-0972 Tel: 805 822-0601. We will be in daily contact, if not hourly.
The work which must be done in industry and business can be begun immediately in Nevada whereas, in this small corrupt little village, we must get through incredibly difficult planning committees and town councils which are completely bought and serve their monied masters. We (you) cannot wait.
ALL TRUTH WILL STAND
As to writings, we welcome any and all lawsuits. We very carefully chose to call our writings JOURNALS, instead of books, for the sharing of information as with magazines and news publications. In addition, the paper is a compilation of information of correct input to the limits of human input to select through guidance. Yes indeed, I do write most all of the paper at this time but, as we expand, we fully intend to handle it much like the "Lyke Report" in that we will offer you all manners of information from various writers and publications. We have already begun by giving you bits of Dr. Coleman's work, Eustace Mullins' work and I believe that George will be handling all of Mullins' work in the near future. We are publishing a series of the "Inslaw" material from the Napa Sentinel and have much information from one R.R. who writes all about the San Luis Obispo connections and other "inside" truthful versions of things such as the Kennedy assassination, etc. This work is fully as correct and dangerous as any Committee of 300 divulgence for it deals with ones in your own government and specifically the most vile group of all, coming out of San Luis Obispo area. The author sent the work unsolicited with permission to use any and/or ALL for use in informing the public.
If a man wants to hold Truth for self and deny readers the input--check out the intent and KNOW that much of the work is invalid. WE WILL NEVER USE ANY BOOK OR WRITING WITHOUT THE EVALUATION OF CONTENT. FURTHER, TO RECOMMEND A WRITING DOES NOT MEAN WE AGREE WITH ALL PORTIONS OF THE WRITINGS--ONLY THAT WHICH IS PRESENTED AND THAT WHICH IS GIVEN WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO EVALUATE FOR SELF. VERY OFTEN A BOOK MAY BE ALMOST TOTALLY CORRECT AND THE CONCLUSION IS COMPLETELY INCORRECT, OR MOST OF THE PRESENTATION IS CORRECT WHILE PARTS ARE TOTALLY INVALID AS SEEN FROM HIGHER AND COMPREHENSIVE VIEW. WE HAVEN'T THE TIME OR SPACE TO ANALYZE EVERY SENTENCE FOR YOU--THAT IS WHAT YOUR MIND IS FOR. SO BE IT.
THE CURRENT WORK
Dealing with the "Divine Plan" causes us to need begin at the beginning. I choose to begin with those writings of the Sumerians of Mesopotamia--WHO WERE CORRECT. Some have erred in the translations but I find one particular book which presents the perceptions better than others, even scholars with no other interest than in translations. This person in point, regarding "Genesis" is outstanding and his work is available. His name Zecharia Sitchin. I do not, however, agree with conclusions in his first writings to the extent I honor his book, GENESIS REVISITED.
I specifically asked that no information regarding this material be sent to Dharma for these perturbations of rock throwing for copying are too hard to attend. But, as with all good Samaritans--the work arrives from every direction. We most certainly appreciate it and, in retrospect, I am now quite glad. A volume of this very work in point showed up from a precious friend having found it at a UFO Exposition. I discount almost ALL material found at UFO Expos. I further discount almost ALL material found at "New Age" Expos. I find very, very little Truth on your bookshelves, as a matter of fact. Does this make me a snob? Does it make me more intelligent? Does it make me greater? NO--IT MEANS I HAVE MORE TECHNOLOGY AVAILABLE AND KNOW THE STORY AND WHAT IS GOING ON AND YOU CAN'T. THAT MEANS, FURTHER, THAT I CAN EVALUATE MATERIAL WRITTEN FOR YOUR CONSUMPTION AND YOU HAVE TO WORRY OVER IT UNTIL YOU GARNER TRUTH. Sitchin has written other books but I shan't even name them herein for I have no interest in them. George will make them available to all readers in time, if you want them or if I choose to utilize them. I shall not be blackmailed by ones attending our "private" meetings as guests who then insist on "royalties" and/or "favors" from us under threat of lawsuit.
IMPORTANT FOR ALL YOU AUTHORS
You had better learn your laws for--even as bad as they are--you misunderstand copyrights.
YOU CANNOT COPYRIGHT TRUTH. I, further, have no interest in your "opinions" except as they are correct and I can comment (preferably favorably). If your work is good, I shall push and shove your material until our readers weary of the assault for I have no intent of total coverage of material--our thrust is insight and awakening and causing ones to research and glean knowledge from correct resources.
Further, you CAN COPY A VOLUME WORD FOR WORD AND IF YOUR CONCLUSIONS ARE NOT IDENTICAL THEN YOU HAVE NOT INFRINGED COPYRIGHTS.
IT MAY MEAN NOTHING TO YOU AT THIS MOMENT BUT THE TIME WILL COME THAT THE ONLY REASON YOUR WORK STANDS IS BECAUSE WE HAVE SHARED IT. I HAVE PILES OF DOCUMENTS FROM WORTH-WHILE WRITERS AWAITING POSSIBLE USE--SENT FROM THOSE WRITERS TO BE SHARED. EUSTANCE MULLINS IS ONE IN POINT: EARLY ON HE SAID "USE ANYTHING" FOR IT'S FOR THE INSIGHT OF THE PEOPLE, IT IS MY ONLY PURPOSE IN WRITING. WHO MIGHT YOU BE WRITING FOR AND WHY?
Now as to Mr. Sitchin's work. I am going to herein tell you that there is a petition for publication of a manuscript (which was not included with the request--only the Index) but it is so like Sitchin' s work as to be quite relevant at this writing. The author comes from Crowley, Texas and states that this is new and undiscovered work and is being presented for this "new age". It is stated that "It will blow your mind." It names the same names, places and Sumerian texts. Is this one infringing on Sitchin's work?? Truth is Truth and good research will reveal THIS Truth. This does point out that Mr. Sitchin is NOT THE ONLY ONE WRITING ABOUT SUMERIANS AND DID TEXTS OF TRUTH. IT IS EXACTLY AS WITH THE COMMITTEE OF 300--NO ONE WAS MORE SHOCKED THAN WAS COLEMAN TO FIND I HAD TWO OTHER FULL DOCUMENTS BEARING THE SAME INFORMATION AND WE HAD NOT MISSED A POINT IN OUR OWN EARLIER WRITINGS. I suggest at you authors take a bit more attention to others as YOU perceive your writings to be "the only ones". Once Truth is "in the ethers", it is going to be scattered.
I find it amusing to note that Bill Cooper was going to sue me and denounced my people because I somehow supposedly "stole his material". I suggest his face may be a bit red to find that I continually hear from readers who insist that Cooper has simply plagiarized all the JOURNALS since. I am grateful if it be so--but the facts are that Mr. Cooper wishes it would be otherwise--however, Truth is Truth is Truth and if Truth be told--it will match other Truth.
LIBERATOR WILL ENDURE
Mine is to GIVE a writer honor--not take from him in any manner. Always! And to Zecharia Sitchin I give great honor. I do not agree with conclusions which are presented but that has not been under discussion at this point and I won't take up the matter at this juncture because my scribe is overburdened quite enough by the added load of other duties these days and doesn't know who in the world is one Zecharia Sitchin--or Bill Cooper for that matter. Bill is simply one, to her, who called she and E.I. "little pukes".
The LIBERATOR will remain exactly as is in this very location so you must watch for changes in INSTRUCTIONS regarding same. The separation will give George far more freedom in his own work by allowing separation. However, as we move along, for we are growing rapidly, our thrust will be to have far less emphasis on "space cadets" and more expression of assistance and confirmation from other writers such as Mullins, Coleman, McAlvany, Gritz, etc. They, however, are honored and respected men and they, too, must come into recognition of the quality of our presentation and that we are NOT kooks, bull-shippers and/or wart hogs.
Greens must be allowed to sustain selves, investments and business interests. They have given years to his work and now must attend financial security for it was never intended that our work would be a "money-making" enterprise. Our task is to get the Word OUT there. The book business can make profits and garner income from other publications as does any publisher/distributor. To do this, however, I must separate the work so that ALL can continue to afford it as a bit easier than hard-back publications and keep the LIBERATOR in a price range possible for you of the masses and effort to not place my own troops into bankruptcy. We remind you--we ask that you copy, mutilate, spindle and handle in any manner appropriate for your needs--along with sharing as many papers, books and tapes as you can--even sharing costs--for ours is simply to inform. Other work will eventually serve to tend my crew but it has been a long and barren three years. But, we have gotten out 58 JOURNALS and a daily writing (at least) and a full paper once weekly. Again I say to you. however. as you grumble about the overload of information: Dharma does 99% of all the writing, all the speaking and all the meetings as well as special tapes, meets with all my business visitors, and speaks for me at all sessions of any size--IF SHE CAN DO IT--YOU CAN FIND TIME TO RECEIVE IT. It is kept this way for this very reason--if one person can present it--you can receive it--if you want to badly enough!
By necessity the writings will taper off as to slower production of JOURNALS. Etc., for she will be required at all sessions of planning for the industrial complexes. Chelas, we are not doing this for the fun and games of it--you are in serious troubles and must have information and resources if you are to make it through. The masses ARE awakening and you can see it in the political arena. Unfortunately, the options are showing themselves to be zilch. Even Perot is going to let you down terribly if you are hoping upon him for foundation. Already he wants a "draft" and to put people to work "to get more taxes". Where are you going to put them to work and for what do you desire a "draft"?
TODAY'S OBSERVATIONS
PHOTON BELT FIASCO
We must speak of the Photon Belt. It is real, alright, and the antics going on and the conspiracy of compromise, threats, attending wars and such, are under full ploy.
MILITARY STRIRRINGS--OMINOUS. MULTI-NATIONAL
There is expected a major effort at a U.S. first strike against the Communists in early July--this comes up regularly. At the same time, equipment and men are being massed all over your nation. Saturday came a Fax from Illinois wherein some 40 rail-cars of tanks and military vehicles along with "obvious" covered artillery. This was only one train of several and all headed from N.E. to S.W.--WITH NO MARKINGS ON ANY EQUIPMENT.
Here in California, "they" are already putting forth the word to "not concern"--just some major "war games" which will include many countries, including a major portion from Japan. Japan??? They have no military according to Constitutional law set forth after W.W.II.
You had all better remember: CHINA IS THE COMMUNIST DRAGON! THEY ALSO WILL HAVE A MAJOR PART IN THE ARMAGEDDON PLAY--YOU HAD BEST PAY ATTENTION.
NOW, FOR THE PHOTON BELT ITSELF
We have another presentation from a group of scientists back East (I guess you could call them "insiders") from a major university, who says the government and military are working around the clock on a photon storage system in hopes of making it through the null time without undue chaos. Oh yes, they expect MAJOR CHAOS and RIOTS and that is why all the artillery, chelas.
CAN THAT PHOTON PHENOMENON BE STOPPED?
INDEED, INDEED!! BUT WE WON'T DO IT WITHOUT A LOT IN RETURN. WE CAN STOP THE WHOLE THING IN LESS THAN 30 SECONDS FROM HAVING ANY IMPACT IN TRANSITION--AT ALL. BUT YOUR ELITE WOULD BE GLOBAL RULERS MOVE RIGHT ON IN FULL INTENT TO BLOW YOUR PLANET TO DUST PARTICLES. YES INDEED--EVEN THE RUSSIAN COSMOSPHERES IN OUTER REACHES COULD STOP IT IF GIVEN A FEW DAYS BUT YOUR ELITE WOULD RATHER HAVE MAJOR INCIDENTS AND WAR. WHAT WILL WE OF THE CONFEDERATION DO? WAIT AND SEE WHAT THE ELITE DO--YOU GAVE THEM YOUR POWER AND THEY WIELD IT LIKE A SLEDGE OVER YOUR HEADS. TIT FOR TAT, THEY SAY--IF WE INTERFERE THEN THERE
WILL BE WAR AND/OR MASSIVE EARTH UPHEAVAL--DURING THE BAD TIMES. IF WE ALLOW THE CHAOTIC TIME OF NULL TIME, THEN YOU STILL GET THE CONFUSION AND BOMBARDMENT WHILE YOU CAN'T RESPOND.
I personally petition for more "time" so that we can get more of our work done for we aren't playing in the political arena--that is your bag, not ours. We simply need to be present to get our people and finish our mission. You have several years of confusion and turmoil ahead of you in any manner in which you can cut the pie.
THREE DAYS OF DARKNESS
All of you who call yourselves "religious" in any manner whatsoever, should be in knowing of the expected three days of darkness--or, is it possible your "preachers" happened to miss a thing or two?
Let us look at some of the written words of prophecy. For this little summary I thank one, Albert J. Hebert, S.M.:
"If I say, 'surely the darkness shall hide me, and night shall be my light'--For You darkness itself is not dark, and night shines as the day." (Ps. 139: 11-12.)
"He who survives those three days of darkness and horror will see himself as if alone, because the earth will be covered with cadavers." (St. Gaspar del Bufalo, founder of the Fathers of the Precious Blood, - d. 1837).
Father Nectou, a Jesuit provincial who was considered a saint and a prophet (d. 1777), spoke of the height of a terrible crisis, "like a little General Judgment":
"When the moment of the last crisis has come, there will be nothing to do but to stay where God has placed us, lock ourselves indoors and pray until the wrath of Divine Justice has passed."
From a woman saint, friend of prelates and of some persons who are now canonized saints, hear this:
"God will send two punishments: one will be in the form of wars, revolutions and other evils,' it shall originate on earth. The others will be sent from Heaven. There shall come over the whole earth an intense darkness lasting three days and three nights. Nothing will be visible, and the air will be laden with pestilence which will claim mainly, but not only, the enemies of religion." (Blessed Anna Maria Taigi - d. 1837).
Madaleine: "Lord, I was afraid because I thought I was going blind ... " CHRIST: "Tell them that everyone on earth is like that--in darkness." (Revelations of the "Glorious Cross", Dozule', France, Jan. 4, 1974)
"We began hearing people say, 'Why is it getting dark at this hour? What's going on?' And so, therefore, I know that this darkness that's coming is going to be happening during the daytime when people are going to be confused at the hour in which it takes place."
A refugee from Communism in Europe, an American scientist and seer, tells you:
"As I was prostrating myself in prayer a vista opened up in front of me. It looked like a colossal inferno. It was night (at least pitch dark), the ground was black, and what must have been the sky was a murkish reddish orange glow, like afire, although I did not see any tongues of flames. As I was looking, I saw the silhouette of two or three groups of angels hoisting upwards a few, three or four, dead bodies. Directly behind the angels the color of the red-orange was very intense. ONLY A FEW! Then the vision ceases. " (Jan. 20, 1986)
"The judgment will come suddenly and be of short duration. Then comes the triumph of the Church and the reign of brotherly love. Happy indeed they who live to see those blessed days." (Father Bernard Maria Clausi, O.F.M. - d. 1849)
"In the end my Immaculate Heart will triumph. Russia will be convened, and there will be an era of peace." (Mary at Fatima, 1917)
The above private revelations, prophecies and visions serve as an introduction to the subject within the framework of what is called the Great Chastisement or Great Cleansing (Purification) or "Minor Judgment" at its peak; and with the promise of an era of peace beyond it.
"We possess the prophetic message as something altogether reliable. Keep your attention closely fixed on it, as you would on a lamp shining in a dark place until the first streaks of dawn appear and the morning star rises in your hearts." (2 Pet. 1:19)
INTRODUCTION TO THAT BOOK:
God, who is Light and who dwells in unapproachable light, said on the first day of creation, "Let there be light." And on the last days His Son Jesus will say, "I am the Morning Star, shining bright." It is then that we, together with the Holy Spirit, will cry out, "Come, Lord Jesus!" And with that Jesus will lead us into the Splendor where dwells His Father and ours to reign with Him forever (1 John 1:5. 1 Tim. 6:16. Gen. 1:3. Rev. 22:16).
All this if we but say, "Yes". For we can say "No", though with what unspeakably terrible consequences! To warn us against this most dreadful alternative, God has from time to time allowed humankind to experience what it is to be in darkness. He did this when He turned three days and nights into one long total night in the land of Egypt (Ex. 10). He did this when, for a similar length of time, He allowed Jonah to be buried in the black depths of the sea in the belly of the great fish (John 2). Above all, He did this when He caused the face of the Earth to be blanketed in utter darkness during the three dread hours when His Son hung dying on the Cross (Mat. 27:45).
In these last days, God, whose love for us is unchanging and who ever wills that we be nothing but Children of Light, appears to be warning us yet once again of the dread consequences of turning away from Him to the night of sin.
No one who reads this with an open mind and heart could doubt that this is so. Take, then, and read! Archbishop George Pearce, S.M.
***
Let him who has eyes to see--see and him who has ears to hear--hear! Is this upcoming null-time in the Photon Belt these days of purification? Well, it certainly will seem like it to you in the experience. Chelas, it matters not if you are prepared--all will make this passage at any rate, be it sooner or later--ALL! I suggest you all stop throwing stones at bringers of Truth and get with the program! If you read something "twice" as you must to have personal knowledge of any duplication--then you must surely understand the value of the information--or do you? Why do you study such works and words? Be it for Truth or the game of "catcha" and "discountcha"? What are YOU trying to prove? Why? "You are either for Me or against Me, sayeth the Lord"!!! Amen. Seems to me that you have blundered around in total darkness for some generations now--is it not about time to walk again within the LIGHT? Ponder it.
Hatonn to clear, please.
