PJ#104, FIRST STEPS

PJ 104

CHAPTER 15

TEST OF ELECTRONIC SHUTDOWN OF AUTOS

Salt Lake Fax Network

"Friends Faxing Friends"

Date: July 28, 1994

From: Salt Lake Fax Network

Subject: Test of Electronic Shutdown of Autos

The following story was related to us last evening by a gen­tleman who has a friend who actually experienced this on Mon­day, July 18th. The man was driving his late model automobile down Interstate 15 near Farmington, a northern suburb of Salt Lake City, Utah. As he drove southbound, he noticed in the distance, four black helicopters hovering above the freeway in rectangular pattern.

As he approached the vicinity where the helicopters hovered, he was surprised to suddenly experience the motor in his vehicle quit, with no warning. No sputter or hesitation as when running out of fuel. The engine simply shut off! As he coasted to a stop, he attempted to pull off the highway. He then attempted to re-start the vehicle, with no success. The starter motor would turn the motor over, but the engine simply would not start.

When he looked out, he noticed that most of the other cars in the area had also stopped. Other drivers were attempting to re­start their vehicles without success. Then he noticed an older model automobile was weaving its way through the maze of stalled vehicles. He saw several other older cars and trucks that were still running, and he carefully noted that most were of a vintage of 1983 or older. The traffic was held up for about an hour, then, as if by magic, all the engines in the stalled vehicles were able to start again. The man noticed that the four black helicopters were flying away in formation. The man drove home and never heard a word of the incident on any of the me­dia. Two other eyewitnesses to the event have come forward and told the same story and two other occurrences in Utah have been reported. One by a man driving up Logan Canyon, who had the same experience.

Based on his experience, the man surmised that this phe­nomenon had to have been caused by the four black helicopters that he had observed. He also surmised that these aircraft were emitting some type of electronic signal that disabled the elec­tronic computers in the automobiles. Why else would the older vehicles be unaffected? The older vehicles (built prior to about 1983) did not utilize electronic computers to control ignition timing, but relied on a very simple ignition system consisting of a distributor, points, and a coil.

Could it be that the technology now exists for an electronic signal to be emitted that commands the electronic computers in newer vehicles to simply shutdown? We have heard similar sto­ries for years of vehicle electrical system failures prior to and during UFO contacts. Could there be a link between the UFO contacts and this recent episode of electronic warfare?

If the powers that be do have this type of technology at their disposal, one must ask the question: "Why would they have such technology, and how would they utilize it"? For those of us who have followed the stories about the mysteries of Area 51, the secret underground facilities, the clandestine alien technol­ogy exchange, and the like, the answers seem obvious.

We have been hearing stories for years from people like Mark from Michigan about these capabilities. Now, we finally have some evidence that it does exist. For the survivalists among us, now would be the opportune time to invest in that older, pre-computerized vehicle. At least you could rest assured that you would still be mobile while the rest of the vehicles were rendered useless hunks of iron.

CHAPTER 16

WHEN IT'S BROKE. FIX IT!
Grandma

CONTACT, Inc. News
July 28, 1994

Dear Rick and Readers,

Re: A statement from U.S. Department of the Treasury Agent, Reginald Joseph, Fairview Heights, Illinois: "The sys­tem has broken down, and the laws do not work anymore".

I have been thinking about this statement, slept on it many nights as it has been the source for much searching, concentra­tion, thoughtful perusal and a lot of sleepless nights.

The Law, being the Common Laws (Federal Laws), (or the laws the Feds are supposed to follow) has been an ongoing (40+ years) love affair as far as GRANDMA has been concerned. For many years she lived and slept with them, then she decided to go deeper into the CAUSES of the Laws, because for every "good" law, you will find 100 bad and conflicting laws which confuse the legal system. Unfortunately, the young ones have not been taught how the Laws were designed to work.

In these later years, with "Lizzy wanting this, and Tommy wanting that", Lizzy says, "I have the Rights because I am a minority", and Tommy says, "I have the Rights because that is the way it is". Everybody feels as though they are "SPECIAL" in some way or the other which has an EXCLUSIONARY and PROPRIETARY LAW for "each individual".

Then comes the Laws for the Pink People, the Green People, the Blue People, people of all colors--and they think: "WE HAVE SPECIAL LAWS" and "NO ONE ELSE IS PRIVY TO THAT LAW, IT'S OUR LAW"!

Well, well, well, isn't that a PIP!? Old "Grizzle Barr" (Thurgood Marshall) would turn over in his grave because, that Law (the unspoken law) "SEPARATE BUT EQUAL" keeps raising its head--the Pinks, Greens, and Blues keep keeping the "separate but equal" and hit the "minority white" over the head with it, as do the others. But, something is wrong here. IT HAS BEEN REVERSED!

Each and every one of those Pink, Green and Blue people have, somehow, found their way into the SYSTEM. They run the computers; they control the records; and they have made certain only about one-half of the money the "white minority" worked their tails off for all these many years, was put into So­cial Security and other Retirement Funds. You can count on it. You put a white person in the food stamp program, the white will get from $10.00 to $200.00 and the others will receive $375.00 to $450.00 and it is almost a 92% surety.

Same thing goes for the Welfare Program.

I don't know how many of you know this or not, but there is a BLACK DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and then there is a WHITE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and, the BLACK DE­PARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Treasury Department) will almost never make certain the Laws which have been broken in regards to a White person will ever be investigated and/or prosecuted. SEPARATE BUT EQUAL, Reverse Discrimination, and dammed near without exception. Right, Ronn Jackson?

Yes, Ronn Jackson and I know one another. We worked to­gether in Law Enforcement. I got sick of watching the screwed-up mess which was being made out of the Legal System back in the 1960s, and got lost. Most of the "good Law Enforcement Agents/Officers" couldn't believe their eyes and ears about some of these CONFUSING LAWS, CONFLICTING LAWS which WE were asked to ENFORCE, as we all felt "THIS IS WRONG"!

We all watched President after President quietly breach the Laws of the Constitution, putting Judges on the Bench, that in all reality were nothing more than "Insurance for the Special Interest Groups". We all knew these "puppet judges' " proper BENCH should have been a PARK BENCH feeding the BIRDS.

You all have seen WHAT happens when a LAW EN­FORCEMENT OFFICER/AGENT "challenges unconstitutional laws", as in the Ronn Jackson Case. They send them off to prison and try to shut them up BECAUSE, these OLD "AGENTS"/"OFFICERS", who studied the Laws, enforced these laws, as IT WAS THEIR SWORN "OATH", TO UPHOLD AND DEFEND THE LAWS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". Furthermore, they took this Oath dammed seriously!

Has anyone ever given any thought to WHY they are trying to get rid of all us older Americans?! WELL, it's because: WE KNOW THE REAL LAWS and CAN TEACH YOU YOUNGER ONES THE REAL LAWS. THEY WANT TO DO AWAY WITH US BECAUSE "WE STILL KNOW WHAT IT TAKES TO MAKE THIS NATION RUN THE WAY THE CONSTITUTIONERS INTENDED IT TO FUNCTION. Think about that one for a while.

Now, back to Special Agent Reginald Joseph's statement: "The system has broken down and nothing works anymore". NO, the system is not unfixable, it is easily fixable, but it takes some GOOD OLD FASHIONED HORSE SENSE TO "FIX IT"!

The "Constitutioners" were not ignorant men, they were wise. They worked from experience and what they had evi­denced, witnessed, etc., that had not worked in the Democratic systems in Europe. They set down the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, subject to the "antecedents" and identified in Article VI of the Constitution. Therefore, the ORIGINAL LAWS WORK! They worked just fine with GOD at the helm of this nation. They worked, prospered and became the envy of all na­tions upon the face of the Earth for 186 years. Then along came some dammed fool and decided "MY RIGHTS ARE BEING VIOLATED", and they kicked God out of our schools, out of our Legislatures, out of our Courts, and out of our Lives. It's been DOWNHILL ALL THE WAY EVER SINCE and, adding insult to injury: "THE DAMMED FOOLS AT THE SAME TIME, TOOK THE MANDATORY LOYALTY OATH, AND THREW IT OUT OF THE WINDOW ALSO".

Ronn Jackson, now I am going to ask you to affirm a state­ment, a Rule, an unwritten Rule which WE were taught to use: "WHEN ALL ELSE FAILS, GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING AND START OVER AGAIN". Right!? And in going back to the ORIGINALS we must do away (Strike down/bar) all these CONFLICTING and CONFUSING LAWS which do not serve the people (a) fairly, (b) equally, (c) without prejudice, (d) con­stitutionally, (e) speedily, and (f) with equal justice for all. Which incidentally, is the true intention of the Constitutioners (writers).

The Rules of Court mandate: "Officers of the Court (this in­cludes judges) shall maintain that office while performing in good conduct, and that upon ANY 'conduct' unbecoming an of­ficer of the Court, the party/partys shall be removed".

This goes even into their private lives, the drunkenness, the broad-jumping, the skinny-dipping, the private payoffs, the do­ing of business which is in conflict with the issues at hand, etc. This even includes, RUNNING AROUND WITH A WET BLOND IN ONE HAND AND A DRY MARTINI IN THE OTHER.

What has happened to RONN JACKSON, GUNTHER RUSSBACHER and many, many others is UNCONSTITU­TIONAL. It has created a CONSTITUTIONAL DISABILITY by the "disabling of the Constitutional rights as mandated by the Constitution, and an outright denial of same, which is mandatory for every citizen in the United States of America". Further­more, any Judge, Legislator, Congressman, Senator and/or any other Law Enforcement Officer and/or Agency who adheres to such ACTS against the CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS has by Law, committed TREASON AGAINST THE PEOPLE, the RIGHTFUL SOVEREIGNS of this nation. Somehow, these nitwits got it BASS ACKWARDS!

ABRAHAM LINCOLN said: "DENY JUST ONE CITIZEN OF THIS GREAT NATION, THE RIGHTS TO THE CON­STITUTIONAL PROVISIONS, AND YOU HAVE DENIED THE ENTIRE NATION", and he was quoting Washington, Adams, and Jefferson. These are people who SIGNED our Constitution, and they were the ones who STATED how our form of government and our form of Laws were to be struc­tured, and it is by ACT OF CONGRESS!

Of course, on the lighter side, in these days, Congress ACTS on television, radio, any stage which they are allowed on, the beach, the street--anywhere there is a television camera--and they have EXCELLED and some of them should be nominated for the ACADEMY AWARDS for an "OSCAR". (Remember that person they called "OSCAR THE ASSIN", Ronn?) Oh well, its a "pun in fun"...First Amendment--Rights reserved.

EQUAL RIGHTS? The Constitution says: "All men are created Equal". Men/man; genus homo sapiens; no gender identified; no color identified.

"When all else fails, go back to the beginning, and start all over again".

/s/ GRANDMA

P.S. Grandpa is home from the hospital, doing fine. God bless and thank you for your prayers, letters, notes, and other assistive encouragements.

PJ 104

CHAPTER 17

ACT TO ENFORCE THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT
April 20, 1871

"C. S. E. M. L."

Dateline: July 29, 1994

CONTACT, Inc. News

Dear Rick and Readers,

First: We want to thank all of you for your letters contain­ing: (a) your concerns,
(b) your desperate problems of losing your homes and farms, (c) the losses of your businesses, (d) your being incarcerated over some silly thing or the other, for which the Law did exceed its vested powers by their own Oaths of Office, whereas and whereby they did take those Oaths to uphold, defend and faithfully execute the Laws of the Constitu­tion of the United States of America. And so many, many, many more letters of desperate plights and desperate pleas of persons, families, men and women and some children, who have become destitute of HOPE.

Second: We have read each and every single letter, and we do apologize for taking so long to respond. It is impossible to respond to all of you, therefore we take this opportunity to re­spond (as you know Russell Herman has been desperately fighting for his life) to all of you, in the CONTACT News. While watching Russ fight for his life, and each breath, minute to minute and hour after hour, day in and day out, all night long for over ONE YEAR now, "I" read each letter, and some I read over and over again. I could not believe my eyes at the things which were and are occurring all over this nation, which creates a CONSTITUTIONAL DISABILITY on every man, woman and child in this nation. Moreover, it is and has been difficult to believe that our DULY ELECTED have sat there, doing nothing and encouraging these acts. The reason I said ENCOURAGED is: Had these duly elected familiarized themselves with the ACT to ENFORCE THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT of April 20th. 1871. U.S. Statutes at Large. Vol XVII, p. 13ff and adhered to its provisions, none of this would have happened in AMERICA, and to THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Organized Criminal Activities would not have prevailed in our Courts, and in our Legislatures, in our Congress, in our Senate, in our State and Local Governments as it has evidenced itself to exist in your thousands of letters.


Thirdly: A copy of that Act to Enforce the Fourteenth Amendment is hereto affixed, and it is requested that it be printed with this letter [p. 31] . And when each of you read this ACT TO ENFORCE THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, hopefully, you will think about each Senator, Congressman, Legislator, Attorney, Judge, President, Vice President and even the local Dog Catcher, who have attempted and succeeded in the "putting down" of this nation. By allowing Organized Criminals and their Organized Crime to prevail in our Courts, the House, the Senate and permeate our every-day lives with such a stench as is only left in the fields of death, left from the ROT and CORRUPTION causing the ROTS.

And when you read this Act to Enforce the Fourteenth Amendment, hopefully you will think on the FEDERAL RE­SERVE ACT, and the parties who, with malicious intent to de­stroy this nation, as they raise the interest rates, while you can barely buy a loaf of bread.

And, hopefully, the Congress and Senate in their HEAR­INGS can finally determine (a) what they can legally do, and (b) what they cannot do. TO OBSTRUCT ANY JUSTICE ON ANY LEVEL is against the Act to Enforce the Fourteenth Amendment, causing the ROT to further encroach across this nation by exemplified FAVORITE LOBBYIST GROUPS; In­surance Companies who have no intent to comply with the Con­tract (the reason for Executive Order 12919). Shame upon shame. NOW as of today, July 29, 1994, "IF" you can still af­ford your PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS--" a Premium is going to be put on the Premium, like the tax hike on Cigarettes".

Fourthly: After begging the President, Bentsen and the rest of that bunch in Washington to allow us to assist the people, af­ter being "sluffed off" and "ignored"
(in the Politically Correct Fashion), we have decided to GO FORTH ON THE BONUS 3392 N-181. The lein is in place, it has been in public print and now is the time to proceed.

GOD BLESS ALL OF YOU who have written and let us know your inner-most thoughts, trials, tribulations, losses, hopes, desires, and even your prayers. We do thank you from the bottom of our hearts.

V.K. Durham CEO, CSEML

DOCUMENTS OF AMERICAN HISTORY

273. ACT_TO ENFORCE THE FOURTEENTH
AMENDMENT
April 20, 1871

(U.S. Statutes at Large, Vol. XVII, p. 13ff.)

This so-called. Ku Klux Act was the most im­portant of several Civil Rights Acts designed to insure for the negro the full benefits of the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments. Similar acts had been passed May 31, 1870 and February 28, 1871. An act designed to secure social equality for the negro was passed March 1, 1875 (see Doc. No. 291). In 1876 the Supreme Court, in U. S. v. Reese, 92 U. S. 214 and U. S. v. Cruikshonk, 92 U. S. 542, declared certain sections of the Civil Rights Act of May 31, 1870 unconstitutional, and thus anticipated its attitude toward the Ku Klux and Civil Rights Acts. In 1883, in U. S. v. Harris, 106 U. S. 629, the Court held parts of the Act of April 20, 1871 uncon­stitutional; in The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U. S. 3, it held the Civil Rights Act unconstitutional. Efforts to repeal these force acts were not successful until the second Cleveland administra­tion. See, W. W. Davis, "The Federal Enforcement Acts", in Studies in Southern History and Politics; W. A. Dunning, Essays on the Civil War and Reconstruction, p. 353 ff.; C. Warren, The Supreme Court (1928 ed.), Vol. II, ch. xxxiv,

An Act to enforce the Provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and for other Purposes. Be it enacted . . . That any person who, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of any State; shall subject, or cause to be subjected, any person within the jurisdiction of the United States to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitu­tion of the United States, shall, any such law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of the State to the contrary notwith­standing, be liable to the party injured in any action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress; such proceeding to be prosecuted in the several district or circuit courts of the United States, with and subject to the same rights of appeal, review upon error, and other remedies provided in like cases in such courts, under the provisions of the [Civil Rights Act of 1866], and the other ‘remedial laws' of the United States which are in their nature applicable in such cases.

SEC. 2. That if two or more persons within any State or Territory of the, United States shall conspire together to overthrow, or to put down or to destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy war against the United States, or to oppose by force the authority of the government of the United States, or by force, intimidation, or threat to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, or by force, intimidation, or threat to prevent any person from accepting or holding any office, or trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging the duties thereof, or by force, intimidation, or threat to induce any officer of the United States to leave any State, district or place, where his duties as such officer might lawfully be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or to injure his person while engaged in the lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duty, or by force, intimidation, or threat to deter any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying in any matter pending in such court, fully, freely, and truthfully, or to injure any such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended of testified, or by force, intimidation or threat to influence--the verb, presentment, or indictment, of any juror or grand juror in any court of the United States, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or on account of his being, or having been such juror, or shall conspire together, or go in disguise upon the public highway or upon the premises of another for the purpose, either directly, or indirectly, of depriving any person or any class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges or immunities under the laws, or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State from giving or securing to all persons within such State the equal protection of the laws, or shall conspire together for the purpose of in any manner impeding, hindering obstructing or defeating the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen of the United States the due and equal protection of the laws, or to injure any person in his person or his property for lawfully enforcing the right of any person or class of persons to the equal protection of the laws, or by force, intimidation, or threat to prevent any citizen of the United States lawfully entitled to vote from giving his support of advocacy in a lawful manner towards or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector of President or Vice-President of the United States, or as a member of the Congress of the United States, or to injure any such citizen in his person or property on account of such support or advocacy, each and every person so offending shall be deemed guilty of a crime, and upon conviction thereof in any district or circuit court of the United States or district or supreme court of any Territory of the United States having jurisdiction of similar offences, shall be punished by a fine not less than five hundred, nor more than five thousand dollars or by imprisonment with or without hard labor, as the court may determine, for a period of not less than six months nor more than six years, as the court may determine, or by both such fine and imprisonment as the court shall determine...

SEC. 3. That in all cases where insurrec­tion, domestic violence, unlawful combina­tions, or conspiracies in any State shall so ob­struct or hinder the execution of the laws thereof, and of the United States, as to de­prive any portion or class of the people of such State of any of the rights, privileges, or immunities, or protection, named in the Constitution and secured by this act, and the constituted authorities of such State shall either be unable to protect, or shall, from any cause, fail in or refuse protection of the peo­ple in such rights, such facts shall be deemed a denial by such State of the equal protection of the laws to which they are entitled under the Constitution of the United States; and in all such cases . . . it shall be lawful for the President, and it shall be his duty to take such measures, by the employment of the militia or the land and naval forces of the United States, or of either, or by other means, as he may deem necessary for the suppression of such insurrection, domestic violence, or combinations . . .

Sec. 4. That whenever in any State or part of a State the unlawful combinations named in the preceding section of this act shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at defiance the constituted authorities of such State, and of the United States within such State, or when the con­stituted authorities are in complicity with, or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become in such district imprac­ticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the gov­ernment of the United States, and during the continuance of such rebellion, and within the limits of the district which shall be so under the sway thereof, such limits to be prescribed by proclamation, it shall be law­ful for the President of the United States, when in his judgment the public safety shall require it, to suspend the privileges of the writ of habeas corpus, to the end that such rebellion may be overthrown: Provided, That all the provisions of the second section of [the Habeas Corpus Act of March 3, 1863], which relate to the discharge of prisoners other than prisoners of war, and to the penalty for refusing to obey the order of the court, shall be in full force so far as the same are applicable to the provisions of this sec­tion: Provided further, That the President shall first have made proclamation, as now provided by law, commanding such insurgents to disperse: And provided also, That the pro­visions of this section shall not be in force after the end of the next regular session of Congress.

SEC. 5. That no person shall be, a grand or petit juror in any court of the United States upon any inquiry, hearing, or trial of any suit, proceeding, or prosecution based upon or arising under the provisions of this act who shall, in the judgment of the court, be in complicity with any such combination or conspiracy; and every such juror shall, before entering upon any such inquiry, hear­ing; or trial, take and subscribe an oath in open court that he has never, directly or indirectly, counseled, advised, or voluntarily aided any such combination or con­spiracy. . . .

SEC. 6. That any person or persons, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done and mentioned in the second section of this act are about to be committed, and, having power to prevent or aid in preventing the same, shall neglect or refuse to do so, and such wrongful act shall ­be committed, such person or persons shall be liable to the person injured. . . for all damages caused by any such wrongful act which such first-named person or persons, by reasonable diligence could have prevented. . . .

CHAPTER 18

MORE SUCCESS WITH PEN
& PAPER POWER

Editor's note: The following great success letter was recently received at the CONTACT office. The 5/17/94 CONTACT ar­ticle called "Hawaii's Sovereignty Stand", referred to in this letter, has caused the lighting of many a fire across this country in State Legislative offices. We would also call your attention to the "10th Amendment Constitutional Revolt" writings in last week's issue (7/26/94) for more "ammunition" for the cause!

CONTACT, INC.
P.O. Box 27800
Las Vegas, Nevada 89126

July 15, 1994

Dear Rick:

Re: The PHOENIX PROJECT/COMMITTEE OF 50 STATES

After seeing the "Hawaii's Sovereignty Stand" in the May 17 issue of CONTACT
I wrote to my Illinois State Representative as well as for other State Representatives from my area. I also sent each of them photo copies of Hawaii's 10th Amendment Resolution and asked what they are doing to protect the State of Illinois' sovereignty.

I am pleased to announce that on June 30, 1994 Illinois HAS passed House Resolution 2540, giving notice to The Federal Government that their mandates to
the State of Illinois is in violation of the 10th Amendment to the Constitution of the
United States.

As frustrated as I feel at times, it is inspiring when something like this happens.
It shows that we are not alone in our effort and thinking in wanting to preserve our Constitutional Rights.

I'm a news addict but I saw nothing about this reported in the papers or on TV. It proves that grass root movements against the POWER of "New World Order" Federal Government's mandates that usurp state and individual rights ARE being heard in spite of controlled mainstream media bias.

I am enclosing copies of Illinois House Resolution 2540 for your file and for possible publication or distribution.

Sincerely, /s/ John & Jean

Schaumburg, IL

PS: I sent copies of the resolution to the AMERICAN PATRIOT NETWORK. Also, I've enclosed some articles from the Chicago Sun Times you might find interesting if you haven't seen them yet from other sources.